WEBVTT - Listener Q's: Potoos! 

0:00:08.119 --> 0:00:12.119
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Creature Feature production of iHeartRadio. I'm your host

0:00:12.160 --> 0:00:16.480
<v Speaker 1>of Many Parasites, Katie Golden. I studied psychology and evolutionary biology,

0:00:16.480 --> 0:00:19.400
<v Speaker 1>and today on the show, it's a listener questions episode.

0:00:20.000 --> 0:00:24.040
<v Speaker 1>You send me your questions to Creature Feature Product gmail

0:00:24.079 --> 0:00:27.880
<v Speaker 1>dot com and I answer them from questions about pets

0:00:28.000 --> 0:00:32.600
<v Speaker 1>to evolutionary biology to random animal questions. I do my best,

0:00:33.600 --> 0:00:39.280
<v Speaker 1>so let's get right into it. First question is from

0:00:39.560 --> 0:00:42.600
<v Speaker 1>Will h who sent me a TikTok video and asked

0:00:42.760 --> 0:00:47.320
<v Speaker 1>is this real or AI slot? So thank you for this,

0:00:47.520 --> 0:00:51.360
<v Speaker 1>Will and anyone else out there. If you see something

0:00:51.400 --> 0:00:57.640
<v Speaker 1>online about an animal that looks weird or too good

0:00:57.680 --> 0:01:00.640
<v Speaker 1>to be true or too strange to be true, or

0:01:00.680 --> 0:01:03.200
<v Speaker 1>you're trying to tell the difference between something that's fake

0:01:03.720 --> 0:01:07.080
<v Speaker 1>and real, send me an email and I will try

0:01:07.080 --> 0:01:10.080
<v Speaker 1>to help you out with that. So I really feel you.

0:01:10.440 --> 0:01:13.160
<v Speaker 1>Because there's so much AI slop out there. It is

0:01:13.280 --> 0:01:16.160
<v Speaker 1>getting harder to tell the real animals from the fakes,

0:01:16.280 --> 0:01:22.080
<v Speaker 1>which isn't great. But fortunately the video that Will scent

0:01:22.600 --> 0:01:26.520
<v Speaker 1>is very real. It depicts this bird that certainly looks

0:01:26.640 --> 0:01:30.280
<v Speaker 1>like a Jim Henson muppet. It does not look real.

0:01:30.880 --> 0:01:34.920
<v Speaker 1>So this is a species of po to bird. These

0:01:35.080 --> 0:01:39.360
<v Speaker 1>birds have huge, gaping mouths, they have giant eyes. They're

0:01:39.360 --> 0:01:43.240
<v Speaker 1>mostly nocturnal. They look like owls sort of, although they

0:01:43.240 --> 0:01:48.600
<v Speaker 1>are not owls. They have these beautiful camouflage feather that

0:01:48.680 --> 0:01:52.480
<v Speaker 1>looks like tree bark, which allows them to perch on

0:01:52.640 --> 0:01:56.040
<v Speaker 1>stumps to blend in. They'll even lift their little heads

0:01:56.120 --> 0:01:59.160
<v Speaker 1>up at an angle so that their sharp profile looks

0:01:59.240 --> 0:02:02.600
<v Speaker 1>like a split piece of wood jutting out from the stump.

0:02:03.240 --> 0:02:06.720
<v Speaker 1>And they will lay their eggs on these stumps, which

0:02:06.840 --> 0:02:10.080
<v Speaker 1>kind of sounds stupid, except that they carefully select a

0:02:10.120 --> 0:02:12.360
<v Speaker 1>stump that has a cranny or a nook that they

0:02:12.360 --> 0:02:15.400
<v Speaker 1>can wedge in the egg and when they're incubating the

0:02:15.520 --> 0:02:19.600
<v Speaker 1>egg and using this amazing camouflage that makes them look

0:02:19.639 --> 0:02:21.640
<v Speaker 1>like they're part of the you know, like when you

0:02:21.680 --> 0:02:27.000
<v Speaker 1>see some wood and a tree's fallen or snapped in half,

0:02:27.000 --> 0:02:30.160
<v Speaker 1>and the wood's uneven and there's like parts of the

0:02:30.200 --> 0:02:32.760
<v Speaker 1>bark that kind of are jutting up. The po two

0:02:33.160 --> 0:02:36.840
<v Speaker 1>mimics this look by using kind of the angles of

0:02:37.040 --> 0:02:39.360
<v Speaker 1>its body and then its coloration to look like a

0:02:39.360 --> 0:02:42.639
<v Speaker 1>piece of bark. It's very convincing and so when it's

0:02:42.680 --> 0:02:46.000
<v Speaker 1>incubating the egg, the egg's completely hidden from sight. I

0:02:46.000 --> 0:02:48.120
<v Speaker 1>think I've also read that the egg can kind of

0:02:48.120 --> 0:02:51.680
<v Speaker 1>look a bit like maybe some fungus on the on

0:02:51.760 --> 0:02:55.640
<v Speaker 1>the bark, so that might help it, like say, if

0:02:55.639 --> 0:02:58.840
<v Speaker 1>a parent is not sitting on it. So in the

0:02:58.919 --> 0:03:01.160
<v Speaker 1>video that will sit and it looks like. This is

0:03:01.280 --> 0:03:05.639
<v Speaker 1>a great po two which is found in South America,

0:03:06.600 --> 0:03:09.720
<v Speaker 1>and they have this really creepy call, which I'm going

0:03:09.760 --> 0:03:19.560
<v Speaker 1>to play for you right now. Ah. So that's a

0:03:19.600 --> 0:03:23.840
<v Speaker 1>call that was recorded in Colombia. Here's another recording that

0:03:23.960 --> 0:03:32.200
<v Speaker 1>was done in Brazil, so you know that would be

0:03:32.360 --> 0:03:37.080
<v Speaker 1>sort of disconcerting to hear at night. And then when

0:03:37.120 --> 0:03:39.960
<v Speaker 1>you look at them, they are also pretty creepy. Their

0:03:40.000 --> 0:03:44.320
<v Speaker 1>iris is dark brown, but when their pupils are expanded,

0:03:44.360 --> 0:03:47.680
<v Speaker 1>it looks like they have these huge, solid black eyes,

0:03:48.000 --> 0:03:51.400
<v Speaker 1>like a doll's eyes. They're about a foot long in

0:03:51.480 --> 0:03:54.520
<v Speaker 1>height with a wingspan of over two feet. They are

0:03:54.600 --> 0:03:59.200
<v Speaker 1>predators and they chase after mainly large flying insects that

0:03:59.240 --> 0:04:03.320
<v Speaker 1>they'll find in the rainforest, or even the occasional bat

0:04:03.480 --> 0:04:06.440
<v Speaker 1>or small bird. Whatever flies in the air and can

0:04:06.440 --> 0:04:09.520
<v Speaker 1>fit in their mouths. The po too will try to eat.

0:04:10.040 --> 0:04:12.320
<v Speaker 1>It's kind of terrifying to think of if you were

0:04:12.360 --> 0:04:15.120
<v Speaker 1>that size, like if you're a little fairy. There's this

0:04:15.200 --> 0:04:18.400
<v Speaker 1>thing that perfectly blends in with a stump, just looks

0:04:18.440 --> 0:04:21.040
<v Speaker 1>like a piece of wood, and then it sits there

0:04:21.120 --> 0:04:23.840
<v Speaker 1>until you fly by, and then jumps out at you

0:04:23.880 --> 0:04:28.159
<v Speaker 1>with this giant, gaping, muppet like mouth and just eat

0:04:28.240 --> 0:04:32.640
<v Speaker 1>your right up. So I would think, given that this

0:04:32.760 --> 0:04:36.600
<v Speaker 1>bird is so strange looking and has such a kind

0:04:36.640 --> 0:04:40.280
<v Speaker 1>of creepy call, that it would have a few sort

0:04:40.320 --> 0:04:44.720
<v Speaker 1>of like myths about it cultural stories about it, and

0:04:44.960 --> 0:04:47.960
<v Speaker 1>I did find some. So one is that parts of

0:04:48.000 --> 0:04:52.520
<v Speaker 1>its body are sometimes uses charms to ward off seduction,

0:04:52.720 --> 0:04:54.720
<v Speaker 1>which I guess, you know, if we listen to that

0:04:54.800 --> 0:04:59.360
<v Speaker 1>call again, Yeah, I can kind of see how that

0:04:59.440 --> 0:05:03.240
<v Speaker 1>would be considered a ward against seduction. It's not a

0:05:03.320 --> 0:05:08.839
<v Speaker 1>very seductive call. But there's also apparently a story told

0:05:08.920 --> 0:05:13.240
<v Speaker 1>by the Shuar group a it's a group of indigenous

0:05:13.240 --> 0:05:18.599
<v Speaker 1>people of the Ecuadorian Amazon. Now, I unfortunately struggle to

0:05:18.720 --> 0:05:22.280
<v Speaker 1>verify whether this is actual folklore. I could only find

0:05:22.279 --> 0:05:27.560
<v Speaker 1>references to this on sort of the Park National Forest

0:05:27.720 --> 0:05:33.600
<v Speaker 1>Lodge websites, So I apologize if this is not culturally accurate,

0:05:33.760 --> 0:05:36.919
<v Speaker 1>but this is what I read. In the story. A

0:05:37.080 --> 0:05:40.960
<v Speaker 1>husband tries to get space from his wife by climbing

0:05:41.000 --> 0:05:44.000
<v Speaker 1>up a vine, and then she follows after him, and

0:05:44.320 --> 0:05:47.279
<v Speaker 1>he is frustrated with her following him, so he cuts

0:05:47.320 --> 0:05:50.880
<v Speaker 1>the vine, which causes her to fall, and she's so

0:05:51.080 --> 0:05:54.760
<v Speaker 1>hurt by his actions that she turns herself into a

0:05:54.800 --> 0:05:58.000
<v Speaker 1>bird the po two and starts to cry out in

0:05:58.040 --> 0:06:03.760
<v Speaker 1>the night, my husband husband or I shearu, I shearu.

0:06:04.320 --> 0:06:09.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure if this is the actual story, but

0:06:10.120 --> 0:06:13.200
<v Speaker 1>it's thought that this, like the call, is this mournful

0:06:13.279 --> 0:06:16.839
<v Speaker 1>cry of this wife who was spurned by her husband.

0:06:17.880 --> 0:06:21.520
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, I mean, it's a It's a fascinating looking bird.

0:06:21.600 --> 0:06:24.039
<v Speaker 1>It is very real though, and it does look like

0:06:24.160 --> 0:06:28.400
<v Speaker 1>something out of some strange fairy tale, a weird puppet

0:06:28.560 --> 0:06:32.880
<v Speaker 1>or maybe AI, but it is absolutely real. Just a

0:06:33.360 --> 0:06:37.920
<v Speaker 1>sort of a tip with identifying AI animals, you kind

0:06:37.920 --> 0:06:43.160
<v Speaker 1>of want to look for a lot of like weird smoothness,

0:06:43.400 --> 0:06:46.799
<v Speaker 1>the lighting being like really perfect for a strange animal

0:06:46.880 --> 0:06:51.280
<v Speaker 1>you've never seen before. Sometimes those are giveaways, right, because

0:06:51.279 --> 0:06:54.800
<v Speaker 1>if there's a newly discovered animal, it's unlikely that it's

0:06:54.839 --> 0:06:58.000
<v Speaker 1>going to be in perfect studio lighting. But you know,

0:06:58.120 --> 0:07:01.080
<v Speaker 1>on occasion there are animals that are well documented to

0:07:01.120 --> 0:07:04.120
<v Speaker 1>have really good photos taken of them that are absolutely bizarre.

0:07:04.240 --> 0:07:06.880
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, it's getting harder and harder to tell. So

0:07:07.080 --> 0:07:09.760
<v Speaker 1>go ahead, and if you have any questions about things

0:07:09.760 --> 0:07:11.400
<v Speaker 1>that you're not sure whether it's true or not, I'll

0:07:11.440 --> 0:07:16.440
<v Speaker 1>try to look into that. Next listener question, Hi, Katie,

0:07:16.600 --> 0:07:18.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure if you ever want to discuss this

0:07:18.680 --> 0:07:21.320
<v Speaker 1>issue on the show, because it's very dark and controversial.

0:07:21.480 --> 0:07:24.560
<v Speaker 1>I was wondering if you had any great academic resources

0:07:24.600 --> 0:07:27.280
<v Speaker 1>or studies on the topic, though too many I've found

0:07:27.280 --> 0:07:31.480
<v Speaker 1>have an agenda. I volunteer at an open intake municipal

0:07:31.600 --> 0:07:36.800
<v Speaker 1>kill shelter with the dogs. The city requires SPAE and neuter,

0:07:36.880 --> 0:07:41.200
<v Speaker 1>but it is a secondary charge, not animal control. Walking

0:07:41.240 --> 0:07:44.040
<v Speaker 1>around checking to see I am in the South. She

0:07:44.120 --> 0:07:48.080
<v Speaker 1>means the Southern United States. How has the North conquered

0:07:48.080 --> 0:07:50.480
<v Speaker 1>this problem? We have a partner shelter that takes at

0:07:50.560 --> 0:07:53.080
<v Speaker 1>least one hundred dogs from US a year and they

0:07:53.120 --> 0:07:56.880
<v Speaker 1>get adopted anyway. What are the reasons that SPAE and

0:07:56.920 --> 0:07:59.720
<v Speaker 1>neuter campaigns never took hold down here in the South?

0:08:00.160 --> 0:08:03.160
<v Speaker 1>I read we have more strays because we have milder winters.

0:08:03.240 --> 0:08:06.320
<v Speaker 1>I know animal cruelty and hoarding exist outside this region.

0:08:07.000 --> 0:08:10.520
<v Speaker 1>Attached are some shelter pups. Thank you, Caitlin. Hi, Caitlin.

0:08:10.600 --> 0:08:13.280
<v Speaker 1>First of all, all the doggie is so cute, so cute.

0:08:13.280 --> 0:08:17.080
<v Speaker 1>I hope they get adopted. I understand how challenging it

0:08:17.160 --> 0:08:20.120
<v Speaker 1>must be to work at a shelter knowing that not

0:08:20.160 --> 0:08:23.400
<v Speaker 1>all your animals will find homes, and in order to

0:08:23.640 --> 0:08:27.000
<v Speaker 1>be humane, some of these animals have to be put down.

0:08:27.640 --> 0:08:31.480
<v Speaker 1>And I know there is this stigma against kill shelters.

0:08:31.520 --> 0:08:35.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the name itself sounds very violent. It's important,

0:08:35.440 --> 0:08:38.320
<v Speaker 1>I think, for people to recognize that shelter workers never

0:08:38.440 --> 0:08:41.000
<v Speaker 1>want to have to put animals down. They're not doing this,

0:08:41.640 --> 0:08:45.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, for any other reason except that there's simply

0:08:45.280 --> 0:08:50.240
<v Speaker 1>not infinite resources, infinite amount of space, and so if

0:08:50.240 --> 0:08:53.880
<v Speaker 1>these animals aren't adopted out fast enough, you know, rather

0:08:53.920 --> 0:08:58.320
<v Speaker 1>than letting this animal starved slowly to death and suffer,

0:08:58.960 --> 0:09:01.880
<v Speaker 1>the decision is made to humanely put them down, which

0:09:01.920 --> 0:09:05.320
<v Speaker 1>is very sad. Of course, I don't really like the

0:09:05.400 --> 0:09:08.839
<v Speaker 1>term kill shelter and no kill shelter. It just I

0:09:08.880 --> 0:09:11.480
<v Speaker 1>think it would be more accurate as Caitlin kind of

0:09:11.520 --> 0:09:15.760
<v Speaker 1>phrased it to say open and take shelters, or with

0:09:15.800 --> 0:09:17.959
<v Speaker 1>the no kill shelters. I think a more accurate name

0:09:17.960 --> 0:09:22.960
<v Speaker 1>would be limited admission private shelters, because what the no

0:09:23.120 --> 0:09:27.520
<v Speaker 1>kill shelters often do is they'll reject animals coming into

0:09:27.559 --> 0:09:31.040
<v Speaker 1>their shelter that they know will probably not be able

0:09:31.120 --> 0:09:33.440
<v Speaker 1>to be adopted or if they don't have space, which

0:09:33.480 --> 0:09:35.760
<v Speaker 1>is of course in their right. I'm not saying that

0:09:36.400 --> 0:09:40.280
<v Speaker 1>these limited admission private shelters shouldn't exist. I think they

0:09:40.360 --> 0:09:44.960
<v Speaker 1>can do good work. But these animals that get rejected

0:09:45.000 --> 0:09:48.360
<v Speaker 1>from the limited admission shelter have to go somewhere, and

0:09:48.440 --> 0:09:52.000
<v Speaker 1>often that is like a municipal shelter also known as

0:09:52.040 --> 0:09:55.040
<v Speaker 1>like a kill shelter, because they take in all of

0:09:55.040 --> 0:09:59.200
<v Speaker 1>the animals that come in off the streets and because

0:09:59.240 --> 0:10:03.280
<v Speaker 1>they don't again and have unlimited resources, infinite amount of space,

0:10:03.679 --> 0:10:07.600
<v Speaker 1>and they can't adopt them all out. Rather than keeping

0:10:07.640 --> 0:10:11.600
<v Speaker 1>these animals in like confined conditions where they're all in

0:10:11.679 --> 0:10:14.400
<v Speaker 1>tiny cages where they can't move around or they don't

0:10:14.400 --> 0:10:19.320
<v Speaker 1>have enough food, they are they're euthanized, which is which

0:10:19.320 --> 0:10:21.679
<v Speaker 1>is really sad, I think, but it's not it's not

0:10:21.720 --> 0:10:25.640
<v Speaker 1>done out of cruelty, it's done out of compassion for

0:10:25.720 --> 0:10:33.440
<v Speaker 1>these animals. So onto the issue of how to different

0:10:33.559 --> 0:10:39.040
<v Speaker 1>shelters manage to when we're talking about like municipal shelters,

0:10:39.040 --> 0:10:42.360
<v Speaker 1>like why do have some have lower rates of euthanasia

0:10:42.400 --> 0:10:47.080
<v Speaker 1>than others? And it's usually resources issue and the number

0:10:47.120 --> 0:10:49.920
<v Speaker 1>of strays, And of course the best way to reduce

0:10:49.960 --> 0:10:53.560
<v Speaker 1>the need for euthanasia and shelters is spaying and neutering programs.

0:10:53.559 --> 0:10:57.640
<v Speaker 1>As our listener pointed out, so you know animals that

0:10:57.679 --> 0:11:02.199
<v Speaker 1>are both strays and those with home being sterilized. Preventing

0:11:02.280 --> 0:11:08.240
<v Speaker 1>an overflow of animals like so spain and neutering programs

0:11:08.280 --> 0:11:11.199
<v Speaker 1>as well as the habits of owners fixing their own

0:11:11.240 --> 0:11:16.040
<v Speaker 1>pets will very regionally. Uh. There was a survey that

0:11:16.400 --> 0:11:20.280
<v Speaker 1>looked into this discrepancy. There's a paper by Carrol Glasser

0:11:20.400 --> 0:11:24.240
<v Speaker 1>called Attitudes towards Spay and neuter in the US population

0:11:24.559 --> 0:11:29.080
<v Speaker 1>Urban versus Rural Cat Dog and Demographic Differences, And there's

0:11:29.120 --> 0:11:33.720
<v Speaker 1>some interesting results from this survey which found that there

0:11:33.760 --> 0:11:37.319
<v Speaker 1>wasn't as much of a discrepancy in attitudes between oral

0:11:37.360 --> 0:11:42.800
<v Speaker 1>populations and rural populations as was expected. Set there seems

0:11:42.800 --> 0:11:46.600
<v Speaker 1>to be maybe more of a generational generational difference. So,

0:11:46.760 --> 0:11:52.960
<v Speaker 1>for instance, millennials, surprisingly that's my generation. They're less likely

0:11:53.200 --> 0:11:57.600
<v Speaker 1>than older generations to understand spain and neuter programs like

0:11:57.640 --> 0:12:03.280
<v Speaker 1>what why they're important there, or to understand what the

0:12:03.320 --> 0:12:06.840
<v Speaker 1>process is. They're also more likely to be concerned about

0:12:06.840 --> 0:12:10.120
<v Speaker 1>the health effects on their pets, and they're also less

0:12:10.200 --> 0:12:12.760
<v Speaker 1>likely to see it as morally positive to have it

0:12:12.800 --> 0:12:16.280
<v Speaker 1>done to their pets than older generations. So there seems

0:12:16.320 --> 0:12:18.840
<v Speaker 1>to be sort of this like shift in attitude towards

0:12:19.200 --> 0:12:23.520
<v Speaker 1>spang and neutering to be less favorable. There's also a

0:12:23.559 --> 0:12:26.800
<v Speaker 1>slight gender difference, so women are more likely to find

0:12:26.880 --> 0:12:31.000
<v Speaker 1>spang and neutering to be more moral than men. I

0:12:31.040 --> 0:12:33.040
<v Speaker 1>can't say why. I don't really know why that is,

0:12:35.160 --> 0:12:37.360
<v Speaker 1>but I think it is interesting because the main thing is,

0:12:37.400 --> 0:12:40.640
<v Speaker 1>this survey doesn't really seem to indicate that there's a

0:12:41.280 --> 0:12:44.920
<v Speaker 1>difference between say, an urban setting, or a huge difference

0:12:44.920 --> 0:12:47.640
<v Speaker 1>between an an urban setting and a rural setting in

0:12:47.720 --> 0:12:51.400
<v Speaker 1>terms of attitudes towards spang and neutering. But you know,

0:12:51.440 --> 0:12:57.840
<v Speaker 1>this is one survey, So in terms of answering Caitlin's question,

0:12:58.480 --> 0:13:02.560
<v Speaker 1>I looked into a some other research. So the first

0:13:02.559 --> 0:13:06.360
<v Speaker 1>thing is to confirm that Caitlin's observations reflect a wider

0:13:06.440 --> 0:13:10.040
<v Speaker 1>trend of there being more stray animals in the South

0:13:10.200 --> 0:13:12.720
<v Speaker 1>versus the North, and in fact that does seem to

0:13:12.720 --> 0:13:15.160
<v Speaker 1>be the case. So there was a twenty eighteen review

0:13:16.280 --> 0:13:19.360
<v Speaker 1>called Dog Population and Dog Sheltering Trends in the United

0:13:19.360 --> 0:13:23.080
<v Speaker 1>States of America. This is by Andrew Rowan and Tamara Kartal.

0:13:24.720 --> 0:13:27.000
<v Speaker 1>They are affiliated with the Humane Society, so you could

0:13:27.080 --> 0:13:31.120
<v Speaker 1>argue that they may have some bias, but they did

0:13:31.160 --> 0:13:35.240
<v Speaker 1>observe that quote. While New Hampshire and New Jersey have

0:13:35.320 --> 0:13:39.480
<v Speaker 1>low intake and euthanasian rates and have significantly lower numbers

0:13:39.520 --> 0:13:42.880
<v Speaker 1>of stray dogs, other states, especially in the South, report

0:13:42.960 --> 0:13:46.360
<v Speaker 1>much higher numbers. So this does seem to back up

0:13:46.440 --> 0:13:50.360
<v Speaker 1>Caitlin's personal observations as someone who works in a shelter.

0:13:51.240 --> 0:13:55.000
<v Speaker 1>So also, according to this review, in places like New

0:13:55.080 --> 0:14:00.240
<v Speaker 1>Jersey where they have lower euthanasian numbers, there are eight

0:14:00.320 --> 0:14:06.680
<v Speaker 1>wide low income spay and neuter programs, So the decrease

0:14:06.720 --> 0:14:10.520
<v Speaker 1>in euthanasia seems to be driven by lower levels of

0:14:10.840 --> 0:14:14.079
<v Speaker 1>animal intake to shelter. So what that means is if

0:14:14.080 --> 0:14:17.840
<v Speaker 1>there's less animal intake to shelters. Usually that means there's

0:14:18.280 --> 0:14:23.680
<v Speaker 1>less of a stray population. Uh So that seems to

0:14:23.720 --> 0:14:27.400
<v Speaker 1>be driving the euthanasian numbers down, which would mean there's

0:14:27.440 --> 0:14:31.320
<v Speaker 1>fewer strays in these areas, which might indicate that these

0:14:31.680 --> 0:14:36.520
<v Speaker 1>spay and neuter programs that are funded by the government

0:14:36.800 --> 0:14:40.160
<v Speaker 1>and low income areas for low income families with pets

0:14:40.200 --> 0:14:43.680
<v Speaker 1>for strays does seem to be having an impact on

0:14:44.040 --> 0:14:48.720
<v Speaker 1>the amount of straight dogs in the area, And adoptions

0:14:48.720 --> 0:14:51.320
<v Speaker 1>have also risen slightly, but they just don't account for

0:14:51.480 --> 0:14:55.040
<v Speaker 1>the majority of the decrease in the euthanasia rates. So

0:14:55.360 --> 0:14:59.480
<v Speaker 1>I would say, given that, like you know, these both

0:14:59.520 --> 0:15:02.360
<v Speaker 1>these studies seem to indicate that it's possibly more of

0:15:02.400 --> 0:15:07.800
<v Speaker 1>a policy issue rather than say a cultural difference, I

0:15:08.080 --> 0:15:12.040
<v Speaker 1>would say that the most likely driver for the difference

0:15:12.080 --> 0:15:15.120
<v Speaker 1>between the North and the South is whether there are

0:15:15.160 --> 0:15:19.480
<v Speaker 1>these statewide spaying neutering programs that cover the cost for

0:15:19.640 --> 0:15:24.680
<v Speaker 1>low income families or low income areas. Probably, if we

0:15:24.720 --> 0:15:27.840
<v Speaker 1>want to see if you're animals being euthanized, we would

0:15:27.880 --> 0:15:30.640
<v Speaker 1>have to increase funding for these spaying and neutering programs

0:15:30.680 --> 0:15:34.160
<v Speaker 1>in these states. There might be more I'm not really sure.

0:15:34.320 --> 0:15:36.880
<v Speaker 1>I'd love to hear from people who are more familiar

0:15:36.880 --> 0:15:40.760
<v Speaker 1>with the politics regarding these issues in the South, but

0:15:40.920 --> 0:15:43.920
<v Speaker 1>there might be more political resistance to bills that fund

0:15:43.920 --> 0:15:47.720
<v Speaker 1>these programs. Maybe there might also just be more poverty

0:15:48.040 --> 0:15:50.960
<v Speaker 1>in some of these states, so that would compete with funding.

0:15:52.280 --> 0:15:57.400
<v Speaker 1>So that would be my educated guests, But I am

0:15:57.560 --> 0:16:00.520
<v Speaker 1>definitely not an expert on this topic. I think it's

0:16:00.560 --> 0:16:03.440
<v Speaker 1>really important to talk about though, thank you Caitlin for

0:16:03.480 --> 0:16:05.880
<v Speaker 1>writing in. I think it is a sensitive question, but

0:16:06.120 --> 0:16:09.080
<v Speaker 1>I think that even though it's sad and it's kind

0:16:09.120 --> 0:16:13.760
<v Speaker 1>of difficult to discuss, I think it is really important. Otherwise,

0:16:14.080 --> 0:16:16.840
<v Speaker 1>powerre we ever going to figure out how we can

0:16:16.880 --> 0:16:21.880
<v Speaker 1>get those the shelters less full of dogs that can't

0:16:21.920 --> 0:16:24.720
<v Speaker 1>be adopted, Like we can't just sweep it under the rug.

0:16:24.720 --> 0:16:26.880
<v Speaker 1>And I think it's also really important to note that

0:16:27.320 --> 0:16:30.200
<v Speaker 1>for so called, you know, like kill shelters, like, it's

0:16:30.320 --> 0:16:35.120
<v Speaker 1>absolutely not morally wrong to adopt from these shelters that

0:16:35.160 --> 0:16:39.240
<v Speaker 1>euthanize animals. In fact, by adopting from those shelters, you

0:16:39.520 --> 0:16:43.320
<v Speaker 1>are helping to reduce the number of animals that are

0:16:43.360 --> 0:16:46.080
<v Speaker 1>in the shelters. And then that leaves up more space

0:16:46.120 --> 0:16:50.560
<v Speaker 1>for animals, and that keeps the euthanasia numbers lower as well.

0:16:50.800 --> 0:16:57.680
<v Speaker 1>So please don't just avoid municipal shelters because they use euthanasia,

0:16:58.560 --> 0:17:01.520
<v Speaker 1>because those animals also need to be adopted. And it's

0:17:02.080 --> 0:17:07.080
<v Speaker 1>again like the private shelters that are no kill shelters.

0:17:07.480 --> 0:17:11.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm I don't have a problem with those, but it's

0:17:11.600 --> 0:17:14.000
<v Speaker 1>the animals that they reject, like they don't take in,

0:17:14.359 --> 0:17:18.119
<v Speaker 1>will ultimately end up going to a municipal shelter. So

0:17:18.160 --> 0:17:21.280
<v Speaker 1>it's not really that they you know, I don't know

0:17:21.359 --> 0:17:24.080
<v Speaker 1>that other than the fact that these private shelters may

0:17:24.080 --> 0:17:28.280
<v Speaker 1>increase capacity for their being more shelter space for dogs,

0:17:29.160 --> 0:17:34.320
<v Speaker 1>they're not it's not necessarily that, you know, they are

0:17:34.359 --> 0:17:38.919
<v Speaker 1>just voluntarily not killing dogs. They are just in a

0:17:38.960 --> 0:17:42.840
<v Speaker 1>position where they are able to not take in all

0:17:42.880 --> 0:17:45.080
<v Speaker 1>the dogs off the streets, so they are able to

0:17:45.240 --> 0:17:48.919
<v Speaker 1>not employ euthanasia. So you know, that's that's the situation.

0:17:49.880 --> 0:17:51.920
<v Speaker 1>It's a it's a sad one, but yeah, I think

0:17:51.960 --> 0:17:54.679
<v Speaker 1>it's a it's a really important thing to discuss, and

0:17:54.680 --> 0:17:58.040
<v Speaker 1>I really appreciate you writing in and anyone else who

0:17:58.320 --> 0:18:01.040
<v Speaker 1>is familiar with these issues or works in shelters or

0:18:01.080 --> 0:18:03.080
<v Speaker 1>has an opinion on it. Please feel free to write

0:18:03.080 --> 0:18:05.080
<v Speaker 1>to me. I'd be really happy to hear from you.

0:18:06.920 --> 0:18:11.920
<v Speaker 1>All Right, on to the next listener question. Dear Katie. Today,

0:18:12.080 --> 0:18:16.080
<v Speaker 1>in an orchid house in Estepona, Spain, I learned about

0:18:16.119 --> 0:18:20.560
<v Speaker 1>the parfumier bees U Glossini. I would love to know

0:18:20.720 --> 0:18:24.439
<v Speaker 1>more about them, and about other artisanal wars Bauer birds

0:18:24.520 --> 0:18:27.879
<v Speaker 1>and a few other artisanal courtiers I know a bit about,

0:18:27.880 --> 0:18:31.040
<v Speaker 1>but more is good, So back to Uglossini. According to

0:18:31.040 --> 0:18:36.200
<v Speaker 1>Wikipedia quote, the male Euphresia proparata is highly unusual among

0:18:36.240 --> 0:18:40.119
<v Speaker 1>insects and seeking out and collecting large quantities of insecticide.

0:18:40.440 --> 0:18:45.359
<v Speaker 1>Dressler discovered in nineteen sixty seven e Proparada collecting aldrin

0:18:45.760 --> 0:18:49.040
<v Speaker 1>and Roberts in nineteen eighty two observed them collecting DDT

0:18:49.680 --> 0:18:53.560
<v Speaker 1>in huge amounts from houses in Brazil, amounting to several

0:18:53.800 --> 0:18:56.520
<v Speaker 1>percent of the bees weight without suffering any harm from

0:18:56.600 --> 0:19:01.640
<v Speaker 1>the activity. Exclamation point always a fan. This is from

0:19:01.680 --> 0:19:05.719
<v Speaker 1>mary Ann. Hi, mary Ann, this is a really cool topic.

0:19:05.760 --> 0:19:07.920
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so much for writing to me about it.

0:19:09.119 --> 0:19:11.240
<v Speaker 1>I think as much as it's important for us to

0:19:11.520 --> 0:19:15.920
<v Speaker 1>reduce our the amount of pollutants like pesticides that leach

0:19:15.920 --> 0:19:19.440
<v Speaker 1>out into the environment. I always find it fascinating when

0:19:19.480 --> 0:19:22.800
<v Speaker 1>animals manage to adapt to the nasty stuff that we

0:19:22.920 --> 0:19:26.080
<v Speaker 1>come up with. It's really really interesting. So orchid bees

0:19:26.880 --> 0:19:30.439
<v Speaker 1>uglossini are a group of brilliant jewel like bees. They

0:19:30.480 --> 0:19:35.440
<v Speaker 1>have this beautiful metallic coloration. There are many species, including

0:19:35.480 --> 0:19:41.000
<v Speaker 1>Euphresia preparata, so these are found in the Amazon basin

0:19:41.240 --> 0:19:46.439
<v Speaker 1>in South America. They are this metallic green and indigo bee.

0:19:46.800 --> 0:19:50.880
<v Speaker 1>And as listener Mary Anne pointed out, it is attracted

0:19:50.880 --> 0:19:55.919
<v Speaker 1>to insecticides, including DDT, which is normally really bad news

0:19:56.119 --> 0:20:02.560
<v Speaker 1>for insects and also birds. So orchid bees, the orchid

0:20:02.560 --> 0:20:06.480
<v Speaker 1>bee species in general, collect scent producing compounds from flowers.

0:20:06.520 --> 0:20:10.399
<v Speaker 1>So basically the males create a perfume for themselves to

0:20:10.440 --> 0:20:14.240
<v Speaker 1>attract females, storing them in their leg baskets, so they're

0:20:14.440 --> 0:20:16.720
<v Speaker 1>behind legs like a lot of bee species have these

0:20:16.760 --> 0:20:22.359
<v Speaker 1>little divots in them where they can store pollen among

0:20:22.359 --> 0:20:26.560
<v Speaker 1>these kind of like grooves, and in these bees, the

0:20:26.600 --> 0:20:34.920
<v Speaker 1>males will store basically compounds that create perfume scents and females.

0:20:35.440 --> 0:20:38.400
<v Speaker 1>These these leg baskets that the males have like they

0:20:38.440 --> 0:20:43.960
<v Speaker 1>act as like diffusers sort of incense diffusers, and the

0:20:44.200 --> 0:20:47.800
<v Speaker 1>females prefer males with a good cologne, and they're more

0:20:47.920 --> 0:20:51.840
<v Speaker 1>likely to successfully entice a female to mate with them

0:20:51.920 --> 0:20:55.840
<v Speaker 1>if they have perfume in their little leg baskets. So

0:20:56.000 --> 0:21:01.280
<v Speaker 1>Euphresia proparata seems to find DDT and other types of

0:21:01.480 --> 0:21:07.600
<v Speaker 1>pesticide compounds to have that genesicua poffume that smells good

0:21:07.800 --> 0:21:12.160
<v Speaker 1>to these bees. So it's similar enough to orchid compounds

0:21:12.200 --> 0:21:14.800
<v Speaker 1>that they typically for them to also use that to

0:21:14.800 --> 0:21:17.720
<v Speaker 1>try to attract females. And because the bees only collect

0:21:17.720 --> 0:21:22.040
<v Speaker 1>a specific broken down compound from say DDT or these

0:21:22.040 --> 0:21:25.920
<v Speaker 1>other pesticides, and they also don't consume it, they store

0:21:25.920 --> 0:21:29.359
<v Speaker 1>it in their leg baskets, the compound does not seem

0:21:29.359 --> 0:21:31.960
<v Speaker 1>to harm them physically. Now, what I don't know is

0:21:32.000 --> 0:21:35.439
<v Speaker 1>how successful it is with the ladies, whether they prefer

0:21:35.800 --> 0:21:39.720
<v Speaker 1>actual orchid compounds or this kind of like pesticide knockoff.

0:21:39.840 --> 0:21:44.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I'd be really interested to find that out. So, guys,

0:21:44.119 --> 0:21:48.120
<v Speaker 1>these were fantastic questions. I really love them. They help

0:21:48.200 --> 0:21:50.080
<v Speaker 1>me learn as well, by the way, Like I have

0:21:50.160 --> 0:21:52.480
<v Speaker 1>to do research for these questions to make sure I'm

0:21:52.480 --> 0:21:55.520
<v Speaker 1>giving you the right answer and that helps me on

0:21:55.560 --> 0:21:57.920
<v Speaker 1>my learning journey. I hope I helped you a little

0:21:57.920 --> 0:22:01.800
<v Speaker 1>bit on your learning journey. Do you have any evolutionary

0:22:01.800 --> 0:22:05.439
<v Speaker 1>biology animal related questions photos of your pets? You can

0:22:05.480 --> 0:22:11.320
<v Speaker 1>write to me at Creature Feature pod at gmail dot com. Again,

0:22:11.400 --> 0:22:14.600
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for these questions, and thanks for

0:22:14.640 --> 0:22:18.160
<v Speaker 1>the space classics where there's super awesome song Exolumina. Creature

0:22:18.240 --> 0:22:21.359
<v Speaker 1>Feature is a production of iHeartRadio. For more podcasts like

0:22:21.400 --> 0:22:23.520
<v Speaker 1>the one you just heard, visit the iHeartRadio app Apple

0:22:23.520 --> 0:22:25.480
<v Speaker 1>podcast or Hey, guess what where have you listen to

0:22:25.520 --> 0:22:29.640
<v Speaker 1>your favorite shows? I can't judge you, just don't go

0:22:29.840 --> 0:22:33.320
<v Speaker 1>spraying DDT on yourself and expecting your date to go well,

0:22:33.359 --> 0:22:36.439
<v Speaker 1>it only works for bees. See you next Wednesday.