1 00:00:03,480 --> 00:00:07,560 Speaker 1: Welcome to the Bloomberg Law Podcast. I'm June Grosso. Every 2 00:00:07,640 --> 00:00:10,440 Speaker 1: day we bring you insight and analysis into the most 3 00:00:10,480 --> 00:00:13,399 Speaker 1: important legal news of the day. You can find more 4 00:00:13,480 --> 00:00:18,040 Speaker 1: episodes of the Bloomberg Law Podcast on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud 5 00:00:18,320 --> 00:00:22,040 Speaker 1: and on Bloomberg dot com slash podcast. President Trump has 6 00:00:22,079 --> 00:00:25,360 Speaker 1: experienced one setback after another in his attempt to cut 7 00:00:25,360 --> 00:00:27,680 Speaker 1: off the flow of immigrants into this country across the 8 00:00:27,680 --> 00:00:31,080 Speaker 1: southern border. Some of his attempts were stymied by Congress, 9 00:00:31,120 --> 00:00:34,519 Speaker 1: some by economics, some by public reaction, but most were 10 00:00:34,520 --> 00:00:37,920 Speaker 1: blocked by the courts. The latest judicial setback came Monday, 11 00:00:37,920 --> 00:00:41,120 Speaker 1: when a federal judge in California stopped Trump from forcing 12 00:00:41,200 --> 00:00:44,880 Speaker 1: Central Americans seeking asylum to wait in Mexico for months 13 00:00:44,960 --> 00:00:48,239 Speaker 1: or even years while their applications are being processed. In 14 00:00:48,280 --> 00:00:51,400 Speaker 1: a speech to the Republican Jewish Coalition last Saturday, Trump 15 00:00:51,479 --> 00:00:55,280 Speaker 1: called the asylum program a scam. They read a little 16 00:00:55,360 --> 00:00:58,720 Speaker 1: page given by lawyers that are all over the lawyers. 17 00:00:58,960 --> 00:01:01,560 Speaker 1: They tell him what this. You look at this guy? 18 00:01:01,640 --> 00:01:05,120 Speaker 1: He said, Wow, that's a tough cookie. I am very 19 00:01:05,160 --> 00:01:09,280 Speaker 1: fearful for my life. Joining me is David Beer, immigration 20 00:01:09,400 --> 00:01:13,160 Speaker 1: policy analyst at the Cato Institute David. Let's start with 21 00:01:13,240 --> 00:01:17,240 Speaker 1: the most recent decision. What did the judge base his 22 00:01:17,560 --> 00:01:22,440 Speaker 1: decision on. Well, he based it on the Asylum Law 23 00:01:22,920 --> 00:01:28,399 Speaker 1: UM and the the law requires the administration not to 24 00:01:28,520 --> 00:01:33,640 Speaker 1: return people to UM anywhere where they may be facing 25 00:01:34,040 --> 00:01:38,640 Speaker 1: persecution or a threat to their life, which the administration 26 00:01:39,440 --> 00:01:43,080 Speaker 1: admitted was the case. Uh, they just said they had 27 00:01:43,120 --> 00:01:47,840 Speaker 1: adequate protocols in place to prevent the removal of people 28 00:01:47,880 --> 00:01:51,960 Speaker 1: who may be threatened in Mexico. The judge disagreed with that. 29 00:01:52,800 --> 00:01:56,080 Speaker 1: UM And the second thing that the judge concluded was 30 00:01:56,240 --> 00:02:03,320 Speaker 1: that UM the statute explicitly obeyed them from using the 31 00:02:03,360 --> 00:02:06,360 Speaker 1: procedure that they were using in order to remove people 32 00:02:06,480 --> 00:02:09,600 Speaker 1: from the country. Again, the asylum law of the United 33 00:02:09,639 --> 00:02:14,160 Speaker 1: States does not allow for the removal of people who 34 00:02:14,400 --> 00:02:20,200 Speaker 1: are potentially eligible for asylum. Let's discuss some of the 35 00:02:20,280 --> 00:02:24,680 Speaker 1: other immigration policies the Trump administration has tried out. The 36 00:02:24,720 --> 00:02:28,800 Speaker 1: administration tried to put restrictions on immigrants seeking asylum with 37 00:02:28,880 --> 00:02:33,880 Speaker 1: a deportation fast tracking policy against immigrants who claimed they 38 00:02:33,880 --> 00:02:37,440 Speaker 1: were victims of domestic or gang violence in their home lends. 39 00:02:37,840 --> 00:02:43,920 Speaker 1: A DC judge ruled against that. Why, well, again, you 40 00:02:43,960 --> 00:02:48,920 Speaker 1: know this is this is really the Trump administration arbitrarily 41 00:02:49,560 --> 00:02:53,680 Speaker 1: deciding what counts as persecution and what doesn't. And it 42 00:02:53,720 --> 00:02:59,480 Speaker 1: goes against a longstanding practice of of of the country 43 00:02:59,720 --> 00:03:05,320 Speaker 1: and and really the the understanding that persecution can take 44 00:03:06,200 --> 00:03:10,640 Speaker 1: various forms. It can it can involve active persecution, which is, 45 00:03:11,360 --> 00:03:15,160 Speaker 1: for example, you know, putting people in you know, gas 46 00:03:15,280 --> 00:03:18,359 Speaker 1: chambers and killing them that way. Or it could be 47 00:03:18,720 --> 00:03:22,720 Speaker 1: that the government of a certain country just simply chooses 48 00:03:22,840 --> 00:03:25,680 Speaker 1: not to protect a certain group of people. They just 49 00:03:26,080 --> 00:03:31,280 Speaker 1: refused to prosecute cases of domestic violence in many parts 50 00:03:31,520 --> 00:03:34,280 Speaker 1: of the northern triangle of Central American And this isn't 51 00:03:34,280 --> 00:03:36,720 Speaker 1: according to myself, this is according to the U. S. 52 00:03:36,720 --> 00:03:41,160 Speaker 1: State Department. And the Trump administration has basically said, we're 53 00:03:41,200 --> 00:03:47,400 Speaker 1: not gonna include that as grounds for asylum because we 54 00:03:47,440 --> 00:03:51,640 Speaker 1: don't like that people are qualifying for asylum under this 55 00:03:52,440 --> 00:03:57,680 Speaker 1: um uh, you know the grounds. The Trump administration, just 56 00:03:57,720 --> 00:04:00,080 Speaker 1: a note, was also blocked by a San Francisco a 57 00:04:00,160 --> 00:04:04,400 Speaker 1: federal judge from automatically denying political asylum to immigrants who 58 00:04:04,600 --> 00:04:08,920 Speaker 1: don't arrive at official ports of entry. Let's talk broadly, 59 00:04:09,040 --> 00:04:12,640 Speaker 1: because President Trump says, you know, Congress should change the 60 00:04:12,680 --> 00:04:17,000 Speaker 1: asylum laws. How much can Congress change the asylum laws 61 00:04:17,080 --> 00:04:23,720 Speaker 1: and how much are their international treaties that might prevent it. Well, 62 00:04:23,760 --> 00:04:27,240 Speaker 1: it wouldn't be the first time that US asylum law 63 00:04:27,320 --> 00:04:30,400 Speaker 1: was out of step with our international agreements. Say, it 64 00:04:30,400 --> 00:04:34,760 Speaker 1: wasn't until night that really asylum law came in um 65 00:04:35,040 --> 00:04:39,039 Speaker 1: UH was in accordance with the U N's UH, the 66 00:04:39,080 --> 00:04:43,640 Speaker 1: U N agreements that we've signed on human rights and refugees. 67 00:04:43,760 --> 00:04:47,640 Speaker 1: So this is this would not be unprecedented, but it 68 00:04:47,640 --> 00:04:50,880 Speaker 1: would be a reversion to a time um where the 69 00:04:51,320 --> 00:04:54,000 Speaker 1: United States really out of step with the rest of 70 00:04:54,040 --> 00:04:59,280 Speaker 1: the world on protecting people from potential persecution in their 71 00:04:59,320 --> 00:05:03,279 Speaker 1: home country. So the short answer is Congress can do 72 00:05:03,320 --> 00:05:09,640 Speaker 1: a lot. Congress could almost entirely removed protection for asylum 73 00:05:09,720 --> 00:05:13,799 Speaker 1: seekers and UH. It certainly seems that the Supreme Court 74 00:05:14,120 --> 00:05:17,880 Speaker 1: would be willing to uphold any kind of statute that 75 00:05:18,480 --> 00:05:24,520 Speaker 1: prohibited or regulated um um migration in almost any manner, 76 00:05:24,560 --> 00:05:27,760 Speaker 1: based on what we saw from the travel ban UH 77 00:05:28,000 --> 00:05:33,120 Speaker 1: case last year. So in response, Trump in February declared 78 00:05:33,120 --> 00:05:36,680 Speaker 1: a national emergency on the US Mexico border to try 79 00:05:36,720 --> 00:05:40,080 Speaker 1: to go around lawmakers that is being held up in 80 00:05:40,160 --> 00:05:44,040 Speaker 1: the courts right now there are about six or more lawsuits. 81 00:05:45,000 --> 00:05:48,600 Speaker 1: Where do you see those cases going if, as expected, 82 00:05:48,640 --> 00:05:51,919 Speaker 1: they end up at the Supreme Court? I mean, this 83 00:05:52,080 --> 00:05:56,560 Speaker 1: is this is really another area where it's really impossible 84 00:05:56,600 --> 00:06:01,680 Speaker 1: to predict what the courts will do. The administration has 85 00:06:01,760 --> 00:06:07,400 Speaker 1: certainly violated the spirit of the Constitution by spending money 86 00:06:07,440 --> 00:06:10,960 Speaker 1: that Congress had intended to be spent somewhere else. But 87 00:06:11,440 --> 00:06:15,760 Speaker 1: there are problems with that argument because Congress has at 88 00:06:15,800 --> 00:06:21,479 Speaker 1: the same time given the President a significant amount of 89 00:06:21,560 --> 00:06:27,080 Speaker 1: leeway and deciding what types of things constitute a national emergency, 90 00:06:27,160 --> 00:06:32,240 Speaker 1: what types of things constitute um, you know, national security 91 00:06:32,560 --> 00:06:38,320 Speaker 1: and UM. Courts have typically deferred to Congress and the 92 00:06:38,400 --> 00:06:42,360 Speaker 1: President on these types of matters. I'm wondering because new 93 00:06:42,440 --> 00:06:45,440 Speaker 1: numbers that are coming out the The l A. Times 94 00:06:46,040 --> 00:06:49,880 Speaker 1: reports that the Trump administration's handling up immigration cases has 95 00:06:49,960 --> 00:06:55,480 Speaker 1: caused a increase in backlogged immigration cases since October of 96 00:06:56,839 --> 00:07:00,920 Speaker 1: Apparently there's an immigration court backlog of more than thousand cases. 97 00:07:01,480 --> 00:07:06,000 Speaker 1: Does that actually contribute to the definite to Trump's definition 98 00:07:06,200 --> 00:07:11,280 Speaker 1: of an emergency in the courts? Well, this is this 99 00:07:11,400 --> 00:07:15,040 Speaker 1: is um again, all about how you define these things. 100 00:07:15,080 --> 00:07:19,880 Speaker 1: But certainly a long backlog in cases is nothing new 101 00:07:19,920 --> 00:07:23,200 Speaker 1: for the immigration system. You have a huge backlog of 102 00:07:23,280 --> 00:07:28,800 Speaker 1: naturalization cases, you have a huge backlog of cases for 103 00:07:28,960 --> 00:07:34,200 Speaker 1: legal immigration benefits. So a huge backlog is just not unusual, 104 00:07:34,400 --> 00:07:39,000 Speaker 1: unfortunately in our immigration system. And the fact that it's 105 00:07:39,080 --> 00:07:42,440 Speaker 1: increased a lot under his watch is not a good 106 00:07:42,520 --> 00:07:48,120 Speaker 1: sign for his administration of the immigration issue. But the 107 00:07:48,200 --> 00:07:52,960 Speaker 1: idea that it would constitute a national emergency where he 108 00:07:53,040 --> 00:07:58,720 Speaker 1: would gain extraordinary powers is just something that doesn't seem 109 00:07:58,800 --> 00:08:01,960 Speaker 1: reasonable to me, to put it, Miley, There seems to 110 00:08:02,000 --> 00:08:05,400 Speaker 1: be a lot of shuffling at the Department of Homeland Security, 111 00:08:05,520 --> 00:08:09,760 Speaker 1: a lot of places left open. Does it seem as 112 00:08:09,760 --> 00:08:13,320 Speaker 1: if there's a plan there who to fill those places with. 113 00:08:14,240 --> 00:08:16,760 Speaker 1: Even if you feel the places with people who are 114 00:08:16,880 --> 00:08:22,320 Speaker 1: tougher on immigration, you still have the law to contend with, right, 115 00:08:22,720 --> 00:08:26,880 Speaker 1: you know. There was a quote in Politico from the 116 00:08:26,920 --> 00:08:33,400 Speaker 1: top advisor for President Trump, Stephen Miller, on immigration, and 117 00:08:33,559 --> 00:08:37,320 Speaker 1: he said, basically, the administration is out of ideas, and 118 00:08:37,360 --> 00:08:41,079 Speaker 1: when you're out of ideas, you blame personnel, and so 119 00:08:41,440 --> 00:08:45,560 Speaker 1: they're placing blame for the fact that they haven't been 120 00:08:45,600 --> 00:08:50,040 Speaker 1: able to reduce the number of migrants who are showing 121 00:08:50,120 --> 00:08:55,120 Speaker 1: up at the border on Secretary Nielsen and the other 122 00:08:55,160 --> 00:09:00,880 Speaker 1: administrators of the immigration agencies. And I think but you'll 123 00:09:00,920 --> 00:09:04,720 Speaker 1: see as a consequence of this is being replaced with 124 00:09:05,080 --> 00:09:09,200 Speaker 1: people who have less experienced dealing with the Department of 125 00:09:09,200 --> 00:09:13,640 Speaker 1: Homeland Security, people who may be outside of the Department 126 00:09:13,920 --> 00:09:16,959 Speaker 1: and UM come from you know, the private sector or 127 00:09:17,000 --> 00:09:21,160 Speaker 1: state agencies, and UM. I expect that that will not 128 00:09:21,240 --> 00:09:25,679 Speaker 1: result in the desired outcome because you do need experience, 129 00:09:26,520 --> 00:09:29,920 Speaker 1: UM in order to you know, control an agency of 130 00:09:29,960 --> 00:09:35,000 Speaker 1: this size, and it seems to be forgotten in you know, 131 00:09:35,040 --> 00:09:38,400 Speaker 1: Trump trying to change the Department of Homeland Security that 132 00:09:38,559 --> 00:09:42,199 Speaker 1: there's a lot more than immigration issues that that department handles. 133 00:09:42,240 --> 00:09:47,400 Speaker 1: Are there other areas areas that are going unnoticed or 134 00:09:48,040 --> 00:09:52,920 Speaker 1: where things are falling behind Well, certainly, you know, the 135 00:09:53,000 --> 00:09:59,040 Speaker 1: Department of Homeland Security also includes FEMA and uh femas 136 00:09:59,200 --> 00:10:04,520 Speaker 1: the depart or the agency in charge of handling federal 137 00:10:04,559 --> 00:10:09,040 Speaker 1: emergencies UM. So, for example, the situation in Puerto Rico 138 00:10:09,160 --> 00:10:14,120 Speaker 1: following the hurricane, they're enormous amount of criticism about how 139 00:10:14,160 --> 00:10:19,839 Speaker 1: that was handled UM and in fact, the UM government 140 00:10:19,960 --> 00:10:23,760 Speaker 1: has been shifting money away from FEMA in order to 141 00:10:23,840 --> 00:10:28,359 Speaker 1: handle some of the immigration issues, and that's been criticized. 142 00:10:28,640 --> 00:10:33,800 Speaker 1: So really the Trump administration has turned the Department of 143 00:10:33,800 --> 00:10:37,480 Speaker 1: Homeland Security, which was you know, has a diverse set 144 00:10:37,520 --> 00:10:41,920 Speaker 1: of duties, into only being about the immigration issue and 145 00:10:41,960 --> 00:10:45,800 Speaker 1: really the border issue in particular. Thank you so much, David, 146 00:10:45,840 --> 00:10:47,840 Speaker 1: Always a pleasure to have you on. That's David Beer, 147 00:10:47,920 --> 00:10:55,199 Speaker 1: immigration policy analyst at the Cato Institute. Thanks for listening 148 00:10:55,240 --> 00:10:58,480 Speaker 1: to the Bloomberg Law Podcast. You can subscribe and listen 149 00:10:58,520 --> 00:11:01,400 Speaker 1: to the show on Apple, pod Cast, SoundCloud, and on 150 00:11:01,520 --> 00:11:06,240 Speaker 1: Bloomberg dot com slash podcast. I'm June Brosso. This is 151 00:11:06,280 --> 00:11:12,360 Speaker 1: Bloomberg m