WEBVTT - What's in a surname?

0:00:01.440 --> 0:00:04.240
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Stuff You Should Know, a production of I

0:00:04.360 --> 0:00:13.680
<v Speaker 1>Heart Radio. Hey, and welcome to the podcast. I'm Josh Clark,

0:00:13.720 --> 0:00:16.280
<v Speaker 1>and there's Charles w Chuck Bryant. It's just the two

0:00:16.360 --> 0:00:20.360
<v Speaker 1>of us, kind of like old time soun Chuck sure,

0:00:21.640 --> 0:00:24.880
<v Speaker 1>and this is Stuff you should It's not the full

0:00:24.920 --> 0:00:29.319
<v Speaker 1>thing without Jerry. That's right. But you said you're Josh Clark,

0:00:29.360 --> 0:00:33.400
<v Speaker 1>don't you mean Josh Clerk. Yeah, that is what my

0:00:33.400 --> 0:00:36.040
<v Speaker 1>my name is from. It's one of the most boring

0:00:36.159 --> 0:00:38.959
<v Speaker 1>names you could have, but it is my last name.

0:00:40.440 --> 0:00:42.000
<v Speaker 1>And that's what we're talking about. I don't even know

0:00:42.520 --> 0:00:46.199
<v Speaker 1>my I mean, I know the like country of origin

0:00:46.240 --> 0:00:49.239
<v Speaker 1>and stuff for Bryant, but I don't really know. Like

0:00:49.479 --> 0:00:54.000
<v Speaker 1>this is one of those episodes where I was constantly going, oh,

0:00:54.480 --> 0:00:57.360
<v Speaker 1>that's where that came from. Oh, that's interesting, but I

0:00:57.360 --> 0:01:00.560
<v Speaker 1>didn't have anything for me. I have something for you, friend.

0:01:01.200 --> 0:01:06.040
<v Speaker 1>You got the origin of Bryant, No origin of Wayne. Okay,

0:01:06.120 --> 0:01:10.960
<v Speaker 1>let's hear it. It denotes a driver or builder of wagons.

0:01:11.000 --> 0:01:15.880
<v Speaker 1>That's you, buddy in a nutshell, Well that was my surname. Yeah, yeah,

0:01:15.920 --> 0:01:17.600
<v Speaker 1>but I mean it still works for your middle name

0:01:17.600 --> 0:01:19.520
<v Speaker 1>is sound like it just loses all meaning when it

0:01:19.560 --> 0:01:23.280
<v Speaker 1>gets moved to the middle. Right, builder wagons, it's me

0:01:23.640 --> 0:01:26.080
<v Speaker 1>or driver. You could have been a driver to truck

0:01:26.120 --> 0:01:31.200
<v Speaker 1>wagon or or a double trouble a builder driver of wagons. Right.

0:01:32.600 --> 0:01:36.080
<v Speaker 1>So that's that's it. But we're not talking about middle names.

0:01:36.080 --> 0:01:38.720
<v Speaker 1>We're never really talking about first names. We're talking about surnames,

0:01:39.200 --> 0:01:41.720
<v Speaker 1>which if you've ever been confused about which one that is,

0:01:41.800 --> 0:01:46.120
<v Speaker 1>it's the last name, it's the family name. Yes, And

0:01:46.160 --> 0:01:48.160
<v Speaker 1>depending on where you live in the world, it might

0:01:48.240 --> 0:01:51.520
<v Speaker 1>come before your first name, it might come after it.

0:01:51.800 --> 0:01:55.120
<v Speaker 1>There might be a couple of surnames involved, there may

0:01:55.120 --> 0:01:58.240
<v Speaker 1>be a hyphen joining them. Um, there's a lot of

0:01:58.240 --> 0:02:01.000
<v Speaker 1>different things you can do with surnames. And like you,

0:02:01.160 --> 0:02:04.280
<v Speaker 1>I was like, okay, there's actually a lot of interesting

0:02:04.320 --> 0:02:06.960
<v Speaker 1>stuff to this, So good pick, and thanks to the

0:02:07.000 --> 0:02:10.400
<v Speaker 1>grabster for helping us out. Yeah, and you know Ed

0:02:11.200 --> 0:02:14.760
<v Speaker 1>will feature later on because I don't want to spoil

0:02:14.800 --> 0:02:18.639
<v Speaker 1>it yet. But his last name is interesting because this

0:02:18.800 --> 0:02:21.359
<v Speaker 1>Polish and Polish names are generally interesting and how they're

0:02:21.800 --> 0:02:24.560
<v Speaker 1>and how they look on paper on the page and

0:02:24.560 --> 0:02:27.560
<v Speaker 1>are often changed. So we're just we're gonna float that

0:02:27.600 --> 0:02:30.640
<v Speaker 1>out there as a teaser. We're gonna be talking about

0:02:30.760 --> 0:02:34.640
<v Speaker 1>Ed's last name and speaking of being on paper. I

0:02:34.680 --> 0:02:38.600
<v Speaker 1>thought it was a polished name all this time. Glad

0:02:38.680 --> 0:02:42.560
<v Speaker 1>you said something first. Uh. The deal with surnames, though,

0:02:42.840 --> 0:02:47.919
<v Speaker 1>is they have been around a lot less long. That's

0:02:47.919 --> 0:02:51.079
<v Speaker 1>one way to say it than a given name or

0:02:51.120 --> 0:02:53.880
<v Speaker 1>a first name. Like first names, they came first, like

0:02:54.120 --> 0:02:57.280
<v Speaker 1>from the beginnings of people, like with Took Took. People

0:02:57.320 --> 0:03:00.440
<v Speaker 1>wanted to call each other things, and so people would

0:03:00.480 --> 0:03:04.079
<v Speaker 1>just give each other names. But surnames were invented much

0:03:04.160 --> 0:03:07.000
<v Speaker 1>much much later for reasons we're going to talk about

0:03:07.080 --> 0:03:10.720
<v Speaker 1>kind of around Dish the eleventh century. Yeah, that's for

0:03:10.919 --> 0:03:16.119
<v Speaker 1>like England, Western Europe. Um. There were places where they

0:03:16.320 --> 0:03:19.079
<v Speaker 1>came along much earlier, like I think in China they've

0:03:19.120 --> 0:03:22.160
<v Speaker 1>been in use for three thousand years as far as

0:03:22.200 --> 0:03:25.400
<v Speaker 1>we can tell. And then in Rome there were different

0:03:25.480 --> 0:03:29.560
<v Speaker 1>naming conventions that had two names, sometimes three names, you know,

0:03:29.760 --> 0:03:33.240
<v Speaker 1>a couple of thousand years ago. So yeah, surnames are

0:03:33.280 --> 0:03:38.200
<v Speaker 1>in England at least or the Western Europe. Uh, they

0:03:38.200 --> 0:03:42.440
<v Speaker 1>are definitely latecomers, is relatively speaking. Yeah, and you know,

0:03:42.480 --> 0:03:45.080
<v Speaker 1>one of the reasons, uh, you might think, like why

0:03:45.120 --> 0:03:47.280
<v Speaker 1>would you need a surname, and there are a bunch

0:03:47.280 --> 0:03:49.760
<v Speaker 1>of reasons, um, one of which, like one of the

0:03:49.800 --> 0:03:52.960
<v Speaker 1>earliest reasons was that people, you know, there were more

0:03:52.960 --> 0:03:57.080
<v Speaker 1>people being born, and so your little quaint town that

0:03:57.240 --> 0:04:02.160
<v Speaker 1>had you know, John and in Jane everyone who John

0:04:02.160 --> 0:04:04.600
<v Speaker 1>and Jane were. But then as more and more people

0:04:04.600 --> 0:04:06.720
<v Speaker 1>are born, that town gets bigger and bigger. There's more

0:04:06.840 --> 0:04:10.040
<v Speaker 1>John's and Jane's. It was literally just like a way

0:04:10.080 --> 0:04:14.480
<v Speaker 1>to differentiate people, yeah, exactly. And then also as people

0:04:14.480 --> 0:04:18.680
<v Speaker 1>started to travel more, um there there that also kind

0:04:18.680 --> 0:04:23.839
<v Speaker 1>of called for people that differentiate themselves a little bit too. So, um,

0:04:24.080 --> 0:04:27.240
<v Speaker 1>population pressure is a really good reason, a really good

0:04:27.279 --> 0:04:31.040
<v Speaker 1>explainer for why there were such things as surnames. Why

0:04:31.120 --> 0:04:34.440
<v Speaker 1>they came along. There's just more people, so you needed

0:04:34.440 --> 0:04:37.839
<v Speaker 1>to be able to say no, not Jane, that Jane,

0:04:37.839 --> 0:04:40.560
<v Speaker 1>the other Jane. People got really sick of doing that,

0:04:40.680 --> 0:04:42.960
<v Speaker 1>especially if a third Jane came along, they just pull

0:04:43.040 --> 0:04:45.599
<v Speaker 1>their hair out and be mad all the time. Right.

0:04:45.839 --> 0:04:50.240
<v Speaker 1>And then by the time people own property or had

0:04:50.279 --> 0:04:53.240
<v Speaker 1>like legal things to transfer to one another, titles and

0:04:53.240 --> 0:04:58.360
<v Speaker 1>things like that, then you had to have surtinnames. So uh, nobles,

0:04:58.400 --> 0:04:59.960
<v Speaker 1>of course, you know, there's you know, a lot of

0:05:00.040 --> 0:05:02.960
<v Speaker 1>class that plays into this because a certain class of

0:05:02.960 --> 0:05:06.960
<v Speaker 1>people were landowners and had official titles. So these nobles

0:05:07.000 --> 0:05:10.400
<v Speaker 1>adopted these surnames, or maybe the monarchs that you have

0:05:10.520 --> 0:05:12.920
<v Speaker 1>to have a surname because we need to know your

0:05:13.320 --> 0:05:16.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, the rights of succession of your land or

0:05:16.040 --> 0:05:17.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's just gotta all legally check out. So

0:05:17.839 --> 0:05:22.320
<v Speaker 1>we just being John isn't enough anymore. Yeah, it was. Um,

0:05:22.360 --> 0:05:26.760
<v Speaker 1>it's strange to think of, but naming somebody and like saying,

0:05:26.760 --> 0:05:28.480
<v Speaker 1>either choose a name or I'm going to choose one

0:05:28.520 --> 0:05:32.160
<v Speaker 1>for you. It was a way for the ruling class

0:05:32.200 --> 0:05:36.160
<v Speaker 1>of a civilization to like basically track people, keep them

0:05:36.200 --> 0:05:39.680
<v Speaker 1>in line, keep you know, one group from you know,

0:05:40.240 --> 0:05:44.520
<v Speaker 1>marrying another group, and consolidating power. Um. And it's interesting

0:05:44.520 --> 0:05:47.560
<v Speaker 1>because they think that, you know, in China, one of

0:05:47.560 --> 0:05:51.599
<v Speaker 1>the reasons why uh they surnames came along three thousand

0:05:51.680 --> 0:05:55.159
<v Speaker 1>years ago was because of population pressure, but also because

0:05:55.279 --> 0:05:58.280
<v Speaker 1>the Zoo dynasty. And I'm probably not saying that correctly.

0:05:58.560 --> 0:06:00.680
<v Speaker 1>I think it's z h O. You is that right?

0:06:02.880 --> 0:06:05.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna go with yao. I'm just kidna. I'm feeling

0:06:05.080 --> 0:06:07.360
<v Speaker 1>a little spicy today. I thought it was h A

0:06:07.480 --> 0:06:09.680
<v Speaker 1>O or am I thinking of something different? Okay? So

0:06:09.880 --> 0:06:13.480
<v Speaker 1>even more I'm going with Jao okay. But anyway, the

0:06:13.560 --> 0:06:16.880
<v Speaker 1>Joo dynasty was saying, um, like, you know, we want

0:06:16.920 --> 0:06:19.480
<v Speaker 1>to keep track of you nobles, and a good way

0:06:19.520 --> 0:06:21.520
<v Speaker 1>to do that is to like label something. That's how

0:06:21.560 --> 0:06:24.479
<v Speaker 1>you keep track of something. And that's that's one of

0:06:24.520 --> 0:06:27.440
<v Speaker 1>the other reasons why these um surnames came along in

0:06:27.520 --> 0:06:30.240
<v Speaker 1>China and the same thing played out um you know,

0:06:30.480 --> 0:06:33.159
<v Speaker 1>a couple of thousand years later in England for basically

0:06:33.240 --> 0:06:35.960
<v Speaker 1>the same reasons. That's right, by the way, I was wrong.

0:06:36.640 --> 0:06:40.000
<v Speaker 1>It is the h O wor I'm sorry, oh you okay,

0:06:40.040 --> 0:06:43.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna go with jaw then. Okay, are you talking

0:06:43.600 --> 0:06:49.440
<v Speaker 1>about William the First Yeah, the Conqueror and his Doomsday book, which, boy,

0:06:49.480 --> 0:06:54.479
<v Speaker 1>if there was ever a book that was mistitled, it's

0:06:54.520 --> 0:06:58.919
<v Speaker 1>not Doomsday. It's Domesday D O M E S D

0:06:59.040 --> 0:07:01.320
<v Speaker 1>A Y. But when you look at it very you

0:07:01.440 --> 0:07:04.400
<v Speaker 1>just want to say doomsday book. Yeah, But what it

0:07:04.480 --> 0:07:07.480
<v Speaker 1>was it was just a survey of land and landowners

0:07:08.000 --> 0:07:13.320
<v Speaker 1>and tight six and William the First commission this thing

0:07:13.400 --> 0:07:15.560
<v Speaker 1>and basically said, all right, we got a book now,

0:07:15.600 --> 0:07:17.920
<v Speaker 1>so all these informal names aren't going to do it,

0:07:17.960 --> 0:07:19.840
<v Speaker 1>so we have to have an official historical record of

0:07:19.880 --> 0:07:25.000
<v Speaker 1>this stuff, So pick a surname. Yeah. It was almost

0:07:25.040 --> 0:07:28.400
<v Speaker 1>like taking a snapshot of like the conventions and the

0:07:28.440 --> 0:07:31.640
<v Speaker 1>customs of naming people at the time, because William the

0:07:31.640 --> 0:07:34.920
<v Speaker 1>Conqueror didn't say, you know, you have to have a

0:07:34.960 --> 0:07:37.880
<v Speaker 1>surname now. It was more like whatever you go by,

0:07:38.160 --> 0:07:40.320
<v Speaker 1>you're going to go down in this book as that

0:07:41.240 --> 0:07:46.760
<v Speaker 1>and that basically solidified and created that tradition of passing

0:07:46.760 --> 0:07:50.120
<v Speaker 1>down surnames. From that point on, it kind of like

0:07:50.560 --> 0:07:53.120
<v Speaker 1>kept it going. What is so funny? I'm just trying

0:07:53.120 --> 0:07:55.320
<v Speaker 1>to think, do you want to be John the a

0:07:55.400 --> 0:07:57.680
<v Speaker 1>hole the rest of your life? Exactly? That's what you're

0:07:57.720 --> 0:07:59.920
<v Speaker 1>known as around town. But if you have a chance

0:08:00.080 --> 0:08:02.280
<v Speaker 1>or to rewrite things, Yeah, and if you go back

0:08:02.280 --> 0:08:06.920
<v Speaker 1>and look, there's a a website that uh that um

0:08:07.200 --> 0:08:10.080
<v Speaker 1>ed found. I'll try to find it later, but it's

0:08:10.120 --> 0:08:15.680
<v Speaker 1>basically just uh, a tittering tour through medieval England and

0:08:15.760 --> 0:08:19.200
<v Speaker 1>some of the horrific last names people got saddled with

0:08:19.360 --> 0:08:22.440
<v Speaker 1>for nicknames and that became like their last name like

0:08:22.720 --> 0:08:26.280
<v Speaker 1>stuff we just can't even possibly say on this podcast. Yeah,

0:08:26.360 --> 0:08:29.360
<v Speaker 1>and uh, Ed points out too, and um, just since

0:08:29.360 --> 0:08:32.920
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about that, that sarcasm is not a recent invention.

0:08:33.000 --> 0:08:36.920
<v Speaker 1>So you might be uh called something like you maybe

0:08:37.360 --> 0:08:40.960
<v Speaker 1>John Goodman, Well not John Gidman. You could be John Goodman.

0:08:41.160 --> 0:08:43.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm just going with John for everything. Uh, when you

0:08:43.640 --> 0:08:46.319
<v Speaker 1>were like a very like not nice dude, somebody might

0:08:46.320 --> 0:08:49.520
<v Speaker 1>have said Goodman as a good man. Yeah, as a

0:08:49.600 --> 0:08:52.280
<v Speaker 1>sort of a nod and a wink or a joke

0:08:52.360 --> 0:08:55.240
<v Speaker 1>or a play on words. Like imagine if John Goodman

0:08:55.360 --> 0:09:01.079
<v Speaker 1>were basically like Russell Crowe gets the point across, he's

0:09:01.120 --> 0:09:04.600
<v Speaker 1>still on Wrestle Crew. I'm I'm trying to throw back here, man,

0:09:04.640 --> 0:09:07.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm trying to bring everybody back to our period of

0:09:07.520 --> 0:09:11.080
<v Speaker 1>comfort rather than moving along with everyone else. But it's

0:09:11.160 --> 0:09:15.920
<v Speaker 1>interesting you mentioned medieval the medieval period because the Roman

0:09:16.600 --> 0:09:20.560
<v Speaker 1>system that you talked about, which eventually evolved to a

0:09:20.600 --> 0:09:24.320
<v Speaker 1>three name system. I think at first, or I guess,

0:09:24.640 --> 0:09:28.640
<v Speaker 1>before Rome, in different civilizations they had single names. But

0:09:28.760 --> 0:09:31.920
<v Speaker 1>then the Romans came along and they had what was

0:09:31.960 --> 0:09:36.720
<v Speaker 1>called a prey I guess prey Noman, which would be

0:09:37.000 --> 0:09:39.120
<v Speaker 1>the equivalent of a given name. Then the Noman which

0:09:39.120 --> 0:09:41.080
<v Speaker 1>what we would think of as the last name, and

0:09:41.120 --> 0:09:43.640
<v Speaker 1>then later on, if you were like an elite, you

0:09:43.640 --> 0:09:46.840
<v Speaker 1>would have a third name, the cognomen uh if you

0:09:46.840 --> 0:09:48.680
<v Speaker 1>wanted to like show off a little bit and show

0:09:48.720 --> 0:09:51.880
<v Speaker 1>your status. But it went away after the Romans for

0:09:51.920 --> 0:09:55.680
<v Speaker 1>a long time and then came back with the Europeans. Yeah,

0:09:55.760 --> 0:09:58.080
<v Speaker 1>it's really interesting that like the Europeans had all this

0:09:58.200 --> 0:10:00.600
<v Speaker 1>influence the Chinese had already in I ended this for

0:10:00.640 --> 0:10:02.800
<v Speaker 1>a couple of thousand years, and it just kind of

0:10:02.840 --> 0:10:07.360
<v Speaker 1>like evolved in isolation later on. So it really kind

0:10:07.360 --> 0:10:09.679
<v Speaker 1>of does just go to go to show you like

0:10:09.720 --> 0:10:12.880
<v Speaker 1>surnames are just once you reach a certain point of

0:10:13.160 --> 0:10:18.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, a civilization or a population growth, it's just

0:10:18.480 --> 0:10:21.280
<v Speaker 1>something that's just going to come up inevitably organically. It's

0:10:21.320 --> 0:10:24.200
<v Speaker 1>pretty neat. It is pretty neat. Um and we I

0:10:24.200 --> 0:10:27.240
<v Speaker 1>know we mentioned um. Some Asian names, I think Korean

0:10:27.280 --> 0:10:31.080
<v Speaker 1>and Japanese and Chinese are traditionally written with the surname

0:10:31.200 --> 0:10:34.040
<v Speaker 1>first and then you're given name. And then just a

0:10:34.040 --> 0:10:37.840
<v Speaker 1>few years ago, Japan I think formally enshrined that and said,

0:10:37.960 --> 0:10:40.199
<v Speaker 1>you know, we're not gonna western ize this anymore. We're

0:10:40.200 --> 0:10:42.559
<v Speaker 1>gonna go with the surname first. Yeah, they're going back

0:10:42.559 --> 0:10:45.360
<v Speaker 1>to their roots. I love it. A new kind of suit.

0:10:47.200 --> 0:10:52.280
<v Speaker 1>That's right. You you got that one really? Yeah? Sure, man, Chuck,

0:10:52.360 --> 0:10:56.439
<v Speaker 1>I'm impressed. Uh, she'll be. Well, since you're impressed, let's

0:10:56.440 --> 0:10:58.480
<v Speaker 1>take a break, because I don't I want to. I

0:10:58.520 --> 0:11:00.440
<v Speaker 1>want to just like bathe in that for minute. I

0:11:00.440 --> 0:11:03.480
<v Speaker 1>think it's a wise move, or rather two minutes, and uh,

0:11:03.559 --> 0:11:07.280
<v Speaker 1>we'll be back and talk about the different types of

0:11:07.280 --> 0:11:18.240
<v Speaker 1>surnames and why they came about right after this defin

0:11:26.440 --> 0:11:32.800
<v Speaker 1>sk Alright. So, um, what's interesting is that surnames, you know,

0:11:33.080 --> 0:11:36.040
<v Speaker 1>take all sorts of different shapes and forms, and there's

0:11:36.040 --> 0:11:38.600
<v Speaker 1>actually some cultures that just don't have them or don't

0:11:38.720 --> 0:11:42.760
<v Speaker 1>use them. I believe, Um, the Philippines didn't use surnames

0:11:42.840 --> 0:11:48.160
<v Speaker 1>until they were colonized by um Europeans. Um. So I mean,

0:11:48.160 --> 0:11:50.640
<v Speaker 1>there's some some cultures that don't use surnames at all.

0:11:50.679 --> 0:11:53.880
<v Speaker 1>But among the cultures that do use surnames in different

0:11:54.360 --> 0:11:58.400
<v Speaker 1>way shape, way, shapes and forms, there's actually some commonalities

0:11:58.559 --> 0:12:02.199
<v Speaker 1>almost universality amongst our names and where they came from

0:12:02.240 --> 0:12:04.800
<v Speaker 1>and what they mean. Um. And there's at least four

0:12:04.880 --> 0:12:08.040
<v Speaker 1>or five that you can kind of hack out that. Say,

0:12:08.120 --> 0:12:10.199
<v Speaker 1>wherever you go in the world, if they're using surnames,

0:12:10.240 --> 0:12:14.280
<v Speaker 1>they may have some sort of like version of this. Yeah,

0:12:14.320 --> 0:12:17.599
<v Speaker 1>and this is the stuff that's really cool. I think. Um,

0:12:17.640 --> 0:12:20.200
<v Speaker 1>and this found me saying, you know, because ed gives

0:12:20.360 --> 0:12:23.080
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of great examples of a surname, and then

0:12:23.080 --> 0:12:25.560
<v Speaker 1>when you find out how it evolved to be that,

0:12:26.400 --> 0:12:29.520
<v Speaker 1>you just go, oh, well, that completely makes sense. Now.

0:12:30.520 --> 0:12:33.439
<v Speaker 1>Uh well, I was about to say something about jobs,

0:12:33.480 --> 0:12:35.560
<v Speaker 1>but we'll get to jobs a minute. Um. First though,

0:12:36.080 --> 0:12:40.160
<v Speaker 1>is place names, specific place names. If you were and

0:12:40.200 --> 0:12:41.720
<v Speaker 1>I think a lot of people know this one, but

0:12:41.800 --> 0:12:44.840
<v Speaker 1>if you were from a place, you might have been

0:12:45.480 --> 0:12:49.840
<v Speaker 1>Chuck of Atlanta, or you know, if it was in Europe,

0:12:49.840 --> 0:12:52.199
<v Speaker 1>it might you might have substituted d E for the Latin,

0:12:52.280 --> 0:12:57.920
<v Speaker 1>like chuck d Atlanta, and then over time that d um.

0:12:57.960 --> 0:13:00.800
<v Speaker 1>There's this this process that happens to words, where if

0:13:00.800 --> 0:13:04.360
<v Speaker 1>you use a word for a thousand years, it gets

0:13:04.440 --> 0:13:08.280
<v Speaker 1>kind of molded and shaped and um and cut down

0:13:08.320 --> 0:13:12.400
<v Speaker 1>to a more manageable size. You're saying L and OMG

0:13:12.840 --> 0:13:16.600
<v Speaker 1>right exactly or l m f A oh because party

0:13:16.679 --> 0:13:20.559
<v Speaker 1>rock is in the house tonight. Um. But it's called truncation.

0:13:21.040 --> 0:13:23.840
<v Speaker 1>And the same thing happens with names too, So instead

0:13:23.880 --> 0:13:27.760
<v Speaker 1>of Chuck day Atlanta, it could just become chuckd Atlanta,

0:13:28.240 --> 0:13:32.800
<v Speaker 1>d apostrophe Atlanta, which is very kind of nice, like

0:13:32.840 --> 0:13:36.040
<v Speaker 1>I like the way that rings that Atlanta. Um, Yeah,

0:13:36.080 --> 0:13:37.800
<v Speaker 1>you have to say it like that, or you could

0:13:37.800 --> 0:13:40.000
<v Speaker 1>just get rid of that apostrophe and make it one

0:13:40.000 --> 0:13:43.720
<v Speaker 1>word chucked Atlanta, right, And that actually happened like that

0:13:43.760 --> 0:13:46.720
<v Speaker 1>with the name Darcy. Um. It used to be um

0:13:46.800 --> 0:13:50.120
<v Speaker 1>somebody a day r C r C is a village

0:13:50.120 --> 0:13:53.400
<v Speaker 1>I believe in France, or Normandy maybe um, And then

0:13:53.440 --> 0:13:56.480
<v Speaker 1>over time it became d apostrophe r C as in

0:13:56.559 --> 0:14:00.880
<v Speaker 1>Jefferson Darcy from Married with Children, or just Darcy d

0:14:01.040 --> 0:14:04.320
<v Speaker 1>A r c y as in Mr Darcy from Pride

0:14:04.360 --> 0:14:08.120
<v Speaker 1>and Prejudice, who I presume Jefferson Darcy's character is based on.

0:14:11.360 --> 0:14:15.760
<v Speaker 1>But if you have the name Darcy, um, you can

0:14:16.040 --> 0:14:17.800
<v Speaker 1>almost I mean, there are other ways that you can

0:14:17.840 --> 0:14:20.760
<v Speaker 1>acquire last surname, which will we'll see kind of along

0:14:20.760 --> 0:14:23.680
<v Speaker 1>the way, but Um, chances are you can probably trace

0:14:23.760 --> 0:14:26.280
<v Speaker 1>that back to the fact that someone in your lineage

0:14:26.320 --> 0:14:30.320
<v Speaker 1>was from Arc. Yes. Um. And it also suggests that

0:14:30.400 --> 0:14:33.480
<v Speaker 1>some somewhere back in your lineage, somebody was probably of

0:14:33.840 --> 0:14:37.680
<v Speaker 1>uh noble lineage, because it was the nobles who would

0:14:37.680 --> 0:14:40.920
<v Speaker 1>have taken the place that they were from as their surname,

0:14:41.640 --> 0:14:44.920
<v Speaker 1>because number one, they would go off to court, so

0:14:45.040 --> 0:14:49.520
<v Speaker 1>they would be I'm Jefferson Darcy, so you know, not

0:14:49.840 --> 0:14:53.800
<v Speaker 1>Jefferson d Atlanta, Jefferson Darcy, I'm the one from Darcy

0:14:53.960 --> 0:14:58.120
<v Speaker 1>or from Arcy. Right, Um, a commoner from r c

0:14:58.480 --> 0:15:00.760
<v Speaker 1>would have no reason to to say that they're from

0:15:00.840 --> 0:15:03.520
<v Speaker 1>Arcy because they don't ever leave Arci. They spent their

0:15:03.640 --> 0:15:07.720
<v Speaker 1>entire life there exactly. And then also, um, it would

0:15:08.320 --> 0:15:11.240
<v Speaker 1>let people know that you were, um you basically like

0:15:11.560 --> 0:15:15.000
<v Speaker 1>ruled that land that you were from. That was that

0:15:15.080 --> 0:15:19.320
<v Speaker 1>was that And it's called a toponymic name. Um, where

0:15:19.520 --> 0:15:21.600
<v Speaker 1>you're it's a place name that you've taken as your

0:15:21.680 --> 0:15:25.480
<v Speaker 1>last name. That's right. If you were a commoner, like

0:15:25.520 --> 0:15:30.360
<v Speaker 1>you said, you would not be Chuck of Atlanta because

0:15:30.400 --> 0:15:32.640
<v Speaker 1>I was I grew up a commoner because I could

0:15:32.640 --> 0:15:35.120
<v Speaker 1>make no claim that I ruled Atlanta back in the

0:15:35.160 --> 0:15:39.120
<v Speaker 1>medieval times or post medieval times. Um, and everyone else

0:15:39.120 --> 0:15:41.560
<v Speaker 1>would have that name too. And in my little neighborhood

0:15:41.640 --> 0:15:44.120
<v Speaker 1>that didn't have a lot of money, let's say, but

0:15:44.480 --> 0:15:50.680
<v Speaker 1>you might have a really local name that is um

0:15:51.000 --> 0:15:53.520
<v Speaker 1>more like topographic. Like if your last name is hill

0:15:54.400 --> 0:16:00.440
<v Speaker 1>or under hill or green, then chances are you're you know,

0:16:00.560 --> 0:16:04.280
<v Speaker 1>distant relatives lived on a hill or on a green

0:16:04.680 --> 0:16:06.480
<v Speaker 1>or under a hill. I don't know if that there

0:16:06.520 --> 0:16:09.200
<v Speaker 1>were cave dwellers, but those are literally named. There's a

0:16:09.280 --> 0:16:11.320
<v Speaker 1>name by water. I've never really heard that, but you

0:16:11.360 --> 0:16:14.160
<v Speaker 1>know it literally means you live by the water. Yeah,

0:16:14.160 --> 0:16:16.560
<v Speaker 1>there's some really nice names that have to do with water.

0:16:16.960 --> 0:16:22.520
<v Speaker 1>Um as that served his last names like bay, shore, bay, meadow. Um.

0:16:22.560 --> 0:16:24.960
<v Speaker 1>I think those are very pleasant, but that I never

0:16:25.000 --> 0:16:28.480
<v Speaker 1>really realized that means that their family lived by a bay,

0:16:28.480 --> 0:16:32.520
<v Speaker 1>by a meadow. I guess last names. Those are very

0:16:32.560 --> 0:16:37.480
<v Speaker 1>nice last names. And then um, Chuck. I also realized

0:16:37.520 --> 0:16:40.080
<v Speaker 1>just now when you were talking, that you could have

0:16:40.200 --> 0:16:47.280
<v Speaker 1>rightly called yourself chuck unpaved road right, Sure that would

0:16:47.320 --> 0:16:50.640
<v Speaker 1>have that would have definitely placed you there. Yeah. Yeah,

0:16:50.640 --> 0:16:53.720
<v Speaker 1>I grew up on a chuck to gravel. Yeah. The

0:16:54.200 --> 0:17:01.520
<v Speaker 1>via Graville another locator or I guess topographic. Um, it's

0:17:01.520 --> 0:17:03.480
<v Speaker 1>sort of along those same lines. If you ever hear

0:17:03.520 --> 0:17:07.440
<v Speaker 1>anyone with the last name of like Scott or Western.

0:17:07.680 --> 0:17:09.800
<v Speaker 1>Western is a great example. It's a great last name

0:17:10.920 --> 0:17:14.200
<v Speaker 1>or the last name Ireland that you know, those are

0:17:14.200 --> 0:17:17.439
<v Speaker 1>just very quite literal last names taken because chances are

0:17:17.480 --> 0:17:19.639
<v Speaker 1>they moved to a different place and maybe that was

0:17:19.680 --> 0:17:22.280
<v Speaker 1>a different rentiator, like there, you know that maybe they

0:17:22.320 --> 0:17:25.080
<v Speaker 1>even called the person from Ireland that moved to a

0:17:25.320 --> 0:17:29.840
<v Speaker 1>place not in Ireland, Ireland, right exactly. They were probably emigrants,

0:17:30.040 --> 0:17:32.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, they were the Scott who just showed up

0:17:32.560 --> 0:17:36.399
<v Speaker 1>that everybody liked, you know, the Scott Okay, yeah, John Scott,

0:17:37.600 --> 0:17:41.639
<v Speaker 1>the Scott school, right exactly. Um. It's also like in

0:17:41.880 --> 0:17:45.960
<v Speaker 1>that movie Zombie Land, where everybody's called where they're from.

0:17:46.160 --> 0:17:49.959
<v Speaker 1>I don't remember that, Yeah, I think, Um, what's his name,

0:17:50.040 --> 0:17:53.960
<v Speaker 1>Jesse Eisenberg. Isn't that who's in it? Yeah? He he's

0:17:54.080 --> 0:17:57.800
<v Speaker 1>like Columbus And I can't remember what Woody Harrelson where

0:17:57.840 --> 0:18:02.640
<v Speaker 1>he's from? Text maybe or some something like that. I know, gotcha. Yeah,

0:18:02.800 --> 0:18:05.160
<v Speaker 1>I just wanted to give a Zombie Land shout out.

0:18:05.240 --> 0:18:08.439
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's a good movie. It really was surprisingly so.

0:18:09.560 --> 0:18:13.359
<v Speaker 1>Um or if you're just finished several you just have

0:18:13.440 --> 0:18:19.280
<v Speaker 1>a last initial like Mark s Well, I just watched

0:18:19.320 --> 0:18:21.320
<v Speaker 1>it twice because Emily didn't watch it the first go round,

0:18:21.400 --> 0:18:23.080
<v Speaker 1>and I was like, I think you would like this actually,

0:18:23.920 --> 0:18:26.560
<v Speaker 1>so um, I watched it all the way through again,

0:18:26.880 --> 0:18:30.080
<v Speaker 1>so I obviously loved it. But that boy, that season

0:18:30.080 --> 0:18:34.240
<v Speaker 1>Family was to st at minute panic attack. It really was,

0:18:34.600 --> 0:18:37.840
<v Speaker 1>and one of the most unfair cliffhangers history of TV

0:18:38.280 --> 0:18:42.359
<v Speaker 1>really was, but really really good stuff. Love it. So

0:18:42.560 --> 0:18:46.640
<v Speaker 1>um moving on, Chuck Um. One of the other things

0:18:46.680 --> 0:18:49.360
<v Speaker 1>we could have adopted as our surnames if that were

0:18:49.359 --> 0:18:52.080
<v Speaker 1>a thing, like people were still taking new surnames, we

0:18:52.119 --> 0:18:57.080
<v Speaker 1>could be Josh Podcaster and Chuck Podcaster. Yeah. I mean

0:18:57.119 --> 0:19:00.040
<v Speaker 1>I love this one because this is uh, probably the

0:19:00.040 --> 0:19:02.159
<v Speaker 1>most common way that someone would get a surname. I

0:19:02.160 --> 0:19:07.000
<v Speaker 1>think more than ten of English surnames are because of

0:19:07.040 --> 0:19:10.760
<v Speaker 1>an occupation in your lineage. So you know, Karen Carpenter,

0:19:11.320 --> 0:19:13.159
<v Speaker 1>she had someone way back in her family that was

0:19:13.240 --> 0:19:17.119
<v Speaker 1>a Carpenter probably, or Earl Weaver had a Weaver in

0:19:17.200 --> 0:19:22.080
<v Speaker 1>his family, and uh any Smith. I mean, well that's

0:19:22.119 --> 0:19:24.359
<v Speaker 1>not true because there is a thing too where a

0:19:24.359 --> 0:19:26.640
<v Speaker 1>lot of time immigrants would adopt the name like one

0:19:26.640 --> 0:19:28.560
<v Speaker 1>of the most common names when they would immigrate to

0:19:28.560 --> 0:19:31.240
<v Speaker 1>a country to fit in, so there might be smith's

0:19:31.240 --> 0:19:33.800
<v Speaker 1>acquired that way. But uh, if you were a smith,

0:19:34.320 --> 0:19:38.119
<v Speaker 1>then you had the last name Smith, right, um. Or

0:19:38.680 --> 0:19:42.760
<v Speaker 1>Clark is a derivative of clerk, which was yeah at

0:19:42.760 --> 0:19:45.439
<v Speaker 1>the time, not just some some pencil pusher. It was

0:19:45.520 --> 0:19:48.480
<v Speaker 1>a scholarly person who could read and write at a

0:19:48.520 --> 0:19:52.560
<v Speaker 1>time when most people couldn't read it. Oh yeah, yeah,

0:19:52.760 --> 0:19:58.360
<v Speaker 1>my ancestors was real smart. Um. Thatcher is another example

0:19:58.400 --> 0:20:01.600
<v Speaker 1>of an occupation le based or shepherd. Uh. These are

0:20:01.600 --> 0:20:05.240
<v Speaker 1>all very obvious, but one kind of cool little oh

0:20:05.520 --> 0:20:09.879
<v Speaker 1>moments is in medieval England they would use s t

0:20:10.080 --> 0:20:13.840
<v Speaker 1>e r or x t e r as a suffix

0:20:13.920 --> 0:20:18.160
<v Speaker 1>if it was a woman's occupation, So a baker would

0:20:18.160 --> 0:20:24.200
<v Speaker 1>become Baxter or brewer would become Brewster. That's right, um,

0:20:24.280 --> 0:20:27.000
<v Speaker 1>so uh, and that's that holds not just for England,

0:20:27.000 --> 0:20:28.800
<v Speaker 1>but like if you went to Germany and your last

0:20:28.880 --> 0:20:31.679
<v Speaker 1>name Schmidt, it's it's the same thing as if you

0:20:31.720 --> 0:20:34.040
<v Speaker 1>were in England and your last name Smith, because there

0:20:34.119 --> 0:20:37.000
<v Speaker 1>was somebody in your lineage that was a blacksmith, which

0:20:37.000 --> 0:20:40.479
<v Speaker 1>is pretty cool. Um. And it was almost like like

0:20:40.520 --> 0:20:43.280
<v Speaker 1>I was saying when that Doomsday book was was um

0:20:43.440 --> 0:20:47.880
<v Speaker 1>when it came out. Sure, it was like a snapshot

0:20:48.000 --> 0:20:52.840
<v Speaker 1>of professions at the time. UM. And apparently within about

0:20:53.560 --> 0:20:57.640
<v Speaker 1>three d four hundred years the use of surnames had

0:20:57.680 --> 0:21:02.439
<v Speaker 1>solidified enough that people became weird for the tradition of

0:21:02.480 --> 0:21:05.199
<v Speaker 1>it being weird for us to say I'm changing my

0:21:05.280 --> 0:21:08.400
<v Speaker 1>last name to podcaster because it's my job, that had

0:21:08.480 --> 0:21:11.400
<v Speaker 1>really kind of solidified. People weren't taking on new surnames,

0:21:11.400 --> 0:21:14.679
<v Speaker 1>they were getting them passed along, and so um. Professions

0:21:14.720 --> 0:21:17.719
<v Speaker 1>that came after the fourteenth and fifteen centuries don't usually

0:21:17.760 --> 0:21:20.960
<v Speaker 1>pop up very often as people's last name. No, but

0:21:21.040 --> 0:21:23.280
<v Speaker 1>it's funny now that I'm thinking my Instagram handle is

0:21:23.440 --> 0:21:27.520
<v Speaker 1>Chuck the Podcaster, I should podcast. I should change it

0:21:27.640 --> 0:21:32.400
<v Speaker 1>to de ampost future. That'd be pretty fun. I think

0:21:32.400 --> 0:21:35.760
<v Speaker 1>that's a great idea, Charles. Another fun thing that Ed

0:21:35.800 --> 0:21:42.040
<v Speaker 1>found was sometimes actors back in the day would um,

0:21:42.200 --> 0:21:44.320
<v Speaker 1>sort of with a nod and a wink, take a

0:21:44.359 --> 0:21:47.240
<v Speaker 1>surname of a character that they played a lot. And

0:21:47.600 --> 0:21:51.359
<v Speaker 1>anyone that knows the origins of the theater knows that

0:21:51.480 --> 0:21:54.560
<v Speaker 1>actors were. You know, they're not like they are to day.

0:21:54.600 --> 0:21:57.640
<v Speaker 1>They were generally sort of the lower class. And so

0:21:57.920 --> 0:22:00.760
<v Speaker 1>if you that, that would like sort of explain away

0:22:00.800 --> 0:22:04.440
<v Speaker 1>why you might find someone of the of a lower

0:22:04.520 --> 0:22:07.680
<v Speaker 1>class maybe with the last name king or lord, because

0:22:07.720 --> 0:22:10.040
<v Speaker 1>they might have been an actor who played a king

0:22:10.160 --> 0:22:13.960
<v Speaker 1>or a lord a lot. Yes. Uh. And then nicknames

0:22:14.000 --> 0:22:18.000
<v Speaker 1>play a really big role across cultures. Uh. And again

0:22:18.040 --> 0:22:20.159
<v Speaker 1>this is kind of what they think the tradition of

0:22:20.640 --> 0:22:23.760
<v Speaker 1>first names came out of. Like your your first name

0:22:24.119 --> 0:22:27.359
<v Speaker 1>was not necessarily John or Jim or Josh or Chalk

0:22:27.480 --> 0:22:30.840
<v Speaker 1>or anything like that way back in the day. It

0:22:30.960 --> 0:22:35.399
<v Speaker 1>was probably just the initial differentiator for you, you you know,

0:22:35.480 --> 0:22:38.200
<v Speaker 1>like instead of that guy, No, no, not that guy.

0:22:38.240 --> 0:22:43.240
<v Speaker 1>That guy they would say, you know red or apparently

0:22:43.359 --> 0:22:48.800
<v Speaker 1>sherlock means fair headed. Um. They would also they would

0:22:48.880 --> 0:22:51.960
<v Speaker 1>apparently if you did things with say like your penis,

0:22:52.280 --> 0:22:55.960
<v Speaker 1>you might end up with a nickname name like Shakespeare

0:22:56.000 --> 0:22:59.680
<v Speaker 1>they think is actually that or Wagstaff they think are

0:22:59.680 --> 0:23:05.920
<v Speaker 1>actually leap from from that kind of lewd uh toilet humor,

0:23:06.000 --> 0:23:09.160
<v Speaker 1>lowbrow humor that people used to love in the medieval era.

0:23:09.680 --> 0:23:12.320
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, I mean there was you know, I mean

0:23:12.359 --> 0:23:15.600
<v Speaker 1>Shakespeare itself was sort of body. But I took an

0:23:15.640 --> 0:23:18.800
<v Speaker 1>English class where we did. Uh. I took a couple

0:23:18.840 --> 0:23:21.600
<v Speaker 1>of like, um, not play writing. Well, I did take

0:23:21.600 --> 0:23:25.960
<v Speaker 1>play writing, but play reading classes. What would you call that? Uh? Yeah,

0:23:26.000 --> 0:23:30.080
<v Speaker 1>play reading had a better name than that. Uh. And

0:23:30.359 --> 0:23:32.320
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the place that we read from the

0:23:32.359 --> 0:23:36.760
<v Speaker 1>time period that weren't Shakespeare were just toilet humor, blue humor,

0:23:36.840 --> 0:23:40.520
<v Speaker 1>dirty body humor. And it's not like that's just gone anywhere.

0:23:40.560 --> 0:23:42.719
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I made a marry but children reference not

0:23:43.040 --> 0:23:46.720
<v Speaker 1>twenty minutes ago, so it's still around, although married with

0:23:46.800 --> 0:23:48.800
<v Speaker 1>children is not around anymore. But you know what I'm saying.

0:23:49.480 --> 0:23:54.960
<v Speaker 1>But I would pose it that, like sophisticated intelligent humor

0:23:55.560 --> 0:23:59.679
<v Speaker 1>is a pretty recent invention, you know. I'm sure there

0:23:59.680 --> 0:24:03.120
<v Speaker 1>are gets of it here there over time, Like Benjamin

0:24:03.160 --> 0:24:05.199
<v Speaker 1>Franklin had a pretty sharp wit, and he was he

0:24:05.280 --> 0:24:08.199
<v Speaker 1>was of an intelligent humor. No, you're right. I mean

0:24:08.200 --> 0:24:10.600
<v Speaker 1>the first joke was pulled my finger, let's be honest, right,

0:24:10.640 --> 0:24:13.760
<v Speaker 1>And that lasted a long time and people use that

0:24:14.520 --> 0:24:17.080
<v Speaker 1>until that well went dry. But I think it's a

0:24:17.119 --> 0:24:20.960
<v Speaker 1>fairly recent thing. And I think, um, you know, I

0:24:21.000 --> 0:24:24.480
<v Speaker 1>think that's kids introduction to humor is like lowbrow toilet humor.

0:24:24.760 --> 0:24:26.639
<v Speaker 1>But I think it's a pretty big marker based on

0:24:26.680 --> 0:24:32.520
<v Speaker 1>how fast you you evolve into intelligent humor. Yeah, oh

0:24:32.560 --> 0:24:35.639
<v Speaker 1>for sure. Like my daughter's her the funniest words for

0:24:35.680 --> 0:24:37.720
<v Speaker 1>her are or when she's trying to make a joke.

0:24:37.760 --> 0:24:41.400
<v Speaker 1>Like kids don't make really good jokes. No, they don't. Uh,

0:24:41.440 --> 0:24:44.000
<v Speaker 1>they're all because they're not sophisticated yet. But they sure

0:24:44.080 --> 0:24:46.840
<v Speaker 1>do like to talk about your you know, having poop

0:24:46.840 --> 0:24:49.720
<v Speaker 1>in your hair and stuff like that. You know, it

0:24:49.880 --> 0:24:52.760
<v Speaker 1>is a pretty good one. And me laughing certainly doesn't help. No,

0:24:52.920 --> 0:24:55.760
<v Speaker 1>definitely not. Does Emily get mad or does she laugh too, No,

0:24:55.960 --> 0:24:58.359
<v Speaker 1>she just walks through the room and goes, she got

0:24:58.359 --> 0:25:00.399
<v Speaker 1>that from you, so she is of your own making.

0:25:01.240 --> 0:25:04.280
<v Speaker 1>And I'm like, yeah, I said, I actually do have

0:25:04.320 --> 0:25:06.240
<v Speaker 1>poop in my hair. It's not a joke. And then say,

0:25:06.280 --> 0:25:09.959
<v Speaker 1>pull my finger, Emily, I probably should take back like

0:25:10.040 --> 0:25:13.800
<v Speaker 1>my little soapbox thing condemning toilet and low brow humor,

0:25:13.800 --> 0:25:15.479
<v Speaker 1>because it is still kind of funny now that you

0:25:15.480 --> 0:25:19.200
<v Speaker 1>mentioned it. Yeah, I love it. I mean I like both.

0:25:19.200 --> 0:25:21.960
<v Speaker 1>I like a sharp wit and I like a fart joke,

0:25:22.119 --> 0:25:24.919
<v Speaker 1>all all at the same time. That chuck makes you

0:25:25.000 --> 0:25:30.240
<v Speaker 1>a renaissance man. Alright, good. Uh if you, Well, I

0:25:30.280 --> 0:25:31.960
<v Speaker 1>was trying to tie that into what I was about

0:25:31.960 --> 0:25:33.320
<v Speaker 1>to say next, but I really couldn't think of a

0:25:33.320 --> 0:25:36.760
<v Speaker 1>good last name for that. But um, if you Another

0:25:36.880 --> 0:25:40.760
<v Speaker 1>very common surname convention is if you were the son

0:25:41.440 --> 0:25:45.320
<v Speaker 1>or daughter of somebody and if John was your dad,

0:25:45.400 --> 0:25:49.560
<v Speaker 1>you would be Johnson or Smithson. Uh. Sometimes it was

0:25:49.600 --> 0:25:52.800
<v Speaker 1>even more basic than that, like if your name was

0:25:53.560 --> 0:25:56.160
<v Speaker 1>It gives the example of someone named Martin and then

0:25:56.160 --> 0:25:58.720
<v Speaker 1>as some named George, they might just take the dad's

0:25:58.800 --> 0:26:02.520
<v Speaker 1>name and be George Martin. Right. Uh. And that's typically

0:26:02.880 --> 0:26:09.520
<v Speaker 1>especially in Western Europe in the UK. Um, that's it's

0:26:09.560 --> 0:26:13.439
<v Speaker 1>it took the father's lineage. So it's patronymic. Is that

0:26:13.520 --> 0:26:15.359
<v Speaker 1>kind of naming convention, And there is such a thing

0:26:15.400 --> 0:26:19.520
<v Speaker 1>as matronymic naming conventions. It's just much rarer in h

0:26:19.600 --> 0:26:23.760
<v Speaker 1>in our cultures. Um, but it does happen, Like Marriott

0:26:23.800 --> 0:26:27.919
<v Speaker 1>means a child of Mary. Um. Yeah, so it happens

0:26:27.920 --> 0:26:31.520
<v Speaker 1>from time to time. It's just much less common. Um.

0:26:31.680 --> 0:26:33.560
<v Speaker 1>But that is a like you said, it's a very

0:26:33.640 --> 0:26:37.399
<v Speaker 1>common thing to name to take a relative's name, and

0:26:37.440 --> 0:26:39.760
<v Speaker 1>it happens in It's a bunch of different ways um

0:26:39.800 --> 0:26:42.280
<v Speaker 1>and a good example of how how you know different

0:26:42.320 --> 0:26:46.560
<v Speaker 1>it can be as in Icelandic culture to where um,

0:26:46.600 --> 0:26:49.600
<v Speaker 1>if you're a son, say you're the son of Eric

0:26:50.520 --> 0:26:57.840
<v Speaker 1>um you of course yeah, um, your your last name

0:26:58.240 --> 0:27:02.040
<v Speaker 1>would be eric Son if you were a son, if

0:27:02.040 --> 0:27:05.720
<v Speaker 1>you were a daughter, you would be Eric's daughter. So

0:27:06.080 --> 0:27:09.080
<v Speaker 1>Eric has a son and a daughter, and they're both

0:27:09.160 --> 0:27:12.640
<v Speaker 1>his son and daughter, but they have two different last names.

0:27:13.280 --> 0:27:16.760
<v Speaker 1>And the reason why Iceland is not catching fire and

0:27:16.800 --> 0:27:19.280
<v Speaker 1>people are running all over the place and confusion is

0:27:19.280 --> 0:27:22.840
<v Speaker 1>because they don't really care as much about last names. Yeah,

0:27:22.880 --> 0:27:25.280
<v Speaker 1>this is kind of cool because Ed brought up b

0:27:25.359 --> 0:27:29.320
<v Speaker 1>York and she doesn't just go by B York to

0:27:29.440 --> 0:27:33.040
<v Speaker 1>be like Madonna. B York goes by BI York because

0:27:33.080 --> 0:27:36.560
<v Speaker 1>in Icelandic culture, the surname just isn't that big of

0:27:36.560 --> 0:27:39.920
<v Speaker 1>a deal. Uh. And so I looked up her surname

0:27:40.480 --> 0:27:43.320
<v Speaker 1>and be York's surname is actually and I'm going to

0:27:43.440 --> 0:27:47.040
<v Speaker 1>mispronounce this because I have no idea about Icelandic stuff,

0:27:47.520 --> 0:27:52.680
<v Speaker 1>but is it's Guman's daughter, which is of course d

0:27:52.800 --> 0:27:58.720
<v Speaker 1>O T T I R. Because her father was Gumander Goonerson.

0:27:59.359 --> 0:28:05.160
<v Speaker 1>That's a great which means that his father was named Gooner, right,

0:28:05.480 --> 0:28:09.120
<v Speaker 1>so it's sort of this weird flip as you go back.

0:28:09.160 --> 0:28:11.480
<v Speaker 1>It's like almost like a little puzzle, a little Icelandic puzzle.

0:28:11.640 --> 0:28:13.960
<v Speaker 1>It is. It's pretty cool. And then also in a

0:28:14.000 --> 0:28:17.760
<v Speaker 1>stroke of awesomeness, um, Iceland has also come up with

0:28:17.840 --> 0:28:24.959
<v Speaker 1>a third uh, a third name for non binary gendered people, Um,

0:28:25.080 --> 0:28:27.240
<v Speaker 1>who don't go by son or daughter, they go by Burr.

0:28:27.400 --> 0:28:31.879
<v Speaker 1>So it would be Eric Burr. That's right, and that

0:28:32.040 --> 0:28:34.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, that's the thing now with especially with hyphen nations.

0:28:35.040 --> 0:28:38.400
<v Speaker 1>We'll get to why you might change your name, but um,

0:28:38.440 --> 0:28:41.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, one of the sort of I feel like

0:28:41.320 --> 0:28:43.200
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of antiquated, but one of the things that

0:28:43.560 --> 0:28:45.520
<v Speaker 1>we do here in the West sometimes is a woman

0:28:45.520 --> 0:28:48.840
<v Speaker 1>that might take her husband's last name or they might

0:28:48.920 --> 0:28:53.400
<v Speaker 1>hyphenate it. But with uh, you know, non binary parents

0:28:53.480 --> 0:28:56.560
<v Speaker 1>or gay parents, sometimes they will hyphenate their last name,

0:28:57.200 --> 0:28:59.960
<v Speaker 1>which you know, apparently can present a little bit of

0:29:00.040 --> 0:29:04.640
<v Speaker 1>the conflict sometimes in that there uh struggle too, I

0:29:04.640 --> 0:29:08.800
<v Speaker 1>guess have a non traditional family but also sort of

0:29:08.800 --> 0:29:12.440
<v Speaker 1>try and fit in with a more traditional naming convention. Yeah,

0:29:12.560 --> 0:29:15.000
<v Speaker 1>which I had never considered, And that's sad. That that

0:29:15.120 --> 0:29:17.960
<v Speaker 1>is even a question, but it makes sense in a

0:29:18.320 --> 0:29:21.800
<v Speaker 1>sad kind of way. Go Iceland, now, huh yeah. And

0:29:21.840 --> 0:29:25.040
<v Speaker 1>then also, um, we really shouldn't leave our Arab cultures

0:29:25.040 --> 0:29:28.560
<v Speaker 1>who use Ibben first son of or if the name

0:29:28.640 --> 0:29:31.640
<v Speaker 1>Ibben comes in the middle of the name, maybe been

0:29:32.800 --> 0:29:36.520
<v Speaker 1>or Bent as daughter of, and it usually can go

0:29:36.600 --> 0:29:40.760
<v Speaker 1>back a couple of generations, sometimes three, which explains why

0:29:40.800 --> 0:29:43.680
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of ebbins or bins um followed by

0:29:43.680 --> 0:29:49.440
<v Speaker 1>other names in somebody's full name from Arab cultures. That's right.

0:29:49.680 --> 0:29:53.120
<v Speaker 1>Or Ed gives a great example of Saddam Hussein was

0:29:53.760 --> 0:30:00.360
<v Speaker 1>Saddam Hussein abdal Magid al tecret and Saddam would be

0:30:00.440 --> 0:30:02.800
<v Speaker 1>the given name there, Hussein would be the father's name.

0:30:03.640 --> 0:30:09.400
<v Speaker 1>Abdol Mageed is grandfather's name. Then al Tecredi is where

0:30:09.480 --> 0:30:12.280
<v Speaker 1>he grew up. So that's sort of a a mesh

0:30:12.440 --> 0:30:16.280
<v Speaker 1>of topic or not topographic. I guess, uh what do

0:30:16.280 --> 0:30:22.280
<v Speaker 1>we call the geographic? Yeah, toponymic and then the patriarchal

0:30:22.720 --> 0:30:25.120
<v Speaker 1>and everything's just sort of matched together and with his grandfather.

0:30:26.760 --> 0:30:28.360
<v Speaker 1>Will you want to take another break and then come

0:30:28.360 --> 0:30:33.120
<v Speaker 1>back and talk more about I don't know surnames. Sure, Okay,

0:30:33.160 --> 0:30:55.560
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna do that. Everybody sit tight, sk uh. So

0:30:55.600 --> 0:30:59.480
<v Speaker 1>one thing we didn't cover with um the uk uh.

0:30:59.680 --> 0:31:04.240
<v Speaker 1>We got to cover the max oh yeah, and the

0:31:03.720 --> 0:31:08.600
<v Speaker 1>the A P S. So, if you were Irish or Scottish,

0:31:08.640 --> 0:31:12.480
<v Speaker 1>the prefix mac would what would mean son of So

0:31:12.560 --> 0:31:14.920
<v Speaker 1>if your name was Dougal and you had a son

0:31:15.080 --> 0:31:19.400
<v Speaker 1>named John, you would be John MacDougal. Or in the

0:31:19.440 --> 0:31:24.040
<v Speaker 1>case of being from Wales, they use a P to

0:31:24.200 --> 0:31:27.400
<v Speaker 1>mean son of so. And this is kind of interesting

0:31:27.440 --> 0:31:31.200
<v Speaker 1>because it gets truncated along the way. So ap Rice

0:31:31.960 --> 0:31:34.920
<v Speaker 1>r h y s would be son of Rice, but

0:31:35.040 --> 0:31:37.640
<v Speaker 1>then over time that gets truncated and the ap just

0:31:37.720 --> 0:31:42.520
<v Speaker 1>becomes a P. So the name price originally can vary. Well,

0:31:42.720 --> 0:31:44.719
<v Speaker 1>it's hard to say like in all cases obviously, but

0:31:45.200 --> 0:31:48.000
<v Speaker 1>I could have very well been like the son of Rice, yeah,

0:31:48.080 --> 0:31:51.080
<v Speaker 1>or Reese. So it could also be the last name priest.

0:31:52.080 --> 0:31:55.680
<v Speaker 1>That don't sound right right, We're going with Rice instead

0:31:57.040 --> 0:31:59.520
<v Speaker 1>and then Chuck. So uh. We talked a little bit

0:31:59.520 --> 0:32:02.520
<v Speaker 1>about changing names, and there's all sorts of reasons people

0:32:02.640 --> 0:32:05.760
<v Speaker 1>change names. There's also a lot of reasons people take

0:32:05.800 --> 0:32:09.000
<v Speaker 1>on names. Again, sometimes it's decreed by law. Apparently there

0:32:09.080 --> 0:32:13.200
<v Speaker 1>was a law during the Austro Hungarian Empire that you

0:32:13.360 --> 0:32:17.040
<v Speaker 1>needed a last name, and so there was a kind

0:32:17.080 --> 0:32:19.680
<v Speaker 1>of a custom or a trend you could almost say,

0:32:19.720 --> 0:32:23.320
<v Speaker 1>among Jewish people who lived in that area or under

0:32:23.360 --> 0:32:28.400
<v Speaker 1>Austro Hungarian rule, UM to kind of take names from nature,

0:32:28.720 --> 0:32:34.200
<v Speaker 1>like Tannenbaum or Rosen meaning fir tree or rose um.

0:32:34.280 --> 0:32:36.520
<v Speaker 1>And that's where a lot of the more common Jewish

0:32:36.640 --> 0:32:39.160
<v Speaker 1>names come from that have a kind of a Germanic

0:32:39.440 --> 0:32:42.320
<v Speaker 1>tone to them. And then also there was a big UM,

0:32:42.880 --> 0:32:47.800
<v Speaker 1>there's a big conundrum, ra I guess the decision that

0:32:47.880 --> 0:32:53.720
<v Speaker 1>faced UM freed enslaved people after the Emancipatent Proclamation then

0:32:53.800 --> 0:32:58.680
<v Speaker 1>later on juneteenth UM, because they didn't actually have surnames

0:32:59.080 --> 0:33:03.360
<v Speaker 1>at the time, especially if they'd you know been you know, second, third, fourth,

0:33:03.400 --> 0:33:06.800
<v Speaker 1>fifth generation American. Um, they might not have a surname

0:33:06.840 --> 0:33:10.600
<v Speaker 1>at all, That's right. And so in many cases, uh,

0:33:10.640 --> 0:33:15.719
<v Speaker 1>they were given or sometimes chosen uh, the name of

0:33:15.960 --> 0:33:19.160
<v Speaker 1>the person who enslaved them, which obviously, as generations went on,

0:33:19.240 --> 0:33:22.240
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't sit as well. Uh. And so a lot

0:33:22.240 --> 0:33:24.680
<v Speaker 1>of times, if you're African American, you may change your

0:33:24.720 --> 0:33:28.160
<v Speaker 1>name later on, UM, Like you know, many generations later

0:33:28.480 --> 0:33:32.680
<v Speaker 1>to sort of shed yourself of that enslaved name. And

0:33:32.720 --> 0:33:35.600
<v Speaker 1>then probably the most common reason, especially in the West,

0:33:35.680 --> 0:33:39.760
<v Speaker 1>that people um changed their names is through marriage, which

0:33:39.760 --> 0:33:42.840
<v Speaker 1>has evolved over time. You know. Traditionally it was the

0:33:43.040 --> 0:33:46.760
<v Speaker 1>wife took the husband's last name, shed her own, you know,

0:33:46.920 --> 0:33:50.200
<v Speaker 1>maiden name, maybe moved it to her middle name UH,

0:33:50.240 --> 0:33:52.840
<v Speaker 1>and then that was it UM. And then over time

0:33:52.880 --> 0:33:56.320
<v Speaker 1>there's there's been kind of like this uh um push

0:33:56.480 --> 0:34:01.840
<v Speaker 1>against just being completely subsumed by their husband's identity UM.

0:34:02.040 --> 0:34:06.960
<v Speaker 1>And that introduced the uh, the hyphenated last name into

0:34:07.040 --> 0:34:10.400
<v Speaker 1>Western culture, which again it's like if you go to Spain,

0:34:10.640 --> 0:34:13.880
<v Speaker 1>they've been doing that for a very long time, so

0:34:13.960 --> 0:34:16.359
<v Speaker 1>much so that like um, you know, the children will

0:34:16.400 --> 0:34:20.640
<v Speaker 1>actually have both of their parents last names, father's first

0:34:20.920 --> 0:34:25.239
<v Speaker 1>hyphened mother's second. And that's that's been going on. It's

0:34:25.239 --> 0:34:30.000
<v Speaker 1>called dosa politos um. But in here, in like the West,

0:34:30.239 --> 0:34:32.080
<v Speaker 1>I should say in the United States, because I guess

0:34:32.080 --> 0:34:36.279
<v Speaker 1>Spain would technically be the West. UM. That's becoming more

0:34:36.280 --> 0:34:38.640
<v Speaker 1>and more common, but it's still fairly new if you

0:34:38.680 --> 0:34:42.040
<v Speaker 1>think about it. I mean, I don't remember people hyphenating

0:34:42.080 --> 0:34:45.120
<v Speaker 1>their names very commonly before, like the eighties or nineties,

0:34:45.120 --> 0:34:48.120
<v Speaker 1>I would say, yeah, I mean, I'm sure it happened,

0:34:48.160 --> 0:34:51.239
<v Speaker 1>but it seems like it definitely caught on. Um. You

0:34:51.280 --> 0:34:54.600
<v Speaker 1>know obviously was sort of in lockstep with the women's

0:34:54.640 --> 0:34:59.560
<v Speaker 1>liberation movement. Yeah, they called it the flash dance effect. Uh,

0:34:59.680 --> 0:35:01.719
<v Speaker 1>it's you know, there's there's no wrong way to do it.

0:35:01.719 --> 0:35:04.360
<v Speaker 1>People should do what they want to do. I never

0:35:04.480 --> 0:35:07.560
<v Speaker 1>wanted or expected Emily to change her name because she's

0:35:07.600 --> 0:35:09.560
<v Speaker 1>just She's got a great last name and that's who

0:35:09.600 --> 0:35:12.120
<v Speaker 1>she is. And I never I just thought, I don't know,

0:35:12.200 --> 0:35:14.319
<v Speaker 1>it seemed outdated to me, but there there is no

0:35:14.560 --> 0:35:19.160
<v Speaker 1>right or wrong way. And eventually years later, Um, I

0:35:19.200 --> 0:35:21.120
<v Speaker 1>think it was probably lined up. When my daughter came along,

0:35:21.200 --> 0:35:24.799
<v Speaker 1>she ended up going with a hyphen it. Uh. And

0:35:24.840 --> 0:35:27.200
<v Speaker 1>then you know our very good friend and friend of

0:35:27.200 --> 0:35:29.759
<v Speaker 1>the show who played Jerry on the Stuff You Should

0:35:29.800 --> 0:35:34.480
<v Speaker 1>Know TV show, Uh, Lucy waynewright Roach, that is a

0:35:34.560 --> 0:35:36.480
<v Speaker 1>hyphen it because her father is Loud and Wayne Wright

0:35:36.880 --> 0:35:39.359
<v Speaker 1>and her mother is says he Roach, and so she

0:35:40.000 --> 0:35:42.680
<v Speaker 1>went with a hyphen it. Yeah. Apparently there's a famous

0:35:42.800 --> 0:35:45.920
<v Speaker 1>um bass player for Jethro toll Um. I had not

0:35:46.000 --> 0:35:49.200
<v Speaker 1>heard of this. Dude had you did you know had

0:35:49.239 --> 0:35:52.600
<v Speaker 1>had not? So his first name is Jeffrey. Will call

0:35:52.680 --> 0:35:54.800
<v Speaker 1>him that for the moment. But both of his parents

0:35:55.040 --> 0:35:58.800
<v Speaker 1>UM had the last name of Hammond. Yeah, they weren't related.

0:35:59.400 --> 0:36:03.560
<v Speaker 1>UM just by him playing bass for Jethro Toll and Um.

0:36:03.600 --> 0:36:05.799
<v Speaker 1>He wanted to honor both of them, so he took

0:36:05.840 --> 0:36:08.880
<v Speaker 1>the last name Jeffrey Hammond Hammond with the hyphen in

0:36:08.920 --> 0:36:13.160
<v Speaker 1>between him. Yeah, it's pretty funny. Yep, good job, Jeffrey.

0:36:13.360 --> 0:36:15.840
<v Speaker 1>I know that's pretty great. He got a great story.

0:36:15.840 --> 0:36:24.359
<v Speaker 1>Everywhere he goes. Intelligent humor, that's right. Yeah, you think, uh,

0:36:24.400 --> 0:36:26.520
<v Speaker 1>somebody who went to a Shakespeare play would get that

0:36:26.600 --> 0:36:31.440
<v Speaker 1>now be totally lost on him. One of the myths

0:36:31.480 --> 0:36:34.080
<v Speaker 1>we can kind of bust, although I'm sure it happens

0:36:34.120 --> 0:36:37.720
<v Speaker 1>some was this notion that if you came through Ellis

0:36:37.760 --> 0:36:42.000
<v Speaker 1>Island you were just given whatever name the person at

0:36:42.040 --> 0:36:45.120
<v Speaker 1>immigration on Ellis Island felt like filling out, or if

0:36:45.120 --> 0:36:47.239
<v Speaker 1>they wanted to shorten it, they shortened it, or if

0:36:47.239 --> 0:36:48.800
<v Speaker 1>they want to get rid of some of the hyphens,

0:36:48.800 --> 0:36:51.920
<v Speaker 1>they get rid of the hyphens. Apparently, I'm sure that

0:36:51.960 --> 0:36:55.359
<v Speaker 1>did happen some, but ung angle man, I could never

0:36:55.360 --> 0:36:59.960
<v Speaker 1>say say this Anglish sizing. He nailed it. Yeah, Anglicized

0:37:00.760 --> 0:37:02.799
<v Speaker 1>did not happen to the extent that people think it

0:37:02.840 --> 0:37:05.480
<v Speaker 1>did on Ellis Island. And many times it was the

0:37:05.520 --> 0:37:08.719
<v Speaker 1>people themselves that new country, new start wanted to fit

0:37:08.760 --> 0:37:12.360
<v Speaker 1>in that would um drop the apostrophe from Darcy and

0:37:12.360 --> 0:37:14.840
<v Speaker 1>stuff like that. Yeah, and I saw that, if anything,

0:37:15.160 --> 0:37:19.759
<v Speaker 1>um Ellis Island Uh immigration officers were more prone to

0:37:19.800 --> 0:37:24.000
<v Speaker 1>actually correct mistakes and spelling errors that some shipping clerk

0:37:24.040 --> 0:37:27.640
<v Speaker 1>over in Europe had made on the ship's manifest Um.

0:37:28.080 --> 0:37:31.920
<v Speaker 1>Most of them spoke multiple languages, and we're you know,

0:37:32.400 --> 0:37:35.560
<v Speaker 1>pretty familiar with what you know. There's a finite number

0:37:35.600 --> 0:37:37.520
<v Speaker 1>of last names, and so if you see one with

0:37:37.560 --> 0:37:41.319
<v Speaker 1>the you know, the the name misspelled, they probably corrected it.

0:37:41.400 --> 0:37:43.160
<v Speaker 1>So it's kind of yeah, it's like the opposite of

0:37:43.160 --> 0:37:46.520
<v Speaker 1>the myth that you have. Yeah. Another thing that people

0:37:46.560 --> 0:37:49.279
<v Speaker 1>have done to make it maybe just a little bit

0:37:49.320 --> 0:37:53.440
<v Speaker 1>easier on everybody else in themselves is to, uh, if

0:37:53.440 --> 0:37:55.879
<v Speaker 1>they have a name that's um kind of a lot

0:37:55.920 --> 0:37:59.120
<v Speaker 1>of consonants in it, let's say, yeah, we're looking at

0:37:59.160 --> 0:38:04.359
<v Speaker 1>you Slavic countries, is to phonetically spell it out uh

0:38:04.440 --> 0:38:06.879
<v Speaker 1>and eds like a tease. At the beginning, Ed's last

0:38:06.960 --> 0:38:11.840
<v Speaker 1>name is we always calling the Grabsters Grabnowski, and he

0:38:12.320 --> 0:38:14.960
<v Speaker 1>lives in the region where there are a lot of

0:38:15.000 --> 0:38:18.279
<v Speaker 1>Polish people still living there. And he says that he

0:38:18.520 --> 0:38:22.640
<v Speaker 1>has never seen another Grabowski, but he does see Grabowski's

0:38:22.719 --> 0:38:27.239
<v Speaker 1>or Grabski's. Yep, no Grabsters. No, we're trying to make

0:38:27.280 --> 0:38:30.879
<v Speaker 1>it happen though, aren't we. Yeah, my friend Paul's last

0:38:30.960 --> 0:38:35.640
<v Speaker 1>name is Waslow, but it is not spelled w A

0:38:35.760 --> 0:38:39.680
<v Speaker 1>z l o W. I can't even remember how how

0:38:39.719 --> 0:38:42.839
<v Speaker 1>it's spelled. But it's not intuitive. But he held onto

0:38:42.880 --> 0:38:45.800
<v Speaker 1>it and he didn't he didn't change it phonetically for Paul,

0:38:46.120 --> 0:38:50.759
<v Speaker 1>sticking into the man Paul's family. Yes, that's right. Have

0:38:50.800 --> 0:38:54.960
<v Speaker 1>you got anything else? I am looking here? Do we

0:38:55.000 --> 0:38:58.720
<v Speaker 1>have anything else? Not? Really, nothing of any great interest

0:38:58.760 --> 0:39:01.880
<v Speaker 1>if you ask me. Now, I think this is good stuff.

0:39:01.920 --> 0:39:04.239
<v Speaker 1>I think it's it's cool. People should check it like.

0:39:04.239 --> 0:39:07.640
<v Speaker 1>I'd love to hear some stories from listeners, or maybe

0:39:07.640 --> 0:39:10.319
<v Speaker 1>do a little research into your own name and where

0:39:10.320 --> 0:39:11.759
<v Speaker 1>it might have come from, because there's a lot of

0:39:11.760 --> 0:39:14.879
<v Speaker 1>interesting stories out there. I'd love to hear more. Yeah. Also, Chuck,

0:39:14.920 --> 0:39:17.799
<v Speaker 1>by the way, your last name denotes somebody who used

0:39:17.840 --> 0:39:24.960
<v Speaker 1>to live by a hill in the Celtic era. Oh really, Bryant, Yes,

0:39:25.360 --> 0:39:30.600
<v Speaker 1>derived from Brionne Hill. People pronounced Briony in northern France,

0:39:30.640 --> 0:39:37.320
<v Speaker 1>so you're a Frenchy Chuck. Interesting, Yeah, pretty cool? Yeah

0:39:37.640 --> 0:39:42.560
<v Speaker 1>dat Atlanta. Well, since Chuck said ha ha, of course,

0:39:42.560 --> 0:39:48.080
<v Speaker 1>that means it's time for a listener mail. All right,

0:39:48.320 --> 0:39:52.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna call this uh choir math and I should

0:39:52.800 --> 0:39:56.560
<v Speaker 1>say that uh Lyle here had a lot of consternation

0:39:56.760 --> 0:40:01.160
<v Speaker 1>after Lyle sent this email about because Lyle is a

0:40:01.200 --> 0:40:04.359
<v Speaker 1>math person and I think a math teacher about how

0:40:04.880 --> 0:40:08.040
<v Speaker 1>Lyle chose to express this so much so that almost

0:40:08.040 --> 0:40:10.480
<v Speaker 1>didn't read ex didn't want to call his Lyle any stress.

0:40:11.360 --> 0:40:12.839
<v Speaker 1>But I'm gonna read it anyway. And this is about

0:40:12.840 --> 0:40:16.120
<v Speaker 1>the church choir coincidence. Uh. When we said one in

0:40:16.160 --> 0:40:18.400
<v Speaker 1>a million, he said, did you guys calculate that yourself?

0:40:18.920 --> 0:40:22.680
<v Speaker 1>Guessing you repeated it from something else? Because unless I'm

0:40:22.719 --> 0:40:26.440
<v Speaker 1>missing something, one out of one million is crazy wrong.

0:40:27.040 --> 0:40:30.880
<v Speaker 1>Using the assumptions you stated for two reasons, here we go.

0:40:31.400 --> 0:40:33.759
<v Speaker 1>If there are fifteen members and each had a one

0:40:33.800 --> 0:40:37.640
<v Speaker 1>quarter chance of being late, the probabilities were equal and independent,

0:40:37.719 --> 0:40:42.120
<v Speaker 1>so it was like rolling fifteen four sided dice. Uh,

0:40:42.480 --> 0:40:44.920
<v Speaker 1>that would be roughly a one in a billion chance

0:40:46.160 --> 0:40:51.640
<v Speaker 1>and number two point two. Even the calculation in one

0:40:51.760 --> 0:40:53.920
<v Speaker 1>completely fails to capture what you seem to want to

0:40:53.920 --> 0:40:57.080
<v Speaker 1>express the chance of something like this happening, i e.

0:40:57.239 --> 0:41:00.640
<v Speaker 1>The simultaneous choire lateness coinciding with the explosion. That would

0:41:00.640 --> 0:41:03.520
<v Speaker 1>be trickier to work out. The simplest way to calculate

0:41:03.600 --> 0:41:05.480
<v Speaker 1>it would be to decide on the chance of a

0:41:05.520 --> 0:41:08.440
<v Speaker 1>nineteen fifty Nebraska church blowing up on a given night

0:41:08.480 --> 0:41:11.200
<v Speaker 1>and multiply that by the one in a billion chance above.

0:41:11.840 --> 0:41:13.840
<v Speaker 1>So basically it sounds like we did half of the

0:41:13.880 --> 0:41:17.400
<v Speaker 1>equation and didn't even do that half. Right, No, that

0:41:17.440 --> 0:41:20.280
<v Speaker 1>sounds like us. So he says, you know, did churches

0:41:20.280 --> 0:41:23.200
<v Speaker 1>blow off and blow up off in nineteen fifty Nebraska.

0:41:23.600 --> 0:41:26.640
<v Speaker 1>But see, you could also say a building blowing up

0:41:27.960 --> 0:41:32.239
<v Speaker 1>or a building killing somebody. Like, I don't know where

0:41:32.280 --> 0:41:33.879
<v Speaker 1>you draw the line because I'm not a math person

0:41:33.960 --> 0:41:37.319
<v Speaker 1>or how you would quantify that. I would think you'd

0:41:37.360 --> 0:41:40.200
<v Speaker 1>need to go with churches just to compare apple to apples.

0:41:40.239 --> 0:41:43.520
<v Speaker 1>And then also, you know, not every building is going

0:41:43.560 --> 0:41:47.200
<v Speaker 1>to invite people into it at seven pm on a

0:41:47.320 --> 0:41:50.879
<v Speaker 1>night or something so good point and then actually goes

0:41:50.960 --> 0:41:53.920
<v Speaker 1>on to to say it's easy to get overly dazzled

0:41:53.960 --> 0:41:55.920
<v Speaker 1>doing calculations like these, And I think that's what we

0:41:55.960 --> 0:42:00.000
<v Speaker 1>are now, is overly dazzled dazzled. The more specifically described

0:42:00.040 --> 0:42:03.240
<v Speaker 1>have any event or collection of events, the more astronomically

0:42:03.280 --> 0:42:06.279
<v Speaker 1>unlikely it becomes. Uh, I e. The chance of my

0:42:06.320 --> 0:42:11.480
<v Speaker 1>spaghetti being in this exact configuration or mind bogglingly low. Uh,

0:42:11.840 --> 0:42:15.520
<v Speaker 1>pretty amazing story still, and that is from Lyle. That

0:42:15.680 --> 0:42:19.759
<v Speaker 1>is classic Lyle, always slipping a spaghetti reference into his emails.

0:42:19.800 --> 0:42:23.279
<v Speaker 1>You know. Yeah, that is interesting to think about though, Like,

0:42:23.960 --> 0:42:26.120
<v Speaker 1>depending on how far you want to drill down you

0:42:26.160 --> 0:42:28.960
<v Speaker 1>can you know, it gets a little nutty totally. But

0:42:29.000 --> 0:42:31.640
<v Speaker 1>I like his calculations even better than ours. One in

0:42:31.680 --> 0:42:34.960
<v Speaker 1>a million chance kind of dazzling one in a billion chance.

0:42:35.160 --> 0:42:38.080
<v Speaker 1>And that's just step one. That's I got stars in

0:42:38.120 --> 0:42:41.799
<v Speaker 1>my eyes basically. Wow. Well thanks a lot, Lyle. I'm

0:42:41.840 --> 0:42:44.360
<v Speaker 1>sorry for driving you a little bit crazy. Uh. We

0:42:44.440 --> 0:42:47.640
<v Speaker 1>are glad that you could take the time to explain

0:42:47.680 --> 0:42:50.719
<v Speaker 1>to us, um what we got wrong and not call

0:42:50.840 --> 0:42:55.160
<v Speaker 1>us stupid in the in the bargain. Thank you. If

0:42:55.200 --> 0:42:56.759
<v Speaker 1>you want to be like Lyle and get in touch

0:42:56.760 --> 0:42:58.600
<v Speaker 1>with us, you can send us an email to Stuff

0:42:58.640 --> 0:43:04.480
<v Speaker 1>Podcasts at iHeart radio dot com. Stuff you Should Know

0:43:04.560 --> 0:43:07.360
<v Speaker 1>is a production of I heart Radio. For more podcasts

0:43:07.400 --> 0:43:10.839
<v Speaker 1>my heart Radio, visit the i heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts,

0:43:10.920 --> 0:43:15.640
<v Speaker 1>or wherever you listen to your favorite shows. H