Speaker 1: Broadcasting live from the Abraham Lincoln Radio Studio the George
Speaker 1: Washington Broadcast Center.
Speaker 2: Jack Armstrong and Joe Ketty, I'm strong and Jackie and he.
Speaker 3: I'm strong and Eddy. What do you think of the
Speaker 3: new leadership? Jasmine AOC and Bernie.
Speaker 4: I consider Congresswoman Okayshia Court to be the leader of
Speaker 4: the Democratic Party. She's entitled to her opinion. I'm entitled
Speaker 4: to mine. As I've said about her before, I think
Speaker 4: she's the reason there are directions on a shampoo box.
Speaker 4: Our plan for dealing that out we got her. Our
Speaker 4: plan for dealing with her is opera called Operation Let
Speaker 4: Her Speak.
Speaker 3: That's Senator John kenn anyway, mock his always attempts at
Speaker 3: humor every time he talks. But she's the reason. Her
Speaker 3: directions on the shampoo bottle is pretty funny. That is
Speaker 3: pretty funny.
Speaker 1: Well in AOC And Bernie Sanders is going to be
Speaker 1: in beautiful, fulsome California continuing there.
Speaker 3: Down with the Olagos tour. Is it next week soon? Yeah?
Speaker 3: Next week April fifteenth.
Speaker 1: Enjoy enjoy that if you're in the area anyway, that
Speaker 1: was from I would go for fun to see that.
Speaker 1: The ancient Socialist in the the Buxom half with Marxists
Speaker 1: speak why not?
Speaker 3: That was a like a focus group thing that Handy
Speaker 3: had that included Lindsay Graham and uh and Senator Kennedy there,
Speaker 3: but they got into a more serious spare with the
Speaker 3: whole Iran thing. There are talks this weekend and what
Speaker 3: might happen if Iran doesn't agree to give up their
Speaker 3: nuclear weapons program. Here's a little of that.
Speaker 4: President Trump understands peace through strength.
Speaker 3: I mean, that's what we are seeing right now, and
Speaker 3: Iran knows that.
Speaker 5: And to your point, we can never allow Iran to
Speaker 5: have a nuclear weapon.
Speaker 1: We know that they will actually use it.
Speaker 5: Bron is very close to assembling six nuclear bombs. They
Speaker 5: will kill Israel, They'll come after us, they'll try to
Speaker 5: pure for our Islam. Donald Trump is the only thing
Speaker 5: between them and a bomb.
Speaker 4: If Iran gets a nuclear weapon, there's going to be
Speaker 4: a war.
Speaker 3: I think there's gonna be a war sometimes to keep
Speaker 3: them from getting a nuclear weapon. I'm a hawk on
Speaker 3: this by a lot, but I do feel like I've
Speaker 3: been told Aroan was a week away from getting the
Speaker 3: bomb for like the last twenty.
Speaker 1: Five years, which is so weak away. No, No, I
Speaker 1: think I don't remember hearing it this urgent.
Speaker 3: Okay, six weeks away, a month away, whatever, They've been
Speaker 3: so close to getting a bomb for like I feel
Speaker 3: like forever. I don't know if those are exaggerations or
Speaker 3: it's just always been true, or I don't I don't
Speaker 3: actually know.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I think the counter argument to you would be,
Speaker 1: and I'm not an expert in this obviously, but there's
Speaker 1: an enormous difference between six weeks and a week away
Speaker 1: from being able to launch a missile.
Speaker 3: It's an enormous difference. Well, we got to quick play
Speaker 3: in this game. At some point, you either go along
Speaker 3: with the getting rid of your nuclear weapons program or
Speaker 3: we're going to bomb you bombed out of existence.
Speaker 1: Well, yeah, I think any like good faith negotiation is
Speaker 1: practically ridiculous at this point.
Speaker 3: Well, remember they've gotten very close before, and then we've
Speaker 3: been successful at a variety of things. Remember that computer
Speaker 3: virus we got into their machinery that caused them to
Speaker 3: like spin out of control and destroyed hundreds of millions
Speaker 3: of dollars worth of equipment that they had built up
Speaker 3: over time. That was a big deal. During the it
Speaker 3: was developed to under Bush and run under Obama. Is
Speaker 3: that right, the legendary stucksnet virus or virus. Yeah, if
Speaker 3: I remember directly, that is one of the things Bush
Speaker 3: told Obama out about as he was leaving the White House. Look,
Speaker 3: we got this virus. You're gonna this is a big deal.
Speaker 3: And then you got every once in a while, Israel
Speaker 3: I think manages to blow up one of their scientists
Speaker 3: like a motorcycle. Will go buy their car and they
Speaker 3: slap a little bomb, magnetic bomb on the door and
Speaker 3: goodbye scientist. Now that's road rage.
Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, okay, well we'll see.
Speaker 3: I think Trump is going.
Speaker 1: To take a hard, hard run at negotiating something other
Speaker 1: than a kinectic attack and a sincere one I suspect,
Speaker 1: But I don't think he thinks it's going to work.
Speaker 3: And then bomb time in days or weeks. I mean,
Speaker 3: this is gonna be soon, gonna be next year, I
Speaker 3: don't think right.
Speaker 1: They're allegedly getting together this weekend to meet full direct talks.
Speaker 1: Allegedly again, we shall see. So this is a complete
Speaker 1: change of topic, but it's just the right length. You've
Speaker 1: perhaps heard us talking in recent days about actually Gaviy
Speaker 1: Newsom has a couple of insane things going on right now.
Speaker 1: One of them is spending hundreds of millions of dollars
Speaker 1: to turn San Quentin from a mean, nasty old prison
Speaker 1: into not a super lucrative housing project, which I would
Speaker 1: like to do, but into something like a Norwegian retreat
Speaker 1: center where the residents can enrich themselves through various programs
Speaker 1: of education and encounter groups and understanding their feelings and
Speaker 1: that sort of thing. I've long been kind of a
Speaker 1: moderate on prison policies. All I want is less recidivism
Speaker 1: and safer corrections officers and a serious deterrent. So that's
Speaker 1: a difficult balance to hit. But if, like an actual
Speaker 1: reasonable expert tells me, for instance, we just learned that
Speaker 1: the prisoners of a certain state be receiving cold refreshing
Speaker 1: treats during the summertime, and I thought, you know, if
Speaker 1: that gives greater compliance and they cooperate with the guards
Speaker 1: so they get their treats and all, it's fine. But
Speaker 1: what about that's probably not happening anyway, But what about
Speaker 1: your career, criminals. Isn't prison supposed to be somewhat unpleasant?
Speaker 1: What if it's not that unpleasant? Exactly if there's no
Speaker 1: detern effect, right, That's why the balance is so hard.
Speaker 1: But anyway, so Gabby's trying to turn san Quentin into
Speaker 1: a retreat center. Got this note from alnonymous the other day.
Speaker 1: You mentioned the ridiculous number amount of tax dollars being
Speaker 1: spent on Chateau Quentin, and it reminded me of another
Speaker 1: infuriating San Quentin fact. My brother in law is a
Speaker 1: current resident there. He did a very bad thing and
Speaker 1: let's just say he won't be attending any family events
Speaker 1: ever again. He occasionally sends a family newsletter that details
Speaker 1: his activities and it's usually well, just dumb and it
Speaker 1: pisses me off. But in his last one he went
Speaker 1: into detail about what great shape he's in, that he's
Speaker 1: really slimming down now that he's using ozempic.
Speaker 3: WTF.
Speaker 1: Well, it's many questions marks and exclamation points. First off,
Speaker 1: the guys maybe twenty pounds overweight, and secondly, wtf, serenity. No,
Speaker 1: so the incredibly expensive ozempic is being handed out to
Speaker 1: prisoners to help them slim even though they're not, you know,
Speaker 1: terribly overweight. They just ask for it in Chateau Quentin.
Speaker 3: Other than perhaps to fight people. Why are you getting
Speaker 3: in better shape in prison? Anyway? It's not like you're
Speaker 3: going out to the bar to meet women this Friday night.
Speaker 1: Now you're going to the exercise yard to meet dudes.
Speaker 1: Undo the math. Hey, there's no women in there. You
Speaker 1: get a free pass for that from the sopranos.
Speaker 3: Yeah, Quentin, Who are taxpayers paying for a zempic for
Speaker 3: slightly overweight prisoners? Of course?
Speaker 1: Yeah? Wow? And changes too, Remember, and then they get
Speaker 1: transferred to the women's prison, whether they have a sex
Speaker 1: station or not. There they do free raping again under
Speaker 1: Gavin's steady hand and wise leadership. And remember, America, you
Speaker 1: too could have that brand of leadership in twenty twenty eight.
Speaker 3: He laugh, I laughed. I want to hit you with
Speaker 3: a text that we got before we take a break
Speaker 3: and get to some other stuff. Hey, guys talking about
Speaker 3: losing jobs. Apparently we were at one point. Oh, I
Speaker 3: was a basketball announcer, Grant Napier who lost his job
Speaker 3: during the George Floyd nuttiness for saying all lives matter,
Speaker 3: lost his free single one. Yes, this guy lost his
Speaker 3: lift job driving in San Francisco for supposedly listening to
Speaker 3: talk radio program that a writer had not approved of.
Speaker 3: He doesn't say if it was us or not, but
Speaker 3: he's texting us, so I'm thinking it was. No questions asked,
Speaker 3: just kicked off after fifteen years of driving for Lyft,
Speaker 3: forty one thousand rides, two days after my seventieth birthday,
Speaker 3: no explanation of what I was listening to. They just
Speaker 3: fired me.
Speaker 1: Wow, wow, lift, I'm going with Uber or maybe a taxicab.
Speaker 3: Damn you that seems like a Are there still taxiicabs?
Speaker 3: How do they make a look?
Speaker 1: Yeah, they hardly do. It's an idol threat. By the way,
Speaker 1: I'm not calling a cab.
Speaker 3: We got more on the way stay here.
Speaker 6: When it comes to tariffs and trade, we all understand
Speaker 6: in the White House and the American people understand that
Speaker 6: ELAW's a car manufacturer. But he's not a car manufacturer.
Speaker 3: He's a car assembler. It's fine.
Speaker 6: He's a car man, he's a car person. That's what
Speaker 6: he does. And he wants to achieve foreign parts and
Speaker 6: we understand that, but we want him home.
Speaker 3: We want him home.
Speaker 6: National security, I'm sure, and everything's good with Elon.
Speaker 3: Elon's not a car Maker's a car assembler, is what
Speaker 3: Peter Navarro said, Peter Navarro is the guy that's leading
Speaker 3: all the talk and suggestions to Trump about how to
Speaker 3: handle this whole tariff policy thing. Elon had said that
Speaker 3: the fact that Navarro's got a PhD from Harvard and
Speaker 3: Economics is a bad thing, not a good thing. That's
Speaker 3: kind of what started at Navarro shoots back, This is
Speaker 3: the Daily Show handling Elon's response to his criticism.
Speaker 2: Peter Navarro thinks Musk is taking advantage of unfair trade
Speaker 2: policies at the risk of American prosperity. Elon, what's your response?
Speaker 5: Must calling him a moron and dumber than a sack
Speaker 5: of bricks.
Speaker 3: And there's the latest calling him Peter Retardo.
Speaker 2: Powerful counterpoint, powerful god. I hope Elon Musk never has
Speaker 2: to defend himself in court, ladies.
Speaker 3: And gentlemen of the jury.
Speaker 2: Gay, I rest my case.
Speaker 3: That is pretty funny. I can see. That's here's my argument,
Speaker 3: Gay Chainsaul, Oh, Peter Retardo, Wow, we are really grunting
Speaker 3: like animals? Is the next step? Right? I like David
Speaker 3: Muir using his serious voice last night.
Speaker 4: Elon Musk calling President Trump's top trade advisor dumber than
Speaker 4: a sack of bricks.
Speaker 1: You gotta be dumbred in a sack of bricks to
Speaker 1: think David muirr is a real journalist.
Speaker 3: Dumber than a sack of bricks. Anyway, the White Now
Speaker 3: look at my arms. Look how buff they are. Have
Speaker 3: you ever seen hair like this and arms like this together?
Speaker 3: Let me hear that one more time. I like that one.
Speaker 4: Elon Musk calling President Trumps top trade advisor dumber than.
Speaker 3: A sack of bricks. That is funny. Oh God, we
Speaker 3: live in funny times or horrifying times, depending on how
Speaker 3: it turns out. The White House.
Speaker 1: I'm both amused and horrified, just speaking for myself.
Speaker 3: There you go, both. Yeah. The White House spokesperson was
Speaker 3: asked yesterday about the back and forth between Navarro and Elon,
Speaker 3: both Trump advisors.
Speaker 7: There's been some public sparring between Elon Musk and the
Speaker 7: President's trade advisor, Peter Navarro on some of these tariffs.
Speaker 7: Musk actually refer to Navarre today as being quote dumber
Speaker 7: than a sack of bricks.
Speaker 3: Are you an o ours?
Speaker 7: The administration, the President all concerned that this is maybe
Speaker 7: impacting the public's understanding.
Speaker 3: Of these terriffs. It might be messing with the message
Speaker 3: on it.
Speaker 8: Now, look, these are obviously two individuals who have very
Speaker 8: different views.
Speaker 3: On trade and on tariffs.
Speaker 8: Boys will be boys, and we will let their public
Speaker 8: sparring continue. And you guys should all be very grateful
Speaker 8: that we have the most transparent administration in history. And
Speaker 8: I think it also speaks to the President's willingness to
Speaker 8: hear from all sides.
Speaker 3: Well, you can't accuse them a group thing, you know.
Speaker 1: I don't like the coarsening of a political conversation in general.
Speaker 1: I like more gentlemanly slash womanly rhetoric. And this whole
Speaker 1: thing is kind of laughable. But I honestly it was funny.
Speaker 1: You could tell that the reports are at there was
Speaker 1: trying to say, is that confusing the American public or damaging.
Speaker 3: Something or other? I'm trying to come up with something.
Speaker 1: To me, it just says, well, among his advisors there's
Speaker 1: real disagreement over how smart this is. That doesn't bother me.
Speaker 1: I'm kind of glad I know it. What do you think?
Speaker 3: Yeah? Yeah, And like you said, I like the idea
Speaker 3: of some back and forth. Not everybody agrees with it
Speaker 3: or feels like they have to say they have to
Speaker 3: agree with it. Now, some of them might feel like
Speaker 3: they have to say they agree that Elon does not
Speaker 3: feel like he has to do anything at all about
Speaker 3: anything in any realm of life on planet Earth. Correct, So,
Speaker 3: which is handy when you're the world come. I could
Speaker 3: just picture him laughing as he tweets that out, child boy.
Speaker 3: Before I get to something important, we have breaking Masters
Speaker 3: golf news. Is the Master's golf tournament this week? Yeah?
Speaker 1: Tomorrow, tomorrow morning kicks off. Yeah, it's a tradition unlike
Speaker 1: any other.
Speaker 3: Jack, the golf coach for Arizona State University, has been
Speaker 3: removed from the course for violating the long standing dress
Speaker 3: code rule. I don't know how he showed up dressed,
Speaker 3: but apparently he broke the rules. What do you gotta wear?
Speaker 3: A three piece suit? Hat? Yeah, a tie. I'll be
Speaker 3: going on Friday. Wait a second, weld on, hold on,
Speaker 3: breaking news. You're going to the Master's Friday, Yes.
Speaker 1: And it it's got to be a white suit because
Speaker 1: it's the South. A three piece white suit like you're
Speaker 1: Tom Wolf and a hat.
Speaker 3: Obviously, you'll be at the Master's golf tournament, which is
Speaker 3: not a tournament you can buy tickets for.
Speaker 1: Uh, well you can. It's fairly difficult.
Speaker 3: Okay, how did you get in? Who do you know?
Speaker 1: I know, what's your people? People who know other people gotcha.
Speaker 1: There's no need to put too fine a point on it.
Speaker 1: But I am there at the invite of someone who holds.
Speaker 3: Past as a favor or a threat. I mean are
Speaker 3: they Is they doing it as a favor to you?
Speaker 3: Or did you say you know those pictures I got
Speaker 3: you from that party? Again, I see no reason to
Speaker 3: put too fine a point on this unt of your business.
Speaker 3: Well are you going to Are you going to call
Speaker 3: in from the master's golf tournament?
Speaker 1: You can't? Oh, I mean I can call in from
Speaker 1: the parking lot. You cannot carry a cell phone onto
Speaker 1: Augusta Nashalan.
Speaker 3: I like that.
Speaker 1: There should be they have metal detectors. You cannot have
Speaker 1: any phone.
Speaker 3: There should be way more things, including school, in church
Speaker 3: and like every meeting you ever go to where phones
Speaker 3: just aren't allowed. I hope that becomes a cultural norm
Speaker 3: that like, you're just like somebody who just lit up
Speaker 3: a cigarette in a meeting. If you start looking at
Speaker 3: your phone in the middle of a meeting.
Speaker 1: Uh yeah yeah. And I've been before and kept my
Speaker 1: cell phone in my car, and I absolutely loved it.
Speaker 1: I mean, it'd be nice to be able to take
Speaker 1: some pictures and stuff, but it's not like you can't
Speaker 1: get pictures of Augusta Ashall.
Speaker 3: Can you have a camera? Can you bring a camera
Speaker 3: on the course.
Speaker 1: I don't think so. I think you need a press
Speaker 1: press pass. Yeah exactly. In fact, yeah, that's got to
Speaker 1: be the case because in every other tournament, everybody's watching
Speaker 1: it through their camera so they can take a video
Speaker 1: to send to their friends.
Speaker 3: How about they're not actually watching the tournament. How about
Speaker 3: anybody who's not white? Are they allowed on the course?
Speaker 3: Oh my god, I know the reputation of the Augusta
Speaker 3: National and isn't that they're.
Speaker 1: In the head of ignoramuses.
Speaker 3: I just saw it in the news at retard What retard? Sorry,
Speaker 3: Oh my god.
Speaker 1: The Southern Poverty Law Center is not an anti hate group.
Speaker 3: They're a hate group. Stay with us, Armstrong and Getty.
Speaker 3: We will not be silenced.
Speaker 1: The silent riot has begun.
Speaker 3: We will not be silenced. The silent riots begun. We
Speaker 3: will not be silenced. The silent riot has begun. We
Speaker 3: will not be silenced. The silent riot has begun. Gosh,
Speaker 3: hard to know where to start with that. Oh, somebody's
Speaker 3: gonna have explain to me what the heck is that?
Speaker 4: Uh?
Speaker 1: Uh, Katie, is this your clip? I mean it's go ahead.
Speaker 1: Is there anything we needed to know?
Speaker 9: Uh No, that's just a compilation. This is a TikTok
Speaker 9: trend that is happening. And before everyone says this is
Speaker 9: the silent riot, it's begun or whatever the hell they
Speaker 9: just said, they just stare into the camera for about
Speaker 9: kinds of protect Yeah, and just for visual all of
Speaker 9: these people look exactly like what you think they look like.
Speaker 1: Yeah, this is perhaps the weakest tea ever served from
Speaker 1: the department of hashtag activism making you feel like a
Speaker 1: brave revolutionary. It is likewise self contradictory. But and secondly,
Speaker 1: it is clearly clearly the province of half wits at best. Yeah,
Speaker 1: if you're as smart as a bag of bricks in
Speaker 1: this crowd, you will be their case.
Speaker 3: I know, I know a couple of people who live
Speaker 3: online and where where it seems like they're most of
Speaker 3: their world is the interaction that happens on you know,
Speaker 3: Instagram and Twitter. So that's yeah, it's it's it's it's
Speaker 3: almost like what are those simulation games? It's sims or
Speaker 3: what of those the people get into. It's almost like that.
Speaker 1: So if they get positive feedback yeah, online, they feel
Speaker 1: like they've lived a good life, right.
Speaker 3: And and well, and it is a big deal because
Speaker 3: they live in this tiny little world and it's way
Speaker 3: fewer people than it than it can seem like, you know,
Speaker 3: you're interacting that because I observed some of these you're
Speaker 3: interacting with the same like fifteen twenty people every day.
Speaker 3: But there's a feeling of like it's you know, millions
Speaker 3: of us across the country.
Speaker 1: Yeah, because you're in and you're submerged.
Speaker 3: In it, yeah, bubbled in it. And so to that,
Speaker 3: if you're the word part of the silent Riot and
Speaker 3: you and your you know, your world of eighty people
Speaker 3: or whatever are all really into it, it feels like you're
Speaker 3: doing something I think, Yeah, wow, how interesting? Boy? Is
Speaker 3: that lame? It is? We will not be silenced. The
Speaker 3: silent Riot has begun. H point of order.
Speaker 1: You will not be what now silenced? Okay, so what
Speaker 1: are you doing, silent riot? Hm?
Speaker 3: You will not be what now silenced? Oh?
Speaker 4: Boy?
Speaker 1: So I think a lot of you know this already,
Speaker 1: but I just really really want to drive it home
Speaker 1: the idea that the Southern Poverty Law Center is an
Speaker 1: anti hate group. You're freaking boneheads like David Muir on
Speaker 1: ABC and all the mainstream media say the SPLC is
Speaker 1: an anti hate group, and they've identified this group is
Speaker 1: a hate group. Well, the SPLC is a lot of things.
Speaker 1: It is not an anti hate group. It is a
Speaker 1: hate group itself. It hates everything that's moderate to conservative,
Speaker 1: and it exists to raise money. That's why it exists.
Speaker 1: And it claims to be an anti hate group, but
Speaker 1: it's not. And Tyler O'Neill is a journalist. Steves wrote
Speaker 1: a really interesting Twitter thread about how a conservative nonprofit
Speaker 1: branded by the SPLC a hate group, spent nine years
Speaker 1: in legal purgatory facing accusations that had helped a woman
Speaker 1: kidnap her own daughter. It was representing a woman who
Speaker 1: demanded two billion dollars in damages from the Liberty Council
Speaker 1: for the lawsuit. A judge just just issued a ruling
Speaker 1: dismissing all.
Speaker 3: Of it, but it took nine years.
Speaker 1: And so Liberty Council is a conservative Christian law firm
Speaker 1: that the SPLC doesn't like because it doesn't kowtow to
Speaker 1: the LGBTQ plus minus or the power of three causes.
Speaker 1: More on that later, Virginia resident Lisa Miller started a
Speaker 1: lesbian relationship with Jennifer Jenkins, moved to Vermont, that was
Speaker 1: the first state that recognized civil unions. MS Miller was impregnated,
Speaker 1: I believe with a child. The two women broke up.
Speaker 1: Lisa Miller disappeared. Liberty Council tried to find her, actually
Speaker 1: to no avail. The Obama administration finally tracked her to Nicaragua,
Speaker 1: where she had fled with her daughter. Jerry's convicted three
Speaker 1: men of assisting with the international kidnapping case, but there
Speaker 1: was never any evidence that Liberty Council was part of this,
Speaker 1: and the Southern Poverty Law Center, which had put Liberty
Speaker 1: Council on a hate map alongside the KKK, volunteered to
Speaker 1: prosecute the case and strung it out for years and
Speaker 1: years and years in an effort to bankrupt the Liberty Council.
Speaker 3: Now, how do I how can I say that?
Speaker 1: Well, a former spokesman for the SPLC, and I should
Speaker 1: have I should have asked for this audio because I
Speaker 1: actually have video of it. May have let slip the
Speaker 1: reason quote. Sometimes the press will describe us as monitoring
Speaker 1: hate groups. I want to say plainly that our eim
Speaker 1: in life is to destroy these groups, completely destroy them.
Speaker 1: When talking about the groups on the hate map, he
Speaker 1: went on to say that the SPLC aims to mortally
Speaker 1: embarrass its targets. The SPLC puts mainstream conservatives and Christian
Speaker 1: groups on the hate map, suggesting they're similarly hateful to
Speaker 1: the KKK. For instance, parental lights. I'm sorry, parental rights
Speaker 1: groups like Moms for Liberty, which we are staunchly in
Speaker 1: favor of around here, are on the hate map, right,
Speaker 1: the ADF legal conservative Christian groups like frc DC, pro
Speaker 1: enforcement prone immigration enforcement groups like Fair, who we've talked
Speaker 1: to many times. Let's see. Oh, the SPLC has even
Speaker 1: put gays against groomers on the map as an anti
Speaker 1: LGBTQ hate group. Yes, a group of openly lesbian and
Speaker 1: gabe and bisexual people is considered an anti LGBTQ hate
Speaker 1: group because they don't believe in indoctrinating children into radical
Speaker 1: gender theory.
Speaker 3: Just Fair is on the list.
Speaker 1: Yeah, wow, yeah, yeah, The Foundation for Immigration Rights Reform
Speaker 1: and Moms for Liberty that doesn't want boys in girls'
Speaker 1: locker rooms is a hate group. That's the SPLC. Just
Speaker 1: to understand, if anybody ever quotes them, A, the people
Speaker 1: who quoted them are either ignorant or in bed with them,
Speaker 1: and B you shouldn't listen to anything they say.
Speaker 3: Tucker used to attack them all the time on his
Speaker 3: show as something Tucker was definitely right about, always pointing
Speaker 3: out that the Southern Poverty Law Center is not in
Speaker 3: the South. It has nothing to do with poverty or
Speaker 3: the law. It's not even really a center. It's just
Speaker 3: a business.
Speaker 1: Yeah, oh yeah, it's a blackmailing business. Oh. Speaking of which,
Speaker 1: Al Sharpton's in trouble. I guess because he was threatening
Speaker 1: pepsi with one dey say we put on notice those
Speaker 1: companies Pepsicola that we will withdraw patronage from those who
Speaker 1: do not live up to what they voluntarily committed in
Speaker 1: DEI Well, an MSNBC sanctioned boycott threat would be a
Speaker 1: very very bad thing, and the FCC is looking into it.
Speaker 1: And I certainly hope that that bonehead Charlotte and blackmailer
Speaker 1: finally loses his gig. But he you know, he learned
Speaker 1: at the feet of the great blackmailer, Jesse Jackson.
Speaker 3: So well, since we're on this track, this is Eddie
Speaker 3: Glod who's on MSNBC all the time, black gentleman, commenting
Speaker 3: on why Trump won. We chose a felon.
Speaker 10: Who is more interested in loyalty, who's more interested in retribution,
Speaker 10: who's more interested in grift than in democracy, and we
Speaker 10: chose a felon because we.
Speaker 3: Didn't want to elect a black woman.
Speaker 10: So to read that, do we actually explicate that? He
Speaker 10: is to say we would rather destroy the republic than
Speaker 10: for that to have happened.
Speaker 3: He is a professor of African American Studies PhD. At
Speaker 3: Princeton University, and he says that we chose a felon
Speaker 3: to be who wants to destroy the country rather than
Speaker 3: a woman of color has to be present.
Speaker 1: Was literally what was happening in the election.
Speaker 3: I followed it all.
Speaker 1: Yeah, Mike, I can't wait to spend seventy five thousand
Speaker 1: dollars a year for that guy to indoctrinate my child.
Speaker 3: My questions always would be does he actually believe that?
Speaker 3: Does he actually believe that Trump won because America can't
Speaker 3: handle a black woman being president. I don't know if
Speaker 3: I think it's better if he believes or if he doesn't.
Speaker 3: I think I think it's better if he's a Charlatan
Speaker 3: than if he actually believes that. Yeah.
Speaker 1: Fortunately, there are many, many, many people on both sides
Speaker 1: of that question. They're either charlatan's or sincere believers. I
Speaker 1: mean a lot of those people drank the kool aid
Speaker 1: Jim Jones served them because they actually believed he was
Speaker 1: the portal to God or whatever. They're cultists, they have
Speaker 1: a bizarre religious belief.
Speaker 3: Well, keep thinking that stuff. As we played John Kennedy earlier,
Speaker 3: Senator Kennedy he would like AOC to be the spokesperson
Speaker 3: for the left, and anythink's the best way to handle
Speaker 3: her is the letter Keep talking, And I would say
Speaker 3: the same thing with guys like Eddie Glaude. Keep talking.
Speaker 3: See if that whips out for you, we will finish strong.
Speaker 3: Next RFK Junior said that he plans to direct the
Speaker 3: CDC to stop recommending floride in drinking water.
Speaker 1: Yeah, apparently it's part of the White House's plan to
Speaker 1: make teeth British again.
Speaker 3: A bit of a stretch, so I mentioned this story.
Speaker 3: I saw in the New or Post a study that
Speaker 3: dating apps can cause a lowering of your libido, and
Speaker 3: so I opened that up and I started looking at it,
Speaker 3: and it reminded me to a certain extent conversation I
Speaker 3: had with a therapist friend of mine a couple of
Speaker 3: weeks ago, and she's telling me about how anybody that's
Speaker 3: out there, like you know, our age or older or whatever,
Speaker 3: and who is single, is damaged, is like emotionally damaged.
Speaker 3: Some has some trauma around relationships because we're not built.
Speaker 3: Human beings were not built to fall in love multiple
Speaker 3: times and have them not work out. You just not
Speaker 3: built for that.
Speaker 1: It's awfully painful. That would certainly indicate, you know, it's
Speaker 1: not great.
Speaker 3: Yeah, And so that through almost all of human history,
Speaker 3: human beings didn't do that. You had that whole giant
Speaker 3: fall in love experience like time, and then you stayed
Speaker 3: together no matter what happened. Pretty much, I mean, that's
Speaker 3: been much of human history. And then you know, someone
Speaker 3: died or whatever, horrible drama blah blah whah. You go
Speaker 3: through that, but it's very traumatic. But we're not we
Speaker 3: didn't evolve to do this like multiple times in our
Speaker 3: lives which is one interesting thing, and I think that
Speaker 3: kind of fits in with this study about dating apps,
Speaker 3: because we're not designed to do that either. And it
Speaker 3: talks about the addictive properties of dating apps and causing
Speaker 3: chronic stress disorder and addictive behavior because of the whole anticipation,
Speaker 3: perception and reward delivery thing that comes with dating apps
Speaker 3: that never came in the real world. In the real world,
Speaker 3: even if you're out there and dating, you might run
Speaker 3: in every once in a while, you'd run into somebody
Speaker 3: you're kind of interested in and maybe they seem interested
Speaker 3: in you, and it unfolds or doesn't unfold or whatever.
Speaker 3: But there a big damn deal, and it's a big deal,
Speaker 3: really deal. You might think about it all weekend. You
Speaker 3: know that all I ran into somebody and blah blah blah.
Speaker 3: But now with the dating apps, the maybe you have
Speaker 3: five of those every night, or you know, ten over
Speaker 3: the weekend, where you somebody swipes on you and you
Speaker 3: swipe on them and you start a conversation and they
Speaker 3: look cute and blah blah blah, and you go through
Speaker 3: that whole thing multiple, multiple times, and how we're just
Speaker 3: not designed for that, right and one there can be
Speaker 3: an addictive behavior where you just that excitement is got
Speaker 3: so many of the good chemicals rushing through your brain.
Speaker 3: I've never online dated, so I don't know this. I'm
Speaker 3: just having to read it and understand it from people
Speaker 3: who've told me. But I could see you get so
Speaker 3: many oh my gosh, what if what if that they
Speaker 3: like me? Ah blah blah blah, you know, over and
Speaker 3: over and over again. I would think, one has got
Speaker 3: to numb you to it, and two I could see
Speaker 3: how it would be addictive, and that how the uh
Speaker 3: the uh. Then if it's a rejection, if it doesn't
Speaker 3: work out, like you don't even make it past like
Speaker 3: the first bit of converse, there's a big drop in
Speaker 3: the libido. And that also is not a common cycle
Speaker 3: to do over and over and over again. We didn't,
Speaker 3: we didn't evolve to do this. You know.
Speaker 1: I've held on to this. I may even put it
Speaker 1: on my wall of fame. From writer Caitlin Flanagan. The
Speaker 1: Internet did not arrive like a wave, allowing us time
Speaker 1: to think about our humanity before we had put our
Speaker 1: toes in the It arrived like a flood, and we've
Speaker 1: been drowning in it for more than a quarter century,
Speaker 1: keeps taking our souls away from us. Every passing year,
Speaker 1: we're less of who we were. Soon there won't be
Speaker 1: much of us left at all. The only thing that
Speaker 1: can save us is the great unplugging, but we'll never
Speaker 1: do that. We love it down here under the dark water.
Speaker 3: Right, And we all know that every technological advance, they've
Speaker 3: said this sort of thing about radio, TV, whatever, you know,
Speaker 3: it's a destroying society, and it always turned out to
Speaker 3: be overblown. And looking back on it, rock and roll, music, jazz,
Speaker 3: it all seems ridiculous in retrospect. Electricity, my fifty thousand
Speaker 3: dollars sex spot, they warned me about it. It's fine,
Speaker 3: But this is different. It's obviously different. I think we
Speaker 3: can all feel it's different. Oh yes, yeah. And unless
Speaker 3: changes in evolution take a long time. Unless over the
Speaker 3: next five thousand years we can adapt to whatever the
Speaker 3: internet does to us, I just don't see it working
Speaker 3: out well for society.
Speaker 1: Well, as a guy who's read a fair amount about genetics,
Speaker 1: the problem with the way we're living is nobody's having babies,
Speaker 1: so exactly how we're going to adapt to anything?
Speaker 3: Right, You don't do any evolution if nobody's having a child, right, Yeah,
Speaker 3: And I wasn't trying to end on a downer. I
Speaker 3: just think that's really interesting. God, I've never I haven't
Speaker 3: experienced it, like I said, But the idea of getting
Speaker 3: addicted to the adorphin rushes, of having a hit somebody's
Speaker 3: interested being somebody's interest to me, We're not designed to
Speaker 3: have somebody interested in this like eight times a week.
Speaker 1: Oh no, No, that's a bizarre experience, so unimaginable for
Speaker 1: the entire history of humanity. Right, and now we're immersed
Speaker 1: in it a lot. If you're you know, doing that.
Speaker 3: I think Caitlin is partly right.
Speaker 1: I think there is some sort of great unplugging comic.
Speaker 1: It's it's forming up inconsistently. The idea of unplugging, putting
Speaker 1: it down, leaving it behind, that sort of thing.
Speaker 3: I think that's going to just grow. Yeah, I take
Speaker 3: it out of the schools was a good first step.
Speaker 11: Right, Final thoughts this, Yeah, what is that that's disturbing?
Speaker 3: Here's your host for final thoughts, Joe Getty.
Speaker 1: Let's get a final thought from everybody on the crew
Speaker 1: to wrap things up for the day. Let's begin with
Speaker 1: our technical director Michaelangelo. Michael final thought, you know a
Speaker 1: lot of people aren't going to movie theaters anymore.
Speaker 3: They need to have movies where a scene comes on,
Speaker 3: you can throw popcorn.
Speaker 1: And make it more interact exactly, Sarn, just hose it
Speaker 1: out at the end of the show. Plastic everything, Katie
Speaker 1: Green Are esteemed to Newswoman as a final thought, Katie.
Speaker 9: One of the other problems with the online dating is
Speaker 9: that you can date multiple people at once easily, And
Speaker 9: I've seen online at those are we dating the same
Speaker 9: guy pages?
Speaker 4: I know?
Speaker 3: Thank you?
Speaker 1: Oh yeah, yeah, that's crazy.
Speaker 3: Jack.
Speaker 1: Final thought, Well.
Speaker 3: Yeah, I've talked about this before. I statistically it's like
Speaker 3: ten percent of dudes get all the hits on that,
Speaker 3: so that they're the ones that are dating everybody and
Speaker 3: kind of misleading people into similar on the female side,
Speaker 3: kind of misleading people into it being something different than
Speaker 3: what it is.
Speaker 1: My final thought is, you guys are so traditional and romantic.
Speaker 1: It was like Diddy said to me as he handed
Speaker 1: me a bottle of baby oil one night at a
Speaker 1: freak off, Joe, don't let a woman get her hooks
Speaker 1: into you. You gotta to play the field online. It's
Speaker 1: much more fun at the fund mentor did he at
Speaker 1: the freak off?
Speaker 3: You say Armstrong and Getdy wrapping up another grueling four
Speaker 3: hour workday as.
Speaker 1: A regular guest. It's good times.
Speaker 3: So many people. Thanks so a little time.
Speaker 1: Go to Armstrong and Getty dot com. We got Katie's corner,
Speaker 1: we got the hot links, got the swag pick up
Speaker 1: at a in g spicy times fitted hat Were.
Speaker 3: You the user or the u Z because some people
Speaker 3: lately they are different.
Speaker 1: I signed a form.
Speaker 3: I can't talk about it. We'll see you tomorrow. Hey,
Speaker 3: if you see anything that the price has gone up
Speaker 3: at Walmart from China, let us know. I'm gonna keep
Speaker 3: our eye on that. God bless America. I'm strong and
Speaker 3: getcha a carnival of negativity. It's the Armstrong and Getty show.
Speaker 3: That's not right, you fool. I expected more. Let's not
Speaker 3: go through this acount. They're locking up my tupe. I
Speaker 3: can show your soul's desire for freedom. I'm a man,
Speaker 3: I'm not a cat. I'm really a boy.
Speaker 2: And the bigger question on everyone's mind.
Speaker 1: Now need to get the prize.
Speaker 2: Get it and on that possibly nightmare inducing note.
Speaker 3: Thank you all very much, armstrong and Getty