WEBVTT - Anticipating More Trump Tariffs, DOGE's Tesla Impact

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:09.080
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news from the heart of

0:00:09.119 --> 0:00:14.880
<v Speaker 1>where innovation, money and power collide in Silicon Valley and beyond.

0:00:15.280 --> 0:00:39.480
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Technology with Caroline Hyde and Ed Ludlow.

0:00:33.880 --> 0:00:35.879
<v Speaker 2>Live from New York and Caroline Hyde and this is

0:00:35.880 --> 0:00:39.199
<v Speaker 2>Bimberg Technology. Coming up. The Nasdaq whip soaring ahead of

0:00:39.200 --> 0:00:42.919
<v Speaker 2>President Trump's tarifs. This week will discuss the global tech impact.

0:00:43.280 --> 0:00:46.320
<v Speaker 2>Plus Elil Musk admits his role with those is taxing

0:00:46.400 --> 0:00:50.240
<v Speaker 2>him and impacting his job as CEO of Tesla and SpaceX,

0:00:50.320 --> 0:00:52.680
<v Speaker 2>and a crew of four passengers are set to embark

0:00:52.760 --> 0:00:56.000
<v Speaker 2>on a journey around Earth's poles, so first time humans

0:00:56.000 --> 0:00:59.160
<v Speaker 2>have flown such a mission. But first a check in

0:00:59.200 --> 0:01:01.920
<v Speaker 2>on these markets, which are under pressure once again in

0:01:02.000 --> 0:01:03.480
<v Speaker 2>sell off mode. As you see, we're off by one

0:01:03.520 --> 0:01:05.440
<v Speaker 2>point six percent off of our lowers for the day

0:01:05.480 --> 0:01:07.960
<v Speaker 2>on the Nasdaq one hundred from a points perspective, though

0:01:07.959 --> 0:01:10.000
<v Speaker 2>it is the Magnificent seven that drag us the most.

0:01:10.200 --> 0:01:12.840
<v Speaker 2>Apple is one name in the green, but otherwise it's

0:01:12.840 --> 0:01:17.200
<v Speaker 2>in video, Microsoft, Amazon, Tesla, as well as Meta and Alphabet.

0:01:17.480 --> 0:01:19.839
<v Speaker 2>Drill into the individual moves that push us a little

0:01:19.840 --> 0:01:21.520
<v Speaker 2>bit lower, and we've got to shine a light on

0:01:21.520 --> 0:01:25.160
<v Speaker 2>what's happening with Tesla. Once again, analysts really shining a

0:01:25.240 --> 0:01:28.640
<v Speaker 2>light on the fact that this is politically entwined in

0:01:28.680 --> 0:01:33.200
<v Speaker 2>many ways. The consumer reaction to one Elon Musk, we're

0:01:33.200 --> 0:01:35.280
<v Speaker 2>off by five and a half percent. Again, they had

0:01:35.280 --> 0:01:38.320
<v Speaker 2>outperformed when we first got those hints of auto tariffs.

0:01:38.440 --> 0:01:41.679
<v Speaker 2>No how evs in particular, Tesla might be hurt less

0:01:41.760 --> 0:01:44.840
<v Speaker 2>than competitors. But once again today in risk of sentiment,

0:01:44.840 --> 0:01:46.600
<v Speaker 2>it's off by five and a half percent. And actually

0:01:46.640 --> 0:01:49.160
<v Speaker 2>his Elon Musk over the weekend speaking at a town

0:01:49.200 --> 0:01:52.560
<v Speaker 2>hall in Wisconsin about the dose impact on Tesla's share price.

0:01:53.360 --> 0:01:55.440
<v Speaker 3>It's costing me a lot to be in this job.

0:01:55.680 --> 0:01:59.200
<v Speaker 3>What they're trying to do is put massive pressure on me,

0:01:59.360 --> 0:02:03.880
<v Speaker 3>and I guess to to you know, I don't stop

0:02:04.000 --> 0:02:06.240
<v Speaker 3>stop doing this. But you know, my Teslis stock and

0:02:06.280 --> 0:02:08.480
<v Speaker 3>the stock of everyone who Holst Tess has gone went

0:02:08.560 --> 0:02:10.360
<v Speaker 3>roughly in half. I mean, it's a big deal.

0:02:11.000 --> 0:02:13.880
<v Speaker 2>Let's get you analysis in Meg's Max Chafkin joins us

0:02:13.919 --> 0:02:18.040
<v Speaker 2>now host of elon Ing podcast and just intertwined with

0:02:18.120 --> 0:02:21.079
<v Speaker 2>his movements. And it was interesting that at a political

0:02:21.160 --> 0:02:23.160
<v Speaker 2>rally he's admitting some of the knock on effects here.

0:02:23.600 --> 0:02:25.919
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I mean, well, it's been pretty dramatic. We've seen

0:02:25.960 --> 0:02:29.399
<v Speaker 4>these huge drops in sales in Europe, where of course

0:02:29.440 --> 0:02:33.200
<v Speaker 4>Elon Musk has also been uh been stirring the pop politically,

0:02:33.280 --> 0:02:37.600
<v Speaker 4>to say the least. And we've seen sales declines going

0:02:37.639 --> 0:02:40.560
<v Speaker 4>on for some time now, and that and those declines

0:02:40.639 --> 0:02:43.120
<v Speaker 4>are colliding with a business that also has all these

0:02:43.120 --> 0:02:46.480
<v Speaker 4>other struggles, so you throw, you know, Elon Musk's kind

0:02:46.520 --> 0:02:50.240
<v Speaker 4>of controversial branding, these these kind of provocations that he's

0:02:50.280 --> 0:02:53.680
<v Speaker 4>been doing almost on the daily with actual struggles with

0:02:53.720 --> 0:02:56.760
<v Speaker 4>the business as well as you know, all the uncertainty

0:02:56.760 --> 0:02:59.639
<v Speaker 4>around tariffs and the economy in general. And it's it's

0:02:59.639 --> 0:03:02.519
<v Speaker 4>really like a perfect storm. It's a bunch of things

0:03:02.520 --> 0:03:04.920
<v Speaker 4>that are all kind of working together to hurt what

0:03:05.080 --> 0:03:08.040
<v Speaker 4>had been just a company that had been soaring, you know,

0:03:08.120 --> 0:03:09.240
<v Speaker 4>even a couple of months ago.

0:03:09.520 --> 0:03:13.080
<v Speaker 2>Soaring on vibes. Many would say often this stock is

0:03:13.120 --> 0:03:16.760
<v Speaker 2>not related to fundamentals of the business. Even when earnings disappoints,

0:03:16.800 --> 0:03:21.079
<v Speaker 2>sales disappoint we've actually seen sale shares push higher. Can

0:03:21.200 --> 0:03:23.480
<v Speaker 2>he restore vibes or do we start to look at

0:03:23.480 --> 0:03:25.679
<v Speaker 2>the fundamental issues of the business. Well, that's the thing.

0:03:25.760 --> 0:03:27.840
<v Speaker 4>I mean, the vibes were based on this idea that

0:03:27.919 --> 0:03:31.960
<v Speaker 4>Elon Musk is this kind of amazing business superhero. He

0:03:32.040 --> 0:03:34.960
<v Speaker 4>can do things that nobody else can do. And so

0:03:35.040 --> 0:03:37.240
<v Speaker 4>much of that brand was built on Elon Musk as

0:03:37.240 --> 0:03:40.120
<v Speaker 4>an innovator, as somebody who invents new products, particularly new

0:03:40.120 --> 0:03:43.520
<v Speaker 4>products that are you know, involved with alternative energy, and

0:03:43.560 --> 0:03:46.320
<v Speaker 4>that kind of flatter the sensibilities of a certain kind

0:03:46.320 --> 0:03:49.400
<v Speaker 4>of consumer. Now, what we've seen over the last couple

0:03:49.440 --> 0:03:51.640
<v Speaker 4>of years, and in a much more intense way over

0:03:51.680 --> 0:03:54.760
<v Speaker 4>the past couple of months, is just Elon Musk subverting

0:03:54.760 --> 0:03:57.200
<v Speaker 4>that brand, taking that brand and essentially throwing it out

0:03:57.240 --> 0:03:59.520
<v Speaker 4>the window and presenting a new brand, which is Elon

0:03:59.640 --> 0:04:03.040
<v Speaker 4>Musk as a you know, cost cutter, as this vehicle

0:04:03.080 --> 0:04:06.640
<v Speaker 4>of trolling austerity. It is very, very different from the

0:04:06.680 --> 0:04:08.480
<v Speaker 4>story that he had been telling before, and I think

0:04:08.480 --> 0:04:10.800
<v Speaker 4>that is going to make it harder to write the ship.

0:04:11.280 --> 0:04:13.480
<v Speaker 2>But does that give a new source of demand for

0:04:13.560 --> 0:04:18.279
<v Speaker 2>those that loathe the new version? Many love it. Many

0:04:18.560 --> 0:04:21.040
<v Speaker 2>like the fact that there's a rebalancing in austerity, that

0:04:21.080 --> 0:04:23.840
<v Speaker 2>perhaps there's a new source of buyer who wants to

0:04:23.839 --> 0:04:25.800
<v Speaker 2>get out there in Tesla who hadn't automatically looks in

0:04:25.880 --> 0:04:28.359
<v Speaker 2>it from an evy environmental perspective.

0:04:28.680 --> 0:04:32.200
<v Speaker 4>Well, this is something we've heard from some people who

0:04:32.240 --> 0:04:34.120
<v Speaker 4>have sort of defended some of these moves as well

0:04:34.120 --> 0:04:35.680
<v Speaker 4>as you know, if you kind of squint, you could

0:04:35.680 --> 0:04:38.640
<v Speaker 4>see while he's trying to sell pickup trucks. So maybe

0:04:38.640 --> 0:04:41.920
<v Speaker 4>it makes sense to signal more to the right. What

0:04:41.960 --> 0:04:44.640
<v Speaker 4>we've seen from Elon Musk, I'd say goes way beyond

0:04:44.720 --> 0:04:47.960
<v Speaker 4>signaling to the right. I mean, he's you know, you know,

0:04:48.160 --> 0:04:51.600
<v Speaker 4>saying things that are racially tinged. He's making gestures that

0:04:51.600 --> 0:04:54.360
<v Speaker 4>to many people look like, you know, he's saluting Hitler

0:04:54.400 --> 0:04:57.920
<v Speaker 4>at a Trump rally. These are not things that even Republicans,

0:04:57.960 --> 0:05:00.200
<v Speaker 4>even a whi of Trump supporters, are not necessarily going

0:05:00.240 --> 0:05:03.200
<v Speaker 4>to be comfortable with these moves. So I think that's

0:05:03.200 --> 0:05:05.920
<v Speaker 4>one issue. The other issue is the cyber truck has

0:05:05.960 --> 0:05:09.480
<v Speaker 4>just not performed as a pickup. It is not competing

0:05:09.560 --> 0:05:11.400
<v Speaker 4>well with you know, the likes of the Ford f

0:05:11.400 --> 0:05:14.040
<v Speaker 4>one fifty. I think sales have really disappointed. It's become

0:05:14.080 --> 0:05:16.880
<v Speaker 4>a great way to signal your support of Donald Trump,

0:05:17.240 --> 0:05:21.680
<v Speaker 4>not necessarily winning fans in the kind of truck driving class.

0:05:22.279 --> 0:05:25.680
<v Speaker 2>Always great to catch up with Max Chafkin, go listen

0:05:25.960 --> 0:05:28.400
<v Speaker 2>to all things elon K as well. Meanwhile, let's stick

0:05:28.440 --> 0:05:32.120
<v Speaker 2>with enel Musk, his artificial intelligence startup Xai, when it's

0:05:32.160 --> 0:05:34.960
<v Speaker 2>just purchased the social media platform X and an all

0:05:34.960 --> 0:05:37.520
<v Speaker 2>stock deal, the values of combined businesses at one hundred

0:05:37.520 --> 0:05:40.880
<v Speaker 2>million dollars. For more, let's bringing Kurt Wagner enol Musk,

0:05:41.040 --> 0:05:44.520
<v Speaker 2>very busy man and one of his startups buying another one.

0:05:44.600 --> 0:05:49.440
<v Speaker 2>And there's a big well boying for the X shareholders

0:05:49.480 --> 0:05:52.720
<v Speaker 2>ecty or debt in many ways, I.

0:05:52.680 --> 0:05:54.440
<v Speaker 5>Think so I think they're the biggest winners in this

0:05:54.520 --> 0:05:56.640
<v Speaker 5>whole thing, right, I mean, because you think about what

0:05:56.839 --> 0:05:59.200
<v Speaker 5>happened over the last two and a half years since

0:05:59.240 --> 0:06:02.680
<v Speaker 5>Elon walked in in the Twitter offices with that sync, right,

0:06:02.720 --> 0:06:05.440
<v Speaker 5>there's been a ton of uncertainty. We've seen advertisers flee,

0:06:05.480 --> 0:06:08.560
<v Speaker 5>we've seen users flee, We've seen the value of that company,

0:06:08.600 --> 0:06:12.440
<v Speaker 5>by some measures, basically cut in half, if not more.

0:06:12.839 --> 0:06:16.080
<v Speaker 5>And so if you are an ex investor today, a

0:06:16.120 --> 0:06:18.880
<v Speaker 5>week ago, you were owning shares in this very struggling

0:06:18.960 --> 0:06:22.960
<v Speaker 5>social networking business with a small advertising arm. Now you

0:06:23.120 --> 0:06:26.919
<v Speaker 5>own shares in an AI startup that's worth double the

0:06:26.960 --> 0:06:29.919
<v Speaker 5>price and growing, and so I think this is a

0:06:29.960 --> 0:06:33.279
<v Speaker 5>big win for them, more so than pretty much anybody else.

0:06:33.560 --> 0:06:38.960
<v Speaker 2>There were initial analyst reactions saying this makes sense. Will Research,

0:06:39.000 --> 0:06:42.760
<v Speaker 2>for example, immediately putting out feeling that the combination makes

0:06:42.760 --> 0:06:46.279
<v Speaker 2>strategic sense, but many also questioning why they needed to

0:06:46.279 --> 0:06:49.080
<v Speaker 2>do it at all. Already Grock was deeply infused with

0:06:49.560 --> 0:06:52.200
<v Speaker 2>in X, Why do they need to make the tie up?

0:06:52.240 --> 0:06:54.560
<v Speaker 2>And other more questions and answers In many.

0:06:54.440 --> 0:06:57.719
<v Speaker 5>Ways, Yeah, I mean, this is my biggest question here

0:06:57.839 --> 0:07:01.240
<v Speaker 5>is that on paper, yes, this makes sense, right, an

0:07:01.279 --> 0:07:04.560
<v Speaker 5>AI company buying a social network like X, getting you know,

0:07:04.640 --> 0:07:08.960
<v Speaker 5>exclusive access to that proprietary data, getting the distribution of

0:07:09.360 --> 0:07:12.080
<v Speaker 5>a GROC to millions of people via X, right, Like

0:07:12.160 --> 0:07:14.080
<v Speaker 5>all those things make sense on paper.

0:07:14.480 --> 0:07:15.760
<v Speaker 6>But the difference here is that.

0:07:15.680 --> 0:07:19.040
<v Speaker 5>Elon already owns both companies, right, So there was no

0:07:19.240 --> 0:07:21.600
<v Speaker 5>fear that X was going to go out and strike

0:07:21.640 --> 0:07:24.520
<v Speaker 5>some exclusive deal with a competitor. You know, they were

0:07:24.560 --> 0:07:28.240
<v Speaker 5>already using X's data to train GROC and work on

0:07:28.280 --> 0:07:32.280
<v Speaker 5>their AI models, so like they had the relationship sort

0:07:32.320 --> 0:07:35.440
<v Speaker 5>of already. And so that's why I don't really understand

0:07:35.440 --> 0:07:38.080
<v Speaker 5>why they needed to spend you know, thirty three billion

0:07:38.280 --> 0:07:41.239
<v Speaker 5>or forty five billion including debt to buy this company

0:07:41.240 --> 0:07:43.880
<v Speaker 5>that they pretty much had all of what they needed

0:07:43.880 --> 0:07:44.680
<v Speaker 5>from it already.

0:07:45.120 --> 0:07:47.640
<v Speaker 2>A key question mark for me as well, Kat not

0:07:47.720 --> 0:07:51.000
<v Speaker 2>only who leads x going forward and what Linda aki

0:07:51.120 --> 0:07:53.960
<v Speaker 2>Yakarino's future looks like, but is how he got an

0:07:54.000 --> 0:07:57.840
<v Speaker 2>eighty billion dollar valuation on Xai. There was no new

0:07:57.840 --> 0:07:59.480
<v Speaker 2>funding here. It seems to be a number that was

0:07:59.560 --> 0:08:03.080
<v Speaker 2>kind of plucked out of the air exactly.

0:08:03.200 --> 0:08:07.120
<v Speaker 5>And so the last time Xai had a funding round

0:08:07.200 --> 0:08:10.000
<v Speaker 5>was in November. I believe it was valued right around

0:08:10.000 --> 0:08:12.960
<v Speaker 5>fifty billion at that time. There's been no new rays

0:08:13.000 --> 0:08:16.400
<v Speaker 5>for Xai since then until this deal, and suddenly Xai

0:08:16.520 --> 0:08:19.360
<v Speaker 5>is worth eighty billion, right, And so this is what happens, Caroline,

0:08:19.360 --> 0:08:22.440
<v Speaker 5>when you have two privately held companies. They're owned by

0:08:22.440 --> 0:08:25.400
<v Speaker 5>the same person, they're represented by the same bank, right,

0:08:25.480 --> 0:08:28.200
<v Speaker 5>Like he is able to essentially, you know, make up

0:08:28.240 --> 0:08:31.320
<v Speaker 5>these valuations and say, you know, I think x is

0:08:31.360 --> 0:08:33.680
<v Speaker 5>worth this, and that means that Xai is now worth

0:08:33.679 --> 0:08:37.120
<v Speaker 5>that and boil that's done, right as long as shareholders

0:08:37.440 --> 0:08:41.359
<v Speaker 5>are not you know, essentially revolting at these these decisions.

0:08:41.600 --> 0:08:44.320
<v Speaker 5>I think Elon has a lot of sort of latitudes

0:08:44.360 --> 0:08:48.040
<v Speaker 5>here to you know, value these things where he wants

0:08:48.080 --> 0:08:49.319
<v Speaker 5>them to be valued.

0:08:49.840 --> 0:08:53.400
<v Speaker 2>Number go up, Kat Wagner, thanks so much joining us.

0:08:53.559 --> 0:08:56.880
<v Speaker 2>Coming up preparing for Trump's reciprocal tariffs. More on the

0:08:56.960 --> 0:09:00.199
<v Speaker 2>global tariff impact on a tech sector. That's next as

0:09:00.200 --> 0:09:13.080
<v Speaker 2>a blombg technology markets. They are in cell off mode

0:09:13.120 --> 0:09:15.640
<v Speaker 2>ahead of President Trump's reciprocal tariff set to begin at

0:09:15.679 --> 0:09:18.439
<v Speaker 2>this Wednesday. Now this is course is he says he's

0:09:18.480 --> 0:09:21.240
<v Speaker 2>prepared to enact secondary tariffs on buyers of Russian oil

0:09:21.280 --> 0:09:24.199
<v Speaker 2>if Putin refuses to cease far US with the Ukraine.

0:09:24.360 --> 0:09:27.800
<v Speaker 2>For more, Bloomberg's Kaylee lines joins us with a macro focus,

0:09:27.840 --> 0:09:29.319
<v Speaker 2>and we want to whickle it a bit more down

0:09:29.360 --> 0:09:33.040
<v Speaker 2>to technology. But Kayley, there's a lot of angst quite

0:09:33.360 --> 0:09:34.920
<v Speaker 2>evidently so today.

0:09:35.880 --> 0:09:38.079
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, a lot of anks because there's a lot of uncertainty,

0:09:38.160 --> 0:09:40.800
<v Speaker 7>Caroline Frankly, at this point, two days ahead of this

0:09:40.960 --> 0:09:43.880
<v Speaker 7>so called Liberation Day announcement the President is planning to make,

0:09:43.880 --> 0:09:45.720
<v Speaker 7>there is a real lack of clarity as to what

0:09:45.800 --> 0:09:48.840
<v Speaker 7>exactly these reciprocal tariffs are going to look like. What

0:09:48.920 --> 0:09:51.240
<v Speaker 7>the rates will be, who will be placed on, and

0:09:51.280 --> 0:09:53.400
<v Speaker 7>whether or not there will be any exemptions, and what

0:09:53.840 --> 0:09:56.560
<v Speaker 7>it will take to get those exemptions. The President over

0:09:56.600 --> 0:09:59.360
<v Speaker 7>the weekend told reporters that this will initially start out

0:09:59.360 --> 0:10:01.599
<v Speaker 7>with our country. That does throw a little bit of

0:10:01.679 --> 0:10:04.000
<v Speaker 7>cold water on the idea that he may have made

0:10:04.000 --> 0:10:07.120
<v Speaker 7>some exceptions right from the jump, that he also is

0:10:07.160 --> 0:10:11.079
<v Speaker 7>suggesting that it's not so much about ten or fifteen countries.

0:10:11.080 --> 0:10:12.760
<v Speaker 7>He said he hadn't heard that rum or, even though

0:10:12.760 --> 0:10:14.719
<v Speaker 7>that it's actually something that was floated by his very

0:10:14.720 --> 0:10:18.280
<v Speaker 7>own Treasury Secretary Scott Bessen, who suggested there is a

0:10:18.360 --> 0:10:22.520
<v Speaker 7>dirty fifteen and according to Bloomberg Economics analyst analysis of

0:10:22.559 --> 0:10:25.400
<v Speaker 7>what those fifteen countries actually are, nine of them that

0:10:25.440 --> 0:10:28.880
<v Speaker 7>have the largest trade deficits with the US are in Asia.

0:10:28.920 --> 0:10:33.120
<v Speaker 7>A lot of components like semiconductors, for example, could be impacted,

0:10:33.160 --> 0:10:35.520
<v Speaker 7>and that is just keeping in mind that whatever reciprocal

0:10:35.600 --> 0:10:37.600
<v Speaker 7>levies are put on, there is always the chance that

0:10:37.679 --> 0:10:39.800
<v Speaker 7>even more tariffs are layered on top of that. The

0:10:39.840 --> 0:10:44.000
<v Speaker 7>President has floated semiconductor specific tariffs at some point in

0:10:44.040 --> 0:10:46.920
<v Speaker 7>the future, as well as on things like pharmaceuticals. Is

0:10:46.960 --> 0:10:49.520
<v Speaker 7>just unclear what exactly that timeline will be and how

0:10:49.520 --> 0:10:51.120
<v Speaker 7>all of these work in conjunction.

0:10:51.200 --> 0:10:51.960
<v Speaker 2>Is he's also.

0:10:51.760 --> 0:10:55.080
<v Speaker 7>Talking about, as you mentioned, Caroline, secondary tariffs on purchasers

0:10:55.320 --> 0:10:57.480
<v Speaker 7>of Russian oil if he doesn't like the way Vladimir

0:10:57.480 --> 0:11:01.720
<v Speaker 7>Putin is conducting seasfire negotiations between the US and of

0:11:01.760 --> 0:11:04.320
<v Speaker 7>course Ukraine, and the big buyers of Russian oil at

0:11:04.360 --> 0:11:07.760
<v Speaker 7>least right now are China and India, both of which,

0:11:07.760 --> 0:11:10.240
<v Speaker 7>of course, in China's case, already have tariffs in place.

0:11:10.280 --> 0:11:12.520
<v Speaker 7>In India could be very threatened given the high levees

0:11:12.559 --> 0:11:15.920
<v Speaker 7>it has on US imports with higher reciprocal terror frates

0:11:15.920 --> 0:11:16.400
<v Speaker 7>as well.

0:11:16.480 --> 0:11:19.559
<v Speaker 2>Kenney, you point us towards the semiconductor effect. We've also

0:11:19.720 --> 0:11:22.160
<v Speaker 2>got to take an account the deadline that comes to

0:11:22.200 --> 0:11:24.400
<v Speaker 2>the end of this week around TikTok as well. Vac

0:11:24.480 --> 0:11:29.760
<v Speaker 2>too embroiled in this geopolitics right now. Yeah, it absolutely is.

0:11:29.760 --> 0:11:32.200
<v Speaker 7>When the President was asked about this last week, Caroline,

0:11:32.200 --> 0:11:35.280
<v Speaker 7>the deadline coming up, he actually suggested that if China

0:11:35.360 --> 0:11:38.520
<v Speaker 7>and the Chinese Communist Party would agree to acquiesce to

0:11:38.600 --> 0:11:41.440
<v Speaker 7>a sale of TikTok's US operations, that that actually could

0:11:41.480 --> 0:11:44.840
<v Speaker 7>result potentially in a lower teriff rate, suggesting once again

0:11:44.880 --> 0:11:47.880
<v Speaker 7>he sees trade policy as a mechanism for negotiating really

0:11:47.960 --> 0:11:50.559
<v Speaker 7>unrelated things. And he also said that if that can't

0:11:50.559 --> 0:11:52.720
<v Speaker 7>be done by Saturday, which of course is the deadline

0:11:52.840 --> 0:11:55.560
<v Speaker 7>April fifth, that he could always just extend it, as

0:11:55.640 --> 0:11:58.040
<v Speaker 7>we saw him do at the very beginning of his term,

0:11:58.080 --> 0:12:00.400
<v Speaker 7>extending at seventy five days, which is why the liners

0:12:00.440 --> 0:12:03.439
<v Speaker 7>this weekend rather than being back in January. But as

0:12:03.440 --> 0:12:06.120
<v Speaker 7>for the actual details of what a deal could look like,

0:12:06.160 --> 0:12:08.640
<v Speaker 7>who that ultimate purchaser could be, and how much control

0:12:08.679 --> 0:12:10.800
<v Speaker 7>they have though, we're not just the operations, but the

0:12:10.840 --> 0:12:13.960
<v Speaker 7>algorithm specifically, very much amadeom question. And we only have

0:12:14.200 --> 0:12:15.920
<v Speaker 7>a few days to go here, Caroline.

0:12:15.679 --> 0:12:18.320
<v Speaker 2>Katie Lions bringing us up to speed, Thank you so much. Meanwhile,

0:12:18.320 --> 0:12:19.800
<v Speaker 2>we've just had some breaking news, as you can see

0:12:19.800 --> 0:12:23.679
<v Speaker 2>across your screens. More ECB European Central Bank officials appear

0:12:23.720 --> 0:12:27.960
<v Speaker 2>ready to accept an April rate pause, basically ending the

0:12:28.000 --> 0:12:30.880
<v Speaker 2>cutting cycle that we have currently seen. It's importantly to

0:12:30.920 --> 0:12:32.760
<v Speaker 2>do with the fears around the fallout from tariffs, the

0:12:32.800 --> 0:12:36.880
<v Speaker 2>inflationary effects. Let's just go more deeply into the global

0:12:36.920 --> 0:12:39.360
<v Speaker 2>tariff impact right now. Ben Harburg's with US, no A

0:12:39.400 --> 0:12:42.440
<v Speaker 2>Capital managing partner and core values Alpha portfolio Manager, No

0:12:42.520 --> 0:12:44.960
<v Speaker 2>A capital. Look, it's a private firm managing over more

0:12:45.000 --> 0:12:48.040
<v Speaker 2>than two billion assets and under management your core values.

0:12:48.320 --> 0:12:52.040
<v Speaker 2>That brings particular exposure to Chinese companies. You're the perfect voice, Ben.

0:12:52.520 --> 0:12:55.400
<v Speaker 2>Are you struggling with a lack of clarity or do

0:12:55.400 --> 0:12:57.160
<v Speaker 2>you feel that you can invest in this moment?

0:12:58.720 --> 0:13:00.880
<v Speaker 8>Well, I think from a Chinese person active, actually the

0:13:00.880 --> 0:13:03.760
<v Speaker 8>country is pretty well positioned. China has been bearing the

0:13:03.800 --> 0:13:08.480
<v Speaker 8>brunt of US tariffs and threats of tariffs for years

0:13:08.520 --> 0:13:12.920
<v Speaker 8>now across both administrations, and so China started much earlier

0:13:12.960 --> 0:13:16.000
<v Speaker 8>than any of other American trade partners and starting to

0:13:16.000 --> 0:13:18.720
<v Speaker 8>think about offshoring, friend shoring, near shoring.

0:13:19.840 --> 0:13:23.240
<v Speaker 9>You know, investors were threatened with sixty percent.

0:13:23.040 --> 0:13:27.080
<v Speaker 8>Tariffs prior to Trump selection, and so actually a lot

0:13:27.120 --> 0:13:30.720
<v Speaker 8>of those kind of very high noise numbers are already

0:13:30.800 --> 0:13:33.520
<v Speaker 8>baked into two people's estimations. And so I think you've

0:13:33.520 --> 0:13:37.280
<v Speaker 8>seen actually the Chinese market outperforming this year relative to

0:13:37.360 --> 0:13:38.720
<v Speaker 8>its US counterparts.

0:13:38.760 --> 0:13:41.240
<v Speaker 2>It's also been outperforming in large part because of the

0:13:41.320 --> 0:13:44.480
<v Speaker 2>Generator AI wave of news. The fact that innovation seems

0:13:44.480 --> 0:13:46.720
<v Speaker 2>to be backfront and center is that something you've been

0:13:46.760 --> 0:13:50.000
<v Speaker 2>betting on to then, innovation was always there.

0:13:50.040 --> 0:13:53.520
<v Speaker 8>I think the issue was that global investors, particularly Western investors,

0:13:53.520 --> 0:13:57.600
<v Speaker 8>didn't price it correctly. That Chinese market was fundamentally undervalued

0:13:58.160 --> 0:14:01.640
<v Speaker 8>for the last few years. You know, Chinese equivalents of

0:14:01.679 --> 0:14:05.600
<v Speaker 8>their American companies valued at many multiples lower. And I

0:14:05.600 --> 0:14:11.960
<v Speaker 8>think some of these more visceral, understandable, concrete actions like

0:14:12.000 --> 0:14:15.679
<v Speaker 8>the Deep Seak kind of Sputnik moment, I think awakened

0:14:15.800 --> 0:14:20.239
<v Speaker 8>global investors to really re evaluating these businesses on their fundamentals,

0:14:20.280 --> 0:14:22.600
<v Speaker 8>and they recognize that actually there was huge amounts of

0:14:22.600 --> 0:14:24.880
<v Speaker 8>innovation going on in China, particularly in the AI.

0:14:24.760 --> 0:14:27.240
<v Speaker 9>Space, where China was always neck and neck with the US.

0:14:27.280 --> 0:14:30.240
<v Speaker 8>And it's not just Deep Seak, it's Alibaba, It's ten Cents.

0:14:30.280 --> 0:14:32.680
<v Speaker 8>So I think people kind of woke up out of

0:14:32.680 --> 0:14:36.000
<v Speaker 8>their sleep and recognize that the market was fundamental innervalue.

0:14:36.400 --> 0:14:39.120
<v Speaker 2>Well, then what about innovation in the United States? As

0:14:39.120 --> 0:14:41.120
<v Speaker 2>we see taris take an impact, is it her?

0:14:42.800 --> 0:14:43.480
<v Speaker 9>I don't think so.

0:14:43.520 --> 0:14:49.360
<v Speaker 8>I mean the American innovative spirit remains intact. Global top

0:14:49.560 --> 0:14:53.200
<v Speaker 8>minds still flocked to the United States and are integrated

0:14:53.240 --> 0:14:55.760
<v Speaker 8>through our universities, into the American workforce, most of them

0:14:55.760 --> 0:15:00.440
<v Speaker 8>becoming Green color holders or US citizens. This same kind

0:15:00.440 --> 0:15:02.560
<v Speaker 8>of query was asked the Chinese when they were kind

0:15:02.560 --> 0:15:06.600
<v Speaker 8>of taking their steps to kind of rein in entrepreneurs

0:15:06.640 --> 0:15:08.440
<v Speaker 8>a couple of years ago. You know, when we saw

0:15:08.600 --> 0:15:11.840
<v Speaker 8>the anti trust measures taken against Ali Baba and Mayitwan,

0:15:12.640 --> 0:15:14.720
<v Speaker 8>it was a similar narrative, was innovation and.

0:15:14.840 --> 0:15:17.480
<v Speaker 9>Entrepreneurship being hurt. So I don't think that's the case.

0:15:17.520 --> 0:15:19.760
<v Speaker 8>And if anything, America is going to put foot on

0:15:19.800 --> 0:15:21.160
<v Speaker 8>the gas on innovation over.

0:15:21.040 --> 0:15:22.160
<v Speaker 9>The Trump era.

0:15:22.560 --> 0:15:24.760
<v Speaker 8>We will see, you know, a lowering of a lot

0:15:24.760 --> 0:15:28.200
<v Speaker 8>of the red tape, the regulatory hindrances, bureaucracy that was

0:15:28.240 --> 0:15:32.960
<v Speaker 8>getting in the way, more tax support, more kind of

0:15:33.000 --> 0:15:36.840
<v Speaker 8>integrated thinking across departments to support innovation. So I expect

0:15:36.840 --> 0:15:39.239
<v Speaker 8>actually a boom in the US innovation, not a decline.

0:15:39.480 --> 0:15:42.120
<v Speaker 2>Then you are close to the administration, we understand that

0:15:42.960 --> 0:15:46.000
<v Speaker 2>when you're trying to give advice to those currently over

0:15:46.040 --> 0:15:48.360
<v Speaker 2>in Washington or any other investor trying to search for

0:15:48.400 --> 0:15:52.840
<v Speaker 2>clarity right now, do help people ultimately eat their vegetables

0:15:52.880 --> 0:15:55.960
<v Speaker 2>with what might longer term be an innovation boost. There

0:15:56.040 --> 0:15:59.440
<v Speaker 2>must be pressure on certain particular parts of innovation when

0:15:59.440 --> 0:16:02.320
<v Speaker 2>it comes to robotics, when it comes to semiconductive access,

0:16:02.360 --> 0:16:02.960
<v Speaker 2>for example.

0:16:04.200 --> 0:16:06.560
<v Speaker 8>Well, so first I think you know, we're things aren't

0:16:06.560 --> 0:16:10.000
<v Speaker 8>as valuats or unpredictable as people think. We're essentially doing

0:16:10.000 --> 0:16:11.720
<v Speaker 8>what the President said he would do. So if you

0:16:11.760 --> 0:16:14.120
<v Speaker 8>want to know where we're going, read what he said.

0:16:14.200 --> 0:16:17.000
<v Speaker 8>Watch what he said. Uh, this is not a huge

0:16:17.000 --> 0:16:19.840
<v Speaker 8>surprise to anyone who was following him over the last

0:16:20.200 --> 0:16:22.240
<v Speaker 8>not not just over the campaign trail, but over the

0:16:22.280 --> 0:16:23.040
<v Speaker 8>last decades.

0:16:24.080 --> 0:16:25.880
<v Speaker 9>And then you know, certainly there is going to be

0:16:25.880 --> 0:16:26.680
<v Speaker 9>short term pain.

0:16:26.760 --> 0:16:29.600
<v Speaker 8>A lot of the key inputs to our supply chain,

0:16:29.640 --> 0:16:34.120
<v Speaker 8>be it automotive, robotics, you know, the rare earth materials

0:16:34.160 --> 0:16:37.640
<v Speaker 8>that come across all kinds of different core inputs. All

0:16:37.680 --> 0:16:39.680
<v Speaker 8>of those are are going to be hit in the

0:16:39.680 --> 0:16:42.880
<v Speaker 8>short term, which will mean some pain. But ultimately we

0:16:43.040 --> 0:16:45.360
<v Speaker 8>have to find a way to wean ourselves off dependence

0:16:45.400 --> 0:16:49.000
<v Speaker 8>on particularly obviously Chinese inputs. We need to either on

0:16:49.160 --> 0:16:52.160
<v Speaker 8>shore those supply chains or near shore friendshore those with

0:16:52.240 --> 0:16:54.720
<v Speaker 8>countries that we know we can rely on for decades

0:16:54.760 --> 0:16:55.080
<v Speaker 8>to come.

0:16:55.680 --> 0:16:57.480
<v Speaker 9>And I think this will ultimately.

0:16:57.160 --> 0:17:00.840
<v Speaker 8>Sell to protect America. America's supply chain and ensure that

0:17:00.920 --> 0:17:03.960
<v Speaker 8>it is not going to be vulnerable to a geopolitical

0:17:04.000 --> 0:17:05.560
<v Speaker 8>adversary over the coming years.

0:17:05.920 --> 0:17:08.760
<v Speaker 2>And what about some of the winners twenty twenty three,

0:17:08.800 --> 0:17:11.240
<v Speaker 2>twenty twenty four in video comes to mind, of course

0:17:11.240 --> 0:17:13.840
<v Speaker 2>some of the key chip makers, which now many are

0:17:13.880 --> 0:17:16.639
<v Speaker 2>worried through regulation won't be able to access some of

0:17:16.680 --> 0:17:20.080
<v Speaker 2>their end demand points. Geopolitics getting in the way of

0:17:20.080 --> 0:17:22.400
<v Speaker 2>that too. Is that the sacrifice it's worth it?

0:17:23.480 --> 0:17:24.600
<v Speaker 9>Well, that's not new again.

0:17:24.680 --> 0:17:26.240
<v Speaker 8>I mean, you know, we were we were already seeing

0:17:26.320 --> 0:17:29.760
<v Speaker 8>chip bands and coming particularly out of the Biden administration

0:17:29.840 --> 0:17:32.840
<v Speaker 8>over the last four years, exporting those chips into China.

0:17:32.840 --> 0:17:34.879
<v Speaker 9>And of course many of the American chip manufacturers and.

0:17:34.960 --> 0:17:37.720
<v Speaker 8>Video side saw thirty to forty percent of all their

0:17:37.760 --> 0:17:40.960
<v Speaker 8>exports going into China. And China's obviously done incredibly well

0:17:41.440 --> 0:17:46.000
<v Speaker 8>building you know, five and ultimately six G hardware mobile handsets,

0:17:46.000 --> 0:17:48.480
<v Speaker 8>and so it is a huge demand market for those

0:17:48.800 --> 0:17:50.520
<v Speaker 8>for those consumers. So what we have to find do

0:17:50.800 --> 0:17:53.159
<v Speaker 8>a way to do is continue to do business with

0:17:53.280 --> 0:17:55.760
<v Speaker 8>China without giving there our most cutting edge chips, so

0:17:55.840 --> 0:17:59.520
<v Speaker 8>ensure that you know, Chinese consumption is still helping to

0:17:59.560 --> 0:18:04.200
<v Speaker 8>understand underlie and fund American art research and development and innovation,

0:18:04.720 --> 0:18:07.639
<v Speaker 8>but make sure we're still ahead on the kind of

0:18:07.680 --> 0:18:09.720
<v Speaker 8>most cutting edge chips. And so that's where these chip

0:18:09.760 --> 0:18:11.560
<v Speaker 8>bands come into effect. And we've got to ensure obviously

0:18:11.600 --> 0:18:14.639
<v Speaker 8>that those aren't being circumvented by third party countries.

0:18:14.280 --> 0:18:17.920
<v Speaker 2>As well, big investor in China, investor in innovation, investor

0:18:18.040 --> 0:18:21.159
<v Speaker 2>in soccer as well, which I think is behind the

0:18:21.200 --> 0:18:23.200
<v Speaker 2>background that we currently see with you at the moment,

0:18:23.240 --> 0:18:25.960
<v Speaker 2>Ben ben Harberg, another capital and anymore, we thank you

0:18:33.359 --> 0:18:36.200
<v Speaker 2>time now for talking tech and first our France has

0:18:36.240 --> 0:18:38.840
<v Speaker 2>fined Apple one hundred and sixty two million dollars over

0:18:38.920 --> 0:18:42.800
<v Speaker 2>iOS data consent rules. Now antitrust regulators say Apple's app

0:18:42.840 --> 0:18:46.320
<v Speaker 2>tracking transparency system does not allow developers to comply with

0:18:46.400 --> 0:18:50.240
<v Speaker 2>Europe's GDPR priphacy rules. Instead, it forces apps to display

0:18:50.359 --> 0:18:53.679
<v Speaker 2>multiple pop ups. Apple said it was disappointed in the decision,

0:18:53.680 --> 0:18:56.679
<v Speaker 2>while similar investigations are actually underway in Germany, Poland, Italy

0:18:56.720 --> 0:19:00.960
<v Speaker 2>and Romania. Plus Nokia and Amazon have settled a global

0:19:01.000 --> 0:19:04.560
<v Speaker 2>patent dispute over its streaming technologies. Nokia had alleged that

0:19:04.560 --> 0:19:08.080
<v Speaker 2>Amazon used its tech in streaming services and devices without authorization.

0:19:08.359 --> 0:19:12.159
<v Speaker 2>The settlement results all patent litigations globally. The terms are

0:19:12.160 --> 0:19:15.840
<v Speaker 2>not disclosed, and Japan is preparing as much as five

0:19:15.880 --> 0:19:18.760
<v Speaker 2>point four billion dollars an additional aid for chip startup

0:19:18.880 --> 0:19:21.439
<v Speaker 2>Rapidness is the latest move by the country to bolster

0:19:21.520 --> 0:19:25.199
<v Speaker 2>its semiconductor industry during heightened US China tensions. Now that

0:19:25.240 --> 0:19:28.680
<v Speaker 2>brings Japan's total public funding of advanced chips to nearly

0:19:28.720 --> 0:19:31.760
<v Speaker 2>eleven and a half billion dollars. And let's just now

0:19:31.880 --> 0:19:35.000
<v Speaker 2>take a look at those US China tentions with a

0:19:35.040 --> 0:19:38.080
<v Speaker 2>focus on Huawei reporting a nine and a half percent

0:19:38.160 --> 0:19:40.639
<v Speaker 2>rise in revenue in the December quarter according to Bloomberg's

0:19:40.640 --> 0:19:43.840
<v Speaker 2>calculations based on annual results. There's also posted a net

0:19:43.920 --> 0:19:46.720
<v Speaker 2>loss and more than forty million dollars due to aggressive

0:19:46.760 --> 0:19:49.159
<v Speaker 2>spending on research into development. Let's talk about it with

0:19:49.200 --> 0:19:52.360
<v Speaker 2>Peter Elstrom. And the point here is China is all

0:19:52.400 --> 0:19:54.600
<v Speaker 2>in on R and D in large part because the

0:19:54.640 --> 0:19:58.840
<v Speaker 2>limitations to access to chips from the US. Yeah, that's

0:19:58.880 --> 0:19:59.560
<v Speaker 2>exactly right.

0:19:59.800 --> 0:20:03.160
<v Speaker 10>This this is a pretty remarkable financial report from Huawei.

0:20:03.680 --> 0:20:07.439
<v Speaker 10>As you mentioned, Huawei's revenue grew almost ten percent to

0:20:07.480 --> 0:20:09.960
<v Speaker 10>about thirty eight billion dollars. The company has been growing

0:20:10.000 --> 0:20:15.080
<v Speaker 10>quite quickly recently. That's largely because of big gains in

0:20:15.119 --> 0:20:18.920
<v Speaker 10>their smartphone business, in particular in their cloud computing business.

0:20:19.160 --> 0:20:21.439
<v Speaker 10>As you may recall, Huawei was largely out of the

0:20:21.480 --> 0:20:24.359
<v Speaker 10>smartphone business because of this US ban on them getting

0:20:24.400 --> 0:20:27.240
<v Speaker 10>the access to the most advanced chips. They weren't able

0:20:27.240 --> 0:20:30.240
<v Speaker 10>to compete with Apple and even their domestic competitors. They've

0:20:30.280 --> 0:20:32.040
<v Speaker 10>now been able to get access to those and the

0:20:32.040 --> 0:20:33.560
<v Speaker 10>smartphone business is growing again.

0:20:33.600 --> 0:20:34.960
<v Speaker 2>Cloud computing is growing again.

0:20:35.160 --> 0:20:38.199
<v Speaker 10>But as you say, really the headline number here is

0:20:38.240 --> 0:20:40.879
<v Speaker 10>the loss that they've got. They haven't lost money in

0:20:40.920 --> 0:20:43.600
<v Speaker 10>a quarter for many years. They're pouring money into R

0:20:43.640 --> 0:20:46.600
<v Speaker 10>and D in particular, Huawei has really become one of

0:20:46.600 --> 0:20:49.399
<v Speaker 10>the leaders, the national champions for China and trying to

0:20:49.400 --> 0:20:52.679
<v Speaker 10>make breakthroughs in these key technologies that are important to

0:20:52.680 --> 0:20:56.159
<v Speaker 10>them strategically. So they've developed their own operating system to

0:20:56.280 --> 0:20:59.600
<v Speaker 10>replace Android, for example, on smartphones, which was very common.

0:21:00.000 --> 0:21:03.920
<v Speaker 10>We also are pouring money into semiconductors. In particular, they've

0:21:03.920 --> 0:21:06.040
<v Speaker 10>come out with their own AI chip to compete within

0:21:06.160 --> 0:21:08.679
<v Speaker 10>Vidia in the market. Because in Vidia can't sell its

0:21:08.720 --> 0:21:11.639
<v Speaker 10>highest end chips into the market. Wawei is taking some

0:21:11.680 --> 0:21:13.560
<v Speaker 10>of that business right now, and they're getting the kind

0:21:13.600 --> 0:21:16.240
<v Speaker 10>of practice in business to be able to make some gains.

0:21:16.280 --> 0:21:19.240
<v Speaker 10>In terms of the sophistication. They're still quite always behind Nvidia,

0:21:19.520 --> 0:21:20.720
<v Speaker 10>but they are making progress.

0:21:20.960 --> 0:21:24.480
<v Speaker 2>And briefly, Peter, this feeds into a moment where we're

0:21:24.480 --> 0:21:28.040
<v Speaker 2>thinking generative AI is actually being upended by China because

0:21:28.080 --> 0:21:30.760
<v Speaker 2>they can do more with less and less powerful chips.

0:21:30.840 --> 0:21:32.159
<v Speaker 2>Does that counterrap that a little?

0:21:33.000 --> 0:21:36.360
<v Speaker 10>Right? We've seen the constraints that the US has put

0:21:36.400 --> 0:21:39.119
<v Speaker 10>on China and Chinese companies have actually led to some

0:21:39.160 --> 0:21:42.119
<v Speaker 10>pretty creative innovations. We saw it with deep Seek in particular,

0:21:42.280 --> 0:21:44.439
<v Speaker 10>where they had access to some in Vidia chips but

0:21:44.520 --> 0:21:47.479
<v Speaker 10>not the most advanced, they still made progress. Now Huawei

0:21:47.560 --> 0:21:49.720
<v Speaker 10>is trying to feed into that also by providing some

0:21:49.800 --> 0:21:52.280
<v Speaker 10>chips that are maybe not quite as sophisticated, but at

0:21:52.359 --> 0:21:55.040
<v Speaker 10>least give some of these China startups an opportunity to

0:21:55.040 --> 0:21:57.639
<v Speaker 10>be able to develop AI services.

0:21:58.200 --> 0:22:00.159
<v Speaker 2>It's astrom great to have you on the show as

0:22:00.160 --> 0:22:09.960
<v Speaker 2>always with your Asia focus. We thank you. Welcome back

0:22:09.960 --> 0:22:11.920
<v Speaker 2>to New meg Technology and Caroline Hide in New York.

0:22:11.920 --> 0:22:13.879
<v Speaker 2>A quick check on these markets. We are bouncing off

0:22:13.920 --> 0:22:15.800
<v Speaker 2>our lows when it comes to the Nasdaq one hundred.

0:22:15.800 --> 0:22:18.880
<v Speaker 2>But look, we've been underwater throughout the trading day, and indeed,

0:22:19.000 --> 0:22:21.280
<v Speaker 2>following on from Friday's anxiety too, we're off by one

0:22:21.320 --> 0:22:24.240
<v Speaker 2>point four percent. Your leaders on the downside are the

0:22:24.240 --> 0:22:28.280
<v Speaker 2>who's who are the magnificent seven in video, Microsoft, Amazon, Tesla,

0:22:28.520 --> 0:22:31.919
<v Speaker 2>Meta Alphabet. In fact, it's really only Apple that's in

0:22:31.960 --> 0:22:34.280
<v Speaker 2>the green at the moment. We're seeing the magnificent seven

0:22:34.280 --> 0:22:36.040
<v Speaker 2>off by two point four percent. As I shine a

0:22:36.080 --> 0:22:38.600
<v Speaker 2>light on in video off by another four percent for

0:22:38.680 --> 0:22:40.680
<v Speaker 2>what have been the star performer of twenty twenty three

0:22:40.720 --> 0:22:42.880
<v Speaker 2>and twenty twenty four. I also should just show what's

0:22:42.880 --> 0:22:45.400
<v Speaker 2>happening to corweav after it went public last week. First

0:22:45.480 --> 0:22:48.040
<v Speaker 2>day of trading was Friday. It didn't perform that well

0:22:48.080 --> 0:22:50.480
<v Speaker 2>on Friday, and now I'm below that initial price of

0:22:50.520 --> 0:22:52.680
<v Speaker 2>forty dollars were ath thirty six dollars and a half.

0:22:53.119 --> 0:22:55.359
<v Speaker 2>No wonder in a risk off attitude, but also as

0:22:55.359 --> 0:22:58.239
<v Speaker 2>we continue to question the ultimate need for compute here,

0:22:58.320 --> 0:23:01.000
<v Speaker 2>let's discuss with the startup whose business relapsed with corweave.

0:23:01.119 --> 0:23:04.200
<v Speaker 2>Lambda CEO Stephen Balabana, I'm very pleased to say joins

0:23:04.240 --> 0:23:07.000
<v Speaker 2>us now your business has breadth, and it's not just

0:23:07.040 --> 0:23:11.040
<v Speaker 2>about access to GPUs and data centers. But how do

0:23:11.119 --> 0:23:13.800
<v Speaker 2>you feel the market is currently responding to the need

0:23:13.840 --> 0:23:15.199
<v Speaker 2>for compute in the longer term.

0:23:15.880 --> 0:23:18.159
<v Speaker 11>Well, I think that a lot of the demand for

0:23:18.320 --> 0:23:21.720
<v Speaker 11>compute in the future is already priced in, and what

0:23:22.040 --> 0:23:24.359
<v Speaker 11>we're seeing in the short term is probably just general

0:23:24.359 --> 0:23:28.760
<v Speaker 11>market fluctuations. But what I've been seeing with open Eye's

0:23:28.880 --> 0:23:31.960
<v Speaker 11>new image generation tools is that there's a lot more

0:23:31.960 --> 0:23:33.840
<v Speaker 11>compute demand coming down the pipe.

0:23:33.960 --> 0:23:35.760
<v Speaker 2>I think that was where the tension lied for us,

0:23:35.760 --> 0:23:39.720
<v Speaker 2>particularly on Friday, when everyone's worried about too much exposure

0:23:39.720 --> 0:23:42.119
<v Speaker 2>of a core weave to a few key hyperscalers. But

0:23:42.160 --> 0:23:44.399
<v Speaker 2>then Sam Altman of open ai is saying that his

0:23:44.520 --> 0:23:48.000
<v Speaker 2>GPUs are melting because everyone is so keen to play

0:23:48.040 --> 0:23:52.280
<v Speaker 2>with his updated model. So can you square that for us?

0:23:52.400 --> 0:23:56.560
<v Speaker 2>How much will demand of generalor AI ultimately push forward

0:23:56.560 --> 0:23:57.800
<v Speaker 2>your business? Yeah?

0:23:57.840 --> 0:24:01.879
<v Speaker 11>So Sam's tweeting that they're seeing biblical demand for the

0:24:01.920 --> 0:24:05.640
<v Speaker 11>image generation tools that they've launched recently, and a lot

0:24:05.640 --> 0:24:07.920
<v Speaker 11>of the businesses that are probably traded right now are

0:24:07.960 --> 0:24:10.520
<v Speaker 11>being valued on a forward basis, which is to say

0:24:10.520 --> 0:24:13.199
<v Speaker 11>that the projections that they're management teams and everyone's been

0:24:13.200 --> 0:24:16.440
<v Speaker 11>providing is how they're being valued. And so I think

0:24:16.480 --> 0:24:19.960
<v Speaker 11>that there's a lot of as they say, would to

0:24:20.080 --> 0:24:23.680
<v Speaker 11>chop to get to to those run rates which are

0:24:23.720 --> 0:24:30.399
<v Speaker 11>the basis for the valuations. But these tools, it's a

0:24:30.440 --> 0:24:33.280
<v Speaker 11>lot more than just anime image generations.

0:24:32.760 --> 0:24:34.720
<v Speaker 2>And means it doesn't feel like that when you're actually

0:24:34.800 --> 0:24:36.600
<v Speaker 2>on ex at the moment, but there is more.

0:24:36.440 --> 0:24:39.600
<v Speaker 11>To it, right, And so the biggest leap here is

0:24:39.640 --> 0:24:42.600
<v Speaker 11>that these are the first generation of models that are

0:24:42.960 --> 0:24:46.919
<v Speaker 11>basically perfect text rendering fidelity. And so what you're going

0:24:46.960 --> 0:24:48.840
<v Speaker 11>to start to see a lot more of is instead

0:24:48.880 --> 0:24:51.800
<v Speaker 11>of an AI generated image being in an embed inside

0:24:51.840 --> 0:24:54.640
<v Speaker 11>of a presentation, you're going to start to see the

0:24:54.840 --> 0:25:00.199
<v Speaker 11>entire presentation slide is generated by a neural network. What

0:25:00.240 --> 0:25:02.960
<v Speaker 11>that means is, I think we're getting closer and closer

0:25:03.000 --> 0:25:06.040
<v Speaker 11>and closer to the future where nearly every pixel you

0:25:06.119 --> 0:25:08.119
<v Speaker 11>see on a computer screen is going to be rendered

0:25:08.119 --> 0:25:09.280
<v Speaker 11>by a neural network.

0:25:10.240 --> 0:25:13.439
<v Speaker 2>Therefore, that just means compute goes up and to the

0:25:13.520 --> 0:25:17.280
<v Speaker 2>right as it weaves into our enterprise life, into our

0:25:17.520 --> 0:25:18.400
<v Speaker 2>personal life.

0:25:18.440 --> 0:25:23.000
<v Speaker 11>Every presentation, every piece of sales collateral, every advertisement, every

0:25:23.320 --> 0:25:25.480
<v Speaker 11>video game, you're going to start to see more and

0:25:25.560 --> 0:25:28.199
<v Speaker 11>more AI compute embedded in those things, which means that

0:25:28.240 --> 0:25:31.160
<v Speaker 11>demand is going to continue to grow more than exponentially.

0:25:31.280 --> 0:25:32.760
<v Speaker 2>Have we got the infrastructure ready for that.

0:25:34.480 --> 0:25:37.760
<v Speaker 11>Everybody is working really hard in our industry to keep

0:25:37.880 --> 0:25:42.200
<v Speaker 11>up with the ongoing demand. Even with all the high

0:25:42.240 --> 0:25:46.400
<v Speaker 11>expectations and ambition that open ai has, their servers are

0:25:46.440 --> 0:25:49.760
<v Speaker 11>still on fire, and they still probably have underestimated the

0:25:49.760 --> 0:25:52.440
<v Speaker 11>amount of demand that they are seen.

0:25:52.480 --> 0:25:52.680
<v Speaker 8>Now.

0:25:52.720 --> 0:25:55.639
<v Speaker 2>I mean you're serving developers, of course, the entire AI

0:25:55.760 --> 0:25:58.679
<v Speaker 2>development cycle right now. What is it like at your business?

0:25:58.720 --> 0:26:00.800
<v Speaker 2>So how are you managing to scale to meet that

0:26:00.880 --> 0:26:01.600
<v Speaker 2>level of demand?

0:26:02.080 --> 0:26:02.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah?

0:26:02.320 --> 0:26:04.680
<v Speaker 11>I think that one way of looking at land versus

0:26:04.920 --> 0:26:07.480
<v Speaker 11>say Core Weave. COREA has a lot of customer base

0:26:07.680 --> 0:26:11.840
<v Speaker 11>and for example open Ai, and what we're doing is

0:26:11.880 --> 0:26:15.360
<v Speaker 11>servicing kind of everybody. Everybody else, A lot of hyperscalers

0:26:15.359 --> 0:26:18.280
<v Speaker 11>and over one hundred and fifty thousand individual developers use

0:26:18.359 --> 0:26:21.240
<v Speaker 11>Lambda cloud to train their models and inference their models.

0:26:21.680 --> 0:26:25.040
<v Speaker 11>And what we're going to see, especially with these new

0:26:25.080 --> 0:26:28.199
<v Speaker 11>advances in image generation, is that Opening Eye is going

0:26:28.240 --> 0:26:31.320
<v Speaker 11>to have their time in the spotlight run away continue

0:26:31.359 --> 0:26:34.359
<v Speaker 11>to grow their market share and then Open source models

0:26:34.359 --> 0:26:36.280
<v Speaker 11>are going to come in and we're going to start

0:26:36.280 --> 0:26:39.560
<v Speaker 11>to see a lot of that compute demand in clouds

0:26:39.600 --> 0:26:41.960
<v Speaker 11>like the hyper scalers and lambda.

0:26:42.040 --> 0:26:46.680
<v Speaker 2>Will that open source winning come from China? How much

0:26:46.720 --> 0:26:49.120
<v Speaker 2>are we going to see it being US made startup

0:26:49.160 --> 0:26:51.680
<v Speaker 2>and AI models or how much will this be really

0:26:51.720 --> 0:26:54.200
<v Speaker 2>global offer it? I think it's hard to predict.

0:26:54.240 --> 0:26:57.160
<v Speaker 11>I think that my bet would be that we'll probably

0:26:57.240 --> 0:27:01.040
<v Speaker 11>see a high quality Chinese model first, and then the

0:27:01.080 --> 0:27:05.080
<v Speaker 11>rest of the world will continue to publish theirs. I

0:27:05.160 --> 0:27:08.919
<v Speaker 11>am generally bullish of open source internationally, whether it's in

0:27:08.920 --> 0:27:10.760
<v Speaker 11>the United States, China, or elsewhere.

0:27:11.080 --> 0:27:14.560
<v Speaker 2>So for those who are currently aware of the hype cycle,

0:27:14.880 --> 0:27:18.399
<v Speaker 2>seeing the valuations skyrocket and then come back down, and

0:27:18.480 --> 0:27:22.719
<v Speaker 2>still waiting for Generator AI to affect their everyday working world,

0:27:23.160 --> 0:27:24.840
<v Speaker 2>how soon will that come? Do you think? How soon?

0:27:24.840 --> 0:27:27.919
<v Speaker 2>If what every PowerPoint display we make is ultimately a

0:27:27.960 --> 0:27:29.000
<v Speaker 2>neural network.

0:27:29.560 --> 0:27:31.800
<v Speaker 11>I think that what you're starting to see is that

0:27:32.000 --> 0:27:34.639
<v Speaker 11>more and more of the productivity that you do is

0:27:34.720 --> 0:27:39.040
<v Speaker 11>going to be coming from tools like chad GPT, and

0:27:39.480 --> 0:27:42.840
<v Speaker 11>so you might not actually end up seeing it embedded

0:27:42.880 --> 0:27:47.080
<v Speaker 11>inside of PowerPoint. It may actually just be hey, please

0:27:47.800 --> 0:27:51.280
<v Speaker 11>generate this presentation for me, here are the key talking points,

0:27:51.560 --> 0:27:53.760
<v Speaker 11>and it perfectly renders a PDF for you at the

0:27:53.800 --> 0:27:56.240
<v Speaker 11>end of it. I think that that's the big shift

0:27:56.280 --> 0:27:59.399
<v Speaker 11>that's happening, is that neural networks are replacing more and

0:27:59.440 --> 0:28:01.440
<v Speaker 11>more and more of software that we use every day.

0:28:02.000 --> 0:28:05.600
<v Speaker 2>Perhaps not particularly beautiful Moune music for some of these

0:28:05.600 --> 0:28:08.560
<v Speaker 2>publicly traded companies and their products that we so use often.

0:28:08.760 --> 0:28:11.520
<v Speaker 2>Stephen Balavan flown in for uswith so thank him, co

0:28:11.600 --> 0:28:15.199
<v Speaker 2>founder and CEO of Lander. Meanwhile, from AI Data Centers

0:28:15.200 --> 0:28:18.800
<v Speaker 2>to compute for crypto, the Trump family is launching a

0:28:18.800 --> 0:28:22.120
<v Speaker 2>bitcoin mining focus venture with HUT eight called American Bitcoin,

0:28:22.320 --> 0:28:25.480
<v Speaker 2>which will focus on bitcoin mining and quote strategic bitcoin

0:28:25.520 --> 0:28:29.040
<v Speaker 2>reserve development. Eric Trump will serve as American Bitcoin's chief

0:28:29.040 --> 0:28:32.240
<v Speaker 2>strategy officer. Bloomberg's Michael Reagan has been helping edit the

0:28:32.280 --> 0:28:35.000
<v Speaker 2>stories across this world at the moment and ever more,

0:28:35.480 --> 0:28:39.720
<v Speaker 2>the administration and family of the administration becoming intertwined with crypto.

0:28:40.120 --> 0:28:42.800
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, that's right, Carolina. Obviously, this is the latest of

0:28:42.880 --> 0:28:47.320
<v Speaker 6>several Trump family projects in the cryptospace world, Liberty Financial

0:28:47.360 --> 0:28:50.080
<v Speaker 6>being sort of the most high profile. A so called

0:28:50.120 --> 0:28:54.760
<v Speaker 6>DeFi platform launched by Trump and members of his circle.

0:28:55.120 --> 0:28:56.960
<v Speaker 2>This was new news this.

0:28:56.880 --> 0:29:00.640
<v Speaker 6>Morning that we did not know who's coming. But Eric

0:29:00.680 --> 0:29:04.800
<v Speaker 6>Trump and Donald Trump Junior are investors in a company

0:29:05.240 --> 0:29:07.720
<v Speaker 6>that is basically forming a joint venture with HUT eight.

0:29:07.840 --> 0:29:10.640
<v Speaker 6>HUT eight will be the majority owner of an eighty

0:29:10.640 --> 0:29:15.040
<v Speaker 6>percent They are transferring all of their bitcoin mining rigs

0:29:15.040 --> 0:29:20.080
<v Speaker 6>to this new subsidiary and it will be called American Bitcoin. Now, remember,

0:29:20.560 --> 0:29:23.920
<v Speaker 6>on the campaign trail, President Trump made this promise that

0:29:24.080 --> 0:29:28.000
<v Speaker 6>he wanted all bitcoin to be mined in the USA,

0:29:28.320 --> 0:29:30.640
<v Speaker 6>which a lot of people in the industry were skeptical

0:29:30.680 --> 0:29:33.840
<v Speaker 6>that he'd actually be able to fulfill that promise just

0:29:33.840 --> 0:29:37.600
<v Speaker 6>because of the decentralized global nature of bitcoin. And we

0:29:37.640 --> 0:29:40.320
<v Speaker 6>haven't heard much from the President himself about how he

0:29:40.360 --> 0:29:42.920
<v Speaker 6>plans to follow through on that plan. But we do

0:29:43.040 --> 0:29:47.480
<v Speaker 6>know now that the Trump sons are a part of

0:29:46.320 --> 0:29:51.040
<v Speaker 6>this operation, this joint venture with HUT eight to mine

0:29:51.080 --> 0:29:52.320
<v Speaker 6>bitcoin in America.

0:29:52.360 --> 0:29:54.959
<v Speaker 2>And once again, it's all about bitcoin. And you've been

0:29:55.000 --> 0:29:58.000
<v Speaker 2>writing some great stories across your team, but what's up

0:29:58.040 --> 0:30:00.200
<v Speaker 2>with ethereum at the moment? Which is the number two

0:30:00.240 --> 0:30:02.920
<v Speaker 2>players still? But DeFi just not translating in the way

0:30:02.960 --> 0:30:03.560
<v Speaker 2>many had thought.

0:30:03.760 --> 0:30:06.720
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, it's a really interesting story, Carolyne. I mean, Ethereum

0:30:06.760 --> 0:30:10.680
<v Speaker 6>had so much promise, so much potential years ago. I

0:30:10.720 --> 0:30:13.120
<v Speaker 6>think if you look at it from its basic sense,

0:30:13.160 --> 0:30:16.800
<v Speaker 6>there's sort of competition on both sides for Ethereum that

0:30:16.880 --> 0:30:20.160
<v Speaker 6>is pretty fierce above it. If you're just an investor

0:30:20.280 --> 0:30:24.360
<v Speaker 6>who just wants exposure to cryptocurrency, Bitcoin has really proven

0:30:24.440 --> 0:30:27.040
<v Speaker 6>to be the token of choice for that, and I

0:30:27.040 --> 0:30:29.400
<v Speaker 6>think a big part of that reason why is because

0:30:29.440 --> 0:30:32.640
<v Speaker 6>of that famously limited supply of Bitcoin, there will only

0:30:32.720 --> 0:30:36.640
<v Speaker 6>ever be twenty one million bitcoin in existence. Ethereum, on

0:30:36.680 --> 0:30:40.160
<v Speaker 6>the other end, doesn't have a cap on how many

0:30:40.600 --> 0:30:44.080
<v Speaker 6>Ethereum tokens will be issued, and there are already about

0:30:44.120 --> 0:30:47.640
<v Speaker 6>six times as many Ethereum tokens out there. So from

0:30:47.680 --> 0:30:50.920
<v Speaker 6>an investor standpoint, it's clear that you know, people looking

0:30:50.960 --> 0:30:53.600
<v Speaker 6>for long term exposure to the growth and prices a

0:30:53.600 --> 0:30:58.080
<v Speaker 6>bit of crypto are sticking with Bitcoin, and the ETF

0:30:58.120 --> 0:31:00.600
<v Speaker 6>flows have been really you know, off the charts for

0:31:00.680 --> 0:31:04.200
<v Speaker 6>Bitcoin and not so much for Ethereum. But then below Ethereum,

0:31:04.360 --> 0:31:07.760
<v Speaker 6>the other competition on that sort of DeFi space is Salana.

0:31:07.920 --> 0:31:11.920
<v Speaker 6>You know, Ethereum's great innovation was that you could trade

0:31:11.960 --> 0:31:14.600
<v Speaker 6>a lot more than just the ether tokens. You know,

0:31:14.640 --> 0:31:19.240
<v Speaker 6>bitcoin exists, that blockchain exists basically just to trade bitcoin.

0:31:19.560 --> 0:31:22.760
<v Speaker 6>Ethereum opened up the world to the possibilities of NFTs

0:31:22.960 --> 0:31:26.440
<v Speaker 6>and these other smart contracts that could be traded on

0:31:26.480 --> 0:31:29.400
<v Speaker 6>crypto blockchains. Now you can roll your eyes on NFTs,

0:31:29.440 --> 0:31:33.920
<v Speaker 6>but for Wall Street that's hungary to tokenize real world assets.

0:31:33.960 --> 0:31:36.080
<v Speaker 6>That was sort of the proof case.

0:31:36.120 --> 0:31:37.040
<v Speaker 2>Of how that could be done.

0:31:37.120 --> 0:31:39.640
<v Speaker 6>But the problem now is Salanta is just doing it

0:31:39.680 --> 0:31:44.280
<v Speaker 6>at a cheaper, faster transaction speed and is really providing

0:31:44.480 --> 0:31:46.080
<v Speaker 6>stiff competition for Ethereum.

0:31:46.680 --> 0:31:49.160
<v Speaker 2>Moment of truth for Italic in a moment, Michael Reagan,

0:31:49.480 --> 0:31:52.320
<v Speaker 2>we thank you very much. Indeed, coming up, we're going

0:31:52.360 --> 0:31:55.120
<v Speaker 2>to be joined by Catherine Bracy, CEO the tech advocacy

0:31:55.160 --> 0:31:58.320
<v Speaker 2>group tech Equity on herniebook dissecting the impact of venture

0:31:58.320 --> 0:32:01.680
<v Speaker 2>capital and society at large. It's a bally meg technology

0:32:11.920 --> 0:32:16.320
<v Speaker 2>Alphabets AI based drug discovery unit Isomorphic Labs. It's just

0:32:16.400 --> 0:32:18.520
<v Speaker 2>that it raised six hundred million dollars in its first

0:32:18.560 --> 0:32:21.720
<v Speaker 2>external funding round, was led by Thrive Capital with participation

0:32:21.760 --> 0:32:25.480
<v Speaker 2>from GV and Alphabet. The goal develop its AI drug

0:32:25.520 --> 0:32:30.280
<v Speaker 2>design engine and support drug candidates into clinical testing. Now

0:32:30.400 --> 0:32:32.200
<v Speaker 2>we're going to take a slightly different approach to the

0:32:32.280 --> 0:32:36.000
<v Speaker 2>VC industry, though. A new book says bad practices from

0:32:36.080 --> 0:32:39.360
<v Speaker 2>venture capital are bleeding into all industries and damaging the economy.

0:32:39.560 --> 0:32:43.720
<v Speaker 2>It's called World Eaters, How venture capital is cannibalizing the economy.

0:32:43.880 --> 0:32:46.960
<v Speaker 2>It's author Katherin Bracy, CEO of the advocacy group tech Equity,

0:32:47.400 --> 0:32:50.680
<v Speaker 2>joins us now, and it's the word cannibalizing. I'm really

0:32:50.680 --> 0:32:54.840
<v Speaker 2>interested in within. Can you articulate briefly what the argument

0:32:54.960 --> 0:32:56.240
<v Speaker 2>is here the bad behavior.

0:32:57.800 --> 0:33:01.959
<v Speaker 12>Well, essentially, it's the power of the venture capital has

0:33:02.000 --> 0:33:06.000
<v Speaker 12>been chasing. It's become about chasing financial returns instead of

0:33:06.040 --> 0:33:09.880
<v Speaker 12>chasing new technologies. And since there's so much money chasing

0:33:09.920 --> 0:33:14.480
<v Speaker 12>a very few companies that can actually deliver venture scale returns,

0:33:15.840 --> 0:33:18.960
<v Speaker 12>the money has gone and sought out areas of the

0:33:19.000 --> 0:33:21.640
<v Speaker 12>economy where it really shouldn't be. And that's why the

0:33:21.640 --> 0:33:24.680
<v Speaker 12>book is called World leaders, a play on Read Hoffman's

0:33:24.800 --> 0:33:27.200
<v Speaker 12>essay from twenty eleven, software is eating the world. I

0:33:27.200 --> 0:33:29.040
<v Speaker 12>don't think it's software that's eating the world. I think

0:33:29.080 --> 0:33:32.080
<v Speaker 12>it's venture capital's business models that are eating the world.

0:33:32.560 --> 0:33:34.520
<v Speaker 2>Well, if you look at the latest funding round, the

0:33:34.560 --> 0:33:36.680
<v Speaker 2>record one that's going to be up to forty billion

0:33:36.760 --> 0:33:39.480
<v Speaker 2>dollars in new equity for now a three hundred billion

0:33:39.480 --> 0:33:44.160
<v Speaker 2>dollar valuation. Open ai surely a generative AI, large language

0:33:44.160 --> 0:33:46.640
<v Speaker 2>model that just would not have the money to continue

0:33:46.680 --> 0:33:49.280
<v Speaker 2>unless it looked to VC or private funding. Surely that

0:33:49.440 --> 0:33:51.840
<v Speaker 2>is the right kind of business to get venture capital funding.

0:33:52.760 --> 0:33:55.560
<v Speaker 12>Well maybe, Actually I interviewed Sam Altman for the book,

0:33:55.600 --> 0:33:59.520
<v Speaker 12>and he told me that the technology behind open ai

0:33:59.600 --> 0:34:02.120
<v Speaker 12>is the kind of thing that government should be investing in,

0:34:02.240 --> 0:34:06.480
<v Speaker 12>same with his other big startup in nuclear that government

0:34:06.560 --> 0:34:09.600
<v Speaker 12>isn't doing it, so venture capital has to step in.

0:34:09.719 --> 0:34:11.640
<v Speaker 12>And the reason he's set up open ai as a

0:34:11.680 --> 0:34:16.160
<v Speaker 12>nonprofit was to protect the technology from the mandates of

0:34:16.239 --> 0:34:18.440
<v Speaker 12>venture capital as much as possible. We see how that

0:34:18.520 --> 0:34:21.359
<v Speaker 12>has ended up and what it means for companies who

0:34:22.040 --> 0:34:26.080
<v Speaker 12>are maybe pursuing these breakthroughs that have a lot of

0:34:26.480 --> 0:34:30.080
<v Speaker 12>danger in the world to be really driven by the

0:34:30.120 --> 0:34:33.359
<v Speaker 12>incentives of investors and not really the incentives of what's

0:34:33.400 --> 0:34:34.480
<v Speaker 12>best for our society.

0:34:35.280 --> 0:34:37.759
<v Speaker 2>Is there a way to realign incentives here at the moment,

0:34:37.800 --> 0:34:40.279
<v Speaker 2>because ultimately the US government, for example, is trying to

0:34:40.280 --> 0:34:43.560
<v Speaker 2>pull back on spending turning evermore to the private markets,

0:34:43.560 --> 0:34:47.480
<v Speaker 2>to private capital to fund AI infrastructure. For example, we've

0:34:47.480 --> 0:34:49.799
<v Speaker 2>got money going into at least genitive AI helping with

0:34:49.920 --> 0:34:53.279
<v Speaker 2>health breakthroughs we just reported from Alphabet. How do you

0:34:53.280 --> 0:34:55.120
<v Speaker 2>realign at this moment, Catherine.

0:34:55.800 --> 0:34:57.879
<v Speaker 12>Well, I definitely think there's a role that government can

0:34:57.960 --> 0:35:00.960
<v Speaker 12>play for market crafting, that is, you know, creating the

0:35:01.000 --> 0:35:05.440
<v Speaker 12>incentives for venture capital to seek out the startups that

0:35:05.480 --> 0:35:07.960
<v Speaker 12>aren't getting invested in. I think, you know, what I

0:35:08.040 --> 0:35:10.400
<v Speaker 12>found in my research was that the bigger problem than

0:35:10.480 --> 0:35:13.880
<v Speaker 12>VC investing in some companies is that they weren't investing

0:35:13.960 --> 0:35:17.480
<v Speaker 12>in many others that could create a lot of great value.

0:35:17.600 --> 0:35:19.880
<v Speaker 12>You know, companies that are hitting doubles or triples instead

0:35:19.880 --> 0:35:21.759
<v Speaker 12>of grand slams, and right now there just are not

0:35:21.880 --> 0:35:25.440
<v Speaker 12>capital markets for them. So, you know, I think there's

0:35:25.480 --> 0:35:27.840
<v Speaker 12>a lot that government could do to catalyze money going

0:35:27.880 --> 0:35:31.640
<v Speaker 12>into those areas. But honestly, there's nothing that policy really

0:35:31.640 --> 0:35:33.759
<v Speaker 12>has to change right now for the markets to change.

0:35:33.800 --> 0:35:37.520
<v Speaker 12>Limited partners could decide that, you know, chasing returns through

0:35:37.600 --> 0:35:41.880
<v Speaker 12>venture capital is not always the best outcome, that not

0:35:41.960 --> 0:35:45.640
<v Speaker 12>every VC fund can be Sequoia or Andres and Horowitz

0:35:45.680 --> 0:35:47.759
<v Speaker 12>and not every limited partner is going to get into them,

0:35:47.800 --> 0:35:50.279
<v Speaker 12>So why not take a bet on you know, fund

0:35:50.320 --> 0:35:54.040
<v Speaker 12>managers that are putting their portfolios together around doubles and

0:35:54.040 --> 0:35:57.640
<v Speaker 12>triples instead of chasing the elusive dec acord.

0:35:57.440 --> 0:35:59.400
<v Speaker 2>And what do these doubles and triples need to fix?

0:35:59.480 --> 0:36:01.480
<v Speaker 2>One are the is that you think of being over looked?

0:36:02.280 --> 0:36:04.440
<v Speaker 12>Well, the one I focus on in my book is housing.

0:36:04.560 --> 0:36:08.320
<v Speaker 12>I think the housing market is a very clear opportunity.

0:36:08.440 --> 0:36:12.000
<v Speaker 12>We need innovation there for sure, but we don't. There

0:36:12.000 --> 0:36:15.040
<v Speaker 12>aren't that many software based or venture scale solutions to

0:36:15.120 --> 0:36:19.480
<v Speaker 12>that software or housing is obviously very infrastructure heavy. There

0:36:19.520 --> 0:36:24.560
<v Speaker 12>are long time cycles here, the regulatory burdens are high,

0:36:24.680 --> 0:36:26.640
<v Speaker 12>and so the way that a fund needs to be

0:36:26.680 --> 0:36:29.600
<v Speaker 12>structured to pursue innovation in the housing market is just

0:36:29.600 --> 0:36:31.040
<v Speaker 12>going to be different. And I don't think there are

0:36:31.040 --> 0:36:34.399
<v Speaker 12>that many fund managers thinking outside the box. How might

0:36:34.440 --> 0:36:38.160
<v Speaker 12>you construct an innovation fund in early stage risk capital

0:36:38.680 --> 0:36:42.640
<v Speaker 12>fund to address solutions in the housing market that doesn't

0:36:42.640 --> 0:36:47.200
<v Speaker 12>look like chasing power law returns at at every angle.

0:36:47.560 --> 0:36:51.120
<v Speaker 2>Has embracing so fascinatingly. Thanks for coming on and talking

0:36:51.160 --> 0:36:53.080
<v Speaker 2>about at CEO tech Equity and the autha of the

0:36:53.120 --> 0:37:05.239
<v Speaker 2>book well details. SpaceX and Apple are fighting for space literally.

0:37:05.480 --> 0:37:07.480
<v Speaker 2>According to the Wall Street Journal, the two companies are

0:37:07.520 --> 0:37:11.239
<v Speaker 2>competing for satellite spectrum rights, which are in limited supply now.

0:37:11.280 --> 0:37:13.920
<v Speaker 2>The iPhone maker has been working to expand its satellite

0:37:13.960 --> 0:37:18.640
<v Speaker 2>connectivity services in a direct combetition with SpaceX's Starling. The

0:37:18.680 --> 0:37:21.040
<v Speaker 2>move would allow Apple to provide service in areas where

0:37:21.080 --> 0:37:22.520
<v Speaker 2>regular cell services can't.

0:37:22.800 --> 0:37:22.960
<v Speaker 11>Now.

0:37:22.960 --> 0:37:26.440
<v Speaker 2>In response, SpaceX has pushed for federal regulators to stall

0:37:26.560 --> 0:37:29.719
<v Speaker 2>Apple funded satellite expansion efforts. And let's just stick with

0:37:29.760 --> 0:37:33.000
<v Speaker 2>SpaceX because the company is preparing to launch four passengers

0:37:33.040 --> 0:37:35.680
<v Speaker 2>around Earth's poles in a first of its kind mission.

0:37:36.040 --> 0:37:39.320
<v Speaker 2>For more, let's bring in Bloomberg's Sana Prashanka and joining

0:37:39.360 --> 0:37:41.600
<v Speaker 2>us for more. The crew of four passengers are doing

0:37:41.640 --> 0:37:43.640
<v Speaker 2>what has never been done before and going around the

0:37:43.680 --> 0:37:46.840
<v Speaker 2>Earth's poles. Right, yes, yes, exactly.

0:37:46.960 --> 0:37:49.479
<v Speaker 13>So it's the first human space flight to fly over

0:37:49.640 --> 0:37:53.720
<v Speaker 13>the Earth's polar regions, which is pretty interesting. So they'll

0:37:53.719 --> 0:37:56.560
<v Speaker 13>take off from Florida and fly in a ninety degree

0:37:56.800 --> 0:37:59.080
<v Speaker 13>circular orbit around the Earth.

0:38:00.239 --> 0:38:03.759
<v Speaker 2>Finance by a crypto billionaire. Why is he and the

0:38:03.800 --> 0:38:08.640
<v Speaker 2>three that he has selected? So keen on the polls. Yeah.

0:38:08.680 --> 0:38:12.560
<v Speaker 13>So they had a press conference last Friday. The FRAM

0:38:12.640 --> 0:38:16.880
<v Speaker 13>two mission. FRAM two is based off a Norwegian polar expeditionship,

0:38:17.800 --> 0:38:22.280
<v Speaker 13>and what Chun Wang, who is a cryptocurrency investor, said

0:38:22.400 --> 0:38:24.480
<v Speaker 13>was that he had always as a kid, always looked

0:38:24.480 --> 0:38:27.520
<v Speaker 13>at the Earth's map and saw this white spot at

0:38:27.560 --> 0:38:29.520
<v Speaker 13>the bottom of the pole and always wondered what was

0:38:29.560 --> 0:38:33.760
<v Speaker 13>out there. So he's excited to view that from space,

0:38:34.400 --> 0:38:39.080
<v Speaker 13>and he's very into visiting different countries, being an explorer

0:38:39.520 --> 0:38:42.080
<v Speaker 13>and going on different adventures, is what he said.

0:38:42.440 --> 0:38:46.280
<v Speaker 2>It's taking an extraordinary group with him of other Pole

0:38:46.400 --> 0:38:50.000
<v Speaker 2>focused explorers, but they're offering their own bodies up to

0:38:50.080 --> 0:38:53.480
<v Speaker 2>research here. They're taking on a lot of risk Altimnisana.

0:38:54.239 --> 0:38:56.920
<v Speaker 13>Yes, yes, definitely, And actually one of the things that

0:38:56.960 --> 0:39:01.960
<v Speaker 13>they're doing on their mission is conducting research on the

0:39:03.360 --> 0:39:08.160
<v Speaker 13>impacts of spaceplight on human health. So they're also teaching

0:39:08.200 --> 0:39:10.479
<v Speaker 13>other people about what it's like to be up there

0:39:10.680 --> 0:39:13.759
<v Speaker 13>while they're putting their own bodies at risks. And one

0:39:13.800 --> 0:39:17.359
<v Speaker 13>of their projects will be capturing the first X ray

0:39:17.360 --> 0:39:20.200
<v Speaker 13>image of a human in space, which will be definitely

0:39:20.320 --> 0:39:23.160
<v Speaker 13>very interesting for the research community in the science community.

0:39:23.320 --> 0:39:28.040
<v Speaker 2>And they lift off Florida. Is this evening, Yes, it's

0:39:28.120 --> 0:39:28.640
<v Speaker 2>this evening.

0:39:28.640 --> 0:39:31.520
<v Speaker 13>They're targeting around nine pm, but there's a couple different

0:39:31.640 --> 0:39:34.520
<v Speaker 13>launch windows if the nine pm one doesn't work out,

0:39:34.560 --> 0:39:37.120
<v Speaker 13>But for now, I think it's around nine thirty pm.

0:39:37.239 --> 0:39:40.640
<v Speaker 2>Sana Pashanka, thanks for following up for us. We appreciate it.

0:39:40.719 --> 0:39:43.919
<v Speaker 2>Also happening today right here on Earth in Vegas at least,

0:39:44.040 --> 0:39:46.960
<v Speaker 2>Intel is holding its two day Intel Vision event. It's

0:39:46.960 --> 0:39:50.200
<v Speaker 2>a conference which kind of showcases Intel's technologies and how

0:39:50.200 --> 0:39:53.000
<v Speaker 2>they're being used to enable new solutions and drive business success,

0:39:53.000 --> 0:39:55.240
<v Speaker 2>so they say, in the AI era. But of course

0:39:55.480 --> 0:39:58.200
<v Speaker 2>that success is all hinges on this guy, Intel's new

0:39:58.280 --> 0:40:00.880
<v Speaker 2>CEO Lit butam he's gonna be speaking for the first

0:40:00.920 --> 0:40:03.839
<v Speaker 2>time this Afternoons's taking on the top job. Let's ask

0:40:03.880 --> 0:40:06.719
<v Speaker 2>man deep seeing from real meg Intelligence what we think

0:40:06.840 --> 0:40:09.480
<v Speaker 2>might be articulated Because he's been out there talking to investors,

0:40:09.480 --> 0:40:13.440
<v Speaker 2>writing letters of course also to his own workforce cuts,

0:40:13.480 --> 0:40:14.839
<v Speaker 2>it seems yeah.

0:40:14.920 --> 0:40:17.640
<v Speaker 14>I mean, look, they've already peered back from the nand

0:40:17.680 --> 0:40:20.640
<v Speaker 14>business so you can see, you know, the focus is

0:40:20.640 --> 0:40:24.120
<v Speaker 14>shifting towards AI hopefully, and that was one of the

0:40:24.160 --> 0:40:26.960
<v Speaker 14>things that I think Pat Gelsinger didn't do very well.

0:40:27.040 --> 0:40:30.560
<v Speaker 14>Was really hone in on AI, which is the growth market.

0:40:30.600 --> 0:40:33.480
<v Speaker 14>I mean, when we look at all the hyperscalers increasing

0:40:33.520 --> 0:40:36.720
<v Speaker 14>their tapics by fifty percent, you would expect is something

0:40:36.760 --> 0:40:38.880
<v Speaker 14>would trickle down to Intel in terms of, you know,

0:40:39.000 --> 0:40:42.520
<v Speaker 14>driving some revenue upside. And I'm hoping, you know, that's

0:40:42.520 --> 0:40:46.359
<v Speaker 14>the vision he articulates when he talks to investors, is

0:40:46.400 --> 0:40:48.960
<v Speaker 14>how Intel is really focused on AI. And look the

0:40:48.960 --> 0:40:52.160
<v Speaker 14>foundry side. I mean, the government seems to be supportive

0:40:53.080 --> 0:40:56.600
<v Speaker 14>to Intel, you know, to bring manufacturing on shore, but

0:40:56.880 --> 0:40:59.920
<v Speaker 14>that is a lengthier turnaround because one of the concerns

0:41:00.040 --> 0:41:03.359
<v Speaker 14>for investors in Intel stock is the cash burn. Yes,

0:41:03.440 --> 0:41:06.200
<v Speaker 14>you don't want to see cash burn. And the message

0:41:06.200 --> 0:41:10.000
<v Speaker 14>here is we're really focused on AI opportunity and they

0:41:10.040 --> 0:41:12.759
<v Speaker 14>somehow have to find a way to compete with Nvidia.

0:41:12.800 --> 0:41:16.200
<v Speaker 2>Well, they got Goudie. That is the offering, right. Do

0:41:16.200 --> 0:41:18.120
<v Speaker 2>they need to change up the talent they have? They've

0:41:18.120 --> 0:41:20.000
<v Speaker 2>certainly been changing up the board talent at least it

0:41:20.080 --> 0:41:20.920
<v Speaker 2>seems well.

0:41:21.200 --> 0:41:23.120
<v Speaker 14>I think there's a lot of that they need to

0:41:23.200 --> 0:41:26.440
<v Speaker 14>change at the product level. Clearly, the product didn't resonate

0:41:26.560 --> 0:41:28.320
<v Speaker 14>very well with the market when it comes to the

0:41:28.400 --> 0:41:31.719
<v Speaker 14>training and influencing opportunity on the AI side. But look,

0:41:31.760 --> 0:41:34.319
<v Speaker 14>this guy is coming from Cadence, so he has that

0:41:34.440 --> 0:41:37.239
<v Speaker 14>software angle in terms of, you know, thinking about what

0:41:37.360 --> 0:41:39.719
<v Speaker 14>is it that Intel can do in terms of both

0:41:39.719 --> 0:41:42.239
<v Speaker 14>the chip side as well as the software side. And

0:41:42.320 --> 0:41:44.480
<v Speaker 14>I hope he articulates that vision.

0:41:45.040 --> 0:41:47.560
<v Speaker 2>It's got to be smoptimism in there too. Right, this

0:41:47.680 --> 0:41:49.719
<v Speaker 2>is a stock that has been wiped out over the

0:41:49.760 --> 0:41:50.520
<v Speaker 2>past year or so.

0:41:50.800 --> 0:41:53.279
<v Speaker 14>Yeah, I mean, if you look at the valuation, this

0:41:53.560 --> 0:41:57.160
<v Speaker 14>is like every pessimistic scenario is baked in the stock

0:41:57.280 --> 0:41:59.759
<v Speaker 14>right now. So any hint of good news around a

0:42:00.640 --> 0:42:04.040
<v Speaker 14>from a vision perspective, and then he lays out clear markers.

0:42:04.080 --> 0:42:06.040
<v Speaker 14>I think it's going to resonate with investors.

0:42:06.200 --> 0:42:08.879
<v Speaker 2>Mandate it's saying, going to be attuned to that talk

0:42:08.880 --> 0:42:12.160
<v Speaker 2>coming from Vegas senior Bloomberg Intelligence analyst. Also, he's busy

0:42:12.280 --> 0:42:16.400
<v Speaker 2>helping organize well as Bloomberg Intelligence's fourth Generator AI conference.

0:42:16.400 --> 0:42:19.760
<v Speaker 2>It's happening on Wednesday, featuring some leading figures in the industry.

0:42:19.760 --> 0:42:22.640
<v Speaker 2>I'm lucky enough to be talking to a few of them. Meanwhile,

0:42:22.840 --> 0:42:25.279
<v Speaker 2>that does it for this edition of Bloomberg Technology. Don't

0:42:25.320 --> 0:42:27.239
<v Speaker 2>forget to check out our podcast. You can find it

0:42:27.280 --> 0:42:29.520
<v Speaker 2>on the terminal as well as online on Apple, Spotify,

0:42:29.600 --> 0:42:32.760
<v Speaker 2>and iHeart from New York. This is Bloomberg Technology.