WEBVTT - Surveillance: Tariff Rollback Unlikely, Kudlow Says

0:00:09.840 --> 0:00:13.800
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Tom Keene Jai Ley.

0:00:13.960 --> 0:00:17.560
<v Speaker 1>We bring you insight from the best in economics, finance, investment,

0:00:18.000 --> 0:00:23.480
<v Speaker 1>and international relations. Find Bloomberg Surveillance on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud,

0:00:23.600 --> 0:00:27.320
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot Com, and of course on the Bloomberg. The

0:00:27.360 --> 0:00:30.040
<v Speaker 1>fancy phrase for this would be shocked HISTORIESUS, and I

0:00:30.160 --> 0:00:33.239
<v Speaker 1>say that in honor of Olivier Blanchard, who was with

0:00:33.400 --> 0:00:36.080
<v Speaker 1>us earlier at this week. He and Laurence Summer with

0:00:36.159 --> 0:00:40.800
<v Speaker 1>pathbreaking research on the effect of the duration of unemployment

0:00:40.840 --> 0:00:43.800
<v Speaker 1>over time. But nowhere in the research, at least have

0:00:43.880 --> 0:00:46.240
<v Speaker 1>I ever, would have could ever suggests that we've seen

0:00:46.240 --> 0:00:49.199
<v Speaker 1>the abruptness that we see now. The abruptness is seen

0:00:49.280 --> 0:00:51.760
<v Speaker 1>in the market. Await to the tape. The tape has

0:00:51.800 --> 0:00:54.000
<v Speaker 1>been green, red, green, right now some red on the

0:00:54.440 --> 0:00:57.440
<v Speaker 1>I scream with the vix forty nine point seven seven

0:00:57.440 --> 0:01:00.360
<v Speaker 1>and yields come in and the tenant thirty years space

0:01:00.920 --> 0:01:03.960
<v Speaker 1>with us that I really am pleased that Jeffrey Rosenberg

0:01:04.000 --> 0:01:06.000
<v Speaker 1>could find time to join us today. He is with

0:01:06.080 --> 0:01:08.959
<v Speaker 1>black Rock and he does a number of things over there,

0:01:09.000 --> 0:01:14.480
<v Speaker 1>but mostly he writes acute summaries of the fixed income space.

0:01:14.560 --> 0:01:16.839
<v Speaker 1>So we're gonna touch on jobs here a little bit,

0:01:17.319 --> 0:01:19.560
<v Speaker 1>but and I really want to get to a discussion

0:01:19.560 --> 0:01:21.760
<v Speaker 1>of what we've got and fixed income down we do this,

0:01:22.080 --> 0:01:24.560
<v Speaker 1>We're thrilled to tell you without commercial interruption, to the

0:01:24.600 --> 0:01:27.200
<v Speaker 1>top of the hour, Jeff, thank you so much for

0:01:27.280 --> 0:01:30.399
<v Speaker 1>being with us. We are seeing an economists pull out

0:01:30.440 --> 0:01:35.560
<v Speaker 1>their duration of this slowdown in the duration of slogging recovery.

0:01:36.200 --> 0:01:38.560
<v Speaker 1>The V shaped recovery seems to have disappeared in the

0:01:38.640 --> 0:01:41.280
<v Speaker 1>last forty eight hours. How do you fold that into

0:01:41.319 --> 0:01:43.640
<v Speaker 1>fixed incomes? What does it mean, for example, for the

0:01:43.680 --> 0:01:49.800
<v Speaker 1>benchmark tenure yield. Well, you know what we're debating is

0:01:49.800 --> 0:01:52.960
<v Speaker 1>is you know, what is the pace? What is the

0:01:53.080 --> 0:01:57.240
<v Speaker 1>shape of the recovery for the tenure yield? However, um

0:01:57.520 --> 0:02:00.360
<v Speaker 1>it may be less about that. And what we seen

0:02:00.480 --> 0:02:04.920
<v Speaker 1>here is just a historic structural change in the relationship

0:02:05.000 --> 0:02:08.760
<v Speaker 1>between the federal reserve and fiscal policy. We are now

0:02:08.880 --> 0:02:13.680
<v Speaker 1>operating in a different structural environment. Monetary policy is in

0:02:13.720 --> 0:02:17.440
<v Speaker 1>the control of the fiscal authority. This is akin to

0:02:17.639 --> 0:02:20.440
<v Speaker 1>wartime finance because we are fighting a war. We're fighting

0:02:20.440 --> 0:02:23.440
<v Speaker 1>a war against the pandemic. And so when you think

0:02:23.440 --> 0:02:27.000
<v Speaker 1>about how interest rates move, Um, you really have to

0:02:27.000 --> 0:02:29.720
<v Speaker 1>stop thinking about, well, what is the shape of the

0:02:29.760 --> 0:02:32.960
<v Speaker 1>economy and what is the outlook for inflation, because there's

0:02:33.000 --> 0:02:35.600
<v Speaker 1>something much much more important that a lot of these

0:02:35.600 --> 0:02:39.160
<v Speaker 1>headlines you've seen. The Fed, for example, this week, change

0:02:39.240 --> 0:02:43.880
<v Speaker 1>the regular regulations around the supplementary leverage ratio. This is

0:02:43.960 --> 0:02:48.200
<v Speaker 1>all about securing the interest rate that the government will

0:02:48.240 --> 0:02:53.040
<v Speaker 1>pay to fund the massive fiscal policy response that we've

0:02:53.080 --> 0:02:56.880
<v Speaker 1>seen to fight the pandemic. And so interest rates are

0:02:56.880 --> 0:02:59.280
<v Speaker 1>going to be much more about fiscal policy than they

0:02:59.320 --> 0:03:02.600
<v Speaker 1>are about monetary policy, the shape of the economic recovery,

0:03:02.600 --> 0:03:05.560
<v Speaker 1>and the said reacting to the shape of the economic recovery,

0:03:05.600 --> 0:03:08.200
<v Speaker 1>because it's gonna be a long time, as as Diane

0:03:08.240 --> 0:03:10.320
<v Speaker 1>was saying, it's gonna be a long time before, you know,

0:03:10.400 --> 0:03:13.320
<v Speaker 1>consumer behavior and confidence comes back. But it's also going

0:03:13.360 --> 0:03:16.200
<v Speaker 1>to be a long time before we get back to

0:03:16.520 --> 0:03:19.800
<v Speaker 1>the pre crisis setting a monetary policy and interest rate.

0:03:20.800 --> 0:03:25.680
<v Speaker 1>So let's talk about the monetary policy currently underway. It

0:03:25.919 --> 0:03:28.720
<v Speaker 1>is uh off the charts. I'm looking right now at

0:03:28.720 --> 0:03:32.639
<v Speaker 1>the balance sheet growth for the Federal Reserve and it

0:03:32.639 --> 0:03:35.440
<v Speaker 1>blows me away. I mean, in one week, six hundred

0:03:35.480 --> 0:03:38.000
<v Speaker 1>billion dollar expansion in the balance sheet. More than a

0:03:38.040 --> 0:03:41.880
<v Speaker 1>trillion dollars added to the Federal reserves holdings of assets

0:03:42.040 --> 0:03:44.400
<v Speaker 1>in two weeks, and I'm wondering, we're looking at a

0:03:44.400 --> 0:03:47.840
<v Speaker 1>five point eight trillion dollar balance sheet on the other

0:03:47.920 --> 0:03:50.920
<v Speaker 1>side of this, What will the Federal Reserve look like,

0:03:51.040 --> 0:03:54.320
<v Speaker 1>considering that it is expanding its power and its scope

0:03:54.400 --> 0:04:00.280
<v Speaker 1>well beyond its historical role into fiscal stimulus. Well, again,

0:04:00.360 --> 0:04:04.000
<v Speaker 1>I think we've got to be careful about history here

0:04:04.200 --> 0:04:08.960
<v Speaker 1>and which history we're comparing to, because the operative history

0:04:08.960 --> 0:04:12.320
<v Speaker 1>to compare is not the one we experienced. That's the

0:04:12.400 --> 0:04:18.479
<v Speaker 1>modern FED. The poste Fed Treasury Accord establishes the modern

0:04:18.560 --> 0:04:21.599
<v Speaker 1>said the independence of monetary policy. But again, if we

0:04:21.680 --> 0:04:25.600
<v Speaker 1>take the analogy two we're at war against the pandemic

0:04:25.640 --> 0:04:29.560
<v Speaker 1>and we've just shifted the structure into wartime finance, then

0:04:29.600 --> 0:04:32.760
<v Speaker 1>the better historical analog is what did the Fed, what

0:04:32.839 --> 0:04:35.560
<v Speaker 1>did its balance she'd look like during World War Two?

0:04:35.600 --> 0:04:38.960
<v Speaker 1>And what we saw during that time period was explicit

0:04:39.080 --> 0:04:42.280
<v Speaker 1>pegging of interest rates three eighths on the bills, two

0:04:42.320 --> 0:04:45.960
<v Speaker 1>and a half on the thirty year, and the subordination

0:04:46.160 --> 0:04:49.360
<v Speaker 1>of the Federal reserve institutions to the needs of the

0:04:49.360 --> 0:04:51.880
<v Speaker 1>fiscal policy in that case, of course, fighting the war

0:04:51.960 --> 0:04:55.160
<v Speaker 1>effort here very similar fighting the war effort in terms

0:04:55.160 --> 0:04:59.920
<v Speaker 1>of providing the funding for these massive amounts of stimul

0:05:00.320 --> 0:05:03.080
<v Speaker 1>and the Balance Street expansion that you're talking about, that

0:05:03.080 --> 0:05:05.919
<v Speaker 1>that that barely scratches the circles, because we have the

0:05:05.920 --> 0:05:09.799
<v Speaker 1>main street business lending facilities still to come. The funding

0:05:09.839 --> 0:05:12.040
<v Speaker 1>of it the four and fifty four billion, but you

0:05:12.120 --> 0:05:14.599
<v Speaker 1>leverage that up up to ten times, and you're talking

0:05:14.640 --> 0:05:18.120
<v Speaker 1>about nearly an additional expansion of five trillion, and the

0:05:18.120 --> 0:05:22.960
<v Speaker 1>Federal Reserve providing that funding into the real economy. Beautifully

0:05:22.960 --> 0:05:26.000
<v Speaker 1>explained Jeffrey Rosenberg with this black Rock, folks, And at

0:05:26.000 --> 0:05:28.040
<v Speaker 1>this time with the jobs report, we have to turn

0:05:28.080 --> 0:05:31.120
<v Speaker 1>a little bit too a discussion for Global Wall Street.

0:05:31.120 --> 0:05:33.320
<v Speaker 1>Will try to keep it in English for all of

0:05:33.360 --> 0:05:35.960
<v Speaker 1>you out there not familiar with some of these arcane phrases.

0:05:36.000 --> 0:05:40.120
<v Speaker 1>Jeff Rosenberg. I thought Ben Emmons was just brilliant yesterday

0:05:40.240 --> 0:05:44.800
<v Speaker 1>writing a note on CMBs, the idea that millions can't

0:05:44.800 --> 0:05:48.840
<v Speaker 1>pay their rent, landlords are left hanging, and all of

0:05:48.880 --> 0:05:52.800
<v Speaker 1>a sudden it redounds over into commercial real estate and

0:05:52.880 --> 0:05:58.000
<v Speaker 1>mortgage securitized ideas. Clos R and b s and stuff

0:05:58.040 --> 0:06:02.320
<v Speaker 1>like that. How urgent is this on a Friday morning

0:06:02.360 --> 0:06:06.039
<v Speaker 1>across America? Is there really going to be a collapsing

0:06:06.720 --> 0:06:10.840
<v Speaker 1>in securitized instruments like we saw in two thousand eight,

0:06:11.200 --> 0:06:15.520
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand nine. So so there's their differences in

0:06:15.680 --> 0:06:20.400
<v Speaker 1>kind and and what we saw already, what we saw

0:06:20.400 --> 0:06:23.440
<v Speaker 1>in the fixing markets in March is kind of the

0:06:23.480 --> 0:06:27.680
<v Speaker 1>first wave of the impact of the pandemic. That was

0:06:27.720 --> 0:06:33.359
<v Speaker 1>a liquidity orientation, that was a liquidity source of market

0:06:33.440 --> 0:06:36.840
<v Speaker 1>drops in prices, and very simply quickly what happened was

0:06:36.880 --> 0:06:40.080
<v Speaker 1>you had this massive demand for liquidity from the real

0:06:40.120 --> 0:06:43.440
<v Speaker 1>economy into the financial economy as a result of the

0:06:43.440 --> 0:06:46.719
<v Speaker 1>sudden stop in the economy at a size that the

0:06:46.720 --> 0:06:52.680
<v Speaker 1>financial economy was never equipped to ever fulfill. The squeezing

0:06:52.839 --> 0:06:55.080
<v Speaker 1>from the real economy of that liquidity out of the

0:06:55.080 --> 0:06:59.640
<v Speaker 1>financial economy. That pivoted back and squeezed financial market liquidity,

0:06:59.680 --> 0:07:02.840
<v Speaker 1>and you saw some large drops. Okay, So now the

0:07:02.880 --> 0:07:07.240
<v Speaker 1>Federal Reserve intervenes, it plugs the whole of that liquidity

0:07:07.240 --> 0:07:09.360
<v Speaker 1>with its balance sheet. That's where we are today. Your

0:07:09.400 --> 0:07:11.240
<v Speaker 1>question is now, well, where do we go from here?

0:07:11.240 --> 0:07:14.600
<v Speaker 1>When you look at the fundamentals of the daisy chain

0:07:15.320 --> 0:07:19.640
<v Speaker 1>of the furbearances. Where does it stop right and where

0:07:19.680 --> 0:07:23.440
<v Speaker 1>it stops is at the investor, at the holdings, at

0:07:23.440 --> 0:07:26.920
<v Speaker 1>the bond level of the securitizations. And so this is

0:07:27.640 --> 0:07:32.000
<v Speaker 1>now what we're considering. But it's about a temporary halt

0:07:32.680 --> 0:07:35.760
<v Speaker 1>to payments as a result of this sudden stop. And

0:07:35.800 --> 0:07:39.920
<v Speaker 1>so the difference in kind relative to nine is the

0:07:39.960 --> 0:07:44.160
<v Speaker 1>two nine was about a fundamental collapse in the value

0:07:44.160 --> 0:07:48.800
<v Speaker 1>of the underlying property. These properties might collapse fundamentally if

0:07:48.880 --> 0:07:53.920
<v Speaker 1>there's a permanence to the halting of those payments, and

0:07:54.040 --> 0:07:57.440
<v Speaker 1>certainly in some sectors of the economy, the structural changes

0:07:57.760 --> 0:08:01.200
<v Speaker 1>that the pandemic brings change ages and how we behave

0:08:01.480 --> 0:08:05.920
<v Speaker 1>may render some of those securities, valuations, and cash flows

0:08:05.960 --> 0:08:09.760
<v Speaker 1>permanently impaired. But the larger broader issue here is this

0:08:09.840 --> 0:08:13.040
<v Speaker 1>is a temporary stop at what we're trying to finance,

0:08:13.120 --> 0:08:16.480
<v Speaker 1>and that earlier program that I just highlighted up the

0:08:16.520 --> 0:08:19.600
<v Speaker 1>best four and a half five trillion dollars of lending

0:08:19.640 --> 0:08:22.920
<v Speaker 1>capacity from the federal Reserve maybe needed to call to

0:08:22.960 --> 0:08:26.880
<v Speaker 1>be called upon, or maybe even additional forms. There's legislation

0:08:26.920 --> 0:08:29.240
<v Speaker 1>and discussion about how do you handle other areas of

0:08:29.240 --> 0:08:32.600
<v Speaker 1>the securitization the mortgage market, How do we fund the

0:08:32.640 --> 0:08:37.000
<v Speaker 1>temporary stop of these forbearances. It all leads to back

0:08:37.040 --> 0:08:40.440
<v Speaker 1>on the federal fisk to provide that bridge. Jeff. Just

0:08:40.480 --> 0:08:42.520
<v Speaker 1>by everything that I've read, the mortgage market is in

0:08:42.679 --> 0:08:44.840
<v Speaker 1>much better shape heading into this, and it's not being

0:08:44.920 --> 0:08:47.480
<v Speaker 1>fundamentally threatened as you're saying, in the same kind of

0:08:47.520 --> 0:08:50.280
<v Speaker 1>way as it was in two thousand seven, two thousand eight,

0:08:50.320 --> 0:08:54.199
<v Speaker 1>and two thousand nine. The corporate debt market, however, is

0:08:54.360 --> 0:08:58.320
<v Speaker 1>and I would argue that the leverage ratios and companies

0:08:58.840 --> 0:09:02.520
<v Speaker 1>have reached level that do exceed historical precedents. And we

0:09:02.559 --> 0:09:05.959
<v Speaker 1>are currently seeing the fastest pace of downgrades by credit

0:09:06.040 --> 0:09:09.480
<v Speaker 1>rating agencies in records going back to two thousand and two,

0:09:09.880 --> 0:09:13.400
<v Speaker 1>and you're expecting default rates up to nine percent and beyond,

0:09:14.240 --> 0:09:17.880
<v Speaker 1>with rating agencies downgrading their expectations going forward on a

0:09:18.000 --> 0:09:21.000
<v Speaker 1>daily basis, how big of a hit is that going

0:09:21.040 --> 0:09:24.440
<v Speaker 1>to be to the corporate credit sector, regardless of any

0:09:24.440 --> 0:09:31.160
<v Speaker 1>fedback stop. Yeah, and and again let's a frame Mike answer.

0:09:31.320 --> 0:09:35.040
<v Speaker 1>In those two phases. The first phase of what we've

0:09:35.040 --> 0:09:38.160
<v Speaker 1>seen has been primarily liquidity phase. And you've seen the

0:09:39.160 --> 0:09:43.199
<v Speaker 1>primary market credit facility, the secondary market credit facility helped

0:09:43.240 --> 0:09:46.920
<v Speaker 1>to stabilize the market. But then you move from liquidity

0:09:46.960 --> 0:09:51.440
<v Speaker 1>to solvency, from liquidity concerns to fundamental credit concerns. And

0:09:51.480 --> 0:09:55.199
<v Speaker 1>so as we roll through to the earlier questions to Diane,

0:09:55.559 --> 0:09:57.880
<v Speaker 1>what is the recession look like? What is the depth

0:09:57.960 --> 0:10:00.280
<v Speaker 1>in the duration? Is it be? Is it you is

0:10:00.320 --> 0:10:04.080
<v Speaker 1>at flat bottom? Now you're talking about real fundamental economic

0:10:04.360 --> 0:10:09.400
<v Speaker 1>impact to which the Federal Reserve is not really designed

0:10:09.559 --> 0:10:13.040
<v Speaker 1>and intended to solve those issues. And you came in

0:10:13.520 --> 0:10:17.080
<v Speaker 1>as your highlighting. You came into this crisis with greater

0:10:17.160 --> 0:10:21.760
<v Speaker 1>vulnerability because the debt stocks not so much historically unprecedented,

0:10:21.800 --> 0:10:25.000
<v Speaker 1>but we're running at kind of very late cycle extended

0:10:25.080 --> 0:10:29.319
<v Speaker 1>level of indebtedness, primarily because the burden of that debt,

0:10:29.320 --> 0:10:32.080
<v Speaker 1>the interest rate burden was so low, but the interest

0:10:32.200 --> 0:10:34.480
<v Speaker 1>rate burden is high when you have an environment of

0:10:34.640 --> 0:10:37.800
<v Speaker 1>zero cash flow. So it's really about how quickly do

0:10:38.200 --> 0:10:42.360
<v Speaker 1>the cashless the economy come back online. And certainly there's

0:10:42.360 --> 0:10:46.440
<v Speaker 1>gonna be an elevated level where the most vulnerable, smaller

0:10:46.480 --> 0:10:50.560
<v Speaker 1>companies less financial flexibility or the areas in the sectors

0:10:50.559 --> 0:10:53.560
<v Speaker 1>of the market that are structurally impaired. Uh, see those

0:10:53.600 --> 0:10:57.079
<v Speaker 1>restructurings in default. Jeffrey Rosenberg, thank you so much to

0:10:57.160 --> 0:11:03.840
<v Speaker 1>black Reck. Greatly appreciate it today and fixed income Ellen

0:11:04.800 --> 0:11:08.120
<v Speaker 1>too was for Morgan Standard today. Ellen, what did you

0:11:08.160 --> 0:11:10.360
<v Speaker 1>glean from the report? The report is so much more

0:11:10.400 --> 0:11:13.320
<v Speaker 1>than five or six numbers. Clearly a shock with seven

0:11:13.360 --> 0:11:16.880
<v Speaker 1>hundred thousand uh non farm payroll loss. But what was

0:11:16.920 --> 0:11:21.000
<v Speaker 1>the other data but that you saw beneath the headline data? Yeah,

0:11:21.040 --> 0:11:23.920
<v Speaker 1>so I think, uh, you know, this is a time Tom,

0:11:23.920 --> 0:11:25.640
<v Speaker 1>when you get these numbers right, that you want a

0:11:25.640 --> 0:11:27.480
<v Speaker 1>grand stand and if ever there was a time that

0:11:27.559 --> 0:11:29.920
<v Speaker 1>it's inappropriate the grand standards. Now, so we had an

0:11:30.040 --> 0:11:33.840
<v Speaker 1>estimate of minus seven hundred thousand uh. And the underlying

0:11:33.960 --> 0:11:36.199
<v Speaker 1>details here that this this had I know, I was

0:11:36.240 --> 0:11:40.760
<v Speaker 1>one thousand off um Uh. The underlying details are that

0:11:40.840 --> 0:11:44.920
<v Speaker 1>this this does not even capture the jobless claims that

0:11:45.080 --> 0:11:48.120
<v Speaker 1>began jumping by the millions, right, that is for the

0:11:48.200 --> 0:11:51.560
<v Speaker 1>April survey periods for the April reports. So how did

0:11:51.600 --> 0:11:54.200
<v Speaker 1>we get this number right and and think that it

0:11:54.280 --> 0:11:57.720
<v Speaker 1>was still going to be so deeply negative? It's about hiring,

0:11:57.840 --> 0:12:01.600
<v Speaker 1>so we always uh we alluson forget the other side

0:12:01.720 --> 0:12:04.440
<v Speaker 1>of this. It's net job games. How many were separated

0:12:04.480 --> 0:12:08.000
<v Speaker 1>from employment? How many were hired? Uh, And it's the

0:12:08.120 --> 0:12:11.560
<v Speaker 1>drop in hiring that drove this number. So think about it.

0:12:11.760 --> 0:12:14.800
<v Speaker 1>March comes around, things are highly uncertain. You have a

0:12:14.840 --> 0:12:17.320
<v Speaker 1>hundred open positions at your company, and you say let's

0:12:17.320 --> 0:12:19.960
<v Speaker 1>hold off on filling those positions. That gets counted in

0:12:20.040 --> 0:12:23.199
<v Speaker 1>these numbers. And you can imagine that that no one

0:12:23.280 --> 0:12:26.959
<v Speaker 1>would have been hiring given the back drop in March

0:12:27.040 --> 0:12:30.000
<v Speaker 1>and how uncertain it was. So that's I think an

0:12:30.000 --> 0:12:33.080
<v Speaker 1>important point because it means in April we'll start drawing

0:12:33.080 --> 0:12:36.120
<v Speaker 1>in not just the drop and hiring, but the firings.

0:12:36.200 --> 0:12:38.640
<v Speaker 1>And so that's how you're going to get expectations for

0:12:39.000 --> 0:12:40.839
<v Speaker 1>the job lost to be in the millions. It will

0:12:40.840 --> 0:12:44.400
<v Speaker 1>make this minus seven hundred thousand look like small potatoes.

0:12:44.800 --> 0:12:48.120
<v Speaker 1>It's gonna be on average out go ahead. Well, it's

0:12:48.120 --> 0:12:50.120
<v Speaker 1>gonna be it's gonna be brutal going forward. And we

0:12:50.160 --> 0:12:52.640
<v Speaker 1>know this by all by all accounts, And I just

0:12:52.679 --> 0:12:54.440
<v Speaker 1>want to focus on the other side of this. And

0:12:54.480 --> 0:12:56.840
<v Speaker 1>you were saying you do expect the recovery to take

0:12:56.920 --> 0:12:59.839
<v Speaker 1>less time than back following the two thousand and eight

0:13:00.040 --> 0:13:04.640
<v Speaker 1>thousand and nine crisis. How how realistic is that given

0:13:04.679 --> 0:13:08.480
<v Speaker 1>the hit to this consumer psychology, to the idea of

0:13:08.600 --> 0:13:12.080
<v Speaker 1>feeling like your reality has been ripped out from under you.

0:13:12.720 --> 0:13:16.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, could that prolonged things to the same type

0:13:16.120 --> 0:13:20.040
<v Speaker 1>of length that we saw heading out of the last crisis. Yeah,

0:13:20.120 --> 0:13:23.160
<v Speaker 1>So it's a it's a it's a really fair question.

0:13:23.400 --> 0:13:26.840
<v Speaker 1>And uh, the answer is that we really don't know.

0:13:27.120 --> 0:13:30.720
<v Speaker 1>And so from here the modeling takes over um and

0:13:30.760 --> 0:13:34.200
<v Speaker 1>tells you that that as the economy gets back on track, um,

0:13:34.280 --> 0:13:36.800
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna have millions in businesses that are just lost,

0:13:36.840 --> 0:13:39.600
<v Speaker 1>that go under. But to the extent that we do

0:13:39.760 --> 0:13:43.000
<v Speaker 1>start to poke our heads outdoors and activity does very

0:13:43.080 --> 0:13:45.360
<v Speaker 1>slowly begin to pick up, that we slowly start to

0:13:45.360 --> 0:13:49.160
<v Speaker 1>bring that unemployment rate down. How slowly it comes down

0:13:49.280 --> 0:13:52.240
<v Speaker 1>will be the question of how slowing has demand. So

0:13:52.440 --> 0:13:57.240
<v Speaker 1>one question is maybe households are out there spending again, Um,

0:13:57.320 --> 0:13:59.640
<v Speaker 1>but the patterns have shifted, and that's where I think

0:13:59.679 --> 0:14:03.040
<v Speaker 1>they're a significant amount of behavioral economics that will that

0:14:03.080 --> 0:14:06.120
<v Speaker 1>will go into the study of this. I totally get it,

0:14:06.120 --> 0:14:08.440
<v Speaker 1>and you know, I frankly I'm optimistic Ellen that we

0:14:08.480 --> 0:14:11.480
<v Speaker 1>could see a redounding rebound when we're done with this virus.

0:14:11.520 --> 0:14:14.320
<v Speaker 1>And let's be sure, folks, in the tragedy that we

0:14:14.360 --> 0:14:16.160
<v Speaker 1>see here in New York City, we're gonna be done

0:14:16.200 --> 0:14:19.240
<v Speaker 1>with this virus at some point. Ellen, you're completely wired

0:14:19.240 --> 0:14:22.720
<v Speaker 1>in um Morgan Stanley, including with James Gorman, on the

0:14:22.800 --> 0:14:26.360
<v Speaker 1>policy prescriptions right now. You know, John Farrell is going

0:14:26.400 --> 0:14:29.080
<v Speaker 1>to talk to Lawrence Cudlow here in thirty forty minutes

0:14:29.160 --> 0:14:32.000
<v Speaker 1>or whatever, and you know he's gonna say the usual drill.

0:14:32.520 --> 0:14:37.400
<v Speaker 1>How urgent is it for Washington to shift from the

0:14:37.600 --> 0:14:41.840
<v Speaker 1>institutionalized response to they get the money in their hands

0:14:42.080 --> 0:14:46.760
<v Speaker 1>now response? Or even say there's a national rent for

0:14:46.880 --> 0:14:50.520
<v Speaker 1>bearance mortgage for barns. Everybody's just gonna wait for X

0:14:50.640 --> 0:14:55.280
<v Speaker 1>number of weeks or months. So Tom, I think that's

0:14:55.280 --> 0:14:57.680
<v Speaker 1>where we're headed. I mean, I think those conversations are

0:14:57.720 --> 0:15:02.160
<v Speaker 1>already being had in terms of you know, monetary and

0:15:02.320 --> 0:15:06.080
<v Speaker 1>fiscal policy acting in concert. We've never seen this before,

0:15:06.520 --> 0:15:09.360
<v Speaker 1>so acting in tandem, supporting each other. You know, this

0:15:09.520 --> 0:15:12.080
<v Speaker 1>main street lending program from the said that we're waiting

0:15:12.120 --> 0:15:15.520
<v Speaker 1>for details from that has meant to complement the Small

0:15:15.560 --> 0:15:20.400
<v Speaker 1>Business Administration loan program. UH. You know, don't be surprised

0:15:20.520 --> 0:15:22.440
<v Speaker 1>if the said also goes for something like a loan

0:15:22.520 --> 0:15:25.440
<v Speaker 1>holiday program. You know, these are things that can be

0:15:25.560 --> 0:15:29.320
<v Speaker 1>broadly UH. Have brought buy in from small businesses and

0:15:29.360 --> 0:15:32.520
<v Speaker 1>from households in order to help be sure that when

0:15:32.520 --> 0:15:35.760
<v Speaker 1>we come out of this, that those that went into

0:15:35.800 --> 0:15:38.760
<v Speaker 1>this with good credit don't then have their credit ruined

0:15:38.840 --> 0:15:43.000
<v Speaker 1>during this time, which would then linked in the recovery

0:15:43.000 --> 0:15:44.840
<v Speaker 1>and it would start to look like something of a

0:15:44.880 --> 0:15:48.640
<v Speaker 1>de leveraging cycle. I do believe that in the future

0:15:48.800 --> 0:15:51.680
<v Speaker 1>that what we've learned from this is that in the future,

0:15:51.720 --> 0:15:54.960
<v Speaker 1>monetary policy and fiscal policy acting in concert will now

0:15:55.200 --> 0:15:58.400
<v Speaker 1>most likely be woven into the fabric of of response

0:15:58.600 --> 0:16:01.800
<v Speaker 1>crisis response. And so I do think that this does

0:16:01.840 --> 0:16:05.600
<v Speaker 1>set a precedent, uh for future downturn turns, and that's important.

0:16:06.080 --> 0:16:09.240
<v Speaker 1>We're speaking with Ellen Zentner, Managing Director, chief US Economist

0:16:09.320 --> 0:16:12.920
<v Speaker 1>and Morgan Stanley, who has nailed the jobless claims calls

0:16:13.000 --> 0:16:15.720
<v Speaker 1>and nailed what we were expecting to see today, one

0:16:15.720 --> 0:16:18.240
<v Speaker 1>of the very few who has consistently gotten it right.

0:16:18.280 --> 0:16:20.400
<v Speaker 1>And Ellen, I want to continue with the idea that

0:16:20.440 --> 0:16:23.480
<v Speaker 1>you were talking about that the economy coming out of

0:16:23.520 --> 0:16:26.280
<v Speaker 1>this will look different than the one coming in, and

0:16:26.360 --> 0:16:29.440
<v Speaker 1>that behavioral economics will play a role in this. Can

0:16:29.440 --> 0:16:32.080
<v Speaker 1>you just humor us and give us a sense of

0:16:32.120 --> 0:16:35.800
<v Speaker 1>how you expect certain industries to shift? What some of

0:16:35.840 --> 0:16:39.760
<v Speaker 1>the beneficiaries maybe of this? Well? I think some of

0:16:39.760 --> 0:16:42.760
<v Speaker 1>the things that we've been um thinking about is, you know,

0:16:42.800 --> 0:16:46.240
<v Speaker 1>work from home arrangements. So businesses are probably going to

0:16:46.280 --> 0:16:49.920
<v Speaker 1>have to revisit their business continuity plans and have some

0:16:50.000 --> 0:16:53.280
<v Speaker 1>sort of rolling work from home arrangements or will be

0:16:53.400 --> 0:16:56.640
<v Speaker 1>very slow to brain work work from home back into

0:16:56.680 --> 0:16:59.680
<v Speaker 1>the office and have a greater share of permanent work

0:16:59.680 --> 0:17:03.000
<v Speaker 1>from Now what does that mean for business centers? Uh?

0:17:03.120 --> 0:17:06.200
<v Speaker 1>Do we get uh you know, a glove of office

0:17:06.240 --> 0:17:10.600
<v Speaker 1>space uh in say a midtown Manhattan uh and other

0:17:11.040 --> 0:17:15.000
<v Speaker 1>business concentration centers? Will we have enough services in more

0:17:15.040 --> 0:17:18.720
<v Speaker 1>residential areas if more people are working from home going forward?

0:17:18.760 --> 0:17:20.600
<v Speaker 1>So I think those are just some of the just

0:17:20.680 --> 0:17:23.080
<v Speaker 1>a few of the ships that we're thinking about. What

0:17:23.200 --> 0:17:27.119
<v Speaker 1>happens when people that never ordered delivery services uh, and

0:17:27.160 --> 0:17:32.120
<v Speaker 1>particularly for food from full service restaurants before until now, uh,

0:17:32.160 --> 0:17:34.400
<v Speaker 1>and now that they've tried it, they want to keep

0:17:34.400 --> 0:17:37.720
<v Speaker 1>doing that or they used to go into the grocery store.

0:17:37.760 --> 0:17:40.119
<v Speaker 1>Now they're having their groceries delivered and decide that they

0:17:40.160 --> 0:17:42.720
<v Speaker 1>actually really like that. So in some ways it would

0:17:42.880 --> 0:17:46.919
<v Speaker 1>accelerate some of those trends that have already been in place. Ellen,

0:17:47.000 --> 0:17:50.240
<v Speaker 1>we look forward to your weekend report. Ellen Sentner with

0:17:50.280 --> 0:17:54.160
<v Speaker 1>Morgan Stanley just extraordinary. Erica can't convey folks how difficult

0:17:54.240 --> 0:18:01.840
<v Speaker 1>it is to game any non farm payroll statistic for

0:18:01.920 --> 0:18:03.879
<v Speaker 1>the White House? Is you on the jobs report? Were

0:18:03.960 --> 0:18:07.119
<v Speaker 1>joined live on bloom Blow TV and on Bloomberg Radio

0:18:07.240 --> 0:18:11.960
<v Speaker 1>from the White House. National Economic Counsel Director Larry Cuddlo Larry,

0:18:11.960 --> 0:18:13.760
<v Speaker 1>fantastic to have you with us. I just want to

0:18:13.760 --> 0:18:15.920
<v Speaker 1>set the stage for our audience so they and understand

0:18:15.920 --> 0:18:17.359
<v Speaker 1>where you and I are going in the next couple

0:18:17.400 --> 0:18:19.960
<v Speaker 1>of minutes. We do have some technical difficulties which means

0:18:20.000 --> 0:18:21.520
<v Speaker 1>there will be a little bit of a delay that

0:18:21.560 --> 0:18:22.760
<v Speaker 1>so that you and I need to be a little

0:18:22.760 --> 0:18:25.720
<v Speaker 1>bit careful about treading on each other. Let's start with

0:18:25.760 --> 0:18:29.119
<v Speaker 1>the payrolls report and reflect on the huge plan that

0:18:29.160 --> 0:18:32.680
<v Speaker 1>Washington pushed through last week. Larry, the numbers are dreadful,

0:18:32.880 --> 0:18:36.200
<v Speaker 1>but this is a mandated stay at home government push,

0:18:36.240 --> 0:18:39.400
<v Speaker 1>and we're trying to offset that with some big, big initiatives,

0:18:39.560 --> 0:18:41.760
<v Speaker 1>and one of them is some help for small businesses

0:18:41.760 --> 0:18:44.280
<v Speaker 1>with small business loans, and they're set to go forward

0:18:44.600 --> 0:18:48.480
<v Speaker 1>be activated today for our audience, Larry, some much needed

0:18:48.480 --> 0:18:51.840
<v Speaker 1>clarity is needed because it's unclear to us which banks

0:18:51.960 --> 0:18:55.520
<v Speaker 1>are ready to deliver those loans today. Larry, do you

0:18:55.600 --> 0:18:57.520
<v Speaker 1>have some clarity on that. Do you have a list

0:18:57.600 --> 0:18:59.600
<v Speaker 1>of banks that are ready to do those loans as

0:18:59.600 --> 0:19:02.800
<v Speaker 1>soon as a night? Well? I do my best, Jonathan,

0:19:02.880 --> 0:19:05.800
<v Speaker 1>thank you, by the way, Um, in terms of the banks,

0:19:05.800 --> 0:19:08.240
<v Speaker 1>I want to get to the broader subject also. But

0:19:08.440 --> 0:19:11.560
<v Speaker 1>on the bank point, uh, today is the first day

0:19:11.560 --> 0:19:18.160
<v Speaker 1>for applications, and any federally deposits, any federally insured depository

0:19:18.200 --> 0:19:21.800
<v Speaker 1>institution is eligible. Now there's also a whole group of

0:19:21.920 --> 0:19:25.960
<v Speaker 1>very significant group of s b A certified lenders. But

0:19:26.440 --> 0:19:31.000
<v Speaker 1>any f D I C bank, any federally insured credit union,

0:19:31.680 --> 0:19:37.760
<v Speaker 1>farm credit institution, all those are participating in this program, which,

0:19:37.840 --> 0:19:41.480
<v Speaker 1>as you know, our loans to keep payrolls all right,

0:19:41.960 --> 0:19:44.520
<v Speaker 1>payroll protection. I think this is one of the essential

0:19:44.560 --> 0:19:48.600
<v Speaker 1>points of the economic assistance plans so we can get

0:19:48.640 --> 0:19:52.199
<v Speaker 1>through this very difficult period. Regarding the impact of the

0:19:52.320 --> 0:19:56.199
<v Speaker 1>of the virus. So any bank and it will be guaranteed,

0:19:56.320 --> 0:19:58.160
<v Speaker 1>so the bank will have no problem. Is at one

0:19:58.200 --> 0:20:03.240
<v Speaker 1>percent interest rate, h it will be payable, um in

0:20:03.320 --> 0:20:06.000
<v Speaker 1>several months. Actually we've got quite a us at least

0:20:06.040 --> 0:20:09.520
<v Speaker 1>six months. Um. Yeah, six months. Loan payments will be

0:20:09.560 --> 0:20:15.160
<v Speaker 1>deferred for six months. No collateral or personal guarantees are required. Um.

0:20:15.240 --> 0:20:19.240
<v Speaker 1>It should be very effective. But the thrust of it, Jonathan,

0:20:19.359 --> 0:20:22.560
<v Speaker 1>is to deal with the issue of unemployment, which of

0:20:22.600 --> 0:20:27.359
<v Speaker 1>course the surfaced today as we all expected, and payroll protection.

0:20:27.520 --> 0:20:31.960
<v Speaker 1>Sev of the loan has to go to maintaining payrolls,

0:20:32.320 --> 0:20:34.800
<v Speaker 1>and then the remainder of the loan will go to

0:20:34.960 --> 0:20:40.160
<v Speaker 1>helping business meet their various expenses, rent leases, mortgage payments

0:20:40.200 --> 0:20:43.240
<v Speaker 1>and so forth. It's on Larry, you're talking about eligibility.

0:20:43.359 --> 0:20:45.359
<v Speaker 1>I'm talking about whether these banks are actually ready to

0:20:45.440 --> 0:20:47.800
<v Speaker 1>deploy the cash. Are they ready as soon as today,

0:20:47.800 --> 0:20:49.680
<v Speaker 1>because the reports that we're seeing is the money banks

0:20:49.680 --> 0:20:52.359
<v Speaker 1>are not and perhaps won't be for several weeks. Do

0:20:52.440 --> 0:20:54.399
<v Speaker 1>you have a list of banks that are ready to

0:20:54.480 --> 0:20:56.840
<v Speaker 1>lend out this money today? I know who's eligible to

0:20:56.880 --> 0:21:01.160
<v Speaker 1>do the work, but who's actually doing it today. Well, look,

0:21:01.359 --> 0:21:05.520
<v Speaker 1>uh we I guess we have a different perspective. I'm

0:21:05.520 --> 0:21:06.960
<v Speaker 1>not going to read you a list of banks. The

0:21:07.000 --> 0:21:10.959
<v Speaker 1>list is gigantic, but they're ready to go. U banks

0:21:10.960 --> 0:21:14.080
<v Speaker 1>have been talking to the Treasury Department, uh, the s

0:21:14.119 --> 0:21:17.480
<v Speaker 1>b A, and Congress as this program was rolled out.

0:21:17.560 --> 0:21:21.680
<v Speaker 1>So I I don't see any barriers and roadblocks, Jonathan.

0:21:21.720 --> 0:21:24.679
<v Speaker 1>There may be some you know, small glitches as this

0:21:24.760 --> 0:21:27.720
<v Speaker 1>thing goes out, but but they are ready. Secretary Manution,

0:21:27.920 --> 0:21:30.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, had a big presser yesterday on this very point.

0:21:31.200 --> 0:21:34.000
<v Speaker 1>So I don't think that's gonna be a problem. I mean,

0:21:34.040 --> 0:21:37.560
<v Speaker 1>what matters here is that we've set aside three hundred

0:21:37.640 --> 0:21:43.040
<v Speaker 1>and fifty billion dollars for paycheck protection. That's absolutely the

0:21:43.160 --> 0:21:47.480
<v Speaker 1>key point, and the hope is that most folks, or

0:21:47.520 --> 0:21:53.119
<v Speaker 1>at least many folks will stay affiliated, stay linked to

0:21:53.200 --> 0:21:58.280
<v Speaker 1>their businesses during this very very difficult business interruptions and

0:21:58.359 --> 0:22:02.040
<v Speaker 1>the economic contraction period and the virus. You want people now,

0:22:02.080 --> 0:22:04.600
<v Speaker 1>you can have a good job without a good business.

0:22:04.640 --> 0:22:08.040
<v Speaker 1>So we've also given a payroll tax holiday to the

0:22:08.080 --> 0:22:10.919
<v Speaker 1>business side, and a number of other assistance plans. But

0:22:11.040 --> 0:22:15.000
<v Speaker 1>on this one in particular, I think the key is

0:22:15.200 --> 0:22:18.200
<v Speaker 1>trying to keep the workforce connected to the small business

0:22:18.280 --> 0:22:21.440
<v Speaker 1>to the extent we can. And I think I think

0:22:21.480 --> 0:22:24.920
<v Speaker 1>the bankers just look leading bankers. I'm not going to

0:22:25.080 --> 0:22:29.600
<v Speaker 1>name names, but leading bankers. We're talking to Secretary Minution

0:22:29.760 --> 0:22:34.080
<v Speaker 1>and others of us right up to the deadline yesterday,

0:22:34.359 --> 0:22:37.200
<v Speaker 1>So I think they are ready to go. Larry, let's

0:22:37.200 --> 0:22:39.359
<v Speaker 1>talk about the poll of lines that's available three in

0:22:39.680 --> 0:22:42.880
<v Speaker 1>fifty billion dollars. I understand that it's first come, first served.

0:22:43.200 --> 0:22:45.960
<v Speaker 1>How easy will it be to go ahead and top

0:22:46.040 --> 0:22:48.560
<v Speaker 1>up that program if we drain the three inchin of

0:22:48.600 --> 0:22:51.000
<v Speaker 1>fifty billion really quite quickly. There's gonna be massive demand

0:22:51.040 --> 0:22:53.040
<v Speaker 1>for this. We know that people are gonna be working really,

0:22:53.080 --> 0:22:55.240
<v Speaker 1>really hard. We have to understand there's going to be

0:22:55.240 --> 0:22:57.639
<v Speaker 1>some technical difficulties along the way to deploy that cash.

0:22:57.880 --> 0:23:00.040
<v Speaker 1>But as it drops down, Larry, are you confidently and

0:23:00.119 --> 0:23:03.360
<v Speaker 1>pop it up very quickly? You know? I would say so, Jonathan,

0:23:03.400 --> 0:23:05.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to get ahead of the story. Uh,

0:23:05.840 --> 0:23:08.600
<v Speaker 1>I think there will be a very significant demand for it.

0:23:08.800 --> 0:23:13.160
<v Speaker 1>I agree with your point, Um, but right now the trick,

0:23:13.200 --> 0:23:15.919
<v Speaker 1>and this is true for all the assistance programs that

0:23:15.960 --> 0:23:19.439
<v Speaker 1>we've run through. Uh. Two point to trillion worth, plus

0:23:19.480 --> 0:23:23.000
<v Speaker 1>the said lending programs at least another four trillion. We're

0:23:23.040 --> 0:23:27.000
<v Speaker 1>assisting roughly one third of the entire economy right now.

0:23:27.040 --> 0:23:29.720
<v Speaker 1>But I don't want to get ahead of my reckoning.

0:23:29.880 --> 0:23:35.240
<v Speaker 1>Is if this program is filled quickly, uh, we could

0:23:35.280 --> 0:23:39.119
<v Speaker 1>probably get some kind of supplemental assistance here through the

0:23:39.200 --> 0:23:42.360
<v Speaker 1>Congress too to expand it, or we might find other

0:23:42.400 --> 0:23:45.919
<v Speaker 1>ways and means. But let's let's see how we do first.

0:23:45.960 --> 0:23:49.440
<v Speaker 1>That's the important thing. And again this is tied, as

0:23:49.520 --> 0:23:54.400
<v Speaker 1>you well know, this is tied to the coronavirus story. Um,

0:23:54.520 --> 0:23:57.919
<v Speaker 1>that story could be improving. I don't want to make

0:23:57.920 --> 0:24:01.080
<v Speaker 1>any forecasts. I just listened to our health specialists, are

0:24:01.119 --> 0:24:05.240
<v Speaker 1>health experts. That story may be improving, hopefully or prayerfully,

0:24:05.640 --> 0:24:09.680
<v Speaker 1>in the next four to eight weeks. That's a possibility,

0:24:09.880 --> 0:24:13.400
<v Speaker 1>and so perhaps we won't have to oversubscribe these programs.

0:24:13.480 --> 0:24:16.280
<v Speaker 1>Let's let's see what happens. It's a dated time week

0:24:16.320 --> 0:24:18.359
<v Speaker 1>at time, gentlethan well, Larry, I want to keep this

0:24:18.440 --> 0:24:20.879
<v Speaker 1>later focus on economic policy. The likes of Tiny Faucci

0:24:20.920 --> 0:24:22.879
<v Speaker 1>doing a great job. Let's leave the health issues to

0:24:22.920 --> 0:24:26.119
<v Speaker 1>them where it should be. For economic policy, You and

0:24:26.160 --> 0:24:28.560
<v Speaker 1>I had an honest and open, frank conversation a month ago.

0:24:29.080 --> 0:24:30.720
<v Speaker 1>And I recall that you said to me after the

0:24:30.760 --> 0:24:32.760
<v Speaker 1>payrolls report that we didn't want to be thrown around

0:24:32.800 --> 0:24:36.080
<v Speaker 1>three hundred and four hundred billion dollars Willy, nearly including

0:24:36.200 --> 0:24:38.880
<v Speaker 1>twelve hundred one thousand dollar checks. Now we're handing out

0:24:38.920 --> 0:24:41.960
<v Speaker 1>twelve hundred dollar checks. This is moved really quickly, and

0:24:42.000 --> 0:24:43.680
<v Speaker 1>this is not a got your moment, Larry. What I'm

0:24:43.680 --> 0:24:47.480
<v Speaker 1>trying to understand here is whether the administration now understands

0:24:47.520 --> 0:24:50.400
<v Speaker 1>that it's no longer about hoping for the best, it's

0:24:50.440 --> 0:24:53.040
<v Speaker 1>preparing for the worst, and we need to prepare to

0:24:53.040 --> 0:24:56.120
<v Speaker 1>do a whole lot more. Well, look, that's fair enough.

0:24:56.280 --> 0:25:02.399
<v Speaker 1>I mean, this story moved incredibly rapidly, um, beginning in March,

0:25:02.520 --> 0:25:07.159
<v Speaker 1>really and uh. What started out as something that you know,

0:25:07.200 --> 0:25:11.320
<v Speaker 1>we thought would be smaller, uh, And we put up

0:25:12.000 --> 0:25:15.280
<v Speaker 1>travel restrictions with China, and for a bit that looked okay,

0:25:15.320 --> 0:25:19.240
<v Speaker 1>and then it exploded. The virus exploded, so I and

0:25:19.280 --> 0:25:22.680
<v Speaker 1>others here Secretary Ammunition, we had to change our point

0:25:22.680 --> 0:25:26.359
<v Speaker 1>of view. And we realized as it rose exponentially, as

0:25:26.400 --> 0:25:31.000
<v Speaker 1>the virus and its consequences rose, exponentially, something frankly I

0:25:31.080 --> 0:25:34.640
<v Speaker 1>thought nobody could foresee. But nonetheless, then yes, we went

0:25:34.680 --> 0:25:38.800
<v Speaker 1>into full gear and move quickly through Congress as best

0:25:38.880 --> 0:25:42.440
<v Speaker 1>we could, and um, you know, starting with them, uh,

0:25:42.640 --> 0:25:45.240
<v Speaker 1>covering sickly for people who were hit by the virus

0:25:45.320 --> 0:25:49.000
<v Speaker 1>or family members, and then going through this economic assistance

0:25:49.040 --> 0:25:51.960
<v Speaker 1>package of two point two trillion to put as much

0:25:52.040 --> 0:25:55.920
<v Speaker 1>help into the economy as we possibly could. Events move rapidly,

0:25:56.280 --> 0:25:59.639
<v Speaker 1>and we moved rapidly. And I'll say in by bars

0:25:59.640 --> 0:26:02.760
<v Speaker 1>and send, Congress moved rapidly. They moved quickly. Maybe not

0:26:02.840 --> 0:26:04.760
<v Speaker 1>quickly enough. And you'll appreciate that this story has just

0:26:04.800 --> 0:26:07.800
<v Speaker 1>moved a whole lot faster. One thing the executive branch

0:26:07.880 --> 0:26:10.480
<v Speaker 1>can do on its own. The White House can get

0:26:10.520 --> 0:26:13.040
<v Speaker 1>together and do something about Harris. We understand there is

0:26:13.040 --> 0:26:18.320
<v Speaker 1>a consideration about announcing a ninety day deferral of tariff payments. Larry,

0:26:18.440 --> 0:26:21.879
<v Speaker 1>where are we on that decision? I don't think. I know,

0:26:21.920 --> 0:26:24.479
<v Speaker 1>I've read a lot about that. I don't expect that

0:26:24.560 --> 0:26:28.000
<v Speaker 1>to be the case. Actually, we we never looked, we

0:26:28.119 --> 0:26:31.280
<v Speaker 1>never looked in any serious way at rolling back caraps.

0:26:31.880 --> 0:26:35.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the deal with China is in place. Um,

0:26:35.119 --> 0:26:37.840
<v Speaker 1>that's going to be implemented U S m C as

0:26:37.880 --> 0:26:41.560
<v Speaker 1>in place. UM, we looked a little bit at some

0:26:43.160 --> 0:26:46.399
<v Speaker 1>most favorite nation custom duties and we decided it was

0:26:46.440 --> 0:26:51.120
<v Speaker 1>too complicated and it might give send the wrong signals.

0:26:51.400 --> 0:26:55.040
<v Speaker 1>So UM, I would not expect to see any movement

0:26:55.119 --> 0:26:58.719
<v Speaker 1>on paraps right now. I mean, the issue here is

0:26:58.800 --> 0:27:04.160
<v Speaker 1>besides the paycheck tection. You know, we've poured um six

0:27:04.240 --> 0:27:08.720
<v Speaker 1>hundred billion dollars apart from the business loans, six hundred

0:27:08.800 --> 0:27:14.200
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars to individuals, families, and that includes the unemployment

0:27:14.240 --> 0:27:18.359
<v Speaker 1>grows up. UM, We've we are giving checks to a

0:27:18.480 --> 0:27:22.520
<v Speaker 1>hundred and seventy five million Americans. Let me repeat that,

0:27:22.640 --> 0:27:26.960
<v Speaker 1>a hundred and seventy five million Americans. And on top

0:27:27.000 --> 0:27:31.119
<v Speaker 1>of that, leveraging from the Treasury's emergency fund. As you

0:27:31.160 --> 0:27:34.520
<v Speaker 1>well know, the Federal Reserve is embarked on a number

0:27:34.560 --> 0:27:41.320
<v Speaker 1>of lending programs, purchasing programs, and broad based industry assistance programs.

0:27:41.320 --> 0:27:44.359
<v Speaker 1>So you've got monetary and fiscal policy working. It is

0:27:44.400 --> 0:27:47.000
<v Speaker 1>the largest package in the history of the US. Is

0:27:47.040 --> 0:27:50.479
<v Speaker 1>principally a main main street package, middle class package. So

0:27:50.560 --> 0:27:52.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't think we're gonna We're not gonna change any

0:27:52.520 --> 0:27:55.680
<v Speaker 1>of the tariff policies right now. I mean, frankly, the

0:27:55.720 --> 0:27:59.359
<v Speaker 1>president cut from pretty good trade deals with China and U. S.

0:27:59.480 --> 0:28:03.480
<v Speaker 1>M c A. And when we return to prosperity, which

0:28:03.520 --> 0:28:06.200
<v Speaker 1>I think will occur before this year is out. When

0:28:06.240 --> 0:28:08.800
<v Speaker 1>we return, part of that return is going to be

0:28:08.800 --> 0:28:12.919
<v Speaker 1>an export boom in my judgment, from these good trade deals,

0:28:13.080 --> 0:28:15.639
<v Speaker 1>so that we knocked down onto A trading practices. But no,

0:28:15.800 --> 0:28:18.880
<v Speaker 1>not now, there's no tarra pullback right now. Well, Larry,

0:28:18.920 --> 0:28:20.800
<v Speaker 1>let's not get far too far down the road. Let's

0:28:20.800 --> 0:28:23.760
<v Speaker 1>focus on the right now. You say no tariff pullback

0:28:23.840 --> 0:28:27.120
<v Speaker 1>right now. As you know, Go Joe, which manufactures parl.

0:28:27.760 --> 0:28:31.399
<v Speaker 1>One of the inputs into the dispenses is an input

0:28:31.440 --> 0:28:35.959
<v Speaker 1>from China that subjects with tariff. They've requested an exemption.

0:28:36.520 --> 0:28:40.320
<v Speaker 1>U STR has declined. I'm trying to understand why. I

0:28:40.360 --> 0:28:42.960
<v Speaker 1>just can't get my hands around why the administration would

0:28:43.000 --> 0:28:46.360
<v Speaker 1>go forward and not exempt that request. You said it

0:28:46.360 --> 0:28:49.440
<v Speaker 1>would send the wrong signals, send the wrong signal to who. Well,

0:28:49.680 --> 0:28:52.320
<v Speaker 1>sending the wrong signal in terms of the president's trade

0:28:52.360 --> 0:28:56.640
<v Speaker 1>policy is what we're concerned about, Jonathan. On specific matters

0:28:56.720 --> 0:28:59.880
<v Speaker 1>like this, Uh, I don't want to rule anything in

0:29:00.000 --> 0:29:03.920
<v Speaker 1>are out. You have to talk to usdr and and

0:29:04.000 --> 0:29:07.720
<v Speaker 1>see on on that particular point. Okay, we're trying to

0:29:07.800 --> 0:29:12.160
<v Speaker 1>keep the flow going. You know, we've imported a lot

0:29:12.200 --> 0:29:15.320
<v Speaker 1>of healthcare products from China and the rest of Asia.

0:29:15.880 --> 0:29:19.400
<v Speaker 1>We also exported some assistance. We're trying to work together

0:29:19.680 --> 0:29:22.920
<v Speaker 1>in terms of the unity of the nations around the

0:29:22.960 --> 0:29:25.600
<v Speaker 1>world to fight this pandemic. So I don't want to

0:29:25.600 --> 0:29:28.640
<v Speaker 1>get into specifics. You know, your question was really a

0:29:28.680 --> 0:29:32.080
<v Speaker 1>broad based question about tariff reduction, and what I'm saying

0:29:32.160 --> 0:29:35.560
<v Speaker 1>is there's no change in those policies, whether it's three

0:29:35.560 --> 0:29:38.160
<v Speaker 1>oh ones or the two thirty twos on steel and

0:29:38.240 --> 0:29:42.560
<v Speaker 1>so forth. Um, individual cases can be examined, and I

0:29:42.680 --> 0:29:45.360
<v Speaker 1>have to find out more about the particular a matter

0:29:45.400 --> 0:29:47.720
<v Speaker 1>you just raise. I'm not up to speed on that.

0:29:48.000 --> 0:29:49.880
<v Speaker 1>I guess what I'm struggling with, Larry's that you and

0:29:49.920 --> 0:29:53.680
<v Speaker 1>I can identify areas where we can help American businesses

0:29:54.080 --> 0:29:57.000
<v Speaker 1>with tariffs exemptions. You're saying that you don't want to

0:29:57.000 --> 0:30:00.320
<v Speaker 1>send the wrong signal on trade policy, but simultane viously

0:30:00.440 --> 0:30:04.400
<v Speaker 1>saying that this health crisis is top of the priorities.

0:30:04.480 --> 0:30:07.240
<v Speaker 1>Nothing tops it. But at the moment. Aren't we putting

0:30:07.800 --> 0:30:11.520
<v Speaker 1>bad signals in your words, on trade ahead of alleviating

0:30:11.560 --> 0:30:14.520
<v Speaker 1>some of the pain on American businesses? No, I don't

0:30:14.520 --> 0:30:17.480
<v Speaker 1>think so. I mean, I'm not sure what you're thinking

0:30:17.480 --> 0:30:21.200
<v Speaker 1>about here. We have some very good trade deals that

0:30:21.360 --> 0:30:25.640
<v Speaker 1>the President completed before this pandemic broke out, and we

0:30:25.680 --> 0:30:30.400
<v Speaker 1>want to maintain those trade deals. And regarding assistance or

0:30:30.480 --> 0:30:35.080
<v Speaker 1>specific areas you know, for example, ventilators or masks, um

0:30:35.600 --> 0:30:38.520
<v Speaker 1>we're looking at that one step at a time, and

0:30:38.840 --> 0:30:43.280
<v Speaker 1>we have imported a huge amount. We've had planes from

0:30:43.480 --> 0:30:48.440
<v Speaker 1>Shanghai landing in the key US cities to provide relief

0:30:49.120 --> 0:30:51.400
<v Speaker 1>to the medical people in the hospitals and so forth.

0:30:51.600 --> 0:30:55.640
<v Speaker 1>So that's wide open. But that's a different matter than

0:30:55.760 --> 0:30:58.640
<v Speaker 1>generic trade policy. Well, hopefully we can get some more

0:30:58.640 --> 0:31:00.800
<v Speaker 1>clarity on that in the next several way. Some clarity

0:31:00.840 --> 0:31:03.600
<v Speaker 1>on Monday we've been needed as well. Opec cluss is

0:31:03.600 --> 0:31:06.760
<v Speaker 1>holding a meeting. Is the US providing a representative to

0:31:06.760 --> 0:31:09.240
<v Speaker 1>take place in that meeting? Would there be participating in

0:31:09.320 --> 0:31:13.040
<v Speaker 1>that meeting on Monday, Larry, we are not members of OPEC.

0:31:13.440 --> 0:31:16.440
<v Speaker 1>OPA plus is open and inviting people from outside of

0:31:16.480 --> 0:31:19.600
<v Speaker 1>the organization of OPEG for others to join. I'm wondering

0:31:19.640 --> 0:31:21.960
<v Speaker 1>if whether America will send a representative to have a

0:31:21.960 --> 0:31:26.600
<v Speaker 1>conversation with the Saudis with the other members of OPEC. Well,

0:31:26.720 --> 0:31:30.240
<v Speaker 1>let me, UH sort of pivot to what's actually happened.

0:31:30.720 --> 0:31:34.880
<v Speaker 1>That is, First of all, the President has been in

0:31:34.960 --> 0:31:39.720
<v Speaker 1>touch on the phone with the MBS in Saudi Arabia

0:31:39.840 --> 0:31:44.920
<v Speaker 1>and Putin in Russia. He's been on the phone several times. UM.

0:31:45.120 --> 0:31:48.200
<v Speaker 1>Other people in the administration have been talking to their

0:31:48.240 --> 0:31:52.040
<v Speaker 1>counterparts in both of those countries. So we do that

0:31:52.320 --> 0:31:55.480
<v Speaker 1>independently in America's interest, we don't have to go to

0:31:55.560 --> 0:31:59.280
<v Speaker 1>the OPEC meeting. UM. The President told me yesterday and

0:31:59.360 --> 0:32:02.680
<v Speaker 1>he did so presequently tweet this out, that he believes

0:32:03.160 --> 0:32:08.520
<v Speaker 1>that Russia and Saudi Arabia will move away from their

0:32:08.720 --> 0:32:12.920
<v Speaker 1>quibbling our argument and will allow market forces to dominate

0:32:13.280 --> 0:32:17.640
<v Speaker 1>and instead of loading up the markets that are already oversupplied,

0:32:18.240 --> 0:32:21.160
<v Speaker 1>that they will pull back. UM. We will see how

0:32:21.200 --> 0:32:24.680
<v Speaker 1>that turns out. Presidents said that oil prices have gone

0:32:24.760 --> 0:32:27.800
<v Speaker 1>up quite a bit seven or eight dollars since that statement.

0:32:28.880 --> 0:32:33.560
<v Speaker 1>I see no reason why these discussions with President Trump

0:32:34.040 --> 0:32:37.280
<v Speaker 1>UH and Prutent MBS will not bear fruit. I think

0:32:37.280 --> 0:32:41.080
<v Speaker 1>they will. I think flooding the market with oil on

0:32:41.200 --> 0:32:44.640
<v Speaker 1>top of the pandemic, which is crushed aggregate demand was

0:32:44.760 --> 0:32:47.560
<v Speaker 1>a very, very poor decision by both of those countries.

0:32:48.160 --> 0:32:51.400
<v Speaker 1>But I think the President's negotiations will bear fruit. Larry,

0:32:51.400 --> 0:32:55.240
<v Speaker 1>will the United States be part of those production cuts? Well, look,

0:32:55.360 --> 0:33:01.240
<v Speaker 1>our oil. We don't dictate oil policies. Are oil and

0:33:01.520 --> 0:33:05.640
<v Speaker 1>gas sectors, Uh, they're smart businesses. The US is still

0:33:05.680 --> 0:33:09.000
<v Speaker 1>the number one energy producer in the world, and we

0:33:09.120 --> 0:33:12.400
<v Speaker 1>expect to remain. So we've taken a number of policies

0:33:12.400 --> 0:33:15.200
<v Speaker 1>to to open the door and permit that to happen.

0:33:15.640 --> 0:33:18.840
<v Speaker 1>We don't dictate I think, as you would guess, oil

0:33:18.960 --> 0:33:22.720
<v Speaker 1>companies seeing a decline and price are going to pull

0:33:22.800 --> 0:33:26.000
<v Speaker 1>back in production. I think that's just common business sense.

0:33:26.200 --> 0:33:29.880
<v Speaker 1>But we don't dictate those decisions. The government doesn't dictate those.

0:33:30.240 --> 0:33:31.920
<v Speaker 1>Just to just to find a question for you, just

0:33:31.960 --> 0:33:33.400
<v Speaker 1>to jump in, I know you've got to run, you've

0:33:33.400 --> 0:33:35.480
<v Speaker 1>got a busy morning. I appreciate that. But as a

0:33:35.520 --> 0:33:38.800
<v Speaker 1>final question, on a day when these small business loans

0:33:38.800 --> 0:33:41.560
<v Speaker 1>are coming down, on a day where Americans are struggling

0:33:41.560 --> 0:33:44.160
<v Speaker 1>to pay the bills, can you communicate to a broader

0:33:44.200 --> 0:33:47.240
<v Speaker 1>audience as to why there is such a big focus

0:33:47.320 --> 0:33:51.400
<v Speaker 1>on the oil market and meeting with all process producers today. Well, look,

0:33:51.760 --> 0:33:55.560
<v Speaker 1>first of all, we have I'm looking forward to the

0:33:55.560 --> 0:33:59.080
<v Speaker 1>meetings today with our producers. I myself have done a

0:33:59.160 --> 0:34:04.480
<v Speaker 1>number of conference calls with the oil and overall energy sectors.

0:34:05.240 --> 0:34:07.880
<v Speaker 1>You know we have. Let me just put this, insert this.

0:34:09.000 --> 0:34:13.319
<v Speaker 1>The degree of public and private government and private partnership

0:34:13.360 --> 0:34:18.480
<v Speaker 1>here is unparalleled. We have worked with every industry, every industry,

0:34:18.560 --> 0:34:22.280
<v Speaker 1>and President has seen them in person or done conference

0:34:22.320 --> 0:34:24.879
<v Speaker 1>calls and so and the rest of us have done

0:34:24.920 --> 0:34:28.239
<v Speaker 1>conference calls. So that's point number one. Point number two.

0:34:29.000 --> 0:34:32.040
<v Speaker 1>Energy is obviously a key part of our economy. It

0:34:32.160 --> 0:34:35.680
<v Speaker 1>was a key part of the tremendous economic growth we

0:34:35.760 --> 0:34:39.960
<v Speaker 1>had in recent years before it was interrupted by this pandemic.

0:34:40.520 --> 0:34:44.440
<v Speaker 1>So it's important motorists, UH, people who get heating fuel,

0:34:44.840 --> 0:34:48.200
<v Speaker 1>on gasoline prices, all that is very key parts of

0:34:48.239 --> 0:34:51.440
<v Speaker 1>American life. So we always take an interest. But I

0:34:51.480 --> 0:34:57.720
<v Speaker 1>will say this regarding any collusion attempts UH by other

0:34:57.840 --> 0:35:01.960
<v Speaker 1>countries in and or out of OPEC that seemed to

0:35:02.040 --> 0:35:06.160
<v Speaker 1>be doing damage to American interest is something that President

0:35:06.160 --> 0:35:08.960
<v Speaker 1>Trump will get engaged with right away to protect the

0:35:09.000 --> 0:35:12.000
<v Speaker 1>American economy. That's what we're doing here. This is you

0:35:12.040 --> 0:35:16.000
<v Speaker 1>know we talked about paycheck protection for small businesses and

0:35:16.320 --> 0:35:20.440
<v Speaker 1>to avoid layoffs. Well, this is just general economic energy.

0:35:20.600 --> 0:35:23.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we we have to stand up for American interests.

0:35:23.360 --> 0:35:25.879
<v Speaker 1>That's what the President has done energy to keep part

0:35:25.880 --> 0:35:28.600
<v Speaker 1>of the economy. So to me, it's, um, you know,

0:35:28.600 --> 0:35:32.200
<v Speaker 1>an American operation. That's what we're concerned about. How you

0:35:32.239 --> 0:35:34.200
<v Speaker 1>say from well, it's good to hear from Larry Carlo,

0:35:34.239 --> 0:35:41.080
<v Speaker 1>their National Economic Council's director. There we are on oil

0:35:41.080 --> 0:35:43.640
<v Speaker 1>and gas, folks, and it's good. I think the terror

0:35:43.760 --> 0:35:48.000
<v Speaker 1>part the microeconomics. Edward Morrisset City Group wrote a skating

0:35:48.040 --> 0:35:52.520
<v Speaker 1>note this morning devolving down to teens oil and even

0:35:52.640 --> 0:35:57.360
<v Speaker 1>single digit oil. Joining us now is the acuity of emerita,

0:35:57.520 --> 0:36:02.120
<v Speaker 1>sin energy aspects and RITA. How do we get a

0:36:02.239 --> 0:36:07.000
<v Speaker 1>demand destruction that gets us to teens rent crude and

0:36:07.320 --> 0:36:10.640
<v Speaker 1>even a wipe out that clears the market in the

0:36:10.800 --> 0:36:15.279
<v Speaker 1>single digits? How do you even get there? We are

0:36:15.360 --> 0:36:19.760
<v Speaker 1>already there. We've got the bulk of global crude prices

0:36:19.760 --> 0:36:21.840
<v Speaker 1>in single digits, and you know we've been calling for

0:36:21.920 --> 0:36:26.319
<v Speaker 1>ten dollar brand for a while, and the issue has

0:36:26.320 --> 0:36:29.120
<v Speaker 1>been that future prices has kind of held around twenty

0:36:29.200 --> 0:36:31.920
<v Speaker 1>at the lows. But the differentials in the world. You know,

0:36:31.960 --> 0:36:34.040
<v Speaker 1>there are crudes in the Permian that are trading at

0:36:34.080 --> 0:36:37.719
<v Speaker 1>three dollars today. Um, the physical markets already think they're

0:36:37.760 --> 0:36:39.680
<v Speaker 1>going to be full. Inventories are going to be full,

0:36:39.760 --> 0:36:42.320
<v Speaker 1>so you have to scale back production right now or

0:36:42.320 --> 0:36:45.080
<v Speaker 1>at least from May onwards. The crude curve is just

0:36:45.120 --> 0:36:47.759
<v Speaker 1>fascinating to look at, and for our listeners worldwide, I'm ready,

0:36:47.800 --> 0:36:49.520
<v Speaker 1>I'll give you a little picture to put in your mind.

0:36:49.800 --> 0:36:52.600
<v Speaker 1>It is very, very depressed at the front end, just

0:36:52.719 --> 0:36:55.439
<v Speaker 1>north at twenty five dollars, and then it stapens quite

0:36:55.480 --> 0:37:00.719
<v Speaker 1>aggressively all the way out to thirty approaching fifth the dollars.

0:37:00.760 --> 0:37:02.759
<v Speaker 1>And I'm rate. So what's interesting about this curve is

0:37:02.760 --> 0:37:04.480
<v Speaker 1>that if you ask many people in the oil market

0:37:04.560 --> 0:37:07.600
<v Speaker 1>right now, why does it look like that? Give me

0:37:07.640 --> 0:37:11.000
<v Speaker 1>one answer? They say demand and not supply. And I'm

0:37:11.040 --> 0:37:12.600
<v Speaker 1>just want to get rate to how much would have

0:37:12.680 --> 0:37:15.319
<v Speaker 1>to be done on the supply side to account for

0:37:15.360 --> 0:37:19.359
<v Speaker 1>the collapse that we've got in demand worldwide. I think

0:37:19.360 --> 0:37:24.359
<v Speaker 1>no amount of supply huts which are organized or orchestrated

0:37:24.400 --> 0:37:27.480
<v Speaker 1>can actually take care of the demand losses. This is

0:37:27.480 --> 0:37:29.680
<v Speaker 1>why our view has been the market is going to

0:37:29.760 --> 0:37:34.280
<v Speaker 1>force shut ins, which means demand collapses at million barrels,

0:37:34.320 --> 0:37:37.279
<v Speaker 1>but in April you run out of storage. Sometime in May,

0:37:37.719 --> 0:37:40.600
<v Speaker 1>prices have to collapse to the point where you are

0:37:40.640 --> 0:37:44.239
<v Speaker 1>shutting in production of whatever that magnitude is, say ten

0:37:44.280 --> 0:37:47.520
<v Speaker 1>million barrels per day um. This has to be market driven.

0:37:47.560 --> 0:37:50.800
<v Speaker 1>And I know OPAC and OPEC pass rather than US

0:37:50.840 --> 0:37:55.160
<v Speaker 1>are talking about production curtailment. These curtailments would have happened

0:37:55.320 --> 0:38:00.239
<v Speaker 1>regardless because the market simply cannot absorb all this gud well.

0:38:00.280 --> 0:38:03.279
<v Speaker 1>And this goes to exactly the social media intervention the

0:38:03.320 --> 0:38:06.080
<v Speaker 1>President Trump staged yesterday, which seemed to be somewhat effective

0:38:06.080 --> 0:38:08.680
<v Speaker 1>in posting oil prices, at least temporarily. When he tweeted

0:38:08.680 --> 0:38:13.000
<v Speaker 1>out that there were discussions between Saudi Arabia and Russia

0:38:13.080 --> 0:38:15.799
<v Speaker 1>of cutting ten million barrels, he didn't specify a time frame.

0:38:15.840 --> 0:38:17.719
<v Speaker 1>People took it per day, which would agree, which would

0:38:17.719 --> 0:38:19.880
<v Speaker 1>amount to about ten percent of the world's oil production.

0:38:20.160 --> 0:38:23.120
<v Speaker 1>We are hearing about a virtual meeting on Monday with

0:38:23.239 --> 0:38:28.400
<v Speaker 1>Opeque plus and perhaps the United States. How likely is it, Amrita,

0:38:28.560 --> 0:38:30.800
<v Speaker 1>that the United States is going to also agree to

0:38:30.920 --> 0:38:36.600
<v Speaker 1>some production cuts, which I don't believe is precedented. Well,

0:38:36.640 --> 0:38:40.279
<v Speaker 1>I don't think the US can um join what it

0:38:40.400 --> 0:38:44.799
<v Speaker 1>calls a cartel. It just goes against everything the US

0:38:44.880 --> 0:38:48.560
<v Speaker 1>has said and stands for for the past decades about

0:38:48.719 --> 0:38:52.560
<v Speaker 1>oil market. The reality is that, of course there's a

0:38:52.600 --> 0:38:54.560
<v Speaker 1>lot of focus on texting jobs, and this is an

0:38:54.600 --> 0:38:58.480
<v Speaker 1>election year, and I think there is a realization that

0:38:58.520 --> 0:39:02.520
<v Speaker 1>actually no oil prices does hold the US economy. But

0:39:03.080 --> 0:39:06.440
<v Speaker 1>this is so messy. How can I mean? At best,

0:39:06.760 --> 0:39:09.880
<v Speaker 1>you're going to get some kind of um an agreement,

0:39:10.680 --> 0:39:13.640
<v Speaker 1>a gentleman's agreement, rather where there will be some form

0:39:13.640 --> 0:39:15.719
<v Speaker 1>of okay, Yes, Texas has said it's going to cut

0:39:15.760 --> 0:39:19.320
<v Speaker 1>by x, but again, how do you devise that mechanism

0:39:19.320 --> 0:39:21.799
<v Speaker 1>of Texas cuts? What? What about an Optakota? What about

0:39:21.800 --> 0:39:26.640
<v Speaker 1>Oklahoma and Russia hands Audireada, both particularly Russia has said

0:39:27.000 --> 0:39:30.879
<v Speaker 1>US has to join the cuts, we are to cut. Okay, Well,

0:39:30.920 --> 0:39:33.799
<v Speaker 1>that makes sense, I guess what's the likelihood of that?

0:39:34.400 --> 0:39:37.720
<v Speaker 1>What is the process for the United States to join

0:39:37.840 --> 0:39:42.640
<v Speaker 1>them in production cuts? Look, I think what we're going

0:39:42.680 --> 0:39:46.200
<v Speaker 1>to get lots of positive headlines because this is political now.

0:39:46.800 --> 0:39:48.799
<v Speaker 1>It's a lot of window dressing. That's the word I'm

0:39:48.800 --> 0:39:52.040
<v Speaker 1>going to use. Because US production is falling anyways because

0:39:52.040 --> 0:39:55.880
<v Speaker 1>of lower prices, and they will just quotify those losses

0:39:55.960 --> 0:39:59.480
<v Speaker 1>somehow two CAPEX carts and whatever else and say, oh, look,

0:39:59.520 --> 0:40:02.440
<v Speaker 1>you know action is following by X and that's how

0:40:02.480 --> 0:40:04.800
<v Speaker 1>they're going to massage these numbers to get to the

0:40:04.920 --> 0:40:07.840
<v Speaker 1>ten million dollars. But they they're talking about the reality

0:40:07.960 --> 0:40:10.840
<v Speaker 1>is this is exactly what the market isn't what was

0:40:10.880 --> 0:40:12.960
<v Speaker 1>going to force them to do anyway, So these aren't

0:40:13.360 --> 0:40:16.719
<v Speaker 1>real cuts to balance the month. I'm rached. Just a

0:40:16.800 --> 0:40:18.520
<v Speaker 1>quick final question for me, just to help us all

0:40:18.640 --> 0:40:23.360
<v Speaker 1>navigate this situation. We keep hearing from the Texas Railroad Commissioner,

0:40:24.000 --> 0:40:27.120
<v Speaker 1>and when people hear from him, they're wondering what this

0:40:27.200 --> 0:40:30.239
<v Speaker 1>means and what kind of power the Texas Railroad Commissioner

0:40:30.320 --> 0:40:33.400
<v Speaker 1>has on oil output in America. Can you give us

0:40:33.440 --> 0:40:37.320
<v Speaker 1>some clarity there? Well, I know he is quite through

0:40:37.360 --> 0:40:40.319
<v Speaker 1>these cuts, but there are plenty who are against it.

0:40:40.640 --> 0:40:44.080
<v Speaker 1>There were senior officials from the Trump administration who came

0:40:44.080 --> 0:40:46.520
<v Speaker 1>out yesterday. There was excell who came out yesterday and

0:40:46.520 --> 0:40:49.719
<v Speaker 1>said we don't want a government intervention. So by no

0:40:49.840 --> 0:40:51.759
<v Speaker 1>means this is a done deal. Yes, there are some

0:40:51.840 --> 0:40:54.960
<v Speaker 1>who are for rationing production and it's been done once

0:40:54.960 --> 0:41:00.480
<v Speaker 1>in Texas, but this isn't a coherent thought through process

0:41:00.560 --> 0:41:03.680
<v Speaker 1>at all. At the stitch and read descent of energy aspects,

0:41:03.680 --> 0:41:07.160
<v Speaker 1>the chief oil analyst langing on this the curious situation.

0:41:07.520 --> 0:41:11.759
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg Surveillance podcast. Subscribe and

0:41:11.800 --> 0:41:17.120
<v Speaker 1>listen to interviews on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, or whichever podcast

0:41:17.160 --> 0:41:21.400
<v Speaker 1>platform you prefer. I'm on Twitter at Tom Keane before

0:41:21.440 --> 0:41:25.280
<v Speaker 1>the podcast. You can always catch us worldwide. I'm Bloomberg

0:41:25.360 --> 0:41:25.600
<v Speaker 1>Radio