WEBVTT - 11/13/20 HOUR 1- Sam Monson

0:00:00.680 --> 0:00:03.520
<v Speaker 1>You are listening to the Dan Patrick Show on Fox

0:00:03.560 --> 0:00:07.840
<v Speaker 1>Sports Radio. Morale is high. Made it to a Friday.

0:00:07.880 --> 0:00:11.440
<v Speaker 1>It's a meat Friday. At that French dip coming off

0:00:11.480 --> 0:00:15.680
<v Speaker 1>the trigger a little bit later on. Everybody's here, but Seton,

0:00:16.160 --> 0:00:20.759
<v Speaker 1>he's at home. I'll have his share today. Man, does

0:00:20.760 --> 0:00:25.120
<v Speaker 1>it smell good this morning? Yeah? Seton, you can take

0:00:25.160 --> 0:00:27.120
<v Speaker 1>my share of that mountain dew cake you guys are

0:00:27.160 --> 0:00:31.400
<v Speaker 1>chopping up to. I don't need any of that we got.

0:00:31.880 --> 0:00:35.200
<v Speaker 1>Paulie got a mountain dew cake for Todd. Todd loves

0:00:35.240 --> 0:00:38.440
<v Speaker 1>mountain dew. And it's a it's a pie, it's it's

0:00:38.520 --> 0:00:41.000
<v Speaker 1>it's I think it's World Kindness Day. Do something nice

0:00:41.040 --> 0:00:43.760
<v Speaker 1>for somebody, but make sure somebody notices you're doing something

0:00:43.840 --> 0:00:46.360
<v Speaker 1>nice for him. I thought it looked like maybe one

0:00:46.400 --> 0:00:50.040
<v Speaker 1>of the holes at Augusta, and you were doing sort

0:00:50.080 --> 0:00:52.279
<v Speaker 1>of sort of a model of what the whole, like

0:00:52.360 --> 0:00:55.360
<v Speaker 1>fourteenth hole at Augusta would look like, and I realized, no,

0:00:55.480 --> 0:00:58.640
<v Speaker 1>that's a mountain dew pie that was baked by Alan,

0:00:58.800 --> 0:01:01.840
<v Speaker 1>who is our chef guy. Yeah, poem, the cake looks

0:01:01.840 --> 0:01:04.520
<v Speaker 1>like the Seattle Seahawks color rush uniforms. Let's put it

0:01:04.520 --> 0:01:08.800
<v Speaker 1>down Yeah, it's like there's a nice like pie crust

0:01:09.080 --> 0:01:12.480
<v Speaker 1>with some type of toxics. If you set your phone

0:01:12.520 --> 0:01:15.920
<v Speaker 1>on it, it it will recharge. Yeah, I've never seen that

0:01:16.000 --> 0:01:18.759
<v Speaker 1>bright a green. It's like kryptonite like times ten. Yeah,

0:01:18.920 --> 0:01:21.040
<v Speaker 1>just imagine if you want to put a coolant in

0:01:21.080 --> 0:01:23.600
<v Speaker 1>your car. This would be the coolnt that you would

0:01:23.600 --> 0:01:26.240
<v Speaker 1>put in your car. But we got it for Todd

0:01:26.520 --> 0:01:28.520
<v Speaker 1>later on today if he would like to have it.

0:01:28.760 --> 0:01:30.120
<v Speaker 1>Good God, we don't want to give it to you

0:01:30.120 --> 0:01:32.280
<v Speaker 1>in the first hour. No telling what it'll do to

0:01:32.319 --> 0:01:34.480
<v Speaker 1>your inside and kindness. I don't know how kind that

0:01:34.560 --> 0:01:36.320
<v Speaker 1>is to the people in that clean the air studio

0:01:36.400 --> 0:01:39.920
<v Speaker 1>after they have that. But yes, it's World Kindness Day.

0:01:40.000 --> 0:01:43.080
<v Speaker 1>Do something nice for somebody, but make sure that everybody

0:01:43.080 --> 0:01:45.480
<v Speaker 1>knows you're doing something nice. Don't do it in a

0:01:45.560 --> 0:01:48.920
<v Speaker 1>subtle private way. According to Paulie, let people know you're

0:01:48.920 --> 0:01:51.400
<v Speaker 1>doing something nice. Yeah. I guess the purpose of a

0:01:51.440 --> 0:01:53.040
<v Speaker 1>world kind of day as you do an act, but

0:01:53.080 --> 0:01:55.160
<v Speaker 1>you make a really grand gesture out of it, you

0:01:55.200 --> 0:01:57.280
<v Speaker 1>tell people you did it, so it's maybe a self

0:01:57.280 --> 0:02:00.600
<v Speaker 1>aggrandizement day as well. But I guess so it will

0:02:00.600 --> 0:02:02.320
<v Speaker 1>catch on. So should we all do that? For each

0:02:02.320 --> 0:02:05.760
<v Speaker 1>other today. No, I think just for to enough. I

0:02:05.800 --> 0:02:08.760
<v Speaker 1>think I think we're one and done. Yes, mclovin. So

0:02:08.840 --> 0:02:12.360
<v Speaker 1>it's world phony day, is what you're saying. But you're

0:02:12.400 --> 0:02:15.040
<v Speaker 1>still doing something nice. You just want somebody to know

0:02:15.080 --> 0:02:18.120
<v Speaker 1>that you're doing something nice. Yeah, which defeats, in my opinion,

0:02:18.200 --> 0:02:23.799
<v Speaker 1>defeats the purpose. Like Pauli's did you do anything nice privately?

0:02:23.919 --> 0:02:28.440
<v Speaker 1>I've done lots of nice things today, like what you're right,

0:02:28.480 --> 0:02:30.920
<v Speaker 1>it's a o'clock I plan to do, but I'm not

0:02:30.919 --> 0:02:34.600
<v Speaker 1>going to do. Charity that's done for public is almost

0:02:34.639 --> 0:02:39.400
<v Speaker 1>worse than no charity. I find the hypocrisy of social

0:02:39.400 --> 0:02:42.520
<v Speaker 1>media and charity. So when somebody donates a large sum

0:02:42.560 --> 0:02:46.040
<v Speaker 1>of money and then they tell you they donated, then

0:02:46.080 --> 0:02:49.440
<v Speaker 1>you have a problem with that. Not necessarily, but I

0:02:49.480 --> 0:02:52.520
<v Speaker 1>do have a problem with the general mindset of our

0:02:52.600 --> 0:02:56.680
<v Speaker 1>world where people are just like saying, oh, I'm such

0:02:56.680 --> 0:02:58.880
<v Speaker 1>a great dude because I did this. Yes. Tis like

0:02:58.919 --> 0:03:01.120
<v Speaker 1>when a celebrity or athlete it's a sick kid in

0:03:01.160 --> 0:03:02.440
<v Speaker 1>the hospital or whatever. I don't know if you need

0:03:02.480 --> 0:03:04.800
<v Speaker 1>to get the publicist, the agent and the manager involved

0:03:04.800 --> 0:03:06.880
<v Speaker 1>so they can you know, let all the news stations

0:03:06.880 --> 0:03:08.520
<v Speaker 1>and everyone make sure they got the cameras ready to

0:03:08.520 --> 0:03:11.120
<v Speaker 1>take a shot. Well, but that's always that's a little

0:03:11.160 --> 0:03:14.640
<v Speaker 1>bit that's unfair because I've done that before and I

0:03:14.680 --> 0:03:16.840
<v Speaker 1>didn't know that there would be people in there taking

0:03:16.840 --> 0:03:19.679
<v Speaker 1>pictures out. It's different, Dan, you told me to bring

0:03:19.680 --> 0:03:21.520
<v Speaker 1>my camera every time I did, I did an a

0:03:21.600 --> 0:03:25.640
<v Speaker 1>video recorder as well and alert the media. Um, you know,

0:03:25.680 --> 0:03:29.760
<v Speaker 1>it's like you go in there and they want publicity

0:03:30.120 --> 0:03:33.000
<v Speaker 1>for the hospital and the treatment and the care and

0:03:33.040 --> 0:03:35.840
<v Speaker 1>the patients. So that's a that's a little bit different.

0:03:36.360 --> 0:03:38.800
<v Speaker 1>Uh you know, it's not like we're alerting the media.

0:03:38.880 --> 0:03:42.320
<v Speaker 1>I remember talking to a photographer and he's in Hollywood

0:03:42.640 --> 0:03:45.640
<v Speaker 1>and he's one of those photographers that's following all these

0:03:45.640 --> 0:03:48.040
<v Speaker 1>celebrities around, and I said, how do you know where

0:03:48.040 --> 0:03:50.200
<v Speaker 1>they're going to be? And he goes, they tell us.

0:03:51.160 --> 0:03:53.520
<v Speaker 1>I go, oh, they call ahead. He goes, well, they're

0:03:53.560 --> 0:03:58.000
<v Speaker 1>publicists or you know somebody, some have relations relationships with

0:03:58.040 --> 0:04:01.840
<v Speaker 1>the photographers. But I go, it's always amazing. It's like,

0:04:01.880 --> 0:04:03.880
<v Speaker 1>how did you know they were gonna be there? And

0:04:03.920 --> 0:04:05.640
<v Speaker 1>he said, yeah, they always give us a heads up.

0:04:05.960 --> 0:04:08.160
<v Speaker 1>Usually we asked for you know, twenty to thirty minutes

0:04:08.200 --> 0:04:09.680
<v Speaker 1>heads up, and then we'll be there and get him

0:04:09.720 --> 0:04:11.720
<v Speaker 1>coming out of a restaurant or they have a new

0:04:11.760 --> 0:04:15.600
<v Speaker 1>boyfriend or girlfriend they want to show off, and I went, oh,

0:04:15.600 --> 0:04:19.000
<v Speaker 1>okay here, I thought your job was tough. Yeah, mclovin.

0:04:20.080 --> 0:04:21.880
<v Speaker 1>I think I'm like kind of getting into what Todd's

0:04:21.880 --> 0:04:24.200
<v Speaker 1>talking about, like the energy of like you know, like

0:04:24.240 --> 0:04:26.480
<v Speaker 1>there's a famous viral video of a woman jumps out

0:04:26.480 --> 0:04:29.760
<v Speaker 1>of her car and grabs an electric drill at a

0:04:29.880 --> 0:04:32.800
<v Speaker 1>rebuilding site. It has it, takes an Instagram photo and

0:04:32.839 --> 0:04:35.040
<v Speaker 1>then puts a drill down. You know, there is a

0:04:35.040 --> 0:04:37.039
<v Speaker 1>lot of that energy out there where it's more for

0:04:37.160 --> 0:04:40.160
<v Speaker 1>Instagram than it is for charity. Yes, point well, what

0:04:40.160 --> 0:04:43.480
<v Speaker 1>if it's altruistic on both sides. Imagine someone like JJ

0:04:43.600 --> 0:04:46.520
<v Speaker 1>Watt when he did the thing for charity, but by

0:04:46.600 --> 0:04:48.760
<v Speaker 1>going public with it, Yes, it helps his brand, it

0:04:48.800 --> 0:04:51.080
<v Speaker 1>helps his cue rating what he called, but he also

0:04:51.200 --> 0:04:53.320
<v Speaker 1>gets millions of dollars that he wouldn't have gotten if

0:04:53.320 --> 0:04:56.359
<v Speaker 1>he did it privately. And also I think celebrities and

0:04:56.360 --> 0:04:59.520
<v Speaker 1>other people would do things publicly charity wise think for themselves.

0:04:59.560 --> 0:05:02.040
<v Speaker 1>I can inspire other people that think maybe I'm gonna

0:05:02.080 --> 0:05:04.320
<v Speaker 1>lean towards doing that when I wouldn't have before. Yeah, Sedon,

0:05:04.800 --> 0:05:06.720
<v Speaker 1>I just like the idea that it's better to never

0:05:06.760 --> 0:05:11.159
<v Speaker 1>do anything nice for anyone. Then you can't get accused

0:05:11.200 --> 0:05:13.840
<v Speaker 1>of being phony. Right, I'm just keeping it real. I

0:05:13.880 --> 0:05:16.560
<v Speaker 1>don't do anything for anyone ever. Yes, but at least

0:05:16.600 --> 0:05:18.039
<v Speaker 1>I'm real about it. But but I do it for

0:05:18.080 --> 0:05:20.080
<v Speaker 1>a good reason. I do it for a good cause,

0:05:20.560 --> 0:05:22.640
<v Speaker 1>right me. Yeah, I do for myself. All right, we

0:05:22.720 --> 0:05:25.480
<v Speaker 1>got we got hijacked here. Let me bring it back

0:05:25.480 --> 0:05:27.880
<v Speaker 1>on to the rails. All right, welcome to the program.

0:05:28.160 --> 0:05:29.760
<v Speaker 1>If you like can get in touch, you can variety

0:05:29.760 --> 0:05:32.040
<v Speaker 1>of ways eight seven seven three D P Show email

0:05:32.040 --> 0:05:34.400
<v Speaker 1>I addressed EPA Dan Patrick dot com, Twitter handle a

0:05:34.480 --> 0:05:36.840
<v Speaker 1>DP Show. Scott Van Pelt from the mother Ship will

0:05:36.880 --> 0:05:40.160
<v Speaker 1>join us from Augusta a little bit later on Reese Davis,

0:05:40.200 --> 0:05:43.440
<v Speaker 1>who's the host of College Game Day College Game Days

0:05:43.480 --> 0:05:46.240
<v Speaker 1>at Augusta at the Masters, and we'll talk to Reese

0:05:46.240 --> 0:05:49.760
<v Speaker 1>a little bit later on as well. And midway point

0:05:49.839 --> 0:05:53.040
<v Speaker 1>of the NFL season, Sam Monson, who works for Pro

0:05:53.120 --> 0:05:57.320
<v Speaker 1>Football Focus, will give us his halfway point of the

0:05:57.360 --> 0:06:01.560
<v Speaker 1>season awards. That'll be coming up. Headlines from last night,

0:06:02.839 --> 0:06:05.159
<v Speaker 1>are you all in on the Colts. Have you abandoned

0:06:05.160 --> 0:06:08.160
<v Speaker 1>ship on the Titans? Colts over the Titans thirty four

0:06:08.240 --> 0:06:12.720
<v Speaker 1>to seventeen. The weekend not a great weekend in college football.

0:06:13.279 --> 0:06:18.159
<v Speaker 1>Notre Dame BC, Indiana, Michigan State, Michigan, Wisconsin, and Northwesterdon

0:06:18.279 --> 0:06:22.279
<v Speaker 1>Purdue Paul Casey right now leading the Masters, you have

0:06:22.400 --> 0:06:26.560
<v Speaker 1>those who didn't finish up yesterday finishing up this morning. Also,

0:06:26.640 --> 0:06:30.200
<v Speaker 1>what happens when they finish up today, then they'll be

0:06:30.680 --> 0:06:34.520
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of time lapsed time between those are

0:06:34.600 --> 0:06:36.680
<v Speaker 1>going out for their second round because they have to

0:06:36.680 --> 0:06:39.880
<v Speaker 1>go back to all eighteen holes and then recut the

0:06:40.240 --> 0:06:43.320
<v Speaker 1>cups for the new pins there. So they finish up,

0:06:43.640 --> 0:06:46.040
<v Speaker 1>everybody goes in, probably get something to eat, and then

0:06:46.080 --> 0:06:48.120
<v Speaker 1>those who are ready to tee off this morning will

0:06:48.160 --> 0:06:50.640
<v Speaker 1>go out, and you know you're going to have golfers

0:06:50.680 --> 0:06:53.360
<v Speaker 1>aren't going to finish their rounds. Those who finish yesterday

0:06:53.400 --> 0:06:57.800
<v Speaker 1>morning will not finish their rounds this afternoon. Hopefully over

0:06:57.839 --> 0:07:00.080
<v Speaker 1>the weekend they're able to make up for this. There

0:07:00.160 --> 0:07:04.080
<v Speaker 1>is a possibility if the event goes long, the Masters

0:07:04.080 --> 0:07:07.520
<v Speaker 1>goes too long on Sunday and cuts into NFL action,

0:07:08.000 --> 0:07:12.240
<v Speaker 1>they will switch I guess over to ABC. From what

0:07:12.360 --> 0:07:16.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm told, ABC would carry the final couple holes of

0:07:16.840 --> 0:07:20.480
<v Speaker 1>the Masters. But getting way ahead of ourselves on this Friday,

0:07:21.320 --> 0:07:24.920
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty has been obviously the strangest sports calendar in history.

0:07:24.960 --> 0:07:28.520
<v Speaker 1>But once the game's got going, this was the weekend

0:07:28.560 --> 0:07:30.760
<v Speaker 1>a lot of his thought, I'm going to circle that

0:07:30.800 --> 0:07:32.520
<v Speaker 1>one on my calendar. Because we knew we were going

0:07:32.600 --> 0:07:35.200
<v Speaker 1>to have NFL, we were supposed to have a big

0:07:35.240 --> 0:07:38.720
<v Speaker 1>college football weekend, but the SEC was basically sent to

0:07:38.760 --> 0:07:41.240
<v Speaker 1>the sidelines with COVID, and of course we were going

0:07:41.280 --> 0:07:45.120
<v Speaker 1>to have the Masters instead of April in November. Nobody

0:07:45.120 --> 0:07:47.440
<v Speaker 1>wanted to see it this way. We want the Masters

0:07:47.440 --> 0:07:51.600
<v Speaker 1>in April. We wanted galleries out there, patrons, but that's

0:07:51.640 --> 0:07:54.120
<v Speaker 1>not going to happen. But it's a once in a

0:07:54.200 --> 0:07:58.360
<v Speaker 1>lifetime situation, at least I hope it is, and you

0:07:58.400 --> 0:08:01.120
<v Speaker 1>know it's on our plate. Enjoy what a week and

0:08:01.200 --> 0:08:02.640
<v Speaker 1>a hunker down on the couch. You're going to have

0:08:02.680 --> 0:08:04.960
<v Speaker 1>to bring your A game to the remote control here.

0:08:05.000 --> 0:08:08.280
<v Speaker 1>But either way, we're going to need a lot of

0:08:08.280 --> 0:08:10.920
<v Speaker 1>time to be able to kind of sift through everything

0:08:10.920 --> 0:08:14.200
<v Speaker 1>that we have going on this weekend in all the

0:08:14.240 --> 0:08:17.600
<v Speaker 1>different sports. But after everything that's happened, it's more than

0:08:17.640 --> 0:08:21.600
<v Speaker 1>okay for what should be a memorable sports weekend. When

0:08:21.640 --> 0:08:24.440
<v Speaker 1>Tiger's on the leaderboard, the Masters is always entertaining. I

0:08:24.440 --> 0:08:26.400
<v Speaker 1>wanted to see the course, see what it looked like.

0:08:26.880 --> 0:08:31.000
<v Speaker 1>It looks the same a little less, you know, foliage,

0:08:31.800 --> 0:08:34.920
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't sound the same. And I was also wondering

0:08:34.920 --> 0:08:38.760
<v Speaker 1>about that. There are certain players when there is a gallery,

0:08:38.800 --> 0:08:45.200
<v Speaker 1>when there are patrons, they almost enhances who they are

0:08:45.240 --> 0:08:47.480
<v Speaker 1>and how they play. You know, when Tiger does something,

0:08:47.800 --> 0:08:52.200
<v Speaker 1>the crowd responds, Phil Nicholson, there's certain players that would

0:08:52.240 --> 0:08:55.559
<v Speaker 1>benefit more from patrons being there than some of these

0:08:55.600 --> 0:08:59.120
<v Speaker 1>other players. You don't have that home course advantage built

0:08:59.160 --> 0:09:02.040
<v Speaker 1>in at A this week, but we'll keep an eye

0:09:02.080 --> 0:09:05.880
<v Speaker 1>on the leaderboard here. Bryson Deshambo I saw were Nick

0:09:05.920 --> 0:09:11.400
<v Speaker 1>Faldo love Fudo. Faldo said that the first hole at

0:09:11.440 --> 0:09:16.199
<v Speaker 1>Augusta's four hundred and forty five yards, and Nick Faldo

0:09:16.960 --> 0:09:20.800
<v Speaker 1>said that if Deshambo put it on the green that

0:09:20.920 --> 0:09:27.920
<v Speaker 1>he would run around Augusta naked. Deshambo he pulled his

0:09:28.000 --> 0:09:30.560
<v Speaker 1>drive left into the roft and Faldo didn't have to

0:09:30.559 --> 0:09:33.880
<v Speaker 1>get naked. But de Shambo came into the Masters with

0:09:33.920 --> 0:09:36.840
<v Speaker 1>an average drive of three hundred and forty four yards,

0:09:37.320 --> 0:09:40.440
<v Speaker 1>and that's more than ten yards clear of the next

0:09:40.440 --> 0:09:43.400
<v Speaker 1>closest golfer. Plus you have to understand, you know, the

0:09:43.760 --> 0:09:48.439
<v Speaker 1>first hole at Augusta, you go uphill. Nobody's reaching that green,

0:09:48.800 --> 0:09:52.400
<v Speaker 1>But there are certain greens that you know, Deshambo is

0:09:52.440 --> 0:09:55.520
<v Speaker 1>going to be able to do some things that nobody's

0:09:55.559 --> 0:09:58.440
<v Speaker 1>ever done at Augusta. But this is what's great about golf.

0:09:59.520 --> 0:10:03.720
<v Speaker 1>Larry Eyes is sixty two years of age. He shot

0:10:03.840 --> 0:10:10.240
<v Speaker 1>two under. Ryce into Shambo shot two under yesterday. Augusta

0:10:10.320 --> 0:10:13.880
<v Speaker 1>played as a golf course for everybody, and if you

0:10:13.960 --> 0:10:16.840
<v Speaker 1>don't hit it long, you were able to survive. You

0:10:16.840 --> 0:10:22.040
<v Speaker 1>were able to thrive. Bernhard Linger is playing extremely well today.

0:10:22.120 --> 0:10:26.280
<v Speaker 1>I think he's sixty three or sixty four and he

0:10:26.360 --> 0:10:29.360
<v Speaker 1>might be five or six under. Golf is you know,

0:10:29.800 --> 0:10:32.880
<v Speaker 1>that's what's fascinating about it. We've all played with somebody

0:10:32.920 --> 0:10:35.640
<v Speaker 1>who doesn't hit it very far, but it always seems

0:10:35.640 --> 0:10:37.000
<v Speaker 1>like they get up and down and you go, how

0:10:37.000 --> 0:10:38.920
<v Speaker 1>are you doing that? And then they'll be the guy

0:10:38.960 --> 0:10:41.319
<v Speaker 1>who just bombs it, but he can't do anything else.

0:10:42.000 --> 0:10:46.360
<v Speaker 1>At Augusta at least today yesterday, You're able to take

0:10:46.400 --> 0:10:49.040
<v Speaker 1>dead aim and that helps some of these hitters who

0:10:49.080 --> 0:10:53.040
<v Speaker 1>don't hit very far. Paul, question to me, glov and,

0:10:53.080 --> 0:10:57.520
<v Speaker 1>what do you have for me today? Okay? Who finishes first?

0:10:57.600 --> 0:10:59.240
<v Speaker 1>Or Hire? I don't know, he's a higher or lower

0:10:59.440 --> 0:11:02.320
<v Speaker 1>tiger wood to Bryson Dschembo Tigers at minus four tire

0:11:03.120 --> 0:11:06.120
<v Speaker 1>but you shoot lower right, tiger. Who's going to have

0:11:06.160 --> 0:11:09.920
<v Speaker 1>a better week tiger or or Bryson Dcembo. Okay, because

0:11:09.960 --> 0:11:13.120
<v Speaker 1>I was actually worried when Bryson hook that. I'm like, oh,

0:11:13.160 --> 0:11:15.400
<v Speaker 1>it's over. I already had a seven, right, Yeah, but

0:11:15.440 --> 0:11:17.760
<v Speaker 1>he seems like he's in a good spot. It's very

0:11:17.880 --> 0:11:20.800
<v Speaker 1>rare for somebody to win the Masters if they have

0:11:20.880 --> 0:11:24.400
<v Speaker 1>a double bogie in any round, very very very rare.

0:11:25.280 --> 0:11:29.520
<v Speaker 1>You know, you you may not have all pars bogie's. Uh,

0:11:30.160 --> 0:11:32.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, a couple of bogeis here. You're gonna have bogies,

0:11:32.880 --> 0:11:37.000
<v Speaker 1>but the double bogie that usually stands out. And maybe

0:11:37.280 --> 0:11:43.680
<v Speaker 1>Ethan who does our stats, you guys know Ethan, Yeah,

0:11:43.720 --> 0:11:46.000
<v Speaker 1>maybe you can do some research and back up my

0:11:46.080 --> 0:11:48.360
<v Speaker 1>claim that I don't have any research to back it

0:11:48.440 --> 0:11:50.520
<v Speaker 1>up right now. But I think it's been a while

0:11:50.559 --> 0:11:53.360
<v Speaker 1>since somebody's won the Masters with a double bogie. Yes, Polly,

0:11:53.400 --> 0:11:54.839
<v Speaker 1>I think a lot of people are hoping for more

0:11:54.920 --> 0:11:57.560
<v Speaker 1>Foliage had Augusta this year and you were, I was.

0:11:57.640 --> 0:12:00.679
<v Speaker 1>I think others, Uh no, you wouldn't want to see

0:12:00.720 --> 0:12:03.320
<v Speaker 1>that course all emblazon and red and browns. No, it

0:12:03.440 --> 0:12:06.800
<v Speaker 1>still looks great. Oh yeah, it still looks spectacular, the

0:12:06.840 --> 0:12:09.240
<v Speaker 1>originality of it. I'm a little disappointed. Also, not a

0:12:09.280 --> 0:12:11.360
<v Speaker 1>lot of white pants this year, because it's November and

0:12:11.400 --> 0:12:13.680
<v Speaker 1>the guy's respect not wearing white pants after you know,

0:12:13.760 --> 0:12:16.800
<v Speaker 1>laber Nay. Other things. I noticed. I'm not going to

0:12:16.840 --> 0:12:19.679
<v Speaker 1>break down golf game. I know, PAULI came in and

0:12:19.320 --> 0:12:21.599
<v Speaker 1>h everybody was sitting around talking about the Masters, and

0:12:21.640 --> 0:12:23.880
<v Speaker 1>Paul goes, you know what I observed. You know, don't

0:12:23.920 --> 0:12:26.520
<v Speaker 1>have anybody wearing some break colors. You know, we don't

0:12:26.559 --> 0:12:29.959
<v Speaker 1>have those springtime colors. And I go, what and and

0:12:30.640 --> 0:12:33.559
<v Speaker 1>I didn't notice a lot of white colored slacks, And

0:12:33.640 --> 0:12:37.360
<v Speaker 1>I go, this is what differentiates this show from all

0:12:37.360 --> 0:12:39.480
<v Speaker 1>the other shows. Tigers were in earth tones. It's like

0:12:39.520 --> 0:12:42.800
<v Speaker 1>a topi brown. I know, that's sort of a blend

0:12:42.880 --> 0:12:46.720
<v Speaker 1>in the background type of outfit today. Yes, McLevin, I

0:12:46.800 --> 0:12:49.720
<v Speaker 1>was gonna ask a real golf question. All those headlines

0:12:49.760 --> 0:12:52.520
<v Speaker 1>Bryson d. Chambou is gonna tear apart the Master's course.

0:12:52.520 --> 0:12:54.720
<v Speaker 1>Its gotta is it is one day enough to know

0:12:54.840 --> 0:12:56.960
<v Speaker 1>that's not going to happen? Or can we be confident

0:12:57.000 --> 0:12:59.600
<v Speaker 1>that he's not going to redefine the way master's play is? Well?

0:13:00.120 --> 0:13:02.840
<v Speaker 1>Only one round here, I mean he's not gonna he's

0:13:02.840 --> 0:13:05.240
<v Speaker 1>obviously I gonna run away to some record masters thing

0:13:05.240 --> 0:13:08.520
<v Speaker 1>like people were talking about. No, but I just want

0:13:08.520 --> 0:13:11.839
<v Speaker 1>to see I mentioned this on Wednesday. You can hit

0:13:11.880 --> 0:13:15.240
<v Speaker 1>it three hundred and fifty yards, but where are you

0:13:15.320 --> 0:13:17.800
<v Speaker 1>hitting it three hundred and fifty yards? You still have

0:13:17.880 --> 0:13:20.720
<v Speaker 1>to play that. This isn't a long drive contest. You

0:13:20.840 --> 0:13:24.000
<v Speaker 1>have to play your next shot. August's all about your

0:13:24.040 --> 0:13:27.960
<v Speaker 1>second shot. It's always been and hopefully always will be.

0:13:28.000 --> 0:13:31.719
<v Speaker 1>It's your second shot that's so important. Where are you

0:13:32.440 --> 0:13:36.079
<v Speaker 1>yardage in a sidehill? Lie? What club are you using?

0:13:36.240 --> 0:13:40.240
<v Speaker 1>What are the greens like? Are they receptive? And can

0:13:40.280 --> 0:13:42.319
<v Speaker 1>you chip and put? I mean that's what this is

0:13:42.360 --> 0:13:46.040
<v Speaker 1>all about. There are guys who bomb it, but you

0:13:46.200 --> 0:13:48.520
<v Speaker 1>got it the local knowledge of being able to Chip

0:13:48.520 --> 0:13:51.880
<v Speaker 1>and Put is unlike any other course in America in

0:13:51.920 --> 0:13:55.960
<v Speaker 1>the world, because they played every single year. It sounds

0:13:56.000 --> 0:13:58.800
<v Speaker 1>like I've gone to a master class in the Masters,

0:13:58.840 --> 0:14:02.079
<v Speaker 1>but the master class offers over nighty classes on a

0:14:02.160 --> 0:14:04.719
<v Speaker 1>variety of topics, all topped by world class masters at

0:14:04.720 --> 0:14:07.160
<v Speaker 1>the top top of their field. See what you did there, Yeah,

0:14:07.160 --> 0:14:10.800
<v Speaker 1>you see a little That's what a probe does this holiday.

0:14:10.800 --> 0:14:13.360
<v Speaker 1>I didn't want to bring attention to it, but thanks.

0:14:13.360 --> 0:14:15.520
<v Speaker 1>See this is world kind this day. I'm calling it

0:14:15.520 --> 0:14:19.920
<v Speaker 1>out for you. That's my good deed for you this holiday.

0:14:20.000 --> 0:14:22.800
<v Speaker 1>When you buy an annual membership, you get another annual

0:14:22.840 --> 0:14:27.720
<v Speaker 1>membership for free. Masterclass dot com slash Patrick masterclass dot

0:14:27.720 --> 0:14:31.360
<v Speaker 1>com slash Patrick, and there you can hear from the

0:14:31.400 --> 0:14:36.960
<v Speaker 1>best Steph Curry, Serena Williams, Gordon Ramsay, all of these

0:14:37.000 --> 0:14:39.200
<v Speaker 1>different classes that you can take. And I have more

0:14:39.200 --> 0:14:41.280
<v Speaker 1>information on this coming up a little bit later on.

0:14:41.640 --> 0:14:44.800
<v Speaker 1>All right, So what other poll question are we looking at? Me? Glevin,

0:14:45.160 --> 0:14:48.080
<v Speaker 1>I got a bunch of NFL questions. Uh, if some

0:14:48.280 --> 0:14:51.200
<v Speaker 1>off this weekend, some off philip rivers want to start

0:14:51.200 --> 0:14:56.320
<v Speaker 1>with philip rivers? Sure? Why not? Okay, philip Rivers first,

0:14:56.360 --> 0:14:58.800
<v Speaker 1>battle Hall of Famer without even look at the numbers,

0:14:58.880 --> 0:15:02.680
<v Speaker 1>yes or no? You know what, let me ask Sam Munson.

0:15:02.760 --> 0:15:06.720
<v Speaker 1>A Pro football focus is Philip Rivers. Michael Irvin did

0:15:06.760 --> 0:15:09.920
<v Speaker 1>an interview with Philip Rivers. It ran last night and

0:15:09.960 --> 0:15:12.960
<v Speaker 1>he said, Hey, I'll see you in five years at

0:15:13.000 --> 0:15:16.880
<v Speaker 1>the Hall of Fame. And I guess as a first

0:15:16.920 --> 0:15:22.240
<v Speaker 1>ballot Hall of Famer, I guess it's not as rare

0:15:22.280 --> 0:15:24.880
<v Speaker 1>when you go, oh, first ballot Hall of Famer. This

0:15:25.000 --> 0:15:27.320
<v Speaker 1>is big in baseball where you're like, oh, you're not

0:15:27.360 --> 0:15:29.800
<v Speaker 1>a first ballot Hall of Famer? Are you a Hall

0:15:29.840 --> 0:15:31.840
<v Speaker 1>of Famer? Yeah? Yeah, but we're not letting in on

0:15:31.880 --> 0:15:34.640
<v Speaker 1>the first ballot. It feels like, you know, Jason Taylor

0:15:34.680 --> 0:15:37.040
<v Speaker 1>went into the Dolphins on the first ballot. Now, he

0:15:37.080 --> 0:15:39.480
<v Speaker 1>did have a letter of recommendation from Tom Brady, and

0:15:39.600 --> 0:15:42.480
<v Speaker 1>Jason Taylor was a very good player, great player, but

0:15:42.720 --> 0:15:47.160
<v Speaker 1>first ballot. All right, Philip Rivers, first ballot. If he

0:15:47.240 --> 0:15:51.160
<v Speaker 1>doesn't do anything in the playoffs the rest of his career,

0:15:52.200 --> 0:15:54.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't think he's a first ballot Hall of Famer.

0:15:54.520 --> 0:15:57.000
<v Speaker 1>And I know that you look at the numbers and

0:15:57.120 --> 0:16:00.120
<v Speaker 1>I go, okay, that the one thing that really stands

0:16:00.120 --> 0:16:03.480
<v Speaker 1>out to meet with Philip Rivers. He doesn't miss games

0:16:04.480 --> 0:16:08.280
<v Speaker 1>at that position. He does not miss games. How many

0:16:08.320 --> 0:16:12.080
<v Speaker 1>games has he missed in his career? McLevin due to injury? Yeah,

0:16:12.080 --> 0:16:17.320
<v Speaker 1>I'll check less than five. Yeah, Polly, I got double

0:16:17.400 --> 0:16:19.240
<v Speaker 1>check this. Has he not missed a game in his career?

0:16:19.280 --> 0:16:20.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't have him missing a game in his career

0:16:20.840 --> 0:16:22.640
<v Speaker 1>due to injury because you do not count his first

0:16:22.640 --> 0:16:25.160
<v Speaker 1>two years when he rode the bench because of the

0:16:25.240 --> 0:16:28.960
<v Speaker 1>quarterback situation. It's pretty amazing. He started quarterbacking six and

0:16:29.000 --> 0:16:31.720
<v Speaker 1>I've got him sixteen for sixteen and nine for nine

0:16:32.360 --> 0:16:35.600
<v Speaker 1>this year. I've never heard they even brought up before. Yeah,

0:16:35.640 --> 0:16:38.240
<v Speaker 1>that's what stands out that he was there. You have

0:16:38.320 --> 0:16:41.320
<v Speaker 1>to be able to play and be there for your

0:16:41.360 --> 0:16:43.480
<v Speaker 1>team at that position, and for him to be able

0:16:43.520 --> 0:16:47.680
<v Speaker 1>to do that, that's a truly remarkable stat. Now we've had,

0:16:48.120 --> 0:16:50.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, Brett Farve and I think Peyton Manning for

0:16:51.000 --> 0:16:54.320
<v Speaker 1>a while they were eli on the consecutive games list.

0:16:54.720 --> 0:16:58.520
<v Speaker 1>But he is not missed. Start yea poll. He's been

0:16:58.560 --> 0:17:01.920
<v Speaker 1>sacked four hundred and fifty three times, I mean, and

0:17:01.960 --> 0:17:03.720
<v Speaker 1>he's never been like a big stack guy where he's

0:17:03.880 --> 0:17:06.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, seventy sexs a year, but he ever just thirty.

0:17:07.200 --> 0:17:10.960
<v Speaker 1>You still think out of four hundred, chances are somebody's

0:17:10.960 --> 0:17:13.359
<v Speaker 1>gonna hit you in a way that's really gonna hurt you.

0:17:13.560 --> 0:17:15.119
<v Speaker 1>Put you out. Yes time. You think with all the

0:17:15.200 --> 0:17:16.560
<v Speaker 1>kids he has, he would have missed at least one

0:17:16.640 --> 0:17:22.080
<v Speaker 1>for childbirth. I think he's a he's a pregnancy manager,

0:17:22.119 --> 0:17:25.360
<v Speaker 1>like a game manager, like he knows, you know, he's

0:17:25.359 --> 0:17:28.280
<v Speaker 1>got this planned out. He's a field general, is what

0:17:28.320 --> 0:17:31.719
<v Speaker 1>he is. To field general. All right, let me take

0:17:31.760 --> 0:17:34.719
<v Speaker 1>a break. We got the halfway Point Awards coming up

0:17:34.720 --> 0:17:38.800
<v Speaker 1>with Pro Football focus is Philip Rivers, first ballot Hall

0:17:38.840 --> 0:17:41.320
<v Speaker 1>of Famer. We do get all fired up about these

0:17:41.320 --> 0:17:43.360
<v Speaker 1>things and then once they go in and we don't

0:17:43.359 --> 0:17:45.760
<v Speaker 1>care anymore about it. But leading up to it, we're like,

0:17:46.440 --> 0:17:50.920
<v Speaker 1>it's five years away. Let's start discussing this. Eight seven

0:17:51.000 --> 0:17:53.080
<v Speaker 1>seven three D P show email address DP of Dan

0:17:53.119 --> 0:17:56.040
<v Speaker 1>Patrick dot com. We say good morning to Peacock and

0:17:56.200 --> 0:17:58.800
<v Speaker 1>we're killing it on Peacock. But it's thanks to you,

0:17:58.880 --> 0:18:02.159
<v Speaker 1>this audience. You downloaded the app and it's free and

0:18:02.200 --> 0:18:05.280
<v Speaker 1>you're able to watch the show. And we love the

0:18:05.359 --> 0:18:09.080
<v Speaker 1>partnership with Peacock. And if you're only able to listen,

0:18:09.160 --> 0:18:12.040
<v Speaker 1>we have the best radio affiliates in America and the

0:18:12.160 --> 0:18:15.639
<v Speaker 1>Fox Sports Radio lineup, numbering three over three hundred and

0:18:15.760 --> 0:18:19.520
<v Speaker 1>sixty five affiliates around the world. Take a break twenty

0:18:19.520 --> 0:18:23.159
<v Speaker 1>after the hour. This is the Dan Patrick Show. I

0:18:23.280 --> 0:18:26.120
<v Speaker 1>was just mentioning masterclass and I had some more information

0:18:26.160 --> 0:18:29.040
<v Speaker 1>on it. They've got exclusive classes on a wide variety

0:18:29.080 --> 0:18:31.760
<v Speaker 1>of topics, all taught my world class masters at the

0:18:31.760 --> 0:18:34.320
<v Speaker 1>top of their fields. If you want to learn how

0:18:34.480 --> 0:18:39.439
<v Speaker 1>to skateboard, Tony Hawk teaches skateboarding. I went and watched

0:18:39.440 --> 0:18:44.400
<v Speaker 1>the Annie Lebovitz teaching photography. I don't know anything about photography,

0:18:44.680 --> 0:18:48.879
<v Speaker 1>but I was fascinated by it because the lighting like

0:18:48.960 --> 0:18:51.480
<v Speaker 1>to me. I just wanted to learn black and white photography.

0:18:51.560 --> 0:18:55.920
<v Speaker 1>But Annie Liebovitz, Serena Williams teaches tennis. Shanda Rhimes, who

0:18:55.960 --> 0:18:59.480
<v Speaker 1>Paulie went to high school with, she teaches TV writing.

0:19:01.640 --> 0:19:06.320
<v Speaker 1>Steve Martin teaches comedy. How to be funny, Todd that's

0:19:06.400 --> 0:19:08.320
<v Speaker 1>right up here at Wright Mail. I have no business

0:19:08.400 --> 0:19:10.960
<v Speaker 1>not checking. I will pay for it, you would, yes,

0:19:11.040 --> 0:19:13.800
<v Speaker 1>Steve Barton just resigned. Each class is broken out into

0:19:13.880 --> 0:19:16.720
<v Speaker 1>individual video lessons that fit into your everyday life. So

0:19:16.800 --> 0:19:21.200
<v Speaker 1>it's normally twenty lessons per class, ten minutes per lesson,

0:19:21.359 --> 0:19:23.639
<v Speaker 1>and then you go at your own pace and you

0:19:23.680 --> 0:19:27.560
<v Speaker 1>can watch anytime anywhere your phone, computer, tablet, or smart TV.

0:19:28.480 --> 0:19:31.160
<v Speaker 1>I highly recommend it. It's a lot of fun. It's

0:19:31.200 --> 0:19:33.480
<v Speaker 1>great you can learn about something at your own pace

0:19:33.520 --> 0:19:36.000
<v Speaker 1>that you never thought you'd be learning from. And these

0:19:36.080 --> 0:19:38.560
<v Speaker 1>are the best at what they do this holiday. When

0:19:38.560 --> 0:19:41.879
<v Speaker 1>you buy an annual membership, you get another annual membership

0:19:42.040 --> 0:19:45.840
<v Speaker 1>for free. Go to Masterclass dot com slash Patrick to

0:19:45.880 --> 0:19:49.080
<v Speaker 1>get the annual membership and give one for Freemasterclass dot

0:19:49.080 --> 0:19:51.560
<v Speaker 1>com slash pen. Thanks for listening to The Dan Patrick

0:19:51.640 --> 0:19:54.360
<v Speaker 1>Show podcast. Be sure to catch us live every weekday

0:19:54.400 --> 0:19:57.720
<v Speaker 1>morning nine to noon Eastern or six to nine Pacific

0:19:57.720 --> 0:20:00.399
<v Speaker 1>on Fox Sports Radio. Find your local stag for The

0:20:00.480 --> 0:20:03.320
<v Speaker 1>Dan Patrick Show at Fox Sports Radio dot com, or

0:20:03.400 --> 0:20:06.560
<v Speaker 1>stream us live every day on the iHeartRadio app by

0:20:06.600 --> 0:20:10.359
<v Speaker 1>searching f s R, or stream us live on the

0:20:10.400 --> 0:20:14.400
<v Speaker 1>Peacock apt Sunday Night, Lamar Jackson and the Baltimore Ravens

0:20:14.440 --> 0:20:17.080
<v Speaker 1>head to Gillette Stadium to take on Cam Newton and

0:20:17.119 --> 0:20:20.639
<v Speaker 1>the Patriots. Sunday Night. They started seven Eastern on Football

0:20:20.720 --> 0:20:24.560
<v Speaker 1>Night in America only on NBC. Did we settle on

0:20:24.600 --> 0:20:27.199
<v Speaker 1>a poll question? McLevin, Yes, I just put up. The

0:20:27.200 --> 0:20:30.400
<v Speaker 1>thing we were debating is Philip Rivers first ballot Hall

0:20:30.440 --> 0:20:35.159
<v Speaker 1>of Famer. The first ballot is the interesting part for

0:20:35.320 --> 0:20:37.520
<v Speaker 1>me when Michael Irvin said that last night, I'll see

0:20:37.520 --> 0:20:39.840
<v Speaker 1>you in five years at the Hall of Fame, and

0:20:39.880 --> 0:20:43.800
<v Speaker 1>I went, okay, first ballot, Hall of Famer. Yeah, mcleven's

0:20:43.840 --> 0:20:46.359
<v Speaker 1>that real quick about that Michael Irvin interview. I found

0:20:46.359 --> 0:20:48.280
<v Speaker 1>a little sad that Michael Irvin was complaining that his

0:20:48.480 --> 0:20:51.040
<v Speaker 1>kids kept on breaking into his interview room. What happened

0:20:51.040 --> 0:20:53.240
<v Speaker 1>to the playmaker with all the partying and the like.

0:20:54.320 --> 0:20:56.480
<v Speaker 1>That is not the end that you used to know, Dad, No,

0:20:56.600 --> 0:20:59.280
<v Speaker 1>it's not. And that's a good thing. And if we'd

0:20:59.280 --> 0:21:03.280
<v Speaker 1>like this reincarnation of Michael Irvin age seven seven three

0:21:03.320 --> 0:21:05.840
<v Speaker 1>DP show email address DP at dan Patrick dot com,

0:21:05.840 --> 0:21:10.120
<v Speaker 1>Twitter handle at DPS show operator Marvin is standing by.

0:21:10.359 --> 0:21:12.400
<v Speaker 1>Mario will take care of your tweets as well. He's

0:21:12.400 --> 0:21:16.359
<v Speaker 1>Sam Mounts and Pro Football Focus lead NFL analysts, Sam,

0:21:16.400 --> 0:21:18.240
<v Speaker 1>good morning, thanks for joining us. Let me start with

0:21:18.280 --> 0:21:21.600
<v Speaker 1>that question the Hall of Fame. It feels like is

0:21:21.640 --> 0:21:24.959
<v Speaker 1>based off of the feelings we have for these players.

0:21:24.960 --> 0:21:27.840
<v Speaker 1>When the writers get together and they nominate somebody, they're

0:21:27.920 --> 0:21:31.679
<v Speaker 1>very passionate about it. You deal with analytics, just the

0:21:31.720 --> 0:21:35.399
<v Speaker 1>analytical part of this. With Philip Rivers, is he a

0:21:35.440 --> 0:21:38.800
<v Speaker 1>first ballot Hall of Famer? I think it's tough because

0:21:38.880 --> 0:21:42.240
<v Speaker 1>you're comparing into the guys from bygone eras for whom

0:21:42.240 --> 0:21:44.320
<v Speaker 1>we don't really have all that data. I mean, one

0:21:44.359 --> 0:21:46.840
<v Speaker 1>of the great things about PFF, whether you agree with

0:21:46.880 --> 0:21:49.040
<v Speaker 1>our numbers or you disagree with them, is we have

0:21:49.200 --> 0:21:52.440
<v Speaker 1>the grading on every single player on every single play

0:21:52.520 --> 0:21:55.480
<v Speaker 1>since we started doing this back in two thousand and six,

0:21:55.800 --> 0:21:58.040
<v Speaker 1>so we can at least try and compare these guys

0:21:58.119 --> 0:22:00.480
<v Speaker 1>like for like. But it gets really hard when you

0:22:00.520 --> 0:22:03.000
<v Speaker 1>start trying to say, all right, Philip Rivers just passed

0:22:03.119 --> 0:22:06.240
<v Speaker 1>Dan Marino on the all time passing yards list. But

0:22:06.240 --> 0:22:08.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't think there's anybody out there that saw both

0:22:08.440 --> 0:22:10.879
<v Speaker 1>those guys play that would say Philip Rivers is a

0:22:10.920 --> 0:22:14.880
<v Speaker 1>better quarterback than Dan Marino. Dan Marino was obviously a

0:22:14.880 --> 0:22:17.399
<v Speaker 1>Hall of Famer and no one would argue that. But

0:22:17.520 --> 0:22:20.320
<v Speaker 1>because of this explosion in passing and how much easier

0:22:20.359 --> 0:22:23.680
<v Speaker 1>it is to play quarterback in today's NFL, and how

0:22:23.720 --> 0:22:25.320
<v Speaker 1>all these guys are now at the top of the

0:22:25.359 --> 0:22:28.760
<v Speaker 1>all time lists. Does that put Philip Rivers in? I

0:22:28.760 --> 0:22:31.000
<v Speaker 1>don't know who's more of a first ballot Hall of

0:22:31.000 --> 0:22:35.040
<v Speaker 1>Fame or Frank Gore or Philip Rivers. I think Philip Rivers.

0:22:35.160 --> 0:22:40.560
<v Speaker 1>I think Frank Gore's legacy is this insane durability that

0:22:40.960 --> 0:22:43.240
<v Speaker 1>really is remarkable when you look at what he was

0:22:43.280 --> 0:22:46.320
<v Speaker 1>as a prospect, Like he dropped in the draft because

0:22:46.320 --> 0:22:48.840
<v Speaker 1>people were concerned that he'd had multiple knee surgeries and

0:22:48.880 --> 0:22:51.439
<v Speaker 1>that he wouldn't last in the NFL. And then the

0:22:51.560 --> 0:22:55.000
<v Speaker 1>defining characteristic or Frank Gore's there's nothing that can knock

0:22:55.040 --> 0:22:56.960
<v Speaker 1>this guy out of the league, and he just keeps

0:22:57.000 --> 0:22:59.280
<v Speaker 1>on trucking. Well, the same thing with Philip Rivers. He

0:22:59.280 --> 0:23:01.840
<v Speaker 1>hasn't missed a game. True, true, but I think Philip

0:23:01.920 --> 0:23:04.159
<v Speaker 1>rivers peaks have been higher than Frank Gore's. I think

0:23:04.240 --> 0:23:06.640
<v Speaker 1>you can make the case that Philip Rivers has been

0:23:06.640 --> 0:23:10.000
<v Speaker 1>genuinely one of the best quarterbacks over the past over

0:23:10.040 --> 0:23:12.520
<v Speaker 1>his entire career. I don't know that you can really

0:23:12.560 --> 0:23:15.160
<v Speaker 1>make that case for Frank Gore outside of a season

0:23:15.280 --> 0:23:18.640
<v Speaker 1>or two if you were going to redraft this first round.

0:23:18.720 --> 0:23:21.080
<v Speaker 1>I saw where you looked at the first round and

0:23:21.200 --> 0:23:23.560
<v Speaker 1>went back and looked at how these rookies are performing.

0:23:24.480 --> 0:23:27.520
<v Speaker 1>What is there somebody that stands out that that they

0:23:27.560 --> 0:23:30.160
<v Speaker 1>would have changed the draft, that they would have gone

0:23:30.200 --> 0:23:33.960
<v Speaker 1>either higher or lower based hall after eight games, that

0:23:34.720 --> 0:23:38.160
<v Speaker 1>how they performed where they were drafted. I think Minnesota's

0:23:38.200 --> 0:23:41.119
<v Speaker 1>Justin Jefferson would definitely be higher of the list, and

0:23:41.200 --> 0:23:43.560
<v Speaker 1>he is now. He might be the first receiver off

0:23:43.600 --> 0:23:45.320
<v Speaker 1>the board if we had a chance to redo all

0:23:45.359 --> 0:23:48.399
<v Speaker 1>this all again, all of his concerns when we were

0:23:48.400 --> 0:23:50.919
<v Speaker 1>looking at him as a college prospect as well. He

0:23:51.000 --> 0:23:53.560
<v Speaker 1>did incredibly from the slot. But can he play outside?

0:23:53.760 --> 0:23:56.000
<v Speaker 1>Excuse me? Can he play outside when he has to

0:23:56.040 --> 0:23:58.720
<v Speaker 1>deal with press coverage? Can he still get off the line?

0:23:58.720 --> 0:24:01.000
<v Speaker 1>Can he still do all that sound rent running stuff.

0:24:01.240 --> 0:24:04.920
<v Speaker 1>The answer is overwhelmingly yes, and that just immediately puts

0:24:04.920 --> 0:24:07.600
<v Speaker 1>you further up the draft because you're a more impactful

0:24:07.640 --> 0:24:09.560
<v Speaker 1>player when you can play outside and deal with the

0:24:09.560 --> 0:24:13.000
<v Speaker 1>press coverage. At the NFL level, he's been an absolute

0:24:13.040 --> 0:24:16.800
<v Speaker 1>superstar wide receiver, and I think very much the match

0:24:16.840 --> 0:24:19.680
<v Speaker 1>of any of those top first round guys. Highest grade

0:24:19.720 --> 0:24:23.240
<v Speaker 1>you've given to a rookie this year's who I think

0:24:23.359 --> 0:24:27.280
<v Speaker 1>right now, it's actually Michael Owen, who the New England Patriots.

0:24:27.760 --> 0:24:31.399
<v Speaker 1>I guess utility offensive lineman because he's played three different

0:24:31.440 --> 0:24:33.840
<v Speaker 1>positions and done them all well. But this was not

0:24:34.400 --> 0:24:37.280
<v Speaker 1>a highly tired draft pick. He's just come in and

0:24:37.400 --> 0:24:40.199
<v Speaker 1>been an absolute force, particularly in the run game, and

0:24:40.320 --> 0:24:42.600
<v Speaker 1>filled in wherever they've need him, whether it's right tackle,

0:24:42.640 --> 0:24:45.800
<v Speaker 1>whether it's the guard position, and really been phenomenal. I mean,

0:24:46.160 --> 0:24:47.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, I've seen people say that if this guy

0:24:47.960 --> 0:24:49.719
<v Speaker 1>was a first round or we'd be talking about how

0:24:49.840 --> 0:24:53.080
<v Speaker 1>New England's draft was fantastic because they snagged this Pro

0:24:53.160 --> 0:24:56.840
<v Speaker 1>Bowl all caliber player right at the top of the draft.

0:24:56.880 --> 0:24:59.120
<v Speaker 1>But because he's a, you know, a lower round guy,

0:24:59.160 --> 0:25:03.320
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of passing almost unnoticed higher grade for Joe

0:25:03.359 --> 0:25:07.640
<v Speaker 1>Burrow or Justin Herbert. It's funny because they're in almost

0:25:07.680 --> 0:25:10.760
<v Speaker 1>exactly the same spot. They're really tied together in terms

0:25:10.800 --> 0:25:13.840
<v Speaker 1>of grading, but the grade comes about in almost completely

0:25:14.240 --> 0:25:18.960
<v Speaker 1>opposite ways. Joe Burrow has been incredibly consistent, particularly up

0:25:19.000 --> 0:25:23.000
<v Speaker 1>to the sort of deep big shots, anything below twenty yards.

0:25:23.000 --> 0:25:25.840
<v Speaker 1>He's been absolute money and has been doing it in

0:25:26.160 --> 0:25:29.680
<v Speaker 1>the face of incredible pressure in Cincinnati. Justin Herbert is

0:25:29.720 --> 0:25:32.600
<v Speaker 1>like the king of the volatile stats. So whether it's

0:25:32.640 --> 0:25:35.800
<v Speaker 1>third down play, whether it's deep throws down the field,

0:25:35.840 --> 0:25:38.240
<v Speaker 1>whether it's you know, all those big time throws and

0:25:38.520 --> 0:25:41.199
<v Speaker 1>those kinds of things the PF charts, He's been a

0:25:41.400 --> 0:25:45.879
<v Speaker 1>phenomenal at those things, but has missed more regular easy throws,

0:25:45.920 --> 0:25:49.160
<v Speaker 1>miss more of the kind of consistently easy stuff than

0:25:49.800 --> 0:25:52.399
<v Speaker 1>Joe Burrow has. And he's been dealing with pressure as well,

0:25:52.600 --> 0:25:54.800
<v Speaker 1>and it kind of nets out to almost the exact

0:25:54.840 --> 0:25:59.600
<v Speaker 1>same PF grade overall. What about Clyde Edwards Hilaire his

0:25:59.720 --> 0:26:02.040
<v Speaker 1>grade aid and where he probably should have been taken

0:26:02.240 --> 0:26:05.400
<v Speaker 1>even though he is a running back. Yeah, And that's

0:26:05.440 --> 0:26:08.679
<v Speaker 1>really the thing is, you know, PF is in this

0:26:08.720 --> 0:26:10.960
<v Speaker 1>analytics group that would say, look, just don't take a

0:26:11.040 --> 0:26:12.800
<v Speaker 1>running back in the first round. It's not that they

0:26:12.800 --> 0:26:15.320
<v Speaker 1>won't ever look good, it's that they just won't justify

0:26:15.520 --> 0:26:18.600
<v Speaker 1>that draft slot. You could get him later on the draft,

0:26:18.720 --> 0:26:20.840
<v Speaker 1>or get a comparable player later on the draft, and

0:26:20.880 --> 0:26:23.040
<v Speaker 1>you'd see the same kind of production. And I think

0:26:23.040 --> 0:26:25.600
<v Speaker 1>that's kind of what we're seeing from Clyde Edwards Hilaire.

0:26:25.680 --> 0:26:28.480
<v Speaker 1>He's great as Okay, he's had good games, but really

0:26:28.560 --> 0:26:31.879
<v Speaker 1>what we're seeing is this product of the Kansas City offense.

0:26:31.880 --> 0:26:34.520
<v Speaker 1>And when that thing is ticking along, when it's going great,

0:26:34.560 --> 0:26:36.760
<v Speaker 1>when Mahomes is playing out of his mind and Patch

0:26:37.200 --> 0:26:40.240
<v Speaker 1>and Andy Reid is scheming up all these plays, Clyde

0:26:40.320 --> 0:26:42.359
<v Speaker 1>Edwards Hilaire is a good player to have on the

0:26:42.400 --> 0:26:45.000
<v Speaker 1>receiving end of those catches out of the backfield and

0:26:45.359 --> 0:26:48.760
<v Speaker 1>be taking the carries. But when things don't go as well,

0:26:48.800 --> 0:26:51.440
<v Speaker 1>he has those worst games and just doesn't look as good.

0:26:51.520 --> 0:26:55.320
<v Speaker 1>Running Backs are basically a product of their environment within

0:26:55.359 --> 0:26:59.360
<v Speaker 1>the offense. He's Sam Munson, Pro Football Focus, lead NFL analyst.

0:26:59.440 --> 0:27:01.280
<v Speaker 1>Who do you can sidered the best running back in

0:27:01.320 --> 0:27:05.919
<v Speaker 1>the NFL? I think right now it's Dalvin Cook. Again

0:27:06.280 --> 0:27:08.240
<v Speaker 1>what I just said, running backs are buying large a

0:27:08.240 --> 0:27:10.760
<v Speaker 1>product of their environment. He's the one guy this season

0:27:10.800 --> 0:27:14.679
<v Speaker 1>that isn't I mean, he's been massively overperforming what the

0:27:14.760 --> 0:27:18.040
<v Speaker 1>Vikings have been giving him. In terms of yards. He

0:27:18.440 --> 0:27:21.560
<v Speaker 1>has by far, I think, the most yards after contact

0:27:21.560 --> 0:27:24.399
<v Speaker 1>in the NFL, and only himself and Derrick Henry have

0:27:24.480 --> 0:27:27.840
<v Speaker 1>more total yards than Dalvin Cook has. Yards after contact.

0:27:27.920 --> 0:27:31.800
<v Speaker 1>He's just consistently generating an incredible amount of yardage off

0:27:31.800 --> 0:27:34.360
<v Speaker 1>his own back beyond what is being blocked for him.

0:27:35.200 --> 0:27:37.560
<v Speaker 1>We brought this up a couple of days ago. I

0:27:37.600 --> 0:27:40.240
<v Speaker 1>asked the audience, you could have any wide receiver for

0:27:40.280 --> 0:27:43.879
<v Speaker 1>the next five years, who do you think they picked?

0:27:45.320 --> 0:27:50.399
<v Speaker 1>Dk YEA. Yeah, did his slippage in the draft and

0:27:50.480 --> 0:27:53.359
<v Speaker 1>his profile was just based off he looks like he

0:27:53.440 --> 0:27:56.679
<v Speaker 1>should be great, but he's always injured. Is that what

0:27:56.800 --> 0:27:59.920
<v Speaker 1>it boiled down to. No, I think there were legit

0:28:00.080 --> 0:28:04.400
<v Speaker 1>him at concerns about his change of direction skills he had.

0:28:04.440 --> 0:28:06.919
<v Speaker 1>He went to the combine and posted this three cone

0:28:06.920 --> 0:28:09.320
<v Speaker 1>time that was slower than Tom Brady. It was, you know,

0:28:09.520 --> 0:28:13.199
<v Speaker 1>historically bad, and he fixed it a little bit at

0:28:13.240 --> 0:28:15.639
<v Speaker 1>his pro day, like he got faster the one at

0:28:15.640 --> 0:28:17.760
<v Speaker 1>the combine he slipped a little bit and they don't

0:28:17.840 --> 0:28:19.680
<v Speaker 1>let you take it again. So it was a bad

0:28:19.680 --> 0:28:22.560
<v Speaker 1>time there. He improved it at his pro day, but

0:28:22.600 --> 0:28:25.200
<v Speaker 1>it still wasn't good. It was still a concern, as

0:28:25.320 --> 0:28:27.400
<v Speaker 1>was his twenty shuttle time. So anything that was trying

0:28:27.440 --> 0:28:30.520
<v Speaker 1>to measure change of direction he was really bad at.

0:28:30.560 --> 0:28:32.840
<v Speaker 1>And I think that leads you to think well, okay,

0:28:32.880 --> 0:28:34.840
<v Speaker 1>does that limit him at the next level to just

0:28:34.960 --> 0:28:38.840
<v Speaker 1>being this linear, vertical threat guy who can't really run

0:28:38.880 --> 0:28:42.720
<v Speaker 1>the entire route tree. Even considering that, I think most

0:28:42.840 --> 0:28:45.280
<v Speaker 1>draft analysts had him going higher than he went in

0:28:45.280 --> 0:28:47.560
<v Speaker 1>the draft. It was still a shock to see him

0:28:47.600 --> 0:28:49.640
<v Speaker 1>slip as far as he did. But I think there

0:28:49.640 --> 0:28:53.280
<v Speaker 1>were real concerns about, you know, a missing component to

0:28:53.400 --> 0:28:55.880
<v Speaker 1>his game that just has been changed, that aren't that

0:28:56.000 --> 0:28:59.280
<v Speaker 1>isn't a missing component anymore. When does Pro Football Focus

0:28:59.320 --> 0:29:01.880
<v Speaker 1>do a deep dive into Trevor Lawrence and Justin Field.

0:29:02.680 --> 0:29:04.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we've got guys cranking on that right now.

0:29:04.920 --> 0:29:07.360
<v Speaker 1>We do. We grade every college game as well, so

0:29:07.400 --> 0:29:09.840
<v Speaker 1>we've got grades on all of these guys. Mike Renner

0:29:09.960 --> 0:29:12.920
<v Speaker 1>is our big draft guy. He's been the guy grinding

0:29:12.920 --> 0:29:16.080
<v Speaker 1>on that every single game of those guys careers. So

0:29:16.160 --> 0:29:18.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if we have a specific deep dive

0:29:18.760 --> 0:29:21.120
<v Speaker 1>article up on the site, but we've definitely got data

0:29:21.200 --> 0:29:23.400
<v Speaker 1>on all those guys right now. Are they working in

0:29:23.400 --> 0:29:26.680
<v Speaker 1>that room behind that door behind you? Yeah, that's a

0:29:26.760 --> 0:29:29.680
<v Speaker 1>room that goes downstairs into a basement where there's just

0:29:29.720 --> 0:29:31.840
<v Speaker 1>one little light hanging out of the ceiling. That's where

0:29:31.840 --> 0:29:34.960
<v Speaker 1>we put all the analysts worst starting quarterback in the NFL?

0:29:35.160 --> 0:29:38.640
<v Speaker 1>Is who the worst starting quarterback? I mean, I think

0:29:38.720 --> 0:29:41.160
<v Speaker 1>you can say it was Dwayne Haskins before he lost

0:29:41.200 --> 0:29:44.520
<v Speaker 1>his job. Now it's it's going to be a battle

0:29:44.560 --> 0:29:48.360
<v Speaker 1>between you know, Sam Darnold in New York Drew Locke

0:29:48.400 --> 0:29:51.560
<v Speaker 1>in Denver. It hasn't shown enough really to get out

0:29:51.560 --> 0:29:54.520
<v Speaker 1>of that conversation. It's it's those kind of young guys

0:29:54.560 --> 0:29:58.239
<v Speaker 1>that have have disappointed in bad situations so far. And

0:29:58.320 --> 0:30:00.760
<v Speaker 1>I thought this was Drew locks coming out party and

0:30:00.800 --> 0:30:03.280
<v Speaker 1>they had weapons, and here we go with Drew Locke.

0:30:03.280 --> 0:30:06.400
<v Speaker 1>I know, we got injured, but it feels like Sam

0:30:06.560 --> 0:30:09.680
<v Speaker 1>that the window of opportunity is about two years. Like

0:30:09.760 --> 0:30:12.440
<v Speaker 1>Baker Mayfields in his third year and it feels like

0:30:12.520 --> 0:30:16.360
<v Speaker 1>he's playing for his future in Cleveland. Are you guys

0:30:16.360 --> 0:30:18.680
<v Speaker 1>getting the sense of how long that window is for

0:30:18.800 --> 0:30:22.400
<v Speaker 1>a quarterback to prove himself. I think you know, this

0:30:22.520 --> 0:30:25.120
<v Speaker 1>run of quarterbacks that have been successful right away have

0:30:25.320 --> 0:30:28.600
<v Speaker 1>definitely changed the opinion of how long you get. And

0:30:28.640 --> 0:30:31.840
<v Speaker 1>if you don't show something almost right away, you have

0:30:31.880 --> 0:30:34.920
<v Speaker 1>to fight pretty hard for that job, particularly if you're

0:30:34.960 --> 0:30:36.800
<v Speaker 1>not a top pick. You know, if you're a first

0:30:36.960 --> 0:30:38.880
<v Speaker 1>you're number one overall pick, you get a little bit

0:30:38.960 --> 0:30:42.640
<v Speaker 1>more time to show something. But if you're not, you know,

0:30:42.720 --> 0:30:44.520
<v Speaker 1>you get a year or two and then we got

0:30:44.520 --> 0:30:46.640
<v Speaker 1>to move on. It's it's time to find the next guy,

0:30:46.800 --> 0:30:49.800
<v Speaker 1>because it's not the landscape is different to the way

0:30:49.800 --> 0:30:51.800
<v Speaker 1>it was a decade ago. You're not in a spot

0:30:51.800 --> 0:30:54.040
<v Speaker 1>anymore where you have to give Alex Smith one hundred

0:30:54.040 --> 0:30:56.880
<v Speaker 1>million dollar contract because the prospect of not having Alex

0:30:56.880 --> 0:31:01.040
<v Speaker 1>Smith is so terrifying. You can find those guys pretty

0:31:01.080 --> 0:31:04.560
<v Speaker 1>easily now, and so teams are much more emboldened to say,

0:31:04.600 --> 0:31:07.200
<v Speaker 1>all right, this guy is not a Hall of Famer,

0:31:07.200 --> 0:31:09.320
<v Speaker 1>he's not the next All Pro we need. We're gonna

0:31:09.360 --> 0:31:12.120
<v Speaker 1>cut bait and move on to the next guy. Do

0:31:12.160 --> 0:31:14.640
<v Speaker 1>you remember when we sort of took a player for

0:31:14.720 --> 0:31:19.440
<v Speaker 1>granted the way we do Patrick Mahomes, And this feels

0:31:19.440 --> 0:31:23.080
<v Speaker 1>like the embryonic stages of Michael Jordan's greatness when he

0:31:23.160 --> 0:31:26.280
<v Speaker 1>had team's success. Prior to that, he was sort of

0:31:26.320 --> 0:31:29.680
<v Speaker 1>just a highlight reel phenomenon. Then they started winning and

0:31:29.760 --> 0:31:32.760
<v Speaker 1>it felt like we got bored with this story. And

0:31:32.800 --> 0:31:35.400
<v Speaker 1>then Karl Malone won an MVP and Charles Barkley won

0:31:35.440 --> 0:31:39.080
<v Speaker 1>an MVP. I don't are we at that stage with

0:31:39.120 --> 0:31:42.920
<v Speaker 1>Patrick Mahomes where? And I know Russell has played extremely well,

0:31:43.320 --> 0:31:46.680
<v Speaker 1>But are we at the point where we're taking Patrick

0:31:46.760 --> 0:31:49.720
<v Speaker 1>mahomes were granted and I'll give you one in the

0:31:49.800 --> 0:31:52.320
<v Speaker 1>NFL as well. I think we've already passed that point

0:31:52.360 --> 0:31:54.920
<v Speaker 1>with Aaron Donald. I think you know, Aaron Donald should

0:31:54.920 --> 0:31:57.280
<v Speaker 1>have won every Defensive Player of the Year award since

0:31:57.480 --> 0:32:00.520
<v Speaker 1>his rookie season. So not the rookie season, but everyone

0:32:00.600 --> 0:32:02.920
<v Speaker 1>since then should have gone to Aaron Donald, and they

0:32:02.960 --> 0:32:05.880
<v Speaker 1>haven't because we've just gotten bored giving the award to

0:32:05.880 --> 0:32:08.760
<v Speaker 1>Aaron Donald, who is by far and away the best

0:32:08.760 --> 0:32:11.680
<v Speaker 1>defensive player in the NFL. I think he's the best player.

0:32:12.560 --> 0:32:15.840
<v Speaker 1>How do you gauge that, though, Sam? I mean to me,

0:32:16.080 --> 0:32:19.160
<v Speaker 1>it's how much further ahead is he than the rest

0:32:19.240 --> 0:32:21.400
<v Speaker 1>of his peers at his position? Right? So it's it's

0:32:21.400 --> 0:32:24.560
<v Speaker 1>really hard to compare positions to say the best defensive

0:32:24.600 --> 0:32:26.760
<v Speaker 1>lineman in the NFL is better than the best linebacker,

0:32:26.840 --> 0:32:29.120
<v Speaker 1>is better than the best safety, the best receiver. So

0:32:29.200 --> 0:32:32.760
<v Speaker 1>let's just stick to his position group and say how

0:32:32.840 --> 0:32:36.480
<v Speaker 1>much better is he than Fletcher Cox or Chris Jones

0:32:36.640 --> 0:32:40.200
<v Speaker 1>or whoever else the next interior guy is. And I

0:32:40.240 --> 0:32:42.960
<v Speaker 1>think it's light years ahead of those guys when you

0:32:43.000 --> 0:32:46.360
<v Speaker 1>consider how much more pressure he gets, how much more

0:32:46.400 --> 0:32:49.600
<v Speaker 1>pressure he gets on a rate basis, and how much

0:32:49.600 --> 0:32:51.480
<v Speaker 1>more he's double team than some of those guys and

0:32:51.600 --> 0:32:55.200
<v Speaker 1>still doing that. It's absolutely unbelievable. And just in terms

0:32:55.200 --> 0:32:59.120
<v Speaker 1>of PF grading, you know, the top X seasons in

0:32:59.200 --> 0:33:01.440
<v Speaker 1>terms of PF raids on the interior have all been

0:33:01.440 --> 0:33:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Aaron Donald. It's just a list of Aaron Donald seasons

0:33:04.040 --> 0:33:06.360
<v Speaker 1>that very slightly. So I think you're right, though, I

0:33:06.360 --> 0:33:09.480
<v Speaker 1>think Mahomes is reaching that category where you need to

0:33:09.480 --> 0:33:12.360
<v Speaker 1>watch him again to remind yourself that like this isn't normal.

0:33:12.720 --> 0:33:15.880
<v Speaker 1>Most quarterbacks don't do this, and we should remember that

0:33:15.960 --> 0:33:19.840
<v Speaker 1>this guy is a singularly unique talents otherwise we will

0:33:19.880 --> 0:33:21.680
<v Speaker 1>get bored with him the same way we do with

0:33:21.720 --> 0:33:25.320
<v Speaker 1>Aaron Donald. Sam, good to talk to you, and thank

0:33:25.360 --> 0:33:28.600
<v Speaker 1>you very much. Thank you, Sam Munson, Pro Football focused

0:33:28.720 --> 0:33:32.760
<v Speaker 1>lead NFL analysts. Yeah, we get bored, it feels like.

0:33:33.120 --> 0:33:35.520
<v Speaker 1>And I used to argue this all the time, and

0:33:35.800 --> 0:33:39.880
<v Speaker 1>I remember I caught grief from Utah Jazz fans because

0:33:40.080 --> 0:33:43.360
<v Speaker 1>I publicly would say who I voted for for MVPIT

0:33:43.800 --> 0:33:46.959
<v Speaker 1>and I said, I voted for Michael Jordan. Karl Malone

0:33:46.960 --> 0:33:49.320
<v Speaker 1>had a great year. It's weird to say, you know,

0:33:49.400 --> 0:33:52.640
<v Speaker 1>Lebron James, we took for granted. Do you know the

0:33:52.720 --> 0:34:00.160
<v Speaker 1>last time Lebron James won the MVP twenty thirteen. He's

0:34:00.200 --> 0:34:04.200
<v Speaker 1>the most valuable player in the NBA. May not be

0:34:04.280 --> 0:34:08.840
<v Speaker 1>the best, but the most valuable. And the same goes,

0:34:09.120 --> 0:34:12.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, with Michael Jordan. It was just Charles Barkley

0:34:12.040 --> 0:34:14.759
<v Speaker 1>had a wonderful year for the Phoenix Suns. I was

0:34:14.840 --> 0:34:17.920
<v Speaker 1>trying to, you know, you go, Okay, I'm gonna because

0:34:18.160 --> 0:34:20.480
<v Speaker 1>we're tired of talking about Jordan. I gotta give it

0:34:20.520 --> 0:34:24.000
<v Speaker 1>to Charles Barkley. And Charles is a friend, and I said, Charles,

0:34:24.080 --> 0:34:27.680
<v Speaker 1>I voted for Jordan, and he goes, I understand, I

0:34:27.680 --> 0:34:31.319
<v Speaker 1>get it. Carl Malone didn't have the same feeling, by

0:34:31.320 --> 0:34:33.160
<v Speaker 1>the way. He's like, yeah, I should have won a

0:34:33.200 --> 0:34:37.520
<v Speaker 1>couple of them. I'm like, okay, I don't know how many.

0:34:37.520 --> 0:34:41.200
<v Speaker 1>Tom Brady should have. He's got three, you know, but

0:34:41.280 --> 0:34:45.000
<v Speaker 1>that's really based off of incredible stats like Jordan was

0:34:45.080 --> 0:34:47.520
<v Speaker 1>just it was just that feel who was the most

0:34:47.600 --> 0:34:53.479
<v Speaker 1>valuable player. It was just Jordan and you know Tom

0:34:53.520 --> 0:34:57.160
<v Speaker 1>Brady is his value shows up in the playoffs. Now,

0:34:57.239 --> 0:34:59.480
<v Speaker 1>that's where he's the most valuable player in the NFL

0:35:00.239 --> 0:35:02.120
<v Speaker 1>and maybe the most valuable player in the history of

0:35:02.120 --> 0:35:06.240
<v Speaker 1>the NFL. Yes, think it's fair to say that there's

0:35:06.239 --> 0:35:09.200
<v Speaker 1>not really one most valuable player. There's like a there's

0:35:09.200 --> 0:35:13.000
<v Speaker 1>like a handful of guys and like like Lebron, Steph Durant,

0:35:13.000 --> 0:35:15.279
<v Speaker 1>we're all in the two thousand and tens, we're all

0:35:15.360 --> 0:35:17.000
<v Speaker 1>right there every year. I mean, you could have given

0:35:17.000 --> 0:35:19.720
<v Speaker 1>it to anything, but Lebron is the most valuable person

0:35:19.880 --> 0:35:23.279
<v Speaker 1>in the NBA. He's the most valuable player, right, but

0:35:23.400 --> 0:35:26.120
<v Speaker 1>not during the Warriors run. I mean, like he couldn't

0:35:26.160 --> 0:35:29.239
<v Speaker 1>he got he beat the Warriors one year. But basically,

0:35:29.280 --> 0:35:31.880
<v Speaker 1>like the Warriors set that single season record, they did

0:35:31.920 --> 0:35:34.480
<v Speaker 1>all sorts of things. They had a dominant run, but

0:35:34.560 --> 0:35:37.520
<v Speaker 1>they didn't win. They didn't win the title. They won three.

0:35:37.719 --> 0:35:39.560
<v Speaker 1>They didn't win the title when they set the record

0:35:39.600 --> 0:35:42.719
<v Speaker 1>for victories. Right, he's step tweaked his knee, but they

0:35:43.120 --> 0:35:45.480
<v Speaker 1>basically then they got Durant, they won three. They were

0:35:45.480 --> 0:35:48.000
<v Speaker 1>the dominant force of the NBA all those guys are MVPs.

0:35:48.000 --> 0:35:49.920
<v Speaker 1>That's what I'm saying. I'm not saying like Lebron hasn't

0:35:49.920 --> 0:35:52.120
<v Speaker 1>won an MVP in seven years. There's that seemed correct,

0:35:52.760 --> 0:35:55.520
<v Speaker 1>seem right. No, But that's because we got bored. That's

0:35:55.520 --> 0:35:57.879
<v Speaker 1>why I thought Lebron had a legitimate case this year,

0:35:57.920 --> 0:36:01.680
<v Speaker 1>only because the voters would go. He kind of reinvented himself.

0:36:02.120 --> 0:36:04.719
<v Speaker 1>He went to the West and said he couldn't win

0:36:04.760 --> 0:36:09.560
<v Speaker 1>the West Western Conference. He acquires Anthony Davis. He himself

0:36:09.600 --> 0:36:13.719
<v Speaker 1>got Anthony Davis there, and that still wasn't good enough

0:36:13.719 --> 0:36:15.560
<v Speaker 1>because we looked at the Greek freak with what he

0:36:15.600 --> 0:36:19.480
<v Speaker 1>did during the regular season. But he Lebron leads the

0:36:19.520 --> 0:36:23.680
<v Speaker 1>league and assist at thirty five, He's still playing at

0:36:23.719 --> 0:36:27.279
<v Speaker 1>an extremely high level. Like, I don't know how to

0:36:27.320 --> 0:36:30.040
<v Speaker 1>assess value. Does it come down to stats? Does it

0:36:30.120 --> 0:36:32.839
<v Speaker 1>come down to team record? If you say, how far

0:36:32.840 --> 0:36:35.600
<v Speaker 1>are you going in the playoffs? I mean, Lebron is

0:36:35.960 --> 0:36:38.719
<v Speaker 1>to the NBA Finals. What you know? Tom Brady's been

0:36:38.719 --> 0:36:43.240
<v Speaker 1>to Super Bowls? Like he's there, he goes. He doesn't

0:36:43.239 --> 0:36:45.760
<v Speaker 1>win as often, but he gets there, and he usually

0:36:45.760 --> 0:36:48.439
<v Speaker 1>goes with an underman team like he did in Cleveland. Yeah,

0:36:48.920 --> 0:36:50.680
<v Speaker 1>but during that run, couldn't you say all those things

0:36:50.680 --> 0:36:53.239
<v Speaker 1>about Steph Curry? He sort of redefined He was a

0:36:53.280 --> 0:36:56.160
<v Speaker 1>great Lake leader. You know, he came in. Everybody the

0:36:56.520 --> 0:36:58.279
<v Speaker 1>league change piece of him too. He was kind of

0:36:58.280 --> 0:37:00.440
<v Speaker 1>an MVP even when he didn't win it. It's a

0:37:00.480 --> 0:37:04.360
<v Speaker 1>shorter run, definitely, But that's why he wasn't even the

0:37:04.400 --> 0:37:06.719
<v Speaker 1>best player on his own team when KD came there.

0:37:07.520 --> 0:37:10.520
<v Speaker 1>When's the last time you say that about Lebron James.

0:37:10.560 --> 0:37:13.520
<v Speaker 1>Somebody he's playing with is better than him, right? But

0:37:13.600 --> 0:37:16.600
<v Speaker 1>in two thy sixteen, the Warriors were the team though.

0:37:16.640 --> 0:37:18.720
<v Speaker 1>That's why I like it, just like I know Lebron

0:37:18.800 --> 0:37:20.600
<v Speaker 1>one one, but that was a considered an upset if

0:37:20.600 --> 0:37:23.319
<v Speaker 1>they were the dominant team. I have no problem. If

0:37:23.320 --> 0:37:26.480
<v Speaker 1>you want to give Steph Curry another MVP, I have

0:37:26.480 --> 0:37:28.399
<v Speaker 1>no problem. You want to take away an MVP from

0:37:28.400 --> 0:37:32.120
<v Speaker 1>Steve Nash, I don't. I'm not be holding to any

0:37:32.120 --> 0:37:34.560
<v Speaker 1>of these guys. I just look at it and I

0:37:34.600 --> 0:37:38.880
<v Speaker 1>assess it in my own terminology, my own opinion. I

0:37:39.000 --> 0:37:42.879
<v Speaker 1>try not to play favorites. Uh. You know, people look

0:37:42.880 --> 0:37:45.319
<v Speaker 1>at a story. What is the story this year? What's

0:37:45.360 --> 0:37:49.919
<v Speaker 1>the story next year? It's not the Greek freak. May

0:37:49.920 --> 0:37:53.040
<v Speaker 1>not be Lebron, it may be Steph Curry coming back.

0:37:54.560 --> 0:37:59.120
<v Speaker 1>Writers are looking for a story. What are you going

0:37:59.160 --> 0:38:01.520
<v Speaker 1>to write about with a freak this year? Hey, he

0:38:01.560 --> 0:38:07.960
<v Speaker 1>averaged thirty thirteen and five. Great, you know what we're

0:38:07.960 --> 0:38:10.880
<v Speaker 1>gonna say, Well, what's he going to do in the postseason?

0:38:11.400 --> 0:38:14.879
<v Speaker 1>Whether that's fair or not, there's no story to write there. Yeah,

0:38:14.880 --> 0:38:17.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm in club. Yeah, Greek freak. Sorry, Greek freak go

0:38:17.640 --> 0:38:20.080
<v Speaker 1>fifty like will. They're never giving him another one, right,

0:38:20.080 --> 0:38:22.160
<v Speaker 1>They're gonna be mad that he didn't show up in

0:38:22.200 --> 0:38:24.640
<v Speaker 1>the playoffs. If he would win a title, then they

0:38:24.640 --> 0:38:28.360
<v Speaker 1>would look at him differently. But they're looking for stories,

0:38:30.000 --> 0:38:32.080
<v Speaker 1>looking for stories. We'll take a break here. Play of

0:38:32.080 --> 0:38:34.719
<v Speaker 1>the Day coming up next, Phone calls as well. We'll

0:38:34.920 --> 0:38:37.200
<v Speaker 1>head to Augusta coming up. Scott Van Pelt will join

0:38:37.239 --> 0:38:39.600
<v Speaker 1>us a little bit later on Rhes Davis, the host

0:38:39.640 --> 0:38:42.040
<v Speaker 1>of College Game Day. They're down there at the Masters

0:38:42.080 --> 0:38:44.000
<v Speaker 1>as well. All of that coming up here on The

0:38:44.040 --> 0:38:46.200
<v Speaker 1>Dan Patrick Show. Thanks for listening to The Dan Patrick

0:38:46.280 --> 0:38:49.040
<v Speaker 1>Show podcast. Be sure to catch us live every weekday

0:38:49.080 --> 0:38:51.840
<v Speaker 1>morning nine until noon eastern six to nine Pacific on

0:38:51.920 --> 0:38:54.279
<v Speaker 1>Fox Sports Radio and you can find us on the

0:38:54.320 --> 0:38:58.520
<v Speaker 1>iHeartRadio app at FSR or stream us live on the

0:38:58.560 --> 0:39:06.000
<v Speaker 1>Peacock app. God the Place of the Day God plays

0:39:06.440 --> 0:39:10.440
<v Speaker 1>is the play on the Day. Check this out. Trevor

0:39:10.520 --> 0:39:12.480
<v Speaker 1>Daniel last time he was on the field shank one.

0:39:12.480 --> 0:39:15.000
<v Speaker 1>It was only a seventeen yard punt. Should get good

0:39:15.040 --> 0:39:17.840
<v Speaker 1>field possession out of this one day walking could plucking

0:39:18.000 --> 0:39:20.920
<v Speaker 1>it picked up by the culture. That's tej ain't carry

0:39:21.280 --> 0:39:30.560
<v Speaker 1>special key touchdown? Why put for a touchdown Colts Radio Network?

0:39:30.719 --> 0:39:33.640
<v Speaker 1>Just the second block punt returned for a touchdown by

0:39:33.680 --> 0:39:36.600
<v Speaker 1>the Colts in the last thirty years. Play of the

0:39:36.680 --> 0:39:39.280
<v Speaker 1>Day Play of the Day brought to you by Masterclass,

0:39:39.320 --> 0:39:42.399
<v Speaker 1>offering over ninety classes on a variety of topics, all

0:39:42.480 --> 0:39:45.120
<v Speaker 1>taught by world class masters at the top of their fields.

0:39:45.360 --> 0:39:47.839
<v Speaker 1>This holiday, when you buy an annual membership, you get

0:39:47.880 --> 0:39:51.520
<v Speaker 1>another annual membership for free. Just go to Masterclass dot

0:39:51.520 --> 0:39:54.080
<v Speaker 1>com slash Patrick. Just go to the website and go

0:39:54.160 --> 0:39:57.480
<v Speaker 1>through all of the different teachers that you have on there,

0:39:57.760 --> 0:40:01.000
<v Speaker 1>and it's really fascinating, biggest names in their field. That's

0:40:01.040 --> 0:40:05.840
<v Speaker 1>a Masterclass dot com slash Patrick. I had mentioned about

0:40:05.840 --> 0:40:08.279
<v Speaker 1>a half hour ago how rare it is to have

0:40:08.400 --> 0:40:10.719
<v Speaker 1>somebody win the Masters and have a double bogie during

0:40:10.760 --> 0:40:14.879
<v Speaker 1>their realm. We saw this with Bryson Deshambo, just one

0:40:14.880 --> 0:40:18.280
<v Speaker 1>of the last eleven Masters winners had a double bogie

0:40:18.360 --> 0:40:20.359
<v Speaker 1>or worse at any point and went on to win

0:40:20.400 --> 0:40:24.280
<v Speaker 1>the tournament. That was Jordan's Speed in twenty fifteen. What's

0:40:24.320 --> 0:40:27.160
<v Speaker 1>more rare is taking a double bogie on a par five,

0:40:27.680 --> 0:40:31.200
<v Speaker 1>as Deshambo did. He. Uh you know the last time

0:40:31.239 --> 0:40:33.719
<v Speaker 1>somebody took a double bogie on a par five at

0:40:33.719 --> 0:40:38.480
<v Speaker 1>Augusta gone on to win Jack Nicholas in nineteen seventy two.

0:40:39.280 --> 0:40:45.520
<v Speaker 1>Maybe just an omen for Bryson Deshambo. All right, uh oh,

0:40:45.680 --> 0:40:49.120
<v Speaker 1>who's who's got the who? Whose stats would you want here? Mclovin,

0:40:49.239 --> 0:40:50.920
<v Speaker 1>is this you? Okay? Yeah, I just set this out.

0:40:51.239 --> 0:40:53.720
<v Speaker 1>Whose stats would you want? Okay? I smell a setup?

0:40:53.800 --> 0:40:56.279
<v Speaker 1>Yeah I do too, well? Whose status would you want?

0:40:56.280 --> 0:40:59.120
<v Speaker 1>It's always a setup? Okay? Do you want me to

0:40:59.120 --> 0:41:01.480
<v Speaker 1>read them? Yeah? Sure? Went during forty nine yards per game?

0:41:01.640 --> 0:41:04.239
<v Speaker 1>Is this this season? This season? Okay? Sixty five point

0:41:04.280 --> 0:41:08.680
<v Speaker 1>six completion percentage, ten tds, seven interceptions or two hundred

0:41:08.640 --> 0:41:11.480
<v Speaker 1>and thirty five yards per game fifty eight point four

0:41:11.560 --> 0:41:15.040
<v Speaker 1>completion percentage, twelve tds, twelve picks, which might be a

0:41:15.040 --> 0:41:18.800
<v Speaker 1>clue you might know who. I mean, Yes, So whose

0:41:18.880 --> 0:41:22.800
<v Speaker 1>stacks do I want? Carson Wentz? The bottom one is

0:41:22.880 --> 0:41:27.000
<v Speaker 1>Carson where yes? And the other one is Nick Foles

0:41:27.080 --> 0:41:29.719
<v Speaker 1>is putting together a nice little skull season for the

0:41:29.800 --> 0:41:33.839
<v Speaker 1>Chicago Bears, and everybody is killing him. I'm not killing him.

0:41:33.880 --> 0:41:37.000
<v Speaker 1>I just said Nick Foles is not a starting quarterback.

0:41:37.080 --> 0:41:40.239
<v Speaker 1>He's not a franchise quarterback. Not you, but people are

0:41:40.239 --> 0:41:42.359
<v Speaker 1>really killing him. But I don't know if that's not

0:41:42.440 --> 0:41:46.000
<v Speaker 1>just a Chicago jinks. Nobody you could play on that

0:41:46.040 --> 0:41:48.799
<v Speaker 1>Bears uniform and you can't. You can't do it. Nah.

0:41:48.880 --> 0:41:52.120
<v Speaker 1>But I mean, I think Nick Foles is a great reliever.

0:41:53.200 --> 0:41:56.280
<v Speaker 1>I don't think he's a great starter. He's had moments,

0:41:56.320 --> 0:41:58.920
<v Speaker 1>but he's not. I still think Carson Wentz is a

0:41:59.000 --> 0:42:05.839
<v Speaker 1>franchise quarterback, but so far and maybe the second half

0:42:05.840 --> 0:42:07.279
<v Speaker 1>of the season we might not see it. With the

0:42:07.320 --> 0:42:10.200
<v Speaker 1>offensive line, you know, it's banged up as it's been,

0:42:10.800 --> 0:42:13.640
<v Speaker 1>and then you get into bad habits and maybe Carson

0:42:13.640 --> 0:42:17.080
<v Speaker 1>Wentz has just got into bad habits there. Cody in Michigan, Hey,

0:42:17.120 --> 0:42:20.920
<v Speaker 1>Cody what's on your mind? Hey, Dan, first time a

0:42:20.960 --> 0:42:25.840
<v Speaker 1>long time five ten, two h five. Yeah, So I

0:42:25.880 --> 0:42:27.920
<v Speaker 1>just want to talk about this Philip Rivers Hall of

0:42:27.960 --> 0:42:30.760
<v Speaker 1>Fame issue. I think I think Rivers has been lucky

0:42:30.840 --> 0:42:33.400
<v Speaker 1>enough to have sort of a recency bias with a

0:42:33.400 --> 0:42:35.440
<v Speaker 1>lot of great quarterbacks that came in his generation. You

0:42:35.520 --> 0:42:38.759
<v Speaker 1>look at Donovan McNabb, he went to multiple championships, went

0:42:38.800 --> 0:42:42.040
<v Speaker 1>to a super Bowl, had zero MVP votes. Tony Romo,

0:42:42.480 --> 0:42:45.680
<v Speaker 1>you know high number is really good quarterback, had two

0:42:45.800 --> 0:42:50.279
<v Speaker 1>MVP votes. Philip Rivers, you know, stayed healthy, never really

0:42:50.320 --> 0:42:53.200
<v Speaker 1>got to the super Bowl. He had four MVP votes.

0:42:53.400 --> 0:42:55.680
<v Speaker 1>So there's all these quarterbacks that come in. You look

0:42:55.719 --> 0:42:58.640
<v Speaker 1>at Eli Manning two super Bowls. They're all great quarterbacks,

0:42:58.640 --> 0:43:01.480
<v Speaker 1>but for some reason, Rivers it's assumed to be the

0:43:01.560 --> 0:43:03.879
<v Speaker 1>automatic Hall of Famer, where I think you could argue

0:43:03.880 --> 0:43:05.080
<v Speaker 1>that all four of them are just in the Hall

0:43:05.120 --> 0:43:08.400
<v Speaker 1>of the very good. Yeah you could. I mean, Eli

0:43:08.480 --> 0:43:10.600
<v Speaker 1>without the two super bowls is in the Hall of

0:43:10.640 --> 0:43:13.760
<v Speaker 1>good or very good. But he's got those super bowls

0:43:13.840 --> 0:43:17.800
<v Speaker 1>and he beat the Patriots. Okay, one hour in the books,

0:43:17.800 --> 0:43:21.640
<v Speaker 1>two more ago, a trigger meet Friday French dip on

0:43:21.680 --> 0:43:23.520
<v Speaker 1>the menu this morning, back after this