WEBVTT - A Supreme Decision - 7.9

0:00:00.240 --> 0:00:03.000
<v Speaker 1>Let not your heart be troubled. You are listening to

0:00:03.040 --> 0:00:06.160
<v Speaker 1>the Sean Hannity Radio Show podcast. If you're like me

0:00:06.200 --> 0:00:08.879
<v Speaker 1>and suffer from insomnia, you know what, that's not fun.

0:00:08.960 --> 0:00:10.800
<v Speaker 1>You know I tried everything I couldn't get a good

0:00:10.880 --> 0:00:14.880
<v Speaker 1>night's sleep. And this is neither drug nor alcohol induced.

0:00:15.040 --> 0:00:18.360
<v Speaker 1>That's right. It is my pillow. Mike Lindell invented it

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:20.520
<v Speaker 1>and he fitted me for my first my pillow, and

0:00:20.520 --> 0:00:23.560
<v Speaker 1>it's changed my life. I fall asleep faster, stay asleep longer,

0:00:23.640 --> 0:00:26.000
<v Speaker 1>and the good news you can too. Just go to

0:00:26.079 --> 0:00:29.360
<v Speaker 1>my pillow dot com promo code Sean and take advantage

0:00:29.360 --> 0:00:32.720
<v Speaker 1>of one of Mike Glendell's best offers, his special four pack.

0:00:32.760 --> 0:00:35.200
<v Speaker 1>You get fifty percent off to my Pillow Premium Pillows

0:00:35.200 --> 0:00:37.960
<v Speaker 1>to go Anywhere Pillows. My Pillows made in the USA,

0:00:38.080 --> 0:00:40.760
<v Speaker 1>has a sixty day unconditional money back guaranteed no risk

0:00:40.760 --> 0:00:43.240
<v Speaker 1>to you, and attend you warranty. You don't want to

0:00:43.240 --> 0:00:46.160
<v Speaker 1>spend more sleepless nights on a pillow tossing interny that's

0:00:46.159 --> 0:00:48.480
<v Speaker 1>not working for you. Just go to my pillow dot

0:00:48.479 --> 0:00:51.280
<v Speaker 1>com right now, use the promo code Sean, and you

0:00:51.320 --> 0:00:54.040
<v Speaker 1>get Mike Glendell's special four pack. You get to my

0:00:54.040 --> 0:00:57.160
<v Speaker 1>Pillow Premium Pillows to Go Anywhere Pillows fifty percent off,

0:00:57.200 --> 0:00:59.360
<v Speaker 1>and you'll start getting the kind of peaceful and RESTful

0:00:59.400 --> 0:01:02.120
<v Speaker 1>and comfortable and deep, peeling and recruitative sleep you've been

0:01:02.120 --> 0:01:05.200
<v Speaker 1>craving and deserve. My pillow dot Com promo coach on.

0:01:05.600 --> 0:01:08.080
<v Speaker 1>All right, glad you're with us. It is great to

0:01:08.160 --> 0:01:11.640
<v Speaker 1>be back, and what an incredible news week this is

0:01:11.760 --> 0:01:15.720
<v Speaker 1>going to be anyway right down a toll free telephone number,

0:01:15.840 --> 0:01:18.440
<v Speaker 1>it's eight nine for one, Shawn. If you want to

0:01:18.440 --> 0:01:20.280
<v Speaker 1>be a part of the program, let me just break

0:01:20.280 --> 0:01:22.640
<v Speaker 1>down where the week is headed and some of the

0:01:22.640 --> 0:01:24.440
<v Speaker 1>things that we know are coming up and some of

0:01:24.440 --> 0:01:27.880
<v Speaker 1>the things that we will be active and involved in

0:01:27.920 --> 0:01:30.600
<v Speaker 1>that I think you're gonna want to be following. First

0:01:30.600 --> 0:01:34.720
<v Speaker 1>of all, at nine oh one thirty Eastern Standard time tonight,

0:01:34.760 --> 0:01:39.560
<v Speaker 1>the President will announce his decision to replace Justice Anthony

0:01:39.640 --> 0:01:42.720
<v Speaker 1>Kennedy on the U. S. Supreme Court. UH. In other words,

0:01:42.880 --> 0:01:45.160
<v Speaker 1>right as we kick off Hannity tonight, we will have

0:01:45.280 --> 0:01:50.920
<v Speaker 1>full complete coverage analysis of the President's comments, and of course,

0:01:51.200 --> 0:01:56.400
<v Speaker 1>the Democrats predictable, It does not matter who the President picks,

0:01:56.880 --> 0:02:01.080
<v Speaker 1>It just doesn't matter if the president cured cancer. Now,

0:02:01.200 --> 0:02:04.200
<v Speaker 1>I am certain if he was able to find a cure,

0:02:04.200 --> 0:02:07.120
<v Speaker 1>if he was willing to give a million dollars to

0:02:07.160 --> 0:02:10.720
<v Speaker 1>every man, woman and child in this country, I am

0:02:10.760 --> 0:02:14.640
<v Speaker 1>convinced the left would hate him. I'm just there's nothing

0:02:14.840 --> 0:02:17.880
<v Speaker 1>he can do in their eyes that they're not going

0:02:17.919 --> 0:02:21.280
<v Speaker 1>to oppose. And the media, of course is right there

0:02:21.440 --> 0:02:24.840
<v Speaker 1>with them. Um, But that's gonna happen six o one

0:02:25.480 --> 0:02:29.760
<v Speaker 1>thirty pm East Pacific Standard time on the West Coast tonight.

0:02:29.840 --> 0:02:32.760
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna have that. That's on Hannity. Let me tell

0:02:32.800 --> 0:02:34.760
<v Speaker 1>you the other things that are happening this week. So

0:02:35.560 --> 0:02:40.600
<v Speaker 1>Lisa Page will be testifying on Wednesday. That will be

0:02:40.600 --> 0:02:44.920
<v Speaker 1>behind closed doors, but I'm pretty certain that there's gonna

0:02:44.960 --> 0:02:47.840
<v Speaker 1>be a lot of information from what I'm hearing. She

0:02:48.040 --> 0:02:52.280
<v Speaker 1>probably is scared to death about her involvement as the

0:02:52.520 --> 0:02:57.240
<v Speaker 1>lead counsel for Andrew McCabe and the boyfriend of Peter Struck.

0:02:57.760 --> 0:03:00.680
<v Speaker 1>And I'm just assuming she's gonna have an awful lot

0:03:00.800 --> 0:03:03.840
<v Speaker 1>to say because there's a lot on the line as

0:03:03.840 --> 0:03:07.760
<v Speaker 1>it relates to her life and her future here. So

0:03:08.080 --> 0:03:12.600
<v Speaker 1>then the other half of this dynamic Trump hating duo

0:03:12.760 --> 0:03:17.280
<v Speaker 1>Peter Struck. He will be testifying publicly on Thursday of

0:03:17.360 --> 0:03:21.520
<v Speaker 1>this week and we will have that coverage as well.

0:03:21.560 --> 0:03:24.600
<v Speaker 1>And my sources in DC are telling me that he's

0:03:24.639 --> 0:03:28.920
<v Speaker 1>getting very nervous at the idea of the jeopardy he

0:03:29.040 --> 0:03:32.640
<v Speaker 1>now finds himself in, which is, you know, the heart

0:03:32.680 --> 0:03:35.880
<v Speaker 1>of this is all very simple. Greg Garald will join

0:03:36.000 --> 0:03:37.800
<v Speaker 1>us later. He his book is out in two weeks,

0:03:37.800 --> 0:03:42.200
<v Speaker 1>The Russia Hoax, the illicit scheme to clear Hillary Clinton

0:03:42.240 --> 0:03:45.360
<v Speaker 1>and frame Donald Trump. And at the heart of all

0:03:45.440 --> 0:03:49.720
<v Speaker 1>of this is Peter Struck. He's the one that changed.

0:03:49.920 --> 0:03:53.880
<v Speaker 1>Remember he was writing the Exoneration of Hillary Clinton in

0:03:54.000 --> 0:03:57.760
<v Speaker 1>May early May with James Comey. He's the one that

0:03:57.920 --> 0:04:02.120
<v Speaker 1>changed the original draft from gross negligence, which is the

0:04:02.200 --> 0:04:06.600
<v Speaker 1>legal standard that would have mandated that Hillary be charged

0:04:06.640 --> 0:04:10.120
<v Speaker 1>with the Espionage Act, because well, she did commit felonies

0:04:10.680 --> 0:04:13.920
<v Speaker 1>to extreme carelessness, and that was all in an effort

0:04:13.920 --> 0:04:17.480
<v Speaker 1>to help preserve her candidacy with the belief that she

0:04:17.640 --> 0:04:21.159
<v Speaker 1>had to beat Donald Trump, because Donald Trump, you know,

0:04:21.240 --> 0:04:25.000
<v Speaker 1>we need was loathsome to them, and they needed an

0:04:25.000 --> 0:04:30.560
<v Speaker 1>insurance policy and they they even said they would stop him.

0:04:30.600 --> 0:04:32.960
<v Speaker 1>So they've got a lot of questions to be answered,

0:04:33.000 --> 0:04:37.080
<v Speaker 1>and that's all coming up this week. Also, the President

0:04:37.120 --> 0:04:40.080
<v Speaker 1>will be taking on NATO this week. In other words,

0:04:40.520 --> 0:04:43.680
<v Speaker 1>we can't as Americans be the piggy bank for the

0:04:43.960 --> 0:04:47.000
<v Speaker 1>entire world, and that goes for the U n that

0:04:47.080 --> 0:04:51.640
<v Speaker 1>goes for NATO, and that our NATO allies are going

0:04:51.720 --> 0:04:55.120
<v Speaker 1>to have to now begin the process of paying their

0:04:55.160 --> 0:04:58.200
<v Speaker 1>fair share. Which a lot of this a little overlapping

0:04:58.240 --> 0:05:01.159
<v Speaker 1>as it relates to these trade de els, which to

0:05:01.279 --> 0:05:06.000
<v Speaker 1>me is just the President negotiating with our allies saying, um,

0:05:06.040 --> 0:05:09.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry, but the idea that you're charging tariffs on

0:05:09.600 --> 0:05:14.480
<v Speaker 1>our steel, on our dairy are farmers, and on you know,

0:05:14.560 --> 0:05:17.599
<v Speaker 1>our automobiles, which basically charge so much in teriffs we

0:05:17.600 --> 0:05:21.200
<v Speaker 1>can't even we can't even import vehicles to other countries

0:05:21.240 --> 0:05:23.599
<v Speaker 1>because it becomes so cost prohibited to the people, they're

0:05:23.600 --> 0:05:26.279
<v Speaker 1>never gonna buy them. And he's saying, no, we believe

0:05:26.320 --> 0:05:29.960
<v Speaker 1>in free trade, but fair trade. And I'm pretty certain

0:05:30.000 --> 0:05:33.720
<v Speaker 1>that there are gonna be some significant developments in terms

0:05:33.720 --> 0:05:36.600
<v Speaker 1>of these countries realizing how much and how badly they

0:05:36.640 --> 0:05:40.479
<v Speaker 1>need the United States and every United States consumer and

0:05:40.640 --> 0:05:43.040
<v Speaker 1>access to our markets. That I think there will be

0:05:43.040 --> 0:05:45.120
<v Speaker 1>better deals that will be struck over time. I don't

0:05:45.160 --> 0:05:48.400
<v Speaker 1>think this is about launching a trade war um, because

0:05:48.440 --> 0:05:50.479
<v Speaker 1>that wouldn't be good for anybody in the process. But

0:05:50.640 --> 0:05:53.440
<v Speaker 1>fighting for free and fair trade, I think is of

0:05:53.520 --> 0:05:56.560
<v Speaker 1>a battle worth having, just like I think it's it's

0:05:56.600 --> 0:05:59.000
<v Speaker 1>not unreasonable to ask the rest of the world to

0:05:59.080 --> 0:06:01.360
<v Speaker 1>step up and pay their fair share of the United

0:06:01.480 --> 0:06:05.320
<v Speaker 1>Nations and pay their fair share of the billions and

0:06:05.400 --> 0:06:08.880
<v Speaker 1>billions of dollars we spend on protecting our friends and

0:06:08.880 --> 0:06:11.159
<v Speaker 1>our allies. We have no problem helping, We have no

0:06:11.279 --> 0:06:14.480
<v Speaker 1>problem in defending. We have already proven to the world

0:06:14.520 --> 0:06:18.840
<v Speaker 1>that we are willing to shed American blood, American treasure,

0:06:19.240 --> 0:06:23.040
<v Speaker 1>spend American billions to help keep the world a better

0:06:23.080 --> 0:06:25.760
<v Speaker 1>and safer place, and and in the end, we're not

0:06:25.839 --> 0:06:29.039
<v Speaker 1>looking to conquer anybody. Although we might ask for a

0:06:29.080 --> 0:06:33.839
<v Speaker 1>little plot of land visa the Normandy UH to bury

0:06:33.960 --> 0:06:37.479
<v Speaker 1>our debt. That might we might request that, but short

0:06:37.520 --> 0:06:40.000
<v Speaker 1>of that, America should not bear the burden of defending

0:06:40.000 --> 0:06:43.320
<v Speaker 1>the entire world when these countries do have the means

0:06:43.320 --> 0:06:46.599
<v Speaker 1>and the ability to step up to a much greater

0:06:46.640 --> 0:06:50.240
<v Speaker 1>extent than they have been. Also, later this week, well

0:06:50.320 --> 0:06:53.400
<v Speaker 1>brus the President will be discussing and talking with his

0:06:53.480 --> 0:06:56.640
<v Speaker 1>NATO allies. That's happening in Brussels, and then he's headed

0:06:56.640 --> 0:06:58.839
<v Speaker 1>to London, where we will be later in the week,

0:06:59.320 --> 0:07:03.760
<v Speaker 1>and we are expected they're to have massive protests anti

0:07:03.800 --> 0:07:07.800
<v Speaker 1>Trump protesting. The left is gonna love this. The left is, Oh,

0:07:07.839 --> 0:07:11.040
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna, They're absolutely gonna, They're gonna. This is like

0:07:11.200 --> 0:07:17.080
<v Speaker 1>manna from heaven for them to have leftists in Europe protesting,

0:07:17.360 --> 0:07:23.480
<v Speaker 1>socialists in Europe protesting open borders, people in Europe protesting

0:07:23.920 --> 0:07:27.720
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump's agenda and policies that have only proven to

0:07:27.760 --> 0:07:30.600
<v Speaker 1>be a great success for the people of the United

0:07:30.640 --> 0:07:33.880
<v Speaker 1>States of America. Uh. In many ways, to me, it's

0:07:33.960 --> 0:07:38.320
<v Speaker 1>somewhat laughable. Um, but let me begin. So we're less now,

0:07:38.440 --> 0:07:41.680
<v Speaker 1>less than six hours away from the president's announcement. I'm

0:07:41.720 --> 0:07:44.960
<v Speaker 1>not gonna spend the rest of the show speculating who

0:07:44.960 --> 0:07:48.080
<v Speaker 1>it might be. I don't know who it's going to be.

0:07:48.840 --> 0:07:53.760
<v Speaker 1>I believe it's probably down likely to four people, maybe

0:07:53.880 --> 0:07:56.640
<v Speaker 1>a fifth whose name is kind of just been thrown

0:07:56.640 --> 0:07:59.480
<v Speaker 1>in the mix a little bit. The President is no

0:07:59.720 --> 0:08:03.520
<v Speaker 1>tor orious for keeping people guessing. I mean, he loves

0:08:03.560 --> 0:08:06.360
<v Speaker 1>to troll and I would have no doubt at all

0:08:06.400 --> 0:08:09.520
<v Speaker 1>that he's doing so in this case, UM, giving you

0:08:09.560 --> 0:08:13.680
<v Speaker 1>the short bio and names of everybody you have, I

0:08:13.680 --> 0:08:16.760
<v Speaker 1>think she's probably the most interesting of all the candidates.

0:08:17.280 --> 0:08:21.120
<v Speaker 1>And it is fascinating how the left is just they

0:08:21.160 --> 0:08:26.480
<v Speaker 1>almost melt at the thought that that Amy Coney Barrett

0:08:26.520 --> 0:08:30.000
<v Speaker 1>is her name of Indiana, UH would in fact be picked.

0:08:30.040 --> 0:08:32.960
<v Speaker 1>She was a recent choice for the US Court of

0:08:32.960 --> 0:08:37.120
<v Speaker 1>Appeals in the seventh District, and she's forty six years old,

0:08:37.679 --> 0:08:40.920
<v Speaker 1>and of course she previously clerked for Anton and Scalia.

0:08:41.040 --> 0:08:44.520
<v Speaker 1>She was appointed by Trump and confirmed for the seventh

0:08:45.200 --> 0:08:49.040
<v Speaker 1>UH District Court of Appeals in October, had a big showdown.

0:08:49.080 --> 0:08:52.040
<v Speaker 1>I'll get to more details in this in October seventeen

0:08:52.080 --> 0:08:56.240
<v Speaker 1>with Diane Feinstein. Barrett is UH. She seems to be

0:08:56.320 --> 0:08:59.000
<v Speaker 1>a top contender. If I would have put them in

0:08:59.080 --> 0:09:02.760
<v Speaker 1>order and probably say that Brett Kavanaugh has probably one

0:09:03.040 --> 0:09:06.959
<v Speaker 1>if just I'm guessing based on what I'm hearing, and

0:09:07.520 --> 0:09:11.600
<v Speaker 1>probably Barrett right there next to him, and Thomas Hardeman

0:09:11.679 --> 0:09:15.160
<v Speaker 1>not far away, and and Raymond Catholics is there as well,

0:09:15.200 --> 0:09:18.600
<v Speaker 1>and um, Partaman is an interesting choice. I know that

0:09:18.760 --> 0:09:21.199
<v Speaker 1>Senator Rick santorm happens to be a big fan of him.

0:09:21.200 --> 0:09:24.040
<v Speaker 1>He's out of Pennsylvania. He's on the US Court of

0:09:24.040 --> 0:09:27.480
<v Speaker 1>Appeals for the Third Circuit. He's fifty two years old.

0:09:27.720 --> 0:09:31.080
<v Speaker 1>By the way, that's the same circuit that that the

0:09:31.120 --> 0:09:34.600
<v Speaker 1>President's sister works on and happens to be a fan

0:09:34.679 --> 0:09:37.920
<v Speaker 1>of Harteman. So that's interesting in terms of what the

0:09:37.920 --> 0:09:41.199
<v Speaker 1>President might be thinking about in terms of his decision. Uh.

0:09:41.240 --> 0:09:43.839
<v Speaker 1>He's spent now about three years as a federal judge

0:09:43.840 --> 0:09:47.480
<v Speaker 1>in Pittsburgh before being nominated for the Third Circuit, and

0:09:47.520 --> 0:09:49.280
<v Speaker 1>that was back in two thousand and six. He has

0:09:49.320 --> 0:09:53.560
<v Speaker 1>a lot of judicial experience. He graduated as well Notre

0:09:53.640 --> 0:09:57.400
<v Speaker 1>Dame and went to law school at Georgetown. There's a

0:09:57.440 --> 0:10:00.520
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and seven ruling Hardaman wrote that upheld the

0:10:00.559 --> 0:10:04.400
<v Speaker 1>constitutionality of strip searches of jail prisoners, regardless of how

0:10:04.760 --> 0:10:07.360
<v Speaker 1>minor and offense they might have been accused of, and

0:10:07.400 --> 0:10:10.160
<v Speaker 1>the Supreme Court upheld that and endorsed his decision. That

0:10:10.240 --> 0:10:13.680
<v Speaker 1>was a five forward decision. Uh. Then there's Brett Kavanaugh.

0:10:13.720 --> 0:10:16.160
<v Speaker 1>I would say, probably through the end of last week,

0:10:16.280 --> 0:10:19.840
<v Speaker 1>was the leading contender. If you're watching the news, UM,

0:10:19.840 --> 0:10:22.360
<v Speaker 1>not sure if that is a head fake or not,

0:10:22.440 --> 0:10:25.800
<v Speaker 1>I honestly don't know. And the US Court of Appeals

0:10:25.840 --> 0:10:28.920
<v Speaker 1>for the District of Columbia, he has probably the most

0:10:28.960 --> 0:10:32.120
<v Speaker 1>experience in terms of judicial writings, and I know that

0:10:32.160 --> 0:10:36.640
<v Speaker 1>there are some cenotas that are that are probably Oh

0:10:36.720 --> 0:10:39.560
<v Speaker 1>the amount of work we have to read twelve years

0:10:39.600 --> 0:10:43.440
<v Speaker 1>of opinions, how difficult, which could be done very expeditiously

0:10:43.480 --> 0:10:46.360
<v Speaker 1>and quickly if they really cared. Uh. He was appointed

0:10:46.400 --> 0:10:48.800
<v Speaker 1>to the powerful D. C. Circuit Court of Appeals in

0:10:48.840 --> 0:10:52.520
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and six by George W. Bush, for whom

0:10:52.559 --> 0:10:56.240
<v Speaker 1>he had previously served as assistant to the President and

0:10:56.280 --> 0:10:59.840
<v Speaker 1>staff secretary, graduate of Yale Law School, clerk for Justice Kennedy,

0:11:00.520 --> 0:11:05.160
<v Speaker 1>and part of the He was an associate council for

0:11:05.280 --> 0:11:08.680
<v Speaker 1>ken Starr that investigated Clinton, and that became a big

0:11:08.720 --> 0:11:12.160
<v Speaker 1>issue last week as it results for him Um in

0:11:12.240 --> 0:11:15.760
<v Speaker 1>his choice and his belief that Clinton could have obstructed

0:11:15.760 --> 0:11:19.480
<v Speaker 1>justice by sending out surrogates to defend him, knowing that

0:11:19.720 --> 0:11:23.000
<v Speaker 1>the surrogates were lying, And then he made a big

0:11:23.040 --> 0:11:26.920
<v Speaker 1>deal in two thousand and nine. About nine years later

0:11:27.760 --> 0:11:29.880
<v Speaker 1>um in a lower review. I believe it was a

0:11:29.920 --> 0:11:32.280
<v Speaker 1>speech in Michigan. If I'm my memory serves me right,

0:11:32.280 --> 0:11:35.320
<v Speaker 1>and read it over the weekend where he just basically said, no,

0:11:35.360 --> 0:11:37.400
<v Speaker 1>I was wrong in what I was saying back in

0:11:38.240 --> 0:11:39.800
<v Speaker 1>probably he was in his twenties at the time. He

0:11:39.840 --> 0:11:43.360
<v Speaker 1>had to be in his twenties or late twenties. UM.

0:11:43.520 --> 0:11:46.800
<v Speaker 1>So that is interesting, and at least it was at

0:11:46.800 --> 0:11:49.240
<v Speaker 1>one point thought of wow that he believed this, this

0:11:49.320 --> 0:11:51.160
<v Speaker 1>is a problem, and then it was discovered that he

0:11:51.200 --> 0:11:54.200
<v Speaker 1>had said, no, I don't believe that at all. Uh.

0:11:54.320 --> 0:11:57.240
<v Speaker 1>Raymond Cathledge a little bit about him. He's from Michigan

0:11:58.040 --> 0:12:01.160
<v Speaker 1>U s. Court of Appeals for the same circuit and

0:12:01.320 --> 0:12:04.440
<v Speaker 1>Keitholics who joined the six Circuit in two thousand and eight. Again,

0:12:04.480 --> 0:12:08.640
<v Speaker 1>pretty long history, long resume, uh, something rarely seen on

0:12:08.679 --> 0:12:11.040
<v Speaker 1>the president Supreme Court list. Now. One of the things

0:12:11.040 --> 0:12:13.720
<v Speaker 1>you've got to keep in mind, the President has given

0:12:13.840 --> 0:12:18.560
<v Speaker 1>us this list and has expanded this list since before

0:12:18.600 --> 0:12:22.200
<v Speaker 1>he was running. There's nobody on this list or any

0:12:22.240 --> 0:12:26.160
<v Speaker 1>of the names we're hearing that the President hasn't foretold

0:12:26.240 --> 0:12:28.880
<v Speaker 1>of before he ever got elected. In other words, he

0:12:29.080 --> 0:12:32.120
<v Speaker 1>just he's been very forthright about the type of justices

0:12:32.200 --> 0:12:34.720
<v Speaker 1>he's looking for and that these are the type of

0:12:34.760 --> 0:12:38.439
<v Speaker 1>people he would be examining anyway. Keitholic trode an opinion

0:12:38.480 --> 0:12:42.160
<v Speaker 1>rejecting the uh uh e e O C in the

0:12:42.280 --> 0:12:46.240
<v Speaker 1>case seeking to limit private employer's use of credit checks

0:12:46.240 --> 0:12:49.320
<v Speaker 1>for job applicants, and the e O C arguing that

0:12:49.400 --> 0:12:52.720
<v Speaker 1>the practice amount of a racial discrimination rate. Keitholics accused

0:12:52.760 --> 0:12:56.559
<v Speaker 1>the agency of hypocrisy, and Keitholish also issued a politically

0:12:56.640 --> 0:13:00.599
<v Speaker 1>charged ruling blasting the Obama administration for continuous existence to

0:13:00.720 --> 0:13:03.920
<v Speaker 1>efforts to discover what actions the I R S took

0:13:03.920 --> 0:13:07.600
<v Speaker 1>against tea party groups nonprofit groups. Uh. Then another name

0:13:07.600 --> 0:13:10.840
<v Speaker 1>that's come up pretty last minute is Joan Larson. Judge Larson,

0:13:11.400 --> 0:13:14.280
<v Speaker 1>confirmed by to the six Circuit Court of Appeals, previously

0:13:14.280 --> 0:13:17.560
<v Speaker 1>served on the Michigan Supreme Court from fifteen until earlier

0:13:17.600 --> 0:13:20.520
<v Speaker 1>this year, and before serving as a judge, was on

0:13:20.600 --> 0:13:23.160
<v Speaker 1>the University of Michigan Law School faculty for more than

0:13:23.200 --> 0:13:25.760
<v Speaker 1>a decade. Well, you know, one of the things you've

0:13:25.760 --> 0:13:27.760
<v Speaker 1>got to remember, why is this not? Why is it

0:13:27.800 --> 0:13:31.839
<v Speaker 1>that Democrats always get the judicial activists that they want,

0:13:32.280 --> 0:13:37.480
<v Speaker 1>and sometimes Republican presidents how comes sometimes they get it wrong. Well,

0:13:37.520 --> 0:13:42.079
<v Speaker 1>it's because Judge Ginsberg once said that you know, I'm

0:13:42.120 --> 0:13:44.840
<v Speaker 1>not going to comment on a particular case. And that's

0:13:44.880 --> 0:13:47.080
<v Speaker 1>sort of like the standard that they now use for

0:13:47.120 --> 0:13:51.280
<v Speaker 1>every judge or or antonin Scalia, saying that I have

0:13:51.360 --> 0:13:54.680
<v Speaker 1>to may maybe make decisions that the law demands that

0:13:54.760 --> 0:13:59.000
<v Speaker 1>I personally don't even like. So the big battle here

0:13:59.080 --> 0:14:02.880
<v Speaker 1>is over judicial philosophy, and that is and again, and

0:14:03.480 --> 0:14:09.280
<v Speaker 1>they're all intellectuals, they're all constitutional scholars, and so sometimes

0:14:09.280 --> 0:14:12.840
<v Speaker 1>far more complicated and nuance than anybody really knows. And

0:14:12.840 --> 0:14:15.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if there's anybody of certainty, but there's

0:14:15.320 --> 0:14:16.880
<v Speaker 1>been a lot of time for everybody to look to

0:14:16.920 --> 0:14:19.880
<v Speaker 1>the background of these individuals. I'm just gonna give you

0:14:19.960 --> 0:14:22.720
<v Speaker 1>the information. I don't know who the President's deciding, and

0:14:23.680 --> 0:14:26.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, I just it's gonna be interesting. But I

0:14:26.160 --> 0:14:28.840
<v Speaker 1>do believe the president has been very clear and believes

0:14:28.840 --> 0:14:35.080
<v Speaker 1>in originalism, constitutionalism, and he is against judicial activism. So

0:14:35.160 --> 0:14:37.800
<v Speaker 1>he was not going to be looking for somebody wants

0:14:37.840 --> 0:14:41.440
<v Speaker 1>to legislate from the bench or use foreign law as

0:14:41.440 --> 0:14:45.360
<v Speaker 1>a basis and a decision, like some of our liberal

0:14:45.400 --> 0:14:50.040
<v Speaker 1>justices have done in the past. You cannot get if

0:14:50.080 --> 0:14:55.080
<v Speaker 1>you like interesting times, you can't get better than this.

0:14:56.080 --> 0:15:00.680
<v Speaker 1>It's I was explaining to a liberal over my fourth

0:15:00.680 --> 0:15:03.200
<v Speaker 1>of July vacation. I'm trying to explain to them, Okay,

0:15:03.240 --> 0:15:05.880
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump believes, what are you going to do every day?

0:15:05.920 --> 0:15:08.680
<v Speaker 1>I said, it's never gonna get that interesting for you

0:15:09.000 --> 0:15:11.640
<v Speaker 1>because liberals wake up every day. And then just how

0:15:11.680 --> 0:15:14.640
<v Speaker 1>do I hate him? How do I hate Donald Trump? Today?

0:15:14.720 --> 0:15:19.040
<v Speaker 1>There's the latest tweet, the latest, latest, latest tweet, the

0:15:19.040 --> 0:15:22.240
<v Speaker 1>biggest outrage. And I keep telling people if they listen,

0:15:22.840 --> 0:15:25.640
<v Speaker 1>if you go on Twitter, all you have to do

0:15:25.720 --> 0:15:28.920
<v Speaker 1>is follow one liberal journalist, just one. And what they

0:15:28.960 --> 0:15:31.160
<v Speaker 1>do is they live in this little bubble world that's

0:15:31.160 --> 0:15:34.000
<v Speaker 1>sort of like the liberal Joe Meeka, you know, Humpty

0:15:34.040 --> 0:15:38.240
<v Speaker 1>Dumpty world and the Nicole Wallace world, where they try

0:15:38.280 --> 0:15:43.840
<v Speaker 1>to feign moral outrage, more moral outrage than the other one.

0:15:44.240 --> 0:15:47.840
<v Speaker 1>If they say no, Donald Trump's the liar liar, the

0:15:47.880 --> 0:15:51.520
<v Speaker 1>next one will say, no, you're wrong, He's a liar, liar, liar,

0:15:51.600 --> 0:15:55.080
<v Speaker 1>pants on fire. And then the next one's gonna say no, liar, liar,

0:15:55.120 --> 0:15:59.160
<v Speaker 1>liar pants on fire. And he's stupid, he's dumb, he's uh,

0:15:59.240 --> 0:16:04.600
<v Speaker 1>he's whatever. And it's like if you take Alca Sultzer.

0:16:04.640 --> 0:16:07.200
<v Speaker 1>I've used this analogy many times. Do you ever have

0:16:07.280 --> 0:16:10.880
<v Speaker 1>alka seltzer alka Seltzer plus cold medicine, which I use

0:16:11.000 --> 0:16:15.360
<v Speaker 1>when I get a cold. You just go PLoP, PLoP,

0:16:16.040 --> 0:16:22.320
<v Speaker 1>fizz fizz, and they bubble and fizz predictably and outcomes

0:16:22.360 --> 0:16:28.760
<v Speaker 1>the venom, the vitriol, the hatred. If you don't believe it,

0:16:29.600 --> 0:16:35.480
<v Speaker 1>just watch what happens the second that Donald Trump announces

0:16:35.520 --> 0:16:43.119
<v Speaker 1>either Barrett or or uh who else, Hardeman or Kavanaugh

0:16:43.520 --> 0:16:48.360
<v Speaker 1>or Catheridge or anybody, it doesn't matter. The borking will

0:16:48.440 --> 0:16:54.440
<v Speaker 1>begin instantaneously and it will be universal stupidity. Quick break

0:16:54.520 --> 0:16:57.880
<v Speaker 1>right back right as we roll along, Sean Hannity Show

0:16:58.800 --> 0:17:01.200
<v Speaker 1>one sewn. You want to be a part of the program. Alright,

0:17:01.720 --> 0:17:04.840
<v Speaker 1>five and a half hours now, the President five hours

0:17:04.840 --> 0:17:09.600
<v Speaker 1>twenty five minutes will be announcing his choice to replace

0:17:09.720 --> 0:17:12.679
<v Speaker 1>Anthony Kennedy on the U. S. Supreme Court. It comes

0:17:12.720 --> 0:17:16.280
<v Speaker 1>down to it looks like five people. Amy Barrett, Indiana,

0:17:16.760 --> 0:17:21.359
<v Speaker 1>Thomas Hardeman of Pennsylvania, Brett Havanaugh, who seemingly was the

0:17:21.359 --> 0:17:24.920
<v Speaker 1>front runner all last week of Maryland, not sure if

0:17:25.160 --> 0:17:28.520
<v Speaker 1>his stock has risen or fallen or remains the same,

0:17:29.280 --> 0:17:33.119
<v Speaker 1>Raymond Catheridge of Michigan, and Judge Larson, who I mentioned

0:17:33.119 --> 0:17:35.639
<v Speaker 1>just only in the last day or two, seems so

0:17:35.800 --> 0:17:37.640
<v Speaker 1>her name has come up a little bit. Not sure

0:17:37.680 --> 0:17:41.119
<v Speaker 1>whether that's going or if that means anything. Let me

0:17:41.280 --> 0:17:45.800
<v Speaker 1>just back up here a second, and I just want

0:17:45.800 --> 0:17:49.440
<v Speaker 1>to tell you what's going to happen. The President will

0:17:49.480 --> 0:17:55.760
<v Speaker 1>make the announcement tonight. This is about the and the

0:17:55.800 --> 0:18:00.159
<v Speaker 1>president tweeted this. President said, I have long heard the

0:18:00.200 --> 0:18:04.439
<v Speaker 1>most important decision that a US president can make is

0:18:04.560 --> 0:18:10.240
<v Speaker 1>the selection of a Supreme Court justice. He's right. We'll

0:18:10.280 --> 0:18:13.840
<v Speaker 1>be announced tonight at nine pm. I kind of like it.

0:18:13.840 --> 0:18:16.480
<v Speaker 1>It's right during the start of Hannity. Perfect, and we

0:18:16.480 --> 0:18:20.040
<v Speaker 1>get to talk about it first. Um. And it is

0:18:20.080 --> 0:18:24.479
<v Speaker 1>the most important decision. This is a lifelong appointment. Now,

0:18:24.560 --> 0:18:28.520
<v Speaker 1>remember this was a massive issue during the campaign. You know,

0:18:28.560 --> 0:18:31.600
<v Speaker 1>it's a little frustrating to me is that all of

0:18:31.640 --> 0:18:35.560
<v Speaker 1>the never Trumpers, all the people that have really just

0:18:36.320 --> 0:18:40.840
<v Speaker 1>have done everything they could do short of you know,

0:18:40.920 --> 0:18:43.639
<v Speaker 1>going out there with Hillary signs at a Trump rally,

0:18:43.720 --> 0:18:47.320
<v Speaker 1>most of them, and how all of them were told,

0:18:47.560 --> 0:18:50.120
<v Speaker 1>wait a minute, this is about the Supreme Court. Look

0:18:50.119 --> 0:18:53.919
<v Speaker 1>at who the president. Then candidate Trump was saying that

0:18:54.000 --> 0:18:56.280
<v Speaker 1>he would like to put on the Supreme Court, people

0:18:56.400 --> 0:19:02.639
<v Speaker 1>like Anton and Scalia who recently passed away, like Clarence Thomas,

0:19:02.680 --> 0:19:05.720
<v Speaker 1>like Sam Alito, who has been a very strong conservative,

0:19:06.600 --> 0:19:11.560
<v Speaker 1>originalist constitutional voice on the Supreme Court. And that that

0:19:11.560 --> 0:19:14.120
<v Speaker 1>that is the type of justice that the president will

0:19:14.160 --> 0:19:16.600
<v Speaker 1>be looking for, and that list is who he would

0:19:16.680 --> 0:19:21.000
<v Speaker 1>choose from, which, by the way, gives the the opposition

0:19:21.040 --> 0:19:24.520
<v Speaker 1>plenty of time to do their research. There's not gonna

0:19:24.600 --> 0:19:29.080
<v Speaker 1>be a single person that the Left is going to say,

0:19:29.160 --> 0:19:33.760
<v Speaker 1>great choice, Mr. President, because they lost the election. They

0:19:33.840 --> 0:19:39.200
<v Speaker 1>only want people like Judge Sodamajor or Ruth Bader Ginsburg,

0:19:39.280 --> 0:19:43.000
<v Speaker 1>etcetera on the court. That's the type of justice they're

0:19:43.000 --> 0:19:45.680
<v Speaker 1>looking for. People that are and I guess it comes

0:19:45.720 --> 0:19:49.359
<v Speaker 1>down to a battle between originalism and a judicial activists.

0:19:49.359 --> 0:19:53.280
<v Speaker 1>They are looking for judicial activists. What is a judicial activist?

0:19:53.400 --> 0:19:58.760
<v Speaker 1>That is somebody that believes that they can legislate from

0:19:58.800 --> 0:20:01.879
<v Speaker 1>the bench and other words, they don't really strongly believe

0:20:01.880 --> 0:20:05.080
<v Speaker 1>in the Constitution. They don't seem to believe in co

0:20:05.320 --> 0:20:09.199
<v Speaker 1>equal branches of government, they don't seem to believe in

0:20:09.320 --> 0:20:14.760
<v Speaker 1>separation of powers. They're perfectly comfortable with judges on the

0:20:14.800 --> 0:20:18.959
<v Speaker 1>bench writing laws which is their job. And the reason

0:20:19.119 --> 0:20:25.199
<v Speaker 1>they want to punt these, especially these controversial decisions to

0:20:25.280 --> 0:20:30.520
<v Speaker 1>the court is there's no political retribution for a judge.

0:20:30.560 --> 0:20:34.720
<v Speaker 1>This is a lifetime appointment. So there so they would

0:20:34.840 --> 0:20:38.240
<v Speaker 1>the things that they cannot get done at the ballot box,

0:20:38.680 --> 0:20:42.560
<v Speaker 1>the things that they could never pass legislatively, that you

0:20:42.800 --> 0:20:46.199
<v Speaker 1>the people would stop, or that there would be a

0:20:46.280 --> 0:20:50.240
<v Speaker 1>huge political price if they ever did try to pass

0:20:50.320 --> 0:20:53.960
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the legislation. They would prefer to use

0:20:54.240 --> 0:21:00.679
<v Speaker 1>a left wing judicial activists, even if that justice site

0:21:01.280 --> 0:21:05.760
<v Speaker 1>foreign law as a basis for a decision which has

0:21:05.880 --> 0:21:10.040
<v Speaker 1>actually happened, which kind of blows my mind, because we

0:21:10.080 --> 0:21:14.560
<v Speaker 1>are a constitutional republic and that judges, and as the

0:21:14.560 --> 0:21:18.960
<v Speaker 1>Great antonin Scalia once said, a good judge will do

0:21:20.200 --> 0:21:24.679
<v Speaker 1>and must consider what the law demands, and that is

0:21:25.040 --> 0:21:29.680
<v Speaker 1>they the judicial philosophy of the original intent. In other words,

0:21:29.680 --> 0:21:33.199
<v Speaker 1>it is deep respect for the fact that we have

0:21:33.240 --> 0:21:37.159
<v Speaker 1>an executive branch, a judicial branch, but also a legislative branch.

0:21:37.840 --> 0:21:41.280
<v Speaker 1>And why Congress would want to see their authority or

0:21:41.320 --> 0:21:45.280
<v Speaker 1>allow a judiciary to assert their authority is because they

0:21:45.320 --> 0:21:47.600
<v Speaker 1>know that that's what they really want America to be,

0:21:48.320 --> 0:21:50.840
<v Speaker 1>and America to turn into but they wouldn't dare ever

0:21:50.920 --> 0:21:54.560
<v Speaker 1>say it because they know politically that they would never survive.

0:21:55.640 --> 0:21:58.919
<v Speaker 1>So this is a big, big battle. It now seems.

0:21:58.920 --> 0:22:01.760
<v Speaker 1>With Neil Gorsuch emly placed in the Supreme Court, it

0:22:01.800 --> 0:22:06.119
<v Speaker 1>looks like that this could be a This could be

0:22:06.160 --> 0:22:12.160
<v Speaker 1>a turning point because Justice Kennedy was a very unpredictable vote.

0:22:12.200 --> 0:22:14.040
<v Speaker 1>We know that he was the swing vote on the

0:22:14.080 --> 0:22:17.920
<v Speaker 1>Supreme Court. That's why this choice matters so much. One

0:22:17.960 --> 0:22:20.679
<v Speaker 1>of the things that I've been watching, I really have

0:22:20.800 --> 0:22:23.680
<v Speaker 1>not I've not gone to Twitter, i have not been

0:22:23.680 --> 0:22:26.359
<v Speaker 1>commenting on it, but I've been reading a lot. And

0:22:26.400 --> 0:22:29.320
<v Speaker 1>the reason is there's so much lobbying going on behind

0:22:29.320 --> 0:22:33.159
<v Speaker 1>the scenes. It actually is somewhat nauseating. It seems that

0:22:33.200 --> 0:22:36.760
<v Speaker 1>if someone's friends with has known or is an acquaintance

0:22:36.920 --> 0:22:42.280
<v Speaker 1>of a particular candidate, that hey, they would they want

0:22:42.280 --> 0:22:46.040
<v Speaker 1>to tell everyone, no, this is the choice. And maybe

0:22:46.040 --> 0:22:48.480
<v Speaker 1>they're making valid arguments. Maybe they really believe that the

0:22:48.520 --> 0:22:50.640
<v Speaker 1>people that they know or have known for a long

0:22:50.720 --> 0:22:56.240
<v Speaker 1>time would would live up to the The philosophy again,

0:22:56.320 --> 0:22:59.320
<v Speaker 1>this is judicial philosophy that we're really looking at here

0:23:00.320 --> 0:23:03.640
<v Speaker 1>that they believe is important for the Court. I shouldn't

0:23:03.680 --> 0:23:07.280
<v Speaker 1>question their motives in any way. I know that Mike Lee,

0:23:07.359 --> 0:23:09.040
<v Speaker 1>I think he got a call from the President, he

0:23:09.160 --> 0:23:11.640
<v Speaker 1>was interviewed. I think one of the first things that

0:23:11.680 --> 0:23:13.440
<v Speaker 1>the left would do. And I think Mike Lee would

0:23:13.480 --> 0:23:18.439
<v Speaker 1>be an incredible originalist and constitutionalist, and I believe that

0:23:18.880 --> 0:23:20.720
<v Speaker 1>he would do a great job on the Supreme Court.

0:23:20.720 --> 0:23:23.639
<v Speaker 1>I put him on my list in a heartbeat. I

0:23:23.680 --> 0:23:26.359
<v Speaker 1>find the most interesting person on the list that seems

0:23:26.400 --> 0:23:29.800
<v Speaker 1>to be hated the most is Amy Barrett of Indiana

0:23:29.960 --> 0:23:32.679
<v Speaker 1>because she happens to be Catholic, and she happens to

0:23:32.680 --> 0:23:35.560
<v Speaker 1>be very religious, and she has happens to have written

0:23:35.600 --> 0:23:39.280
<v Speaker 1>about originalism. And the Left, for whatever reason, is kind

0:23:39.280 --> 0:23:43.119
<v Speaker 1>of glomed onto this that. I mean, it's almost like

0:23:43.160 --> 0:23:47.240
<v Speaker 1>they feel this is a a battle of religion, you know.

0:23:47.760 --> 0:23:49.879
<v Speaker 1>You know, I would argue that the left war against

0:23:49.920 --> 0:23:53.480
<v Speaker 1>women continues. Remember before I went on vacation, there were

0:23:53.480 --> 0:23:57.240
<v Speaker 1>the attacks on Sarah Sanders, the attacks um Pam Bondi,

0:23:57.320 --> 0:24:01.359
<v Speaker 1>the attacks on Secretary Nielsen, the attacks on Avanka, the

0:24:01.400 --> 0:24:05.320
<v Speaker 1>attacks on Milania, the attacks on Baron Trump, the attacks

0:24:05.359 --> 0:24:08.440
<v Speaker 1>on Chloe Trump, the four year old daughter of Donald

0:24:08.440 --> 0:24:11.560
<v Speaker 1>Trump Jr. The granddaughter of the president. I mean, we've

0:24:11.560 --> 0:24:16.040
<v Speaker 1>watched all of this unfold. The reason you might ask, well,

0:24:16.080 --> 0:24:20.479
<v Speaker 1>why is this always a mystery? Why don't we know? Well,

0:24:20.520 --> 0:24:22.840
<v Speaker 1>there's a couple of good answers. I'm not sure you'll

0:24:22.880 --> 0:24:28.280
<v Speaker 1>like them. But as Justice Ginsburg answered when she was

0:24:28.359 --> 0:24:31.640
<v Speaker 1>in the process, she was going through the confirmation process,

0:24:31.680 --> 0:24:36.440
<v Speaker 1>she won't comment on any particular case that she might

0:24:36.560 --> 0:24:40.679
<v Speaker 1>have to rule on in the future, which, by the way,

0:24:40.720 --> 0:24:45.960
<v Speaker 1>every nominee will probably say the exact same things. I know.

0:24:46.080 --> 0:24:48.880
<v Speaker 1>The Left wants to whip everybody's mind into a frenzy

0:24:48.960 --> 0:24:53.520
<v Speaker 1>that somehow Roe vi. Wade is going to be overturned.

0:24:54.200 --> 0:24:56.919
<v Speaker 1>The intellectual side of a lot of judges is that

0:24:57.040 --> 0:25:01.280
<v Speaker 1>Roe v. Wade is horrible law, and that it ought

0:25:01.359 --> 0:25:04.520
<v Speaker 1>to be the states that make that decision. And I'll

0:25:04.520 --> 0:25:08.920
<v Speaker 1>be perfectly blunt and brutally honest here, there is no

0:25:09.040 --> 0:25:14.240
<v Speaker 1>way in the next number of decades, perhaps even a

0:25:14.320 --> 0:25:17.880
<v Speaker 1>hundred years, that a state like New York or California,

0:25:17.960 --> 0:25:22.000
<v Speaker 1>or New Jersey or Illinois, or probably at least forty

0:25:22.119 --> 0:25:27.840
<v Speaker 1>six states whatever outlaw abortion. I don't think that's gonna have.

0:25:27.960 --> 0:25:29.840
<v Speaker 1>It might be a couple of states, but that would

0:25:29.880 --> 0:25:34.080
<v Speaker 1>be a couple. Um, so I think it is. It

0:25:34.200 --> 0:25:39.080
<v Speaker 1>is a fear tactic. I think as of nine oh one. Well, well,

0:25:39.119 --> 0:25:41.359
<v Speaker 1>let's say by nine oh three or nine oh four,

0:25:41.440 --> 0:25:43.399
<v Speaker 1>when the president gets to the point where he mentions

0:25:43.440 --> 0:25:45.320
<v Speaker 1>the name of his choice, well, when the person actually

0:25:45.359 --> 0:25:48.359
<v Speaker 1>walks out with the president tonight, they are going to

0:25:48.400 --> 0:25:55.399
<v Speaker 1>begin the process of smearing, besmirching, and attempting to destroy

0:25:55.520 --> 0:25:59.600
<v Speaker 1>the character, the name, and the background of whoever the

0:25:59.600 --> 0:26:03.520
<v Speaker 1>president and picks. It doesn't matter, for example, that this

0:26:03.600 --> 0:26:09.120
<v Speaker 1>president is literally in in five plus days, has created

0:26:09.400 --> 0:26:14.280
<v Speaker 1>record low unemployment in fourteen states in this country, record

0:26:14.359 --> 0:26:18.160
<v Speaker 1>low unemployment for women in this country, record low unemployment

0:26:19.000 --> 0:26:23.159
<v Speaker 1>for African Americans and Hispanic Americans in this country. We

0:26:23.280 --> 0:26:27.320
<v Speaker 1>have a record number of people in terms of labor

0:26:27.480 --> 0:26:32.200
<v Speaker 1>force participation, in other words, the numbers that we looked

0:26:32.240 --> 0:26:36.359
<v Speaker 1>at closely in the Obama years, nobody seems, you know,

0:26:36.400 --> 0:26:41.919
<v Speaker 1>Reagan once infamously said, you know, stay the course, And

0:26:41.960 --> 0:26:46.000
<v Speaker 1>I will argue that probably starting next week, the importance

0:26:46.040 --> 0:26:51.040
<v Speaker 1>of eighteen is going to be in the forefront of

0:26:51.040 --> 0:26:55.399
<v Speaker 1>everybody's mind. Another way, Mitch McConnell now is speaking ahead

0:26:55.400 --> 0:26:59.680
<v Speaker 1>of the president's Supreme Court announcement. It's very interesting from

0:26:59.720 --> 0:27:01.879
<v Speaker 1>all that I've heard, Mr McConnell has been lobbying for

0:27:01.920 --> 0:27:05.200
<v Speaker 1>the easiest confirmation process. That shouldn't be what it is.

0:27:06.320 --> 0:27:09.560
<v Speaker 1>There's a reality that I have to talk about, and

0:27:09.560 --> 0:27:11.720
<v Speaker 1>the reality is is that there is not a big

0:27:11.720 --> 0:27:15.760
<v Speaker 1>margin in the Senate. In other words, the president has

0:27:15.800 --> 0:27:22.080
<v Speaker 1>a balancing act here. Susan Collins and Lisa Murkowski, if

0:27:22.080 --> 0:27:26.000
<v Speaker 1>there was somebody they believe strongly would quote overturned Row

0:27:26.080 --> 0:27:29.320
<v Speaker 1>and as I explained, it would go back to the States,

0:27:30.760 --> 0:27:34.840
<v Speaker 1>they would oppose that that nominee. Then again, you've got

0:27:35.359 --> 0:27:41.040
<v Speaker 1>strict constructionists and originalists I believe in the judicial philosophy

0:27:41.080 --> 0:27:45.280
<v Speaker 1>that I believe in, like Scalia, like Thomas, people like

0:27:45.359 --> 0:27:48.639
<v Speaker 1>Ted Cruz and Rampoll. You they too could be peeled

0:27:48.640 --> 0:27:52.720
<v Speaker 1>off if the president doesn't make the right choice. John

0:27:52.800 --> 0:27:56.320
<v Speaker 1>McCain has been very ill, so I'm not sure he

0:27:56.359 --> 0:27:58.280
<v Speaker 1>will factor in here, But nor has he been a

0:27:58.280 --> 0:28:02.840
<v Speaker 1>particularly reliable vote for the president. So the bottom line

0:28:02.880 --> 0:28:05.840
<v Speaker 1>is there's no wiggle room here. And then on the

0:28:05.920 --> 0:28:09.080
<v Speaker 1>other hand, politically, you've got all these red state Democrats,

0:28:09.119 --> 0:28:15.960
<v Speaker 1>Claire mccaskell, Bill Nelson, Heidi HeiG Camp and others. Well,

0:28:16.000 --> 0:28:19.840
<v Speaker 1>these are Democratic senators that live in very red states

0:28:19.880 --> 0:28:23.400
<v Speaker 1>that like Donald Trump, they're gonna be feeling the pressure

0:28:23.400 --> 0:28:29.480
<v Speaker 1>to support the president's nomineque. There's also the intellectualism that

0:28:29.560 --> 0:28:33.639
<v Speaker 1>will be means that that people that are jurist or

0:28:33.720 --> 0:28:39.400
<v Speaker 1>people that that literally immersed themselves in constitutional thought and

0:28:39.520 --> 0:28:44.960
<v Speaker 1>constitutional precedent and constitutional writings. In the cases that you

0:28:45.040 --> 0:28:47.640
<v Speaker 1>bring up, you can only glean so much because there's

0:28:47.680 --> 0:28:51.880
<v Speaker 1>so much nuance and specifics in the particular cases that

0:28:51.920 --> 0:28:54.960
<v Speaker 1>they might have ruled on, and that becomes an issue.

0:28:55.000 --> 0:28:57.640
<v Speaker 1>For example, in the case I can tell you right

0:28:57.680 --> 0:29:01.320
<v Speaker 1>now of of one US has been what twelve years

0:29:01.320 --> 0:29:03.880
<v Speaker 1>on the court. I mean, that's a long time. That's

0:29:03.880 --> 0:29:06.640
<v Speaker 1>a lot of justice capital for example. That's a long time,

0:29:07.360 --> 0:29:10.640
<v Speaker 1>a lot of decisions to pour over on. And he

0:29:10.720 --> 0:29:13.680
<v Speaker 1>was I think the front runner leading up to this week.

0:29:13.840 --> 0:29:16.440
<v Speaker 1>And although things seems who knows, I mean, I don't

0:29:16.440 --> 0:29:20.040
<v Speaker 1>even want to speculate. Everybody else is speculating. But here's

0:29:20.040 --> 0:29:23.720
<v Speaker 1>what they want to do. This is what Senator Kennedy

0:29:23.840 --> 0:29:28.560
<v Speaker 1>did to Robert Bork, who was probably one of the smartest,

0:29:29.360 --> 0:29:37.360
<v Speaker 1>most brilliant judicial minds again that means intellectual, nuanced constitutionalist,

0:29:37.440 --> 0:29:41.760
<v Speaker 1>and that's where and he never believed in legislating from

0:29:41.760 --> 0:29:43.480
<v Speaker 1>the bench. This is what happened to him when he

0:29:43.520 --> 0:29:47.120
<v Speaker 1>was announced. Robert Bork's America is a land of which

0:29:47.120 --> 0:29:51.520
<v Speaker 1>women would be forced into back alley abortions, Blacks would

0:29:51.520 --> 0:29:55.520
<v Speaker 1>sit at segregated lunch countess road police could break down

0:29:55.560 --> 0:29:59.480
<v Speaker 1>citizens stores and midnight raids, and school children could not

0:29:59.560 --> 0:30:03.200
<v Speaker 1>be about evolution right as an artist would be censured

0:30:03.520 --> 0:30:07.920
<v Speaker 1>at the whim of government. Okay, really all of that

0:30:08.040 --> 0:30:11.360
<v Speaker 1>was a lie, but it but it ended up and

0:30:11.520 --> 0:30:17.040
<v Speaker 1>resulted in Judge boards Bork's name being withdrawn. And then

0:30:17.080 --> 0:30:20.040
<v Speaker 1>of course we watched Clarence Thomas, who has turned out

0:30:20.040 --> 0:30:23.840
<v Speaker 1>to be, in my humble opinion, one of the greatest

0:30:23.920 --> 0:30:29.000
<v Speaker 1>justices in history. And if you've never read My Grandfather's Son,

0:30:29.040 --> 0:30:32.200
<v Speaker 1>which is Judge Thomas's book, I urge you to read it.

0:30:32.920 --> 0:30:35.760
<v Speaker 1>It is such a good book. And it talks about

0:30:35.760 --> 0:30:39.880
<v Speaker 1>his grandfather and how his grandfather raised him in poverty

0:30:39.920 --> 0:30:45.600
<v Speaker 1>under difficult, difficult, horrible circumstances. At times, remember him having

0:30:45.640 --> 0:30:49.360
<v Speaker 1>to defend himself against the attacks of the left. This

0:30:49.520 --> 0:30:52.800
<v Speaker 1>is a circus, it's a national disgrace. It is a

0:30:52.880 --> 0:30:57.440
<v Speaker 1>high tech lenching for uppity blacks who in any way

0:30:57.560 --> 0:31:01.640
<v Speaker 1>deigned to think for themselves. It is a message that

0:31:01.800 --> 0:31:05.160
<v Speaker 1>unless you cow town to an old order, you will

0:31:05.200 --> 0:31:15.000
<v Speaker 1>be lynched, destroyed, caricatured by a committee of the U. S. U. S. Senate,

0:31:15.600 --> 0:31:20.080
<v Speaker 1>rather than hung from a treat I mean that became

0:31:20.120 --> 0:31:24.120
<v Speaker 1>a national disgrace. But I can tell you the second

0:31:24.160 --> 0:31:27.520
<v Speaker 1>the President announces his decision, it doesn't matter who it is.

0:31:28.800 --> 0:31:33.720
<v Speaker 1>It's not Hillary's choice, and that will send them. Really,

0:31:34.840 --> 0:31:42.000
<v Speaker 1>that's why elections matter. That's why matters, that's why will matter.

0:31:42.960 --> 0:31:46.720
<v Speaker 1>The left in this country is more unhinged than they

0:31:46.760 --> 0:31:50.400
<v Speaker 1>have ever been led by, by the way, a lot

0:31:50.440 --> 0:31:53.440
<v Speaker 1>of so called never Trumpers that once said they were

0:31:53.480 --> 0:31:57.480
<v Speaker 1>conservative and just lie. Al Right, glad you're with us.

0:31:57.600 --> 0:31:59.960
<v Speaker 1>Hour to Sean Hannity Show. Right down our toll for

0:32:00.120 --> 0:32:04.080
<v Speaker 1>telephone number one, Sean if you want to be a

0:32:04.080 --> 0:32:06.280
<v Speaker 1>part of the program. In less than five hours, the

0:32:06.320 --> 0:32:09.800
<v Speaker 1>President of the United States, Donald Trump, will announce his

0:32:09.880 --> 0:32:14.480
<v Speaker 1>Supreme Court choice to replace Justice Kennedy. We have about

0:32:14.480 --> 0:32:17.480
<v Speaker 1>well four real people I think that are on the list. Uh.

0:32:17.560 --> 0:32:22.520
<v Speaker 1>That's Amy Barrett of Indiana, Thomas Hardeman of Pennsylvania, Brett Kavanaugh,

0:32:22.560 --> 0:32:26.040
<v Speaker 1>who seemed last week to be the front runner of Maryland,

0:32:26.280 --> 0:32:29.440
<v Speaker 1>Raymond Catholicge of Michigan, And we just heard a little

0:32:29.480 --> 0:32:32.480
<v Speaker 1>bit of rumblings about Judge Joan Larson. I'm not sure

0:32:32.520 --> 0:32:34.560
<v Speaker 1>if this is a head fake from the President or not.

0:32:35.200 --> 0:32:38.280
<v Speaker 1>He's been known alike to keep his choices and his

0:32:38.400 --> 0:32:42.640
<v Speaker 1>decisions close to the vest and joining us now for

0:32:42.720 --> 0:32:45.360
<v Speaker 1>some insight into all of this. And by the way,

0:32:45.480 --> 0:32:48.640
<v Speaker 1>the author of the New York Times bestseller his second

0:32:48.640 --> 0:32:51.520
<v Speaker 1>biggest selling book, Trump's America, The Truth about our Nation's

0:32:51.520 --> 0:32:55.680
<v Speaker 1>Great Comeback. Uh, congratulations. It seems like everybody wants your

0:32:55.760 --> 0:32:59.200
<v Speaker 1>insight into the mind of Donald Trump, but no in

0:32:59.200 --> 0:33:02.440
<v Speaker 1>this way because you get to filter it through the

0:33:02.480 --> 0:33:06.280
<v Speaker 1>prism of your of you being a professor at heart.

0:33:06.320 --> 0:33:08.280
<v Speaker 1>I've said that many times in my life, and that

0:33:08.360 --> 0:33:11.360
<v Speaker 1>your knowledge of history is second to none. And you're

0:33:11.400 --> 0:33:16.240
<v Speaker 1>looking at his presidency is transformative, and I totally agree

0:33:16.240 --> 0:33:20.080
<v Speaker 1>with you. And Tonight's choice will be important for what

0:33:20.280 --> 0:33:24.200
<v Speaker 1>ultimately becomes Donald Trump's legacy. Yeah, and I think it's

0:33:24.240 --> 0:33:28.000
<v Speaker 1>important to put this in context for a second. Donald

0:33:28.000 --> 0:33:30.520
<v Speaker 1>Trump tonight is going to keep his work. He was

0:33:30.720 --> 0:33:33.520
<v Speaker 1>this important. People remember this after all the griping in

0:33:33.520 --> 0:33:37.360
<v Speaker 1>the liberal media that the fact is Trump campaigned on

0:33:37.840 --> 0:33:42.400
<v Speaker 1>appointing conservative judges. He has consistently now for almost two years,

0:33:42.680 --> 0:33:46.280
<v Speaker 1>appointed conservative judges. He had a list that was developed

0:33:46.800 --> 0:33:49.200
<v Speaker 1>with the help of the Heritage Foundation, in the Federalist

0:33:49.240 --> 0:33:54.360
<v Speaker 1>Society and Leonard Leo of really solid jurists who would

0:33:54.360 --> 0:33:58.760
<v Speaker 1>make great Supreme Court nominees. Uh. He picked uh Neo

0:33:58.800 --> 0:34:04.760
<v Speaker 1>Gorcas off that secular list. I'm confidence and that whoever

0:34:04.800 --> 0:34:07.040
<v Speaker 1>he picks, this is important thing. Remember to be honest.

0:34:07.280 --> 0:34:09.440
<v Speaker 1>The great thing is it the right person? Is it

0:34:09.600 --> 0:34:12.560
<v Speaker 1>the perfect person? Are there are three things that somebody

0:34:12.600 --> 0:34:15.640
<v Speaker 1>doesn't like about him? But the key is this is

0:34:15.640 --> 0:34:18.360
<v Speaker 1>going to be a solid conservative. It's going to be

0:34:18.440 --> 0:34:22.839
<v Speaker 1>one more step towards our returning the courts to interpreting

0:34:22.920 --> 0:34:26.239
<v Speaker 1>the Constitution instead of rewriting it. Uh. And that's an

0:34:26.239 --> 0:34:28.800
<v Speaker 1>amazing achievement. And this is one of the great achievements

0:34:28.840 --> 0:34:31.880
<v Speaker 1>of the the Trump presidency. And tonight, Uh, you know, I

0:34:31.960 --> 0:34:35.759
<v Speaker 1>agree with you. He personally loves the idea that he

0:34:36.040 --> 0:34:38.680
<v Speaker 1>wants to tease everybody so that we all tune in

0:34:38.719 --> 0:34:41.240
<v Speaker 1>at nine o'clock to see what he did. And candidly,

0:34:41.440 --> 0:34:43.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to tune in a class. I think the

0:34:43.480 --> 0:34:46.640
<v Speaker 1>president it is not it is absolutely within him, and

0:34:46.680 --> 0:34:49.040
<v Speaker 1>I think he's done it many times. And you can

0:34:49.080 --> 0:34:51.560
<v Speaker 1>back me up on this. Oh, he has no problem

0:34:51.600 --> 0:34:56.239
<v Speaker 1>trolling people, knowing and building anticipation for what will be

0:34:56.400 --> 0:34:59.920
<v Speaker 1>a historic decision. But there's also the predictable attacks at

0:35:00.000 --> 0:35:04.680
<v Speaker 1>doesn't matter, Mr Speaker, who he chooses. The borking begins

0:35:04.760 --> 0:35:08.280
<v Speaker 1>the second after America. The left will go after anybody

0:35:08.320 --> 0:35:11.400
<v Speaker 1>he puts up there. Look like they actually one interview

0:35:11.400 --> 0:35:15.439
<v Speaker 1>of students who hated Trump's nominee even though he hadn't

0:35:15.440 --> 0:35:18.000
<v Speaker 1>been named yet. Oh, by the way, they hate the nominee.

0:35:18.000 --> 0:35:20.040
<v Speaker 1>I have the tape. I'd play it, but it's three minutes.

0:35:20.080 --> 0:35:23.200
<v Speaker 1>That's hilarious. I don't want to take the time away

0:35:23.239 --> 0:35:25.920
<v Speaker 1>from you. But you're right, they all hated it. But

0:35:26.040 --> 0:35:29.480
<v Speaker 1>it's not been picked yet, right, and and I think

0:35:29.520 --> 0:35:31.920
<v Speaker 1>we just have to recognize. But on the left, and

0:35:31.920 --> 0:35:34.960
<v Speaker 1>they're right. I mean, if you want a radical judge

0:35:35.280 --> 0:35:40.799
<v Speaker 1>who rewrites the Constitution to replace America with a radical society,

0:35:41.360 --> 0:35:43.720
<v Speaker 1>you aren't gonna like who. I don't care who he picks.

0:35:44.040 --> 0:35:46.920
<v Speaker 1>You're not gonna like him, because he's gonna pick somebody

0:35:46.920 --> 0:35:50.400
<v Speaker 1>who actually thinks that the Constitution matters and that it

0:35:50.440 --> 0:35:52.960
<v Speaker 1>was a contract with the American people and that we

0:35:53.000 --> 0:35:56.560
<v Speaker 1>have an obligation to stick to the contract. Yeah. Well,

0:35:56.600 --> 0:35:58.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean that's the amazing part that I don't think

0:35:58.600 --> 0:36:01.920
<v Speaker 1>many people will focus on. Um, let me ask you specifically,

0:36:02.000 --> 0:36:04.560
<v Speaker 1>do you know these candidates or have you just been

0:36:04.600 --> 0:36:07.319
<v Speaker 1>like the rest of us, reading about Well, okay, so

0:36:07.320 --> 0:36:09.840
<v Speaker 1>I've been reading a lot about the decision, and I

0:36:10.360 --> 0:36:13.160
<v Speaker 1>find all of them very very interesting in different ways.

0:36:13.360 --> 0:36:16.600
<v Speaker 1>You know, Raymond Catholics, I mean he he was involved

0:36:17.160 --> 0:36:21.360
<v Speaker 1>in a lot of noteworthy cases, one on free speech

0:36:21.400 --> 0:36:25.359
<v Speaker 1>where he joined a majority holding the First Protection First

0:36:25.400 --> 0:36:28.440
<v Speaker 1>Amendment protected the right of Christians uh to preach at

0:36:28.440 --> 0:36:31.799
<v Speaker 1>a particular Arab American festival. I mean, these are all

0:36:31.960 --> 0:36:36.040
<v Speaker 1>nuanced cases. There's all there's all different variations, which makes

0:36:36.080 --> 0:36:39.439
<v Speaker 1>it very hard to get a firm grasp on any

0:36:39.480 --> 0:36:41.719
<v Speaker 1>one person. And I think that's why maybe there's been

0:36:41.719 --> 0:36:45.520
<v Speaker 1>disappointments like David Suitor, for example, in the past. And

0:36:45.560 --> 0:36:47.920
<v Speaker 1>all of these are great intellectuals that have spent their

0:36:48.080 --> 0:36:52.480
<v Speaker 1>entire lives for the most part, adult lives studying the Constitution. Yeah,

0:36:52.480 --> 0:36:53.719
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think in that sense, you have to

0:36:53.760 --> 0:36:56.719
<v Speaker 1>really look at Suitor as an example of the opposite

0:36:56.719 --> 0:37:02.360
<v Speaker 1>of what Trump is doing. Uh. Trump has consciously turned

0:37:02.400 --> 0:37:07.240
<v Speaker 1>to great conservative scholars and asked their advice in building

0:37:07.280 --> 0:37:11.160
<v Speaker 1>the list. He's then interviewed a wide range of people.

0:37:11.160 --> 0:37:13.799
<v Speaker 1>Now this remember this is his second round of doing this,

0:37:14.520 --> 0:37:16.120
<v Speaker 1>and he said, given a lot of thought. I know

0:37:16.239 --> 0:37:18.560
<v Speaker 1>because I was with him back in the transition of

0:37:18.640 --> 0:37:22.200
<v Speaker 1>Trump Tower and he was talking about the nature of

0:37:22.239 --> 0:37:26.040
<v Speaker 1>shaping the Supreme Court, the burden particularly if he gets

0:37:26.080 --> 0:37:30.160
<v Speaker 1>more than two choices of doing the right thing with

0:37:30.200 --> 0:37:34.160
<v Speaker 1>the right kind of scholars, because once you appoint them,

0:37:34.360 --> 0:37:36.840
<v Speaker 1>they're beyond your control. So you do you'd better have

0:37:36.960 --> 0:37:39.920
<v Speaker 1>some deep gut instinct of who they are. And I

0:37:39.960 --> 0:37:43.200
<v Speaker 1>think that Suitor was the classic example of being too

0:37:43.200 --> 0:37:46.239
<v Speaker 1>clever and pointing somebody who had no track record, and

0:37:46.239 --> 0:37:49.040
<v Speaker 1>then it turned out he really did have no track record.

0:37:49.840 --> 0:37:51.640
<v Speaker 1>There was no base on who he was, and so

0:37:51.680 --> 0:37:54.960
<v Speaker 1>he drifted into the liberal majority because you know, that's

0:37:54.960 --> 0:37:59.080
<v Speaker 1>what the Georgetown cocktail party said wanted. But I think

0:37:59.120 --> 0:38:00.799
<v Speaker 1>I think you know true Rump's not going to pick

0:38:00.840 --> 0:38:04.200
<v Speaker 1>a person of that kind, and I think any conservatives

0:38:04.200 --> 0:38:05.680
<v Speaker 1>my other point, I guess, if I can just say

0:38:05.680 --> 0:38:08.640
<v Speaker 1>it for a second, every conservative country to night at

0:38:08.719 --> 0:38:12.360
<v Speaker 1>nine o'clock, close your eyes for thirty seconds before the

0:38:12.360 --> 0:38:15.440
<v Speaker 1>president starts to talk, and imagine it was Hillary Clinton

0:38:17.040 --> 0:38:21.520
<v Speaker 1>with her second radical nominee. And then tell me how

0:38:22.080 --> 0:38:25.000
<v Speaker 1>why you're gonna be upset with Donald Trump about anything.

0:38:25.680 --> 0:38:28.080
<v Speaker 1>He is so much better than what we were faced with.

0:38:29.360 --> 0:38:32.040
<v Speaker 1>But there's also a political reality that I think has

0:38:32.080 --> 0:38:35.319
<v Speaker 1>to factor into any in this president's decision, and that

0:38:35.480 --> 0:38:39.319
<v Speaker 1>is the close nature of the Senate, and that is,

0:38:39.560 --> 0:38:44.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, nine, John McCain is ill um. He's got

0:38:44.120 --> 0:38:47.560
<v Speaker 1>a threat of needle where you don't where people like

0:38:47.920 --> 0:38:52.160
<v Speaker 1>Susan Collins and Lisa Murkowski don't oppose the the nominee,

0:38:52.160 --> 0:38:54.640
<v Speaker 1>and people like Rampaul and Ted Cruz on the other

0:38:54.680 --> 0:38:58.279
<v Speaker 1>side don't oppose the nominee. So either that or the

0:38:58.400 --> 0:39:00.359
<v Speaker 1>not or we're gonna go through a process where it's

0:39:00.400 --> 0:39:04.400
<v Speaker 1>extraordinarily painful and meaning that it's gonna be one nominee

0:39:04.400 --> 0:39:07.520
<v Speaker 1>withdraw the nomination, the nominee withdraws, then the next one,

0:39:07.560 --> 0:39:09.399
<v Speaker 1>then the next one, and it's never gonna end. So

0:39:10.040 --> 0:39:13.120
<v Speaker 1>there are political realities to the president's decision that probably

0:39:13.160 --> 0:39:16.799
<v Speaker 1>nobody wants to discuss publicly. Well. But I also think,

0:39:16.840 --> 0:39:19.799
<v Speaker 1>and he said a little bit himself, he's gotten much

0:39:19.880 --> 0:39:23.439
<v Speaker 1>smarter about the legislative branch. I thought it was very

0:39:23.520 --> 0:39:28.440
<v Speaker 1>noteworthy they began consulting with senators immediately upon the announcement

0:39:29.120 --> 0:39:31.640
<v Speaker 1>of the retirement. Uh and I think that he is

0:39:31.719 --> 0:39:33.919
<v Speaker 1>very you know, he's trying to parse out two things.

0:39:34.040 --> 0:39:36.640
<v Speaker 1>One are there a couple of Democrats who are in

0:39:36.680 --> 0:39:40.240
<v Speaker 1>such trouble from reelection that they probably can get their vote?

0:39:41.400 --> 0:39:45.200
<v Speaker 1>And two, um, is there a way to find a

0:39:45.280 --> 0:39:49.239
<v Speaker 1>person who will satisfy Collins and Rakowski, who I think

0:39:49.280 --> 0:39:51.879
<v Speaker 1>are probably the bigger challenges. I think in the end,

0:39:52.960 --> 0:39:57.399
<v Speaker 1>Rand Paul and and Uh Crews are going to vote

0:39:57.400 --> 0:40:01.360
<v Speaker 1>for the president's nominee, but particularly shocked if Crews didn't,

0:40:01.800 --> 0:40:04.880
<v Speaker 1>just because he is himself a great lawyer, he understands

0:40:04.880 --> 0:40:07.920
<v Speaker 1>what this is all about. Rand is a little less predictable.

0:40:08.320 --> 0:40:11.040
<v Speaker 1>But in the end, this is a chance to move

0:40:11.080 --> 0:40:14.080
<v Speaker 1>the court back to the constitution. Con Certainly, everything that

0:40:14.200 --> 0:40:16.319
<v Speaker 1>Rand Paul and his father have sent for has been

0:40:16.320 --> 0:40:19.880
<v Speaker 1>talking about getting back to a constitutional framework and this

0:40:19.880 --> 0:40:23.960
<v Speaker 1>this uh, this choice, I believe whichever of the four

0:40:24.080 --> 0:40:26.000
<v Speaker 1>that it is, or even if he drops in the

0:40:26.080 --> 0:40:29.960
<v Speaker 1>fifth l Off who's also on the list by the way, um,

0:40:30.000 --> 0:40:32.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think I think that these will be

0:40:32.080 --> 0:40:33.719
<v Speaker 1>people that in the end they can say, you know,

0:40:34.480 --> 0:40:36.640
<v Speaker 1>I really respect him. Now, the other part of this

0:40:36.719 --> 0:40:38.920
<v Speaker 1>is whoever they take is gonna have to go through

0:40:38.960 --> 0:40:42.640
<v Speaker 1>a set of hearings and be prepared to stand up

0:40:42.640 --> 0:40:45.880
<v Speaker 1>to a knockdown, drag out fight with left wing Democrats.

0:40:45.920 --> 0:40:47.880
<v Speaker 1>And but I think that'll be good for the country.

0:40:48.200 --> 0:40:51.439
<v Speaker 1>That will be very educational for the American people. I

0:40:51.600 --> 0:40:54.000
<v Speaker 1>actually agree with that. One of the most interesting things

0:40:54.040 --> 0:40:56.680
<v Speaker 1>if anybody's ever taken the time to actually you can't

0:40:56.880 --> 0:41:00.040
<v Speaker 1>see them. We don't allow cameras inside the Supreme in

0:41:00.160 --> 0:41:04.120
<v Speaker 1>corporate you can't hear specific arguments before the Supreme Court.

0:41:04.160 --> 0:41:05.880
<v Speaker 1>I think it's one of the most fascinating things in

0:41:05.920 --> 0:41:08.359
<v Speaker 1>the world to listen to. I mean, you might have

0:41:09.280 --> 0:41:11.920
<v Speaker 1>a person for against the particular case, they get out

0:41:11.920 --> 0:41:15.799
<v Speaker 1>two words and and immediately the justices begin grilling them.

0:41:15.800 --> 0:41:18.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean Scalia was you know, so well known for

0:41:18.680 --> 0:41:22.440
<v Speaker 1>his humor and his temperament and his tough questioning. And

0:41:22.560 --> 0:41:25.440
<v Speaker 1>on the other hand, Clarence Thomas usually just remains quiet

0:41:25.560 --> 0:41:27.840
<v Speaker 1>and he takes it all in and outcomes his decision,

0:41:27.880 --> 0:41:30.920
<v Speaker 1>and it has become one of the the great Supreme

0:41:30.920 --> 0:41:33.520
<v Speaker 1>Court justices in our time. In my opinion, why is

0:41:33.560 --> 0:41:36.360
<v Speaker 1>there so much anger? And it seems that the greater

0:41:36.520 --> 0:41:41.200
<v Speaker 1>amount of hostility is towards Judge Barrett um Amy Barrett.

0:41:41.600 --> 0:41:44.480
<v Speaker 1>And you know, for example, they quoted a speech she

0:41:44.600 --> 0:41:47.440
<v Speaker 1>gave in two thousand and six to Notre Dame Graduates

0:41:47.480 --> 0:41:49.920
<v Speaker 1>that your legal career is but a means to an end,

0:41:49.920 --> 0:41:52.520
<v Speaker 1>and the end is building the Kingdom of God. And

0:41:52.600 --> 0:41:56.000
<v Speaker 1>she had a big, knockdown, drag out fight with Diane

0:41:56.000 --> 0:41:58.840
<v Speaker 1>Feinstein last year when she was appointed to the Seventh

0:41:58.880 --> 0:42:03.480
<v Speaker 1>Circuit Court of Appeal and Feinstein pressing our on whether

0:42:03.560 --> 0:42:06.480
<v Speaker 1>she would be able to render judicial rulings faithful to

0:42:06.520 --> 0:42:09.960
<v Speaker 1>the law given her deeply held religious beliefs. I mean,

0:42:10.000 --> 0:42:12.799
<v Speaker 1>it seems like they almost want a religious lipust test

0:42:12.840 --> 0:42:16.000
<v Speaker 1>in in her case, she was a strong Catholic. Since

0:42:16.160 --> 0:42:19.600
<v Speaker 1>you do realize, of course, if if they's exactly the

0:42:19.640 --> 0:42:23.760
<v Speaker 1>same phrase have been said by a Muslim that anybody

0:42:23.800 --> 0:42:27.080
<v Speaker 1>who criticized it would be of course described as a homophobic.

0:42:27.880 --> 0:42:31.480
<v Speaker 1>But we don't have in our current political language, uh,

0:42:31.520 --> 0:42:34.319
<v Speaker 1>anything for Christian folks, which is what we're talking about.

0:42:34.320 --> 0:42:39.560
<v Speaker 1>Tell about people who are deeply resistance to the role

0:42:39.600 --> 0:42:41.680
<v Speaker 1>of God in American life, which is you know, if

0:42:41.719 --> 0:42:43.640
<v Speaker 1>I've written a clisson, I wrote a book onto a

0:42:43.719 --> 0:42:48.239
<v Speaker 1>movie about I mean, you can't describe America without understanding

0:42:48.280 --> 0:42:50.920
<v Speaker 1>that we claim from the very beginning that our rights

0:42:50.960 --> 0:42:53.720
<v Speaker 1>come from our creator. And of course on the left,

0:42:53.760 --> 0:42:58.520
<v Speaker 1>this is this is forbidden language. Uh. She was, by

0:42:58.520 --> 0:43:01.600
<v Speaker 1>the way, um, in particular debate, she did a great

0:43:01.640 --> 0:43:05.960
<v Speaker 1>job defending herself and educating the country, if not the senator,

0:43:06.520 --> 0:43:08.719
<v Speaker 1>but but but but I think the deeper point here

0:43:08.800 --> 0:43:13.279
<v Speaker 1>is if you were a left wing secular woman who

0:43:13.400 --> 0:43:17.520
<v Speaker 1>is rapidly pro abortion, then she is your worst nightmare.

0:43:18.400 --> 0:43:21.360
<v Speaker 1>She's she's a mother, and she has seven children. She

0:43:21.520 --> 0:43:25.359
<v Speaker 1>is a Notre Dame graduate, she's a pound, she's a

0:43:25.640 --> 0:43:30.719
<v Speaker 1>devout Catholic, she's overtly pro life. Um, and so she

0:43:30.920 --> 0:43:35.280
<v Speaker 1>violates every single requirement of the new modern left wing.

0:43:36.040 --> 0:43:43.640
<v Speaker 1>Uh you know, uh, secular socialists, it's about judicial philosophy.

0:43:44.120 --> 0:43:47.600
<v Speaker 1>We believe in the Constitution as the basis for all

0:43:47.719 --> 0:43:50.080
<v Speaker 1>rule of law, and that is what is known as

0:43:50.080 --> 0:43:54.320
<v Speaker 1>an originalist versus the If Hillary were president, which I

0:43:54.360 --> 0:43:56.680
<v Speaker 1>think is a very important thing to remember, this would

0:43:56.680 --> 0:44:00.440
<v Speaker 1>be her second choice. And they believe in judicial division,

0:44:00.480 --> 0:44:03.319
<v Speaker 1>the things that they would never pass legislatively, the things

0:44:03.360 --> 0:44:05.600
<v Speaker 1>that would never get them elected at the ballot box.

0:44:06.360 --> 0:44:10.120
<v Speaker 1>And they're even willing to cite foreign law, believe it

0:44:10.200 --> 0:44:12.759
<v Speaker 1>or not, not our Constitution and as the basis to

0:44:12.880 --> 0:44:18.440
<v Speaker 1>make radical decisions. And remember it's not just judicial activism

0:44:18.480 --> 0:44:21.680
<v Speaker 1>in a random sense. These are left wingers who have

0:44:21.760 --> 0:44:26.520
<v Speaker 1>a secular vision of a particular American future, which requires

0:44:26.560 --> 0:44:29.720
<v Speaker 1>that they crush and drive out of the public square

0:44:30.160 --> 0:44:33.600
<v Speaker 1>anybody who believes in the classical vision of America. And

0:44:33.680 --> 0:44:36.239
<v Speaker 1>so that's why you get this sort of uh to

0:44:36.400 --> 0:44:39.960
<v Speaker 1>tolitary and bullying and the hostility and the things you're

0:44:40.000 --> 0:44:42.200
<v Speaker 1>seeing in the streets. I mean, these are people who

0:44:42.280 --> 0:44:45.480
<v Speaker 1>are desperate to impose their will on the rest of us,

0:44:45.760 --> 0:44:48.399
<v Speaker 1>and they're watching it start to slip away, and it's

0:44:48.480 --> 0:44:51.040
<v Speaker 1>driving them crazy. You know. That is the point. The

0:44:51.080 --> 0:44:53.719
<v Speaker 1>President is going to be in Europe this week in Brussels.

0:44:53.760 --> 0:44:55.759
<v Speaker 1>He's gonna ask NATO to step up and pay their

0:44:55.760 --> 0:44:58.000
<v Speaker 1>fair share, just like I think the UN should pay

0:44:58.000 --> 0:45:00.839
<v Speaker 1>their fair share. Um, and every buddies up in arms

0:45:00.840 --> 0:45:04.000
<v Speaker 1>about that. Then there are going to be European left

0:45:04.000 --> 0:45:06.920
<v Speaker 1>wing socialist protest against him. I'm sure the left wing

0:45:07.000 --> 0:45:09.719
<v Speaker 1>media will love that in this country. And meanwhile, we

0:45:09.760 --> 0:45:13.480
<v Speaker 1>have record low unemployment in fourteen states, record low unemployment

0:45:13.520 --> 0:45:19.040
<v Speaker 1>for women for Hispanic Americans African Americans, and the highest

0:45:19.120 --> 0:45:23.479
<v Speaker 1>labor participation rate that we've ever had in history. And

0:45:23.640 --> 0:45:26.160
<v Speaker 1>the president is making progress with North Korea and he

0:45:26.200 --> 0:45:28.080
<v Speaker 1>wants peace with Putin. We doesn't want to have a

0:45:28.080 --> 0:45:31.000
<v Speaker 1>war with Vladimir Putin, as if that's a bad thing.

0:45:31.960 --> 0:45:34.960
<v Speaker 1>You know, you ought to for your TV show, have

0:45:35.120 --> 0:45:37.799
<v Speaker 1>somebody to go back to the archives and pull up

0:45:37.840 --> 0:45:41.960
<v Speaker 1>the size of the anti Reagan demonstrations in eighty one

0:45:41.960 --> 0:45:44.960
<v Speaker 1>and eighty two and eighty three in particularly in Germany

0:45:45.000 --> 0:45:47.920
<v Speaker 1>but also in London. Uh, because it's easy to forget

0:45:48.160 --> 0:45:51.720
<v Speaker 1>every time you get a strong American conservative as president

0:45:52.040 --> 0:45:55.280
<v Speaker 1>who actually stands up for the United States and actually

0:45:55.280 --> 0:45:59.800
<v Speaker 1>represents freedom, the European left goes crazy. But this is

0:46:00.000 --> 0:46:02.279
<v Speaker 1>I mean, this puts Trump in my judgment, uh. In

0:46:02.440 --> 0:46:05.040
<v Speaker 1>in pretty good company. I mean, if you uh, you know,

0:46:05.160 --> 0:46:07.800
<v Speaker 1>and and I think you'll probably have smaller crowds. And

0:46:07.840 --> 0:46:10.000
<v Speaker 1>Reagan gut because in the in the old days, the

0:46:10.000 --> 0:46:13.440
<v Speaker 1>Soiviet Union actually financed the stuff. The KGB used to

0:46:13.440 --> 0:46:16.879
<v Speaker 1>pay for a lot of the anti war demonstrations, who

0:46:16.880 --> 0:46:19.879
<v Speaker 1>were in effect pro Soviet demonstrations, but they were huge

0:46:19.920 --> 0:46:23.080
<v Speaker 1>demonstrations in the early age. They were all right, what

0:46:23.120 --> 0:46:25.399
<v Speaker 1>do you think of Kavanaugh? Kavanaugh? The only thing people

0:46:25.400 --> 0:46:27.279
<v Speaker 1>seem to be mad at our commons he made in

0:46:27.400 --> 0:46:29.160
<v Speaker 1>ninety eight that he said he was wrong about in

0:46:29.160 --> 0:46:31.400
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and nine. Is it related to Clinton and

0:46:31.480 --> 0:46:35.160
<v Speaker 1>impeachment and possible obstruction and the other thing is his

0:46:35.320 --> 0:46:38.640
<v Speaker 1>view and a decision that he was involved in as

0:46:38.680 --> 0:46:42.879
<v Speaker 1>it relates to Obamacare and justifying the laws attacks which

0:46:42.880 --> 0:46:45.440
<v Speaker 1>by the way, was sold as not being attacks. But

0:46:45.520 --> 0:46:47.319
<v Speaker 1>he seems to have been the front runner up until

0:46:47.360 --> 0:46:52.560
<v Speaker 1>at least this weekend. Well, I mean, I'm look, I'm

0:46:52.640 --> 0:46:55.000
<v Speaker 1>not a lawyer, and I'm I'm starting not a scholar

0:46:55.920 --> 0:46:57.879
<v Speaker 1>on the you know what, You're right, You're not really

0:46:57.880 --> 0:46:59.600
<v Speaker 1>that smart. You're right, Why don't I want to ask

0:46:59.600 --> 0:47:02.840
<v Speaker 1>you that us no, no is gonna be I have

0:47:03.000 --> 0:47:05.960
<v Speaker 1>enormous trust in Leonard Leo and in the team he

0:47:06.000 --> 0:47:09.480
<v Speaker 1>has built at the Federalist Society. Uh. They all believe

0:47:09.600 --> 0:47:12.960
<v Speaker 1>that any of these four, any of them, will be

0:47:13.000 --> 0:47:18.760
<v Speaker 1>a tremendous improvement over Justice Kennedy and will help solidify

0:47:18.800 --> 0:47:23.120
<v Speaker 1>a constitutionalist Supreme Court for the next thirty years. Alright,

0:47:23.160 --> 0:47:25.480
<v Speaker 1>new Gearge, I gotta let you go. We will see

0:47:25.480 --> 0:47:27.759
<v Speaker 1>you on TV later this week. Trump's America, the truth

0:47:27.760 --> 0:47:30.959
<v Speaker 1>about our nation's great comeback in the four now until

0:47:31.000 --> 0:47:34.360
<v Speaker 1>the top of the hour, one Shawn is our number.

0:47:34.400 --> 0:47:38.560
<v Speaker 1>The President at nine oh one thirty PM tonight Eastern

0:47:38.600 --> 0:47:41.359
<v Speaker 1>time six oh one thirty on the West Coast, will

0:47:41.400 --> 0:47:46.279
<v Speaker 1>be announcing his pick to replace Judge Anthony Kennedy on

0:47:46.320 --> 0:47:48.759
<v Speaker 1>the U. S. Supreme Court. The leading candidates, I'm not

0:47:48.800 --> 0:47:52.600
<v Speaker 1>going with the speculation of everybody. Um. Look, you never

0:47:52.760 --> 0:47:56.560
<v Speaker 1>know when you make a choice like this because you

0:47:56.600 --> 0:48:01.160
<v Speaker 1>don't ask specific questions. You can't ask a anybody that

0:48:01.239 --> 0:48:05.279
<v Speaker 1>might be a potential choice where they stand on particular

0:48:05.320 --> 0:48:09.480
<v Speaker 1>issues that is not particularly ethical. There are five candidates

0:48:09.480 --> 0:48:13.600
<v Speaker 1>as of now, one being, of course, Amy Cony Barrett

0:48:13.600 --> 0:48:18.360
<v Speaker 1>of Indiana, Thomas Hardeman of Pennsylvania, Brett Kavanaugh, who seemed

0:48:18.400 --> 0:48:20.600
<v Speaker 1>to have been the front runner up until the end

0:48:20.640 --> 0:48:25.440
<v Speaker 1>of last week. Uh Ray Catledge is also from Michigan.

0:48:25.960 --> 0:48:28.280
<v Speaker 1>Uh Kavanaugh, by the way, the US Court of Appeals

0:48:28.320 --> 0:48:31.720
<v Speaker 1>District of Columbia, and another name that has been thrown

0:48:31.719 --> 0:48:36.520
<v Speaker 1>out recently, Judge Joan Larson. Uh also recently confirms six

0:48:36.560 --> 0:48:40.799
<v Speaker 1>Circuit Court of Appeals. And Jay Sekulo is with the

0:48:40.800 --> 0:48:44.359
<v Speaker 1>American Center for Law Injustice is their chief council. He's

0:48:44.440 --> 0:48:47.879
<v Speaker 1>also the council to the President. And yeah, he's even

0:48:47.920 --> 0:48:50.520
<v Speaker 1>had little o Me as a client. Um listen, let

0:48:50.520 --> 0:48:52.840
<v Speaker 1>me ask you. So I'm looking at this list. I

0:48:52.920 --> 0:48:55.360
<v Speaker 1>have no idea who the president is going to pick.

0:48:55.719 --> 0:48:59.239
<v Speaker 1>All I know is this, I want somebody in the

0:48:59.320 --> 0:49:03.640
<v Speaker 1>vein of a Justice Scalia or justin Justice Thomas, who

0:49:03.719 --> 0:49:07.319
<v Speaker 1>is what we call a constitutionalist or an originalist. I

0:49:07.320 --> 0:49:11.239
<v Speaker 1>don't believe in judicial activism like the left does. I

0:49:11.320 --> 0:49:14.520
<v Speaker 1>don't believe that they should site foreign law like the

0:49:14.640 --> 0:49:17.160
<v Speaker 1>left does. I don't think they should legislate from the bench,

0:49:17.200 --> 0:49:20.640
<v Speaker 1>separation of powers, coequal branches a government, etcetera. But I

0:49:20.680 --> 0:49:24.040
<v Speaker 1>do believe whoever gets picked, they're going to try to

0:49:24.160 --> 0:49:26.759
<v Speaker 1>bork them and destroy them and do what they did

0:49:26.760 --> 0:49:29.719
<v Speaker 1>to not only Robert Borke but also Clarence Thomas. I

0:49:29.719 --> 0:49:32.960
<v Speaker 1>think that is inevitable in this atmosphere. I think that's right.

0:49:33.040 --> 0:49:35.640
<v Speaker 1>But look, you you hit the key issue, Sean, and

0:49:35.719 --> 0:49:37.960
<v Speaker 1>that is the most important question is not how it

0:49:38.000 --> 0:49:41.960
<v Speaker 1>judge rules on a particular case. Judge Ginsburg, then ultimately

0:49:42.000 --> 0:49:44.640
<v Speaker 1>Justice Ginsburg made a statement and I think she was

0:49:44.640 --> 0:49:46.680
<v Speaker 1>absolutely correct on this when she said she's not going

0:49:46.760 --> 0:49:48.879
<v Speaker 1>to discuss how she might rule on a particular case

0:49:48.920 --> 0:49:52.080
<v Speaker 1>that could come before her. So that's the right answer.

0:49:52.320 --> 0:49:54.279
<v Speaker 1>But you want to know what their judicial philosophy is.

0:49:54.320 --> 0:49:57.960
<v Speaker 1>How do they view their role as judge? Uh Salia

0:49:58.040 --> 0:50:01.120
<v Speaker 1>famously said that, you know, a good judge is going

0:50:01.160 --> 0:50:03.600
<v Speaker 1>to sometimes come to a conclusion that they don't personally like,

0:50:03.880 --> 0:50:06.239
<v Speaker 1>but it's what the law demands. So you want that

0:50:06.320 --> 0:50:09.759
<v Speaker 1>kind of uh you know, direct I would call it

0:50:09.840 --> 0:50:13.600
<v Speaker 1>a direct sense of their judicial philosophy as it relates

0:50:13.640 --> 0:50:15.640
<v Speaker 1>to their role as a judge. How do they view

0:50:15.680 --> 0:50:19.960
<v Speaker 1>themselves in our constitutional uh framework? How do we in

0:50:19.960 --> 0:50:23.880
<v Speaker 1>our constitutional republic? They're an Article three branch of government.

0:50:23.880 --> 0:50:26.040
<v Speaker 1>How do they view that role? And that's that goes

0:50:26.080 --> 0:50:29.279
<v Speaker 1>to separation of powers. It goes to uh issues of

0:50:30.040 --> 0:50:33.359
<v Speaker 1>judicial restraint. It it goes to judicial philosophy, how they

0:50:33.440 --> 0:50:35.239
<v Speaker 1>view how they view the role. So that to me

0:50:35.280 --> 0:50:37.200
<v Speaker 1>is always the key. And then then I don't think

0:50:37.200 --> 0:50:40.439
<v Speaker 1>we've ever had. I don't I'm trying to think where

0:50:40.480 --> 0:50:43.600
<v Speaker 1>we ever had in our history a president that pre

0:50:43.680 --> 0:50:46.600
<v Speaker 1>announced people on a list while he was running for president,

0:50:46.680 --> 0:50:49.000
<v Speaker 1>and updated the list while he was president, and kept

0:50:49.040 --> 0:50:50.960
<v Speaker 1>that list out there so people could do all the

0:50:51.040 --> 0:50:54.759
<v Speaker 1>kind of opposition research they wanted to do. But this

0:50:54.840 --> 0:50:56.879
<v Speaker 1>president did that, and he said he's gonna take someone

0:50:56.920 --> 0:50:58.520
<v Speaker 1>from the list, and I suspect that's what it will

0:50:58.600 --> 0:51:01.040
<v Speaker 1>be in a couple of hours. Um, So the main

0:51:01.080 --> 0:51:04.040
<v Speaker 1>thing here is to me is that the president. You know,

0:51:04.040 --> 0:51:06.040
<v Speaker 1>one of the things that is why this is an

0:51:06.080 --> 0:51:09.920
<v Speaker 1>imperfect science. People were asking me this weekend. Why is

0:51:09.960 --> 0:51:13.320
<v Speaker 1>it that Republican presidents often in court tell us that

0:51:13.360 --> 0:51:18.839
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna pick a an originalist, the constitutionalist, somebody that believes,

0:51:19.040 --> 0:51:21.759
<v Speaker 1>as as Judge Scalia, you know, one set as you

0:51:21.880 --> 0:51:25.279
<v Speaker 1>rightly point out, that he may actually have to rule

0:51:25.320 --> 0:51:29.200
<v Speaker 1>a certain way that is against his own personal views.

0:51:29.239 --> 0:51:32.480
<v Speaker 1>But what the law demands, Um, why is it sometimes

0:51:32.480 --> 0:51:35.919
<v Speaker 1>Republicans get it wrong, but it seems democratic presidents never

0:51:36.000 --> 0:51:38.640
<v Speaker 1>get it wrong. They always get the judicial activists that

0:51:38.680 --> 0:51:41.440
<v Speaker 1>they wanted. Because do you ever have to question with

0:51:41.760 --> 0:51:46.680
<v Speaker 1>someone that's being nominated by Democrats whether in fact there

0:51:46.719 --> 0:51:49.200
<v Speaker 1>where they stand on the life issue for instance? I mean,

0:51:49.200 --> 0:51:53.080
<v Speaker 1>does anybody seriously question will you will that person uphold

0:51:53.120 --> 0:51:56.440
<v Speaker 1>ROVERSUS way? But if you take a contrary view, there

0:51:56.480 --> 0:51:59.240
<v Speaker 1>are people that view that as a disqualifier from public

0:51:59.239 --> 0:52:02.360
<v Speaker 1>service on Supreme Court. I think that's sad and tragic.

0:52:02.800 --> 0:52:06.440
<v Speaker 1>Let's just have consequences. Presidents get to nominate. That's what

0:52:06.440 --> 0:52:09.600
<v Speaker 1>what the article article to power the President is. They

0:52:09.640 --> 0:52:13.160
<v Speaker 1>get to nominate. The Senate gets advice and consent to

0:52:13.320 --> 0:52:16.280
<v Speaker 1>separate functions, they can weigh in, and then they can

0:52:16.520 --> 0:52:19.840
<v Speaker 1>vote yes or no. And then if that nominee is

0:52:19.880 --> 0:52:24.319
<v Speaker 1>successful in getting confirmed, they get their authority from Article three.

0:52:24.400 --> 0:52:26.239
<v Speaker 1>So when you have a Supreme Court pick, it puts

0:52:26.239 --> 0:52:30.319
<v Speaker 1>into place all three branches of our government and all

0:52:30.360 --> 0:52:33.120
<v Speaker 1>three articles of our United States Constitution. There are certain

0:52:33.160 --> 0:52:36.320
<v Speaker 1>political considerations that I don't think a lot of people

0:52:36.560 --> 0:52:40.160
<v Speaker 1>are really factoring in here. I mean, with John McCain

0:52:40.239 --> 0:52:43.279
<v Speaker 1>being sick, nor is he a particularly reliable vote for

0:52:43.320 --> 0:52:47.080
<v Speaker 1>the president at this point in his career. That the

0:52:47.120 --> 0:52:53.279
<v Speaker 1>president must also recognize that he needs Lisa Murkowski of Alaska,

0:52:53.719 --> 0:52:57.520
<v Speaker 1>he needs Susan Collins of Maine. He needs Rand Paul

0:52:57.600 --> 0:53:00.320
<v Speaker 1>of Kentucky on the other side, and and Ted Crews

0:53:00.360 --> 0:53:03.600
<v Speaker 1>of Texas. So it's a fine line at the and

0:53:03.960 --> 0:53:07.240
<v Speaker 1>a raiser's edge here politically that the president is walking

0:53:07.440 --> 0:53:10.319
<v Speaker 1>because whoever he does pick, he doesn't want to have

0:53:10.440 --> 0:53:15.160
<v Speaker 1>to either withdraw their nomination or have have this voted

0:53:15.200 --> 0:53:18.759
<v Speaker 1>down in the Senate, And so that becomes somewhat problematic

0:53:18.800 --> 0:53:21.200
<v Speaker 1>for him. As you look at these top four maybe

0:53:21.239 --> 0:53:24.040
<v Speaker 1>five names that we're hearing, is there any one person

0:53:24.120 --> 0:53:26.759
<v Speaker 1>that you think threads that needle? Um? And the other

0:53:26.760 --> 0:53:29.200
<v Speaker 1>big issue that I love you to addresses. You know,

0:53:29.400 --> 0:53:33.080
<v Speaker 1>a lot of these judges, they're great intellectuals. They're writing

0:53:33.120 --> 0:53:37.839
<v Speaker 1>about the greatest document ever created, our Constitution, And there's

0:53:37.880 --> 0:53:41.479
<v Speaker 1>a lot of nuance, there's a lot of intellectualism. Um,

0:53:41.520 --> 0:53:46.520
<v Speaker 1>there's a big judicial philosophy disagreement on originalism versus judicial activism.

0:53:46.840 --> 0:53:49.120
<v Speaker 1>Right now, Look, Sean, you're hitting the issues that are

0:53:49.239 --> 0:53:51.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I'm gonna be with you tonight and uh,

0:53:51.239 --> 0:53:52.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, we'll know then who the nominee is. But

0:53:52.880 --> 0:53:54.920
<v Speaker 1>I will tell you this, all of the people on

0:53:54.960 --> 0:53:57.880
<v Speaker 1>the list, but the one the names that you've raised, Um,

0:53:58.040 --> 0:54:00.680
<v Speaker 1>every one of those would meet the right tiior of

0:54:01.239 --> 0:54:05.640
<v Speaker 1>conservative judicial philosophy, respect for the rule of law, understanding

0:54:05.680 --> 0:54:08.200
<v Speaker 1>the role of the spring cot plays under our constitution.

0:54:08.760 --> 0:54:14.600
<v Speaker 1>And I think without question, would UM support the proposition

0:54:14.840 --> 0:54:17.600
<v Speaker 1>that judges do not make law. Now, having said that,

0:54:17.680 --> 0:54:20.000
<v Speaker 1>let me just this is the politics of it. Is

0:54:20.040 --> 0:54:22.400
<v Speaker 1>it easier for some than others? It probably is, And

0:54:22.440 --> 0:54:26.040
<v Speaker 1>that political calculation has to be made by the president

0:54:26.120 --> 0:54:28.560
<v Speaker 1>when he because you want the nominee to be confirmed,

0:54:28.800 --> 0:54:32.160
<v Speaker 1>can that person be confirmed to that high office? So

0:54:32.200 --> 0:54:35.480
<v Speaker 1>that's you can't ignore that reality, especially you know it's

0:54:35.640 --> 0:54:38.920
<v Speaker 1>gone or the days when Justice Scalia received I think

0:54:39.480 --> 0:54:43.120
<v Speaker 1>votes and Justice getberg N those days are gone. Everything

0:54:43.160 --> 0:54:46.359
<v Speaker 1>is now very partisan. Um. But having said that, I

0:54:46.360 --> 0:54:49.560
<v Speaker 1>think you again, that's part of the calculation. You can't

0:54:49.600 --> 0:54:52.200
<v Speaker 1>ignore it because you ignored it your own peril. We

0:54:52.239 --> 0:54:55.279
<v Speaker 1>don't want a situation actually that judge, the late Judge

0:54:55.280 --> 0:54:59.680
<v Speaker 1>Bork faced. We don't want a situation that Justice Thomas

0:54:59.760 --> 0:55:04.000
<v Speaker 1>had a go through to be confirmed. You want a straightforward,

0:55:04.440 --> 0:55:07.319
<v Speaker 1>tough process. I I no one doubts that that that

0:55:07.320 --> 0:55:09.879
<v Speaker 1>should be thorough. And then but look, the presidents let

0:55:09.880 --> 0:55:13.040
<v Speaker 1>these people be out there preventing purposes for over some

0:55:13.120 --> 0:55:14.759
<v Speaker 1>of them for over a year and a half, and

0:55:15.239 --> 0:55:17.200
<v Speaker 1>so there's no real surprises there at this point. They've

0:55:17.239 --> 0:55:19.480
<v Speaker 1>read everything there is to read about them. But you'll

0:55:19.520 --> 0:55:21.279
<v Speaker 1>hear noises. There's gonna be a lot of noise. Look

0:55:21.320 --> 0:55:23.319
<v Speaker 1>at nine o one will know the announcement. At nine

0:55:23.400 --> 0:55:26.080
<v Speaker 1>or two the other side, Uh well, both sides will

0:55:26.120 --> 0:55:29.279
<v Speaker 1>go to work on the either defending the nominee or

0:55:29.400 --> 0:55:30.920
<v Speaker 1>or whatever the next role would be. I mean, that's

0:55:30.920 --> 0:55:34.040
<v Speaker 1>just kind of the nature of what happens. Having said that, again,

0:55:34.200 --> 0:55:36.400
<v Speaker 1>what we're looking for is someone that has a conservative

0:55:36.440 --> 0:55:38.960
<v Speaker 1>judicial philosophy, and I'm convinced that's what we're gonna receive tonight.

0:55:39.040 --> 0:55:42.520
<v Speaker 1>Why is it? And I've been watching and reading everything

0:55:42.520 --> 0:55:44.520
<v Speaker 1>about every one of these judges, which I spent a

0:55:44.520 --> 0:55:47.600
<v Speaker 1>lot of time earlier in the program talking about. I

0:55:47.600 --> 0:55:50.760
<v Speaker 1>think the person that interests me the most is Judge

0:55:50.840 --> 0:55:53.680
<v Speaker 1>Amy Barrett, and yet she seems to be the most

0:55:53.719 --> 0:55:56.880
<v Speaker 1>hated and the most like by conservatives. At this particular point.

0:55:57.400 --> 0:56:01.120
<v Speaker 1>And you know she's a Catholic. She has seven kids,

0:56:01.120 --> 0:56:05.120
<v Speaker 1>she's adopted a number of kids. Um. She only recently

0:56:05.320 --> 0:56:08.000
<v Speaker 1>was put on the US Court of Appeals for the

0:56:08.040 --> 0:56:11.759
<v Speaker 1>seventh District. Um, she had a big showdown in confrontation

0:56:11.800 --> 0:56:16.000
<v Speaker 1>with Senator Diane Feinstein. And yeah, I mean it seems

0:56:16.040 --> 0:56:18.360
<v Speaker 1>that the fact her religious views seemed to be in

0:56:18.480 --> 0:56:21.960
<v Speaker 1>play big time. UM. And I think there's a certain

0:56:22.080 --> 0:56:26.280
<v Speaker 1>level of just vitriol and intensity against her y because

0:56:26.280 --> 0:56:27.879
<v Speaker 1>of what you said, because of her faith. I mean,

0:56:27.880 --> 0:56:30.800
<v Speaker 1>she's someone that takes her faith seriously. She's about Catholic,

0:56:30.880 --> 0:56:34.799
<v Speaker 1>she is. Uh, she is a person that has well,

0:56:34.880 --> 0:56:37.319
<v Speaker 1>she doesn't have extensive judicial opinions because she's only been

0:56:37.320 --> 0:56:39.920
<v Speaker 1>on the court for seven months. She has extensive academic

0:56:39.920 --> 0:56:42.760
<v Speaker 1>writings and she was a very well respected law professor

0:56:42.960 --> 0:56:46.279
<v Speaker 1>at UM at Notre Dame Law School. She trained under

0:56:46.320 --> 0:56:49.120
<v Speaker 1>the great Charlie Rice, late Professor Charlie Rice, who was

0:56:49.120 --> 0:56:51.040
<v Speaker 1>on our legal advisory board at the A C l

0:56:51.120 --> 0:56:56.359
<v Speaker 1>J for decades. And Um, she's brilliant. Um, the calculus

0:56:56.360 --> 0:56:58.640
<v Speaker 1>will be and the president makes that calculus with his

0:56:59.200 --> 0:57:02.279
<v Speaker 1>media advisors. They make a calculus asked to confirmability and

0:57:02.640 --> 0:57:05.640
<v Speaker 1>issues like that, and she's denominee that because they're convinced

0:57:05.680 --> 0:57:07.640
<v Speaker 1>that they can get her confirmed. By the way, if

0:57:07.680 --> 0:57:09.719
<v Speaker 1>she's not the nominee doesn't doesn't mean she's not going

0:57:09.760 --> 0:57:11.879
<v Speaker 1>to be confirmed. It just means that there were other

0:57:11.920 --> 0:57:14.439
<v Speaker 1>considerations and maybe it was lent the time on the bench.

0:57:14.440 --> 0:57:15.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. We'll see who the nominee is and

0:57:16.080 --> 0:57:18.400
<v Speaker 1>we'll be able to know, but she is certainly somebody

0:57:18.400 --> 0:57:21.360
<v Speaker 1>that galvanizes UM a lot of support, in part because

0:57:21.400 --> 0:57:24.480
<v Speaker 1>the way she was so uh dehemently attacked and kept

0:57:24.480 --> 0:57:27.120
<v Speaker 1>her composure in her dignity during the process. It seems

0:57:27.160 --> 0:57:29.720
<v Speaker 1>that the front runner, at least leading up to today,

0:57:29.880 --> 0:57:34.040
<v Speaker 1>had been uh Judge Brett Kavanaugh, and he's got some

0:57:34.200 --> 0:57:36.320
<v Speaker 1>very interesting cases. I mean, he was involved in the

0:57:36.360 --> 0:57:40.520
<v Speaker 1>Heller versus District of Columbia case in eleven and he

0:57:40.600 --> 0:57:42.600
<v Speaker 1>ended up being on the right side of that case.

0:57:42.640 --> 0:57:46.280
<v Speaker 1>He descended Havanaugh's words, the Supreme Court left quote little

0:57:46.280 --> 0:57:49.600
<v Speaker 1>doubt the courts are to assess gun bands and regulations

0:57:49.640 --> 0:57:53.280
<v Speaker 1>based on text history, tradition, not by a balancing test

0:57:53.320 --> 0:57:57.000
<v Speaker 1>such as a strict intermediate intermediate scrutiny, but then again

0:57:57.440 --> 0:58:01.680
<v Speaker 1>there was you know, some criticism over over his decisions.

0:58:01.720 --> 0:58:05.240
<v Speaker 1>There were two of them as it relates to Obamacare. Yeah,

0:58:05.240 --> 0:58:07.040
<v Speaker 1>and one of them was mine, I mean was the case.

0:58:07.040 --> 0:58:08.880
<v Speaker 1>And I when I've known Bread for a long time

0:58:09.280 --> 0:58:12.040
<v Speaker 1>and was helped on the confirmation to the DC Court

0:58:12.080 --> 0:58:15.640
<v Speaker 1>of Appeals, were working with him in private practice. He

0:58:16.520 --> 0:58:18.760
<v Speaker 1>not a couple of our religious liberty cases. He he

0:58:19.160 --> 0:58:21.840
<v Speaker 1>worked on as a lawyer, So he's he's got I mean,

0:58:21.880 --> 0:58:23.920
<v Speaker 1>I think on the religious liberty issues he would be

0:58:24.000 --> 0:58:26.560
<v Speaker 1>and is great judicial philosophy on that understands of pre

0:58:26.680 --> 0:58:29.520
<v Speaker 1>exercise free speech clauses. What about the decision, and I

0:58:29.600 --> 0:58:34.360
<v Speaker 1>believe it was the yeah, yeah, Well, in the case,

0:58:34.440 --> 0:58:36.720
<v Speaker 1>he would have held that the a c. A complied

0:58:36.760 --> 0:58:39.480
<v Speaker 1>with the clause of the Constitution that requires all bills

0:58:39.840 --> 0:58:42.840
<v Speaker 1>for raising revenue to originate in the House of Representatives

0:58:42.880 --> 0:58:45.160
<v Speaker 1>because the statutes in clause. Yeah. But but what was

0:58:45.240 --> 0:58:48.720
<v Speaker 1>interesting about that it actually held up Obamacare and the

0:58:48.800 --> 0:58:51.040
<v Speaker 1>argument that it was at tax, but we were sold

0:58:51.120 --> 0:58:53.320
<v Speaker 1>that it was not a tax. Yeah. So I mean,

0:58:53.360 --> 0:58:55.160
<v Speaker 1>this was an issue that looked that was in my case,

0:58:55.560 --> 0:58:57.200
<v Speaker 1>but I had we had in front of him, and

0:58:57.200 --> 0:59:00.000
<v Speaker 1>he he did not redress the merits of the constitute

0:59:00.040 --> 0:59:03.200
<v Speaker 1>sotionality of Obamacare that's been misreported. What do you addressed

0:59:03.320 --> 0:59:09.480
<v Speaker 1>was whether the Anti Injunction Act passing UH prohibited a

0:59:09.520 --> 0:59:12.880
<v Speaker 1>proceeding where it was a pre enforcement in other words,

0:59:12.840 --> 0:59:15.560
<v Speaker 1>of plumbinary injunction and injunction to stop the enforcement of

0:59:15.600 --> 0:59:18.440
<v Speaker 1>attacks and the statute on that. I raised this with

0:59:18.480 --> 0:59:20.280
<v Speaker 1>our team early on because as you know, shall my

0:59:20.320 --> 0:59:22.320
<v Speaker 1>background is I came out of Chief Council's Office for

0:59:22.600 --> 0:59:24.280
<v Speaker 1>Treasury to the I R S. I was a travel

0:59:24.320 --> 0:59:27.800
<v Speaker 1>lawyer for a Chief Council's office, and um, I was

0:59:27.840 --> 0:59:30.880
<v Speaker 1>concerned about the issue of the tax um in the

0:59:30.920 --> 0:59:34.160
<v Speaker 1>Anti Injunction Act and that's ultimately where he went. So

0:59:34.280 --> 0:59:37.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it was I mean, I don't think

0:59:38.000 --> 0:59:43.680
<v Speaker 1>it was a way it's being portrayed is accurate. And um, well, look,

0:59:43.680 --> 0:59:45.520
<v Speaker 1>you always want to win your case. It wasn't an

0:59:45.520 --> 0:59:48.720
<v Speaker 1>inconceivable conclusion that he came up with something that speaks.

0:59:48.800 --> 0:59:51.480
<v Speaker 1>And actually some could argue that's a conservative decision because

0:59:51.560 --> 0:59:53.480
<v Speaker 1>you don't overreach when you don't have when you don't

0:59:53.480 --> 0:59:55.720
<v Speaker 1>have statutory authority. We'll take a quick break, we'll come

0:59:55.760 --> 0:59:57.600
<v Speaker 1>back more with J Seculo on the other side, eight

0:59:57.800 --> 1:00:01.040
<v Speaker 1>D nine one, Shawn is our toll free telephone number. Uh.

1:00:01.080 --> 1:00:02.320
<v Speaker 1>Then at the top of the hour, way of the

1:00:02.400 --> 1:00:05.360
<v Speaker 1>latest breaking news on the deep State gate and Page

1:00:05.400 --> 1:00:09.080
<v Speaker 1>and Struck testifying later this week, and apparently there's gonna

1:00:09.080 --> 1:00:12.760
<v Speaker 1>be two big bombshell news reports coming. So my sources

1:00:12.800 --> 1:00:16.120
<v Speaker 1>tell me much more. Right, as we continue with Jay Secular,

1:00:16.200 --> 1:00:18.880
<v Speaker 1>Chief Council American Center for Law and Justice, also Council

1:00:18.920 --> 1:00:21.880
<v Speaker 1>to the President, let me ask, this is an imperfect

1:00:21.920 --> 1:00:24.680
<v Speaker 1>science in a large part, and I want you to

1:00:24.720 --> 1:00:27.560
<v Speaker 1>address this side of it because by and large, if

1:00:27.560 --> 1:00:31.480
<v Speaker 1>you're being considered for the Supreme Court, um, you're an intellectual.

1:00:31.760 --> 1:00:35.160
<v Speaker 1>You this you are deep. You're deep in the weeds

1:00:35.280 --> 1:00:39.080
<v Speaker 1>as it relates to constitutional law. And when you read decisions,

1:00:39.840 --> 1:00:42.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, on the surface, maybe the outcome is based

1:00:42.720 --> 1:00:46.440
<v Speaker 1>on an entirely different way of thinking that most Americans

1:00:46.440 --> 1:00:49.960
<v Speaker 1>would understand. But again we're looking towards judicial philosophy. There

1:00:50.000 --> 1:00:55.840
<v Speaker 1>there are nuances to some decisions and to most decisions. Yeah, yeah, so,

1:00:56.080 --> 1:00:58.120
<v Speaker 1>and part of that part of that nuance this you

1:00:58.520 --> 1:01:00.400
<v Speaker 1>call that, I think that's a good term, is that

1:01:00.560 --> 1:01:03.800
<v Speaker 1>they're ports of of limited jurisdiction in one sense, and

1:01:03.800 --> 1:01:06.280
<v Speaker 1>that they don't reach two issues that they're not supposed

1:01:06.280 --> 1:01:09.720
<v Speaker 1>to hit, uh if they've got a conservative judicial philosophy,

1:01:09.760 --> 1:01:13.160
<v Speaker 1>so they don't overstretch. And part of that process is

1:01:13.280 --> 1:01:16.160
<v Speaker 1>an understanding that when you're looking at this that what

1:01:16.200 --> 1:01:19.280
<v Speaker 1>you're dealing with is a how what you want to

1:01:19.320 --> 1:01:22.080
<v Speaker 1>know is how does the judge view their job? How

1:01:22.080 --> 1:01:24.840
<v Speaker 1>do they view their role as a judge, And that

1:01:24.960 --> 1:01:28.439
<v Speaker 1>really becomes the critical aspect of all of this. How

1:01:28.480 --> 1:01:31.360
<v Speaker 1>do they view their role as a judge that they

1:01:31.360 --> 1:01:34.000
<v Speaker 1>call involves and strikes? Were they coming up with policy

1:01:34.040 --> 1:01:36.360
<v Speaker 1>that they like? If their policy oriented that they should

1:01:36.360 --> 1:01:39.200
<v Speaker 1>be running for legislature for the presidency, they shouldn't be running.

1:01:39.200 --> 1:01:41.480
<v Speaker 1>They should not be nominated as a judge. That's not

1:01:41.560 --> 1:01:45.160
<v Speaker 1>their role. So that's where it becomes very very important. Okay,

1:01:45.240 --> 1:01:47.120
<v Speaker 1>And so I guess at the end of the day,

1:01:47.160 --> 1:01:49.160
<v Speaker 1>as we look at the names, and again I think

1:01:49.160 --> 1:01:51.439
<v Speaker 1>you're rightly pointing out a very important point. There's never

1:01:51.480 --> 1:01:54.280
<v Speaker 1>been a president that has actually given a specific list

1:01:54.360 --> 1:01:56.640
<v Speaker 1>of names and sticks to the list of names that

1:01:56.720 --> 1:02:00.520
<v Speaker 1>he has been telegraphing now since before he got elected.

1:02:01.080 --> 1:02:03.160
<v Speaker 1>Um So in that sense, there won't be any surprises.

1:02:03.200 --> 1:02:06.120
<v Speaker 1>Are you confident at the end of the day that

1:02:06.160 --> 1:02:09.640
<v Speaker 1>we're going to get somebody like an Aledo, like a

1:02:09.760 --> 1:02:12.760
<v Speaker 1>Clarence Thomas or Scalia on the Supreme Court? In this choice?

1:02:13.560 --> 1:02:17.280
<v Speaker 1>I think on the that entire list are individuals of

1:02:17.480 --> 1:02:22.200
<v Speaker 1>impeccable credentials with conservative judicial philosophies, and I think we

1:02:22.200 --> 1:02:25.600
<v Speaker 1>should be comfortable with anybody on that list, and I

1:02:26.080 --> 1:02:28.600
<v Speaker 1>expect that tonight will be very pleased with who the

1:02:28.640 --> 1:02:31.560
<v Speaker 1>nominee is. Again, it's ultimately there's one thing that's very

1:02:31.560 --> 1:02:34.400
<v Speaker 1>clear about Article two. This is the president's choice. It's

1:02:34.440 --> 1:02:37.240
<v Speaker 1>not the Federalist Society, is not Leonard Leo, it's not

1:02:37.720 --> 1:02:40.760
<v Speaker 1>Herita's Foundation, Kay James, is not the American Center for

1:02:40.840 --> 1:02:43.479
<v Speaker 1>Low Injustice, and Jay secularly, this is the president's choice.

1:02:43.800 --> 1:02:45.720
<v Speaker 1>All right, Jay Secular, thank you for being with us.

1:02:45.720 --> 1:02:48.440
<v Speaker 1>When we come back, we have a lot of breaking

1:02:48.440 --> 1:02:50.919
<v Speaker 1>news as it relates coming this week with a deep steak,

1:02:50.960 --> 1:02:54.320
<v Speaker 1>Greg Jared, Sarah Carter. And next, if they don't give

1:02:54.360 --> 1:02:57.720
<v Speaker 1>you that information, what can you do to the f

1:02:57.880 --> 1:03:01.320
<v Speaker 1>behind d J. You've given them more to lines now

1:03:01.480 --> 1:03:03.880
<v Speaker 1>we had yesterday. They were supposed to give us stuff

1:03:03.880 --> 1:03:07.200
<v Speaker 1>now maybe Monday or Tuesday. This investigation has been going

1:03:07.240 --> 1:03:10.120
<v Speaker 1>on for a year. At some point, don't you guys

1:03:10.120 --> 1:03:13.000
<v Speaker 1>feel impotent. Well, look, there's a couple of couple of

1:03:13.000 --> 1:03:15.720
<v Speaker 1>things here, So before July thirty one. For for a

1:03:15.760 --> 1:03:17.840
<v Speaker 1>couple of months now, we've been really zeroing in on that,

1:03:17.920 --> 1:03:19.880
<v Speaker 1>and the FBI d o J have had plenty of

1:03:19.880 --> 1:03:23.360
<v Speaker 1>opportunities to tell us what happened before July one, but

1:03:23.400 --> 1:03:27.400
<v Speaker 1>they have they have not, They have not, they have not. Now, ultimately,

1:03:27.520 --> 1:03:30.960
<v Speaker 1>here the President of the United States, it's his d

1:03:31.040 --> 1:03:34.760
<v Speaker 1>o J and his FBI, and at some point here

1:03:34.840 --> 1:03:37.440
<v Speaker 1>he needs to get involved. You know, I don't know.

1:03:37.480 --> 1:03:40.280
<v Speaker 1>The FISA is very frustrating to me because I think

1:03:40.280 --> 1:03:43.439
<v Speaker 1>that pieces of the FISA that was gone on Carter

1:03:43.560 --> 1:03:48.080
<v Speaker 1>Carter page right, that we've had an ongoing feud about

1:03:48.080 --> 1:03:50.640
<v Speaker 1>this for many, many months. I think the FIS is

1:03:50.720 --> 1:03:55.520
<v Speaker 1>totally fraudulent, fraudulent. You have James Comey and others at

1:03:55.520 --> 1:03:57.880
<v Speaker 1>currently at the FBI d o J who are defending

1:03:57.920 --> 1:04:01.000
<v Speaker 1>the FISA, which is unbelievable to me. So why not

1:04:01.200 --> 1:04:03.240
<v Speaker 1>the President ought to just solve this once and for

1:04:03.280 --> 1:04:06.640
<v Speaker 1>all declassified, don't you don't have to expose sources and methods,

1:04:06.680 --> 1:04:09.200
<v Speaker 1>but most of that visa, the pertinent parts of it,

1:04:09.200 --> 1:04:12.280
<v Speaker 1>could be declassified and he could help answer for all

1:04:12.320 --> 1:04:15.280
<v Speaker 1>of us who was telling the truth or were they

1:04:15.320 --> 1:04:19.160
<v Speaker 1>justified to get a FISA warrant on Carter page or not.

1:04:20.040 --> 1:04:22.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't think they were, and I think the American

1:04:22.040 --> 1:04:23.920
<v Speaker 1>people have a right to know, and the President should

1:04:24.080 --> 1:04:27.160
<v Speaker 1>classify all right, News round up in Information overlo an

1:04:27.160 --> 1:04:31.800
<v Speaker 1>hour one Seawan. That was Devin Newness of the House

1:04:31.800 --> 1:04:35.520
<v Speaker 1>Intel Committee on with Judge Jannine on Saturday night, saying, yeah,

1:04:35.560 --> 1:04:40.000
<v Speaker 1>forty two people now involved with the Russia probe. Uh, yeah,

1:04:40.080 --> 1:04:43.320
<v Speaker 1>they should be interviewed in public. Also, at some point,

1:04:43.360 --> 1:04:46.680
<v Speaker 1>the President's gonna have to get involved and demand that

1:04:46.760 --> 1:04:49.320
<v Speaker 1>the d o J, which he has full authority to do,

1:04:49.480 --> 1:04:53.160
<v Speaker 1>release all of these documents. And once he puts that

1:04:53.240 --> 1:04:55.520
<v Speaker 1>deadline out, they will not have an option at that

1:04:55.560 --> 1:04:59.720
<v Speaker 1>point or they will be literally defying the president who

1:04:59.760 --> 1:05:02.680
<v Speaker 1>has authority. This is we're talking about the executive branch now.

1:05:03.360 --> 1:05:07.440
<v Speaker 1>And uh, lastly, it's noon as talking about the President

1:05:07.560 --> 1:05:10.680
<v Speaker 1>needing to declassify the FISA documents, which would give us

1:05:10.720 --> 1:05:16.160
<v Speaker 1>great insight as to how they justified an unverified, uncorroborated

1:05:16.240 --> 1:05:20.400
<v Speaker 1>political document using Russian sources that was paid for. Even

1:05:20.440 --> 1:05:23.440
<v Speaker 1>the person to put it together says was fifty fifty

1:05:23.480 --> 1:05:27.520
<v Speaker 1>at best. Uh ended up being the the basis or

1:05:27.560 --> 1:05:29.840
<v Speaker 1>the bulk of information to get a warrant to spy

1:05:29.880 --> 1:05:32.440
<v Speaker 1>on an opposition party candidate and lead up to an election.

1:05:32.840 --> 1:05:36.240
<v Speaker 1>It all matters, all right, Glad you're with us for one.

1:05:36.240 --> 1:05:39.160
<v Speaker 1>Shawn is our number. We're still following the president. At

1:05:39.240 --> 1:05:43.000
<v Speaker 1>nine oh one thirty tonight, right when Hannity gets on

1:05:43.040 --> 1:05:47.000
<v Speaker 1>the air, will announce his Supreme Court justice to replace

1:05:47.040 --> 1:05:49.919
<v Speaker 1>Anthony Kennedy. I'm not gonna go with all the speculation

1:05:50.120 --> 1:05:52.840
<v Speaker 1>with all the people that's has chosen that because the

1:05:52.840 --> 1:05:55.560
<v Speaker 1>President had diverted the last time. And I think it

1:05:55.640 --> 1:05:57.640
<v Speaker 1>still comes down to the five candidates that I've been

1:05:57.640 --> 1:06:01.080
<v Speaker 1>talking about well pretty much all day, and that's Amy

1:06:01.600 --> 1:06:06.960
<v Speaker 1>Cony Barrett and Thomas Hardeman, Brett Kavanaugh, Raymond catholicch and

1:06:07.080 --> 1:06:10.760
<v Speaker 1>Judge Joan Larson. But first we continue the deep state

1:06:10.800 --> 1:06:13.200
<v Speaker 1>issue is going to hit a lot of new ground

1:06:13.240 --> 1:06:17.040
<v Speaker 1>this week, as both Lisa Page and Peter Struck testify

1:06:17.120 --> 1:06:20.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah publicly. Well, in the case of Lisa Page behind

1:06:20.520 --> 1:06:24.440
<v Speaker 1>closed doors, but struck publicly for the first time. And then,

1:06:24.440 --> 1:06:26.560
<v Speaker 1>of course we have the President with NATO as I mentioned,

1:06:26.600 --> 1:06:28.360
<v Speaker 1>and we're gonna be doing the show from Europe later

1:06:28.400 --> 1:06:31.920
<v Speaker 1>in the week, UM and the expected protests there. We

1:06:31.960 --> 1:06:35.800
<v Speaker 1>have a busy newsweeks joining us, Greg Jarrett. We are

1:06:35.840 --> 1:06:39.160
<v Speaker 1>now two weeks away from the release of the Russia Hoax.

1:06:39.200 --> 1:06:42.160
<v Speaker 1>The Illicit Scheme to clear Hillary Clinton and frame Donald Trump.

1:06:42.440 --> 1:06:45.080
<v Speaker 1>By the way, available for pre sale on Amazon dot Com.

1:06:45.120 --> 1:06:48.240
<v Speaker 1>This will become the definitive book on what is the

1:06:48.280 --> 1:06:52.200
<v Speaker 1>biggest corruption abuse of power scandal in history. Sarah Carter

1:06:52.560 --> 1:06:56.480
<v Speaker 1>is an investigative reporter Fox News contributor. UM. All right,

1:06:56.560 --> 1:06:59.000
<v Speaker 1>so we have a new poll that shows a majority

1:06:59.000 --> 1:07:03.120
<v Speaker 1>of American Sarah no longer support the Muller probe. We

1:07:03.160 --> 1:07:06.000
<v Speaker 1>have new FBI m O suggesting that Mueller may have

1:07:06.080 --> 1:07:09.200
<v Speaker 1>illegally leaked grand jury material that's in reference to the

1:07:09.200 --> 1:07:13.360
<v Speaker 1>Mantaphor case. We have Julianni saying he suspects Mueller is

1:07:13.400 --> 1:07:16.520
<v Speaker 1>covering up anti Trump text messages that have been sent

1:07:16.600 --> 1:07:21.120
<v Speaker 1>by his prosecution team. And Julianni calling the Muller probe

1:07:21.120 --> 1:07:25.240
<v Speaker 1>the most corrupt investigation he's ever seen. And now we

1:07:25.360 --> 1:07:28.120
<v Speaker 1>have forty two people, as we just turned from Devin Newness,

1:07:28.120 --> 1:07:31.160
<v Speaker 1>that need to go before the public and make some explanations.

1:07:31.200 --> 1:07:35.160
<v Speaker 1>This case is just beginning, it is, and remember this

1:07:35.200 --> 1:07:37.520
<v Speaker 1>has been going on for more than a year. This

1:07:37.600 --> 1:07:40.440
<v Speaker 1>is incredible, Sean. I think one of the biggest things

1:07:40.600 --> 1:07:42.720
<v Speaker 1>that we're going to be looking for this week is

1:07:42.760 --> 1:07:47.520
<v Speaker 1>certainly Peter struck Uh testifying publicly. He may not say anything,

1:07:47.560 --> 1:07:50.040
<v Speaker 1>he may say very little, but I think it's very

1:07:50.080 --> 1:07:52.960
<v Speaker 1>important to have him out there. I also think that

1:07:53.040 --> 1:07:56.080
<v Speaker 1>Devin Newness is doing the right thing. He's putting out

1:07:56.120 --> 1:07:58.960
<v Speaker 1>the names out there that he says need to go public.

1:07:59.200 --> 1:08:02.640
<v Speaker 1>The Americans people are so tired of this because I

1:08:02.680 --> 1:08:06.120
<v Speaker 1>think based on just the last year, based on the

1:08:06.160 --> 1:08:10.640
<v Speaker 1>information that has come out, Americans are smart. We understand

1:08:10.680 --> 1:08:12.880
<v Speaker 1>what's going on here. And that's the reason why we

1:08:12.920 --> 1:08:16.679
<v Speaker 1>haven't stopped going after these stories. The reason we haven't

1:08:16.720 --> 1:08:21.160
<v Speaker 1>stopped exposing what we see is blatant corruption and evidence

1:08:21.520 --> 1:08:25.560
<v Speaker 1>that they were actually working against an incoming president and

1:08:25.600 --> 1:08:28.840
<v Speaker 1>then a duly elected president of the United States. It's

1:08:28.880 --> 1:08:32.040
<v Speaker 1>actually quite incredible, and I think what Newness is doing

1:08:32.080 --> 1:08:35.480
<v Speaker 1>is saying, look, put everybody out there, let them speak publicly,

1:08:35.800 --> 1:08:38.880
<v Speaker 1>and if they're not going to abide by our demands,

1:08:39.320 --> 1:08:43.120
<v Speaker 1>get the BI set go ahead, Mr President, release all

1:08:43.160 --> 1:08:46.160
<v Speaker 1>the documents. Let's get that out there so the American

1:08:46.240 --> 1:08:48.600
<v Speaker 1>public knows once and for all what's going on. This

1:08:48.680 --> 1:08:51.000
<v Speaker 1>has been going on too long, and liked Evan Noon

1:08:51.080 --> 1:08:54.800
<v Speaker 1>has said, this is the president's job. He is oversight

1:08:55.120 --> 1:08:57.640
<v Speaker 1>over the d o J. And if the DOJ is

1:08:57.680 --> 1:09:01.360
<v Speaker 1>not going to comply, if rod Rosenstein, if Robert Mueller,

1:09:01.479 --> 1:09:04.919
<v Speaker 1>if all of these people, if Attorney General Jeff Sessions

1:09:05.200 --> 1:09:09.599
<v Speaker 1>does not comply with the oversight demands of Congress, then

1:09:09.640 --> 1:09:13.160
<v Speaker 1>the President has the authority to declassify that and we

1:09:13.240 --> 1:09:15.519
<v Speaker 1>have the right to see it. Let me go to

1:09:15.560 --> 1:09:18.400
<v Speaker 1>Greg Jarrett by the way here two weeks away. I've

1:09:18.439 --> 1:09:21.400
<v Speaker 1>read the book now. In total, it is the defining

1:09:21.640 --> 1:09:25.599
<v Speaker 1>read on and the title captures everything, the Russia hoax,

1:09:25.600 --> 1:09:29.960
<v Speaker 1>the illicit scheme to clear Hillary Clinton and frame Donald Trump. Um.

1:09:30.080 --> 1:09:32.559
<v Speaker 1>There is so much coming out with the testimony now

1:09:33.000 --> 1:09:36.639
<v Speaker 1>at leasta page behind closed doors. Peter struck publicly, although

1:09:36.640 --> 1:09:39.160
<v Speaker 1>I hear there's some maybe some wavering going on behind

1:09:39.160 --> 1:09:43.320
<v Speaker 1>the scenes, but the title captures exactly what happened. It's true.

1:09:43.840 --> 1:09:47.439
<v Speaker 1>You know, top officials the highest levels of government and

1:09:47.520 --> 1:09:51.439
<v Speaker 1>the Department of Justice and the FBI work together. They

1:09:51.560 --> 1:09:56.200
<v Speaker 1>colluded to twist the law and make up facts and

1:09:56.280 --> 1:10:01.160
<v Speaker 1>exonerate Hillary Clinton even though she clearly violated multiple UH

1:10:01.200 --> 1:10:05.439
<v Speaker 1>federal statutes. And then on the very same day they

1:10:05.439 --> 1:10:09.360
<v Speaker 1>cleared her. The FBI is meeting in London for the

1:10:09.439 --> 1:10:13.880
<v Speaker 1>first time with the author of the dossier, and the

1:10:13.920 --> 1:10:16.920
<v Speaker 1>FBI and the d o J were off to the

1:10:17.000 --> 1:10:20.479
<v Speaker 1>races to try to frame Donald Trump for things he

1:10:20.640 --> 1:10:24.120
<v Speaker 1>did not do. And the dossier with the lynchpin, it

1:10:24.240 --> 1:10:27.439
<v Speaker 1>was phony, was fabricated from the beginning on paid a

1:10:27.560 --> 1:10:29.439
<v Speaker 1>hundred to a hundred and three. I think this is

1:10:29.439 --> 1:10:32.679
<v Speaker 1>going to turn out to be key. Did Brennan at

1:10:32.720 --> 1:10:37.520
<v Speaker 1>the CIA? Then again, they never verified or or corroborated

1:10:37.560 --> 1:10:40.280
<v Speaker 1>this and used it as the bulk of information for

1:10:40.320 --> 1:10:44.840
<v Speaker 1>the dossier. But was Brennan passing this out to be

1:10:44.960 --> 1:10:49.240
<v Speaker 1>used as political fodder in his role as a CIA

1:10:49.320 --> 1:10:51.639
<v Speaker 1>director at the time, and you know the summer leading

1:10:51.680 --> 1:10:54.519
<v Speaker 1>up to of course the FISA warrant. Yes, you're you're

1:10:54.560 --> 1:10:56.800
<v Speaker 1>absolutely correct. You you're write about it in the book,

1:10:56.920 --> 1:11:00.360
<v Speaker 1>page one hundred. It begins, Brennan is the instag gator.

1:11:00.880 --> 1:11:05.040
<v Speaker 1>He gets his hands early on on this phony dossier,

1:11:05.240 --> 1:11:08.200
<v Speaker 1>and he decides this is what we can use to

1:11:08.320 --> 1:11:12.840
<v Speaker 1>destroy Trump. So he's running all over Capitol Hill and

1:11:12.840 --> 1:11:15.840
<v Speaker 1>in particularly goes over to Harry Reid's office and on

1:11:15.960 --> 1:11:20.519
<v Speaker 1>August twenty five, and I believe he shows read this

1:11:20.640 --> 1:11:23.360
<v Speaker 1>document and convince his read we've heard, do we have

1:11:23.560 --> 1:11:26.320
<v Speaker 1>the exact proof on it? Because we've been hearing about

1:11:26.320 --> 1:11:29.040
<v Speaker 1>this from the beginning. We know Read leaked to the

1:11:29.040 --> 1:11:32.479
<v Speaker 1>media a letter he sent to Comey on August two

1:11:32.520 --> 1:11:36.000
<v Speaker 1>thousand and sixteen, and in it he alleges Trump is

1:11:36.040 --> 1:11:41.200
<v Speaker 1>colluding with Russia and he's asking Comy to investigate Trump.

1:11:41.520 --> 1:11:46.080
<v Speaker 1>He look read already knew that the FBI had launched

1:11:46.680 --> 1:11:49.640
<v Speaker 1>uh an investigation of Trump, but he wanted it to

1:11:49.680 --> 1:11:53.599
<v Speaker 1>get leaked out to the media to destroy Trump before

1:11:53.680 --> 1:11:56.759
<v Speaker 1>the election. So let's go through the details of the Sarah.

1:11:56.880 --> 1:11:59.880
<v Speaker 1>This is the Clinton and the d n C money

1:12:00.000 --> 1:12:04.720
<v Speaker 1>which Donna Brazil said that Hillary controls Hillary campaign d

1:12:04.880 --> 1:12:08.720
<v Speaker 1>n C money she controls funneled through Perkins Cooee, a

1:12:08.800 --> 1:12:12.679
<v Speaker 1>law firm, onto Fusion GPS and not research firm, which

1:12:12.680 --> 1:12:16.040
<v Speaker 1>by the way, is fine op researches, you know, something

1:12:16.080 --> 1:12:19.000
<v Speaker 1>that we see every day in politics. And then it's

1:12:19.479 --> 1:12:22.360
<v Speaker 1>they hire Christopher Steele. I think I didn't think foreign

1:12:22.439 --> 1:12:25.519
<v Speaker 1>agents were supposed to be involved in the political process. Well,

1:12:25.600 --> 1:12:29.120
<v Speaker 1>so much for that. And he uses his Russian sources,

1:12:29.160 --> 1:12:32.839
<v Speaker 1>and we believe Russian government sources to create a phony

1:12:32.880 --> 1:12:36.280
<v Speaker 1>dossier that even he in an interrogatory and Great Britain,

1:12:36.360 --> 1:12:39.640
<v Speaker 1>under the threat of perjury, said was well, it's not confirmed.

1:12:39.680 --> 1:12:41.559
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's kind of fifty fifty. I don't know

1:12:41.600 --> 1:12:44.879
<v Speaker 1>if it's true. That became the basis of the FISA warrant,

1:12:45.240 --> 1:12:48.960
<v Speaker 1>and we had the CIA director literally feeding this to

1:12:49.400 --> 1:12:55.000
<v Speaker 1>Harry Reid for political purposes. It's so dangerous, Sean, it

1:12:55.160 --> 1:13:00.320
<v Speaker 1>is so dangerous to even imagine that this was happening

1:13:00.360 --> 1:13:03.240
<v Speaker 1>in the United States, that a director of the CIA,

1:13:03.720 --> 1:13:07.880
<v Speaker 1>which is not supposed to be involved whatsoever by edict,

1:13:07.960 --> 1:13:13.840
<v Speaker 1>in the political process of US politics, basically shopping out

1:13:14.240 --> 1:13:20.440
<v Speaker 1>a disinformation document by a foreign agent against an incoming

1:13:20.479 --> 1:13:23.680
<v Speaker 1>president of the United States or a presidential candidate at

1:13:23.720 --> 1:13:26.960
<v Speaker 1>the time, and then a duly elected incoming president of

1:13:26.960 --> 1:13:30.920
<v Speaker 1>the United States. It's really unheard of. Is this any

1:13:31.000 --> 1:13:34.360
<v Speaker 1>different than what the former Soviet Union would do when

1:13:34.360 --> 1:13:38.720
<v Speaker 1>they propagandized and lied. Remember we always would talk about provoda,

1:13:39.240 --> 1:13:43.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, state run television, state run networks, all designed

1:13:43.720 --> 1:13:49.960
<v Speaker 1>to brainwash, indoctrinate, um disinform, whatever tactics a lot. Well,

1:13:50.000 --> 1:13:53.800
<v Speaker 1>let's put it another way, purposely the government and government

1:13:53.880 --> 1:13:56.759
<v Speaker 1>spies lying to the American people. Is that what happened

1:13:56.800 --> 1:14:00.160
<v Speaker 1>in America, Sarah Carter, Exactly, That's exactly what it what

1:14:00.240 --> 1:14:02.400
<v Speaker 1>it is. I mean when you look at the facts

1:14:02.439 --> 1:14:05.240
<v Speaker 1>on their face, that the director of the CIA, which

1:14:05.280 --> 1:14:08.080
<v Speaker 1>by the way, he you know, this former Director Brennan,

1:14:08.120 --> 1:14:12.640
<v Speaker 1>has not stopped. We've seen his allegations and his disinformation

1:14:12.800 --> 1:14:16.160
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter throughout the months, throughout the recent months, how

1:14:16.200 --> 1:14:20.320
<v Speaker 1>he is constantly bad mouthing and going after President Trump

1:14:20.560 --> 1:14:23.920
<v Speaker 1>and alluding to some kind of secret information that's out

1:14:23.960 --> 1:14:27.840
<v Speaker 1>there that we've never seen, no proof whatsoever. But think

1:14:27.880 --> 1:14:31.360
<v Speaker 1>of the power that this person had. They were the

1:14:31.400 --> 1:14:35.840
<v Speaker 1>director of the premier intelligence agency in the world, and

1:14:35.880 --> 1:14:39.920
<v Speaker 1>instead of dealing with overseas threats, instead of dealing with

1:14:40.120 --> 1:14:45.559
<v Speaker 1>national security issues overseas, they were basically colluding with Russian

1:14:45.720 --> 1:14:50.040
<v Speaker 1>agents and a foreign British agent to take out the

1:14:50.080 --> 1:14:54.920
<v Speaker 1>President of the United States. Credible is this story, because

1:14:54.960 --> 1:14:57.880
<v Speaker 1>that's really what it was. The evidence is there, and

1:14:57.920 --> 1:15:00.879
<v Speaker 1>this is what everybody's not getting. And that's why Greg's

1:15:00.920 --> 1:15:04.000
<v Speaker 1>book is gonna be a blockbuster bestseller and this is

1:15:04.000 --> 1:15:07.639
<v Speaker 1>why you're reporting should get you a Pulitzer. Meanwhile, all

1:15:07.680 --> 1:15:09.760
<v Speaker 1>I get is trashed every day in the media. So

1:15:10.040 --> 1:15:12.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, I've I've got, I've got everything I deserve.

1:15:12.439 --> 1:15:15.320
<v Speaker 1>It's fine, you do. Now take the glory. Um, it's

1:15:15.360 --> 1:15:18.040
<v Speaker 1>about the truth though, and this is the biggest abuse

1:15:18.080 --> 1:15:21.559
<v Speaker 1>of power scandal in American history, and the smoking gun

1:15:21.600 --> 1:15:26.040
<v Speaker 1>evidence does exist as we continue with Greg Jarrett's new

1:15:26.040 --> 1:15:28.680
<v Speaker 1>book coming out just two weeks from today, and it

1:15:28.880 --> 1:15:31.519
<v Speaker 1>is the Russian hoax, the illicit scheme to clear Hillary

1:15:31.520 --> 1:15:35.560
<v Speaker 1>Clinton and framed Donald Trump and also Fox News investigative

1:15:35.560 --> 1:15:37.800
<v Speaker 1>reporter of Sarah Carter. They've agreed to actually hang out

1:15:37.880 --> 1:15:40.360
<v Speaker 1>through the next half hour as we're gonna go deeper

1:15:40.400 --> 1:15:43.360
<v Speaker 1>into this because we're only beginning to touch the surface. Um. So,

1:15:43.439 --> 1:15:47.240
<v Speaker 1>when Paige testifies, she's gonna be behind closed doors, but

1:15:47.560 --> 1:15:50.960
<v Speaker 1>Struck is going in front of the camera and we'll

1:15:51.000 --> 1:15:53.840
<v Speaker 1>see him for the first time, and from what I

1:15:53.920 --> 1:15:57.400
<v Speaker 1>understand is he's in even more trouble than we suspected.

1:15:57.720 --> 1:16:02.280
<v Speaker 1>Sarah Carter so much trouble, and it's incredible. At first,

1:16:02.320 --> 1:16:05.479
<v Speaker 1>his attorney was openly saying, you know, he wants to

1:16:05.520 --> 1:16:09.400
<v Speaker 1>testify publicly, he wants to talk to Congress, He'll be

1:16:09.479 --> 1:16:12.280
<v Speaker 1>forth coming, and then we know he went behind closed

1:16:12.320 --> 1:16:15.040
<v Speaker 1>doors and they were having a difficult time with him.

1:16:15.080 --> 1:16:17.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't suspect and I don't know what Greg's assumption

1:16:18.000 --> 1:16:19.960
<v Speaker 1>is on this that he is going to be as

1:16:20.080 --> 1:16:24.360
<v Speaker 1>forth coming in front of the public. Uh, it's going

1:16:24.400 --> 1:16:27.040
<v Speaker 1>to be very difficult for him because we have seen

1:16:27.120 --> 1:16:30.120
<v Speaker 1>too much evidence. There's too much out there. How can

1:16:30.120 --> 1:16:34.280
<v Speaker 1>he explain this away? Those text messages were very straightforward.

1:16:34.280 --> 1:16:36.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure Greg goes into great detail in his book

1:16:36.760 --> 1:16:40.880
<v Speaker 1>about them because they're explosive. I mean, he worked directly

1:16:41.000 --> 1:16:45.680
<v Speaker 1>under former Deputy Director Andrew McCabe and Comey. He was

1:16:45.720 --> 1:16:49.200
<v Speaker 1>in London. He was central figure in the Hillary Clinton

1:16:49.280 --> 1:16:54.280
<v Speaker 1>server investigation and at the top figure in the Russia investigation.

1:16:54.439 --> 1:16:58.200
<v Speaker 1>His connections were wide and deep, and he was working

1:16:58.200 --> 1:17:03.559
<v Speaker 1>in collusion with Lisa Page, his paramore and lover that

1:17:03.640 --> 1:17:05.400
<v Speaker 1>he was having an affair with and she was an

1:17:05.400 --> 1:17:08.400
<v Speaker 1>attorney at the FBI. And we also know that he

1:17:08.439 --> 1:17:12.000
<v Speaker 1>had very well connected, lots of connections in London, and

1:17:12.040 --> 1:17:15.000
<v Speaker 1>he was able to make things happen. So there is

1:17:15.040 --> 1:17:18.920
<v Speaker 1>going to be so much more information, so many questions

1:17:18.960 --> 1:17:22.280
<v Speaker 1>that Congress has of him and before the public. I

1:17:22.280 --> 1:17:24.320
<v Speaker 1>think it's going to be really difficult for him to

1:17:24.360 --> 1:17:26.479
<v Speaker 1>answer those, at least with the straight face. All Right,

1:17:26.479 --> 1:17:28.880
<v Speaker 1>we'll take a break. We'll continue. Greg and Sarah have

1:17:28.920 --> 1:17:32.200
<v Speaker 1>agreed to stay with us. Sarah Carter, investigative reporter, Fox

1:17:32.240 --> 1:17:35.639
<v Speaker 1>News contributor. Greg's book out in two weeks. The Russia Hoax,

1:17:35.680 --> 1:17:38.479
<v Speaker 1>The Illicits Game to Clear Hillary Clinton Framed Donald Trump,

1:17:38.760 --> 1:17:42.440
<v Speaker 1>now available online Hannity dot com, Amazon dot com bookstores

1:17:42.760 --> 1:17:46.879
<v Speaker 1>in two weeks. Also, we'll get Gregg's preview of tonight's

1:17:46.880 --> 1:17:51.200
<v Speaker 1>big announcement, the President selects his replacement for Justice Anthony

1:17:51.640 --> 1:17:54.680
<v Speaker 1>Kennedy on the Supreme Court. Quick break, right back, we'll

1:17:54.680 --> 1:17:57.519
<v Speaker 1>get to your calls. Also, final half hour, straight ahead. Alright,

1:17:57.560 --> 1:17:59.760
<v Speaker 1>twenty five ounces at the top of the hour. Nine

1:17:59.760 --> 1:18:02.040
<v Speaker 1>phone and Sean is our toll free telephone number. We

1:18:02.080 --> 1:18:04.320
<v Speaker 1>continue with Greg Jarrett's new book is coming out two

1:18:04.320 --> 1:18:08.040
<v Speaker 1>weeks now from today on Hannity dot com, bookstores everywhere,

1:18:08.680 --> 1:18:11.439
<v Speaker 1>Amazon dot com. And it's called The Russia Hoax, The

1:18:11.439 --> 1:18:14.519
<v Speaker 1>Elicits Game to clear Hillary Clinton frame Donald Trump. Sarah Carter,

1:18:14.600 --> 1:18:17.920
<v Speaker 1>investigative reporter, Fox News contributor, All right, let me just

1:18:18.120 --> 1:18:20.080
<v Speaker 1>change topics briefly, and then we're gonna get back to

1:18:20.080 --> 1:18:23.040
<v Speaker 1>Peter Struck here in just a second. Uh So, the

1:18:23.040 --> 1:18:27.639
<v Speaker 1>President at nine oh one thirty Eastern six oh one

1:18:27.760 --> 1:18:31.680
<v Speaker 1>thirty Pacific will announce his choice who he wants to

1:18:31.680 --> 1:18:35.400
<v Speaker 1>replace on the Supreme Court, replace Anthony Kennedy. What are

1:18:35.439 --> 1:18:37.880
<v Speaker 1>your thoughts on the names we keep hearing Greg Jarrett

1:18:38.200 --> 1:18:44.120
<v Speaker 1>Well Kavanaugh, Barrett Hardeman, Larson Catholicge. Those are the contenders reportedly,

1:18:44.240 --> 1:18:47.680
<v Speaker 1>and you cannot go wrong if you're Donald Trump or

1:18:48.080 --> 1:18:51.799
<v Speaker 1>ardent conservative with any of them. They're all young age

1:18:52.240 --> 1:18:54.880
<v Speaker 1>forty five is the youngest, Barrett all the way to

1:18:55.040 --> 1:18:58.600
<v Speaker 1>fifty three. Uh, Kavanaugh and Harteman, So they'll be on

1:18:58.640 --> 1:19:01.040
<v Speaker 1>the court for a long time. And they're all either

1:19:01.240 --> 1:19:07.559
<v Speaker 1>proven originalists or textualists, and that is what conservatives want

1:19:07.640 --> 1:19:10.960
<v Speaker 1>and need to replace, Uh Anthony Kennedy on the court.

1:19:11.080 --> 1:19:13.840
<v Speaker 1>So you could put all five names up on a

1:19:13.920 --> 1:19:17.880
<v Speaker 1>dartboard and throw darts and it doesn't matter where it lands.

1:19:18.520 --> 1:19:22.120
<v Speaker 1>You're a winner if you're Donald. And they're all conservative

1:19:22.880 --> 1:19:27.840
<v Speaker 1>confirmable people, which is important now. Having said that, some

1:19:28.040 --> 1:19:32.280
<v Speaker 1>are more easily confirmed than others. For example, Hardeman, uh

1:19:32.760 --> 1:19:37.120
<v Speaker 1>was confirmed for the Appellate Court ninety five to zero.

1:19:37.520 --> 1:19:41.400
<v Speaker 1>So he is probably, in my judgment, the the most confirmable,

1:19:41.520 --> 1:19:46.960
<v Speaker 1>the easiest confirmed. But you know who got Hardeman, Harteman

1:19:47.760 --> 1:19:50.280
<v Speaker 1>to zero. Not a single vote against Harteman. And it's

1:19:50.479 --> 1:19:53.160
<v Speaker 1>very hard for the U. S. Senate, although the composition

1:19:53.240 --> 1:19:55.880
<v Speaker 1>is now different. Uh, it's very hard to just support

1:19:55.920 --> 1:19:59.280
<v Speaker 1>him then and not now exactly exactly, which is why

1:19:59.320 --> 1:20:02.439
<v Speaker 1>you know, if I'm going for the easiest pick, it's Hardeman.

1:20:02.680 --> 1:20:05.360
<v Speaker 1>It's also Pennsylvania and he's also and by the way,

1:20:05.360 --> 1:20:07.200
<v Speaker 1>it serves on the same court. I believe as the

1:20:07.200 --> 1:20:10.759
<v Speaker 1>President's sister, Yeah, she recommended here, and uh, you know, look,

1:20:11.080 --> 1:20:13.640
<v Speaker 1>I look up to my sister, uh, and you know,

1:20:13.680 --> 1:20:15.320
<v Speaker 1>I think he looks up to his pig sus. I

1:20:15.400 --> 1:20:19.400
<v Speaker 1>know that former Senator Santorum is a big supporter of Hardeman.

1:20:19.439 --> 1:20:22.000
<v Speaker 1>When speaks volumes of of you know, I think he

1:20:22.080 --> 1:20:24.360
<v Speaker 1>goes a long way. Uh, let me ask Sarah one

1:20:24.400 --> 1:20:27.799
<v Speaker 1>Supreme Court question. Because you're roaming the halls of Capitol

1:20:27.840 --> 1:20:30.519
<v Speaker 1>Hill constantly, what are you hearing in terms of is

1:20:30.520 --> 1:20:33.120
<v Speaker 1>there any one name that keeps popping up? It had

1:20:33.160 --> 1:20:37.280
<v Speaker 1>been all Kavanaugh most of last week, and now things

1:20:37.280 --> 1:20:39.400
<v Speaker 1>seem to be up in the air, and nobody seems

1:20:39.400 --> 1:20:41.439
<v Speaker 1>to seems to know which way the president is going

1:20:41.479 --> 1:20:44.720
<v Speaker 1>to go. Well, Kavanaugh was certainly being talked about and

1:20:44.760 --> 1:20:47.760
<v Speaker 1>being discussed, but I think Hardeman is a name that

1:20:47.800 --> 1:20:50.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm hearing over and over again. So I think Gregg

1:20:50.200 --> 1:20:53.680
<v Speaker 1>is right on the money there. Look what greg is right.

1:20:54.160 --> 1:20:57.320
<v Speaker 1>Wherever they throw this start, it's going to be a

1:20:57.320 --> 1:21:00.160
<v Speaker 1>win for the president and and the bigger win is

1:21:00.240 --> 1:21:03.400
<v Speaker 1>his legacy. You know, call it fate, call it what

1:21:03.800 --> 1:21:07.439
<v Speaker 1>you know, Justice Kennedy, did you know by stepping off

1:21:07.479 --> 1:21:11.439
<v Speaker 1>the bench and allowing the president to pick a new

1:21:11.520 --> 1:21:16.120
<v Speaker 1>Supreme Court justice, But he is actually building his legacy.

1:21:16.200 --> 1:21:18.640
<v Speaker 1>And this is a huge legacy to build. It's a

1:21:18.720 --> 1:21:22.120
<v Speaker 1>huge thing to leave behind, particularly for the Republican, for

1:21:22.160 --> 1:21:25.240
<v Speaker 1>the Conservatives, and this is something that I think people

1:21:25.280 --> 1:21:27.360
<v Speaker 1>have been waiting for for some time. So I think

1:21:27.400 --> 1:21:32.040
<v Speaker 1>tonight when he makes this decision. If he picks Hardeman, uh,

1:21:32.080 --> 1:21:35.200
<v Speaker 1>he'll have a much easier time getting him confirmed. But

1:21:35.720 --> 1:21:39.599
<v Speaker 1>whoever he picks, he has definitely solidified his legacy, at

1:21:39.680 --> 1:21:42.559
<v Speaker 1>least with the Supreme Court. Agree with that. Okay, Now

1:21:42.640 --> 1:21:44.720
<v Speaker 1>let me move on back to our other topic, um,

1:21:44.720 --> 1:21:46.719
<v Speaker 1>where there's gonna be a lot of news this week.

1:21:47.080 --> 1:21:48.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean a lot of news. I know of at

1:21:48.720 --> 1:21:53.320
<v Speaker 1>least two, probably three big stories that will be broken

1:21:53.400 --> 1:21:55.720
<v Speaker 1>this week as it relates to Deep State Kate. And

1:21:55.720 --> 1:21:59.479
<v Speaker 1>then we've got senior Justice Department prosecutor that it was

1:21:59.560 --> 1:22:02.880
<v Speaker 1>Andrew Wiseman Mueller's pit pull, that in fact met with

1:22:02.960 --> 1:22:08.560
<v Speaker 1>the Associated Press in April to discuss so called circumstances

1:22:08.560 --> 1:22:12.680
<v Speaker 1>surrounding Paul Manafort's case, which he is the lead counsel on,

1:22:13.479 --> 1:22:16.840
<v Speaker 1>and that in fact, um and then was appointed by

1:22:16.920 --> 1:22:19.479
<v Speaker 1>Robert Mueller after but in fact may have been involved

1:22:19.479 --> 1:22:22.439
<v Speaker 1>in leaking grand jury information and the fact that a

1:22:22.479 --> 1:22:24.880
<v Speaker 1>grand jury had been convened in the man of fourth case.

1:22:25.200 --> 1:22:26.920
<v Speaker 1>What do we know about the Sarah, it's your latest

1:22:26.920 --> 1:22:30.240
<v Speaker 1>column today? Oh well, this is this is big developments. Now.

1:22:30.280 --> 1:22:33.280
<v Speaker 1>You remember in January, Sean we first broke the story

1:22:33.360 --> 1:22:36.880
<v Speaker 1>that Andrew Wiseman had actually met with the Associated Press,

1:22:36.920 --> 1:22:39.720
<v Speaker 1>that he had this like secret meeting with the Associated

1:22:39.720 --> 1:22:42.400
<v Speaker 1>Press reporters. It was in April eleven to two thousand

1:22:42.439 --> 1:22:45.639
<v Speaker 1>and sixteen, and the day after he met with them,

1:22:45.960 --> 1:22:50.160
<v Speaker 1>the Associated Press broke their big explosive expose on Manafort

1:22:50.439 --> 1:22:54.200
<v Speaker 1>talking about his dealings with Ukraine. What was really fascinating

1:22:54.240 --> 1:22:57.559
<v Speaker 1>about this, Remember, at the time, Andrew Wiseman wasn't a

1:22:57.560 --> 1:23:00.840
<v Speaker 1>part of the Special Council. He was the top prosecutor

1:23:00.960 --> 1:23:04.240
<v Speaker 1>over at the Justice Department. And now we find, based

1:23:04.280 --> 1:23:09.880
<v Speaker 1>on the document submitted by Weissman by Manaford's attorneys, that

1:23:09.920 --> 1:23:13.160
<v Speaker 1>it was Weissman himself who called for that meeting. And

1:23:13.240 --> 1:23:16.639
<v Speaker 1>during that time there was a grand jury that had

1:23:16.720 --> 1:23:21.519
<v Speaker 1>convened about Paul Maniford. So this is really a big

1:23:21.520 --> 1:23:24.639
<v Speaker 1>deal for them, and they really are making huge strides

1:23:24.680 --> 1:23:27.360
<v Speaker 1>that they were able to expose this because now it's

1:23:27.400 --> 1:23:29.679
<v Speaker 1>going to be up to the judge at the Eastern

1:23:29.720 --> 1:23:32.639
<v Speaker 1>District here in Virginia. They're going to make the decision,

1:23:32.680 --> 1:23:35.200
<v Speaker 1>and this judge has tended to be very lenient towards

1:23:35.280 --> 1:23:37.920
<v Speaker 1>them when it comes to these issues because he does

1:23:38.000 --> 1:23:40.720
<v Speaker 1>not want exculpatory evidence withheld and that was a big

1:23:40.760 --> 1:23:44.479
<v Speaker 1>deal with Wiseman in the past. Remember it has been criticized. Well,

1:23:44.520 --> 1:23:47.639
<v Speaker 1>the judges actually said straight up that the judge will

1:23:47.680 --> 1:23:50.400
<v Speaker 1>decide in this case what is exculpatory and what is

1:23:50.439 --> 1:23:53.880
<v Speaker 1>not absolutely and he's going to stick to it. But

1:23:54.000 --> 1:23:58.360
<v Speaker 1>now we have all this new evidence that is surfacing,

1:23:58.600 --> 1:24:02.439
<v Speaker 1>and this is important evidence because Andrew Wiseman, according to

1:24:03.000 --> 1:24:05.880
<v Speaker 1>the FBI agents that were in attendance at this meeting,

1:24:06.479 --> 1:24:12.600
<v Speaker 1>according to them, Andrew Wiseman did assist these reporters, allegedly

1:24:13.000 --> 1:24:16.240
<v Speaker 1>had them in the right direction, talked about man of

1:24:16.320 --> 1:24:18.720
<v Speaker 1>Ford's case. This is something that should not be done.

1:24:18.840 --> 1:24:22.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure Greg can talk about the legal issues surrounding this,

1:24:22.439 --> 1:24:25.320
<v Speaker 1>but you cannot. This is a grand jury. This is secretive.

1:24:25.560 --> 1:24:27.519
<v Speaker 1>This is supposed to be secretive. And this is the

1:24:27.600 --> 1:24:31.639
<v Speaker 1>reason why the FBI after this meeting, they weren't expecting

1:24:31.640 --> 1:24:34.280
<v Speaker 1>this meeting to take place. They actually believed that the

1:24:34.320 --> 1:24:36.720
<v Speaker 1>meeting was set up by the Associated Press, and this

1:24:36.760 --> 1:24:39.920
<v Speaker 1>is according to my sources, and that the the Associated

1:24:39.960 --> 1:24:43.120
<v Speaker 1>Press was going to actually give them information and when

1:24:43.160 --> 1:24:45.960
<v Speaker 1>they got into the meeting, it was none of that.

1:24:46.360 --> 1:24:49.280
<v Speaker 1>The Associated press apparently, according to the sources that I

1:24:49.320 --> 1:24:51.920
<v Speaker 1>spoke with, were like, we're not here to give you information,

1:24:51.960 --> 1:24:54.840
<v Speaker 1>We're here to get information. And now we know that

1:24:54.920 --> 1:24:57.439
<v Speaker 1>Wiseman was the one that set it up. That meeting,

1:24:57.600 --> 1:25:01.439
<v Speaker 1>I have been told lasted more than thirty minutes. There

1:25:01.479 --> 1:25:04.960
<v Speaker 1>were a number of questions being asked by the associated press,

1:25:05.000 --> 1:25:08.639
<v Speaker 1>and apparently and allegedly, Wiseman was aiding them and kind

1:25:08.680 --> 1:25:11.160
<v Speaker 1>of nudging them on in the direction you wanted them.

1:25:11.360 --> 1:25:13.439
<v Speaker 1>There's a reason why Wiseman is no longer at the

1:25:13.520 --> 1:25:16.479
<v Speaker 1>prosecution's table in the Paul Mana four cases anymore. He

1:25:16.880 --> 1:25:21.639
<v Speaker 1>kicked off. He was kicked off. I'm I suspect that

1:25:21.920 --> 1:25:24.759
<v Speaker 1>Robert Mueller has kicked him off the case. Well, because

1:25:24.800 --> 1:25:28.360
<v Speaker 1>of this and other things, you'll no longer see Wiseman,

1:25:28.400 --> 1:25:31.880
<v Speaker 1>and the Wiseman was leading the charge when when Judge

1:25:31.920 --> 1:25:34.920
<v Speaker 1>Ellis the third beat them down, I never saw a

1:25:34.960 --> 1:25:37.800
<v Speaker 1>bigger beat down. And that is Judge Ellis saying, oh,

1:25:37.880 --> 1:25:39.880
<v Speaker 1>we all know what you're doing here. We know you're

1:25:39.880 --> 1:25:42.760
<v Speaker 1>putting the screws to Manafort and the hopes that he's

1:25:42.800 --> 1:25:46.559
<v Speaker 1>gonna sing or compose, compose I interpret to be subortin

1:25:46.600 --> 1:25:48.519
<v Speaker 1>perjury to say anything you need to get out of

1:25:48.560 --> 1:25:51.880
<v Speaker 1>a potential jail sentence. And by the way, how many

1:25:51.920 --> 1:25:54.680
<v Speaker 1>days now has Paul Manaphort been twenty three hours a

1:25:54.760 --> 1:25:59.960
<v Speaker 1>day confined, never convicted of a thing. And by the way,

1:26:00.160 --> 1:26:03.479
<v Speaker 1>Manafort apparently reached out to a quote potential witness that

1:26:03.479 --> 1:26:05.640
<v Speaker 1>he never even talked to, as I understand it, and

1:26:06.160 --> 1:26:08.280
<v Speaker 1>what might have been an attempt to get in touch

1:26:08.360 --> 1:26:11.559
<v Speaker 1>with the person. But putting all of that aside, I mean,

1:26:11.800 --> 1:26:14.479
<v Speaker 1>Wiseman was the lead guy. And and they said, the

1:26:14.520 --> 1:26:16.600
<v Speaker 1>reason they want to put the screws to Manafort to

1:26:16.640 --> 1:26:18.640
<v Speaker 1>make them sing or compose it because they want to

1:26:18.640 --> 1:26:23.160
<v Speaker 1>either prosecute or or get informations who impeached Donald Trump

1:26:24.640 --> 1:26:28.960
<v Speaker 1>on TL T SLIS. The judge said, well, wait a minute,

1:26:29.240 --> 1:26:33.120
<v Speaker 1>where did you get this case? Did this case arise

1:26:33.400 --> 1:26:40.080
<v Speaker 1>from the special counsel investigation? And during court room testimony, uh,

1:26:40.240 --> 1:26:43.519
<v Speaker 1>the prosecutors had to confess, no, it didn't. We dug

1:26:43.560 --> 1:26:50.280
<v Speaker 1>it out of the dusty archives in the I R. S. Division. Justice,

1:26:50.400 --> 1:26:54.160
<v Speaker 1>that's right, the Tax Department division. So the judge said, well,

1:26:54.320 --> 1:26:56.160
<v Speaker 1>where do you get the authority? You only have authority

1:26:56.200 --> 1:26:59.759
<v Speaker 1>if something arises out of your assignment as special counsel.

1:27:00.160 --> 1:27:03.080
<v Speaker 1>Now in the end the judge has said I'm gonna

1:27:03.160 --> 1:27:07.680
<v Speaker 1>let it go forward, but I still have reservations about this.

1:27:08.200 --> 1:27:11.840
<v Speaker 1>And uh, you know, Paul Manaford is in solitary confinement,

1:27:11.880 --> 1:27:15.320
<v Speaker 1>behind bars. He's not a violent offender. And this was

1:27:15.360 --> 1:27:17.479
<v Speaker 1>the decision of the d C judge, by the way,

1:27:17.520 --> 1:27:21.040
<v Speaker 1>not Ellis. It's a confin Listen, if twenty three hours

1:27:21.200 --> 1:27:24.360
<v Speaker 1>in a jail cell and you're not all you are

1:27:24.520 --> 1:27:27.800
<v Speaker 1>is charged, you're not convicted of anything. They dug back

1:27:27.840 --> 1:27:31.000
<v Speaker 1>to two thousand and five. But the very reasons Judge

1:27:31.000 --> 1:27:35.120
<v Speaker 1>Ellis courageously spoke out about Sarah, I've got to be honest.

1:27:35.160 --> 1:27:38.280
<v Speaker 1>They are trying to break him hard. They're trying to

1:27:38.320 --> 1:27:41.080
<v Speaker 1>break him and they're doing a job of it because

1:27:41.160 --> 1:27:44.759
<v Speaker 1>right now he's sitting in Northern Neck Regional Jail in Worthaw, Virginia,

1:27:45.120 --> 1:27:47.680
<v Speaker 1>and he has only had twenty three hours a day

1:27:47.720 --> 1:27:49.840
<v Speaker 1>of he's had twenty three hours a day of solitary

1:27:49.840 --> 1:27:54.280
<v Speaker 1>confinement and only one hour outside of that solitary confinement.

1:27:54.360 --> 1:27:57.400
<v Speaker 1>It's one hour a day. That's it. That's it. One

1:27:57.400 --> 1:28:02.240
<v Speaker 1>hour a day he's restricted. He can't even receive electronic communications.

1:28:02.640 --> 1:28:06.120
<v Speaker 1>His phone calls are restricted to ten minutes each. This

1:28:06.200 --> 1:28:09.880
<v Speaker 1>is really an incredible amount of pressure being put on

1:28:09.880 --> 1:28:13.000
<v Speaker 1>one person who I have been told by sources is

1:28:13.080 --> 1:28:16.920
<v Speaker 1>not going to cooperate because he has nothing to cooperate on. Well,

1:28:16.920 --> 1:28:19.719
<v Speaker 1>this is why, Well, this is why the judge said,

1:28:19.760 --> 1:28:23.280
<v Speaker 1>not just sing. Singing would be obviously a tune that

1:28:23.320 --> 1:28:25.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, composing would be what do you want me

1:28:25.920 --> 1:28:27.760
<v Speaker 1>to say so I can get out of this, this

1:28:27.960 --> 1:28:31.599
<v Speaker 1>disastrous situation of twenty three hours a day. Prosecutors know

1:28:32.080 --> 1:28:35.559
<v Speaker 1>that if you apply enough pressure on somebody financially, on

1:28:35.640 --> 1:28:40.439
<v Speaker 1>their family, or on them personally solitary confinement twenty three

1:28:40.439 --> 1:28:44.160
<v Speaker 1>hours a day, that person has a very good likelihood

1:28:44.240 --> 1:28:49.200
<v Speaker 1>of cracking and signing anything. Even a composed statement that

1:28:49.320 --> 1:28:51.599
<v Speaker 1>is nothing more than a lot sounds a lot like

1:28:51.680 --> 1:28:58.200
<v Speaker 1>a movie where we watch Americans held abroad or former POWs.

1:28:58.240 --> 1:29:02.960
<v Speaker 1>I have always said that if a pow being tortured

1:29:03.160 --> 1:29:07.360
<v Speaker 1>signs a document, they do not deserve to get judged

1:29:07.439 --> 1:29:12.000
<v Speaker 1>by the American people because of the circumstances under which

1:29:12.240 --> 1:29:16.080
<v Speaker 1>none of us have ever lived. And there they have

1:29:16.240 --> 1:29:21.040
<v Speaker 1>over two million documents that Robert Mueller has produced to

1:29:21.160 --> 1:29:26.840
<v Speaker 1>his attorneys. On Friday, apparently fifty thousand more documents were

1:29:26.880 --> 1:29:30.439
<v Speaker 1>handed over. This is only weeks before he's supposed to

1:29:30.479 --> 1:29:33.120
<v Speaker 1>go to trial, and he can't even sit with his

1:29:33.160 --> 1:29:37.479
<v Speaker 1>attorneys to go over these documents before the trial date.

1:29:37.720 --> 1:29:40.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's really incredible what they're doing to him.

1:29:40.360 --> 1:29:43.719
<v Speaker 1>They didn't have to throw him in solitary confinement behind bars.

1:29:43.840 --> 1:29:47.519
<v Speaker 1>The judge, the DC judge in this particular case, so well,

1:29:47.520 --> 1:29:50.080
<v Speaker 1>one of my I can't take away his cell phone. Yes,

1:29:50.200 --> 1:29:53.400
<v Speaker 1>your honor, you can take away his cell phone. You

1:29:53.439 --> 1:29:56.200
<v Speaker 1>can confine him to his home with an ankle bracelet

1:29:56.600 --> 1:29:59.360
<v Speaker 1>disconnect his computer and his telephones and take away his

1:29:59.400 --> 1:30:02.760
<v Speaker 1>cell phones. That would have been the proper thing to do.

1:30:02.840 --> 1:30:06.599
<v Speaker 1>But this judge did not want to do justice. Why

1:30:06.880 --> 1:30:09.479
<v Speaker 1>is it that this stands at some point? You know,

1:30:09.520 --> 1:30:12.679
<v Speaker 1>it's almost like this is now and what I thought

1:30:13.120 --> 1:30:16.720
<v Speaker 1>there was the presumption of innocence. In what way is

1:30:16.960 --> 1:30:20.720
<v Speaker 1>Paul Manafort a threat to others in society? When I'm

1:30:20.760 --> 1:30:24.160
<v Speaker 1>talking about a mob murderer here, when I'm talking about

1:30:24.160 --> 1:30:28.120
<v Speaker 1>a big time drug dealer here, We're not talking about

1:30:28.160 --> 1:30:30.839
<v Speaker 1>somebody that you know, a gang member that is seeking

1:30:31.040 --> 1:30:34.160
<v Speaker 1>vengeance in some way. But talking about a two thousand

1:30:34.200 --> 1:30:36.599
<v Speaker 1>and five tax case, right, it's a it's a tax

1:30:36.600 --> 1:30:40.840
<v Speaker 1>fraud case, and and it's absurd and outrageous that he

1:30:41.160 --> 1:30:44.439
<v Speaker 1>be thrown in jail pending trial for this. There were

1:30:44.520 --> 1:30:48.360
<v Speaker 1>other ways to handle it, but this just underscores that

1:30:48.479 --> 1:30:51.320
<v Speaker 1>Manaphort cannot get a fair trial in d C in

1:30:51.360 --> 1:30:54.040
<v Speaker 1>front of that particular judge or in front of a

1:30:54.160 --> 1:30:57.960
<v Speaker 1>d C jury, And in fact, the other case in Alexandria, Virginia,

1:30:58.160 --> 1:31:00.519
<v Speaker 1>he can't get a fair trial there. He gets a

1:31:00.560 --> 1:31:03.760
<v Speaker 1>fair judge T. S Elis, but they ought to move

1:31:03.800 --> 1:31:06.000
<v Speaker 1>it to Ranoke, Virginia, where you can get a fair trial.

1:31:06.120 --> 1:31:09.959
<v Speaker 1>Now let me go. This trial starts July. Of two trials,

1:31:09.960 --> 1:31:12.920
<v Speaker 1>and the second one is apparently scheduled for September seventeen,

1:31:13.360 --> 1:31:17.200
<v Speaker 1>and this in Washington, d C. So you're you're absolutely right, Greg,

1:31:17.600 --> 1:31:20.160
<v Speaker 1>There's been a lot of people talking about that needing

1:31:20.200 --> 1:31:23.599
<v Speaker 1>to be moved. Yeah. Well, let me ask this because

1:31:23.640 --> 1:31:26.240
<v Speaker 1>I think this is very very important. I just want

1:31:26.280 --> 1:31:28.680
<v Speaker 1>to know. One, are the options that Manafort has at

1:31:28.720 --> 1:31:32.080
<v Speaker 1>this time, Well, he's he's exercising one of them, actually

1:31:32.080 --> 1:31:37.160
<v Speaker 1>two of them. He is appealing his confinement. Uh, and

1:31:37.240 --> 1:31:40.120
<v Speaker 1>he has a very solid legal basis for doing that,

1:31:40.160 --> 1:31:43.320
<v Speaker 1>because this is way over the top abusive by the

1:31:43.400 --> 1:31:46.719
<v Speaker 1>special counsel and the judge in d C. And second

1:31:46.720 --> 1:31:49.640
<v Speaker 1>of all, he is making a motion for moving the

1:31:49.720 --> 1:31:53.439
<v Speaker 1>venue too, as I said to run O Virginia, where

1:31:53.439 --> 1:31:56.759
<v Speaker 1>he can get a fair shot at justice there, because

1:31:56.800 --> 1:32:00.720
<v Speaker 1>in d C and Alexandria that are so uh pro

1:32:00.880 --> 1:32:04.719
<v Speaker 1>Hillary Clinton, they voted that way. They're anti Donald Trump,

1:32:04.880 --> 1:32:07.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, and this is a political case where they

1:32:07.320 --> 1:32:10.160
<v Speaker 1>like it or not. Uh, he cannot get a fair trial.

1:32:10.240 --> 1:32:12.720
<v Speaker 1>So those are his two options right now. All right,

1:32:12.760 --> 1:32:14.679
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna have to let you both go, but we'll

1:32:14.720 --> 1:32:17.559
<v Speaker 1>be following all of this nine oh one thirty tonight

1:32:17.640 --> 1:32:20.400
<v Speaker 1>Eastern time on Hannity. The President makes his choice on

1:32:20.479 --> 1:32:24.400
<v Speaker 1>the United States Supreme Court. Also, we have a lot

1:32:24.400 --> 1:32:26.479
<v Speaker 1>of big news with the deep state that is breaking.

1:32:26.479 --> 1:32:29.680
<v Speaker 1>While an update on Manta Fort. We're expecting protests all

1:32:29.680 --> 1:32:32.720
<v Speaker 1>over Europe coming up later this week. We'll be broadcasting

1:32:32.720 --> 1:32:35.120
<v Speaker 1>from there. Thank you, Greg, thank you, Sarah. Quick break

1:32:35.200 --> 1:32:38.519
<v Speaker 1>right back Hannity tonight at nine breaking news, the President

1:32:38.520 --> 1:32:43.479
<v Speaker 1>announced his Supreme Court justice. Alright, that's gonna wrap things

1:32:43.560 --> 1:32:45.759
<v Speaker 1>up for today. All right, We're almost three hours away

1:32:45.760 --> 1:32:50.480
<v Speaker 1>now nine oh one thirty Eastern, six oh one thirty Pacific.

1:32:50.600 --> 1:32:52.280
<v Speaker 1>Just as Hannity comes on the air on the Fox

1:32:52.360 --> 1:32:55.040
<v Speaker 1>News Channel, the President will announce his choice for the U. S.

1:32:55.040 --> 1:32:58.280
<v Speaker 1>Supreme Court, Jay Seculo. We have judged Jenny and Pirou.

1:32:58.400 --> 1:33:02.599
<v Speaker 1>We have Greg Jarrett, Andy McCarthy, We have had Henry

1:33:02.640 --> 1:33:05.400
<v Speaker 1>and Washington. Shannon Bream isn't Washington, She's our expert of

1:33:05.439 --> 1:33:08.880
<v Speaker 1>the Supreme Court. Also, we'll check in with Sarah Carter,

1:33:09.160 --> 1:33:12.800
<v Speaker 1>John Solomon, and much more. That's nine Eastern. Don't miss

1:33:12.880 --> 1:33:15.240
<v Speaker 1>the action tonight on Hannity on the Fox News Channel.