1 00:00:00,240 --> 00:00:02,560 Speaker 1: Hello, and welcome back to movie Mike's movie podcast. I 2 00:00:02,600 --> 00:00:04,920 Speaker 1: am your host Movie Mike. Today, my wife and co 3 00:00:05,000 --> 00:00:06,680 Speaker 1: host Kelsey joins me. How are you. 4 00:00:06,960 --> 00:00:09,000 Speaker 2: I'm good, aside, I'm being a little bit under the weather, 5 00:00:09,080 --> 00:00:10,800 Speaker 2: so sorry if my voice is a little scratchy. 6 00:00:11,200 --> 00:00:13,480 Speaker 1: Best and Worst of the month is what we're gonna 7 00:00:13,480 --> 00:00:16,040 Speaker 1: do talking about all the movies we saw in October. 8 00:00:16,120 --> 00:00:18,200 Speaker 1: We're gonna get into some movie news too, which I 9 00:00:18,280 --> 00:00:21,799 Speaker 1: have read the entire Variety article diving into what is 10 00:00:21,840 --> 00:00:23,960 Speaker 1: happening at Marvel right now, so I'll give you my 11 00:00:24,040 --> 00:00:26,880 Speaker 1: thoughts on that. Kelsey has something festive coming up for 12 00:00:26,920 --> 00:00:29,400 Speaker 1: that segment, we'll get into the movie review, we'll get 13 00:00:29,440 --> 00:00:31,639 Speaker 1: into the trailer park. Thank you for being here, shout 14 00:00:31,680 --> 00:00:34,440 Speaker 1: out to the Monday Morning Movie crew. And now let's 15 00:00:34,479 --> 00:00:35,120 Speaker 1: talk movies. 16 00:00:35,400 --> 00:00:38,600 Speaker 3: In a world where everyone and their mother has a podcast, 17 00:00:39,120 --> 00:00:43,040 Speaker 3: one man stands to infiltrate the ears of listeners like 18 00:00:43,120 --> 00:00:47,040 Speaker 3: never before in a movie podcast. A man with so 19 00:00:47,200 --> 00:00:52,640 Speaker 3: much movie knowledge, he's basically like a walking IMTB with glasses. 20 00:00:53,000 --> 00:00:54,760 Speaker 1: From the Nashville Podcast. 21 00:00:54,440 --> 00:00:58,000 Speaker 3: Network, this is Movie Mike's Movie. 22 00:00:57,720 --> 00:01:03,000 Speaker 1: Podcast Best and Worst for the month of October. Kelsey, 23 00:01:03,000 --> 00:01:05,360 Speaker 1: you kick us off. What was your best movie of 24 00:01:05,400 --> 00:01:08,240 Speaker 1: the month. I think it's obvious Teller's The Flower Move 25 00:01:08,360 --> 00:01:10,839 Speaker 1: That is mine too. We had to go double here. 26 00:01:10,800 --> 00:01:13,160 Speaker 2: A comboo bass movie of the month. There was no 27 00:01:13,200 --> 00:01:13,920 Speaker 2: other contender. 28 00:01:14,160 --> 00:01:16,840 Speaker 1: I found myself coming back to thinking about that movie 29 00:01:16,880 --> 00:01:19,960 Speaker 1: more and more, and maybe it's a little bit overcritical. 30 00:01:20,080 --> 00:01:23,080 Speaker 1: Giving it a four. I still stand by it, but 31 00:01:23,160 --> 00:01:25,119 Speaker 1: I think after I watch it for a second time, 32 00:01:25,160 --> 00:01:28,360 Speaker 1: whenever it comes out on Apple, maybe it'll go up 33 00:01:28,400 --> 00:01:31,720 Speaker 1: a little bit. That given myself a little bit more 34 00:01:31,720 --> 00:01:33,360 Speaker 1: time to spend with it and look back on some 35 00:01:33,440 --> 00:01:36,560 Speaker 1: things I didn't like upon the first watch, maybe I 36 00:01:36,680 --> 00:01:38,160 Speaker 1: like it a little bit more and judge it a 37 00:01:38,200 --> 00:01:41,600 Speaker 1: little less harshly the second time. But is that a 38 00:01:41,640 --> 00:01:44,640 Speaker 1: movie you would consider watching again even though it's so long? 39 00:01:44,840 --> 00:01:46,640 Speaker 2: Oh yeah, I bought it again, especially at home when 40 00:01:46,640 --> 00:01:47,360 Speaker 2: I can take breaks. 41 00:01:47,520 --> 00:01:50,520 Speaker 1: And I did see an interesting survey come out recently 42 00:01:50,800 --> 00:01:54,520 Speaker 1: if there should be an intermission between movies shown in theaters, 43 00:01:55,120 --> 00:01:56,720 Speaker 1: and there are different options here, so let me know 44 00:01:56,760 --> 00:01:59,120 Speaker 1: where you stand. Twelve percent said yes for all movies 45 00:01:59,160 --> 00:02:01,840 Speaker 1: there should be an internation, twenty three percent yes for 46 00:02:01,920 --> 00:02:05,080 Speaker 1: movies two hours or longer, twenty four percent of people 47 00:02:05,120 --> 00:02:07,600 Speaker 1: said yes. For movies that are three hours or longer, 48 00:02:07,880 --> 00:02:11,560 Speaker 1: twenty five percent say no, and for some reason, seventeen 49 00:02:11,560 --> 00:02:14,720 Speaker 1: percent say not sure. Where do you stand on should 50 00:02:14,760 --> 00:02:17,440 Speaker 1: there be intermissions for longer movies in theaters? 51 00:02:17,680 --> 00:02:21,160 Speaker 2: As a resonant member of the tiny bladder community. 52 00:02:20,760 --> 00:02:22,520 Speaker 1: Okay, you represent that demographic. 53 00:02:22,680 --> 00:02:23,760 Speaker 2: I'm going to shock you're gonna say no. 54 00:02:24,280 --> 00:02:27,200 Speaker 1: No whatsoever, it messes up the flow of the movie. 55 00:02:27,200 --> 00:02:28,880 Speaker 2: I don't have the lights to go up. I don't 56 00:02:28,880 --> 00:02:32,680 Speaker 2: want everyone to be milling around. No messes the flow. 57 00:02:32,720 --> 00:02:35,239 Speaker 2: When do you do the intermission? What if halfway through 58 00:02:35,280 --> 00:02:37,840 Speaker 2: the movie there's a critical plot point, You're just like, 59 00:02:38,560 --> 00:02:41,000 Speaker 2: all right, time for everyone to go pee, come back 60 00:02:41,000 --> 00:02:42,520 Speaker 2: in ten minutes for the action commenced. 61 00:02:42,600 --> 00:02:45,080 Speaker 1: No exactly. I see a lot of things wrong with this. 62 00:02:45,200 --> 00:02:47,920 Speaker 1: So I don't have a small bladder, but I am 63 00:02:48,000 --> 00:02:51,320 Speaker 1: right nice. I'm right there with the no twenty five percent. 64 00:02:51,880 --> 00:02:55,200 Speaker 1: I say no because along those same lines, I think 65 00:02:55,280 --> 00:02:57,800 Speaker 1: a director would have to start thinking of when do 66 00:02:57,880 --> 00:03:00,600 Speaker 1: I place the brig It kills the momentum. There could 67 00:03:00,639 --> 00:03:02,920 Speaker 1: be spots where a theater just decide, hey, this is 68 00:03:02,919 --> 00:03:05,120 Speaker 1: where the break should be. Whether it be like ninety 69 00:03:05,120 --> 00:03:07,000 Speaker 1: minutes or two hours. I feel like that throws off 70 00:03:07,000 --> 00:03:08,679 Speaker 1: the flow of the movie. And when I go watch 71 00:03:08,720 --> 00:03:11,280 Speaker 1: a movie that I'm really into, I don't want to 72 00:03:11,280 --> 00:03:12,239 Speaker 1: lose that momentum. 73 00:03:12,480 --> 00:03:14,800 Speaker 2: I feel like it makes sense in like theater because 74 00:03:14,960 --> 00:03:17,000 Speaker 2: you also have the performers who probably need a break. 75 00:03:17,040 --> 00:03:20,720 Speaker 2: But this is not a live entertainment and a live. 76 00:03:20,520 --> 00:03:24,200 Speaker 1: Show, I feel like there are more natural spots where 77 00:03:24,240 --> 00:03:26,640 Speaker 1: you can choose to break between act one and act two. 78 00:03:26,680 --> 00:03:29,920 Speaker 1: There's a different moment in a live performance where you 79 00:03:29,919 --> 00:03:31,760 Speaker 1: can say, Okay, here's a good time for an intermission. 80 00:03:31,760 --> 00:03:34,200 Speaker 1: In a movie, you don't have that because then you're, 81 00:03:34,320 --> 00:03:36,000 Speaker 1: like I said, you're gonna have to think, okay, where 82 00:03:36,040 --> 00:03:38,640 Speaker 1: should this story take a little bit of a break, 83 00:03:38,680 --> 00:03:40,800 Speaker 1: a little bit of a beat. People go to the theater, 84 00:03:40,920 --> 00:03:42,720 Speaker 1: but that's going to be chaos if people go into 85 00:03:42,760 --> 00:03:45,600 Speaker 1: the lobby, people go into the bathroom, and then everybody 86 00:03:45,600 --> 00:03:46,840 Speaker 1: comes back and you kick it back on. 87 00:03:47,240 --> 00:03:49,520 Speaker 2: What if you have people in the intermission that run 88 00:03:49,520 --> 00:03:51,200 Speaker 2: into people who have just seen the movie, and people 89 00:03:51,200 --> 00:03:54,080 Speaker 2: in the bathroom are talking about what happens there's and 90 00:03:54,240 --> 00:03:57,000 Speaker 2: that are in their intermission gets spoiled. Also, if my 91 00:03:57,200 --> 00:04:00,840 Speaker 2: Queen Taylor Swift doesn't need an intermission. We all can 92 00:04:00,840 --> 00:04:03,280 Speaker 2: make it their movie. Just get up, go to the bathroom, 93 00:04:03,320 --> 00:04:05,560 Speaker 2: come back, ask the person next to you. If it's 94 00:04:05,560 --> 00:04:07,760 Speaker 2: a good movie, you can use context clues to figure 95 00:04:07,760 --> 00:04:10,400 Speaker 2: out what happened. If it's a terrible movie, then why 96 00:04:10,440 --> 00:04:11,480 Speaker 2: are you seeing in the first place. 97 00:04:11,560 --> 00:04:13,920 Speaker 1: Yeah, I think you can always kind of find a 98 00:04:14,000 --> 00:04:16,240 Speaker 1: natural point to go to the bathroom. Also, going to 99 00:04:16,320 --> 00:04:17,800 Speaker 1: the bathroom doesn't take that long. 100 00:04:18,760 --> 00:04:20,920 Speaker 2: It depends on why people are coming to the back. 101 00:04:20,960 --> 00:04:23,000 Speaker 1: I guess it depends what you have going on. But 102 00:04:23,080 --> 00:04:25,440 Speaker 1: I feel like I've timed how long it takes me 103 00:04:25,520 --> 00:04:27,840 Speaker 1: to go. I can be back in a few minutes. 104 00:04:27,920 --> 00:04:29,880 Speaker 1: I don't miss a whole lot. If you go with somebody, 105 00:04:29,880 --> 00:04:31,400 Speaker 1: you can tell them to catch you up real quick. 106 00:04:31,560 --> 00:04:33,400 Speaker 1: If you didn't miss anything, they're like, you're good. So 107 00:04:33,920 --> 00:04:36,480 Speaker 1: I also feel that adding on any time to a 108 00:04:36,520 --> 00:04:38,159 Speaker 1: three and a half hour movie is just gonna make 109 00:04:38,200 --> 00:04:40,640 Speaker 1: it feel so much longer. You're gonna spend the entire 110 00:04:40,720 --> 00:04:42,520 Speaker 1: day at the movie theater if you add any kind 111 00:04:42,520 --> 00:04:43,040 Speaker 1: of a break. 112 00:04:43,360 --> 00:04:46,560 Speaker 2: Yeah. Here's the other thing. Our theater, they only have 113 00:04:46,600 --> 00:04:49,800 Speaker 2: one concession stand upstairs. The downstairs one isn't open. If 114 00:04:49,839 --> 00:04:51,840 Speaker 2: you have people in the intermission trying to go get snacks, 115 00:04:51,880 --> 00:04:54,320 Speaker 2: they're all gonna be upstairs. They're all still gonna miss 116 00:04:54,320 --> 00:04:56,039 Speaker 2: parts in the movie, and then they're gonna be mad 117 00:04:56,040 --> 00:04:58,279 Speaker 2: that they miss parts of the movie, even in the intermission, 118 00:04:58,320 --> 00:04:59,440 Speaker 2: So no one's gonna be happy. 119 00:04:59,680 --> 00:05:02,800 Speaker 1: Yeah, i'd say you don't do them at all. If 120 00:05:02,880 --> 00:05:05,760 Speaker 1: anything you could at for very long movies, I would 121 00:05:05,760 --> 00:05:09,359 Speaker 1: say over three hours, because now it's so natural for 122 00:05:09,440 --> 00:05:13,000 Speaker 1: a movie to be two and a half hours, no problem. 123 00:05:13,000 --> 00:05:16,640 Speaker 1: But maybe anything over three hours. You could offer different 124 00:05:16,680 --> 00:05:19,840 Speaker 1: showings that have an intermission, which, like we've been talking 125 00:05:19,880 --> 00:05:22,360 Speaker 1: about before, that theaters need to offer different kind of 126 00:05:22,480 --> 00:05:25,000 Speaker 1: experiences for different types of people. I think that could 127 00:05:25,040 --> 00:05:26,760 Speaker 1: be one of them. That's not a hard thing to 128 00:05:26,800 --> 00:05:28,880 Speaker 1: do to build in a ten minute intermission for those 129 00:05:28,920 --> 00:05:31,440 Speaker 1: people who want it. Maybe it would encourage some people 130 00:05:31,480 --> 00:05:34,000 Speaker 1: who hate long run times to go watch a movie. 131 00:05:34,080 --> 00:05:35,200 Speaker 2: It was actually really good idea. 132 00:05:35,279 --> 00:05:38,520 Speaker 1: I also think that theaters would be into it because, 133 00:05:38,520 --> 00:05:40,720 Speaker 1: like you were mentioning, it would give them time to 134 00:05:40,800 --> 00:05:44,400 Speaker 1: go to the concession stand again. They go make more money, 135 00:05:44,440 --> 00:05:47,600 Speaker 1: they sell more candy, they sell more popcorn, or they 136 00:05:47,680 --> 00:05:50,240 Speaker 1: utilize the free refills for theaters that have that that 137 00:05:50,279 --> 00:05:51,719 Speaker 1: a lot of people feel like don't use that because 138 00:05:51,720 --> 00:05:53,200 Speaker 1: they don't want to go back to the lobby and 139 00:05:53,240 --> 00:05:53,960 Speaker 1: get a refill. 140 00:05:54,560 --> 00:05:56,600 Speaker 2: So I want to miss it. So yeah, theaters, if 141 00:05:56,600 --> 00:06:00,040 Speaker 2: you're listening, maybe maybe intermissions aren't about it different. 142 00:05:59,800 --> 00:06:03,160 Speaker 1: Man, because like what you said with the Taylor Swift movie, 143 00:06:03,920 --> 00:06:07,200 Speaker 1: your theater was more calm and relaxed, and there were 144 00:06:07,240 --> 00:06:10,760 Speaker 1: some theaters that were totally just vibrant like a concert. 145 00:06:10,800 --> 00:06:12,200 Speaker 1: So I feel like they could have had different types 146 00:06:12,200 --> 00:06:14,000 Speaker 1: of showings for people who just want to sit and 147 00:06:14,120 --> 00:06:17,840 Speaker 1: enjoy the movie. Yeah, and the single long version of that. 148 00:06:17,920 --> 00:06:20,159 Speaker 1: So I feel like, yeah, there should be different types 149 00:06:20,200 --> 00:06:23,200 Speaker 1: of experiences that theaters should be looking into. I also 150 00:06:23,200 --> 00:06:25,080 Speaker 1: think that just generates interest, like, oh, what is this 151 00:06:25,160 --> 00:06:28,400 Speaker 1: kind of showing? It's a bring your kid from home 152 00:06:28,520 --> 00:06:30,400 Speaker 1: day showing? I don't know, something like that. Did you 153 00:06:30,400 --> 00:06:32,000 Speaker 1: have kid ones where your kids can run around? 154 00:06:32,040 --> 00:06:32,240 Speaker 3: There? 155 00:06:32,240 --> 00:06:34,279 Speaker 2: You go, wow, I already forgot. I saw the eras. 156 00:06:34,279 --> 00:06:34,960 Speaker 2: Maybe this month? 157 00:06:35,240 --> 00:06:37,599 Speaker 1: Is that my favorite? Oh? Is that your favorite? 158 00:06:37,800 --> 00:06:40,760 Speaker 2: Are we having like a an on air audible? 159 00:06:41,200 --> 00:06:43,719 Speaker 1: Because here's the thing that you can you can tell 160 00:06:43,760 --> 00:06:46,039 Speaker 1: me how far off. I am on this because I 161 00:06:46,040 --> 00:06:48,760 Speaker 1: didn't see it with you, and I said the fact 162 00:06:48,760 --> 00:06:53,280 Speaker 1: that it is not truly cinema because there's no narrative 163 00:06:53,400 --> 00:06:55,840 Speaker 1: to the Taylor Swift Eras movie. It is just a 164 00:06:55,880 --> 00:06:59,120 Speaker 1: concert film. So I feel like me going to see 165 00:06:59,160 --> 00:07:01,719 Speaker 1: it and reviewing it, it wouldn't really make sense because 166 00:07:02,160 --> 00:07:05,359 Speaker 1: it's just a concert. There's no behind the scenes, there's 167 00:07:05,400 --> 00:07:09,040 Speaker 1: no overarching story throughout it. Would you agree with that? 168 00:07:09,320 --> 00:07:11,160 Speaker 2: I would agree. I think I'm gonna keep Killers to 169 00:07:11,160 --> 00:07:15,480 Speaker 2: the Flower Moon because she did also cut some songs 170 00:07:15,920 --> 00:07:17,000 Speaker 2: well Heartbroken. 171 00:07:16,760 --> 00:07:18,960 Speaker 1: Even that was two hours forty six minutes. 172 00:07:19,080 --> 00:07:23,160 Speaker 2: It was indeed, so even that's a longer movie. But yeah, 173 00:07:23,600 --> 00:07:25,120 Speaker 2: she cut like forty five minutes out. 174 00:07:25,400 --> 00:07:27,240 Speaker 1: The other thing that we didn't mention whenever we did 175 00:07:27,320 --> 00:07:29,680 Speaker 1: go see Killers of the Flower Moon that our theater 176 00:07:29,720 --> 00:07:32,400 Speaker 1: started rumbling because there was an showing next door. 177 00:07:32,880 --> 00:07:34,520 Speaker 2: No, it was literally vibrating. 178 00:07:34,600 --> 00:07:38,040 Speaker 1: Yeah, theater was. Everybody was worried because like what is happening? 179 00:07:38,120 --> 00:07:40,360 Speaker 2: Yeah, everyone started looking around it. And then I think 180 00:07:40,440 --> 00:07:43,600 Speaker 2: you just like hear the screams of twenty something year 181 00:07:43,600 --> 00:07:46,360 Speaker 2: old girls and teenagers and you're like, ah, the Eras film. 182 00:07:46,400 --> 00:07:47,960 Speaker 2: I was like They probably shouldn't have put that next 183 00:07:47,960 --> 00:07:49,000 Speaker 2: to such a quiet film. 184 00:07:49,080 --> 00:07:51,360 Speaker 1: Yeah, it's weird because it's such a Killers has like 185 00:07:51,360 --> 00:07:54,960 Speaker 1: such like pensive moments, silence, and then you have Taylor 186 00:07:55,040 --> 00:07:58,480 Speaker 1: Swift blasting in the auditorium next to us. But anyway, yes, 187 00:07:58,520 --> 00:08:01,800 Speaker 1: we stand by both of our favorite movies of the 188 00:08:01,880 --> 00:08:04,480 Speaker 1: last month. We're Killers of the Flower Moon. Honorable mention 189 00:08:05,080 --> 00:08:08,160 Speaker 1: would be Arras Tour and then we both stand by 190 00:08:08,520 --> 00:08:10,800 Speaker 1: I'm surprised that you agreed with this too. No intermissions 191 00:08:10,840 --> 00:08:12,120 Speaker 1: in longer movies, no matter what. 192 00:08:12,400 --> 00:08:13,880 Speaker 2: Yeah, I just think it's going to ruin the flow 193 00:08:13,920 --> 00:08:14,520 Speaker 2: of a movie. 194 00:08:14,680 --> 00:08:16,840 Speaker 1: I agree. So now we'll get into our worst. What 195 00:08:17,040 --> 00:08:18,440 Speaker 1: was your worst for the last month? 196 00:08:18,600 --> 00:08:21,400 Speaker 2: Oh god, this movie was so bad? Fair play on Netflix. 197 00:08:21,600 --> 00:08:23,800 Speaker 1: What is this movie about? We've both watched it together. 198 00:08:23,920 --> 00:08:26,640 Speaker 1: You wanted to watch it? I did, and the trailer 199 00:08:26,680 --> 00:08:27,200 Speaker 1: looked good. 200 00:08:27,440 --> 00:08:30,600 Speaker 2: Yeah, it's like it's about a Wall Street couple. She 201 00:08:30,720 --> 00:08:33,320 Speaker 2: gets the promotion, he doesn't, and it's about how their 202 00:08:33,360 --> 00:08:34,800 Speaker 2: lives like change after that. 203 00:08:34,880 --> 00:08:37,319 Speaker 1: The movie was a train wreck. It was this is 204 00:08:37,360 --> 00:08:41,360 Speaker 1: a disaster described as an erotic thriller. Did you find 205 00:08:41,360 --> 00:08:42,760 Speaker 1: it erotic and thriller? 206 00:08:42,920 --> 00:08:48,080 Speaker 2: You listen there are times when I understand that an 207 00:08:48,120 --> 00:08:51,360 Speaker 2: intimate scene in a movie adds to the story, and 208 00:08:51,400 --> 00:08:53,840 Speaker 2: then there are times where it's just like gratuitous and 209 00:08:53,840 --> 00:08:57,520 Speaker 2: it's like why was this here? Every intimate scene in 210 00:08:57,559 --> 00:09:00,600 Speaker 2: this movie, I was like, what am I watching? 211 00:09:00,800 --> 00:09:01,000 Speaker 3: Why? 212 00:09:01,120 --> 00:09:01,800 Speaker 2: I'm a little. 213 00:09:01,559 --> 00:09:05,880 Speaker 1: Scarred the opening scene alone, Yeah, it's like, what are 214 00:09:05,920 --> 00:09:06,520 Speaker 1: we watching? 215 00:09:06,880 --> 00:09:08,960 Speaker 2: I think we did say that. I think we said 216 00:09:09,000 --> 00:09:10,319 Speaker 2: what are we watching? I think you looked at me 217 00:09:10,320 --> 00:09:12,520 Speaker 2: and you said, what did you pick? And I was like, well, 218 00:09:12,559 --> 00:09:13,720 Speaker 2: it's supposed to be good. 219 00:09:13,920 --> 00:09:15,600 Speaker 1: And it did get better after that. 220 00:09:15,920 --> 00:09:19,920 Speaker 2: It's like HBO's obsession was showing the male anatomy. They 221 00:09:20,080 --> 00:09:21,560 Speaker 2: just just throw it on the screen. 222 00:09:21,679 --> 00:09:23,800 Speaker 1: Yeah, HBO is known for that. 223 00:09:23,800 --> 00:09:25,720 Speaker 2: That's how this movie felt was they were just like, 224 00:09:26,280 --> 00:09:28,439 Speaker 2: how can we It's almost like they were worried that 225 00:09:28,480 --> 00:09:30,160 Speaker 2: people were gonna lose interest in the movie and they 226 00:09:30,160 --> 00:09:32,960 Speaker 2: were like, how can we bring it back? How about this? 227 00:09:33,080 --> 00:09:36,240 Speaker 2: And everyone was like that's it. That's the plot point. 228 00:09:36,480 --> 00:09:39,680 Speaker 1: I will say the movie won me back maybe about 229 00:09:40,320 --> 00:09:42,320 Speaker 1: the end of the first act that I ended up 230 00:09:42,360 --> 00:09:45,000 Speaker 1: probably enjoying it more than you did, because I would 231 00:09:45,080 --> 00:09:46,800 Speaker 1: end up giving it about a three out of five. 232 00:09:47,120 --> 00:09:49,400 Speaker 1: I felt like the story was still pretty good. There 233 00:09:49,400 --> 00:09:52,160 Speaker 1: were some things that I had to not suspend belief 234 00:09:52,200 --> 00:09:54,959 Speaker 1: on but just except for what they were and not 235 00:09:55,040 --> 00:09:57,000 Speaker 1: take it so seriously, which I thought the movie was 236 00:09:57,040 --> 00:09:58,840 Speaker 1: gonna be a little bit more serious, a little bit 237 00:09:58,880 --> 00:10:00,920 Speaker 1: more straight on, and then it was kind of more 238 00:10:00,960 --> 00:10:03,880 Speaker 1: of like a like a fantasy story almost for some people, 239 00:10:04,000 --> 00:10:07,240 Speaker 1: but for my worst I'm going with the movie I 240 00:10:07,280 --> 00:10:09,679 Speaker 1: reviewed last week five Nights at Freddy's. I gave it 241 00:10:09,720 --> 00:10:11,560 Speaker 1: a one point five out of five, and I stand 242 00:10:11,559 --> 00:10:11,840 Speaker 1: by that. 243 00:10:12,080 --> 00:10:13,920 Speaker 2: I knew it was bad when you were like texting 244 00:10:13,960 --> 00:10:17,120 Speaker 2: me movies almost over. You never text during the movie, 245 00:10:17,160 --> 00:10:18,800 Speaker 2: and I knew it was bad when you were like, 246 00:10:19,320 --> 00:10:20,560 Speaker 2: it's almost over. Thank God. 247 00:10:20,720 --> 00:10:23,640 Speaker 1: I had the weirdest moment after watching that movie, though, 248 00:10:23,679 --> 00:10:26,320 Speaker 1: because I couldn't see it any other way of people 249 00:10:26,400 --> 00:10:29,000 Speaker 1: actually enjoying that movie. And then I don't read reviews 250 00:10:29,040 --> 00:10:30,880 Speaker 1: going into a film because I want to have my 251 00:10:30,920 --> 00:10:34,240 Speaker 1: own opinion without any influence. And with that one, right 252 00:10:34,280 --> 00:10:36,400 Speaker 1: after I went and saw what other people said about it, 253 00:10:36,640 --> 00:10:39,040 Speaker 1: and people love that movie. And I think what I 254 00:10:39,120 --> 00:10:42,720 Speaker 1: missed is that it's kind of geared towards kids, and 255 00:10:42,720 --> 00:10:44,000 Speaker 1: I thought it was going to be a straight on 256 00:10:44,040 --> 00:10:47,320 Speaker 1: horror movie kids. But because the video game is so 257 00:10:47,520 --> 00:10:51,000 Speaker 1: popular with kids and people love those characters, I feel 258 00:10:51,000 --> 00:10:53,360 Speaker 1: like if you didn't have a relationship with the video 259 00:10:53,480 --> 00:10:56,800 Speaker 1: game and growing up with it, you didn't really get it. 260 00:10:57,320 --> 00:10:59,040 Speaker 1: So for the first time, I kind of felt like 261 00:10:59,040 --> 00:11:01,520 Speaker 1: a crusty old crist who didn't enjoy a movie that 262 00:11:01,600 --> 00:11:03,760 Speaker 1: all these all these young people are loving. I felt like, 263 00:11:03,840 --> 00:11:06,760 Speaker 1: what the youngsters. Yeah, I feel like ten years ago 264 00:11:06,800 --> 00:11:09,400 Speaker 1: that was me loving all the Marvel movies and critics 265 00:11:09,400 --> 00:11:11,880 Speaker 1: being like, ah, those are so stupid and terrible. So 266 00:11:12,200 --> 00:11:13,920 Speaker 1: it was a weird moment for me of like not 267 00:11:14,720 --> 00:11:17,959 Speaker 1: knowing about this fan base. And it was also an 268 00:11:18,000 --> 00:11:20,800 Speaker 1: instance where I posted the review and I got crushed 269 00:11:20,800 --> 00:11:23,000 Speaker 1: online because everybody was like, ah, you look like a 270 00:11:23,040 --> 00:11:25,040 Speaker 1: type of person who would say this, and I'm like, man, 271 00:11:25,120 --> 00:11:27,240 Speaker 1: I really didn't know that there was such a passion 272 00:11:27,240 --> 00:11:30,400 Speaker 1: for five Nights at Freddy's. So I don't think I'll 273 00:11:30,440 --> 00:11:33,480 Speaker 1: go back and rewatch it. But I saw like clips 274 00:11:33,480 --> 00:11:36,040 Speaker 1: of people talking about it, and it almost convinced me like, man, 275 00:11:36,040 --> 00:11:37,959 Speaker 1: maybe there was something I was missing out here. 276 00:11:38,000 --> 00:11:39,520 Speaker 2: But maybe I saw the wrong movie. 277 00:11:39,640 --> 00:11:42,040 Speaker 1: But if they make a sequel, I'll be interested in 278 00:11:42,080 --> 00:11:44,120 Speaker 1: it now because it was so successful and made so 279 00:11:44,200 --> 00:11:46,400 Speaker 1: much money on a very low budget, which was also 280 00:11:46,440 --> 00:11:49,400 Speaker 1: surprising to me that a movie like that would crush, 281 00:11:49,720 --> 00:11:52,760 Speaker 1: even the fact that it came out on Peacock at 282 00:11:52,760 --> 00:11:54,960 Speaker 1: the same time. You think people would just run to 283 00:11:55,000 --> 00:11:58,000 Speaker 1: Peacock and not go as much to see it in theaters, 284 00:11:58,000 --> 00:12:00,679 Speaker 1: but it just crushed and dominated. So that was one 285 00:12:00,720 --> 00:12:02,720 Speaker 1: I was like, I'm glad for the success of it 286 00:12:02,800 --> 00:12:04,880 Speaker 1: because I love seeing movies that have a really small 287 00:12:04,920 --> 00:12:07,280 Speaker 1: budget do really well at the box office, and I 288 00:12:07,320 --> 00:12:09,440 Speaker 1: think horror is the genre where you can do that, 289 00:12:09,559 --> 00:12:13,000 Speaker 1: spend a little bit, create that environment and that feeling 290 00:12:13,040 --> 00:12:15,559 Speaker 1: for the viewer, and then just cash in on it. 291 00:12:15,640 --> 00:12:17,600 Speaker 1: So I just missed the boat on that one, but 292 00:12:17,640 --> 00:12:19,800 Speaker 1: I stand by it. I still think it's a terrible movie. 293 00:12:19,840 --> 00:12:22,120 Speaker 1: I don't get it. I don't understand it. And if 294 00:12:22,160 --> 00:12:24,000 Speaker 1: that makes me sound old and then a touch on 295 00:12:24,040 --> 00:12:26,520 Speaker 1: that one will still be it. That's my first one. 296 00:12:26,600 --> 00:12:28,960 Speaker 2: People really said, you look like the type of person 297 00:12:29,000 --> 00:12:29,640 Speaker 2: that would say. 298 00:12:29,480 --> 00:12:32,240 Speaker 1: Though, yeah, they told me my review was an l 299 00:12:32,400 --> 00:12:35,520 Speaker 1: was that my little brother? Maybe it was all right, 300 00:12:35,559 --> 00:12:38,040 Speaker 1: that's the best and the worst of the last month. 301 00:12:38,080 --> 00:12:39,440 Speaker 1: I want to switch it up a little bit and 302 00:12:39,440 --> 00:12:42,679 Speaker 1: get into some movie news. We've each brought a story 303 00:12:42,720 --> 00:12:46,319 Speaker 1: we want to share that has happened and developed recently, 304 00:12:46,520 --> 00:12:48,320 Speaker 1: and we'll just kind of talk about it. So what 305 00:12:48,360 --> 00:12:50,200 Speaker 1: do you have in movie news? Kelsey? 306 00:12:50,840 --> 00:12:52,720 Speaker 2: First off, I would like to tell you I'm sorry 307 00:12:52,760 --> 00:12:54,800 Speaker 2: I crammed eleven cookies into your VCRH. 308 00:12:54,840 --> 00:12:56,760 Speaker 1: I know where this is going, guys. 309 00:12:57,080 --> 00:13:00,200 Speaker 2: It's the twentieth anniversary of Elf, which does indeed make 310 00:13:00,240 --> 00:13:00,760 Speaker 2: me feel old. 311 00:13:00,840 --> 00:13:02,680 Speaker 1: I can't believe that movie is twenty years old. And 312 00:13:02,720 --> 00:13:06,480 Speaker 1: I think of Elf as a modern classic, but now 313 00:13:06,520 --> 00:13:09,760 Speaker 1: it's not that modern anymore, because before it was like, ah, 314 00:13:09,800 --> 00:13:12,200 Speaker 1: I don't think they can make any more Christmas classics 315 00:13:12,200 --> 00:13:14,600 Speaker 1: that will watch every single year, and Elf became that. 316 00:13:15,120 --> 00:13:17,240 Speaker 1: Now the movie has been out twenty years, so it's 317 00:13:17,280 --> 00:13:17,839 Speaker 1: just like a. 318 00:13:17,800 --> 00:13:22,040 Speaker 2: Classic twenty years And anyone that lives in New York, 319 00:13:22,120 --> 00:13:27,120 Speaker 2: I'm really jealous because on November seventh, they are lighting 320 00:13:27,240 --> 00:13:30,840 Speaker 2: up the Empire State Building in green and yellow, which 321 00:13:30,840 --> 00:13:31,640 Speaker 2: looks like Buddy the Elf. 322 00:13:31,679 --> 00:13:34,000 Speaker 1: This sounds like your dream you love New York City. 323 00:13:33,880 --> 00:13:35,800 Speaker 2: Which I'm so sad because we are going in a 324 00:13:35,800 --> 00:13:38,600 Speaker 2: few weeks we're just like missing the boat. But they 325 00:13:38,600 --> 00:13:41,560 Speaker 2: are doing like an interactive experience where you can go 326 00:13:41,640 --> 00:13:43,319 Speaker 2: take a picture with a life size cut out of 327 00:13:43,320 --> 00:13:45,240 Speaker 2: Buddy the Elf. So I will be dragging you to that. 328 00:13:45,360 --> 00:13:47,640 Speaker 1: Oh yeah, you love New York, you love Elf. This 329 00:13:47,760 --> 00:13:49,320 Speaker 1: is like everything you right now. 330 00:13:49,200 --> 00:13:52,960 Speaker 2: This is all I want. And I couldn't sleep last night. 331 00:13:53,000 --> 00:13:56,719 Speaker 2: I was doing some online shopping. I like to tell 332 00:13:56,720 --> 00:13:59,040 Speaker 2: you on the podcast, So okay, this is I'm just 333 00:13:59,080 --> 00:14:00,960 Speaker 2: gonna start telling you about my purchases on the podcast 334 00:14:01,000 --> 00:14:01,840 Speaker 2: in front of an audience. 335 00:14:01,880 --> 00:14:04,880 Speaker 1: So they're doing merch for the twentieth anniversary. Yes, and 336 00:14:04,880 --> 00:14:06,360 Speaker 1: you already purchased something I did. 337 00:14:06,520 --> 00:14:09,440 Speaker 2: I bought it this incredible elf pillow from Pottery Barn. 338 00:14:09,720 --> 00:14:12,000 Speaker 2: This is not they are not paying me. I did not. 339 00:14:12,080 --> 00:14:14,559 Speaker 2: I promise you. I bought this pillow with my own 340 00:14:14,600 --> 00:14:19,280 Speaker 2: money and it is the coolest pillow. Because sometimes merch 341 00:14:19,400 --> 00:14:20,400 Speaker 2: is like kind of cheesy. 342 00:14:20,480 --> 00:14:23,840 Speaker 1: Let me see it. I actually like that good because 343 00:14:23,840 --> 00:14:26,400 Speaker 1: it's going on the couch. So I don't love Christmas 344 00:14:26,440 --> 00:14:28,640 Speaker 1: as much as you do. I'm not a gringch. 345 00:14:28,360 --> 00:14:29,400 Speaker 2: By al say that. 346 00:14:29,600 --> 00:14:31,640 Speaker 1: But you like love Christmas yea. 347 00:14:31,640 --> 00:14:34,720 Speaker 2: And Christmas tree is already up it's the one in 348 00:14:34,720 --> 00:14:36,720 Speaker 2: our bedroom went up on November first, and the only 349 00:14:36,760 --> 00:14:38,840 Speaker 2: reason that the big one didn't come until November second 350 00:14:38,880 --> 00:14:39,640 Speaker 2: is you were out of town. 351 00:14:39,840 --> 00:14:43,240 Speaker 1: Yeah, I guess I don't get into the decorating side 352 00:14:43,280 --> 00:14:45,120 Speaker 1: of Christmas. You love that part of it. 353 00:14:45,200 --> 00:14:46,560 Speaker 2: I love it makes the house feel Cody. 354 00:14:46,720 --> 00:14:49,200 Speaker 1: I like that it doesn't look like cheesy Christmas stuff, 355 00:14:49,200 --> 00:14:50,520 Speaker 1: which I usually associated with. 356 00:14:50,680 --> 00:14:53,440 Speaker 2: I've also found we have a family tradition in that 357 00:14:53,680 --> 00:14:57,400 Speaker 2: my brothers and I and now you after marrying into 358 00:14:57,440 --> 00:15:01,440 Speaker 2: the family, we all wear matching Elf shirt on Christmas 359 00:15:01,440 --> 00:15:03,760 Speaker 2: morning and we sit on the stairs and take a picture. 360 00:15:03,880 --> 00:15:07,200 Speaker 2: And I did see that the Warner Brothers shop has 361 00:15:07,200 --> 00:15:09,480 Speaker 2: a lot of cool new shirts, so I think I 362 00:15:09,520 --> 00:15:10,720 Speaker 2: found our Christmas attire. 363 00:15:10,800 --> 00:15:13,400 Speaker 1: So we're replacing the Bye Buddy, I hope you found 364 00:15:13,440 --> 00:15:14,680 Speaker 1: your dad. Why they're dead? 365 00:15:14,800 --> 00:15:17,040 Speaker 2: Yeah, the Narwall shirt. Because my thirteen year old brother 366 00:15:17,080 --> 00:15:19,720 Speaker 2: lost his. I don't know where it is. Now. 367 00:15:19,720 --> 00:15:21,120 Speaker 1: We candle mag. 368 00:15:21,200 --> 00:15:23,960 Speaker 2: That my little brother does have a Texas twang. He 369 00:15:23,960 --> 00:15:25,880 Speaker 2: doesn't think he does, but he does, and he's like, 370 00:15:25,960 --> 00:15:26,920 Speaker 2: I don't know where it went. 371 00:15:27,400 --> 00:15:29,640 Speaker 1: And I did say they're also going to put it 372 00:15:29,680 --> 00:15:32,720 Speaker 1: back up on Max. So we can stream it on Christmas. 373 00:15:33,000 --> 00:15:36,600 Speaker 2: Yeah, they're really really leaning into like the merch collapse, 374 00:15:36,720 --> 00:15:38,840 Speaker 2: and I don't know, maybe next week I'll come report 375 00:15:38,880 --> 00:15:41,520 Speaker 2: on another purchase. Can we just have like a safe 376 00:15:41,560 --> 00:15:43,360 Speaker 2: space every week where I just tell you everything I've 377 00:15:43,360 --> 00:15:45,160 Speaker 2: bought for the house. But it's on the podcast. 378 00:15:45,320 --> 00:15:46,640 Speaker 1: It has to be movie related. 379 00:15:47,880 --> 00:15:50,440 Speaker 2: All of these things are Elf. They're doing some ELF candles. 380 00:15:50,480 --> 00:15:51,440 Speaker 2: You know, I love a candle? 381 00:15:51,520 --> 00:15:54,080 Speaker 1: Do love candles? For my movie news? 382 00:15:54,160 --> 00:15:55,240 Speaker 2: I wasn't then talking about ELT? 383 00:15:55,280 --> 00:15:55,960 Speaker 1: Oh what else you have? 384 00:15:56,680 --> 00:15:58,360 Speaker 2: Just how much I love it? And that it is 385 00:15:58,400 --> 00:16:01,040 Speaker 2: the season to watch Elf. It's the season to start 386 00:16:01,040 --> 00:16:04,960 Speaker 2: watching Christmas movies. Was it twenty twenty that we watched 387 00:16:05,000 --> 00:16:07,920 Speaker 2: every Christmas movie known to man? Including some terrible ones. 388 00:16:07,960 --> 00:16:10,080 Speaker 1: We went in deep into the vault for Christmas movie. 389 00:16:10,160 --> 00:16:13,280 Speaker 2: We even went like Christmas with the Cranks Vault, which, oh, 390 00:16:13,280 --> 00:16:14,560 Speaker 2: as you know, not a good one. 391 00:16:14,640 --> 00:16:16,080 Speaker 1: But we'll start with off this year. 392 00:16:16,240 --> 00:16:18,600 Speaker 2: Okay, great, thank you. Can I get that on writing, Yes, 393 00:16:18,760 --> 00:16:21,880 Speaker 2: I'll write it right now. Okay, okay, I'm done for 394 00:16:22,000 --> 00:16:25,280 Speaker 2: my movie news. I read this entire big article that 395 00:16:25,360 --> 00:16:27,400 Speaker 2: Variety did on Marvel being in. 396 00:16:27,360 --> 00:16:29,480 Speaker 1: Trouble, which a lot of things stuck out to me. 397 00:16:29,560 --> 00:16:32,360 Speaker 1: I think the big headline is that apparently there were 398 00:16:32,400 --> 00:16:37,160 Speaker 1: discussions of rebooting the original Avengers with Robert Downey Junior 399 00:16:37,160 --> 00:16:40,480 Speaker 1: Scarlett Johansen coming back, and I feel like the reason 400 00:16:40,520 --> 00:16:43,760 Speaker 1: they would do that, we're already rebooting, not rebooting, but 401 00:16:43,880 --> 00:16:47,320 Speaker 1: just doing another story and bringing back the original Avengers, 402 00:16:47,400 --> 00:16:48,920 Speaker 1: and I don't know how true that is. 403 00:16:49,080 --> 00:16:49,560 Speaker 2: Too soon. 404 00:16:50,040 --> 00:16:53,680 Speaker 1: Essentially, what the article says is that Marvel is in 405 00:16:53,760 --> 00:16:57,920 Speaker 1: crisis right now, one because a lot of their quality 406 00:16:57,960 --> 00:17:00,880 Speaker 1: of films hasn't been up to par, therefore kind of 407 00:17:00,880 --> 00:17:05,359 Speaker 1: diminishing the brand behind Marvel, which for the longest time 408 00:17:05,400 --> 00:17:07,639 Speaker 1: you just saw Marvel and thought that's going to be 409 00:17:07,640 --> 00:17:09,680 Speaker 1: a great movie. But now you see Marvel and you think, 410 00:17:09,680 --> 00:17:13,280 Speaker 1: ah might not even be that good, which it just 411 00:17:13,320 --> 00:17:15,440 Speaker 1: shows you, like how quickly things can change. 412 00:17:15,760 --> 00:17:18,640 Speaker 2: From a business perspective, it almost feels like they scaled 413 00:17:18,680 --> 00:17:21,840 Speaker 2: too fast. It's like when the hype was hot, they 414 00:17:21,840 --> 00:17:24,280 Speaker 2: were like, We're throwing everything into this, from making TV 415 00:17:24,480 --> 00:17:27,639 Speaker 2: series or doing all of this stuff, and it just 416 00:17:27,840 --> 00:17:30,679 Speaker 2: it feels like those businesses where they scale too fast. 417 00:17:31,000 --> 00:17:33,119 Speaker 2: The Belgium, many stores, the interest ees. 418 00:17:34,080 --> 00:17:37,280 Speaker 1: I watch a lot of those company man videos on YouTube. 419 00:17:37,600 --> 00:17:40,679 Speaker 1: That is usually the problem. You have a successful store, 420 00:17:40,960 --> 00:17:43,200 Speaker 1: they want a franchise, they start doing all these things, 421 00:17:43,280 --> 00:17:45,359 Speaker 1: and then they can't manage all the projects and then 422 00:17:45,480 --> 00:17:47,840 Speaker 1: the quality goes down. I think that is what happened here. 423 00:17:47,920 --> 00:17:50,080 Speaker 1: I think it all traces back to twenty twenty. So 424 00:17:50,840 --> 00:17:53,960 Speaker 1: Endgame came out in twenty nineteen, and then twenty twenty 425 00:17:54,000 --> 00:17:55,960 Speaker 1: with the launch of Disney Plus and the launch of 426 00:17:56,000 --> 00:17:58,480 Speaker 1: all these TV shows. I feel like they were trying 427 00:17:58,480 --> 00:17:59,520 Speaker 1: to scale too fast. 428 00:18:00,080 --> 00:18:03,520 Speaker 2: The TV shows like One Division Great Great, like they 429 00:18:03,520 --> 00:18:04,800 Speaker 2: could have they could have stopped there. 430 00:18:05,480 --> 00:18:07,600 Speaker 1: Yeah, because then with She Hulk and all the other 431 00:18:07,680 --> 00:18:10,440 Speaker 1: ones that have just been kind of subpar, it takes 432 00:18:10,480 --> 00:18:12,960 Speaker 1: away from the excitement of a new Marvel show or 433 00:18:12,960 --> 00:18:16,240 Speaker 1: a Marvel movie coming out. So I feel like, really, 434 00:18:16,240 --> 00:18:19,600 Speaker 1: what is hurt Marvel was the Disney Plus model, which 435 00:18:19,640 --> 00:18:21,680 Speaker 1: also was hurting Disney at the same time, which people 436 00:18:21,680 --> 00:18:24,680 Speaker 1: aren't mentioning, but the fact that there's just so much 437 00:18:24,800 --> 00:18:29,560 Speaker 1: content so quickly coming out so soon, the visual effects 438 00:18:29,560 --> 00:18:33,679 Speaker 1: have been suffering. I just feel like it became so 439 00:18:33,920 --> 00:18:36,240 Speaker 1: big that they wanted to keep that same momentum going 440 00:18:36,280 --> 00:18:39,440 Speaker 1: the entire time that they had riding up till endgame, 441 00:18:40,280 --> 00:18:43,440 Speaker 1: and it just kind of broke down, and you also 442 00:18:43,560 --> 00:18:46,800 Speaker 1: lose a lot of those big characters. And then the 443 00:18:46,920 --> 00:18:50,879 Speaker 1: thing is Marvel started with unknown characters. There is a 444 00:18:50,920 --> 00:18:53,480 Speaker 1: reason whenever Marvel movies were first made that they came 445 00:18:53,520 --> 00:18:56,600 Speaker 1: out with Spider Man, Fantastic Four, and the X Men, 446 00:18:56,720 --> 00:18:59,159 Speaker 1: because those were the biggest comics. Naturally, those would be 447 00:18:59,160 --> 00:19:01,520 Speaker 1: the first big movie they would make. And then Marvel 448 00:19:01,600 --> 00:19:04,160 Speaker 1: sold off the rights to those movies. So then they 449 00:19:04,200 --> 00:19:06,400 Speaker 1: started in two thousand and eight with Ironman, who wasn't 450 00:19:06,440 --> 00:19:09,239 Speaker 1: the most popular Marvel comic. And that's exactly how they 451 00:19:09,280 --> 00:19:13,080 Speaker 1: built the entire MCU with using the lesser known characters 452 00:19:13,080 --> 00:19:15,000 Speaker 1: that they had the rights to to make the films 453 00:19:15,320 --> 00:19:18,800 Speaker 1: with Thor and Captain America. And but that's what their 454 00:19:18,840 --> 00:19:21,760 Speaker 1: model was, Let's use these lesser known characters that we 455 00:19:21,800 --> 00:19:24,680 Speaker 1: have the rights to and create something unique and create 456 00:19:24,680 --> 00:19:28,640 Speaker 1: a cinematic universe. That is exactly what they built their 457 00:19:28,720 --> 00:19:31,800 Speaker 1: brand on. But now that you don't have those characters anymore, 458 00:19:31,800 --> 00:19:34,399 Speaker 1: you don't have those actors, they're trying to do essentially 459 00:19:34,480 --> 00:19:36,320 Speaker 1: the same thing they did back in two thousand and 460 00:19:36,359 --> 00:19:38,640 Speaker 1: eight with all these newer characters, that they do have, 461 00:19:38,760 --> 00:19:41,040 Speaker 1: but the interest just isn't there as much because of 462 00:19:41,080 --> 00:19:44,080 Speaker 1: the saturation. So I feel like it's a saturation problem, 463 00:19:44,280 --> 00:19:46,439 Speaker 1: which leads me back to the point I brought up 464 00:19:46,480 --> 00:19:49,160 Speaker 1: before that Marvel could go the way of the Western, 465 00:19:49,240 --> 00:19:52,359 Speaker 1: which the Western film was the most popular between nineteen 466 00:19:52,440 --> 00:19:55,399 Speaker 1: forty five and nineteen sixty for fifteen years. You look 467 00:19:55,440 --> 00:19:57,119 Speaker 1: at the timeline right now, from two thousand and eight 468 00:19:57,160 --> 00:19:59,680 Speaker 1: to twenty twenty three, that's fifteen years. That's the same 469 00:19:59,760 --> 00:20:02,800 Speaker 1: run good mental math skills. Oh thank you, it's the 470 00:20:02,840 --> 00:20:05,800 Speaker 1: same thing happening. You're bringing out the same type of 471 00:20:05,800 --> 00:20:09,280 Speaker 1: stories inside of the same genre. The audiences just start 472 00:20:09,359 --> 00:20:12,800 Speaker 1: to wear down a little bit too many movies, and 473 00:20:12,840 --> 00:20:15,280 Speaker 1: then what happened back in the sixties is you had 474 00:20:15,320 --> 00:20:18,840 Speaker 1: the rise of sci fi, therefore making the Western look obsolete. 475 00:20:18,920 --> 00:20:20,640 Speaker 1: I feel like that's gonna kind of happen right now 476 00:20:20,720 --> 00:20:23,040 Speaker 1: if they don't make a big change. I still think 477 00:20:23,080 --> 00:20:25,400 Speaker 1: you can make superhero movies. I just think you kind 478 00:20:25,400 --> 00:20:27,440 Speaker 1: of have to scale back the budget and make something 479 00:20:27,480 --> 00:20:30,040 Speaker 1: a little bit more novel. What I think Marvel is 480 00:20:30,080 --> 00:20:32,360 Speaker 1: missing is what DC is about to crush it with 481 00:20:32,440 --> 00:20:35,960 Speaker 1: and having these else worlds that are rated r that 482 00:20:36,000 --> 00:20:39,199 Speaker 1: are not in this big continuous this happens and this 483 00:20:39,240 --> 00:20:41,240 Speaker 1: movie connects with this one. They're just their own thing. 484 00:20:41,560 --> 00:20:45,520 Speaker 1: But I think the problem that Marvel has is being 485 00:20:45,560 --> 00:20:48,520 Speaker 1: connected to Disney. They just want the money and they 486 00:20:48,560 --> 00:20:51,040 Speaker 1: want all the things to go back to Disney World 487 00:20:51,080 --> 00:20:54,280 Speaker 1: and disney Land, so it kind of cuts back on 488 00:20:54,320 --> 00:20:56,800 Speaker 1: their creativity a little bit. And even with Kevin Figi, 489 00:20:56,880 --> 00:21:00,080 Speaker 1: who oversees Marvel, he spreads so thin right now that 490 00:21:00,119 --> 00:21:02,600 Speaker 1: he doesn't really have the same attention to detail that 491 00:21:02,640 --> 00:21:05,360 Speaker 1: he had early on when developing the MCU, and that's 492 00:21:05,359 --> 00:21:09,320 Speaker 1: why nothing really feels cohesive anymore. So I didn't really 493 00:21:09,400 --> 00:21:11,960 Speaker 1: think Marvel was in trouble until I read this article 494 00:21:12,000 --> 00:21:14,119 Speaker 1: and saw everything kind of laid out. And now the 495 00:21:14,160 --> 00:21:18,120 Speaker 1: whole issue they have with Jonathan Major's probably not continuing 496 00:21:18,200 --> 00:21:21,720 Speaker 1: as Kang, and they have really haven't had any time 497 00:21:21,760 --> 00:21:23,800 Speaker 1: because of the writers strike to write him out of that, 498 00:21:24,240 --> 00:21:26,880 Speaker 1: they may go with Doctor Doom, who I don't love 499 00:21:26,920 --> 00:21:29,399 Speaker 1: that decision because Doctor Doom seems so cheesy in the 500 00:21:29,400 --> 00:21:32,760 Speaker 1: Fantastic Four movies. Unless they really give him the right tone, 501 00:21:32,920 --> 00:21:34,720 Speaker 1: then you have the villain issue again. 502 00:21:35,000 --> 00:21:36,879 Speaker 2: I would like to say that we definitely agree with. 503 00:21:36,880 --> 00:21:39,000 Speaker 1: Them writing Jonathan mac oh, Yeah, just. 504 00:21:38,960 --> 00:21:42,440 Speaker 2: Making that known that, Yeah, I'm not on the side 505 00:21:42,440 --> 00:21:42,879 Speaker 2: of him. 506 00:21:42,840 --> 00:21:45,600 Speaker 1: As much as I loved him and amp Man, he 507 00:21:45,680 --> 00:21:50,200 Speaker 1: shouldn't be Kang the Conqueror anymore. They could recast him, 508 00:21:50,400 --> 00:21:52,520 Speaker 1: which I feel like would be the easiest choice, since 509 00:21:52,560 --> 00:21:55,200 Speaker 1: they don't have a way to write him out because 510 00:21:55,200 --> 00:21:58,080 Speaker 1: they were basing everything on that character. I think switching 511 00:21:58,080 --> 00:22:00,200 Speaker 1: to doctor Doom would be like, oh, Man, but he 512 00:22:00,240 --> 00:22:01,000 Speaker 1: wanted to see King. 513 00:22:01,440 --> 00:22:03,440 Speaker 2: That just sounds like a dumb character name King. 514 00:22:03,760 --> 00:22:07,360 Speaker 1: No, oh, doctor Doom. People love him because of the comics, 515 00:22:07,359 --> 00:22:09,440 Speaker 1: which he's great in the comics, but if you look 516 00:22:09,440 --> 00:22:12,240 Speaker 1: at the Fantastic Four movies, he looks so cheesy. So 517 00:22:12,400 --> 00:22:14,840 Speaker 1: you'd have to make him a lot more like Thanos 518 00:22:14,880 --> 00:22:17,359 Speaker 1: and give him some kind of a human quality to 519 00:22:17,400 --> 00:22:19,359 Speaker 1: make me really interested in Doctor Doom. 520 00:22:19,359 --> 00:22:20,399 Speaker 2: But he's a therapist. 521 00:22:20,680 --> 00:22:27,480 Speaker 1: Oh yeah, everybody's biggest fear therapy facing your demons. But yeah, 522 00:22:27,880 --> 00:22:30,359 Speaker 1: I think they need to scale back. I think they 523 00:22:30,359 --> 00:22:33,439 Speaker 1: need to make movies for a more modest budget. I 524 00:22:33,480 --> 00:22:37,160 Speaker 1: also think the problem Marvel has is they don't have 525 00:22:37,520 --> 00:22:40,399 Speaker 1: the same source material, like the same great stories that 526 00:22:40,520 --> 00:22:43,600 Speaker 1: DC has. Which, as you know, I mean getting more 527 00:22:43,600 --> 00:22:44,520 Speaker 1: into comics. 528 00:22:44,200 --> 00:22:45,760 Speaker 2: Lately, wasn't aware. 529 00:22:46,160 --> 00:22:49,040 Speaker 1: And I'm really more drawn to DC's stories because they 530 00:22:49,080 --> 00:22:52,320 Speaker 1: can be grittier and they show you a different style 531 00:22:52,760 --> 00:22:56,080 Speaker 1: of superhero. And then when I look into the Marvel 532 00:22:56,480 --> 00:22:58,960 Speaker 1: back catalog of comics and try to find the one 533 00:22:59,000 --> 00:23:01,800 Speaker 1: singular story for some of these characters, it's not as 534 00:23:01,800 --> 00:23:04,280 Speaker 1: strong as it is on the DC side. So I 535 00:23:04,280 --> 00:23:06,720 Speaker 1: feel like they need to dig through their source material 536 00:23:06,800 --> 00:23:09,840 Speaker 1: and find the really great stories that showcase their superheroes 537 00:23:09,880 --> 00:23:11,960 Speaker 1: in ways they haven't yet, instead of kind of going 538 00:23:12,000 --> 00:23:14,040 Speaker 1: back to that same well that has been kind of 539 00:23:14,040 --> 00:23:18,240 Speaker 1: the MCU style of making movies with the comedy and 540 00:23:18,320 --> 00:23:19,560 Speaker 1: the fun, lightheartedness. 541 00:23:19,720 --> 00:23:20,760 Speaker 2: The well has run dry. 542 00:23:20,920 --> 00:23:23,400 Speaker 1: Yeah, they need to go back and talk to some nerds, 543 00:23:23,520 --> 00:23:26,560 Speaker 1: which is what I would encourage them to do now. Yes, 544 00:23:26,640 --> 00:23:29,440 Speaker 1: create like a focus group of some hardcore comic book 545 00:23:29,480 --> 00:23:32,320 Speaker 1: nerds and ask them what are your favorite stories and 546 00:23:32,359 --> 00:23:34,280 Speaker 1: what do you think we should be making, because I 547 00:23:34,280 --> 00:23:36,800 Speaker 1: think that is essentially what you have to do is 548 00:23:36,840 --> 00:23:40,040 Speaker 1: go back to the people who know the source materials 549 00:23:40,080 --> 00:23:42,720 Speaker 1: so well and the fans that are so passionate, the 550 00:23:42,760 --> 00:23:45,040 Speaker 1: fans that were there with you in the very beginning, 551 00:23:45,080 --> 00:23:47,760 Speaker 1: in the early stages, rooting you on, talk to them 552 00:23:47,800 --> 00:23:49,399 Speaker 1: and find out what they want to do and what 553 00:23:49,440 --> 00:23:50,760 Speaker 1: they want to see on the big screen. 554 00:23:50,840 --> 00:23:52,480 Speaker 2: It's actually a really good idea. Just hold like a 555 00:23:52,520 --> 00:23:55,080 Speaker 2: focus group like Comicon. Yeah, I mean you already got 556 00:23:55,080 --> 00:23:56,800 Speaker 2: all the nerds in one room when you host Comicon. 557 00:23:57,119 --> 00:23:59,000 Speaker 1: That's all you have to do. Talk to some nerds 558 00:23:59,040 --> 00:23:59,920 Speaker 1: because when. 559 00:24:00,040 --> 00:24:02,800 Speaker 2: As to self proclaimed nerds, we're not hating on the nerds. 560 00:24:02,840 --> 00:24:05,600 Speaker 1: We are nerds because whenever movies get announced, you see 561 00:24:05,640 --> 00:24:08,480 Speaker 1: the nerds comment first, you know, referencing the comics. I 562 00:24:08,480 --> 00:24:11,560 Speaker 1: feel like that's where your answer lies, finding those stories 563 00:24:11,600 --> 00:24:13,679 Speaker 1: and then also finding directors. 564 00:24:13,160 --> 00:24:15,240 Speaker 2: Who answer lies on the Facebook comments. 565 00:24:15,480 --> 00:24:19,240 Speaker 1: Look, it kind of does like as dark and dismal 566 00:24:19,280 --> 00:24:21,320 Speaker 1: as that may seem. Of like listening to the people 567 00:24:21,359 --> 00:24:24,439 Speaker 1: who are just shouting on their keyboards, sometimes there is 568 00:24:24,520 --> 00:24:28,040 Speaker 1: something there that you could talk to them about. But overall, 569 00:24:28,119 --> 00:24:30,840 Speaker 1: I don't think the article pointed out anything that I 570 00:24:30,880 --> 00:24:33,479 Speaker 1: hadn't really seen. It was just seeing it all kind 571 00:24:33,520 --> 00:24:35,639 Speaker 1: of laid out and all the pieces kind of fitting 572 00:24:35,640 --> 00:24:38,280 Speaker 1: together that they are on a bit of a decline, 573 00:24:38,359 --> 00:24:40,520 Speaker 1: which I don't think they are by any means going 574 00:24:40,560 --> 00:24:44,320 Speaker 1: to be terrible and completely out for the next five years. 575 00:24:44,440 --> 00:24:47,080 Speaker 1: I feel like it's really crazy that you make a 576 00:24:47,080 --> 00:24:50,720 Speaker 1: few bad projects and everybody kind of jump ship. I'm 577 00:24:50,720 --> 00:24:52,760 Speaker 1: not quite ready to jump ship yet. There are some 578 00:24:52,880 --> 00:24:55,800 Speaker 1: things I'm excited about coming from Marvel, but I do 579 00:24:55,840 --> 00:24:57,520 Speaker 1: think they need to step it up a bit, especially 580 00:24:57,560 --> 00:25:01,640 Speaker 1: with James Gunn taking over DC. Forgetting he went from Marvel, Yeah, 581 00:25:01,800 --> 00:25:04,640 Speaker 1: which people overlooked that he just crushed it this year 582 00:25:04,680 --> 00:25:06,719 Speaker 1: with Guardians at the Galaxy three that was such a 583 00:25:06,720 --> 00:25:10,200 Speaker 1: big hit. That was kind of quietly like everybody didn't 584 00:25:10,240 --> 00:25:13,080 Speaker 1: really contribute that to the MCU, but that was a 585 00:25:13,119 --> 00:25:15,679 Speaker 1: really big moment for them this year. How much do 586 00:25:15,720 --> 00:25:17,399 Speaker 1: we think that paycheck is to go from one to 587 00:25:17,440 --> 00:25:21,320 Speaker 1: the other? Oh tons of money? Nice, But with him 588 00:25:21,320 --> 00:25:24,920 Speaker 1: going over there and taking over making a new Superman 589 00:25:25,080 --> 00:25:27,560 Speaker 1: movie and generating some interest over there, if he can 590 00:25:27,600 --> 00:25:30,880 Speaker 1: do even a fraction of what he did with Guardians 591 00:25:31,320 --> 00:25:34,320 Speaker 1: with Marvel, imagine what he can do with DC. But again, 592 00:25:34,760 --> 00:25:36,960 Speaker 1: I can also see the same issues they have of 593 00:25:37,040 --> 00:25:39,560 Speaker 1: him being involved in so many projects and directing things, 594 00:25:39,840 --> 00:25:43,679 Speaker 1: and whenever people get spread so thin, the quality just diminishes. 595 00:25:43,760 --> 00:25:45,280 Speaker 1: So I think they just need to bring in some 596 00:25:45,320 --> 00:25:49,199 Speaker 1: more people and not base everything on one person, or 597 00:25:49,600 --> 00:25:50,119 Speaker 1: they need. 598 00:25:50,000 --> 00:25:52,800 Speaker 2: To just like truly take a hiatus, create some like 599 00:25:52,920 --> 00:25:55,000 Speaker 2: I don't know, Absence makes the heart grow fonder. I mean, 600 00:25:55,119 --> 00:25:57,200 Speaker 2: people miss a good Marvel movie and then come back 601 00:25:57,240 --> 00:25:59,760 Speaker 2: with something so strong. Stop putting out one two. 602 00:26:00,560 --> 00:26:02,560 Speaker 1: That is a great point and one I think would 603 00:26:02,600 --> 00:26:06,840 Speaker 1: solve everything except for their pockets. Well yeah, because yes, 604 00:26:07,000 --> 00:26:09,720 Speaker 1: going away and really spending some time to you know, 605 00:26:09,800 --> 00:26:11,920 Speaker 1: give viewers a chance to miss them. 606 00:26:12,160 --> 00:26:14,080 Speaker 2: Give writers a chance to have a break. 607 00:26:13,920 --> 00:26:16,320 Speaker 1: Give the VFX artists a chance to have a break, 608 00:26:16,320 --> 00:26:19,320 Speaker 1: who have been just work crazily to get all these 609 00:26:19,320 --> 00:26:22,120 Speaker 1: projects out on time, and the quality is suffered. Give 610 00:26:22,240 --> 00:26:25,040 Speaker 1: everybody a break, recharge, and come back with some really 611 00:26:25,040 --> 00:26:27,680 Speaker 1: great content instead of, like you said, just cranking things 612 00:26:27,680 --> 00:26:29,720 Speaker 1: out over and over again. But again, it's a giant 613 00:26:29,720 --> 00:26:31,280 Speaker 1: business now they can't do that. 614 00:26:31,359 --> 00:26:33,560 Speaker 2: And it, yeah, it sucks when things like that become 615 00:26:33,920 --> 00:26:36,440 Speaker 2: such a moneymaker because it's like it's just another cog 616 00:26:36,440 --> 00:26:38,480 Speaker 2: in the wheel now of their machine. 617 00:26:38,760 --> 00:26:42,119 Speaker 1: But we stand by that reviving the original Avengers right 618 00:26:42,119 --> 00:26:44,399 Speaker 1: now would be a terrible idea, right these don't I 619 00:26:44,400 --> 00:26:46,880 Speaker 1: think you need at least ten years. Twenty twenty nine 620 00:26:46,920 --> 00:26:49,640 Speaker 1: would be the earliest you could do that, even if 621 00:26:49,640 --> 00:26:52,320 Speaker 1: it's some I know they're in the multiverse saga right now, 622 00:26:52,560 --> 00:26:55,280 Speaker 1: and anything kind of goes which I'm also kind of 623 00:26:55,280 --> 00:26:57,639 Speaker 1: tired of the Multiverse right now. To be honest, I 624 00:26:57,720 --> 00:26:58,680 Speaker 1: loved it in the beginning. 625 00:26:58,880 --> 00:26:59,920 Speaker 2: It's very confused. 626 00:27:00,400 --> 00:27:02,800 Speaker 1: I think time stories are kind of starting to wear 627 00:27:02,840 --> 00:27:04,840 Speaker 1: on me a little bit of different timelines. They were 628 00:27:04,920 --> 00:27:08,119 Speaker 1: so interesting and fascinating early on, but everybody's trying to 629 00:27:08,160 --> 00:27:10,160 Speaker 1: do it now. I think after the Flash, I kind 630 00:27:10,160 --> 00:27:12,440 Speaker 1: of told myself, I'm a little bit done with the multiverse. 631 00:27:12,760 --> 00:27:16,200 Speaker 1: Just give me some great, straight ahead stories, some characters 632 00:27:16,240 --> 00:27:18,879 Speaker 1: to root for, some hype moments. That's all we really want. 633 00:27:19,160 --> 00:27:23,399 Speaker 2: Give me like one, just like one time, present, day, past, future, 634 00:27:23,560 --> 00:27:24,920 Speaker 2: just one pick one. 635 00:27:25,080 --> 00:27:27,280 Speaker 1: I also don't want movies to connect anymore. I don't 636 00:27:27,320 --> 00:27:27,960 Speaker 1: care about that. 637 00:27:28,640 --> 00:27:31,840 Speaker 2: Yeah, like I think, I think you also alienate because 638 00:27:31,840 --> 00:27:33,680 Speaker 2: then people feel the need to have seen everything. 639 00:27:33,720 --> 00:27:35,679 Speaker 1: That is a great point. I feel you you've. 640 00:27:35,520 --> 00:27:37,280 Speaker 2: Set that quite a few times. I feel very smart. 641 00:27:37,359 --> 00:27:40,679 Speaker 1: This is why you're cos because it is daunting to 642 00:27:40,680 --> 00:27:43,000 Speaker 1: tell somebody, hey, there's a new Marvel movie coming out. 643 00:27:43,040 --> 00:27:44,720 Speaker 1: The first question is, well, do I have to watch 644 00:27:44,760 --> 00:27:48,080 Speaker 1: every single other of the thirty two movies they've made. No, 645 00:27:48,240 --> 00:27:50,000 Speaker 1: you just needn't watch the like. You just need to 646 00:27:50,040 --> 00:27:51,720 Speaker 1: get people to a point that they just want to 647 00:27:51,720 --> 00:27:53,879 Speaker 1: go watch one movie, be entertained. 648 00:27:54,240 --> 00:27:56,359 Speaker 2: Like I think Black Panther was one of the best 649 00:27:56,440 --> 00:27:59,200 Speaker 2: like standalone they've ever done. I have a friend who 650 00:27:59,320 --> 00:28:02,080 Speaker 2: hasn't ever seen any other Marvel movies. She's seen Black 651 00:28:02,080 --> 00:28:03,679 Speaker 2: Panther like three times. She was like, I loved it. 652 00:28:03,680 --> 00:28:04,120 Speaker 2: It's great. 653 00:28:04,240 --> 00:28:08,200 Speaker 1: Go back to that original model. Trilogies thinking trilogies Part one, 654 00:28:08,480 --> 00:28:14,080 Speaker 1: Origin story, Part two, the emotional unraveling, Part three, the conclusion, 655 00:28:14,160 --> 00:28:15,720 Speaker 1: the big epic ending of our hero. 656 00:28:16,000 --> 00:28:18,879 Speaker 2: That's it trilogies, which just reminds me not a topic 657 00:28:18,920 --> 00:28:20,920 Speaker 2: for today, But we haven't talked on here about them 658 00:28:20,960 --> 00:28:24,439 Speaker 2: turning Harry Potter into like a series on is it Max? 659 00:28:24,720 --> 00:28:27,720 Speaker 1: Yeah? Oh yeah, that's a story for another day. 660 00:28:27,760 --> 00:28:28,919 Speaker 2: I have a lot of thoughts about that. 661 00:28:29,680 --> 00:28:31,640 Speaker 1: But anyway, I could probably go on this. 662 00:28:31,880 --> 00:28:33,919 Speaker 2: Yeah, you got to talk about this way longer than 663 00:28:33,920 --> 00:28:34,920 Speaker 2: I got to talk about Elf. 664 00:28:35,080 --> 00:28:37,000 Speaker 1: I'm sorry. It was a long article and I had 665 00:28:37,000 --> 00:28:38,120 Speaker 1: a lot of things to say about it. 666 00:28:38,000 --> 00:28:38,959 Speaker 2: It was a lot of passion. 667 00:28:39,200 --> 00:28:41,200 Speaker 1: Anything else you want to mention before we go? 668 00:28:42,160 --> 00:28:44,400 Speaker 2: Honorable mention for the month. A couple of good books 669 00:28:44,600 --> 00:28:48,800 Speaker 2: there we go, one called The Last life Boat. Of 670 00:28:48,840 --> 00:28:50,880 Speaker 2: course it is a World War Two I also had 671 00:28:50,880 --> 00:28:52,880 Speaker 2: a breakthrough on that. I remembered I used to read 672 00:28:52,960 --> 00:28:54,760 Speaker 2: historical fiction as a child, and it was like, that 673 00:28:54,760 --> 00:28:57,840 Speaker 2: makes a lot more sense. So yeah, the Last life Boat, 674 00:28:57,920 --> 00:28:58,600 Speaker 2: it's a good one. 675 00:28:58,680 --> 00:29:00,880 Speaker 1: I would have an honorable man, but I feel like 676 00:29:00,920 --> 00:29:03,080 Speaker 1: I went too long in the marvel. I did read 677 00:29:03,120 --> 00:29:06,160 Speaker 1: The Dark Knight Returns, which is now my favorite graphic 678 00:29:06,200 --> 00:29:07,160 Speaker 1: novel that I've ever read. 679 00:29:07,320 --> 00:29:09,160 Speaker 2: I love that you found a hobby only because when 680 00:29:09,160 --> 00:29:11,320 Speaker 2: my sevenths of four boxes come in the mail every week, 681 00:29:11,320 --> 00:29:12,600 Speaker 2: it's like, well, that's my hobby. 682 00:29:13,040 --> 00:29:16,320 Speaker 1: Because books are hard for me to finish, but graphic 683 00:29:16,400 --> 00:29:19,240 Speaker 1: novels I can sit down and read and there are pictures, 684 00:29:19,600 --> 00:29:22,600 Speaker 1: and there are pictures. So we'll come back, we'll do 685 00:29:22,680 --> 00:29:25,719 Speaker 1: the movie review, and we'll do the trailer park after this. 686 00:29:30,160 --> 00:29:32,880 Speaker 1: Let's get into it now. A spoiler free movie review 687 00:29:32,920 --> 00:29:36,280 Speaker 1: of Priscilla. You have Kaylee Spainey playing Priscilla in this movie. 688 00:29:36,360 --> 00:29:39,760 Speaker 1: Jacob Elordi plays Elvis. The movie is directed by Sophia Coppola, 689 00:29:39,840 --> 00:29:42,880 Speaker 1: who is a great director. She wrote the script for 690 00:29:42,920 --> 00:29:45,760 Speaker 1: this movie based on the book written by Priscilla Presley 691 00:29:45,760 --> 00:29:48,800 Speaker 1: who Priscilla is also an executive producer on this movie. 692 00:29:48,880 --> 00:29:51,480 Speaker 1: And I feel that is a very key role in 693 00:29:51,520 --> 00:29:53,800 Speaker 1: how I interpreted this movie and how I ended up 694 00:29:53,920 --> 00:29:57,200 Speaker 1: enjoying it so much, because to say that the dynamic 695 00:29:57,240 --> 00:30:03,680 Speaker 1: between Elvis and Priscilla's relationship is toxic is controversial is 696 00:30:03,800 --> 00:30:06,280 Speaker 1: kind of an understatement when you really look at the 697 00:30:06,320 --> 00:30:09,640 Speaker 1: facts that he was in his twenties already a superstar 698 00:30:09,880 --> 00:30:11,960 Speaker 1: whenever he met Priscilla while he was in the army 699 00:30:12,080 --> 00:30:14,400 Speaker 1: stationed in Germany. She was an army brat and she 700 00:30:14,520 --> 00:30:17,280 Speaker 1: was fourteen years old when they first met and started 701 00:30:17,320 --> 00:30:21,680 Speaker 1: spending time together. So the first twenty minutes of this movie, 702 00:30:21,760 --> 00:30:25,320 Speaker 1: it was really me getting adjusted to the idea of that. 703 00:30:25,400 --> 00:30:28,680 Speaker 1: And yes, this was back in the late fifties early sixties, 704 00:30:29,320 --> 00:30:31,680 Speaker 1: so maybe it was a little bit more common back then, 705 00:30:31,720 --> 00:30:35,600 Speaker 1: but still really weird. And I feel the way we 706 00:30:35,680 --> 00:30:39,280 Speaker 1: have Elvis placed in our heads as being this superstar 707 00:30:39,360 --> 00:30:41,720 Speaker 1: that is so beloved, I don't think this movie was 708 00:30:41,720 --> 00:30:44,680 Speaker 1: trying to diminish his reputation. It was really just telling 709 00:30:45,120 --> 00:30:48,240 Speaker 1: Priscilla's side of the story. It wasn't trying to paint 710 00:30:48,320 --> 00:30:50,240 Speaker 1: him in a bad life or even give him the 711 00:30:50,240 --> 00:30:53,040 Speaker 1: spotlight in this movie, because it is all from her 712 00:30:53,200 --> 00:30:56,080 Speaker 1: side of the relationship. But what this movie helped me 713 00:30:56,200 --> 00:30:59,719 Speaker 1: understand is what it's like to be married to somebody 714 00:30:59,760 --> 00:31:02,200 Speaker 1: who is that big of a icon and that big 715 00:31:02,200 --> 00:31:05,719 Speaker 1: of a presence, to be with somebody who is not 716 00:31:05,760 --> 00:31:09,560 Speaker 1: only famous, but gets everything that they want, has all 717 00:31:09,600 --> 00:31:13,040 Speaker 1: the money to do anything they could ever imagine. Going 718 00:31:13,120 --> 00:31:16,560 Speaker 1: back to the early stages of their relationship where she's 719 00:31:16,600 --> 00:31:20,720 Speaker 1: fourteen years old, Elvis is in the army and he 720 00:31:20,880 --> 00:31:22,880 Speaker 1: just lost his mother, and that's kind of where their 721 00:31:22,920 --> 00:31:26,680 Speaker 1: relationship really begins to grow because he was homesick, lost 722 00:31:26,720 --> 00:31:29,760 Speaker 1: his mother, and he needed somebody to confide in, and 723 00:31:29,800 --> 00:31:32,280 Speaker 1: that is what Priscilla became for him. She helped him 724 00:31:32,280 --> 00:31:34,719 Speaker 1: get through that time. She was the only one who 725 00:31:34,800 --> 00:31:39,280 Speaker 1: really saw him in those dark, intimate moments and became 726 00:31:39,360 --> 00:31:41,520 Speaker 1: somebody that he really leaned on. And in the book 727 00:31:41,600 --> 00:31:44,440 Speaker 1: she says that their relationship was strictly that. So the 728 00:31:44,560 --> 00:31:47,080 Speaker 1: interesting part for me to see in this movie was 729 00:31:47,120 --> 00:31:49,479 Speaker 1: seeing a side of Elvis that we haven't seen before. 730 00:31:49,840 --> 00:31:52,360 Speaker 1: We all saw the Boz Luhrmann movie last year, which 731 00:31:52,360 --> 00:31:55,800 Speaker 1: is very big and flashy, over the top, but that 732 00:31:55,880 --> 00:31:59,360 Speaker 1: movie focused so much on his music and his career 733 00:31:59,800 --> 00:32:03,160 Speaker 1: and really the relationship he had with Colonel Tom Parker, 734 00:32:03,200 --> 00:32:07,320 Speaker 1: his manager, and it was kind of their struggle, his 735 00:32:07,440 --> 00:32:10,880 Speaker 1: manager being the villain and Elvis being the hero of 736 00:32:10,880 --> 00:32:14,840 Speaker 1: that story. Here, it's a little bit different. Elvis isn't 737 00:32:14,880 --> 00:32:17,080 Speaker 1: really seen as a good guy. He's also not the 738 00:32:17,120 --> 00:32:20,240 Speaker 1: main focus of this movie. All the things that happened 739 00:32:20,240 --> 00:32:23,640 Speaker 1: to Priscilla throughout the film are as a result of him, 740 00:32:23,640 --> 00:32:27,920 Speaker 1: but it's all how his actions and his power influence her. 741 00:32:28,360 --> 00:32:30,680 Speaker 1: So it's a much different story that I really ended 742 00:32:30,760 --> 00:32:33,640 Speaker 1: up finding to be a more interesting story because it 743 00:32:33,720 --> 00:32:36,640 Speaker 1: was a side of him that we've never really seen before. 744 00:32:37,000 --> 00:32:39,400 Speaker 1: And it's really showing the dynamic of somebody married to 745 00:32:39,440 --> 00:32:43,480 Speaker 1: somebody so famous who ends up treating her the same 746 00:32:43,520 --> 00:32:47,120 Speaker 1: way that he treats everybody on his team. And it 747 00:32:47,160 --> 00:32:50,760 Speaker 1: was so interesting to see that dynamic that it's almost 748 00:32:50,760 --> 00:32:54,720 Speaker 1: that she wasn't a real life person to him. She 749 00:32:55,000 --> 00:32:57,520 Speaker 1: was as how Prisilla described him in her life to 750 00:32:57,600 --> 00:33:01,400 Speaker 1: be kind of his doll, that he would dress up, 751 00:33:02,120 --> 00:33:04,400 Speaker 1: tell her what to where, tell her how to speak, 752 00:33:04,440 --> 00:33:10,680 Speaker 1: tell her how everything he controlled which rock stars, famous people, actors, musicians, 753 00:33:11,160 --> 00:33:13,720 Speaker 1: they get so used to getting their way in every 754 00:33:13,800 --> 00:33:18,280 Speaker 1: aspect of their life that he took that and translated 755 00:33:18,320 --> 00:33:21,280 Speaker 1: into how he controls the person that he's supposed to 756 00:33:21,320 --> 00:33:23,600 Speaker 1: care about the most. There are moments where she is 757 00:33:23,640 --> 00:33:25,440 Speaker 1: the most important thing in this world that you see 758 00:33:25,480 --> 00:33:28,200 Speaker 1: throughout the film, but there are also moments where he 759 00:33:28,320 --> 00:33:32,520 Speaker 1: kind of forgets that. It shows Elvis's ability to lose 760 00:33:32,560 --> 00:33:37,040 Speaker 1: his temper in a second, his relationship with pills and 761 00:33:37,120 --> 00:33:40,000 Speaker 1: sleeping all day and partying and having all these people 762 00:33:40,040 --> 00:33:43,320 Speaker 1: around him all the time, and the toll that takes 763 00:33:43,960 --> 00:33:46,800 Speaker 1: on the partner in that relationship with Priscilla having to 764 00:33:46,880 --> 00:33:49,400 Speaker 1: stay at home when he goes on tour. We see 765 00:33:49,400 --> 00:33:53,520 Speaker 1: that side of him, of him being seen in tabloids 766 00:33:53,600 --> 00:33:55,920 Speaker 1: cheating on her and trying to tell her that it's 767 00:33:55,960 --> 00:33:59,560 Speaker 1: all made up. So there's a lot of manipulation. There's 768 00:33:59,560 --> 00:34:02,800 Speaker 1: a lot of gaslighting. There was a lot of grooming 769 00:34:02,840 --> 00:34:05,840 Speaker 1: early on, even though that that wasn't really known to 770 00:34:05,920 --> 00:34:09,719 Speaker 1: be a thing back in that time. That is exactly 771 00:34:09,760 --> 00:34:12,759 Speaker 1: what this movie shows. And again, I don't think it 772 00:34:12,840 --> 00:34:17,480 Speaker 1: was set out to villainize Elvis or tarnish his image. 773 00:34:17,920 --> 00:34:19,719 Speaker 1: I just think it was telling her side of the 774 00:34:19,800 --> 00:34:23,560 Speaker 1: story and based on her own words, based on everything 775 00:34:23,560 --> 00:34:25,799 Speaker 1: that she put in that book, and I think it's 776 00:34:26,040 --> 00:34:29,319 Speaker 1: very powerful. I found myself to be more moved by 777 00:34:29,320 --> 00:34:32,319 Speaker 1: Priscilla than I did Elvis last year, and I think 778 00:34:32,360 --> 00:34:34,680 Speaker 1: it's because it's an A twenty four film and it 779 00:34:34,760 --> 00:34:37,840 Speaker 1: just has a grittier feel to it, even down to 780 00:34:37,920 --> 00:34:42,920 Speaker 1: the actors' performances. I found myself being fully into Jacob 781 00:34:42,960 --> 00:34:46,839 Speaker 1: Ulordi as Elvis. Didn't fully look like him, but there's 782 00:34:46,880 --> 00:34:49,719 Speaker 1: the wardrobe. I didn't really see him and think, oh, 783 00:34:49,719 --> 00:34:52,480 Speaker 1: it's just a guy from Euphoria. I bought into the 784 00:34:52,520 --> 00:34:54,759 Speaker 1: fact that he was playing Elvis. I thought he had 785 00:34:54,760 --> 00:34:59,359 Speaker 1: the voice down pretty well. Maybe all the mannerisms and 786 00:34:59,760 --> 00:35:02,680 Speaker 1: show jomanship like of Elvis wasn't really showcasing this movie, 787 00:35:02,680 --> 00:35:04,960 Speaker 1: but I don't think it was supposed to. It was 788 00:35:05,040 --> 00:35:08,200 Speaker 1: really more geared towards the Elvis at home, and even 789 00:35:08,239 --> 00:35:10,000 Speaker 1: the way they reference him in this movie. They call 790 00:35:10,120 --> 00:35:13,680 Speaker 1: him E or EP, so it's kind of pulling the 791 00:35:13,760 --> 00:35:16,719 Speaker 1: curtain back a little bit more than we saw in 792 00:35:16,920 --> 00:35:21,080 Speaker 1: Elvis in seeing him just as human as he can be, 793 00:35:21,080 --> 00:35:23,440 Speaker 1: because he's not going to be a fully human character. 794 00:35:23,840 --> 00:35:27,279 Speaker 1: To have somebody that famous at that time, in no 795 00:35:27,400 --> 00:35:30,200 Speaker 1: way they're going to be human. So it was as 796 00:35:30,320 --> 00:35:32,640 Speaker 1: human as I think that we're going to see Elvis, 797 00:35:32,880 --> 00:35:36,120 Speaker 1: and showing his dark side even more so than we 798 00:35:36,200 --> 00:35:38,600 Speaker 1: saw in the film last year, because yes, that one 799 00:35:38,640 --> 00:35:41,960 Speaker 1: did showcase his addiction and the way he had to 800 00:35:42,000 --> 00:35:44,520 Speaker 1: fight through performances and once he got to Vegas and 801 00:35:44,560 --> 00:35:47,600 Speaker 1: all that, but this one showed more the effects of 802 00:35:47,680 --> 00:35:51,120 Speaker 1: him popping pills, the effects of sleeping all day, and 803 00:35:51,160 --> 00:35:53,799 Speaker 1: the effects of his temper. There are moments in this 804 00:35:53,840 --> 00:35:56,400 Speaker 1: movie where it gets very hostile between the two. You 805 00:35:56,440 --> 00:35:58,440 Speaker 1: see these fits of rage come out of him and 806 00:35:58,480 --> 00:36:02,040 Speaker 1: then quickly apologize, therefore adding to the dynamic of their 807 00:36:02,080 --> 00:36:05,160 Speaker 1: relationship that things were not good. The thing I wasn't 808 00:36:05,200 --> 00:36:08,960 Speaker 1: expecting to find in this movie was comic relief. The 809 00:36:09,000 --> 00:36:12,719 Speaker 1: movie was oddly comedic, not really on purpose, but there 810 00:36:12,719 --> 00:36:14,799 Speaker 1: were moments in the movie where they kind of made 811 00:36:14,880 --> 00:36:17,120 Speaker 1: Elvis out to be kind of a buffoon, to be 812 00:36:17,200 --> 00:36:19,960 Speaker 1: kind of a dummy, so there were moments in my 813 00:36:20,040 --> 00:36:23,320 Speaker 1: movie theater screening where people were laughing, and I feel 814 00:36:23,320 --> 00:36:25,600 Speaker 1: like that added a different level of tone to the 815 00:36:25,640 --> 00:36:28,560 Speaker 1: story of having these little moments where, oh, these are 816 00:36:28,760 --> 00:36:31,800 Speaker 1: normal people, even though they seem like larger than live figures. 817 00:36:31,800 --> 00:36:34,440 Speaker 1: So I thought that was a nice touch. I really 818 00:36:34,480 --> 00:36:37,120 Speaker 1: credit that to director Sophia Coppola, who I thought did 819 00:36:37,120 --> 00:36:40,560 Speaker 1: a fantastic job directing this movie and really getting some 820 00:36:40,680 --> 00:36:44,279 Speaker 1: amazing performances out of everybody. And also shout out to 821 00:36:44,400 --> 00:36:48,400 Speaker 1: the wardrobe department on this movie and the soundtrack and score. 822 00:36:48,880 --> 00:36:51,560 Speaker 1: They didn't use any Elvis songs. I think there are 823 00:36:51,600 --> 00:36:54,400 Speaker 1: a couple moments where they show some of his live performances, 824 00:36:54,800 --> 00:36:56,680 Speaker 1: but they really did a good job of keeping the 825 00:36:56,680 --> 00:36:58,840 Speaker 1: focus off of Elvis, which is probably hard to do 826 00:36:58,920 --> 00:37:01,000 Speaker 1: in a movie like this when and he is so 827 00:37:01,160 --> 00:37:04,040 Speaker 1: dynamic when he is on screen. It's having that ability 828 00:37:04,080 --> 00:37:06,760 Speaker 1: to shift it over to Priscilla to show the effects 829 00:37:06,840 --> 00:37:09,680 Speaker 1: that his stardom is having on her. And the score 830 00:37:09,800 --> 00:37:14,320 Speaker 1: also had like these really nice eighties inspired modern almost 831 00:37:14,920 --> 00:37:17,680 Speaker 1: rock hip hop type songs in between certain scenes. I 832 00:37:17,719 --> 00:37:21,200 Speaker 1: think specifically in the scene whenever her first big transformation 833 00:37:21,400 --> 00:37:24,680 Speaker 1: into how Elvis tried to get her to look exactly 834 00:37:24,719 --> 00:37:26,880 Speaker 1: like he wanted her to look. There were little moments 835 00:37:26,920 --> 00:37:28,880 Speaker 1: like that that really made it feel like an A 836 00:37:29,000 --> 00:37:31,080 Speaker 1: twenty four film because it took it out of the 837 00:37:31,120 --> 00:37:33,960 Speaker 1: time period and really modernized it. So I really like 838 00:37:34,040 --> 00:37:36,319 Speaker 1: that aspect of it too. Kind of reminded me of 839 00:37:36,360 --> 00:37:39,319 Speaker 1: what Boz Lherman always does and did with Elvis, of 840 00:37:39,360 --> 00:37:41,959 Speaker 1: putting these really modern tracks in places where you don't 841 00:37:42,000 --> 00:37:45,320 Speaker 1: expect them. So overall, when all was said and done, 842 00:37:45,480 --> 00:37:48,160 Speaker 1: and I know I keep comparing it to Elvis, which 843 00:37:48,280 --> 00:37:50,960 Speaker 1: maybe isn't the most fair thing to do, but I 844 00:37:51,040 --> 00:37:54,239 Speaker 1: found myself enjoying this side of the story more because 845 00:37:54,239 --> 00:37:57,600 Speaker 1: I think when it comes to biopicks, I love the 846 00:37:57,719 --> 00:38:01,320 Speaker 1: grittier side. I love the side that showed all the biggest, 847 00:38:01,400 --> 00:38:04,319 Speaker 1: darkest moments, which I don't really think Elvis focused on 848 00:38:04,360 --> 00:38:07,320 Speaker 1: that so much. This was really just almost a slice 849 00:38:07,360 --> 00:38:09,600 Speaker 1: of life story because when you look at the story 850 00:38:09,640 --> 00:38:13,319 Speaker 1: on paper, it's not a traditional story format, doesn't really 851 00:38:13,360 --> 00:38:15,880 Speaker 1: follow an act one, two, and three. It's really just 852 00:38:15,960 --> 00:38:18,759 Speaker 1: telling their entire life story. So I feel like it 853 00:38:18,800 --> 00:38:21,160 Speaker 1: was directly taken from the book. So I think what 854 00:38:21,239 --> 00:38:23,279 Speaker 1: the movie served as was just a really deep dive 855 00:38:23,320 --> 00:38:27,160 Speaker 1: and a character study into these really gritty characters. So 856 00:38:27,600 --> 00:38:30,640 Speaker 1: I found that way more enjoyable in the big lavish 857 00:38:30,760 --> 00:38:33,360 Speaker 1: musical movie that we got last year, because it's really 858 00:38:33,400 --> 00:38:35,600 Speaker 1: just plays more to my taste. It plays more to 859 00:38:35,719 --> 00:38:37,759 Speaker 1: the dark side of the story, which there are a 860 00:38:37,800 --> 00:38:40,120 Speaker 1: lot of dark elements when you break it down. So 861 00:38:40,600 --> 00:38:43,840 Speaker 1: really the only issue I had was the subject matter 862 00:38:44,000 --> 00:38:48,520 Speaker 1: of getting over the creepiness of the relationship early on. 863 00:38:48,360 --> 00:38:50,439 Speaker 1: But once I figured out that it really wasn't trying 864 00:38:50,440 --> 00:38:54,440 Speaker 1: to villainize anybody, and also reading what Priscilla had to 865 00:38:54,440 --> 00:38:57,879 Speaker 1: say about this movie being made and it really being 866 00:38:57,920 --> 00:39:01,120 Speaker 1: a representation of the story she wanted to tell, I 867 00:39:01,160 --> 00:39:05,479 Speaker 1: find myself having more comfort and knowing that it wasn't 868 00:39:05,520 --> 00:39:08,799 Speaker 1: somebody making the movie of just trying to monetize off 869 00:39:08,800 --> 00:39:11,400 Speaker 1: of that. So that definitely bumped up my scoring. So 870 00:39:11,480 --> 00:39:13,799 Speaker 1: for Priscilla, I give it four point five out of 871 00:39:13,880 --> 00:39:20,960 Speaker 1: five Gracelands. It's time to head down to movie. 872 00:39:21,040 --> 00:39:22,719 Speaker 2: Mike Traylor Paul. 873 00:39:23,440 --> 00:39:27,000 Speaker 1: It's rare that I have an audible gasp while watching 874 00:39:27,000 --> 00:39:30,920 Speaker 1: a movie trailer, but seeing Ryan Gosling and all his glory, 875 00:39:31,760 --> 00:39:34,440 Speaker 1: like I can admit when a guy is really good looking, 876 00:39:34,480 --> 00:39:37,440 Speaker 1: and I feel like Ryan Gosling and I are not 877 00:39:37,560 --> 00:39:40,640 Speaker 1: even the same species. I feel like if I worked 878 00:39:40,640 --> 00:39:42,400 Speaker 1: out as hard as I wanted to, I could not 879 00:39:42,520 --> 00:39:46,719 Speaker 1: achieve even a tenth of the level of his physique. 880 00:39:46,920 --> 00:39:50,160 Speaker 1: But for that reason, he makes for a great actor 881 00:39:50,360 --> 00:39:51,880 Speaker 1: to throw on a screen and make me want to 882 00:39:51,920 --> 00:39:54,400 Speaker 1: watch every single second that he is on there. But 883 00:39:54,440 --> 00:39:57,000 Speaker 1: he is in a new movie with Emily Blunt, and 884 00:39:57,040 --> 00:39:59,959 Speaker 1: it's a movie that very much reminds me that Ryan 885 00:40:00,000 --> 00:40:04,080 Speaker 1: think Gosling is a very diverse actor. Not only does 886 00:40:04,080 --> 00:40:07,520 Speaker 1: he take on roles that I feel challenge him, but 887 00:40:07,600 --> 00:40:11,719 Speaker 1: he flourishes in them. And with every project he takes on, 888 00:40:11,800 --> 00:40:14,080 Speaker 1: he reminds me that he can really do it all. 889 00:40:14,440 --> 00:40:16,840 Speaker 1: He can do the comedy, he can do the action, 890 00:40:17,000 --> 00:40:19,840 Speaker 1: he can do the drama. He can sing, he can dance, 891 00:40:20,239 --> 00:40:24,000 Speaker 1: He can do all these things so well, and man, 892 00:40:24,160 --> 00:40:26,279 Speaker 1: it just makes you jealous that there's a person out 893 00:40:26,280 --> 00:40:28,960 Speaker 1: there that is so talented. But the new movie is 894 00:40:29,040 --> 00:40:32,120 Speaker 1: called The Fall Guy. He plays a stunt man who's 895 00:40:32,239 --> 00:40:34,640 Speaker 1: kind of washed up and now he's working on a 896 00:40:34,680 --> 00:40:37,879 Speaker 1: movie set with one of the biggest stars in Hollywood 897 00:40:38,200 --> 00:40:40,759 Speaker 1: and ironically, he is somebody who he stunt doubled for 898 00:40:40,920 --> 00:40:43,759 Speaker 1: a long time ago, and this guy's kind of replaced 899 00:40:43,840 --> 00:40:47,280 Speaker 1: him as far as being the star now, Emily Blunt's 900 00:40:47,320 --> 00:40:49,640 Speaker 1: character is the one directing the movie, and where it 901 00:40:49,680 --> 00:40:52,560 Speaker 1: all comes crumbling down is the big A List star 902 00:40:53,080 --> 00:40:56,399 Speaker 1: goes missing and Ryan Gosling has to find a way 903 00:40:56,440 --> 00:40:59,239 Speaker 1: to bring this guy back, and in turn, when the 904 00:40:59,280 --> 00:41:01,520 Speaker 1: heart of em only Blunt where it seems like they 905 00:41:01,520 --> 00:41:03,640 Speaker 1: have some kind of relationships, some kind of pass where 906 00:41:03,640 --> 00:41:05,719 Speaker 1: they dated, or he's been trying to get with her 907 00:41:05,760 --> 00:41:07,879 Speaker 1: for so long, so if he brings the guy back, 908 00:41:08,000 --> 00:41:10,040 Speaker 1: he wins her heart. So before I get into more 909 00:41:10,080 --> 00:41:12,759 Speaker 1: of what this movie is about, also the interesting person 910 00:41:12,760 --> 00:41:15,000 Speaker 1: who is directing this movie, which gives me some pretty 911 00:41:15,040 --> 00:41:18,200 Speaker 1: good perspective on what to expect. Here's just a little 912 00:41:18,239 --> 00:41:19,640 Speaker 1: bit of the Fall Guy trailer. 913 00:41:20,200 --> 00:41:25,759 Speaker 2: Tom Ryder, the biggest action stall on the planet is missing. 914 00:41:25,880 --> 00:41:27,040 Speaker 2: You need to bring him back. 915 00:41:27,160 --> 00:41:31,120 Speaker 1: On Jodie's movie is Dead. Why, I mean, you're a 916 00:41:31,160 --> 00:41:34,400 Speaker 1: stump mad Nobody's gonna notice you. That's your job, no offense. 917 00:41:34,680 --> 00:41:39,799 Speaker 2: I mean some taking you find Ryder, save Joji's film. 918 00:41:40,560 --> 00:41:42,640 Speaker 1: You get the love of your life, back. I'm not 919 00:41:42,719 --> 00:41:44,799 Speaker 1: the hero, I'm just the double do. 920 00:41:46,920 --> 00:41:47,000 Speaker 3: So. 921 00:41:47,120 --> 00:41:50,720 Speaker 1: Not only is Ryan Gosling visually appealing in this trailer, 922 00:41:50,840 --> 00:41:53,239 Speaker 1: but all the stunts that they get to play around with, 923 00:41:53,280 --> 00:41:54,960 Speaker 1: I think are gonna be a lot of fun. Now, 924 00:41:55,400 --> 00:41:58,320 Speaker 1: usually when it comes to making a movie about making 925 00:41:58,360 --> 00:42:01,239 Speaker 1: a movie, the movie ever turns out to be good. 926 00:42:01,320 --> 00:42:03,640 Speaker 1: It's just kind of a lame line. You have to 927 00:42:03,719 --> 00:42:05,680 Speaker 1: walk to make it interesting and not to make it 928 00:42:05,680 --> 00:42:09,080 Speaker 1: too meta. I've never really seen a movie about a 929 00:42:09,120 --> 00:42:12,040 Speaker 1: movie really win me over, But I think is there 930 00:42:12,080 --> 00:42:14,880 Speaker 1: seems to be a pretty good story here underneath it. 931 00:42:14,920 --> 00:42:17,480 Speaker 1: And the movie is based on the TV show from 932 00:42:17,520 --> 00:42:19,120 Speaker 1: back in the eighties. I don't think it's really gonna 933 00:42:19,120 --> 00:42:22,239 Speaker 1: follow a major plot line from that, aside from the 934 00:42:22,280 --> 00:42:24,840 Speaker 1: fact that Ryan Gosling is playing the same type of 935 00:42:24,880 --> 00:42:27,359 Speaker 1: stunt performer. But I think there will be a lot 936 00:42:27,360 --> 00:42:29,799 Speaker 1: of things to play around with if you are doing 937 00:42:29,840 --> 00:42:32,640 Speaker 1: stunts for a movie. Inside of a movie, there are 938 00:42:32,680 --> 00:42:35,680 Speaker 1: scenes where Ryan Gosling's character is set on fire where 939 00:42:35,680 --> 00:42:38,439 Speaker 1: he's crashing cars, but then when you go into him 940 00:42:38,520 --> 00:42:40,600 Speaker 1: in the real world where he's trying to find this 941 00:42:40,680 --> 00:42:43,680 Speaker 1: alis star and bring him back, he is also doing 942 00:42:43,680 --> 00:42:46,239 Speaker 1: these same types of stunts, but at that point it's 943 00:42:46,280 --> 00:42:48,839 Speaker 1: not on the fictional movie set. It's just on a 944 00:42:48,880 --> 00:42:51,440 Speaker 1: real movie set that we are watching. So yes, it 945 00:42:51,480 --> 00:42:53,360 Speaker 1: does get a little bit meta to make a movie 946 00:42:53,400 --> 00:42:56,279 Speaker 1: about a movie, But just by watching this trailer, I 947 00:42:56,280 --> 00:42:58,960 Speaker 1: think they make a pretty clear distinction of what is 948 00:42:59,000 --> 00:43:01,399 Speaker 1: happening on set by the way that those shots look. 949 00:43:01,640 --> 00:43:04,600 Speaker 1: They look very glossed up and Hollywood like, and then 950 00:43:04,600 --> 00:43:06,200 Speaker 1: you pull it back a little bit and there's a 951 00:43:06,239 --> 00:43:09,040 Speaker 1: sense of realism. So you have Ryan Gosting looking great, 952 00:43:09,080 --> 00:43:11,120 Speaker 1: you have those stunts looking great. You also have a 953 00:43:11,160 --> 00:43:13,360 Speaker 1: lot of great wardrobe shots in this movie and the 954 00:43:13,440 --> 00:43:16,600 Speaker 1: different outfits he has been put in throughout his entire career. 955 00:43:16,880 --> 00:43:19,400 Speaker 1: He has some iconic looks. So that is something I 956 00:43:19,440 --> 00:43:21,840 Speaker 1: look forward to now when going to watch a movie. 957 00:43:22,080 --> 00:43:25,840 Speaker 1: And maybe it's because recently I've become more interested in 958 00:43:25,880 --> 00:43:28,840 Speaker 1: the way that I dress and interested in fashion in general, 959 00:43:28,880 --> 00:43:31,000 Speaker 1: which I always just saw it as like, oh, you 960 00:43:31,040 --> 00:43:32,880 Speaker 1: have to have a lot of money to know fashion 961 00:43:33,120 --> 00:43:35,160 Speaker 1: and to be able to wear nice clothes, But I 962 00:43:35,160 --> 00:43:38,240 Speaker 1: think it really comes down to finding your own unique style, 963 00:43:38,560 --> 00:43:41,640 Speaker 1: and really fashion is just being intentional and doing something 964 00:43:41,680 --> 00:43:43,880 Speaker 1: with purpose. So it doesn't really have to cost a 965 00:43:43,920 --> 00:43:46,319 Speaker 1: whole lot. Is something that I've learned so now when 966 00:43:46,320 --> 00:43:49,800 Speaker 1: I go watch movies, I often look for inspiration based 967 00:43:49,880 --> 00:43:53,240 Speaker 1: on movie characters and what they wear. And of course 968 00:43:53,280 --> 00:43:55,800 Speaker 1: I'm not going to get something that cost a crazy 969 00:43:55,840 --> 00:43:58,680 Speaker 1: amount that they spend in movies, but looking at what 970 00:43:58,840 --> 00:44:01,520 Speaker 1: they wear, it gives me, Okay, what can I find 971 00:44:01,560 --> 00:44:04,160 Speaker 1: that I can afford that creates a similar look making 972 00:44:04,200 --> 00:44:06,440 Speaker 1: my own and makes me feel confident like I was 973 00:44:06,480 --> 00:44:08,960 Speaker 1: on a big screen. I like doing that too, And 974 00:44:09,200 --> 00:44:10,719 Speaker 1: just by looking at this trailer and some of the 975 00:44:10,760 --> 00:44:13,799 Speaker 1: different outfit choices, which some are a little bit out 976 00:44:13,800 --> 00:44:17,200 Speaker 1: there and outlandish, but I always leave a Ryan Gosling 977 00:44:17,280 --> 00:44:19,759 Speaker 1: film inspired by what he wears and what they put 978 00:44:19,800 --> 00:44:21,840 Speaker 1: him in. So maybe this movie will give me some 979 00:44:21,920 --> 00:44:23,960 Speaker 1: choices to pick for him later down the line. And 980 00:44:24,000 --> 00:44:26,080 Speaker 1: then you put him with Emily Blunt. I think they 981 00:44:26,120 --> 00:44:28,680 Speaker 1: are really great pairing that I haven't seen together on 982 00:44:28,719 --> 00:44:31,920 Speaker 1: the big screen. She also rarely makes a bad movie. 983 00:44:31,920 --> 00:44:34,239 Speaker 1: Both of them together are two actors who rarely make 984 00:44:34,320 --> 00:44:36,880 Speaker 1: a bad movie. If ever, I just have them on 985 00:44:36,920 --> 00:44:39,080 Speaker 1: that level of top tier actors. And then you have 986 00:44:39,200 --> 00:44:42,480 Speaker 1: director David Leach who we've talked about recently when I 987 00:44:42,480 --> 00:44:45,440 Speaker 1: did my review on Bullet Train, which was a really solid, 988 00:44:45,640 --> 00:44:49,080 Speaker 1: fun and funny action movie that kind of went a 989 00:44:49,080 --> 00:44:51,239 Speaker 1: little bit under the radar when it came out late 990 00:44:51,320 --> 00:44:54,400 Speaker 1: last summer, but I feel like more people started watching 991 00:44:54,400 --> 00:44:56,920 Speaker 1: that and appreciating it after it came out on Netflix. 992 00:44:57,280 --> 00:45:00,760 Speaker 1: But David Leech knows action, and he also he knows comedy. 993 00:45:00,840 --> 00:45:04,160 Speaker 1: He's done movies like John Wick, Deadpool two, Bullet Train, 994 00:45:04,200 --> 00:45:06,200 Speaker 1: which I mentioned, so I think he's gonna pull from 995 00:45:06,239 --> 00:45:09,439 Speaker 1: all those inspirations to make this movie. But the other 996 00:45:09,480 --> 00:45:12,200 Speaker 1: cool thing that excites me is David Leech was a 997 00:45:12,239 --> 00:45:14,360 Speaker 1: stunt performer back in the day. The first time he 998 00:45:14,440 --> 00:45:17,480 Speaker 1: ever met Brad Pitt was working as his stunt double 999 00:45:17,560 --> 00:45:20,880 Speaker 1: on Fight Club. So knowing that he has this long 1000 00:45:21,040 --> 00:45:24,120 Speaker 1: history of being a stunt performer and then directing a 1001 00:45:24,160 --> 00:45:27,320 Speaker 1: movie about a stunt guy who's kind of past this prime, 1002 00:45:27,840 --> 00:45:29,680 Speaker 1: I feel like the reason he made this movie was 1003 00:45:29,719 --> 00:45:31,880 Speaker 1: also to tell his story. And when you get a 1004 00:45:31,920 --> 00:45:34,759 Speaker 1: director who is passionate about what they are doing and 1005 00:45:34,960 --> 00:45:39,080 Speaker 1: also pulling from personal inspiration, I think that's a home 1006 00:45:39,520 --> 00:45:41,480 Speaker 1: run that it's gonna have a lot of heart with 1007 00:45:41,600 --> 00:45:44,439 Speaker 1: somebody who has the arsenal and the tools of how 1008 00:45:44,480 --> 00:45:47,000 Speaker 1: to make that movie come to life. So maybe it's 1009 00:45:47,000 --> 00:45:49,120 Speaker 1: a little selfish of him to make a movie that 1010 00:45:49,200 --> 00:45:51,600 Speaker 1: hits so close to home, but they always say, right, 1011 00:45:51,880 --> 00:45:53,960 Speaker 1: work on what you know. So that is why I'm 1012 00:45:54,000 --> 00:45:57,080 Speaker 1: really interested to see how this entire movie plays out. 1013 00:45:57,239 --> 00:45:59,640 Speaker 1: The trailer just looks fantastic, and the movie is coming 1014 00:45:59,640 --> 00:46:02,520 Speaker 1: out on March first, twenty twenty four, so that's why 1015 00:46:02,600 --> 00:46:04,759 Speaker 1: I'm excited to see it next year. And yes, you're 1016 00:46:04,760 --> 00:46:06,960 Speaker 1: probably thinking, why do you have such a crush on 1017 00:46:07,080 --> 00:46:10,439 Speaker 1: Ryan Gosling? And to that, I say, well, who doesn't said? 1018 00:46:10,480 --> 00:46:13,240 Speaker 2: That was this week's edition of Movie by. 1019 00:46:13,640 --> 00:46:16,840 Speaker 1: Tramer Bar and that is gonna do it for another 1020 00:46:16,880 --> 00:46:19,640 Speaker 1: episode here on the podcast. But before I go, I 1021 00:46:19,640 --> 00:46:22,000 Speaker 1: got to give my listeners shout out of the week. 1022 00:46:22,280 --> 00:46:26,520 Speaker 1: We had an interview last week with Frederick Yahnay talking 1023 00:46:26,560 --> 00:46:28,840 Speaker 1: about his work on Killers of the Flower move and 1024 00:46:28,880 --> 00:46:32,319 Speaker 1: the process behind getting music made for a movie. I 1025 00:46:32,360 --> 00:46:35,120 Speaker 1: asked you to comment with the music note and this 1026 00:46:35,239 --> 00:46:38,440 Speaker 1: week's listener shout out who left that secret emoji is 1027 00:46:38,480 --> 00:46:42,160 Speaker 1: Ashley Kennedy. She wrote, enjoyed this interview and can't wait 1028 00:46:42,200 --> 00:46:45,160 Speaker 1: to watch the movie. So thank you Ashley, thank you 1029 00:46:45,280 --> 00:46:48,799 Speaker 1: all for listening, and until next time, go out and 1030 00:46:48,880 --> 00:46:51,760 Speaker 1: watch good movies and I will talk to you later