WEBVTT - A Requiem for Prabhakar Raghavan

0:00:02.840 --> 0:00:06.800
<v Speaker 1>Zone Media, Hello, and welcome to Better Offline.

0:00:06.960 --> 0:00:08.160
<v Speaker 2>I'm your host ed zetron.

0:00:19.800 --> 0:00:22.880
<v Speaker 1>When Princess Diana died in nineteen ninety seven, Elton John

0:00:22.920 --> 0:00:25.680
<v Speaker 1>Rey wrote his famous song Candle in the Wind, changing.

0:00:25.400 --> 0:00:26.960
<v Speaker 2>The lyrics subtly. As a tribune.

0:00:27.320 --> 0:00:29.639
<v Speaker 1>I did the same thing for this episode about Prabagar

0:00:29.760 --> 0:00:32.760
<v Speaker 1>Ragavan of Google. However, when I told cool Zone Media

0:00:32.760 --> 0:00:35.479
<v Speaker 1>about my plans, Robert Evans threatened me with and I quote,

0:00:35.760 --> 0:00:38.360
<v Speaker 1>a trip to the Carnival prison and then sent me

0:00:38.400 --> 0:00:41.160
<v Speaker 1>a low quality jpeg of a gun. As a result,

0:00:41.200 --> 0:00:43.519
<v Speaker 1>I will be neglecting to release Candle in the Toilet

0:00:43.560 --> 0:00:46.680
<v Speaker 1>for the time being. Nevertheless, it's both my duty and

0:00:46.720 --> 0:00:50.000
<v Speaker 1>my pleasure to reveal that Prabagar Ragavan, one of Better

0:00:50.040 --> 0:00:53.240
<v Speaker 1>Offline's most notorious villains and the former head of Google Search,

0:00:53.479 --> 0:00:57.680
<v Speaker 1>was relieved of duty last week, becoming Google's first chief technologist.

0:00:58.360 --> 0:01:01.440
<v Speaker 1>Now it's very important to know. It's an important rule

0:01:01.480 --> 0:01:04.040
<v Speaker 1>to follow with somebody's title in silicon value that if

0:01:04.080 --> 0:01:06.920
<v Speaker 1>you can't tell what it means, it probably doesn't mean anything.

0:01:06.920 --> 0:01:08.640
<v Speaker 2>With the notorious example.

0:01:08.240 --> 0:01:13.200
<v Speaker 1>Of AOL Shingy their digital profit being my favorite, although

0:01:13.240 --> 0:01:16.360
<v Speaker 1>this one's a little less ridiculous. Ragavan has likely been

0:01:16.360 --> 0:01:18.760
<v Speaker 1>given a ceremonial title in the job that involves and

0:01:18.840 --> 0:01:22.200
<v Speaker 1>I quote, partnering closely with Sundharpishai and providing technical direction,

0:01:22.800 --> 0:01:27.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, as opposed to actually leading it. If you're confused, forgetful,

0:01:27.280 --> 0:01:29.120
<v Speaker 1>or just love hearing me speak, let me give you

0:01:29.160 --> 0:01:32.200
<v Speaker 1>a brief rundown of who Brabagar Ragavan is or indeed was.

0:01:32.920 --> 0:01:35.840
<v Speaker 1>Back in April, I ran probably my most well known episode,

0:01:35.880 --> 0:01:39.000
<v Speaker 1>the Man that destroyed Google Search using emails, revealed as

0:01:39.000 --> 0:01:41.480
<v Speaker 1>part of the Department of Justice is antitrust trial against

0:01:41.520 --> 0:01:44.720
<v Speaker 1>Google over their monopoly over Search. I told the tale

0:01:44.760 --> 0:01:47.319
<v Speaker 1>of how Prabagar Ragavan, then Google's head of Ads, let

0:01:47.319 --> 0:01:49.280
<v Speaker 1>a coup that began the slow descent of the world's

0:01:49.280 --> 0:01:53.200
<v Speaker 1>most important website towards its kind of broken, half working,

0:01:53.280 --> 0:01:55.040
<v Speaker 1>shitty thing that you see today and have for the

0:01:55.120 --> 0:01:58.080
<v Speaker 1>last few years. The key event in the podcast was

0:01:58.120 --> 0:02:01.320
<v Speaker 1>a code yellow crisis declared in twenty nineteen by Google's

0:02:01.360 --> 0:02:05.080
<v Speaker 1>ads and finance teams, which had forecast a disappointing quarter. Indeed,

0:02:05.520 --> 0:02:08.520
<v Speaker 1>in response, Prabagar Ragavan pushed out Ben Gomes, then the

0:02:08.560 --> 0:02:11.679
<v Speaker 1>head of Search, and a genuine pioneer in search technology,

0:02:11.720 --> 0:02:13.959
<v Speaker 1>by the way, he'd been there forever, and he pushed

0:02:14.000 --> 0:02:16.359
<v Speaker 1>him to increase the number of queries people made by

0:02:16.400 --> 0:02:20.280
<v Speaker 1>any means necessary. Now you may think queries on Google

0:02:20.840 --> 0:02:23.200
<v Speaker 1>is that such a bad thing. Well, when you're optimizing

0:02:23.200 --> 0:02:25.520
<v Speaker 1>a search engine to make people search more rather than

0:02:25.600 --> 0:02:28.120
<v Speaker 1>getting than the search engine results they need, you're doing

0:02:28.160 --> 0:02:29.959
<v Speaker 1>so that they can see more ads.

0:02:30.160 --> 0:02:30.919
<v Speaker 2>It's not great.

0:02:31.600 --> 0:02:33.680
<v Speaker 1>And though it's not clear what was done to resolve

0:02:33.720 --> 0:02:36.880
<v Speaker 1>the so called query softness that Ragavan demanded was reversed,

0:02:37.120 --> 0:02:40.120
<v Speaker 1>I hypothesized one of the moves involved rolling back changes

0:02:40.160 --> 0:02:44.160
<v Speaker 1>to search that suppress spami content. Google has since denied

0:02:44.200 --> 0:02:46.720
<v Speaker 1>this in a response to my newsletter, despite the fact

0:02:46.720 --> 0:02:48.880
<v Speaker 1>that emails revealed as part of the same Department of

0:02:49.000 --> 0:02:52.400
<v Speaker 1>Justice trial, revealed that Jerry Dishler, Ragavan's deputy at Google

0:02:52.440 --> 0:02:56.000
<v Speaker 1>Ads at the time, specifically discussed rollbacks as a means

0:02:56.000 --> 0:02:59.480
<v Speaker 1>of increasing queries. And what's also lovely about this in

0:02:59.639 --> 0:03:02.400
<v Speaker 1>old to this in the notes, by the way, is

0:03:02.440 --> 0:03:06.639
<v Speaker 1>their response didn't really attack anything I had to say.

0:03:06.680 --> 0:03:08.919
<v Speaker 1>They just say, oh, oh, it's ridiculous what he said.

0:03:09.080 --> 0:03:12.120
<v Speaker 1>They refuse to give any true data. But I'm going

0:03:12.200 --> 0:03:14.359
<v Speaker 1>to quote the man that destroyed Google searching now to

0:03:14.440 --> 0:03:17.680
<v Speaker 1>kind of run this down. The March twenty nineteen core

0:03:17.760 --> 0:03:19.919
<v Speaker 1>update to Search, which happened about a week before at

0:03:19.960 --> 0:03:22.080
<v Speaker 1>the end of the code Yellow, was expected to be

0:03:22.160 --> 0:03:24.520
<v Speaker 1>and I quote, one of the largest updates to Search

0:03:24.520 --> 0:03:27.240
<v Speaker 1>in a very long time. Yet when it launched, many

0:03:27.280 --> 0:03:30.040
<v Speaker 1>found that the update mostly rolled back changes and traffic

0:03:30.080 --> 0:03:33.000
<v Speaker 1>was increasing to sites that had previously been suppressed by

0:03:33.000 --> 0:03:37.240
<v Speaker 1>Google Search's Penguin update from twenty twelve that specifically targeted

0:03:37.280 --> 0:03:40.040
<v Speaker 1>spammy search results, as well as those hit by an

0:03:40.080 --> 0:03:42.680
<v Speaker 1>update from August first, twenty eighteen, a few months after

0:03:42.720 --> 0:03:46.280
<v Speaker 1>Ben Gomes became head of Search. Prabagar Ragavan was made

0:03:46.280 --> 0:03:48.080
<v Speaker 1>head of Search a little over a year later in

0:03:48.200 --> 0:03:50.800
<v Speaker 1>June twenty twenty, and it's pretty obvious how big a

0:03:50.880 --> 0:03:54.120
<v Speaker 1>decline Google Search has taken since then. Results are filled

0:03:54.120 --> 0:03:57.480
<v Speaker 1>with SEO garbage that search engine optimization by the way,

0:03:57.880 --> 0:04:01.440
<v Speaker 1>ads sponsored content that it's pretty much impossible to tell

0:04:01.480 --> 0:04:04.880
<v Speaker 1>from regular results, and the disastrous launch of Google's AI

0:04:04.960 --> 0:04:08.760
<v Speaker 1>powered summaries, which produced results that range from hilarious like

0:04:08.800 --> 0:04:11.400
<v Speaker 1>telling you to eat rocks or life threatening like telling

0:04:11.440 --> 0:04:13.840
<v Speaker 1>you a mushroom is safe. To eat that will kill you.

0:04:14.800 --> 0:04:17.280
<v Speaker 1>And I think the Probagar Ragavan's reign at Google can

0:04:17.320 --> 0:04:20.240
<v Speaker 1>be seen as an illustration of much larger problems at

0:04:20.240 --> 0:04:22.760
<v Speaker 1>the company. Now for the next bit, please take a

0:04:22.760 --> 0:04:25.920
<v Speaker 1>look at the episode notes and go to TinyURL dot

0:04:25.960 --> 0:04:27.599
<v Speaker 1>com slash B one O two.

0:04:27.600 --> 0:04:27.720
<v Speaker 2>Oh.

0:04:27.960 --> 0:04:30.080
<v Speaker 1>This will be in the notes because you're gonna want

0:04:30.080 --> 0:04:32.159
<v Speaker 1>to look at the chart I'm referencing. But I'm really

0:04:32.200 --> 0:04:33.960
<v Speaker 1>going to try my hardest to get the most of

0:04:34.000 --> 0:04:36.159
<v Speaker 1>it out verbally as well. If you're driving your car,

0:04:36.400 --> 0:04:38.760
<v Speaker 1>if you're currently prizing open a window to steal a

0:04:38.800 --> 0:04:41.279
<v Speaker 1>granny's purse from her car, I'll get it. I'll get

0:04:41.320 --> 0:04:45.160
<v Speaker 1>em anyway. When Propagar Ragavan took over Search in Q

0:04:45.240 --> 0:04:48.160
<v Speaker 1>three twenty twenty, Google had just experienced its first decline

0:04:48.160 --> 0:04:51.239
<v Speaker 1>in year over year quarterly growth since Q four twenty twelve,

0:04:51.440 --> 0:04:53.719
<v Speaker 1>a one point sixty six percent decline in growth that

0:04:53.839 --> 0:04:56.600
<v Speaker 1>was followed by a remarkable recovery with double digit year

0:04:56.640 --> 0:04:58.880
<v Speaker 1>of a year growth just as Prabagar turned the screws

0:04:58.880 --> 0:05:02.400
<v Speaker 1>on Search to a ridiculous sixty one point five eight

0:05:02.440 --> 0:05:05.920
<v Speaker 1>percent year over year growth in Q three twenty twenty one.

0:05:06.760 --> 0:05:11.120
<v Speaker 1>Then things began to slow every quarter saw progressively lower growth,

0:05:11.200 --> 0:05:13.360
<v Speaker 1>reaching in the deer in Q four twenty twenty two,

0:05:13.600 --> 0:05:16.400
<v Speaker 1>when Google experienced a mere point ninety six percent year

0:05:16.440 --> 0:05:18.839
<v Speaker 1>of year growth, something that one might be able to

0:05:18.839 --> 0:05:21.240
<v Speaker 1>blame on the end of the opulent post vaccine spending

0:05:21.279 --> 0:05:24.400
<v Speaker 1>we saw across the entire economy, or the spiraling rates

0:05:24.400 --> 0:05:28.680
<v Speaker 1>of inflation seeing world wide. Maybe it could be something else, right,

0:05:29.240 --> 0:05:33.120
<v Speaker 1>and you'd assume, big deal, work this out right, they'll

0:05:33.160 --> 0:05:35.560
<v Speaker 1>recover as the wider economy did. Right.

0:05:37.320 --> 0:05:38.000
<v Speaker 2>Not so much.

0:05:39.120 --> 0:05:42.000
<v Speaker 1>While Google experienced the degree of recovery in its growth rates,

0:05:42.040 --> 0:05:43.960
<v Speaker 1>it took until Q three twenty twenty three to hit

0:05:44.000 --> 0:05:46.840
<v Speaker 1>double digit growth again eleven percent year every year, hitting

0:05:46.880 --> 0:05:48.920
<v Speaker 1>a high of fifteen point four one percent in Q

0:05:48.960 --> 0:05:51.880
<v Speaker 1>two twenty twenty four, before trending down again in Q

0:05:52.000 --> 0:05:56.000
<v Speaker 1>three twenty twenty four to thirteen point five nine percent.

0:05:56.760 --> 0:05:59.239
<v Speaker 1>The reason these numbers are important is that growth drives

0:05:59.360 --> 0:06:02.520
<v Speaker 1>everything at Google, and prabagar Ragavan drove the most consistent

0:06:02.560 --> 0:06:05.600
<v Speaker 1>growth engine in the company, Search, which grew fourteen percent

0:06:05.720 --> 0:06:07.960
<v Speaker 1>year of a year in Q one twenty twenty four,

0:06:09.440 --> 0:06:12.800
<v Speaker 1>right up until he stopped piloting it. The context is

0:06:12.880 --> 0:06:15.440
<v Speaker 1>key to understanding is I don't know if you call

0:06:15.480 --> 0:06:18.200
<v Speaker 1>it a promotion, a demotion, or just a room with

0:06:18.360 --> 0:06:20.440
<v Speaker 1>no door handle on it which they put him in

0:06:20.480 --> 0:06:23.800
<v Speaker 1>every morning. But this title is most assurdedly not a

0:06:23.880 --> 0:06:27.039
<v Speaker 1>chief technology officer or any kind of officer or executive

0:06:27.080 --> 0:06:30.840
<v Speaker 1>at all. Google has, for the most part, enjoyed one

0:06:30.880 --> 0:06:33.640
<v Speaker 1>of the most incredible runs in business history, with almost

0:06:33.680 --> 0:06:37.040
<v Speaker 1>an entire decade of twenty percent year over year growth,

0:06:37.279 --> 0:06:39.679
<v Speaker 1>with a few exceptions such as Q four twenty twelve,

0:06:39.760 --> 0:06:42.560
<v Speaker 1>a few months after Ragavan began at Google, where he

0:06:42.680 --> 0:06:46.120
<v Speaker 1>started in ads to Q three twenty thirteen, a chaotic

0:06:46.160 --> 0:06:48.880
<v Speaker 1>period where Google fell behind Amazon in shopping at revenue,

0:06:48.960 --> 0:06:52.200
<v Speaker 1>bought Motorola Mobility for twelve point five billion dollars and

0:06:52.279 --> 0:06:54.520
<v Speaker 1>by the way, that's sixty three percent more than its

0:06:54.560 --> 0:06:57.600
<v Speaker 1>trading price, and then they saw a fifteen percent year

0:06:57.640 --> 0:06:59.800
<v Speaker 1>of a year decline in pricing for their search hands.

0:07:00.200 --> 0:07:03.160
<v Speaker 1>Google's earnings also leaked early in this period, which was

0:07:03.400 --> 0:07:06.200
<v Speaker 1>not a lot of fun for Google at all. But

0:07:06.279 --> 0:07:09.560
<v Speaker 1>growth is slowing again and it isn't showing any signs

0:07:09.560 --> 0:07:11.840
<v Speaker 1>of returning to the heady days where seventy percent year

0:07:11.880 --> 0:07:15.400
<v Speaker 1>over year growth each quarter was considered bad Google has

0:07:15.440 --> 0:07:18.080
<v Speaker 1>deliberately made its products worse as a means of increasing

0:07:18.120 --> 0:07:21.280
<v Speaker 1>revenue and increasing growth, spawning a trend of both remarkable

0:07:21.400 --> 0:07:25.640
<v Speaker 1>revenue growth and worsening search results. That study exactly when

0:07:25.680 --> 0:07:29.640
<v Speaker 1>Prapagar Ragavan took the wheel. The chart I'm quoting tells

0:07:29.680 --> 0:07:32.760
<v Speaker 1>another story too, though, that twisting Google Search to make

0:07:32.800 --> 0:07:35.440
<v Speaker 1>it more profitable only worked for a little bit before

0:07:35.480 --> 0:07:39.280
<v Speaker 1>growth began to slow again. Recklessness and desperation begets only

0:07:39.320 --> 0:07:42.600
<v Speaker 1>more recklessness and desperation. And you'll notice that Google's aggressive

0:07:42.640 --> 0:07:45.920
<v Speaker 1>push into Ai followed its dismal Q four twenty twenty

0:07:45.920 --> 0:07:48.560
<v Speaker 1>two quarter where it nearly fell into negative growth, and

0:07:48.600 --> 0:07:50.280
<v Speaker 1>when you in factor in inflation.

0:07:49.920 --> 0:07:50.720
<v Speaker 2>It actually did.

0:08:01.040 --> 0:08:03.840
<v Speaker 1>Now if you forgive the mixed metaphors, Google has essentially

0:08:03.880 --> 0:08:06.360
<v Speaker 1>killed its golden ghost Search and now is in the

0:08:06.400 --> 0:08:09.760
<v Speaker 1>process of pawning its eggs to buy decidedly non magical

0:08:09.800 --> 0:08:13.280
<v Speaker 1>beans in this case, I mean data centers and GPUs.

0:08:13.400 --> 0:08:16.200
<v Speaker 1>With Google increasing its capital expenditures in the financial year

0:08:16.200 --> 0:08:19.320
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty four to fifty billion dollars, equivalent to nearly

0:08:19.400 --> 0:08:22.320
<v Speaker 1>double its average CAPEX from twenty nineteen to twenty twenty

0:08:22.360 --> 0:08:26.200
<v Speaker 1>three since becoming head of Search, Ragavan has also become

0:08:26.240 --> 0:08:29.040
<v Speaker 1>the silent leader of most of Google's other revenue centers,

0:08:29.160 --> 0:08:33.560
<v Speaker 1>Google Ads, Google Shopping Maps, and eventually Gemini, Google's chet

0:08:33.559 --> 0:08:37.079
<v Speaker 1>GPT competitor, which might also explain why he's now been

0:08:37.080 --> 0:08:40.960
<v Speaker 1>pought in the naughty chair. You see, twenty twenty four

0:08:41.120 --> 0:08:43.160
<v Speaker 1>wasn't a great year for Google, and it was a

0:08:43.240 --> 0:08:46.880
<v Speaker 1>much worse one for prabagar Ragavan, starting in February when

0:08:46.960 --> 0:08:51.560
<v Speaker 1>Gemini their large language model generated racially diverse Nazis and,

0:08:51.640 --> 0:08:55.000
<v Speaker 1>among other things, a mess that prabagar Ragavan himself had

0:08:55.000 --> 0:08:57.800
<v Speaker 1>to apologize for. This man never pokes his head up,

0:08:58.000 --> 0:09:01.400
<v Speaker 1>but he had to in February. A few months later,

0:09:01.559 --> 0:09:04.520
<v Speaker 1>Google introduced AI powered search summaries that told users to

0:09:04.559 --> 0:09:06.920
<v Speaker 1>eat rocks and put glue on pizza, which only caused

0:09:06.920 --> 0:09:09.760
<v Speaker 1>people to remember exactly how bad Google Search had got

0:09:09.920 --> 0:09:11.920
<v Speaker 1>and laugh at how the only way that Google seemed

0:09:11.920 --> 0:09:14.040
<v Speaker 1>to be able to innovate was to make it worse.

0:09:14.840 --> 0:09:18.280
<v Speaker 1>Ragavan is being replaced by Nick Fox, a former McKinsey

0:09:18.480 --> 0:09:20.840
<v Speaker 1>guy who, in the emails I called attention to in

0:09:20.880 --> 0:09:23.520
<v Speaker 1>the podcast I've been talking about, told Ben Gomes that

0:09:23.559 --> 0:09:26.440
<v Speaker 1>making Google Search more profitable was and I quote the

0:09:26.559 --> 0:09:29.560
<v Speaker 1>new reality of their jobs, to which Ben Gomes responded

0:09:29.600 --> 0:09:31.640
<v Speaker 1>by saying that he was concerned that growth was all

0:09:31.679 --> 0:09:32.920
<v Speaker 1>that Google was thinking about.

0:09:33.640 --> 0:09:36.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, happy, terrible, warn't them now.

0:09:35.960 --> 0:09:39.559
<v Speaker 1>Nick Fox has to quote Google CEO Sandabashi been instrumental

0:09:39.640 --> 0:09:42.480
<v Speaker 1>in shaping Google's AI product road map, which suggests that

0:09:42.559 --> 0:09:45.200
<v Speaker 1>Google is going all in on artificial intelligence at a

0:09:45.240 --> 0:09:47.800
<v Speaker 1>time when developers are struggling to justify using its models

0:09:47.840 --> 0:09:50.160
<v Speaker 1>and are actively mad at both the way in which

0:09:50.200 --> 0:09:52.200
<v Speaker 1>it markets them and the way in which they're integrated

0:09:52.200 --> 0:09:56.120
<v Speaker 1>into Google's other products. I'm hypothesizing here, but I think

0:09:56.200 --> 0:09:58.840
<v Speaker 1>that Google is desperate, and that its earnings on October

0:09:58.880 --> 0:10:00.280
<v Speaker 1>thirtieth likely to make the.

0:10:00.120 --> 0:10:01.480
<v Speaker 2>Street more than a little worried.

0:10:02.080 --> 0:10:05.120
<v Speaker 1>The medium to long term prognosis is likely even worse two,

0:10:05.600 --> 0:10:08.439
<v Speaker 1>As the Wall Street Journal notes, Google's ads business is

0:10:08.480 --> 0:10:10.760
<v Speaker 1>expected to dip below a fifty percent market share in

0:10:10.760 --> 0:10:12.720
<v Speaker 1>the US in the next year for the first time

0:10:12.760 --> 0:10:15.080
<v Speaker 1>in more than a decade, which, by the way, was

0:10:15.440 --> 0:10:17.640
<v Speaker 1>right around where things were kind of bad for them,

0:10:17.840 --> 0:10:22.160
<v Speaker 1>and Google's gratuitous monopoly oversearch and likely ads, by the way,

0:10:22.320 --> 0:10:24.440
<v Speaker 1>is coming to an end. It's not an if, it's

0:10:24.440 --> 0:10:27.920
<v Speaker 1>a when it's more likely that Google sees AIS a

0:10:27.960 --> 0:10:31.080
<v Speaker 1>fundamental part of their future growth, despite the fact that

0:10:31.120 --> 0:10:34.040
<v Speaker 1>this thing only loses money and people really don't like it.

0:10:35.160 --> 0:10:38.320
<v Speaker 1>As part of the Ragavan reorganization, Google is also moving

0:10:38.360 --> 0:10:41.000
<v Speaker 1>the Gemini app team, the one handling the chat GPT

0:10:41.080 --> 0:10:44.280
<v Speaker 1>competitor I've been talking about under AI research group Deep Mind,

0:10:44.360 --> 0:10:46.240
<v Speaker 1>a move that might be kind of smart in the

0:10:46.480 --> 0:10:48.760
<v Speaker 1>hand the AI to the AI people kind of way,

0:10:48.880 --> 0:10:51.400
<v Speaker 1>but also suggests that there's just this degree of disarray

0:10:51.480 --> 0:10:54.400
<v Speaker 1>at the company, and I don't think that's getting better

0:10:54.559 --> 0:10:58.319
<v Speaker 1>in a hurry. You see, Ragavan was powerful and for

0:10:58.400 --> 0:11:01.800
<v Speaker 1>a time successful. He ruled with nine fist, warning employees

0:11:01.840 --> 0:11:04.200
<v Speaker 1>a few months ago to prepare for a different market

0:11:04.240 --> 0:11:07.439
<v Speaker 1>reality because and I quote things were not like they

0:11:07.480 --> 0:11:10.040
<v Speaker 1>were fifteen to twenty years ago. Yeah, back when he

0:11:10.040 --> 0:11:13.160
<v Speaker 1>worked at Yahoo. And he then would proceed to say

0:11:13.160 --> 0:11:15.080
<v Speaker 1>that he was shortening the amount of time that his

0:11:15.160 --> 0:11:17.760
<v Speaker 1>reports would have to work on certain projects, according to

0:11:17.840 --> 0:11:20.640
<v Speaker 1>Jennifer Elius of CNBC, which is exactly the kind of

0:11:20.679 --> 0:11:23.319
<v Speaker 1>move you make when things are going poorly. This also

0:11:23.400 --> 0:11:25.920
<v Speaker 1>kind of reflects things that I've heard from internal Googlers,

0:11:26.040 --> 0:11:28.200
<v Speaker 1>whether the resources are going to AI or they're going

0:11:28.200 --> 0:11:30.640
<v Speaker 1>nowhere else. The same deal with Microsoft. We're in a

0:11:30.679 --> 0:11:34.480
<v Speaker 1>group delusion, folks. It's not brilliant. But let's get back

0:11:34.520 --> 0:11:37.520
<v Speaker 1>to the other fella. Replacing Gragavan is Nick Fox, a

0:11:37.559 --> 0:11:40.000
<v Speaker 1>man who has only worked to either McKinsey or Google.

0:11:40.040 --> 0:11:41.880
<v Speaker 1>And I am not kidding, by the way. He was

0:11:41.920 --> 0:11:43.840
<v Speaker 1>at McKinsey for a few years then has been at

0:11:43.840 --> 0:11:47.800
<v Speaker 1>Google ever since. It's completely bonkers. And I mean, this

0:11:47.960 --> 0:11:50.000
<v Speaker 1>is the kind of move you make putting a guy

0:11:50.120 --> 0:11:52.280
<v Speaker 1>like Nick Fox on top. It's something you do because

0:11:52.280 --> 0:11:54.640
<v Speaker 1>you don't know what to do, and somebody needed to

0:11:54.640 --> 0:11:57.760
<v Speaker 1>get fired or moved into the naughty box. Something had

0:11:57.760 --> 0:12:02.200
<v Speaker 1>to change, and well it was. And what's crazy is

0:12:02.240 --> 0:12:04.360
<v Speaker 1>that you think they'd find a guy with a history

0:12:04.400 --> 0:12:06.560
<v Speaker 1>of success with a product that people love, that's doing

0:12:06.600 --> 0:12:09.120
<v Speaker 1>really well, that's making a bunch of money, right, Well,

0:12:09.160 --> 0:12:12.080
<v Speaker 1>you'd be wrong because Nick Fox is most famous for

0:12:12.160 --> 0:12:15.920
<v Speaker 1>running Google's Assistant business, which if you google how customers

0:12:15.920 --> 0:12:19.240
<v Speaker 1>feel about it. They hate it, and it's really just

0:12:19.360 --> 0:12:22.320
<v Speaker 1>famous for kind of sucking and literally making them no money.

0:12:22.320 --> 0:12:27.400
<v Speaker 1>Google Assistant is a loss loss, lossy, lossy product. It

0:12:27.480 --> 0:12:30.480
<v Speaker 1>loses so much money, like a bunch of other assistant companies.

0:12:30.480 --> 0:12:34.120
<v Speaker 1>Look at Amazon Alexa losing them over ten billion dollars.

0:12:34.120 --> 0:12:37.320
<v Speaker 1>It's ridiculous. This is the guy who's running Google's revenue.

0:12:37.679 --> 0:12:40.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm scared, well, not scared. It would be kind of

0:12:40.160 --> 0:12:43.280
<v Speaker 1>funny if Google started collapsing. I'd enjoy watching. Or I

0:12:43.320 --> 0:12:47.240
<v Speaker 1>don't know, they could make themselves better. Who knows. Anyway,

0:12:48.040 --> 0:12:50.360
<v Speaker 1>I'd argue there's a compelling case that can be made

0:12:50.360 --> 0:12:53.560
<v Speaker 1>that we're watching the slow, painful collapse of this company.

0:12:54.720 --> 0:12:59.040
<v Speaker 1>Google was at one point known for making these transformational,

0:12:59.400 --> 0:13:02.480
<v Speaker 1>beloved products, and then they chose to put people in

0:13:02.600 --> 0:13:04.720
<v Speaker 1>power to make them worse, to make them more money.

0:13:05.240 --> 0:13:08.320
<v Speaker 1>And maybe what we're watching here is kind of the

0:13:08.360 --> 0:13:11.240
<v Speaker 1>net result of the rot economy. When a rot economist

0:13:11.280 --> 0:13:14.040
<v Speaker 1>is given the wheel, you get these early pops when

0:13:14.120 --> 0:13:17.800
<v Speaker 1>things are going well. Number go up, so far, so hard,

0:13:17.920 --> 0:13:21.720
<v Speaker 1>number so good, so big. We love number. But the

0:13:21.800 --> 0:13:24.800
<v Speaker 1>problem is, if you're just destroying the products, if you're

0:13:24.800 --> 0:13:28.040
<v Speaker 1>squeezing your customers, if you're invading their lives more as

0:13:28.040 --> 0:13:30.840
<v Speaker 1>a means of making this money, what do you fall

0:13:30.880 --> 0:13:33.559
<v Speaker 1>back on when growth goes away? How do you inspire

0:13:33.600 --> 0:13:37.319
<v Speaker 1>your customers when things suck ass. The answer is you don't.

0:13:37.640 --> 0:13:41.600
<v Speaker 1>And just like the rest of the hyperscalers, Google has

0:13:41.640 --> 0:13:44.400
<v Speaker 1>not had a meaningful new product in over a decade,

0:13:44.480 --> 0:13:47.439
<v Speaker 1>and its most meaningful acquisition in years involved paying two

0:13:47.480 --> 0:13:51.120
<v Speaker 1>point seven billion dollars to buy Character to Ai to

0:13:51.360 --> 0:13:54.040
<v Speaker 1>hire back a guy who quit because he was mad

0:13:54.080 --> 0:13:56.360
<v Speaker 1>that Google wouldn't release an early version of a large

0:13:56.400 --> 0:13:58.959
<v Speaker 1>language model in twenty twenty or twenty twenty one. It's

0:13:59.040 --> 0:14:02.240
<v Speaker 1>unclear when that happened, and non Shazier was sudden they

0:14:02.240 --> 0:14:05.200
<v Speaker 1>shouldn't have let go, But at the same time, it's like,

0:14:06.040 --> 0:14:09.400
<v Speaker 1>is this guy really going to turn things around? Seriously,

0:14:09.600 --> 0:14:11.960
<v Speaker 1>Google is just a company bereft of vision, and they're

0:14:12.000 --> 0:14:14.920
<v Speaker 1>incapable of making money without their monopolies, and they're just

0:14:15.000 --> 0:14:18.560
<v Speaker 1>flailing wildly in the hopes that's copying everybody else's shit

0:14:18.640 --> 0:14:22.560
<v Speaker 1>will make them good, will save them from perdition, or

0:14:22.720 --> 0:14:26.320
<v Speaker 1>maybe stop the Department of Justice breaking them up, which

0:14:26.320 --> 0:14:28.960
<v Speaker 1>is I think is going to happen, albeit it might

0:14:29.000 --> 0:14:32.560
<v Speaker 1>take a while. No, Google is exactly the monster that

0:14:32.640 --> 0:14:35.080
<v Speaker 1>Sundar Pashai and Propagar Ragavan wanted it to be.

0:14:35.440 --> 0:14:36.960
<v Speaker 2>This lumbering, ugly.

0:14:36.760 --> 0:14:40.000
<v Speaker 1>Private equity vehicle that uses its crooked money machine to

0:14:40.040 --> 0:14:43.200
<v Speaker 1>demolish smaller players, except there are no more hyper growth

0:14:43.240 --> 0:14:45.920
<v Speaker 1>markets left to throw the billions at, and now they're

0:14:45.960 --> 0:14:48.760
<v Speaker 1>left with generative AI, a technology that lacks any mass

0:14:48.760 --> 0:14:53.120
<v Speaker 1>market utility and burns cash with every single prompt. I

0:14:53.200 --> 0:14:55.480
<v Speaker 1>know it's a bit dramatic to suggest that we're watching

0:14:55.520 --> 0:14:58.120
<v Speaker 1>Google die, but I've done it with Facebook, so why

0:14:58.160 --> 0:15:03.240
<v Speaker 1>not today? Seriously, Probagar Ragavan's time at Google coming to

0:15:03.280 --> 0:15:05.480
<v Speaker 1>an end is a sign that they've realized that something

0:15:05.560 --> 0:15:08.080
<v Speaker 1>is broken, that they know something has to change. But

0:15:08.120 --> 0:15:10.600
<v Speaker 1>it also is a sign that this company doesn't know

0:15:10.680 --> 0:15:13.520
<v Speaker 1>what has to change because they put a fucking McKinsey

0:15:13.520 --> 0:15:15.560
<v Speaker 1>guy at the top. And yes, I know he's more

0:15:15.600 --> 0:15:17.840
<v Speaker 1>a Google guy than a McKinsey guy. But if you

0:15:17.840 --> 0:15:19.400
<v Speaker 1>look back at the emails, and I will link to

0:15:19.440 --> 0:15:21.600
<v Speaker 1>them in the notes, you will see that Nick Fox

0:15:21.680 --> 0:15:23.560
<v Speaker 1>was not on the side of Ben Gomes or shashy

0:15:23.600 --> 0:15:26.400
<v Speaker 1>Thakha and the people trying to save Google Search from

0:15:26.400 --> 0:15:29.800
<v Speaker 1>the rot economists. No, Nick Fox is as much. He's

0:15:29.840 --> 0:15:32.280
<v Speaker 1>just as bad as Probagar Ragavan, except he has a

0:15:32.320 --> 0:15:36.480
<v Speaker 1>worse tenure at Google. Google Assistant sucks. It's not a

0:15:36.480 --> 0:15:40.200
<v Speaker 1>great product. They're shoving AI into it. I get emails

0:15:40.240 --> 0:15:41.920
<v Speaker 1>every week from someone saying, can you do a thing

0:15:41.960 --> 0:15:45.040
<v Speaker 1>on Google Assistant. I don't want to, because all I'd

0:15:45.080 --> 0:15:47.800
<v Speaker 1>be saying for half an hour is Google Assistant is crap.

0:15:48.040 --> 0:15:51.320
<v Speaker 1>Google Assistant is getting worse. Everyone's mad at Google Assistant.

0:15:51.520 --> 0:15:54.360
<v Speaker 1>Why is Google Assistant so bad? And the well, I

0:15:54.360 --> 0:15:56.480
<v Speaker 1>actually don't have an answer for that. But I do

0:15:56.520 --> 0:15:59.560
<v Speaker 1>have an answer for who's running all of Google's stuff now,

0:15:59.680 --> 0:16:02.120
<v Speaker 1>who's running Google Search and a bunch of other things.

0:16:02.280 --> 0:16:05.120
<v Speaker 1>It's the guy who made the extremely unprofitable thing that

0:16:05.120 --> 0:16:07.960
<v Speaker 1>people hate, that's an also ran of other companies.

0:16:08.040 --> 0:16:08.280
<v Speaker 2>Shit.

0:16:09.200 --> 0:16:12.520
<v Speaker 1>That is the guy in charge now. And I just

0:16:12.640 --> 0:16:16.160
<v Speaker 1>believe that Google is falling apart at the seams. Google

0:16:16.200 --> 0:16:18.560
<v Speaker 1>does not know what to do anymore. And I'm really

0:16:18.600 --> 0:16:21.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to tail gave the October thirtieth earnings. I'm

0:16:21.920 --> 0:16:24.040
<v Speaker 1>going to crack a beer. I'm going to listen to

0:16:24.080 --> 0:16:26.360
<v Speaker 1>the call. It's going to be very exciting because I

0:16:26.360 --> 0:16:28.080
<v Speaker 1>don't think it's going to be very good at all.

0:16:28.320 --> 0:16:30.720
<v Speaker 1>They're going to try put lipstick on the pig. They're

0:16:30.760 --> 0:16:32.960
<v Speaker 1>going to try and claim this growth in AI and

0:16:33.000 --> 0:16:34.920
<v Speaker 1>maybe I'm wrong. Maybe I look like a bell end

0:16:34.960 --> 0:16:37.760
<v Speaker 1>for the eight hundredth time in my life, but I

0:16:37.760 --> 0:16:40.680
<v Speaker 1>don't think I am, and I think we're in probably

0:16:40.680 --> 0:16:43.320
<v Speaker 1>one of the most interesting, exciting and horrible eras of

0:16:43.360 --> 0:16:45.760
<v Speaker 1>tech so far, where we're going to watch one of

0:16:45.800 --> 0:16:48.880
<v Speaker 1>these companies collapse. And collapsing might not be as neat

0:16:48.920 --> 0:16:52.200
<v Speaker 1>as the whole company dies, but the fracturing, the talent,

0:16:52.400 --> 0:16:55.240
<v Speaker 1>the brain drain, you're watching it happen now. We've been

0:16:55.280 --> 0:16:58.000
<v Speaker 1>watching it for years. And the results well, I mean,

0:16:58.040 --> 0:17:00.520
<v Speaker 1>look at Google Search, look at Google's products. How bad

0:17:00.560 --> 0:17:04.720
<v Speaker 1>they are now? And that's the thing. You think that

0:17:04.760 --> 0:17:08.919
<v Speaker 1>these companies can't die, And it's probably because dying is

0:17:09.119 --> 0:17:13.040
<v Speaker 1>a relative term for them. You're watching the disease work

0:17:13.080 --> 0:17:15.600
<v Speaker 1>through Google as we speak. Prabagar leaving is not a

0:17:15.600 --> 0:17:17.600
<v Speaker 1>good thing for the company. It's just the sign that

0:17:17.640 --> 0:17:19.800
<v Speaker 1>they don't know what to do. And we're watching the

0:17:19.840 --> 0:17:23.760
<v Speaker 1>fall of Rome. We really are, I'm sure of it.

0:17:23.760 --> 0:17:26.640
<v Speaker 1>It might take ten years, but it will be fascinating

0:17:26.640 --> 0:17:29.040
<v Speaker 1>to watch and fascinating to tell you about. And it's

0:17:29.080 --> 0:17:31.520
<v Speaker 1>been my pleasure to tell you about. How much of

0:17:31.560 --> 0:17:34.199
<v Speaker 1>it you can credit to Prabagar Ragavan the man who

0:17:34.280 --> 0:17:45.560
<v Speaker 1>destroyed Google Search. Thank you for listening to Better Offline.

0:17:45.680 --> 0:17:48.120
<v Speaker 1>The editor and composer of the Better Offline theme song

0:17:48.200 --> 0:17:50.840
<v Speaker 1>is Matasowski. You can check out more of his music

0:17:50.880 --> 0:17:54.359
<v Speaker 1>and audio projects at Mattasowski dot com, m A. T.

0:17:54.520 --> 0:17:59.560
<v Speaker 1>T OsO w Ski dot com. You can email me

0:17:59.600 --> 0:18:02.240
<v Speaker 1>at easy at Better offline dot com or visit Better

0:18:02.240 --> 0:18:04.720
<v Speaker 1>Offline dot com to find more podcast links and of course,

0:18:04.720 --> 0:18:07.840
<v Speaker 1>my newsletter. I also really recommend you go to chat

0:18:07.880 --> 0:18:10.520
<v Speaker 1>dot Where's youread dot at to visit the discord, and

0:18:10.560 --> 0:18:11.880
<v Speaker 1>go to our slash Better.

0:18:11.680 --> 0:18:14.840
<v Speaker 2>Offline to check out I'll Reddit. Thank you so much

0:18:14.880 --> 0:18:15.399
<v Speaker 2>for listening.

0:18:16.240 --> 0:18:18.919
<v Speaker 3>Better Offline is a production of cool Zone Media. For

0:18:19.040 --> 0:18:22.200
<v Speaker 3>more from cool Zone Media, visit our website cool Zonemedia

0:18:22.280 --> 0:18:25.120
<v Speaker 3>dot com, or check us out on the iHeartRadio app,

0:18:25.160 --> 0:18:27.840
<v Speaker 3>Apple Podcasts, or wherever you get your podcasts.