WEBVTT - China vs the US: Kishore Mahbubani on a Zero-Sum Rivalry 

0:00:02.920 --> 0:00:07.440
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news.

0:00:09.000 --> 0:00:14.200
<v Speaker 2>Never before in human history, ever we had two powers

0:00:14.640 --> 0:00:18.520
<v Speaker 2>of the size, the scale and reach of United States

0:00:18.520 --> 0:00:21.920
<v Speaker 2>and China confronting each other in the way that they

0:00:21.960 --> 0:00:25.400
<v Speaker 2>are today. China has become a tiger.

0:00:26.320 --> 0:00:31.000
<v Speaker 1>Kishur Mahpubani, diplomat academic who has seen the rise of

0:00:31.120 --> 0:00:35.080
<v Speaker 1>China from his native Singapore. You said, what's happening now

0:00:35.200 --> 0:00:38.839
<v Speaker 1>is like the Cold War, only America now is behaving

0:00:39.120 --> 0:00:42.640
<v Speaker 1>as the Soviet Union was. It's a very unflattering comparison.

0:00:42.760 --> 0:00:45.080
<v Speaker 2>The goal on my writings is not to say that

0:00:45.280 --> 0:00:48.120
<v Speaker 2>China should win or United States should win. Is to

0:00:48.159 --> 0:00:52.080
<v Speaker 2>say that China and US should step back and reflect

0:00:52.159 --> 0:00:55.000
<v Speaker 2>whether it is in their interests to engage in such

0:00:55.040 --> 0:00:56.240
<v Speaker 2>a zero sum contest.

0:00:57.640 --> 0:01:02.319
<v Speaker 1>From Bloomberg Weekend, this is the Michelle Hussein Show. I'm

0:01:02.400 --> 0:01:10.679
<v Speaker 1>Michelle Hussein. By now you've probably seen a fair amount

0:01:10.760 --> 0:01:14.600
<v Speaker 1>of news emerge out of Beijing, the pictures of that

0:01:14.760 --> 0:01:20.400
<v Speaker 1>summit between Donald Trump and China's Shi Jinping. It's important

0:01:20.400 --> 0:01:23.360
<v Speaker 1>because face to face, one to one meetings like that

0:01:23.680 --> 0:01:28.720
<v Speaker 1>don't happen very often, and yet there's a much bigger

0:01:28.800 --> 0:01:32.679
<v Speaker 1>story to tell than that of these two men or

0:01:33.400 --> 0:01:36.920
<v Speaker 1>any two leaders of these two countries. Actually, the real

0:01:37.000 --> 0:01:41.720
<v Speaker 1>story is an epic tale, one that has been unfolding

0:01:41.760 --> 0:01:47.240
<v Speaker 1>for about thirty years, and it's about supremacy, a battle

0:01:47.280 --> 0:01:51.400
<v Speaker 1>to be the world's number one power, which is why

0:01:51.440 --> 0:01:54.200
<v Speaker 1>we wanted to dive into the US and China for

0:01:54.280 --> 0:01:58.800
<v Speaker 1>this weekend. The story beyond the handshake, the read out

0:01:59.280 --> 0:02:04.040
<v Speaker 1>the truths, and we thought we should discover it through

0:02:04.080 --> 0:02:09.120
<v Speaker 1>the perspective of someone who's neither American nor Chinese, someone

0:02:09.160 --> 0:02:12.520
<v Speaker 1>who has witnessed the rise of China and its relationship

0:02:12.560 --> 0:02:16.120
<v Speaker 1>with the United States from a country that is tiny

0:02:16.480 --> 0:02:22.919
<v Speaker 1>in comparison, Singapore. It's Kishore Mahbubani, who was for three

0:02:23.080 --> 0:02:27.520
<v Speaker 1>decades a Singaporean diplomat, rising to become its ambassador at

0:02:27.560 --> 0:02:33.040
<v Speaker 1>the United Nations. He's from Singapore's minority Indian community, and

0:02:33.080 --> 0:02:36.200
<v Speaker 1>although I've known him for years, I never realized the

0:02:36.240 --> 0:02:39.800
<v Speaker 1>circumstances in which he grew up in the nineteen fifties

0:02:40.040 --> 0:02:44.440
<v Speaker 1>and sixties, how hard life was in Singapore at that time.

0:02:45.280 --> 0:02:48.040
<v Speaker 1>He's written many books, but his most recent is called

0:02:48.240 --> 0:02:54.519
<v Speaker 1>Living the Asian Century. It's also his most personal. As

0:02:54.560 --> 0:02:57.800
<v Speaker 1>you listen, you might well want more on the people,

0:02:58.320 --> 0:03:01.560
<v Speaker 1>the places, the most moments in time we talk about.

0:03:02.040 --> 0:03:04.960
<v Speaker 1>And for that context, have a look at Bloomberg dot

0:03:04.960 --> 0:03:08.920
<v Speaker 1>Com Forward slash Michelle, because that's where you'll find this

0:03:09.000 --> 0:03:12.920
<v Speaker 1>episode in written form, with my reflections and the pictures

0:03:13.160 --> 0:03:17.840
<v Speaker 1>that add to the story. So here's Keshoor Malbubani in

0:03:17.960 --> 0:03:21.679
<v Speaker 1>his own words, talking first about why the US and

0:03:21.800 --> 0:03:27.160
<v Speaker 1>China matters so much right now.

0:03:28.919 --> 0:03:34.960
<v Speaker 2>It is by far the most important contests of our time.

0:03:35.840 --> 0:03:39.160
<v Speaker 2>And I think what most people don't realize is that

0:03:39.400 --> 0:03:45.360
<v Speaker 2>never before in human history have we had two powers

0:03:46.080 --> 0:03:50.400
<v Speaker 2>of the size, the scale and reach of United States

0:03:50.400 --> 0:03:53.800
<v Speaker 2>and China confronting each other in the way that they

0:03:53.800 --> 0:03:59.040
<v Speaker 2>are today. Because the United States is a remarkably powerful country,

0:03:59.520 --> 0:04:02.839
<v Speaker 2>much more powerful than any other great power has been

0:04:02.880 --> 0:04:07.400
<v Speaker 2>in human history. And of course, when the Soviet Union collapsed,

0:04:07.440 --> 0:04:11.040
<v Speaker 2>the United States was left alone as the sole superpower

0:04:11.040 --> 0:04:13.480
<v Speaker 2>in the world, and few expected China to come up

0:04:13.520 --> 0:04:19.320
<v Speaker 2>so quickly. But now China has clearly achieved near parity

0:04:20.240 --> 0:04:23.080
<v Speaker 2>with the United States in the scope and scale of

0:04:23.120 --> 0:04:26.960
<v Speaker 2>its power too. And therefore you notice when President Trump

0:04:27.040 --> 0:04:31.000
<v Speaker 2>launched his tariff wars on all the countries in the world,

0:04:31.640 --> 0:04:34.440
<v Speaker 2>only one country stood up to the United States, and

0:04:34.480 --> 0:04:36.799
<v Speaker 2>that was China.

0:04:36.000 --> 0:04:38.640
<v Speaker 1>In this contest. Then do you see it as bigger

0:04:38.680 --> 0:04:43.360
<v Speaker 1>than the economics of it, the desire on the part

0:04:43.400 --> 0:04:45.839
<v Speaker 1>of the United States to maintain its position as the

0:04:45.839 --> 0:04:49.440
<v Speaker 1>world's biggest economy. Are you talking about powers something broader

0:04:49.480 --> 0:04:53.280
<v Speaker 1>than that, a quest to become the world's only superpower.

0:04:54.160 --> 0:04:56.599
<v Speaker 2>Well, you know, Joe politics has been around for about

0:04:56.600 --> 0:05:00.400
<v Speaker 2>two thousand years or so, and so so there are

0:05:00.440 --> 0:05:05.719
<v Speaker 2>certain habits of behavior that all great powers share in common.

0:05:06.720 --> 0:05:11.880
<v Speaker 2>And the number one power of the time always wants

0:05:11.920 --> 0:05:15.719
<v Speaker 2>to preserve his number one position and not give it

0:05:15.839 --> 0:05:19.479
<v Speaker 2>up gracefully and say, Okay, my turn is up, why

0:05:19.520 --> 0:05:22.000
<v Speaker 2>don't you take over. It's not like in the world

0:05:22.000 --> 0:05:26.680
<v Speaker 2>of business, where IBM will give way to another company,

0:05:26.720 --> 0:05:31.239
<v Speaker 2>for example. But in Joe politics is a zero sum game, sadly,

0:05:32.080 --> 0:05:35.760
<v Speaker 2>and so even though Washington, DC today is a very

0:05:35.839 --> 0:05:41.800
<v Speaker 2>badly divided capital politically, but when it comes to China,

0:05:42.000 --> 0:05:46.039
<v Speaker 2>there's a near universal consensus that it is in the

0:05:46.200 --> 0:05:49.960
<v Speaker 2>interests of the United States to stop the rise of China.

0:05:50.680 --> 0:05:56.280
<v Speaker 2>And that's why the actions against China remain consistent whether

0:05:56.360 --> 0:05:59.560
<v Speaker 2>or not you have President Trump or President Joe Biden

0:06:00.000 --> 0:06:04.680
<v Speaker 2>makes no difference. It's not about personalities, it's about the

0:06:04.720 --> 0:06:06.200
<v Speaker 2>logic of geopolitics.

0:06:06.640 --> 0:06:11.200
<v Speaker 1>And would you say that that is a foolish desire

0:06:11.279 --> 0:06:14.120
<v Speaker 1>to stop the rise of China, because this is the

0:06:14.160 --> 0:06:19.119
<v Speaker 1>way the world is going, that China is on a

0:06:19.160 --> 0:06:24.479
<v Speaker 1>path to become the dominant economic power and the demography

0:06:24.520 --> 0:06:25.279
<v Speaker 1>is on its side.

0:06:25.640 --> 0:06:30.159
<v Speaker 2>Well, no, I would say it's not wise policy of

0:06:30.240 --> 0:06:34.080
<v Speaker 2>the United States to stop the rise of China, because

0:06:34.160 --> 0:06:38.640
<v Speaker 2>China can no longer be stopped. And the only way

0:06:38.680 --> 0:06:44.159
<v Speaker 2>to stop China is to ask the Chinese government to

0:06:44.279 --> 0:06:49.360
<v Speaker 2>stop improving the livelihood of his own people. Right, That's

0:06:49.360 --> 0:06:52.240
<v Speaker 2>the only way that China will stop growing. But China

0:06:52.320 --> 0:06:54.960
<v Speaker 2>still has a long way to go. It's per capita

0:06:55.120 --> 0:06:59.200
<v Speaker 2>income is way behind that of the United States. There's

0:06:59.200 --> 0:07:02.479
<v Speaker 2>a long way to go. So clearly the Chinese people

0:07:02.520 --> 0:07:05.240
<v Speaker 2>want to improve their lives, and the Chinese economy will

0:07:05.320 --> 0:07:07.640
<v Speaker 2>keep growing. Of course, there'll be ups and downs like

0:07:07.640 --> 0:07:12.280
<v Speaker 2>in any other economy, but equally importantly, and this is

0:07:12.320 --> 0:07:16.720
<v Speaker 2>the key point. We live now today in a small, interdependent,

0:07:17.040 --> 0:07:23.800
<v Speaker 2>fragile planet Earth, and our overall priority as humanity should

0:07:23.800 --> 0:07:26.480
<v Speaker 2>be to try and preserve planet Earth before we lose

0:07:26.520 --> 0:07:29.960
<v Speaker 2>it to climate change and other forces. So there is

0:07:30.000 --> 0:07:35.200
<v Speaker 2>afore a larger imperative need for the US and China

0:07:35.320 --> 0:07:39.240
<v Speaker 2>to collaborate to deal with many common challenges in the world,

0:07:39.480 --> 0:07:42.240
<v Speaker 2>rather than to engage in a zero sum game with

0:07:42.360 --> 0:07:45.360
<v Speaker 2>each other. I've used a different analogy in a former

0:07:45.400 --> 0:07:48.680
<v Speaker 2>book of mine, The Great Convergence, saying that the world

0:07:48.720 --> 0:07:51.920
<v Speaker 2>has shrunk, the one hundred and ninety three countries are

0:07:51.920 --> 0:07:54.800
<v Speaker 2>no longer one hundred and ninety three separate boats. The

0:07:54.840 --> 0:07:57.520
<v Speaker 2>one hundred ninety three countries and hundre ninety three separate

0:07:57.760 --> 0:08:03.000
<v Speaker 2>cabins on the same vote. If your cabin on the

0:08:03.040 --> 0:08:08.280
<v Speaker 2>same board, there's no point protecting your cabin if the

0:08:08.320 --> 0:08:13.040
<v Speaker 2>boat is sinking. So therefore there's a common interest for

0:08:13.280 --> 0:08:17.640
<v Speaker 2>us in China to come together and take care of

0:08:17.680 --> 0:08:21.640
<v Speaker 2>the planet Earth, because that's far more important than whatever

0:08:21.720 --> 0:08:25.000
<v Speaker 2>you gained to make in this Joe political game or

0:08:25.000 --> 0:08:25.680
<v Speaker 2>one up mentioned.

0:08:26.080 --> 0:08:29.560
<v Speaker 1>Take me back to nineteen ninety three and a moment

0:08:29.640 --> 0:08:33.640
<v Speaker 1>between the two countries that you saw for yourself as

0:08:33.760 --> 0:08:38.000
<v Speaker 1>a Singaporean diplomat at the Apex Summit of that year.

0:08:38.280 --> 0:08:40.160
<v Speaker 1>What did you see and why did it matter?

0:08:40.960 --> 0:08:46.400
<v Speaker 2>Well, this was the first meeting. Ever, within the new

0:08:46.480 --> 0:08:49.880
<v Speaker 2>President of the United States, then Bill Clinton, and the

0:08:49.960 --> 0:08:54.240
<v Speaker 2>leader of China, Changsa Men. And you may recall that

0:08:54.280 --> 0:08:59.320
<v Speaker 2>in the nineteen ninety two election, Bill Clinton famously stood

0:08:59.360 --> 0:09:04.559
<v Speaker 2>out from H. W. Bush by saying, unlike President Bush,

0:09:04.960 --> 0:09:09.160
<v Speaker 2>I will not coddle the butchers of Beijing. So there

0:09:09.200 --> 0:09:11.440
<v Speaker 2>was a lot of tension in the air wondering whether

0:09:11.520 --> 0:09:16.040
<v Speaker 2>or not Bill Clinton would launch an attack on President Chunkstermin.

0:09:17.720 --> 0:09:20.920
<v Speaker 2>And indeed, President Chunksirmin himself was a bit nervous because

0:09:20.920 --> 0:09:22.840
<v Speaker 2>when he read out his own speech, he read it

0:09:22.880 --> 0:09:26.960
<v Speaker 2>so fast that the Taiwanese delegates said to him, slow down,

0:09:27.000 --> 0:09:29.880
<v Speaker 2>the interpreters cannot follow you. So there was a lot

0:09:29.880 --> 0:09:34.360
<v Speaker 2>of nervousness in the air. And amidst all this nervousness,

0:09:34.480 --> 0:09:39.080
<v Speaker 2>when we had a short break for coffee, the first

0:09:39.080 --> 0:09:43.800
<v Speaker 2>person President Bill Clinton approach was President Chunksirmin. And I

0:09:43.840 --> 0:09:50.720
<v Speaker 2>saw with my own eyes Bill Clinton coddling Chunkstermin in

0:09:50.760 --> 0:09:53.360
<v Speaker 2>a way that he said that he would never do.

0:09:53.640 --> 0:09:56.920
<v Speaker 2>Because that so it was quite a remarkable and everyone

0:09:56.960 --> 0:10:02.280
<v Speaker 2>in the room noticed it was watching incredible sort of

0:10:02.360 --> 0:10:06.920
<v Speaker 2>relief and happiness that what could have been a painful

0:10:07.040 --> 0:10:11.960
<v Speaker 2>confrontational meeting turned out to be a really remarkable breakthrough

0:10:11.960 --> 0:10:13.280
<v Speaker 2>in US China relations.

0:10:13.720 --> 0:10:17.280
<v Speaker 1>And the Butcher of Beijing reference was one to Tianeman

0:10:17.360 --> 0:10:18.760
<v Speaker 1>Square a few years before.

0:10:19.360 --> 0:10:23.000
<v Speaker 2>Exactly. He was referring to what happened in Tienanmen Square

0:10:23.240 --> 0:10:24.360
<v Speaker 2>in nineteen eighty nine.

0:10:25.559 --> 0:10:30.040
<v Speaker 1>And what did that moment which you witnessed then lead to?

0:10:30.200 --> 0:10:32.599
<v Speaker 1>What did it unlock in the years ahead?

0:10:32.800 --> 0:10:41.480
<v Speaker 2>Well, I think it enabled the renormalization of US China relations, because,

0:10:41.520 --> 0:10:46.559
<v Speaker 2>as you know, Tienanmun set the China relationship back quite badly.

0:10:46.640 --> 0:10:48.440
<v Speaker 2>And as you know before then, of course, during the

0:10:48.480 --> 0:10:55.080
<v Speaker 2>Cold War, because the United States needed China as a

0:10:55.200 --> 0:10:59.720
<v Speaker 2>counterweight against the Soviet Union, the United States would always

0:10:59.840 --> 0:11:04.520
<v Speaker 2>be and over backwards to accommodate China. And I can

0:11:04.520 --> 0:11:10.560
<v Speaker 2>tell you an even more horrifying story. In nineteen eighty one,

0:11:11.679 --> 0:11:15.920
<v Speaker 2>there was something called the International Conference on Cambodia, where

0:11:15.960 --> 0:11:21.800
<v Speaker 2>there was a disagreement between China and the Asian countries

0:11:22.640 --> 0:11:25.680
<v Speaker 2>about whether or not the government of Paul Pot should

0:11:25.679 --> 0:11:28.599
<v Speaker 2>be allowed to go back to Nompen after the Vietnamese

0:11:28.600 --> 0:11:33.400
<v Speaker 2>troops left Cambodia, and China took the correct position under

0:11:33.440 --> 0:11:36.440
<v Speaker 2>international law, which is that when a foreign invader leaves,

0:11:36.960 --> 0:11:41.280
<v Speaker 2>Pallpot comes back. But Asian countries said, no, this cannot

0:11:41.320 --> 0:11:44.280
<v Speaker 2>happen because no country will accept the return of Paulpot.

0:11:45.240 --> 0:11:49.400
<v Speaker 2>And fortunately the United States intervene. So we thought the

0:11:49.520 --> 0:11:52.120
<v Speaker 2>United States would of course cite the Asian countries who

0:11:52.120 --> 0:11:57.079
<v Speaker 2>were calling for free elections. Instead, to our absolute horror,

0:11:58.280 --> 0:12:01.160
<v Speaker 2>the United States said, don't stand up with China. We

0:12:01.240 --> 0:12:05.840
<v Speaker 2>need China for our sending up the Soviet Union. So

0:12:05.960 --> 0:12:08.400
<v Speaker 2>that was one of the most amazing things I saw

0:12:08.440 --> 0:12:11.480
<v Speaker 2>in my life. But that showed you how far we

0:12:11.520 --> 0:12:14.439
<v Speaker 2>had come between nineteen eighty one, where China is being

0:12:14.400 --> 0:12:17.880
<v Speaker 2>accommodated all the time, to the end of the Cold War,

0:12:17.920 --> 0:12:21.360
<v Speaker 2>and then China was suddenly an irrelevant partner then.

0:12:21.840 --> 0:12:26.439
<v Speaker 1>But while saying that neither country should be treating it

0:12:26.720 --> 0:12:29.640
<v Speaker 1>as the contest that they are, I think overall you're

0:12:29.720 --> 0:12:33.600
<v Speaker 1>much more critical of US policy towards China than the

0:12:33.640 --> 0:12:36.320
<v Speaker 1>other way around, aren't you. I read that you said

0:12:36.880 --> 0:12:40.680
<v Speaker 1>that what's happening now is like the Cold War, only

0:12:40.800 --> 0:12:45.240
<v Speaker 1>America now is behaving as the Soviet Union was during

0:12:45.280 --> 0:12:49.280
<v Speaker 1>the Cold War. That when the Soviet Union behaved unilaterally

0:12:49.320 --> 0:12:52.760
<v Speaker 1>ignored international opinion, and that was the time when America

0:12:52.920 --> 0:12:57.160
<v Speaker 1>acted multilaterally and marshall global opinion to its side. It's

0:12:57.160 --> 0:12:58.800
<v Speaker 1>a very unflattering comparison.

0:12:59.160 --> 0:13:03.520
<v Speaker 2>Well, that has been made by other scholars to that

0:13:03.720 --> 0:13:07.560
<v Speaker 2>in the contests between the United States and Soviet Union,

0:13:08.600 --> 0:13:16.920
<v Speaker 2>American society was flourishing, but Soviet society wasn't flourishing. But today,

0:13:17.040 --> 0:13:20.600
<v Speaker 2>in the contest between the United States and China, the

0:13:20.640 --> 0:13:25.280
<v Speaker 2>bottom fifty percent of the American population, they haven't seen

0:13:25.320 --> 0:13:29.800
<v Speaker 2>this standard of living improve in several decades. And indeed,

0:13:29.840 --> 0:13:32.880
<v Speaker 2>as you know, the indicators of people at the bottom

0:13:33.120 --> 0:13:36.720
<v Speaker 2>are very bad in the United States. And therefore the

0:13:36.880 --> 0:13:40.520
<v Speaker 2>logical thing for United States to do is to first

0:13:40.559 --> 0:13:44.640
<v Speaker 2>focus on uplifting its people rather than to try to

0:13:44.720 --> 0:13:49.440
<v Speaker 2>engage in a zero sum jeopolitical contests with China. But

0:13:49.480 --> 0:13:53.400
<v Speaker 2>I can tell you in Joe politics, unfortunately common sense

0:13:53.480 --> 0:13:59.080
<v Speaker 2>doesn't work because this desire to be number one is

0:13:59.120 --> 0:14:03.520
<v Speaker 2>so somehow the deeply ingrain into the human brain. That's

0:14:03.600 --> 0:14:07.440
<v Speaker 2>very hard to persuade the policymakers. Hey step back and think,

0:14:07.960 --> 0:14:10.840
<v Speaker 2>what is a better approach to take the goal of

0:14:10.880 --> 0:14:14.200
<v Speaker 2>my writings is not to say that China should win

0:14:14.320 --> 0:14:17.560
<v Speaker 2>or United States should win. The goal of my writings

0:14:17.600 --> 0:14:20.760
<v Speaker 2>is to say that China and US should step back

0:14:21.560 --> 0:14:24.840
<v Speaker 2>and reflect whether it is in their larger long term

0:14:24.960 --> 0:14:28.560
<v Speaker 2>interests to engage in such a zero sum contests.

0:14:29.080 --> 0:14:32.960
<v Speaker 1>And the standard of living of the Chinese population has

0:14:33.040 --> 0:14:36.720
<v Speaker 1>risen immeasurably in recent decades. There are, of course, though,

0:14:37.240 --> 0:14:40.600
<v Speaker 1>rights that they do not enjoy compared to Americans' freedom

0:14:40.600 --> 0:14:43.000
<v Speaker 1>of expression, the right to choose their own leaders.

0:14:43.640 --> 0:14:47.360
<v Speaker 2>Well, you're right, I mean, China has rescued eight hundred

0:14:47.680 --> 0:14:52.840
<v Speaker 2>million people are of poverty. That's two and a half

0:14:52.880 --> 0:14:57.360
<v Speaker 2>to three times the population of United States, and that's

0:14:57.400 --> 0:15:02.840
<v Speaker 2>an amazing achievement. The Chinese don't enjoy many of the

0:15:02.920 --> 0:15:09.640
<v Speaker 2>rights that Americans enjoy, But Chinese society has got its

0:15:09.760 --> 0:15:14.840
<v Speaker 2>own political DNA, which has been embedded in the Chinese

0:15:14.880 --> 0:15:20.000
<v Speaker 2>society only for three thousand years, and over three thousand years,

0:15:20.120 --> 0:15:24.320
<v Speaker 2>the big lesson that the Chinese people have learned is

0:15:24.360 --> 0:15:27.960
<v Speaker 2>that when there's chaos in the center, in the capital,

0:15:28.760 --> 0:15:33.760
<v Speaker 2>the people suffer. But when there's political stability and control

0:15:33.800 --> 0:15:37.920
<v Speaker 2>in the center, the people prosper and flourish. And when

0:15:38.000 --> 0:15:42.240
<v Speaker 2>people say that the Chinese people are not free, I

0:15:42.400 --> 0:15:47.160
<v Speaker 2>ask a very simple question. The Chinese people are not free?

0:15:47.920 --> 0:15:52.520
<v Speaker 2>Why is it? Over one hundred and thirty million Chinese

0:15:52.680 --> 0:16:00.800
<v Speaker 2>people leave China each year and then, amazingly, using their

0:16:00.840 --> 0:16:06.600
<v Speaker 2>own two feet, returned to China every year. Now, if

0:16:06.720 --> 0:16:12.560
<v Speaker 2>China was this harsh, dark communist gula that is portrayed

0:16:12.600 --> 0:16:16.880
<v Speaker 2>in the Anglo Saxon media, the Chinese people are irrational.

0:16:16.880 --> 0:16:20.360
<v Speaker 2>They shouldn't be restarted in China. But the Chinese who

0:16:20.400 --> 0:16:25.440
<v Speaker 2>are returning to China are the ones who have experienced

0:16:25.480 --> 0:16:30.440
<v Speaker 2>life overseas. So China, to put it simply, is a

0:16:30.640 --> 0:16:38.160
<v Speaker 2>different civilization from Western civilization. So the kinds of society

0:16:38.320 --> 0:16:41.440
<v Speaker 2>that the Chinese people want at the end of the

0:16:41.520 --> 0:16:46.520
<v Speaker 2>day will be different from Western society. And that's something

0:16:46.560 --> 0:16:48.360
<v Speaker 2>that we got to learn to live with in the

0:16:48.400 --> 0:16:50.680
<v Speaker 2>new multi civilizational world.

0:16:50.920 --> 0:16:53.640
<v Speaker 1>I hear what you're saying, and I'm also at the

0:16:53.640 --> 0:16:56.200
<v Speaker 1>same time thinking of the evidence that emerged a few

0:16:56.320 --> 0:17:01.240
<v Speaker 1>years ago about those re education camps in western China

0:17:01.320 --> 0:17:06.920
<v Speaker 1>in Sinjiang Province, where Chinese Muslims were detained, some as

0:17:06.960 --> 0:17:09.600
<v Speaker 1>young as in their teens right up to people in

0:17:09.640 --> 0:17:13.920
<v Speaker 1>their seventies because the state felt they needed re educating

0:17:13.960 --> 0:17:15.120
<v Speaker 1>about their beliefs.

0:17:15.600 --> 0:17:21.159
<v Speaker 2>Well, there's no question that China's internal arrangements are not

0:17:21.320 --> 0:17:25.959
<v Speaker 2>the same as those of Western society. But you know,

0:17:26.280 --> 0:17:33.240
<v Speaker 2>when the West raises concerns about the Muslims in China,

0:17:33.560 --> 0:17:35.800
<v Speaker 2>the one comment that the rest of the world makes

0:17:35.880 --> 0:17:41.240
<v Speaker 2>is that in general, the West doesn't like Muslims. In general,

0:17:41.760 --> 0:17:45.760
<v Speaker 2>the West doesn't like Chinese, but for some strange reason,

0:17:46.240 --> 0:17:50.880
<v Speaker 2>they love Chinese Muslims, and it's because it's a political

0:17:51.080 --> 0:17:57.160
<v Speaker 2>tool to be used to embarrass China. Unfortunately, that political

0:17:57.320 --> 0:18:00.920
<v Speaker 2>tool no longer works because they're all world is saying.

0:18:02.200 --> 0:18:04.919
<v Speaker 2>If you in the West are so concerned about the

0:18:04.920 --> 0:18:08.720
<v Speaker 2>conditions of Muslims who are oppress, what have you said

0:18:08.800 --> 0:18:20.960
<v Speaker 2>about Gaza? What have you done about Gaza.

0:18:21.400 --> 0:18:27.720
<v Speaker 1>You have seen international relations through your work as a

0:18:27.880 --> 0:18:31.200
<v Speaker 1>Singaporean diplomat over many years, But I want to ask

0:18:31.200 --> 0:18:34.080
<v Speaker 1>you about your life story too, because I think you

0:18:34.200 --> 0:18:38.320
<v Speaker 1>have lived history in a really interesting way in that

0:18:38.400 --> 0:18:42.520
<v Speaker 1>you came of age in Singapore just at the moment

0:18:42.680 --> 0:18:46.719
<v Speaker 1>as it was getting its independence from Malaysia after British

0:18:46.760 --> 0:18:50.560
<v Speaker 1>colonial rule had come to an end. And when I

0:18:50.640 --> 0:18:53.440
<v Speaker 1>read your book Living the Asian Century, I was really

0:18:53.480 --> 0:18:57.080
<v Speaker 1>struck by the hardship that your family experienced, and that

0:18:57.200 --> 0:19:01.480
<v Speaker 1>you experienced that when you started school in nineteen fifty four,

0:19:02.040 --> 0:19:05.200
<v Speaker 1>you were seriously underweight and you had to be put

0:19:05.240 --> 0:19:07.560
<v Speaker 1>on a special feeding program in school.

0:19:07.680 --> 0:19:12.399
<v Speaker 2>Well, looking back now, this is a strange thing to say.

0:19:13.280 --> 0:19:16.359
<v Speaker 2>I feel that it was almost a privilege to have

0:19:16.480 --> 0:19:20.400
<v Speaker 2>grown up in a poor Third world society. And you're right.

0:19:20.440 --> 0:19:22.639
<v Speaker 2>I was put in a special feeding program at the

0:19:22.680 --> 0:19:26.679
<v Speaker 2>age of six because I was technically under nourish, and

0:19:26.720 --> 0:19:29.800
<v Speaker 2>I lived in a house with no flush toilet until

0:19:29.840 --> 0:19:33.000
<v Speaker 2>I was thirteen years old. One of the biggest changes

0:19:33.040 --> 0:19:36.160
<v Speaker 2>in my life was when the flush toilet appeared, because

0:19:36.160 --> 0:19:40.399
<v Speaker 2>I felt that my sense of dignity improved dramatically. And

0:19:40.560 --> 0:19:44.240
<v Speaker 2>also my family was very poor. My father went to jail,

0:19:44.480 --> 0:19:46.879
<v Speaker 2>the debt collectors came to our house to try and

0:19:46.960 --> 0:19:50.320
<v Speaker 2>auction off the furniture in our house. So I went

0:19:50.359 --> 0:19:54.199
<v Speaker 2>through a very rough Third World childhood. My mother was

0:19:54.240 --> 0:19:56.680
<v Speaker 2>the one who took the brunt of all the pain

0:19:57.480 --> 0:20:02.800
<v Speaker 2>and difficulties, and not one did she crack. And every

0:20:02.880 --> 0:20:05.840
<v Speaker 2>time in my life I go through a difficult patch

0:20:06.320 --> 0:20:09.399
<v Speaker 2>and when I feel depressed, I just think of my

0:20:09.520 --> 0:20:13.400
<v Speaker 2>mother and I say, my mother never cracked under much

0:20:13.440 --> 0:20:19.240
<v Speaker 2>greater pressure, how can I ever crack? So that resilience

0:20:20.160 --> 0:20:24.239
<v Speaker 2>that my mother gave me was an amazing gift in

0:20:24.280 --> 0:20:24.880
<v Speaker 2>my life.

0:20:25.320 --> 0:20:28.119
<v Speaker 1>She had had a narrow escape from communal violence in

0:20:28.200 --> 0:20:32.400
<v Speaker 1>what is now Pakistan at the independence of India nineteen

0:20:32.440 --> 0:20:35.560
<v Speaker 1>forty seven. Your father had obviously had a very difficult

0:20:35.600 --> 0:20:38.879
<v Speaker 1>early life, sent from what was then British India to

0:20:38.920 --> 0:20:43.280
<v Speaker 1>Singapore and starting to work manual labor at the age

0:20:43.320 --> 0:20:43.880
<v Speaker 1>of thirteen.

0:20:44.200 --> 0:20:46.919
<v Speaker 2>Yes, both my parents, none of them ever went to

0:20:47.080 --> 0:20:50.520
<v Speaker 2>university or not even to high school or even secondary

0:20:50.520 --> 0:20:54.760
<v Speaker 2>school by the way, And my father, unfortunately it was

0:20:54.840 --> 0:20:56.760
<v Speaker 2>often at a very young age, and at the age

0:20:56.800 --> 0:20:59.880
<v Speaker 2>of thirteen, was sent to the British colony in Singapore

0:21:00.520 --> 0:21:04.919
<v Speaker 2>and ended up quite naturally without adult supervision, engaged in

0:21:04.960 --> 0:21:09.800
<v Speaker 2>several bad habits like smoking and drinking and gambling. And

0:21:09.880 --> 0:21:12.159
<v Speaker 2>so my mother, who had an arranged marriage, had no

0:21:12.280 --> 0:21:17.080
<v Speaker 2>idea that she was marrying an alcoholic gambler, and that,

0:21:17.200 --> 0:21:20.280
<v Speaker 2>of course was the root of our problems. And my

0:21:20.320 --> 0:21:23.280
<v Speaker 2>mother too, as you said, had a close shave because

0:21:23.359 --> 0:21:27.480
<v Speaker 2>she was in a train leaving Pakistan in the middle

0:21:27.480 --> 0:21:30.240
<v Speaker 2>of the night in the desert when her last compartment

0:21:30.280 --> 0:21:34.119
<v Speaker 2>got decoupled and if a mob had come along, she

0:21:34.160 --> 0:21:38.200
<v Speaker 2>would have been killed, but she survived. So I guess

0:21:38.200 --> 0:21:40.240
<v Speaker 2>our family has had lots of close shaves.

0:21:40.720 --> 0:21:44.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, But as you say, in Singapore too, when you

0:21:44.080 --> 0:21:46.480
<v Speaker 1>were growing up, it was a poor neighborhood. Few of

0:21:46.520 --> 0:21:49.919
<v Speaker 1>your peers even finished school, let alone went to university.

0:21:50.040 --> 0:21:54.560
<v Speaker 1>And that description in your book of living without a toilet,

0:21:54.640 --> 0:21:57.399
<v Speaker 1>it's so striking compared to what Singapore is today that

0:21:57.760 --> 0:22:01.560
<v Speaker 1>each morning the night soil men went around the neighborhood.

0:22:01.600 --> 0:22:04.000
<v Speaker 1>They opened a small door in the wall of every house,

0:22:04.040 --> 0:22:07.240
<v Speaker 1>pulled out a metal can filled with twenty four hours

0:22:07.280 --> 0:22:11.639
<v Speaker 1>worth of feces and urine from the occupants of the house.

0:22:12.640 --> 0:22:17.000
<v Speaker 2>The sights and smells of that experience never go away.

0:22:17.800 --> 0:22:21.840
<v Speaker 2>But what's amazing is that Singapores per capita income and

0:22:22.000 --> 0:22:25.680
<v Speaker 2>independence was around five hundred dollars, the same as Ghanai

0:22:25.720 --> 0:22:30.280
<v Speaker 2>in West Africa. But today Singapore per capita income is

0:22:30.480 --> 0:22:34.199
<v Speaker 2>ninety four thousand dollars, among the highest in the world,

0:22:35.040 --> 0:22:41.480
<v Speaker 2>and no country in the world has gone from five

0:22:41.560 --> 0:22:44.440
<v Speaker 2>hundred dollars per capita the ninety four thousand per capita

0:22:45.440 --> 0:22:48.960
<v Speaker 2>in sixty years, or less than one human lifetime. Now

0:22:49.000 --> 0:22:52.680
<v Speaker 2>that's one of the most remarkable stories of human history.

0:22:53.480 --> 0:22:57.359
<v Speaker 2>And again that's been one of my great privileges to

0:22:57.520 --> 0:23:02.080
<v Speaker 2>travel this remarkable journey upwards with my fellow Singaporeans.

0:23:02.320 --> 0:23:05.080
<v Speaker 1>It didn't feel that way in nineteen sixty five, did it.

0:23:05.119 --> 0:23:09.159
<v Speaker 1>I think you were seventeen, still in school. Singapore left

0:23:09.560 --> 0:23:13.240
<v Speaker 1>the federation it was in with Malaysia, and there's a

0:23:13.280 --> 0:23:16.679
<v Speaker 1>sense of despondency everywhere about how it can possibly survive

0:23:16.720 --> 0:23:17.280
<v Speaker 1>on its own.

0:23:18.160 --> 0:23:22.480
<v Speaker 2>Well, I remember the day vividly, August nine, nineteen sixty five,

0:23:23.240 --> 0:23:27.919
<v Speaker 2>when Singapore was expelled from the Malaysian Federation, and no

0:23:28.040 --> 0:23:32.359
<v Speaker 2>one in Singapore celebrated our independence because we thought Singapore

0:23:32.520 --> 0:23:35.840
<v Speaker 2>was doomed. And there was a simple reason why Singapore

0:23:35.960 --> 0:23:39.199
<v Speaker 2>was doomed, because Singapore was a city. And when a

0:23:39.240 --> 0:23:41.960
<v Speaker 2>city is cut off from his hinterland, which Malaysia was

0:23:41.960 --> 0:23:45.679
<v Speaker 2>the hinterland for Singapore, he can die like taking a

0:23:45.760 --> 0:23:48.800
<v Speaker 2>heart out of a body and expecting the heart to

0:23:48.840 --> 0:23:52.919
<v Speaker 2>survive without the supply of blood and other materials to

0:23:52.960 --> 0:23:56.000
<v Speaker 2>the heart. So we was a very difficult time and

0:23:56.160 --> 0:24:00.400
<v Speaker 2>no one expected Singapore to succeed in the way he did.

0:24:00.440 --> 0:24:03.320
<v Speaker 2>But of course their success was due to three remarkable

0:24:04.280 --> 0:24:09.280
<v Speaker 2>jeoepolitical geniuses Lei Kwan Yu, Gokeng Swi and Raja Utnam.

0:24:09.560 --> 0:24:11.439
<v Speaker 2>One of the greatest privileges in my life is that

0:24:11.480 --> 0:24:14.040
<v Speaker 2>I got to work with all three of them, and

0:24:14.119 --> 0:24:16.600
<v Speaker 2>they were probably the three best tutors I ever had

0:24:16.640 --> 0:24:17.640
<v Speaker 2>in my life.

0:24:17.600 --> 0:24:20.280
<v Speaker 1>Not just in diplomacy, broader than that.

0:24:20.920 --> 0:24:25.440
<v Speaker 2>Much much broader. They were big, deep thinkers, and all

0:24:25.520 --> 0:24:28.680
<v Speaker 2>three of them took a long range view of history.

0:24:29.160 --> 0:24:32.400
<v Speaker 2>So the reason why Singapore was economically successful, of course,

0:24:32.400 --> 0:24:35.240
<v Speaker 2>mister le Kwan, you played a very important role, but

0:24:35.400 --> 0:24:41.160
<v Speaker 2>the economic architect of Singapore's miracle was doctor Goking Sui.

0:24:41.840 --> 0:24:44.439
<v Speaker 2>And when I sat with him, he would tell me

0:24:44.480 --> 0:24:48.159
<v Speaker 2>about how the Japanese succeeded, what happened in the Meiji Reformation,

0:24:49.040 --> 0:24:51.520
<v Speaker 2>the lessons that Japanese learned from the rest of the world,

0:24:51.600 --> 0:24:56.280
<v Speaker 2>and how Singapore must try to emulate Japan and therefore succeed. So,

0:24:56.400 --> 0:25:00.760
<v Speaker 2>I mean, his understanding of history was amazing.

0:25:00.720 --> 0:25:02.760
<v Speaker 1>You know. I interviewed Li Kwan new once I was

0:25:02.800 --> 0:25:05.760
<v Speaker 1>really early in my career. I was in Singapore and

0:25:05.840 --> 0:25:08.639
<v Speaker 1>the BBC sent me to interview him, and he was

0:25:08.680 --> 0:25:13.800
<v Speaker 1>perfectly civil but I think he probably felt quite insulted

0:25:13.880 --> 0:25:18.280
<v Speaker 1>that someone so junior had been sent to talk to him,

0:25:18.359 --> 0:25:21.200
<v Speaker 1>the senior minister and founding father of Singapore.

0:25:21.760 --> 0:25:24.320
<v Speaker 2>But mister Le Kwan Yu was acutely aware that you

0:25:24.359 --> 0:25:28.000
<v Speaker 2>were with BBC, and he knew that by talking to

0:25:28.040 --> 0:25:30.800
<v Speaker 2>you that he would get his views and opinions to

0:25:30.960 --> 0:25:34.639
<v Speaker 2>a very large section of the human population, and so

0:25:34.800 --> 0:25:36.199
<v Speaker 2>he would have been happy to talk to you.

0:25:37.320 --> 0:25:40.520
<v Speaker 1>Tell me, then, in this picture that you've painted of

0:25:41.359 --> 0:25:45.560
<v Speaker 1>rising China a rise that can't be stopped. It is

0:25:45.600 --> 0:25:50.520
<v Speaker 1>a country that, in its own way, has these moments

0:25:50.560 --> 0:25:55.880
<v Speaker 1>where it destabilizes neighbors, for example, closing airspace around South

0:25:55.960 --> 0:25:59.719
<v Speaker 1>Korea's borders, as has been the case recently, doing things

0:25:59.760 --> 0:26:04.160
<v Speaker 1>that upset or worry the Philippines or Taiwan, of course

0:26:04.440 --> 0:26:08.959
<v Speaker 1>Japan at times. How do these states in the region,

0:26:09.000 --> 0:26:12.680
<v Speaker 1>including Singapore, fair in that Asian order.

0:26:13.800 --> 0:26:19.040
<v Speaker 2>Well, I think we have to understand that China's rice

0:26:19.160 --> 0:26:24.320
<v Speaker 2>has been remarkable and dramatic. And to explain how dramatic

0:26:24.400 --> 0:26:27.199
<v Speaker 2>it is, just imagine when you and I began this

0:26:27.320 --> 0:26:31.560
<v Speaker 2>conversation a few minutes ago, there was a cat sitting

0:26:31.600 --> 0:26:35.840
<v Speaker 2>next to me, and suddenly, after fifteen minutes or twenty minutes,

0:26:35.840 --> 0:26:38.640
<v Speaker 2>I turned around. I noticed a cat has become a tiger.

0:26:39.640 --> 0:26:42.560
<v Speaker 2>Now I was very comfortable living sitting next to a cat.

0:26:43.320 --> 0:26:47.800
<v Speaker 2>I'm very uncomfortable sitting next to a tiger. Now China

0:26:47.920 --> 0:26:52.520
<v Speaker 2>has become a tiger. You have to accept that it

0:26:52.600 --> 0:26:57.000
<v Speaker 2>is now the second most powerful country in the world

0:26:57.680 --> 0:27:02.440
<v Speaker 2>and still rising strongly, and so we have to learn

0:27:02.560 --> 0:27:06.320
<v Speaker 2>to live with a much stronger power in our neighborhood.

0:27:07.000 --> 0:27:11.240
<v Speaker 2>And the idea that any power can be benevolent, the

0:27:11.359 --> 0:27:16.200
<v Speaker 2>term benevolent great power is an oxymoron. All great powers

0:27:16.240 --> 0:27:21.320
<v Speaker 2>will protect their interests. The neighbors of China therefore have

0:27:21.440 --> 0:27:24.000
<v Speaker 2>to adjust to Chinese power. But this doesn't mean you

0:27:24.119 --> 0:27:28.360
<v Speaker 2>cow tao to Chinese power, but you learn to manage it.

0:27:29.200 --> 0:27:32.840
<v Speaker 2>I can tell you that the neighbors of China also

0:27:33.000 --> 0:27:36.560
<v Speaker 2>have long histories. And to give you an example, the

0:27:36.680 --> 0:27:41.200
<v Speaker 2>last country with whom China had a major war was Vietnam,

0:27:42.560 --> 0:27:45.800
<v Speaker 2>and in nineteen seventy nine, about a million soldiers were

0:27:45.800 --> 0:27:51.040
<v Speaker 2>fighting each other in that war, and the Vietnamese were

0:27:51.040 --> 0:27:55.600
<v Speaker 2>occupied by China for one thousand years. Right, but the

0:27:55.680 --> 0:27:59.760
<v Speaker 2>Vietnamese have an expression, a very important expression. They say

0:27:59.840 --> 0:28:03.480
<v Speaker 2>that become a leader of Vietnam, you must be able

0:28:03.560 --> 0:28:07.080
<v Speaker 2>to stand up to China and you must be able

0:28:07.119 --> 0:28:11.000
<v Speaker 2>to get along with China. And if you cannot do both,

0:28:11.320 --> 0:28:15.800
<v Speaker 2>you cannot be a leader of Vietnam. So countries in

0:28:15.880 --> 0:28:22.240
<v Speaker 2>this region therefore are pragmatically adjusting to the emergence of China.

0:28:22.760 --> 0:28:26.480
<v Speaker 2>But I can tell you in our private conversations, we

0:28:26.600 --> 0:28:30.040
<v Speaker 2>do tell the Chinese, quite frankly, what our concerns are,

0:28:30.640 --> 0:28:33.760
<v Speaker 2>and they do listen to the concerns. But the important

0:28:33.760 --> 0:28:37.760
<v Speaker 2>thing is that remember that we are in Asia. In Asia,

0:28:37.880 --> 0:28:41.400
<v Speaker 2>you must always save the face of the person you're

0:28:41.440 --> 0:28:45.920
<v Speaker 2>talking to. Please don't insult China publicly in the way

0:28:45.960 --> 0:28:49.960
<v Speaker 2>that European leaders do, in the way that American leaders do,

0:28:50.560 --> 0:28:53.479
<v Speaker 2>because that's not how you get to work with China.

0:28:54.000 --> 0:28:56.760
<v Speaker 1>Well, in many countries, many leaders are learning that that's

0:28:56.800 --> 0:28:59.000
<v Speaker 1>also the way you work with President Trump.

0:28:59.560 --> 0:29:05.600
<v Speaker 2>Well, President Trump is definitely different from his predecessors. But

0:29:06.040 --> 0:29:13.760
<v Speaker 2>I also have to emphasize that all American presidents put

0:29:13.880 --> 0:29:19.680
<v Speaker 2>American interests first over the interests of other countries. That's

0:29:19.800 --> 0:29:22.840
<v Speaker 2>just a fact of life. And for example, when I

0:29:22.840 --> 0:29:26.800
<v Speaker 2>was in the UN in two thousand and three, so

0:29:27.000 --> 0:29:32.480
<v Speaker 2>many countries Advice President George W. Bush not to go

0:29:32.520 --> 0:29:35.200
<v Speaker 2>to war in Iraq. So many countries, including some of

0:29:35.240 --> 0:29:40.320
<v Speaker 2>the best friends of the United States, including France, including Germany,

0:29:40.560 --> 0:29:45.800
<v Speaker 2>including Egypt, including Saudi Arabia, And you know, United States

0:29:45.800 --> 0:29:50.520
<v Speaker 2>didn't listen. So it is not the case that you

0:29:50.640 --> 0:29:55.880
<v Speaker 2>had American presidents in the past who would sacrifice American interests. No,

0:29:56.000 --> 0:29:58.920
<v Speaker 2>they won't. And this is a reality when dealing with

0:29:58.960 --> 0:29:59.840
<v Speaker 2>great powers.

0:30:00.080 --> 0:30:02.920
<v Speaker 1>So what do you think are the implications of these

0:30:02.960 --> 0:30:06.880
<v Speaker 1>weeks of war with Iran? What do you think is

0:30:07.320 --> 0:30:12.000
<v Speaker 1>the effect of this on China? Is there a reshaping

0:30:12.680 --> 0:30:15.160
<v Speaker 1>that is taking place whereas now going to take place

0:30:15.200 --> 0:30:16.440
<v Speaker 1>because of the war with Iran.

0:30:16.760 --> 0:30:20.560
<v Speaker 2>Well, I've said this to my American friends several times,

0:30:20.600 --> 0:30:23.280
<v Speaker 2>and it's also the theme of my book. As China won.

0:30:24.560 --> 0:30:29.239
<v Speaker 2>Every war that the United States fights, especially in the

0:30:29.280 --> 0:30:33.520
<v Speaker 2>Middle East, is a gift to China. So in the

0:30:33.640 --> 0:30:37.320
<v Speaker 2>ten years when the United States was bogged in Iraq

0:30:38.040 --> 0:30:42.840
<v Speaker 2>after the illegal invasion of Iraq by President GEORSH. W. Bush,

0:30:43.560 --> 0:30:48.360
<v Speaker 2>China had its fastest growing years. It was left to

0:30:48.400 --> 0:30:53.440
<v Speaker 2>grow peacefully from twenty three to twenty thirteen. So in

0:30:53.480 --> 0:30:57.440
<v Speaker 2>the same way, if the United States gets bogged down

0:30:57.520 --> 0:31:02.320
<v Speaker 2>and another war in Iran. Again, it buys time for China.

0:31:03.520 --> 0:31:09.480
<v Speaker 2>And this is the difference between Chinese leaders and American leaders,

0:31:10.280 --> 0:31:15.160
<v Speaker 2>is that Chinese leaders, as Henry Kissinger told me, always

0:31:15.160 --> 0:31:20.239
<v Speaker 2>work out a comprehensive long term strategy before embarking on

0:31:20.320 --> 0:31:24.320
<v Speaker 2>a venture. And the Chinese do have a comprehensive long

0:31:24.400 --> 0:31:28.160
<v Speaker 2>term strategy for managing the challenge that the United States

0:31:28.240 --> 0:31:32.440
<v Speaker 2>is posing to China. By contrast, the leaders of the

0:31:32.600 --> 0:31:35.200
<v Speaker 2>United States, and if I don't mean Republicans only, by

0:31:35.240 --> 0:31:39.880
<v Speaker 2>the way, it's both Democrats and Republicans have not work

0:31:39.960 --> 0:31:45.120
<v Speaker 2>out an equally comprehensive long term strategy for managing the

0:31:45.200 --> 0:31:49.200
<v Speaker 2>return of China as a great power. And I try

0:31:49.200 --> 0:31:52.280
<v Speaker 2>to be helpful to both sides by saying, why don't

0:31:52.320 --> 0:31:57.200
<v Speaker 2>you stay a step back and understand the other side, Because,

0:31:57.200 --> 0:32:01.840
<v Speaker 2>as Sunsu said, the Chinese strategists, no thine cell, no

0:32:02.080 --> 0:32:06.360
<v Speaker 2>thine enemy, fight a thousand battles, win a thousand battles.

0:32:07.280 --> 0:32:10.880
<v Speaker 1>But Chinese leaders can act that way because they don't

0:32:10.920 --> 0:32:12.760
<v Speaker 1>have to ever deal with an election.

0:32:14.280 --> 0:32:19.520
<v Speaker 2>That's true, but in the Cold War, a democratic United

0:32:19.560 --> 0:32:26.200
<v Speaker 2>States that had elections every four years defeated the authoritarian

0:32:26.680 --> 0:32:32.320
<v Speaker 2>Soviet Union, so the constant elections in America were in

0:32:32.360 --> 0:32:37.520
<v Speaker 2>no way a handicap. In fact, as the architect of

0:32:37.720 --> 0:32:40.240
<v Speaker 2>the success of the United States in the Cold War

0:32:40.360 --> 0:32:42.880
<v Speaker 2>was a man called George Cannon, whom I met once.

0:32:43.840 --> 0:32:47.320
<v Speaker 2>And George Cannon said way back in nineteen forty nine

0:32:48.360 --> 0:32:51.440
<v Speaker 2>that the outcome of the Coal War would be determined

0:32:51.480 --> 0:32:55.320
<v Speaker 2>not by the number of bullets or warships, or aircraft

0:32:55.360 --> 0:32:58.640
<v Speaker 2>carriers or jet fighters you have. You'll depend at the

0:32:58.720 --> 0:33:03.240
<v Speaker 2>end of the day, which society creates a spiritual vitality

0:33:04.120 --> 0:33:08.160
<v Speaker 2>that leads to his people flourishing and growing. So if

0:33:08.200 --> 0:33:13.040
<v Speaker 2>George Kennon were alive today, he would advise the United States,

0:33:13.880 --> 0:33:17.800
<v Speaker 2>don't try to get more aircraft carriers. Try to focus

0:33:17.840 --> 0:33:20.560
<v Speaker 2>on improving the livelihood or the bottom fifty percent of

0:33:20.600 --> 0:33:24.600
<v Speaker 2>American people. And if you succeed in doing that, that's

0:33:24.640 --> 0:33:27.400
<v Speaker 2>how you win the long term contests against China.

0:33:29.440 --> 0:33:32.720
<v Speaker 1>Professor Kishour and Mabubarani, thank you so much, pleasure, thank

0:33:32.760 --> 0:33:38.800
<v Speaker 1>you for having me. And that's where we left the conversation.

0:33:39.440 --> 0:33:41.840
<v Speaker 1>By the way, this time the notes in my written

0:33:41.920 --> 0:33:46.120
<v Speaker 1>version go from polpot and Cambodia to Singapore on that

0:33:46.320 --> 0:33:51.400
<v Speaker 1>Independence Day that Kishaw remembers so well. Plus there's fact

0:33:51.480 --> 0:33:54.600
<v Speaker 1>checking on the statistics that came up. You'll find it

0:33:54.640 --> 0:33:59.120
<v Speaker 1>all at Bloomberg dot Com, Forward slash, michell and so to.

0:33:59.160 --> 0:34:02.680
<v Speaker 1>The team producers are Jessica Beck and Chris Martineu, with

0:34:02.760 --> 0:34:06.440
<v Speaker 1>guest booking by Elan Byrd, social media by Alex Morgan,

0:34:06.680 --> 0:34:10.600
<v Speaker 1>and production assistance by Jennifer Seeley. Our music is by

0:34:10.600 --> 0:34:14.080
<v Speaker 1>Bart Walshaw, audio mixing was by Richard Ward, and this

0:34:14.239 --> 0:34:18.880
<v Speaker 1>time our video producer was Megan Olsen. The executive producer

0:34:19.160 --> 0:34:23.400
<v Speaker 1>is Louisa Lewis, and at Bloomberg Weekend, Brendan Francis Neunham

0:34:23.480 --> 0:34:26.920
<v Speaker 1>is director of Audio and Special Projects, and our executive

0:34:27.000 --> 0:34:32.200
<v Speaker 1>editor is Catherine Bell. Until the next time you join us, goodbye,