WEBVTT - What is Justice?

0:00:03.240 --> 0:00:05.440
<v Speaker 1>If you will place your left hand on the Bible

0:00:05.559 --> 0:00:08.920
<v Speaker 1>and raise your right hand, and please repeat after me

0:00:09.200 --> 0:00:13.440
<v Speaker 1>and I do solemnly swear, then titled action find the

0:00:13.480 --> 0:00:16.840
<v Speaker 1>defendant guilty of the time. It makes no sense, it

0:00:16.880 --> 0:00:20.639
<v Speaker 1>doesn't fit. If it doesn't fit, you must equit. We

0:00:20.680 --> 0:00:22.840
<v Speaker 1>all took the same of the office. We are all

0:00:22.880 --> 0:00:26.480
<v Speaker 1>bound by that common commitment to support and defend the Constitution,

0:00:26.760 --> 0:00:29.360
<v Speaker 1>to bear true faith and allegiance to the same that

0:00:29.480 --> 0:00:32.199
<v Speaker 1>you faithfully discharge the duties of our office. Do you

0:00:32.240 --> 0:00:35.480
<v Speaker 1>solemnly swear or affirm that the testimony you are about

0:00:35.520 --> 0:00:37.640
<v Speaker 1>to give will be the truth, the whole truth, and

0:00:37.720 --> 0:00:41.640
<v Speaker 1>nothing but the truth. From Tenderfoot TV and I Heart Radio,

0:00:42.200 --> 0:00:53.280
<v Speaker 1>this is Sworn. I'm your host Philip Holloway. I viewed

0:00:53.320 --> 0:01:01.920
<v Speaker 1>justice as being a collection of people assesses any laws

0:01:03.440 --> 0:01:07.480
<v Speaker 1>that has to be executed by human beings. Until we

0:01:07.520 --> 0:01:12.160
<v Speaker 1>can remove the human being aspect out of it. We're

0:01:12.200 --> 0:01:15.440
<v Speaker 1>not going to have perfection, But it is my hope,

0:01:16.160 --> 0:01:20.240
<v Speaker 1>my desire, my dream, if you will that we continue

0:01:20.280 --> 0:01:25.880
<v Speaker 1>to evolve. Technology evolves, our way of thinking evolves, crime

0:01:26.000 --> 0:01:32.200
<v Speaker 1>fighting tools evolved. A lot of people in society believe

0:01:32.880 --> 0:01:36.720
<v Speaker 1>they may not have anything to contribute to our legal

0:01:36.760 --> 0:01:40.640
<v Speaker 1>system because they're not attorneys, they're not police, they're not

0:01:40.760 --> 0:01:45.360
<v Speaker 1>district attorneys. But we as citizens all play a role.

0:01:46.000 --> 0:01:47.920
<v Speaker 1>So what I would like to tell the general public

0:01:48.960 --> 0:01:52.880
<v Speaker 1>is that when you sit on a jury, please take

0:01:52.920 --> 0:01:55.600
<v Speaker 1>it seriously. A lot of the compics will tell you

0:01:56.320 --> 0:02:01.760
<v Speaker 1>never trust your life. The twelve People wants smart enough

0:02:01.840 --> 0:02:07.600
<v Speaker 1>to get off of Jerry. They're wrong. Jerry duty serious business.

0:02:08.200 --> 0:02:13.480
<v Speaker 1>Jerry duty can save an innocent person from being incarcerated.

0:02:14.080 --> 0:02:21.840
<v Speaker 1>Jerry duty can punish derightfully guilty. Please take Jerry Duty seriously.

0:02:30.240 --> 0:02:33.720
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the season finale of Sworn. We have been

0:02:33.720 --> 0:02:37.120
<v Speaker 1>extremely fortunate to talk to some amazing people this season,

0:02:37.680 --> 0:02:43.000
<v Speaker 1>and everything has centered around one central question. What is justice.

0:02:44.080 --> 0:02:47.040
<v Speaker 1>This may sound like a simple question, but it's not

0:02:47.200 --> 0:02:50.960
<v Speaker 1>a question that can easily be answered in absolute terms.

0:02:52.000 --> 0:02:54.360
<v Speaker 1>In this episode, we're going to look back to the

0:02:54.400 --> 0:02:57.639
<v Speaker 1>people who have shared their stories and their expertise with us,

0:02:58.200 --> 0:03:00.880
<v Speaker 1>and from each of their unique person actives, we will

0:03:00.919 --> 0:03:04.600
<v Speaker 1>do our best to tell you what justice really is.

0:03:07.200 --> 0:03:09.880
<v Speaker 1>We'll start with the exonorees we spoke to early in

0:03:09.880 --> 0:03:13.840
<v Speaker 1>the season. They know personally what it feels like to

0:03:13.960 --> 0:03:17.960
<v Speaker 1>be denied justice. At the beginning of the episode, you

0:03:18.040 --> 0:03:23.040
<v Speaker 1>heard from Joe Diaz, the man from the Eyewitness Testimony episode.

0:03:24.160 --> 0:03:28.080
<v Speaker 1>Joe was wrongfully convicted and served eight years for a

0:03:28.160 --> 0:03:31.880
<v Speaker 1>sexual assault he did not commit. The next voice is

0:03:31.960 --> 0:03:36.160
<v Speaker 1>William Dylon. William is from our episode on Polygraphs and

0:03:36.240 --> 0:03:40.840
<v Speaker 1>sent Dogs, who was wrongfully incarcerated for twenty seven years

0:03:41.280 --> 0:03:45.320
<v Speaker 1>for a murder he did not commit. Justice means truth,

0:03:46.000 --> 0:03:50.800
<v Speaker 1>that's all it means. It doesn't mean getting something for something.

0:03:51.040 --> 0:03:56.840
<v Speaker 1>Justice only means truth to me. This is Bill Richards

0:03:56.880 --> 0:04:01.120
<v Speaker 1>from the Bite Marks episode. Bill sir twenty three years

0:04:01.240 --> 0:04:05.400
<v Speaker 1>in a California prison after he found his wife murdered.

0:04:05.760 --> 0:04:11.280
<v Speaker 1>Police still have not found the real killer. Justice to

0:04:11.400 --> 0:04:14.839
<v Speaker 1>me would be punishing the people who did to me,

0:04:15.360 --> 0:04:17.400
<v Speaker 1>because it would stop him from doing it to other people.

0:04:17.600 --> 0:04:19.960
<v Speaker 1>It's not that I'm bengeful, It's just that the only

0:04:20.000 --> 0:04:23.120
<v Speaker 1>way to stoft people is to see justice, and then

0:04:23.240 --> 0:04:26.200
<v Speaker 1>justice would be if they actually went after I found

0:04:26.240 --> 0:04:28.919
<v Speaker 1>who did this to my wife. But justice would be

0:04:28.960 --> 0:04:34.520
<v Speaker 1>punishing the right person and stopping people doing this like

0:04:34.600 --> 0:04:37.680
<v Speaker 1>what happened to me. I don't believe any person went

0:04:37.800 --> 0:04:40.680
<v Speaker 1>to prison who was innocent without some kind of misconduct

0:04:40.880 --> 0:04:42.640
<v Speaker 1>and that needs to be stopped. And the way to

0:04:42.680 --> 0:04:44.960
<v Speaker 1>stop that is you need to punish the people doing

0:04:45.000 --> 0:04:48.880
<v Speaker 1>it so the next guy doesn't do it. Lastly, we

0:04:48.960 --> 0:04:52.960
<v Speaker 1>have Calvin Johnson from the episode on racial bias. Calvin,

0:04:52.960 --> 0:04:56.039
<v Speaker 1>who is an African American was convicted by an all

0:04:56.120 --> 0:05:01.360
<v Speaker 1>whiet jury and wrongfully served sixteen year of a life sentence.

0:05:02.480 --> 0:05:04.919
<v Speaker 1>But what was this justice being to me? Probably the

0:05:04.920 --> 0:05:10.120
<v Speaker 1>same thing everybody else said, just uf If the word

0:05:10.200 --> 0:05:13.440
<v Speaker 1>justice will actually taken into exact content as the way

0:05:13.480 --> 0:05:17.280
<v Speaker 1>it should be, it means fair, equal quality for all

0:05:17.400 --> 0:05:21.800
<v Speaker 1>human beings. The problem is is just the justice system itself.

0:05:22.240 --> 0:05:26.160
<v Speaker 1>It's not justice because of the flaws. Therefore, it's not

0:05:26.839 --> 0:05:32.400
<v Speaker 1>equal equality for all citizens. Its inequality for its citizens

0:05:32.400 --> 0:05:36.800
<v Speaker 1>based on who they may be. Lower income people that

0:05:36.960 --> 0:05:39.359
<v Speaker 1>don't have the money to have to be able to

0:05:39.360 --> 0:05:42.480
<v Speaker 1>fight against the justice system that has all the odds

0:05:42.640 --> 0:05:46.080
<v Speaker 1>and all the policies and procedures stacked up against you.

0:05:47.240 --> 0:05:51.440
<v Speaker 1>It's against uh, the minorities. So it's just when you

0:05:51.480 --> 0:05:55.600
<v Speaker 1>look at it like that, the word justice does not

0:05:56.080 --> 0:06:01.279
<v Speaker 1>being honored and portrayed or fulfilled to be the truth.

0:06:02.360 --> 0:06:05.039
<v Speaker 1>Just as the United States right now really doesn't exist

0:06:05.320 --> 0:06:10.520
<v Speaker 1>except for rare cases. During our episode on Calvin's case,

0:06:10.680 --> 0:06:14.359
<v Speaker 1>we spoke with Molly Palmer. Molly is an attorney and

0:06:14.480 --> 0:06:18.479
<v Speaker 1>board member of the Georgia Innocence Project. In our interview

0:06:18.480 --> 0:06:21.320
<v Speaker 1>with Molly, we told her how Calvin has answered this

0:06:21.400 --> 0:06:26.679
<v Speaker 1>question about justice, that justice is just us. She said

0:06:26.720 --> 0:06:30.440
<v Speaker 1>that kind of insight is common among the Axonorees she

0:06:30.560 --> 0:06:34.000
<v Speaker 1>works with. You know, one of the things in working

0:06:34.040 --> 0:06:38.960
<v Speaker 1>with Axonorees, you know, they're never better. They spend so

0:06:39.000 --> 0:06:42.880
<v Speaker 1>many years behind bars, and they emerge grateful and happy

0:06:42.920 --> 0:06:46.479
<v Speaker 1>to have whatever life they have left. And at the

0:06:46.520 --> 0:06:48.360
<v Speaker 1>same time, you know, I think that there there are

0:06:48.360 --> 0:06:51.480
<v Speaker 1>certain things that they say that really gets to the

0:06:51.520 --> 0:06:55.840
<v Speaker 1>heart of their experience. Calvin is so gracious and such

0:06:55.880 --> 0:06:58.960
<v Speaker 1>a lovely man, but that kind of statement is so

0:06:59.080 --> 0:07:03.240
<v Speaker 1>heavy because as what it's saying is, so long as

0:07:03.320 --> 0:07:06.880
<v Speaker 1>you have a wrongfully imprisoned man, a single one man

0:07:07.000 --> 0:07:09.640
<v Speaker 1>or woman, so long as there is one person that

0:07:09.720 --> 0:07:14.000
<v Speaker 1>the system has failed, it's not justice. It just can't be.

0:07:15.840 --> 0:07:19.440
<v Speaker 1>I believe that justice does not look for the guilty,

0:07:19.440 --> 0:07:24.200
<v Speaker 1>it looks for the innocent. This is Dr Joel Zibet

0:07:24.400 --> 0:07:28.920
<v Speaker 1>from our episode on lethal injection. Justice is something that

0:07:29.000 --> 0:07:31.880
<v Speaker 1>you need to test on the people you despise. Justice

0:07:31.920 --> 0:07:34.840
<v Speaker 1>is the thing that works for people that we hate

0:07:35.240 --> 0:07:39.720
<v Speaker 1>and that we can't stand. And justice is about the

0:07:39.880 --> 0:07:44.640
<v Speaker 1>fair distribution of the way that people are brought forth

0:07:44.680 --> 0:07:47.800
<v Speaker 1>to trial, of what their punishment should look like, of

0:07:47.840 --> 0:07:52.120
<v Speaker 1>how society should look. There is this problem in America

0:07:52.320 --> 0:07:55.600
<v Speaker 1>with too many people incarcerated. There's two point two million

0:07:55.960 --> 0:07:59.440
<v Speaker 1>people in this country are in prisons. We stand out

0:07:59.480 --> 0:08:03.160
<v Speaker 1>in civil societies to have this many people incarcerated, and

0:08:03.200 --> 0:08:06.160
<v Speaker 1>so there's a talk about trying to reduce incarceration rate

0:08:06.160 --> 0:08:09.040
<v Speaker 1>and trying to find alternatives. You know, it's interesting too

0:08:09.120 --> 0:08:13.120
<v Speaker 1>because it's complicated. I'll give you an example. Jesse Smollett

0:08:13.720 --> 0:08:18.040
<v Speaker 1>in Chicago. It's unclear what happened there. Something strange happened.

0:08:18.320 --> 0:08:21.520
<v Speaker 1>He seemed to be involved in it. Now the question

0:08:21.560 --> 0:08:23.760
<v Speaker 1>is to how to punish him. And so it turned

0:08:23.760 --> 0:08:27.480
<v Speaker 1>out that his punishment was to do community service of

0:08:27.520 --> 0:08:30.800
<v Speaker 1>some sort, which, if I think of it, seems perfectly

0:08:30.800 --> 0:08:33.959
<v Speaker 1>reasonable to me, Like what does it matter? Why should

0:08:33.960 --> 0:08:37.679
<v Speaker 1>a person like that go to prison? And yet people

0:08:37.720 --> 0:08:42.360
<v Speaker 1>are very outraged that he didn't go to prison, that

0:08:42.559 --> 0:08:45.880
<v Speaker 1>the district attorney, I think dropped the charges because some

0:08:46.000 --> 0:08:50.440
<v Speaker 1>other deal was made. And so I think that our

0:08:50.480 --> 0:08:53.959
<v Speaker 1>desire for what we think is justice, or the need

0:08:54.040 --> 0:08:57.760
<v Speaker 1>to incarcerate people, I think runs pretty deep in America

0:08:57.840 --> 0:09:01.520
<v Speaker 1>these days. And until we get over this need to

0:09:01.600 --> 0:09:06.920
<v Speaker 1>incarceraate everybody, I think that what really we would consider

0:09:06.960 --> 0:09:10.760
<v Speaker 1>to be a just society is still often the distance.

0:09:11.720 --> 0:09:15.439
<v Speaker 1>So to me, justice doesn't look like putting everybody in prison.

0:09:16.400 --> 0:09:19.120
<v Speaker 1>And I think also the justice requires telling the story

0:09:19.160 --> 0:09:23.360
<v Speaker 1>of the defense as well as the prosecution. The media

0:09:23.440 --> 0:09:27.559
<v Speaker 1>and television is fascinated by the stories of the prosecution,

0:09:28.080 --> 0:09:32.760
<v Speaker 1>and there's very little stories about the defense. I believe

0:09:32.840 --> 0:09:35.920
<v Speaker 1>that people should be innocent until proven guilty. I believe

0:09:36.000 --> 0:09:39.400
<v Speaker 1>that they should not be prejudged, and I think that

0:09:39.480 --> 0:09:42.160
<v Speaker 1>these are necessary parts of a just system. A just

0:09:42.400 --> 0:09:47.319
<v Speaker 1>system is open and honest and accountable and available. So

0:09:47.520 --> 0:09:54.160
<v Speaker 1>that's my view of justice. Here's Amelia Maxfield, a forensic

0:09:54.200 --> 0:10:00.320
<v Speaker 1>specialist for the Pennsylvania Innocence Project. From my specific stand point,

0:10:00.400 --> 0:10:06.560
<v Speaker 1>what justice means now is finality. Our system preferences the

0:10:06.640 --> 0:10:11.559
<v Speaker 1>resolution of cases over getting it right. That is written

0:10:11.679 --> 0:10:14.360
<v Speaker 1>in our case law, in our precedent. It's more important

0:10:14.800 --> 0:10:17.760
<v Speaker 1>for a case to be over then for the right

0:10:17.800 --> 0:10:20.920
<v Speaker 1>person to be in prison or even on death row,

0:10:21.040 --> 0:10:24.000
<v Speaker 1>or even executed for that crime. And I think that

0:10:24.000 --> 0:10:27.079
<v Speaker 1>plays out across the system in the pressure to plead

0:10:27.080 --> 0:10:30.600
<v Speaker 1>guilty to small misdemeanors in order to not inconvenience the

0:10:30.640 --> 0:10:34.640
<v Speaker 1>court by having a trial. Our system is just designed

0:10:34.640 --> 0:10:39.280
<v Speaker 1>to grind people through, from misdemeanor convictions to homicide cases.

0:10:39.760 --> 0:10:42.240
<v Speaker 1>We just want resolution, We just wanted to be over.

0:10:42.679 --> 0:10:44.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't believe that should be a principle of any

0:10:44.760 --> 0:10:48.360
<v Speaker 1>justice system. That may have made sense when we didn't

0:10:48.400 --> 0:10:51.560
<v Speaker 1>have DNA testing, when we didn't have evolving science, but

0:10:51.960 --> 0:10:55.000
<v Speaker 1>science inherently evolved, and if you're going to be using

0:10:55.040 --> 0:10:59.320
<v Speaker 1>evidence that changes and developed to secure conviction, you have

0:10:59.440 --> 0:11:02.800
<v Speaker 1>to be open into revisiting that conviction as the science

0:11:02.880 --> 0:11:06.840
<v Speaker 1>or the evidence changes and evolved. The justice system should

0:11:06.920 --> 0:11:12.160
<v Speaker 1>preference getting it right over having it resolved. I think

0:11:12.200 --> 0:11:14.320
<v Speaker 1>it should be much more important to be sure that

0:11:14.360 --> 0:11:18.120
<v Speaker 1>the evidence that's being used is reliable and valid and accurate,

0:11:18.640 --> 0:11:22.800
<v Speaker 1>rather than just securing a conviction and resolving a case

0:11:23.040 --> 0:11:28.160
<v Speaker 1>just to have it resolved. Here's Justin Brooks, the director

0:11:28.200 --> 0:11:31.840
<v Speaker 1>and co founder of the California Innocence Project, pointing out

0:11:31.880 --> 0:11:36.520
<v Speaker 1>how different economic factors can affect justice. Well, that's where

0:11:36.559 --> 0:11:39.360
<v Speaker 1>we start seeing the separation of rich from poor in

0:11:39.480 --> 0:11:42.320
<v Speaker 1>terms of getting the amount of justice you can afford.

0:11:42.760 --> 0:11:46.960
<v Speaker 1>The defense attorney can obviously ask the judge for those resources,

0:11:47.240 --> 0:11:50.720
<v Speaker 1>can petition to get those experts, but every county in

0:11:50.720 --> 0:11:53.120
<v Speaker 1>America has limits on that, and it will depend on

0:11:53.520 --> 0:11:55.880
<v Speaker 1>what the county budget is and how much they allocate

0:11:55.920 --> 0:11:58.200
<v Speaker 1>to experts, and whether the judge thinks you need it

0:11:58.280 --> 0:12:01.120
<v Speaker 1>or not. But those decisions is won't be left up

0:12:01.160 --> 0:12:04.800
<v Speaker 1>to you, the defendant if you're indigent, and a lot

0:12:04.840 --> 0:12:07.199
<v Speaker 1>of times your lawyer won't be able to get the

0:12:07.240 --> 0:12:10.959
<v Speaker 1>resources they need. What I've seen in California, which is interesting,

0:12:10.960 --> 0:12:14.120
<v Speaker 1>which I think is counterintuitive for most people, is that

0:12:14.240 --> 0:12:18.360
<v Speaker 1>almost all our exonerations came from cases where private lawyers

0:12:18.360 --> 0:12:21.000
<v Speaker 1>were handling the case that we're either appointed by the

0:12:21.040 --> 0:12:25.480
<v Speaker 1>court or retained, and very few cases where there were

0:12:25.480 --> 0:12:29.160
<v Speaker 1>public defenders. And I think it's because in public defender cases,

0:12:29.440 --> 0:12:35.560
<v Speaker 1>the public defenders have training, experience, supervisors, and probably most

0:12:35.600 --> 0:12:40.000
<v Speaker 1>importantly in my cases, access to investigators, where sometimes you

0:12:40.040 --> 0:12:42.640
<v Speaker 1>have private attorneys that are very small offices don't have

0:12:42.679 --> 0:12:45.719
<v Speaker 1>a lot of resources. The families come forward with all

0:12:45.760 --> 0:12:48.760
<v Speaker 1>the money they have, and it's still not enough to

0:12:48.880 --> 0:12:52.200
<v Speaker 1>put together a good defense, and so they might go

0:12:52.280 --> 0:12:55.720
<v Speaker 1>a little short on the investigation or retaining experts or

0:12:55.760 --> 0:12:59.080
<v Speaker 1>doing things like that, whereas public defenders offices often do

0:12:59.120 --> 0:13:01.600
<v Speaker 1>a better job on that. And I think the general

0:13:01.640 --> 0:13:04.640
<v Speaker 1>public thinks the opposite is true, that you're always better

0:13:04.640 --> 0:13:06.880
<v Speaker 1>with a private lawyer than you are a public defender.

0:13:07.440 --> 0:13:10.319
<v Speaker 1>And again I'm not saying there's not amazing private lawyers

0:13:10.360 --> 0:13:13.240
<v Speaker 1>out there with amazing law firms, and when they have

0:13:13.360 --> 0:13:16.720
<v Speaker 1>the right resources and people can compensate them, that they

0:13:16.800 --> 0:13:19.559
<v Speaker 1>aren't the best. But I think the problem is in

0:13:19.600 --> 0:13:23.280
<v Speaker 1>the middle. Where are you better off having a lawyer

0:13:23.320 --> 0:13:25.640
<v Speaker 1>without that much experience who as a private lawyer who

0:13:25.640 --> 0:13:28.520
<v Speaker 1>has no supervision and no investigators. Are you better off

0:13:28.559 --> 0:13:31.400
<v Speaker 1>getting a public offender to represent you? And I think

0:13:31.440 --> 0:13:33.760
<v Speaker 1>often when you don't have any resources, you're better off

0:13:33.760 --> 0:13:38.560
<v Speaker 1>with the public defender. The systems are so different county

0:13:38.600 --> 0:13:42.040
<v Speaker 1>to county. I worked as a quarter pointed lawyer in Michigan,

0:13:42.760 --> 0:13:44.480
<v Speaker 1>and I give you an example of a thing that

0:13:44.520 --> 0:13:47.560
<v Speaker 1>just denies people due process is when I did it

0:13:47.559 --> 0:13:51.120
<v Speaker 1>in Lansing, Michigan, I would get paid per case and

0:13:51.120 --> 0:13:53.680
<v Speaker 1>it was a flat fee. When I did it in

0:13:53.800 --> 0:13:57.240
<v Speaker 1>in Arbor, Michigan, I got paid by the hour. And

0:13:57.280 --> 0:13:59.560
<v Speaker 1>so if I took a case to trial in Lansing,

0:14:00.080 --> 0:14:02.080
<v Speaker 1>I would still get the same amount of money as

0:14:02.120 --> 0:14:04.120
<v Speaker 1>if I played it out, And if I took a

0:14:04.120 --> 0:14:06.360
<v Speaker 1>case to trial in ann Arbor, I would get paid

0:14:06.360 --> 0:14:09.040
<v Speaker 1>for all those trial hours. So what's going to happen

0:14:09.240 --> 0:14:11.719
<v Speaker 1>when people are running businesses and have to pay their

0:14:11.760 --> 0:14:14.400
<v Speaker 1>mortgage and pay for their kids schooling and all that.

0:14:15.080 --> 0:14:18.280
<v Speaker 1>We actually set a system up where it makes it

0:14:18.360 --> 0:14:22.200
<v Speaker 1>very difficult for lawyers to provide the same services. And

0:14:22.320 --> 0:14:25.640
<v Speaker 1>in California we have some of these crazy contracts out

0:14:25.680 --> 0:14:28.680
<v Speaker 1>in some of the smaller counties where one lawyer will

0:14:28.720 --> 0:14:32.720
<v Speaker 1>contract for the entire indigent defense work for the year

0:14:33.200 --> 0:14:36.360
<v Speaker 1>for the county. And now they're running a business that

0:14:36.440 --> 0:14:39.600
<v Speaker 1>gets a contract, and the more money they spend, the

0:14:39.720 --> 0:14:42.800
<v Speaker 1>less money they make on that contract. And this is

0:14:42.880 --> 0:14:46.320
<v Speaker 1>not good and it's it's crazy that within the same country,

0:14:46.360 --> 0:14:50.480
<v Speaker 1>with the same sixth Amendment the Federal Constitution, there's such

0:14:50.840 --> 0:14:56.000
<v Speaker 1>varying quality and resources on the defense side of the work.

0:14:56.080 --> 0:14:58.760
<v Speaker 1>And that's true not only just state to state, but

0:14:58.880 --> 0:15:02.120
<v Speaker 1>county by county within the same state. Because if what's

0:15:02.120 --> 0:15:05.280
<v Speaker 1>all about is getting the truth, and those resources will

0:15:05.320 --> 0:15:07.880
<v Speaker 1>assist the fact finder and getting to the truth, and

0:15:07.880 --> 0:15:09.680
<v Speaker 1>there should be no question about it. It shouldn't be

0:15:09.720 --> 0:15:14.000
<v Speaker 1>about well, he shouldn't get it. It should be about, well,

0:15:14.040 --> 0:15:17.240
<v Speaker 1>this best assist us in finding out the truth. It's

0:15:17.240 --> 0:15:20.120
<v Speaker 1>in all our best interests that innocent people aren't convicted

0:15:20.120 --> 0:15:24.400
<v Speaker 1>and that guilty people are and if providing additional resources

0:15:24.440 --> 0:15:43.600
<v Speaker 1>gets us there, it should happen. Here's retired judge and

0:15:43.720 --> 0:15:49.600
<v Speaker 1>lawyer Ray Gary Jr. Every county has their own, their

0:15:49.640 --> 0:15:55.880
<v Speaker 1>own idea of justice. For example, during my middle years

0:15:56.320 --> 0:16:00.560
<v Speaker 1>as a lawyer, Fulton County and cob Can Honey are

0:16:00.640 --> 0:16:05.800
<v Speaker 1>separated by a river. Fulton County was run by Democrats,

0:16:06.720 --> 0:16:11.680
<v Speaker 1>Cobb County was run by Republicans. I had a client

0:16:11.880 --> 0:16:15.960
<v Speaker 1>charged with a sex crime. Most of my cases were

0:16:15.960 --> 0:16:20.080
<v Speaker 1>in Cobb County, and I knew from experience he'd be

0:16:20.120 --> 0:16:23.240
<v Speaker 1>looking at ten years in prison, are going to trial

0:16:23.280 --> 0:16:27.240
<v Speaker 1>and taking his chance. But this case wasn't in Cobb County,

0:16:27.280 --> 0:16:30.520
<v Speaker 1>it was next door in Fulton County. The judge sent

0:16:30.560 --> 0:16:34.320
<v Speaker 1>a letter out and said we're bringing everybody in and

0:16:34.400 --> 0:16:36.760
<v Speaker 1>this will be your only chance to do a plea bargain.

0:16:37.040 --> 0:16:39.520
<v Speaker 1>If you don't do a polea burgain on this court date,

0:16:39.760 --> 0:16:43.040
<v Speaker 1>you're going to trial. So I got down there and

0:16:43.080 --> 0:16:46.760
<v Speaker 1>the prosecutor offered me to reduce it to a misdemeanor

0:16:46.800 --> 0:16:50.480
<v Speaker 1>and give him twelve months probation and not be a

0:16:50.520 --> 0:16:54.200
<v Speaker 1>sex offender. And I was thinking, this is too good

0:16:54.240 --> 0:16:58.040
<v Speaker 1>to be true. You know, from our perspective that if

0:16:58.080 --> 0:17:00.800
<v Speaker 1>this was in my Republican county and I live in,

0:17:01.080 --> 0:17:03.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, the best offer would have been twenty to

0:17:03.240 --> 0:17:07.520
<v Speaker 1>do ten be a lifestun sex offender. Because it happened

0:17:07.880 --> 0:17:10.639
<v Speaker 1>across the other side of the river, then it was

0:17:10.760 --> 0:17:16.919
<v Speaker 1>twelve months probation, no sex offender. We naturally jumped on

0:17:17.040 --> 0:17:20.920
<v Speaker 1>it and played guilty that very day. One funny thing

0:17:21.000 --> 0:17:25.040
<v Speaker 1>happened was I had charged my client ten thousand dollars

0:17:25.400 --> 0:17:27.360
<v Speaker 1>because I thought it was going to be a lot

0:17:27.400 --> 0:17:30.639
<v Speaker 1>more to it than that, and so he had paid

0:17:30.680 --> 0:17:34.480
<v Speaker 1>it in cash. The next day, after he played guilt,

0:17:34.480 --> 0:17:37.720
<v Speaker 1>didn't get out of jail, he called up and he said,

0:17:38.200 --> 0:17:40.080
<v Speaker 1>he said, listen, I gave you a lot of money

0:17:40.119 --> 0:17:43.159
<v Speaker 1>didn't you. I said, you sure did. I said that

0:17:43.240 --> 0:17:46.040
<v Speaker 1>was a lot of money. He said, you really didn't

0:17:46.040 --> 0:17:48.440
<v Speaker 1>have to do all that much. I said, that's true,

0:17:48.520 --> 0:17:50.880
<v Speaker 1>as it didn't. As it worked out, I really didn't

0:17:50.880 --> 0:17:53.040
<v Speaker 1>have to do a whole lot. He said, well, I

0:17:53.040 --> 0:17:55.520
<v Speaker 1>don't think I got my money's worth. I said, well,

0:17:55.560 --> 0:17:59.680
<v Speaker 1>you're in luck, I said, because the prosecutor is having

0:17:59.720 --> 0:18:02.760
<v Speaker 1>set at thoughts. She's wishing that she had never gave

0:18:02.800 --> 0:18:05.720
<v Speaker 1>you that deal. So I can go down there and

0:18:05.800 --> 0:18:09.000
<v Speaker 1>withdraw your plea and put you on the trial calendar

0:18:09.040 --> 0:18:12.080
<v Speaker 1>for Monday morning, first trial out, and we can we

0:18:12.119 --> 0:18:14.399
<v Speaker 1>can take this plea bargain off the table and have

0:18:14.520 --> 0:18:16.480
<v Speaker 1>your trial. And I said, a matter of fact, let

0:18:16.520 --> 0:18:18.400
<v Speaker 1>me put your on hole and I'll get my secretary

0:18:18.440 --> 0:18:21.520
<v Speaker 1>to get started on the motion and I can drive

0:18:21.600 --> 0:18:24.520
<v Speaker 1>down there, you know, this afternoon and foul it. He's

0:18:24.520 --> 0:18:26.520
<v Speaker 1>a hold up on that. Let me think about it.

0:18:26.600 --> 0:18:29.760
<v Speaker 1>And so I never heard back from him. But for everyone,

0:18:29.840 --> 0:18:32.080
<v Speaker 1>I came out smelling like a rose. There was ten

0:18:32.280 --> 0:18:37.600
<v Speaker 1>were I ended up being paid way too little. This

0:18:37.960 --> 0:18:41.320
<v Speaker 1>is defense attorney Michelle Tiegel on the idea of what

0:18:41.359 --> 0:18:45.760
<v Speaker 1>it means to win your case. I struggled with that.

0:18:45.800 --> 0:18:48.239
<v Speaker 1>When I first started doing criminal defense, I was an

0:18:48.280 --> 0:18:51.199
<v Speaker 1>athlete and I really wanted to win for all of

0:18:51.240 --> 0:18:55.600
<v Speaker 1>my clients. I had to redefine what winning means, and

0:18:55.680 --> 0:18:58.480
<v Speaker 1>I learned a lot about that from my former law

0:18:58.560 --> 0:19:01.280
<v Speaker 1>partner and kind of make me a little teary, because

0:19:01.720 --> 0:19:04.720
<v Speaker 1>as a criminal defense lawyer and also as a prosecutor,

0:19:05.240 --> 0:19:09.680
<v Speaker 1>we have to redefine what winning means. There were cases

0:19:09.880 --> 0:19:13.240
<v Speaker 1>where winning meant I had to be an advocate to

0:19:13.320 --> 0:19:18.440
<v Speaker 1>my client about taking what really was the best deal

0:19:18.560 --> 0:19:21.800
<v Speaker 1>and the best thing for their life. In some cases,

0:19:21.920 --> 0:19:25.280
<v Speaker 1>winning meant we fought to the very bitter end until

0:19:25.320 --> 0:19:27.800
<v Speaker 1>we got an acquittal, and we got it. In some

0:19:27.880 --> 0:19:32.040
<v Speaker 1>cases capital murder cases where the evidence was strong on

0:19:32.080 --> 0:19:37.800
<v Speaker 1>the state side and difficult to deal with, just preventing

0:19:37.840 --> 0:19:41.480
<v Speaker 1>a death sentence and getting life without parole was a win,

0:19:41.960 --> 0:19:44.240
<v Speaker 1>and that was a win that I struggled to wrap

0:19:44.320 --> 0:19:48.720
<v Speaker 1>my head around. But I had situations where just making

0:19:48.760 --> 0:19:51.200
<v Speaker 1>sure the state couldn't kill my client was a win.

0:19:52.080 --> 0:19:55.000
<v Speaker 1>And I would have never thought, starting as a baby

0:19:55.040 --> 0:19:58.920
<v Speaker 1>criminal defense lawyer, that a life without parole could go

0:19:59.080 --> 0:20:02.320
<v Speaker 1>in the win category. Glory, but winning is relative and

0:20:02.600 --> 0:20:06.280
<v Speaker 1>criminal practice and criminal law on both sides, and I

0:20:06.400 --> 0:20:09.320
<v Speaker 1>hope that from the prosecutor's side, and I know there

0:20:09.320 --> 0:20:13.920
<v Speaker 1>are prosecutors like this, that they will also start redefining

0:20:13.960 --> 0:20:17.040
<v Speaker 1>winning and that it will truly be based not just

0:20:17.200 --> 0:20:20.480
<v Speaker 1>on I'm going to get this conviction or I'm going

0:20:20.520 --> 0:20:24.480
<v Speaker 1>to advocate for this victim that is sometimes their role,

0:20:24.720 --> 0:20:27.400
<v Speaker 1>but that they're really going to just try to make

0:20:27.440 --> 0:20:30.400
<v Speaker 1>the right decision that serves the community and that does justice,

0:20:30.480 --> 0:20:32.840
<v Speaker 1>because that's what they're there to do. I think when

0:20:32.840 --> 0:20:38.120
<v Speaker 1>they lose sight of that, it creates a really dangerous system.

0:20:38.160 --> 0:20:43.680
<v Speaker 1>Here's Georgia prosecutor Jesse Evans. Justice means getting it right,

0:20:44.000 --> 0:20:46.959
<v Speaker 1>and we're all striving to get it right. It requires

0:20:46.960 --> 0:20:50.080
<v Speaker 1>that we act honorably. We try to act impartially trying

0:20:50.119 --> 0:20:53.400
<v Speaker 1>to get to the right fair results. So justice really

0:20:53.480 --> 0:20:56.080
<v Speaker 1>is about getting it right and about being fair. I

0:20:56.119 --> 0:20:58.040
<v Speaker 1>think that's the best way to find it. And as

0:20:58.080 --> 0:21:00.280
<v Speaker 1>long as we're acting honorably and we have the best

0:21:00.320 --> 0:21:03.439
<v Speaker 1>intentions within the criminal justice system, my experiences that we

0:21:03.520 --> 0:21:07.080
<v Speaker 1>usually get there, and they're rare instances where fairness is

0:21:07.119 --> 0:21:10.440
<v Speaker 1>not reached, where you have an outcome that seems unjust.

0:21:10.520 --> 0:21:12.399
<v Speaker 1>But I think those are more to the exception and

0:21:12.440 --> 0:21:14.679
<v Speaker 1>not the norm, and I think that's a product of

0:21:14.880 --> 0:21:17.720
<v Speaker 1>experience in time. A criminal justice system is not without

0:21:17.760 --> 0:21:20.800
<v Speaker 1>its flaws. I think we're always moving towards making it

0:21:20.840 --> 0:21:23.159
<v Speaker 1>better and open to the idea that we need to

0:21:23.200 --> 0:21:26.359
<v Speaker 1>be reflective. We need to be introspective from a criminal

0:21:26.400 --> 0:21:29.440
<v Speaker 1>justice perspective and say, are the ways of doing things

0:21:29.520 --> 0:21:31.800
<v Speaker 1>better to make sure that we get to that fairness,

0:21:31.800 --> 0:21:36.119
<v Speaker 1>to get to that right, results driven goal. This is

0:21:36.119 --> 0:21:40.640
<v Speaker 1>Ashley Wilcot, a lawyer who specializes in child welfare cases.

0:21:41.080 --> 0:21:44.600
<v Speaker 1>She's also a judge into cab County, Georgia. We last

0:21:44.600 --> 0:21:48.320
<v Speaker 1>heard from her in our episode on racial bias. Oh,

0:21:48.359 --> 0:21:50.760
<v Speaker 1>people are gonna hear this response and think, oh, she

0:21:50.880 --> 0:21:53.800
<v Speaker 1>lives in our own little world. But again, justice is blind.

0:21:54.320 --> 0:21:57.320
<v Speaker 1>There's a reason there's a blindfold on, lady. Justice. Justice

0:21:57.359 --> 0:22:03.440
<v Speaker 1>is blind. We have lost for a reason. We have crimes.

0:22:03.440 --> 0:22:06.080
<v Speaker 1>What what constitute a crime and how it's defined for

0:22:06.119 --> 0:22:10.560
<v Speaker 1>a reason in a perfect world, that's applicable to everyone equally.

0:22:11.200 --> 0:22:13.520
<v Speaker 1>In a perfect world, if you commit a crime, if

0:22:13.520 --> 0:22:17.840
<v Speaker 1>you violate a law, you're arrested, but you then face

0:22:17.880 --> 0:22:22.440
<v Speaker 1>a fair trial. You are presumed innocent. It doesn't matter

0:22:22.480 --> 0:22:25.119
<v Speaker 1>if there's a video of you doing it. You are

0:22:25.160 --> 0:22:28.080
<v Speaker 1>presumed innocent until it has proven in a court of law,

0:22:28.680 --> 0:22:30.639
<v Speaker 1>because I would keep in mind that a video that

0:22:30.680 --> 0:22:32.960
<v Speaker 1>you look at does not give you a three hundred

0:22:32.960 --> 0:22:36.399
<v Speaker 1>and sixty degree view. So you have to be convicted

0:22:36.440 --> 0:22:39.280
<v Speaker 1>by a jury of your peers or by a judge

0:22:39.320 --> 0:22:42.720
<v Speaker 1>if you choose to waive that. In a perfect world,

0:22:42.800 --> 0:22:49.199
<v Speaker 1>that process works the same for every individual, regardless of

0:22:49.240 --> 0:22:54.359
<v Speaker 1>their age, regardless of their color, regardless their gender or

0:22:54.440 --> 0:22:59.920
<v Speaker 1>gender identification. That's what justice is for me. This is

0:23:00.040 --> 0:23:05.960
<v Speaker 1>Federal judge jed Rakoff from New York. I have a

0:23:06.040 --> 0:23:12.280
<v Speaker 1>deep believer that just sense requires the judge to get

0:23:12.280 --> 0:23:16.200
<v Speaker 1>deeply into the facts, effects of the crime, the effects

0:23:16.359 --> 0:23:21.080
<v Speaker 1>of the criminal, effects of the victims, and to do

0:23:21.240 --> 0:23:25.440
<v Speaker 1>the very difficult and of an agonizing but careful job

0:23:26.200 --> 0:23:30.800
<v Speaker 1>of figuring out what sense makes sense when you factor

0:23:30.960 --> 0:23:37.919
<v Speaker 1>in those various opponents. The mandatory minimums, of course, prevent

0:23:38.000 --> 0:23:42.200
<v Speaker 1>you from doing that whatsoever. But even the sentencing guidelines

0:23:42.280 --> 0:23:46.240
<v Speaker 1>within the federal system are no longer mandatory, but they

0:23:46.520 --> 0:23:52.720
<v Speaker 1>might view are mistake because they emphasize certain factors, usually

0:23:53.200 --> 0:23:59.440
<v Speaker 1>in excess of other factors. So, for example, the sensing

0:23:59.480 --> 0:24:05.040
<v Speaker 1>guide lie as federal sentencing guidelines for drugs are vastly

0:24:05.160 --> 0:24:08.760
<v Speaker 1>dependent on the weight of the drugs that are sold,

0:24:09.359 --> 0:24:14.520
<v Speaker 1>and that means that if you have a large scale

0:24:15.160 --> 0:24:21.080
<v Speaker 1>narcotics conspiracy, even the lowest level person faces to huge

0:24:21.119 --> 0:24:25.680
<v Speaker 1>sense because the conspiracy as a whole distributed a lot

0:24:25.720 --> 0:24:28.640
<v Speaker 1>of drugs. This does not make sense to base. So

0:24:28.800 --> 0:24:32.879
<v Speaker 1>I would go back to the system that it persisted

0:24:32.920 --> 0:24:36.879
<v Speaker 1>in this nation for nearly two hundred years, which was

0:24:37.280 --> 0:24:40.120
<v Speaker 1>we leave it to the good sense of the judge,

0:24:40.400 --> 0:24:42.720
<v Speaker 1>and we encourage our judges to do a lot of

0:24:42.720 --> 0:24:46.800
<v Speaker 1>my work before they impose sense. Here's Kevin Ring, the

0:24:46.880 --> 0:24:52.400
<v Speaker 1>president of fam formally known as Families Against Mandatory Minimums.

0:24:55.080 --> 0:24:57.119
<v Speaker 1>So what we want to see is judges be allowed

0:24:57.160 --> 0:24:59.960
<v Speaker 1>to sentence again. We think judges need to have to

0:25:00.000 --> 0:25:03.520
<v Speaker 1>discretion to fashion punishments that fit the unique facts and

0:25:03.600 --> 0:25:07.240
<v Speaker 1>circumstances of each crime. Not every crime is the same,

0:25:07.320 --> 0:25:10.400
<v Speaker 1>not every defendant's the same. We don't want to see

0:25:10.440 --> 0:25:15.320
<v Speaker 1>people treated differently for reasons that aren't relevant, like grace

0:25:15.440 --> 0:25:18.400
<v Speaker 1>or gender or things like that. But we want people

0:25:18.440 --> 0:25:21.000
<v Speaker 1>who are more serious offenders to get longer punishments and

0:25:21.080 --> 0:25:24.000
<v Speaker 1>less serious offenders to get shorter punishments. And that sounds

0:25:24.040 --> 0:25:26.879
<v Speaker 1>so obvious and basic, but that's not the way the

0:25:26.920 --> 0:25:30.200
<v Speaker 1>system works. It's too much of a game now who

0:25:30.200 --> 0:25:33.280
<v Speaker 1>can plead first, who has more information to give up,

0:25:33.800 --> 0:25:35.640
<v Speaker 1>And so we have too many cases where low level

0:25:35.680 --> 0:25:39.000
<v Speaker 1>offenders are getting longer punishments because they don't have any information.

0:25:39.040 --> 0:25:42.040
<v Speaker 1>They can't give anybody up. We think the only way

0:25:42.040 --> 0:25:44.639
<v Speaker 1>to fix that is to get rid of mandatory sentences.

0:25:45.359 --> 0:25:48.360
<v Speaker 1>Let prosecutors bring what charges they want. They can make

0:25:48.359 --> 0:25:51.320
<v Speaker 1>their recommendations to the judge for what the sentence should

0:25:51.320 --> 0:25:53.639
<v Speaker 1>be based on the defendant's characteristics in the nature of

0:25:53.680 --> 0:25:56.320
<v Speaker 1>the crime. But we want judges to have control over

0:25:56.359 --> 0:25:59.639
<v Speaker 1>punishment again, so that it can be tailored to, you know,

0:25:59.680 --> 0:26:04.080
<v Speaker 1>what really happened, and not just some arbitrary standard that

0:26:04.160 --> 0:26:07.879
<v Speaker 1>was set by politicians who know nothing about this defendant

0:26:07.960 --> 0:26:10.600
<v Speaker 1>or this crime, but who wrote the mandatory minimum maybe

0:26:10.600 --> 0:26:14.480
<v Speaker 1>ten twenty years ago and couldn't have foreseen this particular instance.

0:26:32.160 --> 0:26:36.040
<v Speaker 1>This is my much better half, my wife, Natalie Holloway.

0:26:36.600 --> 0:26:39.280
<v Speaker 1>I might be a little biased here, but I like

0:26:39.520 --> 0:26:43.879
<v Speaker 1>her answer quite a bit. I think justice loves like fairness,

0:26:45.200 --> 0:26:47.840
<v Speaker 1>I think that's the best way off the cuff that

0:26:47.920 --> 0:26:52.200
<v Speaker 1>I can say that, And I think unfortunately that word

0:26:53.359 --> 0:26:57.960
<v Speaker 1>is not a simple definition, and so I think people

0:26:58.000 --> 0:27:02.080
<v Speaker 1>get caught up in what's right and what's wrong for

0:27:02.119 --> 0:27:05.600
<v Speaker 1>certain people. I believe in the bottom of my heart

0:27:05.600 --> 0:27:08.360
<v Speaker 1>that we also had the best for everybody, and everybody

0:27:08.400 --> 0:27:13.240
<v Speaker 1>is trying their best every day, and so fairness, fairness

0:27:13.359 --> 0:27:15.280
<v Speaker 1>is that what I best, what I think justice should be.

0:27:16.000 --> 0:27:20.960
<v Speaker 1>Here's defense attorney, actually merchant. I actually think the federal

0:27:21.000 --> 0:27:23.760
<v Speaker 1>government has a much better system than the state governments.

0:27:23.760 --> 0:27:27.280
<v Speaker 1>To the federal government, if you're arrested, you know, they've

0:27:27.280 --> 0:27:30.520
<v Speaker 1>got some evidence against you. It's a completely different system.

0:27:30.760 --> 0:27:34.439
<v Speaker 1>And in the state system, we arrest and then we

0:27:34.480 --> 0:27:36.400
<v Speaker 1>try and get the evidence, you know, like the confession

0:27:36.400 --> 0:27:38.720
<v Speaker 1>and things like that. I think that jurors need to

0:27:38.760 --> 0:27:42.080
<v Speaker 1>require more evidence to convict people. I think that they

0:27:42.080 --> 0:27:45.120
<v Speaker 1>need to actually require guilt beyond approved you know, beyond

0:27:45.119 --> 0:27:47.879
<v Speaker 1>a reasonable doubt to convict people. I think that's really

0:27:47.880 --> 0:27:50.760
<v Speaker 1>really important for us to have justice. I think that

0:27:50.840 --> 0:27:53.760
<v Speaker 1>obviously crime shouldn't happen, and guilty people should go to jail.

0:27:53.960 --> 0:27:56.800
<v Speaker 1>But I also think that there's oftentimes a reason and

0:27:56.800 --> 0:27:59.000
<v Speaker 1>like I said, truth always lies somewhere in the middle.

0:27:59.560 --> 0:28:01.639
<v Speaker 1>You know, maybe the person did something, but they didn't

0:28:01.640 --> 0:28:05.400
<v Speaker 1>do everything that they're accused of. I think that there's

0:28:05.440 --> 0:28:08.240
<v Speaker 1>a lot of power in the hands of prosecutors who

0:28:08.359 --> 0:28:12.440
<v Speaker 1>are oftentimes right out of law school, absolutely no perspective,

0:28:12.760 --> 0:28:15.680
<v Speaker 1>don't have kids, don't have a family, has never known

0:28:15.680 --> 0:28:19.840
<v Speaker 1>anybody accused of a criminal case. I think judges need

0:28:19.880 --> 0:28:22.400
<v Speaker 1>to have done both sides, I really do. I think

0:28:22.440 --> 0:28:24.679
<v Speaker 1>that that helps us get justice because if you've not

0:28:24.760 --> 0:28:27.399
<v Speaker 1>walked in my shoes and the prosecutors shoes, it's really

0:28:27.440 --> 0:28:29.399
<v Speaker 1>hard for you to judge us. And a lot of

0:28:29.440 --> 0:28:32.640
<v Speaker 1>times we see prosecutors on the bench, and defense lawyers

0:28:32.640 --> 0:28:34.080
<v Speaker 1>don't usually want to go on the bench, so that's

0:28:34.080 --> 0:28:38.120
<v Speaker 1>the problem. But it's hard because they have not walked

0:28:38.200 --> 0:28:40.440
<v Speaker 1>in our shats, and they haven't defended a person. They

0:28:40.480 --> 0:28:42.880
<v Speaker 1>haven't sat next to a person as a sob when

0:28:42.920 --> 0:28:45.600
<v Speaker 1>they're convicted, you know, and crying and saying I didn't

0:28:45.600 --> 0:28:46.680
<v Speaker 1>do this, and I'm going to spend the rest of

0:28:46.680 --> 0:28:49.680
<v Speaker 1>my life in jail hugging the mom who calls you

0:28:49.760 --> 0:28:52.040
<v Speaker 1>every day and says my son is innocent, and you

0:28:52.040 --> 0:28:55.280
<v Speaker 1>know he's in jail and feeling that. So I think

0:28:55.360 --> 0:28:59.160
<v Speaker 1>that if we can work towards a better system, that's justice.

0:28:59.240 --> 0:29:01.040
<v Speaker 1>But you know, I've a I don't want guilty people

0:29:01.040 --> 0:29:03.160
<v Speaker 1>to run around and be able to commit crimes. I mean,

0:29:03.200 --> 0:29:07.240
<v Speaker 1>I think that's awful, you know, But I also don't

0:29:07.240 --> 0:29:11.040
<v Speaker 1>want innocent people to be incarcerated. And I've always advocated

0:29:11.040 --> 0:29:12.840
<v Speaker 1>that we need to be smart on crime. I think

0:29:12.880 --> 0:29:16.280
<v Speaker 1>that programs work like these. We have accountability courts where

0:29:16.280 --> 0:29:18.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, drug court and dou I court and all

0:29:18.760 --> 0:29:20.320
<v Speaker 1>these different types of courts. I think that those are

0:29:20.320 --> 0:29:23.800
<v Speaker 1>really important because they're focusing on treatment. But the problem

0:29:23.880 --> 0:29:26.680
<v Speaker 1>I see with those is that it's just like anything,

0:29:27.120 --> 0:29:30.760
<v Speaker 1>we are kind of segregating classes of crime. We're saying,

0:29:30.800 --> 0:29:34.160
<v Speaker 1>if you are mentally ill and you commit a theft

0:29:34.240 --> 0:29:36.320
<v Speaker 1>type case, you can go to mental health court. But

0:29:36.360 --> 0:29:39.400
<v Speaker 1>if you smack your mom it's violent, you can't go.

0:29:40.000 --> 0:29:42.360
<v Speaker 1>You're mentally ill, you know you need the treatment. But

0:29:42.840 --> 0:29:45.920
<v Speaker 1>we're kind of segregating the types of classes and the

0:29:45.920 --> 0:29:47.800
<v Speaker 1>types of crimes, and I don't know that that necessarily

0:29:47.800 --> 0:29:56.920
<v Speaker 1>makes sense. I have made a career out of the

0:29:57.000 --> 0:30:00.720
<v Speaker 1>criminal justice system. I have worked my entire our adult

0:30:00.800 --> 0:30:04.880
<v Speaker 1>life in some capacity or another in the business of justice.

0:30:05.480 --> 0:30:08.240
<v Speaker 1>And even after all these years, I don't know that

0:30:08.320 --> 0:30:11.880
<v Speaker 1>I have a great answer to our question. You see,

0:30:12.080 --> 0:30:16.720
<v Speaker 1>the concept of justice, at its very core is subjective.

0:30:17.320 --> 0:30:20.560
<v Speaker 1>It will look differently depending on just where you're standing.

0:30:21.560 --> 0:30:26.360
<v Speaker 1>To some people, justice means punishing someone who has wronged them.

0:30:26.400 --> 0:30:30.480
<v Speaker 1>To others, it may mean mercy or forgiveness. On a

0:30:30.560 --> 0:30:33.760
<v Speaker 1>day to day basis. The justice that I work towards

0:30:33.960 --> 0:30:38.640
<v Speaker 1>means negotiating in good faith. It means both sides striving

0:30:38.680 --> 0:30:42.960
<v Speaker 1>for a fair outcome. Fairness is another esoteric word with

0:30:43.040 --> 0:30:47.960
<v Speaker 1>a meaning that escapes easy definition. But what fairness looks

0:30:48.000 --> 0:30:52.080
<v Speaker 1>like also changes from case to case. I have three

0:30:52.160 --> 0:30:54.920
<v Speaker 1>or four case files sitting right here on my desk

0:30:55.080 --> 0:30:58.600
<v Speaker 1>right now, and justice means something different in each and

0:30:58.680 --> 0:31:02.120
<v Speaker 1>every one of those case is It's fair to say

0:31:02.120 --> 0:31:05.320
<v Speaker 1>that I'm passionate about justice, after all, it is my

0:31:05.480 --> 0:31:08.440
<v Speaker 1>life's work. But I don't know that I am, or

0:31:08.480 --> 0:31:12.800
<v Speaker 1>that I should be more passionate about justice than anyone else.

0:31:13.840 --> 0:31:15.640
<v Speaker 1>It is in all of our interests to have a

0:31:15.680 --> 0:31:19.000
<v Speaker 1>system that works smoothly and is administered well. But I

0:31:19.040 --> 0:31:22.840
<v Speaker 1>think a lot of times we forget about empathy, about humility,

0:31:22.880 --> 0:31:26.840
<v Speaker 1>and about human decency. It is so easy to get

0:31:26.840 --> 0:31:30.200
<v Speaker 1>wrapped up in the idea of punishment or I foreign

0:31:30.200 --> 0:31:33.920
<v Speaker 1>eye justice, And that's why we wanted to tell these

0:31:34.040 --> 0:31:38.920
<v Speaker 1>stories this season. Until you go through an injustice, until

0:31:38.960 --> 0:31:42.560
<v Speaker 1>you inexperience an abuse of the system, it is easy

0:31:42.640 --> 0:31:46.880
<v Speaker 1>to focus on retribution. We idealize it. We see what

0:31:47.000 --> 0:31:50.280
<v Speaker 1>the media shows us. We hear about horrific crimes, and

0:31:50.320 --> 0:31:55.640
<v Speaker 1>we call for maximum retaliation. But our system is not perfect.

0:31:55.920 --> 0:31:59.680
<v Speaker 1>People are overcharged, people are taken from their families, People

0:31:59.720 --> 0:32:03.680
<v Speaker 1>are removed from society every day under the guise of

0:32:04.040 --> 0:32:07.560
<v Speaker 1>public safety. But is there not a greater threat with

0:32:07.680 --> 0:32:13.000
<v Speaker 1>the system that forgets individual humanity? What is safe, after all,

0:32:13.040 --> 0:32:16.800
<v Speaker 1>about a system that views people solely by their charges

0:32:16.960 --> 0:32:23.320
<v Speaker 1>and not by their individual unique circumstances. Our justice system

0:32:23.320 --> 0:32:26.600
<v Speaker 1>in America is light years ahead of many others around

0:32:26.600 --> 0:32:29.320
<v Speaker 1>the world. Most of the time, we get it right.

0:32:29.840 --> 0:32:32.760
<v Speaker 1>Most of the time the police arrest the right person.

0:32:33.480 --> 0:32:37.040
<v Speaker 1>But we so often overlooked that there are victims of

0:32:37.080 --> 0:32:41.760
<v Speaker 1>the system itself. Victims of crimes can be victims of

0:32:41.800 --> 0:32:46.200
<v Speaker 1>the system. Wrongfully accused persons are victims of the system.

0:32:46.720 --> 0:32:51.080
<v Speaker 1>Families of these people are also victims of the system,

0:32:51.120 --> 0:32:56.360
<v Speaker 1>and so is the community in so many instances. Every day,

0:32:56.400 --> 0:32:59.160
<v Speaker 1>in every case I work, I strive to do better

0:32:59.400 --> 0:33:03.560
<v Speaker 1>to find a better justice for my clients. Fortunately, I

0:33:03.680 --> 0:33:07.680
<v Speaker 1>also see so many people across the country advocating for

0:33:07.760 --> 0:33:11.800
<v Speaker 1>a better way, for a better criminal justice system, for

0:33:11.880 --> 0:33:16.840
<v Speaker 1>more fairness and sentencing, for better rehabilitation measures, for quicker

0:33:16.920 --> 0:33:20.920
<v Speaker 1>closure for victims. I hope that we've inspired you, perhaps

0:33:20.960 --> 0:33:23.560
<v Speaker 1>just a little bit, to think about the broader criminal

0:33:23.640 --> 0:33:26.680
<v Speaker 1>justice system. I hope that when you hear about cases,

0:33:26.800 --> 0:33:30.160
<v Speaker 1>perhaps like the ones we've talked about this season, that

0:33:30.280 --> 0:33:32.560
<v Speaker 1>you take a little bit of time and maybe think

0:33:32.680 --> 0:33:35.960
<v Speaker 1>just a little bit longer, and, as judges tell jurors,

0:33:36.320 --> 0:33:40.720
<v Speaker 1>take your responsibilities as a citizen seriously and keep an

0:33:40.760 --> 0:33:46.560
<v Speaker 1>open mind because things may just not be what they appear. Well,

0:33:46.880 --> 0:33:50.560
<v Speaker 1>that's enough from me for now. Let us know what

0:33:50.680 --> 0:33:53.800
<v Speaker 1>you thought about this new season of Sworn and our

0:33:53.840 --> 0:33:57.600
<v Speaker 1>new format. Give us a call with any criminal justice

0:33:57.680 --> 0:34:00.640
<v Speaker 1>questions you may have. Leave us a voice at four

0:34:00.760 --> 0:34:04.840
<v Speaker 1>zero four four one zero zero four for one, and

0:34:04.920 --> 0:34:07.800
<v Speaker 1>of course, feel free to reach out on social media

0:34:08.120 --> 0:34:11.879
<v Speaker 1>like Twitter, Instagram, and Facebook. If you reach out I'll

0:34:11.880 --> 0:34:14.880
<v Speaker 1>do my best to try to answer. We'll talk to

0:34:14.920 --> 0:34:22.120
<v Speaker 1>you soon here on Sworn. Sworn is a production of

0:34:22.160 --> 0:34:26.200
<v Speaker 1>Tenderfoot TV and I Heart Radio. Our lead producer is

0:34:26.280 --> 0:34:31.360
<v Speaker 1>Christina Dana. Executive producers are Payne Lindsay and Donald Albright

0:34:31.480 --> 0:34:34.920
<v Speaker 1>for Tenderfoot TV, Matt Frederick and Alex Williams for I

0:34:35.040 --> 0:34:40.479
<v Speaker 1>Heart Radio, and myself Philip Holloway. Additional production by Trevor Young,

0:34:40.920 --> 0:34:46.560
<v Speaker 1>Mason Lindsay, Mike Rooney, Jamie Albright, and Halle Beadall original

0:34:46.640 --> 0:34:49.960
<v Speaker 1>music and sound designed by Makeup and Vanity Set. Our

0:34:50.040 --> 0:34:53.200
<v Speaker 1>theme song is Blood in the Water by Layup. Show

0:34:53.320 --> 0:34:58.040
<v Speaker 1>art and design is by Trevor Eisler, editing by Christina Dana,

0:34:58.640 --> 0:35:02.840
<v Speaker 1>Mixing and mastering by Mike Rooney and Cooper Skinner. Special

0:35:02.840 --> 0:35:06.319
<v Speaker 1>thanks to the team at I Heart Radio from U

0:35:06.400 --> 0:35:10.920
<v Speaker 1>t a or In Rosenbound and Grace Royer, Bryan Nord

0:35:11.000 --> 0:35:15.200
<v Speaker 1>and Matthew Papa from the Nord Group, BA Media and

0:35:15.280 --> 0:35:18.759
<v Speaker 1>Marketing and Station sixteen. I'd also like to extend a

0:35:18.960 --> 0:35:22.600
<v Speaker 1>very personal and special thanks to all of our contributors

0:35:22.600 --> 0:35:25.040
<v Speaker 1>and guests who have helped to make all of these

0:35:25.040 --> 0:35:29.520
<v Speaker 1>episodes possible. You can find sworn on Facebook, Twitter, and

0:35:29.600 --> 0:35:34.600
<v Speaker 1>Instagram at sworn podcast and follow me your host, Philip

0:35:34.600 --> 0:35:38.919
<v Speaker 1>Halloway on Twitter at phil Holloway e s Q. Our

0:35:38.920 --> 0:35:42.239
<v Speaker 1>website is sworn podcast dot com and you can check

0:35:42.280 --> 0:35:48.080
<v Speaker 1>out other Tenderfoot TV podcasts at www dot tenderfoot dot tv.

0:35:48.840 --> 0:35:51.640
<v Speaker 1>If you have questions or comments, you can email us

0:35:51.680 --> 0:35:56.239
<v Speaker 1>at Sworn at tenderfoot dot tv or leave us a

0:35:56.320 --> 0:36:01.440
<v Speaker 1>voicemail at four zero four for one zero zero four

0:36:01.560 --> 0:36:07.840
<v Speaker 1>four one. As always, thanks for listening. From your perspective,

0:36:08.160 --> 0:36:11.320
<v Speaker 1>How can our listeners be better jurors when they get summoned?

0:36:11.600 --> 0:36:16.640
<v Speaker 1>Besides finding people guilty, right, I think that the important

0:36:16.640 --> 0:36:19.120
<v Speaker 1>thing to understand is that we all want to find

0:36:19.200 --> 0:36:21.440
<v Speaker 1>jurors that are going to be fair, that are going

0:36:21.520 --> 0:36:24.200
<v Speaker 1>to be impartial to both sides. And those are sort

0:36:24.239 --> 0:36:26.359
<v Speaker 1>of the touchstone words that we use when we do

0:36:26.440 --> 0:36:28.600
<v Speaker 1>jury selection is are you gonna be fair? Are you

0:36:28.600 --> 0:36:31.319
<v Speaker 1>gonna be impartial? So the only thing that I would

0:36:31.360 --> 0:36:33.240
<v Speaker 1>encourage people to do is to keep an open mind

0:36:33.280 --> 0:36:37.399
<v Speaker 1>when you come into jury selection. I understand that we're

0:36:37.400 --> 0:36:40.120
<v Speaker 1>all different, we all have feelings that we're gonna bring

0:36:40.160 --> 0:36:42.880
<v Speaker 1>with us because of our own personal background when it

0:36:42.920 --> 0:36:46.239
<v Speaker 1>comes to the awesome responsibility of being a juror in

0:36:46.239 --> 0:36:48.719
<v Speaker 1>the case, just understanding that you're gonna have to check

0:36:48.719 --> 0:36:50.799
<v Speaker 1>some of that background baggage at the door and make

0:36:50.840 --> 0:36:52.759
<v Speaker 1>a decision based on the facts and evidence that is

0:36:52.760 --> 0:36:54.920
<v Speaker 1>presented in the courtroom. And even more important than that,

0:36:55.200 --> 0:36:56.880
<v Speaker 1>be open to the law that the judge is going

0:36:56.960 --> 0:36:58.759
<v Speaker 1>to give that juror as well. I think a lot

0:36:58.760 --> 0:37:00.680
<v Speaker 1>of people won't make the mistake of thinking, well, they're

0:37:00.680 --> 0:37:02.480
<v Speaker 1>only going to be looking at a given set of

0:37:02.520 --> 0:37:04.439
<v Speaker 1>facts and that's how the decision is going to be made,

0:37:04.640 --> 0:37:06.320
<v Speaker 1>and nothing could be further than In truth, one of

0:37:06.320 --> 0:37:09.440
<v Speaker 1>the most important parts of the jury trial system is

0:37:09.480 --> 0:37:11.919
<v Speaker 1>that the judge is going to give those jury instructions

0:37:12.080 --> 0:37:14.320
<v Speaker 1>as to how each fact patterns to be judged. So

0:37:14.360 --> 0:37:15.920
<v Speaker 1>you need to keep an open mind not only as

0:37:15.960 --> 0:37:17.359
<v Speaker 1>to the facts, but as to the law as well.