WEBVTT - Daybreak Holiday: OPEC+ Delays, Holiday Shopping Begins, Google Antitrust Case, Ozempic Effect

0:00:02.040 --> 0:00:05.480
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for joining us for this special edition of Bloomberg Daybreak.

0:00:05.480 --> 0:00:08.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm Nathan Hager. The US market is closed for the

0:00:08.400 --> 0:00:11.560
<v Speaker 1>Thanksgiving Day holiday. Coming up this hour, we will look

0:00:11.560 --> 0:00:14.040
<v Speaker 1>at how the retailers are doing as we approach the

0:00:14.080 --> 0:00:18.000
<v Speaker 1>holiday shopping season beginning with Black Friday. Plus we'll get

0:00:18.040 --> 0:00:21.840
<v Speaker 1>an update on some big antitrust cases, including the Justice

0:00:21.880 --> 0:00:26.560
<v Speaker 1>Department's lawsuit against Google. Also, is there room for seconds

0:00:26.680 --> 0:00:30.000
<v Speaker 1>at the Thanksgiving Feast? We'll look at the ozampic effect

0:00:30.520 --> 0:00:33.640
<v Speaker 1>on the holiday meal. First, though, let's dig into what's

0:00:33.720 --> 0:00:37.760
<v Speaker 1>driving the market and talk about oil, because crude has

0:00:37.840 --> 0:00:40.280
<v Speaker 1>been on quite a ride. We've seen about a thirty

0:00:40.320 --> 0:00:42.800
<v Speaker 1>dollars swing in the price of a barrel this year.

0:00:43.040 --> 0:00:45.320
<v Speaker 1>There are a lot of factors at play, among them

0:00:45.479 --> 0:00:48.200
<v Speaker 1>wars in Ukraine and the Middle East, and of course,

0:00:48.280 --> 0:00:51.360
<v Speaker 1>the ongoing recovery from the pandemic. So for more on

0:00:51.400 --> 0:00:53.840
<v Speaker 1>what's in store for the energy space, we have an

0:00:54.000 --> 0:00:57.520
<v Speaker 1>expert roundtable set up for you. John Kilduff is with

0:00:57.640 --> 0:00:59.720
<v Speaker 1>us on the phone. He is the founding partner at

0:00:59.720 --> 0:01:04.000
<v Speaker 1>a Game Capital, and Stephen Shork is joining us on zoom.

0:01:04.040 --> 0:01:07.520
<v Speaker 1>Stephen is president of the Short Group. Thanks to both

0:01:07.560 --> 0:01:09.480
<v Speaker 1>of you for being with us on this holiday. And

0:01:09.520 --> 0:01:11.600
<v Speaker 1>I'll start with you, John, because it wasn't that long

0:01:11.640 --> 0:01:13.880
<v Speaker 1>ago we were talking about the return of one hundred

0:01:13.920 --> 0:01:16.800
<v Speaker 1>dollars a barrel oil. Now we're quite a ways off

0:01:16.840 --> 0:01:17.240
<v Speaker 1>from that.

0:01:17.880 --> 0:01:21.320
<v Speaker 2>What happened, well, basically, the sum of our worst fears

0:01:21.319 --> 0:01:25.399
<v Speaker 2>for the market just never materialized. With the initiation of

0:01:25.440 --> 0:01:28.720
<v Speaker 2>the Ukraine War foot or was thought to put you know,

0:01:28.959 --> 0:01:31.840
<v Speaker 2>meaningful amounts of Russian supplies of crude oil and refined

0:01:31.880 --> 0:01:34.520
<v Speaker 2>products at jeopardy to be embargoed by the West, but

0:01:34.560 --> 0:01:37.400
<v Speaker 2>they wouldn't be purchased. Meanwhile, they found a home almost

0:01:37.520 --> 0:01:40.440
<v Speaker 2>mediately in China and India and Turkey to a lesser extent.

0:01:40.760 --> 0:01:44.720
<v Speaker 2>And then you know, from there a similar situation here

0:01:44.800 --> 0:01:48.120
<v Speaker 2>with situation in Gaza. Fears about you know, all kinds

0:01:48.120 --> 0:01:50.280
<v Speaker 2>of a parade of horribles, about the straight of Hormos

0:01:50.280 --> 0:01:54.400
<v Speaker 2>getting shut ran getting involved, and meanwhile, really the unfortunate

0:01:54.440 --> 0:01:59.200
<v Speaker 2>situation has been very much contained to Gaza, no regionals

0:01:59.480 --> 0:02:03.160
<v Speaker 2>still and certainly no threat to any supplies of oil.

0:02:03.560 --> 0:02:08.320
<v Speaker 2>So once those geopolitical risk premiums dissolved, we're back to

0:02:08.400 --> 0:02:12.800
<v Speaker 2>dealing with the relative even or oversupply and the worries

0:02:12.840 --> 0:02:15.960
<v Speaker 2>about the main other factor in this market, which is demand,

0:02:16.280 --> 0:02:20.519
<v Speaker 2>and China and the situation with their blackluster economy, their

0:02:20.560 --> 0:02:24.200
<v Speaker 2>property market situation being deteriorating, and of course even Japan

0:02:24.320 --> 0:02:27.519
<v Speaker 2>now showing significant economic weakness and demand for oil.

0:02:27.680 --> 0:02:30.240
<v Speaker 1>Is that how you see things, Steven? Is risk premium

0:02:30.280 --> 0:02:32.480
<v Speaker 1>off the table? Is there risk it returns?

0:02:32.880 --> 0:02:36.720
<v Speaker 3>Yeah? Absolutely no. I'd never even thought risk premium was

0:02:36.760 --> 0:02:40.560
<v Speaker 3>adequately priced in for the few days that we actually

0:02:40.560 --> 0:02:44.360
<v Speaker 3>saw a pop post October seventh, So I am quite

0:02:44.400 --> 0:02:48.360
<v Speaker 3>perplexed that there is no risk premium and in fact

0:02:48.480 --> 0:02:51.720
<v Speaker 3>there's now a discount being priced into the market. It

0:02:51.840 --> 0:02:55.400
<v Speaker 3>is just amazing to me that the market continues to

0:02:55.480 --> 0:02:58.560
<v Speaker 3>ignore what is going on. This is a war, not

0:02:58.680 --> 0:03:02.960
<v Speaker 3>between Israel and Hamas. This is not a military conflict,

0:03:02.960 --> 0:03:05.000
<v Speaker 3>This is not a police action. This is a war.

0:03:05.440 --> 0:03:08.560
<v Speaker 3>This is a war between Israel and let's face it, Iran.

0:03:09.440 --> 0:03:13.520
<v Speaker 3>The Hamas has Belat, the Hutis have all declared war

0:03:13.639 --> 0:03:17.320
<v Speaker 3>on Israel. I eat the West. So that is Iran.

0:03:17.800 --> 0:03:20.760
<v Speaker 3>And the fact that we have forty percent of the

0:03:20.800 --> 0:03:24.200
<v Speaker 3>world's waterborne oil that flows through a forty miles straight

0:03:24.320 --> 0:03:29.520
<v Speaker 3>of Hormuz, and people refuse to factor that in. I

0:03:29.560 --> 0:03:33.919
<v Speaker 3>think the market's taking a tremendous risk. So the theme

0:03:34.000 --> 0:03:37.400
<v Speaker 3>coming into this year was China, China, China, to quote

0:03:37.440 --> 0:03:41.600
<v Speaker 3>our jam Brady here, and with all of that demand

0:03:41.880 --> 0:03:45.800
<v Speaker 3>and you know, China never never materialized. China quite frankly

0:03:45.880 --> 0:03:49.960
<v Speaker 3>to me, looks like Japan's circuit early nineteen nineties. The

0:03:50.040 --> 0:03:52.600
<v Speaker 3>curtain is being pulled back on that regime and on

0:03:52.720 --> 0:03:55.520
<v Speaker 3>that economy. So now going into the new year, there

0:03:55.560 --> 0:04:00.520
<v Speaker 3>are legitimate concerns whether it's China really the tiger of

0:04:00.520 --> 0:04:03.240
<v Speaker 3>the Far East or is it now just a paper tiger.

0:04:03.320 --> 0:04:07.200
<v Speaker 1>He raises an interesting point, John, is this market underpricing

0:04:07.360 --> 0:04:10.880
<v Speaker 1>the potential for risk premium to return and what about

0:04:10.920 --> 0:04:13.200
<v Speaker 1>the fundamentals going into twenty twenty four.

0:04:13.360 --> 0:04:15.240
<v Speaker 2>Well, I think you would need to see a real

0:04:15.360 --> 0:04:17.760
<v Speaker 2>escalation here. I mean for me, and I don't mean

0:04:17.800 --> 0:04:20.200
<v Speaker 2>to be you know, anything less than you know this

0:04:20.240 --> 0:04:23.120
<v Speaker 2>is a horrible situation. But look, Hamas kind of got

0:04:23.160 --> 0:04:27.560
<v Speaker 2>left hanging by Iran and by you know, Hesbala in

0:04:27.560 --> 0:04:30.880
<v Speaker 2>the north. The Hamas thought that these other parties would

0:04:30.920 --> 0:04:33.520
<v Speaker 2>come in on their side and really make this the one,

0:04:34.000 --> 0:04:36.960
<v Speaker 2>make this the situation. And if that had happened then

0:04:37.080 --> 0:04:39.440
<v Speaker 2>what everything Stephen just said, and I would have been

0:04:39.520 --> 0:04:41.719
<v Speaker 2>right on board with that. We would have had material

0:04:41.760 --> 0:04:44.919
<v Speaker 2>amounts of crude oil at risk. And you know, for

0:04:45.000 --> 0:04:47.680
<v Speaker 2>whatever reason that the calculation just wasn't there. I don't

0:04:47.680 --> 0:04:49.760
<v Speaker 2>know whose miscalculation it was. It's saying it sounds like

0:04:49.800 --> 0:04:52.880
<v Speaker 2>it was Hamas's because they're not getting the support right

0:04:52.920 --> 0:04:56.279
<v Speaker 2>now that they expected. They're getting pin pricks sort of

0:04:56.600 --> 0:04:59.760
<v Speaker 2>dust ups in various parts of Syria and other places

0:04:59.800 --> 0:05:02.320
<v Speaker 2>by Iran which they're getting hit back with, but again

0:05:02.400 --> 0:05:06.760
<v Speaker 2>no material amounts of oil. The fundamentals, though, are are interesting,

0:05:06.880 --> 0:05:08.560
<v Speaker 2>and certainly it's going to it's hard to make an

0:05:08.640 --> 0:05:10.920
<v Speaker 2>argument for prices to go much lower because of what

0:05:10.960 --> 0:05:13.520
<v Speaker 2>the Saudi Arabia has been doing with their output policy

0:05:13.520 --> 0:05:16.720
<v Speaker 2>and OPEC plus overall. Once again, o pech plus has

0:05:16.760 --> 0:05:19.800
<v Speaker 2>fallen short of their lofty goals, but the Saudis haven't.

0:05:19.880 --> 0:05:23.040
<v Speaker 2>They have delivered. They're only producing nine million barrels a day.

0:05:23.040 --> 0:05:25.440
<v Speaker 2>Can you imagine that the United States produces thirty percent

0:05:25.520 --> 0:05:28.120
<v Speaker 2>more oil right now than Saudi Arabia does. Yep, that's

0:05:28.160 --> 0:05:30.960
<v Speaker 2>the case, and Sadi exports are down, so you know

0:05:31.040 --> 0:05:34.720
<v Speaker 2>there's a potential for relative tightness emerging. But again, without

0:05:34.839 --> 0:05:38.720
<v Speaker 2>China getting back into a groove of growth, it's hard

0:05:38.720 --> 0:05:40.920
<v Speaker 2>to see prices materially going higher either.

0:05:41.120 --> 0:05:43.320
<v Speaker 1>I think I hear you want to pop in there, Steven.

0:05:43.400 --> 0:05:46.520
<v Speaker 1>What's your view on whether the Saudis continue with these

0:05:46.560 --> 0:05:48.599
<v Speaker 1>supply cuts that we've seen over the last couple of months.

0:05:48.680 --> 0:05:51.679
<v Speaker 3>Oh, yeah, no, No, I'm certainly on board with John

0:05:52.480 --> 0:05:56.039
<v Speaker 3>with regard to offers, the geopolitics that it is a

0:05:56.040 --> 0:05:58.320
<v Speaker 3>wait and see market, right. We know everyone knows that

0:05:58.440 --> 0:06:01.200
<v Speaker 3>risk there, but for no one's willing to price it

0:06:01.240 --> 0:06:04.440
<v Speaker 3>in and therefore we're going to have to wait. It

0:06:04.520 --> 0:06:08.200
<v Speaker 3>certainly is a concern with Saudi Arabia. And let's keep

0:06:08.240 --> 0:06:13.599
<v Speaker 3>in mind the sunny Saudis and the Shiah Persians don't

0:06:13.600 --> 0:06:17.400
<v Speaker 3>necessarily agree on I mean, they really hate one another.

0:06:17.560 --> 0:06:20.760
<v Speaker 3>I mean, let's be honest here, and the fact that

0:06:20.800 --> 0:06:23.600
<v Speaker 3>the Saudis are doing what they can to keep prices

0:06:24.440 --> 0:06:26.800
<v Speaker 3>higher with regard to production. Yeah, I do see that.

0:06:26.839 --> 0:06:29.520
<v Speaker 3>I agree with John. I do see that going forward

0:06:29.520 --> 0:06:32.360
<v Speaker 3>that they are sticking to their guns. And I think

0:06:32.360 --> 0:06:34.880
<v Speaker 3>they're going to continue to stick to their guns because

0:06:35.120 --> 0:06:38.080
<v Speaker 3>when we look at the spread action of difference between

0:06:38.160 --> 0:06:41.279
<v Speaker 3>prices in the near term versus prices longer out along

0:06:41.320 --> 0:06:44.640
<v Speaker 3>the curve. We're going into a situation where we're pricing

0:06:44.680 --> 0:06:47.000
<v Speaker 3>on the front of the curve is signaling to the

0:06:47.040 --> 0:06:51.000
<v Speaker 3>market that it is over supplied relative to demand. I

0:06:51.000 --> 0:06:53.159
<v Speaker 3>want to say in crude oil. You're not seeing that

0:06:53.279 --> 0:06:57.040
<v Speaker 3>dynamic playing out in gasoline, which is very interesting because

0:06:57.080 --> 0:07:01.200
<v Speaker 3>gasoline demand is strong as we know for this holiday

0:07:01.720 --> 0:07:04.799
<v Speaker 3>we're looking at one of the strongest holiday seasons since well,

0:07:04.839 --> 0:07:08.839
<v Speaker 3>certainly in the post COVID start, and so the gas

0:07:08.880 --> 0:07:10.960
<v Speaker 3>lien spreads of tightening, so there seems to be some

0:07:11.120 --> 0:07:14.120
<v Speaker 3>concern with regard to supply in that manner, but the

0:07:14.160 --> 0:07:17.080
<v Speaker 3>overall global market when we see how the spreads have

0:07:17.240 --> 0:07:20.600
<v Speaker 3>really started to come down the front end. OPEK watches

0:07:20.680 --> 0:07:24.320
<v Speaker 3>this stuff, so the formation of the forward curve is

0:07:24.480 --> 0:07:29.200
<v Speaker 3>very important. I'm friends and I work with OPEK. I

0:07:29.240 --> 0:07:32.920
<v Speaker 3>do know they put a lot of emphasis on this. Therefore,

0:07:33.080 --> 0:07:36.720
<v Speaker 3>with the spreads collapsing with Saudi Arabia, if they're going

0:07:36.800 --> 0:07:38.960
<v Speaker 3>to make any move would probably in the new year.

0:07:39.000 --> 0:07:41.360
<v Speaker 3>If the spread state their way, they are, they'll probably

0:07:41.440 --> 0:07:46.520
<v Speaker 3>cut rather than add production. Going into twenty twenty four, is.

0:07:46.440 --> 0:07:48.560
<v Speaker 1>That how you see it as well, John? And if

0:07:48.600 --> 0:07:51.360
<v Speaker 1>Saudi Arabia does continue to cut, does the rest of

0:07:51.360 --> 0:07:52.400
<v Speaker 1>OPEK plus follow?

0:07:52.880 --> 0:07:55.960
<v Speaker 2>The Sadi's have certainly put their shoulder to the wheel

0:07:55.960 --> 0:08:01.200
<v Speaker 2>here that the energy minister Mahan Bensaman, as you know,

0:08:01.480 --> 0:08:04.520
<v Speaker 2>delivered lollipops, and they want a higher price. You know,

0:08:04.560 --> 0:08:07.960
<v Speaker 2>they need to pay for Neome and their other aspirations

0:08:08.440 --> 0:08:11.200
<v Speaker 2>for their country, and they want oil prices closer to

0:08:11.240 --> 0:08:14.240
<v Speaker 2>one hundred. The question I have though, is that are

0:08:14.240 --> 0:08:16.520
<v Speaker 2>we getting closer to the cycle, the point in the

0:08:16.560 --> 0:08:19.920
<v Speaker 2>cycle where the Saddies throw a fit again like they

0:08:19.920 --> 0:08:23.080
<v Speaker 2>did back in two thousand, right before excuse me, twenty twenty,

0:08:23.160 --> 0:08:26.440
<v Speaker 2>right before COVID hit and flooded the market to collapse

0:08:26.480 --> 0:08:29.040
<v Speaker 2>the price to try to squeeze out higher cost producers,

0:08:29.040 --> 0:08:31.880
<v Speaker 2>which they're kind of suffering from right now. Part of

0:08:31.920 --> 0:08:34.200
<v Speaker 2>their problem is the United States with the twelve million

0:08:34.200 --> 0:08:36.800
<v Speaker 2>barrels per day of production and about five million barrels

0:08:36.800 --> 0:08:39.560
<v Speaker 2>per day we're pushing on it anyway of daily crude

0:08:39.559 --> 0:08:42.800
<v Speaker 2>oil exports, so we're making their job a lot harder.

0:08:42.960 --> 0:08:45.520
<v Speaker 2>As the years go by. Here, we'll see if that persists.

0:08:45.880 --> 0:08:48.280
<v Speaker 2>But I do believe the Sattis want higher prices, and

0:08:48.320 --> 0:08:50.200
<v Speaker 2>I do think they're willing to take one or more

0:08:50.240 --> 0:08:53.640
<v Speaker 2>for the team to succeed in that endeavor, and so yes,

0:08:53.679 --> 0:08:55.480
<v Speaker 2>and with Stephen on that that they're more than likely

0:08:55.559 --> 0:08:58.440
<v Speaker 2>to cut right now until they finally throw that fit

0:08:58.679 --> 0:09:00.000
<v Speaker 2>and collapse the market.

0:09:00.280 --> 0:09:04.280
<v Speaker 1>Stephen, what about the impact of central banks and demand?

0:09:04.640 --> 0:09:10.560
<v Speaker 1>Can prices grind higher when we could potentially see interest

0:09:10.640 --> 0:09:15.000
<v Speaker 1>rates fall and the potential for a slow and demand

0:09:15.520 --> 0:09:18.520
<v Speaker 1>depending on how this economy goes into twenty twenty four.

0:09:18.840 --> 0:09:23.160
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that is a really interesting point, and really I'm perplexed.

0:09:23.480 --> 0:09:26.760
<v Speaker 3>I'm impressed with the US economy when we consider that

0:09:28.160 --> 0:09:31.559
<v Speaker 3>consumer spending is seventy seventy zero percent of the economy,

0:09:31.600 --> 0:09:35.040
<v Speaker 3>and we're looking at eighteen consecutive months of credit card

0:09:35.360 --> 0:09:39.320
<v Speaker 3>debt well over one trillion dollars with interest rates on

0:09:39.400 --> 0:09:42.520
<v Speaker 3>those credit cards at twenty two percent. When we look

0:09:42.520 --> 0:09:45.880
<v Speaker 3>at savings rates that we've all gone through, all of

0:09:45.920 --> 0:09:48.640
<v Speaker 3>the savings that we are the income or the cash

0:09:48.880 --> 0:09:50.760
<v Speaker 3>that was printed by the US government, we no longer

0:09:50.760 --> 0:09:53.160
<v Speaker 3>have those savings. So I don't know where where the

0:09:53.280 --> 0:09:56.480
<v Speaker 3>juice from the consumer is coming from, but it's there.

0:09:56.880 --> 0:10:02.079
<v Speaker 3>So certainly if we do seetea of if rate rises

0:10:02.280 --> 0:10:05.400
<v Speaker 3>have indeed been cut, you know we've seen the end

0:10:05.440 --> 0:10:07.480
<v Speaker 3>of it. I'm skeptical on that, but if we have,

0:10:07.800 --> 0:10:09.720
<v Speaker 3>and to your point, if you do start to see

0:10:09.760 --> 0:10:13.280
<v Speaker 3>interest rates coming back, well, heck, if the US consumer

0:10:13.640 --> 0:10:17.600
<v Speaker 3>can spend in a twenty two percent credit card interest environment,

0:10:18.200 --> 0:10:21.760
<v Speaker 3>you start bringing those down a few hundred bases points,

0:10:22.200 --> 0:10:25.920
<v Speaker 3>then I can see this certainly being a catalyst that

0:10:25.920 --> 0:10:29.840
<v Speaker 3>that will be that next trans next demand driver that

0:10:30.040 --> 0:10:33.080
<v Speaker 3>can certainly propel oil prices higher into the new year.

0:10:33.280 --> 0:10:35.199
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for this look at what could be driving oil

0:10:35.240 --> 0:10:39.120
<v Speaker 1>prices into twenty twenty four. That was Stephen Schork, president

0:10:39.200 --> 0:10:43.239
<v Speaker 1>of the Short Group, joining us on zoom and John Kilduff,

0:10:43.280 --> 0:10:46.679
<v Speaker 1>founding partner at Again Capital, with us on the phone

0:10:46.760 --> 0:10:50.640
<v Speaker 1>on this special Thanksgiving Day edition of Bloomberg Daybreak, and

0:10:50.679 --> 0:10:52.959
<v Speaker 1>straight ahead we'll get you set for Black Friday. We'll

0:10:52.960 --> 0:10:56.200
<v Speaker 1>look ahead to the holiday shopping season with Bert Flickinger

0:10:56.559 --> 0:11:00.480
<v Speaker 1>of Strategic Resource Group. It's eighteen minutes past the I'm

0:11:00.520 --> 0:11:09.360
<v Speaker 1>Nathan Hager, and this is Bloomberg. Welcome back to this

0:11:09.440 --> 0:11:13.040
<v Speaker 1>special edition of Bloomberg Daybreak. The US markets are closed

0:11:13.040 --> 0:11:17.319
<v Speaker 1>for the Thanksgiving holiday. I'm Nathan Hager and retailers, well,

0:11:17.360 --> 0:11:20.079
<v Speaker 1>they're open and entering their most crucial time of the

0:11:20.160 --> 0:11:23.760
<v Speaker 1>year for many. It has already begun with Black Friday

0:11:23.840 --> 0:11:27.760
<v Speaker 1>sales underway. And for more on the kickoff of holiday

0:11:27.840 --> 0:11:32.680
<v Speaker 1>shopping season, we welcome Bert Flickinger, Managing director at Strategic

0:11:32.760 --> 0:11:35.880
<v Speaker 1>Resource Group. Bert, this time of year is always big

0:11:35.920 --> 0:11:40.440
<v Speaker 1>for retail, but how big is this year's holiday shopping season,

0:11:40.480 --> 0:11:43.840
<v Speaker 1>particularly when you think about companies like Walmart warning about

0:11:43.880 --> 0:11:46.000
<v Speaker 1>the consumer outlook heading into next year.

0:11:46.679 --> 0:11:52.080
<v Speaker 4>Nathan, Happy Thanksgiving Day, and there is some concerns with

0:11:52.200 --> 0:11:56.160
<v Speaker 4>Walmart and everyone else that while retail sales will be

0:11:56.280 --> 0:11:58.320
<v Speaker 4>up three to three and a half percent over the

0:11:58.360 --> 0:12:05.000
<v Speaker 4>holiday season and this Black Friday weekend, overall, adjusted for inflation,

0:12:05.440 --> 0:12:08.600
<v Speaker 4>sales are flat and on the Bloomberg terminal the University

0:12:08.640 --> 0:12:15.000
<v Speaker 4>of Michigan consumer sentiments near twelvemonth low and that's all

0:12:15.400 --> 0:12:20.080
<v Speaker 4>due to inflation and sixty percent of people going paycheck

0:12:20.120 --> 0:12:22.280
<v Speaker 4>to paycheck and carrying a lot of consumer debt.

0:12:22.400 --> 0:12:24.280
<v Speaker 1>So does that have you thinking that a lot of

0:12:24.320 --> 0:12:26.960
<v Speaker 1>shoppers are going to be going into more of the

0:12:27.120 --> 0:12:30.719
<v Speaker 1>lower end retail chains as opposed to some of the

0:12:30.800 --> 0:12:32.040
<v Speaker 1>higher end locations.

0:12:32.280 --> 0:12:35.640
<v Speaker 4>Yes, Nathan, the US Department of Commerce is reporting that

0:12:36.000 --> 0:12:41.880
<v Speaker 4>anything's food based, like you said, Walmart, Costco, Kroger will

0:12:41.880 --> 0:12:46.719
<v Speaker 4>do well. But the category dominant areas of the business,

0:12:47.360 --> 0:12:53.280
<v Speaker 4>home improvement, furniture, sporting goods, electronics are all trending down,

0:12:53.600 --> 0:12:58.800
<v Speaker 4>even not before they're adjusted for inflation. So the consumer spending,

0:12:58.840 --> 0:13:02.160
<v Speaker 4>but the consumer's cast in my alma mater, Price Waterhouse

0:13:02.160 --> 0:13:05.600
<v Speaker 4>Coopers said almost all the spending increases are coming from

0:13:05.640 --> 0:13:10.360
<v Speaker 4>the top twenty percent of people in the disposable income ladder.

0:13:10.520 --> 0:13:12.199
<v Speaker 1>So what does that mean when it comes to the

0:13:12.280 --> 0:13:16.160
<v Speaker 1>kind of deals that we're used to seeing on Black Friday.

0:13:16.240 --> 0:13:18.240
<v Speaker 1>If the thinking is that a lot of shoppers are

0:13:18.240 --> 0:13:20.800
<v Speaker 1>looking more toward the lower end more of the staples,

0:13:20.840 --> 0:13:22.800
<v Speaker 1>does that mean we're going to see deeper discounts on

0:13:22.840 --> 0:13:25.080
<v Speaker 1>some of those like consumer tech items that you usually

0:13:25.080 --> 0:13:28.280
<v Speaker 1>think about selling really well around Black Friday and beyond.

0:13:28.920 --> 0:13:32.920
<v Speaker 4>Yes, you'll see better deals because Walmart, Target and others

0:13:32.960 --> 0:13:37.040
<v Speaker 4>are still carrying ten to fifteen percent more inventory than

0:13:37.600 --> 0:13:42.720
<v Speaker 4>they were pre pandemic, and all the retailers really started

0:13:43.040 --> 0:13:47.839
<v Speaker 4>their Black Friday holiday sales programs either right after Labor

0:13:47.920 --> 0:13:51.400
<v Speaker 4>Day or right after Columbus Day or Indigenous People's Day.

0:13:52.120 --> 0:13:53.960
<v Speaker 4>So the deals have been out there for a long

0:13:54.000 --> 0:13:57.079
<v Speaker 4>time and a lot of the people's shopping has already

0:13:57.080 --> 0:14:01.040
<v Speaker 4>been done. So Price Waterhouse Coopers is saying about forty

0:14:01.120 --> 0:14:03.800
<v Speaker 4>two percent of the shopping is going to be done online,

0:14:03.920 --> 0:14:07.960
<v Speaker 4>forty one percent in store, and the remaining seventeen percent

0:14:08.040 --> 0:14:11.800
<v Speaker 4>click and collect. But a lot of the shoppings been completed,

0:14:12.400 --> 0:14:15.520
<v Speaker 4>except at Macy's with the Thanksgiving Day parade right near

0:14:15.559 --> 0:14:20.520
<v Speaker 4>Bloomber's World headquarters doing well, and this is their big

0:14:20.600 --> 0:14:24.000
<v Speaker 4>day is with the Macy's parade as Thanksgiving Day.

0:14:24.120 --> 0:14:26.480
<v Speaker 1>Well, if so much of the shopping has already been

0:14:26.480 --> 0:14:31.280
<v Speaker 1>done even before Black Friday, what kind of impact could

0:14:31.400 --> 0:14:34.120
<v Speaker 1>some of these Black Friday discounts even have.

0:14:34.680 --> 0:14:40.000
<v Speaker 4>Nathan's your excellent point to minimus impact because we're overstored

0:14:40.040 --> 0:14:43.280
<v Speaker 4>in the suburbs and understored in the cities or the

0:14:43.400 --> 0:14:46.840
<v Speaker 4>urban areas. So it's interestingly it's up to the Federal

0:14:46.880 --> 0:14:51.160
<v Speaker 4>Trade Commission and exhibit A is letting Kroger and Albertson's

0:14:51.240 --> 0:14:54.920
<v Speaker 4>merge to protect unionized employers and unionize jobs, and it

0:14:54.960 --> 0:14:58.640
<v Speaker 4>was infirmed by John and Margot Katsmetitis from Cristiiti's and

0:14:58.720 --> 0:15:02.880
<v Speaker 4>Dagostino after they and teammates gave out ten thousand turkeys.

0:15:02.920 --> 0:15:07.320
<v Speaker 4>We talked to Democratic National Committee chair ed Rendell, Governor

0:15:07.440 --> 0:15:12.600
<v Speaker 4>David Patterson, and Senator Malcolm Smith and John and Margot Katsmatitis,

0:15:13.080 --> 0:15:16.520
<v Speaker 4>and they said it's really up to the government to

0:15:16.680 --> 0:15:20.440
<v Speaker 4>let the chains, especially the Krogers of the world that

0:15:20.480 --> 0:15:24.320
<v Speaker 4>are unionized, continue to operate and expand in the urban

0:15:24.360 --> 0:15:27.320
<v Speaker 4>areas as well as suburban and rural areas because Walmart

0:15:27.560 --> 0:15:30.520
<v Speaker 4>and Amazon have been subsidized in the city, and as

0:15:30.560 --> 0:15:34.240
<v Speaker 4>soon as the government subsidies run out, Walmart tends to

0:15:34.280 --> 0:15:38.720
<v Speaker 4>close and exit the urban areas, as they did ignominiously

0:15:39.880 --> 0:15:43.680
<v Speaker 4>in the South and West side of Chicago before this

0:15:44.400 --> 0:15:46.160
<v Speaker 4>twenty twenty three holiday season.

0:15:46.560 --> 0:15:50.520
<v Speaker 1>Speaking with Bert Flickinger, the managing director of Strategic Resource Group,

0:15:51.000 --> 0:15:55.200
<v Speaker 1>how do you expect this particular holiday shopping kickoff to

0:15:55.360 --> 0:16:00.280
<v Speaker 1>compare two years past when we think about so much

0:16:00.280 --> 0:16:04.880
<v Speaker 1>of the consumer running out of excess savings relying more

0:16:04.960 --> 0:16:07.280
<v Speaker 1>on credit cards. How is that going to play out

0:16:07.600 --> 0:16:10.720
<v Speaker 1>when it compares to some past Black Fridays.

0:16:11.320 --> 0:16:15.240
<v Speaker 4>As it plays out, Nathan, it's by now pay later.

0:16:15.760 --> 0:16:21.240
<v Speaker 4>PwC said that fifteen percent of the purchases for this

0:16:21.880 --> 0:16:26.120
<v Speaker 4>Black Friday weekend and small business Saturday and two days

0:16:26.120 --> 0:16:28.960
<v Speaker 4>and Cyber Monday and four days, it's going to be

0:16:29.160 --> 0:16:33.120
<v Speaker 4>buy now, pay later. Fifteen percent of all purchases will

0:16:33.160 --> 0:16:36.720
<v Speaker 4>be that way. And consumers are still taking on credit

0:16:36.720 --> 0:16:41.080
<v Speaker 4>card debt, but sixty three percent of consumers will be

0:16:41.160 --> 0:16:45.440
<v Speaker 4>buying with debit cards, so instant cash to the retailers

0:16:45.760 --> 0:16:48.600
<v Speaker 4>and trying to put less on credit. As interest rates

0:16:48.600 --> 0:16:52.560
<v Speaker 4>of climbed and the average household has seventeen thousand and

0:16:52.640 --> 0:16:54.600
<v Speaker 4>revolving unpaid credit card debt.

0:16:54.800 --> 0:16:58.720
<v Speaker 1>What's the read through to retailer's bottom lines their profit margins.

0:16:58.720 --> 0:17:01.560
<v Speaker 1>If we do see more consumers relying on buy now,

0:17:01.560 --> 0:17:02.280
<v Speaker 1>pay later.

0:17:02.720 --> 0:17:08.800
<v Speaker 4>The retailer's bottom lines will be under pressure because about

0:17:08.880 --> 0:17:13.080
<v Speaker 4>three percent of consumers are defaulting on credit card debt

0:17:13.119 --> 0:17:18.040
<v Speaker 4>of some sort car loans, retail credit card debt, etc.

0:17:18.440 --> 0:17:24.760
<v Speaker 4>So retailers will have a solid sales season flat adjusted

0:17:24.760 --> 0:17:29.639
<v Speaker 4>for inflation, profit will be good but not great. But

0:17:29.680 --> 0:17:33.359
<v Speaker 4>the real concern is the upcoming calendar year going into

0:17:33.400 --> 0:17:35.800
<v Speaker 4>the election cycle of twenty twenty four.

0:17:36.080 --> 0:17:39.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I did want to get into what this holiday

0:17:40.119 --> 0:17:45.919
<v Speaker 1>shopping season kickoff means in terms of momentum for retailers.

0:17:46.160 --> 0:17:49.879
<v Speaker 1>Do you see the momentum growing for retailers once we

0:17:49.920 --> 0:17:53.600
<v Speaker 1>get past this season or are there further headwinds.

0:17:53.520 --> 0:17:58.679
<v Speaker 4>The momentums growing? And interestingly, Nathan, part of it is

0:17:59.640 --> 0:18:03.199
<v Speaker 4>following the Bloomberg terminal. If a company like Bedbath and

0:18:03.240 --> 0:18:08.119
<v Speaker 4>Beyond files for bankruptcy or Toys r Us earlier filed

0:18:08.119 --> 0:18:10.760
<v Speaker 4>for bankruptcy and liquidation, who picks up the business? So

0:18:10.840 --> 0:18:14.000
<v Speaker 4>Macy's and Target have done a terrific job picking up

0:18:14.640 --> 0:18:18.159
<v Speaker 4>the toy business, especially Macy's, which on the Bloomberg Terminal

0:18:18.240 --> 0:18:22.760
<v Speaker 4>reported very good earnings. It's so expensive to feed a

0:18:22.800 --> 0:18:27.600
<v Speaker 4>family of four for over fifty dollars at McDonald's that

0:18:27.800 --> 0:18:32.120
<v Speaker 4>for the first first time in decades, more people are

0:18:32.160 --> 0:18:38.160
<v Speaker 4>buying food at Walmart, Kroger, Costco and cooking and entertaining

0:18:38.200 --> 0:18:42.919
<v Speaker 4>at home because it's unaffordable to go out. So that

0:18:43.200 --> 0:18:47.760
<v Speaker 4>shift in terms of consumers regardless of income, are all

0:18:47.760 --> 0:18:52.439
<v Speaker 4>smart shoppers, and they're shopping more to buy and serve

0:18:52.560 --> 0:18:56.200
<v Speaker 4>and stay at home rather than go out. Where our

0:18:56.240 --> 0:18:59.760
<v Speaker 4>family was one of the largest food service suppliers to

0:18:59.800 --> 0:19:03.560
<v Speaker 4>the restaurant industry and the food service restaurant industry. Nathan

0:19:03.600 --> 0:19:06.679
<v Speaker 4>marks up the food about three hundred percent, marks up

0:19:06.680 --> 0:19:11.400
<v Speaker 4>the beverages about seven hundred percent. First fifteen dollars big

0:19:11.480 --> 0:19:15.000
<v Speaker 4>mac meal at McDonald's. That same meal could be bought

0:19:15.280 --> 0:19:20.840
<v Speaker 4>at Kroger, Costco or Walmart for about a dollar per person.

0:19:21.200 --> 0:19:23.840
<v Speaker 1>So just quickly, it looks like we're hearing a lot

0:19:23.960 --> 0:19:27.080
<v Speaker 1>more thinking about, a lot more picking and choosing for

0:19:27.119 --> 0:19:29.680
<v Speaker 1>this holiday shopping season perhaps than the years past.

0:19:30.600 --> 0:19:37.920
<v Speaker 4>Yes, a lot more cautious, careful shopping. But ultimately, retail

0:19:38.000 --> 0:19:42.440
<v Speaker 4>has gone from four hundred percent overstored fifteen years ago

0:19:42.520 --> 0:19:45.520
<v Speaker 4>to only about one hundred percent overstored. And in the

0:19:45.640 --> 0:19:51.600
<v Speaker 4>urban areas we're twenty to thirty to sometimes forty percent understored.

0:19:51.920 --> 0:19:56.840
<v Speaker 4>So the big opportunities urban retail, and that's where Kroger

0:19:56.880 --> 0:20:01.280
<v Speaker 4>and the unionized companies to locally, Christie and Augustinos and

0:20:01.320 --> 0:20:05.119
<v Speaker 4>Morton Williams and fair Way have done it particularly well.

0:20:05.720 --> 0:20:08.280
<v Speaker 1>All right, Berd Flick and thanks for this. It's Bird

0:20:08.320 --> 0:20:12.040
<v Speaker 1>Flick and Jert managing partner at Strategic Resource Group, and

0:20:12.119 --> 0:20:15.200
<v Speaker 1>still ahead on this Thanksgiving edition of Bloomberg day Break,

0:20:15.240 --> 0:20:18.520
<v Speaker 1>We'll take the pulse of some key antitrust cases in

0:20:18.560 --> 0:20:22.240
<v Speaker 1>a busy year for the Justice Department against corporate America.

0:20:22.480 --> 0:20:25.320
<v Speaker 1>It's thirty five minutes past the hour. I'm Nathan Hager,

0:20:25.520 --> 0:20:34.439
<v Speaker 1>and this is Bloomberg. Welcome back to this special Thanksgiving

0:20:34.600 --> 0:20:38.399
<v Speaker 1>edition of Bloomberg Daybreak. I'm Nathan Hager. Us markets are

0:20:38.480 --> 0:20:41.640
<v Speaker 1>closed for the holiday. Twenty twenty three has been a

0:20:41.760 --> 0:20:44.919
<v Speaker 1>very busy year for the Justice Department. It's in the

0:20:44.920 --> 0:20:48.080
<v Speaker 1>middle of a number of high profile trials aimed at

0:20:48.080 --> 0:20:52.000
<v Speaker 1>limiting consolidation in corporate America. So who better to get

0:20:52.080 --> 0:20:55.840
<v Speaker 1>you caught up on these cases than Bloomberg Intelligence Senior

0:20:55.920 --> 0:20:59.480
<v Speaker 1>Litigation analyst Jennifer reed. Jen thanks for being with us

0:20:59.560 --> 0:21:01.680
<v Speaker 1>on this holiday, taking a bit of a break from

0:21:01.680 --> 0:21:04.720
<v Speaker 1>what has been a very busy time for you, particularly

0:21:05.080 --> 0:21:10.239
<v Speaker 1>thinking about Google and these cases against that company and

0:21:10.320 --> 0:21:13.040
<v Speaker 1>its parent Alphabet. Let's start with the one that's been

0:21:13.040 --> 0:21:15.400
<v Speaker 1>going on for quite a while, with the Justice Department

0:21:15.400 --> 0:21:18.720
<v Speaker 1>taking on Google over its dominance in search. What are

0:21:18.760 --> 0:21:20.440
<v Speaker 1>the allegations there? Where do things stand?

0:21:20.560 --> 0:21:22.600
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, that is a big one, and some are even

0:21:22.640 --> 0:21:25.679
<v Speaker 5>calling that one the antitrust trial of the century. I

0:21:25.720 --> 0:21:27.679
<v Speaker 5>don't know if when all is said and done, all

0:21:27.680 --> 0:21:29.520
<v Speaker 5>that fanfare is going to be worth it. But this

0:21:29.560 --> 0:21:34.080
<v Speaker 5>trial just ended November sixteenth, but closing arguments aren't set

0:21:34.160 --> 0:21:36.240
<v Speaker 5>until early May, so it's going to be some time

0:21:36.280 --> 0:21:39.680
<v Speaker 5>before Yeah. Really, this judge is taking it very seriously.

0:21:39.880 --> 0:21:42.399
<v Speaker 5>There was a lot of evidence introduced in the trial,

0:21:42.440 --> 0:21:44.439
<v Speaker 5>and I think he's going to carefully parse through it

0:21:44.480 --> 0:21:48.400
<v Speaker 5>all before making any decisions and having those closing arguments.

0:21:48.680 --> 0:21:51.600
<v Speaker 5>But here what the DOJ has accused Google of doing

0:21:51.720 --> 0:21:54.760
<v Speaker 5>is illegally maintaining a monopoly in search and a couple

0:21:54.840 --> 0:21:58.679
<v Speaker 5>different search advertising markets because they have these agreements with

0:21:58.800 --> 0:22:02.399
<v Speaker 5>Apple and makers of Android mobile devices where they're spending

0:22:02.400 --> 0:22:05.280
<v Speaker 5>a lot of money twenty six billion you heard in

0:22:05.320 --> 0:22:08.200
<v Speaker 5>twenty twenty two for Google Search to be said is

0:22:08.240 --> 0:22:10.560
<v Speaker 5>the default. So what it means is that if somebody

0:22:10.560 --> 0:22:12.439
<v Speaker 5>buys a phone, they buy an Android phone, and you

0:22:12.520 --> 0:22:14.760
<v Speaker 5>go right in and you go into Safari. Let's say

0:22:15.280 --> 0:22:17.480
<v Speaker 5>Google is set as your default, whether you know it

0:22:17.600 --> 0:22:19.199
<v Speaker 5>or not, whether you like it or not, and you

0:22:19.240 --> 0:22:21.240
<v Speaker 5>do your search and that's what you're using. And so

0:22:21.320 --> 0:22:23.439
<v Speaker 5>they're able to then get all the revenue from the

0:22:23.480 --> 0:22:26.120
<v Speaker 5>advertising that comes up from that search, and the DJ

0:22:26.280 --> 0:22:29.800
<v Speaker 5>is basically saying, look, Google's tied up everything with these agreements,

0:22:29.960 --> 0:22:32.480
<v Speaker 5>and if being in duc duc go can't get in there,

0:22:33.000 --> 0:22:35.800
<v Speaker 5>you know they can't improve because you need the data

0:22:35.840 --> 0:22:37.919
<v Speaker 5>to improve, and you get the data by having more

0:22:37.960 --> 0:22:40.280
<v Speaker 5>and more people do a search on your service.

0:22:40.640 --> 0:22:43.520
<v Speaker 1>And we've had in the course of this case a

0:22:43.560 --> 0:22:48.200
<v Speaker 1>lot of numbers revealed almost reluctantly by the parties involved

0:22:48.200 --> 0:22:51.520
<v Speaker 1>in how much has been spent to keep Google at

0:22:51.520 --> 0:22:54.359
<v Speaker 1>the top of the search list. But when we have

0:22:54.600 --> 0:22:58.080
<v Speaker 1>so much time between the end of the arguments and

0:22:58.480 --> 0:23:02.320
<v Speaker 1>the closing ares in this case, what are we expecting

0:23:02.320 --> 0:23:05.520
<v Speaker 1>from this judge after all this time pouring through all

0:23:05.560 --> 0:23:06.160
<v Speaker 1>the evidence.

0:23:06.600 --> 0:23:09.679
<v Speaker 5>You know, he said himself that he has absolutely no

0:23:09.840 --> 0:23:12.280
<v Speaker 5>idea how he's going to rule, And I suppose that's

0:23:12.280 --> 0:23:14.639
<v Speaker 5>what he should say, because he needs to spend the

0:23:14.720 --> 0:23:16.600
<v Speaker 5>time to look at the precedent and look at all

0:23:16.640 --> 0:23:19.240
<v Speaker 5>the evidence before he makes up his mind. I mean,

0:23:19.520 --> 0:23:23.160
<v Speaker 5>my feeling is that I lean a bit here toward

0:23:23.200 --> 0:23:27.040
<v Speaker 5>the DOJ. I think the DJ introduced really compelling evidence

0:23:27.320 --> 0:23:29.960
<v Speaker 5>that it is very difficult for other search engines to

0:23:30.000 --> 0:23:33.040
<v Speaker 5>be able to develop and be able to compete with Google.

0:23:33.080 --> 0:23:35.480
<v Speaker 5>Having all of these agreements for default, and even though

0:23:35.480 --> 0:23:38.720
<v Speaker 5>people can change that, you know, it's not completely foreclosing.

0:23:38.760 --> 0:23:40.720
<v Speaker 5>You can go in and change your default to BING.

0:23:41.040 --> 0:23:44.320
<v Speaker 5>But they had these experts in behavioral economics that basically

0:23:44.359 --> 0:23:48.080
<v Speaker 5>showed that in many instances, people simply don't change a

0:23:48.119 --> 0:23:50.480
<v Speaker 5>default if they don't know about it, or if they

0:23:50.520 --> 0:23:52.800
<v Speaker 5>have to do some research or work to figure out

0:23:52.840 --> 0:23:54.679
<v Speaker 5>how to do it, they just don't do it. And

0:23:54.720 --> 0:23:57.400
<v Speaker 5>Google's paying twenty six billions, So obviously there's a lot

0:23:57.440 --> 0:23:58.840
<v Speaker 5>of value in being the default.

0:23:59.000 --> 0:23:59.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:23:59.200 --> 0:24:01.639
<v Speaker 1>I mean for so many people, Google and Search are

0:24:01.640 --> 0:24:05.000
<v Speaker 1>almost synonymous. I mean, if the Justice Department ends up

0:24:05.000 --> 0:24:06.960
<v Speaker 1>winning out in this case, it's going to be a

0:24:06.960 --> 0:24:09.400
<v Speaker 1>pretty big sea change, not just for the tech industry

0:24:09.440 --> 0:24:11.360
<v Speaker 1>but for the people who use it, wouldn't it.

0:24:11.359 --> 0:24:13.159
<v Speaker 5>Well, you know, it may and it may not. You know,

0:24:13.160 --> 0:24:16.119
<v Speaker 5>you talk about really these trials being so protracted. We

0:24:16.320 --> 0:24:19.680
<v Speaker 5>probably won't get a decision given closing arguments in May

0:24:19.960 --> 0:24:22.640
<v Speaker 5>until i'd say early in the second half of next year.

0:24:22.840 --> 0:24:25.760
<v Speaker 5>And this is only halfway through this process because the

0:24:25.800 --> 0:24:29.120
<v Speaker 5>trial that just ended was only on liability. In other words,

0:24:29.200 --> 0:24:32.200
<v Speaker 5>did Google Elite violate the laws? Did they do something illegal?

0:24:32.720 --> 0:24:35.000
<v Speaker 5>If it is determined that it did, there will be

0:24:35.040 --> 0:24:37.720
<v Speaker 5>a whole second trial on what the appropriate remedy is.

0:24:38.160 --> 0:24:40.879
<v Speaker 5>So you're looking at possibly not even getting an answer

0:24:40.920 --> 0:24:44.600
<v Speaker 5>to that question until late twenty twenty four, maybe early

0:24:44.640 --> 0:24:47.359
<v Speaker 5>twenty twenty five. I doubt a remedy would be so

0:24:47.480 --> 0:24:50.639
<v Speaker 5>drastic as to do something like break up Google, you know,

0:24:50.720 --> 0:24:52.840
<v Speaker 5>force it to sell off Google Search, or sell off

0:24:52.920 --> 0:24:55.400
<v Speaker 5>Chrome or something like that. I suspect it would be

0:24:55.600 --> 0:24:58.760
<v Speaker 5>more like something like sharing the data with rivals or

0:24:59.119 --> 0:25:01.639
<v Speaker 5>creating a choice screen like Google has been forced to

0:25:01.640 --> 0:25:02.400
<v Speaker 5>do in Europe.

0:25:02.480 --> 0:25:05.240
<v Speaker 1>Now, along with this case, with involving the Justice Department,

0:25:05.280 --> 0:25:09.160
<v Speaker 1>Google is facing another matter, a lawsuit from Epic Games.

0:25:09.520 --> 0:25:11.760
<v Speaker 1>Tell us more about where that one stands as well.

0:25:11.840 --> 0:25:14.399
<v Speaker 5>Right, So, this one just started and it's going to

0:25:14.400 --> 0:25:17.959
<v Speaker 5>go through toward the end of December. It is just private.

0:25:18.080 --> 0:25:20.480
<v Speaker 5>We did have state attorneys general involved, but they have

0:25:20.600 --> 0:25:23.520
<v Speaker 5>settled with Google. Basically everybody who was a plaintiff in

0:25:23.600 --> 0:25:26.720
<v Speaker 5>this case except Epic Games has settled the case. And

0:25:26.760 --> 0:25:30.199
<v Speaker 5>what Epic Games really objects to are Googles policies and

0:25:30.240 --> 0:25:34.480
<v Speaker 5>strategies to force buyers of the Android mobile devices to

0:25:34.560 --> 0:25:38.440
<v Speaker 5>download apps through Google's Playstore and not outside of the Playstore,

0:25:38.720 --> 0:25:41.680
<v Speaker 5>and any kind of app purchases or in app purchases

0:25:41.720 --> 0:25:44.560
<v Speaker 5>have to be made through the Playstore and Google services

0:25:44.560 --> 0:25:47.359
<v Speaker 5>that payment. And so what Epic says is this allows

0:25:47.359 --> 0:25:51.120
<v Speaker 5>Google to charge developers really an unfairly high fee every

0:25:51.200 --> 0:25:54.000
<v Speaker 5>time somebody is buying an app. Epic would like access.

0:25:54.280 --> 0:25:56.399
<v Speaker 5>You know, they tried this with Apple. They want to

0:25:56.400 --> 0:25:59.480
<v Speaker 5>be an app store themselves and distribute apps on mobile devices.

0:25:59.480 --> 0:26:01.520
<v Speaker 5>They tried this with Apple. They're now trying this with

0:26:01.600 --> 0:26:03.560
<v Speaker 5>Google to get in there so that they can be

0:26:03.600 --> 0:26:06.040
<v Speaker 5>an app store and they can service the payments themselves.

0:26:06.160 --> 0:26:08.760
<v Speaker 1>Well, the last time Epic tried something like this with

0:26:08.880 --> 0:26:11.159
<v Speaker 1>Apple and ended up losing. Why does it think it

0:26:11.200 --> 0:26:13.000
<v Speaker 1>stands a better chance this time around?

0:26:13.200 --> 0:26:13.360
<v Speaker 2>Right?

0:26:13.400 --> 0:26:15.760
<v Speaker 5>And it mostly lost. There was one little piece and

0:26:15.800 --> 0:26:18.200
<v Speaker 5>which Epic one, but really what it was going for

0:26:18.320 --> 0:26:22.520
<v Speaker 5>it lost. There's some differences. The biggest difference here is

0:26:22.520 --> 0:26:25.560
<v Speaker 5>that Apple's case was before a jury and Google's case,

0:26:25.600 --> 0:26:28.200
<v Speaker 5>I'm sorry, Apple's case was before a judge. Google's case

0:26:28.280 --> 0:26:31.000
<v Speaker 5>is before a jury, and I think that really could

0:26:31.080 --> 0:26:33.399
<v Speaker 5>cause a difference because a judge is going to focus

0:26:33.680 --> 0:26:36.560
<v Speaker 5>on the very technical requirements of what a plaintiff has

0:26:36.600 --> 0:26:39.720
<v Speaker 5>to prove to show illegal monopoly maintenance, and there are

0:26:39.720 --> 0:26:42.080
<v Speaker 5>a lot of technical hurdles the plaintiff has to get over.

0:26:42.280 --> 0:26:45.080
<v Speaker 5>It's difficult to win. A jury may be a little

0:26:45.160 --> 0:26:48.000
<v Speaker 5>less focused on that. You know, if the plaintiffs can

0:26:48.080 --> 0:26:51.560
<v Speaker 5>portray Google as a bully here or doing something unfair,

0:26:51.840 --> 0:26:54.960
<v Speaker 5>you know, maybe that'll sway a jury and they'll focus

0:26:55.040 --> 0:26:58.640
<v Speaker 5>less on whether or not Epics met those technical requirements

0:26:58.640 --> 0:27:02.400
<v Speaker 5>and more on Google's So maybe Epic feels it has

0:27:02.600 --> 0:27:05.080
<v Speaker 5>a better shot here given that they'll be playing to

0:27:05.119 --> 0:27:06.560
<v Speaker 5>a jury and not to a judge.

0:27:06.680 --> 0:27:08.919
<v Speaker 1>As you mentioned, this one's just getting started, so a

0:27:08.960 --> 0:27:11.679
<v Speaker 1>lot more to watch there. But let's turn back to

0:27:12.080 --> 0:27:15.200
<v Speaker 1>the Justice Department. The other big case that it's been

0:27:15.240 --> 0:27:20.639
<v Speaker 1>pursuing is against Jet Blues purchase of Spirit Airlines under

0:27:20.720 --> 0:27:24.720
<v Speaker 1>anti competitive argument. Why does the Justice Department see this

0:27:24.760 --> 0:27:28.480
<v Speaker 1>as anti competitive when you have quite a few much

0:27:28.640 --> 0:27:31.440
<v Speaker 1>bigger airlines that both of these are competing with.

0:27:31.720 --> 0:27:34.159
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, it's so interesting because they really are in the

0:27:34.200 --> 0:27:37.200
<v Speaker 5>scheme of things in the United States, two small airlines

0:27:37.320 --> 0:27:41.159
<v Speaker 5>compared to the legacies. But what the Department of Justice

0:27:41.240 --> 0:27:44.520
<v Speaker 5>is concerned about is that Spirit has a very particular model.

0:27:44.800 --> 0:27:47.280
<v Speaker 5>It's called an ultra low cost carrier, and it offers

0:27:47.440 --> 0:27:50.639
<v Speaker 5>very low fares for an unbundled product. In other words,

0:27:50.800 --> 0:27:52.760
<v Speaker 5>just the fair. If you want to check a bag,

0:27:52.800 --> 0:27:54.440
<v Speaker 5>if you want to drink, if you want some extra

0:27:54.560 --> 0:27:56.400
<v Speaker 5>leg room, you have to pay for all of that. Yeah,

0:27:56.400 --> 0:27:59.639
<v Speaker 5>that's right, right, right exactly, And some people, you know,

0:27:59.640 --> 0:28:02.120
<v Speaker 5>rely on that very low fare in order to visit

0:28:02.160 --> 0:28:05.080
<v Speaker 5>friends or family or go on a vacation. Jet Blue

0:28:05.119 --> 0:28:07.000
<v Speaker 5>is a little bit different. It's kind of a step up.

0:28:07.119 --> 0:28:09.080
<v Speaker 5>It has bigger seats, a little more leg room, a

0:28:09.119 --> 0:28:12.920
<v Speaker 5>few more amenities, and it charges higher prices. And Jet

0:28:12.960 --> 0:28:14.919
<v Speaker 5>Blue spin made no bones about the fact that it

0:28:14.960 --> 0:28:18.600
<v Speaker 5>intends once it buys Spirit to change those planes, reduce

0:28:18.680 --> 0:28:22.120
<v Speaker 5>the seating, and increase the fares. So what the Department

0:28:22.160 --> 0:28:24.600
<v Speaker 5>of Justice is worried about is this ultra low cost

0:28:24.720 --> 0:28:27.919
<v Speaker 5>unbundled option being removed from the market for some consumers

0:28:27.920 --> 0:28:28.679
<v Speaker 5>that depend on it.

0:28:28.880 --> 0:28:33.080
<v Speaker 1>So what is Jet Blue saying to try to assuage

0:28:33.359 --> 0:28:37.520
<v Speaker 1>the Justice Department that this won't be as anti competitive

0:28:37.520 --> 0:28:38.040
<v Speaker 1>as insane?

0:28:38.360 --> 0:28:40.960
<v Speaker 5>Jet Blue has a good argument too, you know, they say, look,

0:28:40.960 --> 0:28:43.360
<v Speaker 5>first of all, we're really small, and we're all struggling

0:28:43.440 --> 0:28:46.120
<v Speaker 5>to fight against compete against the big guys Delta, United

0:28:46.160 --> 0:28:50.520
<v Speaker 5>American Southwest. We also bring down fares. We bring down

0:28:50.560 --> 0:28:53.640
<v Speaker 5>the fares of those really expensive airlines, and we'll be

0:28:53.680 --> 0:28:57.640
<v Speaker 5>able to expand capacity with Spirits planes and Spirits pilots,

0:28:58.200 --> 0:29:01.239
<v Speaker 5>and we'll pull the fares down when we compete more

0:29:01.320 --> 0:29:04.280
<v Speaker 5>vigorously against the big legacy airlines. And that's a pro

0:29:04.320 --> 0:29:06.880
<v Speaker 5>competitive effect. So this is going to be an interesting

0:29:06.880 --> 0:29:08.480
<v Speaker 5>trial where the judge is going to have to really

0:29:08.520 --> 0:29:10.680
<v Speaker 5>look at both have set both sides, you know, the

0:29:10.680 --> 0:29:14.000
<v Speaker 5>anti competitive side and the beneficial side, and decide which

0:29:14.040 --> 0:29:15.040
<v Speaker 5>one outweighs the other.

0:29:15.280 --> 0:29:17.920
<v Speaker 1>And just quickly, Jen, what do you make so far

0:29:18.320 --> 0:29:22.920
<v Speaker 1>of the Justice departments pretty aggressive stance in going after

0:29:23.440 --> 0:29:27.000
<v Speaker 1>what it sees is anti competitive anti monopoly practices.

0:29:27.320 --> 0:29:28.480
<v Speaker 5>It's been good to its word.

0:29:28.640 --> 0:29:28.840
<v Speaker 6>You know.

0:29:28.920 --> 0:29:31.760
<v Speaker 5>When the Biden administration came in, there was an executive

0:29:31.840 --> 0:29:36.520
<v Speaker 5>order in which the administration really encouraged all of the agencies,

0:29:36.560 --> 0:29:40.280
<v Speaker 5>not just DOJ and FTC to enforce the anti trust laws,

0:29:40.320 --> 0:29:43.200
<v Speaker 5>to be you know, to be careful about consolidation and

0:29:43.280 --> 0:29:46.200
<v Speaker 5>industries and do what they could to make the economy

0:29:46.200 --> 0:29:48.280
<v Speaker 5>more competitive. And the DJ said Hey, we're going to

0:29:48.280 --> 0:29:50.600
<v Speaker 5>follow through with that, and you know, it's been good

0:29:50.600 --> 0:29:53.920
<v Speaker 5>to its word. Instead of settling cases that the DOJ

0:29:54.120 --> 0:29:57.600
<v Speaker 5>views as problematic, like was really the primary practice in

0:29:57.600 --> 0:30:00.520
<v Speaker 5>the past, that DJ has brought quite a few lawsuits

0:30:00.520 --> 0:30:03.600
<v Speaker 5>and they are trying to stem the tide of m

0:30:03.640 --> 0:30:06.240
<v Speaker 5>and A activity and to stop what they view as

0:30:06.280 --> 0:30:09.840
<v Speaker 5>anti competitive conduct by dominant firms. So, you know, they've

0:30:09.840 --> 0:30:13.160
<v Speaker 5>had mixed success. They've had some success, they've had some failures,

0:30:13.200 --> 0:30:16.240
<v Speaker 5>but they are doing exactly what they said they would.

0:30:16.040 --> 0:30:19.440
<v Speaker 1>Do, and they've given you a feast of topics to

0:30:19.480 --> 0:30:21.440
<v Speaker 1>take a look at. Thanks for this, Jen, great having

0:30:21.480 --> 0:30:24.640
<v Speaker 1>you on with us. It's Jennifer Ree, senior litigation analyst

0:30:24.720 --> 0:30:28.800
<v Speaker 1>for Bloomberg Intelligence. Still ahead on this special holiday edition

0:30:28.960 --> 0:30:31.120
<v Speaker 1>of Bloomberg day Break, we'll take a look at the

0:30:31.160 --> 0:30:34.880
<v Speaker 1>story that really matters the Thanksgiving feast. How much is

0:30:34.920 --> 0:30:38.160
<v Speaker 1>that turkey and trimming's really costing you this year. It's

0:30:38.200 --> 0:30:41.120
<v Speaker 1>fifty minutes past the hour. I'm Nathan Hager, and this

0:30:41.560 --> 0:30:50.040
<v Speaker 1>is Bloomberger. Welcome back to the special edition of Bloomberg Daybreak.

0:30:50.080 --> 0:30:53.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm Nathan Hager. US markets are closed for Thanksgiving Day

0:30:54.120 --> 0:30:57.240
<v Speaker 1>and we now turn to the story. You're really focused

0:30:57.240 --> 0:31:02.000
<v Speaker 1>on this holiday, your meal, the turkey, the green bean casserole,

0:31:02.040 --> 0:31:05.080
<v Speaker 1>grandma's pumpkin pie. How much is it really costing you

0:31:05.120 --> 0:31:08.080
<v Speaker 1>compared to years past? And how much room is there

0:31:08.080 --> 0:31:12.680
<v Speaker 1>for seconds with many Americans now on appetite suppressing drugs

0:31:12.720 --> 0:31:16.560
<v Speaker 1>like ozempic and wagovy. For some answers. We're joined by

0:31:16.600 --> 0:31:19.280
<v Speaker 1>Dina Shanker, who covers food for Bloomberg News. So this

0:31:19.360 --> 0:31:22.160
<v Speaker 1>must really be your time of year. Dina, thanks for

0:31:22.200 --> 0:31:26.000
<v Speaker 1>being with us. So overall inflation is slowing is the

0:31:26.040 --> 0:31:27.480
<v Speaker 1>Thanksgiving meal following?

0:31:27.800 --> 0:31:32.320
<v Speaker 6>That was not the expectation from Wells Fargo Agrifood Institute's

0:31:32.400 --> 0:31:36.360
<v Speaker 6>report that came out last month. Basically, out of home

0:31:36.440 --> 0:31:40.360
<v Speaker 6>eating is just still more expensive, even if that inflation

0:31:40.720 --> 0:31:44.240
<v Speaker 6>has slowed down. Eating at home is just getting more

0:31:44.360 --> 0:31:49.720
<v Speaker 6>expensive as certain parts of the supply chain remain elevated.

0:31:49.920 --> 0:31:53.719
<v Speaker 6>We've seen, for example, canned foods are way up, and

0:31:53.760 --> 0:31:57.000
<v Speaker 6>that could include your canned pumpkin and your pumpkin pie.

0:31:57.360 --> 0:32:02.360
<v Speaker 6>It could include canned cramp berries. But at the same time,

0:32:02.800 --> 0:32:06.600
<v Speaker 6>ham prices are up to all the while the big centerpiece,

0:32:06.680 --> 0:32:10.760
<v Speaker 6>the turkey. The prediction was for those prices to come

0:32:10.800 --> 0:32:14.080
<v Speaker 6>down compared to the last year, So that is its

0:32:14.160 --> 0:32:21.320
<v Speaker 6>own special reason for coming down, because essentially wholesale prices

0:32:21.360 --> 0:32:25.680
<v Speaker 6>are down from farmers putting too many birds in the barns,

0:32:26.080 --> 0:32:30.040
<v Speaker 6>and then retailers get to lower their price and consumers

0:32:30.040 --> 0:32:32.959
<v Speaker 6>win with lower prices. But we make up for it

0:32:33.000 --> 0:32:35.520
<v Speaker 6>with the other with the sides and everything else that

0:32:35.560 --> 0:32:36.080
<v Speaker 6>we want to eat.

0:32:36.200 --> 0:32:38.080
<v Speaker 1>So I guess we're getting a little bit of a

0:32:38.280 --> 0:32:41.520
<v Speaker 1>balance maybe when it comes to the price of the

0:32:41.560 --> 0:32:45.440
<v Speaker 1>meal compared to years past. But you have to wonder now,

0:32:46.040 --> 0:32:50.160
<v Speaker 1>with so much attention on these GLP ones o Zepic

0:32:50.240 --> 0:32:53.280
<v Speaker 1>with Gooviy, we talk about it all the time, is

0:32:53.320 --> 0:32:57.320
<v Speaker 1>that going to make the Thanksgiving table a little less

0:32:57.360 --> 0:32:59.440
<v Speaker 1>of a spread that it's been in the past.

0:33:00.080 --> 0:33:03.400
<v Speaker 6>So I spoke to a number of people that are

0:33:03.400 --> 0:33:06.680
<v Speaker 6>taking the GLP on drugs and it was really interesting.

0:33:06.800 --> 0:33:09.600
<v Speaker 6>Nobody said they were going to serve like less dishes,

0:33:09.920 --> 0:33:12.280
<v Speaker 6>but some people said they were going to make smaller

0:33:12.320 --> 0:33:16.880
<v Speaker 6>amounts because they're all eating smaller serving. One woman I

0:33:16.960 --> 0:33:19.480
<v Speaker 6>spoke to said, basically, she's going to make that sweet

0:33:19.480 --> 0:33:22.000
<v Speaker 6>potato castrole, She's going to make the green bean castrole.

0:33:22.000 --> 0:33:24.360
<v Speaker 6>But she barely plans on eating it. It's mostly for

0:33:24.440 --> 0:33:27.040
<v Speaker 6>her parents the guests, and she's going to send them

0:33:27.080 --> 0:33:30.120
<v Speaker 6>home with the leftovers. One woman I spoke to told

0:33:30.120 --> 0:33:33.959
<v Speaker 6>me that usually in preparation for Thanksgiving, she spends weeks

0:33:34.000 --> 0:33:37.000
<v Speaker 6>scouring the internet looking for the best recipes, and she's

0:33:37.000 --> 0:33:39.280
<v Speaker 6>just not thinking about it this year. So she's going

0:33:39.320 --> 0:33:41.480
<v Speaker 6>to make everything and she's actually going to even skip

0:33:41.520 --> 0:33:44.440
<v Speaker 6>her shot so that she can enjoy herself after doing

0:33:44.440 --> 0:33:48.240
<v Speaker 6>all that work. But all that time that people spend

0:33:48.280 --> 0:33:50.719
<v Speaker 6>thinking about food and the run up to Thanksgiving, if

0:33:50.720 --> 0:33:52.800
<v Speaker 6>you're on one of these drugs, chances are you are

0:33:52.840 --> 0:33:54.280
<v Speaker 6>not doing all that thinking.

0:33:54.560 --> 0:33:59.480
<v Speaker 1>And obviously one Thanksgiving isn't going to give you a trend.

0:33:59.640 --> 0:34:02.920
<v Speaker 1>But I have to think a lot of grocery stores,

0:34:03.000 --> 0:34:05.760
<v Speaker 1>a lot of these big retailers that sell groceries are

0:34:05.840 --> 0:34:09.520
<v Speaker 1>keeping a really close eye on what happens if there's

0:34:09.560 --> 0:34:13.200
<v Speaker 1>going to be an ozembic impact on their bottom lines

0:34:13.239 --> 0:34:15.239
<v Speaker 1>depending on what we see this Thanksgiving.

0:34:15.640 --> 0:34:18.560
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, I mean, we've been talking to food companies and

0:34:18.600 --> 0:34:21.200
<v Speaker 6>they definitely have their eye on it. One of the

0:34:21.239 --> 0:34:25.080
<v Speaker 6>most interesting points came from Walmart because they have, you know,

0:34:25.080 --> 0:34:28.480
<v Speaker 6>a pharmacy division and a supermarket division, so they are

0:34:28.560 --> 0:34:31.560
<v Speaker 6>able to see the overlap there, and they said that

0:34:31.600 --> 0:34:34.120
<v Speaker 6>the shoppers taking weight loss drugs were buying a little

0:34:34.120 --> 0:34:34.880
<v Speaker 6>bit less food.

0:34:35.480 --> 0:34:35.680
<v Speaker 3>You know.

0:34:35.719 --> 0:34:37.640
<v Speaker 6>Actually, that woman who I just told you about who's

0:34:37.640 --> 0:34:40.279
<v Speaker 6>skipping her shot, she says her sons noticed that her

0:34:40.440 --> 0:34:42.600
<v Speaker 6>house doesn't have the same level of snacks that they

0:34:42.680 --> 0:34:46.480
<v Speaker 6>used to keep around. So it's definitely it really does

0:34:46.520 --> 0:34:48.480
<v Speaker 6>have an impact on the people taking it. I think

0:34:48.520 --> 0:34:50.680
<v Speaker 6>the big question is is how many people are going

0:34:50.760 --> 0:34:52.880
<v Speaker 6>to be taking it at any given time, considering the

0:34:52.960 --> 0:34:57.640
<v Speaker 6>high cost, considering the lack of availability of the drugs

0:34:57.680 --> 0:35:00.000
<v Speaker 6>for everybody who wants them, and then also there are

0:35:00.080 --> 0:35:03.319
<v Speaker 6>side effects from these drugs, and some people don't want

0:35:03.360 --> 0:35:05.920
<v Speaker 6>to stick with them through the side effects, so they

0:35:06.280 --> 0:35:07.000
<v Speaker 6>stop taking them.

0:35:07.200 --> 0:35:08.799
<v Speaker 1>And it's going to be interesting to see just how

0:35:08.800 --> 0:35:13.080
<v Speaker 1>many leftovers there really are after this Thanksgiving. Thanks for this, Dina,

0:35:13.160 --> 0:35:15.920
<v Speaker 1>great having you on with us. That's Bloomberg News Food

0:35:15.960 --> 0:35:19.520
<v Speaker 1>reporter Dina Shanker, and thanks as well to Jenniferree of

0:35:19.520 --> 0:35:23.160
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Intelligence, Spurt Flick and Jurr of Strategic Resource Group

0:35:23.480 --> 0:35:26.239
<v Speaker 1>and our Oil Panel, John Kilduff and again Capital and

0:35:26.280 --> 0:35:29.719
<v Speaker 1>Stephen Short of the short group special thanks to you

0:35:29.840 --> 0:35:33.279
<v Speaker 1>as well for joining us on this Thanksgiving holiday. I'm

0:35:33.360 --> 0:35:37.240
<v Speaker 1>Nathan Hager. Stay with us. Today's top stories and global

0:35:37.280 --> 0:35:40.040
<v Speaker 1>business headlines are coming up right now