Speaker 1: Check it down Man Now Down Now. Thursday morning, November
Speaker 1: four nine, Team Up Feeding the Book Podcast. It's Gill Alexander.
Speaker 1: It is the Megapod week number eleven in the National
Speaker 1: Football League. Is always the staples of the show the
Speaker 1: stars from Circus Sports Derek Stephen's conciliary. He is the
Speaker 1: vice president of operations. It is Michael Palm. Everybody, Good morning, Michael,
Speaker 1: good morning. I'm doing very well. You're looking good. We're
Speaker 1: all on video here except for our guest. And I
Speaker 1: just want to say that our our cohort is shirtless,
Speaker 1: and it is. It's disturbing, is what it is. It's
Speaker 1: Todd wishing of everybody. Hello Todd, why no shirt? You
Speaker 1: can only see my face? So why don't you just
Speaker 1: zip it already? Okay, that's not what we saw before
Speaker 1: and it wasn't pretty. I just want to say that.
Speaker 1: So this show, this show is under protest. Just want
Speaker 1: to point that out. And our rotating guests of the day.
Speaker 1: He is back on the show. Uh. He is producer
Speaker 1: number one of the numbers game at Visa. But you
Speaker 1: know him as one of the staples of is it
Speaker 1: called Clear Data Sports? Still Michael, is that the is
Speaker 1: that the name still Clear Sports, Clear Data Sports. It's
Speaker 1: Michael Lamborn. Hello, Michael, good morning, Gail. Happy to be back, mikey,
Speaker 1: so good to hear from you. You've been okay, I've
Speaker 1: been doing well. Yeah. I have this minimize the screen
Speaker 1: so I don't have to look at Todd here, but
Speaker 1: I'm listening. Then for sure, Todd is now eating one
Speaker 1: I don't even know the guy, and he takes up
Speaker 1: with the evil Gil and Mike Palm Cartel to try
Speaker 1: to take me down. Thanks Mike or Cartel's not like
Speaker 1: you've ever mistreated guests or anything, Todd, right, never, never
Speaker 1: at all. Uh. Let's let's begin with the clear People
Speaker 1: can't see the video, so it's it's not as funny
Speaker 1: Clear Data Sports. Uh is. By the way, Michael, I
Speaker 1: should tell you, Michael Lamborn, Clear Data Sports. Part of
Speaker 1: the reason why Marco and Ace are not here anymore.
Speaker 1: I never told this story publicly, but one of the
Speaker 1: reasons that Marco and and those guys were upset with
Speaker 1: me is because they thought that I worked with you
Speaker 1: guys to try to poach one of their people from them,
Speaker 1: Ralph Michael's and I told them I go, you do
Speaker 1: realize I don't work for Clear Day Sports. Those are
Speaker 1: just my buddies. I would have actually told them to
Speaker 1: stop trying to poach Ralph Michael's from you guys. Marco
Speaker 1: was like, oh, I guess well we'll strike that one.
Speaker 1: That's pretty juicy. I think you have an idea for
Speaker 1: a new podcast their deal. You can do like the
Speaker 1: backstory of the sports betting industry. I think that might
Speaker 1: be the best show of them all. All right, we
Speaker 1: always started the show with the Circus Sports Update. I
Speaker 1: was on drugs because of my roptrare achille, so I
Speaker 1: failed to even submit my Circus Sports picks last week. Mike,
Speaker 1: what's the update? Who's in the lead? Well, you know,
Speaker 1: I guess I should have prepared a little better for
Speaker 1: this um, but I didn't have time to tell me
Speaker 1: the order of the show. Oh yeah, good preparation, Mike.
Speaker 1: It's like you've ready Wednesday morning. I know this. The
Speaker 1: leader is actually higher than the leader at the west Gate.
Speaker 1: I found because remember the west Gate that got guys
Speaker 1: started out twenty seven and three and was like two
Speaker 1: and a half games ahead of our leader. That's thirty
Speaker 1: five and a half, right, Mike, Yeah, let's see here
Speaker 1: we got overall, we have thirty six and a half
Speaker 1: is the lead U M J. Tadeh thirty six and
Speaker 1: a half, and then we have four entries including CB
Speaker 1: Elite that won the first quarter at thirty four and
Speaker 1: a half. Two games back. Where are you talking? I'm
Speaker 1: at twenty seven and a half after my disaster. Oh
Speaker 1: in five weeks, I went three and two last week,
Speaker 1: I'm a twenty seven, twenty two and one. All I
Speaker 1: gotta do here is have a complete sweep of the
Speaker 1: board and I'll probably win a whole thing and you
Speaker 1: can still get the money. Maybe steel in the third
Speaker 1: in the third quarter, one entry halfway through at nine
Speaker 1: and a half, and excuse me, six entries at nine
Speaker 1: and fifteen entries at eight and a half right now?
Speaker 1: So what no tens? In other words, no tens? You said,
Speaker 1: no perfect tens for the first two weeks. No perfect tens.
Speaker 1: December contest a five week contest, Yes, that is correct. Alright,
Speaker 1: Let's begin with the Thursday night game. Boys Tonight, pretty
Speaker 1: good Thursday night game, a f C North clash between
Speaker 1: the Steelers and the Browns. The Browns are three point favorites,
Speaker 1: I guess three on guessing lines was two and a
Speaker 1: half at the time. It has come to me at three. Uh,
Speaker 1: Steelers defense out standing with Minka Fitzpatrick back there, I
Speaker 1: turnover producing machine. Offense not so much, but Pittsburgh coming
Speaker 1: off their win against the Rams Cleveland beating Buffalo, outlasting Buffalo,
Speaker 1: staving them off for a ninet sixt win in that ballgame.
Speaker 1: Maka fitz Patrick on the season now. While he returned
Speaker 1: to fumble in this past game against the Rams forty
Speaker 1: three yards for touchdown, the second quarter also had a
Speaker 1: game ceiling pick. Six takeaways for Fitzpatrick five picks, one
Speaker 1: fumble recovery in seven games with the Steelers. Mike Lamboard,
Speaker 1: we start with you. Anything on this game for you? Yeah,
Speaker 1: I actually like this game quite a big You know,
Speaker 1: you know a lot about our model. We built it
Speaker 1: three years ago, starting kind of with player grades from
Speaker 1: the bottom up and arriving at unit grades to assess
Speaker 1: the components of each team, and we put an overweighting.
Speaker 1: At the time, nobody was really talking about offensive and
Speaker 1: defensive line three or four years ago. Now it's a
Speaker 1: little bit more common in the media, but it's all
Speaker 1: about skill positions. So we overweighted the offensive and defensive line,
Speaker 1: and this is kind of a banner game for that.
Speaker 1: Cleveland has some really popular guy as off quarterbacks skill positions.
Speaker 1: Pittsburgh has no name skill positions, but pretty high quality
Speaker 1: offensive and defensive line. So our model um predictably likes
Speaker 1: Pittsburgh in this spot. Favored by about a point, a
Speaker 1: little bit over a point, So that's gonna be a
Speaker 1: play for me. Gil, Pittsburgh Steelers, would you say that's
Speaker 1: one of your best bets to Mike. I'm throwing it
Speaker 1: in there, Gil, I'm throwing it in there. Okay, Pittsburgh,
Speaker 1: Mike all over at Mike Lamboard, Mike palm any thing tonight. Yeah,
Speaker 1: Let's let's get a good show on here, Todd and
Speaker 1: have some disagreement early. I'm gonna give you a best bet.
Speaker 1: On the other side, I'm gonna lay the three with Cleveland.
Speaker 1: Pittsburgh's padded all these wins, all at home, and Prissette
Speaker 1: doesn't get hurt. They lose to the Colts. Miami dominated
Speaker 1: them in the first half of the game before that
Speaker 1: inexplicable uh Let's eight that changed that whole game. McGoff
Speaker 1: incomplete pass is ruled a fumble that changed that game. Um,
Speaker 1: the Rudolph hasn't played a road game in weeks and
Speaker 1: and Hayden is Gempi. I like the Browns in this spot.
Speaker 1: I compared to them playing Buffalo. This is like the
Speaker 1: same game all over again. To me, they're playing quarterback
Speaker 1: that won't beat you through the air against a decent
Speaker 1: defensive team. Cleveland dominated that game between the tens. I mean,
Speaker 1: they've got to improve in the Red zoner or they're
Speaker 1: they're in big trouble, but they still got a shot.
Speaker 1: Look at their schedule the rest of the way out.
Speaker 1: It starts with beating Pittsburgh tonight on a three with
Speaker 1: the Browns. Yeah, let's not forget the Browns scored just
Speaker 1: three points in that game against the Bills despite twelve
Speaker 1: plays inside Buffal Those three yard line. Bills in fact
Speaker 1: stop the Browns on eight straight plays at the one,
Speaker 1: the equivalent of two goal line stands in the first quarter.
Speaker 1: So that game should have been much worse than the
Speaker 1: final score indicated. Todd, Is that the best bet for you, Mike?
Speaker 1: By the way, Yes, it is. Wow, best bets on Thursday, Todd,
Speaker 1: This is not the best bet for me, but Unfortunately,
Speaker 1: I'm going to agree with the evil Mike Bomb, and
Speaker 1: I'm going to agree with him because my model shows
Speaker 1: that the Pittsburgh Steelers. I designed my model by sitting
Speaker 1: in a smokey room and watching every effing game possible
Speaker 1: to watch. And that's a different type of model that
Speaker 1: so far AI hasn't figured out. But I will say this,
Speaker 1: the Pittsburgh Steelers are coming off a huge win against
Speaker 1: the Rams. Lucky lucky lucky. I mean, you're winning games
Speaker 1: without an offense. Basically, the defense is playing great. Don't
Speaker 1: get me wrong, the defense is playing great. The one
Speaker 1: good thing that the Browns have for them, I mean
Speaker 1: the the Steelers have going for them as Kitchens as
Speaker 1: the code to the Browns. Other than that, the Steelers
Speaker 1: are winning with smoke and mirrors and it was all
Speaker 1: at home. Like Mike just said, Mason Rudolf has not
Speaker 1: been on the road yet except that forty Niners game
Speaker 1: where he looked like a you know, a deer in headlights.
Speaker 1: So I'd be very nervous taking a Pittsburgh team that
Speaker 1: I think has been very lucky and playing over their head. Cleveland.
Speaker 1: I don't want them either because of Kitchens. But I
Speaker 1: would have to lean with with Cleveland. I'm sorry to say, yeah,
Speaker 1: I'm Mike Lambourne. I I apologize for the for the
Speaker 1: rude welcome or wasn't planning on this happening, but you know,
Speaker 1: I'm I'm on the Browns two and it is the
Speaker 1: best bet for me. I'm making it a best bet.
Speaker 1: You know that play in that game, in that Pittsburgh
Speaker 1: Rams game, to the fumble that was called on Jared
Speaker 1: Golf that Fitzpatrick. It was not a fumble. It was
Speaker 1: not a fumble, and it drives me crazy. By the way,
Speaker 1: I don't think the announcer has made enough of it.
Speaker 1: It was second second quarter of that game. It was
Speaker 1: third and seven at the Rams forty one yard line
Speaker 1: left and a half. I believe the score was in
Speaker 1: the seven at the time, and that's when the whole
Speaker 1: game changed. I'm going Cleveland in this ballgame. I do
Speaker 1: get it that I'm putting a best bet on Freddie Kitchens,
Speaker 1: but damn it, call me crazy, I'm gonna do it.
Speaker 1: Freddie Kitchens and the Browns are my best bet number.
Speaker 1: By the way, that was one of the most curious
Speaker 1: fumble calls that I've seen, because usually if there's even
Speaker 1: a hint of the hand moving forward, even a little
Speaker 1: teeny teeny weeny weeny hint of the hand going forward,
Speaker 1: they call it incomplete. And shockingly they didn't you know,
Speaker 1: you know, there were there were other similar plays in
Speaker 1: football that day that we're just like that, that we're
Speaker 1: called the other way. But I think we've gotten to
Speaker 1: the point with NFL officiate and we've we've all talked
Speaker 1: about it until we're blew in the face all these calls,
Speaker 1: the layers of them, challenges and non challenges, and we've
Speaker 1: talked about that. I think the layer we haven't talked
Speaker 1: about is now we've gotten to the point that everything
Speaker 1: is so confusing that when you talk about these games
Speaker 1: on Monday. So when I went into a number do
Speaker 1: a numbers game on Monday morning and I was outraged
Speaker 1: about that play producing number five Jeff Parlay, he said
Speaker 1: to me, he goes, I think you're wrong about it.
Speaker 1: I think it was a fumble because it was open hand.
Speaker 1: And I'm like, wait a minute. Now, you're so confused
Speaker 1: that the rules like they've they've get up so much
Speaker 1: that we don't even know what the rules are, Like
Speaker 1: you think it was a fumble. I say, you could
Speaker 1: almost shoot someone in Fifth Avenue and maybe get away
Speaker 1: with maybe I lost my earphone. Excuse me? Alright, alright, Gil,
Speaker 1: it's a beat. Then, Pittsburgh Cleveland, Momo Fucho dinner dinner bet,
Speaker 1: not just the lunch menu. What's that now? Sing in
Speaker 1: it's a bet. Pittsburgh Cleveland. You and I Momo Fuco
Speaker 1: dinner bet, not just the lunch man dinner. You got it.
Speaker 1: I'm giving you three dinner bet. Me and Michael Lamber
Speaker 1: all right, let's do our first best bets then, Uh,
Speaker 1: Michael's already got his Mike Landborn. That is, he is
Speaker 1: on Pittsburgh, Mike, Mike Palm and I both on Cleveland
Speaker 1: as our first best bet. Todd, what is your first
Speaker 1: best bet? My first best bet is then Jay Judge
Speaker 1: Judge Jet. That's right, your New York Sam Mono Jets.
Speaker 1: And here's why I like them. One word Haskins. Haskins
Speaker 1: is not ready to be a quarterback. Let's all be honest.
Speaker 1: If this was case Keenum, I don't want any part
Speaker 1: of it. But because it's Clem Haskins, I know that's
Speaker 1: on his first name, but I called him clem Clem.
Speaker 1: Haskins is not ready to be a quarterback. So I
Speaker 1: am gonna go with the Jets. If it was Keenam,
Speaker 1: I'd laid off. But because it's Haskins, give me the Jets.
Speaker 1: I know the Jets stink. The Washington Redskins with Haskins
Speaker 1: stink worse. Give me the Jets. Yeah. I can't argue
Speaker 1: with it, and I I don't think it requires any more explanation.
Speaker 1: Jets held the Giants the twenty three yards rushing last week.
Speaker 1: Twenty of those twenty three from Daniel Jones himself. Say,
Speaker 1: Kwan Barkley thirteen carries one yard. Take away the Redskins
Speaker 1: running game with Darius Guys and Adrian Peterson. And you
Speaker 1: put the game into Dwayne Haskins hands. Oh, Jets, Todd's
Speaker 1: first best bed, Oh Am, I getting bus one or
Speaker 1: one and a half on that. You are getting plus
Speaker 1: one and a half, sir, beautiful. That is the consensus.
Speaker 1: Mike Palm later saying that I'm trying to chance him
Speaker 1: out of points. You know how he loves to do
Speaker 1: you know how he loves to do that routine with
Speaker 1: Michael Lamborn pick number two sore. So you know We've
Speaker 1: been dabbling with live betting in game wagers for a
Speaker 1: couple of years now, this is really the first year
Speaker 1: that we're going almost exclusively to in game wagering for
Speaker 1: our plays. So we have the model to kind of
Speaker 1: guide what we're looking for ahead of time in these
Speaker 1: games based on the components of each team, and we
Speaker 1: kind of know that the pregame spreads are pretty tight.
Speaker 1: You can still find some edges, but I think in
Speaker 1: game is a really good opportunity. Now. There's just so
Speaker 1: many different time and state and game score situations that
Speaker 1: can pop up. And just if you look at a
Speaker 1: few different books while you're watching the game and the
Speaker 1: differences that they have UM for that in game spread
Speaker 1: and total during different times of that game, it's kind
Speaker 1: of evidence that there is a pretty good edge to
Speaker 1: be had in this market. So, um, all of our members,
Speaker 1: all of our subscribers looking at pregame plays or sorry,
Speaker 1: in game plays right now. UM, And I've got my
Speaker 1: eye on the Buffalo Miami game. This is one where
Speaker 1: if Buffalo takes the lead, our model says that that
Speaker 1: the teams are constructed two, we could see a slowdown
Speaker 1: in scoring in that situation if Buffalo takes a lead
Speaker 1: going up against that Miami passing offense, which we have
Speaker 1: graded at four team percent below average. Blow an average
Speaker 1: passing offense up against a good Buffalo pass defense. And
Speaker 1: then also Buffalo's ability to run the ball, perhaps run
Speaker 1: the ball, run some clock out against that Miami poor
Speaker 1: run defense at fourteen percent below average. So I'll be
Speaker 1: looking at if Buffalo takes a lead in that game,
Speaker 1: and there's a couple of uppard uh different things that
Speaker 1: we look at in that situation. But if Buffalo takes
Speaker 1: a lead, uh maybe let's say seven to ten points,
Speaker 1: gonna look for the in game under in that situation. Okay,
Speaker 1: so a in game bet as a best But I
Speaker 1: don't know if we'll but wait, we we we Here's
Speaker 1: the thing. First of all, Mr Longboard is preaching to
Speaker 1: the choir with lboard. We love what is it? It's landboard. Okay,
Speaker 1: I'm sorry. Mr Lamborn is preaching to the choir because
Speaker 1: we it sounds like you just took that right off
Speaker 1: a numbers game. We love the end game betting, We
Speaker 1: love it, and we agree with you a thousand percent
Speaker 1: on that, Mike Um. But here on on this megapod, Gil,
Speaker 1: we have to pick three games with no end game
Speaker 1: because it's prett you just want to take the under
Speaker 1: then in that game, Mike, I'll just go ahead and
Speaker 1: do that. Yep. Okay, okay, that was an easy sell.
Speaker 1: Uh the under? H what do we have for the under?
Speaker 1: Their consensus time? What are you saying? The one that
Speaker 1: the under in the Buffalo Miami game? But understanding what
Speaker 1: Mike is saying, looking for one? Yes? Okay. By the way,
Speaker 1: I mean I could give you the three team ten
Speaker 1: point teaser too, but unfortunately we can't do this on
Speaker 1: this particular outlet, Mike, but I couldn't agree with it.
Speaker 1: By the way, when he when he started and saying
Speaker 1: that stuff, Gil, I was like, Wow, this guy knows
Speaker 1: his crap. Todd is a stickler for the rules. Mike.
Speaker 1: I apologize for that. But but Mike, you're so you're
Speaker 1: so right about how the lines are different at different
Speaker 1: end game books and how the end game is just
Speaker 1: so much better. I never I almost never make a
Speaker 1: pre flu bet, and we're all about the live wagering,
Speaker 1: Like Mike, palm your number two. I agree with Todd
Speaker 1: wishnev on the Jets play plus one, but I'm not
Speaker 1: going to copy that play Instead, I'm gonna take the
Speaker 1: under in that game. Thirty eight and a half is
Speaker 1: what I'm seeing, Todd. What what are you gonna give
Speaker 1: it to me at thirty six? Uh? Because you're a
Speaker 1: nice guy? Thirty six and a half? No, seriously, under
Speaker 1: thirty eight and a half, Gill, Is that what you have, sir? Yes? Yeah,
Speaker 1: I'm gonna combine the fact of Haskins and his limited
Speaker 1: ability to perform in the National Football League or to
Speaker 1: have any part of the playbook, combined with Bill Callahan's
Speaker 1: desire to end up game and under two hours at
Speaker 1: thirty five minutes and and it's not porous Washington defense
Speaker 1: point against the inconsistent Sam Donald. I just don't think
Speaker 1: there'll be a lot of points. I agree with Todd.
Speaker 1: I'd take anything if the Jets are getting points, and
Speaker 1: I will, but that's not the best bet. The best
Speaker 1: bet is the under here, all right, I'm going to
Speaker 1: uh Michael Lamborne's game, Uh, the game that he has
Speaker 1: the under in, and I'm just taking the Miami Dolphins.
Speaker 1: This is literally the only thing I get right every
Speaker 1: single week in the National Football League is just taking
Speaker 1: the Dolphins. I think the market is, you know, chronically
Speaker 1: underrating them, and I think they've done it here again
Speaker 1: against the Bills. They're at home, the Dolphins are You're
Speaker 1: giving me six points, which is what the consensus is.
Speaker 1: I believe right now, Todd, do you tell me if
Speaker 1: I'm wrong? I believe six points is yeah. And again,
Speaker 1: why is Josh Allen favored by that many points on
Speaker 1: the road. I don't have an explanation for it. Last week,
Speaker 1: Uh no touchdown passes from Josh Allen again, one pick
Speaker 1: he was zack once he was twenty two or one
Speaker 1: for two six six, but he did his damage with
Speaker 1: his leg six carries, twenty eight yards. I just don't
Speaker 1: think it's sustainable in the National Football League. Sure could
Speaker 1: the Bills win, absolutely, but giving six or getting six
Speaker 1: for the Dolphins, I'll take it in six points? Again,
Speaker 1: what is the justification for this? I guessed lower than
Speaker 1: I believe. I guess three and a half on guessing
Speaker 1: lines three and a half or four and a half,
Speaker 1: something like that. Give me value, I'll take it. Miami
Speaker 1: Dolphins pick number two. Hey, Gil, they played before the
Speaker 1: score was a ten point win by Buffalo, but it
Speaker 1: was totally misleading because Miami was up four nine with
Speaker 1: the ball in the two yard line to go up nine,
Speaker 1: so I more fuel for the fodder. And that was
Speaker 1: on the road. Now you're going into that incredibly difficult
Speaker 1: home field advantage by Miami. No, I'm just kidding about that,
Speaker 1: but seriously, but seriously, that's just more fuel for the
Speaker 1: fodder for you. Here's who I would like to take.
Speaker 1: I am going to go back to the well with
Speaker 1: the tried and true of every single week in the
Speaker 1: National Football League, and that I've been pounding the drum
Speaker 1: on Mega Pod. I impounding the drums on the numbers game.
Speaker 1: Mike is moving his head back and forth, bobbing it.
Speaker 1: But I will say this, the Tampa Bay Buccaneer over
Speaker 1: is the way to go, baby, because they go over
Speaker 1: every week. Why do they go over every week? Because
Speaker 1: they're not interested in defense. They have no interest in
Speaker 1: playing defense. They also have explosive offense with Michael Evans
Speaker 1: catching every ball out of the sky. They also have
Speaker 1: the possibility for lots of volatility with Mr Jamis can
Speaker 1: fumble on every play, he can give you a pick
Speaker 1: six on every play. The Tampa Bay Buccaneers are an
Speaker 1: over lover's dream. The first two time these times these
Speaker 1: teams played in New Orleans, it was that equals fifty five,
Speaker 1: I believe. And now it's only at forty nine and
Speaker 1: a half. Now, granted, I could get screwed here if
Speaker 1: New Orleans plays a great game on defense and somehow
Speaker 1: it goes under because they win thirty four to ten
Speaker 1: or something that could happen. But you know what prove
Speaker 1: to me? First, Tampa Bay goes over every week. You're
Speaker 1: getting it for what forty nine and a half or fifty?
Speaker 1: What do you have, gil, I have it at do
Speaker 1: do do do Do Do do do do fifty? Okay,
Speaker 1: so give it to me over fifty and I get
Speaker 1: there thirty four seventeen or some such score that adds
Speaker 1: up to over fifty. Thank you. We could literally play
Speaker 1: back the me picking Miami. You taking a Tampa Bay
Speaker 1: over on a loop every week on this show, and
Speaker 1: why they both right? Why not? Why make it more difficult?
Speaker 1: Same thing? Jamis thirty forty eight last week, three fifty
Speaker 1: eight yards, one touchdown, two picks, sacked four times, but
Speaker 1: then you know he drove ninety two yards for the
Speaker 1: winning touchdown after Jamal Dean redeemed himself from a terrible
Speaker 1: performance the previous week. He allowed several big plays during
Speaker 1: a the overtime lost the Seattle fort four uh ending
Speaker 1: Kyler Murray's rookie streak of two d eleven consecutive past
Speaker 1: attempts with a pick without a pick, I should say
Speaker 1: he picks it off and then Jamison the Bucks matriculate
Speaker 1: and beat the Cardinals seven, overcoming lead. And you're right
Speaker 1: about Mike Evans four of eighty two, just every week
Speaker 1: getting the statue going. But Jamis Winston his interceptions in
Speaker 1: that game, thirteen turnovers now in the past four games
Speaker 1: for Jamis, So yeah, you'll get points. You'll get set
Speaker 1: up for points on the other side of the field
Speaker 1: every time with Jamis, that's for sure. But by the way,
Speaker 1: there was also a touchdown that should have been a
Speaker 1: touchdown there wasn't one. When Arizona was inside the ten
Speaker 1: yard line and fourth and one. They threw it to
Speaker 1: a wide open tight end who could have just walked
Speaker 1: into the end zone and he dropped the ball, so
Speaker 1: it could have been even more points. Michael Lambor and
Speaker 1: pick number three. All right, you guys are not gonna
Speaker 1: like this one either, but I'm going back to another
Speaker 1: in game selection. I would rather UH win, have a
Speaker 1: good shot at winning than kind of go with the
Speaker 1: flow and UH stick with the conventional bets. That's just
Speaker 1: me personally. But looking at Jacksonville, Indie in particular, if
Speaker 1: Jacksonville takes the lead, we've got their defense at nine
Speaker 1: percent advantage in that matchup going against the Indie passing
Speaker 1: off fence. Both run defenses should not do that well,
Speaker 1: so we could see a running clock in that matchup.
Speaker 1: But I'll be looking at an end game under for
Speaker 1: your rules. We can take the the overall game under,
Speaker 1: but I'll be looking for an end game under on
Speaker 1: Jacksonville if if they take a lead. See, this is
Speaker 1: why Michael Lamborg got fired at Vicent because he refuses
Speaker 1: to do anything that anyone tells him to do. He
Speaker 1: refuses with him. By the way, we're agreeing with his theory. Yes, no,
Speaker 1: I'm just telling you. This is Michael Lamborne. This is
Speaker 1: vintage Michael Lamborn. Mikey, miss you the theory, Todd, But
Speaker 1: we can put into practice too well, Jacksonville, Andy, what's
Speaker 1: the under forty three and a half. That's what I say. Yeah,
Speaker 1: forty three and a half. Let's see here. Oh, we
Speaker 1: can't trust you, Michael Lamborne. Uh yeah, I see uh
Speaker 1: forty three and a half. He's absolutely right everywhere, all right,
Speaker 1: Mike Palm, Well, I agree with Mike second pick, and
Speaker 1: I'll go to the game you chose as well. I
Speaker 1: like this game in Miami under we saw it in
Speaker 1: the first matchup in Orchard Park. Miami had the ability
Speaker 1: to run the football and had several long drives that
Speaker 1: they sustained by being able to control the line of scrimmage.
Speaker 1: I just don't trust Alan with his arms not consistent enough.
Speaker 1: I mean, he can beat you with his legs, but
Speaker 1: I don't think he can beat you with his arm.
Speaker 1: I'll go I'll go under the forty one. Okay, we'll
Speaker 1: double up on that one. Um My final pick of
Speaker 1: the week, I'm going with the Kansas City Omaha Chiefs
Speaker 1: in Mexico City giving three and a half. I'm taking
Speaker 1: the Chiefs giving three and a half at Mexico City
Speaker 1: against the charge charges on extra rest here charges coming
Speaker 1: off that horrific loss to the Raiders in which they
Speaker 1: were down two points. Final drive of the game had
Speaker 1: three time outs. All they had to do is matriculate deliberately.
Speaker 1: But nope, Philip Rivers just decided to throw wounded ducks
Speaker 1: every single down thinking that was the way to get
Speaker 1: three points, and the Chargers lose another miserable game. This
Speaker 1: is why Philip Rivers, by the way, is one of
Speaker 1: the all time very good and will never be one
Speaker 1: of the all time grades though perhaps he's a Hall
Speaker 1: of famer. I don't know Chiefs last I'm just telling you,
Speaker 1: if you look at the stats, he may get in
Speaker 1: on stats alone. That's all I'm saying. I don't fit now.
Speaker 1: Is there anything with my eyes that tells me he's
Speaker 1: a Hall of Famer? No, but longevity. It's like a
Speaker 1: baseballs like Craig Bisio. Should he be in the Hall
Speaker 1: of Fame? No, he played in five thousand years exactly.
Speaker 1: All right. Now, The reason why I'm going with the
Speaker 1: Chiefs here is there's nothing about that Chief's loss to
Speaker 1: the Titans last week that takes me off of the Chiefs.
Speaker 1: If you look at the box score of that game,
Speaker 1: and Todd and I talked a little bit about this
Speaker 1: on a numbers game today, they dominated that game, absolutely
Speaker 1: dominated it. Yes, they did not cover. They did not win,
Speaker 1: but they were a position to cover that. They had
Speaker 1: the snaffoos of the end Ryan Tannehill by the way
Speaker 1: through a twenty three yard touchdown Adam Humphreys with twenty
Speaker 1: three seconds left, Joshua Kalou blocked a last second field
Speaker 1: goal attempt to be the Chiefs thirty five to thirty two.
Speaker 1: Titans only had a chance after a bad snap by
Speaker 1: the Chiefs on Harrison. But there's fifth field goal attempt
Speaker 1: of the day. Uh Kansas City coach Andy Reid blaming
Speaker 1: communication for the snap taking a holder Dustin co quit
Speaker 1: by surprise. So there were two botches on field goals
Speaker 1: by the Chiefs in that game. But they just absolutely
Speaker 1: crushed in the box score. And I was saying historically
Speaker 1: speaking box score domination like the one we saw in
Speaker 1: that game. Literally, there's about two hundred sixty examples of
Speaker 1: that since the year. Teams have lost that kind of
Speaker 1: box score domination. There's different categories total yards, first down domination,
Speaker 1: there's a couple other categories once in two hundred sixty
Speaker 1: previous such situations. So they should have won the game, period,
Speaker 1: whether they should have covered or not. Okay, coin flippy,
Speaker 1: but there's nothing about their performance in that game. That
Speaker 1: makes me down on them. I do think Andy Reid
Speaker 1: does some dumb hit like at the end of the
Speaker 1: first half he's running a play for no reason, risking
Speaker 1: a fumble like. I don't get why he does stuff
Speaker 1: like that. But all that said, I have no faith
Speaker 1: in Anthony Lynn. I think Andy Reid is the far
Speaker 1: better coach in this game. And again we talked about
Speaker 1: if you only had one thing to handicap games on
Speaker 1: handicap the coaches. I'll take Casey giving three and a
Speaker 1: half at Mexico City pick number three, Todd. I don't
Speaker 1: like it because if you're up end late, you're gonna lose.
Speaker 1: I don't like you, so we're even how about that. Yeah,
Speaker 1: but here's the difference between me and you're not liking
Speaker 1: me and me not liking your pick one is you're
Speaker 1: gonna get a backdoor touchdown. If you don't like me,
Speaker 1: you're not gonna get a backdoor touchdown. So it doesn't
Speaker 1: matter if I don't get a backdoor touchdown. Dinner on
Speaker 1: you at Momofuko. I don't know where that is and
Speaker 1: I did not agree to that, thank you. Um Now,
Speaker 1: my last pick is going to be the New England
Speaker 1: Patriots against the Philadelphia fly over the total of forty
Speaker 1: four and a half or forty five? What do you
Speaker 1: have for me? Go forty four and a half five? Okay,
Speaker 1: So I'm gonna go over in New England and the
Speaker 1: Philadelphia Eagles. And here's why. Uh, New England made all
Speaker 1: these gaudy numbers on defense against teams that have no offense,
Speaker 1: so their numbers are better than their really true ability.
Speaker 1: And we saw that against the Ravens last week. They
Speaker 1: went up against the team could move the football, and
Speaker 1: all of a sudden, the New England Patriots defense looks
Speaker 1: a lot more pedestrian than it does when they're beating
Speaker 1: the likes of the Jets and the Dolphins and all
Speaker 1: these garbage teams that they usually play against. So we
Speaker 1: haven't really seen New England against the team that can
Speaker 1: move the ball. And when we have seen it, New
Speaker 1: England was getting their butt spank. So I think the
Speaker 1: Philadelphia Eagles, led by Carson Wentz in their home stadium,
Speaker 1: will be able to move the football in New England. Conversely,
Speaker 1: the Philadelphia Eagles don't play the events. They're like Tampa Bay.
Speaker 1: They're not interested in tackling and and New England will
Speaker 1: figure out a way to move the football with Bill
Speaker 1: Belichick against the Eagles ridiculous defense. And forty five is
Speaker 1: just way too low. Give me over forty five. Todd
Speaker 1: wish to have picked number three. All right, gentlemen, Now
Speaker 1: my favorite time of the show sport for today's Beating
Speaker 1: the Book podcast comes as always from our friends at
Speaker 1: Bookmaker dot EU. The Bookmaker dot US an industry leader
Speaker 1: for close to thirty years, You should know that by
Speaker 1: now pro players consider them a must because their first
Speaker 1: to post dots, they take the highest limits, and most importantly,
Speaker 1: pride themselves on never having kicked out a winning player.
Speaker 1: That is huge in this day and age. Bookmakers a
Speaker 1: high volume sports book best suited for not only the
Speaker 1: sophisticated player who understand sports betting, but also to large
Speaker 1: recreational players as well. And their motto is where the
Speaker 1: lines originate, because chances are the sports book at which
Speaker 1: you've been betting all along follows their lines. And right now,
Speaker 1: if you visit Bookmaker dot eu slash GILL that's Bookmaker
Speaker 1: dot E slash g I l L, you can claim
Speaker 1: an exclusive welcome bonus of up to three hundred dollars
Speaker 1: once again. That's bookmaker dot eu slash gill g I
Speaker 1: l L to join and claim you're welcome bonus of
Speaker 1: up to three hundred dollars right now. Don't miss out
Speaker 1: teaser time. Um. Last week, for the first time, I
Speaker 1: went away from a Stanford Wong teaser and I probably
Speaker 1: shouldn't done that, and I lost. But while you can
Speaker 1: make fun of me for my horrific teaser record this year,
Speaker 1: one and nine on two teamers of six points, I
Speaker 1: don't even accept the blame because all I've done is
Speaker 1: Stanford Wong teasers. So blame Stanford Wong, don't blame me.
Speaker 1: That's my excuse. Uh. But let's start with Mike Lamboard.
Speaker 1: Do you have a two team or six point teaser here? Mike,
Speaker 1: I do. I'm gonna throw Pittsburgh in there. I like
Speaker 1: them the with the best bet anyway, and then Jacksonville
Speaker 1: as well, both at three so we can get across three,
Speaker 1: four and seven. The model likes both of those teams anyway,
Speaker 1: so that was a pretty easy one for me. Yeah,
Speaker 1: we said on guessing lines that Pittsburgh would be the
Speaker 1: most popular teaser leg of the week. Todd what were
Speaker 1: you saying? So I'm giving him Pittsburgh plus nine, Jags
Speaker 1: plus nine. That is correct, Pittsburgh plus nine, Jags plus nine.
Speaker 1: Michael Palm, I'm gonna take Todd's j e Ts, Jets, Jets,
Speaker 1: Jets up to seven and a half, and then like Mike,
Speaker 1: I'm gonna take a swing with big Dick Nick and
Speaker 1: go up to nine with Big Dish Nick Nick Foles
Speaker 1: getting the starting nod eligible to play after being on
Speaker 1: IR eligible play for the Jacksonville Jaguars. Gardner Mins who
Speaker 1: ends up four and four straight up? By the way, Uh,
Speaker 1: my teaser is the Jets because again through the three
Speaker 1: and the seven, how the can that lose? Seriously? If that,
Speaker 1: if that loses, then you know it's me. How about that?
Speaker 1: We'll just put it that way. Uh, And I am
Speaker 1: going to pair them with the Are you ready for this?
Speaker 1: I'm pairing them with the Philadelphia Eagles plus nine and
Speaker 1: a half plus nine and a half. Give me the
Speaker 1: Eagles at home against the Patriots. Do you want to
Speaker 1: talk about why you want the way you like that
Speaker 1: or you just want to let it go? I think
Speaker 1: if you're giving me the Eagles at home against the Patriots.
Speaker 1: I don't think the Patriots. Listen. I had Aaron Shots
Speaker 1: on a numbers game this week and we talked. You
Speaker 1: were there, Todd, and we talked about the fact that
Speaker 1: the Patriots, by his numbers, are historically one of the
Speaker 1: six or seven greatest defenses through nine games since the year,
Speaker 1: which is as far back as he goes with his numbers.
Speaker 1: I asked him, is this schedule adjusted? He goes, yes,
Speaker 1: it is, because if it wasn't, the Eagles would the
Speaker 1: Patriots by far this year, would have the greatest defense
Speaker 1: ever through the first UH nine games. But as Todd,
Speaker 1: as you and I discussed, they haven't played anybody. And
Speaker 1: I know it's schedule adjusted, and I know these are
Speaker 1: the numbers that he came up with with the d
Speaker 1: v O A and I love Aaron Shots, but these
Speaker 1: guys haven't played anybody. And if you don't think that,
Speaker 1: Carson Wentz and the Eagles don't smell blood. Now in
Speaker 1: the NFC East, with the Cowboys faltering by the way, Cowboys,
Speaker 1: we don't know if they're facing Matthew Stafford or not.
Speaker 1: They're game against Detroit. You're giving me a nine and
Speaker 1: a half point cushion in this Super Bowl revenge game
Speaker 1: from a couple of years ago, Carson Wentz and the
Speaker 1: Eagles against an a Patriots offense that is not scaring anyone.
Speaker 1: I think the Eagles could win this game out right.
Speaker 1: That's how That's how strongly I feel about it. By
Speaker 1: the day, I'm sorry, Todd Serka did put a number
Speaker 1: up on the Cowboys game. What do you got the number?
Speaker 1: Yesterday afternoon we posted a Cowboys six. It's been bet
Speaker 1: down to four and a half. Just just for those
Speaker 1: out there listening, is a point of interest. Yeah, that
Speaker 1: that is interesting. By the way, one of the other
Speaker 1: things we talked about with Aaron Shots is this notion
Speaker 1: Aaron Shots is doing this um study on trying to
Speaker 1: predict future interceptions and the team that came up as
Speaker 1: and how he does this is you know, I talked
Speaker 1: about triple Crown. Those who listened to the Beating the
Speaker 1: Book podcast for many years in a numbers game and
Speaker 1: betting dork before Beating the Book know that when I
Speaker 1: talked about triple Crown races for all these years, that
Speaker 1: we didn't have a triple Crown winner in between Affirmed
Speaker 1: and American Pharaoh all those thirty plus years. I always
Speaker 1: used to bet on a horse will win the Triple Crown.
Speaker 1: It was great odds, and people thought it was crazy,
Speaker 1: and Alway said, there's so there's been so many near misses,
Speaker 1: and it's just like home runs in baseball. The better
Speaker 1: predictor of home runs is a fly ball, right, not
Speaker 1: actual home runs hit. The better predictor of goals scored
Speaker 1: his shots on will not goal scored. Aaron has tried
Speaker 1: something now in football, passes defended a better predictor of
Speaker 1: future interceptions than interceptions themselves. And what he found that
Speaker 1: the Patriots are way off the charts in terms of
Speaker 1: them being able to pick off the ball thus far
Speaker 1: this year. That should tank. I don't see them picking
Speaker 1: off Carson Wentz here in this game. That's another reason
Speaker 1: why I like the Eagles. Give me the nine and
Speaker 1: a half again, not picking them to win it, even
Speaker 1: though I can see it happening. But for the teaser, Jets,
Speaker 1: Eagles do give me the Jets. I've already discussed why
Speaker 1: I like the Jets versus Clem Haskins. So I will
Speaker 1: take the Jets plus seven and a half, and I'm
Speaker 1: gonna go with your Bill O'Brien, Houston Texans. Now do
Speaker 1: I get ten and a half? Or do I get ten? Gil,
Speaker 1: you get ten and a half? Wait, hold on, it
Speaker 1: is dead even you can take the ten and a half. Okay.
Speaker 1: I especially like it if I get the ten and
Speaker 1: a half because then I get to go over the
Speaker 1: key number of ten as well. So give me the
Speaker 1: Jets and me the Texans plus ten and a half.
Speaker 1: This Texan game, it looks like to me a preview
Speaker 1: of a playoff game Ravens Texans. I love DeShawn Watson.
Speaker 1: It smells to me like a really tight ball game.
Speaker 1: I like going against a Ravens team that just you know,
Speaker 1: came two weeks ago, came off the big Patriot win.
Speaker 1: I just like the Texans here. The Texas have a
Speaker 1: tendency to play close games. So give me the Jets
Speaker 1: plus the seven half the Texans plus the ten and
Speaker 1: a half. In the teaseration, what did you say that
Speaker 1: the spread was on the Dallas the Troy game, Mike,
Speaker 1: We opened at six yesterday afternoon. They bet it down
Speaker 1: to four and a half. That well, we don't know,
Speaker 1: we don't know. We posted it not knowing, but the
Speaker 1: assumption was it was Drisco right, Otherwise it wouldn't be
Speaker 1: they wouldn't be favored by that much. But the fact
Speaker 1: that they're betting it down to four and a half
Speaker 1: means that people are hoping for Stafford in that game
Speaker 1: right there. Taking then they can get Stafford with with
Speaker 1: You know what, what would you say here, because it's
Speaker 1: interesting to me, Mike, what what? What was the philosophy
Speaker 1: there at Circle about posting that? Yeah, well, we do.
Speaker 1: We feel like we're giving away too many days of
Speaker 1: action when we wait till Saturday to post these games,
Speaker 1: and we want we want to create the action. And
Speaker 1: the last time we did it was the vikings in
Speaker 1: the Chiefs And if Holmes doesn't play, we took all
Speaker 1: that action and went all the way from two and
Speaker 1: a half one way to five and a half the other,
Speaker 1: and we collected every beat. Want to keep writing. Yeah,
Speaker 1: look Jesus God, lend him in and that other guy.
Speaker 1: They know what they're doing. They have released their power
Speaker 1: rankings before the committee that we might have a different poll.
Speaker 1: Right now, let me just repeat what Todd is referring
Speaker 1: to is an exchange on the Numbers Game yesterday where
Speaker 1: Todd tried to use his incredible brain power to use
Speaker 1: logic that he felt was better than everybody else's. He
Speaker 1: asked a question, what would the spread be of Alabama?
Speaker 1: Blade L s U. I believe that was the game? Georgia,
Speaker 1: Georgia George right? And Todd was expecting to get an
Speaker 1: answer like, oh, Georgia would be favored. Instead, he got
Speaker 1: the answer. Instead, he got the answer then Alabama was
Speaker 1: favored by four by Matt Lindeman and Matt and uh
Speaker 1: Matt metcalf over there at circa and then and then
Speaker 1: Todd backed into a corner, realizing he just got beat
Speaker 1: at his own game and looked like an ass, decided
Speaker 1: to call them Jesus and God. Is that a good recap? Dot? Oh?
Speaker 1: The only last part is that Chris Felika, who I
Speaker 1: consider the true God, the true god of the college
Speaker 1: football world, agrees with me. Has nothing to do with
Speaker 1: what you asked. In the logic you were trying to give,
Speaker 1: you said, who would make the line? We have an
Speaker 1: actual line. Chris is not making lines, so you lose. Sorry, alright,
Speaker 1: what's that toose, guys? I'm sorry? What nothing, I'm just
Speaker 1: kidding around. Okay, final two questions gentlemen. Sorry, Mike Lamborne
Speaker 1: that you had to sit there all that apologize. I
Speaker 1: love listening to you guys, because a great Okay, here's
Speaker 1: the here's the final two questions. Which are the big favorites?
Speaker 1: In your opinion? Is the most likely to lose out
Speaker 1: right this week in the National Football League, Minnesota ten
Speaker 1: and a half point favorites at home against the Denver Broncos.
Speaker 1: San Francisco ten point favorites at home against the Arizona
Speaker 1: Cardinals ten ten and a half, somewhere in there, Oakland
Speaker 1: ten and a half point favorites at home against the
Speaker 1: Cincinnata Bengals. And we'll throw in the three that are
Speaker 1: six or six and a half just to make it interesting.
Speaker 1: Buffalo six point favorites on the road against Miami, New
Speaker 1: Orleans six point favorites on the road against Tampa Bay
Speaker 1: And Sunday night, the Rams six and a half point
Speaker 1: favorites at home against the Chicago Bears. Michael Lamboard, which
Speaker 1: of those is the most likely to lose outright? I'm
Speaker 1: looking at this Denver Minnesota game. We run one of
Speaker 1: the models, the early play efficiency model, and last week
Speaker 1: Mark took the Miami Dolphins at plus four eighty based
Speaker 1: on that early play efficiency model. I don't know if
Speaker 1: he'll be on Denver in this spot. We record that
Speaker 1: on Friday, but our model does give us slight lean
Speaker 1: to Denver. And then if you believe in this sort
Speaker 1: of thing, the Vikings coming off a big win the
Speaker 1: Broncos off of by should be a bit of an
Speaker 1: advantage there as well. So I'm staying away from Minnesota there,
Speaker 1: that's not a stay away that we're asking like, which
Speaker 1: of those big favorites is most likely to lose? Outright? Sorry, yeah, Minnesota.
Speaker 1: I think it has a shot to go down. Okay. See,
Speaker 1: this is the thing with Mike Lamboard does not play
Speaker 1: by anybody rules. He just answers whatever he wants to answer.
Speaker 1: Mike Palm, you know what I'm gonna go with New Orleans. Uh,
Speaker 1: it's it's how much of an outlier can this be
Speaker 1: that a team that had ZrO defense the whole year
Speaker 1: in Atlanta was able to just beat the hell out
Speaker 1: of Drew Brees at him seven times. Um, if another
Speaker 1: team with no defense is Todd would say the Bucks
Speaker 1: can do that, then they're very susceptible. I was just
Speaker 1: I thought that was the most shocking result of the year,
Speaker 1: and I'm still bothered by that, and I can't find
Speaker 1: myself supporting Fannie pack Vick. So uh, I'm gonna go
Speaker 1: with this thing. Yeah, I mean my thing here is,
Speaker 1: so I just gave you three games that were ten
Speaker 1: or ten and a half in three games that were
Speaker 1: six or six and a half. So obviously you want
Speaker 1: to gravitate towards the six and the six and a half,
Speaker 1: but just by instinct, but I will say this about
Speaker 1: all three of those games that are six or six
Speaker 1: and a half, I could see Miami beating Buffalo outright,
Speaker 1: I could see Tampa Bay beating New Orleans out right,
Speaker 1: and I could absolutely see Chicago beating the Rams out right.
Speaker 1: Like those Just based on that thought alone, those ought
Speaker 1: to be three against the spread picks for me. Really,
Speaker 1: I'm just sort of talking myself into it as we speak.
Speaker 1: But if you're asking me to pick one of them,
Speaker 1: I will I will say that it's the Miami Dolph.
Speaker 1: You know, I'm gonna say Miami Dolphins number one. We
Speaker 1: all have to live through that together. I'm gonna I'm
Speaker 1: gonna agree with Mike Palm. I think it's Tampa Bay
Speaker 1: with a slightest. I think it's New Orleans. New Orleans
Speaker 1: is the big favorite, most likely to lose out right,
Speaker 1: with a slight edge over both Buffalo and the Rams.
Speaker 1: The Rams. I'd love to pick Chicago there to win
Speaker 1: it out right, but there's Trabisky and that, and that
Speaker 1: bears offense, so that bothers. That's bothersome. With Buffalo in Miami,
Speaker 1: I can see Miami totally covering. But it's like Miami
Speaker 1: to win out right, I mean, it's never fun. But
Speaker 1: Tampa Bay they're as valerable as they come, as you
Speaker 1: talked about earlier, Todd. So I'd say that's the one.
Speaker 1: I'd go with the Miami Dolphins. I just did their
Speaker 1: song for you. And the reason I do it is
Speaker 1: they were on the road at Buffalo up fourteen to nine,
Speaker 1: on the two yard line late in the third quarter
Speaker 1: to go up twenty one nine. They probably win the game,
Speaker 1: they didn't, but I don't see any reason why they
Speaker 1: can't beat the Buffalo Bills at home. Uh, you know,
Speaker 1: Buffalo is what Buffalo is, their mediocre. So I I
Speaker 1: think Miami is the most likely, and I don't see that.
Speaker 1: I don't see the Saints dropping laying two eggs in
Speaker 1: a row. Alright, Michael Lamboard, which of these games you want?
Speaker 1: No part of whatsoever. We live in a strange, bizarre
Speaker 1: world where you had to pick a side and bet
Speaker 1: aside on each of these pre flop. What's the one
Speaker 1: you wouldn't bet? Yeah, New Orleans Tampa Bay based on
Speaker 1: the Drew Brees situation. Not sure what version we're getting.
Speaker 1: I'm gonna stay away from that game. I'm gonna go
Speaker 1: with the Dallas games simply because we don't know Stafford status,
Speaker 1: and if we did, I would still look probably back
Speaker 1: the Lions here if we did. I'm down on the Cowboys.
Speaker 1: I think they're an eight and eight team, and I
Speaker 1: agree with you, Gil, Philadelphia is very live to have
Speaker 1: a three or four seed. I'm with it. I know
Speaker 1: this is this is strange that I would answer this
Speaker 1: for both questions. But it's New Orleans Tampa Bay for
Speaker 1: me because that game could go any possible way. I
Speaker 1: think Tampa Bay plus six is gonna be a pick
Speaker 1: for me. Could I see New Orleans beating him by
Speaker 1: twenty Yeah. I wouldn't be the strangest thing in the
Speaker 1: world either, But I could see Tampa Bay winning it
Speaker 1: easily out right, and I think I'm with you, Michael Lamborn,
Speaker 1: where I don't. I don't know what version of Drew
Speaker 1: Brees we're getting. Keep in mind last year before the
Speaker 1: whole Rams Saints postseason game took all the headlines away
Speaker 1: and we were focused on the bad refereeing in that game,
Speaker 1: Drew Brees was kind of sucky at football. So that's
Speaker 1: my pick there as well. Todd finishing it off. You
Speaker 1: know what I'm gonna go with with Mike Palms call,
Speaker 1: how do you know what's going to happen in Detroit?
Speaker 1: You don't know who the quarterback is. It seems very
Speaker 1: uh fishy, the whole thing. And but I also agree
Speaker 1: with Mike. I don't think the Cowboys are any good,
Speaker 1: So I'll pretty much go with exactly Mike's answer on
Speaker 1: that one. All right, boys, we've done all we can do.
Speaker 1: Michael Lamborn from Clare Data Sports. Thank you, Michael, producing
Speaker 1: number one numbers game. All right, Thanks Gil, Thank you, Michael,
Speaker 1: Mike palm and Roach to a meeting walking us through
Speaker 1: Circus Sports here by Skype video. Thank you, Mike, appreciate it.
Speaker 1: Todd Wishnup. Thank you as well. Yes, and nice to
Speaker 1: meet you, Mike, um Mike from you as well. Good
Speaker 1: luck with all your bests this week. Get in the
Speaker 1: National Football League Week eleven. Thank you so much for listening.