1 00:00:02,920 --> 00:00:10,600 Speaker 1: Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. You're listening to the 2 00:00:10,640 --> 00:00:14,560 Speaker 1: Bloomberg Balance of Power podcast. Catch Just Live weekdays at 3 00:00:14,560 --> 00:00:18,480 Speaker 1: noon Eastern on Applecarplay and Enrounoo with the Bloomberg Business app. 4 00:00:18,560 --> 00:00:21,720 Speaker 1: Listen on demand wherever you get your podcasts, or watch 5 00:00:21,800 --> 00:00:25,320 Speaker 1: us live on YouTube. 6 00:00:25,720 --> 00:00:29,040 Speaker 2: Cogress woman, when more about the democrat from Wisconsin is 7 00:00:29,120 --> 00:00:31,200 Speaker 2: with us right now? Congresswoman, it's great to see you 8 00:00:31,280 --> 00:00:33,319 Speaker 2: before we move on to some other issues, Welcome back 9 00:00:33,320 --> 00:00:37,040 Speaker 2: to Bloomberg Hearing. Wes Moore talk prompts a number of 10 00:00:37,159 --> 00:00:40,440 Speaker 2: questions about this effort. We've had some lawmakers suggest that 11 00:00:41,080 --> 00:00:44,000 Speaker 2: a funding bill, or at least a commitment to fund 12 00:00:44,080 --> 00:00:48,199 Speaker 2: rebuilding that bridge, could be attached to a Ukraine funding 13 00:00:48,240 --> 00:00:50,919 Speaker 2: bill that the House could act on soon. Would that 14 00:00:50,960 --> 00:00:54,480 Speaker 2: be an appropriate vehicle to cover the cost of this 15 00:00:54,560 --> 00:00:55,720 Speaker 2: bridge in Baltimore. 16 00:00:57,600 --> 00:00:59,200 Speaker 3: I have to just tell you that I don't know. 17 00:00:59,320 --> 00:01:02,319 Speaker 3: I have not heard that proposal. I do know that 18 00:01:02,760 --> 00:01:06,800 Speaker 3: getting funding to Ukraine is a heavy lift all by itself, 19 00:01:07,240 --> 00:01:10,640 Speaker 3: and so perhaps the thinking is that the extent to 20 00:01:10,680 --> 00:01:13,600 Speaker 3: which we're able to do that heavy lift, maybe it 21 00:01:13,680 --> 00:01:17,920 Speaker 3: could just live on to that. I hadn't heard that strategy. 22 00:01:19,000 --> 00:01:24,600 Speaker 3: But I do think that the Baltimore Bridge really has 23 00:01:24,640 --> 00:01:30,760 Speaker 3: an impact on not only local passenger traffic, but commerce, 24 00:01:31,440 --> 00:01:33,399 Speaker 3: and so I know that it should be it is 25 00:01:33,440 --> 00:01:34,480 Speaker 3: a very high priority. 26 00:01:37,040 --> 00:01:40,399 Speaker 4: Well, Congresswoman, you just described Ukraine Aid as a very 27 00:01:40,520 --> 00:01:43,760 Speaker 4: heavy lift. We heard yesterday from some members on the 28 00:01:43,800 --> 00:01:46,759 Speaker 4: Republican side that that could be voted on next week, 29 00:01:46,840 --> 00:01:50,400 Speaker 4: but we also saw yesterday a rule failing again on 30 00:01:50,520 --> 00:01:53,160 Speaker 4: the House floor. How confident are you not just that 31 00:01:53,240 --> 00:01:56,000 Speaker 4: this could be brought to the floor, but go anywhere 32 00:01:56,040 --> 00:01:57,880 Speaker 4: at all. 33 00:01:57,880 --> 00:02:00,000 Speaker 5: Please can't do it. 34 00:02:00,040 --> 00:02:02,720 Speaker 3: Ask me for confidence, because I don't have the confidence 35 00:02:02,720 --> 00:02:06,200 Speaker 3: about anything that can happen in the House of Representatives. 36 00:02:06,440 --> 00:02:08,360 Speaker 5: The margins are very very narrow. 37 00:02:08,720 --> 00:02:11,400 Speaker 3: I do know that there is a lot of support 38 00:02:11,440 --> 00:02:18,600 Speaker 3: for Ukraine in both caucuses and especially among Democrats. We 39 00:02:18,720 --> 00:02:22,040 Speaker 3: do have a very lively caucus I think, headed up 40 00:02:22,040 --> 00:02:25,800 Speaker 3: by Marjorie Taylor Green that is against Ukraine Aid, and 41 00:02:25,840 --> 00:02:29,240 Speaker 3: if it comes to the floor, it will pass. So 42 00:02:29,560 --> 00:02:31,560 Speaker 3: if a Republican has told you that we could be 43 00:02:31,639 --> 00:02:35,560 Speaker 3: voting on it in a few weeks, I am sure 44 00:02:36,080 --> 00:02:40,760 Speaker 3: that they have assessed and evaluated the. 45 00:02:40,760 --> 00:02:43,120 Speaker 5: Democratic support that may or may not be there. 46 00:02:43,520 --> 00:02:46,920 Speaker 3: Now They may bring it up on suspension, in which 47 00:02:47,000 --> 00:02:51,440 Speaker 3: case that they could bypass the Rules Committee and they 48 00:02:51,480 --> 00:02:55,000 Speaker 3: won't have to rely on Democratic votes to pass their rule. 49 00:02:55,560 --> 00:02:58,480 Speaker 3: Weis that came under a rule, so if it comes 50 00:02:58,560 --> 00:03:01,640 Speaker 3: under suspension, they must have assessed. 51 00:03:01,160 --> 00:03:03,880 Speaker 5: That the votes were two thirds of the House would. 52 00:03:03,720 --> 00:03:06,799 Speaker 3: Vote for it for it to come under under suspension 53 00:03:06,840 --> 00:03:07,239 Speaker 3: of the room. 54 00:03:09,120 --> 00:03:12,480 Speaker 2: Speaking of that rule failing, we spoke with your colleague 55 00:03:12,520 --> 00:03:15,440 Speaker 2: French Hill, the Republican from Arkansas, I was a champion 56 00:03:15,480 --> 00:03:19,360 Speaker 2: of renewing FIZA. He spoke with us shortly after that 57 00:03:19,480 --> 00:03:23,320 Speaker 2: happened here on Bloomberg's TV and radio and expressed his 58 00:03:23,400 --> 00:03:24,480 Speaker 2: extreme disappointment. 59 00:03:24,480 --> 00:03:26,680 Speaker 6: Here's what he told us. Congresswoman, we'll have you respond. 60 00:03:26,720 --> 00:03:27,200 Speaker 6: Let's listen. 61 00:03:27,840 --> 00:03:31,840 Speaker 7: It's very frustrating today. This bill was important, a renewing 62 00:03:31,919 --> 00:03:36,640 Speaker 7: seven zero two authority which allows us to monitor communications 63 00:03:36,640 --> 00:03:40,800 Speaker 7: from our adversaries outside of the United States, not American citizens. 64 00:03:40,800 --> 00:03:42,080 Speaker 8: Not American citizens. 65 00:03:42,600 --> 00:03:46,200 Speaker 7: It is non negotiable that has to be renewed before 66 00:03:46,280 --> 00:03:48,600 Speaker 7: April nineteenth. 67 00:03:49,160 --> 00:03:51,840 Speaker 2: Congresswoman, as a progressive Democrat, do you want to see 68 00:03:51,840 --> 00:03:54,840 Speaker 2: FIST renewed in its current form? Should a warrant be 69 00:03:54,920 --> 00:03:57,600 Speaker 2: required if an American is involved in data collection. 70 00:03:59,120 --> 00:04:02,560 Speaker 3: Well, just let me say that the bill that came 71 00:04:02,640 --> 00:04:06,360 Speaker 3: to the floor that would have been come had we 72 00:04:06,440 --> 00:04:09,520 Speaker 3: passed the rule, did have some reforms in it, so 73 00:04:09,560 --> 00:04:12,400 Speaker 3: we are at risk of not having those reforms in 74 00:04:12,440 --> 00:04:17,200 Speaker 3: it to protect American citizens. I think the Republicans listened 75 00:04:17,240 --> 00:04:21,279 Speaker 3: to Donald Trump, who had a bone to pick with FISA, 76 00:04:21,880 --> 00:04:26,440 Speaker 3: since you know he and you know his comrades were 77 00:04:26,520 --> 00:04:34,000 Speaker 3: engaged in in conversations inappropriately with Russia were caught up 78 00:04:34,040 --> 00:04:36,760 Speaker 3: in the in the visa warrants. So I think that 79 00:04:37,120 --> 00:04:40,960 Speaker 3: you know that he has personalized this and not looked 80 00:04:41,000 --> 00:04:46,040 Speaker 3: at the broader the need to make sure that our 81 00:04:46,040 --> 00:04:51,520 Speaker 3: country is protected by our adversaries overseas. There were reforms 82 00:04:51,240 --> 00:04:53,880 Speaker 3: that that I agreed with, and perhaps we won't see 83 00:04:53,920 --> 00:04:56,720 Speaker 3: those reforms if they have to come up with a 84 00:04:57,120 --> 00:04:58,240 Speaker 3: near renewal. 85 00:04:59,760 --> 00:05:03,159 Speaker 4: Well, Congresswoman. As you bring up former President Donald Trump, 86 00:05:03,160 --> 00:05:05,600 Speaker 4: it's worth noting that the House Speaker, Mike Johnson will 87 00:05:05,640 --> 00:05:08,680 Speaker 4: be alongside him tomorrow in a news conference at mar 88 00:05:08,720 --> 00:05:12,159 Speaker 4: A Lago in Florida. Especially given all of the murmurs 89 00:05:12,200 --> 00:05:15,800 Speaker 4: we have heard about potentially Democrats such as yourself stepping 90 00:05:15,880 --> 00:05:18,760 Speaker 4: in to save the speaker should Marjorie Taylor Green actually 91 00:05:18,800 --> 00:05:21,440 Speaker 4: move on a motion to vacate the chair, does his 92 00:05:21,560 --> 00:05:26,040 Speaker 4: closeness with the former president change the calculation for Democrats? 93 00:05:26,040 --> 00:05:28,680 Speaker 4: What do you think about whether you would ever cast 94 00:05:28,720 --> 00:05:30,599 Speaker 4: a vote or just not vote at all to help 95 00:05:30,640 --> 00:05:31,320 Speaker 4: save the speaker? 96 00:05:32,920 --> 00:05:35,240 Speaker 3: Well, I can tell you does a person who's sick 97 00:05:35,279 --> 00:05:44,800 Speaker 3: and tired of the impeachments and censorships and punishments. I 98 00:05:44,800 --> 00:05:47,280 Speaker 3: can say that I'm very disappointed that he's going down 99 00:05:47,320 --> 00:05:51,640 Speaker 3: there to kiss the ring on so called election integrity, 100 00:05:52,839 --> 00:05:59,720 Speaker 3: which is another Trump groups for I gotta be elected. 101 00:06:00,440 --> 00:06:02,720 Speaker 5: I'm gonna do January sixth all over again. 102 00:06:02,760 --> 00:06:08,000 Speaker 3: I'm very disappointed that the Speaker shows the path of 103 00:06:08,240 --> 00:06:11,640 Speaker 3: going down to kiss the ring as opposed to just 104 00:06:11,720 --> 00:06:18,799 Speaker 3: working with the Democrats on avoiding the Marjorie Taylor Green 105 00:06:18,920 --> 00:06:20,680 Speaker 3: initiative to expel him. 106 00:06:21,440 --> 00:06:23,680 Speaker 5: She wants to expel him because. 107 00:06:23,400 --> 00:06:26,840 Speaker 3: He cooperated with Democrats to keep the government from shutting down, 108 00:06:27,440 --> 00:06:30,200 Speaker 3: and now if he were to bring the Ukraine Bill 109 00:06:30,320 --> 00:06:33,720 Speaker 3: to the floor, she has threatened to do that. I 110 00:06:33,800 --> 00:06:38,800 Speaker 3: hate to see the Grand Old Party now becoming the 111 00:06:38,839 --> 00:06:39,719 Speaker 3: Party of Putin. 112 00:06:42,360 --> 00:06:46,719 Speaker 2: Well, with that said, Mike Johnson isn't exactly the he's 113 00:06:46,720 --> 00:06:51,080 Speaker 2: not exactly the normal kind of partygoer at mar A Lago. Congresswoman, 114 00:06:51,160 --> 00:06:53,560 Speaker 2: what advice would you give the Speaker before he flies 115 00:06:53,600 --> 00:06:54,320 Speaker 2: to Palm Beach. 116 00:06:55,600 --> 00:06:58,960 Speaker 3: Well, you know, bipartisanship is the only game in town, 117 00:07:00,080 --> 00:07:03,080 Speaker 3: and he should lean into it and go down in history, 118 00:07:03,680 --> 00:07:07,520 Speaker 3: you know, as a speaker that's saved the one hundred 119 00:07:07,600 --> 00:07:12,880 Speaker 3: and eighty the Congress from being the worst Congress in history. 120 00:07:14,440 --> 00:07:16,680 Speaker 4: Well, and you mentioned, Congresswoman, the idea that he may 121 00:07:16,680 --> 00:07:18,840 Speaker 4: be in hot water with his own party because he 122 00:07:18,880 --> 00:07:22,720 Speaker 4: worked with yours to keep the government funding funded. If 123 00:07:22,800 --> 00:07:25,160 Speaker 4: he were to work with Democrats in the House as 124 00:07:25,160 --> 00:07:28,360 Speaker 4: well to make sure that Ukraine got funding, do you 125 00:07:28,440 --> 00:07:31,560 Speaker 4: think it is likely that his speakership would remain intact 126 00:07:31,640 --> 00:07:34,200 Speaker 4: due to democratic action. Have you heard anything from Hakim 127 00:07:34,280 --> 00:07:35,480 Speaker 4: Jeffries about that idea. 128 00:07:36,480 --> 00:07:38,920 Speaker 5: Well, the person to hear from is Mike Johnson. 129 00:07:38,960 --> 00:07:42,240 Speaker 3: Instead of flying down to Florida, why doesn't he walk 130 00:07:42,280 --> 00:07:45,160 Speaker 3: across the hall and talk to Hakim Jefferies. 131 00:07:45,240 --> 00:07:47,680 Speaker 5: I just think that it's you know, it's less. 132 00:07:47,400 --> 00:07:51,840 Speaker 3: Time consuming and less expensive, and it's more integrity saving 133 00:07:51,920 --> 00:07:52,480 Speaker 3: to do that. 134 00:07:54,800 --> 00:07:58,320 Speaker 2: Congress Woman, when more with a sum Bloomberg TV and Radio. Lastly, Congresswoman, 135 00:07:58,360 --> 00:08:01,000 Speaker 2: I'm struck by a new poll from the d Triple C, 136 00:08:01,560 --> 00:08:04,960 Speaker 2: of course, tasked with electing Democrats to the House. A 137 00:08:05,000 --> 00:08:07,640 Speaker 2: poll of more than a thousand likely voters in more 138 00:08:07,720 --> 00:08:11,320 Speaker 2: than sixty competitive House battleground districts. They found two issues 139 00:08:11,360 --> 00:08:16,680 Speaker 2: were deal breakers, immigration and abortion. Thirty six percent of 140 00:08:16,760 --> 00:08:19,120 Speaker 2: voters say they cannot support a candidate who disagreed with 141 00:08:19,200 --> 00:08:21,760 Speaker 2: them on abortion, and I think we can agree that 142 00:08:21,760 --> 00:08:24,560 Speaker 2: that's been helping Democrats. Thirty three percent as well said 143 00:08:24,560 --> 00:08:27,160 Speaker 2: the same for immigration. With that in mind, do you 144 00:08:27,240 --> 00:08:30,400 Speaker 2: support President Biden acting on his own through executive order 145 00:08:30,800 --> 00:08:35,120 Speaker 2: to manage the flow of illegal immigrants crossing our southwestern border? 146 00:08:36,040 --> 00:08:38,360 Speaker 3: You know, I just want to point something out. There 147 00:08:38,400 --> 00:08:41,680 Speaker 3: was a lot going on January twentieth, twenty twenty one. 148 00:08:42,080 --> 00:08:45,760 Speaker 3: We had just two weeks earlier, had January sixth insurrection, 149 00:08:46,440 --> 00:08:51,720 Speaker 3: So people don't remember that Day one of the Biden administration, 150 00:08:51,960 --> 00:08:58,080 Speaker 3: he introduced immigration reform legislation. People don't remember. 151 00:08:58,200 --> 00:08:58,920 Speaker 6: Should you do more? 152 00:08:59,640 --> 00:09:01,480 Speaker 5: Just check the facts. 153 00:09:01,960 --> 00:09:06,840 Speaker 3: And then the Republicans put forth a border bill that 154 00:09:06,920 --> 00:09:14,640 Speaker 3: the border protection lobby supported, and Donald Trump told Republicans 155 00:09:14,720 --> 00:09:17,920 Speaker 3: not to bring it forth because he wants to run 156 00:09:18,040 --> 00:09:21,119 Speaker 3: on this broken immigration system. 157 00:09:21,240 --> 00:09:22,360 Speaker 5: I want to remind people. 158 00:09:22,400 --> 00:09:27,000 Speaker 3: I mean, so, the broken borders and immigration is a 159 00:09:27,600 --> 00:09:31,360 Speaker 3: gift that keeps on giving to Donald Trump, who wants 160 00:09:31,400 --> 00:09:37,080 Speaker 3: to run a gift President Biden on that. But I 161 00:09:37,200 --> 00:09:41,000 Speaker 3: want people to know that President Biden, from day one 162 00:09:41,280 --> 00:09:44,280 Speaker 3: of his administration has tried to fix immigration. 163 00:09:45,880 --> 00:09:48,920 Speaker 4: All right, Congresswoman Gwen Moore at the Democrat from Wisconsin, 164 00:09:48,960 --> 00:09:51,240 Speaker 4: thank you so much for joining us today on Balance 165 00:09:51,240 --> 00:09:51,640 Speaker 4: of Power. 166 00:09:54,880 --> 00:09:58,280 Speaker 1: You're listening to the Bloomberg Balance of Power podcast kens 167 00:09:58,400 --> 00:10:01,280 Speaker 1: just live weekdays at Noone's You're An on Applecarplay and 168 00:10:01,280 --> 00:10:04,120 Speaker 1: then Roudoo with a Bloomberg business ad. You can also 169 00:10:04,160 --> 00:10:07,679 Speaker 1: listen live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station, 170 00:10:08,040 --> 00:10:11,040 Speaker 1: Just Say Alexa play Bloomberg eleven thirty. 171 00:10:13,320 --> 00:10:16,360 Speaker 2: Live from Washington alongside Kaylee Lines. It's the fastest show 172 00:10:16,360 --> 00:10:20,240 Speaker 2: in politics, with big questions about funding for Ukraine even 173 00:10:20,240 --> 00:10:24,199 Speaker 2: as we see some very difficult headlines emerge from Ukraine. Kayleie, 174 00:10:24,200 --> 00:10:27,040 Speaker 2: we were talking about this earlier, the missile barrage again 175 00:10:27,160 --> 00:10:30,400 Speaker 2: against a Kiev that knocked out the biggest power plant 176 00:10:30,400 --> 00:10:32,679 Speaker 2: in that area, and now an emergency meeting by the 177 00:10:32,800 --> 00:10:36,240 Speaker 2: UN's Atomic Watchdog on what might happen to Zaparijia. You 178 00:10:36,240 --> 00:10:38,839 Speaker 2: could go back a year and tell these same kinds 179 00:10:38,880 --> 00:10:43,440 Speaker 2: of stories. Yet the concern about funding is a real one. 180 00:10:43,480 --> 00:10:44,880 Speaker 2: As the Speaker of the House heads to mar A 181 00:10:44,960 --> 00:10:46,959 Speaker 2: Lago this weekend, and we know how Donald Trump feels 182 00:10:46,960 --> 00:10:47,360 Speaker 2: about that. 183 00:10:47,760 --> 00:10:50,240 Speaker 4: Yeah, it's still a major question what action the US 184 00:10:50,280 --> 00:10:53,040 Speaker 4: Congress may take, and frankly, how quickly an actual vote 185 00:10:53,040 --> 00:10:56,800 Speaker 4: on providing additional military assistance Ukraine could actually transmit to 186 00:10:56,880 --> 00:10:59,360 Speaker 4: Ukraine getting the assistance it needs to fend off missile 187 00:10:59,360 --> 00:11:01,360 Speaker 4: attacks like the one we saw. And this is where 188 00:11:01,360 --> 00:11:04,080 Speaker 4: we begin with General Mark kim At, the retired brigadier 189 00:11:04,080 --> 00:11:05,920 Speaker 4: general in the US Army who was joining us here 190 00:11:05,920 --> 00:11:08,600 Speaker 4: in our Washington d C studios. So, general, as we 191 00:11:09,360 --> 00:11:13,800 Speaker 4: see once again Russia arguably weaponizing energy, we hear President 192 00:11:13,920 --> 00:11:17,480 Speaker 4: vladimir's Alynsky during a visit to Lithuania saying that air 193 00:11:17,520 --> 00:11:20,960 Speaker 4: defense is the biggest challenge that they have. How quickly 194 00:11:21,000 --> 00:11:23,440 Speaker 4: could the US, even if it decided it wanted to 195 00:11:23,880 --> 00:11:25,880 Speaker 4: help Ukraine in that regard. 196 00:11:25,920 --> 00:11:30,320 Speaker 9: Well air defense capabilities, there is a significant amount in 197 00:11:30,360 --> 00:11:33,640 Speaker 9: the inventory that could get over there pretty quickly. Where 198 00:11:33,760 --> 00:11:37,800 Speaker 9: we are having problems is in manufacturing artillery rounds. 199 00:11:37,840 --> 00:11:39,240 Speaker 6: That's where there's a shortage. 200 00:11:40,520 --> 00:11:43,439 Speaker 9: They would draw down from existing stocks, perhaps take them 201 00:11:43,480 --> 00:11:47,200 Speaker 9: from other theaters. But that's one of those systems that 202 00:11:47,280 --> 00:11:49,040 Speaker 9: I think if we can get it over there. I 203 00:11:49,080 --> 00:11:51,400 Speaker 9: haven't seen the list. I didn't see a large amount 204 00:11:51,480 --> 00:11:55,720 Speaker 9: of air defense weapons on there in a few snippets 205 00:11:55,800 --> 00:11:58,439 Speaker 9: that have been shared with me, but I think that's 206 00:11:58,440 --> 00:11:59,920 Speaker 9: something that they could get over quite quickly. 207 00:12:00,360 --> 00:12:02,880 Speaker 2: This is a Pentagon spending a lot of plates right now, 208 00:12:02,960 --> 00:12:05,920 Speaker 2: and if you believe reporting, there is an imminent strike 209 00:12:06,160 --> 00:12:10,480 Speaker 2: that we're preparing for either by Iran or Iranian proxies 210 00:12:10,840 --> 00:12:15,000 Speaker 2: against Israel following the Israeli strike against the Iranian embassy 211 00:12:15,040 --> 00:12:19,720 Speaker 2: in Damascus. To what extent can we model the possibilities here? 212 00:12:19,760 --> 00:12:22,560 Speaker 2: What are they talking about today behind closed doors at 213 00:12:22,559 --> 00:12:23,080 Speaker 2: the Pentagon? 214 00:12:23,440 --> 00:12:26,280 Speaker 9: Yeah, I think the options for the Iranians would be 215 00:12:26,280 --> 00:12:30,880 Speaker 9: a direct strike on Israel from Iranian territorial units. 216 00:12:31,360 --> 00:12:32,559 Speaker 6: I think that is significant. 217 00:12:32,559 --> 00:12:35,240 Speaker 9: That would be significant, and that could very well draw 218 00:12:35,280 --> 00:12:38,679 Speaker 9: the United States in, because President Biden has told Prime 219 00:12:38,679 --> 00:12:40,240 Speaker 9: Minister Netnyahu. 220 00:12:39,720 --> 00:12:40,400 Speaker 6: That he would help. 221 00:12:41,760 --> 00:12:45,640 Speaker 9: But this would sound more like an instance where the 222 00:12:45,720 --> 00:12:47,840 Speaker 9: Iranians would work through their proxies. 223 00:12:48,160 --> 00:12:48,959 Speaker 6: If you go over the. 224 00:12:50,640 --> 00:12:53,880 Speaker 9: Annual report given by the State Department on State Sponsors 225 00:12:53,880 --> 00:12:58,800 Speaker 9: of Terrorism, the lines drawn in there about Iran and 226 00:12:58,840 --> 00:13:03,079 Speaker 9: their terrorist activities are enormous. So it would be likely 227 00:13:03,360 --> 00:13:06,400 Speaker 9: that perhaps not in the Middle East, but Iran could 228 00:13:06,440 --> 00:13:09,040 Speaker 9: in fact go after an Iranian go after an Israeli 229 00:13:09,080 --> 00:13:13,199 Speaker 9: embassy somewhere in South America that would take their fingerprints 230 00:13:13,200 --> 00:13:15,319 Speaker 9: on it, off of it if they use a group 231 00:13:15,400 --> 00:13:20,000 Speaker 9: like Hezbola, and there wouldn't. 232 00:13:19,679 --> 00:13:20,560 Speaker 6: Be direct attribution. 233 00:13:20,640 --> 00:13:24,599 Speaker 9: As you remember, Iran sent an agent into Washington, d C. 234 00:13:24,760 --> 00:13:29,200 Speaker 9: To try to assassinate dua ambassador, so I would expect 235 00:13:29,200 --> 00:13:30,280 Speaker 9: something like that to happen. 236 00:13:30,440 --> 00:13:33,000 Speaker 4: Well, we heard the take from Senator Marco Rubi, or 237 00:13:33,080 --> 00:13:34,960 Speaker 4: at least we could read it on x where he 238 00:13:35,000 --> 00:13:37,600 Speaker 4: posted this morning, Iran wants to launch a large scale 239 00:13:37,640 --> 00:13:41,920 Speaker 4: attack from their own territory against Israel respond instantly with 240 00:13:41,960 --> 00:13:45,400 Speaker 4: an even more severe counterattack inside of Iran. What happens 241 00:13:45,400 --> 00:13:48,800 Speaker 4: next is the most dangerous Middle East moment since nineteen 242 00:13:48,920 --> 00:13:49,640 Speaker 4: seventy three. 243 00:13:50,400 --> 00:13:53,600 Speaker 9: You think, I think it's exactly right if that was 244 00:13:54,040 --> 00:13:56,719 Speaker 9: what the Iranians were to do. I laid that out 245 00:13:56,760 --> 00:13:58,520 Speaker 9: as an option, but I think it's a very low 246 00:13:58,600 --> 00:14:02,959 Speaker 9: probability to that having happening, because Ron has enough problems 247 00:14:03,000 --> 00:14:06,280 Speaker 9: of its own right now, internal descent, huge amount of 248 00:14:06,320 --> 00:14:12,280 Speaker 9: inflation shortages that would almost be apocalyptic, if not suicidal. 249 00:14:12,840 --> 00:14:15,640 Speaker 2: So it comes through a proxy group, then most likely 250 00:14:15,679 --> 00:14:18,920 Speaker 2: we've already got a carrier group in the region to 251 00:14:19,040 --> 00:14:21,720 Speaker 2: deal with that. Is that how it ends, or would 252 00:14:21,720 --> 00:14:25,160 Speaker 2: we have to send additional resources to manage an attack 253 00:14:25,280 --> 00:14:25,800 Speaker 2: of that sort. 254 00:14:26,200 --> 00:14:29,760 Speaker 9: Well, if a proxy group goes after an Israeli embassy 255 00:14:29,800 --> 00:14:34,280 Speaker 9: in South America or in Western Asia, I don't think 256 00:14:34,320 --> 00:14:36,520 Speaker 9: that that carrier is going to do a lot of good. 257 00:14:36,760 --> 00:14:38,000 Speaker 6: How about if it stays in the region. 258 00:14:38,040 --> 00:14:40,600 Speaker 9: However, if it stays in the region, I think it 259 00:14:40,640 --> 00:14:44,440 Speaker 9: would depend on the severity the attack, whether it was 260 00:14:44,480 --> 00:14:47,200 Speaker 9: against US assets in the region. As you remember, when 261 00:14:47,240 --> 00:14:52,280 Speaker 9: we targeted Costumsulamani, the response from the Iranians was in 262 00:14:52,320 --> 00:14:57,400 Speaker 9: fact an attack from Iranian territorial units, but it was 263 00:14:57,440 --> 00:15:01,400 Speaker 9: a fairly soft attack on a U space that created 264 00:15:01,560 --> 00:15:07,880 Speaker 9: a number of soldiers getting PTSD and their bells rung essentially, 265 00:15:08,440 --> 00:15:10,520 Speaker 9: but it wasn't much more than that. 266 00:15:11,200 --> 00:15:14,680 Speaker 4: Of course, against the backdrop to all of this is 267 00:15:14,720 --> 00:15:18,120 Speaker 4: the ongoing war between Israel and Tamas, and a lot 268 00:15:18,160 --> 00:15:21,120 Speaker 4: of questions around how the US policy in regard to 269 00:15:21,160 --> 00:15:23,440 Speaker 4: that may be changing. As we hear from the Biden administration. 270 00:15:23,480 --> 00:15:24,880 Speaker 4: If they don't see the changes they would like to 271 00:15:24,880 --> 00:15:28,000 Speaker 4: see from Israel, US policy might change. There's been talk 272 00:15:28,080 --> 00:15:31,800 Speaker 4: about conditioning aid. Can the US do anything like that? 273 00:15:31,960 --> 00:15:35,000 Speaker 4: Knowing that this threat against Israel, not just from Hamas 274 00:15:35,000 --> 00:15:37,800 Speaker 4: but from other Iranian proxies or iron itself, seems so 275 00:15:38,400 --> 00:15:39,240 Speaker 4: real right now. 276 00:15:39,440 --> 00:15:42,000 Speaker 9: I think there's a policy issue and there's a political issue. 277 00:15:42,040 --> 00:15:44,400 Speaker 9: I won't go into the political issue because it would 278 00:15:44,400 --> 00:15:47,680 Speaker 9: appear that President Biden is trying to walk the fine 279 00:15:47,720 --> 00:15:51,080 Speaker 9: line between support for Israel and also support for these 280 00:15:51,240 --> 00:15:53,880 Speaker 9: Lama communities here in the United States. 281 00:15:54,320 --> 00:15:54,880 Speaker 6: But on a. 282 00:15:54,760 --> 00:15:57,200 Speaker 9: Policy issue, we already have the laws. We have laws 283 00:15:57,240 --> 00:16:00,640 Speaker 9: such as the Lehi Law, which prevents the Americans from 284 00:16:00,680 --> 00:16:06,240 Speaker 9: giving equipment to foreign countries if they're verifiable human rights violations. 285 00:16:06,400 --> 00:16:09,200 Speaker 9: So I would simply say that if the president uses 286 00:16:09,240 --> 00:16:11,240 Speaker 9: the laws in the book, he has a tremendous way 287 00:16:11,280 --> 00:16:14,240 Speaker 9: to hold up that support to Israel. 288 00:16:14,360 --> 00:16:15,280 Speaker 6: I don't think he will. 289 00:16:15,360 --> 00:16:18,920 Speaker 2: What will happen in Rafa if the idea I actually 290 00:16:19,040 --> 00:16:22,040 Speaker 2: rolls in. We hear there's a date that's according to Benjaminttinya, 291 00:16:22,040 --> 00:16:24,240 Speaker 2: who I know that the administration is trying to prevent 292 00:16:24,320 --> 00:16:27,640 Speaker 2: this from happening, but surely they have plans as well. 293 00:16:27,640 --> 00:16:29,240 Speaker 6: If they're executed, what does it look like? 294 00:16:29,560 --> 00:16:29,760 Speaker 1: You know? 295 00:16:30,120 --> 00:16:32,840 Speaker 9: That's what confuses me, because it sounds like it would 296 00:16:32,880 --> 00:16:35,480 Speaker 9: be what we saw in Gaza. I don't think it 297 00:16:35,520 --> 00:16:38,680 Speaker 9: would be anything more than that, which was tragic in 298 00:16:38,720 --> 00:16:41,880 Speaker 9: and of itself. The only difference, of course, would be 299 00:16:41,960 --> 00:16:45,600 Speaker 9: somewhat of Hamas's last stand. But what I would note 300 00:16:45,800 --> 00:16:48,280 Speaker 9: is if we go through with some of these programs 301 00:16:48,360 --> 00:16:52,400 Speaker 9: to limit the amount of precision weapons given to Israel, 302 00:16:52,880 --> 00:16:56,440 Speaker 9: well they're going to use much more, much less precise 303 00:16:56,480 --> 00:16:58,960 Speaker 9: weapons and cause a whole lot more collateral damage and 304 00:16:59,000 --> 00:17:02,120 Speaker 9: death of civilians. So I think we've got to accept 305 00:17:02,200 --> 00:17:04,680 Speaker 9: that Prime Minister Netanya, who's going to do what he 306 00:17:05,119 --> 00:17:09,280 Speaker 9: thinks is best for his country and candidly listen to 307 00:17:09,359 --> 00:17:11,960 Speaker 9: the Americans when it is convenient and ignore it when 308 00:17:11,960 --> 00:17:13,120 Speaker 9: it's not convenient to him. 309 00:17:13,320 --> 00:17:15,439 Speaker 4: Well, and what we consistently hear from Netanya, who is 310 00:17:15,440 --> 00:17:18,479 Speaker 4: that victory it can only be achieved if the remaining 311 00:17:18,480 --> 00:17:21,600 Speaker 4: battalions are eliminated, and there's of course multiple Hamas battalions 312 00:17:21,640 --> 00:17:24,919 Speaker 4: still in Rafa. But I guess I question what the 313 00:17:24,920 --> 00:17:27,440 Speaker 4: idea of elimination really means if we're talking about taking 314 00:17:27,480 --> 00:17:31,240 Speaker 4: out the actual Hamas fighters or their military capabilities. But 315 00:17:31,280 --> 00:17:35,119 Speaker 4: can you defeat the Hamas ideology? And I just wonder 316 00:17:35,240 --> 00:17:39,679 Speaker 4: if how victory can even realistically be achieved in the 317 00:17:39,720 --> 00:17:40,919 Speaker 4: longer term sense. 318 00:17:40,840 --> 00:17:43,680 Speaker 9: Well in the short term sense. What he can do 319 00:17:43,880 --> 00:17:46,439 Speaker 9: in his legacy that he is trying to achieve is 320 00:17:46,480 --> 00:17:49,399 Speaker 9: he does not want to be another Israeli Prime minister 321 00:17:49,520 --> 00:17:53,399 Speaker 9: that stops the fight short and you all of a 322 00:17:53,400 --> 00:17:56,359 Speaker 9: sudden have Sinoar going up and down the streets of 323 00:17:56,400 --> 00:18:00,280 Speaker 9: Dohag declaring victory. He wants to end Hamas. He will 324 00:18:00,280 --> 00:18:03,840 Speaker 9: never end the ideology. That's a long term problem. What 325 00:18:03,920 --> 00:18:07,840 Speaker 9: he can do is forestall another attack that Hamas has 326 00:18:07,960 --> 00:18:11,040 Speaker 9: promised will happen time and time and time again. That's 327 00:18:11,080 --> 00:18:13,400 Speaker 9: why he wants to go after the infrastructure. That's why 328 00:18:13,440 --> 00:18:15,960 Speaker 9: he wants to take out Hamas fighters. 329 00:18:16,400 --> 00:18:18,399 Speaker 2: General Mark Kimmitt, great to see you back with us 330 00:18:18,400 --> 00:18:19,720 Speaker 2: here at the table at Bloomberg. 331 00:18:19,760 --> 00:18:22,399 Speaker 6: You're always welcome. We appreciate the insights, Kaylie. 332 00:18:22,440 --> 00:18:24,480 Speaker 2: There are huge questions about what's going to happen next 333 00:18:24,480 --> 00:18:30,480 Speaker 2: and whether that attack actually takes place at all. 334 00:18:31,200 --> 00:18:34,720 Speaker 1: You're listening to the Bloomberg Balance of Power podcast. Catch 335 00:18:34,800 --> 00:18:38,399 Speaker 1: Just Live weekdays at noon Eastern on Applecarplay and Enrounoo 336 00:18:38,520 --> 00:18:41,560 Speaker 1: with the Bloomberg Business app. Listen on demand wherever you 337 00:18:41,600 --> 00:18:47,280 Speaker 1: get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube in. 338 00:18:47,320 --> 00:18:49,920 Speaker 2: The Nation's capital, thanks for being with us on Bloomberg Radio, 339 00:18:50,000 --> 00:18:53,520 Speaker 2: on the satellite and on YouTube. With Congress in town, 340 00:18:53,760 --> 00:18:56,480 Speaker 2: the President is here as well, but not a lot 341 00:18:56,520 --> 00:18:58,960 Speaker 2: of news after that FISA bill was stopped in its 342 00:18:58,960 --> 00:19:01,520 Speaker 2: tracks yesterday. Couldn't even get a rule passed in the House, 343 00:19:02,119 --> 00:19:04,520 Speaker 2: making us wonder if anything can move in the House, 344 00:19:04,640 --> 00:19:08,359 Speaker 2: including Ukraine funding, which some thought might happen in the 345 00:19:08,440 --> 00:19:09,000 Speaker 2: next week. 346 00:19:09,200 --> 00:19:11,359 Speaker 6: It is feeling a lot less like it at the moment. 347 00:19:12,200 --> 00:19:15,240 Speaker 2: As Speaker Mike Johnson prepares to make a visit to 348 00:19:15,280 --> 00:19:17,800 Speaker 2: mar A Lago in a couple of days, going to 349 00:19:17,840 --> 00:19:21,720 Speaker 2: be holding a joint news conference apparently with Donald Trump. 350 00:19:22,320 --> 00:19:25,280 Speaker 2: This could impact the agenda. We'll talk about that more ahead, 351 00:19:25,320 --> 00:19:28,880 Speaker 2: because the news from Ukraine has been very concerning over 352 00:19:28,920 --> 00:19:30,760 Speaker 2: the past twenty four hours. I think we can call 353 00:19:30,800 --> 00:19:34,880 Speaker 2: it desperate, as a UN atomic watchdog now calls an 354 00:19:34,880 --> 00:19:38,800 Speaker 2: emergency meeting in Vienna to talk about the increasing risk 355 00:19:39,359 --> 00:19:42,960 Speaker 2: of a meltdown at the nuclear power plant in Zaparisia. 356 00:19:42,960 --> 00:19:47,440 Speaker 2: And that follows Russian missile attacks knocking out the biggest 357 00:19:47,440 --> 00:19:51,719 Speaker 2: power plant in the Kiev region yesterday, taking advantage of 358 00:19:51,840 --> 00:19:54,320 Speaker 2: pockets in the air defense. And that's where we start 359 00:19:54,320 --> 00:19:58,720 Speaker 2: here with Nick Watdams, Bloomberg's, of course, National Security team leader. 360 00:19:58,720 --> 00:20:01,920 Speaker 2: He drives our coverage here from Washington and a regular 361 00:20:02,000 --> 00:20:04,159 Speaker 2: on this broadcast. It's great to see you Nick, as 362 00:20:04,200 --> 00:20:07,400 Speaker 2: we join together again to talk about some pretty tough news. 363 00:20:08,200 --> 00:20:11,199 Speaker 2: I wonder, are we going to be hearing all of 364 00:20:11,240 --> 00:20:15,000 Speaker 2: this being a cause of a lack of ammunition or 365 00:20:15,040 --> 00:20:17,280 Speaker 2: would this have happened either way with Ukraine? 366 00:20:17,480 --> 00:20:20,399 Speaker 10: Well, I mean, there is no question whether or not 367 00:20:20,440 --> 00:20:23,159 Speaker 10: you draw a direct causal link. There is no question 368 00:20:23,280 --> 00:20:25,920 Speaker 10: that Russia has been much more aggressive in the skies 369 00:20:25,920 --> 00:20:28,080 Speaker 10: over Ukraine. You had that footage a day or two 370 00:20:28,160 --> 00:20:33,040 Speaker 10: ago of Russian jets essentially flying unchallenged over Ukraine, something 371 00:20:33,040 --> 00:20:35,840 Speaker 10: that would not have happened several months ago. And we 372 00:20:35,920 --> 00:20:38,400 Speaker 10: know very clearly that Ukraine is running out of ammunition, 373 00:20:38,520 --> 00:20:40,840 Speaker 10: and the US says, listen, there is no Plan B 374 00:20:41,000 --> 00:20:45,480 Speaker 10: here if you do not get us the money. This 375 00:20:45,560 --> 00:20:49,280 Speaker 10: is Ukraine has already rationing ammunition, It's running out of 376 00:20:49,280 --> 00:20:52,880 Speaker 10: its air defenses. They need help, and we don't have 377 00:20:52,960 --> 00:20:55,800 Speaker 10: any other options, so you got to act. It be 378 00:20:55,920 --> 00:20:58,040 Speaker 10: very interesting to see what happens in mar A Lago, 379 00:20:58,160 --> 00:21:01,639 Speaker 10: because you know, if Mike john Hinson does force this vote, 380 00:21:01,640 --> 00:21:04,399 Speaker 10: the sort of common wisdom is that that's going to 381 00:21:04,440 --> 00:21:07,160 Speaker 10: force his ouster. But we're also hearing, you know, Donald 382 00:21:07,200 --> 00:21:09,320 Speaker 10: Trump likes Mike Johnson. He doesn't want to have another 383 00:21:09,440 --> 00:21:12,320 Speaker 10: Republican leadership fight, so there may be some wiggle room there. 384 00:21:12,440 --> 00:21:12,840 Speaker 10: We'll see. 385 00:21:13,000 --> 00:21:15,639 Speaker 2: Very curious to hear what might emerge from that conversation. 386 00:21:15,720 --> 00:21:19,360 Speaker 2: I wonder if either of them know we remember Vladimir 387 00:21:19,400 --> 00:21:23,040 Speaker 2: Putin using the cold as a weapon in the winter season. 388 00:21:23,080 --> 00:21:25,440 Speaker 2: He's using energy, I guess as a weapon in this case, 389 00:21:25,440 --> 00:21:28,879 Speaker 2: actually targeting energy infrastructure, whether it's this plant that he 390 00:21:28,920 --> 00:21:31,520 Speaker 2: knocked out in Kiev, the concerns about the nuke plant 391 00:21:31,600 --> 00:21:32,440 Speaker 2: in Zaporisha. 392 00:21:32,880 --> 00:21:34,879 Speaker 6: Where does this go? What's he trying to accomplish? 393 00:21:34,920 --> 00:21:35,160 Speaker 11: Well? 394 00:21:35,400 --> 00:21:37,680 Speaker 10: It's always difficult to tell how much of this is 395 00:21:37,720 --> 00:21:41,760 Speaker 10: a deliberate strategy. I mean, obviously the goal right now 396 00:21:41,880 --> 00:21:46,520 Speaker 10: is to inflict as much pain on Ukraine. It's military 397 00:21:46,560 --> 00:21:49,680 Speaker 10: but also the civilians there as he possibly can. And 398 00:21:50,119 --> 00:21:55,800 Speaker 10: it's both inflicting pain and also exacerbating the really low morale. 399 00:21:55,920 --> 00:21:58,280 Speaker 10: I think that you're seeing among Ukrainian troops in a 400 00:21:58,359 --> 00:22:01,240 Speaker 10: sense that they are not getting what they need from 401 00:22:01,240 --> 00:22:03,119 Speaker 10: the West. I don't know if you'd say they feel 402 00:22:03,240 --> 00:22:06,960 Speaker 10: abandoned by the US and European allies, but certainly a 403 00:22:07,000 --> 00:22:09,719 Speaker 10: feeling that, you know, if Russia is allowed to do 404 00:22:09,800 --> 00:22:12,840 Speaker 10: something like this unchallenged, well what does that say about 405 00:22:12,880 --> 00:22:17,960 Speaker 10: the relationship. So I mean, as ever, Vladimir Putin delights 406 00:22:18,000 --> 00:22:22,800 Speaker 10: in exploiting these rifts and points of tension between Ukraine 407 00:22:22,840 --> 00:22:24,680 Speaker 10: and its allies. I think that's what he's doing here. 408 00:22:24,960 --> 00:22:29,240 Speaker 2: All the while, we have quite a situation brewing in Israel. 409 00:22:29,280 --> 00:22:32,080 Speaker 2: It's getting more complex for this administration, it seems like 410 00:22:32,080 --> 00:22:34,400 Speaker 2: by the day, as we now anticipate what we're told 411 00:22:34,440 --> 00:22:38,440 Speaker 2: as an eminent strike by Iran or by its proxies 412 00:22:38,920 --> 00:22:44,199 Speaker 2: in retaliation against this Israeli strike in Damascus. 413 00:22:44,080 --> 00:22:47,280 Speaker 6: Do we believe that something like this could. 414 00:22:47,160 --> 00:22:50,800 Speaker 2: Be born originated from Iranian soil, or would this be 415 00:22:50,880 --> 00:22:51,959 Speaker 2: from Yemen or someone else. 416 00:22:52,119 --> 00:22:54,359 Speaker 10: You know, it's a great question because the thing that 417 00:22:54,400 --> 00:22:57,760 Speaker 10: you really have not seen in this conflict so far 418 00:22:58,200 --> 00:23:02,280 Speaker 10: is Israel and Iran going toe to toe against each 419 00:23:02,359 --> 00:23:05,439 Speaker 10: other directly. It's all been playing out through proxies. So 420 00:23:05,480 --> 00:23:11,280 Speaker 10: I mean, yes, you had Israel targeting Iranian generals, but 421 00:23:11,400 --> 00:23:13,959 Speaker 10: they were based in Syria, so it was yes, they 422 00:23:14,000 --> 00:23:16,520 Speaker 10: were going after Iranian forces, but there was that half 423 00:23:16,560 --> 00:23:19,439 Speaker 10: step that they were actually in serious So you know, 424 00:23:19,560 --> 00:23:24,119 Speaker 10: a direct strike from Iran on Israel or vice versa, 425 00:23:24,119 --> 00:23:29,720 Speaker 10: frankly that was actually publicly acknowledged would be a huge escalation. 426 00:23:29,960 --> 00:23:33,200 Speaker 10: So we're all, I mean, this is this occupying all 427 00:23:33,240 --> 00:23:34,919 Speaker 10: of our time at the moment, trying to figure out 428 00:23:34,960 --> 00:23:36,399 Speaker 10: what the contras of this strike would be. 429 00:23:36,440 --> 00:23:37,240 Speaker 1: But what is clear. 430 00:23:37,280 --> 00:23:41,639 Speaker 10: I mean, as President Joe Biden said yesterday, they are anticipating. 431 00:23:41,680 --> 00:23:44,919 Speaker 10: They do have strong evidence that something is coming. The 432 00:23:45,000 --> 00:23:48,320 Speaker 10: question is what and how escalatory it's going to be. 433 00:23:48,400 --> 00:23:50,200 Speaker 6: That we are laser focused. 434 00:23:49,840 --> 00:23:52,160 Speaker 2: On it, and we have a high ranking military official 435 00:23:52,320 --> 00:23:55,800 Speaker 2: in Israel right now talking about how they respond to 436 00:23:55,920 --> 00:23:59,640 Speaker 2: the response would that be coordinated with the US either way. 437 00:24:00,240 --> 00:24:00,480 Speaker 12: Yes. 438 00:24:00,560 --> 00:24:03,040 Speaker 10: I mean it's a very interesting dynamic there because the 439 00:24:03,200 --> 00:24:07,960 Speaker 10: US Defense Department has played a role in advising Israel 440 00:24:08,040 --> 00:24:12,280 Speaker 10: on its responses both to Hamas but also in this 441 00:24:12,359 --> 00:24:15,560 Speaker 10: proxy fight. But you know, it hasn't always been the 442 00:24:15,560 --> 00:24:17,719 Speaker 10: case that Israel has taken that advice, and there has 443 00:24:17,760 --> 00:24:20,439 Speaker 10: been some frustration in the Pentagon that hey, we're sending 444 00:24:20,440 --> 00:24:23,000 Speaker 10: you these assets and you're not listening, You're not paying 445 00:24:23,040 --> 00:24:25,800 Speaker 10: attention to us. So again you get back to that 446 00:24:26,040 --> 00:24:29,680 Speaker 10: other really festering issue, which is the continued tension between 447 00:24:29,800 --> 00:24:30,480 Speaker 10: US and Israel. 448 00:24:30,600 --> 00:24:32,720 Speaker 6: Something tells me we'll talk again soon. Yeah, if it'll 449 00:24:32,760 --> 00:24:33,600 Speaker 6: come back to help us out. 450 00:24:33,720 --> 00:24:36,159 Speaker 2: Great to see you, Nick, as always, Nick Wadams, just 451 00:24:36,160 --> 00:24:39,520 Speaker 2: doing great work as always on Bloomberg's National Security team 452 00:24:39,600 --> 00:24:42,359 Speaker 2: here in Washington. They have a very important corner of 453 00:24:42,400 --> 00:24:45,080 Speaker 2: our bureau, and we really do rely on them, certainly 454 00:24:45,119 --> 00:24:47,520 Speaker 2: since I've been here at Bloomberg considering everything that has 455 00:24:47,560 --> 00:24:49,960 Speaker 2: gone on around the world and is continuing to unfold here. 456 00:24:50,600 --> 00:24:53,520 Speaker 6: We'll stay in touch with Nick for you here at home. 457 00:24:53,720 --> 00:24:56,800 Speaker 2: The President actually talking about this today in a trilateral 458 00:24:56,920 --> 00:24:59,119 Speaker 2: meeting with the Prime Minister of Japan, of course, was 459 00:24:59,160 --> 00:25:01,240 Speaker 2: in town yesterday, and you're adding the President of the 460 00:25:01,240 --> 00:25:04,679 Speaker 2: Philippines today all of this with an Ion China. But 461 00:25:04,720 --> 00:25:07,680 Speaker 2: as we heard from the Prime Minister Kishida, the Prime 462 00:25:07,680 --> 00:25:10,440 Speaker 2: Minister of Japan before a joint session of Congress earlier, 463 00:25:10,840 --> 00:25:16,320 Speaker 2: they are deeply invested in this situation in Ukraine with 464 00:25:16,359 --> 00:25:18,040 Speaker 2: an Ion China as well. 465 00:25:18,040 --> 00:25:20,200 Speaker 6: It's interesting how these stories overlap. 466 00:25:20,480 --> 00:25:22,800 Speaker 2: The President speaking yesterday not only about this in the 467 00:25:22,840 --> 00:25:26,200 Speaker 2: Rose Garden, but also taking a question about the border. 468 00:25:26,640 --> 00:25:30,359 Speaker 2: Fascinating to hear him talk on Univision about his plans 469 00:25:30,400 --> 00:25:33,760 Speaker 2: to take executive action here in lieu of a legislative solution. 470 00:25:33,840 --> 00:25:36,959 Speaker 2: Remember that compromise went up in smoke following Senate passagees 471 00:25:37,320 --> 00:25:39,800 Speaker 2: DOA in the House. So here we are again, quote, 472 00:25:39,880 --> 00:25:43,399 Speaker 2: we're examining whether or not I have that power unquote. 473 00:25:43,640 --> 00:25:45,760 Speaker 2: The President himself does not know if this will hold 474 00:25:45,840 --> 00:25:48,840 Speaker 2: up in court, as he seeks to tighten the definition 475 00:25:49,320 --> 00:25:51,439 Speaker 2: of asylum, and we wanted to get more into that 476 00:25:51,480 --> 00:25:54,320 Speaker 2: today with somebody who has some experience in that field. 477 00:25:54,400 --> 00:25:57,800 Speaker 2: Leon Fresco is with US former Deputy Assistant Attorney General 478 00:25:57,800 --> 00:26:00,720 Speaker 2: at the Department of Justice, Office of Immigration litigation is 479 00:26:00,760 --> 00:26:03,160 Speaker 2: now at Holland and Knight, Leon, Thank you for being 480 00:26:03,200 --> 00:26:03,560 Speaker 2: with us. 481 00:26:03,680 --> 00:26:05,560 Speaker 6: Is this going to be a protracted court battle? And 482 00:26:05,560 --> 00:26:06,399 Speaker 6: if so, who wins? 483 00:26:07,600 --> 00:26:10,960 Speaker 12: Well, absolutely it will be a protracted court battle because 484 00:26:11,080 --> 00:26:15,879 Speaker 12: the premise of the entire reason that the Republicans have 485 00:26:15,920 --> 00:26:19,480 Speaker 12: made this argument that there is an exclusion authority under 486 00:26:19,560 --> 00:26:23,000 Speaker 12: what is known as INA Section two twelve F is 487 00:26:23,040 --> 00:26:26,400 Speaker 12: because there's a ban and that travel ban is permitted, 488 00:26:26,920 --> 00:26:30,119 Speaker 12: but the ban is on this word called entry, meaning 489 00:26:30,440 --> 00:26:33,480 Speaker 12: if you're outside of the United States, you can be 490 00:26:33,600 --> 00:26:37,159 Speaker 12: banned from entering the United States. So you can be 491 00:26:37,200 --> 00:26:39,639 Speaker 12: banned from getting a visa, you can be banned when 492 00:26:39,680 --> 00:26:42,600 Speaker 12: you're at the airport. But here's the problem. Once you've 493 00:26:42,640 --> 00:26:46,679 Speaker 12: crossed illegally, there's hundreds of years of case law that 494 00:26:46,760 --> 00:26:49,159 Speaker 12: says that that is an entry, which is why you 495 00:26:49,240 --> 00:26:53,640 Speaker 12: can be charged criminally with illegal entry, and so then 496 00:26:53,720 --> 00:26:57,560 Speaker 12: the bar doesn't actually apply to you because you've already entered. 497 00:26:58,000 --> 00:27:00,159 Speaker 12: And at that point then the question is, well, you 498 00:27:00,200 --> 00:27:03,959 Speaker 12: ban people from applying for asylum, and so the answer 499 00:27:04,200 --> 00:27:07,000 Speaker 12: is yes, but that doesn't mean you can ban them 500 00:27:07,000 --> 00:27:10,679 Speaker 12: from applying for something else, which is called withholding of removal, 501 00:27:11,119 --> 00:27:15,560 Speaker 12: which is a statutory relief that is short of asylum, 502 00:27:15,560 --> 00:27:19,680 Speaker 12: but that lets people stay. And so these bars, those 503 00:27:19,720 --> 00:27:22,960 Speaker 12: are the two problems with them. Is one, will a 504 00:27:23,080 --> 00:27:25,720 Speaker 12: court actually let you get away? Well, a court actually 505 00:27:25,800 --> 00:27:28,840 Speaker 12: let you get away with not calling it an entry 506 00:27:28,920 --> 00:27:31,640 Speaker 12: when someone has already entered and saying yes, we can 507 00:27:31,680 --> 00:27:34,960 Speaker 12: kick them out because they haven't actually entered, that's one thing. 508 00:27:34,960 --> 00:27:37,720 Speaker 12: And then could you actually ban them from applying for 509 00:27:37,880 --> 00:27:40,480 Speaker 12: any sort of relief? And in both of those those 510 00:27:40,480 --> 00:27:43,760 Speaker 12: are things tried by President Trump, and President Trump was 511 00:27:43,800 --> 00:27:45,639 Speaker 12: unsuccessful on both of those grounds. 512 00:27:45,640 --> 00:27:47,360 Speaker 6: In the pipes my god. 513 00:27:47,520 --> 00:27:51,160 Speaker 2: Well, for those of us who are more confused than 514 00:27:51,240 --> 00:27:54,000 Speaker 2: when we started, leon, let me ask you about the 515 00:27:54,040 --> 00:27:56,840 Speaker 2: definition of asylum, because they tried to get to this 516 00:27:57,520 --> 00:28:01,160 Speaker 2: in the Senate compromise. These are people who are fleeing 517 00:28:01,720 --> 00:28:07,359 Speaker 2: obviously economic conditions as well as violent conditions, and the 518 00:28:07,440 --> 00:28:11,560 Speaker 2: idea was to tighten this definition to include only those 519 00:28:11,600 --> 00:28:14,080 Speaker 2: who were in physical harm. How do you think it 520 00:28:14,119 --> 00:28:15,760 Speaker 2: should read? What would stand up in court? 521 00:28:16,560 --> 00:28:20,560 Speaker 12: Well, the definition of asylum is what it is, which 522 00:28:20,640 --> 00:28:24,760 Speaker 12: is that you fear persecution on the basis of your race, religion, 523 00:28:24,880 --> 00:28:29,199 Speaker 12: national origin, social group, or political opinion. So basically on 524 00:28:29,280 --> 00:28:33,919 Speaker 12: an inutable factor of you specifically, not on the basis 525 00:28:34,320 --> 00:28:38,000 Speaker 12: of something that's happened happening economically in your country. The 526 00:28:38,160 --> 00:28:40,479 Speaker 12: problem has been with the burden of proof you have 527 00:28:40,560 --> 00:28:43,600 Speaker 12: to show to make your initial case that allows you 528 00:28:43,640 --> 00:28:47,120 Speaker 12: to stay for many years, and people have thought that 529 00:28:47,120 --> 00:28:51,600 Speaker 12: that initial burden, which is called credible fear, which is 530 00:28:51,760 --> 00:28:54,640 Speaker 12: one where you basically have to show the best is 531 00:28:54,960 --> 00:28:59,719 Speaker 12: a significant possibility that you could win, was too low, 532 00:29:00,320 --> 00:29:04,320 Speaker 12: and so administrations have tried to rent that up administratively. 533 00:29:04,640 --> 00:29:07,280 Speaker 12: But the problem is they can't change that because that 534 00:29:07,560 --> 00:29:11,600 Speaker 12: standard is in the statutory law. So all they can 535 00:29:11,680 --> 00:29:15,320 Speaker 12: do is basically issue memos that say, hey, remember what 536 00:29:15,440 --> 00:29:20,600 Speaker 12: the standard is, which triggers sort of a subliminal readout 537 00:29:20,680 --> 00:29:23,520 Speaker 12: to the agent, Hey, maybe you want to deny more cases. 538 00:29:23,840 --> 00:29:27,840 Speaker 12: But when that happens, then lawsuits happened because people say, hey, 539 00:29:28,120 --> 00:29:30,640 Speaker 12: what you're trying to do is actually change the standard 540 00:29:30,880 --> 00:29:34,560 Speaker 12: from what it actually is, which is why the president 541 00:29:34,640 --> 00:29:38,360 Speaker 12: was asking for a congressional change, so that that initial 542 00:29:38,440 --> 00:29:42,440 Speaker 12: threshold standard could be raised to something more definitive, or 543 00:29:42,480 --> 00:29:46,320 Speaker 12: you had to already present something more concrete than just 544 00:29:46,520 --> 00:29:50,959 Speaker 12: articulating some magic words Hey, I'm against the government in 545 00:29:51,000 --> 00:29:54,440 Speaker 12: my country, and so that's why I'm trying to come in, 546 00:29:55,000 --> 00:29:57,240 Speaker 12: and that that would be more You know that you 547 00:29:57,280 --> 00:29:59,160 Speaker 12: would need more than that. You would already need some 548 00:29:59,280 --> 00:30:03,360 Speaker 12: documents or something to show that you actually could justify 549 00:30:03,400 --> 00:30:05,320 Speaker 12: what you're saying in order for you to stay and 550 00:30:05,360 --> 00:30:06,840 Speaker 12: make the second part of your case. 551 00:30:07,880 --> 00:30:10,720 Speaker 2: Spending time with immigration attorney Leon Fresco at Holland and 552 00:30:10,840 --> 00:30:14,680 Speaker 2: Night getting back to this idea of qualifying entry. Leon 553 00:30:14,880 --> 00:30:18,960 Speaker 2: under section two twelve f of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 554 00:30:18,960 --> 00:30:24,120 Speaker 2: which Donald Trump tried to leverage repeatedly, it says that 555 00:30:24,160 --> 00:30:27,280 Speaker 2: the president has brought leeway to block entry of certain 556 00:30:27,280 --> 00:30:32,160 Speaker 2: immigrants if it would be detrimental to US national interests. 557 00:30:32,160 --> 00:30:33,880 Speaker 6: What qualifies as detrimental. 558 00:30:34,760 --> 00:30:37,920 Speaker 12: So there in the Trump versus Hawaii case, the court 559 00:30:37,960 --> 00:30:41,120 Speaker 12: actually gave President Trump. The Supreme Court and that was 560 00:30:41,160 --> 00:30:43,920 Speaker 12: when they remember, we had the travel ban, which first 561 00:30:44,000 --> 00:30:48,680 Speaker 12: started with during the election, the allegation that he would 562 00:30:48,680 --> 00:30:51,640 Speaker 12: ban all quote unquote Muslims, and then it kind of 563 00:30:51,680 --> 00:30:54,040 Speaker 12: shrunk it to a seven He kind of shrunk into 564 00:30:54,040 --> 00:30:57,680 Speaker 12: a seven country ban, and it was more security oriented 565 00:30:57,840 --> 00:31:01,360 Speaker 12: than Muslim orient that there was about whether those countries 566 00:31:01,400 --> 00:31:05,240 Speaker 12: had specific security thresholds in place. But in any case, 567 00:31:05,680 --> 00:31:09,080 Speaker 12: the Supreme Court gave broad authority to presidents to be 568 00:31:09,120 --> 00:31:12,680 Speaker 12: able to say that that was not reviewable that issue. 569 00:31:12,920 --> 00:31:17,160 Speaker 12: They only had to say that there was this there 570 00:31:17,320 --> 00:31:21,360 Speaker 12: was this reason, and as long as a reason was articulated, 571 00:31:21,640 --> 00:31:25,240 Speaker 12: then it wasn't reviewable. So the reason itself was not 572 00:31:25,560 --> 00:31:29,400 Speaker 12: relevant as long as it was articulated. And so there 573 00:31:29,440 --> 00:31:32,320 Speaker 12: that's a huge standard. But again, the problem isn't bad. 574 00:31:32,760 --> 00:31:37,280 Speaker 12: The problem is that the people coming across illegally are 575 00:31:37,320 --> 00:31:41,520 Speaker 12: already entering, which is what makes them liable for illegal entry. 576 00:31:41,960 --> 00:31:45,080 Speaker 12: So then you can't ban their entry because they've already entered. 577 00:31:45,480 --> 00:31:48,480 Speaker 12: The entries that can be banned are people who are outside, 578 00:31:48,880 --> 00:31:50,680 Speaker 12: or who are at the board of Entries, or who 579 00:31:50,720 --> 00:31:54,160 Speaker 12: are at the airport, but not the people who crossed illegally. 580 00:31:55,720 --> 00:32:00,000 Speaker 2: Leon, you're reminding me why I'm not a lawyer President Biden's, 581 00:32:00,000 --> 00:32:02,480 Speaker 2: he says, we're examining whether or not I have that power. 582 00:32:02,480 --> 00:32:04,680 Speaker 2: What's his legal team telling him? What should they be 583 00:32:04,720 --> 00:32:05,440 Speaker 2: telling him today? 584 00:32:06,040 --> 00:32:08,480 Speaker 12: Well, I think he's getting two kinds of advice. One 585 00:32:08,600 --> 00:32:11,000 Speaker 12: kind of advice is, look, just do it. Have the 586 00:32:11,040 --> 00:32:13,200 Speaker 12: court say it's illegal, and say, you see, I did 587 00:32:13,240 --> 00:32:17,960 Speaker 12: everything I could. You Republicans told me everything, told me 588 00:32:18,000 --> 00:32:20,640 Speaker 12: I had this power. I clearly didn't. Let's get back 589 00:32:20,680 --> 00:32:23,520 Speaker 12: to the drawing board and let's negotiate something. And then 590 00:32:23,560 --> 00:32:26,040 Speaker 12: the other lawyers are telling him you can't do it, 591 00:32:26,080 --> 00:32:28,840 Speaker 12: and you shouldn't do it because we don't pass laws 592 00:32:28,880 --> 00:32:30,960 Speaker 12: here that are going to get enjoined by the court. 593 00:32:31,000 --> 00:32:33,240 Speaker 12: We swore an ope not to do that. And he's 594 00:32:33,280 --> 00:32:35,440 Speaker 12: just got to decide which advice he wants to take 595 00:32:35,480 --> 00:32:36,320 Speaker 12: in that situation. 596 00:32:37,120 --> 00:32:39,560 Speaker 6: Do you think he's got an angel on one shoulder 597 00:32:39,560 --> 00:32:40,520 Speaker 6: and a devil on the other? 598 00:32:41,160 --> 00:32:41,640 Speaker 5: Correct? 599 00:32:41,760 --> 00:32:44,560 Speaker 12: And this is always the fifty to fifty burden of 600 00:32:44,600 --> 00:32:48,360 Speaker 12: any president in this situation is do you do it now? 601 00:32:48,680 --> 00:32:50,840 Speaker 12: You're always gonna have to have a credible argument because 602 00:32:50,880 --> 00:32:52,960 Speaker 12: you don't want the lawyers going to court to get 603 00:32:53,000 --> 00:32:55,560 Speaker 12: in trouble or get this barred that they've made a 604 00:32:55,640 --> 00:32:58,400 Speaker 12: ridiculous argument. So you're gonna have to do something that's 605 00:32:58,440 --> 00:33:01,240 Speaker 12: at least credible enough to pass the threshold of the 606 00:33:01,360 --> 00:33:05,520 Speaker 12: lawyers being sanctioned. But the point is, if you think 607 00:33:05,560 --> 00:33:09,160 Speaker 12: you're gonna win, then that's really what you should move forward. 608 00:33:09,520 --> 00:33:11,760 Speaker 12: But he might do it not thinking he's gonna win, 609 00:33:12,000 --> 00:33:14,720 Speaker 12: just so he can prove everybody that they were wrong. 610 00:33:14,840 --> 00:33:16,960 Speaker 12: I hear, because he'd ever had that power in the 611 00:33:17,000 --> 00:33:17,560 Speaker 12: first place. 612 00:33:18,640 --> 00:33:20,760 Speaker 2: Hey, Leon, thanks for coming to talk to us today, 613 00:33:20,920 --> 00:33:24,280 Speaker 2: Leon Fresco, Hollanden Knight, as we try to figure out 614 00:33:24,720 --> 00:33:27,040 Speaker 2: President Biden's next move on this one or what the 615 00:33:27,080 --> 00:33:29,960 Speaker 2: courts might say. Much more ahead on Balance of Power. 616 00:33:30,040 --> 00:33:30,920 Speaker 2: This is Bloomberg. 617 00:33:34,400 --> 00:33:37,680 Speaker 1: You're listening to the Bloomberg Balance of Power podcast. Can 618 00:33:37,880 --> 00:33:40,760 Speaker 1: just live weekdays at noon Eastern on Apple CarPlay and 619 00:33:40,760 --> 00:33:43,600 Speaker 1: then Ronoo with the Bloomberg Business app. You can also 620 00:33:43,640 --> 00:33:47,160 Speaker 1: listen live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station. 621 00:33:47,560 --> 00:33:51,560 Speaker 1: Just say Alexa play Bloomberg eleven thirty. 622 00:33:52,640 --> 00:33:55,480 Speaker 2: Certainly after yesterday's route and as we try to rebuild 623 00:33:55,480 --> 00:33:57,880 Speaker 2: things at least to some extent today, we want to 624 00:33:57,880 --> 00:33:59,720 Speaker 2: make sure you know what's happening in the markets. With 625 00:34:00,560 --> 00:34:02,800 Speaker 2: one day PPI, the next here we are do they 626 00:34:02,840 --> 00:34:03,800 Speaker 2: cancel each other out? 627 00:34:04,160 --> 00:34:05,320 Speaker 6: Remember how upset. 628 00:34:05,040 --> 00:34:07,280 Speaker 2: Everyone was around this time yesterday We had the end 629 00:34:07,280 --> 00:34:09,719 Speaker 2: of the world situation. We're never cutting rates again as 630 00:34:09,719 --> 00:34:13,359 Speaker 2: long as we're alive. And then twenty four hours later, 631 00:34:13,440 --> 00:34:16,719 Speaker 2: PPI and everyone starts turning in the other direction. Almost 632 00:34:16,840 --> 00:34:20,080 Speaker 2: a little bit of relief here on a very different 633 00:34:20,160 --> 00:34:23,280 Speaker 2: reading when it comes to wholesale inflation and the Fed's 634 00:34:23,400 --> 00:34:29,280 Speaker 2: preferred reading here, of course, the core Personal consumption Expenditures 635 00:34:29,360 --> 00:34:32,640 Speaker 2: Price Index, which I woke up thinking about this morning. 636 00:34:33,360 --> 00:34:35,759 Speaker 2: I'm Joe, Matthew and Washington, joined at the table by 637 00:34:35,800 --> 00:34:37,880 Speaker 2: Lindsay Owens of the Groundwork Collaborative. 638 00:34:37,920 --> 00:34:39,319 Speaker 6: She's with us at the table today. 639 00:34:39,360 --> 00:34:41,839 Speaker 2: Great to see you in studio here at Bloomberg. Thanks 640 00:34:41,920 --> 00:34:44,560 Speaker 2: for joining us. We last spoke around jobs Day. As 641 00:34:44,600 --> 00:34:48,800 Speaker 2: you reminded me, We've had two big data points since then. Yesterday, 642 00:34:48,880 --> 00:34:51,360 Speaker 2: as I said, people thought, okay, this is a problem 643 00:34:51,719 --> 00:34:54,719 Speaker 2: three months as a trend. Then you see something that 644 00:34:54,800 --> 00:34:58,279 Speaker 2: many people consider a leading indicator with the PPI data 645 00:34:58,440 --> 00:35:00,480 Speaker 2: this morning, and we feel a little bit better about things. 646 00:35:00,480 --> 00:35:00,880 Speaker 6: Where are you? 647 00:35:01,480 --> 00:35:01,640 Speaker 12: Yeah? 648 00:35:01,680 --> 00:35:04,280 Speaker 8: I mean, look, Job's Day was great. Last week. 649 00:35:04,680 --> 00:35:07,560 Speaker 11: We saw continued strength in the labor market. That's building 650 00:35:07,600 --> 00:35:10,160 Speaker 11: on continued strength in the economy overall. Right, we've had 651 00:35:10,200 --> 00:35:13,520 Speaker 11: great GDP numbers. I think folks sort of fell back 652 00:35:13,560 --> 00:35:15,799 Speaker 11: down to earth this week with the inflation numbers coming 653 00:35:15,840 --> 00:35:19,719 Speaker 11: in hotter than expected. Yesterday worrying that maybe inflation is 654 00:35:19,760 --> 00:35:22,560 Speaker 11: a bit stickier than we'd hoped, the sort of disinflation 655 00:35:22,719 --> 00:35:26,839 Speaker 11: story of twenty twenty three, you know, maybe eroding a bit. 656 00:35:26,880 --> 00:35:29,520 Speaker 11: But then you know, today's PPI numbers, I think give 657 00:35:29,600 --> 00:35:32,040 Speaker 11: us a little bit of hope. You know, they tell 658 00:35:32,120 --> 00:35:35,960 Speaker 11: us that the Fed's preferred gauge PCE is maybe softening 659 00:35:36,000 --> 00:35:38,879 Speaker 11: a touch, and you know, perhaps we'll still get those 660 00:35:38,920 --> 00:35:41,640 Speaker 11: rate cuts that we're hoping for from the Fed later 661 00:35:41,719 --> 00:35:45,839 Speaker 11: this year. I think for me, the question is, you know, 662 00:35:45,960 --> 00:35:49,719 Speaker 11: why would the Fed continue this high interst rate environment 663 00:35:50,440 --> 00:35:53,320 Speaker 11: for longer given what we saw under the hood yesterday 664 00:35:53,400 --> 00:35:57,799 Speaker 11: in those CPI numbers. Well, housing is really what's continuing 665 00:35:57,840 --> 00:36:02,200 Speaker 11: to drive CPI. And as you know, we don't get 666 00:36:02,239 --> 00:36:06,520 Speaker 11: relief in the housing market with higher interest rates. We 667 00:36:06,640 --> 00:36:11,040 Speaker 11: get higher mortgage rates putting pressure on rental prices. Right, 668 00:36:11,080 --> 00:36:14,359 Speaker 11: Folks aren't moving out of houses, and folks aren't leaving 669 00:36:14,360 --> 00:36:17,920 Speaker 11: the rental market to jump in and start buying. So 670 00:36:18,600 --> 00:36:20,719 Speaker 11: you know, the Fed's interest rate tool is not very 671 00:36:20,760 --> 00:36:23,560 Speaker 11: well matched for housing inflation. If anything, it may be 672 00:36:23,600 --> 00:36:26,680 Speaker 11: exacerbating housing inflation. And so that's the real sort of 673 00:36:26,760 --> 00:36:28,759 Speaker 11: paradox and predicament I think we're in here, is how 674 00:36:28,760 --> 00:36:29,360 Speaker 11: do we get out of this? 675 00:36:29,640 --> 00:36:32,719 Speaker 2: Sure without a building boom, Sure you're trying to take 676 00:36:32,760 --> 00:36:35,920 Speaker 2: another lever, But if you're Jay Powell, you're saying, look, 677 00:36:36,000 --> 00:36:38,560 Speaker 2: i mean we're not anywhere near two percent right now, 678 00:36:38,640 --> 00:36:40,759 Speaker 2: and the last thing I want to do is start cutting. 679 00:36:40,440 --> 00:36:42,279 Speaker 6: And have to start racing again. And I'm sure you 680 00:36:42,800 --> 00:36:45,440 Speaker 6: empathize with that. Yeah, I mean, he has history shows 681 00:36:45,480 --> 00:36:46,200 Speaker 6: the danger there. 682 00:36:46,320 --> 00:36:48,000 Speaker 11: He has one tool in his toolbox, right, he has 683 00:36:48,040 --> 00:36:50,480 Speaker 11: interest rates, and so that's what he's looking at. Is 684 00:36:50,480 --> 00:36:52,000 Speaker 11: he going to stay the course? Is he going to 685 00:36:52,000 --> 00:36:54,880 Speaker 11: be higher for longer? Is he going to sort of 686 00:36:54,920 --> 00:36:57,799 Speaker 11: continue with his promise to begin cutting this year? I mean, 687 00:36:57,840 --> 00:36:59,520 Speaker 11: my guess is the language that we'll see from the 688 00:36:59,560 --> 00:37:02,400 Speaker 11: FED won't change very much. It'll still talk about an 689 00:37:02,440 --> 00:37:05,040 Speaker 11: outlook of cuts beginning this year. But I think this 690 00:37:05,120 --> 00:37:07,600 Speaker 11: does maybe call into question how quickly they move to 691 00:37:07,640 --> 00:37:10,160 Speaker 11: the first cut, maybe puts June. 692 00:37:10,560 --> 00:37:11,960 Speaker 8: A little bit in the rear view mirror. 693 00:37:12,600 --> 00:37:15,799 Speaker 11: But I'm still I'm still optimistic that you know, that 694 00:37:15,960 --> 00:37:19,640 Speaker 11: really could see movements sooner this year in June, maybe 695 00:37:19,680 --> 00:37:21,760 Speaker 11: not June, but you know, still optimistic. 696 00:37:21,520 --> 00:37:22,919 Speaker 2: Because the worry is, oh, now there was a sudden 697 00:37:22,920 --> 00:37:24,680 Speaker 2: we're in political season. He's not going to want to 698 00:37:24,719 --> 00:37:27,080 Speaker 2: do anything in the fall. Does that apply at this point? 699 00:37:27,080 --> 00:37:29,080 Speaker 2: Whenevery other norm has been thrown out the window? Does 700 00:37:29,120 --> 00:37:31,040 Speaker 2: history matter? If j Palell thinks he needs to cut 701 00:37:31,120 --> 00:37:32,879 Speaker 2: rates in September, he's going to. 702 00:37:32,840 --> 00:37:35,040 Speaker 11: Do it, right, Yeah, I mean, look, federal reserved tres 703 00:37:35,080 --> 00:37:37,640 Speaker 11: have cut rates during election years before. There is no 704 00:37:37,840 --> 00:37:40,600 Speaker 11: law or rule that says you can't cut an interest 705 00:37:40,680 --> 00:37:41,719 Speaker 11: rate during an election year. 706 00:37:41,840 --> 00:37:44,879 Speaker 2: You know what people would say though, that it's political. Well, 707 00:37:44,920 --> 00:37:47,560 Speaker 2: he's auditioning for the job again. He's trying to of 708 00:37:47,600 --> 00:37:49,960 Speaker 2: course political that's that's that would be the refrain, and 709 00:37:49,960 --> 00:37:51,040 Speaker 2: that's what he's trying to avoid. 710 00:37:51,120 --> 00:37:52,560 Speaker 8: Yeah, he's trying to avoid politics. 711 00:37:52,560 --> 00:37:55,319 Speaker 11: Look, I think you know, in that case, I would 712 00:37:55,400 --> 00:37:58,480 Speaker 11: argue actually that you know, cutting rates earlier with more 713 00:37:58,640 --> 00:38:02,359 Speaker 11: gap between now and November is less political than sort 714 00:38:02,360 --> 00:38:04,040 Speaker 11: of moving to recuts in the fall. 715 00:38:04,400 --> 00:38:05,720 Speaker 8: Right on the eve of the election. 716 00:38:05,880 --> 00:38:09,400 Speaker 2: Did the President help Yesterday? He actually went there. We 717 00:38:09,440 --> 00:38:11,960 Speaker 2: can't get anybody to talk about the fedting. God knows, 718 00:38:12,000 --> 00:38:13,200 Speaker 2: we've tried. 719 00:38:13,480 --> 00:38:13,800 Speaker 6: I don't know. 720 00:38:14,080 --> 00:38:17,160 Speaker 2: Heather Bouchet, who's going to join us later today, Jared Bernstein. 721 00:38:17,280 --> 00:38:21,040 Speaker 2: They're trained to say we're not going there. As opposed 722 00:38:21,080 --> 00:38:23,200 Speaker 2: to the last administration. The president was tweeting at j 723 00:38:23,320 --> 00:38:25,719 Speaker 2: Powell every day. But yesterday Joe Biden, in front of 724 00:38:25,719 --> 00:38:27,759 Speaker 2: a rose garden full of reporters, says, there's going to 725 00:38:27,760 --> 00:38:29,080 Speaker 2: be a ray cut this year. You might have to 726 00:38:29,080 --> 00:38:31,600 Speaker 2: wait a month, he said, talking almost like somebody who 727 00:38:31,600 --> 00:38:34,560 Speaker 2: would come on Bloomberg. Did he cross the line or 728 00:38:34,760 --> 00:38:39,239 Speaker 2: did it at least change an unspoken policy. 729 00:38:38,760 --> 00:38:39,800 Speaker 6: At this White House? 730 00:38:39,920 --> 00:38:41,800 Speaker 11: Yeah? I mean, look, just like there's no rule against 731 00:38:41,840 --> 00:38:44,560 Speaker 11: the Federal Reserve chair cutting interest rates the election year, 732 00:38:44,800 --> 00:38:47,680 Speaker 11: there's a rule against the president talking about the Federal Reserve. 733 00:38:47,760 --> 00:38:48,640 Speaker 8: I think this kind of. 734 00:38:48,640 --> 00:38:51,440 Speaker 2: But they reinforced that independence when they came into office. 735 00:38:51,480 --> 00:38:51,719 Speaker 8: They do. 736 00:38:51,920 --> 00:38:54,319 Speaker 11: I mean, but it's really custom, it's not law. These 737 00:38:54,320 --> 00:38:57,440 Speaker 11: are norms, you know, not hard and fast rules. And 738 00:38:57,880 --> 00:39:00,440 Speaker 11: I actually think it's a disservice. And so ways, the 739 00:39:00,440 --> 00:39:03,520 Speaker 11: American people should be hearing from the President about his 740 00:39:03,600 --> 00:39:05,600 Speaker 11: plans to bring down inflation, and they should be hearing 741 00:39:05,600 --> 00:39:08,720 Speaker 11: from the President whether or not he thinks interest rates 742 00:39:08,760 --> 00:39:11,280 Speaker 11: are helping or hurting. And I think in this case, again, 743 00:39:12,040 --> 00:39:15,040 Speaker 11: you know where we see housing driving a huge percentage 744 00:39:15,080 --> 00:39:17,759 Speaker 11: of continued inflation, and the interest rate environment is not 745 00:39:17,840 --> 00:39:18,439 Speaker 11: our front here. 746 00:39:20,719 --> 00:39:22,879 Speaker 2: I suspect he's going to lean into this more as 747 00:39:23,000 --> 00:39:26,040 Speaker 2: we get closer to the election. We'll see what happens 748 00:39:26,080 --> 00:39:30,640 Speaker 2: to the economy. You wonder how much his political fortunes 749 00:39:32,120 --> 00:39:33,920 Speaker 2: lie in a soft landing, if we can call I 750 00:39:33,960 --> 00:39:35,600 Speaker 2: don't know if we're even beyond calling it that at 751 00:39:35,600 --> 00:39:37,200 Speaker 2: this point. Some people think we're already in one. 752 00:39:37,600 --> 00:39:37,799 Speaker 3: Yeah. 753 00:39:37,840 --> 00:39:40,360 Speaker 11: Look, I think obviously the economy is going to be 754 00:39:40,440 --> 00:39:43,719 Speaker 11: a huge part of the story in November, and I 755 00:39:43,760 --> 00:39:46,640 Speaker 11: don't think a high interest rate environment helps President Biden. 756 00:39:46,719 --> 00:39:50,640 Speaker 11: I mean, punishingly high borrowing costs for families. They notice those, 757 00:39:50,760 --> 00:39:53,319 Speaker 11: and they're frustrated by those, and they'd like to see 758 00:39:53,320 --> 00:39:56,840 Speaker 11: those go down. So the President is surely aware of that. Obviously, 759 00:39:56,880 --> 00:39:59,520 Speaker 11: continued high prices are a problem too. I think he's 760 00:39:59,560 --> 00:40:01,399 Speaker 11: done a great, great job, and you know, he did 761 00:40:01,400 --> 00:40:04,880 Speaker 11: this yesterday as well, at pointing out that there's a 762 00:40:04,920 --> 00:40:08,040 Speaker 11: place where we could see inflation come down considerably, where 763 00:40:08,040 --> 00:40:09,719 Speaker 11: we could get a lot of pricing back. 764 00:40:09,680 --> 00:40:11,000 Speaker 8: And that's in the markup channel. 765 00:40:11,640 --> 00:40:14,560 Speaker 11: You know, continued high actually, you know right before the 766 00:40:15,520 --> 00:40:18,480 Speaker 11: you know, the easter break, we saw corporate profits come 767 00:40:18,480 --> 00:40:20,560 Speaker 11: in at their all time record high, not a post 768 00:40:20,560 --> 00:40:23,120 Speaker 11: pandemic record high, a true all time record high. 769 00:40:23,600 --> 00:40:24,960 Speaker 8: And markups are up as well. 770 00:40:25,080 --> 00:40:27,400 Speaker 11: And you know, the President has said repeatedly that he 771 00:40:27,480 --> 00:40:29,960 Speaker 11: thinks markups are a place where we could see softening 772 00:40:30,000 --> 00:40:32,440 Speaker 11: and prices, And you know, just yesterday he mentioned that 773 00:40:33,040 --> 00:40:35,360 Speaker 11: he'd like to see those sort of record high grocery 774 00:40:35,400 --> 00:40:39,120 Speaker 11: margins he passed back to consumers in terms of, you know, 775 00:40:39,160 --> 00:40:40,359 Speaker 11: in the form of lower food prices. 776 00:40:40,440 --> 00:40:42,600 Speaker 2: Well, why did you mention that, because actually one of 777 00:40:42,640 --> 00:40:45,200 Speaker 2: the positive refrains from the CPI was food wasn't as 778 00:40:45,239 --> 00:40:48,760 Speaker 2: bad as its How worried are you about grocery prices? 779 00:40:48,840 --> 00:40:50,719 Speaker 2: There's a real political side to this because just like 780 00:40:50,760 --> 00:40:52,359 Speaker 2: gas prices, people see it every day. 781 00:40:52,560 --> 00:40:52,759 Speaker 8: Yeah. 782 00:40:52,800 --> 00:40:55,960 Speaker 11: Look, I mean here's the here's the rub for the consumer. 783 00:40:56,560 --> 00:40:59,600 Speaker 11: Disinflation doesn't mean lower prices, right. The fact that prices 784 00:40:59,600 --> 00:41:02,040 Speaker 11: stop accelerating doesn't mean that you go to a grocery 785 00:41:02,040 --> 00:41:04,640 Speaker 11: store and you know the price of eggs doesn't take 786 00:41:04,680 --> 00:41:08,320 Speaker 11: your breath away, right, So the sticker shock, I don't think, 787 00:41:09,480 --> 00:41:12,560 Speaker 11: you know, really gets alleviated by today's numbers. But of course, 788 00:41:12,680 --> 00:41:14,160 Speaker 11: you know it's a positive sign that we don't have 789 00:41:14,200 --> 00:41:15,680 Speaker 11: continued to inflation in food. 790 00:41:15,880 --> 00:41:16,800 Speaker 6: Uh huh. 791 00:41:16,920 --> 00:41:20,000 Speaker 2: The other is energy, and we're looking at gas prices rising. 792 00:41:20,040 --> 00:41:22,640 Speaker 2: Of course, there's a seasonal pattern here, and the last 793 00:41:22,680 --> 00:41:24,560 Speaker 2: thing the president wants to hear about is four dollars 794 00:41:24,560 --> 00:41:24,920 Speaker 2: a gallon. 795 00:41:24,960 --> 00:41:26,920 Speaker 6: But that could happen. That is in some forecasts. 796 00:41:27,040 --> 00:41:27,600 Speaker 8: Absolutely. 797 00:41:27,640 --> 00:41:30,000 Speaker 11: I mean, we've got a seasonal pattern on gas prices 798 00:41:30,000 --> 00:41:30,720 Speaker 11: and energy prices. 799 00:41:30,760 --> 00:41:32,520 Speaker 8: We've also got geopolitical. 800 00:41:31,960 --> 00:41:36,240 Speaker 11: Factors now and looming that are going to affect energy prices. 801 00:41:36,320 --> 00:41:38,359 Speaker 11: And again I would just point out this is yet 802 00:41:38,360 --> 00:41:40,440 Speaker 11: another area where the feed is not going to be 803 00:41:40,520 --> 00:41:42,640 Speaker 11: much helped, and so we are really in a little 804 00:41:42,640 --> 00:41:45,200 Speaker 11: bit of a predicament here where the primary tool we're 805 00:41:45,280 --> 00:41:47,440 Speaker 11: using to bring down prices is probably not going to 806 00:41:47,440 --> 00:41:48,320 Speaker 11: give us a lot of relief. 807 00:41:48,440 --> 00:41:49,799 Speaker 2: Well, so when you sit down at the ground, we're 808 00:41:49,800 --> 00:41:52,360 Speaker 2: collaborative and consisted, consider where we're going to be in 809 00:41:52,400 --> 00:41:53,000 Speaker 2: six months. 810 00:41:54,000 --> 00:41:55,160 Speaker 6: What's your vision here? 811 00:41:55,360 --> 00:41:57,760 Speaker 2: Is it a no landing, is it a hot landing 812 00:41:57,840 --> 00:42:00,000 Speaker 2: like I heard this morning on Bloomberg Surveil. 813 00:42:00,320 --> 00:42:01,960 Speaker 6: What does it feel like in the fall? 814 00:42:02,440 --> 00:42:06,600 Speaker 11: Yeah, Look, we're really optimistic about the continued likelihood of 815 00:42:06,640 --> 00:42:07,400 Speaker 11: a soft landing. 816 00:42:07,480 --> 00:42:09,319 Speaker 8: You know, we've been saying for years that it. 817 00:42:09,320 --> 00:42:12,719 Speaker 11: Is possible to have both a strong labor market and 818 00:42:12,840 --> 00:42:15,399 Speaker 11: low prices, that we didn't have to choose between those that, 819 00:42:15,760 --> 00:42:18,240 Speaker 11: you know, the path forward for bringing down prices wasn't 820 00:42:18,480 --> 00:42:21,000 Speaker 11: eviscerating the labor market making us all too poor to 821 00:42:21,000 --> 00:42:23,759 Speaker 11: buy stuff, yeah, and bringing down prices that way. And 822 00:42:24,000 --> 00:42:28,840 Speaker 11: I do think, you know, overall, you know, this couple 823 00:42:28,880 --> 00:42:31,240 Speaker 11: of months hasn't been great on the inflation front, but overall, 824 00:42:31,239 --> 00:42:34,680 Speaker 11: what we've seen now is twenty six full months of 825 00:42:34,800 --> 00:42:38,960 Speaker 11: unemployment below four percent and inflation coming down off its 826 00:42:39,000 --> 00:42:41,399 Speaker 11: peak for you know, a year and a half now, 827 00:42:41,440 --> 00:42:44,240 Speaker 11: and so obviously, you know, we're not getting that straight 828 00:42:44,280 --> 00:42:46,360 Speaker 11: line on inflation that we'd like to see. But I 829 00:42:46,360 --> 00:42:49,160 Speaker 11: think overall the pattern is a strong labor market and 830 00:42:49,160 --> 00:42:52,400 Speaker 11: continued disinflation. And that's the story of a soft landing, 831 00:42:52,480 --> 00:42:54,640 Speaker 11: and that's the story of a strong economy that we're 832 00:42:54,640 --> 00:42:55,240 Speaker 11: hoping to see. 833 00:42:55,320 --> 00:42:59,640 Speaker 6: So you're actually projecting that that will happen. We're hoping 834 00:42:59,640 --> 00:43:01,160 Speaker 6: for it that's not already happened. 835 00:43:01,200 --> 00:43:01,640 Speaker 8: Absolutely. 836 00:43:01,760 --> 00:43:03,680 Speaker 2: Yeah, it's great to see you. Thanks for coming in 837 00:43:03,760 --> 00:43:06,640 Speaker 2: to talk to us in studio. As always, Lindsay Owens groundwork, 838 00:43:06,680 --> 00:43:10,000 Speaker 2: collaborative and a really interesting take on the economy that 839 00:43:10,040 --> 00:43:11,960 Speaker 2: we wanted to bring to you. Lindsay spent time as 840 00:43:11,960 --> 00:43:15,640 Speaker 2: an economic advisor to Senator Elizabeth Warren, to Congresswoman at 841 00:43:15,640 --> 00:43:19,200 Speaker 2: Primela Jaia Paul, and part of the equation here in Washington. 842 00:43:19,239 --> 00:43:21,760 Speaker 2: When we think about the interest rate cycle the impact 843 00:43:21,800 --> 00:43:24,239 Speaker 2: that it's having politically on this administration, Lindsay is. 844 00:43:24,160 --> 00:43:29,880 Speaker 6: A voice that we turn to. Thanks for listening to 845 00:43:29,920 --> 00:43:31,520 Speaker 6: the Balance of Power podcast. 846 00:43:32,120 --> 00:43:35,239 Speaker 2: Make sure to subscribe if you haven't already, at Apple, Spotify, 847 00:43:35,360 --> 00:43:37,920 Speaker 2: or wherever you get your podcasts, and you can find 848 00:43:38,000 --> 00:43:41,240 Speaker 2: us live every weekday from Washington, DC at noontime Eastern 849 00:43:41,520 --> 00:43:42,960 Speaker 2: at Bloomberg dot com.