WEBVTT - Enough From Michael

0:00:00.320 --> 0:00:04.720
<v Speaker 1>Enough from me. I want to hear from you. We

0:00:04.800 --> 0:00:07.440
<v Speaker 1>all do, so we are taking your questions here. This

0:00:07.480 --> 0:00:15.800
<v Speaker 1>is verdict with Ted Cruise. Verdict with Ted Cruz is

0:00:15.840 --> 0:00:19.400
<v Speaker 1>sponsored by stamps dot Com. If you're looking for ways

0:00:19.440 --> 0:00:21.640
<v Speaker 1>to skip the trip to the post office and dodge

0:00:21.680 --> 0:00:25.080
<v Speaker 1>all that hectic holiday shopping traffic, why not save time

0:00:25.120 --> 0:00:28.200
<v Speaker 1>and money with stamps dot Com. Stamps dot Com lets

0:00:28.200 --> 0:00:32.320
<v Speaker 1>you compare rates, print labels, and access exclusive discounts on

0:00:32.520 --> 0:00:36.160
<v Speaker 1>UPS and USPS services all year long. Here at sound front,

0:00:36.240 --> 0:00:38.600
<v Speaker 1>we use stamps dot com to send you merch like

0:00:38.680 --> 0:00:41.680
<v Speaker 1>that sweet sweet cactus hat, to do business on the road,

0:00:41.760 --> 0:00:44.519
<v Speaker 1>and to save time and money. It just makes sense,

0:00:44.840 --> 0:00:47.360
<v Speaker 1>especially if your business sends more mail and packages during

0:00:47.400 --> 0:00:50.920
<v Speaker 1>the holidays. Whether you're selling online or running an office

0:00:51.040 --> 0:00:53.559
<v Speaker 1>or a side hustle, stamps dot com can save you

0:00:53.640 --> 0:00:56.560
<v Speaker 1>so much time, money and stress during the holidays and

0:00:56.720 --> 0:00:59.920
<v Speaker 1>get discounts on postoffice and UPS shipping services without make

0:01:00.160 --> 0:01:02.960
<v Speaker 1>the trip. Discounts you can't find anywhere else, like up

0:01:03.000 --> 0:01:06.720
<v Speaker 1>to forty percent off USPS rates and seventy six percent

0:01:06.800 --> 0:01:09.880
<v Speaker 1>off UPS. Going to the post office instead of using

0:01:09.880 --> 0:01:12.080
<v Speaker 1>stamps dot com is kind of like taking the stairs

0:01:12.080 --> 0:01:14.720
<v Speaker 1>instead of the elevator. If you spend more than a

0:01:14.720 --> 0:01:17.160
<v Speaker 1>few minutes a week dealing with mail and shipping, stamps

0:01:17.160 --> 0:01:20.120
<v Speaker 1>dot Com is a lifesaver. Save time and money this

0:01:20.160 --> 0:01:23.039
<v Speaker 1>holiday season with stamps dot Com. Sign up with promo

0:01:23.080 --> 0:01:25.480
<v Speaker 1>code Verdict for a special offer that includes a four

0:01:25.480 --> 0:01:28.360
<v Speaker 1>week trial, free postage, and a digital scale. No long

0:01:28.480 --> 0:01:31.319
<v Speaker 1>term commitments or contracts. Just go to stamps dot com,

0:01:31.360 --> 0:01:33.399
<v Speaker 1>click the microphone at the top of the page and

0:01:33.600 --> 0:01:37.800
<v Speaker 1>enter code Verdict. Verdict is also brought to you by AMAC.

0:01:38.959 --> 0:01:42.240
<v Speaker 1>Did you know there's a conservative advocacy and benefits organization

0:01:42.440 --> 0:01:46.440
<v Speaker 1>with more than two million members in counting. It's called AMAC,

0:01:46.720 --> 0:01:51.400
<v Speaker 1>The Association of Mature American Citizens. AMAC has become one

0:01:51.400 --> 0:01:55.800
<v Speaker 1>of the most impactful conservative organizations in America. Joining AMAC

0:01:55.840 --> 0:01:59.160
<v Speaker 1>gives you access to money saving benefits, cutting edge news,

0:01:59.440 --> 0:02:02.120
<v Speaker 1>and a mega magazine full of insightful takes on today's

0:02:02.160 --> 0:02:07.120
<v Speaker 1>most important issues. But most importantly, AMAC is working tirelessly

0:02:07.240 --> 0:02:10.600
<v Speaker 1>to preserve the freedom secured by our constitution. With a

0:02:10.600 --> 0:02:13.680
<v Speaker 1>full time presence on Capitol Hill, AMAC is pushing back

0:02:13.720 --> 0:02:17.480
<v Speaker 1>against the efforts to defund our police, weaken our borders,

0:02:17.760 --> 0:02:21.560
<v Speaker 1>and replace your freedom with government controls. So stand with

0:02:21.680 --> 0:02:24.840
<v Speaker 1>me and over two million patriots by joining right now

0:02:25.200 --> 0:02:30.919
<v Speaker 1>at Amac dot us forward slash cactus. That's am Ac

0:02:31.560 --> 0:02:36.480
<v Speaker 1>dot us forward slash cactus. The benefits are great, but

0:02:36.600 --> 0:02:41.160
<v Speaker 1>the cause is greater. So join today at Amac dot

0:02:41.240 --> 0:02:46.799
<v Speaker 1>us forward slash Cactus. Verdict with Ted Cruz is also

0:02:46.840 --> 0:02:49.920
<v Speaker 1>sponsored by American Hartford Gold. I'm sure I'm not the

0:02:49.960 --> 0:02:53.200
<v Speaker 1>only one who's noticed everything is getting expensive. We are

0:02:53.200 --> 0:02:55.600
<v Speaker 1>in the biggest economic crisis since two thousand and eight,

0:02:55.840 --> 0:02:58.800
<v Speaker 1>with a government that's printing trillions and trillions of dollars,

0:02:59.040 --> 0:03:01.720
<v Speaker 1>consumer prices or the highest we've seen in thirty years.

0:03:02.000 --> 0:03:05.160
<v Speaker 1>Inflation is certainly here to stay, and if the government

0:03:05.200 --> 0:03:08.080
<v Speaker 1>continues it's out of control printing and spending, the dollar

0:03:08.240 --> 0:03:10.840
<v Speaker 1>could continue its free fall and lose its coveted role

0:03:10.880 --> 0:03:13.880
<v Speaker 1>as the world reserve currency. So how do you protect

0:03:13.919 --> 0:03:17.760
<v Speaker 1>your money, your retirement, your savings. Well, American Hartford Gold

0:03:17.760 --> 0:03:19.640
<v Speaker 1>can show you how to head your hard earned savings

0:03:19.639 --> 0:03:22.919
<v Speaker 1>against inflation by helping you diversify a portion of your

0:03:22.919 --> 0:03:26.280
<v Speaker 1>portfolio into physical gold and silver. They'll even help move

0:03:26.280 --> 0:03:28.600
<v Speaker 1>your existing IRA or four oh one K out of

0:03:28.600 --> 0:03:32.040
<v Speaker 1>the volatile stock market into a precious metals IRA and

0:03:32.120 --> 0:03:34.480
<v Speaker 1>they make it easy. They are the highest rated firm

0:03:34.480 --> 0:03:36.320
<v Speaker 1>in the country with an A plus rating from the

0:03:36.320 --> 0:03:39.760
<v Speaker 1>Better Business Bureau and thousands of satisfied clients. And if

0:03:39.760 --> 0:03:41.320
<v Speaker 1>you call them right now, they'll give you up to

0:03:41.360 --> 0:03:44.760
<v Speaker 1>fifteen hundred dollars a free silver on your first qualifying order.

0:03:45.000 --> 0:03:47.520
<v Speaker 1>So don't wait, call them right now. Call eight five

0:03:47.640 --> 0:03:51.839
<v Speaker 1>five seven, six, eight one, eight eight three. That's eight

0:03:51.920 --> 0:03:55.320
<v Speaker 1>five five seven, six eight one eight eight three. Or

0:03:55.440 --> 0:03:58.560
<v Speaker 1>text Cactus to six five five three two Again that's

0:03:58.600 --> 0:04:02.040
<v Speaker 1>eight five five seven six eight one eight eight three.

0:04:02.200 --> 0:04:05.960
<v Speaker 1>Or text Cactus to six five five three two. Welcome

0:04:06.000 --> 0:04:08.520
<v Speaker 1>back to Verdict with Ted Cruz, so wonderful to be

0:04:08.560 --> 0:04:11.280
<v Speaker 1>with everybody. We have not done a great job on

0:04:11.320 --> 0:04:15.600
<v Speaker 1>recent episodes in taking questions from our wonderful Verdict audience.

0:04:15.600 --> 0:04:17.599
<v Speaker 1>We've gotten so wrapped up in the things we're talking

0:04:17.600 --> 0:04:20.839
<v Speaker 1>about that we have neglected the absolute best part of

0:04:20.880 --> 0:04:23.159
<v Speaker 1>the show, which is hearing from you, which we will

0:04:23.160 --> 0:04:25.560
<v Speaker 1>do in one second. But before we do that, we

0:04:25.640 --> 0:04:28.480
<v Speaker 1>have a favor to ask. You need to apply at

0:04:28.640 --> 0:04:32.839
<v Speaker 1>yaf dot org slash Verdict to bring this show to

0:04:32.920 --> 0:04:34.520
<v Speaker 1>your school. We don't just want to hear from you

0:04:34.520 --> 0:04:36.039
<v Speaker 1>in the mailbag. We want to hear from you in

0:04:36.120 --> 0:04:38.599
<v Speaker 1>real life. We had a great time on the fall tour,

0:04:38.800 --> 0:04:42.080
<v Speaker 1>going all around to Wisconsin, to Texas to Washington, DC.

0:04:42.400 --> 0:04:45.279
<v Speaker 1>We're going to be doing another three schools this spring

0:04:45.320 --> 0:04:47.760
<v Speaker 1>with Young America's Foundation, So if you want to apply,

0:04:47.800 --> 0:04:51.159
<v Speaker 1>the deadline is December fifteenth, head on over to YAF

0:04:51.279 --> 0:04:56.360
<v Speaker 1>dot org slash Verdict. All right, Liz, let's hear from

0:04:56.360 --> 0:04:59.240
<v Speaker 1>our wonderful listeners in the mailbag. Thank you, Michael. We

0:04:59.279 --> 0:05:02.760
<v Speaker 1>have a lot of great questions over on Verdict Plus today.

0:05:02.880 --> 0:05:04.760
<v Speaker 1>As always, if you want to submit a question for

0:05:05.160 --> 0:05:07.080
<v Speaker 1>the mail bag portion of our show, you can do

0:05:07.120 --> 0:05:10.200
<v Speaker 1>so on Verdict Plus. Just go to Verdict with Ted

0:05:10.240 --> 0:05:13.760
<v Speaker 1>Cruz dot com slash plus and submit your question. Subscribers

0:05:13.760 --> 0:05:16.359
<v Speaker 1>over there get exclusive access to be the ones to

0:05:16.480 --> 0:05:19.440
<v Speaker 1>ask Michael and the Senator and me any question that

0:05:19.520 --> 0:05:20.960
<v Speaker 1>you want. As I said, we have a lot of

0:05:20.960 --> 0:05:23.159
<v Speaker 1>great questions. You can always continue to submit them, but

0:05:23.240 --> 0:05:26.680
<v Speaker 1>let's get to the first one. The first one, Senator

0:05:26.720 --> 0:05:29.640
<v Speaker 1>Cruz is for you. It is from Jersey. Jersey asks

0:05:30.040 --> 0:05:32.800
<v Speaker 1>can the federal government, after a person has been tried

0:05:32.839 --> 0:05:35.520
<v Speaker 1>and judged by his and her peers retry a case

0:05:36.080 --> 0:05:38.279
<v Speaker 1>by what authority or law do they even have that

0:05:38.320 --> 0:05:41.440
<v Speaker 1>authority in power to intervene in a state's judicial system.

0:05:41.680 --> 0:05:44.080
<v Speaker 1>What in the constitution or bill of rights gives or

0:05:44.240 --> 0:05:47.479
<v Speaker 1>retrains the federal government from the power to intervene in

0:05:47.480 --> 0:05:50.560
<v Speaker 1>a concluded and tried in a court case. Well, that's

0:05:50.560 --> 0:05:54.839
<v Speaker 1>a good question. So the constitution protect you from what's

0:05:54.839 --> 0:05:58.360
<v Speaker 1>called double jeopardy, which is you cannot be tried twice

0:05:58.440 --> 0:06:03.559
<v Speaker 1>for the same crime. If you're charged with murder and

0:06:03.800 --> 0:06:08.600
<v Speaker 1>there is a murder trial and you are acquitted, they

0:06:08.640 --> 0:06:10.760
<v Speaker 1>can't come back and say, oh, we don't like that result,

0:06:10.800 --> 0:06:15.160
<v Speaker 1>so let's go bring another murder charge against you. There is, however,

0:06:15.560 --> 0:06:17.760
<v Speaker 1>an exception to double jeopardy, which is you can be

0:06:17.920 --> 0:06:21.080
<v Speaker 1>tried for a different crime, and so there's a legal

0:06:21.080 --> 0:06:25.640
<v Speaker 1>analysis of whether. So for example, let's say you, to

0:06:26.040 --> 0:06:29.280
<v Speaker 1>use an easy example, you're tried and acquitted to murder,

0:06:29.839 --> 0:06:32.560
<v Speaker 1>but you also were speeding on the way to the murder.

0:06:32.560 --> 0:06:35.080
<v Speaker 1>You can certainly be tried and convicted or acquitted of

0:06:35.120 --> 0:06:39.080
<v Speaker 1>the speeding because those are separate and distinct crimes. When

0:06:39.120 --> 0:06:43.839
<v Speaker 1>it comes to a federal crime, if it is a

0:06:43.960 --> 0:06:46.520
<v Speaker 1>separate and distinct crime, you can be charged with it,

0:06:46.560 --> 0:06:50.200
<v Speaker 1>but there's a legal analysis in terms of whether you're

0:06:50.279 --> 0:06:54.440
<v Speaker 1>simply re trying for the acquitted conduct and the acquitted crime.

0:06:54.560 --> 0:06:59.240
<v Speaker 1>So no one a murder charge for example, but yes

0:06:59.320 --> 0:07:02.560
<v Speaker 1>if they are different indistinct crimes. All right, Michael, let

0:07:02.560 --> 0:07:04.480
<v Speaker 1>me pivot over to you, because this is a question

0:07:04.480 --> 0:07:09.479
<v Speaker 1>that came in specifically requesting clarification from Knolls. JJ forty

0:07:09.520 --> 0:07:13.480
<v Speaker 1>eight eighty four says, I know you often criticize libertarians

0:07:13.520 --> 0:07:16.120
<v Speaker 1>for being too licentious and crazy when it comes to

0:07:16.120 --> 0:07:19.520
<v Speaker 1>certain moral issues. Are there certain people of certain occupations

0:07:19.600 --> 0:07:23.720
<v Speaker 1>or fields of interest that cannot be traditionally conservative i e.

0:07:23.880 --> 0:07:27.480
<v Speaker 1>Tech issues? Are there ways you could steal man libertarianism

0:07:27.480 --> 0:07:30.560
<v Speaker 1>and any prominent libertarians you could stand alongside. That's a

0:07:30.560 --> 0:07:33.840
<v Speaker 1>great question. Well, you know, I'm glad to hear you

0:07:33.840 --> 0:07:36.520
<v Speaker 1>brought up big tech because at first, when you said

0:07:37.120 --> 0:07:40.840
<v Speaker 1>that you wanted to know of certain professions just naturally

0:07:40.880 --> 0:07:44.640
<v Speaker 1>can't lend themselves to virtue and naturally lend themselves to licentiousness.

0:07:44.680 --> 0:07:49.080
<v Speaker 1>I assumed you were talking about, say, prostitution, but working

0:07:49.120 --> 0:07:52.320
<v Speaker 1>for big tech is far far more disreputable than being

0:07:52.320 --> 0:07:54.520
<v Speaker 1>a prostitute or a drug dealer or something like that.

0:07:54.600 --> 0:07:57.200
<v Speaker 1>So I think that's a pretty good example to bring

0:07:57.280 --> 0:08:02.000
<v Speaker 1>up big tech here. Yeah, there are certain fields that

0:08:03.480 --> 0:08:06.560
<v Speaker 1>naturally are just not going to be all that conservative,

0:08:06.720 --> 0:08:08.440
<v Speaker 1>and I do think it has been a mistake of

0:08:08.440 --> 0:08:10.960
<v Speaker 1>the conservative movement to try to be all things to

0:08:11.040 --> 0:08:13.720
<v Speaker 1>all people and to say that you can do whatever

0:08:13.800 --> 0:08:16.040
<v Speaker 1>you want as long as it doesn't hurt me or

0:08:16.080 --> 0:08:18.280
<v Speaker 1>scare the horses in the street. I mean, this is

0:08:18.320 --> 0:08:20.440
<v Speaker 1>why we still have drug laws in this countries. We're

0:08:20.440 --> 0:08:23.640
<v Speaker 1>saying there are some things that you can do with

0:08:23.680 --> 0:08:25.480
<v Speaker 1>your body that we don't think that you should be

0:08:25.520 --> 0:08:28.640
<v Speaker 1>allowed to do, or actually, for that matter, laws against prostitution.

0:08:28.800 --> 0:08:31.120
<v Speaker 1>And so now, as we have discussed on this show

0:08:31.160 --> 0:08:33.400
<v Speaker 1>a number of times, one of the debates on the

0:08:33.520 --> 0:08:38.480
<v Speaker 1>right is over the influence that libertarianism should have versus traditionalism,

0:08:38.600 --> 0:08:41.640
<v Speaker 1>versus all. You know, conservatives love all their isms. A

0:08:41.679 --> 0:08:44.800
<v Speaker 1>friend of mine once told me that the obscure political

0:08:44.840 --> 0:08:47.880
<v Speaker 1>monikers are the right wing version of gender pronouns. So

0:08:48.080 --> 0:08:52.280
<v Speaker 1>everyone's got one and some people have multiple. And after

0:08:52.320 --> 0:08:55.800
<v Speaker 1>the Second World War there was what's called fusionism. This

0:08:55.960 --> 0:08:58.560
<v Speaker 1>was the postwar conservative movement put together by guys like

0:08:58.840 --> 0:09:01.800
<v Speaker 1>Bill Buckley and Frank Meyer. You might call it the

0:09:01.800 --> 0:09:06.560
<v Speaker 1>Reagan coalition of libertarians and traditional conservatives and warhawk Democrats.

0:09:07.240 --> 0:09:09.679
<v Speaker 1>They all had a common enemy in the Soviet Union.

0:09:10.520 --> 0:09:13.040
<v Speaker 1>They might have hated Communism for different reasons, but they

0:09:13.080 --> 0:09:15.920
<v Speaker 1>partnered together and won the Cold War. And since that time,

0:09:16.200 --> 0:09:19.800
<v Speaker 1>probably the libertarian side or the neo conservative side has

0:09:19.880 --> 0:09:23.560
<v Speaker 1>led that coalition. Traditional conservatives and some of the other

0:09:23.600 --> 0:09:27.920
<v Speaker 1>groups have fallen out of favor, lost some of their power.

0:09:28.000 --> 0:09:31.520
<v Speaker 1>In twenty sixteen, then you saw the more traditional conservative

0:09:31.559 --> 0:09:33.880
<v Speaker 1>types kind of or the more populous types try to

0:09:33.440 --> 0:09:36.600
<v Speaker 1>take ground, and so these debates are inevitable. But in

0:09:36.640 --> 0:09:39.600
<v Speaker 1>answer to your question, would you stand alongside libertarians as I,

0:09:39.640 --> 0:09:42.520
<v Speaker 1>of course I would. The fact is politics is the

0:09:42.600 --> 0:09:45.520
<v Speaker 1>art of inclusion, and the only way you're ever going

0:09:45.559 --> 0:09:48.160
<v Speaker 1>to do anything is if you can win elections. And

0:09:48.200 --> 0:09:50.960
<v Speaker 1>in order to win elections, you need to win fifty

0:09:51.000 --> 0:09:53.440
<v Speaker 1>percent of the vote plus one. And there simply are

0:09:53.520 --> 0:09:57.199
<v Speaker 1>not enough traditional conservatives, or enough Libertarians for that matter,

0:09:57.280 --> 0:10:01.520
<v Speaker 1>or enough whoever to win on their own, so you've

0:10:01.600 --> 0:10:06.200
<v Speaker 1>got to form coalitions. I just think that in some

0:10:06.240 --> 0:10:10.080
<v Speaker 1>cases the libertarians have had a little too much leeway

0:10:10.120 --> 0:10:13.600
<v Speaker 1>and Frankly, I don't I even use this term libertarianism

0:10:15.200 --> 0:10:20.400
<v Speaker 1>reluctantly because I don't think that legalizing all drugs and

0:10:21.000 --> 0:10:24.160
<v Speaker 1>saying that we have to totally redefine marriage and legalizing

0:10:24.200 --> 0:10:28.200
<v Speaker 1>all manner of vice and licentiousness is exactly in the

0:10:28.240 --> 0:10:31.680
<v Speaker 1>tradition of John Locke or Thomas Jefferson, or even the

0:10:31.679 --> 0:10:35.000
<v Speaker 1>twentieth century libertarians, certainly not the classical liberals. So I

0:10:35.040 --> 0:10:37.760
<v Speaker 1>just think we need to be a little more substantive

0:10:37.800 --> 0:10:41.040
<v Speaker 1>about our views, not merely the right to freedom of

0:10:41.080 --> 0:10:43.199
<v Speaker 1>religion or the right to freedom of speech, but actually

0:10:43.240 --> 0:10:45.920
<v Speaker 1>have something to say and actually something more clearly that

0:10:45.960 --> 0:10:48.160
<v Speaker 1>we can believe. And I think part of that is

0:10:48.200 --> 0:10:53.720
<v Speaker 1>just intrinsic to the conservative movement in America. But whatever

0:10:53.760 --> 0:10:56.040
<v Speaker 1>we've been doing for the past twenty years or so,

0:10:56.240 --> 0:10:58.280
<v Speaker 1>it it doesn't seem to have worked that well. We

0:10:58.320 --> 0:11:00.880
<v Speaker 1>seem to have lost on every may your cultural issue,

0:11:00.920 --> 0:11:02.960
<v Speaker 1>and so I think we need the courage to say, now,

0:11:03.400 --> 0:11:05.320
<v Speaker 1>this is this is good, this is bad, this is true,

0:11:05.320 --> 0:11:09.280
<v Speaker 1>this is false, and stand by those convictions even if

0:11:09.320 --> 0:11:11.840
<v Speaker 1>they're unpopular. Well, and Michael, let me chime in on

0:11:11.880 --> 0:11:14.640
<v Speaker 1>that real briefly, which is I think I'm a little

0:11:14.640 --> 0:11:16.920
<v Speaker 1>bit more libertarian than you are. But but but I'll

0:11:16.920 --> 0:11:19.160
<v Speaker 1>go even further right now, Senator, I think a Tell

0:11:19.200 --> 0:11:20.920
<v Speaker 1>of the Hunt is a little more libertarian than I am.

0:11:20.920 --> 0:11:24.240
<v Speaker 1>So it's absolutely fair. But I'm going to go even

0:11:24.280 --> 0:11:29.160
<v Speaker 1>further and and praise a libertine which whiches and by

0:11:29.280 --> 0:11:33.679
<v Speaker 1>name Bill Maher. H Bill Maher. His politics are very

0:11:33.679 --> 0:11:36.959
<v Speaker 1>different from yours. They're very different from mine. Um, he

0:11:37.400 --> 0:11:40.200
<v Speaker 1>may be an old school liberal, but Bill Maher is

0:11:40.240 --> 0:11:43.360
<v Speaker 1>someone who I think might well admit he's a libertine.

0:11:43.400 --> 0:11:47.480
<v Speaker 1>And he defends licensuousness as with with gusto and pride.

0:11:49.120 --> 0:11:52.120
<v Speaker 1>And it's an amazing statement of where we are today

0:11:52.160 --> 0:11:55.720
<v Speaker 1>that that that Bill Maher as as an unabashed libertine,

0:11:55.800 --> 0:12:01.200
<v Speaker 1>as is finding himself relatively conservative because and maybe the

0:12:01.280 --> 0:12:05.720
<v Speaker 1>new impetus for the new Fusionism will be the woke

0:12:05.840 --> 0:12:10.240
<v Speaker 1>anti americanism of the hard left. Because when Bill Maher

0:12:10.400 --> 0:12:14.240
<v Speaker 1>speaks out against cancel culture, when he speaks out against

0:12:14.600 --> 0:12:17.280
<v Speaker 1>Democrats who have lost common sense, when he speaks out

0:12:17.280 --> 0:12:21.640
<v Speaker 1>against the idiocy of of you know, canceling people and

0:12:21.720 --> 0:12:25.600
<v Speaker 1>correcting your pronouns, and or when he speaks out against

0:12:25.920 --> 0:12:33.080
<v Speaker 1>radical Jahad and today's angry Left condemns him. Even though

0:12:33.160 --> 0:12:36.319
<v Speaker 1>Bill Maher and I disagree on a lot of issues,

0:12:37.440 --> 0:12:39.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm grateful that he has the courage to speak out

0:12:41.040 --> 0:12:44.319
<v Speaker 1>against the petty tyrants that would silence all of us.

0:12:44.640 --> 0:12:47.200
<v Speaker 1>The next question is from Elizabeth P. And I promise

0:12:47.280 --> 0:12:49.600
<v Speaker 1>I did not pick this question solely based on the

0:12:49.600 --> 0:12:51.600
<v Speaker 1>fact that we share a name. I picked it because

0:12:51.800 --> 0:12:53.800
<v Speaker 1>it's a good question as well, but there might have

0:12:53.800 --> 0:12:56.320
<v Speaker 1>been a little element of It's not nepotism, but you know,

0:12:56.400 --> 0:12:59.400
<v Speaker 1>some sort of similarity of name. Elizabeth P. Says, please

0:12:59.440 --> 0:13:02.640
<v Speaker 1>ask the Senator to block all efforts by the DOJ

0:13:02.880 --> 0:13:06.920
<v Speaker 1>to retrial Kyle or to retry Kyle and attach parents

0:13:07.280 --> 0:13:12.160
<v Speaker 1>attack parents speaking out at school boards. Senator, Yeah, look,

0:13:12.640 --> 0:13:14.920
<v Speaker 1>it is a great point. I very much hope we

0:13:15.000 --> 0:13:18.680
<v Speaker 1>do not see the Biden Justice Department try to attack

0:13:18.800 --> 0:13:22.400
<v Speaker 1>Kyle Rittenhouse. We had a trial, the jury rendered its verdict.

0:13:22.400 --> 0:13:27.280
<v Speaker 1>They need to accept that verdict. Now I'm concerned. I

0:13:27.760 --> 0:13:32.160
<v Speaker 1>think this Justice Department has been wildly political. I think

0:13:32.200 --> 0:13:35.640
<v Speaker 1>it's in the first year been in many ways more

0:13:35.679 --> 0:13:38.360
<v Speaker 1>political than the Obama Justice Department, which is hard to

0:13:38.400 --> 0:13:42.480
<v Speaker 1>believe because the Obama Justice Department was deeply politicized. You know,

0:13:42.520 --> 0:13:46.200
<v Speaker 1>the second half of that question focused on going after parents,

0:13:46.200 --> 0:13:49.439
<v Speaker 1>and it's one of the worst examples of the politicized

0:13:49.480 --> 0:13:54.400
<v Speaker 1>Biden Justice Department, where the National Association of School Boards

0:13:54.480 --> 0:13:56.640
<v Speaker 1>wrote a letter to the Biden White House saying, will

0:13:56.679 --> 0:14:00.000
<v Speaker 1>you please go after parents, treat them as domestic terrorists,

0:14:00.400 --> 0:14:03.120
<v Speaker 1>use the Patriot Act and silence them, because gosh, we

0:14:03.200 --> 0:14:06.200
<v Speaker 1>really don't like parents getting mad at us for teaching

0:14:06.240 --> 0:14:08.880
<v Speaker 1>critical race theory. We don't like parents getting mad at

0:14:08.960 --> 0:14:14.239
<v Speaker 1>us for covering up sexual assaults of girls in bathrooms

0:14:14.240 --> 0:14:18.280
<v Speaker 1>at school. And so if would the Department of Justice

0:14:18.320 --> 0:14:21.960
<v Speaker 1>go after these terrorists? And just five days later, the

0:14:22.000 --> 0:14:25.800
<v Speaker 1>Attorney General directed the DOJ and the FBI to target

0:14:26.880 --> 0:14:29.000
<v Speaker 1>parents and to use tools to go after them. I

0:14:29.000 --> 0:14:31.920
<v Speaker 1>think it was an absolute grotesque abuse of power. It

0:14:32.000 --> 0:14:35.080
<v Speaker 1>wasn't law, it was politics. And I got to say,

0:14:35.080 --> 0:14:38.400
<v Speaker 1>if we see the Biden DJ ago after Kyle Rittenhouse,

0:14:38.760 --> 0:14:41.920
<v Speaker 1>it won't be law, it'll be politics. And so the

0:14:42.040 --> 0:14:47.160
<v Speaker 1>question asked, will you please stop them? I will say, sadly,

0:14:47.240 --> 0:14:50.360
<v Speaker 1>I don't have a magic stop button in my Senate office.

0:14:50.400 --> 0:14:52.520
<v Speaker 1>I wish I did. I would I would much like

0:14:52.600 --> 0:14:55.880
<v Speaker 1>Bill Bill Buckley perhaps stand athwart history and yell halt

0:14:55.960 --> 0:14:59.280
<v Speaker 1>or yell stop. But I do at least have a

0:15:00.080 --> 0:15:04.120
<v Speaker 1>spotlight and the ability to draw attention and call them out.

0:15:04.280 --> 0:15:09.760
<v Speaker 1>But under our constitution, it's the executive branch that executes,

0:15:09.840 --> 0:15:14.440
<v Speaker 1>and so right now, the Biden administration is the only

0:15:14.720 --> 0:15:17.720
<v Speaker 1>federal branch of the federal government that can bring an indictment.

0:15:17.720 --> 0:15:19.800
<v Speaker 1>It is the only branch of the federal government that

0:15:20.200 --> 0:15:22.840
<v Speaker 1>can execute the laws. So I can do all I

0:15:22.880 --> 0:15:25.080
<v Speaker 1>can to shine a light on them and denounce them.

0:15:25.600 --> 0:15:28.760
<v Speaker 1>But at the end of the day, until the voters

0:15:28.840 --> 0:15:31.520
<v Speaker 1>come in and give us a new Congress and a

0:15:31.560 --> 0:15:35.240
<v Speaker 1>new executive, we're going to continue to see more and

0:15:35.280 --> 0:15:38.840
<v Speaker 1>more abusive power. I sadly from the Biden DOJ and Senator.

0:15:38.920 --> 0:15:41.400
<v Speaker 1>This next question is a very good question as it

0:15:41.440 --> 0:15:45.320
<v Speaker 1>pertains to I guess the legal authority of the chief

0:15:45.320 --> 0:15:48.040
<v Speaker 1>executive hit here. This question is from verdict Hawk, who

0:15:48.080 --> 0:15:52.120
<v Speaker 1>asks if a court suspends or rules against an action

0:15:52.240 --> 0:15:55.760
<v Speaker 1>taken by the administration, ie the vaccine mandate, but the

0:15:55.800 --> 0:16:00.760
<v Speaker 1>administration persists, what remedies are available to the court. So

0:16:00.800 --> 0:16:03.240
<v Speaker 1>that's a great question. There are a couple of different

0:16:03.280 --> 0:16:06.840
<v Speaker 1>incidences of that occurring right now to come to mind.

0:16:08.280 --> 0:16:13.880
<v Speaker 1>Number one is the order you just referenced, which is

0:16:13.920 --> 0:16:17.920
<v Speaker 1>the Fifth Circuit Federal Court of Appeals has issued an

0:16:18.000 --> 0:16:23.720
<v Speaker 1>order staying the effect of the Biden vaccine mandate insofar

0:16:23.840 --> 0:16:27.160
<v Speaker 1>as it applies to private employers. So the Ocean mandate

0:16:27.600 --> 0:16:29.840
<v Speaker 1>that applies to employers with a one hundred hundred and

0:16:29.840 --> 0:16:34.480
<v Speaker 1>more employees, that's been stayed pending litigation. Initially, the Biden

0:16:34.600 --> 0:16:38.160
<v Speaker 1>White House, the deputy Press Secretary went out and said, well,

0:16:38.240 --> 0:16:40.400
<v Speaker 1>will you ought to just comply anyway, never mind the

0:16:40.440 --> 0:16:43.800
<v Speaker 1>court order, just just obey anyway. And we've talked on

0:16:43.840 --> 0:16:47.160
<v Speaker 1>the pod about how I think the Biden White House

0:16:47.320 --> 0:16:51.040
<v Speaker 1>knows that this vaccine mandate is illegal and it's likely

0:16:51.080 --> 0:16:53.880
<v Speaker 1>to lose in court, but I think they cynically are

0:16:53.960 --> 0:16:58.440
<v Speaker 1>counting on most people obeying anyway while the litigation proceeds.

0:16:58.440 --> 0:17:01.120
<v Speaker 1>And I think that order was an example, not the

0:17:01.200 --> 0:17:03.280
<v Speaker 1>order of the comment from the Press secretary was an

0:17:03.280 --> 0:17:09.200
<v Speaker 1>example of that lawlessness. I will say OSHA did formally

0:17:09.240 --> 0:17:12.560
<v Speaker 1>suspend the order pending the resolution of that lawsuit. So

0:17:12.600 --> 0:17:18.040
<v Speaker 1>you did see ultimately the administration forced to comply even

0:17:18.119 --> 0:17:21.520
<v Speaker 1>while they're urging people to pretend like the order still

0:17:21.520 --> 0:17:25.800
<v Speaker 1>has force of law. A second example of this concerns

0:17:25.880 --> 0:17:31.120
<v Speaker 1>are open borders and the decision that Joe Biden may

0:17:31.240 --> 0:17:34.560
<v Speaker 1>that caused the most havoc on our southern border was

0:17:34.640 --> 0:17:37.600
<v Speaker 1>the decision to end the Remain in Mexico Agreement. Remain

0:17:37.640 --> 0:17:43.080
<v Speaker 1>in Mexico was an agreement Trump negotiated with Mexico where

0:17:43.119 --> 0:17:47.040
<v Speaker 1>people who came illegally into Mexico were applying to for

0:17:47.160 --> 0:17:50.120
<v Speaker 1>US asylum. They'd stay in Mexico while the asylum case

0:17:50.200 --> 0:17:54.560
<v Speaker 1>was proceeding. Remain in Mexico was unbelievably effective. Last year,

0:17:54.560 --> 0:17:56.800
<v Speaker 1>we had the lowest rate of illegal immigration in forty

0:17:56.840 --> 0:18:00.200
<v Speaker 1>five years. Biden came in on day one and did

0:18:00.200 --> 0:18:04.000
<v Speaker 1>remain in Mexico, and the illegal immigrations skyrocketed to now

0:18:04.080 --> 0:18:11.000
<v Speaker 1>the highest rate in sixty one years. Biden administration was

0:18:11.040 --> 0:18:15.200
<v Speaker 1>sued for pulling out of Remain in Mexico by Texas

0:18:15.200 --> 0:18:18.920
<v Speaker 1>and Missouri, and Biden had been lost. A district court

0:18:19.000 --> 0:18:23.080
<v Speaker 1>in Texas ruled that the Biden administration had violated the

0:18:23.160 --> 0:18:25.640
<v Speaker 1>law by pulling out of the Remain in Mexico agreement

0:18:25.640 --> 0:18:29.240
<v Speaker 1>without going through the notice and process and the procedural

0:18:29.320 --> 0:18:32.760
<v Speaker 1>steps required to do that. So they're under an order

0:18:33.480 --> 0:18:37.239
<v Speaker 1>to re enter the remain in Mexico agreement. They are

0:18:37.320 --> 0:18:40.280
<v Speaker 1>dragging their feet and they're basically defying that order. And

0:18:40.920 --> 0:18:45.320
<v Speaker 1>I've talked to whistleblowers at Customs and Border Patrol who

0:18:45.440 --> 0:18:47.320
<v Speaker 1>said that even though this court order has been in

0:18:47.359 --> 0:18:51.200
<v Speaker 1>place for many, many weeks now, they're just slow rolling

0:18:51.240 --> 0:18:54.840
<v Speaker 1>if they're moving unbelievably slowly. So they're telling the JUDGEO,

0:18:54.960 --> 0:18:58.320
<v Speaker 1>we're going to comply. But in particular with this kind

0:18:58.320 --> 0:19:03.080
<v Speaker 1>of order, it's easy z for a defined administration to

0:19:03.320 --> 0:19:07.119
<v Speaker 1>resist it because it requires the cooperation of a sovereign nation.

0:19:07.640 --> 0:19:11.680
<v Speaker 1>So all they have to do is surreptitiously tell Mexico

0:19:12.200 --> 0:19:15.120
<v Speaker 1>wink wink, nudge, nudge, please tell us you don't want

0:19:15.160 --> 0:19:17.360
<v Speaker 1>to do this. And then Mexico says, sorry, we don't

0:19:17.400 --> 0:19:19.120
<v Speaker 1>want to do this, and they say, gosh, Judge, nothing

0:19:19.119 --> 0:19:22.359
<v Speaker 1>we can do. Mexico doesn't want to do this. I

0:19:22.480 --> 0:19:27.240
<v Speaker 1>have deep suspicions that's what they're doing. When Homeland Security

0:19:27.280 --> 0:19:30.880
<v Speaker 1>Secretary Mayorcus testified before the Judiciary Committee, I asked him

0:19:30.920 --> 0:19:34.880
<v Speaker 1>that question specifically, he denied they were doing it. But

0:19:35.040 --> 0:19:38.159
<v Speaker 1>you know, you just ask a minute ago. What remedies

0:19:38.200 --> 0:19:40.160
<v Speaker 1>are there. I'll tell you the judge has a remedy,

0:19:40.720 --> 0:19:43.400
<v Speaker 1>which is you can hold the judge can hold specific

0:19:43.480 --> 0:19:47.760
<v Speaker 1>members of the administration in contempt for violating the order,

0:19:47.760 --> 0:19:52.480
<v Speaker 1>and can literally incarceerate them. You know, I asked Secretary Mayorcus,

0:19:52.520 --> 0:19:54.600
<v Speaker 1>what would you say to the judge if the judge said,

0:19:54.640 --> 0:19:57.960
<v Speaker 1>mister secretary, why should I not put you in jail

0:19:58.240 --> 0:20:02.240
<v Speaker 1>right now for buying my order and slow walking my order?

0:20:02.800 --> 0:20:05.199
<v Speaker 1>May Orc As his answer as well, we're trying to obey.

0:20:05.240 --> 0:20:08.840
<v Speaker 1>We are complying what he didn't admit. As they're doing

0:20:08.880 --> 0:20:14.040
<v Speaker 1>so unbelievably slowly and allowing the chaos to unfold. Ultimately,

0:20:14.119 --> 0:20:16.600
<v Speaker 1>they risk I think there's a real possibility you see

0:20:16.600 --> 0:20:19.920
<v Speaker 1>a judge enter a contempt hearing because they have, as

0:20:20.040 --> 0:20:24.359
<v Speaker 1>a real and practical matter, a contempt for anything holding

0:20:24.359 --> 0:20:27.360
<v Speaker 1>them to account. And what makes it even more confusing

0:20:27.440 --> 0:20:30.760
<v Speaker 1>for especially for a layman like me, is we keep

0:20:30.800 --> 0:20:33.840
<v Speaker 1>talking about this as a fight between the executive and

0:20:33.880 --> 0:20:36.679
<v Speaker 1>the judiciary, and we're taught in school that there is

0:20:36.680 --> 0:20:39.840
<v Speaker 1>the executive and the judiciary and the legislature. But there

0:20:39.880 --> 0:20:42.360
<v Speaker 1>are a couple of other groups pop up as well.

0:20:42.440 --> 0:20:44.639
<v Speaker 1>So we sometimes talk about the media as a fourth

0:20:44.640 --> 0:20:47.320
<v Speaker 1>branch of government, But what about the administrative state. You know,

0:20:47.359 --> 0:20:51.200
<v Speaker 1>in this case, the judiciary is saying, don't enforce the order.

0:20:51.320 --> 0:20:55.000
<v Speaker 1>Joe Biden is tasking an administrative agency OSHA, to enforce

0:20:55.240 --> 0:20:59.640
<v Speaker 1>his order. And so Biden says, employers keep following the order, OSHA.

0:20:59.680 --> 0:21:02.200
<v Speaker 1>The ministrative agency says, okay, we're going to suspend the

0:21:02.280 --> 0:21:04.520
<v Speaker 1>order until the court finally decides on this. And so

0:21:04.560 --> 0:21:06.359
<v Speaker 1>you seem to have a little bit of dissent even

0:21:06.400 --> 0:21:09.520
<v Speaker 1>within the executive branch, you know, the president and his

0:21:09.560 --> 0:21:12.359
<v Speaker 1>administrative agencies, all of which says to me, without a

0:21:12.400 --> 0:21:15.520
<v Speaker 1>law school education, never having argued before the Supreme Court,

0:21:16.359 --> 0:21:18.679
<v Speaker 1>that our government might not work quite the way we

0:21:18.680 --> 0:21:21.480
<v Speaker 1>were told it does. In Schoolhouse Rock, Michael, I was

0:21:21.560 --> 0:21:24.119
<v Speaker 1>with you right until the moment that you cast dispersions

0:21:24.119 --> 0:21:29.320
<v Speaker 1>on Schoolhouse Rock. That was going too far. And my god, man,

0:21:29.440 --> 0:21:34.000
<v Speaker 1>have you no shame? Have you no decency? Sir? Yes?

0:21:34.200 --> 0:21:39.560
<v Speaker 1>At long last, have you no decency? All right? Our

0:21:39.560 --> 0:21:41.800
<v Speaker 1>next question, Michael, I'm going to toss this one to you.

0:21:41.920 --> 0:21:44.480
<v Speaker 1>This is from well, the username of this individual, just

0:21:44.520 --> 0:21:47.480
<v Speaker 1>to quote it exactly, is dead ass nemo. Take that

0:21:47.560 --> 0:21:49.359
<v Speaker 1>or leave it. Here's the question, tho. It's a good question.

0:21:49.800 --> 0:21:54.959
<v Speaker 1>What do Michael and Senator Cruz disagree on politically and culturally? Well,

0:21:54.720 --> 0:21:58.320
<v Speaker 1>we touched on something earlier, which is a Senator said

0:21:58.320 --> 0:22:01.000
<v Speaker 1>he's probably a little more libertarian than me. And because

0:22:01.520 --> 0:22:05.840
<v Speaker 1>just about everyone, including Genghis Khan, is more libertarian than me,

0:22:05.880 --> 0:22:09.800
<v Speaker 1>I guess that would be one area of distinction. And

0:22:09.840 --> 0:22:17.000
<v Speaker 1>then we all were both Italian, we were both cigar smokers.

0:22:17.640 --> 0:22:20.879
<v Speaker 1>In terms of legislation, we probably agree on almost every

0:22:20.960 --> 0:22:24.320
<v Speaker 1>single thing. You know, Okay, I know, I know what

0:22:24.359 --> 0:22:26.560
<v Speaker 1>we agree. I have a big point of disagreement here.

0:22:28.160 --> 0:22:30.480
<v Speaker 1>Senator Cruises a money christal guy, and I'm a little

0:22:30.480 --> 0:22:33.040
<v Speaker 1>bit more of a Coheba man myself. You know, I'm

0:22:33.040 --> 0:22:37.200
<v Speaker 1>willing to split the difference and spoke both. See that's compromised.

0:22:38.119 --> 0:22:41.000
<v Speaker 1>It's the art of the possible, all right. The last

0:22:41.080 --> 0:22:45.760
<v Speaker 1>question is from Eileen. This one topically is it's not

0:22:45.840 --> 0:22:48.240
<v Speaker 1>out there, but I thought it was very interesting because

0:22:48.280 --> 0:22:50.720
<v Speaker 1>you don't often hear this question. Eileen asked, what are

0:22:50.720 --> 0:22:56.520
<v Speaker 1>your ideas for an alternative option for our power grid? Senator, Well,

0:22:56.880 --> 0:22:59.040
<v Speaker 1>there are lots of things we can do to enhance

0:22:59.160 --> 0:23:02.479
<v Speaker 1>the resilience of the power grid. Some of it is

0:23:02.560 --> 0:23:05.399
<v Speaker 1>having a diversity of sources of energy so that you

0:23:05.440 --> 0:23:08.000
<v Speaker 1>don't have a particular source that goes down and that

0:23:08.040 --> 0:23:13.159
<v Speaker 1>the system is dependent on that. You have coal fired plants,

0:23:13.200 --> 0:23:19.040
<v Speaker 1>which are widespread and pretty consistently the most reliable. They

0:23:19.080 --> 0:23:23.639
<v Speaker 1>also pollute the most. You've got natural gas electricity generation.

0:23:23.800 --> 0:23:28.000
<v Speaker 1>Natural gas is also very reliable, has much much lower pollution,

0:23:28.119 --> 0:23:31.440
<v Speaker 1>much much lower CO two emissions, which is a big

0:23:31.480 --> 0:23:34.120
<v Speaker 1>part of the reason why last year the United States

0:23:34.240 --> 0:23:37.320
<v Speaker 1>led the world in reduction of CO two emissions because

0:23:37.359 --> 0:23:41.119
<v Speaker 1>we shifted a whole bunch of electricity production from cold

0:23:41.160 --> 0:23:45.040
<v Speaker 1>and natural gas. You've got wind and solar, both of

0:23:45.080 --> 0:23:49.080
<v Speaker 1>which are important parts of the UH the grid. The

0:23:49.119 --> 0:23:50.960
<v Speaker 1>state of Texas. A lot of people don't know Texas

0:23:51.040 --> 0:23:55.200
<v Speaker 1>is the number one producer of wind energy in the country.

0:23:56.400 --> 0:23:58.720
<v Speaker 1>One of the problems with wind and solar as they're

0:23:58.760 --> 0:24:01.280
<v Speaker 1>not always reliable. They're days when the sun doesn't shine

0:24:01.320 --> 0:24:03.720
<v Speaker 1>where it's cloudy or it's rainy, and solar doesn't produce

0:24:03.760 --> 0:24:06.000
<v Speaker 1>the same power their days when the wind doesn't blow.

0:24:06.640 --> 0:24:10.640
<v Speaker 1>UH and and so wind and solar can supplement your

0:24:11.200 --> 0:24:14.679
<v Speaker 1>electrical output, but they're not good on days, they're not

0:24:14.840 --> 0:24:17.919
<v Speaker 1>consistently reliable, and they tend to be highly variable in

0:24:18.040 --> 0:24:21.960
<v Speaker 1>terms of their output UM. And and in places like

0:24:22.040 --> 0:24:24.800
<v Speaker 1>Texas where we don't often have cold, we saw in

0:24:24.840 --> 0:24:27.440
<v Speaker 1>the winter storm last year a lot of the wind

0:24:27.440 --> 0:24:32.040
<v Speaker 1>turbines froze because they weren't weatherized. You can weatherize wind turbines,

0:24:32.080 --> 0:24:35.399
<v Speaker 1>and in colder environments they do that. In Texas they hadn't,

0:24:35.400 --> 0:24:37.600
<v Speaker 1>and that that clearly proved to be a mistake. That

0:24:37.600 --> 0:24:41.520
<v Speaker 1>that that that hopefully is being corrected the state legislature

0:24:42.400 --> 0:24:48.120
<v Speaker 1>past legislation to weatherize UH the grid. You've got nuclear.

0:24:48.160 --> 0:24:52.040
<v Speaker 1>I think nuclear has enormous potential in terms of steady,

0:24:52.080 --> 0:24:58.560
<v Speaker 1>reliable production of electricity UH with with virtually no pollution

0:24:59.119 --> 0:25:02.720
<v Speaker 1>or carbon emission UM. We actually had in the freeze

0:25:02.720 --> 0:25:06.600
<v Speaker 1>in Texas, UM one of our major nuclear plants went

0:25:06.640 --> 0:25:08.959
<v Speaker 1>down and it went down. I actually went and visited

0:25:08.960 --> 0:25:13.120
<v Speaker 1>the plant UM a few weeks ago, and it went

0:25:13.240 --> 0:25:17.040
<v Speaker 1>down because one small pipe, and it was a little

0:25:17.040 --> 0:25:21.359
<v Speaker 1>pipeline that transmitted water was not weatherized. And we're talking,

0:25:21.480 --> 0:25:26.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, pennies to weatherize this pipe, and that one

0:25:26.080 --> 0:25:29.359
<v Speaker 1>pipe froze and it was water that was used for

0:25:29.400 --> 0:25:34.080
<v Speaker 1>a sensor. But because that pipe froze, it triggered the

0:25:34.119 --> 0:25:37.080
<v Speaker 1>alarms and it shut down an entire reactor for days

0:25:37.119 --> 0:25:41.040
<v Speaker 1>and took a bunch of power offline. Because one pipe

0:25:41.960 --> 0:25:44.600
<v Speaker 1>years ago had not been weatherized, and it didn't, it

0:25:44.640 --> 0:25:48.800
<v Speaker 1>didn't jeopardize the safety of the plant. But because that

0:25:48.840 --> 0:25:52.960
<v Speaker 1>water pipe froze, uh, the the warnings went off and

0:25:52.960 --> 0:25:56.160
<v Speaker 1>they shut the plant down altogether. Um. They've obviously since

0:25:56.200 --> 0:25:59.399
<v Speaker 1>weatherized that pipe, but it was a lesson that that

0:26:00.480 --> 0:26:03.640
<v Speaker 1>was not fun learning in the process. You know, I'll

0:26:03.680 --> 0:26:09.320
<v Speaker 1>say something else that is really potent for resiliency of

0:26:09.359 --> 0:26:12.680
<v Speaker 1>the grid. And this is going to surprise at least

0:26:12.720 --> 0:26:14.520
<v Speaker 1>some of you, but it's bitcoin. And we're going to

0:26:14.600 --> 0:26:19.800
<v Speaker 1>do a subsequent podcast diving into cryptocurrency in bitcoin, because

0:26:19.800 --> 0:26:22.000
<v Speaker 1>that's a topic I've been getting very, very involved in.

0:26:22.880 --> 0:26:25.720
<v Speaker 1>It's a complicated topic. Most members of the Senate don't

0:26:25.720 --> 0:26:27.840
<v Speaker 1>know a damn thing about bitcoin, don't know a damn

0:26:27.920 --> 0:26:31.840
<v Speaker 1>thing about cryptocurrency. I've been in the process of trying

0:26:31.840 --> 0:26:35.240
<v Speaker 1>to educate myself, learn more about it, meeting with industry experts.

0:26:36.400 --> 0:26:39.560
<v Speaker 1>But one of the interesting possibilities, and you may be saying, well,

0:26:40.320 --> 0:26:42.280
<v Speaker 1>what does bitcoin have to do with the grid, And

0:26:42.320 --> 0:26:46.520
<v Speaker 1>to the extent you think about anything concerning bitcoin and

0:26:47.440 --> 0:26:50.480
<v Speaker 1>the grid, you think about it as energy consumers. Well,

0:26:50.560 --> 0:26:57.240
<v Speaker 1>Texas is becoming really the epicenter of bitcoin and cryptomning

0:26:57.640 --> 0:26:59.719
<v Speaker 1>in the United States and in the world. And part

0:26:59.760 --> 0:27:01.800
<v Speaker 1>of the reason is if you want to mind bitcoin

0:27:01.880 --> 0:27:05.160
<v Speaker 1>or other crypto, you need abundant energy, you need low

0:27:05.240 --> 0:27:10.240
<v Speaker 1>cost energy, and Texas has a lot of that, and

0:27:10.760 --> 0:27:14.720
<v Speaker 1>there is an opportunity. It's it's something a couple of

0:27:14.720 --> 0:27:18.919
<v Speaker 1>months ago, I spoke at the Blockchain National Conference that

0:27:18.960 --> 0:27:21.640
<v Speaker 1>was in Austin, Texas, and I talked about a win

0:27:21.720 --> 0:27:24.040
<v Speaker 1>win opportunity that there is that in West Texas and

0:27:24.080 --> 0:27:29.320
<v Speaker 1>the Permian Basin, We've got lots and lots of wells

0:27:29.359 --> 0:27:32.119
<v Speaker 1>that are right now flaring natural gas. And what happens

0:27:32.200 --> 0:27:35.600
<v Speaker 1>is you drill an oil well starts producing oil. Often

0:27:35.680 --> 0:27:39.240
<v Speaker 1>with the oil, there's natural gas, and there's not enough

0:27:39.280 --> 0:27:41.439
<v Speaker 1>of the natural gas for it to be economical for

0:27:41.520 --> 0:27:44.080
<v Speaker 1>you to build a pipeline to transmit the natural gas

0:27:44.080 --> 0:27:47.359
<v Speaker 1>and use it. So instead what they do is they

0:27:47.400 --> 0:27:49.280
<v Speaker 1>flare it. And flare it literally means they light it

0:27:49.359 --> 0:27:51.080
<v Speaker 1>on fire. So you go out to West Texas at

0:27:51.160 --> 0:27:53.880
<v Speaker 1>night and you see these flames like torches that are

0:27:53.880 --> 0:27:58.040
<v Speaker 1>just burning the natural gas that is being produced alongside

0:27:58.080 --> 0:28:02.160
<v Speaker 1>the oil that they're piping out and selling. Well, what

0:28:02.240 --> 0:28:06.080
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin provides the opportunity to do is you can go

0:28:06.200 --> 0:28:09.240
<v Speaker 1>and set up a bitcoin rig, think like an eighteen wheeler,

0:28:09.320 --> 0:28:13.040
<v Speaker 1>like the back of an eighteen wheeler. You can set

0:28:13.080 --> 0:28:17.679
<v Speaker 1>it up right there at that oil. Well, you can

0:28:17.760 --> 0:28:20.640
<v Speaker 1>capture the natural gas, put it a generator right there,

0:28:20.640 --> 0:28:25.480
<v Speaker 1>and so produce electricity using that natural gas. That electricity

0:28:25.560 --> 0:28:29.840
<v Speaker 1>can turn can power a bitcoin rig that is mining bitcoin,

0:28:30.359 --> 0:28:35.080
<v Speaker 1>so you're capturing it benefits the environment because flaring natural

0:28:35.080 --> 0:28:37.119
<v Speaker 1>gas is not great for the environment. It produces a

0:28:37.119 --> 0:28:39.720
<v Speaker 1>lot of pollution, a lot of CO two. If you

0:28:39.800 --> 0:28:41.560
<v Speaker 1>capture it and put it in a generator, it's much

0:28:41.600 --> 0:28:46.400
<v Speaker 1>better for the environment. You generate bitcoin, you it makes

0:28:46.520 --> 0:28:49.640
<v Speaker 1>instead of economic waste, it makes it an economic profit.

0:28:50.680 --> 0:28:54.479
<v Speaker 1>And if you have that rig connected to the grid,

0:28:55.520 --> 0:28:59.080
<v Speaker 1>what it provides is a real opportunity for resiliency because

0:28:59.120 --> 0:29:03.680
<v Speaker 1>those rigs can be switched on or off in one

0:29:03.800 --> 0:29:06.400
<v Speaker 1>one hundredth of a second. So if you have let's

0:29:06.440 --> 0:29:09.040
<v Speaker 1>say you have a weather disaster, whether it's a hurricane

0:29:09.120 --> 0:29:12.160
<v Speaker 1>or a tornado or another freeze, and suddenly the grid

0:29:12.680 --> 0:29:15.240
<v Speaker 1>there's a shortage of electricity and the price for electricity

0:29:15.280 --> 0:29:18.200
<v Speaker 1>shoots up. Well, if suddenly the price on the grid

0:29:18.200 --> 0:29:21.680
<v Speaker 1>for electricity is higher than the value that would be

0:29:21.720 --> 0:29:25.120
<v Speaker 1>generated mining bitcoin, in a hundredth of a second, they

0:29:25.120 --> 0:29:27.800
<v Speaker 1>can stop the mining of the bitcoin and put that

0:29:27.960 --> 0:29:32.160
<v Speaker 1>electricity instead onto the grid. So one way to think

0:29:32.200 --> 0:29:35.240
<v Speaker 1>about bitcoin and cryptomning is it's like a battery. It's

0:29:35.240 --> 0:29:40.480
<v Speaker 1>a way of producing excess electricity that can be diverted

0:29:40.480 --> 0:29:43.720
<v Speaker 1>back into the grid to meet critical needs in a

0:29:43.760 --> 0:29:47.480
<v Speaker 1>time of emergency, so it can enhance resiliency of the grid.

0:29:47.960 --> 0:29:50.040
<v Speaker 1>You know, my answer was just going to be hamsters

0:29:50.040 --> 0:29:52.880
<v Speaker 1>on wheels. So that that's much more interesting, Senator. And

0:29:53.040 --> 0:29:57.960
<v Speaker 1>that's that's gosh, And especially now, I just recently went

0:29:57.960 --> 0:30:01.000
<v Speaker 1>out and bought a crip do coin. I had not

0:30:01.360 --> 0:30:03.720
<v Speaker 1>really invested in crypto at all. I don't know anything

0:30:03.720 --> 0:30:06.920
<v Speaker 1>about crypto or really anything about investing. So I wanted

0:30:06.960 --> 0:30:09.200
<v Speaker 1>to do it. And I found a coin that was

0:30:09.280 --> 0:30:12.160
<v Speaker 1>kind of mean about Joe Biden, and I bought about

0:30:12.160 --> 0:30:14.040
<v Speaker 1>a billion of them. So I am a billionaire. I

0:30:14.040 --> 0:30:16.000
<v Speaker 1>don't want you to treat me any differently now, but

0:30:16.120 --> 0:30:18.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm very excited for this future episode where I will

0:30:18.800 --> 0:30:22.040
<v Speaker 1>get to learn about the thing that I just invested in,

0:30:22.560 --> 0:30:25.280
<v Speaker 1>because it sounds like there's a whole lot of possibility there.

0:30:25.800 --> 0:30:27.760
<v Speaker 1>So I'm very excited about it. But we'll have to

0:30:27.760 --> 0:30:31.520
<v Speaker 1>hold it until then. Thank you, Liz. All Right, anybody

0:30:31.520 --> 0:30:34.400
<v Speaker 1>who wants to ask a question for next week's episode

0:30:34.440 --> 0:30:36.920
<v Speaker 1>going over to Verdict with Tedcruise dot com slash plus.

0:30:37.240 --> 0:30:39.600
<v Speaker 1>If you are a subscriber on Verdict Plus, you two

0:30:39.680 --> 0:30:42.440
<v Speaker 1>can ask a question to Michael Noles, Senator Cruise, or

0:30:42.720 --> 0:30:45.680
<v Speaker 1>to me. That is Verdict with Ted Cruise dot Com

0:30:45.720 --> 0:30:50.360
<v Speaker 1>slash plus. If you love watching Verdict, if you love

0:30:50.400 --> 0:30:53.040
<v Speaker 1>writing into the show, if you potentially love having us

0:30:53.040 --> 0:30:56.240
<v Speaker 1>to your college campus, you gotta get the merch you

0:30:56.440 --> 0:30:59.640
<v Speaker 1>gotta and you can do that now at Verdict with

0:31:00.080 --> 0:31:03.800
<v Speaker 1>Cruise dot com slash shop. That's right, Verdict With Ted

0:31:03.840 --> 0:31:06.600
<v Speaker 1>Cruise dot com slash Shop, you can get all of

0:31:06.640 --> 0:31:09.400
<v Speaker 1>the great merch. Not a lot with my face, not

0:31:09.520 --> 0:31:12.600
<v Speaker 1>a lot with Senator Cruz's face, a lot of cactus.

0:31:13.240 --> 0:31:15.920
<v Speaker 1>Why the producers made that choice, I don't know, and

0:31:15.960 --> 0:31:17.680
<v Speaker 1>I won't be offended by it, but you can get

0:31:17.680 --> 0:31:20.240
<v Speaker 1>your merch today. Head on over to Verdict with Ted

0:31:20.280 --> 0:31:24.000
<v Speaker 1>Cruise dot com slash shop. In the meantime, I'm Michael Knowles.

0:31:24.000 --> 0:31:25.920
<v Speaker 1>This is Verdict with Ted Cruz. We'll see you next time.

0:31:34.880 --> 0:31:37.840
<v Speaker 1>This episode of Verdict with Ted Cruz is being brought

0:31:37.920 --> 0:31:41.080
<v Speaker 1>to you by Jobs, Freedom and Security Pack, a political

0:31:41.120 --> 0:31:46.080
<v Speaker 1>action committee dedicated to supporting conservative causes, organizations, and candidates

0:31:46.080 --> 0:31:49.400
<v Speaker 1>across the country. In twenty twenty two, Jobs, Freedom and

0:31:49.440 --> 0:31:52.920
<v Speaker 1>Security Pack plans to donate to conservative candidates running for

0:31:53.000 --> 0:31:56.320
<v Speaker 1>Congress and help the Republican Party across the nation.