WEBVTT - Charlie Kirk analyzes Trump's new immigration plan

0:00:00.240 --> 0:00:03.880
<v Speaker 1>This is the buck Sexton Show, where the mission or

0:00:03.960 --> 0:00:08.080
<v Speaker 1>mission is to decode what really matters with actionable intelligence.

0:00:10.280 --> 0:00:14.000
<v Speaker 1>Make no mistake, America, You're a great American. Again the

0:00:14.000 --> 0:00:24.119
<v Speaker 1>buck Sexton Show begins. Remember the Hello everybody, This is

0:00:24.320 --> 0:00:28.760
<v Speaker 1>Charlie Kirk filling in for the Great Buck Sexton on

0:00:28.840 --> 0:00:32.199
<v Speaker 1>the buck Sexton Radio Show. I was with you a

0:00:32.240 --> 0:00:35.120
<v Speaker 1>couple days ago. Just thrilled to be back here on

0:00:35.280 --> 0:00:38.600
<v Speaker 1>familiar turf. Buck Sexton is a patriot. Buck Sexton is

0:00:38.600 --> 0:00:41.760
<v Speaker 1>a hero. It's terrific to be here. A lot going

0:00:41.800 --> 0:00:46.919
<v Speaker 1>on in the news today seems that it's amazing how

0:00:47.040 --> 0:00:51.839
<v Speaker 1>upset the left and Democrats get whenever there are measures,

0:00:51.840 --> 0:00:54.680
<v Speaker 1>wherever there are efforts to try to save lives. I'm

0:00:54.720 --> 0:01:00.760
<v Speaker 1>on board, children, It's amazing how upset the left, how

0:01:00.840 --> 0:01:04.520
<v Speaker 1>much they rage, how much victory all there is when

0:01:04.560 --> 0:01:10.039
<v Speaker 1>conservatives and Republicans do whatever they can to protect the unborn.

0:01:11.760 --> 0:01:15.319
<v Speaker 1>And I want to go slowly but deliberately about this

0:01:15.360 --> 0:01:18.319
<v Speaker 1>abortion issue. So I got a lot of questions about it,

0:01:18.360 --> 0:01:21.080
<v Speaker 1>and I think there's a lot of confusion around this topic.

0:01:23.000 --> 0:01:27.840
<v Speaker 1>First and foremost, we have to decide when life begins.

0:01:29.640 --> 0:01:36.000
<v Speaker 1>We have a universal medically adopted, medically agreed upon consensus

0:01:37.480 --> 0:01:41.600
<v Speaker 1>of when life ends. We can say we issue a

0:01:41.600 --> 0:01:47.240
<v Speaker 1>death certificate of when a life is over. However, we

0:01:47.319 --> 0:01:51.520
<v Speaker 1>do not have that same sort of consensus of when

0:01:51.560 --> 0:01:55.600
<v Speaker 1>life begins. In fact, there is no agreement, There is

0:01:55.680 --> 0:02:03.840
<v Speaker 1>no sort of determination, for lack of a better term,

0:02:04.800 --> 0:02:08.400
<v Speaker 1>of when that life begins. And so typically those of

0:02:08.480 --> 0:02:13.720
<v Speaker 1>us that are pro life believe that life begins when

0:02:13.760 --> 0:02:18.799
<v Speaker 1>the sperm and the egg meet. This is commonly called conception.

0:02:19.680 --> 0:02:24.840
<v Speaker 1>That is, when there is the unique and magical blend

0:02:25.520 --> 0:02:29.920
<v Speaker 1>of two different beings capacity to reproduce, something happens there

0:02:30.520 --> 0:02:38.960
<v Speaker 1>that will never happen again. More specifically, there is a DNA,

0:02:39.160 --> 0:02:44.600
<v Speaker 1>There is a mixture that is so unique that the

0:02:44.800 --> 0:02:49.800
<v Speaker 1>termination of that rather intentional such as abortion or birth control,

0:02:49.800 --> 0:02:57.760
<v Speaker 1>are unintentional such as a miscarriage, will make that unique

0:02:57.840 --> 0:03:00.720
<v Speaker 1>being disappear forever. And so that's where we start from.

0:03:00.760 --> 0:03:03.000
<v Speaker 1>Those of us that are pro life, we start from

0:03:03.919 --> 0:03:09.040
<v Speaker 1>the scientific that's right, I'm using that word scientific, the

0:03:09.200 --> 0:03:18.400
<v Speaker 1>scientific fact that life begins. And so the first question

0:03:18.520 --> 0:03:20.520
<v Speaker 1>that I always have when I'm debating people that are

0:03:20.560 --> 0:03:25.280
<v Speaker 1>pro choice, do is they call the being? I think

0:03:25.280 --> 0:03:26.560
<v Speaker 1>that's what I'm going to call it just as a

0:03:26.600 --> 0:03:29.640
<v Speaker 1>neutral term to describe as they call the being in

0:03:29.680 --> 0:03:32.520
<v Speaker 1>the womb a fetus. They say it's a fetus. They

0:03:32.560 --> 0:03:35.720
<v Speaker 1>see it's a fetus, they see it's a fetus. So

0:03:35.760 --> 0:03:40.320
<v Speaker 1>my first question always is is the fetus alive or not?

0:03:41.840 --> 0:03:45.760
<v Speaker 1>And of course they say, yeah, the fetus is alive. Okay,

0:03:45.760 --> 0:03:50.840
<v Speaker 1>So then discontinuing the fetus would be making something not alive.

0:03:51.480 --> 0:03:54.680
<v Speaker 1>What do we call that? Let make it's silent. We

0:03:54.880 --> 0:03:58.200
<v Speaker 1>usually would call that being dead. In order to make

0:03:58.240 --> 0:04:01.160
<v Speaker 1>something dead, you have to end a life. I say,

0:04:01.160 --> 0:04:04.520
<v Speaker 1>oh no, no, that's demagoguery. You're playing linguistical terms. I said, oh, okay, fine,

0:04:05.320 --> 0:04:10.880
<v Speaker 1>what species is the fetus? What species is the fetus?

0:04:11.560 --> 0:04:15.480
<v Speaker 1>Because Whoopi Goldberg had this whole deal the other day

0:04:15.520 --> 0:04:17.560
<v Speaker 1>where I think she said it's not a human in

0:04:19.080 --> 0:04:22.600
<v Speaker 1>the womb. She said something along those lines. I hear

0:04:22.640 --> 0:04:26.359
<v Speaker 1>this a lot, and I think about it. Wow, those

0:04:26.400 --> 0:04:30.440
<v Speaker 1>people that really believe in evolution have accelerated their viewpoint.

0:04:30.440 --> 0:04:32.240
<v Speaker 1>Are you trying to tell me that there's a species

0:04:32.360 --> 0:04:38.360
<v Speaker 1>change that happens within the womb, that actually there's something

0:04:38.480 --> 0:04:48.520
<v Speaker 1>pre human about being a fetus that there's something pre human.

0:04:48.760 --> 0:04:50.360
<v Speaker 1>I just said that twice. I'm trying to think a

0:04:50.400 --> 0:04:52.520
<v Speaker 1>better way to say it, but there's something before being

0:04:52.560 --> 0:04:55.920
<v Speaker 1>a human being, about being a fetus. And and of

0:04:56.000 --> 0:05:01.560
<v Speaker 1>course the answer, of course there isn't because the essence

0:05:01.560 --> 0:05:06.440
<v Speaker 1>of what an abortion does is it ends human life

0:05:07.160 --> 0:05:09.640
<v Speaker 1>that is a human being at the moment of conception.

0:05:10.520 --> 0:05:13.159
<v Speaker 1>And so those of us that came that care about

0:05:13.200 --> 0:05:17.120
<v Speaker 1>the rights and the protections of all people. We care

0:05:17.240 --> 0:05:19.960
<v Speaker 1>that as soon as the sperm and the egg, meat,

0:05:20.000 --> 0:05:22.760
<v Speaker 1>and conception happens, that there should be some form of

0:05:22.800 --> 0:05:29.320
<v Speaker 1>protection for that being. And we understand that you can

0:05:29.520 --> 0:05:32.240
<v Speaker 1>live in a very mixed society and that you have

0:05:32.320 --> 0:05:35.440
<v Speaker 1>to have conversations. And you have one form of the

0:05:35.440 --> 0:05:39.320
<v Speaker 1>American political discourse that I'm on that believes abortion is

0:05:39.320 --> 0:05:43.120
<v Speaker 1>abhorrent and horrific and should be reduced that all measures possible,

0:05:44.880 --> 0:05:46.920
<v Speaker 1>and then you have another side that thinks is nothing

0:05:46.960 --> 0:05:49.840
<v Speaker 1>more than cosmetic surgery, it's no big deal, that it's

0:05:49.880 --> 0:05:54.160
<v Speaker 1>just something that needs to be disposed of. And when

0:05:54.160 --> 0:05:56.040
<v Speaker 1>you have that kind of polar opposites, you have to

0:05:56.120 --> 0:05:59.560
<v Speaker 1>understand that, well, maybe we should begin by having no

0:05:59.680 --> 0:06:02.320
<v Speaker 1>late term abortion. How about that no abortion for how

0:06:02.360 --> 0:06:04.960
<v Speaker 1>about let's even start even beyond that, let's not have

0:06:05.000 --> 0:06:10.080
<v Speaker 1>abortion for people that survive abortions. And the Democrats can't

0:06:10.080 --> 0:06:13.720
<v Speaker 1>even agree to that. They cannot even agree to the

0:06:13.760 --> 0:06:18.039
<v Speaker 1>fact that we should not have protections or children or

0:06:18.080 --> 0:06:27.400
<v Speaker 1>for babies that survive abortions. And so there was there

0:06:27.600 --> 0:06:31.400
<v Speaker 1>is a law that was just passed in Alabama that

0:06:31.440 --> 0:06:34.680
<v Speaker 1>restricts abortion that quite frankly, is designed to make this

0:06:34.720 --> 0:06:37.279
<v Speaker 1>go all the way up to the Supreme Court, that

0:06:37.440 --> 0:06:44.599
<v Speaker 1>is designed to challenge roversus weight. And the hysteria on

0:06:44.640 --> 0:06:48.440
<v Speaker 1>the left is predictable. And I want to be very clear,

0:06:48.480 --> 0:06:50.520
<v Speaker 1>this is not going after people that have had abortions,

0:06:50.600 --> 0:06:52.520
<v Speaker 1>is going after abortion doctors. And if you have not

0:06:52.640 --> 0:06:56.360
<v Speaker 1>seen the procedure of an abortion, you've not actually seen

0:06:57.000 --> 0:07:00.880
<v Speaker 1>the inhumanity that happens, the crushing of the skull. I'm

0:07:00.880 --> 0:07:06.040
<v Speaker 1>going to be as as far away from graphic as

0:07:06.040 --> 0:07:07.400
<v Speaker 1>I can because I don't want to get into that.

0:07:07.480 --> 0:07:09.960
<v Speaker 1>But you should go see it for yourself. And my

0:07:10.040 --> 0:07:13.240
<v Speaker 1>friend Lyla Rose at Live Action is very good at

0:07:13.240 --> 0:07:15.360
<v Speaker 1>this and she talks about it quite often. Sure her

0:07:15.440 --> 0:07:21.520
<v Speaker 1>videos are just terrific. And so this issue of abortion

0:07:21.560 --> 0:07:24.560
<v Speaker 1>for those of us that are pro life. We come

0:07:24.600 --> 0:07:29.280
<v Speaker 1>at it from a from a position that every life matters,

0:07:29.280 --> 0:07:31.800
<v Speaker 1>that every life deserves protection. But isn't it always the

0:07:31.880 --> 0:07:34.520
<v Speaker 1>left that is saying that they want to protect children.

0:07:34.960 --> 0:07:37.640
<v Speaker 1>Isn't always the left that says we need to protect

0:07:37.840 --> 0:07:40.280
<v Speaker 1>the rights of the unborn. Isn't it always the left

0:07:40.320 --> 0:07:42.679
<v Speaker 1>that says they're not the unborn? The left? They always

0:07:42.680 --> 0:07:44.120
<v Speaker 1>say that we need to protect the rights of those

0:07:44.160 --> 0:07:46.560
<v Speaker 1>that can't protect themselves, the vulnerable, is what I'm saying

0:07:46.680 --> 0:07:48.480
<v Speaker 1>that they always say that we should protect the rights

0:07:48.760 --> 0:07:51.400
<v Speaker 1>of the vulnerable. What could be more vulnerable than someone

0:07:51.480 --> 0:07:54.200
<v Speaker 1>who's in a person that is in the womb with

0:07:54.240 --> 0:07:58.600
<v Speaker 1>no ability to defend themselves. Here's an interesting question. A

0:07:58.680 --> 0:08:02.240
<v Speaker 1>woman says, it's my body, my choice. We as conservatives

0:08:02.800 --> 0:08:07.240
<v Speaker 1>believe that there's two bodies. Therefore, you don't have a

0:08:07.320 --> 0:08:10.520
<v Speaker 1>choice to end that life. Let me give you a

0:08:10.560 --> 0:08:14.480
<v Speaker 1>great example. I'll give you three examples really quick. Number one,

0:08:15.160 --> 0:08:17.080
<v Speaker 1>do you ever notice how when you go up to

0:08:17.200 --> 0:08:20.119
<v Speaker 1>a pregnant woman that you might know, you say, hey,

0:08:20.560 --> 0:08:25.720
<v Speaker 1>how's your baby? You don't say how's your body? Is

0:08:25.800 --> 0:08:28.480
<v Speaker 1>that interesting? And I say hey, when's your body due?

0:08:29.320 --> 0:08:32.000
<v Speaker 1>You say how's your baby? Because you recognize there something

0:08:32.040 --> 0:08:35.720
<v Speaker 1>else within that woman. We've already believed this as a

0:08:35.760 --> 0:08:38.880
<v Speaker 1>culture in a society, you ever hear a woman who's

0:08:38.880 --> 0:08:44.040
<v Speaker 1>pregnant say, boy, my baby was kicking last night, or

0:08:44.240 --> 0:08:46.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm eating for two. Now, do you ever hear a

0:08:46.559 --> 0:08:50.160
<v Speaker 1>pregnant woman say that I'm eating for two or you know,

0:08:50.200 --> 0:08:53.000
<v Speaker 1>I can't wait to meet my child? There's a there's

0:08:53.040 --> 0:08:55.640
<v Speaker 1>already built into our culture that there's another being within you,

0:08:56.280 --> 0:08:58.840
<v Speaker 1>that that there you don't have the jurisdiction over that being,

0:08:58.880 --> 0:09:03.800
<v Speaker 1>just because you're the temperary host. That's a separate human life.

0:09:04.080 --> 0:09:07.240
<v Speaker 1>It's the first thing. In many states this is still

0:09:07.240 --> 0:09:09.280
<v Speaker 1>the case. New York has just repealed this, which is

0:09:09.320 --> 0:09:12.200
<v Speaker 1>just unbelievable. But in most states, if you kill a

0:09:12.240 --> 0:09:16.000
<v Speaker 1>pregnant woman, it counts as double homicide. If the horrific

0:09:16.080 --> 0:09:18.560
<v Speaker 1>thing that happens, when you actually kill a pregnant woman,

0:09:18.559 --> 0:09:22.360
<v Speaker 1>it counts as a double homicide because that counts as

0:09:22.800 --> 0:09:26.720
<v Speaker 1>is two lives. And do you ever notice that when

0:09:26.800 --> 0:09:29.160
<v Speaker 1>women what do we call I'm here with the producer

0:09:29.200 --> 0:09:33.840
<v Speaker 1>here of the Charlie Kirkshow, executive producer and Andrew and

0:09:34.040 --> 0:09:36.040
<v Speaker 1>of the Charlie kirk Show on Apple podcasts. You can

0:09:36.040 --> 0:09:40.000
<v Speaker 1>download go to Apple podcast type and Charlie kirkshow press subscribe? Andrew,

0:09:40.040 --> 0:09:41.880
<v Speaker 1>what do we call it when a pregnant woman has

0:09:41.880 --> 0:09:47.760
<v Speaker 1>a celebration for their pregnancy. That would be a reveal

0:09:48.320 --> 0:09:53.200
<v Speaker 1>or a something shower? Oh, a baby shower. We don't

0:09:53.200 --> 0:09:56.640
<v Speaker 1>call it a fetus shower. That is correct, okay. And

0:09:56.720 --> 0:10:00.880
<v Speaker 1>so when you call something a baby shower, now here's

0:10:00.920 --> 0:10:06.080
<v Speaker 1>what's so amazing something life should not be determinable on

0:10:06.200 --> 0:10:10.319
<v Speaker 1>object on subjectivity. It should be objectivity. So a woman

0:10:10.400 --> 0:10:14.240
<v Speaker 1>could have a baby shower, be celebrated for her upcoming baby,

0:10:15.000 --> 0:10:16.800
<v Speaker 1>and have a gender reveal. I want you to think

0:10:16.800 --> 0:10:19.960
<v Speaker 1>about this really carefully. People could celebrate it. People could

0:10:20.440 --> 0:10:23.800
<v Speaker 1>have either pink or red. What do they do right?

0:10:23.800 --> 0:10:25.720
<v Speaker 1>The different pink or blue? Those the kind of the

0:10:25.720 --> 0:10:28.199
<v Speaker 1>typical ones? Right pink or blue? Based on the gender reveal?

0:10:29.280 --> 0:10:32.760
<v Speaker 1>And then the woman who is pregnant, based on our laws,

0:10:33.640 --> 0:10:35.560
<v Speaker 1>could drive right after her baby shower and then go

0:10:35.600 --> 0:10:38.560
<v Speaker 1>have an abortion. Think about that? Does it make it

0:10:38.640 --> 0:10:40.360
<v Speaker 1>less of a life or more of a life just

0:10:40.400 --> 0:10:44.600
<v Speaker 1>based on her decision? Everyone's treating is it? Is? It? Is?

0:10:44.600 --> 0:10:47.400
<v Speaker 1>It as if it is a child at that baby shower, right,

0:10:48.000 --> 0:10:50.520
<v Speaker 1>they want to take a picture with, you know, the

0:10:51.960 --> 0:10:55.240
<v Speaker 1>expecting mom. She's talking about the nursery, or she's talking

0:10:55.240 --> 0:10:57.240
<v Speaker 1>about the school that the kid might go to, and

0:10:57.280 --> 0:10:59.080
<v Speaker 1>then right after that she can go have an abortion.

0:11:01.040 --> 0:11:02.480
<v Speaker 1>Does that mean all of a sudden, make that make

0:11:02.480 --> 0:11:05.400
<v Speaker 1>it seem as if that life didn't exist? And this

0:11:05.480 --> 0:11:08.800
<v Speaker 1>is so interesting because we as conservatives, believed we should

0:11:08.800 --> 0:11:13.440
<v Speaker 1>have objective views on when life starts and when life ends.

0:11:13.440 --> 0:11:15.360
<v Speaker 1>What could be more important than that? I think that

0:11:15.440 --> 0:11:17.640
<v Speaker 1>I think you're hitting on a really important topic here,

0:11:17.679 --> 0:11:21.040
<v Speaker 1>because every other litmus test is subjective. Right, If we're

0:11:21.040 --> 0:11:24.960
<v Speaker 1>going to judge life on when it can sustain itself,

0:11:25.440 --> 0:11:29.320
<v Speaker 1>it's like, well, you know, you know my fourteen month

0:11:29.400 --> 0:11:32.960
<v Speaker 1>old can't sustain itself. Does that means she's not a life?

0:11:33.480 --> 0:11:37.959
<v Speaker 1>I mean, they're every other measure is subjective, without a doubt.

0:11:37.960 --> 0:11:41.480
<v Speaker 1>And so they say, well, the I want an abortion

0:11:41.520 --> 0:11:44.559
<v Speaker 1>because I didn't want the child. Whoa you think we

0:11:44.600 --> 0:11:47.320
<v Speaker 1>should just dismiss children that aren't wanted in our society.

0:11:47.520 --> 0:11:49.679
<v Speaker 1>First of all, there are millions of people waiting for

0:11:49.720 --> 0:11:52.160
<v Speaker 1>adoption right now in America. Millions of people in the

0:11:52.160 --> 0:11:54.400
<v Speaker 1>adoption laws are so screwed up. They're so screwed up.

0:11:54.720 --> 0:11:57.199
<v Speaker 1>But you really think we should become a society that

0:11:57.320 --> 0:12:00.959
<v Speaker 1>judges life based on how much we want child. Think

0:12:01.000 --> 0:12:05.600
<v Speaker 1>about that. I don't want the kid. Really. It's called

0:12:05.640 --> 0:12:11.040
<v Speaker 1>taking responsibility for your life, isn't it. And they say, well,

0:12:11.080 --> 0:12:13.360
<v Speaker 1>you know the child can't think for itself, Well, neither

0:12:13.440 --> 0:12:15.640
<v Speaker 1>can a six month year old, six month year old

0:12:15.679 --> 0:12:19.000
<v Speaker 1>couldn't sustain itself. Six month old six month old, not

0:12:19.080 --> 0:12:21.920
<v Speaker 1>a six month year old six month old couldn't sustain itself.

0:12:22.559 --> 0:12:25.680
<v Speaker 1>So you put all these things together, and this is

0:12:25.720 --> 0:12:27.520
<v Speaker 1>why those of us that are pro life are so

0:12:27.559 --> 0:12:30.200
<v Speaker 1>passionate about this topic. I do want to nuance this

0:12:30.280 --> 0:12:33.600
<v Speaker 1>point is that I'm in no way against or criticizing,

0:12:33.679 --> 0:12:36.880
<v Speaker 1>or trying to demonize or women that have had abortions

0:12:37.160 --> 0:12:39.440
<v Speaker 1>at all. I understand that could be a very personal

0:12:39.480 --> 0:12:41.959
<v Speaker 1>and very difficult decision. I know people that have gone

0:12:41.960 --> 0:12:43.920
<v Speaker 1>through that decision. I don't think less of those people

0:12:44.240 --> 0:12:48.839
<v Speaker 1>at all. I really don't. Criticism is towards abortion doctors

0:12:48.840 --> 0:12:52.319
<v Speaker 1>because they know exactly what's going on. They see the ultrasounds,

0:12:52.320 --> 0:12:56.240
<v Speaker 1>they actually do the procedure, and they and their nurses

0:12:56.880 --> 0:13:01.320
<v Speaker 1>actually help engage in those side of processes, and so

0:13:01.559 --> 0:13:03.440
<v Speaker 1>I think far too often the pro life movement becomes

0:13:03.440 --> 0:13:06.280
<v Speaker 1>one that becomes highly critical of women that have actually

0:13:06.679 --> 0:13:09.520
<v Speaker 1>had abortions. So coming up, we're gonna keep talking about

0:13:09.559 --> 0:13:13.960
<v Speaker 1>this Alabama abortion law some of my predictions surrounding that.

0:13:14.040 --> 0:13:17.439
<v Speaker 1>This is Charlie Kirk from Turning Point USATPUSA dot com,

0:13:17.440 --> 0:13:20.280
<v Speaker 1>filling in for Buck Sexton on The Buck Sexton Radio Show.

0:13:20.760 --> 0:13:23.120
<v Speaker 1>You can subscribe to my podcast. Go to Apple Podcasts,

0:13:23.120 --> 0:13:25.720
<v Speaker 1>press subscribe Charlie Kirk Show. We will be right back.

0:13:27.080 --> 0:13:30.080
<v Speaker 1>Hello everybody. This is Charlie Kirk filling in for the

0:13:30.120 --> 0:13:34.240
<v Speaker 1>great Buck Sexton on the Buck Sexton Radio Show. I

0:13:34.320 --> 0:13:38.320
<v Speaker 1>am the founder and executive director of Turning Point USA,

0:13:38.600 --> 0:13:42.920
<v Speaker 1>the nation's largest student movement dedicated to educating, empowering, and

0:13:43.120 --> 0:13:47.040
<v Speaker 1>organizing students around the values of free markets and limited

0:13:47.080 --> 0:13:49.960
<v Speaker 1>government TPUSA dot com. I'm also the host of the

0:13:50.080 --> 0:13:52.480
<v Speaker 1>Charlie Kirk Show. You can go to Apple Podcasts, type

0:13:52.520 --> 0:13:56.120
<v Speaker 1>in Charlie Kirk Show and press subscribe. I'm kind of

0:13:56.160 --> 0:13:58.000
<v Speaker 1>flipping through Twitter here and I'm kind of seeing some

0:13:58.040 --> 0:14:00.360
<v Speaker 1>of the reaction. I'm kind of seeing some of the

0:14:00.800 --> 0:14:05.040
<v Speaker 1>misrepresentations around abortion. I've asked producer Andrew to read off

0:14:05.040 --> 0:14:06.840
<v Speaker 1>some of them and you can kind of comment on

0:14:06.840 --> 0:14:08.880
<v Speaker 1>some of what you got. Well, yeah, I mean right now,

0:14:08.960 --> 0:14:13.240
<v Speaker 1>abortion hashtag abortion is a Woman's Right is trending number

0:14:13.240 --> 0:14:17.080
<v Speaker 1>two on Twitter, and you've got lots of celebrities chiming in.

0:14:17.160 --> 0:14:20.040
<v Speaker 1>You've got you know, Liam from one direction, and I

0:14:20.080 --> 0:14:23.200
<v Speaker 1>mean some of the listeners might not be as familiar

0:14:23.240 --> 0:14:25.440
<v Speaker 1>with somebody like Liam, but you know, suffice to say

0:14:25.480 --> 0:14:28.720
<v Speaker 1>he holds a lot of sway with younger audience, very

0:14:28.800 --> 0:14:33.520
<v Speaker 1>very internationally famous pop star says, I don't normally I

0:14:33.520 --> 0:14:36.600
<v Speaker 1>don't usually comment on politics. By the way, I love it.

0:14:36.600 --> 0:14:38.840
<v Speaker 1>It's always I don't normally comment on it. Okay, you

0:14:38.880 --> 0:14:41.760
<v Speaker 1>mean you only comment every week when you disagree with Trump?

0:14:41.840 --> 0:14:44.880
<v Speaker 1>Go ahead. I don't usually comment on politics, but this

0:14:44.920 --> 0:14:47.040
<v Speaker 1>one got me and is so important, and he quotes

0:14:47.320 --> 0:14:50.440
<v Speaker 1>this whole abortion law thing in America is a mess.

0:14:50.560 --> 0:14:53.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you're completely taking away by the way he

0:14:53.240 --> 0:14:55.960
<v Speaker 1>misspells your which is a pet peeve should be you

0:14:56.520 --> 0:15:00.000
<v Speaker 1>postivie r e. Completely taking away the rights of women

0:15:00.000 --> 0:15:03.520
<v Speaker 1>and the ownership of the bodies, bodies plural that belong

0:15:03.600 --> 0:15:08.520
<v Speaker 1>to them. I mean, and so read that last part again.

0:15:10.320 --> 0:15:13.880
<v Speaker 1>This is your compete, this is more. Oh yeah, he

0:15:13.880 --> 0:15:17.040
<v Speaker 1>did a screen grab of his nay yet completely. He's

0:15:17.040 --> 0:15:19.400
<v Speaker 1>got a whole thing here. It's bad enough that women

0:15:19.440 --> 0:15:21.160
<v Speaker 1>have to go through cycles of periods that can be

0:15:21.160 --> 0:15:23.280
<v Speaker 1>painful without making some of them have to go through

0:15:23.960 --> 0:15:26.880
<v Speaker 1>with unwanted pregnancies that will literally change the course of lives.

0:15:26.960 --> 0:15:28.520
<v Speaker 1>This guy should not be an author, by the way,

0:15:28.640 --> 0:15:30.480
<v Speaker 1>or a columnist the same time. Soon it's like a

0:15:30.520 --> 0:15:34.040
<v Speaker 1>flow of consciousness. Abortion up to a certain point. Oh,

0:15:34.080 --> 0:15:36.880
<v Speaker 1>abortion up to a certain point. Hold On, should be legal,

0:15:37.040 --> 0:15:39.400
<v Speaker 1>always be legal. It's only right that women are given

0:15:39.400 --> 0:15:41.440
<v Speaker 1>that choice to make for themselves. Well, hold On first

0:15:41.440 --> 0:15:43.560
<v Speaker 1>of all his positions and direct defines to the Democrat

0:15:43.600 --> 0:15:47.280
<v Speaker 1>Primary and the Democrat Party because they actually don't believe

0:15:47.440 --> 0:15:49.960
<v Speaker 1>they believe in abortion a limited abortion on demand always

0:15:50.480 --> 0:15:54.800
<v Speaker 1>And here's it always bothers me is that it the

0:15:55.200 --> 0:15:58.760
<v Speaker 1>woman is the host of another being. The woman is

0:15:58.760 --> 0:16:01.960
<v Speaker 1>the host of a child within her, and so what

0:16:02.120 --> 0:16:04.880
<v Speaker 1>gives her the full jurisdiction to decide the feature and

0:16:04.880 --> 0:16:07.920
<v Speaker 1>the fate of that child based I do believe there

0:16:07.920 --> 0:16:10.120
<v Speaker 1>should be exceptions. Actually, I do believe there are in

0:16:10.120 --> 0:16:13.160
<v Speaker 1>certain exceptions. I'm actually in the minority in some of

0:16:13.160 --> 0:16:16.400
<v Speaker 1>the concerted moment. I think that rape, incest, life the mother,

0:16:16.680 --> 0:16:19.000
<v Speaker 1>and health of the mother should be reasonable exceptions. But

0:16:19.040 --> 0:16:21.120
<v Speaker 1>just so you know, that's less than two percent of

0:16:21.120 --> 0:16:25.480
<v Speaker 1>all abortions. Solissa Milano goes on CNN and she says, well,

0:16:25.800 --> 0:16:29.520
<v Speaker 1>some women have unwanted pregnancies because a crime gets committed

0:16:29.520 --> 0:16:31.560
<v Speaker 1>to them. And she's talking about insisting rape, and she says,

0:16:31.600 --> 0:16:33.640
<v Speaker 1>Republicans want to take that away. First of all, the

0:16:33.640 --> 0:16:36.760
<v Speaker 1>majority opinion of Republicans out there is no those exceptions

0:16:36.760 --> 0:16:39.560
<v Speaker 1>are perfectly fine. Some conservatives think there should be no

0:16:39.600 --> 0:16:43.120
<v Speaker 1>exception for rape, and I respect that opinion. I just

0:16:43.120 --> 0:16:44.880
<v Speaker 1>disagree if that. I think if an act of a

0:16:44.920 --> 0:16:47.440
<v Speaker 1>crime was done to you that results in a pregnancy,

0:16:47.920 --> 0:16:49.800
<v Speaker 1>you should not be you should not be forced to

0:16:49.840 --> 0:16:51.920
<v Speaker 1>have to continue to have that child. That's an act

0:16:51.920 --> 0:16:55.640
<v Speaker 1>of force was done against you. And sam can be

0:16:55.640 --> 0:16:58.440
<v Speaker 1>said with incest, which is a crime against the woman.

0:16:58.760 --> 0:17:01.160
<v Speaker 1>But again that's the percentage. There's a small percentage. It's

0:17:01.200 --> 0:17:03.800
<v Speaker 1>less than two percent of all abortions actually pertained to it.

0:17:03.920 --> 0:17:07.200
<v Speaker 1>What do you got Andrew got some more hashtag abortion

0:17:07.240 --> 0:17:11.960
<v Speaker 1>as a woman's right. Well, you've got Kirsten Gillibrand chiming

0:17:11.960 --> 0:17:14.800
<v Speaker 1>in as well. This is about Alabama just passed a

0:17:14.880 --> 0:17:18.640
<v Speaker 1>near total ban on abortion, no exceptions for rape or incests.

0:17:18.760 --> 0:17:22.000
<v Speaker 1>Doctors could face ninety nine years in prison for providing abortion.

0:17:22.160 --> 0:17:24.919
<v Speaker 1>This is a war on women and it is time

0:17:25.119 --> 0:17:28.359
<v Speaker 1>to fight, Like hell, what about the what about the

0:17:29.320 --> 0:17:32.240
<v Speaker 1>young babies that are aborted that are women? Isn't that

0:17:32.280 --> 0:17:35.600
<v Speaker 1>a war on women? If you're aborting women children, if

0:17:35.640 --> 0:17:38.720
<v Speaker 1>you're aborting women babies, isn't that making their less women

0:17:38.760 --> 0:17:40.920
<v Speaker 1>in the world. I want more people. I want more

0:17:40.920 --> 0:17:43.600
<v Speaker 1>people in the world generally and altogether. So this is

0:17:43.600 --> 0:17:46.600
<v Speaker 1>being labeled as culture war twenty twenty. We are hopefully

0:17:46.640 --> 0:17:48.800
<v Speaker 1>going to have an honest conversation. Hey, Andrew, We're always

0:17:48.800 --> 0:17:51.200
<v Speaker 1>though about having an honest conversation, right, how many times

0:17:51.480 --> 0:17:53.640
<v Speaker 1>I hear we need to have an honest conversation about race,

0:17:53.680 --> 0:17:55.680
<v Speaker 1>We need to have an honest conversation about climate change. Well,

0:17:55.920 --> 0:17:58.640
<v Speaker 1>you know what, we can have an honest conversation about

0:17:58.680 --> 0:18:01.360
<v Speaker 1>life in this country. One does life begin? Should life

0:18:01.359 --> 0:18:05.760
<v Speaker 1>be protected? Preserved? Better understood? Does life matter? What protections

0:18:05.760 --> 0:18:08.360
<v Speaker 1>and provisions should be put in place to actually make

0:18:08.440 --> 0:18:12.360
<v Speaker 1>sure that those that cannot defend themselves should be preserved

0:18:12.400 --> 0:18:15.760
<v Speaker 1>and protected. And so this is going to only become

0:18:16.040 --> 0:18:19.240
<v Speaker 1>a bigger and bigger issue. You're going to see the

0:18:19.400 --> 0:18:23.080
<v Speaker 1>left really gallivant, I think try to galvanize this into

0:18:23.119 --> 0:18:25.160
<v Speaker 1>one of their big issues for twenty twenty. I think

0:18:25.160 --> 0:18:27.080
<v Speaker 1>America is becoming more and more pro life. I think

0:18:27.080 --> 0:18:28.760
<v Speaker 1>there it's not going to work well. This is Charlie

0:18:28.840 --> 0:18:30.840
<v Speaker 1>Kirk filling in for Buck Sexton, host of The Charlie

0:18:30.920 --> 0:18:33.520
<v Speaker 1>Kirks Show. You're going to Apple Podcast Press subscribe or

0:18:33.560 --> 0:18:36.600
<v Speaker 1>go to TPUSA dot com. That's TPUSA dot com. We'll

0:18:36.600 --> 0:18:50.760
<v Speaker 1>be right back. He's holding the line for America. Buck

0:18:50.840 --> 0:18:56.040
<v Speaker 1>Sexton is back. Hello, everybody. This is Charlie Kirk filling

0:18:56.080 --> 0:18:59.640
<v Speaker 1>in for the great Buck Sexton. I am the founder

0:18:59.640 --> 0:19:02.040
<v Speaker 1>and exam I Coultive, director of Turning Point USA, the

0:19:02.119 --> 0:19:08.520
<v Speaker 1>nation's largest student movement dedicated to educating students around the

0:19:08.640 --> 0:19:13.960
<v Speaker 1>values of free markets and limited government. College campuses have

0:19:14.040 --> 0:19:20.479
<v Speaker 1>become islands of totalitarianism. They have become places where freedom

0:19:20.520 --> 0:19:24.479
<v Speaker 1>of speech and freedom of thought are not allowed, and

0:19:24.640 --> 0:19:27.919
<v Speaker 1>instead they have become a place where you must have

0:19:27.960 --> 0:19:35.159
<v Speaker 1>a monolithic, singular viewpoint in order to be respected and

0:19:35.240 --> 0:19:39.399
<v Speaker 1>even have a platform. And as this year comes to

0:19:39.400 --> 0:19:42.280
<v Speaker 1>an end and it's a graduation season, and I reflect

0:19:42.359 --> 0:19:44.840
<v Speaker 1>back on the year of Turning Point USA, and I've

0:19:44.880 --> 0:19:48.359
<v Speaker 1>seen our hundreds and hundreds of campus events that we've hosted,

0:19:48.359 --> 0:19:51.520
<v Speaker 1>and I see the over fourteen hundred college and high

0:19:51.560 --> 0:19:54.600
<v Speaker 1>school campuses that were present on and hundreds of thousands

0:19:54.600 --> 0:19:57.480
<v Speaker 1>of members, and the millions and tens of millions and

0:19:57.800 --> 0:20:02.040
<v Speaker 1>hundreds of millions of people that we have reached social media.

0:20:02.280 --> 0:20:07.840
<v Speaker 1>It's still is not enough. We need to continue to

0:20:07.880 --> 0:20:12.119
<v Speaker 1>push for the values of free markets and limited government,

0:20:12.160 --> 0:20:17.399
<v Speaker 1>American exceptionalism on these campuses where the fight matters most,

0:20:18.240 --> 0:20:21.879
<v Speaker 1>because if we lose the next generation, if we lose students,

0:20:22.680 --> 0:20:27.600
<v Speaker 1>we will have a country that soon becomes unrecognizable. We

0:20:27.640 --> 0:20:31.439
<v Speaker 1>will have a country that embraces socialism, that capitalism. And

0:20:31.480 --> 0:20:34.200
<v Speaker 1>if you don't believe, whatever happens on college campuses will

0:20:34.240 --> 0:20:37.520
<v Speaker 1>soon happen in the halls of Congress. And it's not

0:20:37.600 --> 0:20:41.440
<v Speaker 1>that students are opposed to our ideas, it's that they're

0:20:41.480 --> 0:20:44.159
<v Speaker 1>not exposed on them at all. In the first place,

0:20:44.680 --> 0:20:48.119
<v Speaker 1>I got an alert here that the constantly wrong but

0:20:48.240 --> 0:20:54.320
<v Speaker 1>never in doubt. Congresswoman from New York's fourteen congressional has

0:20:54.359 --> 0:20:59.879
<v Speaker 1>a new tweet, Alexandria asuquittez Alete. She says to bar

0:21:00.280 --> 0:21:04.080
<v Speaker 1>streisand if male politicians could get pregnant, there would be

0:21:04.119 --> 0:21:07.720
<v Speaker 1>as many planned parent clinics as there are post offices.

0:21:08.880 --> 0:21:11.480
<v Speaker 1>Can you can you can you interpret this? Andrew? I

0:21:11.520 --> 0:21:13.880
<v Speaker 1>don't want to man explain it to the audience. Well,

0:21:13.920 --> 0:21:16.919
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think that's the center of the Twitter

0:21:16.960 --> 0:21:19.720
<v Speaker 1>debate today, not that Twitter is the real world, but

0:21:20.840 --> 0:21:23.399
<v Speaker 1>basically you have a lot of progressive people on the left,

0:21:25.119 --> 0:21:28.320
<v Speaker 1>very very upset at all the men that voted for

0:21:29.280 --> 0:21:33.960
<v Speaker 1>this bill in Alabama, probably Georgia as well. There's pictures

0:21:34.040 --> 0:21:37.680
<v Speaker 1>of their faces going around Twitter. It's sort of attempt

0:21:37.680 --> 0:21:40.040
<v Speaker 1>to docks these men, saying you should not be speaking

0:21:40.080 --> 0:21:44.000
<v Speaker 1>about my body. And I think you know, Alexandro Coasto

0:21:44.080 --> 0:21:49.359
<v Speaker 1>Cortez is focusing in on that certainly. Well. And I

0:21:49.359 --> 0:21:53.240
<v Speaker 1>mean AOC who actually is the most powerful person elected

0:21:53.240 --> 0:21:56.199
<v Speaker 1>person of the Democrat primary a party, and it's actually

0:21:56.200 --> 0:21:58.680
<v Speaker 1>probably the most powerful Democrat outside of Barack Obama right now?

0:21:58.920 --> 0:22:00.680
<v Speaker 1>Would you say that's true? And and I think the

0:22:00.760 --> 0:22:02.199
<v Speaker 1>Servitis have a lot to do with that, because we

0:22:02.200 --> 0:22:03.480
<v Speaker 1>talked about her all the time. Yeah. I mean there

0:22:03.520 --> 0:22:06.280
<v Speaker 1>was an article in Politico that I think said it well,

0:22:06.280 --> 0:22:10.680
<v Speaker 1>that it was the most hers is the most coveted endorsement,

0:22:10.760 --> 0:22:15.679
<v Speaker 1>endorsement in the primaries, the AOC primary. Oh boy, help us.

0:22:17.560 --> 0:22:24.160
<v Speaker 1>The So AOC had another tweet yesterday and you could

0:22:24.160 --> 0:22:26.000
<v Speaker 1>pull it up or she said, this is really all

0:22:26.000 --> 0:22:30.520
<v Speaker 1>about advancing a core tenant of the conservative worldview, the patriarchy.

0:22:31.080 --> 0:22:32.640
<v Speaker 1>And I'm gonna be honest, this is why I wish

0:22:32.720 --> 0:22:35.119
<v Speaker 1>just AOC would talk to conservatives. I talked to liberals

0:22:35.160 --> 0:22:37.560
<v Speaker 1>all the time. This is a super important point that

0:22:37.760 --> 0:22:39.280
<v Speaker 1>I talked to a liberal journalists, I talked to a

0:22:39.280 --> 0:22:41.400
<v Speaker 1>liberal TV host, I talked to a liberal radio show host.

0:22:41.560 --> 0:22:44.720
<v Speaker 1>I'd have debate, I've dialogue, I discussion I every day

0:22:44.840 --> 0:22:46.600
<v Speaker 1>every time I go in college campus, I have people

0:22:46.600 --> 0:22:48.560
<v Speaker 1>that disagree with us. I invite them to the front

0:22:48.560 --> 0:22:51.640
<v Speaker 1>of the line. We have conversations that are spirited and fruitful.

0:22:51.920 --> 0:22:54.520
<v Speaker 1>I just wish AOC would do the same, because she

0:22:54.600 --> 0:22:58.719
<v Speaker 1>had this tweet that was just so wrong and so

0:22:58.760 --> 0:23:03.359
<v Speaker 1>she's like she said yesterday, AOC Alexandria Kazi grdes abortion

0:23:03.440 --> 0:23:08.960
<v Speaker 1>bands aren't just about controlling women's bodies hardstop did anyone's

0:23:09.080 --> 0:23:12.159
<v Speaker 1>did I say anything about controlling anything at all before?

0:23:12.520 --> 0:23:17.520
<v Speaker 1>So she's just misrepresenting it intentionally. They're about controlling women's sexuality,

0:23:17.760 --> 0:23:23.560
<v Speaker 1>owning women hold on saying okay, no from limiting birth control,

0:23:23.600 --> 0:23:28.520
<v Speaker 1>the banning comprehensive sex, said us religious fundamentalists. She's she's

0:23:28.520 --> 0:23:30.920
<v Speaker 1>declaring war in religion. Can you believe this? Are bringing

0:23:30.960 --> 0:23:34.200
<v Speaker 1>clinging to their God's gun in religion? Right are working

0:23:34.600 --> 0:23:39.720
<v Speaker 1>hard outlaws sex that fails outside their theology. Okay. Ultimately

0:23:39.760 --> 0:23:42.800
<v Speaker 1>this is about women's power. When women are in control

0:23:42.880 --> 0:23:46.679
<v Speaker 1>of their sexuality, it threatens a core element of underpinning

0:23:46.680 --> 0:23:52.160
<v Speaker 1>of right wing ideology, patriarchy. Okay, I know right wing.

0:23:52.600 --> 0:23:54.640
<v Speaker 1>By First of all, I hate this term right wing.

0:23:54.760 --> 0:23:56.600
<v Speaker 1>I hate it. I hate it. I try to never

0:23:56.680 --> 0:23:59.560
<v Speaker 1>use it ever because I just don't call myself right wing.

0:23:59.600 --> 0:24:04.240
<v Speaker 1>I think it's become a pejorative. And I know the

0:24:04.280 --> 0:24:08.520
<v Speaker 1>conservative libertarian worldview better than most because I live in it.

0:24:09.000 --> 0:24:11.720
<v Speaker 1>Patriarchy is not anything that we talk about. First of all,

0:24:11.840 --> 0:24:13.800
<v Speaker 1>what would you have to say to someone like Nicky Haley.

0:24:14.000 --> 0:24:16.760
<v Speaker 1>Do you think she's in this for the patriarchy. I mean,

0:24:16.800 --> 0:24:18.440
<v Speaker 1>what do you have to say about someone like Ivanka

0:24:18.480 --> 0:24:23.480
<v Speaker 1>Trump or Betsy Devas or Kelly and Conway or Mercedes

0:24:23.840 --> 0:24:27.240
<v Speaker 1>Mercedes Schlapp or Kathy McMorris Rogers, who's one of the

0:24:27.280 --> 0:24:30.920
<v Speaker 1>highest ranking women in the House, or Joni Earnst or

0:24:30.960 --> 0:24:34.040
<v Speaker 1>any of these women. They're in this The underpinning right

0:24:34.040 --> 0:24:37.359
<v Speaker 1>wing ideology is the patriarchy. When you actually look at

0:24:37.359 --> 0:24:39.199
<v Speaker 1>the statistics, and we could pull all of them up.

0:24:39.760 --> 0:24:42.240
<v Speaker 1>Men are much more likely to commit suicide in America.

0:24:42.359 --> 0:24:44.440
<v Speaker 1>Women are much more likely to graduate from high school,

0:24:44.440 --> 0:24:46.760
<v Speaker 1>graduate from college, got a master's and a doctorate degree.

0:24:46.960 --> 0:24:49.560
<v Speaker 1>Women comprise a majority of the small business startups. Men

0:24:49.600 --> 0:24:51.879
<v Speaker 1>are much more likely to die while at work. Men

0:24:51.920 --> 0:24:53.720
<v Speaker 1>are much more likely to die go fighting at war.

0:24:53.880 --> 0:24:56.159
<v Speaker 1>I can go through all the statistics, especially if you

0:24:56.200 --> 0:24:58.600
<v Speaker 1>look at unemployment rates of men between the age of

0:24:58.680 --> 0:25:01.359
<v Speaker 1>twenty five. The thirty five unemployment rate is much higher

0:25:01.359 --> 0:25:03.520
<v Speaker 1>for men than it is for young women. I can

0:25:03.840 --> 0:25:05.879
<v Speaker 1>go piece by piece by piece. Women control the majority

0:25:05.880 --> 0:25:08.399
<v Speaker 1>of the financial decisions in this country, but women and

0:25:08.480 --> 0:25:10.880
<v Speaker 1>their thirties aren't a much better financial condition than men

0:25:10.920 --> 0:25:13.520
<v Speaker 1>in their thirties. Yet there's whole idea a patriarchy exists.

0:25:13.520 --> 0:25:16.520
<v Speaker 1>What patriarch are you talking about? They say, Well, women

0:25:16.560 --> 0:25:20.359
<v Speaker 1>don't make up enough board positions on Forbes five hundred

0:25:20.400 --> 0:25:23.879
<v Speaker 1>CEO seats. It's a great point to talk about, not

0:25:23.920 --> 0:25:26.399
<v Speaker 1>a great point to make. Why is it that women

0:25:26.440 --> 0:25:28.920
<v Speaker 1>at times don't make up the highest echelons of the

0:25:28.920 --> 0:25:32.320
<v Speaker 1>corporate ladder? Well, usually women voluntarily eggs of the workforce

0:25:32.520 --> 0:25:34.600
<v Speaker 1>in the late twenties or early thirties to go have

0:25:34.760 --> 0:25:37.560
<v Speaker 1>children voluntarily. No one's forcing them to make that decision,

0:25:37.760 --> 0:25:39.679
<v Speaker 1>no one coerced them. And then making that decision, no

0:25:39.760 --> 0:25:42.439
<v Speaker 1>one told them then to make that decision. They've voluntarily

0:25:42.520 --> 0:25:45.479
<v Speaker 1>left the workforce to go have children. The last part

0:25:45.520 --> 0:25:48.040
<v Speaker 1>of AOC's tweet is it's a brutal form of oppression

0:25:48.040 --> 0:25:50.240
<v Speaker 1>to seize control of the one essential thing a person

0:25:50.280 --> 0:25:53.800
<v Speaker 1>should command, their own body. That's the only thing they

0:25:53.840 --> 0:25:56.359
<v Speaker 1>should command, though Andrew, not their spirit, not their mind,

0:25:56.520 --> 0:25:59.320
<v Speaker 1>just the body. But what about the body of the

0:25:59.400 --> 0:26:02.199
<v Speaker 1>baby with in the woman? What about the body that

0:26:02.320 --> 0:26:06.879
<v Speaker 1>of the baby that can't control themselves? And in AOC

0:26:07.000 --> 0:26:09.320
<v Speaker 1>here has one hundred and fourteen thousand likes on this street.

0:26:09.320 --> 0:26:11.680
<v Speaker 1>Can you believe, you know, two hundred and fifty thousand likes?

0:26:11.720 --> 0:26:15.920
<v Speaker 1>It's unbelievable that, you know, It's always an interesting form

0:26:15.960 --> 0:26:20.080
<v Speaker 1>of projecting. I think when I totally agreement with they

0:26:20.080 --> 0:26:23.800
<v Speaker 1>always go straight to this idea of control, and you know,

0:26:23.840 --> 0:26:26.080
<v Speaker 1>I think it's actually more of a reflection about how

0:26:26.119 --> 0:26:28.960
<v Speaker 1>they view the world. They view the world in terms

0:26:28.960 --> 0:26:31.520
<v Speaker 1>of who has control, who doesn't, who has power who

0:26:31.560 --> 0:26:34.480
<v Speaker 1>That's exactly right. So their whole paradigm of analysis of

0:26:34.560 --> 0:26:37.480
<v Speaker 1>politics is who's currently the people that have power, who

0:26:37.480 --> 0:26:39.800
<v Speaker 1>are currently the people that are in control, and the

0:26:39.840 --> 0:26:42.159
<v Speaker 1>people that aren't in control, the ones that are disaffected

0:26:42.160 --> 0:26:44.800
<v Speaker 1>and are being exploited inherently. Well, first of all, this

0:26:44.880 --> 0:26:49.840
<v Speaker 1>is just so silly because in America large in part,

0:26:50.160 --> 0:26:54.080
<v Speaker 1>those of which that have control are people that graduate

0:26:54.160 --> 0:26:56.760
<v Speaker 1>high school, get married, don't commit crimes, and have a job.

0:26:57.080 --> 0:26:59.560
<v Speaker 1>Amazing combination of success. In America is the only country

0:26:59.560 --> 0:27:02.320
<v Speaker 1>in the world that guarrantee success if you make good choices.

0:27:02.359 --> 0:27:04.840
<v Speaker 1>That's what a meritocracy is, or a country that rewards

0:27:05.240 --> 0:27:08.640
<v Speaker 1>good choices. And so she thinks of this, she actually

0:27:08.680 --> 0:27:12.720
<v Speaker 1>thinks that Alabama passed this law because people want to

0:27:12.720 --> 0:27:16.080
<v Speaker 1>control their people, like, ah, I'm so unhappy with my life,

0:27:16.400 --> 0:27:19.320
<v Speaker 1>my religion says I must control people. Therefore I pass it. Instead.

0:27:19.760 --> 0:27:23.320
<v Speaker 1>The motivation is, we need to end this horror called abortion.

0:27:23.760 --> 0:27:27.720
<v Speaker 1>We need to end this unbelievably bad practice called abortion.

0:27:28.280 --> 0:27:30.120
<v Speaker 1>And we want to have more people in our world

0:27:30.160 --> 0:27:32.320
<v Speaker 1>and have more babies, and what people that are pregnant

0:27:32.440 --> 0:27:34.800
<v Speaker 1>should have those children because we want his life is

0:27:34.840 --> 0:27:38.560
<v Speaker 1>a gift. That's the motivation. So she immediately and I

0:27:38.600 --> 0:27:45.000
<v Speaker 1>think just arrantly, right, would you say describes it in

0:27:45.000 --> 0:27:47.640
<v Speaker 1>a way that is so inappropriate and so outrageous. Well,

0:27:47.680 --> 0:27:53.680
<v Speaker 1>they always avoid the personhood of the baby, right, They

0:27:53.720 --> 0:27:56.240
<v Speaker 1>always talk about that has no identity. All that matters,

0:27:56.760 --> 0:28:01.159
<v Speaker 1>All that matters is right and in the in the right,

0:28:01.880 --> 0:28:03.960
<v Speaker 1>the right political right in this country is not looking

0:28:04.000 --> 0:28:06.400
<v Speaker 1>at it as trying to control anybody. It's saying, there's

0:28:06.440 --> 0:28:08.960
<v Speaker 1>a there's a baby that we need to protect because

0:28:09.000 --> 0:28:12.080
<v Speaker 1>life is sacred. It's as simple as that. We actually

0:28:12.119 --> 0:28:18.760
<v Speaker 1>want to empower the baby, the most um vulnerable among us. Right,

0:28:18.760 --> 0:28:21.280
<v Speaker 1>And if you believe in this, in this idea that

0:28:21.320 --> 0:28:26.880
<v Speaker 1>it is actually a fully human um, It's not fully formed,

0:28:26.880 --> 0:28:28.399
<v Speaker 1>but it is a child. It is a baby, it

0:28:28.480 --> 0:28:30.919
<v Speaker 1>is a child human, it has identity. And by the way,

0:28:31.240 --> 0:28:33.320
<v Speaker 1>you know I I tweeted this out earlier. I'm gonna

0:28:33.359 --> 0:28:35.600
<v Speaker 1>find it right now. And um, which is all the

0:28:35.680 --> 0:28:39.000
<v Speaker 1>characteristics and how quick those characteristics reach it might really

0:28:39.000 --> 0:28:42.280
<v Speaker 1>surprise you if you actually go and and read it. Um.

0:28:42.280 --> 0:28:44.080
<v Speaker 1>And my Twitter is at Charlie kirk Levin. If you

0:28:44.080 --> 0:28:46.760
<v Speaker 1>want to give me a follow, it's always great. So

0:28:46.800 --> 0:28:49.240
<v Speaker 1>just so you know, there are one point two million

0:28:49.320 --> 0:28:52.280
<v Speaker 1>children aboarded every year in America. Only to think about that,

0:28:52.840 --> 0:28:55.719
<v Speaker 1>And so here's another question for the left. What if

0:28:55.720 --> 0:28:57.120
<v Speaker 1>we want to just cut that number in half? Would

0:28:57.120 --> 0:28:58.920
<v Speaker 1>you agree with that? How do we have less abortions?

0:29:00.320 --> 0:29:01.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. That's a horrible thing. You want to

0:29:01.800 --> 0:29:04.440
<v Speaker 1>control people? No, what didn't used to be right? I mean, oh,

0:29:04.560 --> 0:29:08.440
<v Speaker 1>of course it's famous for saying we want a few

0:29:08.800 --> 0:29:13.040
<v Speaker 1>and safe, safe, safe, legal and rare. Yes, I can

0:29:13.080 --> 0:29:15.280
<v Speaker 1>never remember that. I should always struggled with that. That

0:29:15.440 --> 0:29:17.959
<v Speaker 1>is three thousand, two hundred and eighty eight abortions this day,

0:29:18.440 --> 0:29:21.040
<v Speaker 1>this ding, in this one hour that I have hosted

0:29:21.080 --> 0:29:23.240
<v Speaker 1>the Buck Sexton Radio show, which I'm honored to be doing,

0:29:24.600 --> 0:29:28.200
<v Speaker 1>there have been one hundred thirty seven abortions in America.

0:29:28.320 --> 0:29:30.720
<v Speaker 1>When you think about that, there's been a hundred and

0:29:30.920 --> 0:29:34.680
<v Speaker 1>thirty seven abortions in this country since I've started hosting

0:29:34.680 --> 0:29:37.000
<v Speaker 1>this show. Oh my goodness, that does that just send

0:29:37.040 --> 0:29:40.320
<v Speaker 1>up a chill up your spine? There have been nine.

0:29:40.720 --> 0:29:43.800
<v Speaker 1>There were nine during our commercial break. And in the

0:29:43.840 --> 0:29:47.760
<v Speaker 1>twenty six seconds that I have described this entire tweet,

0:29:47.800 --> 0:29:50.280
<v Speaker 1>there was another abortion. Let me you to think about that.

0:29:50.520 --> 0:29:52.480
<v Speaker 1>Just when I started talking about my Twitter. There's already

0:29:52.480 --> 0:29:56.400
<v Speaker 1>been another abortion like this every twenty six seconds. And

0:29:56.440 --> 0:29:58.760
<v Speaker 1>if you sort of zoom out since Roe v. Wade

0:29:58.840 --> 0:30:01.440
<v Speaker 1>right in nineteen seventy three, I mean, there's been over

0:30:01.560 --> 0:30:06.880
<v Speaker 1>sixty million abortions. It's a number so unconscionable it becomes

0:30:06.880 --> 0:30:09.760
<v Speaker 1>almost like the national debt. You become desensiti You can't

0:30:09.800 --> 0:30:15.520
<v Speaker 1>actually put a number that large into context in your mind. No. No,

0:30:16.040 --> 0:30:18.840
<v Speaker 1>And so at eighteen days, did you know a baby

0:30:18.880 --> 0:30:22.560
<v Speaker 1>hearts beat, baby heartbeat starts. Did you know at forty

0:30:22.600 --> 0:30:26.200
<v Speaker 1>two days, brain waves are detected. Did you know at

0:30:26.280 --> 0:30:28.440
<v Speaker 1>fifty two days a baby can hick up and yawn?

0:30:29.440 --> 0:30:33.320
<v Speaker 1>At eight weeks, all organs are functioning. At nine weeks,

0:30:33.360 --> 0:30:36.360
<v Speaker 1>a baby has fingerprints, At ten weeks, a baby can

0:30:36.400 --> 0:30:40.360
<v Speaker 1>feel pain, and at twelve weeks babies can smile. It's

0:30:40.400 --> 0:30:43.320
<v Speaker 1>pretty amazing. Yet Democrats don't even want to have late

0:30:43.400 --> 0:30:46.600
<v Speaker 1>term abortion restrictions that allow that would restrict abortion with

0:30:46.640 --> 0:30:49.640
<v Speaker 1>all these different categories. And just in this break that

0:30:49.640 --> 0:30:51.040
<v Speaker 1>we're about to take right now, and I hope you

0:30:51.080 --> 0:30:54.000
<v Speaker 1>hang with us, because we got more stuff coming. There

0:30:54.040 --> 0:31:01.720
<v Speaker 1>will be another nine abortions in just the break we

0:31:01.760 --> 0:31:04.160
<v Speaker 1>have coming up right now. Nine babies will be aborted

0:31:04.160 --> 0:31:07.800
<v Speaker 1>in just this break. It's horrifying. This is Charlie Kirk

0:31:07.800 --> 0:31:10.120
<v Speaker 1>filling in for Buck Sexton on the Buck Sexton Radio Show.

0:31:10.360 --> 0:31:13.440
<v Speaker 1>Can follow me on Twitter at Charlie kirklevn TPUSA dot com,

0:31:13.480 --> 0:31:18.920
<v Speaker 1>Charlie Kirkshow, and Apple Podcast. We'll be right back. Hello everybody.

0:31:19.040 --> 0:31:23.120
<v Speaker 1>This is Charlie Kirk, founder of Turning Point USA, the

0:31:23.200 --> 0:31:28.160
<v Speaker 1>nation's largest student movement dedicated to educating, empowering, and organizing

0:31:28.200 --> 0:31:32.160
<v Speaker 1>students around the values of free markets and limited government,

0:31:32.280 --> 0:31:37.080
<v Speaker 1>the Constitution, and of course American exceptionalism. We live in

0:31:37.080 --> 0:31:39.120
<v Speaker 1>the greatest country ever to exist in the history of

0:31:39.120 --> 0:31:41.120
<v Speaker 1>the world. It is a blessing that we live in

0:31:41.120 --> 0:31:43.560
<v Speaker 1>this country. We should be thankful that we live here,

0:31:43.920 --> 0:31:48.320
<v Speaker 1>not angry that we live in this country. The horse

0:31:48.440 --> 0:31:52.560
<v Speaker 1>race continues and the Democrat primary I call it the carnival.

0:31:52.640 --> 0:31:55.320
<v Speaker 1>I think the circus gives it too much credit, but

0:31:55.360 --> 0:32:01.360
<v Speaker 1>it's the carnival. It is amazing. I agree with this

0:32:01.520 --> 0:32:07.479
<v Speaker 1>assessment completely. I think Kevin McCarthy hit it on the

0:32:07.480 --> 0:32:10.840
<v Speaker 1>head when he said this, Joe Biden will be the

0:32:10.920 --> 0:32:14.600
<v Speaker 1>Jeb Bush of this cycle. Good for Kevin McCarthy. That's

0:32:14.640 --> 0:32:17.520
<v Speaker 1>kind of like an insult, isn't it, mister producer? I mean,

0:32:17.680 --> 0:32:21.560
<v Speaker 1>pretty pretty harsh, pretty harsh. Yeah, it's Kevin McCarthy's energy Jeb,

0:32:21.880 --> 0:32:25.160
<v Speaker 1>low energy Joe or flip flop Joe. What do you think,

0:32:25.800 --> 0:32:28.040
<v Speaker 1>creepy Joe. I like creepy Joe. I don't like him.

0:32:28.080 --> 0:32:30.360
<v Speaker 1>I like the term creepy Joe. But I think he

0:32:30.480 --> 0:32:33.400
<v Speaker 1>is going to be the Jeb Bush, or he already is.

0:32:33.440 --> 0:32:35.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean, he's the front runner. He's raising all the

0:32:35.160 --> 0:32:38.040
<v Speaker 1>money and just wait, the knives are going to be out.

0:32:38.080 --> 0:32:40.640
<v Speaker 1>And I know some liberal activists on Twitter and I

0:32:40.680 --> 0:32:43.800
<v Speaker 1>follow him, Boy do they have anger towards Joe Biden?

0:32:44.080 --> 0:32:47.040
<v Speaker 1>And what an AOC I'll be I don't want to

0:32:47.080 --> 0:32:50.720
<v Speaker 1>say the word on radio something if we're gonna let

0:32:50.760 --> 0:32:52.880
<v Speaker 1>the people that screwed up our climate now going to

0:32:52.920 --> 0:32:56.120
<v Speaker 1>be our nominee or something like that, it's typical. Well

0:32:56.120 --> 0:32:58.959
<v Speaker 1>what did she say? She said, conservatives on both sides

0:32:59.000 --> 0:33:02.840
<v Speaker 1>of the aisle, and she was definitely talking about Joe Biden.

0:33:03.080 --> 0:33:05.480
<v Speaker 1>But this is really important. It shows that that the

0:33:05.560 --> 0:33:10.200
<v Speaker 1>Democrat Primary, that the Democrat circus or carnival or whatever

0:33:10.240 --> 0:33:13.280
<v Speaker 1>you want to call it, the Democrats show has become

0:33:14.600 --> 0:33:16.280
<v Speaker 1>as I like to call other as, like I say,

0:33:16.400 --> 0:33:18.560
<v Speaker 1>the Trump hating Olympics and whoever can be the most

0:33:19.040 --> 0:33:22.560
<v Speaker 1>radical person in the room. It's quite it's quite extraordinary.

0:33:22.600 --> 0:33:25.520
<v Speaker 1>It's not good for the country either. There there are common,

0:33:25.560 --> 0:33:29.040
<v Speaker 1>decent sense things that our country needs, like an infrastructure proposal.

0:33:29.040 --> 0:33:31.960
<v Speaker 1>All these things have become impossible because the Democrats hate

0:33:31.960 --> 0:33:34.160
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump a lot more than they love America. They

0:33:34.200 --> 0:33:36.520
<v Speaker 1>hate him so much that at all costs, no matter

0:33:36.520 --> 0:33:39.160
<v Speaker 1>what's what is it going to take, they have to

0:33:39.320 --> 0:33:41.720
<v Speaker 1>oppose him, no matter what it is, they have to

0:33:41.760 --> 0:33:46.720
<v Speaker 1>oppose him. And it's too bad because there this country

0:33:47.320 --> 0:33:51.480
<v Speaker 1>is needing right now for bipartners and approval of a

0:33:51.560 --> 0:33:54.320
<v Speaker 1>variety of different things. And so just wait, you're going

0:33:54.360 --> 0:33:57.000
<v Speaker 1>to see Bernie Sanders, You're gonna see Elizabeth Warren, You're

0:33:57.000 --> 0:33:59.920
<v Speaker 1>gonna see Peepooha, Judge. You're gonna see Kamala Harris start

0:34:00.040 --> 0:34:04.240
<v Speaker 1>to unite against Joe Biden. You're going to see them unite.

0:34:04.800 --> 0:34:09.719
<v Speaker 1>And I think I think I think we're underestimating how

0:34:09.800 --> 0:34:12.440
<v Speaker 1>quick and how sudden and how dramatic the fall of

0:34:12.520 --> 0:34:14.799
<v Speaker 1>Joe Biden's gonna be. At least in my estimation, that's

0:34:14.800 --> 0:34:18.920
<v Speaker 1>what it's going to be. And so I guess the

0:34:19.000 --> 0:34:21.080
<v Speaker 1>question is this, I'm just reading this headline right now

0:34:21.440 --> 0:34:26.839
<v Speaker 1>that some Hollywood actress poses naked in protest of Alabama's

0:34:26.840 --> 0:34:31.640
<v Speaker 1>abortion bill passing. What is that supposed to me? Emily

0:34:31.760 --> 0:34:34.920
<v Speaker 1>radj Dakowski. By the way, it was a female governor,

0:34:35.040 --> 0:34:37.279
<v Speaker 1>wasn't it that signed the bill? Is it not? It

0:34:37.400 --> 0:34:39.520
<v Speaker 1>was It was a female So the war on women

0:34:39.600 --> 0:34:42.719
<v Speaker 1>is being launched by a female governor. Go figure that one.

0:34:42.800 --> 0:34:44.680
<v Speaker 1>But oh, you know, she doesn't really care about women,

0:34:44.680 --> 0:34:46.920
<v Speaker 1>and blah blah blah blah blah blah blah that whole thing.

0:34:48.600 --> 0:34:54.160
<v Speaker 1>And so, as Tucker Carlson said, this is exactly how

0:34:55.000 --> 0:34:57.080
<v Speaker 1>the function of government is supposed to work, is that

0:34:57.160 --> 0:34:59.280
<v Speaker 1>you put people in place, you have people in positions

0:34:59.280 --> 0:35:02.759
<v Speaker 1>of power, and then you have policies based on the

0:35:02.800 --> 0:35:05.920
<v Speaker 1>people that you actually put in those positions of power.

0:35:06.880 --> 0:35:10.319
<v Speaker 1>And I find it so amazing, kind of going back

0:35:10.320 --> 0:35:13.960
<v Speaker 1>to my earlier point, and how passionate the Democrats have

0:35:14.040 --> 0:35:17.160
<v Speaker 1>become to make sure that the lives of the unborn

0:35:17.280 --> 0:35:21.759
<v Speaker 1>will never see the light of day. And we see

0:35:21.760 --> 0:35:23.720
<v Speaker 1>this a lot. The anger and the vitriol and college

0:35:23.719 --> 0:35:26.160
<v Speaker 1>campus is the work that we do at Turning Point USA.

0:35:26.320 --> 0:35:29.560
<v Speaker 1>At Turning Point USA, we are trying to fight America's

0:35:29.560 --> 0:35:32.719
<v Speaker 1>culture war around the values of constitutional liberty and free

0:35:32.760 --> 0:35:35.640
<v Speaker 1>markets and limited government. And we find so often that

0:35:36.120 --> 0:35:38.880
<v Speaker 1>the students on the left just have contempt and victriol

0:35:39.160 --> 0:35:43.359
<v Speaker 1>and are so programmed around these perspectives that you can't

0:35:43.400 --> 0:35:47.120
<v Speaker 1>tell them anything different. And that's exactly why we are

0:35:47.160 --> 0:35:50.239
<v Speaker 1>doing what we are doing. And I do anticipate this

0:35:50.320 --> 0:35:53.400
<v Speaker 1>abortion fight to heat up even further. I do anticipate

0:35:53.480 --> 0:35:57.960
<v Speaker 1>this to intensify heading into twenty twenty. Well, this has

0:35:57.960 --> 0:35:59.760
<v Speaker 1>been a fun first hour. We're going to be around

0:36:00.239 --> 0:36:02.920
<v Speaker 1>for another couple so hang tight here at the buck

0:36:02.960 --> 0:36:05.160
<v Speaker 1>Sexton Radio Show. Do you like what you heard? Go

0:36:05.239 --> 0:36:07.719
<v Speaker 1>to Apple Podcast and subscribe on the Charlie Kirk Show,

0:36:08.239 --> 0:36:13.719
<v Speaker 1>Standard remission, decoding the news and disseminating information with actionable intelligence.

0:36:15.920 --> 0:36:19.680
<v Speaker 1>Make no mistake America, You're a great American again. This

0:36:20.239 --> 0:36:29.440
<v Speaker 1>is the buck Sexton Show. CIA analysts remember the Hello everybody,

0:36:29.440 --> 0:36:31.560
<v Speaker 1>this is Charlie Kirk. Welcome the hour two of the

0:36:31.560 --> 0:36:34.879
<v Speaker 1>buck Sexton Radio Show. Filling in for my good friend here.

0:36:34.920 --> 0:36:37.840
<v Speaker 1>I am the founder of Turning Point USA, the nation's

0:36:37.920 --> 0:36:41.960
<v Speaker 1>largest student movement dedicated to educating, empowering, and organizing college

0:36:41.960 --> 0:36:44.360
<v Speaker 1>and high school students around the values of free markets

0:36:44.719 --> 0:36:48.439
<v Speaker 1>and limited government. We believe America is the greatest country

0:36:48.480 --> 0:36:49.879
<v Speaker 1>ever to exist in the history of the world. I'm

0:36:49.880 --> 0:36:54.600
<v Speaker 1>also the host of the Charlie Kirk Show podcast, which

0:36:54.600 --> 0:36:56.680
<v Speaker 1>can be found on Apple Podcast. If you have an

0:36:56.680 --> 0:36:59.320
<v Speaker 1>Apple device, just open up that podcast app, type in

0:36:59.400 --> 0:37:02.400
<v Speaker 1>Charlie Kirks, press subscribe. It really helps us out. I'm

0:37:02.480 --> 0:37:04.920
<v Speaker 1>joined here by the executive producer of The Charlie Kirkshow,

0:37:04.960 --> 0:37:10.880
<v Speaker 1>Andrew Sir Andrew hell And it is quite extraordinary, isn't it, Andrew?

0:37:10.920 --> 0:37:14.920
<v Speaker 1>Just seeing the Democrats outrage of having more children in

0:37:14.920 --> 0:37:20.160
<v Speaker 1>the world. They are very upset today. They're even posing

0:37:20.160 --> 0:37:25.960
<v Speaker 1>in the nude in protest as actress Emily Rotski. I

0:37:26.000 --> 0:37:30.280
<v Speaker 1>think I follow her on Instagram, say in Alissa Milano

0:37:30.360 --> 0:37:33.520
<v Speaker 1>is of course in the mix as well. And it

0:37:34.040 --> 0:37:41.200
<v Speaker 1>never ceases to amaze me how how extreme the Democrats

0:37:41.239 --> 0:37:44.520
<v Speaker 1>are willing to go just to oppose Donald Trump. It

0:37:44.600 --> 0:37:47.960
<v Speaker 1>seems no matter what the issue is, how whatever it

0:37:48.000 --> 0:37:50.640
<v Speaker 1>takes to oppose him at all costs. It is the

0:37:51.120 --> 0:37:54.080
<v Speaker 1>appeach at all costs caucus. And it's gonna be interesting

0:37:54.120 --> 0:37:56.120
<v Speaker 1>to see actually on the debate stage when they do

0:37:56.200 --> 0:37:59.279
<v Speaker 1>have a debate, when people actually disagree and say, I

0:37:59.280 --> 0:38:01.359
<v Speaker 1>don't know if we should this impeachment thing. Oh, you're

0:38:01.400 --> 0:38:04.160
<v Speaker 1>really a conservative, you're bought by the right, You're all

0:38:04.239 --> 0:38:05.799
<v Speaker 1>these things. I do have to say, I have to

0:38:05.840 --> 0:38:10.200
<v Speaker 1>go after somebody in particular, Elizabeth Warren. Can you find

0:38:10.200 --> 0:38:13.200
<v Speaker 1>the exact language she used about Fox News? Can you

0:38:13.239 --> 0:38:18.160
<v Speaker 1>find the exact language Elizabeth Warren? And an attempt maybe

0:38:18.200 --> 0:38:20.759
<v Speaker 1>to I don't know, get attention. I mean I really

0:38:20.800 --> 0:38:24.400
<v Speaker 1>respected and appreciated Amy Klobachar and Bernie Sanders going on

0:38:24.440 --> 0:38:26.720
<v Speaker 1>Fox News and actually having a town hall, mayor. Pete's

0:38:26.719 --> 0:38:29.600
<v Speaker 1>doing it as well, Pete Boodh Jedge And anyway, I

0:38:29.600 --> 0:38:32.560
<v Speaker 1>have to say President Trump pronouncing Buddha Judge the other day.

0:38:32.560 --> 0:38:35.400
<v Speaker 1>It was one of the funniest things you got, Pete

0:38:35.440 --> 0:38:39.760
<v Speaker 1>boot Edge Edge, It's very funny. But what did Elizabeth

0:38:39.760 --> 0:38:42.840
<v Speaker 1>Warren say about Fox News but her exact she said,

0:38:45.120 --> 0:38:48.320
<v Speaker 1>a Fox News town hall adds money to the hate

0:38:48.320 --> 0:38:53.279
<v Speaker 1>for profit machine, to which I say, hard pass. I

0:38:53.280 --> 0:38:55.759
<v Speaker 1>think she said something about it being a network for

0:38:55.840 --> 0:38:59.680
<v Speaker 1>racists or something like that, pulling it up. I mean

0:39:00.360 --> 0:39:04.960
<v Speaker 1>Elizabeth Warren's she goes on and on and on all

0:39:05.040 --> 0:39:07.000
<v Speaker 1>through this. She says, I love town halls of then

0:39:07.040 --> 0:39:09.000
<v Speaker 1>more than seventy cents January. I'm glad to have a

0:39:09.040 --> 0:39:10.719
<v Speaker 1>television audience to be part of the Fox News has

0:39:10.760 --> 0:39:12.880
<v Speaker 1>invited me to do a town hall, but I'm turning

0:39:12.920 --> 0:39:15.400
<v Speaker 1>them down. Here's why Fox News is a hate for

0:39:15.520 --> 0:39:20.200
<v Speaker 1>profit racket that gives a megaphone to racists and conspiracists.

0:39:20.239 --> 0:39:22.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't know who she's talking about. I mean, she

0:39:22.680 --> 0:39:26.120
<v Speaker 1>must be talking about her friend, Louis Farracon. It's designed

0:39:26.120 --> 0:39:28.600
<v Speaker 1>to turn us against each other, risking life and death.

0:39:28.960 --> 0:39:32.279
<v Speaker 1>Consequences to provide cover for the corruption that's rotting our

0:39:32.280 --> 0:39:35.600
<v Speaker 1>government and hallowing out our middle class. She's this is

0:39:35.600 --> 0:39:38.000
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter, by the way, is Elizabeth Warren. She goes

0:39:38.000 --> 0:39:42.000
<v Speaker 1>on and on goodness five paragraphs, here was a more racist.

0:39:42.400 --> 0:39:45.319
<v Speaker 1>I won't ask millions of Democrat primary voters to tune

0:39:45.360 --> 0:39:48.040
<v Speaker 1>into an outlet that profits from racism and hate in

0:39:48.160 --> 0:39:51.319
<v Speaker 1>order to see our candidates. It's you know, what really

0:39:51.400 --> 0:39:54.480
<v Speaker 1>upsets me about this is that when everything becomes racist,

0:39:54.520 --> 0:39:58.080
<v Speaker 1>nothing is racist. There are actual racists in American society,

0:39:58.320 --> 0:40:00.760
<v Speaker 1>and they should be condemned and they should be ostras.

0:40:01.480 --> 0:40:06.560
<v Speaker 1>But when Elizabeth Warren says a network with viewers throughout

0:40:06.600 --> 0:40:09.319
<v Speaker 1>a week of fifteen to twenty million people and five

0:40:09.400 --> 0:40:12.080
<v Speaker 1>million a night that watch on primetime are just all

0:40:12.160 --> 0:40:15.480
<v Speaker 1>racist to hate for profit machine, she's trying to indict

0:40:15.520 --> 0:40:19.080
<v Speaker 1>an entire segment of the American population. What kind of

0:40:19.120 --> 0:40:22.120
<v Speaker 1>contempt and what kind of anger is within her to

0:40:22.239 --> 0:40:25.320
<v Speaker 1>say something like that? And it's really too bad because

0:40:25.320 --> 0:40:27.520
<v Speaker 1>Bernie Sanders. So what is she saying? Bernie Sanders is

0:40:27.520 --> 0:40:29.840
<v Speaker 1>okay with appeasing races? Is her way to like attack

0:40:29.880 --> 0:40:33.440
<v Speaker 1>other people in the primary. Pete poota Judge or Amy Klobuchar,

0:40:33.880 --> 0:40:37.360
<v Speaker 1>that they're somehow okay with it and she's not. And

0:40:37.760 --> 0:40:41.600
<v Speaker 1>it's this sort of attack on the main institutions on

0:40:41.640 --> 0:40:45.000
<v Speaker 1>the conservative arena. And so, if you have noticed how

0:40:45.920 --> 0:40:49.080
<v Speaker 1>the left has reignited their war on Russia, Lumba, They've

0:40:49.080 --> 0:40:52.320
<v Speaker 1>reignited their war on Sean Hannity, on Tucker Carlson on

0:40:52.480 --> 0:40:55.960
<v Speaker 1>Fox News, on the think tanks such as the Judicial

0:40:56.000 --> 0:40:59.120
<v Speaker 1>Crisis Network. It's like, all of a sudden, the left

0:40:59.239 --> 0:41:02.680
<v Speaker 1>is realized that there is a well built conservative infrastructure

0:41:02.680 --> 0:41:05.040
<v Speaker 1>that is now behind Donald Trump completely. And it's not

0:41:05.040 --> 0:41:07.319
<v Speaker 1>just the war on Trump. It's behind all the organizations,

0:41:07.560 --> 0:41:10.319
<v Speaker 1>It's behind the pundits, behind the companies, behind the media

0:41:10.320 --> 0:41:14.879
<v Speaker 1>networks that are also in harmony with Donald Trump. And yes,

0:41:14.960 --> 0:41:19.120
<v Speaker 1>Fox News is a singular piece of opposite opinion on

0:41:19.320 --> 0:41:23.040
<v Speaker 1>all the cable networks. Every cable network agrees on the

0:41:23.080 --> 0:41:30.160
<v Speaker 1>exact same thing on every single issue. You go to CNN, MSNBC, HLN, ABC, CBS, NBC,

0:41:30.320 --> 0:41:32.799
<v Speaker 1>they agree on every single issue, no matter what it is.

0:41:32.840 --> 0:41:36.640
<v Speaker 1>Not to mention Washington, Washington Post, New York Times, Chicago Tribune,

0:41:36.960 --> 0:41:39.640
<v Speaker 1>La Times, you name it. Every major network, and then

0:41:39.640 --> 0:41:42.920
<v Speaker 1>you have not to mention the online having the post.

0:41:42.960 --> 0:41:47.360
<v Speaker 1>BuzzFeed and Fox News is the singular, the singular different

0:41:47.440 --> 0:41:50.640
<v Speaker 1>voice on cable, and they get all of the hate,

0:41:50.680 --> 0:41:53.440
<v Speaker 1>all of the boycotts, all of the attention, and for

0:41:53.520 --> 0:41:56.760
<v Speaker 1>doing what for having a separate opinion, for having a

0:41:56.800 --> 0:42:01.319
<v Speaker 1>difference of opinion, for having a perspective that might be

0:42:01.800 --> 0:42:04.960
<v Speaker 1>a little bit out of what would be called the

0:42:05.000 --> 0:42:08.560
<v Speaker 1>Beltway ordinary, and they say they give credence to racists

0:42:08.560 --> 0:42:10.560
<v Speaker 1>and all this whole n A second, the most racist

0:42:10.560 --> 0:42:13.399
<v Speaker 1>stuff I've heard of been on networks like CNN where

0:42:13.440 --> 0:42:16.600
<v Speaker 1>Bakari Sellers said, I'm not going to say it on

0:42:16.719 --> 0:42:18.799
<v Speaker 1>air because it's so bad. He said something horrible abou

0:42:18.840 --> 0:42:21.319
<v Speaker 1>Kanye West and insulted him using a racial pejorative. I'm

0:42:21.360 --> 0:42:22.840
<v Speaker 1>not going to say it. I mean, I can go

0:42:22.920 --> 0:42:25.439
<v Speaker 1>time and time again of horrific things that are set.

0:42:25.600 --> 0:42:28.000
<v Speaker 1>I'll give you another example on the MSNBC in the

0:42:28.040 --> 0:42:30.319
<v Speaker 1>last couple in the last months, you had to contribute that.

0:42:30.320 --> 0:42:31.880
<v Speaker 1>And this is this is one of the most racist

0:42:31.880 --> 0:42:34.239
<v Speaker 1>things that the left always says. The left says is

0:42:34.239 --> 0:42:37.120
<v Speaker 1>all the time they say, well, we need illegals because

0:42:37.120 --> 0:42:40.200
<v Speaker 1>who else is going to pick our vegetables and clean

0:42:40.280 --> 0:42:43.480
<v Speaker 1>our houses. That's such a racist thing to say, to

0:42:43.560 --> 0:42:46.759
<v Speaker 1>say that illegal aliens are good for nothing more than housework.

0:42:47.239 --> 0:42:50.040
<v Speaker 1>And they said this on MSNBC. It goes completely unanswered.

0:42:50.040 --> 0:42:53.640
<v Speaker 1>And so Elizabeth Warren believes just because a network might

0:42:53.760 --> 0:42:57.399
<v Speaker 1>challenge her on her fake Native American ancestry, that might

0:42:57.480 --> 0:43:00.839
<v Speaker 1>challenge her on her socialist ideas, that I challenge her

0:43:01.200 --> 0:43:05.560
<v Speaker 1>on her radicalism. Somehow she is not able to go

0:43:05.600 --> 0:43:06.879
<v Speaker 1>on there. And she says, I'm not going to give

0:43:06.920 --> 0:43:10.240
<v Speaker 1>them a problem, you know, I hate for profit machine instead.

0:43:10.280 --> 0:43:12.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't remember, Andrew, maybe you could enlighten me how

0:43:12.440 --> 0:43:15.360
<v Speaker 1>many town halls did MSNBC do with any of the

0:43:15.440 --> 0:43:18.719
<v Speaker 1>candidates for the Republican candidates back in twenty sixteen. I

0:43:18.760 --> 0:43:20.440
<v Speaker 1>don't think they did any of them. So if it

0:43:20.520 --> 0:43:22.760
<v Speaker 1>was really like a hate for profit thing, Elizabeth Warren,

0:43:22.960 --> 0:43:24.719
<v Speaker 1>why didn't the other ones do it? Why didn't the

0:43:24.719 --> 0:43:27.239
<v Speaker 1>other ones give credence to that? Well? I think this

0:43:27.440 --> 0:43:30.640
<v Speaker 1>goes back to what you're always saying about how the

0:43:30.080 --> 0:43:33.960
<v Speaker 1>UH the Democratic Party right now, there's so many candidates

0:43:33.960 --> 0:43:37.680
<v Speaker 1>they're forced to follow, radicalize, the forced to find ways

0:43:37.719 --> 0:43:39.359
<v Speaker 1>to stand out from the back. And this seems like

0:43:39.880 --> 0:43:43.560
<v Speaker 1>a very transparent attempt at saying, well, okay, well, if

0:43:43.640 --> 0:43:47.320
<v Speaker 1>Bernie and me are often lumped into the same group,

0:43:47.719 --> 0:43:50.040
<v Speaker 1>well how can I out Bernie Bernie, I'm gonna I'm

0:43:50.040 --> 0:43:52.480
<v Speaker 1>gonna stick it to Fox, even though you know, Bernie

0:43:52.480 --> 0:43:54.640
<v Speaker 1>Sanders obviously did his town hall with Fox and it

0:43:54.680 --> 0:43:56.960
<v Speaker 1>was by all accounts of great success for his campaign.

0:43:57.080 --> 0:43:59.640
<v Speaker 1>So to go to one of my favorite heroes in

0:43:59.680 --> 0:44:03.040
<v Speaker 1>AMR in con cinema history, Kelsey Grammar, none other than

0:44:03.080 --> 0:44:05.239
<v Speaker 1>Frasier Krane. He was a great radio show host two

0:44:05.239 --> 0:44:09.320
<v Speaker 1>on KCl seven eighty, the Seattle Talk of Hello, everybody,

0:44:09.320 --> 0:44:11.640
<v Speaker 1>this is doctor Frasier Crane. The Frasier fans out there,

0:44:12.040 --> 0:44:15.960
<v Speaker 1>Kelsey Grammer said, says Trump has accomplished more than the

0:44:16.000 --> 0:44:19.560
<v Speaker 1>Washington clowns have in sixty years. Washington didn't do us

0:44:19.600 --> 0:44:22.279
<v Speaker 1>any favors. I love Kelsey Grammer. He's been a rock

0:44:22.320 --> 0:44:25.719
<v Speaker 1>solid conservative Republican for years. And actually one of his

0:44:26.040 --> 0:44:33.319
<v Speaker 1>best performances Andrew was in the television series about the

0:44:33.400 --> 0:44:37.160
<v Speaker 1>Chicago mayor. It was called So I can't remember the

0:44:37.200 --> 0:44:41.160
<v Speaker 1>name of It was excellent, excellent, excellent. Well, the listeners

0:44:41.239 --> 0:44:43.880
<v Speaker 1>might not know that you are a proud Chicagoan. I

0:44:43.920 --> 0:44:46.000
<v Speaker 1>am a proud Chicagoan. So you know what the fun

0:44:46.000 --> 0:44:48.399
<v Speaker 1>thing about being from Chicago is we have term limits

0:44:48.440 --> 0:44:50.319
<v Speaker 1>in Illinois. One term in office, one term in jail,

0:44:51.200 --> 0:44:54.760
<v Speaker 1>and we always we vote early, vote often. My grandmother

0:44:54.760 --> 0:44:56.759
<v Speaker 1>passed away in them in nineteen nineties. She's been voting

0:44:56.760 --> 0:45:01.200
<v Speaker 1>Democrat ever since. And you know, it's actually seeing a

0:45:01.239 --> 0:45:04.279
<v Speaker 1>profile in a Chicago mayor with something quite enlightening and

0:45:04.400 --> 0:45:08.919
<v Speaker 1>quite fun and so kind of going going back to

0:45:09.280 --> 0:45:12.799
<v Speaker 1>this idea of Elizabeth Moore and boycotting Fox News and

0:45:12.840 --> 0:45:16.000
<v Speaker 1>boycotting the conservative networks. Andrew, isn't it an amazing You've

0:45:16.000 --> 0:45:18.280
<v Speaker 1>been to a lot of my campus events Attorney Point, USA.

0:45:18.360 --> 0:45:20.520
<v Speaker 1>You've been to a lot of my kind of campus outreach.

0:45:20.840 --> 0:45:24.560
<v Speaker 1>Is it incredible how the left stays away from conversation,

0:45:24.600 --> 0:45:27.279
<v Speaker 1>how conservatives want to go towards the conversation. Isn't that

0:45:27.280 --> 0:45:28.759
<v Speaker 1>how you can tell who's on the right side of

0:45:28.760 --> 0:45:33.759
<v Speaker 1>the issue and who's actually on the proper side of discussion. Well,

0:45:33.800 --> 0:45:36.520
<v Speaker 1>I think you know the conservatives, at least on campus

0:45:36.560 --> 0:45:39.640
<v Speaker 1>for example. I mean, there's just so much more pressure

0:45:39.760 --> 0:45:43.560
<v Speaker 1>on conservatives there that their arguments actually get better and

0:45:43.640 --> 0:45:46.560
<v Speaker 1>better and better, and the student activists get their messaging honed,

0:45:46.600 --> 0:45:50.719
<v Speaker 1>and they have to challenge their assumptions, and what you

0:45:50.800 --> 0:45:53.839
<v Speaker 1>end up having is activists on campus that are way

0:45:53.840 --> 0:45:57.239
<v Speaker 1>more effective. I think the modern left needs to take

0:45:57.280 --> 0:46:00.239
<v Speaker 1>a page out of the conservatives on campus that when

0:46:00.239 --> 0:46:02.200
<v Speaker 1>you get challenged, you get better well, and then you

0:46:02.239 --> 0:46:04.960
<v Speaker 1>embrace it. And so if Elizabeth Warren wants to be president,

0:46:05.200 --> 0:46:07.920
<v Speaker 1>Elizabeth Warren wants to be president of this country, she's

0:46:07.960 --> 0:46:10.440
<v Speaker 1>gonna have to talk to people like Fox News and

0:46:10.560 --> 0:46:12.840
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump. This is what I love about Donald Trump.

0:46:12.880 --> 0:46:15.000
<v Speaker 1>From the day Donald Trump announced he was doing he

0:46:15.040 --> 0:46:17.759
<v Speaker 1>was doing interviews with anyone, he was doing well. Now

0:46:17.760 --> 0:46:20.600
<v Speaker 1>he's been deep platformed. But yeah, exactly, they won't shows

0:46:20.840 --> 0:46:23.560
<v Speaker 1>his rallies anymore because they realized they might have contributed

0:46:23.719 --> 0:46:26.320
<v Speaker 1>or yeah, or that they actually might convert other people.

0:46:26.560 --> 0:46:28.880
<v Speaker 1>My favorite is, you know, Donald Trump used to do

0:46:28.920 --> 0:46:31.759
<v Speaker 1>phoners with CNN. He used to call into CNN and

0:46:31.800 --> 0:46:34.480
<v Speaker 1>just take a whole hour. I mean, the guy would

0:46:34.520 --> 0:46:37.279
<v Speaker 1>talk to anybody. He'll take any question about anything, and

0:46:37.320 --> 0:46:38.799
<v Speaker 1>if he has a problem with it, he'll tell you.

0:46:39.080 --> 0:46:42.160
<v Speaker 1>Elizabeth Warren is a coward. She is a coward for

0:46:42.239 --> 0:46:44.399
<v Speaker 1>not wanting to go on Fox News, for actually hearing

0:46:44.400 --> 0:46:47.040
<v Speaker 1>a difference of opinion or sharing your different opinion. You

0:46:47.080 --> 0:46:49.080
<v Speaker 1>know what I actually respect about Bernie Sanders. You know

0:46:49.120 --> 0:46:50.959
<v Speaker 1>what he said. He said, Well, there might be people

0:46:50.960 --> 0:46:52.719
<v Speaker 1>that watch Fox News that have a bad opinion of me,

0:46:52.719 --> 0:46:54.160
<v Speaker 1>and I want to give them a good one. Good

0:46:54.200 --> 0:46:57.200
<v Speaker 1>for him. That's exactly what civil discourse is all about. Right,

0:46:57.320 --> 0:46:59.520
<v Speaker 1>That's what dialogue is all about. You should not be

0:46:59.600 --> 0:47:03.040
<v Speaker 1>afraid here or say something that people might be disagreeable.

0:47:03.120 --> 0:47:05.680
<v Speaker 1>And this whole decision just sort of reeks of a

0:47:05.760 --> 0:47:09.040
<v Speaker 1>basket of deplorable's type of of statement. You know, I mean,

0:47:09.360 --> 0:47:12.440
<v Speaker 1>you're you're talking to an audience or a network that

0:47:12.520 --> 0:47:15.520
<v Speaker 1>represents roughly half of the American electorate. Yeah, that's exactly,

0:47:15.560 --> 0:47:17.759
<v Speaker 1>but not all of them. Obviously, not all conservatives like

0:47:17.800 --> 0:47:19.719
<v Speaker 1>Fox or listen to Fox. There's a lot of critiques

0:47:19.719 --> 0:47:22.279
<v Speaker 1>of Fox. But you're talking to a roughly half of

0:47:22.280 --> 0:47:25.800
<v Speaker 1>the electorate that put President Trump into the Oval office.

0:47:25.840 --> 0:47:28.239
<v Speaker 1>And then she has the gall and really the audacity

0:47:28.280 --> 0:47:30.360
<v Speaker 1>to say, you know, hey, listen, you're a hate for

0:47:30.440 --> 0:47:33.799
<v Speaker 1>profit routet. And then you guys advance racism and It's

0:47:33.880 --> 0:47:37.520
<v Speaker 1>essentially it's like saying basket of deplorables or what else?

0:47:37.600 --> 0:47:41.680
<v Speaker 1>What irredeemable? It is what she said Trump supporters are irredeemable, right.

0:47:41.680 --> 0:47:43.239
<v Speaker 1>I think this is going to come back to haunt her.

0:47:43.320 --> 0:47:45.520
<v Speaker 1>She might see it as useful in the primaries, but

0:47:45.560 --> 0:47:47.759
<v Speaker 1>if you know she was to you know, make it

0:47:48.080 --> 0:47:50.560
<v Speaker 1>any any farther, you know this is going to be

0:47:50.640 --> 0:47:53.279
<v Speaker 1>a problematic thing to say. I totally completely agree. This

0:47:53.400 --> 0:47:55.040
<v Speaker 1>is Charlie Kirk filling in for the Buck Sex Then

0:47:55.160 --> 0:47:57.160
<v Speaker 1>radio show. We're gonna be talking about school choice and

0:47:57.239 --> 0:47:59.239
<v Speaker 1>my column that just got published in The Hill. If

0:47:59.280 --> 0:48:00.560
<v Speaker 1>you like what you're hearing, you can go to an

0:48:00.560 --> 0:48:03.880
<v Speaker 1>Apple podcast type and Charlie Kirk show Press subscribe, Founder

0:48:03.880 --> 0:48:06.520
<v Speaker 1>of Turning Point USA TPUSA dot com. We will be

0:48:06.640 --> 0:48:11.200
<v Speaker 1>right back. Hello everybody, This is Charlie Kirk filling in

0:48:11.239 --> 0:48:14.000
<v Speaker 1>for Buck sex Then on the Buck Sex Then Radio show.

0:48:14.280 --> 0:48:15.920
<v Speaker 1>Having a lot of fun here on the founder of

0:48:16.000 --> 0:48:19.280
<v Speaker 1>Turning Point USA. And you go to TPUSA dot com

0:48:19.760 --> 0:48:21.680
<v Speaker 1>you want to get more involved on the culture war

0:48:21.719 --> 0:48:24.879
<v Speaker 1>on college campuses. I just have a new piece out

0:48:24.920 --> 0:48:27.360
<v Speaker 1>for The Hill where I say let's talk about education

0:48:27.400 --> 0:48:30.520
<v Speaker 1>and school choice in twenty twenty. And this is so

0:48:30.640 --> 0:48:34.040
<v Speaker 1>important because I believe this is the issue that could

0:48:34.040 --> 0:48:38.160
<v Speaker 1>break the back of the Democrat Party. I believe that

0:48:38.239 --> 0:48:43.239
<v Speaker 1>this is the issue that could change the fabric of

0:48:43.320 --> 0:48:48.040
<v Speaker 1>the political discourse and could also change the political dynamics

0:48:48.080 --> 0:48:53.000
<v Speaker 1>as we know it. It is immoral and it is

0:48:53.040 --> 0:49:00.160
<v Speaker 1>wrong that there are students, particularly minority students, that are

0:49:00.200 --> 0:49:04.719
<v Speaker 1>stuck in these perpetually failing public schools. That students are

0:49:04.760 --> 0:49:09.760
<v Speaker 1>being forced to go to schools with teachers that should

0:49:09.760 --> 0:49:14.279
<v Speaker 1>be fired, lowly motivated administrators, underfunded schools, and so I

0:49:14.360 --> 0:49:17.600
<v Speaker 1>talk about school choice as the ability for parents to

0:49:17.719 --> 0:49:21.160
<v Speaker 1>be able to send their kids to better schools. We

0:49:21.239 --> 0:49:25.040
<v Speaker 1>have over fifty million students primary and secondary students enrolled

0:49:25.040 --> 0:49:29.200
<v Speaker 1>in schools in the United States. A great example of

0:49:29.200 --> 0:49:32.000
<v Speaker 1>this was the Milwaukee Parental school Choice program. This was

0:49:32.040 --> 0:49:34.600
<v Speaker 1>the vision of Milton Frean. Milton Freeman, one of my

0:49:34.840 --> 0:49:40.719
<v Speaker 1>intellectual heroes, was a champion of school choice, and this

0:49:40.800 --> 0:49:43.560
<v Speaker 1>was implemented in nineteen ninety and there are twenty now.

0:49:43.560 --> 0:49:46.000
<v Speaker 1>There are voucher systems all across the country. In the

0:49:46.040 --> 0:49:49.040
<v Speaker 1>Milwaukee Parental school Choice program has been one of the

0:49:49.160 --> 0:49:54.240
<v Speaker 1>most successful school choice experiments in history, raising test scores,

0:49:54.560 --> 0:49:58.719
<v Speaker 1>raising literacy rates, lowering crime, and you name it. Yet

0:49:58.840 --> 0:50:03.520
<v Speaker 1>But unfortunately it is the education unions and liberal politicians

0:50:03.640 --> 0:50:05.880
<v Speaker 1>that say we need to spend more money in education.

0:50:06.840 --> 0:50:12.200
<v Speaker 1>But if we actually had a school choice plan, the

0:50:12.320 --> 0:50:16.640
<v Speaker 1>public schools would then have the pressure to better spend

0:50:16.680 --> 0:50:19.520
<v Speaker 1>the money they're already having. It is not a funding problem,

0:50:19.560 --> 0:50:21.719
<v Speaker 1>believe it or not. We have thrown more and more

0:50:21.760 --> 0:50:25.280
<v Speaker 1>money at public schools, like, for example, in Chicago between

0:50:25.320 --> 0:50:28.720
<v Speaker 1>twenty seven to twenty eighteen, they were the CPS Chicago

0:50:28.760 --> 0:50:31.280
<v Speaker 1>Public Schools. We're bringing in more than two hundred dollars

0:50:31.320 --> 0:50:34.360
<v Speaker 1>more per student. The total of five thousand, three hundred

0:50:34.360 --> 0:50:36.200
<v Speaker 1>twenty dollars per high school students is not factor in

0:50:36.200 --> 0:50:38.399
<v Speaker 1>the funding from the state of Illinois. That is far

0:50:38.560 --> 0:50:42.640
<v Speaker 1>less than it costs to educate a student on in

0:50:42.640 --> 0:50:46.640
<v Speaker 1>private schools or in charter schools in the city of Chicago.

0:50:47.520 --> 0:50:49.560
<v Speaker 1>And I believe this is such an important issue because

0:50:49.600 --> 0:50:51.600
<v Speaker 1>not only rarely do you have an issue that is

0:50:51.800 --> 0:50:55.440
<v Speaker 1>the right policy, but also really really good politics, and

0:50:55.560 --> 0:50:58.839
<v Speaker 1>also the other side cannot contend with it. The other

0:50:58.880 --> 0:51:05.840
<v Speaker 1>side can not promise, the other side cannot respond to

0:51:05.960 --> 0:51:09.920
<v Speaker 1>the fact that students are failing because of Democrat politicians,

0:51:10.160 --> 0:51:13.759
<v Speaker 1>failing public schools and teacher unions. Their only response is

0:51:13.760 --> 0:51:15.160
<v Speaker 1>we need to throw more money at the problem, where

0:51:15.200 --> 0:51:17.439
<v Speaker 1>he's like, well, why don't why can't we send that

0:51:17.560 --> 0:51:21.839
<v Speaker 1>kid to this school? Oh? Well, and then they lose it.

0:51:22.560 --> 0:51:25.839
<v Speaker 1>The teacher unions have disallowed Democrats from talking about this

0:51:25.880 --> 0:51:31.960
<v Speaker 1>issue altogether. The teacher unions which own the Democrat primary,

0:51:32.040 --> 0:51:35.120
<v Speaker 1>the National Education Association and the American Federation of Teachers,

0:51:35.280 --> 0:51:38.960
<v Speaker 1>the two major teacher unions in this country. They own

0:51:39.520 --> 0:51:42.520
<v Speaker 1>the Democrat primary, they own the American left. They do not,

0:51:42.760 --> 0:51:46.319
<v Speaker 1>they will not allow, and they do not allow politicians

0:51:46.320 --> 0:51:49.800
<v Speaker 1>on the left to talk about this issue. So rarely

0:51:49.800 --> 0:51:52.920
<v Speaker 1>do you get this perfect trinity, this intersection where you

0:51:52.920 --> 0:51:56.759
<v Speaker 1>have really good policy that will improve people's lives, you

0:51:56.800 --> 0:51:59.600
<v Speaker 1>have the ability to draw differences with your opponent on it,

0:52:01.080 --> 0:52:05.840
<v Speaker 1>and it's also very popular. It's very popular. Eighty percent

0:52:05.840 --> 0:52:08.880
<v Speaker 1>of the American people ninety support school choice. And I

0:52:08.920 --> 0:52:11.960
<v Speaker 1>think that we are missing this issue because what could

0:52:12.000 --> 0:52:14.800
<v Speaker 1>be more personal for a mother or for a family

0:52:15.360 --> 0:52:19.000
<v Speaker 1>than sending your child to a good school or sending

0:52:19.000 --> 0:52:21.359
<v Speaker 1>your child to a better school. What could be more

0:52:21.440 --> 0:52:25.560
<v Speaker 1>personal what could be more important than improving your life

0:52:25.760 --> 0:52:29.239
<v Speaker 1>and improving your kid's life than sending your child to

0:52:29.400 --> 0:52:33.120
<v Speaker 1>a school that allows them a higher likelihood to get

0:52:33.200 --> 0:52:37.200
<v Speaker 1>skills and a higher likelihood to succeed in their life.

0:52:37.480 --> 0:52:41.160
<v Speaker 1>And that's exactly what school choice does. School choice is

0:52:41.200 --> 0:52:43.560
<v Speaker 1>the issue that could break the back of the Democrat

0:52:43.600 --> 0:52:45.719
<v Speaker 1>Paria primary. And I could tell you the work that

0:52:45.760 --> 0:52:48.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm doing at Turning Point, USA and on college campuses.

0:52:48.480 --> 0:52:52.640
<v Speaker 1>I find so often that students that think they're liberals

0:52:52.680 --> 0:52:56.759
<v Speaker 1>totally and completely agree that our education system is total nonsense,

0:52:57.120 --> 0:53:00.520
<v Speaker 1>that it needs to be rewired, that are educated. System

0:53:00.600 --> 0:53:05.640
<v Speaker 1>needs to be changed to allow low income, particular minority

0:53:05.719 --> 0:53:08.720
<v Speaker 1>students the freedom. And that's really what it's all about.

0:53:08.760 --> 0:53:11.760
<v Speaker 1>The freedom to be able to go to a better school,

0:53:11.760 --> 0:53:14.280
<v Speaker 1>the freedom to be able to pull that parental trigger

0:53:14.560 --> 0:53:17.239
<v Speaker 1>to be able to go to a school that succeeds.

0:53:17.880 --> 0:53:20.799
<v Speaker 1>Because if we do not have a society or a

0:53:20.840 --> 0:53:27.440
<v Speaker 1>culture that respects every individual's right to education, or I

0:53:27.480 --> 0:53:33.239
<v Speaker 1>should rephrase that every individual's access to education, then we

0:53:33.360 --> 0:53:37.440
<v Speaker 1>are going to continually have this endless cycle of poverty

0:53:37.480 --> 0:53:40.080
<v Speaker 1>and violence that plagues our inner cities. How are we

0:53:40.080 --> 0:53:44.000
<v Speaker 1>going to break that cycle schools that work. And what's

0:53:44.000 --> 0:53:47.759
<v Speaker 1>so frustrating is that now we are having millions and

0:53:47.800 --> 0:53:49.799
<v Speaker 1>millions of illegals come into our country that will then

0:53:49.840 --> 0:53:52.520
<v Speaker 1>be put in these very failing public schools where they're

0:53:52.560 --> 0:53:55.600
<v Speaker 1>more likely to live in poverty. If you go to

0:53:55.600 --> 0:53:57.319
<v Speaker 1>a failing public school and you're not taught to read,

0:53:57.320 --> 0:53:58.799
<v Speaker 1>if you're not taught to write, if you're not taught

0:53:58.840 --> 0:54:01.520
<v Speaker 1>to do math, you're far less likely to succeed. You're

0:54:01.560 --> 0:54:06.000
<v Speaker 1>far less likely to be able to contribute meaningfully. And

0:54:06.080 --> 0:54:09.279
<v Speaker 1>because of that, we then have an entire portion of

0:54:09.320 --> 0:54:13.880
<v Speaker 1>the American population that is disenfranchised and feels really disenfranchised.

0:54:14.080 --> 0:54:17.279
<v Speaker 1>So they turn to government benefits. They turned to the

0:54:17.320 --> 0:54:21.320
<v Speaker 1>government dole, they turned to social welfare. And when that happens,

0:54:21.960 --> 0:54:24.160
<v Speaker 1>you have an entire portion of the American population that

0:54:24.160 --> 0:54:27.480
<v Speaker 1>then becomes Democrat voters. And so school choice is an

0:54:27.480 --> 0:54:31.120
<v Speaker 1>issue that is good policy. It improves people's lives, It

0:54:31.160 --> 0:54:34.440
<v Speaker 1>could increase the standard of living for all people, and

0:54:34.520 --> 0:54:38.320
<v Speaker 1>it can elevate it can elevate the perception that Republicans

0:54:38.320 --> 0:54:41.160
<v Speaker 1>and Conservatives don't care about the inner cities. I think

0:54:42.000 --> 0:54:46.319
<v Speaker 1>conservatives should have an ambitious urban agenda. I think Conservatives

0:54:46.360 --> 0:54:51.040
<v Speaker 1>should have a school choice, opportunity zone, small business agenda

0:54:51.160 --> 0:54:55.440
<v Speaker 1>that could totally change the dynamics of politics within our

0:54:55.480 --> 0:55:01.040
<v Speaker 1>inner cities. I have never been more focused on an

0:55:01.040 --> 0:55:03.120
<v Speaker 1>issue that I think could break the back of the

0:55:03.120 --> 0:55:07.040
<v Speaker 1>Democrat primary and put Republicans and majorities in state houses

0:55:07.239 --> 0:55:10.480
<v Speaker 1>in Congress permanently because the Democrats can't support this issue.

0:55:10.480 --> 0:55:13.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna say that again, Democrats cannot support this issue

0:55:13.120 --> 0:55:15.800
<v Speaker 1>because their number one special interest group, the American Federation

0:55:15.800 --> 0:55:19.840
<v Speaker 1>of Teachers in the National Education Association, own their party.

0:55:20.719 --> 0:55:22.680
<v Speaker 1>We talk about this all the time at Turning Point

0:55:22.719 --> 0:55:28.360
<v Speaker 1>USA TPUSA dot com. And students are so passionate about

0:55:28.960 --> 0:55:33.880
<v Speaker 1>allowing their peers or allowing their brothers, their sisters, or

0:55:33.920 --> 0:55:36.680
<v Speaker 1>other students that are in elementary and high school education

0:55:36.719 --> 0:55:39.439
<v Speaker 1>go to better schools. Do you like what you're hearing?

0:55:39.480 --> 0:55:43.520
<v Speaker 1>Go to Apple Podcasts. Subscribe Charlie Kirkshow Press Subscribe helps

0:55:43.600 --> 0:55:46.400
<v Speaker 1>us out, give us five stars Apple Podcast Charlie Kirkshow,

0:55:46.719 --> 0:55:49.680
<v Speaker 1>TPUSA dot com, Turning Point USA. We'll be right back,

0:55:50.800 --> 0:55:53.080
<v Speaker 1>all right, welcome back. This is Charlie kirk filling in

0:55:53.080 --> 0:55:54.960
<v Speaker 1>for Buck Sex. Then on the Buck Sex then radio

0:55:55.000 --> 0:55:58.480
<v Speaker 1>show founder of Turning Point USA, the nation's largest student

0:55:58.480 --> 0:56:02.239
<v Speaker 1>movement dedicated to educating and powering and organizing students around

0:56:02.280 --> 0:56:05.360
<v Speaker 1>the values of free markets and limited government. My friend

0:56:05.360 --> 0:56:07.880
<v Speaker 1>and mister producer of the Charlie kirk Show Charlie Kirkshow

0:56:07.880 --> 0:56:10.560
<v Speaker 1>podcast that you can find an Apple podcast reminded me

0:56:10.600 --> 0:56:13.160
<v Speaker 1>of some of my predictions. Yeah. One of the things

0:56:13.200 --> 0:56:14.840
<v Speaker 1>we've been covering a lot in the shows, if you

0:56:14.880 --> 0:56:19.000
<v Speaker 1>guys have been tuning in, is that, you know, Charlie

0:56:19.040 --> 0:56:22.760
<v Speaker 1>has a hunch that they're, you know, the front runner

0:56:22.800 --> 0:56:25.439
<v Speaker 1>and the Democratic Party for twenty twenty has not yet

0:56:25.480 --> 0:56:30.560
<v Speaker 1>emerged despite all the buzz around Vice President Biden. You know,

0:56:30.719 --> 0:56:32.839
<v Speaker 1>Charlie's I mean, you've said this time and time again

0:56:32.880 --> 0:56:34.640
<v Speaker 1>that you think he's gonna get eaten up by the

0:56:34.640 --> 0:56:37.560
<v Speaker 1>progressive wing of the Democratic Party. You will be devoured

0:56:37.640 --> 0:56:41.680
<v Speaker 1>by the radical Democrats that have taken over this party. Well,

0:56:41.719 --> 0:56:43.600
<v Speaker 1>and it's been really impressive since you've sort of made

0:56:43.640 --> 0:56:45.840
<v Speaker 1>those predictions on the show. It's like every day it

0:56:45.840 --> 0:56:48.120
<v Speaker 1>seems like somebody else is entering the fray, you know,

0:56:48.120 --> 0:56:52.520
<v Speaker 1>whether it be Mark Cuban or now most recently de Blasio. Well,

0:56:52.560 --> 0:56:54.680
<v Speaker 1>so I have to talk about da Blasio. This is

0:56:54.680 --> 0:56:58.799
<v Speaker 1>really interesting. Imagine being the worst at something and then

0:56:58.880 --> 0:57:01.319
<v Speaker 1>think you can be president. He is the worst mayor

0:57:01.320 --> 0:57:05.120
<v Speaker 1>in America. He really is. I mean, I used to

0:57:05.160 --> 0:57:07.480
<v Speaker 1>love New York City. I know there's probably a lot

0:57:07.480 --> 0:57:10.440
<v Speaker 1>of listeners listen to this from New York. I love

0:57:10.560 --> 0:57:14.600
<v Speaker 1>New York under Mayor Juliani, and I'll have to say this.

0:57:14.719 --> 0:57:17.160
<v Speaker 1>I'll say this publicly. I think Mayor Bloomberg did define job.

0:57:17.880 --> 0:57:19.320
<v Speaker 1>I think there were a lot of stuff I disagree

0:57:19.360 --> 0:57:22.320
<v Speaker 1>with that the big Gulp confiscation thing was silly and stupid,

0:57:22.320 --> 0:57:24.840
<v Speaker 1>the gun control stuff, but there was some common sense

0:57:24.840 --> 0:57:27.680
<v Speaker 1>policies Mayor Bloomberg instituted. He's a businessman. He was a

0:57:27.720 --> 0:57:31.280
<v Speaker 1>center right businessman, and he was center right on fiscal stuff,

0:57:31.280 --> 0:57:34.880
<v Speaker 1>center left on social stuff, super successful business man. I

0:57:34.880 --> 0:57:36.600
<v Speaker 1>think he's kind of become a little prickly in recent

0:57:36.720 --> 0:57:39.160
<v Speaker 1>years against Trump. I think he's spending money to elect Democrats.

0:57:39.440 --> 0:57:41.800
<v Speaker 1>Don't miss quote me media matters, because I know you're listening.

0:57:41.840 --> 0:57:44.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't love Mayor Bloomberg, but I think New York

0:57:44.040 --> 0:57:46.680
<v Speaker 1>under Mayor Bloomberg, who was a reasonably well run city,

0:57:47.480 --> 0:57:51.560
<v Speaker 1>New York has become a mess underd Blaggio. He cares

0:57:51.600 --> 0:57:56.160
<v Speaker 1>more about appeasing leftist radicals that actually running the city properly.

0:57:57.120 --> 0:57:59.640
<v Speaker 1>The amount of vagrancy, the amount of homelessness. You know,

0:57:59.800 --> 0:58:05.800
<v Speaker 1>Mayor Giuliani instituted a no vagrancy, no homelessness policy because

0:58:05.800 --> 0:58:07.480
<v Speaker 1>he said, you know what, we have so many homeless

0:58:07.520 --> 0:58:10.400
<v Speaker 1>shelters here. If you are going to what do they

0:58:10.440 --> 0:58:14.600
<v Speaker 1>call it? I don't want to say a negative connotation

0:58:14.640 --> 0:58:17.120
<v Speaker 1>about it, but solicit is that a proper word towards it?

0:58:17.720 --> 0:58:20.160
<v Speaker 1>Or panhandle? Yeah, I was gonna say, I don't know

0:58:20.160 --> 0:58:22.200
<v Speaker 1>if that's a negative word or not, but I think

0:58:22.200 --> 0:58:24.360
<v Speaker 1>it's just the word. It is right if you're going

0:58:24.400 --> 0:58:29.880
<v Speaker 1>to be on the streets and ask for money or

0:58:30.320 --> 0:58:32.200
<v Speaker 1>do you can't do that? You should go to home.

0:58:32.200 --> 0:58:33.520
<v Speaker 1>There was one of the that was one of the

0:58:33.560 --> 0:58:36.520
<v Speaker 1>ways Mayor Giuliani cleaned up the streets. Mayor Giuliani, can

0:58:36.560 --> 0:58:40.840
<v Speaker 1>you imagine just I just want everyone understand this. Nineteen

0:58:40.920 --> 0:58:43.400
<v Speaker 1>years ago a Republican won the mayor's race in New York.

0:58:43.720 --> 0:58:45.520
<v Speaker 1>Can you just see how far this country has come

0:58:46.000 --> 0:58:49.720
<v Speaker 1>that nineteen years ago there was a Republican mayor of

0:58:49.720 --> 0:58:52.600
<v Speaker 1>the City of New York, Mayor Giuliani. It's incredible how

0:58:52.640 --> 0:58:54.800
<v Speaker 1>far this country. There was a Republican mayor in Los

0:58:54.840 --> 0:58:57.240
<v Speaker 1>Angeles too, from ninety three to two thousand and one.

0:58:57.440 --> 0:59:01.040
<v Speaker 1>I didn't know that. Yeah, decent ended leaders used to exist.

0:59:01.080 --> 0:59:03.320
<v Speaker 1>There's not been a Republican mayor of Chicago since nineteen

0:59:03.360 --> 0:59:06.920
<v Speaker 1>thirty one. That's an interesting statistic anyway. So imagine being

0:59:07.000 --> 0:59:11.240
<v Speaker 1>the worst at something. Imagine being awful, the worst hitter

0:59:11.320 --> 0:59:13.800
<v Speaker 1>in the major leagues, and then complaining that you're not

0:59:13.840 --> 0:59:16.000
<v Speaker 1>on the All star team. This is Mayor de Blagio.

0:59:16.360 --> 0:59:19.000
<v Speaker 1>He is the worst mayor in America. The city is

0:59:19.040 --> 0:59:23.160
<v Speaker 1>a mess of crime is rising, vagrancy is rampant, the

0:59:23.280 --> 0:59:25.520
<v Speaker 1>taxes are out of control. I mean, look at how

0:59:25.560 --> 0:59:27.520
<v Speaker 1>they screwed up this Amazon deal. This is a great

0:59:27.560 --> 0:59:30.680
<v Speaker 1>example of the fecklessness of leadership of Mayor de Blagia.

0:59:31.000 --> 0:59:35.320
<v Speaker 1>He allowed a constantly wrong but never in doubt socialist

0:59:35.440 --> 0:59:39.080
<v Speaker 1>from New York's fourteenth Congressional District, Alexander Kaizer Cortez, to

0:59:39.200 --> 0:59:42.720
<v Speaker 1>hijack the recruitment of jobs into New York City. Mayor

0:59:42.800 --> 0:59:45.600
<v Speaker 1>de Blaig, you could have called up Alexander Kaiser Cortez said, listen,

0:59:46.360 --> 0:59:49.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm in charge of this negotiation. Allow the adults in

0:59:49.560 --> 0:59:52.840
<v Speaker 1>the room to handle Amazon. Instead, he cowtowned to the

0:59:52.920 --> 0:59:56.560
<v Speaker 1>leftist radical pressure of AOC and the city lost twenty

0:59:56.960 --> 1:00:01.200
<v Speaker 1>thousand jobs because of it. He is the worst mayor

1:00:01.280 --> 1:00:04.240
<v Speaker 1>in America, and now he is in the Democrat primary.

1:00:04.720 --> 1:00:06.720
<v Speaker 1>Who else do we have? But we have Bullock, right,

1:00:06.760 --> 1:00:10.560
<v Speaker 1>we have Bullock from Montana, who one of my favorite

1:00:10.600 --> 1:00:13.720
<v Speaker 1>kind of pieces in the last couple days of audio

1:00:13.800 --> 1:00:16.720
<v Speaker 1>visual has been seeing him try to name one accomplishment

1:00:16.760 --> 1:00:20.160
<v Speaker 1>as governor and he just kind of stumbles. I don't know,

1:00:20.240 --> 1:00:23.200
<v Speaker 1>and he's been a horrible governor Montana. Montana is probably

1:00:23.200 --> 1:00:25.040
<v Speaker 1>one of my favorite states in the entire country. I

1:00:25.160 --> 1:00:27.400
<v Speaker 1>love going to Montana. I've actually been to all fifty

1:00:27.440 --> 1:00:29.840
<v Speaker 1>states so I can prepare them all. I think, rather reasonably,

1:00:30.080 --> 1:00:33.440
<v Speaker 1>he's a horrific, horrific governor, and he thinks he can

1:00:33.480 --> 1:00:37.400
<v Speaker 1>bring people together. Actually, the not so closed, not the

1:00:37.520 --> 1:00:40.000
<v Speaker 1>not so secret narrative in Montana is that he's going

1:00:40.040 --> 1:00:41.720
<v Speaker 1>to run for the presidency and then go back and

1:00:41.840 --> 1:00:44.320
<v Speaker 1>run for the Senate against Steve Danes. He would give

1:00:44.640 --> 1:00:46.360
<v Speaker 1>Steve Danes a run for his money. In Montana. I

1:00:46.360 --> 1:00:47.760
<v Speaker 1>think Steve would he could out, that'd be a really

1:00:47.800 --> 1:00:51.720
<v Speaker 1>tough race. That'd be a fifty million dollar race right there,

1:00:51.880 --> 1:00:54.880
<v Speaker 1>That'd be a fifty million dollar race. But then if

1:00:54.920 --> 1:00:59.160
<v Speaker 1>you count Beto rebooting officially rebooting while he's getting a

1:00:59.200 --> 1:01:01.080
<v Speaker 1>haircut with the heck is that all about it? And

1:01:01.240 --> 1:01:03.920
<v Speaker 1>going on the view that no, my favorite is I

1:01:03.920 --> 1:01:05.280
<v Speaker 1>don't know if it was your, somebody else who did

1:01:05.280 --> 1:01:07.800
<v Speaker 1>a Beata impersonation? Was it you? It was the hands,

1:01:07.960 --> 1:01:10.240
<v Speaker 1>it was now somebody else did like the voice. So

1:01:10.680 --> 1:01:14.200
<v Speaker 1>I really think that I don't have privilege, but I

1:01:14.240 --> 1:01:17.760
<v Speaker 1>do have privilege, and I think it reinforced the narrative.

1:01:17.800 --> 1:01:20.520
<v Speaker 1>But what did Vanity Fair come out and say, Andrew, Well, today,

1:01:20.680 --> 1:01:23.800
<v Speaker 1>Vanity Fair the epitome of privilege. Well, you know about

1:01:24.080 --> 1:01:26.600
<v Speaker 1>when he went on the View, he was asked by

1:01:26.680 --> 1:01:30.080
<v Speaker 1>Joy behar Uh if going on the cover Vanity Fair

1:01:30.160 --> 1:01:32.760
<v Speaker 1>had been a mistake, to which he answered, yeah, I

1:01:32.800 --> 1:01:37.760
<v Speaker 1>think it reinforces that perception of privilege, and so he's

1:01:37.800 --> 1:01:40.520
<v Speaker 1>basically then goes on, no one is born to be

1:01:40.560 --> 1:01:43.400
<v Speaker 1>president of the United States of America, least of all me,

1:01:43.720 --> 1:01:45.680
<v Speaker 1>and his sense tried to walk back the fact that

1:01:45.720 --> 1:01:48.880
<v Speaker 1>he didn't say he was born to run, to which

1:01:49.400 --> 1:01:52.160
<v Speaker 1>the editor of I'm sorry, when is Bruce Springsteen gonna

1:01:52.160 --> 1:01:54.919
<v Speaker 1>sue him? I mean, when when is Bruce Springsteen gonna

1:01:54.920 --> 1:01:57.400
<v Speaker 1>have a class actions? But this is what's great. It's

1:01:57.480 --> 1:01:59.640
<v Speaker 1>it's great to watch watch all the behind the scenes.

1:01:59.680 --> 1:02:04.720
<v Speaker 1>So the editor of Vanity Fair, Redhica Jones, isn't buying it.

1:02:05.640 --> 1:02:08.920
<v Speaker 1>H And she's quoted as saying ended upcoming Christine Christiane

1:02:08.960 --> 1:02:12.360
<v Speaker 1>amanpoor interview. I mean, he did say it, and I

1:02:12.400 --> 1:02:15.120
<v Speaker 1>have felt actually it is clear what he meant. So

1:02:15.840 --> 1:02:18.240
<v Speaker 1>but it has got some explaining to do, not least

1:02:18.240 --> 1:02:20.400
<v Speaker 1>of which is why he's only pulling it. Two. I

1:02:20.440 --> 1:02:22.400
<v Speaker 1>love when Trump says he sunk like a rock. What

1:02:22.520 --> 1:02:26.280
<v Speaker 1>happened to him? Uh, he's really been. He's been probably

1:02:26.320 --> 1:02:29.760
<v Speaker 1>the greatest twenty twenty you know, flounder, and and it

1:02:29.800 --> 1:02:31.640
<v Speaker 1>really kind of goes to show he really had very

1:02:31.680 --> 1:02:37.640
<v Speaker 1>little merit. He had very little um following I shouldn't

1:02:37.640 --> 1:02:40.640
<v Speaker 1>say following, let me kurt myself. He had very little depth,

1:02:40.840 --> 1:02:43.320
<v Speaker 1>That's what I'm looking for. And yeah, he was very

1:02:43.320 --> 1:02:45.400
<v Speaker 1>he was always very thin. He was always very heavy

1:02:45.440 --> 1:02:48.000
<v Speaker 1>on the platitudes and the viral videos, but there's very

1:02:48.000 --> 1:02:50.800
<v Speaker 1>little behind it. So he's rebooting his campaign again. We're

1:02:50.800 --> 1:02:52.680
<v Speaker 1>in May and we're already in the reboots. I mean,

1:02:52.680 --> 1:02:56.520
<v Speaker 1>that's really interesting. Um, he'll probably be on the debate stage,

1:02:56.560 --> 1:02:57.880
<v Speaker 1>but there will be a moment and the way I

1:02:57.960 --> 1:03:00.200
<v Speaker 1>kind of see this all coming together, See, i'd become

1:03:00.200 --> 1:03:06.000
<v Speaker 1>a master, an expert, a doctorate level proficients in the

1:03:06.000 --> 1:03:08.800
<v Speaker 1>American Left. Would you say that's true, Andrew, you're good

1:03:08.800 --> 1:03:10.720
<v Speaker 1>at predicting things. Well, I'm not the predicting, but the

1:03:10.800 --> 1:03:13.040
<v Speaker 1>American left like understanding the left. Well, you're good at

1:03:13.040 --> 1:03:17.000
<v Speaker 1>predicting because you understand what drives them from a motivational standpoint,

1:03:17.000 --> 1:03:19.760
<v Speaker 1>from a founder right. And I'm not trying to overly

1:03:19.840 --> 1:03:22.680
<v Speaker 1>describe my insight into the American Left, but I deal

1:03:22.720 --> 1:03:25.400
<v Speaker 1>with them every day on college campuses, and the college

1:03:25.400 --> 1:03:28.880
<v Speaker 1>campuses are the leading indicator of the spirit and the

1:03:29.000 --> 1:03:32.960
<v Speaker 1>energy and the center of gravity of the left, the

1:03:33.040 --> 1:03:35.480
<v Speaker 1>leftist movement. And so if you understand what drives a

1:03:35.520 --> 1:03:41.240
<v Speaker 1>college leftist, do you understand what drives students on students

1:03:41.240 --> 1:03:44.080
<v Speaker 1>on an issue, or student groups or true and activists,

1:03:44.120 --> 1:03:47.880
<v Speaker 1>you can then reasonably predict what's going to happen and

1:03:47.920 --> 1:03:50.000
<v Speaker 1>how it's going to happen. And so because of this,

1:03:50.440 --> 1:03:52.480
<v Speaker 1>there's going to be a moment on the Democrat primary

1:03:52.520 --> 1:03:54.800
<v Speaker 1>stage where Biden will be right there in the middle,

1:03:54.880 --> 1:03:56.480
<v Speaker 1>kind of where Trump used to be. Remember Trump never

1:03:56.600 --> 1:03:58.720
<v Speaker 1>left the middle. I love those debates. Those were some

1:03:58.800 --> 1:04:01.320
<v Speaker 1>of the great things. And Biden will be there in

1:04:01.320 --> 1:04:04.280
<v Speaker 1>the middle, and he will be flanked by Warren and

1:04:04.520 --> 1:04:09.000
<v Speaker 1>Harris and Jilla Brand and all of this. And somebody's

1:04:09.040 --> 1:04:11.360
<v Speaker 1>going to say something like that, probably Jilla Brand, because

1:04:11.360 --> 1:04:13.320
<v Speaker 1>she has nothing to lose, and her campaign has been

1:04:13.360 --> 1:04:17.280
<v Speaker 1>so amazingly unimpressive. It's really been it's actually been impressive.

1:04:17.280 --> 1:04:19.600
<v Speaker 1>How unimpressive her campaign is. She's gonna say, I think

1:04:19.600 --> 1:04:21.240
<v Speaker 1>it's time for a woman to be in the White House.

1:04:21.520 --> 1:04:23.280
<v Speaker 1>I think it's time for a woman to be present.

1:04:23.320 --> 1:04:26.240
<v Speaker 1>Someone's going to say something intersectional or a person of color,

1:04:26.560 --> 1:04:29.160
<v Speaker 1>I do have to say that their field is much

1:04:29.160 --> 1:04:32.360
<v Speaker 1>whiter than people actually actually realize their field as much

1:04:32.400 --> 1:04:34.720
<v Speaker 1>not as diverse as I think people thought it would

1:04:34.720 --> 1:04:37.400
<v Speaker 1>be anyway, And then Biden will punch back, what do

1:04:37.440 --> 1:04:40.280
<v Speaker 1>you mean that just because you look a certain way

1:04:40.360 --> 1:04:42.240
<v Speaker 1>or a woman or a man doesn't mean that's not

1:04:42.280 --> 1:04:46.720
<v Speaker 1>a qualification. And the war of identity politics will be

1:04:46.840 --> 1:04:52.120
<v Speaker 1>launched within the Democrat primary. They will have a conflict

1:04:52.680 --> 1:04:57.520
<v Speaker 1>around skin color, around gender identity that will be so

1:04:59.680 --> 1:05:03.000
<v Speaker 1>her fic to watch, but also very insightful for those

1:05:03.040 --> 1:05:05.840
<v Speaker 1>of us that actually enjoy political theater. And this this

1:05:05.920 --> 1:05:08.080
<v Speaker 1>is already being signaled, This is already being talked about.

1:05:08.160 --> 1:05:11.160
<v Speaker 1>In fact, I think it was Simone Sanders that said

1:05:11.200 --> 1:05:13.360
<v Speaker 1>that about Biden, that we can't have a white man.

1:05:13.880 --> 1:05:16.320
<v Speaker 1>I tweeted at one of them, and she responded and

1:05:16.360 --> 1:05:19.000
<v Speaker 1>she said, well, I said that in a different context. Obviously,

1:05:19.040 --> 1:05:21.760
<v Speaker 1>I believe Joe Biden can be president because his idea

1:05:21.800 --> 1:05:24.960
<v Speaker 1>as a writer or something silly like that. But the

1:05:25.080 --> 1:05:29.440
<v Speaker 1>horse race of the Democrat primary now is so interesting

1:05:30.040 --> 1:05:35.160
<v Speaker 1>because in some ways they're trying to outradicalize themselves. It's

1:05:35.160 --> 1:05:38.040
<v Speaker 1>the Trump hating Olympics, as I've always called it. But

1:05:38.920 --> 1:05:45.280
<v Speaker 1>they have such little actual differences amongst their own opinions

1:05:45.280 --> 1:05:48.080
<v Speaker 1>of how much they want to take, what direction they

1:05:48.080 --> 1:05:50.200
<v Speaker 1>want to take the country. See in what made the

1:05:50.240 --> 1:05:52.560
<v Speaker 1>Republican primary in twenty sixteen so interesting is you had

1:05:52.640 --> 1:05:55.440
<v Speaker 1>a lot of dramatic differences Jeff Bush and Ted Cruz

1:05:55.520 --> 1:05:58.480
<v Speaker 1>did not agree on immigration in the twenty sixteen prime.

1:05:58.600 --> 1:06:01.280
<v Speaker 1>John Kay McDonald Trump did not agree on much in

1:06:01.360 --> 1:06:04.960
<v Speaker 1>the twenty sixteen primary. What what actually substantially does Elizabeth

1:06:05.000 --> 1:06:08.280
<v Speaker 1>Warren Corey Booker disagree on? What does Krick Kurston, Jilla

1:06:08.360 --> 1:06:11.760
<v Speaker 1>Brand and Elizabeth Warren actually disagree on? Very little? How

1:06:11.840 --> 1:06:13.440
<v Speaker 1>much they hate Trump? I mean, what are they going

1:06:13.480 --> 1:06:15.680
<v Speaker 1>to do in the primary on the debate? I hate Trump?

1:06:15.760 --> 1:06:17.840
<v Speaker 1>I hate him a lot more than I hate No,

1:06:17.840 --> 1:06:19.680
<v Speaker 1>no way can you hate him more than I do?

1:06:20.760 --> 1:06:25.240
<v Speaker 1>And they'll definitely throughout the word constitutional crisis. Oh no,

1:06:25.280 --> 1:06:26.600
<v Speaker 1>By the way, we should have a drinking game for

1:06:26.600 --> 1:06:28.320
<v Speaker 1>the demo. I don't actually drink very much for all

1:06:28.320 --> 1:06:32.240
<v Speaker 1>the audience. I understand very rare occasions, but metaphorical one. Right,

1:06:32.240 --> 1:06:33.640
<v Speaker 1>you know what I'm saying. You could have bingo? How

1:06:33.640 --> 1:06:37.080
<v Speaker 1>about that? You could kind of you could drink water. Yeah, anyway,

1:06:37.160 --> 1:06:41.640
<v Speaker 1>So we're so. This is Charlie Kirk filling in for

1:06:41.680 --> 1:06:43.480
<v Speaker 1>the Bucks second for Buck Sex on the Buck Sexton

1:06:43.560 --> 1:06:46.840
<v Speaker 1>Radio Show. You can follow us TPUSA dot com or

1:06:46.880 --> 1:06:49.600
<v Speaker 1>go to Charlie Kirk Show on Apple podcast Press Subscribe.

1:06:49.680 --> 1:06:52.480
<v Speaker 1>We'll be right back. Welcome back, to the Buck Sexton

1:06:52.640 --> 1:06:56.000
<v Speaker 1>radio show. This is Charlie Kirk, founder of Turning Point

1:06:56.120 --> 1:07:00.280
<v Speaker 1>USA and host of The Charlie Kirk Show podcast, asked

1:07:00.320 --> 1:07:04.080
<v Speaker 1>you can go download that on Apple Podcasts. Press subscribe

1:07:04.480 --> 1:07:09.000
<v Speaker 1>really helps us out. I'm reading here on Drudge something

1:07:09.000 --> 1:07:11.080
<v Speaker 1>that reminded me of a column I wrote last week.

1:07:11.120 --> 1:07:13.240
<v Speaker 1>I wrote a column for Breitbart dot Com that said

1:07:13.400 --> 1:07:17.080
<v Speaker 1>trump greatest show of power is in his reluctance to

1:07:17.160 --> 1:07:23.160
<v Speaker 1>use power, and I kind of detailed the president's courage

1:07:23.360 --> 1:07:27.520
<v Speaker 1>in standing up to Iran, standing up to Venezuela, standing

1:07:27.600 --> 1:07:30.360
<v Speaker 1>up to Russia, but also not going as far to

1:07:31.720 --> 1:07:36.120
<v Speaker 1>engage US military might in endless wars and endless conflict.

1:07:36.160 --> 1:07:39.000
<v Speaker 1>This is such a fine line, because yes, we should

1:07:39.000 --> 1:07:43.440
<v Speaker 1>take a huge stance against the evil Iranian regime. We

1:07:43.480 --> 1:07:47.200
<v Speaker 1>should take a strong stance against the number one world

1:07:47.440 --> 1:07:51.840
<v Speaker 1>funder of terror. We should take a stance against Russia

1:07:52.080 --> 1:07:54.680
<v Speaker 1>Vladimir Putin doing nefarious things all across the world. We

1:07:54.680 --> 1:07:58.400
<v Speaker 1>should take a even stronger stance against China. And yes,

1:07:58.440 --> 1:08:01.960
<v Speaker 1>we should take a strong stance against Nicholas Murdurou and

1:08:02.120 --> 1:08:09.000
<v Speaker 1>his horrendous citizen exploitation in the country of Venezuela. But

1:08:09.040 --> 1:08:11.240
<v Speaker 1>I also talk about in this column what he should

1:08:11.280 --> 1:08:15.919
<v Speaker 1>not do. So I used the first parameter of talking

1:08:15.920 --> 1:08:19.679
<v Speaker 1>about Venezuela. I talked about Venezuela that right now, sure

1:08:19.720 --> 1:08:21.960
<v Speaker 1>we could put America could about one hundred thousand troops

1:08:22.000 --> 1:08:25.240
<v Speaker 1>in Venezuela. We can make Guido go into power. We'd

1:08:25.400 --> 1:08:29.960
<v Speaker 1>we'd lose American citizens for that, we would lose civilians,

1:08:29.960 --> 1:08:33.080
<v Speaker 1>no doubt. War is messy, War is horrible. War is

1:08:33.120 --> 1:08:35.720
<v Speaker 1>one of the worst things that human beings can engage in.

1:08:35.800 --> 1:08:40.120
<v Speaker 1>I think far too often, for whatever reason, war is romanticized.

1:08:40.160 --> 1:08:42.320
<v Speaker 1>It's something that never should be a romanticized should be

1:08:42.680 --> 1:08:45.680
<v Speaker 1>the last possible option of manage imaginable. So let's say

1:08:45.680 --> 1:08:48.960
<v Speaker 1>we get Guido and in power. Wouldn't take much military might.

1:08:49.240 --> 1:08:51.720
<v Speaker 1>That happened almost immediately, all the Americans are coming. Well,

1:08:51.760 --> 1:08:54.120
<v Speaker 1>then what then We'd have to rebuild the schools that

1:08:54.160 --> 1:08:57.160
<v Speaker 1>we broke, We'd have to fund all the hospitals, and

1:08:57.160 --> 1:09:00.400
<v Speaker 1>all of a sudden, we'd have another permanent military intervention

1:09:00.720 --> 1:09:03.320
<v Speaker 1>in another part of the world. Meanwhile, we have a

1:09:03.320 --> 1:09:05.880
<v Speaker 1>twenty two trillion dollar day. The same could be said

1:09:05.920 --> 1:09:10.479
<v Speaker 1>for Iran. And this is a very dangerous potential path

1:09:10.520 --> 1:09:14.760
<v Speaker 1>that we're on right now. Iran is an evil, murderous

1:09:15.040 --> 1:09:20.760
<v Speaker 1>terrorist funding regime. Iran should be sanctioned. Iran should not

1:09:20.800 --> 1:09:24.920
<v Speaker 1>be sent palettes of cash like Barack Obama did. But

1:09:25.080 --> 1:09:27.120
<v Speaker 1>you can think a country should be put in check.

1:09:27.520 --> 1:09:29.920
<v Speaker 1>You think a country should be shunned. You think you

1:09:29.960 --> 1:09:32.880
<v Speaker 1>can think a country should have economic pressure put against it,

1:09:33.479 --> 1:09:38.439
<v Speaker 1>without supporting a ground war, without doing another country's bidding,

1:09:38.760 --> 1:09:40.400
<v Speaker 1>and so. On the front page of Drudge, I read

1:09:40.520 --> 1:09:44.840
<v Speaker 1>something that said that a Saudi Arabian newspaper urges United

1:09:44.880 --> 1:09:48.600
<v Speaker 1>States strikes on a run. This is really important for

1:09:48.640 --> 1:09:50.519
<v Speaker 1>those of you that kind of follow my commentary. You know,

1:09:50.600 --> 1:09:53.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm no huge fan of Saudi Arabia. I think that

1:09:53.280 --> 1:09:57.439
<v Speaker 1>they have been double faced and double minded in the

1:09:57.479 --> 1:10:00.240
<v Speaker 1>eyes of the United States. Are far too long. I

1:10:00.360 --> 1:10:02.559
<v Speaker 1>talk about their involvement in nine to eleven. I talk

1:10:02.600 --> 1:10:05.360
<v Speaker 1>about their funding of madrasas across the world. I talk

1:10:05.400 --> 1:10:08.720
<v Speaker 1>about their funding of al Qaeda, and also the most

1:10:08.840 --> 1:10:13.439
<v Speaker 1>radical form of Islamism, which is Wahabism. But I'm equally

1:10:13.439 --> 1:10:16.720
<v Speaker 1>as critical against Iran. For whatever reason, seems as if

1:10:16.760 --> 1:10:18.639
<v Speaker 1>there has to be this binary choice that you can't

1:10:18.640 --> 1:10:21.639
<v Speaker 1>be critical of Saudi Arabia while also being critical of Iran.

1:10:21.880 --> 1:10:24.519
<v Speaker 1>I'm very critical of both. But this paper said that

1:10:24.560 --> 1:10:26.960
<v Speaker 1>the Saudi Arabian paper urges the United States to do

1:10:27.000 --> 1:10:29.920
<v Speaker 1>surgical strikes against Iran, which would be an act of war,

1:10:30.680 --> 1:10:34.240
<v Speaker 1>which would put us in another endless conflict, potentially in

1:10:34.280 --> 1:10:37.200
<v Speaker 1>the Middle East. This would be a horrendous mistake. If

1:10:37.240 --> 1:10:40.320
<v Speaker 1>we are doing the bidding of another country's foreign policy,

1:10:40.880 --> 1:10:44.439
<v Speaker 1>that is a mistake. Saudi Arabia and Iran have a

1:10:44.439 --> 1:10:48.160
<v Speaker 1>Shia Sunni conflict that goes back hundreds and thousands of years,

1:10:48.240 --> 1:10:52.160
<v Speaker 1>a thousands, a thousand years. Probably. This would be an

1:10:52.240 --> 1:10:57.320
<v Speaker 1>unbelievable mistake for our country to attack war against a

1:10:57.400 --> 1:11:00.280
<v Speaker 1>sovereign country. The last time we did that was when

1:11:00.320 --> 1:11:03.200
<v Speaker 1>we evaded Iraq. Iraq. The Iraq War was one of

1:11:03.240 --> 1:11:07.600
<v Speaker 1>the worst mistakes foreign policy mistakes in American history. In

1:11:07.680 --> 1:11:10.080
<v Speaker 1>American history, spent trillions of dollars in a region, had

1:11:10.080 --> 1:11:12.320
<v Speaker 1>nothing to show for a thousands of Americans lives lost,

1:11:12.439 --> 1:11:17.160
<v Speaker 1>tens of thousands of vets have PTSD, and we attacked

1:11:17.160 --> 1:11:19.719
<v Speaker 1>a sovereign nation with an inappropriate response to nine to eleven.

1:11:19.920 --> 1:11:22.439
<v Speaker 1>So I guess my word to the wise, my word,

1:11:23.640 --> 1:11:25.920
<v Speaker 1>my word of caution here we should have an America

1:11:26.000 --> 1:11:29.120
<v Speaker 1>first foreign policy. Yes, it is America first to put

1:11:29.160 --> 1:11:33.360
<v Speaker 1>sanctions on Iran because Iran is funding terror directly against

1:11:33.360 --> 1:11:36.479
<v Speaker 1>America against our interests. They could shut the straighter harmus,

1:11:36.640 --> 1:11:39.240
<v Speaker 1>they could shut down the flow of energy. But no,

1:11:39.479 --> 1:11:42.120
<v Speaker 1>it is not in our interests to get in a

1:11:42.320 --> 1:11:45.679
<v Speaker 1>ground war with one hundred and twenty thousand, four hundred thousand,

1:11:45.720 --> 1:11:48.760
<v Speaker 1>whatever many troops it would be against Iran. And then what,

1:11:48.880 --> 1:11:51.880
<v Speaker 1>let's say we overthrow the Ayatola Kameni. Let's say we

1:11:51.920 --> 1:11:55.560
<v Speaker 1>overthrow Akademajad. We've done that before. We did that in

1:11:55.640 --> 1:11:59.759
<v Speaker 1>nineteen fifty three, and then of course that got displaced,

1:11:59.800 --> 1:12:01.600
<v Speaker 1>which led us to the Iranian Revolution, which we had

1:12:01.640 --> 1:12:04.160
<v Speaker 1>the radicalism which we have today. The Shaw was far

1:12:04.240 --> 1:12:07.280
<v Speaker 1>less radical than we have today. But the seeds of

1:12:07.320 --> 1:12:10.680
<v Speaker 1>resentment that we sewed in displacing the leader back in

1:12:10.800 --> 1:12:15.080
<v Speaker 1>nineteen fifty three is one of the reasons we're there today.

1:12:15.080 --> 1:12:17.080
<v Speaker 1>Why would we continue to make the same mistakes that

1:12:17.080 --> 1:12:19.519
<v Speaker 1>we made there. You can have pressure against Iran, you

1:12:19.560 --> 1:12:21.600
<v Speaker 1>can believe that they're evil and murderous about having to

1:12:21.600 --> 1:12:23.840
<v Speaker 1>do the bidding of another country in the Middle East,

1:12:23.960 --> 1:12:26.439
<v Speaker 1>like Saudi Arabia that wants us to do surgical strikes

1:12:26.600 --> 1:12:29.280
<v Speaker 1>against the sovereign country. This is Charlie Kirk filling in

1:12:29.320 --> 1:12:31.320
<v Speaker 1>for Buck Sext on the Buck Sexton Radio Show. We'll

1:12:31.320 --> 1:12:34.240
<v Speaker 1>be right back. Hello everybody, Welcome back to the Buck

1:12:34.320 --> 1:12:38.160
<v Speaker 1>Sexton Radio Show. This is Charlie Kirk filling in form

1:12:38.160 --> 1:12:41.360
<v Speaker 1>my friend, the great Buck Sexton. It is an honor

1:12:41.400 --> 1:12:45.320
<v Speaker 1>to be hosting with you today. I am the founder

1:12:45.680 --> 1:12:50.639
<v Speaker 1>and executive director of Turning Point USA, the nation's largest

1:12:51.200 --> 1:12:55.880
<v Speaker 1>student movement dedicated to educating the next generation around the

1:12:55.960 --> 1:13:00.479
<v Speaker 1>values of free markets, limited government in the Constitution. I

1:13:00.479 --> 1:13:03.160
<v Speaker 1>am also the host of The Charlie Kirk Show on

1:13:03.200 --> 1:13:06.679
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts. Go to Apple podcast, type in the Charlie

1:13:06.760 --> 1:13:10.559
<v Speaker 1>Kirk Show, Press subscribe, Maybe give us a five star rating.

1:13:10.640 --> 1:13:13.120
<v Speaker 1>That really helps us out. We give you the news

1:13:13.160 --> 1:13:15.559
<v Speaker 1>of the week and a unique take on everything that

1:13:15.720 --> 1:13:20.280
<v Speaker 1>is going on today. President Trump talked and unveiled his

1:13:20.439 --> 1:13:26.120
<v Speaker 1>immigration proposal. President Trump has really changed the conversation when

1:13:26.160 --> 1:13:30.160
<v Speaker 1>it comes to immigration in this country. Both parties have

1:13:30.400 --> 1:13:33.360
<v Speaker 1>ignored this issue for so long, and they both have

1:13:33.439 --> 1:13:38.040
<v Speaker 1>different reasons for why they want open borders. Traditionally, Republicans

1:13:38.080 --> 1:13:44.240
<v Speaker 1>want open borders for cheap labor, for the ability for

1:13:44.280 --> 1:13:48.839
<v Speaker 1>these big corporations to be able to have workers illegal

1:13:48.840 --> 1:13:54.960
<v Speaker 1>workers be able to undercut wages. And Democrats want illegals

1:13:55.360 --> 1:13:58.840
<v Speaker 1>for votes. They want them for potential political control, and

1:13:58.920 --> 1:14:01.559
<v Speaker 1>they want to be able to use use certain portions

1:14:01.600 --> 1:14:07.240
<v Speaker 1>of the American population for their own political purposes. So

1:14:07.400 --> 1:14:09.240
<v Speaker 1>this is what the left is very very good at.

1:14:09.680 --> 1:14:15.719
<v Speaker 1>The Left has become experts at pitting different American groups

1:14:15.880 --> 1:14:20.720
<v Speaker 1>against each other. So when you look at illegals, the

1:14:20.840 --> 1:14:24.840
<v Speaker 1>left wants to be able to use them as political

1:14:26.080 --> 1:14:29.040
<v Speaker 1>political voting base, but also as a way to use

1:14:29.080 --> 1:14:33.679
<v Speaker 1>their suffering towards their own political power. And President Trump,

1:14:33.720 --> 1:14:38.360
<v Speaker 1>to his credit, started his original campaign launched back in

1:14:38.479 --> 1:14:42.639
<v Speaker 1>June of twenty fifteen, on the issue of immigration. See

1:14:42.640 --> 1:14:45.600
<v Speaker 1>both parties had refused to fix this issue. George W.

1:14:45.720 --> 1:14:48.120
<v Speaker 1>Bush did not build the wall. Bill Clinton did not

1:14:48.120 --> 1:14:50.639
<v Speaker 1>build the wall. George HW. Bush didn't build the wall.

1:14:50.840 --> 1:14:54.439
<v Speaker 1>Obama certainly didn't build the wall. Ronald Reagan didn't build

1:14:54.439 --> 1:14:58.639
<v Speaker 1>the wall. In fact, Ronald Reagan offered amnesty to millions

1:14:58.640 --> 1:15:01.839
<v Speaker 1>of illegals in California and other parts of the country

1:15:01.920 --> 1:15:05.040
<v Speaker 1>is in what he later called one of his biggest mistakes.

1:15:06.000 --> 1:15:10.080
<v Speaker 1>We now have well over fifteen to twenty million illegals

1:15:10.120 --> 1:15:13.280
<v Speaker 1>in this country. It's probably even more than that. And

1:15:13.800 --> 1:15:16.720
<v Speaker 1>the issue is not just what do you do with

1:15:16.760 --> 1:15:19.240
<v Speaker 1>the people that are already here? What are we doing

1:15:19.280 --> 1:15:22.360
<v Speaker 1>to stop the next one million illegals from entering our country.

1:15:22.800 --> 1:15:27.520
<v Speaker 1>We are expected to have one million border crossings into

1:15:27.640 --> 1:15:33.360
<v Speaker 1>our country alone this year, one million border crossings. One

1:15:33.479 --> 1:15:38.200
<v Speaker 1>percent of the entire population of Guatemala is anticipated to

1:15:38.240 --> 1:15:41.240
<v Speaker 1>immigrate or to border jump to this country. And now

1:15:41.280 --> 1:15:44.200
<v Speaker 1>I will tell you I get quite bothered by the

1:15:44.320 --> 1:15:50.960
<v Speaker 1>terminology immigration, because immigration means you obey the law, you

1:15:51.000 --> 1:15:54.320
<v Speaker 1>wait in line, you don't commit crimes in your home country,

1:15:54.320 --> 1:15:58.000
<v Speaker 1>You visit the United States embassy, you apply, you wait

1:15:58.040 --> 1:16:00.880
<v Speaker 1>your turn, You enter the country, you find a job,

1:16:00.920 --> 1:16:05.000
<v Speaker 1>you pay taxes, You have kids, and your kids can

1:16:05.040 --> 1:16:07.080
<v Speaker 1>then have a better life than you. That is immigration.

1:16:07.920 --> 1:16:12.040
<v Speaker 1>It is not fair that someone from Guatemala can cut

1:16:12.040 --> 1:16:16.200
<v Speaker 1>in line, someone from Belarus or someone from Vietnam that

1:16:16.280 --> 1:16:18.280
<v Speaker 1>has to wait in line and does not have the

1:16:18.360 --> 1:16:22.840
<v Speaker 1>geographic proximity to border jump into our country. So I'm

1:16:22.920 --> 1:16:26.040
<v Speaker 1>very hesitant to even call that immigration. It is line

1:16:26.080 --> 1:16:30.280
<v Speaker 1>cutting and border jumping. We never have as a country

1:16:30.320 --> 1:16:36.080
<v Speaker 1>ever talked positively about cutting in line. We've never said, oh, yeah,

1:16:36.080 --> 1:16:38.000
<v Speaker 1>it's a good thing that people are cutting in line.

1:16:38.240 --> 1:16:40.280
<v Speaker 1>No matter what it is, whether it be as something

1:16:40.280 --> 1:16:43.559
<v Speaker 1>as simple as a restaurant or boarding a plane, there

1:16:43.720 --> 1:16:48.639
<v Speaker 1>is a cultural process that is within our country that

1:16:48.720 --> 1:16:51.360
<v Speaker 1>we respect people that are patient and obey the rule

1:16:51.400 --> 1:16:56.120
<v Speaker 1>of law and the structure of systems. However, when it

1:16:56.120 --> 1:16:59.040
<v Speaker 1>comes to the issue of immigration, I do not equate

1:16:59.080 --> 1:17:02.559
<v Speaker 1>people that cut in line and jump the border as

1:17:02.600 --> 1:17:06.360
<v Speaker 1>the same people that wait patiently to get their turn.

1:17:07.040 --> 1:17:10.640
<v Speaker 1>And so President Trump has changed the dynamic when it

1:17:10.680 --> 1:17:14.840
<v Speaker 1>comes to immigration in this country. For far too long,

1:17:14.960 --> 1:17:18.800
<v Speaker 1>we have agreed as conservatives to have open borders to

1:17:18.840 --> 1:17:21.640
<v Speaker 1>appease the left for our own purposes, and now it

1:17:21.800 --> 1:17:28.240
<v Speaker 1>is having significant cultural, financial, and national security implications in

1:17:28.280 --> 1:17:32.360
<v Speaker 1>our country. Illegals cost well over one hundred billion dollars

1:17:32.360 --> 1:17:36.840
<v Speaker 1>a year in state, local and federal tax burden. Illegals

1:17:36.840 --> 1:17:39.200
<v Speaker 1>in the state of Arizona are twice as likely to

1:17:39.280 --> 1:17:44.880
<v Speaker 1>commit a crime versus a natural born citizen. You look

1:17:44.920 --> 1:17:48.080
<v Speaker 1>at the amount of guns being smuggled across our southern border,

1:17:48.200 --> 1:17:52.479
<v Speaker 1>tens of thousands of guns every single month, hundreds of

1:17:52.560 --> 1:17:55.559
<v Speaker 1>pounds of drugs are smuggled every single day across the

1:17:55.560 --> 1:17:58.920
<v Speaker 1>southern border. Children are being sex trafficked. Over ten thousand

1:17:59.240 --> 1:18:03.519
<v Speaker 1>children are sex trafficked across the southern border every single month.

1:18:03.880 --> 1:18:06.240
<v Speaker 1>And the President has changed this dynamic, and he has

1:18:06.280 --> 1:18:09.920
<v Speaker 1>even been more generous than some people in the conservative

1:18:09.960 --> 1:18:14.040
<v Speaker 1>base would have been comfortable with him to be to

1:18:14.240 --> 1:18:18.439
<v Speaker 1>offer a DOCA deal and to even go as far

1:18:18.479 --> 1:18:21.320
<v Speaker 1>to say that there should be a way that illegals

1:18:21.320 --> 1:18:23.760
<v Speaker 1>can stay in our country if they obey the law,

1:18:23.840 --> 1:18:27.280
<v Speaker 1>if in return you have border security. See if the

1:18:27.320 --> 1:18:30.680
<v Speaker 1>Democrats actually cared about protecting the people that were in

1:18:30.720 --> 1:18:34.679
<v Speaker 1>this country illegally and we're worried about them, then they

1:18:34.760 --> 1:18:39.040
<v Speaker 1>would have struck the president to be able to build

1:18:39.040 --> 1:18:42.080
<v Speaker 1>the wall to prevent more illegals coming into this country,

1:18:42.240 --> 1:18:45.959
<v Speaker 1>to prevent more people that are in a position of suffering,

1:18:46.320 --> 1:18:49.479
<v Speaker 1>while in exchange fixing the problem once and for all.

1:18:49.760 --> 1:18:51.920
<v Speaker 1>The President had some comments on this, let's go to

1:18:52.040 --> 1:18:57.200
<v Speaker 1>cut one. Currently, sixty six percent of legal immigrants come

1:18:57.240 --> 1:19:02.959
<v Speaker 1>here on the basis of random chance. They're admitted solely

1:19:03.000 --> 1:19:08.000
<v Speaker 1>because they have a relative in the United States, and

1:19:08.120 --> 1:19:13.040
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't really matter who that relative is. Another twenty

1:19:13.040 --> 1:19:17.240
<v Speaker 1>one percent of immigrants are issued either by random lottery

1:19:18.280 --> 1:19:24.120
<v Speaker 1>or because they're fortunate enough to be selected for humanitarian relief.

1:19:26.160 --> 1:19:31.200
<v Speaker 1>The President is critiquing the fact that our immigration system,

1:19:31.240 --> 1:19:35.479
<v Speaker 1>our legal immigration system right now, is so screwed up

1:19:35.520 --> 1:19:37.879
<v Speaker 1>in the sense that if you know someone in this country,

1:19:38.160 --> 1:19:40.400
<v Speaker 1>you have an opportunity to come here. This is called

1:19:40.920 --> 1:19:47.000
<v Speaker 1>family chain migration, when in reality we should have the smartest,

1:19:47.360 --> 1:19:52.400
<v Speaker 1>most qualified, most ambitious, entrepreneurial people in the world come

1:19:52.400 --> 1:19:54.840
<v Speaker 1>to this country. See. I have this debate amongst some

1:19:54.920 --> 1:19:57.920
<v Speaker 1>people in conservative circles. They say, oh, no, no, no,

1:19:57.960 --> 1:20:00.960
<v Speaker 1>we don't need more immigrants altogether. I totally disagree. I

1:20:01.000 --> 1:20:05.880
<v Speaker 1>think we need millions and millions of more qualified, ambitious people.

1:20:06.160 --> 1:20:08.200
<v Speaker 1>We do not have a land problem in this country.

1:20:08.640 --> 1:20:11.360
<v Speaker 1>You go to Nebraska, the Dakota is Iowa, Illinois where

1:20:11.360 --> 1:20:15.719
<v Speaker 1>I'm from, Illinois, Indiana, Ohio. We have unbelievable natural resources,

1:20:15.720 --> 1:20:19.400
<v Speaker 1>abundant amount of land. We could build forever. We could

1:20:19.400 --> 1:20:21.840
<v Speaker 1>fit the entire world's population in Texas, by the way,

1:20:21.960 --> 1:20:25.839
<v Speaker 1>and still have land leftover, Still have tracts of land leftover.

1:20:26.960 --> 1:20:29.839
<v Speaker 1>If you believe in market principles, you first and foremost

1:20:29.840 --> 1:20:31.760
<v Speaker 1>believe in the rule of law. So I'm not an

1:20:31.800 --> 1:20:35.440
<v Speaker 1>open borders person like some people on the extreme libertarian

1:20:35.479 --> 1:20:37.519
<v Speaker 1>side are. Or they say we have to open up

1:20:37.520 --> 1:20:41.000
<v Speaker 1>the borders an unrestricted amount of legal immigration, of immigration

1:20:41.080 --> 1:20:43.160
<v Speaker 1>illegal or legal, there's no such thing. I don't agree

1:20:43.200 --> 1:20:45.960
<v Speaker 1>with that. But if you have qualified people entering your

1:20:46.000 --> 1:20:48.519
<v Speaker 1>workforce and they're going to start businesses and they're going

1:20:48.560 --> 1:20:51.120
<v Speaker 1>to compete and create wealth, of course we want those

1:20:51.120 --> 1:20:53.479
<v Speaker 1>people in our country. And since we have such a

1:20:53.560 --> 1:20:57.680
<v Speaker 1>booming economy, we have job openings of qualified people that

1:20:57.760 --> 1:21:01.280
<v Speaker 1>want to come to this country. I find inspiration from

1:21:01.280 --> 1:21:05.000
<v Speaker 1>someone that has grown up in less than desirable circumstances,

1:21:05.439 --> 1:21:12.040
<v Speaker 1>from Vietnam, from Laos, Cambodia, Guatemala, Somalia, anywhere in the

1:21:12.080 --> 1:21:14.240
<v Speaker 1>country and anywhere the world, I should say, and they

1:21:14.280 --> 1:21:17.120
<v Speaker 1>want to come here and make something of themselves. See,

1:21:17.240 --> 1:21:22.200
<v Speaker 1>a country should always want ambitious people, a country should

1:21:22.200 --> 1:21:25.280
<v Speaker 1>always want law abiding people, and a country should always

1:21:25.280 --> 1:21:31.040
<v Speaker 1>want ethical people. If those three things are how we

1:21:31.520 --> 1:21:35.920
<v Speaker 1>design an immigration system, we'd have a much more prosperous

1:21:35.960 --> 1:21:38.840
<v Speaker 1>country today. Because if you have someone that comes in

1:21:38.880 --> 1:21:42.040
<v Speaker 1>the country and they're going to go to school, they're

1:21:42.040 --> 1:21:46.160
<v Speaker 1>gonna obey the law, they're going to act ethically. There's

1:21:46.200 --> 1:21:47.960
<v Speaker 1>nothing negative that could come out of that. Well, I

1:21:47.960 --> 1:21:50.360
<v Speaker 1>shouldn't say there's nothing negative. There's very little old chance

1:21:50.400 --> 1:21:53.719
<v Speaker 1>that something negative would come out of that, very low chance. Instead,

1:21:54.080 --> 1:21:57.080
<v Speaker 1>they will start businesses and they'll reinvest in our country,

1:21:57.360 --> 1:22:01.479
<v Speaker 1>almost assuredly, or they'll get high paying job, they'll purchase houses,

1:22:01.479 --> 1:22:05.240
<v Speaker 1>and they'll participate in the market economy. Now, the problem is,

1:22:05.600 --> 1:22:08.640
<v Speaker 1>as the President pointed out, when you have people that

1:22:08.640 --> 1:22:11.879
<v Speaker 1>are just related to other people and you're not actually

1:22:11.920 --> 1:22:19.160
<v Speaker 1>screening for ambition, likelihood to participate an entrepreneurial activity, or

1:22:19.200 --> 1:22:21.920
<v Speaker 1>their wealth coming into the country, anything that you're able

1:22:21.960 --> 1:22:25.000
<v Speaker 1>to screen for that has some leading indicator that they

1:22:25.040 --> 1:22:29.960
<v Speaker 1>will be able to produce for themselves in their family

1:22:30.320 --> 1:22:33.240
<v Speaker 1>and maybe provide jobs in the future. All of a sudden,

1:22:33.240 --> 1:22:37.360
<v Speaker 1>you have a higher likelihood that those immigrants will then

1:22:37.600 --> 1:22:40.360
<v Speaker 1>take welfare and they will live on the government dole.

1:22:40.920 --> 1:22:43.160
<v Speaker 1>And that's not helpful for anybody. So let's go to

1:22:43.200 --> 1:22:45.200
<v Speaker 1>cut two. As the President continues to comment on the

1:22:45.200 --> 1:22:49.960
<v Speaker 1>immigration debate, under the senseless rules of the current system.

1:22:50.920 --> 1:22:55.600
<v Speaker 1>We're not able to give preference to a doctor, a researcher,

1:22:56.840 --> 1:23:00.280
<v Speaker 1>a student who graduated number one in his class from

1:23:00.280 --> 1:23:06.200
<v Speaker 1>the finest colleges in the world, anybody. We're not able

1:23:06.240 --> 1:23:08.679
<v Speaker 1>to take care of it. We're not able to make

1:23:08.760 --> 1:23:15.320
<v Speaker 1>those incredible breakthroughs. If somebody graduates top of their class

1:23:15.640 --> 1:23:19.559
<v Speaker 1>from the Vest College, sorry, go back to your country.

1:23:19.600 --> 1:23:25.479
<v Speaker 1>We want to keep them here. And it's the president.

1:23:25.640 --> 1:23:27.719
<v Speaker 1>Just to kind of add clarity what he was saying,

1:23:28.200 --> 1:23:32.200
<v Speaker 1>he was almost in my observation of what he said,

1:23:32.720 --> 1:23:36.320
<v Speaker 1>I think critiquing how silly it is if someone someone

1:23:36.560 --> 1:23:38.880
<v Speaker 1>graduates first in their class. Of course we want them

1:23:39.000 --> 1:23:42.000
<v Speaker 1>here in America. So to kind of I'm going to

1:23:42.080 --> 1:23:46.360
<v Speaker 1>detail his America First immigration plan in just a second.

1:23:46.360 --> 1:23:51.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to walk through exactly what the actual policies

1:23:51.120 --> 1:23:53.120
<v Speaker 1>been in Before I get to that, I want to

1:23:53.120 --> 1:23:56.599
<v Speaker 1>just reinforce the fact we're even having an immigration debate

1:23:56.880 --> 1:24:01.080
<v Speaker 1>altogether is extraordinary. The fact that we're even discussing the

1:24:01.160 --> 1:24:05.599
<v Speaker 1>issue of immigration is a testament to the President's courage

1:24:05.760 --> 1:24:08.879
<v Speaker 1>and conviction and clarity when it comes to public policy.

1:24:09.160 --> 1:24:12.240
<v Speaker 1>This is Charlie Kirk, founder of Turning Point USA, host

1:24:12.280 --> 1:24:15.160
<v Speaker 1>of the Charlie Kirk Show podcast. You're going to Apple

1:24:15.200 --> 1:24:18.200
<v Speaker 1>Podcast Press subscribe. It'll help us out. In just a minute,

1:24:18.240 --> 1:24:21.840
<v Speaker 1>we'll be right back talking about Donald Trump's America First

1:24:21.840 --> 1:24:24.680
<v Speaker 1>immigration plan. We'll be right back. Welcome back. This is

1:24:24.760 --> 1:24:28.439
<v Speaker 1>Charlie Kirk filling in for the great Buck Sexton. Today.

1:24:28.520 --> 1:24:32.360
<v Speaker 1>President Trump. He detailed his America First immigration plan. So

1:24:32.400 --> 1:24:36.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to go for this point by point, very meticulously.

1:24:36.520 --> 1:24:42.160
<v Speaker 1>First and foremost, big cuts in chain migration. This is

1:24:42.200 --> 1:24:46.160
<v Speaker 1>so important. You should not be able to come to

1:24:46.200 --> 1:24:49.920
<v Speaker 1>our country just because you know somebody in this country.

1:24:50.400 --> 1:24:53.360
<v Speaker 1>You should have to have qualifications. You should have to

1:24:53.400 --> 1:24:57.599
<v Speaker 1>have maybe some form of wealth, ambition, maybe high test scores,

1:24:58.360 --> 1:25:04.639
<v Speaker 1>you name it. There is very little argument to be said, Oh,

1:25:04.720 --> 1:25:06.519
<v Speaker 1>we should just let people in because they have an

1:25:06.520 --> 1:25:08.559
<v Speaker 1>ant or an uncle or a niece or a nephew

1:25:08.640 --> 1:25:13.439
<v Speaker 1>or a cousin. No, we want people that are proven

1:25:14.080 --> 1:25:19.120
<v Speaker 1>or have leading indicators to produce in our country. Big

1:25:19.439 --> 1:25:23.200
<v Speaker 1>cuts and chain migration, huge win for the America First agenda,

1:25:23.320 --> 1:25:28.960
<v Speaker 1>big time. Second, drastic increase in skilled labor. Wow, what

1:25:29.160 --> 1:25:32.360
<v Speaker 1>a want to know? What a novel concept to be

1:25:32.400 --> 1:25:35.439
<v Speaker 1>able to say that we want more people that have skills.

1:25:35.680 --> 1:25:39.880
<v Speaker 1>Can you code? Can you speak multiple languages? Did you

1:25:39.880 --> 1:25:43.680
<v Speaker 1>get high test scores? We want more people that have

1:25:43.800 --> 1:25:46.599
<v Speaker 1>skills because when you have those types of skills, you're

1:25:46.680 --> 1:25:49.960
<v Speaker 1>much less likely to go on government benefits, You're much

1:25:50.080 --> 1:25:53.400
<v Speaker 1>less likely to commit crime, you're much less likely to

1:25:53.520 --> 1:25:58.240
<v Speaker 1>drop off and participate in anything in society that is

1:25:58.320 --> 1:26:00.479
<v Speaker 1>less than desirable, and you're much more likely to get

1:26:00.479 --> 1:26:03.240
<v Speaker 1>a high paying job. You're much more likely to start

1:26:03.240 --> 1:26:07.680
<v Speaker 1>a business. So this plan increase includes a dramatic and

1:26:07.880 --> 1:26:12.920
<v Speaker 1>drastic increase in skilled labor. And so what kind of

1:26:12.960 --> 1:26:17.360
<v Speaker 1>the skills are these? And engineering, nursing, being a doctor,

1:26:17.720 --> 1:26:21.760
<v Speaker 1>things that we need in our country. We need more

1:26:21.800 --> 1:26:23.880
<v Speaker 1>of that. We can't find enough of that work. There

1:26:23.880 --> 1:26:26.280
<v Speaker 1>are companies that are saying we can't find enough work. Now,

1:26:26.600 --> 1:26:29.960
<v Speaker 1>some people on the very very far conservative side of things,

1:26:30.160 --> 1:26:32.680
<v Speaker 1>and I'm friends with a lot of these people. Admittedly

1:26:32.960 --> 1:26:34.519
<v Speaker 1>they say, oh, Charlie, what are you talking about. We

1:26:34.560 --> 1:26:37.679
<v Speaker 1>need Americans to fill those jobs. Well, look, first of all,

1:26:38.439 --> 1:26:39.639
<v Speaker 1>there are a lot of people that have been left

1:26:39.640 --> 1:26:43.559
<v Speaker 1>behind in the American economy that don't have these skills,

1:26:43.560 --> 1:26:45.479
<v Speaker 1>and we should do more for job training. We should

1:26:45.520 --> 1:26:48.240
<v Speaker 1>do more to actually teach these skills. But that's not

1:26:48.280 --> 1:26:53.360
<v Speaker 1>an excuse not to expand the immigration quotas for people

1:26:53.360 --> 1:26:58.320
<v Speaker 1>that actually have the capacity to fill these jobs. Now,

1:26:58.800 --> 1:27:01.559
<v Speaker 1>we as a country, if you believe in market based forces,

1:27:01.800 --> 1:27:04.320
<v Speaker 1>you believe when someone comes with ambition and ethics and skill,

1:27:04.520 --> 1:27:07.880
<v Speaker 1>ambition and ethics and skill, they're going to participate in

1:27:07.880 --> 1:27:11.360
<v Speaker 1>that economy generally in a positive sense. I want more

1:27:11.360 --> 1:27:13.759
<v Speaker 1>people like Elon Musk. Elon Musk was a legal immigrant

1:27:13.760 --> 1:27:15.960
<v Speaker 1>to this country from South Africa, and he has made

1:27:15.960 --> 1:27:18.960
<v Speaker 1>America a better place. He employs tens of thousands of people,

1:27:18.960 --> 1:27:21.759
<v Speaker 1>He's made billions of dollars. He's ambitious, he has vision,

1:27:21.960 --> 1:27:25.120
<v Speaker 1>and he has ethics. The third part of this America

1:27:25.439 --> 1:27:30.280
<v Speaker 1>First Plan was a self sustained Border Security Trust Fund.

1:27:31.520 --> 1:27:35.000
<v Speaker 1>From my understanding of this, this is the ability to

1:27:35.040 --> 1:27:37.920
<v Speaker 1>have some funding mechanism to make sure that the border

1:27:38.000 --> 1:27:40.880
<v Speaker 1>is always properly funded, that we have a secure border,

1:27:40.920 --> 1:27:44.240
<v Speaker 1>that we have a wall, and we have some form

1:27:44.880 --> 1:27:48.280
<v Speaker 1>of a capacity to make sure that the border is

1:27:48.320 --> 1:27:53.040
<v Speaker 1>not subject to these partisan silly funding fights. This is

1:27:53.080 --> 1:27:57.599
<v Speaker 1>long overdue. The border has become such a political issue.

1:27:58.000 --> 1:28:02.160
<v Speaker 1>The border has become such a contentious partnersan issue. The

1:28:02.240 --> 1:28:07.120
<v Speaker 1>President is looking five, ten, fifteen, twenty years ahead, saying,

1:28:07.120 --> 1:28:10.840
<v Speaker 1>how can I fund the border in a way to

1:28:10.920 --> 1:28:15.320
<v Speaker 1>make sure that the ice border patrol agents and the

1:28:15.360 --> 1:28:17.400
<v Speaker 1>construction of the wall, what is needed in the future,

1:28:17.640 --> 1:28:21.719
<v Speaker 1>can be self sustainable. He also said there's a build

1:28:21.800 --> 1:28:26.200
<v Speaker 1>America visa. Now, what this is is if you're coming

1:28:26.200 --> 1:28:28.920
<v Speaker 1>into our country, we will give you a visa if

1:28:28.960 --> 1:28:33.479
<v Speaker 1>you actually want to build infrastructure and build buildings in

1:28:33.479 --> 1:28:37.519
<v Speaker 1>our country. It is an America First immigration plan. Then

1:28:37.520 --> 1:28:41.240
<v Speaker 1>finally civics exams. This is so important. The President talked

1:28:41.240 --> 1:28:45.840
<v Speaker 1>about having a civic exam. Do you know our basic

1:28:45.880 --> 1:28:49.439
<v Speaker 1>founding documents? Don't know our basic ideas? Can you speak English?

1:28:49.439 --> 1:28:53.400
<v Speaker 1>Having the ability to have a civic exam has been

1:28:53.439 --> 1:28:56.040
<v Speaker 1>missing in our immigration debate for so long. Let's go

1:28:56.080 --> 1:28:59.719
<v Speaker 1>to cut three, the President on immigration. Companies are moving

1:28:59.800 --> 1:29:04.360
<v Speaker 1>off officers to other countries because our immigration rules prevent

1:29:04.439 --> 1:29:09.120
<v Speaker 1>them from retaining highly skilled And even if I might

1:29:09.560 --> 1:29:18.480
<v Speaker 1>totally brilliant people, we discriminate against genius. We discriminate against brilliance.

1:29:19.400 --> 1:29:23.280
<v Speaker 1>We won't anymore once we get this past, and we

1:29:23.360 --> 1:29:27.800
<v Speaker 1>hope to get it past as soon as possible. Discriminate

1:29:27.840 --> 1:29:31.799
<v Speaker 1>against genius. That is exactly right. Our current immigration system

1:29:31.880 --> 1:29:36.720
<v Speaker 1>discriminates against high qualified people. I have always said I

1:29:36.880 --> 1:29:42.559
<v Speaker 1>want the Kentucky Basketball of immigration policy. What do I

1:29:42.600 --> 1:29:45.840
<v Speaker 1>mean by that? I want the most qualified, the most ambitious,

1:29:45.960 --> 1:29:48.800
<v Speaker 1>the most intelligent, the most entrepreneurial people to come to

1:29:48.880 --> 1:29:53.120
<v Speaker 1>this country. There should not be an inherent discrimination against

1:29:53.320 --> 1:29:58.120
<v Speaker 1>qualifications when applying to come into America. In just a minute,

1:29:58.120 --> 1:29:59.960
<v Speaker 1>we'll be back. I'm going to detail this even more

1:30:00.120 --> 1:30:02.200
<v Speaker 1>or we're going to talk about some of the reaction

1:30:02.280 --> 1:30:04.479
<v Speaker 1>from the left on this immigration issue. They're finding a

1:30:04.479 --> 1:30:07.439
<v Speaker 1>reason to oppose it. This is Charlie Kirk, host of

1:30:07.439 --> 1:30:09.640
<v Speaker 1>The Charlie Kirk Show. You can subscribe by going to

1:30:09.680 --> 1:30:13.720
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcast typing in the Charlie Kirk Show Press subscribe.

1:30:13.960 --> 1:30:17.680
<v Speaker 1>Founder of Turning Point USA TPUSA dot com. We'll be

1:30:17.800 --> 1:30:22.519
<v Speaker 1>right back. Welcome back. This is Charlie Kirk filling in

1:30:22.640 --> 1:30:25.920
<v Speaker 1>for the Great Buck Sexton on the Buck Sexton Radio Show.

1:30:26.320 --> 1:30:31.960
<v Speaker 1>I am the founder of Turning Point USA TPUSA dot com,

1:30:31.960 --> 1:30:37.559
<v Speaker 1>the nation's largest student movement dedicated to the education of

1:30:37.680 --> 1:30:42.639
<v Speaker 1>the next generation. Behind the ideas of free markets, limited government,

1:30:42.680 --> 1:30:47.240
<v Speaker 1>American exceptionalism, and the Constitution. We've been talking about immigration

1:30:47.320 --> 1:30:50.880
<v Speaker 1>this hour. This is an issue that I think is

1:30:50.920 --> 1:30:54.400
<v Speaker 1>the number one issue heading into the twenty twenty election.

1:30:55.560 --> 1:30:59.719
<v Speaker 1>The Democrats have no position on immigration. In fact, Robert

1:30:59.760 --> 1:31:03.240
<v Speaker 1>f answers o rourke. He calls himself Beta, Beto O'Rourke,

1:31:03.520 --> 1:31:07.160
<v Speaker 1>calls himself Beto O'Rourke. Right, mister producer, that's right, that's

1:31:07.520 --> 1:31:11.960
<v Speaker 1>mister producer there. And he has a position where he

1:31:12.040 --> 1:31:16.519
<v Speaker 1>was standing overlooking the fence that actually works in El Paso, Texas,

1:31:16.800 --> 1:31:21.120
<v Speaker 1>that actually works, and Chris Hayes from MSNBC asks him,

1:31:21.160 --> 1:31:23.400
<v Speaker 1>if you could, would you tear down these walls right now?

1:31:23.600 --> 1:31:25.720
<v Speaker 1>Actually might be the toughest question that a Democrat has

1:31:25.720 --> 1:31:29.040
<v Speaker 1>gotten so far in the twenty twenty election, and he says,

1:31:29.040 --> 1:31:32.280
<v Speaker 1>of course, yes, absolutely, I would. He would tear down

1:31:32.320 --> 1:31:35.920
<v Speaker 1>the wall with El Paso. The Democrats are put on

1:31:36.040 --> 1:31:37.880
<v Speaker 1>defense from this issue. And I have to give the

1:31:37.920 --> 1:31:41.559
<v Speaker 1>president credit by framing the immigration debate. Here's what he's

1:31:41.560 --> 1:31:44.760
<v Speaker 1>really doing. He's going to work with Mitch McConnell to

1:31:44.840 --> 1:31:48.280
<v Speaker 1>get this bill into the United States Senate and he

1:31:48.320 --> 1:31:50.719
<v Speaker 1>will put every Democrat running for president, which is about

1:31:50.720 --> 1:31:52.840
<v Speaker 1>half the United States Senate of the Democrat Caucus. It

1:31:52.880 --> 1:31:58.360
<v Speaker 1>seems on the record against these very reasonable immigration proposals,

1:31:59.520 --> 1:32:04.200
<v Speaker 1>cutting chain migration, increasing skilled labor, having a self sustained

1:32:04.479 --> 1:32:09.000
<v Speaker 1>border security trust fund, more build America Visa's civics exams.

1:32:09.120 --> 1:32:11.360
<v Speaker 1>Do you believe in that, Senator Jillibrand, do you believe

1:32:11.400 --> 1:32:14.840
<v Speaker 1>in that? Senator Booker? Do you believe in that? Senator Colbatar, Colobatar?

1:32:15.120 --> 1:32:16.640
<v Speaker 1>Do you believe in that? Senator Warren? I mean what

1:32:16.720 --> 1:32:18.439
<v Speaker 1>senator is not running for president. By the way, we

1:32:18.439 --> 1:32:21.519
<v Speaker 1>should have a list of every Democrat not running for president.

1:32:21.560 --> 1:32:24.160
<v Speaker 1>I think it might be Senator Tim Kane. I think

1:32:24.200 --> 1:32:26.640
<v Speaker 1>he's not running for president now. Senator Tim Kane is

1:32:26.640 --> 1:32:29.200
<v Speaker 1>definitely not running for president. But you go through this list,

1:32:29.680 --> 1:32:34.599
<v Speaker 1>it is such reasonable immigration policy. And what it really

1:32:34.680 --> 1:32:36.960
<v Speaker 1>does is it's now going to put Vice President Joe

1:32:37.000 --> 1:32:41.160
<v Speaker 1>Biden the air apparent front runner of the Democrat primary,

1:32:41.160 --> 1:32:42.960
<v Speaker 1>which I've made this prediction. I believe he will not

1:32:43.080 --> 1:32:45.960
<v Speaker 1>be the Democrat nominee. I believe Joe Biden will not

1:32:46.040 --> 1:32:48.640
<v Speaker 1>be the Democrat nominee. It now puts him in a

1:32:48.800 --> 1:32:51.840
<v Speaker 1>very difficult situation. It now puts him in a very

1:32:52.080 --> 1:32:55.519
<v Speaker 1>tough position because now Vice President Joe Biden is now

1:32:55.560 --> 1:32:57.120
<v Speaker 1>going to have to be against stuff he used to

1:32:57.120 --> 1:32:59.720
<v Speaker 1>be for, which is actually seemed to be kind of

1:33:00.080 --> 1:33:04.519
<v Speaker 1>Joe Biden's twenty slogan, Joe Biden, if I don't support

1:33:04.560 --> 1:33:07.599
<v Speaker 1>it now, I probably did then vote for me. I've

1:33:07.640 --> 1:33:10.759
<v Speaker 1>been on every side of the issue, or Joe Biden's

1:33:10.760 --> 1:33:13.240
<v Speaker 1>new slogan, which is, if I set it back then,

1:33:13.320 --> 1:33:15.240
<v Speaker 1>I might not say it today. What do you think

1:33:15.240 --> 1:33:18.320
<v Speaker 1>that's that's good? I think that's this new slogan. If

1:33:18.360 --> 1:33:21.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm not for it I was before, or something like that.

1:33:21.760 --> 1:33:24.320
<v Speaker 1>The guy has been on every single issue of every

1:33:24.360 --> 1:33:29.160
<v Speaker 1>political topic in the American political conversation. He in two

1:33:29.160 --> 1:33:30.920
<v Speaker 1>thousand and six said we waited to build a wall,

1:33:30.960 --> 1:33:32.599
<v Speaker 1>we need to kick out all the illegals, and now

1:33:32.600 --> 1:33:35.360
<v Speaker 1>he says we need to give health care for everybody it.

1:33:36.600 --> 1:33:39.880
<v Speaker 1>The genius of Trump's immigration plan is to compare it

1:33:39.960 --> 1:33:43.559
<v Speaker 1>against what I would say, more leftist notions, the same

1:33:43.640 --> 1:33:47.439
<v Speaker 1>notions that the modern progressive left adores, and so he's

1:33:47.640 --> 1:33:51.160
<v Speaker 1>he's creating contrast through good policy. So not is this

1:33:51.360 --> 1:33:53.479
<v Speaker 1>not only is this something that should, hopefully God willing

1:33:53.520 --> 1:33:56.400
<v Speaker 1>get past. Nancy Pelosi will not allow this to come

1:33:56.479 --> 1:33:59.040
<v Speaker 1>in its true form. But this will also this is

1:33:59.040 --> 1:34:01.599
<v Speaker 1>the genius of Trump's plan. This will put blue dog

1:34:01.640 --> 1:34:04.960
<v Speaker 1>alleged blue dog Democrats like Connor Lamb and these guys

1:34:05.000 --> 1:34:07.759
<v Speaker 1>that have just taken the House back with Nancy Pelosi

1:34:07.800 --> 1:34:09.800
<v Speaker 1>in a very tough position because they're gonna have to

1:34:09.880 --> 1:34:12.519
<v Speaker 1>vote against leadership. They're gonna have to vote against the

1:34:12.800 --> 1:34:15.000
<v Speaker 1>wishes of the of the Nancy Pelosi. This is a

1:34:15.040 --> 1:34:17.840
<v Speaker 1>moderate immigration plan. This is now. Yes, it has a

1:34:17.840 --> 1:34:20.519
<v Speaker 1>lot of border security. But you might see some of

1:34:20.520 --> 1:34:25.200
<v Speaker 1>these ads on Fox News being run by Numbers USA.

1:34:25.400 --> 1:34:28.000
<v Speaker 1>Numbers USA does not believe in this immigration plan. I

1:34:28.040 --> 1:34:30.800
<v Speaker 1>disagree with Numbers USA, and I like a lot of

1:34:30.800 --> 1:34:32.880
<v Speaker 1>what they do. I agree with them on the illegal immigration.

1:34:33.280 --> 1:34:35.400
<v Speaker 1>But this is a conversation that I've had with some

1:34:35.479 --> 1:34:38.240
<v Speaker 1>of our own team, you know, at the Charlie Kirk Show,

1:34:38.280 --> 1:34:40.200
<v Speaker 1>Charlie Kirk Show podcast that you can download on an

1:34:40.200 --> 1:34:42.639
<v Speaker 1>Apple podcast. There's a conversation and debate that we have

1:34:42.800 --> 1:34:45.519
<v Speaker 1>should we have more immigration? My stance is absolutely, I

1:34:45.600 --> 1:34:49.160
<v Speaker 1>want millions and millions of more smart, ambitious, ethical people.

1:34:49.240 --> 1:34:52.160
<v Speaker 1>Smart ambitious, ethical people that's hard to find. Though, it's

1:34:52.160 --> 1:34:54.120
<v Speaker 1>hard to qualify, isn't it Because as soon as you

1:34:54.160 --> 1:34:57.439
<v Speaker 1>say that you have to curtail chain migration, you have

1:34:57.479 --> 1:35:01.040
<v Speaker 1>to curtail people that my I just know somebody or

1:35:01.080 --> 1:35:04.519
<v Speaker 1>have some sort of diversity, the slattery, and so the

1:35:04.560 --> 1:35:06.880
<v Speaker 1>conversation immigration should be always this And this is what

1:35:06.960 --> 1:35:09.559
<v Speaker 1>I love about this president's plan right now? Is it

1:35:09.600 --> 1:35:12.320
<v Speaker 1>going to help America? Not? Does it make you feel good? Not?

1:35:12.520 --> 1:35:14.320
<v Speaker 1>Is it going to put more people there disaffected in

1:35:14.360 --> 1:35:18.960
<v Speaker 1>your country? Is? Will this policy actually help America? Will

1:35:18.960 --> 1:35:21.880
<v Speaker 1>this policy benefit the nation state that you're elected to serve?

1:35:22.280 --> 1:35:26.639
<v Speaker 1>Isn't that a novel concept? Actually ask yourself will your

1:35:26.720 --> 1:35:30.040
<v Speaker 1>public policy you're pushing for benefit your constituents. It seems

1:35:30.040 --> 1:35:32.799
<v Speaker 1>as if the Democrats are will it get me elected?

1:35:33.080 --> 1:35:35.040
<v Speaker 1>Or will it put me in power? Or will it

1:35:35.080 --> 1:35:37.400
<v Speaker 1>make me feel good? Or will it get applause some

1:35:37.400 --> 1:35:42.960
<v Speaker 1>sort of leftist gathering of ACLU human rights campaign. It'll

1:35:43.000 --> 1:35:45.479
<v Speaker 1>be very interesting to see which Democrat actually has something

1:35:45.560 --> 1:35:47.960
<v Speaker 1>nice to say about this, which will probably none of them,

1:35:47.960 --> 1:35:50.880
<v Speaker 1>and they'll all vote. My guess is war into Clobuchart.

1:35:51.000 --> 1:35:54.120
<v Speaker 1>All of them will one by one by one vote

1:35:54.160 --> 1:36:00.360
<v Speaker 1>against this very reasonable immigration proposal and plan. And I

1:36:00.400 --> 1:36:02.519
<v Speaker 1>do want to reinforce a point I made earlier, which

1:36:02.600 --> 1:36:05.519
<v Speaker 1>is we are only talking about immigration because of President Trump.

1:36:06.000 --> 1:36:08.680
<v Speaker 1>Let's play a hypothetical out. Let's say it was President

1:36:09.320 --> 1:36:12.320
<v Speaker 1>Jeb Bush or President Marco Rubio. Do you think we'd

1:36:12.320 --> 1:36:15.080
<v Speaker 1>be having this conversation around the illegal immigration in this country?

1:36:15.439 --> 1:36:17.920
<v Speaker 1>Do you think we'd actually be having the conversation around

1:36:18.240 --> 1:36:22.760
<v Speaker 1>declaring the southern border as a national emergency. I think

1:36:22.760 --> 1:36:26.200
<v Speaker 1>there's a zero percent chance that the traditional Republican Party

1:36:26.320 --> 1:36:29.639
<v Speaker 1>would actually be addressing illegal immigration. They'd be talking about

1:36:29.640 --> 1:36:31.560
<v Speaker 1>it from a corporatist lens. What do you think, No,

1:36:31.720 --> 1:36:34.800
<v Speaker 1>we'd be doing exactly the point you've made time and

1:36:34.840 --> 1:36:37.439
<v Speaker 1>time again, that we'd be talking about how much we

1:36:37.479 --> 1:36:40.519
<v Speaker 1>can concede to the Democrats so that we can stay

1:36:40.560 --> 1:36:43.080
<v Speaker 1>at the cocktail parties as opposed to getting actual immigration.

1:36:43.120 --> 1:36:45.200
<v Speaker 1>It seems like that that's a trend, isn't it. It

1:36:45.280 --> 1:36:49.320
<v Speaker 1>seems as if that's exactly right. It's the traditional Republican

1:36:49.360 --> 1:36:53.040
<v Speaker 1>Party is this traditionally, and that Trump has blown this up,

1:36:53.080 --> 1:36:55.800
<v Speaker 1>blown this up, and most Republicans, like Lindsay Graham, are

1:36:55.840 --> 1:36:57.840
<v Speaker 1>no longer like this. I want to qualify this. Most

1:36:57.880 --> 1:37:01.360
<v Speaker 1>Republicans are no longer like this. The traditional Republican Party,

1:37:02.439 --> 1:37:07.080
<v Speaker 1>especially in the early two thousands, is two things. How

1:37:07.120 --> 1:37:09.000
<v Speaker 1>can I get the Democrats and media to not say

1:37:09.000 --> 1:37:11.320
<v Speaker 1>bad things about me? And how do I serve corporate interests?

1:37:12.400 --> 1:37:14.519
<v Speaker 1>How do I not get the Democrats and media not

1:37:14.560 --> 1:37:15.920
<v Speaker 1>to say bad things about me? And how do I

1:37:15.960 --> 1:37:18.920
<v Speaker 1>serve corporate interests? How do I stay on CNN? Yeah, exactly?

1:37:19.000 --> 1:37:21.920
<v Speaker 1>How do I say on certain cable networks? How do

1:37:21.960 --> 1:37:25.439
<v Speaker 1>I stay on certain cable networks while also still getting

1:37:25.439 --> 1:37:27.680
<v Speaker 1>invited to the cocktail parties? How do I blend those

1:37:27.680 --> 1:37:30.160
<v Speaker 1>two things together? Donald Trump doesn't care about the cocktail parties.

1:37:30.320 --> 1:37:32.599
<v Speaker 1>The ultimate cocktail party where you go to get loved

1:37:32.640 --> 1:37:34.879
<v Speaker 1>is the White House correspondence dinner. When you're a president,

1:37:34.960 --> 1:37:37.600
<v Speaker 1>that is that is the oscars of being president. Of

1:37:37.640 --> 1:37:39.160
<v Speaker 1>course you get made fun of a little bit, but

1:37:39.200 --> 1:37:41.760
<v Speaker 1>you get that is your show. And President Trump has

1:37:41.760 --> 1:37:43.639
<v Speaker 1>shown he doesn't care about that. He goes and actually

1:37:43.760 --> 1:37:46.599
<v Speaker 1>rallies with real Americans. Here's a kind of a fun

1:37:46.640 --> 1:37:51.040
<v Speaker 1>stat that my executive producer, who you're hearing some nice

1:37:51.120 --> 1:37:53.840
<v Speaker 1>chime in, Andrew told me. Currently only about twelve percent

1:37:53.840 --> 1:37:57.000
<v Speaker 1>of immigrants are admitted based unemployment and skills, while sixty

1:37:57.000 --> 1:37:59.679
<v Speaker 1>six are Oh my goodness, this is unbelievable, while sixty

1:37:59.720 --> 1:38:02.920
<v Speaker 1>six are admitted based on family connections. Inside the United

1:38:02.920 --> 1:38:05.240
<v Speaker 1>States administration, are you kidding me? This means that sixty

1:38:05.240 --> 1:38:07.720
<v Speaker 1>six percent two thirds. I want you to imagine a

1:38:07.760 --> 1:38:10.400
<v Speaker 1>pie right now, Okay, a physical pie, and two thirds

1:38:10.400 --> 1:38:13.559
<v Speaker 1>of that pie, sixty six percent of immigrants, legal immigrants

1:38:13.560 --> 1:38:15.680
<v Speaker 1>into our country right now are admitted just based on

1:38:15.720 --> 1:38:18.599
<v Speaker 1>family ties. That's no way are we getting the best

1:38:18.600 --> 1:38:20.160
<v Speaker 1>people in the world because of that. Do you know

1:38:20.160 --> 1:38:23.160
<v Speaker 1>what that also means? That means that we are disenfranchising

1:38:23.240 --> 1:38:25.880
<v Speaker 1>qualified people from other parts of the world, because that

1:38:25.920 --> 1:38:28.400
<v Speaker 1>means qualified people are being puts the back of the

1:38:28.479 --> 1:38:31.920
<v Speaker 1>line because someone else is here. That means somebody else.

1:38:31.920 --> 1:38:33.240
<v Speaker 1>So you know what else that means. That means it

1:38:33.240 --> 1:38:35.840
<v Speaker 1>gives you preference to people that know illegal immigrants. Do

1:38:35.960 --> 1:38:38.160
<v Speaker 1>you know any illegal and that illegal has a child,

1:38:38.320 --> 1:38:40.200
<v Speaker 1>that child that becomes fifteen or sixteen, you can then

1:38:40.280 --> 1:38:42.960
<v Speaker 1>use that fifteen or sixteen year old daughter of an

1:38:42.960 --> 1:38:46.160
<v Speaker 1>illegal immigrant to come to this country legally. That's silly.

1:38:46.439 --> 1:38:48.920
<v Speaker 1>We should be to have an immigration policy that is

1:38:48.960 --> 1:38:53.320
<v Speaker 1>crafted based on merit, based on ambition and based on ethics.

1:38:53.760 --> 1:38:56.000
<v Speaker 1>A country should be built on what is best for

1:38:56.040 --> 1:38:58.960
<v Speaker 1>the nation state, not what makes you feel good. This

1:38:59.040 --> 1:39:00.960
<v Speaker 1>is Charlie Kirk filling for Buck Sex Then on the

1:39:00.960 --> 1:39:03.720
<v Speaker 1>Buck Sex Then Radio Show. We'll be right back, Welcome back.

1:39:03.760 --> 1:39:06.880
<v Speaker 1>This is Charlie Kirk filling in for the great Buck

1:39:06.920 --> 1:39:09.519
<v Speaker 1>Sex Then on the Buck Sex Then Radio Show. I

1:39:09.560 --> 1:39:13.160
<v Speaker 1>am the founder of Turning Point USA. Turning Point USA

1:39:13.439 --> 1:39:18.000
<v Speaker 1>is the nation's largest student movement dedicated to educating, empowering,

1:39:18.000 --> 1:39:22.000
<v Speaker 1>and organizing the next generation around the values of free markets,

1:39:22.600 --> 1:39:25.680
<v Speaker 1>limited government, and the constitution. We'd like to learn more,

1:39:25.720 --> 1:39:29.000
<v Speaker 1>you can visit our website at tpusa dot com. That

1:39:29.160 --> 1:39:36.559
<v Speaker 1>is tp usa dot com. So Andrew Andrew's here, executive

1:39:36.560 --> 1:39:38.280
<v Speaker 1>producer of The Charlie Kirk Show. You can go to

1:39:38.680 --> 1:39:41.320
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts and subscribe to The Charlie Kirk Show. We

1:39:41.360 --> 1:39:45.000
<v Speaker 1>were just talking about immigration, and it seems far too

1:39:45.040 --> 1:39:49.040
<v Speaker 1>often that the immigration debate in our country gets immediately demagogued.

1:39:49.560 --> 1:39:51.760
<v Speaker 1>It seems as if the left wants to use it

1:39:52.000 --> 1:39:55.720
<v Speaker 1>as a way to perpetually have future voters. If the

1:39:55.800 --> 1:39:58.840
<v Speaker 1>Left was serious but actually solving this problem, they would

1:39:58.840 --> 1:40:01.559
<v Speaker 1>build a wall. As I co and le say if

1:40:01.600 --> 1:40:07.320
<v Speaker 1>illegals entering America and their children were likely to vote Republican,

1:40:07.520 --> 1:40:09.400
<v Speaker 1>but while would already be built, and anyone that would

1:40:09.400 --> 1:40:12.400
<v Speaker 1>oppose the wall would be a racist. If people coming

1:40:12.439 --> 1:40:16.720
<v Speaker 1>across the southern border would actually tend to be more conservative,

1:40:17.200 --> 1:40:18.760
<v Speaker 1>then the left would say, oh, we gotta build the wall,

1:40:18.800 --> 1:40:20.559
<v Speaker 1>we gotta restrict because you know how we know this

1:40:20.600 --> 1:40:23.519
<v Speaker 1>to be true. The left does not want actual legal

1:40:23.520 --> 1:40:26.720
<v Speaker 1>immigration from countries that are far more likely to have

1:40:26.920 --> 1:40:29.360
<v Speaker 1>Republicans or people of the vote Republicans. I'll give you

1:40:29.360 --> 1:40:33.040
<v Speaker 1>a great example when time and time again we try

1:40:33.080 --> 1:40:36.960
<v Speaker 1>to accept the victims of communism from countries like Venezuela,

1:40:37.120 --> 1:40:40.639
<v Speaker 1>or from Cuba, or from Eastern Europe, the Democrats want

1:40:40.640 --> 1:40:43.360
<v Speaker 1>to put restrictions on that. Democrats, time and time again

1:40:43.360 --> 1:40:47.439
<v Speaker 1>would rather have people that are in caravans coming from

1:40:47.520 --> 1:40:51.320
<v Speaker 1>Guatemala that are living in less than desirable circumstances. Living

1:40:51.360 --> 1:40:53.920
<v Speaker 1>in less than desirable circumstances are not a reason to

1:40:53.920 --> 1:40:57.040
<v Speaker 1>be able to come to America. Living in less than

1:40:57.040 --> 1:40:59.840
<v Speaker 1>desirable circumstances. I have empathy for those people. I have

1:41:00.040 --> 1:41:02.080
<v Speaker 1>compassion for those people. Actually believe the best way to

1:41:02.120 --> 1:41:04.880
<v Speaker 1>help those people is to empower their own nation state,

1:41:05.040 --> 1:41:07.120
<v Speaker 1>to have a free market economy, to have the rule

1:41:07.160 --> 1:41:11.320
<v Speaker 1>of law, and to have a constitutional republic free expression.

1:41:12.080 --> 1:41:14.280
<v Speaker 1>That's the best way to help people in less than

1:41:14.320 --> 1:41:17.920
<v Speaker 1>desirable circumstances, not to just say, oh, leave Guatemala. I

1:41:17.960 --> 1:41:21.120
<v Speaker 1>have twenty five percent of Guatemala comes to America. What

1:41:21.160 --> 1:41:23.000
<v Speaker 1>does that mean. It means the twenty five percent they're

1:41:23.040 --> 1:41:26.840
<v Speaker 1>actually young enough. Their young workforce leaves their country and

1:41:26.880 --> 1:41:28.960
<v Speaker 1>they have less people, less quality, they have less people

1:41:29.000 --> 1:41:31.680
<v Speaker 1>at all, and their country is less off today than

1:41:31.720 --> 1:41:35.719
<v Speaker 1>it was beforehand. And so Donald Trump, to his credit,

1:41:35.960 --> 1:41:39.519
<v Speaker 1>has kept the national conversation around immigration going for some

1:41:39.600 --> 1:41:41.880
<v Speaker 1>time now. It is an issue. And this is what

1:41:41.920 --> 1:41:44.040
<v Speaker 1>I love about President Trump. He doesn't care if it's

1:41:44.040 --> 1:41:47.240
<v Speaker 1>a divisive issue. He doesn't care if it's a difficult issue.

1:41:47.520 --> 1:41:49.320
<v Speaker 1>He cares if it's an issue that needs to be

1:41:49.360 --> 1:41:53.280
<v Speaker 1>addressed by the country and for the country. And so

1:41:53.320 --> 1:41:57.240
<v Speaker 1>the President takes on these difficult issues. The President takes

1:41:57.360 --> 1:42:01.000
<v Speaker 1>on these issues that he knows are going to spur

1:42:01.120 --> 1:42:04.960
<v Speaker 1>conversation because he knows it's good for America long term

1:42:05.120 --> 1:42:08.400
<v Speaker 1>to actually solve our immigration crisis. We are on pace

1:42:08.479 --> 1:42:11.840
<v Speaker 1>to have one million people cross the southern border this year.

1:42:11.880 --> 1:42:14.920
<v Speaker 1>One million people. Think about that, you know, you know,

1:42:15.000 --> 1:42:16.840
<v Speaker 1>you know what? You know, how many one million people is?

1:42:17.160 --> 1:42:22.080
<v Speaker 1>That's the entire population of Montana. The state of Montana

1:42:22.280 --> 1:42:25.559
<v Speaker 1>is illegally crossing into our country every single year. One

1:42:25.680 --> 1:42:29.400
<v Speaker 1>million people a year, every single year. This is not sustainable.

1:42:29.560 --> 1:42:32.280
<v Speaker 1>These are people that are not on our books. These

1:42:32.320 --> 1:42:34.800
<v Speaker 1>are people that are going to be draining the public resources.

1:42:35.000 --> 1:42:37.160
<v Speaker 1>These are people that are going to be flooding our schools.

1:42:37.479 --> 1:42:40.240
<v Speaker 1>It's different if you come from a country and you

1:42:40.280 --> 1:42:43.080
<v Speaker 1>come legally. What what's the actual distinction of the difference here?

1:42:43.240 --> 1:42:45.840
<v Speaker 1>When you come legally, you get placed usually in a

1:42:45.920 --> 1:42:49.240
<v Speaker 1>region or a country or a city that can sustain

1:42:49.360 --> 1:42:51.600
<v Speaker 1>that kind of immigration or that is in need of

1:42:51.640 --> 1:42:55.439
<v Speaker 1>that kind of immigration. There is a beautiful documentary done

1:42:55.479 --> 1:42:57.960
<v Speaker 1>on Frontline, which I know is a PBS thing, but Frontline,

1:42:58.000 --> 1:42:59.840
<v Speaker 1>actually I think does they do a pretty fair job.

1:42:59.840 --> 1:43:03.680
<v Speaker 1>I love the music to I love Frontline, I always have.

1:43:04.040 --> 1:43:07.120
<v Speaker 1>I think I think Frontline is one of the great

1:43:08.280 --> 1:43:11.120
<v Speaker 1>true I think they're one of the great documentary kind

1:43:11.120 --> 1:43:14.200
<v Speaker 1>of providers in the country. Anyway, there's a great there

1:43:14.240 --> 1:43:16.759
<v Speaker 1>was a really terrific piece that they did on Ohio.

1:43:16.800 --> 1:43:18.439
<v Speaker 1>I think it was Date in Ohio where they talked

1:43:18.439 --> 1:43:22.360
<v Speaker 1>about how, what's the cash register company that went out?

1:43:22.400 --> 1:43:25.160
<v Speaker 1>It was a cash register company went to Atlanta and

1:43:25.400 --> 1:43:27.600
<v Speaker 1>I'll look it up, National Cash I think it was

1:43:27.600 --> 1:43:31.080
<v Speaker 1>called NCR National Cash Register, and they're four billion dollar

1:43:31.120 --> 1:43:33.400
<v Speaker 1>company left Date in Ohio and the whole city has

1:43:33.400 --> 1:43:35.200
<v Speaker 1>been grappling with this. And they voted for Trump by

1:43:35.200 --> 1:43:38.640
<v Speaker 1>eighty percent. And I kind of love these leftist documentarians

1:43:38.880 --> 1:43:41.080
<v Speaker 1>that look at Trump voters as if there's some sort

1:43:41.080 --> 1:43:43.880
<v Speaker 1>of zoo animals and now looking into the wild, we

1:43:43.960 --> 1:43:48.439
<v Speaker 1>try to figure out why Cynthia from Ohio actually voted

1:43:49.200 --> 1:43:54.799
<v Speaker 1>for Donald Trump. Yes, it is NCR National Cash Register.

1:43:54.840 --> 1:43:57.000
<v Speaker 1>In two thousand and nine, they left Date in Ohio

1:43:57.040 --> 1:43:58.479
<v Speaker 1>and the city is still trying to grapple with that.

1:43:58.520 --> 1:44:02.040
<v Speaker 1>Thousands of jobs were lost. Anyway, So you go to Dayton, Ohio.

1:44:02.760 --> 1:44:04.559
<v Speaker 1>And this was a really cool thing is that it

1:44:04.680 --> 1:44:07.200
<v Speaker 1>showed that there was an entire community of Dayton, Ohio

1:44:07.600 --> 1:44:10.160
<v Speaker 1>of these unbelievably entrepreneurial people. I think they were Armenian

1:44:10.640 --> 1:44:12.360
<v Speaker 1>or they were Turkish or something. They were they were

1:44:12.400 --> 1:44:14.240
<v Speaker 1>from that part of the world. Probably, I think it

1:44:14.240 --> 1:44:18.040
<v Speaker 1>was Armenian and they came to distinction, but yes, a

1:44:18.160 --> 1:44:21.960
<v Speaker 1>huge distinction. But I'm confusing it because Armenia and Turkey

1:44:22.040 --> 1:44:24.840
<v Speaker 1>has history, so I'm confusing it. You can actually probably

1:44:24.880 --> 1:44:27.080
<v Speaker 1>look it up on frontline. I want to be very precise,

1:44:27.320 --> 1:44:29.080
<v Speaker 1>try to always be very precise in this. But the

1:44:29.080 --> 1:44:32.080
<v Speaker 1>whole point is that these this community came in five

1:44:32.160 --> 1:44:36.879
<v Speaker 1>ten years ago with high skill visas and they've totally

1:44:36.960 --> 1:44:40.120
<v Speaker 1>changed Northern Dayton for the better. They own auto dealerships,

1:44:40.160 --> 1:44:43.240
<v Speaker 1>they have manufacturing plans. Is like this amazing story of

1:44:43.320 --> 1:44:46.160
<v Speaker 1>legal immigration and their net their net income for their

1:44:46.200 --> 1:44:49.920
<v Speaker 1>communities like eighty thousand dollars and the whole community loves them.

1:44:49.960 --> 1:44:51.720
<v Speaker 1>I can't I can't remember if it was Armenian or

1:44:51.760 --> 1:44:54.240
<v Speaker 1>Turkish or if it was whatever. It doesn't really matter.

1:44:54.280 --> 1:44:55.760
<v Speaker 1>The whole point is that that's what we want more

1:44:55.800 --> 1:44:59.200
<v Speaker 1>of Dayton, Ohio is now seeing a net benefit from

1:44:59.240 --> 1:45:01.479
<v Speaker 1>that type of that was not, by the way, It

1:45:01.560 --> 1:45:04.320
<v Speaker 1>was not chain migration, it was not family based migration.

1:45:04.680 --> 1:45:06.680
<v Speaker 1>It was actually people that came here for the right

1:45:06.720 --> 1:45:09.720
<v Speaker 1>reasons that have entrepreneural activity. And you know what, they're

1:45:09.720 --> 1:45:12.960
<v Speaker 1>all flying American flags over all their businesses that's talk

1:45:12.960 --> 1:45:14.960
<v Speaker 1>about how much they love America, from about how much

1:45:15.000 --> 1:45:17.719
<v Speaker 1>they love this country, how appreciative they are of this country.

1:45:17.960 --> 1:45:20.480
<v Speaker 1>And I find the people that are sometimes most appreciative

1:45:20.840 --> 1:45:24.400
<v Speaker 1>of this country, our first generation immigrants that came here

1:45:24.520 --> 1:45:27.240
<v Speaker 1>and fled something and came for a reason. They love America.

1:45:27.400 --> 1:45:29.840
<v Speaker 1>And the Democrats always make it seem as if we're

1:45:29.840 --> 1:45:32.320
<v Speaker 1>against these people. They were like, oh, you hate immigrants. No,

1:45:32.439 --> 1:45:36.920
<v Speaker 1>we don't. We don't hate immigrants. We love immigrants. We

1:45:37.040 --> 1:45:39.720
<v Speaker 1>love people that come here for the right reasons. We

1:45:39.880 --> 1:45:43.080
<v Speaker 1>don't want border jumpers or line cutters. We have to

1:45:43.160 --> 1:45:46.479
<v Speaker 1>change our language when it comes to immigration. Immigration is

1:45:46.520 --> 1:45:54.280
<v Speaker 1>following the rules. Illegals, our border jumpers and line cutters,

1:45:54.479 --> 1:45:57.559
<v Speaker 1>those are not people that have obeyed our protocol and

1:45:57.640 --> 1:46:00.479
<v Speaker 1>obeyed the set of standards put in one of them,

1:46:00.560 --> 1:46:05.479
<v Speaker 1>and those standards exist for Those standards exist for the

1:46:05.600 --> 1:46:09.680
<v Speaker 1>nation state. Those standards exist for a very particular reason. Well,

1:46:09.720 --> 1:46:11.960
<v Speaker 1>it's been a fun couple hours here on the Buck

1:46:11.960 --> 1:46:14.000
<v Speaker 1>Sex Then Radio Show. I want to thank our executive

1:46:14.000 --> 1:46:17.000
<v Speaker 1>producer here of the Charlie Kirk Show. If you liked

1:46:17.040 --> 1:46:19.320
<v Speaker 1>what you heard, you can go to the Apple podcast.

1:46:19.360 --> 1:46:21.760
<v Speaker 1>Type in Charlie Kirk Show and press subscribe. That really

1:46:21.760 --> 1:46:24.320
<v Speaker 1>helps us out. We have a weekly episode and sometimes

1:46:24.320 --> 1:46:26.719
<v Speaker 1>even more than that. Again, I'm the founder of Turning

1:46:26.720 --> 1:46:30.760
<v Speaker 1>Point USATPUSA dot com. It's been such a thrill with

1:46:30.800 --> 1:46:35.080
<v Speaker 1>you these last couple hours. Please get involved on college campuses,

1:46:35.240 --> 1:46:37.240
<v Speaker 1>if you have a young person, if yourself, want to

1:46:37.240 --> 1:46:39.519
<v Speaker 1>get involved in the culture war, We'd love to do it.

1:46:39.560 --> 1:46:45.040
<v Speaker 1>We believe in free markets, the constitution, limited government, American exceptionalism.

1:46:45.280 --> 1:46:47.639
<v Speaker 1>We believe America is the greatest country in the history

1:46:47.680 --> 1:46:52.160
<v Speaker 1>of the world. That's TPUSA dot com. Again, that's TPUSA

1:46:52.240 --> 1:46:55.280
<v Speaker 1>dot com. Or you could subscribe to the Charlie Kirk Show.

1:46:55.720 --> 1:46:59.000
<v Speaker 1>We want you to be a subscriber, no charge, tons

1:46:59.000 --> 1:47:01.800
<v Speaker 1>of fun involved in the fight. This has been a

1:47:01.800 --> 1:47:04.080
<v Speaker 1>great couple of hours. Hope to see you again soon.

1:47:04.080 --> 1:47:06.040
<v Speaker 1>In fact, I'm hosting the show again tomorrow, so I'll

1:47:06.040 --> 1:47:08.200
<v Speaker 1>see you tomorrow. This is Charlie Kirk signing off on

1:47:08.240 --> 1:47:09.760
<v Speaker 1>the Buck Sexton Radio Show.