Speaker 1: Thanks to all of you for being with us.
Speaker 2: Right down our toll free telephone number, it's eight hundred
Speaker 2: and ninety four one Sean if you want to join
Speaker 2: us all. We have a lot of news we got
Speaker 2: to get to today. Let me just say, if you
Speaker 2: know Donald Trump, unlike so many the comment about Donald Trump,
Speaker 2: and you know his objectives and you actually listen to
Speaker 2: what he says, he is not somebody that is that
Speaker 2: complicated to figure out. When he gave the Iranians fifty
Speaker 2: days before Midnight Hammer, he meant fifty days. He gave
Speaker 2: them an opportunity every time before epic fury, and now
Speaker 2: they have an opportunity to make a deal.
Speaker 1: I know.
Speaker 2: It's the fourth tier leadership of the Iranians, although they
Speaker 2: kind of I guess in a similar sense if you
Speaker 2: think of proof of life and a kidnap ransom situation
Speaker 2: by again and again showing and I'll play President Trump
Speaker 2: on the weekend coming up, that they're allowing twenty huge
Speaker 2: oil tankers as promised through the Strait of Hormuz. Clearly
Speaker 2: the people that the White House is talking to have
Speaker 2: have power or else that would not be possible. They
Speaker 2: wouldn't be able to accomplish that if you do know him,
Speaker 2: and you do listen to him, and you have faith
Speaker 2: in him and have been a supporter, not one of
Speaker 2: these you know, fair weather friend supporters that think they
Speaker 2: know Donald Trump, that don't know anything about Donald Trump
Speaker 2: and at various times hated Donald Trump, but act like
Speaker 2: they're the experts on Donald Trump. And there's a lot
Speaker 2: of those people out there. I've known him for thirty years.
Speaker 2: He means what he says. This, This is how I
Speaker 2: will interpret it for you and then give you the
Speaker 2: specifics behind it is. Donald Trump now has indicated Mark
Speaker 2: or Rubio has indicated for people that actually want to
Speaker 2: pay attention, this Operation Epic Fury is winding down and
Speaker 2: winding down very very clearly. You know, last when the
Speaker 2: White House first started negotiation, we now know who would
Speaker 2: is the head of the Uranium Parliament, I guess is
Speaker 2: one of the main things. Now there is fragmented leadership,
Speaker 2: and I'm sure that there is a power vacuum, and
Speaker 2: I'm sure that there's probably a little bit of a
Speaker 2: power struggle within Iran and probably some disagreements. But with
Speaker 2: all of that said, you know, it's sort of like
Speaker 2: John Brennan saying last week, Oh, I believe the Iranians
Speaker 2: over Donald Trump. If they say they're not negotiating, they're
Speaker 2: not negotiating. And then Donald Trump got his present and
Speaker 2: those oil tankers went right through the Strait of Hormuz
Speaker 2: with no problems at all whatsoever. There is a reason
Speaker 2: that you have thirty five US sailors and marines that
Speaker 2: have arrived in the Middle East. I'm going to tell
Speaker 2: you what the President said that I'm going to interpret
Speaker 2: it all for you, and I'm going to tell you
Speaker 2: that my interpretation is very clear. It is unambiguous. Is
Speaker 2: if you read the tea leaves and you know Donald
Speaker 2: Trump's guiding principles and what he has said, and what
Speaker 2: his stated goals are and what they have won to
Speaker 2: accomplish here, and what precipitated epicure in the first place.
Speaker 2: When you factor all of that in together, there is
Speaker 2: now a fairly predictable outcome and a fairly short time
Speaker 2: frame because the ten days that he gave him last
Speaker 2: week to negotiate are quickly coming to an end. And
Speaker 2: the goal has always been, beyond everything else, is to
Speaker 2: destroy any potential possibility that the Iranians can have nuclear weapons.
Speaker 2: That has been their number one goal. In the process,
Speaker 2: they have destroyed their navy, their air force, their missile
Speaker 2: defense systems, their missile launchers, their ballistic missile systems. And
Speaker 2: now we can now achieve our objectives. You know, whether
Speaker 2: or not the ground troops will be necessary or not.
Speaker 2: Now there are a couple of things that need to
Speaker 2: happen before you could really say that the president has
Speaker 2: accomplished all of his goals there. And this then goes
Speaker 2: to the real reason why we went in in the
Speaker 2: first place. And the saddest part of all of this,
Speaker 2: assuming that the president can and again this none of
Speaker 2: this is easy. All of it is hard being a
Speaker 2: commander in chief. You know, George Bush famously said, I'm
Speaker 2: the decider. I have to make those decisions. Ultimately, the
Speaker 2: president had to make a decision. And I've said from
Speaker 2: the beginning that there are three principles really guiding Donald Trump,
Speaker 2: and one is he learned the lesson from Reagan. Peace
Speaker 2: through strength. This president. That's how he defeated the Isis Caliphate.
Speaker 2: Never got the credit he deserved, but that was an
Speaker 2: existential threat to America in the world. Took out Solomani
Speaker 2: bag Daddy took out drop the mother of all bombs
Speaker 2: on Afghanistan, Midnight Hammer fourteen bunker buster bombs, taking out
Speaker 2: the nuclear Richmond capabilities and so on and so forth,
Speaker 2: and then giving them time. Here what precipitated this, Let's
Speaker 2: go back to it, because this is what's also going
Speaker 2: to end it. And again, just pay attention to what
Speaker 2: the President is saying. Listen to what he's saying. Listen
Speaker 2: to what Mark or Rubio is saying. Listen to what
Speaker 2: Witkoff is saying. Now, if you recall, it was the
Speaker 2: Middle East Envoy Jared Steve Witkoff along with Jared Kushner.
Speaker 2: They were negotiating with the Iranians. They were saying to
Speaker 2: the Iranians, in this negotiation, we will provide civilian use
Speaker 2: enriched uranium, which is about five percent enrichment and it's
Speaker 2: very hard to go from five to sixty percent. And
Speaker 2: the Iranians said no, They said they had they had
Speaker 2: the right to enrich uranium and have nuclear weapons. Okay,
Speaker 2: that was a non starter. And then they bragged about
Speaker 2: their thousand plus pounds or four under and sixty kilograms
Speaker 2: whichever Linda prefers on any given day, which would be
Speaker 2: sixty percent enrichment to get to ninety percent weapons great enrichment.
Speaker 2: That would be about a seven to twelve day process,
Speaker 2: depending on which nuclear scientists you might be talking to
Speaker 2: on any given day. That would be the equivalent of
Speaker 2: having enough capability to build eleven nuclear bombs.
Speaker 1: All right, that.
Speaker 2: Was the inflection point. Again, if I talked to the
Speaker 2: President gotten specific confirmation, No, but it's obvious because the
Speaker 2: President's stated words where they can never have nuclear weapons,
Speaker 2: At that point it became far more imminent their ability
Speaker 2: to get nuclear weapons, which the President then had to
Speaker 2: apply other military and historical principles too. And I think
Speaker 2: the second thing that the President looked at, well, this
Speaker 2: is an evil regime, the number one state sponsor of terror. Yes,
Speaker 2: they do chant death to America, death to Israel. They
Speaker 2: have been fomenting death and destruction throughout the region their history.
Speaker 2: Their fanaticism coupled with a weapon of mass destruction, you know,
Speaker 2: could lead to a modern day holocaust. And if we
Speaker 2: learned anything from the last one hundred years of history,
Speaker 2: which we have gone into great depth and specificity detail
Speaker 2: on this program, over one hundred million dead human souls,
Speaker 2: And you ask yourself what are the lessons to be
Speaker 2: learned from history? If you have a chance to take
Speaker 2: out radicalism that could result in millions of dead people
Speaker 2: ahead of time, I think history would teach us take
Speaker 2: advantage of that window of opportunity and remove that threat.
Speaker 2: And that I do believe, at the end of the day,
Speaker 2: is what the guiding principle has been for the president.
Speaker 2: Here the third thing, and this part has yet to
Speaker 2: be proven, but if if my timeline and calculation is correct,
Speaker 2: and that you know, three weeks from now, we are
Speaker 2: going to be having about Iran a very very different discussion,
Speaker 2: very different discussion, because there are really two major strategic goals.
Speaker 2: The first one has to do with the real fundamental
Speaker 2: reason that I believe the President went in, which is
Speaker 2: the untold story, and that is that they were way
Speaker 2: closer to getting enough enriched weapons grade uranium than anybody
Speaker 2: had ever known. Whenever globalist organizations had made assessments about
Speaker 2: Iranians military capability, they have been dead wrong. The IAEA
Speaker 2: has always been dead wrong. They've always underestimate, underestimated their capabilities.
Speaker 2: And we learned something else in the course of this
Speaker 2: conflict that the Iranians had ballistic missiles that had a
Speaker 2: far greater range than had previously been known. Now Gordon
Speaker 2: Chang will join us later later in the program. Today
Speaker 2: he will tell you that with the help of the
Speaker 2: North Koreans that even though we estimate their current ranges
Speaker 2: somewhere in the twenty five one hundred mile plus range,
Speaker 2: somewhere in and around that area, which we didn't think
Speaker 2: that they had, that in fact it may be must
Speaker 2: much higher. If the North Koreans, as suspected by some
Speaker 2: people in the Intel community, you know, have these boosters
Speaker 2: that could then you know, now we're talking about the
Speaker 2: potential very quickly, very soon, of reaching the continental US.
Speaker 2: You know, if the President is fully successful in this mission,
Speaker 2: we will be finished in no time. But there are
Speaker 2: two main components that have to be dealt with. One
Speaker 2: is what led us in there in the first place,
Speaker 2: the clear and present danger of the Iranians or the
Speaker 2: thousand pounds of sixty percent of rich uranium. Now we're
Speaker 2: in the middle of negotiations with the Iranians, and the
Speaker 2: President put out this truth social post. It says the
Speaker 2: United States, the USA is in serious discussions with a
Speaker 2: new more reasonable regime to end our military operations in
Speaker 2: a ram. Now, granted, you have to assume that this
Speaker 2: fragmented leadership, you have to assume that, you have to
Speaker 2: assume that there is a battle fight for power. But
Speaker 2: to go on. The President also went into great length
Speaker 2: about how this particular group of negotiators also have proven
Speaker 2: that they have the power to accomplish things, as evidence
Speaker 2: by the twenty oil tankers that they've allowed through the
Speaker 2: Strait of Hormuz. Now, he said, great progress has been made,
Speaker 2: but if for any reason a deal is not shortly reached,
Speaker 2: which it probably will be, and if the Horn Mouz
Speaker 2: straight is not immediately open for business, we will conclude
Speaker 2: our lovely stay in Iran by blowing up and completely
Speaker 2: obliterating all of their electric generating plants, oil wells, carg Island,
Speaker 2: and possibly all desalinization plants which they need because they've
Speaker 2: had a massive drought there, which we have purposely not
Speaker 2: yet touched. This will be in retribution for our many
Speaker 2: soldiers and others that Iran has butchered and killed over
Speaker 2: the old regime's forty seven year reign of terror. Thank
Speaker 2: you for your attention to this matter, Donald J.
Speaker 1: Trump.
Speaker 2: Now, the President warned the Uranian negotiators. If they don't
Speaker 2: make this deal soon and they don't open the street
Speaker 2: of horn moves, I would say that there are two
Speaker 2: big military accomplishments left. One is this sixty percent enriched
Speaker 2: uranium issue, because the danger is if they either will
Speaker 2: give it over voluntarily or it will be taken by force.
Speaker 2: It is not an accident that we now have over
Speaker 2: thirty five hundred marines ready to go into Iran if possible. Now,
Speaker 2: is that the first choice? Absolutely positively not. Is the
Speaker 2: President clearly, as he did before Midnight Hammer and Epic Fury,
Speaker 2: trying to prevent that from happening.
Speaker 1: Yes, he is.
Speaker 2: Has everyone that made every prediction about Donald Trump and
Speaker 2: dead wrong. They couldn't be more wrong about what the
Speaker 2: Trump doctrine is. But you know, the three principles are
Speaker 2: what would be the point?
Speaker 3: All right?
Speaker 2: The president it was never his stated goal for regime change,
Speaker 2: but regime change happened. It happened in the opening minutes
Speaker 2: of Epic Fury and Roaring Lion.
Speaker 1: It just happened.
Speaker 2: They wiped out the first tier of leadership, the second
Speaker 2: tier of leadership, the third tier of leadership were either
Speaker 2: at the fourth of fifth nobody can say for sure.
Speaker 2: And and so I've got to imagine that the people
Speaker 2: they are negotiating with had to have learned something. Because
Speaker 2: what is what is really sad in all of this
Speaker 2: for the president is we will never be able to calculate.
Speaker 2: We probably at some point will learn how dangerous, how
Speaker 2: dangerously closed the Iranians were to having nuclear weapons. Now,
Speaker 2: there are going to be some of people out there
Speaker 2: that will doubt. There are some people that you know
Speaker 2: that have always wanted to say that this is going
Speaker 2: to be a forever war. There are some people that
Speaker 2: would rightly be skeptical. I'm not even against skeptic. I
Speaker 2: think skepticism within an administration and outside of an administration
Speaker 2: can be actually helpful. And you've got to look at
Speaker 2: an upside downside to any military decision that a president
Speaker 2: has to make. But in the end, the president has
Speaker 2: to make it. And people would say, well, we don't
Speaker 2: want this to become a quagmire, we don't want this
Speaker 2: to become Iraq and Afghanistan. We don't want America to
Speaker 2: return to the idea of nation building. We don't want
Speaker 2: a forever war. Why should we believe the same government
Speaker 2: that lied to us about COVID. Those are all legitimate criticisms,
Speaker 2: except none of them have to.
Speaker 1: Do with Donald J. Trump. And that's the point. So
Speaker 1: this could create and this would be the thing.
Speaker 2: If we could have taken out the Nazi regime and Hitler,
Speaker 2: how many lives could have been saved if we acted earlier.
Speaker 2: It's not like if Donald Trump is fully completely successful
Speaker 2: and prevents them from getting this nuclear weapon or nuclear
Speaker 2: capability and ballistic missile capability, You're not going to be
Speaker 2: able to sit there with a calculator and figure out
Speaker 2: how many how many human lives ultimately were saved here.
Speaker 2: But so the best case scenario is one that I'm
Speaker 2: hoping for is that the Iranians will wise up understand
Speaker 2: they've got no shot. They'll have no country, no money,
Speaker 2: no infrastructure left because the president means what he says,
Speaker 2: he doesn't make idle threats, and that everybody that had
Speaker 2: been so dead sure they understood Donald Trump in the end,
Speaker 2: I think will be proven wrong now or they're going
Speaker 2: to do it the hard way.
Speaker 1: And so far every.
Speaker 2: Time they've had that choice, unfortunately they've chosen the hard way.
Speaker 2: There's been so many lives, so much propaganda, you know.
Speaker 2: And it's interesting because the American people, especially the president supporters,
Speaker 2: about ninety percent of them, support what he's doing here.
Speaker 2: But President has been clear about this from the start.
Speaker 2: They're going to eliminate a RAN's nuclear missile and missile ruts.
Speaker 2: They're going to leave the regime no way to assault
Speaker 2: its neighbors moving forward. Nor do they want to decimate
Speaker 2: the world's energy supplies. The President is clearly threatening that
Speaker 2: to get their attention, and he will. He said from
Speaker 2: the beginning it would be four to six weeks. We're
Speaker 2: now on the other side of that. We're getting close
Speaker 2: where it's going to be about two issues moving forward.
Speaker 2: One is going to be keeping the keeping open the
Speaker 2: straight of Horn moves for the free flow of oil
Speaker 2: up market prices. And the second is going to be
Speaker 2: they cannot have sixty percent enriched uranium. The President refused
Speaker 2: to list anything as off limits, including that would be
Speaker 2: a limited ground operation if they don't give it up voluntarily,
Speaker 2: that enriched uranium. But according to everyone else, he's failing. Oh,
Speaker 2: he's actually succeeding at a level I've never seen before.
Speaker 2: Be sure to check in as soon as you get
Speaker 2: to your car after work for breaking information you need
Speaker 2: to know about.
Speaker 1: This is the Sean Hannity Show.
Speaker 2: So from my perspective, and again I don't it's kind
Speaker 2: of hard to say this. Knowing Donald Trump as well
Speaker 2: as I do, knowing how he thinks, knowing his history,
Speaker 2: covering this man for eleven years, I know how I
Speaker 2: know he means what he says. And the amazing part
Speaker 2: of this is people don't listen. The media purposely doesn't listen.
Speaker 2: The Democrats that they purposely don't listen. If you look
Speaker 2: at the media. I mean, I talked about this. I
Speaker 2: was doing Patrick Bette David's podcast last week and I
Speaker 2: talked about this. I mean, it is so disgusting how
Speaker 2: the corrupt media in this country is. You know, you
Speaker 2: have you know, the economists claiming Iran is winning. Did
Speaker 2: in ha Kem Jefferies also say Iran's going to win
Speaker 2: and RAN's winning. Republicans in Congress convinced this is this
Speaker 2: is going to be a forever war. It's not, and
Speaker 2: it's not. When you say, well, Hannity, how do you
Speaker 2: know that? Because I know Donald Trump and I'm listening
Speaker 2: very clearly to what he has been saying, and the
Speaker 2: fact that people don't listen is kind of breathtaking to
Speaker 2: me because he has been crystal clear and consistent about
Speaker 2: what the goals of Epic Fury were, you know, from
Speaker 2: the very beginning, and the main the main goal has
Speaker 2: always been to eliminate Iran's nuclear and missile threat and
Speaker 2: also to leave the regime no way to assault their
Speaker 2: neighbors nor decimate the world's energy supplies. And now, and
Speaker 2: he said it would be for to says, well, that
Speaker 2: leaves us about two to three weeks left and it's over.
Speaker 1: And I think we're on that timetable. Now.
Speaker 2: Time will prove if I'm right or wrong, But I
Speaker 2: have every confidence that they're going to continue to degrade
Speaker 2: whatever military capabilities by air because we own the skies
Speaker 2: there that the Iranians may have left. We did learn
Speaker 2: that once again the world underestimated their ballistic missile capability,
Speaker 2: and they were fully transparent and bragging about all this
Speaker 2: sixty percent enriched uranium. We have you combine ballistic missiles
Speaker 2: and the potential maybe with North Korea, because we've learned
Speaker 2: the North Koreans have been helping them out at a
Speaker 2: level we didn't really know until recently I'm sure our
Speaker 2: intel community did know, but their booster rockets would mean
Speaker 2: I mean, we now know their ballistic missiles are capable
Speaker 2: of hitting Paris and London and probably not that far
Speaker 2: away from an intercontinental ballistic missile. Somebody that knows a
Speaker 2: lot about a Gordon Shangle have more to say on
Speaker 2: this at the top of the next hour. But the
Speaker 2: President has been consistent. The President does not believe in
Speaker 2: forever wars now because the calculus of this kind of changed,
Speaker 2: and it's really what precipitated the president's actions here, which
Speaker 2: is the sixty percent enriched uranium. That then complicates things
Speaker 2: a little bit more because there's no way that this
Speaker 2: president is going to come this far and go this
Speaker 2: deep into preventing them from ever becoming a nuclear power
Speaker 2: and leave sixty percent enriched uranium, which if they reconstitute
Speaker 2: their enrichment program, can be turned into weapons grade uranium
Speaker 2: in anywhere from seven to twelve days. So that's not
Speaker 2: going to happen, Nor is the President going to leave
Speaker 2: without a plan in place to see that the free
Speaker 2: flow of oil at market prices remains the same too.
Speaker 2: And yeah, or all the predictable people in the legacy
Speaker 2: media mob. Have they been predicting doom and gloom that
Speaker 2: any of them ever anticipate. And then you've got this
Speaker 2: whole other crowd that really never supported Trump too, the
Speaker 2: new isolationist as I refer to them. You know, okay,
Speaker 2: so Iran's on the precipice of having nuclear weapons and
Speaker 2: you don't want to. You didn't learn anything from World
Speaker 2: War Two. You didn't learn anything from Mao in China,
Speaker 2: or Stalin in Russia or Hitler in Germany. You didn't
Speaker 2: learn a thing from fascism and Mussolini. You didn't You
Speaker 2: didn't learn from Tojo in Japan. You didn't learn over
Speaker 2: one hundred million human souls died and how many of
Speaker 2: those lives could have been saved had we acted sooner
Speaker 2: instead of having this appeasement mindset mentality that that's the
Speaker 2: breathtaking part of how Europe has exposed itself in all
Speaker 2: of this. But the goals that we set out to
Speaker 2: achieve are being achieved by the greatest military on the
Speaker 2: first base of the Earth. And the fact that some
Speaker 2: were are still willing to gamble with the nuclear armed
Speaker 2: Duran as a future for our children and grandchildren, I
Speaker 2: really don't have much to say to them except that
Speaker 2: they're wrong. They are morally historically ignorant, and I don't
Speaker 2: think they understand the nature of evil. So we'll see
Speaker 2: if this can be done the easy way. The President
Speaker 2: has tried numerous times to do things easy, in the
Speaker 2: easy way with the Iranians, but of course we know
Speaker 2: to no avail. And you know, the one thing is,
Speaker 2: assuming the President is successful and defanging this dangerous threat
Speaker 2: to the world, will never be able to calculate how
Speaker 2: many lives may have been saved. You know, had we
Speaker 2: taken out Hitler before Nazi Germany, had the admonitions of
Speaker 2: people like Winston Churchill, you know that won the argument
Speaker 2: of that day versus Neville Chamberlain, how many millions of
Speaker 2: lives would have been saved. And that's the calculation. Look,
Speaker 2: if you have a different opinion than me, I'm perfectly
Speaker 2: fine with that. I know I'm never going to convince
Speaker 2: you that it would be foolish to go in another direction.
Speaker 2: And I'd hate to think of the consequences if we
Speaker 2: didn't have such a decisive president that might not have
Speaker 2: the political will and courage to defang and neutralize a
Speaker 2: threat before millions of lives could be destroyed. Those that
Speaker 2: would be comfortable handing off our country to our children
Speaker 2: and grandchildren with a nuclear armed Iran, I don't understand
Speaker 2: their decision making. Thank god, we have built out first
Speaker 2: really under Donald Trump in his first administration, the next
Speaker 2: generation of weaponry, which made this and none of it
Speaker 2: is easy. I want you to misunderstand me. Every bit
Speaker 2: of this is hard. Anytime you make a decision to
Speaker 2: put our national treasure in harm's way, it is hard.
Speaker 2: But on the other side of it, if we were
Speaker 2: inactive because of political cowardice or a lack of courage
Speaker 2: or resolve or understanding of what could possibly be waiting
Speaker 2: on the other side of a nuclear armed Iran, it's
Speaker 2: It's not something I even want to ever think about,
Speaker 2: and the world hopefully will never have to think about.
Speaker 2: By the way, I don't know if you saw this.
Speaker 2: This progressive candidate Michigan, Abdul l said apparently is a
Speaker 2: candidate Michigan's Democratic us cent a primary, telling his staff
Speaker 2: during a conference call he worried about celebrating the killing
Speaker 2: of the Iranian Iahtola ali Hamani because his voters in
Speaker 2: Dearborn would be very sad about that.
Speaker 3: And I also want to remind you guys that there
Speaker 3: are a lot of people in Dearborn who are sad today. Like,
Speaker 3: I just don't want to comment on MNA at all.
Speaker 3: I don't think it's worth even touching that. Like they're
Speaker 3: gonna try this is what we practiced, but like, is
Speaker 3: it a ham Ani a bad guy? Is Nick great
Speaker 3: that he's dead? On my first amen is eighty six
Speaker 3: years old, who's gonna be dead sometimes soon? Anyway?
Speaker 2: Okay, but just don't say it publicly because we don't
Speaker 2: want to lose a voting base that would be be
Speaker 2: like this. It was a very interesting analysis in the
Speaker 2: Mid East Forum as it relates to the Strait of Hormuze,
Speaker 2: which again is the last part of this puzzle. I
Speaker 2: think before there is a draw down and hopefully complete
Speaker 2: victory for the president in terms of achieving his objectives.
Speaker 2: And some say, well, well, Sean, why don't we go
Speaker 2: all the way because that was never the president's objective,
Speaker 2: meaning regime change. We've already had regime change. You can
Speaker 2: make that argument. We've had regime changed on tier one,
Speaker 2: tier two, tier three, probably tier four, and we're on
Speaker 2: the fifth level of it, you would hope that maybe
Speaker 2: the President is right and is an analysis that this is
Speaker 2: more reasonable. He's dealing with more reasonable people. But you know,
Speaker 2: while the media and the left obsessing over the volatility
Speaker 2: that the President also warned about in terms of oil
Speaker 2: markets in the short term, Iran, you know fans, the
Speaker 2: flames of panic, and Democrats and Republicans, so just you know,
Speaker 2: I guess willing dupes in all of this. But the panic, however,
Speaker 2: is really unwarranted in many many ways because that can
Speaker 2: be neutralized as well. And you know, unfortunately NATO really
Speaker 2: exposed themselves here. I'm not sure if NATO will even
Speaker 2: survive this in the end. I think, after you know Spain,
Speaker 2: you know Macron and France, and you know Kiras Starmer,
Speaker 2: how do you even consider such people allies. The only
Speaker 2: thing that President requested is help us keep the straight
Speaker 2: o hor moves open for the free flow of oil
Speaker 2: at market prices, when Spain now has closed their airspace
Speaker 2: to US warplanes and a further rebuke to President Trump
Speaker 2: a NATO member, they're not going to complicate, be complicit
Speaker 2: in something that is bad for the world. Really, I
Speaker 2: guess the leader of Spain is willing to risk that
Speaker 2: Jerusalem Post had an interesting peace out. European affairs journalists
Speaker 2: Jean Marie Montali speaking to the Post of his in
Speaker 2: Rezavi's book on Iran and their spy and influence networks
Speaker 2: within France. How is it France has no gozones and
Speaker 2: other parts of Europe have no gozones? And did why
Speaker 2: did Great Britain ever allow unfettered illegal immigration without assimilation
Speaker 2: resulting in Sharia courts nearly one hundred of them inside
Speaker 2: of Great Britain. But it is, it is what it is,
Speaker 2: the one component. I don't think we knew a lot
Speaker 2: about going into this, and Gordon Scheng will weigh in
Speaker 2: on this more in the next hour. But the Islamic
Speaker 2: Republic of Iran, their vast missile system is the brain trial.
Speaker 2: As a matter of fact, most of their ballistic missiles
Speaker 2: are coming from North Korea and that regime who's been
Speaker 2: working hand in glove with the Iranians. The missile launched
Speaker 2: at the Diego Garcia was a North Korean missile. The
Speaker 2: Iranians bought nineteen of those from the North Koreans. They
Speaker 2: took delivery back in five They have had this kick
Speaker 2: capability since then is not the secret weapon as some
Speaker 2: people were claiming that it was, but I know that.
Speaker 2: On Fox they reported last week Iran significantly escalated the
Speaker 2: war effort by launching two of these intermediate range ballistic
Speaker 2: missiles towards the Diego Garcia that's again twenty five hundred
Speaker 2: miles from Iran. They didn't meet their target, But the
Speaker 2: most important threat from Iran as the war with the
Speaker 2: US and Israel has evolved, has been ballistic missiles, and
Speaker 2: with the help of the North Koreans, which is nuclear armed,
Speaker 2: that is a clear and present danger. And at some
Speaker 2: point I guess little Rocketman is probably going to be
Speaker 2: engaged by the President too, although the President was pretty
Speaker 2: effective at neutralizing him in his first term and actually
Speaker 2: developed a relationship that ended up being somewhat productive actually,
Speaker 2: But there's mountain of concerns too. But this is all
Speaker 2: a Biden Harris may Orchis problem. And I keep reading
Speaker 2: New York Post fifteen hundred are intercepted at the border.
Speaker 2: During the Biden administration, we had over twelve plus million
Speaker 2: unvetted Biden Harris may orcus illegals from over two hundred countries.
Speaker 2: Many of those countries have terroritized. You know, of those
Speaker 2: fifteen hundred Iranians that were intercepted, we have no idea
Speaker 2: how many got aways there were. And there are known
Speaker 2: terrorists in the country of confirmed that with Tom Holman,
Speaker 2: confirmed that with Cash Bettel. We have no idea how
Speaker 2: many people were able to get into the country. Senator
Speaker 2: Haggerty is quoted in this New York Post piece. He's
Speaker 2: a member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. But about
Speaker 2: half of the intercepted Iranians were released into the country
Speaker 2: by Joe Biden and Kamala Harris and may Orcus And
Speaker 2: between Joe Biden's years twenty one to twenty four, seven
Speaker 2: hundred Iranians released into this country pending court cases. And
Speaker 2: we have no idea what most of them are. Is
Speaker 2: there a possibilities some of them are sleeper cells, of
Speaker 2: course it is. By the way, the Foreign Office issue
Speaker 2: do not travel warnings to fifty two countries. I suggest
Speaker 2: if you're planning on traveling, you check that list out
Speaker 2: ahead of time.
Speaker 1: US also urging citizens.
Speaker 2: To leave Iraq immediately, but to be honest, if you're
Speaker 2: in that part of the world, until this is all
Speaker 2: said and done, I'd leave a lot of it behind.
Speaker 2: Now we have a lot to get to we have.
Speaker 2: I don't know if you saw the lunacy on display
Speaker 2: the No Kings protests around the country. Fox News had
Speaker 2: a very interesting report that these numbers, it's, you know,
Speaker 2: a lot of this is astro turfing. They actually came
Speaker 2: up with a conclusion about five hundred organizations behind these
Speaker 2: No Kings protests. They say it's grassroots, but it was
Speaker 2: one hundred percent astro turf. We'll get to that. We'll
Speaker 2: have the latest on the government shutdown. There is an
Speaker 2: Insider Advantage poll that shows a huge percentage of Americans
Speaker 2: approve of Donald Trump's executive of order to finally pay
Speaker 2: tsa agent. Some Democrats are against that, and much much more.
Speaker 2: All right, let me come back. Gordon Chang knows more
Speaker 2: about the real capability of the Iranians, way more than
Speaker 2: has been disclosed. This likely and all likely, this was
Speaker 2: a far more imminent threat than anybody knew. We'll get
Speaker 2: to that next. Your calls coming up. Eight hundred and
Speaker 2: ninety four one.
Speaker 1: Shawn