WEBVTT - How Taiwan Became the World's Most Perilous Geopolitical Chokepoint

0:00:02.720 --> 0:00:16.360
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, Radio News.

0:00:17.960 --> 0:00:20.640
<v Speaker 2>Hello and welcome to another episode of the Odd Thoughts Podcast.

0:00:20.720 --> 0:00:22.040
<v Speaker 2>I'm Tracy Alloway.

0:00:21.840 --> 0:00:23.080
<v Speaker 3>And I'm Joe Wisenthal.

0:00:23.400 --> 0:00:23.680
<v Speaker 1>Joe.

0:00:23.960 --> 0:00:27.159
<v Speaker 2>Up until recently, very recently, I would say there are

0:00:27.680 --> 0:00:31.479
<v Speaker 2>or were two hypothetical blockades that kind of loomed large

0:00:31.640 --> 0:00:35.360
<v Speaker 2>in the minds of geopolitical strategists everywhere. And the first was,

0:00:35.479 --> 0:00:38.840
<v Speaker 2>of course, Iran blockading the Strait of War moves. That's

0:00:38.880 --> 0:00:42.560
<v Speaker 2>clearly not a hypothetical on anymore. It's actually happened. It's reality,

0:00:42.680 --> 0:00:44.800
<v Speaker 2>and we've been doing a lot of episodes about it.

0:00:45.159 --> 0:00:48.680
<v Speaker 2>And so the big hypothetical blockade that we're left with

0:00:49.320 --> 0:00:53.360
<v Speaker 2>to ponder is China potentially doing something with Taiwan.

0:00:53.640 --> 0:00:55.880
<v Speaker 3>Definitely, and you know, the only thing I would actually

0:00:55.960 --> 0:00:58.880
<v Speaker 3>flip them in the sense that I would say the

0:00:59.040 --> 0:01:02.600
<v Speaker 3>vast majority of discourse has been about the letter China

0:01:02.760 --> 0:01:04.360
<v Speaker 3>potentially blockading.

0:01:03.880 --> 0:01:05.200
<v Speaker 4>Taiwan in some way.

0:01:06.240 --> 0:01:08.360
<v Speaker 3>That was the thing that everyone has been talking about

0:01:08.360 --> 0:01:11.800
<v Speaker 3>for years and years with growing intensity. And then, of course,

0:01:11.840 --> 0:01:15.840
<v Speaker 3>as you mentioned now, the Hormuz situation, which sort of,

0:01:16.040 --> 0:01:17.880
<v Speaker 3>I don't know, hit people by their blind spot because

0:01:17.880 --> 0:01:19.760
<v Speaker 3>they didn't think it could ever really happen, or whatever

0:01:19.800 --> 0:01:24.600
<v Speaker 3>really happened has happened. But when this resolves, If this resolves,

0:01:24.680 --> 0:01:28.400
<v Speaker 3>et cetera, I believe the question of Taiwan will very

0:01:28.480 --> 0:01:29.560
<v Speaker 3>quickly return to the fore.

0:01:29.720 --> 0:01:33.319
<v Speaker 2>Oh absolutely, So, as you mentioned, it obviously hasn't happened yet,

0:01:33.360 --> 0:01:35.400
<v Speaker 2>but people have been writing and thinking about it for

0:01:35.480 --> 0:01:37.959
<v Speaker 2>years and years and years, and as you know, I

0:01:38.080 --> 0:01:41.039
<v Speaker 2>consider myself an expert on this topic, having once written

0:01:41.040 --> 0:01:44.319
<v Speaker 2>a paper in college saying that China was going to

0:01:44.319 --> 0:01:47.559
<v Speaker 2>invade Taiwan before the two thousand and eight Beijing Olympics,

0:01:47.600 --> 0:01:50.080
<v Speaker 2>and that obviously didn't happen.

0:01:50.320 --> 0:01:52.880
<v Speaker 3>Well, being wrong has never gotten in the way of

0:01:52.920 --> 0:01:55.880
<v Speaker 3>any pundit's career, that's right, so that I wouldn't worry

0:01:55.920 --> 0:01:58.200
<v Speaker 3>about that. That has never been an issue as long

0:01:58.320 --> 0:02:03.720
<v Speaker 3>it was as as well articulated and actually et cetera.

0:02:03.880 --> 0:02:04.760
<v Speaker 3>That you're fine.

0:02:04.960 --> 0:02:08.200
<v Speaker 2>It was written from a server closet while I was

0:02:08.280 --> 0:02:11.640
<v Speaker 2>in Beijing, so it had that going for it. But anyway,

0:02:11.680 --> 0:02:13.640
<v Speaker 2>my point is that this is something that's always sort

0:02:13.680 --> 0:02:16.720
<v Speaker 2>of looming in the background, and you always see headlines

0:02:16.840 --> 0:02:20.560
<v Speaker 2>kind of coming up that hint at China Taiwan tension.

0:02:20.639 --> 0:02:23.440
<v Speaker 2>So we actually had one this morning. We're recording on

0:02:23.480 --> 0:02:27.800
<v Speaker 2>April twenty. First, the headline is Taiwan's president canceled his

0:02:27.919 --> 0:02:31.400
<v Speaker 2>visit to Swatini. Do you know where that is? It's

0:02:31.440 --> 0:02:34.440
<v Speaker 2>a tiny, tiny place in Africa?

0:02:35.600 --> 0:02:36.360
<v Speaker 3>Did they record?

0:02:36.360 --> 0:02:37.440
<v Speaker 4>Did they like? You know?

0:02:37.520 --> 0:02:40.119
<v Speaker 3>It is interesting because there's a few countries still help

0:02:40.280 --> 0:02:44.280
<v Speaker 3>wholly out there that recognize that's right, Taipei is the

0:02:44.400 --> 0:02:48.519
<v Speaker 3>unified capital of China. Most of like a lot most

0:02:48.520 --> 0:02:50.400
<v Speaker 3>of switch. There's a few random ones out there that

0:02:50.480 --> 0:02:54.200
<v Speaker 3>are still like they don't recognize the mainland, et cetera.

0:02:54.520 --> 0:02:56.840
<v Speaker 3>So I'm always, you know, all little factoids here and there.

0:02:56.880 --> 0:03:01.040
<v Speaker 2>I didn't know that, But so Taiwan's president offices citing

0:03:01.480 --> 0:03:04.280
<v Speaker 2>air root issues. I'm doing air quotes for those who

0:03:04.320 --> 0:03:08.640
<v Speaker 2>can't see this video, and China pressure. So yeah, you

0:03:08.680 --> 0:03:10.840
<v Speaker 2>do get those kind of headlines every once in a while.

0:03:10.840 --> 0:03:13.919
<v Speaker 2>And then the one other thing I would say is like, okay,

0:03:14.160 --> 0:03:16.920
<v Speaker 2>the straight of horror moves the blockade. There clearly an

0:03:16.960 --> 0:03:19.680
<v Speaker 2>oil story, and oil is something that powers the entire

0:03:19.720 --> 0:03:23.679
<v Speaker 2>global economy. But as we've kind of learned over the

0:03:23.720 --> 0:03:26.160
<v Speaker 2>past six or seven weeks, oil might not actually be

0:03:26.280 --> 0:03:29.639
<v Speaker 2>the thing that like powers markets. Right if you think

0:03:29.639 --> 0:03:32.959
<v Speaker 2>about the true, true, the thing that matters for markets,

0:03:33.040 --> 0:03:37.640
<v Speaker 2>it might be something much closer to AI and semiconductor

0:03:37.840 --> 0:03:39.760
<v Speaker 2>evaluation is.

0:03:39.720 --> 0:03:43.840
<v Speaker 3>Cut right, Yes, totally. I mean, evidently the world could

0:03:43.920 --> 0:03:47.280
<v Speaker 3>go a few weeks and not grind to a halt

0:03:47.560 --> 0:03:49.280
<v Speaker 3>if the straight of horm moves is closed for a

0:03:49.280 --> 0:03:53.240
<v Speaker 3>few weeks, I believe the reaction in markets would be

0:03:53.360 --> 0:03:56.040
<v Speaker 3>and just all around the world, and really can everything

0:03:56.080 --> 0:03:59.480
<v Speaker 3>would be orders of magnitude differently off someone's like no chips,

0:03:59.600 --> 0:04:02.480
<v Speaker 3>no chips coming out. That would be such a bigger deal.

0:04:02.600 --> 0:04:05.600
<v Speaker 3>And of course you know the question of you know,

0:04:05.680 --> 0:04:09.960
<v Speaker 3>Taiwan's role in the world, that would already have been

0:04:10.080 --> 0:04:13.240
<v Speaker 3>a very big security question even prior to the now

0:04:13.600 --> 0:04:16.080
<v Speaker 3>constant drum beat obsession with AI chips, et cetera. But

0:04:16.360 --> 0:04:19.680
<v Speaker 3>it only magnifies why this is such a live issue.

0:04:19.760 --> 0:04:22.520
<v Speaker 2>Right, So apparently we can kind of survive a few

0:04:22.560 --> 0:04:25.440
<v Speaker 2>weeks without oil. Can we survive a few weeks without

0:04:25.680 --> 0:04:27.200
<v Speaker 2>we can survive a few months.

0:04:27.600 --> 0:04:30.400
<v Speaker 3>We can survive a few weeks without a fraction of

0:04:30.760 --> 0:04:34.919
<v Speaker 3>a certain fraction the didy whereas if we you know,

0:04:35.080 --> 0:04:37.560
<v Speaker 3>the chip flow were to be disrupted on that level

0:04:37.600 --> 0:04:40.400
<v Speaker 3>would just be Yes, much bigger deal.

0:04:40.440 --> 0:04:42.120
<v Speaker 2>All right, Well, we do, in fact have the perfect

0:04:42.120 --> 0:04:45.200
<v Speaker 2>guests to talk about all of this, someone who has

0:04:45.240 --> 0:04:49.520
<v Speaker 2>just written a book on exactly this topic called Defending Taiwan,

0:04:49.600 --> 0:04:51.960
<v Speaker 2>a Strategy to Prevent War with China. We're going to

0:04:52.040 --> 0:04:54.919
<v Speaker 2>be speaking with Ike Freiman. He is also a Hoover

0:04:55.000 --> 0:04:57.159
<v Speaker 2>Fellow at Stanford. So, Ike, thank you so much for

0:04:57.160 --> 0:04:57.479
<v Speaker 2>coming on.

0:04:57.520 --> 0:04:59.040
<v Speaker 4>All thoughts, thanks for having me on.

0:04:59.240 --> 0:05:00.960
<v Speaker 2>Here's my first ques. And you've spent a lot of

0:05:01.040 --> 0:05:03.599
<v Speaker 2>time in China, including researching this book. Are you going

0:05:03.640 --> 0:05:04.559
<v Speaker 2>to be able to go back?

0:05:05.480 --> 0:05:07.400
<v Speaker 5>I think I could go back. The question is whether

0:05:07.440 --> 0:05:10.400
<v Speaker 5>I could leave. I'm joking. I'm joking. They gave me

0:05:10.440 --> 0:05:12.800
<v Speaker 5>a hard time at immigration on the way out last time.

0:05:12.880 --> 0:05:13.520
<v Speaker 2>Oh interesting.

0:05:13.640 --> 0:05:16.960
<v Speaker 5>And I can't do useful research there anymore. It's not

0:05:17.000 --> 0:05:19.720
<v Speaker 5>like there's archives I can access, interviews.

0:05:19.200 --> 0:05:19.640
<v Speaker 4>I can do.

0:05:20.000 --> 0:05:22.480
<v Speaker 5>So the value of it for research is going down

0:05:22.560 --> 0:05:24.400
<v Speaker 5>for me, but also the risk of my person and

0:05:24.440 --> 0:05:24.919
<v Speaker 5>the risk.

0:05:24.760 --> 0:05:26.520
<v Speaker 4>Of my devices is going up.

0:05:27.040 --> 0:05:29.040
<v Speaker 5>I do try to engage as much as I can,

0:05:29.440 --> 0:05:32.640
<v Speaker 5>but I think it's better to engage in the third countries.

0:05:33.480 --> 0:05:36.400
<v Speaker 3>What do you tell us the genesis of this book

0:05:36.480 --> 0:05:39.000
<v Speaker 3>or the origin of it or how you got interested

0:05:39.279 --> 0:05:41.839
<v Speaker 3>in this particular topic.

0:05:42.279 --> 0:05:45.839
<v Speaker 5>Well, my background is as a China scholar looking at

0:05:46.040 --> 0:05:49.440
<v Speaker 5>the China's global investment campaign. My first book was about

0:05:49.440 --> 0:05:52.120
<v Speaker 5>the Belton Road and I looked at a bunch of

0:05:52.160 --> 0:05:54.599
<v Speaker 5>Chinese language sources that show how it works under the

0:05:54.600 --> 0:05:58.480
<v Speaker 5>hood as a campaign to mobilize the party state behind

0:05:58.560 --> 0:06:01.000
<v Speaker 5>Seson Ping, and then I went on the trail of

0:06:01.040 --> 0:06:04.560
<v Speaker 5>it to Sri Lanka, to Tanzania, Greece, Greenland. Actually I

0:06:04.560 --> 0:06:07.839
<v Speaker 5>did my PhD about China in Greenland trying to understand

0:06:07.880 --> 0:06:09.040
<v Speaker 5>how China leverages.

0:06:09.320 --> 0:06:11.840
<v Speaker 3>You did our PhD about China and Greenland. Yeah, oh

0:06:11.920 --> 0:06:13.320
<v Speaker 3>that is timely, and I keep going.

0:06:13.400 --> 0:06:14.320
<v Speaker 4>That'll be another book.

0:06:14.400 --> 0:06:15.440
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:06:15.600 --> 0:06:19.160
<v Speaker 5>But what I learned in the process of doing this

0:06:19.200 --> 0:06:23.360
<v Speaker 5>book is that China has this formidable toolkit for blending

0:06:23.680 --> 0:06:29.520
<v Speaker 5>economic power with its geopolitical objectives. And Taiwan was clearly

0:06:29.520 --> 0:06:33.240
<v Speaker 5>emerging during COVID as the ai story was heating up

0:06:33.839 --> 0:06:37.400
<v Speaker 5>as this monumental issue in the structure of the world economy,

0:06:37.720 --> 0:06:39.760
<v Speaker 5>not just for the old reasons that we care about Taiwan,

0:06:39.800 --> 0:06:42.800
<v Speaker 5>which is largely about geography. So it seemed to me

0:06:42.960 --> 0:06:46.240
<v Speaker 5>reading about this, China had more ships, more planes, more missiles,

0:06:46.240 --> 0:06:48.919
<v Speaker 5>more drones. What was I missing? Why is the United

0:06:48.960 --> 0:06:52.920
<v Speaker 5>States not completely outmatched? So I started this project with

0:06:52.960 --> 0:06:56.000
<v Speaker 5>a friend of mine named Harry Halem, who's a superstar

0:06:56.279 --> 0:06:59.200
<v Speaker 5>naval historian, and I asked him, what's the book I

0:06:59.200 --> 0:07:01.480
<v Speaker 5>should read to underst what a US China war over

0:07:01.520 --> 0:07:04.560
<v Speaker 5>Taiwan would be, like, what it would take to win,

0:07:05.080 --> 0:07:06.719
<v Speaker 5>and then what of those things the US can do

0:07:06.839 --> 0:07:09.520
<v Speaker 5>or can't do? And he said, well, the book doesn't exist.

0:07:10.160 --> 0:07:12.320
<v Speaker 5>I can give you hundreds of articles, hundreds of people

0:07:12.320 --> 0:07:13.960
<v Speaker 5>to follow on Twitter, but no one thing to read.

0:07:14.480 --> 0:07:18.320
<v Speaker 5>And so began this collaboration between two historians, one focused

0:07:18.320 --> 0:07:20.160
<v Speaker 5>on the economics, one focused on the military, to.

0:07:20.080 --> 0:07:21.000
<v Speaker 4>Put the pieces together.

0:07:21.680 --> 0:07:24.000
<v Speaker 5>And as I did so, I began to discover there's

0:07:24.160 --> 0:07:26.760
<v Speaker 5>huge gaps in our knowledge of this problem. This is

0:07:26.800 --> 0:07:33.000
<v Speaker 5>the most complex, multidisciplinary, multifunctional foreign policy problem that American

0:07:33.000 --> 0:07:36.640
<v Speaker 5>statecraft is ever faced. Because it's a military problem, it's

0:07:36.640 --> 0:07:40.520
<v Speaker 5>also an industrial problem, it's a technology policy problem, it's

0:07:40.560 --> 0:07:44.040
<v Speaker 5>a diplomatic problem, a real one, complex one for how

0:07:44.120 --> 0:07:45.680
<v Speaker 5>we do with China, with Taiwan and with the rest

0:07:45.680 --> 0:07:48.520
<v Speaker 5>of the world. And then finally it's an economic problem.

0:07:48.560 --> 0:07:51.920
<v Speaker 5>It's a question of global economic order, because if Taiwan

0:07:52.040 --> 0:07:55.760
<v Speaker 5>falls by force or coercion and China seizes the FABS,

0:07:55.920 --> 0:07:59.240
<v Speaker 5>the semiconductor FABS, or the FABS are disabled or destroyed,

0:07:59.800 --> 0:08:03.200
<v Speaker 5>that is a hard reset of the entire global economic

0:08:03.240 --> 0:08:05.360
<v Speaker 5>system that we have had since nineteen eighty nine and

0:08:05.480 --> 0:08:08.040
<v Speaker 5>arguably back to nineteen forty five. So what comes next?

0:08:08.600 --> 0:08:11.200
<v Speaker 5>And while we have a lot of good thinking about

0:08:11.280 --> 0:08:14.440
<v Speaker 5>certain aspects of this scenario, like the wargaming of what

0:08:14.480 --> 0:08:17.160
<v Speaker 5>an amphibious campaign would look like and how we stop it,

0:08:17.440 --> 0:08:19.720
<v Speaker 5>there's other aspects, like the economic planning, that we just

0:08:19.800 --> 0:08:20.480
<v Speaker 5>haven't done.

0:08:20.720 --> 0:08:22.080
<v Speaker 4>So that was the idea for the book.

0:08:22.520 --> 0:08:25.040
<v Speaker 5>Pull together the best of existing knowledge, fill in the

0:08:25.080 --> 0:08:28.560
<v Speaker 5>gaps where we can, based on interviews, based on historical work,

0:08:28.640 --> 0:08:31.080
<v Speaker 5>Chinese language materials, and try to be the person to

0:08:31.080 --> 0:08:32.000
<v Speaker 5>put the pieces together.

0:08:32.679 --> 0:08:35.640
<v Speaker 2>I want to back way up for a second and

0:08:35.679 --> 0:08:38.920
<v Speaker 2>ask a very obvious question, which is why does China

0:08:38.920 --> 0:08:41.320
<v Speaker 2>actually care so much about Taiwan? And then is it

0:08:41.360 --> 0:08:44.120
<v Speaker 2>even accurate to say, like why does China care about Taiwan?

0:08:44.160 --> 0:08:47.920
<v Speaker 2>Should I be asking why does she himping care about Taiwan?

0:08:48.760 --> 0:08:50.800
<v Speaker 5>Those are the two right questions to ask, and it's

0:08:50.800 --> 0:08:53.320
<v Speaker 5>where we start with the book. The first thing to

0:08:53.400 --> 0:08:55.680
<v Speaker 5>understand is that it's not about the chips.

0:08:56.120 --> 0:08:56.640
<v Speaker 4>For China.

0:08:57.480 --> 0:08:59.840
<v Speaker 5>The chips are a co benefit. But China cared about

0:08:59.840 --> 0:09:02.000
<v Speaker 5>time I won long before they made hips, and they

0:09:02.040 --> 0:09:04.480
<v Speaker 5>would care about them if they didn't make chips. Taiwan

0:09:04.600 --> 0:09:08.640
<v Speaker 5>is the unfinished business of China's Civil War. In nineteen

0:09:08.679 --> 0:09:12.720
<v Speaker 5>forty nine, as the gwoman Dang Chang Kai Shek's government

0:09:13.080 --> 0:09:16.240
<v Speaker 5>was losing control of northern China, they began to evacuate

0:09:16.280 --> 0:09:19.199
<v Speaker 5>their forces alongside all the treasures of the Imperial Palace,

0:09:19.520 --> 0:09:23.120
<v Speaker 5>to Taipei, and they set up a government there, essentially

0:09:23.120 --> 0:09:26.800
<v Speaker 5>took over the island by force, and became, over the

0:09:26.840 --> 0:09:30.000
<v Speaker 5>course of the Korean War essentially a US ally. In

0:09:30.080 --> 0:09:33.360
<v Speaker 5>nineteen fifty five, Eisenhower went to Taipei. They became a

0:09:33.400 --> 0:09:37.160
<v Speaker 5>critical node in the US Alliance architecture. Mao obviously wanted

0:09:37.160 --> 0:09:38.880
<v Speaker 5>to take this island. He wanted to wipe out the

0:09:38.920 --> 0:09:42.080
<v Speaker 5>remnants of his enemy, and for him, the fact that

0:09:42.120 --> 0:09:46.080
<v Speaker 5>there was this other China right across the strait, which

0:09:46.120 --> 0:09:48.319
<v Speaker 5>at the time enjoyed the Chinese seat in the UN

0:09:48.360 --> 0:09:50.640
<v Speaker 5>Security Council, was recognized by most of the world as

0:09:50.679 --> 0:09:53.160
<v Speaker 5>the one true China. This was a fundamental question of

0:09:53.160 --> 0:09:56.760
<v Speaker 5>the legitimacy of the Chinese Communist Party, and so it

0:09:56.840 --> 0:10:01.600
<v Speaker 5>became this tootemic propaganda point. We will liberate Taiwan from

0:10:01.600 --> 0:10:04.760
<v Speaker 5>the imperialists, and in the process we will make China whole.

0:10:05.160 --> 0:10:09.040
<v Speaker 5>We will fix this historical wrong that we were separated

0:10:09.120 --> 0:10:12.120
<v Speaker 5>under this century of humiliation, and therefore for us to

0:10:12.160 --> 0:10:15.560
<v Speaker 5>be fully rejuvenated as a civilization, Taiwan has to be

0:10:15.559 --> 0:10:18.240
<v Speaker 5>brought to heal and the world must accept it's not

0:10:18.320 --> 0:10:21.800
<v Speaker 5>just about control over Taiwan. It's about political legitimacy. The

0:10:21.920 --> 0:10:24.960
<v Speaker 5>United Nations must accept. The United States must accept that

0:10:25.040 --> 0:10:27.320
<v Speaker 5>Taiwan is part of China, and there's only one China

0:10:27.360 --> 0:10:29.360
<v Speaker 5>in the world, and the Communist Party is the only

0:10:29.440 --> 0:10:32.319
<v Speaker 5>legitimate government. So this is why it's sensitive. It's not

0:10:32.440 --> 0:10:36.760
<v Speaker 5>just about the status of Taiwan. It's about what China means,

0:10:37.840 --> 0:10:40.160
<v Speaker 5>and that has always been bound up in competition with

0:10:40.200 --> 0:10:41.040
<v Speaker 5>the United States.

0:10:41.360 --> 0:10:45.240
<v Speaker 3>Prior to the KMT having fled the mainland of the

0:10:45.280 --> 0:10:48.440
<v Speaker 3>civil war and all that, what was understood to be

0:10:48.679 --> 0:10:52.680
<v Speaker 3>the status of that geography called Taiwan, and to what

0:10:52.800 --> 0:10:56.079
<v Speaker 3>degree going back even prior to the Civil War, etc.

0:10:57.600 --> 0:11:00.920
<v Speaker 3>What was its relationship to mainland China.

0:11:01.040 --> 0:11:02.680
<v Speaker 5>It depends how far back you want to go. Back

0:11:02.679 --> 0:11:05.120
<v Speaker 5>in the seventeenth century, the Dutch had a presence there

0:11:05.920 --> 0:11:09.560
<v Speaker 5>as the Ming Empire was falling apart. You had generals

0:11:09.600 --> 0:11:12.360
<v Speaker 5>who came from the mainland. They're claimed by both sides now.

0:11:13.000 --> 0:11:15.240
<v Speaker 5>A couple of them became gods actually, and there's temples

0:11:15.280 --> 0:11:19.160
<v Speaker 5>to them in Taiwan. And essentially during the Qing Dynasty,

0:11:19.240 --> 0:11:23.880
<v Speaker 5>China's final dynasty, they were a region of the province

0:11:24.200 --> 0:11:28.559
<v Speaker 5>across the strait on the mainland, but the Qing dynasty's.

0:11:27.960 --> 0:11:29.240
<v Speaker 4>Writ didn't really run there.

0:11:29.320 --> 0:11:31.440
<v Speaker 5>They were settled by people from the mainland, but it

0:11:31.480 --> 0:11:35.000
<v Speaker 5>was swampy and pestilential, and there were indigenous people, and

0:11:35.000 --> 0:11:40.040
<v Speaker 5>it wasn't really actively administered by the center. The Qing

0:11:40.480 --> 0:11:44.000
<v Speaker 5>pretty quickly lost control over the fringes of their empire,

0:11:44.480 --> 0:11:47.679
<v Speaker 5>and then the Japanese took it in the Sino Japanese

0:11:47.679 --> 0:11:50.280
<v Speaker 5>War in eighteen ninety five, and the Japanese developed it.

0:11:50.320 --> 0:11:52.839
<v Speaker 5>The Japanese industrialized, they left a mark on it, and

0:11:52.920 --> 0:11:56.480
<v Speaker 5>unlike other places that the Japanese colonized were like Korea,

0:11:56.880 --> 0:12:01.679
<v Speaker 5>where their colonization was brutal in Taiwan, they left relatively

0:12:01.679 --> 0:12:05.160
<v Speaker 5>good feelings. So all through the first half of the

0:12:05.280 --> 0:12:08.600
<v Speaker 5>twentieth century, when the communists and the nationalists were fighting

0:12:08.640 --> 0:12:13.120
<v Speaker 5>on the mainland, Taiwan was under Japanese control. And then

0:12:13.200 --> 0:12:16.840
<v Speaker 5>the question is after Japan surrendered in nineteen forty five,

0:12:17.679 --> 0:12:21.040
<v Speaker 5>who did they surrender it to? And was the status

0:12:21.040 --> 0:12:25.160
<v Speaker 5>of Taiwan decided after Japan's surrender, And the US position is,

0:12:25.280 --> 0:12:29.920
<v Speaker 5>legally it remains unresolved. It remains unresolved who Japan surrendered

0:12:29.920 --> 0:12:32.640
<v Speaker 5>it to. So the US position is we don't actually

0:12:32.640 --> 0:12:35.360
<v Speaker 5>take a view on what the true status of Taiwan is.

0:12:35.960 --> 0:12:38.480
<v Speaker 5>This is something for Taipei and Beijing to work out

0:12:38.480 --> 0:12:41.600
<v Speaker 5>between themselves, and we are open to any outcome, but

0:12:42.400 --> 0:12:46.320
<v Speaker 5>it has to be done peacefully, so no force and

0:12:46.400 --> 0:12:49.559
<v Speaker 5>no coercion. And since Taiwan's become a democracy, it has

0:12:49.600 --> 0:12:52.360
<v Speaker 5>to be democratically acceptable to the people of Taiwan. And

0:12:52.400 --> 0:12:55.600
<v Speaker 5>that's a principled position which is really about the stability

0:12:55.600 --> 0:12:59.600
<v Speaker 5>of the broader region because it recognizes that this region

0:12:59.640 --> 0:13:03.880
<v Speaker 5>has held together through trade routes that go through international waters,

0:13:03.920 --> 0:13:07.760
<v Speaker 5>international airspace. It's been stable since nineteen forty five. And

0:13:08.080 --> 0:13:11.440
<v Speaker 5>if the United States starts allowing borders to be changed

0:13:11.480 --> 0:13:15.120
<v Speaker 5>by force, trade routes to be changed by force, very quickly,

0:13:15.120 --> 0:13:16.640
<v Speaker 5>the whole regional order in.

0:13:17.559 --> 0:13:19.160
<v Speaker 4>This part of the world will collapse.

0:13:19.840 --> 0:13:22.560
<v Speaker 5>And this is a grave economic danger for the United

0:13:22.559 --> 0:13:24.160
<v Speaker 5>States as a geopolitical danger.

0:13:24.400 --> 0:13:25.360
<v Speaker 4>So that's the view.

0:13:25.800 --> 0:13:28.120
<v Speaker 5>And unfortunately, what China is doing is they're trying to

0:13:28.160 --> 0:13:32.240
<v Speaker 5>revise that situation by pushing in the gray zone, pushing

0:13:32.320 --> 0:13:35.040
<v Speaker 5>through coercion, and there's obviously always the risk they could

0:13:35.080 --> 0:13:35.679
<v Speaker 5>escalate to war.

0:13:36.120 --> 0:13:38.200
<v Speaker 2>I want to talk more about that, but just on

0:13:38.240 --> 0:13:42.520
<v Speaker 2>the topic of I guess US policy towards China, and

0:13:42.559 --> 0:13:45.320
<v Speaker 2>you already touched on the one China policy. But what

0:13:45.440 --> 0:13:49.520
<v Speaker 2>exactly is strategic ambiguity? Because whenever I hear that term,

0:13:49.559 --> 0:13:51.880
<v Speaker 2>I always think it's like, that's what I would do

0:13:51.920 --> 0:13:53.360
<v Speaker 2>if I was trying to get out of a social

0:13:53.360 --> 0:13:56.440
<v Speaker 2>commitment later that evening, or something like, oh maybe I'll

0:13:56.440 --> 0:13:59.280
<v Speaker 2>come maybe you know, we'll see, we'll see what happens.

0:13:59.600 --> 0:14:02.120
<v Speaker 2>What is exactly does that mean? And isn't it weird

0:14:02.160 --> 0:14:05.720
<v Speaker 2>that people recognize that as an actual policy strategic ambiguity?

0:14:05.760 --> 0:14:06.520
<v Speaker 2>What does it mean?

0:14:07.000 --> 0:14:09.959
<v Speaker 5>So the whole policy is sort of strange because it

0:14:10.040 --> 0:14:13.440
<v Speaker 5>was never put forward by one person. It emerged through accretion.

0:14:14.280 --> 0:14:17.040
<v Speaker 5>So it's like seeing one hundred bottles of beer on

0:14:17.040 --> 0:14:19.800
<v Speaker 5>the wall, like you keep adding a new lyric every

0:14:19.840 --> 0:14:23.080
<v Speaker 5>time there's a new administration. So what is the components

0:14:23.080 --> 0:14:25.840
<v Speaker 5>of the One China policy. Well, there's three communicates, three

0:14:25.880 --> 0:14:28.720
<v Speaker 5>agreements that the United States signed with China between the

0:14:28.720 --> 0:14:31.520
<v Speaker 5>seventies and the eighties, and those are the political foundation

0:14:31.640 --> 0:14:36.640
<v Speaker 5>of our relationship with the PRC. And the language is vague,

0:14:37.120 --> 0:14:39.960
<v Speaker 5>and there's some key phrases that are translated differently in

0:14:39.960 --> 0:14:42.320
<v Speaker 5>English and Chinese, so we get to claim that the

0:14:42.360 --> 0:14:44.200
<v Speaker 5>other side said things that the other side says it

0:14:44.200 --> 0:14:47.600
<v Speaker 5>doesn't say. There's a whole lot of that, But basically

0:14:48.000 --> 0:14:52.160
<v Speaker 5>the United States position is we will have a relationship

0:14:52.680 --> 0:14:53.680
<v Speaker 5>with the PRC.

0:14:53.800 --> 0:14:54.600
<v Speaker 4>We will treat.

0:14:54.360 --> 0:14:58.720
<v Speaker 5>Beijing as the sole legitimate government of China, but we

0:14:58.800 --> 0:15:03.080
<v Speaker 5>will maintain for all practical purposes an informal relationship with

0:15:03.120 --> 0:15:07.119
<v Speaker 5>Taiwan as if it were a country, just not technically

0:15:07.680 --> 0:15:12.520
<v Speaker 5>not de jury. And this has been reaffirmed by Congress,

0:15:12.600 --> 0:15:15.040
<v Speaker 5>which in nineteen seventy nine past the Taiwan Relations Act

0:15:15.200 --> 0:15:17.200
<v Speaker 5>that makes very clear that it's the sense of Congress.

0:15:17.200 --> 0:15:18.440
<v Speaker 4>So we should treat Taiwan as a.

0:15:18.360 --> 0:15:21.560
<v Speaker 5>State in basically every respect except for some of these formal,

0:15:22.000 --> 0:15:25.400
<v Speaker 5>very high end political and military interactions. And then in

0:15:25.440 --> 0:15:28.320
<v Speaker 5>the Reagan administration we made some extra commitments to Taiwan

0:15:28.720 --> 0:15:32.120
<v Speaker 5>called the Six Assurances, and they basically reduced to we

0:15:32.160 --> 0:15:34.560
<v Speaker 5>will not force you to the negotiating table, we will

0:15:34.600 --> 0:15:37.080
<v Speaker 5>not trade you away. In other words, you will never

0:15:37.160 --> 0:15:41.000
<v Speaker 5>face pressure from us to take a bad deal. And

0:15:41.640 --> 0:15:44.280
<v Speaker 5>what this policy adds up to has been called by

0:15:44.280 --> 0:15:49.560
<v Speaker 5>political scientists dual deterrence. We want to deter Taiwan from

0:15:49.600 --> 0:15:54.240
<v Speaker 5>declaring independence or doing something provocative that might trigger a crisis,

0:15:55.000 --> 0:15:58.640
<v Speaker 5>and we want to persuade Beijing that if it intervenes,

0:15:58.680 --> 0:16:02.000
<v Speaker 5>it might face the devastating real but that they don't

0:16:02.000 --> 0:16:04.560
<v Speaker 5>have to worry because Taiwan has also deterred, so they

0:16:04.600 --> 0:16:07.280
<v Speaker 5>can take their time, and hopefully if we deter both

0:16:07.320 --> 0:16:10.680
<v Speaker 5>sides from doing something extreme, we can encourage them to

0:16:10.760 --> 0:16:14.720
<v Speaker 5>resolve their differences peacefully. So that strategic ambiguity is the

0:16:14.840 --> 0:16:18.680
<v Speaker 5>not saying exactly what we would do or under what circumstances.

0:16:19.160 --> 0:16:22.720
<v Speaker 5>The tricky thing is that was a great policy when

0:16:22.720 --> 0:16:27.600
<v Speaker 5>we had overwhelming economic, technological, and military advantages.

0:16:28.720 --> 0:16:29.960
<v Speaker 4>That is no longer the case.

0:16:30.560 --> 0:16:34.120
<v Speaker 5>We probably could defeat China in a high end conventional war,

0:16:34.680 --> 0:16:37.680
<v Speaker 5>and we can go into why if we put sanctions

0:16:37.680 --> 0:16:40.520
<v Speaker 5>on China, we could probably cause a greater GDP hit

0:16:40.560 --> 0:16:44.080
<v Speaker 5>in China, And we can get into why. But the

0:16:44.200 --> 0:16:46.640
<v Speaker 5>cost to us and the risk to us as Americans

0:16:46.840 --> 0:16:49.200
<v Speaker 5>is just going up up up as the relative balance shifts,

0:16:49.480 --> 0:16:51.960
<v Speaker 5>and so now it increasingly seems like it's a get

0:16:52.000 --> 0:16:53.960
<v Speaker 5>out of jail free card, even if it isn't.

0:17:09.760 --> 0:17:14.440
<v Speaker 3>Quick question, I know basically nothing about taiwanis domestic politics.

0:17:14.880 --> 0:17:15.639
<v Speaker 4>Am I wrong?

0:17:15.760 --> 0:17:15.960
<v Speaker 1>Though?

0:17:16.040 --> 0:17:18.639
<v Speaker 3>I feel like I read somewhere it's like the KMT

0:17:19.040 --> 0:17:22.400
<v Speaker 3>the success they and they were the revolutionaries, aren't they

0:17:22.440 --> 0:17:25.400
<v Speaker 3>the more dubbish of the parties and relations with Beijing?

0:17:25.520 --> 0:17:27.600
<v Speaker 3>And don't aren't they the party that seems to be

0:17:27.840 --> 0:17:30.320
<v Speaker 3>a little bit softening of the stances of the future

0:17:30.640 --> 0:17:33.800
<v Speaker 3>and maybe, you know, uniting the two sides a little bit?

0:17:33.800 --> 0:17:37.040
<v Speaker 4>Am I wrong about? That's? How is that possible? It's

0:17:37.680 --> 0:17:38.800
<v Speaker 4>how nerdy do you want to get?

0:17:38.920 --> 0:17:39.000
<v Speaker 1>So?

0:17:39.080 --> 0:17:41.560
<v Speaker 4>Here's the thing I mentioned.

0:17:41.280 --> 0:17:45.560
<v Speaker 5>That the dispute is largely about what China means. Now

0:17:45.600 --> 0:17:49.679
<v Speaker 5>that question continues. The Gwomandong, the KMT, which is the

0:17:49.720 --> 0:17:54.199
<v Speaker 5>successor of Chang Kai Shek's party, they believe that there

0:17:54.200 --> 0:17:56.919
<v Speaker 5>are still the legitimate representatives.

0:17:56.119 --> 0:17:56.960
<v Speaker 4>Of the true China.

0:17:57.040 --> 0:17:57.960
<v Speaker 3>The entire thing.

0:17:58.160 --> 0:18:00.840
<v Speaker 5>Well, they recognize that there is a free China and

0:18:00.880 --> 0:18:03.840
<v Speaker 5>an un free China. And I think they've long since

0:18:03.880 --> 0:18:06.120
<v Speaker 5>given up their aspirations of raising an army and going

0:18:06.160 --> 0:18:08.119
<v Speaker 5>back across the straight and taken over the mainland. But

0:18:08.160 --> 0:18:11.520
<v Speaker 5>I think they have an aspiration that one day this

0:18:11.640 --> 0:18:15.359
<v Speaker 5>divided China can be unified, either in some kind of

0:18:15.359 --> 0:18:18.440
<v Speaker 5>confederation structure or who knows, maybe with the KMT on top.

0:18:19.080 --> 0:18:24.680
<v Speaker 5>And they identify culturally, historically, civilizationally as Chinese. They say,

0:18:24.720 --> 0:18:27.320
<v Speaker 5>we're Chinese, we just happen to live on Taiwan. But

0:18:27.320 --> 0:18:31.480
<v Speaker 5>we're one civilization, one nation. And the KMT's point of

0:18:31.560 --> 0:18:36.200
<v Speaker 5>view is that we one China, respective interpretations, and on

0:18:36.240 --> 0:18:39.880
<v Speaker 5>that basis, Beijing is willing to talk to them because

0:18:40.160 --> 0:18:42.520
<v Speaker 5>they disagree about one China means what one China means.

0:18:42.520 --> 0:18:44.640
<v Speaker 5>But they both believe in principle that there is only

0:18:44.640 --> 0:18:46.440
<v Speaker 5>one China and the world and Taiwan's part of it.

0:18:47.119 --> 0:18:50.280
<v Speaker 5>But the current ruling party in Taiwan, the Democratic Progressive

0:18:50.280 --> 0:18:53.960
<v Speaker 5>Party of the DPP. They have a different perspective. They say,

0:18:53.960 --> 0:18:56.560
<v Speaker 5>we are a country called Taiwan. We're one of the

0:18:56.560 --> 0:18:59.879
<v Speaker 5>most technologically advanced places in the world. We are thriving

0:18:59.880 --> 0:19:02.600
<v Speaker 5>to democracy. The world needs our chips, you know. We

0:19:02.640 --> 0:19:05.600
<v Speaker 5>are at the center of this security architecture.

0:19:05.760 --> 0:19:07.840
<v Speaker 3>They themselves is a distinct nation.

0:19:08.080 --> 0:19:10.480
<v Speaker 5>We are a distinct nation and we should be recognized

0:19:10.520 --> 0:19:14.520
<v Speaker 5>by the world as such. And they're not suicidal, they're

0:19:14.560 --> 0:19:18.320
<v Speaker 5>not crazy. They recognize that if they declare independence that

0:19:18.760 --> 0:19:20.480
<v Speaker 5>this could bring the hammer down on them.

0:19:20.800 --> 0:19:21.439
<v Speaker 4>But their points of.

0:19:21.480 --> 0:19:24.000
<v Speaker 5>View is we will never declare independence because we already are.

0:19:25.960 --> 0:19:29.000
<v Speaker 5>And Americans, I think will are about to have to

0:19:29.080 --> 0:19:31.600
<v Speaker 5>learn this lesson because Taiwan is going into a presidential

0:19:31.640 --> 0:19:35.840
<v Speaker 5>campaign and it is far from clear where the wind

0:19:35.880 --> 0:19:39.000
<v Speaker 5>is blowing, and the United States will have to work

0:19:39.040 --> 0:19:41.920
<v Speaker 5>with whoever wins, because that's what it means to have

0:19:42.000 --> 0:19:43.240
<v Speaker 5>a partner that's a democracy.

0:19:43.760 --> 0:19:46.320
<v Speaker 4>But these two parties have very different.

0:19:46.000 --> 0:19:48.280
<v Speaker 5>Points of view, and one of the points I make

0:19:48.320 --> 0:19:50.920
<v Speaker 5>in the book is we need to learn to handle

0:19:51.040 --> 0:19:55.000
<v Speaker 5>Taiwan's domestic politics. We are two democracies that respond to

0:19:55.119 --> 0:19:58.479
<v Speaker 5>one another. For example, I think the KMT, if they

0:19:58.520 --> 0:20:00.760
<v Speaker 5>come back to power, will be much less interested in

0:20:00.800 --> 0:20:05.440
<v Speaker 5>helping America reshore chip production, and they're also probably much

0:20:05.480 --> 0:20:08.560
<v Speaker 5>less interested in doing military cooperation with the United States

0:20:09.000 --> 0:20:12.359
<v Speaker 5>if that's going to inflame China. I think, basically you

0:20:12.359 --> 0:20:15.040
<v Speaker 5>can think about it this way. The DPP believes that

0:20:15.080 --> 0:20:17.560
<v Speaker 5>the relationship with the United States is the most important thing,

0:20:18.200 --> 0:20:21.359
<v Speaker 5>that we matter to them just as they matter to us,

0:20:21.760 --> 0:20:24.400
<v Speaker 5>and that if Taiwan gets in trouble, America will come.

0:20:25.080 --> 0:20:28.520
<v Speaker 5>And the KMT views are diverse, but they tend to

0:20:28.520 --> 0:20:31.800
<v Speaker 5>have the view the cavalry might not be coming. The

0:20:31.840 --> 0:20:34.080
<v Speaker 5>Americans might be using us as upon in a bigger

0:20:34.119 --> 0:20:37.639
<v Speaker 5>geopolitical game, but can we really trust them? And we

0:20:37.640 --> 0:20:41.280
<v Speaker 5>don't want to become Ukraine, So maybe the best approach

0:20:41.400 --> 0:20:44.640
<v Speaker 5>is to negotiate. And these are two very different points

0:20:44.680 --> 0:20:48.359
<v Speaker 5>of view. They're both plausible interpretations of the facts, and

0:20:48.560 --> 0:20:50.560
<v Speaker 5>the United States has to learn to deal with both sides.

0:20:50.880 --> 0:20:53.200
<v Speaker 2>I want to ask you more about reshoring, but since

0:20:53.240 --> 0:20:56.040
<v Speaker 2>we're on the topic of domestic Taiwanese politics, one thing

0:20:56.200 --> 0:20:58.960
<v Speaker 2>I've always wondered, and I'm curious if you maybe got

0:20:58.960 --> 0:21:00.800
<v Speaker 2>some color on this in the cour of your research.

0:21:00.880 --> 0:21:04.120
<v Speaker 2>But one of the reasons, it's not the only reason,

0:21:04.200 --> 0:21:06.280
<v Speaker 2>but a big one. One of the reasons Taiwan is

0:21:06.320 --> 0:21:09.439
<v Speaker 2>strategically important is because of the semiconductor business and the

0:21:09.440 --> 0:21:13.920
<v Speaker 2>presence of TSMC and companies like that. What role does

0:21:13.920 --> 0:21:18.239
<v Speaker 2>a TMC play in Taiwanese domestic politics? Like, are there

0:21:18.280 --> 0:21:22.439
<v Speaker 2>actual instances of like semiconductor companies having a seat at

0:21:22.440 --> 0:21:26.160
<v Speaker 2>the table when it comes to formulating national security policy

0:21:26.320 --> 0:21:29.800
<v Speaker 2>or indirect influence or anything like that. Have you seen examples?

0:21:29.960 --> 0:21:31.480
<v Speaker 4>It's hugely, hugely important.

0:21:31.560 --> 0:21:34.800
<v Speaker 5>It's only a couple of percent the semiconductor industry depending

0:21:34.840 --> 0:21:37.600
<v Speaker 5>on how you define it with related services industries, it's

0:21:37.600 --> 0:21:40.880
<v Speaker 5>something like five percent of employments in Taiwan, but it's

0:21:40.920 --> 0:21:45.480
<v Speaker 5>an outside share of Taiwan's exports. And right now, just

0:21:45.520 --> 0:21:47.760
<v Speaker 5>if you look at the macro data, Taiwan's exports are

0:21:47.760 --> 0:21:50.879
<v Speaker 5>booming because no one can get enough of their chips.

0:21:51.520 --> 0:21:56.360
<v Speaker 5>There is an entire ecosystem of universities, vocational training centers,

0:21:56.960 --> 0:22:00.959
<v Speaker 5>companies that supply to TSMC. This is a national champion

0:22:01.000 --> 0:22:03.639
<v Speaker 5>in so many ways, and they get tax benefits and

0:22:03.840 --> 0:22:07.640
<v Speaker 5>subsidized land and Taiwan's political economy is organized around making

0:22:07.680 --> 0:22:11.840
<v Speaker 5>them a success, just as South Korea's has been organized

0:22:11.840 --> 0:22:14.960
<v Speaker 5>around making Samsung and others a success. TSMC is smart

0:22:15.040 --> 0:22:17.680
<v Speaker 5>enough to know that it has to deal with administrations

0:22:17.680 --> 0:22:20.919
<v Speaker 5>of both parties. But TSMC is also caught in a

0:22:21.040 --> 0:22:24.480
<v Speaker 5>US China at tension too, and TSMC doesn't share the

0:22:24.560 --> 0:22:28.840
<v Speaker 5>United States political objectives here. TSMC is happy to sell

0:22:28.880 --> 0:22:31.120
<v Speaker 5>to China. They don't have a problem with China buys

0:22:31.160 --> 0:22:33.040
<v Speaker 5>lots of their chips, but they have to work with

0:22:33.040 --> 0:22:36.119
<v Speaker 5>the United States because ultimately they are fabricating chips at

0:22:36.119 --> 0:22:38.760
<v Speaker 5>the high end that are made with US designs, So

0:22:38.800 --> 0:22:41.800
<v Speaker 5>the US does have the ability to export control where

0:22:41.800 --> 0:22:42.919
<v Speaker 5>there's final products go.

0:22:43.280 --> 0:22:46.160
<v Speaker 3>This is really interesting and important and I hadn't thought

0:22:46.200 --> 0:22:49.199
<v Speaker 3>about this dynamic. I mean, I guess it sort of

0:22:49.320 --> 0:22:51.359
<v Speaker 3>makes sense to me that, like if I were like

0:22:51.440 --> 0:22:54.480
<v Speaker 3>the leadership in Taiwan, I don't know if I would

0:22:54.480 --> 0:22:58.920
<v Speaker 3>be like that thrilled about our main company opening up

0:22:59.160 --> 0:23:02.120
<v Speaker 3>FABS and Arizona, et cetera. But I guess it sort

0:23:02.119 --> 0:23:04.680
<v Speaker 3>of makes sense, Like, Okay, you know, the US is

0:23:04.680 --> 0:23:07.439
<v Speaker 3>a pretty important partner. But what I'm wondering, you know,

0:23:07.520 --> 0:23:10.600
<v Speaker 3>like in a future scenario. So going back to Reagan,

0:23:10.760 --> 0:23:13.600
<v Speaker 3>and it's like, we're this doctrine, We're never gonna put

0:23:13.640 --> 0:23:17.480
<v Speaker 3>pressure on you to like accept a bad deal. What if,

0:23:17.920 --> 0:23:23.399
<v Speaker 3>over time, organically a new generation of sort of more

0:23:23.520 --> 0:23:29.240
<v Speaker 3>sympathetic like mainland voters, like they grow up, they look

0:23:29.280 --> 0:23:31.399
<v Speaker 3>at the world, they see maybe the US sort of

0:23:31.400 --> 0:23:34.200
<v Speaker 3>looks like a belligerent power sometimes, et cetera. They look

0:23:34.240 --> 0:23:36.439
<v Speaker 3>at China and it seems it looks like they're doing

0:23:36.480 --> 0:23:38.440
<v Speaker 3>a lot better. They're not as poor as they used

0:23:38.480 --> 0:23:41.879
<v Speaker 3>to be, they look pretty stable, et cetera. Like, could

0:23:42.080 --> 0:23:46.399
<v Speaker 3>Taiwan just sort of migrate closer to the Chinese sphere

0:23:46.480 --> 0:23:49.960
<v Speaker 3>or perhaps even merge back into China organically?

0:23:50.160 --> 0:23:51.240
<v Speaker 4>Yes? And that and.

0:23:51.359 --> 0:23:54.480
<v Speaker 3>Is that is that something that like US policy like

0:23:54.560 --> 0:23:56.520
<v Speaker 3>feel like, do we feel.

0:23:56.119 --> 0:23:57.239
<v Speaker 4>That we have to prevent that?

0:23:57.320 --> 0:24:01.520
<v Speaker 3>If that's sort of where the democratic action in Taiwan goes, well.

0:24:01.359 --> 0:24:04.240
<v Speaker 5>Our long standing policy is that it's the right of

0:24:04.320 --> 0:24:07.040
<v Speaker 5>the people of Taiwan, yeah, to decide their own future.

0:24:07.480 --> 0:24:10.320
<v Speaker 5>And that's a principled position that we hold for a

0:24:10.359 --> 0:24:13.960
<v Speaker 5>reason that is also self interested, which is, if Taiwan

0:24:14.040 --> 0:24:16.760
<v Speaker 5>decides that they want to submit or they want to

0:24:16.800 --> 0:24:19.080
<v Speaker 5>take a deal, and they want to unify with the mainland.

0:24:19.400 --> 0:24:22.680
<v Speaker 5>By the way the mainland uses this term reunification, that's

0:24:22.680 --> 0:24:25.760
<v Speaker 5>a weasel word. Taiwan has never been subject to the

0:24:25.800 --> 0:24:28.479
<v Speaker 5>People's Republic of China in its history. But if Taiwan

0:24:28.520 --> 0:24:32.160
<v Speaker 5>becomes unified as part of China, what's the United States.

0:24:31.880 --> 0:24:33.760
<v Speaker 4>Going to go in? We're going to go in and

0:24:33.760 --> 0:24:34.600
<v Speaker 4>topple the governments.

0:24:34.640 --> 0:24:37.239
<v Speaker 5>We're going to tell them no, that they should have

0:24:37.240 --> 0:24:41.119
<v Speaker 5>self determination to decide. And that is one reason why

0:24:41.160 --> 0:24:45.640
<v Speaker 5>it's a no brainer to start to build a semiconductor

0:24:45.720 --> 0:24:48.000
<v Speaker 5>manufacturing base in the United States and Japan and other

0:24:48.000 --> 0:24:51.159
<v Speaker 5>allied countries, because there's any number of reasons to doubt

0:24:51.480 --> 0:24:55.199
<v Speaker 5>whether we have assured access in the long term to

0:24:55.280 --> 0:24:58.720
<v Speaker 5>Taiwan's chip supply. And if this is the most essential

0:24:58.760 --> 0:25:03.320
<v Speaker 5>bottleneck the develop meant of frontier ai then we cannot

0:25:03.320 --> 0:25:04.760
<v Speaker 5>put all of our eggs in that basket.

0:25:04.800 --> 0:25:08.080
<v Speaker 3>Do we know like younger Taiwan is there a reason

0:25:08.160 --> 0:25:10.679
<v Speaker 3>to think that? Like, I don't know. I have again,

0:25:11.119 --> 0:25:15.520
<v Speaker 3>I haven't looked at polling of like how the younger

0:25:16.119 --> 0:25:17.000
<v Speaker 3>what do we know about them?

0:25:17.040 --> 0:25:20.920
<v Speaker 5>So the younger Taiwanese tend to lean more towards the DPP. Historically,

0:25:21.000 --> 0:25:23.960
<v Speaker 5>they tend to in polls, they tend to identify as

0:25:24.160 --> 0:25:27.520
<v Speaker 5>I'm Taiwanese only. Rather very few of them will say

0:25:27.520 --> 0:25:31.399
<v Speaker 5>I'm Chinese only. More of them will an increasing number

0:25:31.480 --> 0:25:34.120
<v Speaker 5>will say that I'm Taiwanese only, although many will say

0:25:34.160 --> 0:25:38.439
<v Speaker 5>I'm both Taiwanese and Chinese. Chinese in the sense of

0:25:38.960 --> 0:25:41.439
<v Speaker 5>culturally civilization of Chinese, not Chinese in the sense of

0:25:41.600 --> 0:25:46.639
<v Speaker 5>People's Republic of China Chinese. And I think these dynamics

0:25:46.640 --> 0:25:49.400
<v Speaker 5>are affected by what the mainland does.

0:25:50.280 --> 0:25:50.919
<v Speaker 4>China is.

0:25:51.200 --> 0:25:53.840
<v Speaker 5>I think perfectly happier season Ping will be perfectly happy

0:25:54.160 --> 0:25:56.960
<v Speaker 5>if Taiwan would sign a piece of paper that says

0:25:57.160 --> 0:26:01.640
<v Speaker 5>I accept one country, two systems Taiwan, which is to say,

0:26:01.680 --> 0:26:04.719
<v Speaker 5>I accept your principle that there's only one China and

0:26:04.760 --> 0:26:07.240
<v Speaker 5>we're part of it, and you're the legitimate leaders, and

0:26:07.320 --> 0:26:09.520
<v Speaker 5>we will get a Hong Kong style arrangement where we

0:26:09.560 --> 0:26:12.520
<v Speaker 5>get to keep our laws, our institutions, our democracy, we

0:26:12.560 --> 0:26:16.200
<v Speaker 5>get some freedom of expression, freedom to organize, We get

0:26:16.200 --> 0:26:18.560
<v Speaker 5>our fancy passports that have visa free access to all

0:26:18.600 --> 0:26:21.080
<v Speaker 5>these countries, all these perks, and maybe Beijing will give

0:26:21.119 --> 0:26:22.800
<v Speaker 5>them free energies.

0:26:22.920 --> 0:26:24.320
<v Speaker 4>Other subsidies, other perks.

0:26:25.160 --> 0:26:27.160
<v Speaker 5>That is the offer that's on the table for Taiwan,

0:26:27.680 --> 0:26:31.119
<v Speaker 5>but it's become a whole lot less attractive now that

0:26:31.160 --> 0:26:34.000
<v Speaker 5>Taiwan has watched what happened to Hong Kong.

0:26:34.480 --> 0:26:35.760
<v Speaker 4>Because Hong Kong took that.

0:26:35.720 --> 0:26:39.600
<v Speaker 5>Deal and it was all right until people in Hong

0:26:39.680 --> 0:26:42.960
<v Speaker 5>Kong started to object to the CCP's encroachment on their

0:26:42.960 --> 0:26:45.280
<v Speaker 5>institutions and their freedom to organize and speak out.

0:26:45.680 --> 0:26:47.200
<v Speaker 4>And when it ended up happening.

0:26:46.880 --> 0:26:50.800
<v Speaker 5>Is season ping sent in masked thugs that brutalized people,

0:26:50.960 --> 0:26:56.000
<v Speaker 5>rounded them up, disappeared people in the night, terrorized the population,

0:26:56.119 --> 0:26:59.239
<v Speaker 5>and crushed them into submission. So I think Taiwan has

0:26:59.320 --> 0:27:04.200
<v Speaker 5>understood twenty nineteen that if they take one country, two systems,

0:27:04.600 --> 0:27:07.200
<v Speaker 5>it's the slow beginning of the end of their democratic

0:27:07.280 --> 0:27:10.639
<v Speaker 5>institutions and their freedom. It is not a it's not

0:27:10.720 --> 0:27:14.639
<v Speaker 5>a deal that they would take, I think willingly. But

0:27:14.720 --> 0:27:16.720
<v Speaker 5>if they feel that the United States and the rest

0:27:16.760 --> 0:27:20.040
<v Speaker 5>of the world isn't backing them up, and they're offered,

0:27:20.800 --> 0:27:23.040
<v Speaker 5>Beijing essentially says, you want to do this the easy

0:27:23.040 --> 0:27:25.440
<v Speaker 5>way or the hard way. I can imagine a world

0:27:25.480 --> 0:27:28.400
<v Speaker 5>in which they choose the easy way and This matters

0:27:28.560 --> 0:27:31.560
<v Speaker 5>because we're not just talking at peace time. We're also

0:27:31.560 --> 0:27:34.639
<v Speaker 5>talking about crisis scenarios. There's all kinds of things that

0:27:34.720 --> 0:27:37.840
<v Speaker 5>China can do to dial up the pressure. They can

0:27:37.880 --> 0:27:41.000
<v Speaker 5>mobilize their forces in the Taiwan Strait for a potential invasion.

0:27:41.040 --> 0:27:43.560
<v Speaker 4>Oh, it's just an exercise. It's just an exercise until

0:27:43.600 --> 0:27:43.840
<v Speaker 4>it's not.

0:27:44.800 --> 0:27:49.040
<v Speaker 5>They can start to curtail the flow of goods and

0:27:49.160 --> 0:27:52.240
<v Speaker 5>planes coming to and from Taiwan. They can start to

0:27:52.320 --> 0:27:55.840
<v Speaker 5>ask for manifests. Who's on the plane? Oh so sorry,

0:27:55.920 --> 0:27:57.280
<v Speaker 5>Ike is on the plane? Could you make a pit

0:27:57.320 --> 0:27:59.320
<v Speaker 5>stup in Shanghai? We want to ask them some questions.

0:28:00.040 --> 0:28:02.400
<v Speaker 5>There's so many ways that Bijin can turn up the pressure.

0:28:02.720 --> 0:28:05.359
<v Speaker 5>They probably have Special Forces United Front people on the

0:28:05.359 --> 0:28:08.240
<v Speaker 5>ground in Taiwan. They can do cyber attacks against someone

0:28:08.240 --> 0:28:11.960
<v Speaker 5>critical infrastructure. They can blank the country with propaganda, the

0:28:12.000 --> 0:28:15.480
<v Speaker 5>island rather with propaganda. There's so much things that China

0:28:15.520 --> 0:28:18.639
<v Speaker 5>can do to put the pressure on and try to

0:28:18.680 --> 0:28:21.879
<v Speaker 5>drive wedges between Taiwan, the United States and Japan. And

0:28:22.000 --> 0:28:26.280
<v Speaker 5>in those moments, what is the US political strategy? Yeah,

0:28:26.280 --> 0:28:28.479
<v Speaker 5>we have a military strategy if they turn to an invasion,

0:28:28.520 --> 0:28:31.000
<v Speaker 5>But what is the political strategy, if the markets start

0:28:31.040 --> 0:28:33.000
<v Speaker 5>to panic, if we think we may need to get

0:28:33.000 --> 0:28:35.800
<v Speaker 5>our American citizens out, And these are the scenarios I

0:28:35.880 --> 0:28:38.640
<v Speaker 5>argue in the book that we haven't yet fully thought through.

0:28:39.120 --> 0:28:42.400
<v Speaker 2>In your framework. What's been the big constraint on Hihinping

0:28:42.680 --> 0:28:46.040
<v Speaker 2>so far historically, Like, why hasn't he done something on

0:28:46.080 --> 0:28:47.200
<v Speaker 2>Taiwan yet?

0:28:47.920 --> 0:28:49.760
<v Speaker 4>Well, we don't know. We have to speculate.

0:28:50.320 --> 0:28:53.400
<v Speaker 5>One reason is that the People's Liberation Army, the PLA,

0:28:54.640 --> 0:28:57.680
<v Speaker 5>I think it's fair to say, up until recently and

0:28:57.760 --> 0:29:00.880
<v Speaker 5>probably still now, lacks the ability to take and hold

0:29:00.920 --> 0:29:05.160
<v Speaker 5>Taiwan by force. Back in nineteen forty nine, after Mao

0:29:05.240 --> 0:29:07.000
<v Speaker 5>took over the mainland, the first thing he did was

0:29:07.000 --> 0:29:08.800
<v Speaker 5>he told his generals, now give me the plan to

0:29:08.840 --> 0:29:12.360
<v Speaker 5>take Taiwan. And they studied it and they concluded, Sir,

0:29:12.400 --> 0:29:14.720
<v Speaker 5>it can't be done. This is one of the hardest

0:29:14.720 --> 0:29:17.959
<v Speaker 5>waterways in the world. There's crazy tides, there's enormous waves,

0:29:18.160 --> 0:29:20.800
<v Speaker 5>there's fifty mile an hour winds, there's typhoons, there's fog,

0:29:21.440 --> 0:29:24.040
<v Speaker 5>and there's only a few landing beaches that are plausible.

0:29:24.560 --> 0:29:27.080
<v Speaker 5>And Taiwan knows what those are. And now they have

0:29:27.160 --> 0:29:29.640
<v Speaker 5>spent the better part of a century fortifying them. So

0:29:29.760 --> 0:29:31.680
<v Speaker 5>if you want to get all of your men across

0:29:31.680 --> 0:29:33.840
<v Speaker 5>the strait, you have to deliver them by sea or

0:29:33.840 --> 0:29:37.640
<v Speaker 5>by air, and air is difficult, as Ukraine has shown.

0:29:37.680 --> 0:29:41.040
<v Speaker 5>It's easy to shoot down helicopters and planes, and so

0:29:41.120 --> 0:29:43.400
<v Speaker 5>you need to take them in these amphibious ships, which

0:29:43.400 --> 0:29:46.080
<v Speaker 5>can be sunk by mines or cheap drones or artillery.

0:29:46.360 --> 0:29:48.920
<v Speaker 5>And then you have to get them into the shores,

0:29:49.280 --> 0:29:51.520
<v Speaker 5>and then you potentially have to sustain them for a

0:29:51.560 --> 0:29:55.280
<v Speaker 5>long period of time. You need to give them vehicles

0:29:55.400 --> 0:30:00.440
<v Speaker 5>and AMMO and fuel and food and medicine. And happens

0:30:00.480 --> 0:30:03.480
<v Speaker 5>if you successfully deliver fifteen thousand troops to the shores,

0:30:04.080 --> 0:30:04.480
<v Speaker 5>and then.

0:30:04.400 --> 0:30:06.960
<v Speaker 4>Your logistics tail gets cut because.

0:30:06.760 --> 0:30:08.280
<v Speaker 5>A number of your amphibious ships end up on the

0:30:08.280 --> 0:30:10.240
<v Speaker 5>bottom of the Tai one straight, and then your men

0:30:10.280 --> 0:30:13.960
<v Speaker 5>are massacred on the beaches. So many things have to

0:30:14.080 --> 0:30:18.440
<v Speaker 5>go right in a highly synchronized way for an amphibious

0:30:18.440 --> 0:30:20.800
<v Speaker 5>invasion to work, such that d Day, which is the

0:30:20.840 --> 0:30:23.120
<v Speaker 5>great example in history where we had all these advantages

0:30:23.120 --> 0:30:27.400
<v Speaker 5>that China wouldn't have today, Very very almost it came

0:30:27.520 --> 0:30:29.800
<v Speaker 5>very very close to going completely off the rails, as

0:30:29.800 --> 0:30:33.120
<v Speaker 5>I discussed in the book. So season paying is systematically

0:30:33.120 --> 0:30:36.120
<v Speaker 5>building the capabilities he would need. He's building out this

0:30:36.200 --> 0:30:40.120
<v Speaker 5>amphibious fleet. He's building better anti submarine warfare to force

0:30:40.400 --> 0:30:43.920
<v Speaker 5>us back. He's building longer range ballistic missiles that can

0:30:43.920 --> 0:30:47.080
<v Speaker 5>target ships to force our aircraft carriers to stay further

0:30:47.200 --> 0:30:49.320
<v Speaker 5>back from the conflict zone. He's building out his air

0:30:49.320 --> 0:30:52.880
<v Speaker 5>force and drones, cyber tools, all these things to coerce Taiwan.

0:30:53.440 --> 0:30:56.880
<v Speaker 5>But if you roll the dice on an invasion today,

0:30:58.080 --> 0:31:00.400
<v Speaker 5>I think, at least if you look at the public wargames,

0:31:01.320 --> 0:31:04.160
<v Speaker 5>it is possible that he would suffer a pretty catastrophic defeat.

0:31:04.440 --> 0:31:08.520
<v Speaker 5>So that's one reason for patients. But as his preparations proceed,

0:31:08.600 --> 0:31:09.800
<v Speaker 5>I think he's getting more confident.

0:31:10.160 --> 0:31:12.239
<v Speaker 2>So one of the things you used to hear a

0:31:12.240 --> 0:31:14.560
<v Speaker 2>lot more, and I don't think you hear it nearly

0:31:14.600 --> 0:31:17.760
<v Speaker 2>as much nowadays, but this idea of economic pain, Right,

0:31:18.040 --> 0:31:21.840
<v Speaker 2>if China invaded Taiwan, there would be some sort of retaliation,

0:31:22.240 --> 0:31:26.360
<v Speaker 2>maybe sanctions, something like that. And because the CCP had

0:31:26.360 --> 0:31:29.760
<v Speaker 2>built its legitimacy on the social compact with its population,

0:31:29.800 --> 0:31:32.560
<v Speaker 2>which was basically, you know, we're in power and in exchange,

0:31:32.600 --> 0:31:37.360
<v Speaker 2>you all hopefully get rich. That was just untenable for

0:31:38.040 --> 0:31:41.640
<v Speaker 2>Shishimping and other policy makers. You don't hear that that

0:31:41.840 --> 0:31:45.000
<v Speaker 2>much anymore. And I wonder, I wonder why that is.

0:31:45.000 --> 0:31:47.080
<v Speaker 2>Is it just because like people feel that China has

0:31:47.120 --> 0:31:50.400
<v Speaker 2>reached the level of economic development, where like okay, the

0:31:50.480 --> 0:31:53.480
<v Speaker 2>legitimacy has been established in terms of the social compact.

0:31:53.680 --> 0:31:56.600
<v Speaker 2>Or is it because we had an example of Russia

0:31:56.640 --> 0:32:01.479
<v Speaker 2>invading Ukraine and very obviously being willing to trade off

0:32:02.000 --> 0:32:06.160
<v Speaker 2>that military action even though it generated an enormous amount

0:32:06.200 --> 0:32:07.640
<v Speaker 2>of economic pain for the country.

0:32:07.920 --> 0:32:10.720
<v Speaker 5>It's a whole bunch of factors at once. Season Ping

0:32:10.760 --> 0:32:14.200
<v Speaker 5>has overseen a transformation in the social contract in China

0:32:15.360 --> 0:32:21.040
<v Speaker 5>from development to ideology and national security. From the anti

0:32:21.040 --> 0:32:27.640
<v Speaker 5>corruption campaign to his ideological rectification campaigns, to rewriting the

0:32:27.680 --> 0:32:34.080
<v Speaker 5>history textbooks to taking Communist party cadres to historical sites

0:32:34.080 --> 0:32:37.560
<v Speaker 5>to study points of hardship and party history. Season Ping

0:32:37.680 --> 0:32:42.040
<v Speaker 5>uses this term struggle to describe what the party should do,

0:32:42.880 --> 0:32:45.960
<v Speaker 5>and he has told young people that can't find work

0:32:46.000 --> 0:32:48.880
<v Speaker 5>that they should eat bitterness, the idea being you should

0:32:48.920 --> 0:32:52.080
<v Speaker 5>tough it out. We are in nations striving for national rejuvenation,

0:32:52.720 --> 0:32:56.320
<v Speaker 5>national rejuvenation means rising to the height of human achievement

0:32:56.360 --> 0:32:59.000
<v Speaker 5>in every human endeavor. And to do that, we're going

0:32:59.080 --> 0:33:00.960
<v Speaker 5>to work hard, and we're going to make some sacrifices.

0:33:01.560 --> 0:33:06.520
<v Speaker 5>And he has tightened surveillance, he has tightened discipline that

0:33:07.000 --> 0:33:09.600
<v Speaker 5>allows him to run this regime according to a very

0:33:09.600 --> 0:33:12.920
<v Speaker 5>different set of rules through coercion. And that means we

0:33:13.000 --> 0:33:16.120
<v Speaker 5>have to assume that China's tolerance for economic pain has increased.

0:33:17.080 --> 0:33:20.480
<v Speaker 5>Now at some point there's a limit if the financial

0:33:20.560 --> 0:33:23.760
<v Speaker 5>system were just to implode under the threat under the

0:33:23.760 --> 0:33:26.840
<v Speaker 5>threat of sanctions, or because there's just mass capital flight

0:33:27.200 --> 0:33:29.920
<v Speaker 5>because no investor wants to be stuck in ill liquid

0:33:29.920 --> 0:33:32.120
<v Speaker 5>assets in China. If the US and China are headed

0:33:32.120 --> 0:33:35.640
<v Speaker 5>to war, Yes, there's possible that China could suffer a

0:33:35.680 --> 0:33:40.680
<v Speaker 5>sudden black Swan collapse, but I think that's not base case.

0:33:41.160 --> 0:33:43.480
<v Speaker 5>And I have a work that I describe in a

0:33:43.520 --> 0:33:45.600
<v Speaker 5>lot of detail in the book about how over the

0:33:45.680 --> 0:33:49.520
<v Speaker 5>last ten years China has been systematically building shock absorbers

0:33:49.560 --> 0:33:53.040
<v Speaker 5>into its financial system to make it more likely to

0:33:53.120 --> 0:33:56.080
<v Speaker 5>survive the gut punch of the imposition of sanctions and

0:33:56.240 --> 0:34:00.200
<v Speaker 5>the fact that Rush's financial system, which had met it

0:34:00.320 --> 0:34:04.800
<v Speaker 5>lacked many of these advantages, was able to steady itself

0:34:05.360 --> 0:34:08.799
<v Speaker 5>after the imposition of sanctions. Is I think an encouraging sign,

0:34:08.960 --> 0:34:11.319
<v Speaker 5>just a couple of numbers to bring us home. At

0:34:11.360 --> 0:34:14.440
<v Speaker 5>the beginning of the Russia Ukraine War, Russia was blindsided

0:34:14.480 --> 0:34:17.880
<v Speaker 5>that the Europeans joined all the sanctions. They had moved

0:34:17.920 --> 0:34:20.880
<v Speaker 5>a lot of their central bank assets from dollars into euros,

0:34:21.360 --> 0:34:24.520
<v Speaker 5>and then the Europeans froze those assets, which meant suddenly

0:34:24.560 --> 0:34:27.279
<v Speaker 5>half of their foreign exchange reserves were just inaccessible to them.

0:34:27.800 --> 0:34:30.480
<v Speaker 4>That was a huge boo boo for the Russians.

0:34:31.360 --> 0:34:35.640
<v Speaker 5>And then the sanctions regime targeted SpareBank and other major

0:34:35.680 --> 0:34:39.360
<v Speaker 5>banks in ways it had not been expected. So the

0:34:39.440 --> 0:34:41.520
<v Speaker 5>ruble lost something like half its value in a couple

0:34:41.560 --> 0:34:46.360
<v Speaker 5>of weeks, and there was a real risk of Russian collapse.

0:34:46.880 --> 0:34:49.719
<v Speaker 5>But with only three hundred billion dollars at foreign exchange available,

0:34:50.080 --> 0:34:54.200
<v Speaker 5>they were able to write the ship because they they

0:34:54.280 --> 0:34:57.040
<v Speaker 5>imposed capital control regime. They limited outflows from banks, They

0:34:57.080 --> 0:34:59.359
<v Speaker 5>raised interest rates to twenty percent, They demanded that state

0:34:59.480 --> 0:35:02.280
<v Speaker 5>enterprises payments in rubles, all of these things to increase

0:35:02.320 --> 0:35:05.160
<v Speaker 5>demand for rubles and keep the bank solvent. And then

0:35:06.480 --> 0:35:09.840
<v Speaker 5>foreign hedge funds that had profited on the ruble short

0:35:10.480 --> 0:35:12.120
<v Speaker 5>took a look at the situation and they said, well,

0:35:12.120 --> 0:35:14.880
<v Speaker 5>are there are more sanctions coming? Well, if the answer

0:35:14.960 --> 0:35:17.239
<v Speaker 5>is no, then it's all priced in and the ruble

0:35:17.280 --> 0:35:20.560
<v Speaker 5>looks pretty cheap because actually Russia's imports have just collapsed

0:35:20.760 --> 0:35:23.560
<v Speaker 5>and their exports are booming because the oil price is up.

0:35:23.800 --> 0:35:26.040
<v Speaker 5>And then in April of twenty twenty two, the ruble

0:35:26.160 --> 0:35:29.760
<v Speaker 5>was the best performing currency in the world, and then

0:35:29.880 --> 0:35:34.040
<v Speaker 5>the ship was setting, and then the economic war became

0:35:34.080 --> 0:35:37.680
<v Speaker 5>an attritional contest that we have not won yet. And

0:35:38.320 --> 0:35:40.640
<v Speaker 5>I think there is a similar dynamic with China. There's

0:35:40.640 --> 0:35:44.920
<v Speaker 5>some possibility that their financial system could implode, but China,

0:35:45.400 --> 0:35:48.200
<v Speaker 5>if you count their shadow reserves, has between ten and

0:35:48.280 --> 0:35:49.080
<v Speaker 5>twenty times.

0:35:48.920 --> 0:35:50.600
<v Speaker 4>The EFX that was available to Russia.

0:35:50.680 --> 0:35:53.080
<v Speaker 5>They have an existing capital control regime, all the banks

0:35:53.080 --> 0:35:55.680
<v Speaker 5>are run by the state, and if they survived that

0:35:55.719 --> 0:35:58.640
<v Speaker 5>gut punch, they have the stockpiles to live on their

0:35:58.680 --> 0:36:01.840
<v Speaker 5>own supply for men many many months if they're entirely

0:36:01.880 --> 0:36:05.200
<v Speaker 5>cut off from imports. So the question is, if we

0:36:05.239 --> 0:36:09.200
<v Speaker 5>can't defeat them economically slowly, how do we think about

0:36:09.239 --> 0:36:12.759
<v Speaker 5>the long term contest of economic pain such that it

0:36:12.840 --> 0:36:15.279
<v Speaker 5>is something that we as a coalition of democracies can

0:36:15.400 --> 0:36:17.840
<v Speaker 5>possibly win. And the answer I come to in the

0:36:17.840 --> 0:36:20.040
<v Speaker 5>book is we have to stop thinking about it as punishment.

0:36:20.440 --> 0:36:23.080
<v Speaker 5>Stop thinking about is how we could hurt China in

0:36:23.120 --> 0:36:24.839
<v Speaker 5>a way that hurt us too. We need to think

0:36:24.840 --> 0:36:26.239
<v Speaker 5>about what are the things that we would want to

0:36:26.239 --> 0:36:28.600
<v Speaker 5>do in our own best interests in a crisis to

0:36:28.640 --> 0:36:31.440
<v Speaker 5>secure our own economic interests that would just happen to

0:36:31.520 --> 0:36:44.000
<v Speaker 5>hurt China as a byproduct.

0:36:47.960 --> 0:36:51.040
<v Speaker 3>Just real quickly on cutting off imports? Are they good

0:36:51.080 --> 0:36:51.520
<v Speaker 3>on oil?

0:36:51.960 --> 0:36:52.840
<v Speaker 4>For like this is?

0:36:52.920 --> 0:36:55.879
<v Speaker 3>We know they have this big oil stockpile. War would

0:36:55.920 --> 0:37:00.520
<v Speaker 3>be extremely oil intensive process. You know, they d a

0:37:00.520 --> 0:37:03.040
<v Speaker 3>lot of cars. I doubt they're military as nearly is.

0:37:03.320 --> 0:37:04.879
<v Speaker 4>I think they're good. I think they're good on oil.

0:37:04.960 --> 0:37:09.160
<v Speaker 5>You think so? They in peacetime they consume what is it,

0:37:09.200 --> 0:37:12.520
<v Speaker 5>thirteen fourteen million barrels a day, of which around four

0:37:13.440 --> 0:37:18.040
<v Speaker 5>are produced domestically. If they became cost and sensitive, which

0:37:18.040 --> 0:37:21.200
<v Speaker 5>they would be in a crisis, they could probably squeeze

0:37:21.200 --> 0:37:25.440
<v Speaker 5>that up a bit. They also can import overland. They import,

0:37:25.640 --> 0:37:27.759
<v Speaker 5>you know, a couple of million barrels a day over land.

0:37:27.760 --> 0:37:30.759
<v Speaker 5>And if they had to, they could import more by land.

0:37:31.239 --> 0:37:33.719
<v Speaker 5>It wouldn't be comfortable, it wouldn't be cheap, but if

0:37:33.719 --> 0:37:35.640
<v Speaker 5>they would have willingness to pay, they have plenty of

0:37:35.640 --> 0:37:38.839
<v Speaker 5>foreign exchange. They could also do as the Nazis did,

0:37:38.960 --> 0:37:42.239
<v Speaker 5>which is turned coal into fuel oil fisher trobes has

0:37:42.280 --> 0:37:44.840
<v Speaker 5>been done in the past. The Nazis declared were on

0:37:44.840 --> 0:37:47.000
<v Speaker 5>all their oil suppliers, and they still managed to fight

0:37:47.520 --> 0:37:49.320
<v Speaker 5>through nineteen forty five pretty effectively.

0:37:50.719 --> 0:37:51.640
<v Speaker 4>But there's more to this.

0:37:51.719 --> 0:37:54.080
<v Speaker 5>They've got They declare, what is it, one point three

0:37:54.120 --> 0:37:56.640
<v Speaker 5>billion barrels in their spr they probably have something more

0:37:56.680 --> 0:37:59.920
<v Speaker 5>like two, and then they can make the civilian economy.

0:38:00.560 --> 0:38:02.799
<v Speaker 5>The PLA would use something like five hundred thousand barrels

0:38:02.840 --> 0:38:04.560
<v Speaker 5>a day. So if you run the math and I

0:38:04.640 --> 0:38:06.120
<v Speaker 5>just do the back of the envelope in the book,

0:38:06.800 --> 0:38:08.279
<v Speaker 5>what matters is not that they would run out of

0:38:08.280 --> 0:38:11.000
<v Speaker 5>oil eventually at some point they would feel the squeeze,

0:38:11.280 --> 0:38:14.360
<v Speaker 5>but our allies Japan, South Korea.

0:38:14.120 --> 0:38:16.400
<v Speaker 4>Taiwan would feel the squeeze much faster.

0:38:17.960 --> 0:38:23.239
<v Speaker 5>So our coalition as currently set up doesn't have the

0:38:23.280 --> 0:38:26.359
<v Speaker 5>advantage in a long term contest of extreme economic war.

0:38:27.120 --> 0:38:29.760
<v Speaker 5>And it's not just about oil. It's about everything else.

0:38:30.280 --> 0:38:34.080
<v Speaker 5>They have stockpiles of cotton, they have stockpiles of chips,

0:38:34.280 --> 0:38:36.919
<v Speaker 5>they have stockpiles of everything plausible that they might need.

0:38:37.000 --> 0:38:41.279
<v Speaker 5>Taiwan doesn't have that, Japan doesn't have that. So this

0:38:41.440 --> 0:38:43.640
<v Speaker 5>is the risk that they take us up to the brink.

0:38:44.160 --> 0:38:47.640
<v Speaker 5>We are forced to contemplate what the long term economic.

0:38:47.200 --> 0:38:47.840
<v Speaker 4>War looks like.

0:38:48.239 --> 0:38:50.239
<v Speaker 5>We realize that if they can last for twelve months

0:38:50.280 --> 0:38:51.879
<v Speaker 5>and we can last for three, that's not a game

0:38:51.920 --> 0:38:55.000
<v Speaker 5>we want to play, and we fold. And then if

0:38:55.239 --> 0:38:57.920
<v Speaker 5>that is established, they can coerce us. And this is

0:38:57.960 --> 0:39:01.840
<v Speaker 5>not just about Taiwan. This goes far, far, far beyond Taiwan.

0:39:02.200 --> 0:39:04.560
<v Speaker 5>This is about our entire alliance architecture in the region,

0:39:04.719 --> 0:39:06.520
<v Speaker 5>and frankly, this is about our hemisphere too.

0:39:06.840 --> 0:39:08.759
<v Speaker 2>One of the arguments you make in the book is

0:39:08.760 --> 0:39:11.600
<v Speaker 2>this idea that a US policy response can't just be

0:39:11.760 --> 0:39:14.440
<v Speaker 2>about military power, it has to be about economic power

0:39:14.480 --> 0:39:17.799
<v Speaker 2>as well. And you talk about this idea of avalanche decoupling,

0:39:17.880 --> 0:39:21.320
<v Speaker 2>so sort of forming a grand alliance with other democracies

0:39:21.440 --> 0:39:26.560
<v Speaker 2>to try to isolate China from the global economy. And

0:39:26.840 --> 0:39:29.319
<v Speaker 2>when I hear a term like avalanche decoupling, I kind

0:39:29.320 --> 0:39:32.319
<v Speaker 2>of think like, well, in some respects. The US and

0:39:32.440 --> 0:39:34.239
<v Speaker 2>maybe some other parts of the world have been trying

0:39:34.239 --> 0:39:38.480
<v Speaker 2>to decouple from China for a long time, with varied

0:39:38.560 --> 0:39:44.480
<v Speaker 2>degrees of success. What convinces you that something like that

0:39:44.520 --> 0:39:48.040
<v Speaker 2>would be possible in a crisis moment, especially when we're

0:39:48.040 --> 0:39:52.279
<v Speaker 2>talking about again grand alliances with democracies that maybe under

0:39:52.280 --> 0:39:54.840
<v Speaker 2>the Trump administration we don't seem to have the best

0:39:54.880 --> 0:39:56.680
<v Speaker 2>of relations with at the moment.

0:39:56.880 --> 0:40:00.000
<v Speaker 5>It's a really important question, So let's take the heart

0:40:00.239 --> 0:40:02.799
<v Speaker 5>facts head on. In the last couple of years, we

0:40:02.840 --> 0:40:05.279
<v Speaker 5>have learned some very important things about what is and

0:40:05.400 --> 0:40:07.880
<v Speaker 5>is not possible when it comes to breaking our critical

0:40:07.920 --> 0:40:11.400
<v Speaker 5>dependencies on China. Everyone knows that we have these critical

0:40:11.400 --> 0:40:16.960
<v Speaker 5>dependencies which strike at the very heart of our lives

0:40:16.960 --> 0:40:19.759
<v Speaker 5>and livelihoods. We depend on China for the active pharmaceutical

0:40:19.840 --> 0:40:23.320
<v Speaker 5>ingredients that save lives every day in hospitals. We depend

0:40:23.400 --> 0:40:26.000
<v Speaker 5>China on the supply chain to build any drone in

0:40:26.000 --> 0:40:29.800
<v Speaker 5>the United States. We depend on China for legacy chips,

0:40:30.000 --> 0:40:32.960
<v Speaker 5>without which we can't make cars. There is no Ford,

0:40:33.120 --> 0:40:37.239
<v Speaker 5>there is no Stilantis. I think that's crazy. I think

0:40:37.280 --> 0:40:39.880
<v Speaker 5>it's crazy. I think it opens up the United States

0:40:40.000 --> 0:40:43.480
<v Speaker 5>to black economic blackmail, and frankly, the fact that our

0:40:43.520 --> 0:40:45.919
<v Speaker 5>allies have the same dependencies opens them up to black

0:40:45.920 --> 0:40:49.319
<v Speaker 5>mil too. So it's a no brainer that we should

0:40:49.360 --> 0:40:51.520
<v Speaker 5>start to break these dependencies on China in the same

0:40:51.560 --> 0:40:54.239
<v Speaker 5>way that China is trying to break its dependencies on

0:40:54.360 --> 0:40:57.560
<v Speaker 5>us because they don't want to be blackmailed. So what

0:40:57.640 --> 0:41:00.160
<v Speaker 5>is dangerous is that China would be able to de

0:41:00.280 --> 0:41:02.719
<v Speaker 5>risk their economy largely from ours. But we couldn't do

0:41:02.800 --> 0:41:06.520
<v Speaker 5>that in a symmetrical way. But if a crisis happens

0:41:06.640 --> 0:41:10.319
<v Speaker 5>over Taiwan, whether that's tomorrow or eighteen months from now

0:41:10.440 --> 0:41:14.240
<v Speaker 5>or five years from now, it will be an oh shoot,

0:41:14.280 --> 0:41:16.000
<v Speaker 5>I guess we should have done all of that five

0:41:16.080 --> 0:41:19.319
<v Speaker 5>years ago, But that will be yesterday's problem. And the

0:41:19.400 --> 0:41:21.600
<v Speaker 5>question for today's problem is how do we deal with

0:41:21.600 --> 0:41:25.240
<v Speaker 5>the situation we face. And it's very possible that situation

0:41:25.280 --> 0:41:27.799
<v Speaker 5>would be in the context of a crushing recession and

0:41:27.840 --> 0:41:30.960
<v Speaker 5>stock market correction, because, as we mentioned at the beginning

0:41:30.960 --> 0:41:34.800
<v Speaker 5>of this conversation, the whole equity market is being held

0:41:34.880 --> 0:41:39.200
<v Speaker 5>up by an ai trade. We're seven tech companies that

0:41:39.280 --> 0:41:42.960
<v Speaker 5>are priced for perfection make up forty percent of the

0:41:43.000 --> 0:41:45.240
<v Speaker 5>S and P, and if you take away the supply

0:41:45.320 --> 0:41:49.160
<v Speaker 5>of chips, they fall to earth. Six hundred billion dollars.

0:41:49.200 --> 0:41:51.439
<v Speaker 5>Is that the number the hyperscalers are spending on data

0:41:51.480 --> 0:41:52.279
<v Speaker 5>centers this year.

0:41:52.320 --> 0:41:53.160
<v Speaker 3>It's close enough.

0:41:53.320 --> 0:41:53.839
<v Speaker 4>You take that.

0:41:53.840 --> 0:41:57.080
<v Speaker 5>Away, and the use economy is in recession. So imagine

0:41:57.120 --> 0:42:01.680
<v Speaker 5>the context of a terrifying stock market correction and heading

0:42:01.719 --> 0:42:05.920
<v Speaker 5>into recession. Let's assume that we China has taken some

0:42:06.000 --> 0:42:08.640
<v Speaker 5>actions that reveal that we really need to expand this

0:42:08.760 --> 0:42:13.239
<v Speaker 5>derisking or partial decoupling thing. But we've also learned that

0:42:13.320 --> 0:42:16.160
<v Speaker 5>we can't decouple from China all at once, because we

0:42:16.280 --> 0:42:19.759
<v Speaker 5>tried this on Liberation Day and we got cold feet

0:42:19.880 --> 0:42:22.640
<v Speaker 5>within a week because the bond market blew up and

0:42:22.719 --> 0:42:25.200
<v Speaker 5>all the captains of industry called up the president and said,

0:42:25.239 --> 0:42:28.920
<v Speaker 5>you have to reverse this, mister President, or we're cooked. So,

0:42:29.080 --> 0:42:32.360
<v Speaker 5>if you can't decouple from China all at once and quickly,

0:42:32.880 --> 0:42:37.560
<v Speaker 5>the only way to do it is gradually looking at

0:42:37.600 --> 0:42:40.080
<v Speaker 5>the critical stuff first and the non critical stuff later.

0:42:40.160 --> 0:42:42.600
<v Speaker 5>If ever, so what I want to do is say

0:42:42.600 --> 0:42:44.319
<v Speaker 5>what is the most critical things? If you have to

0:42:44.360 --> 0:42:48.520
<v Speaker 5>stack rank our dependencies, what's ninety ninth percentile, what's ninetieth,

0:42:48.719 --> 0:42:51.880
<v Speaker 5>what's seventieth, what's fiftieth, and then let's go down the

0:42:51.960 --> 0:42:53.880
<v Speaker 5>list one at a time and figure out how do

0:42:53.920 --> 0:42:57.000
<v Speaker 5>we break these dependencies. So in the event of a crisis,

0:42:57.600 --> 0:42:59.759
<v Speaker 5>an invasion of Taiwan or a blockade of Taiwan or

0:42:59.800 --> 0:43:04.239
<v Speaker 5>some gray zone ambiguous thing, if we decide we need

0:43:04.280 --> 0:43:06.440
<v Speaker 5>to reset this relationship and we need to decouple from

0:43:06.520 --> 0:43:09.960
<v Speaker 5>China five percent, ten percent, thirty percent, what does that

0:43:10.040 --> 0:43:10.840
<v Speaker 5>actually entail?

0:43:12.200 --> 0:43:13.839
<v Speaker 4>And I would submit that that's a much.

0:43:13.719 --> 0:43:16.960
<v Speaker 5>Harder problem than we've realized, because even if we want

0:43:16.960 --> 0:43:20.200
<v Speaker 5>to decouple just a little bit, we face a transhipment

0:43:20.239 --> 0:43:23.680
<v Speaker 5>problem right now. As we've discovered, you have a tariff

0:43:23.680 --> 0:43:26.200
<v Speaker 5>differential on China, the tariffun China is here, the tariff

0:43:26.239 --> 0:43:28.000
<v Speaker 5>on Vietnam, Mexico, everyone else is here.

0:43:28.719 --> 0:43:30.920
<v Speaker 4>So companies will export their.

0:43:30.840 --> 0:43:33.640
<v Speaker 5>Stuff from China to Vietnam or Mexico, they'll write made

0:43:33.640 --> 0:43:34.879
<v Speaker 5>in Vietnam or Mexico on.

0:43:34.840 --> 0:43:37.200
<v Speaker 4>It, and though we send it to us. So if

0:43:37.200 --> 0:43:38.160
<v Speaker 4>you don't develop a.

0:43:38.080 --> 0:43:41.279
<v Speaker 5>Solution to this transhipment problem, there is no way that

0:43:41.320 --> 0:43:45.120
<v Speaker 5>you can decouple from China even a little bit, even

0:43:45.200 --> 0:43:48.799
<v Speaker 5>in a crisis. That to me is very scary and

0:43:48.840 --> 0:43:52.240
<v Speaker 5>the process of working with other countries to address this. Essentially,

0:43:52.239 --> 0:43:55.239
<v Speaker 5>this is rules of origin for trade. This is a

0:43:55.280 --> 0:43:58.320
<v Speaker 5>big enterprise that is going to take years and years

0:43:58.360 --> 0:44:00.920
<v Speaker 5>to do. It cannot be done right away. So what

0:44:00.920 --> 0:44:04.680
<v Speaker 5>we're talking about with Avalanche de coupling is a process

0:44:04.960 --> 0:44:07.960
<v Speaker 5>that it abandons the fiction that we can do this

0:44:08.000 --> 0:44:10.239
<v Speaker 5>all at once and starts thinking about if we need

0:44:10.239 --> 0:44:13.400
<v Speaker 5>to divorce China ten percent, thirty sixty percent, whatever it is,

0:44:13.800 --> 0:44:15.560
<v Speaker 5>how do we go about building a new kind of

0:44:15.600 --> 0:44:19.080
<v Speaker 5>economic order such that we can still have trading relations

0:44:19.160 --> 0:44:21.560
<v Speaker 5>with the rest of the world. And that question has

0:44:21.600 --> 0:44:23.360
<v Speaker 5>not been addressed until this book.

0:44:23.680 --> 0:44:27.319
<v Speaker 3>I find this conversation to be like, very alarming, and

0:44:28.000 --> 0:44:31.080
<v Speaker 3>you know, obviously and it should be very alarming. I

0:44:31.120 --> 0:44:34.239
<v Speaker 3>guess the good news, if there is any, is that

0:44:34.280 --> 0:44:37.879
<v Speaker 3>we have spent the last year several years deepening our

0:44:37.920 --> 0:44:41.120
<v Speaker 3>friendships with the rest of the world and building up

0:44:41.120 --> 0:44:46.000
<v Speaker 3>our allies and establishing that open non China trading block.

0:44:46.239 --> 0:44:49.800
<v Speaker 3>At least we're oh wait, no, we're literally we're literally

0:44:49.840 --> 0:44:50.520
<v Speaker 3>doing the opposite.

0:44:50.560 --> 0:44:52.320
<v Speaker 2>Well, I was going to say, on the plus side,

0:44:52.520 --> 0:44:55.160
<v Speaker 2>if one of the one of the elements of China

0:44:55.200 --> 0:44:59.319
<v Speaker 2>deterrence is building a better custom system, where we can

0:44:59.320 --> 0:45:02.799
<v Speaker 2>actually track transhipments, then maybe maybe some of that work

0:45:02.840 --> 0:45:06.120
<v Speaker 2>has been done. It's better than like buildings.

0:45:06.280 --> 0:45:08.239
<v Speaker 3>But like it does seem like we're kind of not

0:45:08.280 --> 0:45:10.320
<v Speaker 3>doing any of this right, I mean not only not

0:45:10.440 --> 0:45:13.120
<v Speaker 3>doing any of this correct, we are like rowing. I like,

0:45:13.960 --> 0:45:18.280
<v Speaker 3>if the goal is let's do this avalanchey coupling around

0:45:18.280 --> 0:45:20.240
<v Speaker 3>the world, to like, we're going in the opposite direction.

0:45:20.480 --> 0:45:21.960
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, that's exactly that's exactly right.

0:45:22.000 --> 0:45:23.640
<v Speaker 5>The only way you can get this stuff done is

0:45:23.680 --> 0:45:25.319
<v Speaker 5>if you work with your partners.

0:45:25.840 --> 0:45:26.600
<v Speaker 4>That's the only way.

0:45:26.760 --> 0:45:33.120
<v Speaker 5>Yeah. And that's not about being moralistic, it's about practically speaking.

0:45:33.520 --> 0:45:35.120
<v Speaker 5>There's stuff that we don't know how to make in

0:45:35.160 --> 0:45:38.680
<v Speaker 5>this country anymore because we outsourced it two generations ago

0:45:38.760 --> 0:45:40.960
<v Speaker 5>and there literally aren't any people left who know how

0:45:40.960 --> 0:45:45.440
<v Speaker 5>it's done. And Japan or South Korea in particular, but

0:45:45.600 --> 0:45:48.359
<v Speaker 5>many of our European partners too have this know how

0:45:48.719 --> 0:45:51.759
<v Speaker 5>in advanced manufacturing, and not to partner with them I

0:45:51.760 --> 0:45:55.200
<v Speaker 5>think is kind of crazy. Also, they face the same problems,

0:45:55.360 --> 0:45:58.560
<v Speaker 5>the same risks of economic coercion by China, and they

0:45:58.560 --> 0:46:00.600
<v Speaker 5>have even less leverage to put back push back against

0:46:00.680 --> 0:46:03.440
<v Speaker 5>China because Chinese, relatively speaking, as much bigger than they are.

0:46:03.960 --> 0:46:06.960
<v Speaker 5>So I think the Trump administration has a few correct

0:46:07.000 --> 0:46:11.080
<v Speaker 5>ideas dealing with these rules of origin through these bilateral deals. Yeah,

0:46:11.120 --> 0:46:14.560
<v Speaker 5>doing bilateral economic security packs like with Japan, but we

0:46:14.640 --> 0:46:18.399
<v Speaker 5>need to be bringing larger groups of allies and partners together.

0:46:18.120 --> 0:46:19.400
<v Speaker 4>To do this, just real quickly.

0:46:19.440 --> 0:46:22.000
<v Speaker 3>I think you mentioned at the beginning that you actually

0:46:22.040 --> 0:46:26.600
<v Speaker 3>think currently in a conventional war that the American military

0:46:26.640 --> 0:46:29.640
<v Speaker 3>would have the upper hand. I don't, but like, you know,

0:46:29.680 --> 0:46:31.799
<v Speaker 3>it looks like I don't know what's going to go

0:46:31.840 --> 0:46:34.959
<v Speaker 3>on with the ron and I'm very susceptible water child,

0:46:35.000 --> 0:46:38.319
<v Speaker 3>the Johnese propaganda. I watched the military prayers, like it

0:46:38.320 --> 0:46:41.600
<v Speaker 3>looks really impressive, the robot dogs and all this stuff

0:46:41.880 --> 0:46:45.600
<v Speaker 3>or the robot dogs. Yeah, like, give a short version

0:46:45.640 --> 0:46:49.080
<v Speaker 3>of why as of April twenty first, twenty twenty six,

0:46:49.160 --> 0:46:51.279
<v Speaker 3>you think the US military still is the upper hand.

0:46:51.680 --> 0:46:53.719
<v Speaker 5>This is something I learned in the process of working

0:46:53.760 --> 0:46:56.360
<v Speaker 5>on this book and the previous book. There's a companion

0:46:56.360 --> 0:46:59.400
<v Speaker 5>book called The Arsenal of Democracy, which is all of

0:46:59.400 --> 0:47:01.360
<v Speaker 5>the military US in volts that my editor is like,

0:47:01.360 --> 0:47:04.719
<v Speaker 5>no way you're putting it. That's too nerdy. But here's

0:47:04.719 --> 0:47:08.680
<v Speaker 5>what I discovered in researching that book. The wars that

0:47:08.719 --> 0:47:12.319
<v Speaker 5>America has fought over the last eighty years have been

0:47:12.400 --> 0:47:17.000
<v Speaker 5>land wars, and land war has a certain character and

0:47:17.080 --> 0:47:20.319
<v Speaker 5>war at sea has a totally different character. And the

0:47:20.560 --> 0:47:23.799
<v Speaker 5>basic reason is that war on land involves lots and

0:47:23.840 --> 0:47:27.680
<v Speaker 5>lots and lots of units that are basically interchangeable, and

0:47:27.760 --> 0:47:31.240
<v Speaker 5>so it's attritional. You're wearing each other down, you're fighting

0:47:31.239 --> 0:47:34.279
<v Speaker 5>along a long line. You're applying pressure, and there's an

0:47:34.280 --> 0:47:37.120
<v Speaker 5>equilibrium and a balance, and you're basically trying to hold

0:47:37.200 --> 0:47:40.200
<v Speaker 5>up enough reserves with potential energy to punch through the

0:47:40.320 --> 0:47:43.120
<v Speaker 5>enemy's line and then send in the cavalry and their

0:47:43.160 --> 0:47:44.880
<v Speaker 5>line collapses and you write to victory. So if you

0:47:44.920 --> 0:47:47.080
<v Speaker 5>look at the maps of World War One, for example,

0:47:47.320 --> 0:47:49.000
<v Speaker 5>the line doesn't move, it doesn't move, it doesn't move,

0:47:49.000 --> 0:47:50.080
<v Speaker 5>it doesn't move, and then it breaks.

0:47:50.920 --> 0:47:51.960
<v Speaker 4>War at sea is different.

0:47:52.360 --> 0:47:54.479
<v Speaker 5>You have a very small number or much smaller number

0:47:54.480 --> 0:47:57.759
<v Speaker 5>of platforms, and they're much more specialized. And so if

0:47:57.800 --> 0:48:00.600
<v Speaker 5>you can take out just one or two of the

0:48:00.719 --> 0:48:06.320
<v Speaker 5>enemy's vessels, specialized aircraft, specialized ships, the whole structure starts

0:48:06.360 --> 0:48:10.560
<v Speaker 5>to collapse and the rest become easier to kill and

0:48:10.600 --> 0:48:13.720
<v Speaker 5>that means that there's no real incentive to hold back reserves.

0:48:14.480 --> 0:48:18.640
<v Speaker 5>Once the engagement starts, it's incredibly intense, and it's often

0:48:18.680 --> 0:48:23.239
<v Speaker 5>decided in the first hours todays. And one significant implication

0:48:23.360 --> 0:48:27.480
<v Speaker 5>of that is your ability to see and communicate across

0:48:27.520 --> 0:48:30.640
<v Speaker 5>the battle space is really really critical, And especially as

0:48:31.000 --> 0:48:33.759
<v Speaker 5>the range of our missiles and our drones has increased,

0:48:34.400 --> 0:48:38.920
<v Speaker 5>that means that US aircraft and ships and submarines that

0:48:39.000 --> 0:48:42.319
<v Speaker 5>could potentially strike targets in or around China can be

0:48:42.400 --> 0:48:45.800
<v Speaker 5>zooming around across literally millions of square miles of ocean.

0:48:46.480 --> 0:48:49.520
<v Speaker 5>So to see these things, to target them, and then

0:48:49.560 --> 0:48:51.600
<v Speaker 5>to deliver mass to a target to kill them is

0:48:51.640 --> 0:48:54.080
<v Speaker 5>no easy feet And if the US can use cyber

0:48:54.360 --> 0:48:57.760
<v Speaker 5>counter space capabilities and so on to disrupt China's ability

0:48:57.760 --> 0:49:01.000
<v Speaker 5>to see and communicate in those critical early hours, then

0:49:01.000 --> 0:49:03.760
<v Speaker 5>it could potentially win a lopsided victory or vice versa.

0:49:04.560 --> 0:49:07.439
<v Speaker 5>And one of the implications of that is if you're

0:49:07.480 --> 0:49:10.719
<v Speaker 5>just counting ships or counting planes or missiles, you will

0:49:10.719 --> 0:49:12.800
<v Speaker 5>miss the parts of the balance that are most important,

0:49:13.080 --> 0:49:16.000
<v Speaker 5>that are actually qualitative, many of which can be augmented

0:49:16.000 --> 0:49:20.319
<v Speaker 5>with AI. And this is hard because it means when

0:49:20.320 --> 0:49:23.560
<v Speaker 5>you're wargaming these things. If you don't have a clearance,

0:49:24.160 --> 0:49:26.520
<v Speaker 5>you kind of have to make it up. With these capabilities,

0:49:27.000 --> 0:49:28.960
<v Speaker 5>we don't know what the cutting edge of cyber is.

0:49:29.000 --> 0:49:32.680
<v Speaker 5>For example, only a very small compartmented group of people

0:49:32.719 --> 0:49:36.560
<v Speaker 5>within the national security establishment know all of the relevant capabilities.

0:49:37.080 --> 0:49:39.480
<v Speaker 5>But I just think that if China believed that they

0:49:39.480 --> 0:49:41.640
<v Speaker 5>could defeat the US in a high end war, they

0:49:41.680 --> 0:49:44.680
<v Speaker 5>would be behaving more assertively. They would be operating not

0:49:44.719 --> 0:49:46.319
<v Speaker 5>just in the time went straight, but all around the

0:49:46.320 --> 0:49:47.879
<v Speaker 5>region in a way that they're not yet.

0:49:48.600 --> 0:49:52.120
<v Speaker 2>We started this conversation talking about, you know, the famous

0:49:52.239 --> 0:49:58.000
<v Speaker 2>hypothetical blockades in geopolitics and international relations classrooms around the world.

0:49:59.080 --> 0:50:01.080
<v Speaker 2>What's your big take away from the Strait of Ormuz

0:50:01.160 --> 0:50:04.600
<v Speaker 2>situation as it applies potentially to China and Taiwan.

0:50:04.920 --> 0:50:07.600
<v Speaker 5>It's a good wrap up for the conversation. Really, it's

0:50:08.040 --> 0:50:12.640
<v Speaker 5>the United States military has these godlike capabilities with special forces,

0:50:12.840 --> 0:50:16.719
<v Speaker 5>with cyber electronic warfare in some senses the way our

0:50:17.080 --> 0:50:21.799
<v Speaker 5>air defenses have performed, which is exceptionally exceptionally well. But

0:50:22.239 --> 0:50:24.799
<v Speaker 5>while our military is very good at doing the operational

0:50:24.840 --> 0:50:29.040
<v Speaker 5>military stuff, we are not succeeding at the strategic level,

0:50:29.920 --> 0:50:33.920
<v Speaker 5>because ultimately, war is the continuation of politics by other means,

0:50:34.760 --> 0:50:38.360
<v Speaker 5>and our politics is susceptible to economic pressure in a

0:50:38.400 --> 0:50:41.600
<v Speaker 5>way that our adversaries is not. And if we don't,

0:50:42.760 --> 0:50:44.880
<v Speaker 5>if we don't get the message, if we don't take

0:50:44.920 --> 0:50:47.800
<v Speaker 5>the wake up call and start working on our economic

0:50:47.840 --> 0:50:51.880
<v Speaker 5>resilience and our credible ability to bear economic pain and

0:50:51.920 --> 0:50:55.320
<v Speaker 5>supply chain disruptions and the rest, we will be unprepared

0:50:55.360 --> 0:50:59.080
<v Speaker 5>on exam day because China has so many more capabilities

0:50:59.760 --> 0:51:03.520
<v Speaker 5>to impose economic pain on us and to micro calibrate

0:51:04.000 --> 0:51:07.080
<v Speaker 5>the character of that economic pain than Iran does, and

0:51:07.120 --> 0:51:08.600
<v Speaker 5>they have more ability to do it for a long

0:51:08.600 --> 0:51:10.960
<v Speaker 5>period of time in multiple theaters.

0:51:10.640 --> 0:51:11.399
<v Speaker 4>And parts of the world.

0:51:12.120 --> 0:51:14.200
<v Speaker 5>And we can only deal with this problem if we

0:51:14.239 --> 0:51:17.799
<v Speaker 5>treat it as it all of government, interdepartmental problem, not

0:51:17.840 --> 0:51:20.520
<v Speaker 5>just a military problem, and if we work with allies,

0:51:20.560 --> 0:51:22.520
<v Speaker 5>and if we try to make some kind of bipartisan

0:51:22.560 --> 0:51:26.320
<v Speaker 5>consensus that national economic resilience matters, That to me is

0:51:26.360 --> 0:51:27.320
<v Speaker 5>the lesson of performers.

0:51:27.440 --> 0:51:30.880
<v Speaker 2>All right, on that cheerful note, Ike Friman, thank you

0:51:30.920 --> 0:51:32.960
<v Speaker 2>so much for coming on all thoughts. And the book

0:51:33.080 --> 0:51:36.560
<v Speaker 2>is defending Taiwan a strategy to prevent war with China.

0:51:36.680 --> 0:51:37.520
<v Speaker 2>Really appreciate it.

0:51:37.640 --> 0:51:38.680
<v Speaker 4>Thanks so much for having me on.

0:51:39.080 --> 0:51:39.719
<v Speaker 3>Thanks so much.

0:51:39.760 --> 0:51:39.920
<v Speaker 1>Ike.

0:51:40.000 --> 0:51:55.960
<v Speaker 2>That was great, Joe, that was a fascinating conversation. And

0:51:56.280 --> 0:51:58.120
<v Speaker 2>I haven't read the entire book, but I did flip

0:51:58.160 --> 0:52:00.560
<v Speaker 2>through it and I do recommend it's super interesting. There's

0:52:00.600 --> 0:52:05.080
<v Speaker 2>also like some really interesting appendices with speeches from various Taiwanese.

0:52:05.320 --> 0:52:06.120
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I'm gonna have to.

0:52:06.400 --> 0:52:09.239
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's definitely worth reading. One of the things that

0:52:09.280 --> 0:52:11.799
<v Speaker 2>stood out there was this, I mean towards the end

0:52:11.840 --> 0:52:14.440
<v Speaker 2>of the conversation, when we were talking about the possibility

0:52:14.440 --> 0:52:17.520
<v Speaker 2>of like how do you build up economic resilience that

0:52:17.680 --> 0:52:22.400
<v Speaker 2>requires the participation of other economies at the same time

0:52:23.239 --> 0:52:26.160
<v Speaker 2>that the Trump administration seems to be pushing a lot

0:52:26.200 --> 0:52:29.520
<v Speaker 2>of those other economies and strategic alliances further away.

0:52:30.320 --> 0:52:34.360
<v Speaker 3>You know. So we didn't get into this, but obviously, okay,

0:52:34.600 --> 0:52:37.279
<v Speaker 3>like we don't like the stock market it falls a

0:52:37.280 --> 0:52:40.440
<v Speaker 3>couple percent and suddenly we get cold fee. Okay, that's

0:52:40.520 --> 0:52:44.000
<v Speaker 3>economic resilience. I think there's another issue which we didn't

0:52:44.000 --> 0:52:48.880
<v Speaker 3>get into, which's political appetite for war. You know, especially

0:52:48.960 --> 0:52:53.480
<v Speaker 3>after the Iraq war, it is diminished the current war

0:52:53.520 --> 0:52:57.880
<v Speaker 3>and around is not popular pretty clearly, regardless of whether

0:52:58.239 --> 0:53:02.440
<v Speaker 3>it's wise or regardless of how serious the economic toll is.

0:53:03.000 --> 0:53:06.440
<v Speaker 3>And so I think, like another interesting and important dimension

0:53:06.600 --> 0:53:10.319
<v Speaker 3>here is look around. And I'd be curious, like how

0:53:10.360 --> 0:53:13.359
<v Speaker 3>many okay, we could sit here and make the argument, Look,

0:53:13.600 --> 0:53:17.120
<v Speaker 3>we really need chips, or we need to defend this

0:53:17.239 --> 0:53:21.600
<v Speaker 3>principle whatever, et cetera. Is there really the domestic political

0:53:21.760 --> 0:53:26.239
<v Speaker 3>appetite for massive conflict, et cetera. I don't know even

0:53:26.320 --> 0:53:31.520
<v Speaker 3>beyond even beyond the economic question, does the appetite exist?

0:53:31.640 --> 0:53:34.759
<v Speaker 3>But I really enjoyed that conversation. It was certainly very interesting,

0:53:35.040 --> 0:53:37.720
<v Speaker 3>you know, hearing him, for example, walk through the math

0:53:37.800 --> 0:53:40.960
<v Speaker 3>of how much shell oil China has and how much

0:53:41.040 --> 0:53:43.000
<v Speaker 3>you would be able to how long it would be

0:53:43.000 --> 0:53:46.200
<v Speaker 3>able to go with its existing stockpiles. And it does

0:53:46.239 --> 0:53:49.600
<v Speaker 3>seem right this question of whether there will ever be

0:53:49.920 --> 0:53:55.000
<v Speaker 3>some sort of serious change to the China Taiwan relationship,

0:53:55.040 --> 0:54:00.000
<v Speaker 3>et cetera. And it's it's a complicated one on many dimensions.

0:53:59.800 --> 0:54:02.920
<v Speaker 3>As he said in the beginning, yes, almost almost one

0:54:02.920 --> 0:54:04.480
<v Speaker 3>of the most complicated questions there is.

0:54:04.520 --> 0:54:04.600
<v Speaker 1>Oh.

0:54:04.680 --> 0:54:08.080
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely, there's also a fundamental tension between you know, the

0:54:08.200 --> 0:54:12.359
<v Speaker 2>US building out it's chips resilience while deterring China from

0:54:12.400 --> 0:54:14.760
<v Speaker 2>doing something in Taiwan, and that if the US actually

0:54:14.800 --> 0:54:20.000
<v Speaker 2>manages to be successful in building domestic capacity chip's capacity,

0:54:20.040 --> 0:54:24.880
<v Speaker 2>than that, like the silicone shield that's protected, Taiwan gets

0:54:24.920 --> 0:54:25.840
<v Speaker 2>weaker and weaker.

0:54:25.920 --> 0:54:29.200
<v Speaker 3>Right, we have to start paying attention to upcoming Taiwanese

0:54:29.280 --> 0:54:33.479
<v Speaker 3>election and start wondering whether the government in Taiwan will

0:54:33.520 --> 0:54:37.080
<v Speaker 3>continue to be enthusiastic about the idea of the US

0:54:37.560 --> 0:54:40.840
<v Speaker 3>building a chip capacity. This is a new uh, this

0:54:40.920 --> 0:54:44.560
<v Speaker 3>is a new dimension of international relations and so forth

0:54:44.560 --> 0:54:46.319
<v Speaker 3>that we have to key in on.

0:54:46.800 --> 0:54:48.640
<v Speaker 2>You just want to go to Taiwan, Well, you know what.

0:54:48.719 --> 0:54:50.239
<v Speaker 3>The one thing I will say is I do want

0:54:50.280 --> 0:54:51.799
<v Speaker 3>to go to Taiwan. But the one thing I will

0:54:51.800 --> 0:54:53.920
<v Speaker 3>say is I always want to learn more about the

0:54:53.960 --> 0:54:56.440
<v Speaker 3>domestic policy of other countries, because I do think it's

0:54:56.520 --> 0:54:58.720
<v Speaker 3>very easy to look at the US and say, okay,

0:54:58.760 --> 0:55:01.520
<v Speaker 3>here I know a fair amount about American domestic policy,

0:55:01.719 --> 0:55:04.280
<v Speaker 3>and then you hear about like, and here's Taiwan's policy,

0:55:04.480 --> 0:55:08.640
<v Speaker 3>here's Iron's policy, here's Israel's policy, right, and there's Corea's policy.

0:55:08.880 --> 0:55:12.000
<v Speaker 3>Is if there is just one right polity or it

0:55:12.080 --> 0:55:14.680
<v Speaker 3>is just there is just this one unified thing. And

0:55:14.719 --> 0:55:16.840
<v Speaker 3>I think it's important to remember that all these countries

0:55:17.239 --> 0:55:20.680
<v Speaker 3>have domestic politics just like the United States.

0:55:20.440 --> 0:55:24.200
<v Speaker 2>And disagreements and nuances and all of that. Yep, absolutely,

0:55:24.239 --> 0:55:24.960
<v Speaker 2>shall we leave it there.

0:55:25.040 --> 0:55:25.799
<v Speaker 3>Let's leave it there.

0:55:25.920 --> 0:55:28.319
<v Speaker 2>This has been another episode of the Authots podcast. I'm

0:55:28.360 --> 0:55:31.120
<v Speaker 2>Tracy Alloway. You can follow me at Tracy Alloway.

0:55:31.000 --> 0:55:32.920
<v Speaker 3>And I'm Joe wisanth All. You could have followed me

0:55:32.960 --> 0:55:35.919
<v Speaker 3>at the Stalwart Fellow. Our guest Ike Freman, He's at

0:55:36.000 --> 0:55:39.759
<v Speaker 3>Eke Freman Fellow or producers Carmen Rodriguez at Carmen armand

0:55:39.840 --> 0:55:43.160
<v Speaker 3>dash Ol Bennett at dashbod Kelbrooks at Kilbrooks and Kevin

0:55:43.200 --> 0:55:46.640
<v Speaker 3>Lozano at Kevin Lloyd Lozano. And from a odd Laws content,

0:55:46.680 --> 0:55:48.880
<v Speaker 3>go to Bloomberg dot com slash odd Lots. We're of

0:55:48.880 --> 0:55:51.160
<v Speaker 3>a daily newsletter and all of our episodes and you

0:55:51.160 --> 0:55:53.200
<v Speaker 3>can chat about all these topics twenty four to seven

0:55:53.280 --> 0:55:56.920
<v Speaker 3>in our discord Discord dot gg slash off Lots.

0:55:57.239 --> 0:55:59.360
<v Speaker 2>And if you enjoy odd Lots, if you want us

0:55:59.400 --> 0:56:01.400
<v Speaker 2>to take a trip to Taiwan, then please leave us

0:56:01.400 --> 0:56:04.400
<v Speaker 2>a positive review on your favorite podcast platform. And remember

0:56:04.440 --> 0:56:06.600
<v Speaker 2>If you are a Bloomberg subscriber, you can listen to

0:56:06.719 --> 0:56:09.399
<v Speaker 2>all of our episodes absolutely ad free. All you need

0:56:09.440 --> 0:56:11.840
<v Speaker 2>to do is find the Bloomberg channel on Apple Podcasts

0:56:11.880 --> 0:56:30.480
<v Speaker 2>and follow the instructions there. Thanks for listening.