WEBVTT - Bloomberg Daybreak Holiday Edition

0:00:01.400 --> 0:00:03.360
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so much for joining us on this good

0:00:03.400 --> 0:00:07.360
<v Speaker 1>Friday edition of Bloomberg Daybreak. I'm Nathan Hagar coming up

0:00:07.400 --> 0:00:10.360
<v Speaker 1>this hour with so much division on Capitol Hill, is

0:00:10.400 --> 0:00:13.280
<v Speaker 1>the US in real jeopardy of defaulting on its debt?

0:00:13.440 --> 0:00:15.760
<v Speaker 1>We'll look at the debate awaiting lawmakers when they get

0:00:15.800 --> 0:00:19.000
<v Speaker 1>back from the holiday with Bloomberg Government's Emily Wilkins. Plus,

0:00:19.040 --> 0:00:20.560
<v Speaker 1>we'll take you to part of the country that has

0:00:20.600 --> 0:00:23.480
<v Speaker 1>traditionally been a pretty good indicator of the economy. We'll

0:00:23.480 --> 0:00:26.560
<v Speaker 1>tell you why it's now flashing signs of a recession. Plus,

0:00:26.760 --> 0:00:28.680
<v Speaker 1>we'll take it to Geneva, where one of the year's

0:00:28.720 --> 0:00:33.200
<v Speaker 1>biggest events in the luxury watch industry just wrapped up. First, though,

0:00:33.200 --> 0:00:35.800
<v Speaker 1>it was a shock to commodity markets to begin the

0:00:35.800 --> 0:00:40.120
<v Speaker 1>week at surprise production cut from OPEC Plus for more

0:00:40.159 --> 0:00:42.920
<v Speaker 1>on the short and long term implications of this move

0:00:43.000 --> 0:00:45.600
<v Speaker 1>in the oil space, We're pleased to welcome Stephen Schork,

0:00:45.880 --> 0:00:48.559
<v Speaker 1>who of course covers energy markets as president of the

0:00:48.600 --> 0:00:51.280
<v Speaker 1>Short Group. Stephen, thanks for being with us. How big

0:00:51.280 --> 0:00:53.960
<v Speaker 1>a surprise was this for you to hear OPEC plus

0:00:53.960 --> 0:00:55.280
<v Speaker 1>come out and say we're going to take more than

0:00:55.320 --> 0:00:58.400
<v Speaker 1>a million barrels off the market every day. It was

0:00:58.480 --> 0:01:02.440
<v Speaker 1>a surprise, but but not shocking surprise. Actually, I thought

0:01:02.480 --> 0:01:06.640
<v Speaker 1>we would have more hawkish rhetoric out of OPEC in

0:01:06.680 --> 0:01:10.960
<v Speaker 1>their prior meeting, so this did come out of the blows.

0:01:11.040 --> 0:01:15.160
<v Speaker 1>So I was surprised that we didn't get a hawkish

0:01:15.280 --> 0:01:18.280
<v Speaker 1>rhetoric the last time and the last go around, and

0:01:18.440 --> 0:01:22.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm surprised that it happened now, but not shocked. So

0:01:22.880 --> 0:01:25.920
<v Speaker 1>the real shocking thing is not the cut itself, but

0:01:26.000 --> 0:01:30.080
<v Speaker 1>what the cut tells us. And first and foremost, it

0:01:30.200 --> 0:01:33.679
<v Speaker 1>isn't a political move. Yeah, there's the old Saint on

0:01:33.720 --> 0:01:36.759
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street that bulls and bears make money, hogs get slaughtered.

0:01:37.160 --> 0:01:40.759
<v Speaker 1>And OPEC is very aware there's a limit to how

0:01:40.840 --> 0:01:43.880
<v Speaker 1>high they want prices to go. And what they're telling

0:01:43.959 --> 0:01:47.480
<v Speaker 1>us now by this production cut is they're very skeptical

0:01:47.720 --> 0:01:52.520
<v Speaker 1>about the economy, the global economy, and therefore they want

0:01:52.560 --> 0:01:56.440
<v Speaker 1>to get ahead of any sort of demand destruction. So

0:01:56.480 --> 0:01:59.520
<v Speaker 1>they've decided to pull that supply off of the market.

0:01:59.800 --> 0:02:01.920
<v Speaker 1>So it's more of a kind of a canary in

0:02:01.960 --> 0:02:04.720
<v Speaker 1>a coal mine, and for all of us, that canary

0:02:05.480 --> 0:02:08.560
<v Speaker 1>is sucking wind right now, telling us that there are

0:02:08.600 --> 0:02:11.560
<v Speaker 1>some economic headwinds in the nearby future. Is that a

0:02:11.560 --> 0:02:14.760
<v Speaker 1>concern that you share with the oil ministers at OPEC,

0:02:14.840 --> 0:02:19.680
<v Speaker 1>Plus that we could see demand concerns for energy in

0:02:19.720 --> 0:02:23.799
<v Speaker 1>the months to come here, Well, it really seems that

0:02:25.440 --> 0:02:28.160
<v Speaker 1>the OPEC and kind of the all the language we

0:02:28.160 --> 0:02:31.079
<v Speaker 1>were getting out of China is China was full steam

0:02:31.120 --> 0:02:36.840
<v Speaker 1>ahead with regard to summer demand. And so I didn't

0:02:36.880 --> 0:02:39.200
<v Speaker 1>quite buy into that. I don't buy into anything that

0:02:39.240 --> 0:02:43.480
<v Speaker 1>comes out of official reports coming out of China. They

0:02:43.520 --> 0:02:46.160
<v Speaker 1>did raise their quotas they did, they did signal some

0:02:46.360 --> 0:02:50.440
<v Speaker 1>some demand uptick and they have been buying for an

0:02:50.440 --> 0:02:54.519
<v Speaker 1>oil they have in buying US crude oil. But that said,

0:02:55.080 --> 0:02:59.280
<v Speaker 1>I cannot argue with this when we look at sort

0:02:59.320 --> 0:03:02.160
<v Speaker 1>of the the headlines that are coming out, the I

0:03:02.400 --> 0:03:06.440
<v Speaker 1>S numbers, n numbers, the industrial production numbers, record credit

0:03:06.480 --> 0:03:09.720
<v Speaker 1>card debt, uh, you know, so forth, there are a

0:03:09.760 --> 0:03:13.120
<v Speaker 1>lot of indications out there that the economy has a

0:03:13.200 --> 0:03:17.799
<v Speaker 1>big up uphill battle and the thing really shaving kind

0:03:17.840 --> 0:03:20.080
<v Speaker 1>of the the you know, the bulls, you know, the

0:03:20.240 --> 0:03:24.239
<v Speaker 1>on the economic front was strong, you know, strong job numbers,

0:03:24.240 --> 0:03:26.560
<v Speaker 1>which are battle you know, to me, they are baffling.

0:03:27.440 --> 0:03:31.200
<v Speaker 1>But look, we just got the job, job opening, and

0:03:31.280 --> 0:03:34.000
<v Speaker 1>labor turnover surveyed. The Jolts report out of the BLS

0:03:34.040 --> 0:03:36.560
<v Speaker 1>the other day and it disappointed. It was a downer

0:03:37.120 --> 0:03:40.160
<v Speaker 1>um and then the ADPEP report came out today with

0:03:40.280 --> 0:03:45.000
<v Speaker 1>jobs again another downer. So if that if we get

0:03:45.080 --> 0:03:48.360
<v Speaker 1>confirmation you know a month, oh you know, this month,

0:03:48.440 --> 0:03:51.480
<v Speaker 1>next month, so forth in the in the BLS employment numbers,

0:03:51.720 --> 0:03:54.200
<v Speaker 1>then yeah, we we Yeah, I'm certainly buying into the

0:03:54.200 --> 0:03:57.880
<v Speaker 1>theory that we got trouble ahead. Okay, so we have

0:03:58.000 --> 0:04:02.360
<v Speaker 1>a lot of these economic potential head wins moving forward. Here.

0:04:02.520 --> 0:04:05.960
<v Speaker 1>What's the potential that if we do start to see

0:04:06.280 --> 0:04:10.880
<v Speaker 1>commodity prices spike with this level of production coming off

0:04:10.920 --> 0:04:16.839
<v Speaker 1>the market, adding even further to those macroeconomic pressure Stephen, Oh,

0:04:16.880 --> 0:04:18.640
<v Speaker 1>if we see the spike, and you know, keep in

0:04:18.720 --> 0:04:23.040
<v Speaker 1>mind we had a significant sell off over the prior

0:04:23.120 --> 0:04:27.040
<v Speaker 1>two weeks related to first with Signature Banking then SVB.

0:04:28.000 --> 0:04:31.080
<v Speaker 1>So there are those issues and the banking system, as

0:04:31.120 --> 0:04:34.039
<v Speaker 1>Jamie Diamonds just said, there are troubles there now. A

0:04:34.120 --> 0:04:36.960
<v Speaker 1>banking crisis has been an antecede into two of the

0:04:37.000 --> 0:04:40.120
<v Speaker 1>prior three recessions. Of course, what we all can remember

0:04:40.120 --> 0:04:43.880
<v Speaker 1>what happened during the mortgage backed securities in Great Recession,

0:04:43.920 --> 0:04:45.960
<v Speaker 1>but we also had the recession that was brought on

0:04:46.040 --> 0:04:50.520
<v Speaker 1>by the SNL crisis. So right now we have one

0:04:50.720 --> 0:04:53.720
<v Speaker 1>of the fuses lit for an implosion in the economy.

0:04:54.320 --> 0:04:57.360
<v Speaker 1>What also, going back to two thousand and eight, what

0:04:57.400 --> 0:05:01.320
<v Speaker 1>we saw was oil prices one hundred and fifty dollars,

0:05:01.520 --> 0:05:05.840
<v Speaker 1>massive increases and energy costs, which of course hampered US

0:05:05.920 --> 0:05:08.520
<v Speaker 1>spending this time around. Yes, we did get to one

0:05:08.560 --> 0:05:11.520
<v Speaker 1>hundred and fifty dollars last year. We didn't stay there,

0:05:11.880 --> 0:05:15.680
<v Speaker 1>but we've stayed high on the energy front and also

0:05:16.080 --> 0:05:20.479
<v Speaker 1>on the entire inflation front. So consumers, I think it's

0:05:20.560 --> 0:05:25.000
<v Speaker 1>thirty three straight months that they're purchasing power has decreased.

0:05:25.200 --> 0:05:28.520
<v Speaker 1>So for thirty three straight months, we're getting poorer each month.

0:05:29.480 --> 0:05:33.440
<v Speaker 1>I just intuitively, logically, I have to think that is

0:05:33.480 --> 0:05:36.000
<v Speaker 1>going to have a carry on. Now, if this spike

0:05:36.520 --> 0:05:41.120
<v Speaker 1>goes any higher than what we've already seen, than yeah,

0:05:41.360 --> 0:05:45.599
<v Speaker 1>the odds are for a significant downturn. But what I

0:05:45.640 --> 0:05:48.960
<v Speaker 1>want to point out now is Sunday night, the first

0:05:49.000 --> 0:05:53.400
<v Speaker 1>opportunity to trade the OPEC number, the market surged higher. Okay,

0:05:53.760 --> 0:05:56.600
<v Speaker 1>hasn't gone any higher since then. So all we are

0:05:56.720 --> 0:05:59.640
<v Speaker 1>right now is right back to where we wore prior

0:05:59.680 --> 0:06:04.599
<v Speaker 1>to the of the S ANDDB a catastrophe. So kind

0:06:04.640 --> 0:06:06.359
<v Speaker 1>of like the market is kind of like pumping the

0:06:06.400 --> 0:06:10.880
<v Speaker 1>brakes here. The bulls are not getting any carry over momentum.

0:06:11.160 --> 0:06:14.120
<v Speaker 1>Now if you're bullish, if you bought Sunday night, you're

0:06:14.160 --> 0:06:16.240
<v Speaker 1>out of the money right now. And you know, with

0:06:16.600 --> 0:06:19.760
<v Speaker 1>us allegedly bullish, this headline was you're not getting any

0:06:19.760 --> 0:06:23.559
<v Speaker 1>followed through and that is a very clear telltale that

0:06:24.160 --> 0:06:26.480
<v Speaker 1>the market is skeptical. I don't think skeptical of the

0:06:26.480 --> 0:06:28.919
<v Speaker 1>OPEC decision that they'll carry through. I think they are

0:06:29.000 --> 0:06:32.080
<v Speaker 1>skeptical of what the OPEC decision is telling them about

0:06:32.080 --> 0:06:35.400
<v Speaker 1>the economy. Speaking with Stephen Short, oil analyst and president

0:06:35.440 --> 0:06:38.080
<v Speaker 1>of the Short Group here on Bloomberg Day Break, So

0:06:38.120 --> 0:06:41.840
<v Speaker 1>we talked about the short term implications here. Stephen, what's

0:06:41.880 --> 0:06:45.080
<v Speaker 1>your longer term view on what this could mean for

0:06:45.320 --> 0:06:49.800
<v Speaker 1>oil prices? Are you changing your target for where barrel

0:06:49.800 --> 0:06:53.560
<v Speaker 1>accrude could go from here? Well, I run probabilistic models

0:06:53.560 --> 0:06:55.120
<v Speaker 1>and ate Nathan that that kind of gives you a

0:06:55.240 --> 0:07:01.400
<v Speaker 1>range and likelihood based on uncertain giving odds of prices happening,

0:07:01.880 --> 0:07:05.160
<v Speaker 1>and we've been in the upper range since the beginning

0:07:05.200 --> 0:07:07.440
<v Speaker 1>of the year. What I've shared with with with with

0:07:07.520 --> 0:07:11.160
<v Speaker 1>clients and analysis for clients, and that was oil bottoming

0:07:11.200 --> 0:07:14.560
<v Speaker 1>in the seventy dollars area, that is the Brent crudal

0:07:14.680 --> 0:07:17.440
<v Speaker 1>market more of a global market, which means that w

0:07:17.640 --> 0:07:20.720
<v Speaker 1>TI would would would bottom some near somewhere around there,

0:07:20.840 --> 0:07:25.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, high sixties. And that's exactly where where we've bottomed. UH.

0:07:25.040 --> 0:07:27.720
<v Speaker 1>And the catalyst was that for was for that major headline,

0:07:27.760 --> 0:07:32.280
<v Speaker 1>the SVB. But we we've ricocheted back. We're back around

0:07:32.400 --> 0:07:34.720
<v Speaker 1>hovering eighty dollars a barrel. So we're right in the

0:07:34.760 --> 0:07:38.400
<v Speaker 1>middle of where I expected to meet and we'll call

0:07:38.440 --> 0:07:41.400
<v Speaker 1>it the sixty eight percent. That that one standard deviation

0:07:41.400 --> 0:07:43.960
<v Speaker 1>of where my outcomes were coming out. They were coming

0:07:43.960 --> 0:07:47.720
<v Speaker 1>out between seventy ninety dollars. Now, when we move further

0:07:47.800 --> 0:07:50.800
<v Speaker 1>out on the tail and we factor in a potential

0:07:51.320 --> 0:07:56.600
<v Speaker 1>UH demand destruction going forth for at least this month,

0:07:57.200 --> 0:07:59.680
<v Speaker 1>UH in the what we can get down into the

0:07:59.720 --> 0:08:03.880
<v Speaker 1>low sixties and in the first quarter oil below fifty

0:08:03.920 --> 0:08:07.000
<v Speaker 1>dollars in a severe recession ALLAH akin to what we

0:08:07.080 --> 0:08:09.560
<v Speaker 1>saw in O eight oh nine that we're talking about

0:08:09.560 --> 0:08:12.160
<v Speaker 1>oil back down below fifty dollars barrel. Do you see

0:08:12.160 --> 0:08:15.560
<v Speaker 1>a move like this having an impact on diversification of

0:08:15.600 --> 0:08:18.400
<v Speaker 1>the energy mix. Do renewables get a lift if we

0:08:18.480 --> 0:08:21.920
<v Speaker 1>start to see more pressure on fossil fuel prices? No,

0:08:22.040 --> 0:08:24.840
<v Speaker 1>because renewables have been one of the catalysts for the

0:08:25.040 --> 0:08:28.440
<v Speaker 1>rise in fossil fuel. I mean nothing, nothing brought coal

0:08:28.560 --> 0:08:33.040
<v Speaker 1>back or wood burning back in Europe this winter than

0:08:33.240 --> 0:08:36.360
<v Speaker 1>what we've seen, the manipulation that we saw with carbon

0:08:36.400 --> 0:08:39.760
<v Speaker 1>credits and renewable prices. So, for crying out loud, Germany

0:08:39.800 --> 0:08:43.839
<v Speaker 1>was cutting down ancient forests for fuel this So no,

0:08:43.920 --> 0:08:47.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't I think what's going to happen is not diversification.

0:08:47.800 --> 0:08:50.800
<v Speaker 1>We need national security. And the problem with renewables, which

0:08:50.800 --> 0:08:52.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm a big fan of, Nathan, you and I were

0:08:52.559 --> 0:08:56.520
<v Speaker 1>just having an off phone talk here. We both have

0:08:56.880 --> 0:08:59.920
<v Speaker 1>versions of you. You have all electric, I have hybrid electric.

0:09:00.160 --> 0:09:02.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm a big fan of it. But it can't do

0:09:02.280 --> 0:09:06.000
<v Speaker 1>it alone, nowhere near alone. So the renewables are part

0:09:06.000 --> 0:09:09.560
<v Speaker 1>of the answer. Fossil fuels hydrocarbons are more of the

0:09:09.600 --> 0:09:11.840
<v Speaker 1>complete answer. And I'm not even go to nukes because

0:09:11.840 --> 0:09:14.679
<v Speaker 1>that's the hundred percent answer. We're not there yet at

0:09:14.679 --> 0:09:17.520
<v Speaker 1>this point. So no, given I think renewables are a

0:09:17.559 --> 0:09:20.360
<v Speaker 1>big driver with the lack of money so forth going

0:09:20.360 --> 0:09:24.439
<v Speaker 1>into hydrocarbon infrastructure longer term out, they're the catalyst, that's

0:09:24.480 --> 0:09:28.439
<v Speaker 1>the catalyst for high prices. So as long as we continue,

0:09:28.480 --> 0:09:31.600
<v Speaker 1>we in the West, continue to pursue a zero sum

0:09:31.720 --> 0:09:34.960
<v Speaker 1>game where we don't want any investments in hydrocarbons and

0:09:35.000 --> 0:09:38.760
<v Speaker 1>we want it in a source that is not reliable.

0:09:39.320 --> 0:09:43.319
<v Speaker 1>Wind solar not reliable, and they're terrible. They're just as

0:09:43.320 --> 0:09:47.680
<v Speaker 1>bad for the environment, Believe it or not, when we

0:09:47.760 --> 0:09:51.360
<v Speaker 1>talk about non recyclable plastics in windmills, we talked about batteries,

0:09:51.400 --> 0:09:54.680
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about landfill fill ups, We're talking about degradation

0:09:54.960 --> 0:09:57.280
<v Speaker 1>of the environment. We're digging up these rare earths, and

0:09:57.320 --> 0:09:59.640
<v Speaker 1>we're digging up rare earths in countries that are not

0:09:59.679 --> 0:10:02.640
<v Speaker 1>exact be friendly to the United States. But yet we

0:10:02.679 --> 0:10:05.640
<v Speaker 1>want all of our investment to go into this one commodity,

0:10:05.679 --> 0:10:08.960
<v Speaker 1>and it's it's it's a terrible risk we are taking.

0:10:09.080 --> 0:10:14.520
<v Speaker 1>So to reiterate my answer, no, you'll see the political moves.

0:10:14.800 --> 0:10:18.080
<v Speaker 1>But with the crash of SVB and the lack of

0:10:18.240 --> 0:10:21.000
<v Speaker 1>return on HT that we are seeing both from an

0:10:21.000 --> 0:10:24.800
<v Speaker 1>economic and a social cost. I would think this would

0:10:24.840 --> 0:10:28.559
<v Speaker 1>be the catalyst to diversify more towards and bring hydrocarbons

0:10:28.800 --> 0:10:31.880
<v Speaker 1>that conversation back into the mix. Now we're going to

0:10:31.960 --> 0:10:34.200
<v Speaker 1>be keeping an eye on the crude market very closely

0:10:34.200 --> 0:10:37.079
<v Speaker 1>as we had even closer to summer driving season. Thanks

0:10:37.120 --> 0:10:40.040
<v Speaker 1>as always, Stephen, good having you with us. Thank you, Nathan.

0:10:40.240 --> 0:10:43.000
<v Speaker 1>That's Stephen Short, the president of the Short Group. And

0:10:43.080 --> 0:10:45.480
<v Speaker 1>up next, time is on our side. One of the

0:10:45.520 --> 0:10:48.640
<v Speaker 1>world's biggest events in the luxury watch its has wrapped up.

0:10:48.640 --> 0:10:52.160
<v Speaker 1>We'll get the highlights from Geneva. Next. I'm Nathan Tiger

0:10:52.480 --> 0:11:09.640
<v Speaker 1>and this is welcome back to the special edition of

0:11:09.640 --> 0:11:13.280
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Daybreak. I'm Nathan Hagar. US markets are closed on

0:11:13.320 --> 0:11:16.640
<v Speaker 1>this good Friday, and speaking of time and the future,

0:11:16.960 --> 0:11:19.320
<v Speaker 1>let's talk about time and how we keep track of

0:11:19.320 --> 0:11:21.920
<v Speaker 1>it on our wrists if you can afford it. We

0:11:22.000 --> 0:11:23.920
<v Speaker 1>just wrapped up one of the biggest events of the

0:11:24.000 --> 0:11:28.280
<v Speaker 1>year for the luxury watch business. It happened in Geneva,

0:11:28.400 --> 0:11:32.120
<v Speaker 1>and Bloomberg's Andy Hoffman was there at this event and

0:11:32.400 --> 0:11:34.920
<v Speaker 1>joins us for some of the TikTok I had to

0:11:34.960 --> 0:11:37.680
<v Speaker 1>say it, Andy, thanks for being here. What better place

0:11:37.760 --> 0:11:40.000
<v Speaker 1>to join us from then, the home of luxury Swiss

0:11:40.040 --> 0:11:42.920
<v Speaker 1>time pieces. Tell us more about this event. For those

0:11:42.960 --> 0:11:45.960
<v Speaker 1>who are not in the know, it's called Watches and Wonders, right,

0:11:46.320 --> 0:11:48.839
<v Speaker 1>indeed it is. It's called Watches and Wonders. It is,

0:11:49.280 --> 0:11:52.640
<v Speaker 1>without a doubt, the biggest industry event for the watch

0:11:52.679 --> 0:11:56.840
<v Speaker 1>industry each year. It's where most of the top brands,

0:11:56.920 --> 0:12:01.520
<v Speaker 1>including Rolex protect for the old Richmon's own brands come

0:12:01.559 --> 0:12:06.280
<v Speaker 1>together and they present their new watches, their new wares,

0:12:06.720 --> 0:12:11.560
<v Speaker 1>to retailers, to their best collectors, and of course to

0:12:11.679 --> 0:12:16.120
<v Speaker 1>the growing watch press who come. And it was five

0:12:16.200 --> 0:12:19.640
<v Speaker 1>days this week for that private event, and then it

0:12:19.720 --> 0:12:23.360
<v Speaker 1>was two days open to the public for the first time. Overall,

0:12:23.400 --> 0:12:26.400
<v Speaker 1>I think there was something like forty thousand people who

0:12:26.480 --> 0:12:29.800
<v Speaker 1>attended this event, which was twice as many as last year. Wow.

0:12:29.920 --> 0:12:32.360
<v Speaker 1>So that gives you something of an idea of just

0:12:32.520 --> 0:12:37.000
<v Speaker 1>how high demand continues to be in the luxury space

0:12:37.080 --> 0:12:39.800
<v Speaker 1>even with all the macro head ones we continue to

0:12:39.800 --> 0:12:42.720
<v Speaker 1>talk about here on Bloomberg. What are some of the

0:12:42.760 --> 0:12:45.040
<v Speaker 1>highlights for you? What really stood out let's start with

0:12:45.120 --> 0:12:47.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean Rolex. I mean, that's one of the biggest

0:12:47.640 --> 0:12:51.720
<v Speaker 1>brands in Switzerland. What's new from them? Rolex is always

0:12:51.720 --> 0:12:54.040
<v Speaker 1>sort of the focus in the center of attention. They

0:12:54.040 --> 0:12:57.080
<v Speaker 1>are the biggest brand. Their sales or something like nine

0:12:57.120 --> 0:12:59.559
<v Speaker 1>point three billion Swiss francs a year. They have about

0:12:59.600 --> 0:13:03.320
<v Speaker 1>twenty nine percent market share. And so what role X

0:13:03.360 --> 0:13:06.920
<v Speaker 1>does at watches and Wonders is it shows everybody it's

0:13:07.000 --> 0:13:12.960
<v Speaker 1>new models each year, and they also would reveal which

0:13:13.040 --> 0:13:16.760
<v Speaker 1>models they will be discontinuing, and this has a great

0:13:16.800 --> 0:13:21.760
<v Speaker 1>impact obviously on demand and supply for certain models. And

0:13:21.800 --> 0:13:24.679
<v Speaker 1>then what we often see is that, you know, models

0:13:24.679 --> 0:13:29.560
<v Speaker 1>that are discontinued, their value on the secondary market will

0:13:29.679 --> 0:13:33.559
<v Speaker 1>generally increase because we know there will be less supply

0:13:33.720 --> 0:13:37.120
<v Speaker 1>going forward. So what are some of the most notable

0:13:37.360 --> 0:13:41.360
<v Speaker 1>new designs that you saw from Rolex? It was quite interesting.

0:13:41.360 --> 0:13:45.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it is an anniversary for the Rolex Daytona,

0:13:45.400 --> 0:13:49.319
<v Speaker 1>their chronograph, and they did a new model which has

0:13:49.360 --> 0:13:52.520
<v Speaker 1>an open case back so you can actually see the

0:13:52.679 --> 0:13:55.160
<v Speaker 1>movement and this is a first for Rolex, They've never

0:13:55.200 --> 0:13:59.880
<v Speaker 1>done this before. They also did a really wild surprise

0:14:00.320 --> 0:14:03.720
<v Speaker 1>version of their day date watch that had a sort

0:14:03.720 --> 0:14:07.120
<v Speaker 1>of a puzzle um pattern on the dial, and then

0:14:07.200 --> 0:14:11.800
<v Speaker 1>instead of days or um there there are sort of

0:14:12.360 --> 0:14:15.679
<v Speaker 1>words like love and emotions and things like that, and

0:14:15.720 --> 0:14:20.400
<v Speaker 1>there's emojis in the in where the date wheel normally

0:14:20.520 --> 0:14:25.000
<v Speaker 1>is so fly one different emojiss. Those quite bold and

0:14:25.200 --> 0:14:27.920
<v Speaker 1>strange for Rolex to do, which is generally a very

0:14:28.000 --> 0:14:32.760
<v Speaker 1>safe and conservative brand. Yeah, I mean that really sort

0:14:32.760 --> 0:14:34.480
<v Speaker 1>of flies in the face of what you think about

0:14:34.560 --> 0:14:36.960
<v Speaker 1>when you think of a Rolex. Did you get a

0:14:37.040 --> 0:14:40.800
<v Speaker 1>chance to talk to any of the officials from Rolex

0:14:40.840 --> 0:14:42.840
<v Speaker 1>about what their strategy might be with some of these

0:14:42.960 --> 0:14:45.720
<v Speaker 1>left field ideas. It's a good question. I mean, we

0:14:45.800 --> 0:14:47.840
<v Speaker 1>get we do get to speak to some of the

0:14:47.880 --> 0:14:51.720
<v Speaker 1>people from Rolex, but their CEO is known for not

0:14:51.880 --> 0:14:56.920
<v Speaker 1>giving interviews about rolex Um. But yeah, I mean, you

0:14:56.960 --> 0:15:00.360
<v Speaker 1>know they're they're very careful and garden with what they say,

0:15:00.360 --> 0:15:03.520
<v Speaker 1>but they you know, for those who get the invite,

0:15:03.600 --> 0:15:06.280
<v Speaker 1>you do get the chance to come and see the

0:15:06.320 --> 0:15:08.960
<v Speaker 1>new models in the flash, So you get to hold

0:15:09.000 --> 0:15:11.120
<v Speaker 1>these things in your hand and put them on your

0:15:11.120 --> 0:15:14.480
<v Speaker 1>wrist and you know it's you and you can feel

0:15:14.520 --> 0:15:18.800
<v Speaker 1>the weight as it were. So indeed, quite interesting. Yeah,

0:15:18.840 --> 0:15:21.920
<v Speaker 1>anything to dream. We're speaking with Andy Hoffman of Bloomberg

0:15:21.960 --> 0:15:25.360
<v Speaker 1>News talking about the Watches and Wonders event in Geneva,

0:15:25.440 --> 0:15:28.840
<v Speaker 1>Switzerland for luxury time piece collectors. Now, I know you

0:15:28.920 --> 0:15:31.320
<v Speaker 1>did get a chance to talk with the CEO of

0:15:31.440 --> 0:15:34.800
<v Speaker 1>another well known Swiss brandon that would be Potech Philippe.

0:15:34.960 --> 0:15:37.080
<v Speaker 1>What did he have to tell you? We were very fortunate.

0:15:37.360 --> 0:15:40.800
<v Speaker 1>My colleague Chris Rosar and I sat down with Terry Stern,

0:15:40.920 --> 0:15:44.320
<v Speaker 1>who is the chairman of Protect Philip. But it was

0:15:44.440 --> 0:15:47.560
<v Speaker 1>really quite interesting. Mister Stern was very talkative and he

0:15:47.640 --> 0:15:50.600
<v Speaker 1>was in a very good mood, and he revealed to

0:15:50.680 --> 0:15:54.040
<v Speaker 1>us that, you know, they have a prototype ready and

0:15:54.240 --> 0:15:56.040
<v Speaker 1>they you know, they want to get all the final

0:15:56.120 --> 0:15:58.560
<v Speaker 1>designs in place before they start producing. But they are

0:15:58.600 --> 0:16:02.200
<v Speaker 1>going to introduce their first model line for the first

0:16:02.200 --> 0:16:06.200
<v Speaker 1>time since nineteen ninety nine, so it's almost a quarter century.

0:16:06.480 --> 0:16:09.160
<v Speaker 1>So this is a major deal for them. And what

0:16:09.320 --> 0:16:12.360
<v Speaker 1>Potech is trying to do, and we don't know what

0:16:12.400 --> 0:16:14.320
<v Speaker 1>the watch is or what the design is, but what

0:16:14.360 --> 0:16:18.000
<v Speaker 1>they're trying to do is, you know, give their customers

0:16:18.840 --> 0:16:22.040
<v Speaker 1>and the collectors who buy their time pieces, you know,

0:16:22.240 --> 0:16:26.880
<v Speaker 1>something to look beyond the Nautilus and you know those

0:16:27.000 --> 0:16:30.480
<v Speaker 1>great complicated watch that's watches that they're known for. They

0:16:30.480 --> 0:16:33.520
<v Speaker 1>want to be more diversified, you know, like a portfolio

0:16:33.680 --> 0:16:35.400
<v Speaker 1>or something, and they don't want to be just a

0:16:35.440 --> 0:16:37.760
<v Speaker 1>one trick pony. We'll see if they're a new design

0:16:37.840 --> 0:16:40.800
<v Speaker 1>includes any emojis as well, that'd be something. I know,

0:16:40.880 --> 0:16:44.320
<v Speaker 1>you broke some news as well, Andy with another legendary

0:16:44.360 --> 0:16:49.560
<v Speaker 1>Swiss brand, ottomarp Gay and an effort to fight watch theft.

0:16:49.760 --> 0:16:52.840
<v Speaker 1>This is becoming something that's become quite a big concern

0:16:52.920 --> 0:16:55.600
<v Speaker 1>for watchmakers. Yeah, I mean, you know, we've been writing

0:16:55.640 --> 0:16:58.080
<v Speaker 1>stories over the past year. I mean, you know what's

0:16:58.080 --> 0:17:01.040
<v Speaker 1>going on with watches the is you know that more

0:17:01.120 --> 0:17:05.359
<v Speaker 1>of the world is paying attention to watches. People are,

0:17:05.840 --> 0:17:09.639
<v Speaker 1>you know, showing off their watches on Instagram and social media.

0:17:09.760 --> 0:17:13.479
<v Speaker 1>And at the same time, the problem of watch theft,

0:17:13.640 --> 0:17:18.800
<v Speaker 1>people getting mugged for their watches has become a huge issue.

0:17:18.880 --> 0:17:22.080
<v Speaker 1>You know, this in fact, could present a sort of

0:17:22.160 --> 0:17:26.480
<v Speaker 1>existential crisis for the major luxury brands, most of which

0:17:26.480 --> 0:17:31.600
<v Speaker 1>are here in Switzerland. If customers are afraid to wear

0:17:31.720 --> 0:17:35.200
<v Speaker 1>their time pieces, you know, they just might stop buying them.

0:17:35.280 --> 0:17:38.120
<v Speaker 1>And you know, nobody wants. Everybody buys a watch because

0:17:38.160 --> 0:17:40.680
<v Speaker 1>they want to wear it. It's just an unprecedented thing

0:17:40.720 --> 0:17:42.679
<v Speaker 1>that they're doing. They've got a new program where if

0:17:42.760 --> 0:17:46.280
<v Speaker 1>you bought an Odemarpgay watch such as the Royal Oak,

0:17:46.359 --> 0:17:49.200
<v Speaker 1>which is the watch that they're known for in twenty

0:17:49.240 --> 0:17:52.640
<v Speaker 1>twenty two, which was the fiftieth anniversary of that watch,

0:17:52.880 --> 0:17:55.480
<v Speaker 1>or in twenty twenty three this year, you can register

0:17:55.600 --> 0:17:59.760
<v Speaker 1>that watch with Odomarp Gay and become part of an

0:17:59.760 --> 0:18:04.240
<v Speaker 1>extended service program. And if that watch is stolen or

0:18:04.440 --> 0:18:08.639
<v Speaker 1>lost or damaged. You know, the language they use is

0:18:08.720 --> 0:18:13.919
<v Speaker 1>suddenly and unexpectedly i e. And a robbery, they will replace,

0:18:15.200 --> 0:18:19.800
<v Speaker 1>refund or repair that watch. No one has ever done

0:18:19.800 --> 0:18:24.840
<v Speaker 1>this before in the luxury watch industry. It's quite unprecedented.

0:18:25.119 --> 0:18:28.480
<v Speaker 1>We don't know how it's going to play out. It's

0:18:28.520 --> 0:18:32.240
<v Speaker 1>indeed quite a bold move. Yeah, interesting that there hasn't

0:18:32.280 --> 0:18:34.600
<v Speaker 1>been something like that before, But lots to think about

0:18:34.640 --> 0:18:37.800
<v Speaker 1>coming out of the Watches and Wonders event in Geneva.

0:18:37.960 --> 0:18:40.200
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for this, Andy, great having you with us. That's

0:18:40.240 --> 0:18:44.639
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg's Andy Hoffman from Geneva, Switzerland and still ahead on

0:18:44.680 --> 0:18:48.240
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg day Break is a US debt default really a risk.

0:18:48.440 --> 0:18:51.880
<v Speaker 1>We speak with Bloomberg government reporter Emily Wilkins. Next, I'm

0:18:51.960 --> 0:18:58.159
<v Speaker 1>Nathan Hagar, and this is Bloomberg. Welcome back to the

0:18:58.200 --> 0:19:01.680
<v Speaker 1>special Good Friday edition of burg Daybreak. I'm Nathan Hagar.

0:19:01.960 --> 0:19:04.240
<v Speaker 1>It is a holiday not just on Wall Street, but

0:19:04.320 --> 0:19:06.800
<v Speaker 1>on Capitol Hill. Lawmakers in factor in the middle of

0:19:06.840 --> 0:19:10.080
<v Speaker 1>a two week spring recess, getting a break from a

0:19:10.080 --> 0:19:12.080
<v Speaker 1>debate that is going to get even more pressing for

0:19:12.119 --> 0:19:14.600
<v Speaker 1>the markets as we get closer to summer. It's over

0:19:14.680 --> 0:19:18.639
<v Speaker 1>the debt ceiling, the risk of an unprecedented default on

0:19:18.680 --> 0:19:22.280
<v Speaker 1>the nation's obligations. House Speaker Kevin McCarthy says he has

0:19:22.280 --> 0:19:25.080
<v Speaker 1>a message for the White House. Mister President, I'm ready

0:19:25.119 --> 0:19:28.400
<v Speaker 1>at any time, at any moment, I'll come tonight. It

0:19:28.440 --> 0:19:31.840
<v Speaker 1>doesn't make it difficult to sit down and negotiate and

0:19:31.920 --> 0:19:35.159
<v Speaker 1>find common ground to make America a little stronger and

0:19:35.240 --> 0:19:37.760
<v Speaker 1>make sure we stop overspending. But the message from White

0:19:37.800 --> 0:19:41.320
<v Speaker 1>House Press Secretary Karine Jean Pierre is President Biden's shown

0:19:41.320 --> 0:19:45.360
<v Speaker 1>Republicans his budget. Now they should show him theirs what

0:19:45.359 --> 0:19:48.160
<v Speaker 1>we have seen, our is and heard our excuses after

0:19:48.200 --> 0:19:51.639
<v Speaker 1>excuses after excuses. But they should be transparent to the

0:19:51.680 --> 0:19:54.119
<v Speaker 1>American people. They should lay out what is it that

0:19:54.160 --> 0:19:57.120
<v Speaker 1>they want to cut Karne, Jean Pierre and Kevin McCarthy

0:19:57.200 --> 0:19:59.720
<v Speaker 1>drawing their lines in this debate over the debt. Let's

0:19:59.720 --> 0:20:02.320
<v Speaker 1>bring it. Bloomberg government reporter Emily Wilkins, who's going to

0:20:02.359 --> 0:20:05.720
<v Speaker 1>be keeping a very close eye on these negotiations once

0:20:05.800 --> 0:20:09.800
<v Speaker 1>lawmakers return to Washington from their home districts. Emily, I

0:20:09.800 --> 0:20:12.320
<v Speaker 1>know you're paying attention to this, but how much attention

0:20:12.359 --> 0:20:15.080
<v Speaker 1>should market participants be paying at this point? I think

0:20:15.080 --> 0:20:18.920
<v Speaker 1>you do have to pay some attention because the agreements

0:20:18.960 --> 0:20:22.440
<v Speaker 1>that they're being worked out right now. We all knew

0:20:22.480 --> 0:20:25.399
<v Speaker 1>that this was going to take time, but at the

0:20:25.480 --> 0:20:28.760
<v Speaker 1>same point, and we're getting kind of early indicators now

0:20:28.800 --> 0:20:31.840
<v Speaker 1>about how easy or difficult this will be, and it's

0:20:31.880 --> 0:20:35.359
<v Speaker 1>going to be quite difficult, as we're seeing now. You know,

0:20:35.440 --> 0:20:39.080
<v Speaker 1>initially saw the meeting between Biden and McCarthy. They sat down,

0:20:39.200 --> 0:20:42.160
<v Speaker 1>it was pretty pleasant, and then Biden kind of said, hey,

0:20:42.160 --> 0:20:44.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to release my budget and he expected Republicans

0:20:44.800 --> 0:20:46.680
<v Speaker 1>to do the same. For a minute, it did look

0:20:46.720 --> 0:20:49.880
<v Speaker 1>like Republicans we're going to release a budget either this

0:20:49.920 --> 0:20:52.920
<v Speaker 1>month in April or potentially even next month in May,

0:20:53.280 --> 0:20:57.000
<v Speaker 1>that now seems a little bit less likely. Kevin McCarthy

0:20:57.280 --> 0:21:00.320
<v Speaker 1>sent a letter to Biden with basically four bullets points

0:21:00.320 --> 0:21:02.800
<v Speaker 1>of what Republicans want to see in a Deadlomit agreement,

0:21:03.040 --> 0:21:05.520
<v Speaker 1>and they're basically now saying that they're not going to

0:21:05.720 --> 0:21:08.720
<v Speaker 1>move forward anymore until Biden sits down with them again.

0:21:08.800 --> 0:21:11.400
<v Speaker 1>So it feels like both the sides are a deadlock

0:21:11.600 --> 0:21:14.360
<v Speaker 1>right now. Of course, there is some time to work

0:21:14.400 --> 0:21:16.760
<v Speaker 1>it out, but remember Congress is not a body that

0:21:16.800 --> 0:21:20.000
<v Speaker 1>moves particularly quickly. With any sort of agreement. You're going

0:21:20.040 --> 0:21:22.119
<v Speaker 1>to have to have at least a couple different weeks

0:21:22.119 --> 0:21:24.240
<v Speaker 1>for it to go through the Senate, go through the House,

0:21:24.280 --> 0:21:27.320
<v Speaker 1>have the debate, go through the process. And so I

0:21:27.359 --> 0:21:29.760
<v Speaker 1>don't think we're in a spot yet where we need

0:21:29.800 --> 0:21:34.080
<v Speaker 1>to panic, but things aren't looking super great at the

0:21:34.200 --> 0:21:37.840
<v Speaker 1>moment for getting this agreement done well. I wonder if

0:21:37.840 --> 0:21:41.200
<v Speaker 1>they're feeling any more pressure to move forward on this

0:21:41.240 --> 0:21:44.639
<v Speaker 1>when they get back. Given the turmoil we saw in

0:21:44.680 --> 0:21:47.800
<v Speaker 1>the banking sector with the collapse of Silicon Valley Bank

0:21:48.119 --> 0:21:51.840
<v Speaker 1>and Signature Bank, it's raised all these questions that you

0:21:51.920 --> 0:21:54.480
<v Speaker 1>know when you have a financial system that is so

0:21:54.600 --> 0:21:58.840
<v Speaker 1>reliant on treasuries. If there is a concern about those

0:21:58.880 --> 0:22:02.600
<v Speaker 1>treasuries default, we could be in some trouble. Emily, Oh,

0:22:02.640 --> 0:22:04.600
<v Speaker 1>we definitely could be in some trouble. And I feel

0:22:04.600 --> 0:22:07.879
<v Speaker 1>like every lawmaker understands the states for not raising the

0:22:07.960 --> 0:22:11.920
<v Speaker 1>debt limit. I don't think they're really particularly among leadership.

0:22:12.080 --> 0:22:14.159
<v Speaker 1>A lot of Republicans who don't want to see the

0:22:14.680 --> 0:22:17.240
<v Speaker 1>limit raised in some capacity. They just want to be

0:22:17.280 --> 0:22:20.040
<v Speaker 1>able to say that they've also gotten cuts to do so.

0:22:20.640 --> 0:22:23.800
<v Speaker 1>And so when we think a little bit about you know,

0:22:23.960 --> 0:22:27.000
<v Speaker 1>what is coming next and how the banking crisis relates,

0:22:27.200 --> 0:22:29.520
<v Speaker 1>I think it's also just important to point out Congress

0:22:29.560 --> 0:22:33.200
<v Speaker 1>is certainly taking the banking crisis seriously. You have Financial

0:22:33.200 --> 0:22:36.080
<v Speaker 1>Services Chairman Patrick McHenry, who I think is interested in

0:22:36.119 --> 0:22:39.399
<v Speaker 1>holding more hearings, kind of looking into banking from a

0:22:39.440 --> 0:22:42.600
<v Speaker 1>holistic perspective and seeing what needs to be done there.

0:22:42.920 --> 0:22:45.440
<v Speaker 1>At the same point, a Congress is kind of done

0:22:45.440 --> 0:22:48.399
<v Speaker 1>with like the crisis mode on the banks. They're feeling

0:22:48.400 --> 0:22:50.760
<v Speaker 1>free to kind of look at other issues, look at

0:22:50.760 --> 0:22:53.919
<v Speaker 1>other concerns. There's a sense now that because we haven't

0:22:53.920 --> 0:22:56.800
<v Speaker 1>seen more bank shutter that the bleeding has at least

0:22:56.800 --> 0:22:59.800
<v Speaker 1>been stopped, even if the wound hasn't been fully healed.

0:23:00.080 --> 0:23:03.440
<v Speaker 1>And so I do question you know exactly how much

0:23:03.480 --> 0:23:05.919
<v Speaker 1>pressure the banking is going to be putting on the

0:23:06.000 --> 0:23:09.000
<v Speaker 1>debt limit, if only because I don't think Congress can

0:23:09.080 --> 0:23:12.280
<v Speaker 1>use that as an emergency situation anymore, even though they

0:23:12.280 --> 0:23:15.040
<v Speaker 1>still see it as an important situation that they'll continue

0:23:15.080 --> 0:23:16.760
<v Speaker 1>to focus on. So what are you going to be

0:23:16.800 --> 0:23:20.120
<v Speaker 1>looking for once lawmakers do get back. You mentioned that

0:23:20.400 --> 0:23:24.639
<v Speaker 1>list of bullet points that Republicans put out before the break.

0:23:24.840 --> 0:23:27.119
<v Speaker 1>Are you expecting that we're going to see any further

0:23:27.280 --> 0:23:30.639
<v Speaker 1>details of what Republicans are looking for when it comes

0:23:30.640 --> 0:23:33.960
<v Speaker 1>to cuts before they get into these negotiations with the

0:23:34.000 --> 0:23:37.199
<v Speaker 1>White House. So I think two things that I'm looking for.

0:23:37.400 --> 0:23:40.639
<v Speaker 1>Number one is that if the White House and House Republicans,

0:23:40.680 --> 0:23:43.480
<v Speaker 1>if Kevin McCarthy does sit down with Joe Biden again

0:23:43.800 --> 0:23:46.120
<v Speaker 1>at this point, that seems unlikely because the White House

0:23:46.200 --> 0:23:48.320
<v Speaker 1>is saying that Republicans need to put out a budget

0:23:48.359 --> 0:23:51.199
<v Speaker 1>before they sit down and talk. That just does not

0:23:51.400 --> 0:23:54.000
<v Speaker 1>seem likely. So it'll be interesting to see kind of

0:23:54.040 --> 0:23:56.640
<v Speaker 1>the balls in both courts. I'd say the White House

0:23:56.680 --> 0:23:58.720
<v Speaker 1>could make a move that could change things, so could

0:23:58.760 --> 0:24:02.360
<v Speaker 1>House Republicans. But look, Republicans acknowledge that if they are

0:24:02.400 --> 0:24:05.000
<v Speaker 1>going to pass some debt limit deal through, they want

0:24:05.040 --> 0:24:07.199
<v Speaker 1>to do it through what they call regular order, and

0:24:07.240 --> 0:24:09.919
<v Speaker 1>that basically just means a longer process. It means they

0:24:09.920 --> 0:24:13.120
<v Speaker 1>actually want to bring legislation to committees. The committees, they

0:24:13.119 --> 0:24:15.479
<v Speaker 1>hold a hearing, they mark it up, they bring it

0:24:15.520 --> 0:24:17.840
<v Speaker 1>to the Rules Committee, they prep it for the House floor,

0:24:17.880 --> 0:24:20.520
<v Speaker 1>they bring it. This is all things that take time,

0:24:20.960 --> 0:24:23.960
<v Speaker 1>and at this point, it doesn't really look like Republicans

0:24:24.000 --> 0:24:26.840
<v Speaker 1>have a lot of this legislation written yet. And of course,

0:24:27.119 --> 0:24:30.240
<v Speaker 1>the more details that Republicans begin to put down on paper,

0:24:30.600 --> 0:24:34.440
<v Speaker 1>the more they risk isolating various factions of their conference

0:24:34.520 --> 0:24:37.439
<v Speaker 1>into saying, hey, we're simply not going to support this,

0:24:37.760 --> 0:24:39.800
<v Speaker 1>and that's where things are going to get really tricky

0:24:39.880 --> 0:24:42.159
<v Speaker 1>and really messy. And we just haven't even gotten to

0:24:42.200 --> 0:24:45.159
<v Speaker 1>that part yet. Because the four bullet points that Republicans

0:24:45.160 --> 0:24:48.720
<v Speaker 1>have put out, I mean, they're pretty vague all things considered.

0:24:48.800 --> 0:24:51.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's things like clineback COVID nineteen funding, having

0:24:51.760 --> 0:24:55.120
<v Speaker 1>stricter work requirements, passing bills that's basically all of them

0:24:55.119 --> 0:24:58.080
<v Speaker 1>agree to but some of these things aren't going to

0:24:58.119 --> 0:25:00.280
<v Speaker 1>be no goes with the White House. And to get

0:25:00.280 --> 0:25:03.080
<v Speaker 1>more into details on that, you know, it's they only

0:25:03.119 --> 0:25:05.919
<v Speaker 1>have a four vote majority, so it really does not

0:25:06.000 --> 0:25:08.040
<v Speaker 1>take a lot of members to decide, hey, we don't

0:25:08.080 --> 0:25:11.400
<v Speaker 1>want this to completely stall the process. Speaking with Bloomberg

0:25:11.400 --> 0:25:14.240
<v Speaker 1>government reporter Emily Wilkins, who keeps say, a very close

0:25:14.280 --> 0:25:17.960
<v Speaker 1>eye on what's happening with the debt ceiling negotiations that

0:25:18.000 --> 0:25:21.240
<v Speaker 1>are going to be ramping up really heading into the summer. Here,

0:25:21.400 --> 0:25:25.520
<v Speaker 1>I want to ask you, specifically, Emily, about that four

0:25:25.760 --> 0:25:29.320
<v Speaker 1>seat majority in the Republican Party and the factions and

0:25:29.359 --> 0:25:34.320
<v Speaker 1>the difficulty that how Speaker McCarthy has keeping his caucus

0:25:34.359 --> 0:25:36.920
<v Speaker 1>in line. Are there certain lawmakers that you're looking at

0:25:36.960 --> 0:25:40.320
<v Speaker 1>in particular who could potentially go one way or the

0:25:40.320 --> 0:25:43.480
<v Speaker 1>other to try to come to some kind of majority

0:25:43.520 --> 0:25:46.240
<v Speaker 1>that can get around the idea of doing something either

0:25:46.280 --> 0:25:48.960
<v Speaker 1>about spending cuts or raising the dead ceiling. So I

0:25:49.000 --> 0:25:51.119
<v Speaker 1>think in the case like this, you always kind of

0:25:51.160 --> 0:25:54.639
<v Speaker 1>have to look at what the extremes are on either side.

0:25:54.960 --> 0:25:58.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean, certainly on one end you have hardliners, conservative hardliners.

0:25:58.800 --> 0:26:01.440
<v Speaker 1>It looks like Lauren Bob and Matt Gates, who have

0:26:01.520 --> 0:26:04.520
<v Speaker 1>shown before that they are willing to buck Kevin McCarthy

0:26:04.640 --> 0:26:07.399
<v Speaker 1>until he gives them what they want. And you know,

0:26:07.440 --> 0:26:09.960
<v Speaker 1>it's the question of sort of exactly what do they want?

0:26:09.960 --> 0:26:12.080
<v Speaker 1>What are they going to be willing to accept. We've

0:26:12.119 --> 0:26:15.119
<v Speaker 1>seen the Conservative Freedom Caucus put out a couple of

0:26:15.119 --> 0:26:19.919
<v Speaker 1>proposals at the same point. Ki McCarthy's majority rests on

0:26:19.960 --> 0:26:24.080
<v Speaker 1>a number of lawmakers, Republican lawmakers who won in twenty

0:26:24.160 --> 0:26:27.320
<v Speaker 1>twenty two in districts that Biden carried in twenty to

0:26:27.359 --> 0:26:31.720
<v Speaker 1>twenty and so these are Republican lawmakers representing moderate districts.

0:26:31.720 --> 0:26:33.680
<v Speaker 1>They need to make sure that they're continuing to get

0:26:33.720 --> 0:26:37.080
<v Speaker 1>support from independence and Democrats there. And so there's really

0:26:37.119 --> 0:26:39.920
<v Speaker 1>only so far that they can go with various cuts.

0:26:40.160 --> 0:26:42.200
<v Speaker 1>And so those are kind of two groups that I'm

0:26:42.280 --> 0:26:44.639
<v Speaker 1>keeping a very close eye on. But the fact is

0:26:44.720 --> 0:26:47.680
<v Speaker 1>sort of anyone could potentially move or be a mover

0:26:47.840 --> 0:26:51.520
<v Speaker 1>or shaker here for various reasons. Tony Gonzalez, a congressman

0:26:51.520 --> 0:26:54.320
<v Speaker 1>from Texas who's been pretty vocal on bills dealing with

0:26:54.400 --> 0:26:57.760
<v Speaker 1>border security and immigration. He tweeted out something the other

0:26:57.840 --> 0:27:00.600
<v Speaker 1>week basically saying, look if if any bills come to

0:27:00.640 --> 0:27:03.639
<v Speaker 1>the floor that he deems his anti immigrant, he's not

0:27:03.680 --> 0:27:06.000
<v Speaker 1>going to support the debt limit. And usually if you

0:27:06.080 --> 0:27:07.800
<v Speaker 1>had a bigger majority, it would be a kind of

0:27:07.800 --> 0:27:10.120
<v Speaker 1>a thing where it's like, you don't have any leverage here.

0:27:10.160 --> 0:27:12.639
<v Speaker 1>But all he needs is three more Republicans with a

0:27:12.680 --> 0:27:15.800
<v Speaker 1>similar mindset to join him, and that again is going

0:27:15.840 --> 0:27:19.560
<v Speaker 1>to pose another hurdle for McCarthy to have to navigate

0:27:19.600 --> 0:27:22.000
<v Speaker 1>around as he tries to figure out what the denlop

0:27:22.040 --> 0:27:23.639
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be. So this is definitely a thing

0:27:23.680 --> 0:27:25.360
<v Speaker 1>where if you've got you know, if you're a lawmaker

0:27:25.600 --> 0:27:28.119
<v Speaker 1>and you've got three other lawmakers and you all desperately

0:27:28.160 --> 0:27:30.560
<v Speaker 1>care about an issue, when you want to have leverage

0:27:30.560 --> 0:27:32.560
<v Speaker 1>on it, and this is a point where you can

0:27:32.640 --> 0:27:35.639
<v Speaker 1>really use that leverage. Of course, it comes at the

0:27:35.720 --> 0:27:39.000
<v Speaker 1>risk of potentially defaulting on our national debt. So when

0:27:39.040 --> 0:27:41.600
<v Speaker 1>do you expect this to really start to heat up, Emily,

0:27:41.640 --> 0:27:43.920
<v Speaker 1>do we have a really clear idea of what that

0:27:44.240 --> 0:27:47.719
<v Speaker 1>X state is and when we could potentially face that

0:27:47.840 --> 0:27:50.320
<v Speaker 1>risk of debt default. So initially we had all talked

0:27:50.320 --> 0:27:53.359
<v Speaker 1>about the X state as being June sets, and I

0:27:53.400 --> 0:27:56.560
<v Speaker 1>think that date is still in many lawmakers minds, but

0:27:56.640 --> 0:27:59.199
<v Speaker 1>it is not the It is kind of considered on

0:27:59.240 --> 0:28:02.199
<v Speaker 1>the early side of things. It's now looking like the

0:28:02.440 --> 0:28:05.200
<v Speaker 1>X date could occur a little bit into the summer,

0:28:05.359 --> 0:28:08.520
<v Speaker 1>potentially even into the fall. At this point, I still

0:28:08.520 --> 0:28:11.320
<v Speaker 1>think we don't quite know. Me Jenny Yellen is updating

0:28:11.359 --> 0:28:14.119
<v Speaker 1>Congress as much as she can on it. But I

0:28:14.119 --> 0:28:16.320
<v Speaker 1>think there's a sense that, you know, as far as

0:28:16.400 --> 0:28:18.800
<v Speaker 1>things getting really intense, it's when you're going to hit

0:28:18.880 --> 0:28:22.720
<v Speaker 1>June and you kind of hit that first projected deadline.

0:28:23.160 --> 0:28:25.679
<v Speaker 1>Is that going to be the deadline? Maybe not, but

0:28:25.800 --> 0:28:28.679
<v Speaker 1>it's going to sort of be when when people realize that, Okay,

0:28:28.800 --> 0:28:30.640
<v Speaker 1>now is the time that we need to move. Yeah,

0:28:30.760 --> 0:28:33.280
<v Speaker 1>so we have several more weeks, if not months, to

0:28:34.119 --> 0:28:38.000
<v Speaker 1>keep talking about this. Thank you as always, Bloomberg Government's

0:28:38.160 --> 0:28:41.440
<v Speaker 1>Emily Wilkins. And up next on this Good Friday edition

0:28:41.440 --> 0:28:44.720
<v Speaker 1>of Bloomberg Daybreak, recession signs from one of the key

0:28:44.840 --> 0:28:48.840
<v Speaker 1>areas of the US economy. I'm Nathan Hagar, and this

0:28:49.440 --> 0:28:56.680
<v Speaker 1>is welcome back to this special edition of Bloomberg Daybreak.

0:28:56.720 --> 0:28:59.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm Nathan Hagar. US markets are closed for this Good

0:28:59.720 --> 0:29:02.200
<v Speaker 1>Friday holiday. We now want to turn to the economy

0:29:02.240 --> 0:29:05.520
<v Speaker 1>and a key area of the country that has traditionally

0:29:05.560 --> 0:29:08.160
<v Speaker 1>been a pretty good indicator of the nation's economic health,

0:29:08.200 --> 0:29:12.200
<v Speaker 1>and right now it is flashing warning signs for recession.

0:29:12.280 --> 0:29:15.920
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg's Augusta Suriva's been covering this and is here with

0:29:16.040 --> 0:29:20.040
<v Speaker 1>us now for more on this story. Thanks for being here, Augusta. So,

0:29:20.120 --> 0:29:24.320
<v Speaker 1>where is this geographical economic indicator in the US? Thank

0:29:24.320 --> 0:29:26.920
<v Speaker 1>you for having me. So, this is an area called

0:29:26.960 --> 0:29:30.760
<v Speaker 1>the Inland Empire, and it's located next to La and

0:29:30.960 --> 0:29:34.080
<v Speaker 1>it's called an empire because it's so big. Gets started

0:29:34.160 --> 0:29:38.840
<v Speaker 1>as a farming location and then because of its because

0:29:38.880 --> 0:29:43.520
<v Speaker 1>of its location so close to the largest port complex

0:29:43.520 --> 0:29:46.840
<v Speaker 1>in the country, which is located in LA, it gave prominence.

0:29:47.160 --> 0:29:51.240
<v Speaker 1>They started building warehouse after warehouse until we became North

0:29:51.240 --> 0:29:55.800
<v Speaker 1>America's warehousing mecca in a way. So it started as

0:29:55.800 --> 0:29:59.360
<v Speaker 1>a farming mecca, now a warehousing mecca. Obviously, we've come

0:29:59.400 --> 0:30:02.640
<v Speaker 1>out of penn Emmic where we've had supply chain issues

0:30:02.840 --> 0:30:05.440
<v Speaker 1>and is that what we're seeing here in the Inland

0:30:05.480 --> 0:30:08.720
<v Speaker 1>Empire that it's starting to come into focus where goods

0:30:08.760 --> 0:30:12.200
<v Speaker 1>get stored in this country exactly in the way this

0:30:12.360 --> 0:30:15.200
<v Speaker 1>region was storried of a post her child of the pandemic,

0:30:15.440 --> 0:30:17.680
<v Speaker 1>Most of the goods we were buying in places like

0:30:17.880 --> 0:30:22.440
<v Speaker 1>Amazon and Target passed by this region before they were

0:30:22.480 --> 0:30:24.560
<v Speaker 1>shipped out to the rest of the country. So there

0:30:24.560 --> 0:30:28.160
<v Speaker 1>are more than four thousand warehouses in the region, so

0:30:28.240 --> 0:30:31.640
<v Speaker 1>pretty much everything we buy online is stored there at

0:30:31.640 --> 0:30:35.120
<v Speaker 1>some point nowadays. And you mentioned it's close to Los Angeles,

0:30:35.160 --> 0:30:37.880
<v Speaker 1>which is of course the Port of Los Angeles and

0:30:37.960 --> 0:30:40.080
<v Speaker 1>the Port of Long Beach. What are the changes that

0:30:40.160 --> 0:30:43.720
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing between the end of the pandemic, when we

0:30:43.920 --> 0:30:47.160
<v Speaker 1>sort of had this glut of supply chain issues to now.

0:30:47.760 --> 0:30:50.400
<v Speaker 1>So one of the things that we're seeing now economically

0:30:50.680 --> 0:30:53.360
<v Speaker 1>is the slowdown when it comes to good spanning rain.

0:30:53.680 --> 0:30:56.120
<v Speaker 1>It could be both because people are starting to tight

0:30:56.240 --> 0:30:59.200
<v Speaker 1>under belts, but also because people are going back to

0:30:59.280 --> 0:31:02.840
<v Speaker 1>spanning on services. We were always a service economy, and

0:31:02.880 --> 0:31:07.479
<v Speaker 1>now people are spending more on experiences and less and

0:31:07.520 --> 0:31:10.280
<v Speaker 1>are spending lost time buying things online. Right, So for

0:31:10.360 --> 0:31:13.840
<v Speaker 1>a region where now one and three people now work

0:31:14.240 --> 0:31:18.280
<v Speaker 1>in the broad transportation sector, that's a warning sign, right,

0:31:18.400 --> 0:31:21.720
<v Speaker 1>what's going to happen to this place when people start

0:31:21.760 --> 0:31:26.360
<v Speaker 1>buying less? What does this mean, for the economic health

0:31:26.600 --> 0:31:29.320
<v Speaker 1>of that part of the country. How does it compare

0:31:29.760 --> 0:31:31.920
<v Speaker 1>to the rest of the country when it comes to

0:31:32.160 --> 0:31:36.120
<v Speaker 1>the quality of jobs and wages that people get in

0:31:36.240 --> 0:31:38.840
<v Speaker 1>that part of the country. So this is a region

0:31:38.960 --> 0:31:41.760
<v Speaker 1>that is used to boom and bus cycles. When we

0:31:41.800 --> 0:31:46.760
<v Speaker 1>had the Great Recession, it was hardly hit. The unemployment

0:31:46.880 --> 0:31:51.640
<v Speaker 1>rate spiked to above fourteen percent, it's a rampant foreclosures.

0:31:51.960 --> 0:31:54.280
<v Speaker 1>So it's a region that's used to that. But right

0:31:54.320 --> 0:31:57.720
<v Speaker 1>now it's a region that has become overreliant on a

0:31:57.840 --> 0:32:01.720
<v Speaker 1>single industry, and that's why people are concerned. And not

0:32:01.760 --> 0:32:04.880
<v Speaker 1>only that, but as you mentioned wages, it's a region

0:32:05.000 --> 0:32:10.120
<v Speaker 1>where the warehousing workers specifically make on average eight dollars

0:32:10.200 --> 0:32:13.880
<v Speaker 1>less than the national average for all occupations. So some

0:32:13.920 --> 0:32:18.960
<v Speaker 1>people say that these jobs, even though they're booming and

0:32:19.040 --> 0:32:23.560
<v Speaker 1>they do provide jobs for workers in the region, they're

0:32:23.640 --> 0:32:26.960
<v Speaker 1>not sustainable in the long run. So are there efforts

0:32:27.000 --> 0:32:30.000
<v Speaker 1>underway to try to diversify the economy and the inland

0:32:30.040 --> 0:32:33.480
<v Speaker 1>empire away from warehousing or is it even possible to

0:32:33.520 --> 0:32:36.520
<v Speaker 1>do that. I would say right now the region is

0:32:36.640 --> 0:32:39.600
<v Speaker 1>very reliant on a single industry, But of course you

0:32:39.640 --> 0:32:42.920
<v Speaker 1>have efforts to not only diversify to other industries, so

0:32:43.120 --> 0:32:47.320
<v Speaker 1>healthcare for example, as an industry that's a major employer

0:32:47.400 --> 0:32:51.160
<v Speaker 1>to They're trying to bring more more jobs in the

0:32:51.200 --> 0:32:54.880
<v Speaker 1>scientific sector for example, and not only that, but also

0:32:54.960 --> 0:32:58.760
<v Speaker 1>efforts to improve education levels in the region, which tend

0:32:58.800 --> 0:33:01.400
<v Speaker 1>to be lower than another parts of the country. But

0:33:01.600 --> 0:33:03.920
<v Speaker 1>right now it seems like the focus when it comes

0:33:03.960 --> 0:33:07.920
<v Speaker 1>to governments is to invest more in the warehousing sector

0:33:08.000 --> 0:33:10.920
<v Speaker 1>in an effort to make this a more sustainable industry,

0:33:11.000 --> 0:33:14.240
<v Speaker 1>not necessarily straight away from it. An interesting insight and

0:33:14.560 --> 0:33:16.240
<v Speaker 1>good to have you on with us to talk more

0:33:16.280 --> 0:33:18.600
<v Speaker 1>about it. Thanks for this, Augusta, really good at having

0:33:18.600 --> 0:33:21.240
<v Speaker 1>you with us. Thank you for having me Bloomberg's Augusta,

0:33:21.360 --> 0:33:24.760
<v Speaker 1>Sorry Eva joining us on the special edition of Bloomberg Daybreak,

0:33:24.800 --> 0:33:27.840
<v Speaker 1>and our thanks as well to Bloomberg Government reporter Emily Wilkins,

0:33:27.840 --> 0:33:31.680
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg's Andy Hoffman with us from Geneva, Switzerland along with

0:33:31.760 --> 0:33:34.479
<v Speaker 1>oil industry analyst Stephen Shark. We want to thank you

0:33:34.520 --> 0:33:37.160
<v Speaker 1>for joining us as well on this good Friday. I'm

0:33:37.240 --> 0:33:40.680
<v Speaker 1>Nathan Hagert. Stay with us. Today's top stories and global

0:33:40.720 --> 0:33:44.120
<v Speaker 1>business news headlines are coming up right now.