Speaker 1: Welcome.
Speaker 2: It is verdict with Senator Ted Cruz, Ben Ferguson with
Speaker 2: you and Senator I gotta say it was a train wreck.
Speaker 2: That's the only way you can describe Kamala Harris's interview
Speaker 2: where she finally had to answer questions from an actual
Speaker 2: journalist in Brett Baer.
Speaker 1: It did not go well well.
Speaker 3: I think train wreck is actually an understatement. It was
Speaker 3: a train wreck meets an implosion, meets a collapse, meets
Speaker 3: a total destruction and falling into a ball of quivering goo.
Speaker 3: And to be honest, I'm spinning right now in Kamala's favor.
Speaker 3: So it was a bad interview. We're gonna break it down.
Speaker 3: I'm not sure it was possible to give worse answers
Speaker 3: than she gives Gabe. But the nice thing is is
Speaker 3: we go through it. Each answer she gives you're gonna think, wow,
Speaker 3: that's the worst answer possible until we play the next one.
Speaker 3: There's also big news yesterday, which is the head of
Speaker 3: Hamas Sinwar is dead. Is Bill has taken him out.
Speaker 3: It turns out when you lead a bunch of psychopathic
Speaker 3: terrorists to attack Israel, that shortens your life expectancy rather dramatically.
Speaker 3: This is a great day for Israel, a great day
Speaker 3: for America, a great day for justice and truth.
Speaker 4: We're going to break that down as well.
Speaker 2: Yeah, it was an incredible news coming out of there,
Speaker 2: and we've got some of those clips for you as
Speaker 2: well as N'tna who explained to the world what's next,
Speaker 2: which is a big part of this. I want to
Speaker 2: talk to you real quick about your morning routine. If
Speaker 2: you're like me and you got to get up early
Speaker 2: and you love having a cup of coffee, don't settle
Speaker 2: for an average cup of coffee, and certainly don't give
Speaker 2: your mind to those woke coffee companies. When I said that,
Speaker 2: you probably thought of a couple of big brands right away. Well,
Speaker 2: there's a new company that you're gonna love. Maybe it's
Speaker 2: not really new, it's just new to you and new
Speaker 2: to me. And it's Blackout Coffee, and it is a
Speaker 2: premium cup of coffee that I get to have every
Speaker 2: morning without the woke agenda of the left. This is
Speaker 2: the reason why I want you to try Blackout Coffee,
Speaker 2: because now I get emails and messages on social media
Speaker 2: almost every day from different vertical listeners saying, Ben, you
Speaker 2: weren't lying. I get to start my day with a
Speaker 2: hot America first cup of Blackout Coffee, and you're right.
Speaker 2: It's not average. It is a premium cup of coffee.
Speaker 2: This coffee is one hundred percent of America and zero percent woke.
Speaker 2: Blackout Coffee is committed to conservative values from the sourcing
Speaker 2: of the beans to the roasting process, customer support and shipping,
Speaker 2: and they embody true American values. Now here's the part
Speaker 2: that I love. I got to up the quality of
Speaker 2: my cup of coffee when I switch because they accept
Speaker 2: no compromise on taste or quality ever period.
Speaker 1: Now I want you to try.
Speaker 2: Blackout Coffee, and I want you to save money while
Speaker 2: you do it. Go to Blackoutcoffee dot com, slash verdict,
Speaker 2: Blackoutcoffee dot com, slash vertict, use the coupon code vertict
Speaker 2: for twenty percent off your first order Blackoutcoffee dot com,
Speaker 2: slash vertict, Be Awake, not woke, that's Blackoutcoffee dot com
Speaker 2: slash verdict and use the promo code verdict for twenty
Speaker 2: percent off your first order and get the best cup
Speaker 2: of coffee of your life. So you knew the interview
Speaker 2: was bad, Senator when Kamala Harris's team was so visibly
Speaker 2: rattled by the direction of her interview, so much so
Speaker 2: that they literally were jumping up and down and giving
Speaker 2: the wrap signal with their hands in the air. Apparently
Speaker 2: four different staffers waving their hands like this has got
Speaker 2: to stop. We've got it in this thing now. And
Speaker 2: Brett Baar even talked about it.
Speaker 3: Yeah, give a listen to what Brett Baar said. You noticed,
Speaker 3: if you watch the interview, he ended it really abruptly. Well,
Speaker 3: he explained, why give a listen.
Speaker 5: Dana, You've been on the other side. You've been on
Speaker 5: the rapper as a press secretary interviewing a president, and
Speaker 5: you know, I'm talking like four people waving their hands
Speaker 5: like it's got the shop. So Martha final, Yeah, I
Speaker 5: had to dismount there at the end. There's so many things,
Speaker 5: and she maybe should do more of these.
Speaker 6: Well I think so.
Speaker 1: I love that maybe she should do more of these.
Speaker 2: You and I have actually talked about this in different
Speaker 2: races that we've seen around the country, where a lot
Speaker 2: of Democrats have taken on this strategy of hey, we
Speaker 2: might be able to win elections without ever having to
Speaker 2: do tough interviews.
Speaker 1: Ever, again.
Speaker 2: They obviously got this guy idea from Joe Biden heidening
Speaker 2: in his basement last time. Kamala Harris's campaign adopted this,
Speaker 2: and the problem is many other people running for office
Speaker 2: around the country on the Democratic side have taken to
Speaker 2: this idea.
Speaker 1: By the election put.
Speaker 2: Out ads only do friendly interviews, which are not real interviews.
Speaker 2: And then the problem is you're not prepared for when
Speaker 2: you just sit down with an actual journalist. Because let's
Speaker 2: be clear, Brett Baher was not asking I got you questions.
Speaker 2: He just did what a journalist should have done every
Speaker 2: day when they interview her, instead of doing call her
Speaker 2: Daddy podcasts, sitting down with the world journalists, and she
Speaker 2: didn't know what to do well.
Speaker 3: Several observations. Number one, the fact that she did this
Speaker 3: interview is indicative of a panic on behalf of the
Speaker 3: Harris campaign. They've tried for two months, the Biden basement
Speaker 3: strategy hiding, and what they've seen is they've seen her
Speaker 3: poll numbers plummeting. They've seen Trump's numbers rising in every
Speaker 3: one of the swing states. They're looking at polling right
Speaker 3: now that shows if the election was today, she loses
Speaker 3: and Trump's the next president. So they're in a panic.
Speaker 3: They're like, uh oh, the basement isn't working. So they decide,
Speaker 3: all right, let's do Fox. And I'm sure they sat
Speaker 3: around and said, all right, this will show how powerfully
Speaker 3: brave we are. This will be see she's fearless. And
Speaker 3: by the way, every Democrat Spindmeister and every media person
Speaker 3: after the media, they all use the same adjectives. They said,
Speaker 3: it showed she was tough, tough, tough, that was their word.
Speaker 3: You know, it's kind of amazing if you're a Republican,
Speaker 3: you do hostile interviews every day. You sit down with
Speaker 3: reporters who are throwing fastballs at you, who are throwing
Speaker 3: gotcha questions, who are trying to attack you or trying
Speaker 3: to make you look dumb. That's just part of being
Speaker 3: a Republican if you do any media interviews. The Democrats
Speaker 3: are used to being in this warm, loving cocoon of
Speaker 3: these corporate media journalists who gaze at them adoringly. They
Speaker 3: ask what's your favorite flavor of ice cream? Or I
Speaker 3: guess the Call Your Daddy podcast.
Speaker 4: I don't know.
Speaker 3: I don't listen to that podcast, so I don't know
Speaker 3: what they talk about. But I have a feeling it's
Speaker 3: not hard hitting policy questions, and Democrats are used to
Speaker 3: just never being challenged on anything. And so for Kamala,
Speaker 3: I think the idea that she sat down with a
Speaker 3: reporter who would ask her a real question was a
Speaker 3: little shocking. But then I think once they decided to
Speaker 3: do it, I think what happened is she and her
Speaker 3: team got cold feet. And so you got to understand,
Speaker 3: not only did they end the interview early, and they
Speaker 3: ended it in a panic like four people jumping up
Speaker 3: and down saying end and in that is a side
Speaker 3: uh oh, the train has gone off the rails. We
Speaker 3: got to stop this. But they also shortened it on
Speaker 3: the front end. So take a listen to Brett Baer
Speaker 3: talking about how they chopped the interview on both ends,
Speaker 3: because what I think happened is they got cold feet
Speaker 3: and decided that they were really scared of doing it.
Speaker 4: Give a listen to Brett Bear on this.
Speaker 5: Dana, I'll give you a little behind the scenes here.
Speaker 5: I know you love this and it fits in with
Speaker 5: Dana read sports. You know when the kicker in football
Speaker 5: they call a timeout right before he's going.
Speaker 6: To kick the field goal.
Speaker 5: They're icing the kicker. So we were supposed to start
Speaker 5: at five pm. This was the time they gave us. Originally,
Speaker 5: we're going to do twenty five or thirty minutes. It
Speaker 5: came in and said, well, maybe twenty So it was
Speaker 5: already getting whittled down, and then the Vice president showed up.
Speaker 5: How five point fifteen, we were pushing the envelope to
Speaker 5: be able to turn it around for the.
Speaker 1: Top of the six o'clock. So that's how it started.
Speaker 5: And I could tell when we started talking that she
Speaker 5: was going to be tough to to, you know, redirect
Speaker 5: without me trying to interrupt. I did this with President Obama.
Speaker 5: At one point I just said, mister President, I know
Speaker 5: you liked the filibuster. I just didn't even have the
Speaker 5: chance to sometimes redirect in those ways.
Speaker 1: I had a lot of other questions.
Speaker 7: Real yeah, so what a missed opportunity for them, right So,
Speaker 7: I don't know what she had before.
Speaker 6: I know she had that one event right before.
Speaker 7: But what's more important than this interview today on your
Speaker 7: campaign schedule? If your goal as a candidate at this
Speaker 7: point is to win the day, when the new cycle
Speaker 7: of the day, then your interview with Fox is arguably
Speaker 7: your most important issue, and I think you could tell
Speaker 7: at the end that you were having to rush through
Speaker 7: it so that you could get to the top of
Speaker 7: the show, and you were trying to be respectful of
Speaker 7: their time. But it would have been really interest for
Speaker 7: her to be able to say to her team, no, no,
Speaker 7: let's keep going, Brett, what else do you have? Right
Speaker 7: and let it keep going?
Speaker 2: And so people understand how this was supposed to go,
Speaker 2: just for a little more context. They wanted to do
Speaker 2: the interview basically tape it and go straight live unedited
Speaker 2: for his show, which is at the top of the hour.
Speaker 2: So when she purposely showed up fifteen minutes late, you're
Speaker 2: running fifteen minutes behind schedule with a show that you're
Speaker 2: supposed to be airing this interview in forty five minutes.
Speaker 2: And in his point, he's making years like they clearly
Speaker 2: did that on purpose to basically put us in a bind,
Speaker 2: to limit the amount of time we could talk to her.
Speaker 2: And then when you wrap early, that really screws up
Speaker 2: the entire plan for a live TV show at the
Speaker 2: top of the hour.
Speaker 1: And that was done deliberately.
Speaker 3: Well, of course it was. It was not accidental. And
Speaker 3: the reason is the Kamala Harris campaign. Their objective in
Speaker 3: this interview was not to go out and persuade Fox viewers.
Speaker 3: I don't think they believed anything she said was going
Speaker 3: to suddenly make someone say, gosh, an open border left
Speaker 3: wing radical seems like a great choice to be president.
Speaker 3: That was not their objective. They decided they wanted the
Speaker 3: headline Kamala Harris does an interview with Fox, So the
Speaker 3: simple fact of it existing is all they wanted. And
Speaker 3: then as they're sitting there preparing, they're like, uh, oh,
Speaker 3: our candidate doesn't actually handle hard questions very well.
Speaker 4: We want to minimize the time.
Speaker 3: So, look, you're running a presidential campaign, and I've done that.
Speaker 3: You've been on a presidential campaign on the commstaff. If
Speaker 3: you've got a major national interview at five o'clock, you
Speaker 3: don't show up at five point fifteen, or if you do,
Speaker 3: it is a very deliberate decision. And it's a deliberate
Speaker 3: decision because they were trying to minimize the exposure. They
Speaker 3: chop off time at the beginning and time at the
Speaker 3: end so that there would be less opportunities for Kamala
Speaker 3: to screw up. Ironically, even doing that, she managed to
Speaker 3: screw up a whole lot in the limited time she had.
Speaker 2: So for example, by the way, did you see it
Speaker 2: hit her? By the way, let me say this because
Speaker 2: this made me laugh. Did you see and I know
Speaker 2: you've been traveling Todavid, did you see the Babylon B
Speaker 2: headline of this interview that came out? No, it's hilarious,
Speaker 2: it says quote. Harris complains she was not informed the
Speaker 2: interview would include questions. It's obviously satire, but it's so
Speaker 2: accurate to the situation, is it not?
Speaker 4: Yep? Yep, it is. And let's start.
Speaker 3: Let's start with one of the first examples, which is
Speaker 3: Brettbaar hits her for flip flopping on decriminalizing illegal immigration.
Speaker 4: So give a listen to this back and forth.
Speaker 5: So decriminalizing border crossings, like you said in twenty nineteen, I.
Speaker 8: Do not believe in decriminalizing border crossings, and I've not
Speaker 8: done that as vice president.
Speaker 6: I will not do that as president. So these are
Speaker 6: that you've had. Well, let's be very clear.
Speaker 8: I'm the only person who's running for president who is
Speaker 8: prosecuted transnational criminal organizations from the Sinaloa cartel to the
Speaker 8: guadalajaraq quotel cartel to people who have trafficked in guns, drugs,
Speaker 8: and human beings. I have spent a significant part of
Speaker 8: my career going after people who present a threat to
Speaker 8: the safety of the American people and cross our border
Speaker 8: with the intent of doing US harm and cross our
Speaker 8: border illegally. And I will do that work as Vice president.
Speaker 8: I take that work quite seriously.
Speaker 6: This is a time one vote.
Speaker 2: I mean you listen to it theories like basically saying
Speaker 2: like you want to really play this, do you want
Speaker 2: to just say you've had an evolution? And that's a
Speaker 2: kind way of putting in other words, you're either lying
Speaker 2: to the American people, you're not.
Speaker 4: Well.
Speaker 3: Look, I'll say a couple of things. One you saw there,
Speaker 3: and you're you're gonna hear this on a number of examples,
Speaker 3: how she filibusters and on each question she tries to
Speaker 3: take as much time as possible with her answer, and
Speaker 3: her answer is just her memorized talking points. And so
Speaker 3: she's doing that there, and I will say, listen, Brett
Speaker 3: Bhar was a very gentle questioner. To be honest, I've
Speaker 3: had tougher interviews with Brett Behar than he was with Kamala.
Speaker 3: He gave her a lot of room. He let her
Speaker 3: just talk and talk and talk. And so there he
Speaker 3: pointed out she said that she wanted to decriminalize illegal immigration.
Speaker 3: And she jumps in and says, no, no, I don't,
Speaker 3: and she doesn't address the fact that it's a total
Speaker 3: reversal of what she said when she was campaigning for president.
Speaker 3: But she also this talking point and she says it
Speaker 3: a lot. I'm the only one who has prosecuted drug cartels.
Speaker 3: So that's actually an objectively false statement. So when she
Speaker 3: was attorney general, or for that matter, when she was
Speaker 3: district attorney, to the best of my knowledge, she never
Speaker 3: went into a courtroom as a prosecutor and tried any
Speaker 3: case against any drug cartel. She was not actually the
Speaker 3: line lawyer. She was not the lead lawyer that I
Speaker 3: know of in any single case against a drug cartel.
Speaker 4: So that's fine.
Speaker 3: She was the executive in charge of an organization where
Speaker 3: she had lawyers that were reporting up through the chain
Speaker 3: of command that I'm sure were prosecuting people in drug cartels. Well,
Speaker 3: you know what, so did Donald Trump. If you're saying
Speaker 3: lawyers who worked for me and reported me were prosecuting
Speaker 3: drug cartels. Well, what do you think the Apartment of
Speaker 3: Justice did during the four years that Donald J. Trump
Speaker 3: was president? And the DOJ was going after drug traffickers
Speaker 3: and human traffickers. And so she's trying to claim she's tough,
Speaker 3: but it's something that's true for both her and Donald Trump.
Speaker 3: Now here's another exchange where Brettbear points out that she
Speaker 3: allowed millions of the illegal immigrants into the country and
Speaker 3: she failed to act, and so he's trying to focus
Speaker 3: on her actual record and give a listen to what
Speaker 3: she said in response.
Speaker 5: When you came into office, your administration immediately reversed a
Speaker 5: number of Trump border policies, most significantly the policy that
Speaker 5: required illegal immigrants to be detained through deportation, either in
Speaker 5: the US or in Mexico. And you switched that policy.
Speaker 5: They were released from custody awaiting trial. So instead included
Speaker 5: in those were a large number of single men, adult
Speaker 5: men who went on to commit heinous crimes. So, looking back,
Speaker 5: do you regret the decision to terminate remain in Mexico
Speaker 5: at the beginning of your administration.
Speaker 8: At the beginning of our administration, Within practically hours of
Speaker 8: taking the oath, the first bill that we offered Congress,
Speaker 8: before we worked on infrastructure, before the Inflation and Reduction Act,
Speaker 8: before the Chipsum Science Act, before the Bipartisan Safety Communities Act.
Speaker 8: The first bill practically within hours of taking the oath,
Speaker 8: as a bill to fix our immigration system.
Speaker 9: This man.
Speaker 5: It was called the US Citizen Citizenship Act of two
Speaker 5: thousand exactly twenty one.
Speaker 1: It was essentially but I wad.
Speaker 8: A citizenship for the finished finished responding for you, but
Speaker 8: you have to let me finish.
Speaker 5: You had the White House and the House and the Senate,
Speaker 5: and they didn't bring.
Speaker 8: Up responding to the point you're raising, and I'd like
Speaker 8: to finish.
Speaker 9: Man.
Speaker 8: We recognized from day one that to the point of
Speaker 8: this being your first question, it is a priority for
Speaker 8: US as a nation and for the American people, and
Speaker 8: our focus has been on fixing a problem.
Speaker 1: I mean number one.
Speaker 2: I got to say, Brett Barry had some serious restraint
Speaker 2: there because this was, like like you said earlier, total filibuster,
Speaker 2: total bs yep.
Speaker 3: So she refused to answer his question. He pointed out
Speaker 3: that she ended detaining illegal immigrants, she ended keeping violent
Speaker 3: criminal illegal aliens in detention, and instead she implemented catch
Speaker 3: and release, and he asked, do you regret that, and
Speaker 3: she refused to answer that. Instead she fill of us
Speaker 3: or she talks and talks and talks, and she says, well,
Speaker 3: the first bill we introduced her, one of the first
Speaker 3: bills was an immigration Now, he quickly points out, yeah,
Speaker 3: but that was an amnesty bill. That wasn't a border
Speaker 3: security bill. That was you wanted to make illegal immigrants citizens.
Speaker 3: That's not actually solving the problem. And she's like, will
Speaker 3: you let me finish? Let me finish. By the way,
Speaker 3: she does that in debates, Remember in debates, that was
Speaker 3: her big line, I'm speaking, let me finish. She likes
Speaker 3: to be anyone who tries to press her. She gets
Speaker 3: on our high horse and lectures them. But every word
Speaker 3: she said was a total non sequitur. And she didn't
Speaker 3: answer a single word of his questions. Now, let's shift
Speaker 3: on to when Brett Baer asked her a very simple question,
Speaker 3: how many illegal immigrants did she release into the country. Now,
Speaker 3: that's not a complicated question, but you're gonna notice she
Speaker 3: doesn't answer, and she fill about give a listen.
Speaker 5: You know, voters tell polsters all over the country, and
Speaker 5: here in Pennsylvania, that immigration is one of the key
Speaker 5: issues that they're looking at this election, and specifically the
Speaker 5: influx of illegal immigrants from more than one hundred and
Speaker 5: fifty countries. How many illegal immigrants would you estimate your
Speaker 5: administration has released into the country over the last three and.
Speaker 8: A half years. Well, I'm glad you raised the issue
Speaker 8: of immigration because I agree with you. It is It
Speaker 8: is a topic of discussion that people want to rightly have.
Speaker 8: And you know what I'm going to talk about.
Speaker 1: Yeah, but you're just a number.
Speaker 6: Do you think it's one million? Three million?
Speaker 5: Brett.
Speaker 8: Let's just get to the point, Okay. The point is
Speaker 8: that we have a broken immigration system that needs to
Speaker 8: be repaired.
Speaker 5: So your Homeland Security secretary said that eighty five percent
Speaker 5: of apprehension.
Speaker 6: I'm not finished.
Speaker 5: We have a we have a six million people have
Speaker 5: been released into the country, and let me just finish.
Speaker 6: I'll get you the question.
Speaker 1: I promise you I was.
Speaker 6: Beginning to answer.
Speaker 1: And when I mean, you can hear it there. She
Speaker 1: won't answer the question.
Speaker 3: No, Well, A, she doesn't know. B she doesn't care. See,
Speaker 3: she's certainly not gonna say even if she did know,
Speaker 3: and she did care, you have to understand this was
Speaker 3: not an accident. It was a conscious decision to open
Speaker 3: up the borders. Remember, Kamala Harris inherited the lowest rate
Speaker 3: of illegal immigration in forty five years. I worked hand
Speaker 3: in hand, very closely with President Trump to secure the border,
Speaker 3: and the success we achieved was historic. The numbers plummeted
Speaker 3: when Joe Biden Kamala Harris walked into office. That's what
Speaker 3: they inherited. They very deliberately, they systematically broke it. And
Speaker 3: so when he asked her, how many illegal immigrants have
Speaker 3: you released, She's not going to answer that. She's not
Speaker 3: going to admit she's released anyone. And there's an even
Speaker 3: broader pattern. So, not only does she filibuster every question,
Speaker 3: not only does she refuse to answer any question, but
Speaker 3: she also has a pattern, which is whenever she gets
Speaker 3: in trouble, her answer to everything is I hate Donald Trump. So,
Speaker 3: no matter what any policy failure on her part, her
Speaker 3: answer is I hate Donald Trump. So and so, if
Speaker 3: you listen to, for example, when Brett Behar asks her
Speaker 3: about the people who are killed by violent illegal immigrants
Speaker 3: that she released, listen to her answer on this.
Speaker 5: Jocelyn Hungary, Rachel Morin Lacln Riley. They are young women
Speaker 5: who were brutally assaulted and killed by some of the
Speaker 5: men who were released at the beginning of the administration,
Speaker 5: well before a negotiated bipartisan bill. Former President Clinton actually
Speaker 5: referred to Lake and Riley Sunday campaigning for You and Georgia, saying,
Speaker 5: if those men had been properly vetted, Lake and Riley
Speaker 5: probably would not have been killed. So if it wouldn't
Speaker 5: have happened, this is well before any negotiation, This is
Speaker 5: well before Donald Trump got involved in the politics. This
Speaker 5: is a specific policy decision by your administration to release
Speaker 5: these men into the country. So what I'm saying to you,
Speaker 5: do you know those families really I think an apology.
Speaker 8: Let me just say, first of all, those are tragic cases.
Speaker 6: There's no question about that. There is no question about that.
Speaker 8: And I can't imagine the pain that the families of
Speaker 8: those victims have experienced for a loss that should not
Speaker 8: have occurred.
Speaker 6: So that is true.
Speaker 8: It is also true that if a border of security
Speaker 8: had actually been passed nine months ago, it would be
Speaker 8: nine months that we would have had more border agents
Speaker 8: at the border, more support for the folks who are
Speaker 8: working around the clock trying to hold it all together,
Speaker 8: Madame Vice Press, to ensure that no future harm would occur.
Speaker 8: And this election in twenty days will determine whether we
Speaker 8: have a president of the United States who actually cares
Speaker 8: more about fixing a problem, even if it is not
Speaker 8: to their political advantage in an election.
Speaker 6: Because there was a solution, brat Mada.
Speaker 5: Vice President, it was a policy decision in the early
Speaker 5: part of your administration.
Speaker 6: I will let one of the mothers talk about it.
Speaker 6: Take a listen.
Speaker 9: Because of the Biden Harris administration open border policies catch
Speaker 9: and release, they were enrolled in the Alternatives to Detention program.
Speaker 9: This meant that they were released into the United States.
Speaker 9: It was not even a full three weeks later that
Speaker 9: they would take my daughter, Joscelyn Nungery's life. I believe
Speaker 9: the Biden Harris administration open border policies are responsible for
Speaker 9: the death of my daughter.
Speaker 6: That's the early days.
Speaker 5: So do you owe them an apologies?
Speaker 8: I shall tell you that I am so sorry for
Speaker 8: her loss. I'm so sorry for her loss sincerely, But
Speaker 8: let's talk about what is happening right now with an
Speaker 8: individual who does not want to participate in solutions.
Speaker 6: Let's talk about that as well. Right, in all.
Speaker 8: Fairness, I told you I feel awful for what she
Speaker 8: and her family have experienced during that time.
Speaker 2: It's still shocking to me that she refuses to accept
Speaker 2: no responsibility or accountability for her open border policy as
Speaker 2: the borders are. She refuses to say, yeah, we probably
Speaker 2: did some things wrong.
Speaker 3: So listen, I will say. Just listening to that testimony,
Speaker 3: and I listened to it when it happened. I listened
Speaker 3: to it when the interview happened with Brett Baer. That's
Speaker 3: the testimony from Alexis Nungary, who is the mother of
Speaker 3: Joscelyn Hungary. And I've spent some real time with Alexis.
Speaker 3: She is a beautiful young woman. She's just twenty seven
Speaker 3: years old, and she lost her baby girl or twelve
Speaker 3: year old raped and murdered by two illegal immigrants that
Speaker 3: Joe Biden and Kamala Harris they had in custody. They
Speaker 3: had apprehended them. At least one of them is alleged
Speaker 3: to have been a Venezuelan gang member, and yet they
Speaker 3: released those two criminal illegal aliens the same day they
Speaker 3: apprehended them, and just a few weeks later, they went
Speaker 3: to Houston, Texas and raped and murdered that beautiful little girl.
Speaker 3: What Joscelyn's mother went through as the ultimate nightmare.
Speaker 4: And when.
Speaker 3: Kamala says that she's so sorry for what happened, sincerely,
Speaker 3: you want to tell, you want to tell. When a
Speaker 3: politician like Kamala Harris says the word sincerely, it means
Speaker 3: she's lying to you. And I'll tell you why she's
Speaker 3: lying to you. Because number one, as you rightly noted, Ben,
Speaker 3: she has zero accountability. She takes no She doesn't even
Speaker 3: acknowledge that the rapist and murderers couldn't custody and she released.
Speaker 3: She doesn't say that. But number two, even more importantly,
Speaker 3: if she was actually sincere about these are tragic cases
Speaker 3: and we need to prevent them, she would change that policy.
Speaker 3: Kamala Harris today released additional illegal aliens, criminal illegal aliens,
Speaker 3: some of whom are at real risk of raping and
Speaker 3: murdering another little girl. She keeps doing the same thing
Speaker 3: and you're not sorry for it if you keep doing
Speaker 3: it and doing it and doing it. For Kamala Harris,
Speaker 3: the politics matters more than the body count, than the
Speaker 3: people who suffer, than the people who pay the price
Speaker 3: is the This was the answer that made me angry.
Speaker 3: I mean it just and part of it is because
Speaker 3: I know Joscelyn's mom, because I have sat in the
Speaker 3: living room with Joscelyn's mom and Joscelyn's grandfather and felt
Speaker 3: the tears and the agony of losing that little girl.
Speaker 3: And you see, what does Kamala Harris say. Kamala Harris says,
Speaker 3: I hate that's her answer. The problem is Trump now
Speaker 3: number one, it's a non sequitter. She's focusing on the
Speaker 3: Chuck Schumer border bill, which happened this past year and
Speaker 3: the fourth year of the Biden Harris administration. So it
Speaker 3: had zero impact on Joscelyn Nungary, It had zero impact
Speaker 3: on Rachel morn, It had zero impact on Lake and Riley.
Speaker 3: Their murderers were released by Kamala Harris long before this
Speaker 3: ridiculous border bill. Now, secondly, and you and I have
Speaker 3: talked about this at great length, the border bill, the
Speaker 3: Chuck Schumer bill, would not have secured the border. You
Speaker 3: know Kamala talks about well, gosh, it would have put
Speaker 3: more border agents there, yes, but it wrote into law
Speaker 3: catch and release, so it would have written into law
Speaker 3: that the next murderer shall be released, so you have
Speaker 3: more agents there to process and release illegal immigrants faster.
Speaker 3: But this bill was designed to codify, to write into
Speaker 3: law catch and release, and to normalize five thousand illegal
Speaker 3: immigrants a day, one point eight million a year, every
Speaker 3: year forever. And the cynicism of just turning your back
Speaker 3: on the people who are suffering. That answer of the
Speaker 3: entire interview, that's the one that made me most angry
Speaker 3: and upset.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I couldn't agree with you more.
Speaker 2: October seventh was the one year mark of the worst
Speaker 2: massacre of the Jewish people since the Holocaust. Twelve hundred
Speaker 2: Israelis were murdered in more than two hundred and fifty
Speaker 2: taken hostage, many of them still being held by the Terrists.
Speaker 2: Yet the war in Israel is raging on today, with
Speaker 2: the Ran firing a massive barrage of nearly two hundred
Speaker 2: ballistic missiles earlier this month. Israel and our people are
Speaker 2: facing attacks from enemies on all sides, and that's why
Speaker 2: I'm asking for your help for the people in Israel.
Speaker 2: The International Fellowship of Christians and Jews is on the
Speaker 2: ground providing food shelter and safety to those in need
Speaker 2: during this crisis. Since the war started, thousands of reservists
Speaker 2: every day Israeli citizens have left their families to serve
Speaker 2: their country. Soldiers have been injured, and their families now
Speaker 2: need our support. Your gift of one hundred and fifty
Speaker 2: dollars helps the Fellowship provide food and other necessities to
Speaker 2: the families to help them survive and things to a
Speaker 2: generous Fellowship supporter, your gift will be matched doubling in
Speaker 2: an impact, meaning if you give one hundred and fifty,
Speaker 2: there's another one hundred and fifty given with that that
Speaker 2: means three hundred dollars. So join us in letting those
Speaker 2: families know that the listeners like you stand with Israel
Speaker 2: and the people of Israel. To make your one hundred
Speaker 2: and fifty dollars gift right now, you can call eight
Speaker 2: to eight four eight eight IFCJ.
Speaker 1: That's eight to eight four eight eight four.
Speaker 2: Three two five, or go online to support IFCJ dot org.
Speaker 1: That's one word, support dot org.
Speaker 2: Senator, you mentioned something a moment ago, and it's a
Speaker 2: theme that went back to a core point in this
Speaker 2: interview where she always went back to somehow I'm not
Speaker 2: the vice.
Speaker 1: President, I'm not in charge, and it's.
Speaker 2: All Donald Trump's fault, who hasn't been in charge for
Speaker 2: what three and a half years now? And I don't
Speaker 2: know why she thought that was going to get her
Speaker 2: out of the jail card on every tough question.
Speaker 3: Well, this was her standard answer to every difficult question
Speaker 3: about the failure of her record. So why have you
Speaker 3: had an open border with eleven and a half million
Speaker 3: people invading this country?
Speaker 4: Answer? I hate Donald Trump?
Speaker 3: Why did if Iran is America's greatest enemy, which is
Speaker 3: what she said on sixty Minutes, why did your administration
Speaker 3: give Iran one hundred billion dollars? Answer? I hate Donald Trump?
Speaker 3: And one of the ones that was most just I
Speaker 3: thought funny, was okay, your campaigning on change, how are
Speaker 3: you different from Joe Biden? And spoiler alert? But her
Speaker 3: answer is I hate Donald Trump.
Speaker 4: Get a listen.
Speaker 5: Slogan is a new way forward and it's time to
Speaker 5: turn the page. You've been vice president for three and
Speaker 5: a half years. So what are you turning the page from.
Speaker 8: Well, first of all, turning the page from the last
Speaker 8: decade in which we have been burdened with the kind
Speaker 8: of rhetoric coming from Donald Trump that has been designed
Speaker 8: and implemented to divide our country and have Americans literally
Speaker 8: point fingers at each other.
Speaker 6: Rhetoric and an approach.
Speaker 8: To leadership that suggests that the strength of a leader
Speaker 8: is based on who you beat down instead of what
Speaker 8: we all know. The strength of leadership is based on
Speaker 8: who you lift up, the strength of an American president,
Speaker 8: which is one who understands that the vast majority of
Speaker 8: us have more in common than.
Speaker 6: What separates us.
Speaker 8: That that is about turning the page on rhetoric that
Speaker 8: people are frankly exhausted of Brett more than people are sovietle.
Speaker 5: To tell the country is on the wrong track. They
Speaker 5: say the country is on the wrong track. If it's
Speaker 5: on the wrong track, that track follows three and a
Speaker 5: half years of you being vice president and President Biden
Speaker 5: being president. That is what they're saying, seventy nine percent
Speaker 5: of them. Why are they saying that If you're turning
Speaker 5: the page. You've been in office for three and a
Speaker 5: half years.
Speaker 6: And Donald Trump has been running for office. You've been
Speaker 6: the person home for the office. What you and I
Speaker 6: both know what I'm talking about.
Speaker 8: You and I both know what I'm actually don't what
Speaker 8: are you talking about. What I'm talking about is that
Speaker 8: over the last decade people have the power.
Speaker 2: But listen, I love what is response there. I actually
Speaker 2: don't know what you're talking about. She's like, yes, you do,
Speaker 2: and she's basically saying, because the.
Speaker 3: Single best moment of the of the entire interview. It's
Speaker 3: the single best moment of the entire interview, and kudos
Speaker 3: to Brett Bher like, I actually don't was spectacular, and
Speaker 3: you got to understand Kamala Harris, like virtually every Democrat
Speaker 3: and elected office, and like all of CNN and all
Speaker 3: of MSNBC and all of ABCNBC and CBS has full
Speaker 3: on Trump derangement syndrome. So she literally like, you're turning
Speaker 3: the page, but wait, you're in power. What are you
Speaker 3: turning the page from? If we're on the wrong track,
Speaker 3: doesn't that mean what you're doing is wrong? And like
Speaker 3: her line, well, and Donald Trump has been running for office,
Speaker 3: so clearly that's the problem. How dare he run for office?
Speaker 3: And then she's like, you and I both know what
Speaker 3: I'm talking about, and it's we hate Trump, like we
Speaker 3: wake up and he is the devil and I love
Speaker 3: Brett Barry, it's just like Shakes's said, I actually.
Speaker 4: Don't it really is.
Speaker 3: She's not willing to address anything about her record other
Speaker 3: than Trump bad. So there there's another exchange where Brett
Speaker 3: Behar is like, Okay, fine, you don't like Trump, Well
Speaker 3: what about Joe Biden. The guy has dementia. He's clearly
Speaker 3: not capable of being president or running for president? Why
Speaker 3: are you covering that up? When did you see that?
Speaker 3: And this exchange also she completely dodges accountability.
Speaker 5: Give a listening ask you this, and you interviewers that
Speaker 5: Joe Biden was on his game, that ran around circles
Speaker 5: on his staff. When did you first notice that President
Speaker 5: Biden's mental faculties appeared diminished?
Speaker 6: Joe Biden.
Speaker 8: I have watched from the Oval office to the situation room,
Speaker 8: and he has the judgment and the experiment and experience
Speaker 8: to do exactly what he has done and making very
Speaker 8: important decisions on.
Speaker 6: Behalf of the American people.
Speaker 5: Joe Biden is not on ballot, I understand.
Speaker 6: And Donald Trump.
Speaker 10: Donald Trump talked about it, and Donald within a few
Speaker 10: minutes of talking to a fundraiser that he thought this
Speaker 10: was not the same Joe Biden that we saw on.
Speaker 6: The debate stage.
Speaker 1: She goes back to Donald Trump. There.
Speaker 2: I actually think this is one of the most damning
Speaker 2: parts of her legacy as the vice president. She she
Speaker 2: lied to the American people and covered up the day after.
Speaker 4: Day, month after month, year after year. Yep.
Speaker 1: And and then she's like, absolutely, calmed down, it's not
Speaker 1: a big deal. Now I'm the candidate. Leave me alone.
Speaker 4: Yeah.
Speaker 3: And her answer is, but but Orange man bad, I
Speaker 3: hate Trump. That that that's the only thing she can say. Well, yes,
Speaker 3: I lied to the American people. Well, yes, I I
Speaker 3: actively covered up to the commander in chief has full
Speaker 3: on dementia. Yes, I covered up the fact that the
Speaker 3: person in charge with keeping the nation, our nation safe,
Speaker 3: the person with his finger on the nuclear button still
Speaker 3: right now today, like today, if Joe Biden woke up
Speaker 3: from his four o'clock nap and said, let's exterminate humanity,
Speaker 3: he is one of the very few people on the
Speaker 3: planet with the power to do so, assuming his generals
Speaker 3: would follow his orders. And she was an active and
Speaker 3: integral participant in covering up the fact that he is
Speaker 3: not competent and capable of protecting this country.
Speaker 4: And her only answer is I hate Trump.
Speaker 2: It is a theme. I go back to this question.
Speaker 2: You look at this interview. I think the idea of
Speaker 2: this interview is a smart one. They obviously feel that
Speaker 2: something has changed in this election. I think you and
Speaker 2: I can feel it out there as well.
Speaker 1: On the road.
Speaker 2: There's been a shift in the last I don't know,
Speaker 2: ten to fifteen days where it just feels like there's
Speaker 2: starting to be a surge of support for Donald Trump.
Speaker 2: And their campaign clearly felt it to the point where
Speaker 2: they're like, all right, that last week of all those
Speaker 2: big interviews, and we should have been focusing on the
Speaker 2: hurricane number two hitting this country and putting her on
Speaker 2: late night comedy shows and putting on her caller Daddy
Speaker 2: podcast or Charlemagne the God.
Speaker 1: That didn't work.
Speaker 2: So now we're going to see if we can, in
Speaker 2: a weird way, have Fox News bail us out. Not
Speaker 2: only did not work, it was a disaster. What do
Speaker 2: you do now if you're her campaign? I mean, do
Speaker 2: you go back to the baseball strategy?
Speaker 4: Listen?
Speaker 3: I think what is happening. And this is something you
Speaker 3: and I talked about. You and I talked about coming
Speaker 3: out of the Democrat convention where she had a surge,
Speaker 3: and by the way the polling numbers, if the vote
Speaker 3: had been right after the Democrat Convention, she probably would
Speaker 3: have won. She probably would have been president. Her numbers
Speaker 3: surge at the time. Simply replacing Joe Biden with Kamala
Speaker 3: Harris on the ballot was worth five to eight points
Speaker 3: for every Democrat in the country because it unified Democrats
Speaker 3: and it was a pure shook shook high. But you
Speaker 3: and I said at the podcast at the time, the
Speaker 3: election is not today. We've got several months to go.
Speaker 3: And what I believe is the issue set strongly favors
Speaker 3: Republicans because the issue set, whether it is illegal immigration,
Speaker 3: on which Kamala Harris's record is a disaster and on
Speaker 3: which Donald Trump's record is incredibly successful, or whether it
Speaker 3: is the economy and inflation, on which Kamala Harris's record
Speaker 3: is a disaster and on which Donald Trump's record is
Speaker 3: incredibly successful, Or whether it is war and peace, on
Speaker 3: which Kamala Harris's track record is a disaster and Donald
Speaker 3: Trump's record is incredibly successful. Every one of those issues,
Speaker 3: the advantage is with the Republicans. And so as the
Speaker 3: campaign has gone on, I think that advantage is asserting itself,
Speaker 3: and she's left with the only thing. She can't talk
Speaker 3: about her record because her record is so bad. She
Speaker 3: can't talk about her policies because her policies have failed,
Speaker 3: So she just tests a vet at Trump. And actually,
Speaker 3: there was one exchange that I thought illustrated that in
Speaker 3: a way that was really funny. So it has become
Speaker 3: a big issue the Democrats radicalism on transgender issues and
Speaker 3: in particular boys and girls sports, boys and girls, locker
Speaker 3: rooms and dressing rooms, and also Kamala Harris's support of
Speaker 3: using taxpayer dollars to pay for sex changes for illegal
Speaker 3: aliens in prison. And by the way, when Trump brought
Speaker 3: that up at the debate, I pointed out, that sounded
Speaker 3: like something you would hear on Saturday Night Live. That
Speaker 3: sounds like something almost made up, sex changes for illegal
Speaker 3: immigrants in jail. Like let's just make it so wacky
Speaker 3: that only a loon would support it. Now, of course
Speaker 3: Kamala Harris did support it, and when Brett Behar asked
Speaker 3: her about it again, I'm going to give you a surprise.
Speaker 4: What did she do? She pivots to Trump.
Speaker 2: Listen before I play that for you, I want to
Speaker 2: tell you about something that is truly incredible that can
Speaker 2: help you protect yourself and your family. We've seen a
Speaker 2: major increase of violent crime around her country, and we
Speaker 2: need to remember that personal safety and security for you
Speaker 2: and your family is the most important thing in life. Now,
Speaker 2: what I'm about to tell you about is something that
Speaker 2: I've now purchased for not only my wife, but for
Speaker 2: my mother in law, my sister in law, my sister,
Speaker 2: my mom. And it is incredible less lethal technology. Maybe
Speaker 2: you can't carry a firearm everywhere you go, maybe you
Speaker 2: just don't feel comfortable yet with carrying a firearm, or
Speaker 2: maybe you work in what they refer to as a
Speaker 2: you know, gun free zone. Well, do you really want
Speaker 2: to have to worry about having nothing to protect yourself? Well,
Speaker 2: you don't have to compromise on your peace of mind anymore.
Speaker 2: That is because of the BURNA less lethal pistol launcher.
Speaker 2: A BURNA can save two lives. It is a great
Speaker 2: compliment to owning firearms, and if you or your family
Speaker 2: is in a situation where you feel threatened, you need
Speaker 2: to start with less lethal It is legal in all
Speaker 2: fifty states. No permits or background checks are needed. I
Speaker 2: own these myself and they are great for your family members.
Speaker 2: Like I mentioned, Burna is the answer and it's designed
Speaker 2: for easy use by all age groups eighteen or older.
Speaker 2: The Burna launcher has powerful deterrence like tear gas and
Speaker 2: kinetic rounds with a sixty foot range, one shot can
Speaker 2: incapacitate attackers for up to forty minutes. It is used
Speaker 2: by government agencies and law enforcement around the country. In fact,
Speaker 2: there's over a half million units that have been sold
Speaker 2: more than fourteen thousand, four and a half star reviews
Speaker 2: as well. If you want to see what a Burna
Speaker 2: can do for you, go online to burna dot com
Speaker 2: slash verdict. You're gonna get ten percent off your purchase.
Speaker 2: That's by r inna dot com slash verdict. For ten
Speaker 2: percent off, that's by r inna dot com slash verdict.
Speaker 2: All right, take a listen to this moment again. Kamala
Speaker 2: Harris in her own words on transgender surgeries and transition
Speaker 2: surgeries in general in prison that you're supposed to be
Speaker 2: paying for.
Speaker 1: Listen, it's gotten a lot of attention.
Speaker 3: Kamala supports taxpayer funded sex changes for prisoners.
Speaker 6: Surgery for prisoners for prisoners.
Speaker 8: Every transgender inmate in the prison system would have access.
Speaker 5: So are you still in support of using taxpayer dollars
Speaker 5: to help prison inmates or detain the illegal aliens to
Speaker 5: transition to another gender.
Speaker 6: I will follow the law.
Speaker 8: And it's a law that Donald Trump actually followed. You're
Speaker 8: probably familiar with.
Speaker 6: Now.
Speaker 8: It's a public report that under Donald Trump's administration, these
Speaker 8: surgeries were available to on a medical necessity basis to
Speaker 8: people in the federal prison system. And I think, frankly
Speaker 8: that ad for the Trump campaign is a little bit
Speaker 8: of like throwing, you know, stones when you're living in
Speaker 8: the classhouse.
Speaker 5: The Trump haids say that he never advocated for that
Speaker 5: prison policy and no gender transition.
Speaker 8: Well, responsible for what happened in your administration.
Speaker 5: Yeah, no surgery has happened in this pregnant Would you
Speaker 5: still advocate for using task pair of dollars for gender reassignment?
Speaker 6: I will follow the law, just as you think.
Speaker 2: I mean, it's amazing she accuses Trump of doing something
Speaker 2: and Brett Baer's like, A you never did that. She's like, yes, yes,
Speaker 2: you didn't know. Actually he really didn't. And she's like,
Speaker 2: I will follow the law. This is again back to
Speaker 2: Pitt to Trump, it's all it's all Trump's fault, even
Speaker 2: though I'm in charge.
Speaker 3: Well, and I actually think the funniest statement in all
Speaker 3: of that is, well, you got to take responsibility for
Speaker 3: what happens in your administration. I will be surprised if
Speaker 3: we don't see that clip air and immediately after it,
Speaker 3: I'm Donald Trump and I approved this message. I mean,
Speaker 3: I mean, it really is talk about an indictment of
Speaker 3: every other word of the interview. She's not taking respet
Speaker 3: ponsibility for anything that has happened in her administration. Everything
Speaker 3: that's gone wrong under Joe Biden and Kamala Harris, it's
Speaker 3: all Trump's fault. And by the way, everything that went
Speaker 3: right when Trump was president that's not his fault, is
Speaker 3: all at all. And it really does show how at
Speaker 3: the end of the day, her entire argument is that
Speaker 3: she hates Trump, and I promise you nobody, nobody remotely
Speaker 3: conscious miss the point that she and the rest of
Speaker 3: the Democratic Party hates Trump. It just happens that their
Speaker 3: policies are also disastrous for virtually every American.
Speaker 2: I want to move to this other issue because I
Speaker 2: think it's really important and it is the breaking news
Speaker 2: out of Israel that Israel has killed the October seventh Mastermind.
Speaker 2: It is interesting it took them about a year to
Speaker 2: do that. It's something that we in this country have
Speaker 2: still not accomplished. Since nine to eleven. The mastermind of
Speaker 2: nine to eleven, Khalade Sheik Muhammad, has still not been executed,
Speaker 2: even though we have him in our custody. Many Democrats
Speaker 2: have tried to give him a plea deal to save
Speaker 2: his life, which was a major point that we talked about.
Speaker 2: And we're able to at least stop that deal from
Speaker 2: taking place because of so many listeners that were outraged
Speaker 2: by the decision by the Biden Harris administration to give
Speaker 2: him a deal as the master might nine to eleven.
Speaker 2: Israel said, yeah, we're not going to do that. We're
Speaker 2: we're not going to do that at all. In fact,
Speaker 2: what we're going to do is we're going to kill
Speaker 2: the leader of Hamas that planned this attack. And they
Speaker 2: did it today and told the world, yeah, we're not
Speaker 2: messing around. We're taking out everybody that was involved in
Speaker 2: this attack on innocent civilians and those that took hostages.
Speaker 3: Look that that is exactly right, And I will say
Speaker 3: this is a very very good day for Israel. It's
Speaker 3: a very good day for America. The Hamas leader Sinoir
Speaker 3: hated America, was responsible for American deaths, and it's a
Speaker 3: good day for justice. And here I want you to
Speaker 3: listen to the coverage when the Israeli foreign minister confirms
Speaker 3: that the Hamas leader is dead.
Speaker 4: Give a listen, does.
Speaker 6: A Fox News alert.
Speaker 11: Reuters is now reporting that Israel's foreign minister has just
Speaker 11: confirmed the death of Hamas leader ya Ya Sinhwar. Yaya
Speaker 11: Sinhwar was responsible and the mastermind between the vicious October
Speaker 11: seventh attack that was the deadliest attack on Jews since
Speaker 11: the Holocaust. And Reuters is reporting at Israeli conficials who
Speaker 11: were analyzing his dental records, that he is in fact dead.
Speaker 11: We go to trey yinst and Haifa Israel with more
Speaker 11: on this developing story.
Speaker 12: Tray, Yeah, guys, good afternoon. According to reports, the leader
Speaker 12: of Hamas, yah Yah Sinoar, is dead. We cannot independently
Speaker 12: confirm this, and I'm going to tell you why. There
Speaker 12: are two things ongoing at the moment. Israeli officials are
Speaker 12: using dental records and they are used DNA to try
Speaker 12: to match Jakya Sinoar's DNA to DNA the Israelis have
Speaker 12: in their file. The dental records match, but we are
Speaker 12: waiting to report until the DNA test comes back. Just
Speaker 12: given how high profile this figure is. But again, according
Speaker 12: to reports attributed to Israel's Foreign Minister Israel Katz Yakia
Speaker 12: Sinoar is dead. This follows in Israeli operation in southern
Speaker 12: Gaza today, reportedly in the city of Rafa, Gaza's third
Speaker 12: largest city that sits next to the Egyptian border. This
Speaker 12: was not a planned intelligence operation, according to officials, but
Speaker 12: rather a ground patrol that intercepted movement in southern Gaza. Ultimately,
Speaker 12: Israeli forces reportedly fired on that movement, and among the
Speaker 12: cell of Hamas militants was the leader Yaqiya Sinoar. Now
Speaker 12: Sinoar is a man who has been at the top
Speaker 12: of the Israeli target list since October seventh. He is
Speaker 12: one of three masterminds behind the massacre, along with Mohammad Deaf,
Speaker 12: a man who was killed in an Israeli airstrike earlier
Speaker 12: this year, and is Al Hania, a man who was
Speaker 12: killed in an explosion in the Iranian capital of Tehran
Speaker 12: over the summer. So now that this is confirmed, the
Speaker 12: three masterminds behind the massacre are dead.
Speaker 9: Now.
Speaker 12: Sinoar spent twenty two years in an Israeli prison. He
Speaker 12: was released back in twenty eleven as part of a
Speaker 12: prisoner swap deal for one single Israeli soldier, Gilad Shalit.
Speaker 12: Shalit was exchanged for more than a thousand Palestinian prisoners. Now.
Speaker 12: When Sinoir went back to Gaza, he was appointed to
Speaker 12: a defense minister level position among Hamas's Al Klassam Brigades,
Speaker 12: the military wing of Hamas, and then ultimately later took
Speaker 12: over as the leader of Hamas inside Gaza. The last
Speaker 12: time that I saw Sinoir was in twenty twenty one.
Speaker 12: The month was May and he was giving a rally
Speaker 12: where an infamous photo of him was taken holding a
Speaker 12: Palestinian child who was dressed as a member of the
Speaker 12: Al Khlassam Brigades. Sinoar is someone who has devoted his
Speaker 12: life to killing Israelis, despite the fact that the Israelis
Speaker 12: actually saved his life doing brain surgery on him in
Speaker 12: the early two thousands while he was still in is
Speaker 12: In and following the October seventh massacre. He had been
Speaker 12: hiding in the tunnel network beneath Gaza. Some of the
Speaker 12: Israeli hostages who were released as part of the November
Speaker 12: sees fire deal back in twenty twenty three reported meeting
Speaker 12: him in the tunnels beneath Gaza City. And so this
Speaker 12: is significant news and an indication that the Israelis will
Speaker 12: continue to pick off the remaining Hamas leaders that exist
Speaker 12: still inside Gaza. They have destroyed the battalions within the
Speaker 12: Gaza Strip, but the question remains what does this mean
Speaker 12: for the remaining Israeli hostages inside Gaza. One hundred and
Speaker 12: one of them are there, around half of them are
Speaker 12: estimated to be alive.
Speaker 1: And Israeli sources.
Speaker 12: Are texting now they are talking about this news that
Speaker 12: is taking place. We do expect to hear from Israel's
Speaker 12: Prime Minister Benjamin nettan Yahoo later tonight Israel time. And
Speaker 12: the Israelis, according to this source, are in communication with
Speaker 12: their American counterparts to discuss the operation that took place today. Again,
Speaker 12: according to our reporting, this was not a planned operation,
Speaker 12: but rather one that took place after I movement was
Speaker 12: identified inside the Gaza Strip. Again, the latest information that
Speaker 12: we have attributable to reports we are waiting for DNA evidence,
Speaker 12: is that yak Yao Sinoar, the leader of Hamas, is dead.
Speaker 2: Guys, I mean this is incredible news. And I loved
Speaker 2: how steadfast and Hu has been.
Speaker 3: Yes, so two observations. Number one on yet another issue,
Speaker 3: Kamala Harris was wrong. Remember, Kamala Harris has been opposing Israel,
Speaker 3: continuing to fight to eliminate Hamas. Harris was explicit urging Israel,
Speaker 3: opposing Israel going on the offensive in Rafa, and she
Speaker 3: claimed to be an expert. She claimed to know that
Speaker 3: nothing could be accomplished, and what happened today proved that wrong.
Speaker 3: I want you to listen to a flashback of Kamala
Speaker 3: in March of twenty twenty four when she's claiming to
Speaker 3: to know that going into Rafa is going to be
Speaker 3: a mistake.
Speaker 8: We have been clear in multiple conversations and in every
Speaker 8: way that any major military operation in Rafa would be
Speaker 8: a huge mistake. Let me tell you something. I have
Speaker 8: studied the maps. There's nowhere for those folks to go,
Speaker 8: and we're looking at about a million and a half
Speaker 8: people in Rafa.
Speaker 6: Who are there because they were told to go there,
Speaker 6: most of them.
Speaker 8: And so we've been very clear that it would be
Speaker 8: a mistake to move into Rafa with any type of
Speaker 8: military operation.
Speaker 6: A mistake.
Speaker 9: But would there be consequences if he does move forward?
Speaker 6: But we're going to take it one step at a time.
Speaker 8: But we've been very clear in terms of our perspective
Speaker 8: on whether or not that to happen.
Speaker 9: Are you ruling out that there would be consequences from
Speaker 9: the United States?
Speaker 6: I am ruling out nothing.
Speaker 1: Wow.
Speaker 4: Well, once again, Kamala Harris was wrong. She was wrong.
Speaker 3: She was threatened Israel with consequences, and to be clear,
Speaker 3: she and Joe Biden cut off critical weapons to Israel
Speaker 3: and have been pressuring and undermining Israel at every stage
Speaker 3: since October seventh, and long before that. She was categorically wrong.
Speaker 3: And I'll tell you the real consequences. The consequences were
Speaker 3: for sinwar. And this is the final point that I
Speaker 3: want to wrap up.
Speaker 4: The podcast with.
Speaker 3: You know, it was twelve years ago that I was
Speaker 3: elected to the Senate and when I came into the
Speaker 3: Senate at the time, I resolved to be the leading
Speaker 3: defender of Israel in the Senate and I got to
Speaker 3: tell you, A lot of times people ask me how
Speaker 3: on earth did it come to pass that a Cuban
Speaker 3: Texan Southern Baptist would end up the leading defender of
Speaker 3: Israel in the United States Senate. And there are a
Speaker 3: lot of reasons, but one of the fundamental reasons that
Speaker 3: I've described this before is I was a little kid
Speaker 3: when the Nentemi rate happened.
Speaker 4: I was I think five.
Speaker 3: Years old, and listen, I didn't understand in detail what
Speaker 3: happened in the Ntebe raid, but it made an impression
Speaker 3: on me as a child. And my understanding of the
Speaker 3: Nteby raid at the time was the people of Israel
Speaker 3: were saying, if you take our citizens hostage, our citizens
Speaker 3: might die, but you are going to die. And I
Speaker 3: got to say, ben as a five year old, that
Speaker 3: struck me as a very Texan foreign policy. There was
Speaker 3: a clarity to that. And I got to say, the
Speaker 3: three masterminds of October seventh, including Sinwar the head of
Speaker 3: hamas well, they've gone to meet their seventy two virgins,
Speaker 3: and I think they're disappointed with what they found. And
Speaker 3: there is an absolute seriousness with which Benjamin netanyahuo in
Speaker 3: the Nation of Israel takes protecting themselves, protecting their citizens,
Speaker 3: protecting their safety, defeating Hamas, defeating Hezbolah, and that is
Speaker 3: good for America, good for Israe real, good for the world,
Speaker 3: and cause for celebration.
Speaker 1: Am into that.
Speaker 2: Don't forget to share this show on social media so
Speaker 2: other people can hear this conversation. Without you guys doing that,
Speaker 2: people don't hear it. And we say thank you, and
Speaker 2: we mean it sincerely when we say thank you for
Speaker 2: sharing the show.
Speaker 1: Don't forget.
Speaker 2: We do it Monday, Wednesday, and Friday, So hit that
Speaker 2: subscribe or auto download button at wherever you're listening to
Speaker 2: this podcast so you don't miss an episode. We do
Speaker 2: this Monday, Wednesday and Friday, and on in between days
Speaker 2: grab my podcast, so Ben Ferguson podcast hit subscribe to
Speaker 2: that as well, so you don't miss a day of
Speaker 2: important news as it breaks, especially in this election season.
Speaker 2: And we'll see you back here for our week in
Speaker 2: review on Saturday as well.