WEBVTT - The Market has Distinct Trading Pattern : Phil Orlando

0:00:05.800 --> 0:00:08.720
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg p m L Podcast. I'm pim Fox.

0:00:08.760 --> 0:00:11.440
<v Speaker 1>Along with my co host Lisa A. Brahmowitz. Each day

0:00:11.480 --> 0:00:15.000
<v Speaker 1>we bring you the most important, noteworthy, and useful interviews

0:00:15.040 --> 0:00:17.520
<v Speaker 1>for you and your money, whether you're at the grocery

0:00:17.560 --> 0:00:20.560
<v Speaker 1>store or the trading floor. Find the Bloomberg p m

0:00:20.680 --> 0:00:33.519
<v Speaker 1>L Podcast on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, and Bloomberg dot com.

0:00:33.520 --> 0:00:37.040
<v Speaker 1>With this earning season coming to a conclusion, what to

0:00:37.159 --> 0:00:41.240
<v Speaker 1>expect next for stocks? Typically stocks rally into and during

0:00:41.320 --> 0:00:44.559
<v Speaker 1>the earning season, depending force on the results of specific companies.

0:00:44.800 --> 0:00:48.000
<v Speaker 1>Here to tell us about earnings and market valuations is

0:00:48.040 --> 0:00:50.800
<v Speaker 1>Matt Forrester. He's the chief investment officer for b n

0:00:50.960 --> 0:00:55.360
<v Speaker 1>Y Melon Lockwood Advisers. He helps to oversee nearly eight

0:00:55.520 --> 0:00:59.240
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars. Is based in King of Prussia, Pennsylvania. Matt,

0:00:59.240 --> 0:01:02.000
<v Speaker 1>thanks very much for in with me. You know, one

0:01:02.000 --> 0:01:04.440
<v Speaker 1>of the one of the things that that always sort

0:01:04.440 --> 0:01:06.680
<v Speaker 1>of is interesting is if you take a look at

0:01:06.680 --> 0:01:09.039
<v Speaker 1>a chart of the SMP five hundred, let's just use

0:01:09.080 --> 0:01:11.480
<v Speaker 1>that as a as a proxy, you can kind of

0:01:11.520 --> 0:01:15.680
<v Speaker 1>tell when earning season takes place without even knowing what

0:01:15.720 --> 0:01:18.480
<v Speaker 1>the dates are, what the calendar is on the bottom

0:01:18.520 --> 0:01:20.720
<v Speaker 1>of the of the chart, because it seems that we

0:01:20.800 --> 0:01:25.080
<v Speaker 1>have this pattern that has almost been ingrained in investor behavior.

0:01:25.360 --> 0:01:30.880
<v Speaker 1>Have you noticed this as well? Absolutely, since since of

0:01:30.920 --> 0:01:33.919
<v Speaker 1>the stock market gains have occurred during this earning season,

0:01:34.000 --> 0:01:37.919
<v Speaker 1>and this one has been absolutely spectacular. Uh, course driven

0:01:37.920 --> 0:01:41.039
<v Speaker 1>by the tax cuts, but we've had a remarkable earning

0:01:41.080 --> 0:01:44.520
<v Speaker 1>season um and we've also seen analysts begin to pick

0:01:44.600 --> 0:01:48.000
<v Speaker 1>up their expectations for future quarters going into the next

0:01:48.400 --> 0:01:51.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, rest of and in the twenty nineteen. So

0:01:51.800 --> 0:01:56.880
<v Speaker 1>we've clearly had some some really remarkable corporate results. Uh. Interestingly,

0:01:57.120 --> 0:02:00.560
<v Speaker 1>the markets have not always in every visual case of

0:02:00.680 --> 0:02:03.160
<v Speaker 1>certain cases where they have looked at these earnings and

0:02:03.200 --> 0:02:06.080
<v Speaker 1>then looked at the guidance and look deeper. So I

0:02:06.120 --> 0:02:08.520
<v Speaker 1>think it's fair to say that a lot of the

0:02:08.600 --> 0:02:12.680
<v Speaker 1>good earnings number have been widely anticipated. But we've continued

0:02:12.680 --> 0:02:14.919
<v Speaker 1>to have gains in markets, and we've sort of powered

0:02:15.000 --> 0:02:18.000
<v Speaker 1>through this other levels of risks that we've seen every

0:02:18.080 --> 0:02:20.760
<v Speaker 1>markets or the last few a few months. All right,

0:02:20.880 --> 0:02:23.440
<v Speaker 1>we'll get to the risks in a second. But this

0:02:23.480 --> 0:02:26.200
<v Speaker 1>notion that we see these gains, as you said, of

0:02:26.240 --> 0:02:28.880
<v Speaker 1>the gains seemed to come in this in this specific

0:02:29.280 --> 0:02:32.520
<v Speaker 1>time period. If you're an investor and you're looking for

0:02:32.560 --> 0:02:35.440
<v Speaker 1>a time to get in, do you wait until the

0:02:35.480 --> 0:02:39.480
<v Speaker 1>earning season is over, see what people are doing in

0:02:39.560 --> 0:02:42.560
<v Speaker 1>terms of maybe taking some short term profits, and then

0:02:42.680 --> 0:02:45.240
<v Speaker 1>go and prospect for the stocks the companies that you

0:02:45.320 --> 0:02:48.920
<v Speaker 1>really want to own. Yeah, it could be. I suspect

0:02:48.960 --> 0:02:51.080
<v Speaker 1>that we're going to have a summer where some of

0:02:51.080 --> 0:02:54.240
<v Speaker 1>the issues that have recently cropped up UH and some

0:02:54.320 --> 0:02:56.639
<v Speaker 1>of the risks are probably gonna give us these periodics

0:02:56.680 --> 0:02:59.919
<v Speaker 1>buying opportunities. So if you're looking to make large new

0:03:00.040 --> 0:03:03.400
<v Speaker 1>allocations to perhaps the equity market, you may want to

0:03:03.440 --> 0:03:07.160
<v Speaker 1>see how that affects the overall macro picture. So clearly

0:03:07.160 --> 0:03:10.320
<v Speaker 1>you've had the Italian news, which you know had some

0:03:10.880 --> 0:03:14.359
<v Speaker 1>stuff just like it's right, but it gives you those

0:03:14.360 --> 0:03:17.600
<v Speaker 1>buying opportunities that are very short lived. I think those

0:03:17.639 --> 0:03:20.680
<v Speaker 1>are very hard for UH, for market players to adjust

0:03:20.720 --> 0:03:22.880
<v Speaker 1>to UM. But if you look at those lists we

0:03:22.960 --> 0:03:27.000
<v Speaker 1>ascaren February on average hourly earnings U, you know, it's

0:03:27.040 --> 0:03:31.320
<v Speaker 1>somewhat crazy for markets to respond to a three tents

0:03:31.400 --> 0:03:35.720
<v Speaker 1>of a of a increase from expected number and average

0:03:35.760 --> 0:03:38.480
<v Speaker 1>hourly earnings, but it got the markets worried about the

0:03:38.520 --> 0:03:42.560
<v Speaker 1>things that we might see in inflation, whether the FED

0:03:42.680 --> 0:03:45.520
<v Speaker 1>was behind a curve, you know, raise questions about whether

0:03:45.600 --> 0:03:49.960
<v Speaker 1>or not monetary policy was have to go even tighter, uh,

0:03:50.000 --> 0:03:52.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, for more quickly than what the markets have expected.

0:03:53.000 --> 0:03:55.240
<v Speaker 1>And when we see those types of fears work their

0:03:55.280 --> 0:03:58.000
<v Speaker 1>way through the markets, UM, that's going to give us

0:03:58.040 --> 0:04:01.040
<v Speaker 1>those periodic trade opportunities to the calendar there, you know,

0:04:01.120 --> 0:04:03.280
<v Speaker 1>from here to the mid terms is going to be

0:04:03.440 --> 0:04:07.600
<v Speaker 1>filled with these trade issues, which we're going to be ongoing. Uh,

0:04:07.600 --> 0:04:09.720
<v Speaker 1>We're going to be continue to dealing with some of

0:04:09.760 --> 0:04:14.320
<v Speaker 1>the European populism and what's what's arisen from the Italian crisis. H.

0:04:14.560 --> 0:04:16.520
<v Speaker 1>On the backdrop of that, that was gonna be a

0:04:16.520 --> 0:04:19.440
<v Speaker 1>lot of really good earnings numbers, you know, coming from

0:04:19.480 --> 0:04:22.760
<v Speaker 1>from American corporation. So we're hoping that that is going

0:04:22.800 --> 0:04:26.760
<v Speaker 1>to power us through these isolated events. Um. But there

0:04:26.760 --> 0:04:29.960
<v Speaker 1>are real structure of reasons why investors should be somewhat

0:04:29.960 --> 0:04:35.239
<v Speaker 1>concerned about Italy, the third largest bondasher on the planet,

0:04:35.800 --> 0:04:39.200
<v Speaker 1>eighth largest economy around the world, twelfth largest by purchasing

0:04:39.200 --> 0:04:42.760
<v Speaker 1>power parity concept. Uh. You know, if there are challenges

0:04:42.800 --> 0:04:45.479
<v Speaker 1>to European populism. H those things are going to have

0:04:45.560 --> 0:04:49.120
<v Speaker 1>an effect on on the Eurozone. Um, we're gonna have

0:04:49.200 --> 0:04:54.960
<v Speaker 1>to power through these trade issues. The structural um connections

0:04:55.000 --> 0:04:58.080
<v Speaker 1>between the U. S and China are really big. This

0:04:58.160 --> 0:05:00.240
<v Speaker 1>is a really big deal. Uh, they are you know,

0:05:00.279 --> 0:05:04.400
<v Speaker 1>we have more connections than any set of geopolitical or

0:05:04.480 --> 0:05:08.560
<v Speaker 1>business rivals and maybe in the twentieth century. So we

0:05:08.640 --> 0:05:11.320
<v Speaker 1>need to work through this. I think the structure probably

0:05:11.360 --> 0:05:14.440
<v Speaker 1>means that we will tread carefully. But in so many

0:05:14.480 --> 0:05:18.240
<v Speaker 1>of these things, markets are dealing with issues that are

0:05:18.320 --> 0:05:22.680
<v Speaker 1>largely opaque. They may not be able to have a visibility.

0:05:22.839 --> 0:05:26.960
<v Speaker 1>We don't know as market players what the Italian government,

0:05:27.040 --> 0:05:29.440
<v Speaker 1>new populistic Italian government really wants to do. I don't

0:05:29.440 --> 0:05:35.080
<v Speaker 1>think the new Italian necessarily. Maybe we've gotta We're limited

0:05:35.080 --> 0:05:36.520
<v Speaker 1>in time, and I want to give you about thirty

0:05:36.600 --> 0:05:39.600
<v Speaker 1>seconds here too. What do you specifically focused on in

0:05:39.680 --> 0:05:42.520
<v Speaker 1>terms of where you're putting money to work right now?

0:05:42.800 --> 0:05:46.240
<v Speaker 1>So I think because of these successes here as the risks,

0:05:46.279 --> 0:05:49.640
<v Speaker 1>you have to think about your portfolio as an overall whole.

0:05:50.240 --> 0:05:52.640
<v Speaker 1>You should have some pieces of your portfolio that may

0:05:52.680 --> 0:05:55.920
<v Speaker 1>act as ballast. Uh. You know to help help keep

0:05:55.960 --> 0:05:59.480
<v Speaker 1>the ship afloat when these periodic risk events continue to

0:05:59.560 --> 0:06:03.080
<v Speaker 1>hit us. And for me that means gold, it means

0:06:03.120 --> 0:06:06.480
<v Speaker 1>some amount of exposure to a long term high grade debt.

0:06:07.000 --> 0:06:08.919
<v Speaker 1>We can't do this in all of our portfolios, but

0:06:08.960 --> 0:06:11.719
<v Speaker 1>where we can, we try to isolate some places where

0:06:11.720 --> 0:06:14.840
<v Speaker 1>we can have some pieces of ballast. Uh US small

0:06:14.920 --> 0:06:17.720
<v Speaker 1>caps may be less exposed to some of the events

0:06:17.760 --> 0:06:20.159
<v Speaker 1>going on overseas. For all those things, those kinds of

0:06:20.160 --> 0:06:21.440
<v Speaker 1>things that we're for him to put into some for

0:06:21.800 --> 0:06:24.360
<v Speaker 1>portfolios today. Thank you very much for being with me.

0:06:24.440 --> 0:06:27.120
<v Speaker 1>You got Matt Forrester, Chief Investment Officer b n Y

0:06:27.200 --> 0:06:30.520
<v Speaker 1>Melon Lockwood Advisers, helping to manage nearly eight billion dollars

0:06:30.560 --> 0:06:33.520
<v Speaker 1>of customer assets. He says, look at gold, high grade

0:06:33.520 --> 0:06:51.880
<v Speaker 1>corporate debt, and small cap stocks. Hello everybody, and welcome.

0:06:51.920 --> 0:06:55.160
<v Speaker 1>I want to bring you in Dr David Kelly, he

0:06:55.360 --> 0:06:57.520
<v Speaker 1>really knows how to CHRISTI wait a minute. You have

0:06:57.600 --> 0:07:00.120
<v Speaker 1>to tell people you were hosting an amazing path at

0:07:00.160 --> 0:07:04.760
<v Speaker 1>all at the b n Y Melon inside and Dr

0:07:04.839 --> 0:07:07.120
<v Speaker 1>David Kelly was on it. And he always does a

0:07:07.120 --> 0:07:11.080
<v Speaker 1>wonderful job at crystallizing and sort of distilling complicated economic

0:07:11.160 --> 0:07:14.520
<v Speaker 1>issues into wonderful metaphors that actually ring home. He is

0:07:14.600 --> 0:07:18.200
<v Speaker 1>chief Global Strategist at Jpmorkan Asset Management. And one thing

0:07:18.200 --> 0:07:21.400
<v Speaker 1>that you said that really struck me was that you

0:07:21.480 --> 0:07:24.480
<v Speaker 1>think that investors are being too barished in the short

0:07:24.600 --> 0:07:28.640
<v Speaker 1>term and too bullish in a long term. Can you explain, Yeah,

0:07:28.800 --> 0:07:31.080
<v Speaker 1>I think, I think in terms of the short term,

0:07:31.560 --> 0:07:34.080
<v Speaker 1>we are seeing a real pickup at economic activity, and

0:07:34.120 --> 0:07:36.920
<v Speaker 1>we've I think economic growth in the second quarter cope

0:07:36.920 --> 0:07:39.280
<v Speaker 1>as much as four percent. Look at the lowest unemployment

0:07:39.360 --> 0:07:42.120
<v Speaker 1>rates since nineteen nine. Earnings this year are going to

0:07:42.160 --> 0:07:44.720
<v Speaker 1>be up about twenty six percent year over year. These

0:07:44.760 --> 0:07:47.560
<v Speaker 1>are these are really wonderful numbers. And when you think

0:07:47.600 --> 0:07:49.960
<v Speaker 1>about the stock market, I would invest in stocks today

0:07:50.040 --> 0:07:52.040
<v Speaker 1>just because of the money companies are earning right now.

0:07:52.440 --> 0:07:54.560
<v Speaker 1>Never mind about the future, because right now they're they're

0:07:54.560 --> 0:07:56.640
<v Speaker 1>generating a no fault of cash that can be paid

0:07:56.640 --> 0:07:58.400
<v Speaker 1>at in dividends that could be used to stock buybacks.

0:07:58.400 --> 0:08:01.400
<v Speaker 1>That's that's all positive. I think. In the long run, though,

0:08:01.440 --> 0:08:03.960
<v Speaker 1>we have to recognize that that. You know, there's a

0:08:03.960 --> 0:08:06.240
<v Speaker 1>lot of talking to these days about three percent growth.

0:08:06.480 --> 0:08:08.280
<v Speaker 1>I think we can do three percent growth for about

0:08:08.280 --> 0:08:11.400
<v Speaker 1>a year. But because we don't have any growth in

0:08:11.440 --> 0:08:14.240
<v Speaker 1>the number of our virtually no growth in the population

0:08:14.240 --> 0:08:18.560
<v Speaker 1>age sixty four, we're really out of available workers. And so,

0:08:18.680 --> 0:08:20.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think the employery can come down a

0:08:20.160 --> 0:08:21.800
<v Speaker 1>little bit more, but then it's going to stop and

0:08:21.800 --> 0:08:23.880
<v Speaker 1>growth has got to slow down to about two percent,

0:08:24.400 --> 0:08:25.920
<v Speaker 1>and I think, you know, for the long run, we

0:08:25.920 --> 0:08:27.960
<v Speaker 1>need to recognize that that's where we are. Unless we

0:08:28.120 --> 0:08:31.880
<v Speaker 1>change our policies with regard to immigration and legal immigration

0:08:31.960 --> 0:08:34.720
<v Speaker 1>to increase the number of skilled workers in the United States,

0:08:35.320 --> 0:08:37.520
<v Speaker 1>we will slow down. But there's also a lot of

0:08:37.559 --> 0:08:40.040
<v Speaker 1>opportunity overseas, and so I think that in the short

0:08:40.120 --> 0:08:42.920
<v Speaker 1>run people are being um a little too pessimistic and

0:08:43.000 --> 0:08:46.000
<v Speaker 1>not giving the market credit for the earnings that companies

0:08:46.040 --> 0:08:48.000
<v Speaker 1>are earning right now. But in the long run, I

0:08:48.000 --> 0:08:50.920
<v Speaker 1>think we're we're not recognizing the real structural problems the

0:08:51.000 --> 0:08:53.280
<v Speaker 1>US economy has, not just around this labor supply, I think,

0:08:53.280 --> 0:08:56.079
<v Speaker 1>but also around very big budget deficits which are growing.

0:08:56.800 --> 0:08:58.319
<v Speaker 1>If you want to find out about the health of

0:08:58.360 --> 0:09:01.360
<v Speaker 1>the US consumer, where do you go? I go to Costco.

0:09:01.880 --> 0:09:03.920
<v Speaker 1>It's you know, it's a it's a it's a wonderful

0:09:03.960 --> 0:09:06.959
<v Speaker 1>place here you I mean you see these mobs of people.

0:09:07.040 --> 0:09:08.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean they're piled back into the aisles, and then

0:09:08.800 --> 0:09:10.080
<v Speaker 1>you look at their their cards and they have to

0:09:10.080 --> 0:09:12.760
<v Speaker 1>push these big, oversized carts and then they pile everything

0:09:12.800 --> 0:09:14.480
<v Speaker 1>up to a peak. But what what you really should

0:09:14.480 --> 0:09:16.200
<v Speaker 1>do is look in the carts because people are buying

0:09:16.280 --> 0:09:20.199
<v Speaker 1>enough mustard for a generation. I mean, why hasn't got

0:09:20.200 --> 0:09:21.800
<v Speaker 1>the money? And and so if you want to see

0:09:21.840 --> 0:09:25.440
<v Speaker 1>mindless consumerism come to Costco, Okay what I asked. I

0:09:25.480 --> 0:09:27.679
<v Speaker 1>asked it for a reason because I want to get

0:09:27.720 --> 0:09:29.840
<v Speaker 1>to the point that it is one thing to sit

0:09:29.880 --> 0:09:32.520
<v Speaker 1>in front of a screen and watch a number. It

0:09:32.679 --> 0:09:35.319
<v Speaker 1>is another thing to go out into the real economy,

0:09:35.320 --> 0:09:38.040
<v Speaker 1>in the real world and find out what is new,

0:09:38.080 --> 0:09:40.480
<v Speaker 1>what is innovative, what people are spending their money on,

0:09:40.559 --> 0:09:43.640
<v Speaker 1>what they're not spending their money on. And I'm wondering

0:09:43.679 --> 0:09:47.280
<v Speaker 1>whether this is something that you in a sense advocate

0:09:47.440 --> 0:09:51.840
<v Speaker 1>combined with all of your higher level world absolutely, because

0:09:51.840 --> 0:09:54.560
<v Speaker 1>you look at big numbers and I don't believe in

0:09:54.559 --> 0:09:57.760
<v Speaker 1>in modeling based on anecdotes, but you can use anecdotal

0:09:57.760 --> 0:10:00.400
<v Speaker 1>information to really get what's going on. I mean, you

0:10:00.520 --> 0:10:03.440
<v Speaker 1>try and find a plumber in America today, you can't

0:10:03.480 --> 0:10:04.800
<v Speaker 1>find one. I mean, you just you know, if you've

0:10:04.800 --> 0:10:06.040
<v Speaker 1>got a problem right now, they're not going to come

0:10:06.040 --> 0:10:08.480
<v Speaker 1>out today. Maybe wait, wait a week, maybe wait two weeks.

0:10:08.960 --> 0:10:11.120
<v Speaker 1>But the but the problem is where there's a real

0:10:11.400 --> 0:10:13.320
<v Speaker 1>shortage of skilled workers and you can see that in

0:10:13.360 --> 0:10:15.000
<v Speaker 1>your day to day life if you actually try and

0:10:15.080 --> 0:10:17.640
<v Speaker 1>hire something to do a particular job. Um And equally,

0:10:17.640 --> 0:10:19.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, if if you want to see what's going

0:10:19.000 --> 0:10:21.040
<v Speaker 1>on with consumer spending, as I say, you can, there

0:10:21.040 --> 0:10:22.800
<v Speaker 1>are plenty of areas where you can see just how

0:10:22.840 --> 0:10:25.160
<v Speaker 1>mind to see people spend whatever money is in their pockets,

0:10:25.200 --> 0:10:26.880
<v Speaker 1>you know. But just to push back, if you look

0:10:26.880 --> 0:10:28.079
<v Speaker 1>at it from the other point of view, if you

0:10:28.080 --> 0:10:30.880
<v Speaker 1>want to just look at anecdotal evidence, there's still a

0:10:30.920 --> 0:10:34.120
<v Speaker 1>lot of I don't know, pessimism out there among a

0:10:34.160 --> 0:10:36.080
<v Speaker 1>lot of people. I mean, perhaps it's not captured by

0:10:36.080 --> 0:10:38.240
<v Speaker 1>some of the economic surveys, but you certainly see this

0:10:38.280 --> 0:10:40.920
<v Speaker 1>with the birth rate falling off from millennials, and you

0:10:40.920 --> 0:10:43.360
<v Speaker 1>certainly see this with you know the fact that we

0:10:43.360 --> 0:10:46.679
<v Speaker 1>aren't seeing wages increase more so, how do you reconcile that? Well,

0:10:46.840 --> 0:10:48.679
<v Speaker 1>I think that's true. I mean the gap between rich

0:10:48.720 --> 0:10:51.280
<v Speaker 1>and poor is growing, and I think it will continue

0:10:51.320 --> 0:10:53.880
<v Speaker 1>to grow. Uh And and a lot of people are

0:10:53.880 --> 0:10:56.920
<v Speaker 1>getting left behind. But again we're talking about you know,

0:10:56.960 --> 0:10:59.880
<v Speaker 1>how do you how do you invest? And and you know,

0:11:00.080 --> 0:11:02.000
<v Speaker 1>in the in the first quarter, operating earnings are up

0:11:02.000 --> 0:11:05.040
<v Speaker 1>twenty six percent. In May, wages are up two point

0:11:05.120 --> 0:11:06.880
<v Speaker 1>eight percent. That's not good for workers, but it's great

0:11:06.880 --> 0:11:09.959
<v Speaker 1>for shareholders. So it's I think you have to recognize

0:11:09.960 --> 0:11:11.760
<v Speaker 1>the economy that that we actually have here. We're just

0:11:11.800 --> 0:11:13.880
<v Speaker 1>pretty good for corporations. One of the things that you

0:11:13.880 --> 0:11:15.800
<v Speaker 1>said in the panel that I thought was really interesting

0:11:16.640 --> 0:11:20.200
<v Speaker 1>was about how people in Sweden managed to equalize the

0:11:20.240 --> 0:11:22.600
<v Speaker 1>amount of espresso they drink with the amount of vodka

0:11:22.640 --> 0:11:24.920
<v Speaker 1>they drink in the evenings. Uh. And you're sort of

0:11:24.920 --> 0:11:27.920
<v Speaker 1>making analogy that we've got this incredible tax plan that's

0:11:27.960 --> 0:11:31.720
<v Speaker 1>boosting earnings and a really solid corporate backdrop, but we

0:11:31.760 --> 0:11:33.880
<v Speaker 1>also have all the uncertainty from trade top. Can you

0:11:33.920 --> 0:11:36.280
<v Speaker 1>just explain to well, yeah, I mean that's this is

0:11:36.280 --> 0:11:39.160
<v Speaker 1>this This was mainly a slurn some colleagues of mine

0:11:39.200 --> 0:11:42.160
<v Speaker 1>from Sweeten nothing not the entire Swedish nation. They appreciate it,

0:11:42.240 --> 0:11:44.719
<v Speaker 1>but no, I think I think we have a sort

0:11:44.720 --> 0:11:47.160
<v Speaker 1>of a mixture of Vodican expressing on the economy right now.

0:11:47.640 --> 0:11:50.280
<v Speaker 1>We've got you know, espresso is clearly a stimulative and

0:11:50.280 --> 0:11:52.760
<v Speaker 1>we've got all the stimulus from fiscal stiments, which is

0:11:52.800 --> 0:11:55.520
<v Speaker 1>very unusual this lations cycle. But we've got this big

0:11:55.559 --> 0:11:57.760
<v Speaker 1>tax cut, a lot of money in people's pockets, a

0:11:57.800 --> 0:11:59.960
<v Speaker 1>lot of money in corporate pockets. That's helping the account

0:12:00.000 --> 0:12:01.960
<v Speaker 1>of me grow. And if it was just for that,

0:12:02.120 --> 0:12:05.000
<v Speaker 1>the economy probably be overheating. We'd be really worried about inflation.

0:12:05.360 --> 0:12:07.679
<v Speaker 1>But at the same time, we've got the the the

0:12:08.760 --> 0:12:13.520
<v Speaker 1>sedative or the vodica if you like, of um, tariff worries,

0:12:13.800 --> 0:12:17.839
<v Speaker 1>Washington worries, political divide um, and all of that is

0:12:17.840 --> 0:12:20.400
<v Speaker 1>creating uncertainty. The problem with uncertainty is the business is

0:12:20.800 --> 0:12:22.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, when you've got uncertainty, what what? What do

0:12:22.640 --> 0:12:24.920
<v Speaker 1>people say? Well, let's wait and see. The problems are

0:12:24.960 --> 0:12:27.080
<v Speaker 1>three most dangerous words and economics I wait and see.

0:12:27.080 --> 0:12:28.920
<v Speaker 1>If everybody decides to wait and see, what what, this

0:12:29.160 --> 0:12:31.080
<v Speaker 1>is not good. And so we've actually got this drag

0:12:31.679 --> 0:12:34.720
<v Speaker 1>from uncertainty which who are a particular round trade policy

0:12:34.760 --> 0:12:37.160
<v Speaker 1>which is negating some of the stimulus from the fiscal

0:12:37.400 --> 0:12:40.839
<v Speaker 1>from the fiscal package. Well, you know, caffeine and alcohol.

0:12:40.880 --> 0:12:43.480
<v Speaker 1>There are two things that can lead to addiction, right,

0:12:43.520 --> 0:12:45.319
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you know, if you have a lot of caffeine,

0:12:45.520 --> 0:12:48.880
<v Speaker 1>you need more and you need to keep it consistent, right,

0:12:48.920 --> 0:12:51.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that's right, And they both have they both

0:12:51.200 --> 0:12:52.960
<v Speaker 1>have bad long term and that really gets back from

0:12:53.320 --> 0:12:55.080
<v Speaker 1>near term. People should be more bullish long term, they

0:12:55.080 --> 0:12:58.000
<v Speaker 1>should maybe be more bearish because on the fiscal side,

0:12:58.040 --> 0:13:00.280
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna have, you know, starting in Octobe, where we're

0:13:00.280 --> 0:13:02.480
<v Speaker 1>gonna have federal defence of over trillion dollars for as

0:13:02.480 --> 0:13:04.960
<v Speaker 1>far as I can see, that is going to impoverish

0:13:05.080 --> 0:13:08.120
<v Speaker 1>US in the long run. Um And equally with trade,

0:13:08.160 --> 0:13:10.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, you want to trade negotiations to result in

0:13:10.880 --> 0:13:14.320
<v Speaker 1>trade agreements quickly, because uncertainly about trade just means that

0:13:14.559 --> 0:13:16.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't know as a corporation. Should should I build

0:13:16.400 --> 0:13:18.840
<v Speaker 1>a plant in Prioria? Should I build a plant in Poland?

0:13:18.920 --> 0:13:20.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't know? And if I don't know, I'm not

0:13:20.720 --> 0:13:24.120
<v Speaker 1>gonna do either. And so so I think both both

0:13:24.240 --> 0:13:29.280
<v Speaker 1>extra uncertainty from Washington and unwarranted but budget deficits are

0:13:29.480 --> 0:13:32.160
<v Speaker 1>those are both negatives in the long run to investors

0:13:32.240 --> 0:13:36.200
<v Speaker 1>make investing too complicated for themselves, and absolutely they do.

0:13:36.280 --> 0:13:38.160
<v Speaker 1>I think I think I think people need to think about,

0:13:38.240 --> 0:13:40.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, for example, emerging markets. I think emerging markets

0:13:40.640 --> 0:13:42.520
<v Speaker 1>is a great is a people should have in a

0:13:42.600 --> 0:13:44.800
<v Speaker 1>portfolio right now. But people think, oh, it's too complicated.

0:13:44.800 --> 0:13:46.360
<v Speaker 1>I have to know about all these things. No, you don't,

0:13:46.679 --> 0:13:49.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean you don't. You need to have a good

0:13:49.440 --> 0:13:52.080
<v Speaker 1>manager and let them invest in the forest. I'm not

0:13:52.080 --> 0:13:54.600
<v Speaker 1>gonna I'm not going to to testify and behalf any

0:13:54.640 --> 0:13:57.440
<v Speaker 1>individual tree in emerging markets. But the forest will grow,

0:13:57.600 --> 0:13:59.560
<v Speaker 1>Emerging markets will grow fast, and the rest of the

0:13:59.679 --> 0:14:02.040
<v Speaker 1>than to help markets for years to come along. Term

0:14:02.080 --> 0:14:04.800
<v Speaker 1>investor should have position in emerging markets and just feel

0:14:04.800 --> 0:14:07.920
<v Speaker 1>comfortable about that rather than trying to nitpick each individual country.

0:14:08.080 --> 0:14:10.040
<v Speaker 1>He also said that you thought the theme most overvalued

0:14:10.080 --> 0:14:13.200
<v Speaker 1>asset right now is bitcoin. Yeah, but the problem by

0:14:13.280 --> 0:14:15.200
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin is I mean, I know, I know a lot

0:14:15.240 --> 0:14:17.959
<v Speaker 1>of people unfortunately do this, but I want to invest

0:14:18.000 --> 0:14:21.480
<v Speaker 1>in bitcoin. The problem with bitcoin or any cryptocurrency is

0:14:21.480 --> 0:14:23.840
<v Speaker 1>there's no real barrier to entry. Now. I think blockchain

0:14:23.840 --> 0:14:26.200
<v Speaker 1>technology is obviously a good technology. It's obviously gonna be

0:14:26.240 --> 0:14:28.720
<v Speaker 1>useful in a a lot of ways, but right now it's

0:14:28.800 --> 0:14:30.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, Bitcoin is is like the leader, but it's

0:14:30.920 --> 0:14:32.600
<v Speaker 1>got nothing that's going to maintain its lead. It's got

0:14:32.600 --> 0:14:34.680
<v Speaker 1>no barrier to entry. It's like you build a new

0:14:34.880 --> 0:14:38.200
<v Speaker 1>Olympics Olympic stadium and you've got this weekend jog are

0:14:38.280 --> 0:14:40.400
<v Speaker 1>running around, running around the path, and they look really

0:14:40.480 --> 0:14:42.600
<v Speaker 1>good in the stadium. The problem is the varsity teams

0:14:42.600 --> 0:14:44.400
<v Speaker 1>on a bus headed for the stadium, and when they

0:14:44.400 --> 0:14:47.600
<v Speaker 1>get there, you know, the weekend jog is not gonna

0:14:47.600 --> 0:14:51.200
<v Speaker 1>look so good. I think with the problem with something

0:14:51.280 --> 0:14:53.680
<v Speaker 1>a cryptocurrency is it's not a store of value, it's

0:14:53.680 --> 0:14:55.880
<v Speaker 1>not a unit of account, it's not a medium of exchange.

0:14:56.480 --> 0:14:59.160
<v Speaker 1>In the long run, I think blockchain dollars, blockchain the end,

0:14:59.520 --> 0:15:02.320
<v Speaker 1>blockchain euros will be much better. Best. Thank you very

0:15:02.400 --> 0:15:05.560
<v Speaker 1>much for being with us. Dr David Kelly, chief Global Strategist,

0:15:05.560 --> 0:15:08.960
<v Speaker 1>head of a global market insights strategy team at a

0:15:09.080 --> 0:15:27.120
<v Speaker 1>JP Morgan Asset Management. I am very pleased to bring

0:15:27.120 --> 0:15:31.000
<v Speaker 1>in Phil Orlando, chief equity market striate just at Federated

0:15:31.080 --> 0:15:33.840
<v Speaker 1>joining us here in Orlando, Florida. Do you feel a

0:15:33.840 --> 0:15:37.480
<v Speaker 1>particular affinity to Orlando is in Orlando, Yeah, do you

0:15:37.480 --> 0:15:40.520
<v Speaker 1>feel like the city firth to you to answer that question.

0:15:40.600 --> 0:15:43.280
<v Speaker 1>It creates a lot of confusion with T s A

0:15:43.520 --> 0:15:47.040
<v Speaker 1>and hotel check in clerks and all sorts of So

0:15:47.120 --> 0:15:49.520
<v Speaker 1>I want to start with a question, a kind of

0:15:49.600 --> 0:15:52.360
<v Speaker 1>existential question it's been plaguing in the market, which is

0:15:52.360 --> 0:15:56.000
<v Speaker 1>is this as good as it gets? With earnings? First

0:15:56.000 --> 0:15:57.920
<v Speaker 1>of all, I want to say, you did a superb

0:15:58.040 --> 0:16:01.640
<v Speaker 1>job moderating the panel this morning with with Rinehart and

0:16:01.720 --> 0:16:05.680
<v Speaker 1>David Kelly. Uh, really good job. And and this was

0:16:05.720 --> 0:16:09.120
<v Speaker 1>a topic that you touched on, uh with with your

0:16:09.120 --> 0:16:13.680
<v Speaker 1>panelists this morning. Uh you talk about is your question

0:16:13.760 --> 0:16:15.920
<v Speaker 1>is this as good as it gets? I would actually

0:16:15.920 --> 0:16:17.880
<v Speaker 1>take the other side of the argument that I don't

0:16:17.920 --> 0:16:21.280
<v Speaker 1>think the market believes a lot of what they see.

0:16:21.720 --> 0:16:25.000
<v Speaker 1>We think that the stronger economic growth, stronger earnings growth,

0:16:25.040 --> 0:16:27.400
<v Speaker 1>all of that in fact is sustainable, and the market's

0:16:27.440 --> 0:16:31.680
<v Speaker 1>not as as a bulliant as it should be because

0:16:31.720 --> 0:16:34.080
<v Speaker 1>they don't think that any of this is gonna last

0:16:34.120 --> 0:16:37.080
<v Speaker 1>and it's all ephemeral and it's just gonna disappear. Um.

0:16:37.160 --> 0:16:39.120
<v Speaker 1>So I I you know our view. We've got a

0:16:39.120 --> 0:16:42.960
<v Speaker 1>thirty one forecast for the SMP five by the end

0:16:42.960 --> 0:16:44.720
<v Speaker 1>of this year. We think there's gonna be a strong

0:16:44.800 --> 0:16:48.520
<v Speaker 1>fourth quarter rally once we get through the summer period

0:16:48.760 --> 0:16:51.040
<v Speaker 1>where there's gonna be a lot of concern about the

0:16:51.080 --> 0:16:54.880
<v Speaker 1>midterm elections and uh, what's the Fed doing? Are they

0:16:54.920 --> 0:16:58.200
<v Speaker 1>eventually going to overshoot? What's their policy going to be? Uh?

0:16:58.240 --> 0:17:01.320
<v Speaker 1>This pop and first quarter earnings is that sustainable? This

0:17:01.480 --> 0:17:03.320
<v Speaker 1>pop that we think we're going to see in second

0:17:03.400 --> 0:17:06.480
<v Speaker 1>quarter g d P is that sustainable. Everyone's assuming that

0:17:06.480 --> 0:17:08.280
<v Speaker 1>that all of this is just a flash in the pan.

0:17:08.400 --> 0:17:12.440
<v Speaker 1>It ends badly. Um, we think that that that we're

0:17:12.480 --> 0:17:15.200
<v Speaker 1>putting in place a foundation that's gonna get us back

0:17:15.440 --> 0:17:18.360
<v Speaker 1>to trend line or better economic growth. We're looking at

0:17:18.440 --> 0:17:20.720
<v Speaker 1>at corporate earnings growth that hasn't been this good in

0:17:20.760 --> 0:17:23.720
<v Speaker 1>seven or eight years, and and the market needs to

0:17:23.760 --> 0:17:26.520
<v Speaker 1>be more excited about this, and I think eventually they will.

0:17:26.720 --> 0:17:29.359
<v Speaker 1>Today's not that day. So you think we're gonna get

0:17:29.400 --> 0:17:33.960
<v Speaker 1>another six points on the uh? So we're sitting in

0:17:34.000 --> 0:17:38.720
<v Speaker 1>about okay points so so, and we think that the

0:17:38.800 --> 0:17:40.520
<v Speaker 1>back of that is going to be a very strong

0:17:40.560 --> 0:17:43.400
<v Speaker 1>fourth quarter. Ralty that that when you study the history

0:17:43.760 --> 0:17:49.359
<v Speaker 1>that this year calendaren there's a very unusual confluence of

0:17:49.480 --> 0:17:53.080
<v Speaker 1>three seasonal events. The selling man go away thing happens

0:17:53.080 --> 0:17:55.720
<v Speaker 1>every year. We know about that um but this is

0:17:55.760 --> 0:17:58.720
<v Speaker 1>also the second year of the four year presidential election cycle,

0:17:58.800 --> 0:18:01.959
<v Speaker 1>tends to be very volatile of stocks. And we've had

0:18:01.960 --> 0:18:04.480
<v Speaker 1>a leadership transition at the Federal Reserve. Now the Fed's

0:18:04.520 --> 0:18:07.160
<v Speaker 1>been around a hundred years, has only been sixteen chairman.

0:18:07.520 --> 0:18:10.399
<v Speaker 1>But the market has a very distinct trading pattern whenever

0:18:10.480 --> 0:18:14.000
<v Speaker 1>we change horses, and and when when these three things

0:18:14.040 --> 0:18:17.280
<v Speaker 1>come together, they've only come together six times in the

0:18:17.359 --> 0:18:21.119
<v Speaker 1>last eighty five years or so, and and the previous

0:18:21.160 --> 0:18:24.640
<v Speaker 1>five times you've had this sort of barbell shaped year

0:18:24.640 --> 0:18:26.800
<v Speaker 1>where we started the year in good shape, there's a

0:18:26.800 --> 0:18:29.520
<v Speaker 1>lot of volatility and instability in the middle of the year,

0:18:29.640 --> 0:18:32.040
<v Speaker 1>and then we ended the year in really great shape.

0:18:32.200 --> 0:18:35.320
<v Speaker 1>I think we're going through that that instability period right

0:18:35.359 --> 0:18:39.000
<v Speaker 1>now in terms of what's gonna happen with the midterm elections,

0:18:39.040 --> 0:18:41.040
<v Speaker 1>what's gonna happen with the Fed. We've got another f

0:18:41.240 --> 0:18:43.280
<v Speaker 1>MC meeting coming up next week. All right, we think

0:18:43.280 --> 0:18:45.000
<v Speaker 1>there's gonna be a quarter point hike. I think that's

0:18:45.000 --> 0:18:48.040
<v Speaker 1>a fairly consensus view. But the question from then is

0:18:48.280 --> 0:18:51.200
<v Speaker 1>what do the dots look like. What's the FEDS policy

0:18:51.280 --> 0:18:53.840
<v Speaker 1>prescription gonna be over the course of the next eighteen

0:18:53.880 --> 0:18:56.960
<v Speaker 1>months or so? Will they overtight? We don't know the

0:18:57.000 --> 0:18:59.159
<v Speaker 1>answers to that. Well, it's just about a minute to

0:18:59.240 --> 0:19:01.960
<v Speaker 1>go here. I'm wondering what your perspective is, given the

0:19:01.960 --> 0:19:04.880
<v Speaker 1>fact that you expect a strong fourth quarter rally. Does

0:19:04.920 --> 0:19:08.040
<v Speaker 1>the FED matter for that considering the fact that people

0:19:08.080 --> 0:19:10.520
<v Speaker 1>are pricing in or are talking about certainly four rate

0:19:10.560 --> 0:19:13.240
<v Speaker 1>hips is here, Well, it absolutely matters because our forecast

0:19:13.320 --> 0:19:16.440
<v Speaker 1>is only three rate hikes. Uh So, so if we're

0:19:16.480 --> 0:19:18.960
<v Speaker 1>wrong and and the Fed is gonna give us four

0:19:19.200 --> 0:19:23.480
<v Speaker 1>or more, um, you know, there's been a rumor that, uh,

0:19:23.520 --> 0:19:25.240
<v Speaker 1>you know j Powell one of the things he's thinking

0:19:25.240 --> 0:19:29.679
<v Speaker 1>about is is sort of scrapping Janny Yellen's idea of

0:19:29.800 --> 0:19:33.879
<v Speaker 1>only four press conferences, going to eight press conferences. And uh.

0:19:33.960 --> 0:19:37.400
<v Speaker 1>The reason why that's significant is that the market has

0:19:37.400 --> 0:19:40.360
<v Speaker 1>gotten into their head that only a press conference, only

0:19:40.359 --> 0:19:42.960
<v Speaker 1>a pressor only a meeting with the presser's a live meeting,

0:19:43.600 --> 0:19:45.080
<v Speaker 1>and that we're not going to do anything and the

0:19:45.080 --> 0:19:48.760
<v Speaker 1>other meeting. Now that's not necessarily right, but Powell wants

0:19:48.800 --> 0:19:52.000
<v Speaker 1>to strip that thought process away from the market and say, okay,

0:19:52.000 --> 0:19:53.960
<v Speaker 1>every time we meet every six weeks for an f

0:19:54.160 --> 0:19:57.800
<v Speaker 1>MC meeting, we might do something. And and the reason

0:19:57.840 --> 0:20:00.879
<v Speaker 1>that Yelling apparently didn't want to do press there's every

0:20:00.920 --> 0:20:02.919
<v Speaker 1>time is that it's a lot of work to prepare

0:20:02.960 --> 0:20:06.639
<v Speaker 1>for them. We are broadcasting from b n Y Melon

0:20:06.760 --> 0:20:11.080
<v Speaker 1>Inside in Orlando, and joining us, of course, is Phil Orlando,

0:20:11.200 --> 0:20:15.920
<v Speaker 1>chief equity market strategist at Federated UH. Phil, let's talk

0:20:15.960 --> 0:20:18.040
<v Speaker 1>about small and mid cap stocks for just a second.

0:20:18.080 --> 0:20:20.040
<v Speaker 1>I was looking at the Russell two thousands up eight

0:20:20.080 --> 0:20:23.240
<v Speaker 1>and a half percent so far this year. UH. Is

0:20:23.280 --> 0:20:26.239
<v Speaker 1>it because they are more domestically focused or is it

0:20:26.280 --> 0:20:29.920
<v Speaker 1>because they just didn't get any love previously? Combination of

0:20:30.000 --> 0:20:32.760
<v Speaker 1>the two. This has been one of our biggest calls.

0:20:33.560 --> 0:20:36.760
<v Speaker 1>We went to a table pounding burn yourself at the

0:20:37.240 --> 0:20:40.639
<v Speaker 1>stake by on small caps last fall and there were

0:20:40.680 --> 0:20:43.040
<v Speaker 1>probably a half a dozen key reasons. At the top

0:20:43.080 --> 0:20:45.760
<v Speaker 1>of the list was the fact that the U. S economy,

0:20:46.240 --> 0:20:49.080
<v Speaker 1>corporate earnings economic growth was starting to really perk up,

0:20:49.840 --> 0:20:53.399
<v Speaker 1>and a small cap company typically does eighty percent or

0:20:53.440 --> 0:20:56.840
<v Speaker 1>so of their business here, so theoretically that was going

0:20:56.880 --> 0:20:59.840
<v Speaker 1>to benefit them Uh, if we were right that the

0:21:00.000 --> 0:21:02.840
<v Speaker 1>economy and the corporate earnings we're gonna get stronger, that

0:21:02.880 --> 0:21:05.080
<v Speaker 1>meant that the Fed was probably going to accelerate its

0:21:05.119 --> 0:21:08.960
<v Speaker 1>tightening policy. That's happened, which meant that the dollar was

0:21:09.040 --> 0:21:12.040
<v Speaker 1>going to finally catch a bit. Now. Remember dollar euro

0:21:12.200 --> 0:21:15.840
<v Speaker 1>had gone from one oh three to one twenty five

0:21:15.960 --> 0:21:17.880
<v Speaker 1>or so over the course of last year. We thought

0:21:17.960 --> 0:21:20.600
<v Speaker 1>that was overdone and that we should have seen a

0:21:20.720 --> 0:21:23.720
<v Speaker 1>rally back to about the one fifteen level or so.

0:21:23.880 --> 0:21:26.359
<v Speaker 1>So we're sitting in about one see eighteen or so

0:21:26.520 --> 0:21:30.480
<v Speaker 1>right now. The strength in the dollar should benefit small

0:21:30.560 --> 0:21:34.080
<v Speaker 1>cap companies, just as the weaker dollar tends to benefit

0:21:34.200 --> 0:21:37.240
<v Speaker 1>large cap companies. It makes their goods and services cheaper

0:21:37.280 --> 0:21:40.600
<v Speaker 1>as they're exporting them overseas. Half or more of a

0:21:40.680 --> 0:21:44.600
<v Speaker 1>large cap company stuff is done overseas. So the stronger dollar,

0:21:44.720 --> 0:21:47.480
<v Speaker 1>based upon those other things was going to benefit small caps.

0:21:47.560 --> 0:21:49.399
<v Speaker 1>So I'm just wondering before we move on to some

0:21:49.480 --> 0:21:52.119
<v Speaker 1>of the other sectors, I'm just wondering a lot of

0:21:52.119 --> 0:21:55.040
<v Speaker 1>people think that the dollar is gonna weaken again, probably

0:21:55.440 --> 0:21:58.040
<v Speaker 1>in six months, maybe a year, as people start to

0:21:58.040 --> 0:22:01.080
<v Speaker 1>realize how deep the deficits really are. Do you agree,

0:22:01.200 --> 0:22:03.600
<v Speaker 1>and when would you consider start taking starting to take

0:22:03.640 --> 0:22:06.600
<v Speaker 1>some risk out of small caps. So I'm not sure

0:22:06.640 --> 0:22:09.679
<v Speaker 1>that I fully agree with that assessment. I am concerned

0:22:09.720 --> 0:22:13.119
<v Speaker 1>about the debt and the deficit levels, no question. But

0:22:13.359 --> 0:22:17.679
<v Speaker 1>Dan Clifton over at Strategos put out a note a

0:22:17.680 --> 0:22:20.280
<v Speaker 1>week or so ago saying that when we start to

0:22:20.359 --> 0:22:23.479
<v Speaker 1>get some of the data out of the government this

0:22:23.560 --> 0:22:28.400
<v Speaker 1>year in terms of how much the federal tax revenue

0:22:28.400 --> 0:22:31.560
<v Speaker 1>has increased because economic growth is better, capital gains taxes

0:22:31.600 --> 0:22:34.719
<v Speaker 1>are better, etcetera, and and how much some of that

0:22:34.800 --> 0:22:36.760
<v Speaker 1>has been applied to the debt and the depth said

0:22:36.880 --> 0:22:40.360
<v Speaker 1>the numbers, he said, will look better. We as an

0:22:40.359 --> 0:22:43.320
<v Speaker 1>investment community don't really have an appreciation of that because

0:22:43.400 --> 0:22:45.760
<v Speaker 1>right now we're just speculating. So you think that the

0:22:45.840 --> 0:22:48.360
<v Speaker 1>small caps have have a pretty long run ahead of them,

0:22:48.400 --> 0:22:51.000
<v Speaker 1>It sounds like absolutely what about tech stocks because they

0:22:51.040 --> 0:22:53.880
<v Speaker 1>have been reaching record highs and I'm just wondering how

0:22:53.920 --> 0:22:57.320
<v Speaker 1>you're thinking about that. So we we love tech through

0:22:57.440 --> 0:22:59.720
<v Speaker 1>last year into the first quarter of this year, and

0:22:59.720 --> 0:23:02.760
<v Speaker 1>then sort of went neutral. I guess as the market

0:23:02.880 --> 0:23:06.240
<v Speaker 1>was sort of peaking in that late January early February standpoint.

0:23:06.320 --> 0:23:09.679
<v Speaker 1>The reason for that valuation appeared to us to be

0:23:09.720 --> 0:23:13.120
<v Speaker 1>a little ahead of itself, and large cap world generally

0:23:13.160 --> 0:23:16.760
<v Speaker 1>had outperformed large cap value by about twenty five percentage

0:23:16.800 --> 0:23:20.080
<v Speaker 1>points over the course of seventeen in the first part

0:23:20.119 --> 0:23:23.480
<v Speaker 1>of eighteen. Now, that's a one standard deviation event that

0:23:23.560 --> 0:23:27.080
<v Speaker 1>has only occurred five times in the last forty years

0:23:27.160 --> 0:23:29.359
<v Speaker 1>or so, So it appeared to us that growth was

0:23:29.440 --> 0:23:33.160
<v Speaker 1>ahead of itself. Now, in those other four instances, when

0:23:33.200 --> 0:23:36.800
<v Speaker 1>that inflection point came and money were starting to rotate

0:23:36.840 --> 0:23:40.400
<v Speaker 1>back into value, the value had a phenomenal run. And

0:23:40.400 --> 0:23:42.640
<v Speaker 1>and so we think we're at one of those inflection

0:23:42.720 --> 0:23:46.879
<v Speaker 1>points now. And so we've been overweight energy stocks, financial

0:23:46.920 --> 0:23:50.720
<v Speaker 1>service stocks, and industrial stocks in the domestic market as

0:23:50.720 --> 0:23:53.399
<v Speaker 1>a result of that. I'm gonna throw a little bit

0:23:53.400 --> 0:23:56.560
<v Speaker 1>of a curveball here, because, uh, we're talking about all

0:23:56.560 --> 0:23:59.160
<v Speaker 1>of this in the context of this conference and people

0:23:59.200 --> 0:24:02.800
<v Speaker 1>planning for their financial future and trying to uh in

0:24:02.880 --> 0:24:06.119
<v Speaker 1>some way, not to simplify it, but make it applicable

0:24:06.160 --> 0:24:11.520
<v Speaker 1>to their personal situation. Social security, right is a big

0:24:11.600 --> 0:24:14.360
<v Speaker 1>part of people's retirement plan. Whether you have a lot

0:24:14.400 --> 0:24:16.320
<v Speaker 1>of money or a little money, you're kind of in

0:24:16.320 --> 0:24:18.640
<v Speaker 1>your mind have this notion you're going to get your

0:24:18.680 --> 0:24:21.600
<v Speaker 1>social Security check. This is the first time since n

0:24:22.240 --> 0:24:24.280
<v Speaker 1>two that the government's having to dip into the trust

0:24:24.320 --> 0:24:28.040
<v Speaker 1>fund in order to fund social security payments. Right, what

0:24:28.080 --> 0:24:31.720
<v Speaker 1>do you say to people who are using social security

0:24:31.760 --> 0:24:35.240
<v Speaker 1>as the first piece of the bigger puzzle of a

0:24:35.359 --> 0:24:40.280
<v Speaker 1>retirement plan. Well, if it's the only piece, um, I

0:24:40.720 --> 0:24:43.359
<v Speaker 1>would be a little nervous. I think it's part of

0:24:43.359 --> 0:24:46.920
<v Speaker 1>a mosaic that you've got your your four oh one

0:24:47.040 --> 0:24:50.360
<v Speaker 1>k uh, You've got your I rara, you've got your

0:24:50.359 --> 0:24:54.360
<v Speaker 1>Social Security, You've you've got some some some savings, you've

0:24:54.400 --> 0:24:57.120
<v Speaker 1>got the equity in your house. All of that together,

0:24:57.240 --> 0:25:00.760
<v Speaker 1>people should be fine if if you've done thing other

0:25:00.840 --> 0:25:03.920
<v Speaker 1>than continue to hope and pray and light candles that

0:25:04.000 --> 0:25:06.760
<v Speaker 1>the government will continue to, you know, be able to

0:25:06.800 --> 0:25:09.560
<v Speaker 1>support you with your social Security checks. I think that's

0:25:09.560 --> 0:25:13.240
<v Speaker 1>a risky strategy because we've got to address, in my opinion,

0:25:13.760 --> 0:25:18.640
<v Speaker 1>the unsustainable trajectory of entitlements at some point in the future.

0:25:18.840 --> 0:25:20.679
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that today is that day, because I

0:25:20.680 --> 0:25:23.760
<v Speaker 1>don't think we have the right mix of government officials

0:25:23.800 --> 0:25:26.000
<v Speaker 1>with the backbone and the vision to be able to

0:25:26.000 --> 0:25:29.200
<v Speaker 1>fix the problem. But but this problem is getting progressively

0:25:29.320 --> 0:25:32.760
<v Speaker 1>worse every day. Uh. And and if I were sitting

0:25:32.800 --> 0:25:34.960
<v Speaker 1>in the White House right now, I'd be trying to

0:25:34.960 --> 0:25:38.639
<v Speaker 1>put together a plan that that brings the best thinking

0:25:38.680 --> 0:25:41.600
<v Speaker 1>of both sides to compromise on the issue that that

0:25:41.680 --> 0:25:46.520
<v Speaker 1>we've got to do some things to recognize better health UH,

0:25:46.560 --> 0:25:52.679
<v Speaker 1>longer UH retirement ages UH means testing of benefits for

0:25:53.040 --> 0:25:56.080
<v Speaker 1>the super wealthy, increasing the tax base. There's a bunch

0:25:56.119 --> 0:25:58.480
<v Speaker 1>of different things that we need to do in order

0:25:58.520 --> 0:26:01.640
<v Speaker 1>to get Social Security on a more sustainable footage. Thank

0:26:01.680 --> 0:26:03.959
<v Speaker 1>you so much for being with us, Phil Orlando. Always

0:26:03.960 --> 0:26:07.280
<v Speaker 1>wonderful to get your insights, especially in the town that

0:26:07.359 --> 0:26:10.200
<v Speaker 1>was named after you. Phil Orlando, chief equity market strategist

0:26:10.480 --> 0:26:14.880
<v Speaker 1>at Federated ruling over his roost here at the Insight

0:26:15.280 --> 0:26:18.679
<v Speaker 1>Conference in Orland. So thank you so much for having me.

0:26:18.880 --> 0:26:20.960
<v Speaker 1>This was this was a thrill to be with you, guys.

0:26:35.240 --> 0:26:38.479
<v Speaker 1>Our next guest spent more than two decades at the

0:26:38.480 --> 0:26:41.800
<v Speaker 1>Federal Reserve in a variety of capacities. He now serves

0:26:42.119 --> 0:26:45.520
<v Speaker 1>as the chief economist at Standish, which is part of

0:26:45.560 --> 0:26:48.680
<v Speaker 1>b n Y Melan Asset Management. I want to bring

0:26:48.680 --> 0:26:51.040
<v Speaker 1>in vincent Reinhardt thank you so much for joining us.

0:26:51.080 --> 0:26:53.720
<v Speaker 1>Really a pleasure having you for having me. I want

0:26:53.720 --> 0:26:57.200
<v Speaker 1>to start with a lot of some of the handwringing

0:26:57.280 --> 0:27:01.320
<v Speaker 1>in the economics profession right now. Is the Phillips curve dead? Uh?

0:27:01.440 --> 0:27:04.160
<v Speaker 1>Can we throw away the yield curve as it flattens

0:27:04.160 --> 0:27:06.080
<v Speaker 1>and disregarded even though in the past it's been a

0:27:06.119 --> 0:27:09.360
<v Speaker 1>telling indicator of recessions. What do you think the biggest

0:27:09.480 --> 0:27:13.040
<v Speaker 1>thing is right now that the economics professional economists are

0:27:13.040 --> 0:27:17.359
<v Speaker 1>getting wrong? First thing they remember is all that handwringing.

0:27:17.480 --> 0:27:19.679
<v Speaker 1>Notwithstanding at the end you have to go back to

0:27:19.720 --> 0:27:24.280
<v Speaker 1>certain mechanisms because that's what keeps your understanding and the

0:27:23.840 --> 0:27:27.399
<v Speaker 1>U of the world in motion. Uh. To me, I

0:27:27.440 --> 0:27:32.000
<v Speaker 1>think the biggest thing the brethren get wrong is that

0:27:32.160 --> 0:27:34.600
<v Speaker 1>the rest of the world is bigger and it doesn't

0:27:34.640 --> 0:27:39.400
<v Speaker 1>act exactly like us. That a lot of macroeconomists are

0:27:39.560 --> 0:27:43.440
<v Speaker 1>used to a closed form representation of the US economy

0:27:43.440 --> 0:27:46.119
<v Speaker 1>and much more comfortable of that. But the plain fact

0:27:46.280 --> 0:27:51.720
<v Speaker 1>is we went from something like um emerging markets being

0:27:51.760 --> 0:27:57.080
<v Speaker 1>a third of the UH Federal Reserved Exchange Rate Index

0:27:57.160 --> 0:28:00.399
<v Speaker 1>to being more like seventy of the of the Federal

0:28:00.400 --> 0:28:03.879
<v Speaker 1>Reserves Exchange Rate Index. So what's the practical implication of that?

0:28:03.920 --> 0:28:05.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean, how does that factor into sort of the

0:28:05.640 --> 0:28:09.359
<v Speaker 1>everyday existence of Americans. So it's a couple things. One is,

0:28:09.359 --> 0:28:13.200
<v Speaker 1>it's probably why they're so uh so much pressure keeping

0:28:13.240 --> 0:28:16.440
<v Speaker 1>inflation from going up even though there's evident resource pressure,

0:28:16.600 --> 0:28:19.000
<v Speaker 1>because the rest of the world is there meets somewhere

0:28:19.000 --> 0:28:22.840
<v Speaker 1>our demand. Because the rest of world also doesn't act

0:28:23.080 --> 0:28:27.320
<v Speaker 1>like us. Uh. Emerging markets in particular try to limit

0:28:27.359 --> 0:28:30.600
<v Speaker 1>their fluctuations of their exchange rate piece of FISA dollar.

0:28:31.119 --> 0:28:34.679
<v Speaker 1>That implies that major currencies aren't as important as they

0:28:34.720 --> 0:28:38.960
<v Speaker 1>used to be. Have we become more isolated in our thinking?

0:28:40.280 --> 0:28:44.320
<v Speaker 1>I think we didn't change and therefore are relatively more

0:28:44.360 --> 0:28:47.280
<v Speaker 1>isolated than we should should have. I e. If you

0:28:47.400 --> 0:28:51.440
<v Speaker 1>missed the fact that China is the largest economy in

0:28:51.560 --> 0:28:55.760
<v Speaker 1>terms of international purchasing power, you're you're gonna you're you're

0:28:55.800 --> 0:28:59.880
<v Speaker 1>gonna be missing out on on on the explanation. Great example.

0:29:00.320 --> 0:29:02.680
<v Speaker 1>We know from the minutes that back in January, the

0:29:02.760 --> 0:29:05.880
<v Speaker 1>f m C had a long discussion about inflation determination.

0:29:06.280 --> 0:29:08.400
<v Speaker 1>They put a page and a half in the FLM

0:29:08.480 --> 0:29:10.360
<v Speaker 1>scene in its I used to sign those for six

0:29:10.440 --> 0:29:13.280
<v Speaker 1>or seven years. That's a lot. That's a big footprint.

0:29:13.880 --> 0:29:17.240
<v Speaker 1>Over those page and a half you will find nowhere

0:29:17.640 --> 0:29:21.760
<v Speaker 1>global supply chain, rest of the world, exchange value of

0:29:21.800 --> 0:29:26.000
<v Speaker 1>the dollar. It was all domestic center. So uh, you know,

0:29:26.040 --> 0:29:28.960
<v Speaker 1>we spoke about this earlier, but scottman Ard of Googgenheim

0:29:29.080 --> 0:29:33.000
<v Speaker 1>came out and today said that the flattening yield curve

0:29:33.040 --> 0:29:36.440
<v Speaker 1>now at the flattester about since two thousand seven, is

0:29:36.480 --> 0:29:38.800
<v Speaker 1>an indicator that we're getting closer to the end of

0:29:38.840 --> 0:29:41.640
<v Speaker 1>this cycle, that we're probably within two years of a recession.

0:29:42.040 --> 0:29:45.320
<v Speaker 1>Do you agree? So I can say the easy thing,

0:29:45.720 --> 0:29:48.640
<v Speaker 1>and that is the U S economy is dynamic. In

0:29:48.680 --> 0:29:51.360
<v Speaker 1>the post war period, about fifteen percent of the years

0:29:51.400 --> 0:29:54.240
<v Speaker 1>had recessions in them. So if you're asking me for

0:29:54.240 --> 0:29:57.200
<v Speaker 1>a multi year forecast, there's gotta be a probability of

0:29:57.240 --> 0:29:59.840
<v Speaker 1>recession in there. Now does the yield? Is the yield

0:30:00.040 --> 0:30:02.640
<v Speaker 1>nerve as scary as it used to be? And I

0:30:02.680 --> 0:30:06.440
<v Speaker 1>think the answers know. And the reason is yield curve

0:30:06.600 --> 0:30:10.280
<v Speaker 1>used to be very scary because if short rates were

0:30:10.360 --> 0:30:14.560
<v Speaker 1>below long rates, it meant that long rates incorporated the

0:30:14.600 --> 0:30:18.320
<v Speaker 1>expectation of the FED easy. If short rates were real high,

0:30:18.360 --> 0:30:20.760
<v Speaker 1>it meant the FED had a tight policy. So what

0:30:20.840 --> 0:30:25.320
<v Speaker 1>gets the FED from tight too easy a recession and

0:30:25.400 --> 0:30:28.280
<v Speaker 1>so therefore it was good at predicting a recession. What's

0:30:28.320 --> 0:30:32.360
<v Speaker 1>the difference now, and that is long rates always incorporated

0:30:32.480 --> 0:30:37.160
<v Speaker 1>term premium, the scarcity you know, uh value associated with

0:30:37.240 --> 0:30:42.000
<v Speaker 1>holding treasury securities. Well, treasuries are really really scarce because

0:30:42.520 --> 0:30:45.640
<v Speaker 1>the feder reserve and foreign official accounts hold them. In

0:30:45.680 --> 0:30:48.960
<v Speaker 1>that environment, estimates of the term premium are actually negative,

0:30:49.440 --> 0:30:52.000
<v Speaker 1>so it's not as big as signal about a future

0:30:52.080 --> 0:30:55.440
<v Speaker 1>FED mistake when long rates are low relative to short rates.

0:30:56.600 --> 0:30:59.040
<v Speaker 1>You've heard the phrase the generals fight the last war?

0:30:59.760 --> 0:31:02.960
<v Speaker 1>Have economists and politicians are they fighting the last war?

0:31:03.040 --> 0:31:05.880
<v Speaker 1>Particularly on trade? Rather than figuring out how to live

0:31:05.880 --> 0:31:08.560
<v Speaker 1>in a world where China is, as you described as

0:31:08.680 --> 0:31:13.000
<v Speaker 1>dominant our we seem to be fighting skirmishes at the

0:31:13.240 --> 0:31:17.440
<v Speaker 1>edges to try to satisfy some nostalgic version of what

0:31:17.480 --> 0:31:19.640
<v Speaker 1>we think the world ought to look like. I think

0:31:19.640 --> 0:31:22.160
<v Speaker 1>a good way to frame it is we're still thinking

0:31:22.200 --> 0:31:27.560
<v Speaker 1>about the accomplishment of bringing China into the global trading

0:31:27.720 --> 0:31:31.560
<v Speaker 1>order with their accession to the World Trading Organization, and

0:31:31.600 --> 0:31:35.480
<v Speaker 1>we're all backslapped and saying that's a real accomplishment. What

0:31:35.560 --> 0:31:39.400
<v Speaker 1>we aren't thinking about was exactly who we brought into

0:31:39.440 --> 0:31:44.000
<v Speaker 1>that world trading organization, that global system. It's somebody. It's

0:31:44.040 --> 0:31:47.240
<v Speaker 1>a country that has a much more longer term focused

0:31:47.240 --> 0:31:53.160
<v Speaker 1>than us, that has a desire to um get market

0:31:53.160 --> 0:31:56.640
<v Speaker 1>share and get the technology that we've gotten. It's not

0:31:56.720 --> 0:31:59.200
<v Speaker 1>the same kind of trading partner that that that you

0:31:59.280 --> 0:32:02.160
<v Speaker 1>write down in most economic bombs. You know. We also

0:32:02.240 --> 0:32:05.160
<v Speaker 1>we hit on our emerging markets earlier in Turkey's central

0:32:05.200 --> 0:32:08.040
<v Speaker 1>bank earlier today's surprise the market by raising interest rates,

0:32:08.680 --> 0:32:12.360
<v Speaker 1>the main interest rate to nearly eighteen percent. They just

0:32:12.440 --> 0:32:16.720
<v Speaker 1>had a near record amount of inflation over the past year.

0:32:17.040 --> 0:32:19.520
<v Speaker 1>How are you thinking about emerging markets right now? Well,

0:32:19.560 --> 0:32:22.920
<v Speaker 1>and by the way, the Argentine Central Bank went up.

0:32:24.280 --> 0:32:27.560
<v Speaker 1>And those two examples are just great to teach in

0:32:27.600 --> 0:32:31.320
<v Speaker 1>a classroom on financial crisis because it tells you about

0:32:31.400 --> 0:32:35.360
<v Speaker 1>the impossibility of an interest rate defense. You're trying to

0:32:35.400 --> 0:32:37.719
<v Speaker 1>hold your exchange rate and you're going to do it

0:32:37.760 --> 0:32:41.320
<v Speaker 1>by raised raising your domestic rate. Well, the problem is

0:32:41.400 --> 0:32:44.160
<v Speaker 1>that's not real credible because the more and more you

0:32:44.280 --> 0:32:48.480
<v Speaker 1>jack up your your policy rate to lessen the pressures

0:32:48.480 --> 0:32:50.760
<v Speaker 1>on the exchange rate, the more likely you're killing your

0:32:50.760 --> 0:32:54.400
<v Speaker 1>own economy, the more likely you're gonna get replaced, the

0:32:54.480 --> 0:32:57.680
<v Speaker 1>more likely it's not going to be sustained. So in fact,

0:32:57.880 --> 0:33:01.880
<v Speaker 1>the need to do something that dramatic is read by

0:33:01.920 --> 0:33:05.760
<v Speaker 1>investors is saying there's something dramatic underneath. Well, and certainly

0:33:05.800 --> 0:33:07.600
<v Speaker 1>there is, but I'm just wondering, you know, given the

0:33:07.640 --> 0:33:12.400
<v Speaker 1>fact that we're seeing Argentina, Turkey, Brazil kind of suffering

0:33:12.440 --> 0:33:15.040
<v Speaker 1>with their currency falling out of bed a bit, you know,

0:33:15.320 --> 0:33:18.000
<v Speaker 1>is this sort of indicating a bigger issue at this point.

0:33:18.320 --> 0:33:20.479
<v Speaker 1>So Brazil is a good example where it wasn't an

0:33:20.520 --> 0:33:23.320
<v Speaker 1>interest rate defense. They didn't lower rates when they had

0:33:23.360 --> 0:33:27.760
<v Speaker 1>the opportunity, and and an opportunity they took that Argentina

0:33:28.040 --> 0:33:30.400
<v Speaker 1>didn't take was they built up more reserves. So they're

0:33:30.400 --> 0:33:33.240
<v Speaker 1>a little distinct. But guess what they've got political risk

0:33:33.320 --> 0:33:35.920
<v Speaker 1>to They're also going to be a source of uncertain

0:33:36.560 --> 0:33:40.440
<v Speaker 1>The scary thing about this is it wasn't much of

0:33:40.480 --> 0:33:45.560
<v Speaker 1>a backup and interest rates that exposed the pressure US

0:33:45.600 --> 0:33:49.600
<v Speaker 1>interest rates that exposed pressure on e M and who

0:33:49.640 --> 0:33:53.440
<v Speaker 1>did markets focus on. It focused on the economies that

0:33:53.600 --> 0:33:58.440
<v Speaker 1>had ongoing budget deficits, and current account deficits. Market participants

0:33:58.480 --> 0:34:02.520
<v Speaker 1>are not your friend when they're worried about funding your

0:34:02.520 --> 0:34:07.720
<v Speaker 1>ongoing obligations. And that's something officials forgot over the prior

0:34:07.800 --> 0:34:11.759
<v Speaker 1>couple of years when it was so easy to sell

0:34:11.920 --> 0:34:16.480
<v Speaker 1>long term securities. Ten seconds. What is Vincent Reinhart reading

0:34:16.480 --> 0:34:19.480
<v Speaker 1>at the beach this summer reading at the beach. I'm

0:34:19.560 --> 0:34:24.120
<v Speaker 1>catching up on a bunch of old his Mark Twain books.

0:34:24.840 --> 0:34:26.799
<v Speaker 1>Thanks very much for being with us, Thanks for having

0:34:26.840 --> 0:34:30.520
<v Speaker 1>always a pleasure. Vincent Reinhardt is the chief economist of

0:34:30.600 --> 0:34:34.480
<v Speaker 1>what He's got a quadruple mandate Standish Melon Capital, the

0:34:34.520 --> 0:34:38.320
<v Speaker 1>Boston Company Asset Management, and b n Y Melon Asset

0:34:38.360 --> 0:34:44.880
<v Speaker 1>Management North America. Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg P

0:34:45.000 --> 0:34:47.960
<v Speaker 1>and L podcast. You can subscribe and listen to interviews

0:34:48.000 --> 0:34:52.040
<v Speaker 1>at Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, or whatever podcast platform you prefer.

0:34:52.480 --> 0:34:56.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm pim Fox. I'm on Twitter at pim Fox. I'm

0:34:56.080 --> 0:34:59.440
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter at Lisa abramowits one before the podcast. You

0:34:59.440 --> 0:35:05.120
<v Speaker 1>can always hatch us worldwide on Bloomberg radioh