WEBVTT - BI Weekend: Commerzbank Move, Apple’s Rise

0:00:02.920 --> 0:00:07.760
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio news.

0:00:10.560 --> 0:00:14.400
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Intelligence with Alex Steinhl and Paul'sweenye.

0:00:14.520 --> 0:00:17.720
<v Speaker 1>The real app performance has been in US corporate high yield.

0:00:17.880 --> 0:00:20.240
<v Speaker 3>Are the companies lean enough? Have they trimmed all the fats?

0:00:20.320 --> 0:00:23.880
<v Speaker 1>The semiconductor business is a really cyclical business.

0:00:23.600 --> 0:00:27.200
<v Speaker 2>Breaking market headlines and corporate news from across the globe.

0:00:27.240 --> 0:00:29.880
<v Speaker 3>Do investors like the M and A that we've seen?

0:00:30.080 --> 0:00:31.000
<v Speaker 4>These are two.

0:00:31.040 --> 0:00:33.159
<v Speaker 1>Big time blue chip companies.

0:00:33.320 --> 0:00:36.920
<v Speaker 3>The window between the peak and cut changing super fast.

0:00:37.080 --> 0:00:41.680
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Intelligence with Alex Steinhl and Paul'sweenye on Bloomberg Radio.

0:00:43.400 --> 0:00:45.720
<v Speaker 1>On Today's Bloomberg Intelligence Show, we dig inside the big

0:00:45.720 --> 0:00:48.120
<v Speaker 1>business stories impacting Wall Street and the global markets.

0:00:48.320 --> 0:00:50.240
<v Speaker 3>Each and every week, we provide in depth research and

0:00:50.320 --> 0:00:52.080
<v Speaker 3>data on some of the two thousand companies and one

0:00:52.159 --> 0:00:54.800
<v Speaker 3>hundred and thirty industries our analysts cover worldwide.

0:00:54.840 --> 0:00:56.840
<v Speaker 1>Today, we'll look at a potential bank takeover that could

0:00:56.880 --> 0:00:58.320
<v Speaker 1>reshape Europe's banking landscape.

0:00:58.360 --> 0:01:01.200
<v Speaker 3>Plus we'll discuss why German automake are now sinking deeper

0:01:01.240 --> 0:01:03.000
<v Speaker 3>into an industry wide crisis.

0:01:03.280 --> 0:01:06.280
<v Speaker 1>For first, we dive into US politics, Vice President Kamala

0:01:06.280 --> 0:01:09.040
<v Speaker 1>Harris and former President Donald Trump are in a closely

0:01:09.080 --> 0:01:11.640
<v Speaker 1>contested race to be president, and we're now less than

0:01:11.680 --> 0:01:13.160
<v Speaker 1>two months away from election day.

0:01:13.319 --> 0:01:16.160
<v Speaker 3>Recently, Bloomberg Intelligence took another deep dive into the US

0:01:16.240 --> 0:01:19.279
<v Speaker 3>presidential election. The research looked at how a potential Harris

0:01:19.360 --> 0:01:22.360
<v Speaker 3>or Trump presidency could impact different sectors and policies in

0:01:22.400 --> 0:01:22.840
<v Speaker 3>the US.

0:01:23.000 --> 0:01:24.840
<v Speaker 1>For more on this, we were joined by Nathan Dean,

0:01:24.920 --> 0:01:27.040
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Intelligence Senior policy analyst.

0:01:27.280 --> 0:01:29.160
<v Speaker 3>We first asked Nathan to break down some of the

0:01:29.200 --> 0:01:31.440
<v Speaker 3>sectors that could be impacted after the US election.

0:01:31.880 --> 0:01:33.680
<v Speaker 5>In some of our key sectors to watch where we're

0:01:33.680 --> 0:01:36.360
<v Speaker 5>like renewables tied to the Inflation Reduction Act. There's a

0:01:36.400 --> 0:01:38.679
<v Speaker 5>lot of tax carrots, if you will, in there that

0:01:38.760 --> 0:01:41.600
<v Speaker 5>are spurring renewable investment, especially in cap backs and a

0:01:41.600 --> 0:01:44.560
<v Speaker 5>lot of up states. Others involved the banks, you know,

0:01:44.640 --> 0:01:47.000
<v Speaker 5>the Basel three end game, a proposal that would increase

0:01:47.040 --> 0:01:49.640
<v Speaker 5>capper requirements around nine percent for the investment banks.

0:01:49.640 --> 0:01:51.960
<v Speaker 6>If President Trump wins, that may not go forward.

0:01:52.200 --> 0:01:54.920
<v Speaker 5>Other things are global manufacturers due to the tax change's

0:01:55.080 --> 0:01:58.000
<v Speaker 5>healthcare there are twenty five billion dollars in Obamacare subsidies

0:01:58.160 --> 0:02:00.960
<v Speaker 5>that are up for renewal next year. Only big tech

0:02:01.320 --> 0:02:03.280
<v Speaker 5>you know, whether if you be Kamala Harris, wins, are

0:02:03.280 --> 0:02:06.240
<v Speaker 5>gonna have a continuation of the very stringent M and

0:02:06.280 --> 0:02:09.040
<v Speaker 5>a anti trust authority that the Biden era regulators are

0:02:09.040 --> 0:02:09.919
<v Speaker 5>putting on big tech.

0:02:10.080 --> 0:02:10.760
<v Speaker 6>But if JD.

0:02:10.840 --> 0:02:13.760
<v Speaker 5>Vance's idea of economic populism gets into the White House,

0:02:13.960 --> 0:02:15.720
<v Speaker 5>you could see a Republican president.

0:02:15.360 --> 0:02:18.079
<v Speaker 6>Also be very skeptical of big tech. So a lot

0:02:18.120 --> 0:02:19.519
<v Speaker 6>of what ifs, but a lot of.

0:02:19.400 --> 0:02:21.880
<v Speaker 5>You know, you know, scenarios in which those industries could

0:02:21.880 --> 0:02:22.720
<v Speaker 5>be heavily impacted.

0:02:22.880 --> 0:02:26.240
<v Speaker 1>You know, I listened to former President Trump's economic planeting

0:02:26.400 --> 0:02:29.480
<v Speaker 1>Economic Club of New York. I don't know hard time

0:02:29.480 --> 0:02:31.120
<v Speaker 1>making heads or tails out of it, but I guess

0:02:31.120 --> 0:02:34.160
<v Speaker 1>it was lower taxes, higher tariffs. Is that kind of

0:02:34.240 --> 0:02:37.760
<v Speaker 1>the basis of his economic I guess platform.

0:02:38.120 --> 0:02:38.360
<v Speaker 6>Yeah.

0:02:38.440 --> 0:02:41.520
<v Speaker 5>I think that's the really good point to point out,

0:02:41.560 --> 0:02:43.760
<v Speaker 5>because I think it's almost like a phase one, phase

0:02:43.760 --> 0:02:45.520
<v Speaker 5>two type of deal with President Trump.

0:02:45.560 --> 0:02:45.800
<v Speaker 6>Wins.

0:02:45.840 --> 0:02:48.080
<v Speaker 5>Phase one is tariffs. You know, this is something that

0:02:48.120 --> 0:02:49.639
<v Speaker 5>he can do. The power of the presidency is a

0:02:49.680 --> 0:02:52.400
<v Speaker 5>lot more powerful there, and so sorry the first half

0:02:52.440 --> 0:02:54.079
<v Speaker 5>of twenty twenty five, you could see a lot more

0:02:54.120 --> 0:02:54.760
<v Speaker 5>tariffs coming in.

0:02:54.840 --> 0:02:56.480
<v Speaker 6>Now. I would argue that a lot.

0:02:56.320 --> 0:02:59.200
<v Speaker 5>Of these tariffs are negotiation ploys. You know, if he

0:02:59.240 --> 0:03:01.320
<v Speaker 5>holds up an execut order and says I'm going to

0:03:01.400 --> 0:03:03.840
<v Speaker 5>sign a tariff, there's probably a language in that executive

0:03:03.880 --> 0:03:05.679
<v Speaker 5>order saying two hundred and seventy days from now, it

0:03:05.720 --> 0:03:08.320
<v Speaker 5>won't go into fruition until then, because you're gonna give

0:03:08.320 --> 0:03:11.320
<v Speaker 5>the opposite side multiple times to negotiate. But it's certainly

0:03:11.320 --> 0:03:13.160
<v Speaker 5>something that he's comfortable with and I think, you know,

0:03:13.320 --> 0:03:15.920
<v Speaker 5>would easily put out if he feels that it's necessary.

0:03:16.080 --> 0:03:18.000
<v Speaker 5>But then the tax reform debate is what's going to

0:03:18.040 --> 0:03:20.080
<v Speaker 5>come next, because at the end of twenty twenty five,

0:03:20.360 --> 0:03:23.720
<v Speaker 5>those Trump Ara tax cuts for individuals expire. Now President

0:03:23.760 --> 0:03:26.280
<v Speaker 5>Trump has said fifteen percent corporate tax rate. I'm not

0:03:26.280 --> 0:03:27.840
<v Speaker 5>sure he'll be able to get that. You know, he's

0:03:27.880 --> 0:03:29.519
<v Speaker 5>gonna have to negotiate. We've seen a little bit of

0:03:29.560 --> 0:03:32.480
<v Speaker 5>statements from House Republicans saying, yeah, maybe we should go

0:03:32.520 --> 0:03:35.160
<v Speaker 5>down to twenty or nineteen or eighteen percent. But being

0:03:35.200 --> 0:03:37.160
<v Speaker 5>able to pay for that fifteen percent it's going to

0:03:37.200 --> 0:03:40.240
<v Speaker 5>be somewhat difficult for these deficit hawks. So but you know,

0:03:40.280 --> 0:03:42.320
<v Speaker 5>there's a lot of provisions of the Trump are tax

0:03:42.360 --> 0:03:44.720
<v Speaker 5>cuts that have already expired for industry, and I think

0:03:44.760 --> 0:03:46.920
<v Speaker 5>President Trump is going to try and institute those though

0:03:47.040 --> 0:03:49.360
<v Speaker 5>at a large level, think Trump two point zero is

0:03:49.400 --> 0:03:51.240
<v Speaker 5>going to do another version of the same tax cut.

0:03:51.400 --> 0:03:54.840
<v Speaker 3>I literally remember having the exact same conversation in twenty fifteen,

0:03:54.920 --> 0:03:57.600
<v Speaker 3>twenty sixteen, like the phase to how you get it done,

0:03:58.240 --> 0:04:00.960
<v Speaker 3>et cetera. So what's an interesting to me, though, is

0:04:01.000 --> 0:04:04.280
<v Speaker 3>the lack of response though in say, high tax companies

0:04:04.760 --> 0:04:07.120
<v Speaker 3>versus low tax companies, like the things that would make

0:04:07.200 --> 0:04:10.560
<v Speaker 3>sense because those policies are so different, say on corporate taxes.

0:04:10.760 --> 0:04:13.080
<v Speaker 3>Are we seeing that reflected within market moves?

0:04:14.160 --> 0:04:14.360
<v Speaker 4>You know?

0:04:14.880 --> 0:04:16.840
<v Speaker 5>I think so, But you know a lot I've been

0:04:16.880 --> 0:04:19.159
<v Speaker 5>talking to a lot of investors over the last few weeks,

0:04:19.160 --> 0:04:21.160
<v Speaker 5>and a lot of folks come to me and they say,

0:04:21.480 --> 0:04:23.560
<v Speaker 5>we just really don't know what's going to happen on

0:04:23.640 --> 0:04:26.560
<v Speaker 5>tax until we know the makeup of Congress. And the

0:04:26.600 --> 0:04:29.080
<v Speaker 5>reason being is is that if President Trump wins but

0:04:29.160 --> 0:04:32.039
<v Speaker 5>the Democrats take the House, pretty much all of his

0:04:32.279 --> 0:04:36.440
<v Speaker 5>tax vision, if you will, is going to be curtailed, negotiated,

0:04:36.480 --> 0:04:38.719
<v Speaker 5>and a lot more restricted. Now, if he ends up

0:04:38.760 --> 0:04:41.440
<v Speaker 5>winning the House and the Senate, they can use reconciliation

0:04:41.520 --> 0:04:44.719
<v Speaker 5>to essentially bypass the Democrats, and they have a very

0:04:44.720 --> 0:04:47.159
<v Speaker 5>broad net that they can cast. So a lot of

0:04:47.200 --> 0:04:49.120
<v Speaker 5>people that I've been talking to you of saying, look,

0:04:49.160 --> 0:04:53.039
<v Speaker 5>we understand the Trump era desires and we understand that

0:04:53.120 --> 0:04:57.240
<v Speaker 5>these broads deficit inducing tax cuts potentially could be on

0:04:57.279 --> 0:04:59.920
<v Speaker 5>the horizon, but we're not excited about it. Just yes,

0:05:00.160 --> 0:05:01.919
<v Speaker 5>because we need to see how the House and Senate

0:05:02.000 --> 0:05:03.120
<v Speaker 5>races play out.

0:05:03.400 --> 0:05:07.360
<v Speaker 1>What is the thinking currently in Washington, Nathan about how

0:05:07.360 --> 0:05:08.880
<v Speaker 1>that will play out in Congress?

0:05:09.560 --> 0:05:11.320
<v Speaker 5>Well, look, I mean, you know, if you go to

0:05:11.320 --> 0:05:14.160
<v Speaker 5>the function on the terminal WSL election, you can see

0:05:14.160 --> 0:05:16.240
<v Speaker 5>all the data there. But I think you know when

0:05:16.279 --> 0:05:18.359
<v Speaker 5>it comes to the Senate, that's going to be somewhat

0:05:18.480 --> 0:05:20.719
<v Speaker 5>very difficult for the Democrats to control because right now

0:05:20.760 --> 0:05:22.880
<v Speaker 5>it's fifty one to forty nine. You're gonna lose West

0:05:22.960 --> 0:05:25.960
<v Speaker 5>Virginia because Senator Joe Manchin is retiring, So now you're

0:05:25.960 --> 0:05:28.080
<v Speaker 5>at a fifty fifty and the Democrats essentially have to

0:05:28.160 --> 0:05:30.679
<v Speaker 5>run the board just to keep that fifty to fifty.

0:05:30.760 --> 0:05:33.559
<v Speaker 5>Think of Senator Shery Brown in Ohio, Senator John Tester,

0:05:33.640 --> 0:05:36.880
<v Speaker 5>and Montana Senator Jackie Rose in Nevada. So assuming that

0:05:36.920 --> 0:05:39.479
<v Speaker 5>if the Democrats lose one, the Republicans are most likely

0:05:39.520 --> 0:05:41.880
<v Speaker 5>going to take the Senate. And if President Trump wins,

0:05:42.080 --> 0:05:44.200
<v Speaker 5>then obviously allow him the ability to put in.

0:05:44.200 --> 0:05:46.960
<v Speaker 6>Judges and his regulatory leadership when it comes to the House.

0:05:46.960 --> 0:05:48.279
<v Speaker 6>I've seen pulling up both sides.

0:05:48.320 --> 0:05:50.599
<v Speaker 5>But my general view, and this is just my personal view,

0:05:50.839 --> 0:05:52.880
<v Speaker 5>is that whoever wins the President also wins the House.

0:05:53.200 --> 0:05:56.159
<v Speaker 1>Our thanks to Nathan Dean, Bloomberg Intelligence Senior Policy Analyst.

0:05:56.520 --> 0:05:58.760
<v Speaker 3>We next take a look at the coffee chains Starbucks.

0:05:58.839 --> 0:06:02.120
<v Speaker 3>Starbucks CEO Brian Nicchol officially took office this week, and

0:06:02.200 --> 0:06:03.880
<v Speaker 3>expectations for him are high.

0:06:04.040 --> 0:06:06.720
<v Speaker 1>The company shares sort of eighteen percent after it named

0:06:06.800 --> 0:06:10.080
<v Speaker 1>Nicol CEO, and this comes after two consecutive quarters of

0:06:10.200 --> 0:06:13.200
<v Speaker 1>sales slumps. For more, we were joined by Michael Halen,

0:06:13.279 --> 0:06:15.920
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Intelligence Senior Restaurant and Food service centerals.

0:06:16.080 --> 0:06:18.360
<v Speaker 3>We first asked Michael just how long the market gives

0:06:18.440 --> 0:06:19.760
<v Speaker 3>Nicol before judging him.

0:06:20.160 --> 0:06:22.839
<v Speaker 7>It's tough to say, right, you know, I think really

0:06:23.520 --> 0:06:25.760
<v Speaker 7>it's going to take some time. You know, you don't

0:06:25.760 --> 0:06:28.120
<v Speaker 7>turn around an aircraft carrier on a dime, you know,

0:06:28.200 --> 0:06:31.680
<v Speaker 7>Starbucks is a behemoth of a company, so I think

0:06:31.720 --> 0:06:34.040
<v Speaker 7>the market gives him some time. He's got a phenomenal

0:06:34.080 --> 0:06:37.320
<v Speaker 7>track record, right what he's done at Taco Bell and

0:06:37.320 --> 0:06:41.240
<v Speaker 7>then Chipotle, obviously we're very impressive, you know, and he's

0:06:41.279 --> 0:06:43.719
<v Speaker 7>really you know, the first thing he's going to do,

0:06:43.760 --> 0:06:45.720
<v Speaker 7>I think is just try to change that culture, right,

0:06:45.760 --> 0:06:49.640
<v Speaker 7>bringing in a culture of transparency, accountability. He's going to

0:06:49.720 --> 0:06:53.720
<v Speaker 7>talk about hard work and compensating his employees for doing

0:06:53.760 --> 0:06:56.719
<v Speaker 7>a good job, because you know, those are some of

0:06:56.720 --> 0:07:00.479
<v Speaker 7>the things he talked about changing at Chipotle on his

0:07:00.560 --> 0:07:02.960
<v Speaker 7>first earnings call there. So you know, all that stuff's

0:07:02.960 --> 0:07:04.320
<v Speaker 7>going to take a little bit of time, and because

0:07:04.360 --> 0:07:07.239
<v Speaker 7>of his track record he'll get he'll get a pretty

0:07:07.240 --> 0:07:07.680
<v Speaker 7>long leash.

0:07:07.720 --> 0:07:10.560
<v Speaker 1>I think, what are the challenges facing this company? Because

0:07:10.680 --> 0:07:13.560
<v Speaker 1>just as a consumer, I mean the Starbucks and Route

0:07:13.560 --> 0:07:15.520
<v Speaker 1>thirty five in Wall Township, New Jersey, they do a

0:07:15.560 --> 0:07:18.320
<v Speaker 1>great job. People are great. It just works like a

0:07:18.400 --> 0:07:20.920
<v Speaker 1>charm stores in great shape. The one in Summit's good,

0:07:20.960 --> 0:07:23.120
<v Speaker 1>it's always packed. What do they need to do here?

0:07:23.200 --> 0:07:24.239
<v Speaker 1>I don't think anything's broken.

0:07:24.600 --> 0:07:26.720
<v Speaker 7>You know, it sounds like that location is doing pretty well.

0:07:26.720 --> 0:07:29.800
<v Speaker 7>But they have of thousands and thousands of locations across

0:07:29.840 --> 0:07:32.360
<v Speaker 7>the globe. I mean, you know, in the US, operations

0:07:32.440 --> 0:07:35.679
<v Speaker 7>is a big issue. You know, drink orders have become

0:07:35.720 --> 0:07:41.640
<v Speaker 7>more complicated. Digital orders have kind of changed the experience

0:07:41.680 --> 0:07:46.080
<v Speaker 7>for the in cafe customer, right, Like it was it

0:07:46.200 --> 0:07:49.480
<v Speaker 7>became popular because the briests new your name, right, and

0:07:50.280 --> 0:07:53.160
<v Speaker 7>the level of service was phenomenal for a chain of

0:07:53.200 --> 0:07:58.960
<v Speaker 7>that size, right, and through digital ordering and these very

0:07:59.000 --> 0:08:02.680
<v Speaker 7>complicated orders, you know, they've lost some of that, right,

0:08:02.760 --> 0:08:05.680
<v Speaker 7>and so so operations, you know, they're losing a lot

0:08:05.680 --> 0:08:07.640
<v Speaker 7>of orders because people are trying to place them on

0:08:07.680 --> 0:08:10.560
<v Speaker 7>the app and the wait times are are kind of

0:08:10.560 --> 0:08:15.000
<v Speaker 7>obnoxious at times, right, And so I think operations is

0:08:15.040 --> 0:08:19.000
<v Speaker 7>going to be his primary focus. Running the best cafes

0:08:19.080 --> 0:08:22.280
<v Speaker 7>possible is really going to be job number one. But

0:08:22.320 --> 0:08:24.880
<v Speaker 7>there's a bunch of different issues, you know, operations is

0:08:24.960 --> 0:08:28.480
<v Speaker 7>just one of them. Politics has been an issue, right.

0:08:28.960 --> 0:08:32.199
<v Speaker 7>Starbucks has always been a brand that kind of puts

0:08:32.240 --> 0:08:35.280
<v Speaker 7>their politics in your face, and I think Brian Nichol

0:08:35.360 --> 0:08:37.280
<v Speaker 7>is going to want to step back from that, right

0:08:37.360 --> 0:08:39.719
<v Speaker 7>because you know, all the issues they've had with their

0:08:39.760 --> 0:08:43.200
<v Speaker 7>customer base, right, people haven't been happy with you know,

0:08:43.200 --> 0:08:46.640
<v Speaker 7>there's been some boycott talks online about their stance on

0:08:46.640 --> 0:08:50.040
<v Speaker 7>the Israel Hamas War, about their stance and how they've

0:08:50.080 --> 0:08:53.559
<v Speaker 7>handled the union negotiations. You know, So that's a big thing.

0:08:53.640 --> 0:08:56.520
<v Speaker 7>And then you know, we think eventually, once they have

0:08:56.559 --> 0:08:59.320
<v Speaker 7>the stores running really really well, they're going to start

0:08:59.360 --> 0:09:01.840
<v Speaker 7>spending some more money on marketing. Maybe not a ton

0:09:01.880 --> 0:09:05.880
<v Speaker 7>of money, but we would expect them to start spending

0:09:06.320 --> 0:09:07.120
<v Speaker 7>on marketing.

0:09:07.400 --> 0:09:07.640
<v Speaker 1>You know.

0:09:08.000 --> 0:09:11.040
<v Speaker 7>It's not something that that Starbucks has traditionally done. But

0:09:11.080 --> 0:09:14.360
<v Speaker 7>it also wasn't something that Chipotle had traditionally done, and

0:09:14.400 --> 0:09:17.600
<v Speaker 7>it's been paying them dividends now for a handful of years.

0:09:17.720 --> 0:09:19.920
<v Speaker 3>So I think with Chipottle though, we just maybe Paul

0:09:19.960 --> 0:09:23.160
<v Speaker 3>can attest. Is it like there's a menu and it's basic,

0:09:23.320 --> 0:09:25.760
<v Speaker 3>like they're add ons, right, but like it's a basic menu.

0:09:25.840 --> 0:09:29.600
<v Speaker 3>Starbucks menu is like explosive, Like they can't even have

0:09:29.800 --> 0:09:32.280
<v Speaker 3>all the options up on the ordering board because they're

0:09:32.320 --> 0:09:35.000
<v Speaker 3>just too many. So it is working with operations and

0:09:35.040 --> 0:09:36.800
<v Speaker 3>getting that better. I mean, they have to pair back

0:09:36.840 --> 0:09:37.880
<v Speaker 3>their menu and get back.

0:09:37.720 --> 0:09:39.720
<v Speaker 8>To their base. Yeah.

0:09:39.760 --> 0:09:40.240
<v Speaker 1>Probably.

0:09:40.400 --> 0:09:43.560
<v Speaker 7>You know, we had been critical of the previous management

0:09:43.600 --> 0:09:47.920
<v Speaker 7>team because they kept rolling out new menu platforms and

0:09:47.960 --> 0:09:50.920
<v Speaker 7>then in the in the next breath talking about improving throughput.

0:09:51.000 --> 0:09:53.840
<v Speaker 7>But you can't have baths, so we we fully expect

0:09:53.840 --> 0:09:56.440
<v Speaker 7>them to pair back this menu, make it easier to

0:09:56.480 --> 0:10:00.960
<v Speaker 7>execute in the cafes, right, make lie it's easier for

0:10:01.600 --> 0:10:05.120
<v Speaker 7>their employees and get the orders out faster. So yeah,

0:10:05.160 --> 0:10:07.760
<v Speaker 7>I think that's going to be a major part of

0:10:07.840 --> 0:10:09.120
<v Speaker 7>what they do going forward.

0:10:09.840 --> 0:10:13.559
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Bloomberg had a story from last in twenty

0:10:13.559 --> 0:10:16.199
<v Speaker 1>twenty three where I mean the variations. If you add

0:10:16.360 --> 0:10:19.280
<v Speaker 1>all the potential options, there's like billions of different types

0:10:19.320 --> 0:10:21.240
<v Speaker 1>of drinks that could be oh yeah, yeah, you know.

0:10:21.320 --> 0:10:23.320
<v Speaker 3>So it's just at it and there's like the cold drink,

0:10:23.320 --> 0:10:25.840
<v Speaker 3>there's the tea, there's the refreshers. Then there's the frozen

0:10:25.840 --> 0:10:28.640
<v Speaker 3>refreshers and the blended refreshers. And I know those because

0:10:28.640 --> 0:10:30.800
<v Speaker 3>my daughter likes those things. But sometimes you get them

0:10:30.800 --> 0:10:33.319
<v Speaker 3>frozen and sometimes they're not. It's very complicated.

0:10:33.400 --> 0:10:36.080
<v Speaker 1>I know how they do it, and my power, you know,

0:10:36.280 --> 0:10:38.360
<v Speaker 1>my hats off to them. All Right, let's step back

0:10:38.440 --> 0:10:41.200
<v Speaker 1>and look at the restaurant space in general. Here, You've

0:10:41.200 --> 0:10:44.319
<v Speaker 1>got some research out recently restaurant promotions marketing heat up.

0:10:44.520 --> 0:10:46.360
<v Speaker 1>That's not what shareholders want to hear, do.

0:10:46.400 --> 0:10:49.920
<v Speaker 7>They no, But restaurants are kind of desperate right now

0:10:49.920 --> 0:10:53.680
<v Speaker 7>to get some traffic into their stores. Low income consumers

0:10:54.080 --> 0:10:57.160
<v Speaker 7>spending has been very weak. This seems to be spreading

0:10:57.200 --> 0:11:00.199
<v Speaker 7>to the middle income consumers, right, based on the industry

0:11:00.280 --> 0:11:04.320
<v Speaker 7>data that we've seen, which showed an improvement you know,

0:11:04.520 --> 0:11:07.719
<v Speaker 7>last month in August, but it was still negative at

0:11:07.880 --> 0:11:12.360
<v Speaker 7>casual dining restaurants, at family dining restaurants, and at quick service, right,

0:11:12.400 --> 0:11:15.720
<v Speaker 7>and so they bounce from that horrific July numbers that

0:11:15.800 --> 0:11:19.880
<v Speaker 7>we saw, but still are negative. And so yeah, restaurants

0:11:20.120 --> 0:11:23.480
<v Speaker 7>are trying to do whatever they can to bring you know,

0:11:23.880 --> 0:11:27.160
<v Speaker 7>those low income consumers and middle income consumers back into

0:11:27.160 --> 0:11:29.160
<v Speaker 7>their restaurants. You know, just for example, it was you know,

0:11:29.240 --> 0:11:31.640
<v Speaker 7>I think it's thirty five out of the last thirty

0:11:31.679 --> 0:11:35.760
<v Speaker 7>seven quarters quick service chains have had negative traffic, right,

0:11:35.800 --> 0:11:39.120
<v Speaker 7>And so that's that's not a sustainable type of situation

0:11:39.160 --> 0:11:41.480
<v Speaker 7>when you have same source sales rising because your prices

0:11:41.520 --> 0:11:45.000
<v Speaker 7>are going up, but traffic can continues to decline. Eventually

0:11:45.040 --> 0:11:48.120
<v Speaker 7>there's a tipping point, and that's what we've seen this year.

0:11:48.559 --> 0:11:51.320
<v Speaker 3>So to that point, then, which ones are do you

0:11:51.360 --> 0:11:53.640
<v Speaker 3>have faith that can maintain some kind of margin and

0:11:53.760 --> 0:11:55.960
<v Speaker 3>also grow their top line.

0:11:56.200 --> 0:11:59.120
<v Speaker 7>You know, it's some of these chains that have a

0:11:59.160 --> 0:12:03.040
<v Speaker 7>big gas on pricing, you know, in terms of you know,

0:12:03.320 --> 0:12:04.400
<v Speaker 7>they've been pricing less.

0:12:04.280 --> 0:12:05.079
<v Speaker 9>Than their competitors.

0:12:05.120 --> 0:12:07.880
<v Speaker 7>Right, So if you you're providing a lot of value,

0:12:08.280 --> 0:12:10.600
<v Speaker 7>and value can be two ways. It can be a

0:12:10.640 --> 0:12:12.760
<v Speaker 7>better price, but it also can be a lot more

0:12:12.800 --> 0:12:16.160
<v Speaker 7>food for what you pay. But some of these companies

0:12:16.200 --> 0:12:21.080
<v Speaker 7>that people see value at, you know, Winkstop, Chipotle, Texas Roadhouse,

0:12:21.120 --> 0:12:23.679
<v Speaker 7>these are all of the chains that have been outperforming.

0:12:23.720 --> 0:12:25.520
<v Speaker 7>These all of the chains that have been able to

0:12:25.640 --> 0:12:28.120
<v Speaker 7>drive traffic, and a big part of it is being

0:12:28.200 --> 0:12:32.600
<v Speaker 7>priced below competitors. You know, Winkstops raise prices about half

0:12:32.640 --> 0:12:35.600
<v Speaker 7>as much as their competitors, and on their last earnings call,

0:12:35.640 --> 0:12:39.080
<v Speaker 7>they credited that as a big reason for their phenomenal

0:12:39.200 --> 0:12:40.040
<v Speaker 7>qorder our.

0:12:40.080 --> 0:12:43.480
<v Speaker 1>Thanks to Michael Halen Bloomberg Intelligence, senior restaurant and food service.

0:12:43.280 --> 0:12:45.920
<v Speaker 3>Centers coming up will break down Apples rise into the

0:12:46.000 --> 0:12:48.200
<v Speaker 3>most valuable company in the world.

0:12:48.360 --> 0:12:51.160
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to Bloomberg Intelligence on Bloomberg Radio, providing in

0:12:51.200 --> 0:12:53.679
<v Speaker 1>depth research and data on two thousand companies in one

0:12:53.760 --> 0:12:56.959
<v Speaker 1>hundred and thirty industries. You can access Bloomberg Intelligence via

0:12:57.040 --> 0:12:58.840
<v Speaker 1>b I go on the terminal on Paul.

0:12:58.720 --> 0:13:01.240
<v Speaker 3>Sweeney and a Malex Steele. This is Bloomberg.

0:13:06.800 --> 0:13:10.720
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Intelligence with now like Steele and Paul

0:13:10.760 --> 0:13:13.120
<v Speaker 2>Sweeney on Bloomberg Radio.

0:13:14.120 --> 0:13:16.800
<v Speaker 3>We look next at European banks. This week we heard

0:13:16.840 --> 0:13:18.800
<v Speaker 3>that Unit Credit has built a nine percent stake in

0:13:18.840 --> 0:13:21.400
<v Speaker 3>Commerce Bank and plans to enter into talks with the lender.

0:13:21.800 --> 0:13:24.240
<v Speaker 1>This raises the possibility of a full takeover that could

0:13:24.240 --> 0:13:27.360
<v Speaker 1>reshape Europe's banking landscape for more. We were joined by

0:13:27.440 --> 0:13:30.520
<v Speaker 1>Philip Richards, Bloomberg Intelligence, senior analysts for European banks.

0:13:30.559 --> 0:13:32.880
<v Speaker 3>We first asked Philip to break down the possibility Commerce

0:13:32.920 --> 0:13:34.240
<v Speaker 3>Bank will actually be taken over.

0:13:34.600 --> 0:13:36.280
<v Speaker 10>It's an interesting one. As you say, this is not

0:13:36.320 --> 0:13:38.959
<v Speaker 10>a new boombed deal. It's been going on for literally

0:13:39.000 --> 0:13:41.280
<v Speaker 10>well over a decade now in terms of big cross

0:13:41.280 --> 0:13:43.480
<v Speaker 10>bordered deals. But the simple case of mains, any big

0:13:43.520 --> 0:13:46.920
<v Speaker 10>cross border transaction among European banks so hasn't happened in

0:13:46.960 --> 0:13:49.760
<v Speaker 10>the last fifteen years since the clasis. Will it happen now? Yes,

0:13:49.800 --> 0:13:52.240
<v Speaker 10>it's possibility, but there's still a lot of hurdles on

0:13:52.400 --> 0:13:55.560
<v Speaker 10>left in terms of the German government allow and specifically

0:13:56.120 --> 0:13:58.520
<v Speaker 10>when it would flag. The German market is very different

0:13:58.520 --> 0:14:01.480
<v Speaker 10>to all the other European markets, very big cooperative or

0:14:01.520 --> 0:14:04.360
<v Speaker 10>mutual society. They've got the Sparcasm and the Landers banks.

0:14:04.480 --> 0:14:06.880
<v Speaker 10>So actually the private banks Deutsche Bank and Commerce Bank

0:14:07.040 --> 0:14:10.040
<v Speaker 10>are a much smaller part of the overall market. And

0:14:10.080 --> 0:14:12.640
<v Speaker 10>therefore could they take out the second biggest germin Bank?

0:14:12.800 --> 0:14:14.800
<v Speaker 10>I think it is possible on our front.

0:14:14.960 --> 0:14:17.319
<v Speaker 1>Would it be a good deal for Unit Credit? I

0:14:17.360 --> 0:14:19.880
<v Speaker 1>guess what I'm asking is how good of a management team,

0:14:19.920 --> 0:14:22.080
<v Speaker 1>how good of a franchise is UniCredit?

0:14:22.800 --> 0:14:23.040
<v Speaker 4>Well?

0:14:23.160 --> 0:14:24.680
<v Speaker 10>Is it a good deal? I mean that will come

0:14:24.720 --> 0:14:26.720
<v Speaker 10>down to the price. And one good thing about Commerce

0:14:26.720 --> 0:14:29.840
<v Speaker 10>Bank is is pricing is a low level in terms

0:14:29.840 --> 0:14:31.760
<v Speaker 10>of what you get for it. Yes, the earnings have

0:14:31.840 --> 0:14:34.280
<v Speaker 10>been very very weak for the last fifteen years, one

0:14:34.280 --> 0:14:36.680
<v Speaker 10>of the lowest return and equity of all banks in Europe,

0:14:36.760 --> 0:14:39.640
<v Speaker 10>but they have increased massively with rate risers across Europe.

0:14:39.920 --> 0:14:41.400
<v Speaker 10>But of course the flip tide to that, of course,

0:14:41.480 --> 0:14:44.400
<v Speaker 10>is interest rates now going down. So the question becomes

0:14:44.440 --> 0:14:46.600
<v Speaker 10>what will happen to Commerce Bank's earning is going forward?

0:14:47.040 --> 0:14:49.360
<v Speaker 10>And frankly they're probably going to be going down and

0:14:49.400 --> 0:14:51.480
<v Speaker 10>therefore that's where the pressure on them will lie. So

0:14:51.520 --> 0:14:53.880
<v Speaker 10>are they getting a good deal or they're paying almost

0:14:53.760 --> 0:14:55.960
<v Speaker 10>at the top in terms of their earning potential?

0:14:56.400 --> 0:14:58.880
<v Speaker 3>What company would that make UniCredit like, would this be

0:14:59.600 --> 0:15:02.880
<v Speaker 3>a gient investment bank and a giant retail bank.

0:15:03.520 --> 0:15:07.200
<v Speaker 10>Well, they will become the third largest European bank if

0:15:07.200 --> 0:15:09.480
<v Speaker 10>they did the deal in terms of a market cap basis.

0:15:10.000 --> 0:15:12.560
<v Speaker 10>Obviously Commerce Bank is almost entirely now a retail and

0:15:12.600 --> 0:15:15.360
<v Speaker 10>commercial bank is sold or the investment banking operations that

0:15:15.520 --> 0:15:18.160
<v Speaker 10>had after the financial crisis, So this is amount of

0:15:18.160 --> 0:15:20.680
<v Speaker 10>the case of expanding in terms of that retail commercial space.

0:15:21.000 --> 0:15:23.720
<v Speaker 10>UniCredit have a big presence in Germany already through hyper

0:15:23.800 --> 0:15:26.120
<v Speaker 10>Variant Bank, so one of the attractions to sort of

0:15:26.200 --> 0:15:28.720
<v Speaker 10>deal for them would be combining that so Commerce Bank

0:15:28.760 --> 0:15:30.920
<v Speaker 10>and hyper viands and therefore trying to get the constand

0:15:30.960 --> 0:15:32.720
<v Speaker 10>news out of them. But say, it's veryment on a

0:15:32.720 --> 0:15:35.240
<v Speaker 10>commercial retail side rather than investment banking.

0:15:35.680 --> 0:15:38.120
<v Speaker 1>So Philip talk to us about I mean, just the

0:15:38.200 --> 0:15:41.840
<v Speaker 1>German banking market. Does there need to be consolidation.

0:15:41.680 --> 0:15:44.280
<v Speaker 10>Does they? Yes? I mean it's probably the least consolidated

0:15:44.360 --> 0:15:46.760
<v Speaker 10>market in Europe in terms of as you said, you've

0:15:46.760 --> 0:15:49.720
<v Speaker 10>got this huge number of coopertive banks or sparkasms, et cetera.

0:15:50.480 --> 0:15:53.200
<v Speaker 10>So it is a very difficult and diluted market. But

0:15:53.240 --> 0:15:55.160
<v Speaker 10>the fact is, you know, Commerce Bank itself has got

0:15:55.160 --> 0:15:57.640
<v Speaker 10>a sub ten percent market share. So even if you

0:15:57.800 --> 0:15:59.880
<v Speaker 10>got it, did buy it and combined hyper virans with it,

0:16:00.200 --> 0:16:03.080
<v Speaker 10>they're still probably just getting over about that ten percent mark.

0:16:03.720 --> 0:16:06.280
<v Speaker 10>So will it change the dial in Germany not at all,

0:16:06.440 --> 0:16:09.120
<v Speaker 10>you know, because we're only talking in a thirty percent subsector.

0:16:09.160 --> 0:16:11.720
<v Speaker 10>In terms of the private banks, we're seventy percent or

0:16:11.720 --> 0:16:14.880
<v Speaker 10>so off the market you know, is in this mutual side.

0:16:15.160 --> 0:16:17.000
<v Speaker 3>So you were talking earlier that this has been rumored

0:16:17.040 --> 0:16:18.880
<v Speaker 3>for ten years. I remember talking about this at least

0:16:18.920 --> 0:16:21.880
<v Speaker 3>six plus years ago. Also, why do you think that

0:16:22.120 --> 0:16:24.240
<v Speaker 3>now could be actually the moment.

0:16:24.560 --> 0:16:26.080
<v Speaker 10>Well, you asked us about you know, what they get

0:16:26.120 --> 0:16:27.920
<v Speaker 10>in terms of the Commerce Bank. We heard your CEO

0:16:28.000 --> 0:16:30.120
<v Speaker 10>of Commerce Bank said he will not renew a tenor

0:16:30.160 --> 0:16:31.920
<v Speaker 10>which I missed fires at the end of next year.

0:16:32.240 --> 0:16:34.000
<v Speaker 10>So you know that does open a hole at the

0:16:34.080 --> 0:16:36.240
<v Speaker 10>top of the bank would obviously be in traction for them.

0:16:36.880 --> 0:16:39.200
<v Speaker 10>There's one potential way of doing it. Who would have

0:16:39.200 --> 0:16:41.760
<v Speaker 10>bought Commerce Bank given the excessive risks they had, say

0:16:41.800 --> 0:16:44.000
<v Speaker 10>three or four years ago, where we had the commercial

0:16:44.040 --> 0:16:46.000
<v Speaker 10>real estate risks, we had the bank trading at point

0:16:46.080 --> 0:16:49.200
<v Speaker 10>three times book value. We had earnings are very very low.

0:16:49.400 --> 0:16:51.360
<v Speaker 10>So in a way the risk has gone away a

0:16:51.360 --> 0:16:53.960
<v Speaker 10>lot of Commerce Bank because simply because the earnings are

0:16:54.040 --> 0:16:56.880
<v Speaker 10>much stronger now because of those rate rises. Also, the

0:16:56.920 --> 0:16:59.040
<v Speaker 10>German government took a big stake in the bank, so

0:16:59.120 --> 0:17:01.760
<v Speaker 10>as they sell that than further down. That's part of

0:17:01.760 --> 0:17:05.200
<v Speaker 10>the way Unichledate built their state. Today that obviously becomes

0:17:05.200 --> 0:17:07.520
<v Speaker 10>more and more attractive because it comes more into the private sector.

0:17:08.040 --> 0:17:10.160
<v Speaker 10>So there are numbers more reasons why it could happen,

0:17:10.240 --> 0:17:13.160
<v Speaker 10>but doesn't mean anything will happen then, No, is.

0:17:13.080 --> 0:17:15.320
<v Speaker 1>This going to ignite maybe a little bit more discussion

0:17:15.359 --> 0:17:18.080
<v Speaker 1>about more across M and A trades just broadly defined

0:17:18.160 --> 0:17:19.360
<v Speaker 1>across Europe.

0:17:19.359 --> 0:17:22.160
<v Speaker 10>Without any doubt it will trigger more emine spectation today,

0:17:22.160 --> 0:17:23.680
<v Speaker 10>And I think the fact that you said they build

0:17:23.720 --> 0:17:26.200
<v Speaker 10>a temperate stake and yet the share then rally twenty

0:17:26.240 --> 0:17:28.399
<v Speaker 10>percent shows that the market doesn't think this is the

0:17:28.440 --> 0:17:30.000
<v Speaker 10>end of the story and there's going to be more

0:17:30.000 --> 0:17:32.800
<v Speaker 10>of a deal and the potential by bid for Commerce

0:17:32.840 --> 0:17:35.240
<v Speaker 10>Bank is possible. That said, you know, why has there

0:17:35.320 --> 0:17:37.400
<v Speaker 10>been no big m and A across the sector now

0:17:37.400 --> 0:17:40.000
<v Speaker 10>for fifteen years? And because a number of the regularly

0:17:40.080 --> 0:17:42.240
<v Speaker 10>hurdles are main You know, there's not a single rule

0:17:42.240 --> 0:17:45.479
<v Speaker 10>book across Europe, government interference, people don't want to leave

0:17:45.480 --> 0:17:48.120
<v Speaker 10>their biggest banks and be taken over by a foreign institution,

0:17:48.560 --> 0:17:51.359
<v Speaker 10>et cetera. All these hurdles and nothing's actually changed on

0:17:51.400 --> 0:17:54.399
<v Speaker 10>that front. So you know, no big deals have happened.

0:17:54.440 --> 0:17:56.879
<v Speaker 10>Could this be the first, Yes, but it's by no

0:17:56.960 --> 0:17:58.159
<v Speaker 10>means certain it will.

0:17:58.119 --> 0:18:02.000
<v Speaker 3>Thirty seconds if the deal does happen. Would the bank

0:18:02.080 --> 0:18:04.080
<v Speaker 3>be able to lend more and do stuff?

0:18:04.880 --> 0:18:06.640
<v Speaker 10>I would have said yes three years ago just because

0:18:06.640 --> 0:18:08.679
<v Speaker 10>of the week of financial position that Commerce Bank was in.

0:18:08.880 --> 0:18:10.879
<v Speaker 10>I think because of the eaight hikes. Now is in

0:18:10.880 --> 0:18:13.960
<v Speaker 10>a much stronger position. It's got a service capital position itself,

0:18:14.119 --> 0:18:16.680
<v Speaker 10>so there's no real bowriers in terms of the supply side,

0:18:16.720 --> 0:18:19.840
<v Speaker 10>their potential to lend more. What's restraining them from growing

0:18:19.920 --> 0:18:22.359
<v Speaker 10>actually more the weaker Germany economy, and we're hearing more

0:18:22.359 --> 0:18:24.760
<v Speaker 10>about that over the press, and that's what's being holding

0:18:24.760 --> 0:18:27.400
<v Speaker 10>them back and Franklly, nothing changes with his unique credit

0:18:27.440 --> 0:18:30.280
<v Speaker 10>deal there those heard will still remain. So no, I

0:18:30.280 --> 0:18:31.800
<v Speaker 10>don't think this would really help in terms of the

0:18:31.840 --> 0:18:34.120
<v Speaker 10>lending or the growth potential. It's much more I think

0:18:34.119 --> 0:18:36.520
<v Speaker 10>about the synergies in terms of the cost takeout potential.

0:18:36.840 --> 0:18:37.080
<v Speaker 6>All right.

0:18:37.080 --> 0:18:40.680
<v Speaker 1>Thanks to Philip Richards, Bloomberg Intelligence Senior analyst for European Banks,

0:18:40.800 --> 0:18:41.280
<v Speaker 1>we now.

0:18:41.160 --> 0:18:44.199
<v Speaker 3>Turned to big tech and Apple. Apple was the subject

0:18:44.240 --> 0:18:46.680
<v Speaker 3>of a Bloomberg Big Take piece this week titled How

0:18:46.720 --> 0:18:48.080
<v Speaker 3>Apple Rules the World.

0:18:48.280 --> 0:18:51.320
<v Speaker 1>It discussed how Apple ascended from a scrappy tech underdog

0:18:51.359 --> 0:18:53.399
<v Speaker 1>to the most valuable company in the world.

0:18:53.640 --> 0:18:53.919
<v Speaker 6>From More.

0:18:54.000 --> 0:18:56.720
<v Speaker 1>We were joined by Austin Karr, Bloomberg News technology reporter.

0:18:56.920 --> 0:18:59.199
<v Speaker 3>We first asked Austin to connect all the dots for

0:18:59.280 --> 0:19:01.560
<v Speaker 3>Apple from the nineteen eighties until now.

0:19:02.080 --> 0:19:04.440
<v Speaker 9>You want me to summarize forty years and can you

0:19:05.720 --> 0:19:06.080
<v Speaker 9>go up?

0:19:06.760 --> 0:19:07.080
<v Speaker 10>Okay?

0:19:07.160 --> 0:19:09.840
<v Speaker 9>Well, well, really, what this story does is chart why

0:19:10.160 --> 0:19:13.359
<v Speaker 9>and how Apple found in its position today, facing a

0:19:13.400 --> 0:19:17.880
<v Speaker 9>big antitrust lawsuit in the US, a lot of regulatory

0:19:17.920 --> 0:19:21.840
<v Speaker 9>pressure in Europe, as well as a lot of really

0:19:21.960 --> 0:19:24.480
<v Speaker 9>just skepticism and criticism for a lot of the partners

0:19:24.480 --> 0:19:27.359
<v Speaker 9>and developers that have depended on Apple over the years,

0:19:27.560 --> 0:19:30.320
<v Speaker 9>and it charts out basically Apple has changed from that

0:19:30.480 --> 0:19:33.679
<v Speaker 9>nineteen eighty four era when it released the Mac it

0:19:33.720 --> 0:19:36.440
<v Speaker 9>was seen as this sort of disruptive force in the

0:19:36.480 --> 0:19:38.800
<v Speaker 9>technology industry to twenty twenty four when a lot of

0:19:38.840 --> 0:19:41.400
<v Speaker 9>people think that this is a sort of domineering force

0:19:41.440 --> 0:19:43.680
<v Speaker 9>that needs to be disrupted. So we go through from

0:19:43.680 --> 0:19:46.560
<v Speaker 9>the Mac to the iPod and iPhone up through present day,

0:19:47.000 --> 0:19:49.520
<v Speaker 9>and it's just really just putting all the pieces together

0:19:49.560 --> 0:19:52.040
<v Speaker 9>about how Apple finds itself in that position now.

0:19:52.320 --> 0:19:55.320
<v Speaker 1>And Austin, along with Max Chafkin, you guys reported this

0:19:55.359 --> 0:19:58.879
<v Speaker 1>story just fantastic work. But for me, Cameron Galley, he

0:19:58.920 --> 0:20:01.640
<v Speaker 1>does all the illustration. It just made it really cool

0:20:01.680 --> 0:20:05.119
<v Speaker 1>and really interactive, some awesome stuff as always. So Austin,

0:20:05.160 --> 0:20:07.679
<v Speaker 1>where do you think Apple goes from here? Is it

0:20:07.800 --> 0:20:10.879
<v Speaker 1>just new products? Is it maybe getting more ingrained in

0:20:10.880 --> 0:20:13.600
<v Speaker 1>our daily lives if that's even possible. What do you

0:20:13.600 --> 0:20:15.760
<v Speaker 1>think kind of a longer term vision is for the

0:20:15.760 --> 0:20:16.720
<v Speaker 1>folks in Kupertino?

0:20:17.000 --> 0:20:19.080
<v Speaker 9>Look, I mean, I think a really good question for

0:20:19.440 --> 0:20:22.239
<v Speaker 9>listeners right now or even you guys, is just this

0:20:22.320 --> 0:20:24.840
<v Speaker 9>new iPhone? If you guys are Apple users have you

0:20:24.880 --> 0:20:28.000
<v Speaker 9>ever seriously considered switching to a different device, or is

0:20:28.000 --> 0:20:30.159
<v Speaker 9>it just the default now that I'm going to upgrade

0:20:30.160 --> 0:20:32.760
<v Speaker 9>to the iPhone sixteen, maybe at default, And so I

0:20:32.760 --> 0:20:35.200
<v Speaker 9>think the question is how long can that last where

0:20:35.320 --> 0:20:37.280
<v Speaker 9>it is just sort of the default. I mean, even

0:20:37.320 --> 0:20:39.399
<v Speaker 9>their new features they are all about you know, AI

0:20:39.520 --> 0:20:42.000
<v Speaker 9>and how that ties into some of its hardware, But

0:20:42.320 --> 0:20:44.800
<v Speaker 9>in all honesty, they're two years late to AI. A

0:20:44.800 --> 0:20:47.399
<v Speaker 9>lot of the features. Mark Kerman or Apple colleague is

0:20:47.440 --> 0:20:50.119
<v Speaker 9>reporting that won't really release until twenty twenty five, at

0:20:50.119 --> 0:20:52.480
<v Speaker 9>which point maybe you should just wait for the iPhone seventeen.

0:20:52.800 --> 0:20:55.439
<v Speaker 9>And I just think there's a big question about you know,

0:20:55.600 --> 0:20:57.760
<v Speaker 9>Apple's products are still good. They still make you know,

0:20:57.840 --> 0:21:01.560
<v Speaker 9>the best laptop, the best you know watch and earbuds.

0:21:01.560 --> 0:21:03.560
<v Speaker 9>I'm talking through my AirPods right now. But at the

0:21:03.560 --> 0:21:05.800
<v Speaker 9>same time, when they don't face that type of pressure,

0:21:06.040 --> 0:21:09.000
<v Speaker 9>does their products just become too incremental and too boring?

0:21:09.160 --> 0:21:11.680
<v Speaker 9>And I think that is when you're going to see

0:21:11.680 --> 0:21:14.520
<v Speaker 9>a lot more disruptives trying to change the way computing

0:21:14.560 --> 0:21:17.159
<v Speaker 9>works and work outside of the Apple ecosystem. But the

0:21:17.200 --> 0:21:19.400
<v Speaker 9>problem for consumers like us is we're kind of stuck

0:21:19.400 --> 0:21:21.520
<v Speaker 9>in it. I'm not going to switch anytime soon for sure.

0:21:22.080 --> 0:21:23.919
<v Speaker 3>Well then to that point. But I found also interesting,

0:21:24.040 --> 0:21:26.040
<v Speaker 3>and I didn't know in the piece that you wrote,

0:21:26.200 --> 0:21:29.800
<v Speaker 3>was sort of Tim Cook's role in managing Apple supply chain,

0:21:29.840 --> 0:21:33.040
<v Speaker 3>and you dug deep into Apple would have a supply

0:21:33.160 --> 0:21:36.200
<v Speaker 3>chain partner and then in essence look to manufacture that

0:21:36.440 --> 0:21:39.080
<v Speaker 3>in house, and then booed that company, which is really

0:21:39.119 --> 0:21:41.680
<v Speaker 3>messed up tons of companies around the world. Can you

0:21:41.680 --> 0:21:42.800
<v Speaker 3>give us some detail on that.

0:21:44.440 --> 0:21:44.760
<v Speaker 4>Sure.

0:21:45.240 --> 0:21:48.160
<v Speaker 9>The most infamous example actually goes back about a decade ago.

0:21:48.240 --> 0:21:51.960
<v Speaker 9>Apple was developing these new sapphire screams that were going

0:21:52.040 --> 0:21:54.119
<v Speaker 9>to be alter durable instead of the glass that they

0:21:54.160 --> 0:21:56.600
<v Speaker 9>currently use, and they sort of outsourced it to a

0:21:56.640 --> 0:21:58.879
<v Speaker 9>partner and then left that partner on the hook with

0:21:58.920 --> 0:22:00.919
<v Speaker 9>all the liability when Apple decided not to go that

0:22:01.000 --> 0:22:03.560
<v Speaker 9>route because the sapphire wasn't quite going as fast as

0:22:03.560 --> 0:22:06.520
<v Speaker 9>they could develop it for the iPhone. And I think

0:22:06.520 --> 0:22:08.479
<v Speaker 9>that we sort of position that a symbolic of what

0:22:08.520 --> 0:22:11.080
<v Speaker 9>Apple has seen with a few of the partners they've

0:22:11.080 --> 0:22:13.280
<v Speaker 9>worked with over the years, not just in the supply chain,

0:22:13.320 --> 0:22:16.639
<v Speaker 9>but also on the software ecosystem side. It's really fascinating

0:22:16.680 --> 0:22:18.639
<v Speaker 9>all this sort of trend that we see of a

0:22:18.680 --> 0:22:21.760
<v Speaker 9>partner really excited to work with Apple in the beginning,

0:22:21.760 --> 0:22:25.359
<v Speaker 9>like Goldman Sachs on the Apple card or even General

0:22:25.359 --> 0:22:27.840
<v Speaker 9>Motors we sid as another example of working them on CarPlay,

0:22:28.000 --> 0:22:30.040
<v Speaker 9>and then years go by and suddenly they're not so

0:22:30.119 --> 0:22:32.639
<v Speaker 9>happy with the relationship with the Apple anymore. And I

0:22:32.640 --> 0:22:35.000
<v Speaker 9>think that really has become our trend in recent years

0:22:35.040 --> 0:22:38.320
<v Speaker 9>as the company has grown to this massive, multi trillion

0:22:38.320 --> 0:22:41.439
<v Speaker 9>dollar force that essentially it's Apple's where or the highway.

0:22:41.640 --> 0:22:43.600
<v Speaker 9>And I'm just curious how long that will last with

0:22:43.640 --> 0:22:46.200
<v Speaker 9>partners before they say, you know what, enough is enough?

0:22:46.600 --> 0:22:48.119
<v Speaker 1>And you know, Austin, I think for a lot of

0:22:48.119 --> 0:22:50.760
<v Speaker 1>investors one of the longer term issues that's still always

0:22:50.760 --> 0:22:52.919
<v Speaker 1>out there and is probably increasing in concern. It's just

0:22:52.920 --> 0:22:55.720
<v Speaker 1>the regulatory risk for not just Apple but kind of

0:22:55.720 --> 0:22:58.240
<v Speaker 1>big tech in general, but certainly for Apple given their

0:22:58.240 --> 0:23:00.919
<v Speaker 1>marketing position. How do you think the companies kind of

0:23:01.080 --> 0:23:02.880
<v Speaker 1>how do they react to that, and just in terms

0:23:02.920 --> 0:23:05.160
<v Speaker 1>of a long term thread or headwind.

0:23:05.600 --> 0:23:07.919
<v Speaker 9>Well, actually, I mean the DOJ case in the US.

0:23:08.040 --> 0:23:10.679
<v Speaker 9>You know, they just released their their complaint in March.

0:23:11.280 --> 0:23:14.080
<v Speaker 9>Apple is pushed to dismiss it just earlier in August.

0:23:14.080 --> 0:23:15.800
<v Speaker 9>That's going to play out over the course of years.

0:23:15.840 --> 0:23:18.280
<v Speaker 9>I think that, you know, the preceding cases with the

0:23:18.320 --> 0:23:20.639
<v Speaker 9>DOJ and IBM or DJ and Microsoft. I mean this

0:23:20.720 --> 0:23:24.000
<v Speaker 9>last many, many years, but we're already seeing sort of

0:23:23.640 --> 0:23:26.000
<v Speaker 9>a precursor to that, and what's happening in Europe with

0:23:26.040 --> 0:23:29.119
<v Speaker 9>the Digital Markets Act, which has already pushed Apple to

0:23:29.240 --> 0:23:32.000
<v Speaker 9>change a ton In fact right now in Europe because

0:23:32.000 --> 0:23:35.400
<v Speaker 9>of those regulatory changes, you can get an alternative marketplace,

0:23:35.600 --> 0:23:38.119
<v Speaker 9>meaning you don't just have to rely on Apple's App store.

0:23:38.960 --> 0:23:41.359
<v Speaker 9>You're you're actually able to delete a lot of native

0:23:41.359 --> 0:23:43.440
<v Speaker 9>Apple apps that you can't delete the US. You can

0:23:43.480 --> 0:23:46.560
<v Speaker 9>delete Safari, you can, You'll eventually be able to delete

0:23:46.600 --> 0:23:48.840
<v Speaker 9>your phone app, your camera app, the app store and

0:23:48.880 --> 0:23:52.320
<v Speaker 9>just use alternative products from the third party ecosystem. And

0:23:52.359 --> 0:23:54.399
<v Speaker 9>so what you're seeing in Europe is this almost two

0:23:54.480 --> 0:23:58.200
<v Speaker 9>track system where they have a lot more flexible sort

0:23:58.200 --> 0:24:01.560
<v Speaker 9>of computing platform than anywhere else if you're an Apple user.

0:24:01.800 --> 0:24:03.400
<v Speaker 9>So I think what they've sort of done is take

0:24:03.440 --> 0:24:06.440
<v Speaker 9>this almost whack a mole approach to regulation the EU,

0:24:06.560 --> 0:24:08.359
<v Speaker 9>and even in some of the pressure they've seen in

0:24:08.359 --> 0:24:10.680
<v Speaker 9>the US, they've had to open up that walled garden that,

0:24:11.080 --> 0:24:13.240
<v Speaker 9>as we refer to it, sort of their closed ecosystem

0:24:13.320 --> 0:24:15.320
<v Speaker 9>a little bit more in a way that Apple doesn't

0:24:15.359 --> 0:24:17.720
<v Speaker 9>like because they lose control. But for consumers in a

0:24:17.760 --> 0:24:19.440
<v Speaker 9>lot of ways, it's a little bit interesting to watch

0:24:19.480 --> 0:24:21.879
<v Speaker 9>this company have to change and not just have it

0:24:21.960 --> 0:24:24.280
<v Speaker 9>the Apple approach. They're going to have to, at least

0:24:24.280 --> 0:24:26.359
<v Speaker 9>in Europe so far, open up their wild garden a

0:24:26.400 --> 0:24:29.159
<v Speaker 9>little bit allows some more players within their ecosystem to

0:24:29.720 --> 0:24:31.280
<v Speaker 9>run some of those fundamental cards.

0:24:31.720 --> 0:24:31.959
<v Speaker 4>All right.

0:24:31.960 --> 0:24:34.840
<v Speaker 1>Thanks to Austin car Bloomberg News technology reporter.

0:24:34.720 --> 0:24:36.600
<v Speaker 3>Coming up on the program, a look at why activity

0:24:36.600 --> 0:24:38.919
<v Speaker 3>in the carbon capture industry is starting to slow in

0:24:38.960 --> 0:24:39.440
<v Speaker 3>the US.

0:24:39.680 --> 0:24:43.080
<v Speaker 1>They're listening to Bloomberg Intelligence on Bloomberg Radio, providing research

0:24:43.119 --> 0:24:45.040
<v Speaker 1>and data on two thousand companies and one hundred and

0:24:45.080 --> 0:24:47.960
<v Speaker 1>thirty industries. You can access Bloomberg Intelligence via bi go

0:24:48.080 --> 0:24:48.639
<v Speaker 1>on the terminal.

0:24:48.720 --> 0:24:53.280
<v Speaker 3>I'm Paul Sweeney an a Malex Steel, and this is Bloomberg.

0:24:57.359 --> 0:25:01.760
<v Speaker 2>Your listening to Bloomberg Intelligence Nowlex Steel and Paul Sweenie

0:25:02.080 --> 0:25:03.760
<v Speaker 2>on Bloomberg Radio.

0:25:04.720 --> 0:25:06.800
<v Speaker 3>We move now to the auto industry and focus in

0:25:06.880 --> 0:25:09.639
<v Speaker 3>on Europe. German carmakers are now sinking deeper into an

0:25:09.640 --> 0:25:10.879
<v Speaker 3>industry wide crisis.

0:25:11.040 --> 0:25:13.439
<v Speaker 1>This week, BMW warned their profits We'll get hit by

0:25:13.440 --> 0:25:16.840
<v Speaker 1>a costly brake problem to Volkswagen scrap job protections that

0:25:16.920 --> 0:25:19.160
<v Speaker 1>workers have enjoyed for three decades for more.

0:25:19.200 --> 0:25:21.560
<v Speaker 3>We are joined by Michael Dean, Bloomberg Intelligence, Head of

0:25:21.600 --> 0:25:23.879
<v Speaker 3>Global Autos, and we first asked Michael to dig deeper

0:25:23.880 --> 0:25:26.680
<v Speaker 3>into YBMW lowered its expectations for the year.

0:25:27.160 --> 0:25:30.000
<v Speaker 11>So BMW had a profit warning, and that was partly

0:25:30.000 --> 0:25:33.040
<v Speaker 11>on the back of a warranty issue has with its

0:25:33.400 --> 0:25:34.720
<v Speaker 11>breaks not on the xtreek.

0:25:34.760 --> 0:25:37.680
<v Speaker 4>So you'll fine Paul Good, but they're going to have to.

0:25:37.640 --> 0:25:41.480
<v Speaker 11>Recall one point five million vehicles and that's going to

0:25:41.520 --> 0:25:44.879
<v Speaker 11>cost a high three digits million in terms of earnings

0:25:44.880 --> 0:25:47.000
<v Speaker 11>for twenty twenty four. But that doesn't tell the whole

0:25:47.040 --> 0:25:49.720
<v Speaker 11>story because they've downgraded their margin by about two hundred

0:25:49.760 --> 0:25:52.840
<v Speaker 11>bases points, which is about two billion v bits. So

0:25:53.000 --> 0:25:56.200
<v Speaker 11>the balance of that is coming from we could China sales,

0:25:57.240 --> 0:26:01.120
<v Speaker 11>lower pricing in Europe, lower demanding you. So just the

0:26:01.200 --> 0:26:04.639
<v Speaker 11>demand and pricing environment globally has been very difficult and

0:26:04.680 --> 0:26:06.560
<v Speaker 11>that's part of the reason for the profit warning.

0:26:06.800 --> 0:26:09.560
<v Speaker 3>Which then leads us to Volkswagen. So the latest news

0:26:09.640 --> 0:26:11.920
<v Speaker 3>is that it's ending its job protections for autoworkers in

0:26:11.960 --> 0:26:14.919
<v Speaker 3>Germany as part of its cost cutting push. There are

0:26:14.960 --> 0:26:17.400
<v Speaker 3>several agreements that were linked to a three decades old

0:26:17.440 --> 0:26:19.640
<v Speaker 3>pack that was supposed to safeguard employment un till twenty

0:26:19.720 --> 0:26:21.800
<v Speaker 3>twenty nine, but now those guarantees are going to run

0:26:21.800 --> 0:26:23.840
<v Speaker 3>out by the middle of next year.

0:26:24.560 --> 0:26:27.120
<v Speaker 4>I mean, wow, yeah.

0:26:27.280 --> 0:26:29.720
<v Speaker 11>So you know, Volkswagen was in the news last week

0:26:29.800 --> 0:26:32.600
<v Speaker 11>because it said it needs to close half a million

0:26:32.680 --> 0:26:37.280
<v Speaker 11>units of capacity in Germany. So that's very difficult because

0:26:37.280 --> 0:26:39.919
<v Speaker 11>of workers' rights. And you know, worker's rights have been

0:26:40.000 --> 0:26:43.199
<v Speaker 11>very one sided for Volkswagen in particular because you have

0:26:43.240 --> 0:26:46.040
<v Speaker 11>VW law and this is where twenty percent of the

0:26:46.200 --> 0:26:49.399
<v Speaker 11>ordinary shares, the voting shares are owned by the States

0:26:49.400 --> 0:26:52.879
<v Speaker 11>of Lower Saxony, which is where Volkswagen's biggest battery is,

0:26:53.000 --> 0:26:56.320
<v Speaker 11>and funnily enough, and they have the ability to block

0:26:57.240 --> 0:27:02.960
<v Speaker 11>certain agreements. So workers rights are very strong for Volkswagen employees.

0:27:03.119 --> 0:27:05.119
<v Speaker 11>And now I think management are saying, okay, hold on

0:27:05.240 --> 0:27:08.639
<v Speaker 11>a minute. The automotive world is changing rapidly. We need

0:27:08.680 --> 0:27:10.960
<v Speaker 11>to do something to reduce costs. And part of that

0:27:11.280 --> 0:27:13.600
<v Speaker 11>is the close factories and reduce jobs.

0:27:14.440 --> 0:27:16.880
<v Speaker 1>Michael, give us it just a thirty thousand foot view

0:27:16.880 --> 0:27:19.360
<v Speaker 1>of kind of the global auto business here. I mean,

0:27:19.440 --> 0:27:22.240
<v Speaker 1>the weakness that you're seeing in Europe, the weakness you're

0:27:22.240 --> 0:27:26.560
<v Speaker 1>seeing in China. Is that just general economic weakness effect

0:27:26.840 --> 0:27:28.640
<v Speaker 1>that we've seen in past cycles or is this something

0:27:28.680 --> 0:27:32.600
<v Speaker 1>to do with this ongoing transition to electric vehicles.

0:27:33.520 --> 0:27:35.600
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, it's a bit of both. So you know, you

0:27:35.640 --> 0:27:38.680
<v Speaker 11>have the transition to battery electric vehicles. It's going much

0:27:38.720 --> 0:27:42.840
<v Speaker 11>slower than expected in Western markets. Other markets probably going

0:27:42.920 --> 0:27:46.080
<v Speaker 11>quicker than expected, such as China. But the problem Volkswagen

0:27:46.200 --> 0:27:49.000
<v Speaker 11>has is that the competition is so intense and has

0:27:49.440 --> 0:27:52.560
<v Speaker 11>overtaken them in China, such as BYD So. Volkswagen a

0:27:52.560 --> 0:27:54.840
<v Speaker 11>couple of years ago was the market leader in China.

0:27:55.119 --> 0:27:58.720
<v Speaker 11>Now byd within two years has overtaken Volkswagen. And really

0:27:58.760 --> 0:28:01.000
<v Speaker 11>it's going to be a survival of the fittest in

0:28:01.280 --> 0:28:02.040
<v Speaker 11>these markets.

0:28:02.280 --> 0:28:05.120
<v Speaker 3>Well, I mean, these companies aren't going to go under

0:28:05.200 --> 0:28:07.359
<v Speaker 3>or anything, right, So I guess I'm wondering when the

0:28:07.400 --> 0:28:10.000
<v Speaker 3>trough is When do we know what is a trough

0:28:10.040 --> 0:28:11.000
<v Speaker 3>actually going to look like?

0:28:11.960 --> 0:28:14.240
<v Speaker 11>Well, you say, well, a lot of companies could could

0:28:14.280 --> 0:28:17.119
<v Speaker 11>go under, particularly the pure play battery electric vehicles.

0:28:17.480 --> 0:28:19.000
<v Speaker 3>And I mean I just meant that, like Germany is

0:28:19.040 --> 0:28:20.520
<v Speaker 3>not gonna let Bolkswagon.

0:28:20.040 --> 0:28:22.399
<v Speaker 4>Go bankrupt now, of course.

0:28:22.520 --> 0:28:25.440
<v Speaker 11>And the interesting thing if you look at the valuation

0:28:25.480 --> 0:28:28.920
<v Speaker 11>of Volkswagen today is valued at forty five billion euros.

0:28:29.400 --> 0:28:31.520
<v Speaker 4>I've had a lot of clients talk to me about this.

0:28:31.920 --> 0:28:34.440
<v Speaker 11>They have almost forty billion of cash on the balance sheet,

0:28:34.640 --> 0:28:37.119
<v Speaker 11>there's seventy five percent stake in Porsche is worth forty

0:28:37.119 --> 0:28:42.680
<v Speaker 11>five billion euros. They own Lamborghini brands, which has higher

0:28:42.680 --> 0:28:46.360
<v Speaker 11>probability rates than Ferrari, which is currently valued at seventy

0:28:46.400 --> 0:28:49.280
<v Speaker 11>seven billion. So we think Lamborghini's worth thirty billion to

0:28:49.360 --> 0:28:51.760
<v Speaker 11>use a Ferrari valuation. So there's some of the parts

0:28:51.760 --> 0:28:56.280
<v Speaker 11>of volksg is huge compared to the actual valuation at

0:28:56.320 --> 0:28:57.400
<v Speaker 11>Volkswagen at the moment.

0:28:57.920 --> 0:29:01.760
<v Speaker 1>So you highlight an area for me that just kind

0:29:01.800 --> 0:29:03.680
<v Speaker 1>of feels like a long term issue, which is China.

0:29:04.200 --> 0:29:06.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if you they spend decades they being any

0:29:06.880 --> 0:29:11.840
<v Speaker 1>auto company Volkswagen, BMW, Mercedes, whatever, building brand value and

0:29:11.880 --> 0:29:14.480
<v Speaker 1>brand loyalty in a market like China, and in a

0:29:14.520 --> 0:29:17.720
<v Speaker 1>period of two years they've lost that. It seems like,

0:29:18.120 --> 0:29:20.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean, is that the real barish case for some

0:29:20.920 --> 0:29:22.200
<v Speaker 1>of these global auto companies.

0:29:23.400 --> 0:29:24.880
<v Speaker 4>It's a it's a big case.

0:29:24.920 --> 0:29:27.600
<v Speaker 11>So for the German auto makers, in the past few years,

0:29:27.840 --> 0:29:31.000
<v Speaker 11>China was the most profitable market, accounted for thirty five

0:29:31.640 --> 0:29:33.920
<v Speaker 11>of their profits. Now this year it could be as

0:29:34.000 --> 0:29:37.280
<v Speaker 11>low as ten percent, and you know what the market's

0:29:37.320 --> 0:29:39.640
<v Speaker 11>pricing is is that could be zero in the future.

0:29:39.640 --> 0:29:43.560
<v Speaker 11>And that's because the technology changing and the way that

0:29:44.160 --> 0:29:48.440
<v Speaker 11>startups in China are pushing through so quickly. They're really

0:29:48.440 --> 0:29:50.600
<v Speaker 11>fighting for market share at the moment and their future.

0:29:51.480 --> 0:29:53.960
<v Speaker 3>So then it goes back to my question, what does

0:29:54.200 --> 0:29:58.040
<v Speaker 3>the bottom for either US car companies or for European

0:29:58.040 --> 0:30:01.520
<v Speaker 3>car companies wind up looking? Like as the tariffs go

0:30:01.520 --> 0:30:05.280
<v Speaker 3>into place, as China keeps producing those really CHEAPVS, as

0:30:05.320 --> 0:30:07.720
<v Speaker 3>we have different restrictions here in the US, like what

0:30:07.880 --> 0:30:08.240
<v Speaker 3>is that?

0:30:09.400 --> 0:30:11.320
<v Speaker 11>Well, you look at what GM and Ford have done,

0:30:11.320 --> 0:30:14.440
<v Speaker 11>I mean, in particulate, it's looked at different markets and

0:30:14.440 --> 0:30:16.640
<v Speaker 11>if it's not profitable, it's pulled out of those markets.

0:30:16.760 --> 0:30:20.320
<v Speaker 11>So China's one example, Europe's another example. So it's whether

0:30:20.440 --> 0:30:23.560
<v Speaker 11>the German automakers take a view that can they be

0:30:23.640 --> 0:30:27.560
<v Speaker 11>profitable in China in the future, and many foreign carmakers

0:30:27.560 --> 0:30:29.960
<v Speaker 11>are saying no. Volksnagen at the moment is saying yes

0:30:30.000 --> 0:30:32.680
<v Speaker 11>we can, and they've got this long term plan and

0:30:32.720 --> 0:30:38.160
<v Speaker 11>they've invested in Xpeng so hopefully accelerate their transition. But

0:30:38.200 --> 0:30:40.600
<v Speaker 11>it's going to be very, very difficult for foreign carmakers

0:30:40.600 --> 0:30:43.000
<v Speaker 11>to continue to make profits in China.

0:30:43.640 --> 0:30:47.120
<v Speaker 1>So I mean again it feels like is there an

0:30:47.160 --> 0:30:50.120
<v Speaker 1>even discussion of whether they should be there at some point.

0:30:51.080 --> 0:30:55.280
<v Speaker 11>Certainly within the markets, but for the company itself that

0:30:55.280 --> 0:30:58.880
<v Speaker 11>they've invested heavily in China and they've got a plan

0:30:58.960 --> 0:31:01.560
<v Speaker 11>now to try and catch up with local producers, to

0:31:01.600 --> 0:31:05.440
<v Speaker 11>catch up with BYD, which is with this partnership with XPANG.

0:31:05.800 --> 0:31:08.600
<v Speaker 11>So they think they've got an opportunity because they've got

0:31:08.600 --> 0:31:10.240
<v Speaker 11>a good brand in China.

0:31:10.280 --> 0:31:12.440
<v Speaker 4>But it's going to be very tough. I mean, pricing in.

0:31:12.400 --> 0:31:16.040
<v Speaker 11>China is really really competitive at the moment, so the

0:31:16.080 --> 0:31:19.960
<v Speaker 11>point where battery electric vehicles are actually priced below internal

0:31:19.960 --> 0:31:22.760
<v Speaker 11>combustion in vehicles compared to that to Europe, where the

0:31:22.760 --> 0:31:26.600
<v Speaker 11>average battery electric vehicle is thirty five percent higher than

0:31:26.720 --> 0:31:29.120
<v Speaker 11>a ice vehicle, and they still can barely make a

0:31:29.160 --> 0:31:31.880
<v Speaker 11>profit in Europe, so yeah, it's a very tough environment.

0:31:32.480 --> 0:31:35.800
<v Speaker 1>Thanks to Michael Dean, Bloomberg Intelligence, Head of Global Autos.

0:31:35.520 --> 0:31:38.120
<v Speaker 3>Each week we look at research from Bloomberg n EF

0:31:38.120 --> 0:31:41.640
<v Speaker 3>previously known as New Energy Finance. The team in Bloomberg

0:31:41.680 --> 0:31:47.400
<v Speaker 3>the tracks and analyzes the energy transition from commodities to power, transport, industries, buildings,

0:31:47.400 --> 0:31:48.800
<v Speaker 3>and agricultural sectors.

0:31:49.040 --> 0:31:51.360
<v Speaker 1>This week we looked at carbon capture. After two years

0:31:51.400 --> 0:31:54.360
<v Speaker 1>of consecutive and dramatic growth, activity in the carbon capture

0:31:54.360 --> 0:31:56.160
<v Speaker 1>industry is starting to slow in the US.

0:31:56.400 --> 0:31:59.280
<v Speaker 3>For more, we are joined by Brenna Casey, Bloomberg BNEF

0:31:59.280 --> 0:32:00.440
<v Speaker 3>carbon Capture Analyst.

0:32:00.800 --> 0:32:03.240
<v Speaker 1>We first asked Brennet to define what carbon capture is.

0:32:03.720 --> 0:32:08.640
<v Speaker 12>Basically simply CCUS carbon capture, utilization and storage. It's kind

0:32:08.640 --> 0:32:12.640
<v Speaker 12>of just a way to abate emissions from heavy industry,

0:32:12.760 --> 0:32:18.240
<v Speaker 12>so things like petrochemical refineries, integrated steel mills, hydrogen blue hydrogen.

0:32:18.440 --> 0:32:18.760
<v Speaker 4>Okay.

0:32:19.240 --> 0:32:22.520
<v Speaker 12>Natural gas processing is a huge historical and use sector.

0:32:22.720 --> 0:32:25.760
<v Speaker 3>So basically there's some sectors that you cannot decarbonize you

0:32:26.000 --> 0:32:28.880
<v Speaker 3>and they have to exist, like you need cement for example.

0:32:29.080 --> 0:32:30.239
<v Speaker 3>So this is a way to kind of get them

0:32:30.240 --> 0:32:31.680
<v Speaker 3>out of the air, and then the question is kind

0:32:31.720 --> 0:32:32.960
<v Speaker 3>of what do you do with it? Do you reuse

0:32:33.000 --> 0:32:34.920
<v Speaker 3>it somewhere, do you put it somewhere, do you store

0:32:34.960 --> 0:32:37.520
<v Speaker 3>it in a rock or somewhere else. And it's been

0:32:37.560 --> 0:32:40.680
<v Speaker 3>a huge focus for a lot of companies, energy companies

0:32:40.720 --> 0:32:42.880
<v Speaker 3>and a like in oil companies for example, what has

0:32:42.920 --> 0:32:44.600
<v Speaker 3>been the investment cycle like and.

0:32:44.560 --> 0:32:45.719
<v Speaker 8>Where are we now in that cycle?

0:32:46.400 --> 0:32:50.640
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, So if we're looking particularly to the US, following

0:32:50.680 --> 0:32:54.479
<v Speaker 12>the Inflation Reduction Act, we saw this catalysis of not

0:32:54.560 --> 0:32:58.000
<v Speaker 12>only project announcements, but kind of you know Series A,

0:32:58.520 --> 0:33:01.640
<v Speaker 12>you know, lots of equity finance into that into the

0:33:01.680 --> 0:33:05.920
<v Speaker 12>market right now, as you know, the IRS has still

0:33:06.000 --> 0:33:08.520
<v Speaker 12>yet to address forty five Q. So that's the inflation

0:33:08.600 --> 0:33:10.960
<v Speaker 12>reduction Yeah. Yeah, So the Inflation Reduction Act, which was

0:33:11.040 --> 0:33:14.040
<v Speaker 12>signed into law you know, two years ago. Forty five

0:33:14.080 --> 0:33:16.280
<v Speaker 12>Q is an investment tax credit that the government is

0:33:16.320 --> 0:33:20.280
<v Speaker 12>proposing to you know, heavy emitters. They can if they

0:33:20.320 --> 0:33:23.480
<v Speaker 12>meet X, y Z requirements, then they can take this

0:33:23.600 --> 0:33:26.800
<v Speaker 12>credit and apply it to their tax burden. And you know,

0:33:27.200 --> 0:33:29.280
<v Speaker 12>kind of helps to mitigate the cost of ccs because

0:33:29.320 --> 0:33:30.920
<v Speaker 12>it's extremely capex intensive.

0:33:31.440 --> 0:33:32.959
<v Speaker 3>So if you store your carbon er get it out

0:33:33.000 --> 0:33:34.160
<v Speaker 3>of the air, you get a tax credit.

0:33:34.200 --> 0:33:36.400
<v Speaker 12>Okay, Yeah, it's like eighty five dollars per ton if

0:33:36.440 --> 0:33:38.840
<v Speaker 12>you store it, and then sixty if you reutilize it.

0:33:38.920 --> 0:33:39.640
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, exactly.

0:33:40.160 --> 0:33:43.040
<v Speaker 12>However, the IRS has yet to finalize the criteria, so

0:33:43.200 --> 0:33:47.280
<v Speaker 12>developers don't know what actually constitutes as a project that

0:33:47.320 --> 0:33:50.080
<v Speaker 12>can qualify for these sorts of credits, and so what

0:33:50.160 --> 0:33:53.760
<v Speaker 12>we've actually seen is not only investment taper off, but

0:33:54.200 --> 0:33:55.360
<v Speaker 12>just announcements of you.

0:33:55.360 --> 0:33:56.760
<v Speaker 8>Know, future projects into the sector.

0:33:56.760 --> 0:33:58.959
<v Speaker 12>Which what's kind of ironic is that if you look

0:33:58.960 --> 0:34:01.360
<v Speaker 12>at INVESTM numbers for last year for ccs in total,

0:34:01.400 --> 0:34:02.880
<v Speaker 12>it was globally eleven point.

0:34:02.640 --> 0:34:04.880
<v Speaker 8>Three billion higher than it's ever been before.

0:34:06.000 --> 0:34:09.560
<v Speaker 12>The US to come around two point eight billion of that, however,

0:34:10.040 --> 0:34:12.400
<v Speaker 12>that is all bolstered by just DOOE grants. So the

0:34:12.440 --> 0:34:14.839
<v Speaker 12>DOE has you know, these direct air capture hubs. They're

0:34:14.840 --> 0:34:18.800
<v Speaker 12>trying to throw money at growing out midstream infrastructure, so

0:34:18.880 --> 0:34:22.800
<v Speaker 12>trans like pipelines, the storage like storage basins you mentioned earlier.

0:34:23.600 --> 0:34:26.040
<v Speaker 12>But there's really no FIDS being taken in the sector

0:34:26.040 --> 0:34:29.160
<v Speaker 12>at all. Besides, I think it was the hydrogen Bomont

0:34:29.280 --> 0:34:30.360
<v Speaker 12>complex last year.

0:34:30.239 --> 0:34:33.720
<v Speaker 3>So FID is foreign investment decision final best financaim sorry,

0:34:34.040 --> 0:34:36.080
<v Speaker 3>And it basically means like, Okay, I have enough and

0:34:36.120 --> 0:34:38.160
<v Speaker 3>I understand enough of the economics where I can actually

0:34:38.160 --> 0:34:39.640
<v Speaker 3>like put money in the ground and like put a

0:34:39.680 --> 0:34:41.640
<v Speaker 3>shovel in the ground and do some stuff. And that's

0:34:41.640 --> 0:34:44.319
<v Speaker 3>where we're really lacking, which raids of the question is

0:34:44.320 --> 0:34:47.480
<v Speaker 3>it building this stuff is still too complicated? Or is

0:34:47.520 --> 0:34:50.160
<v Speaker 3>it the demand side? So I'm a company and I'm like,

0:34:50.200 --> 0:34:51.960
<v Speaker 3>I can capture your carbon and I can store it

0:34:52.040 --> 0:34:53.680
<v Speaker 3>for you, but how much are you willing to pay

0:34:53.680 --> 0:34:55.319
<v Speaker 3>for that? Is that part of the issue now?

0:34:56.000 --> 0:34:59.720
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, it's definitely kind of a sector by sector issue.

0:34:59.760 --> 0:35:01.040
<v Speaker 8>So we look to power.

0:35:01.480 --> 0:35:03.880
<v Speaker 12>We're seeing the most cancelations in the power sector just

0:35:03.920 --> 0:35:08.319
<v Speaker 12>because CCS is tremendously expensive and so for seeing a

0:35:08.320 --> 0:35:11.440
<v Speaker 12>project announced around, you know, thirty percent of those projects

0:35:11.440 --> 0:35:13.640
<v Speaker 12>in the power sector are like they're probably going to

0:35:13.680 --> 0:35:16.879
<v Speaker 12>get canceled. And that's because retrofitting with CCS adds around

0:35:16.920 --> 0:35:18.200
<v Speaker 12>fifty six percent.

0:35:18.719 --> 0:35:21.640
<v Speaker 8>To the total l COE. So it's eight hundred million

0:35:21.800 --> 0:35:25.640
<v Speaker 8>plus capex investments. If you look to something which how

0:35:25.640 --> 0:35:26.440
<v Speaker 8>did they recoup that?

0:35:26.480 --> 0:35:28.759
<v Speaker 3>Because that's about power, it's either the company is paying

0:35:28.800 --> 0:35:30.799
<v Speaker 3>for it or like I'm paying for it in my bills, right,

0:35:30.840 --> 0:35:31.719
<v Speaker 3>And that's the definite.

0:35:31.480 --> 0:35:33.200
<v Speaker 8>Way of how they recoup that cash.

0:35:33.080 --> 0:35:35.279
<v Speaker 12>Especially if you know the forty five Q credit if

0:35:35.360 --> 0:35:37.600
<v Speaker 12>you are in amit or to qualify, it only lasts

0:35:37.600 --> 0:35:40.040
<v Speaker 12>twelve years. A lot of these lifetimes are twenty twenty

0:35:40.040 --> 0:35:42.560
<v Speaker 12>five years, and so yeah, how do you kind of

0:35:42.560 --> 0:35:43.720
<v Speaker 12>make that investment back.

0:35:43.520 --> 0:35:48.600
<v Speaker 1>Hard and capture losing some momentum because maybe just the

0:35:48.719 --> 0:35:51.120
<v Speaker 1>transition to green in the US has become a little

0:35:51.160 --> 0:35:53.480
<v Speaker 1>politicized and maybe it's losing a little bit of impetus.

0:35:53.480 --> 0:35:55.800
<v Speaker 1>Are we falling behind other countries for example?

0:35:57.080 --> 0:35:59.000
<v Speaker 8>I mean, the US is definitely the market leader.

0:35:59.080 --> 0:36:03.160
<v Speaker 12>So globe there's around four hundred and twenty four million

0:36:03.160 --> 0:36:05.839
<v Speaker 12>metric tons of CU two capture capacity do to come

0:36:05.840 --> 0:36:08.719
<v Speaker 12>online by twenty thirty five. Now, out of that, around

0:36:08.760 --> 0:36:11.520
<v Speaker 12>one hundred and sixty I think it's one sixty three

0:36:11.840 --> 0:36:14.920
<v Speaker 12>million tons is based in the US and following you know,

0:36:15.000 --> 0:36:18.000
<v Speaker 12>the forty five Q Inflace Reduction Act. Even though there's

0:36:18.040 --> 0:36:23.080
<v Speaker 12>you know, hiccups here, hiccups with transparent storage permitting, we

0:36:23.160 --> 0:36:25.080
<v Speaker 12>do see the United States as the best place in

0:36:25.120 --> 0:36:27.480
<v Speaker 12>the world is to kind of build one of these projects.

0:36:27.560 --> 0:36:29.520
<v Speaker 3>So what companies do you feel like have the real

0:36:29.560 --> 0:36:31.080
<v Speaker 3>deal it? So I talk to a lot of companies

0:36:31.080 --> 0:36:32.560
<v Speaker 3>and they're all going to try and sell me their

0:36:32.560 --> 0:36:35.279
<v Speaker 3>carbon capture products and like why they're the best, and

0:36:35.360 --> 0:36:36.960
<v Speaker 3>how their economics.

0:36:36.400 --> 0:36:37.600
<v Speaker 8>Work and all that stuff.

0:36:37.840 --> 0:36:39.560
<v Speaker 3>Who actually can make this work?

0:36:40.040 --> 0:36:43.120
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, I mean, if we're looking at power and hydrogen,

0:36:43.120 --> 0:36:44.880
<v Speaker 12>which are the two leaders right now, kind of the

0:36:44.920 --> 0:36:46.400
<v Speaker 12>biggest players here, we're.

0:36:46.239 --> 0:36:47.440
<v Speaker 8>Seeing Occidental Energy.

0:36:47.520 --> 0:36:50.680
<v Speaker 12>So not only are they looking to retrofit they're you know,

0:36:50.840 --> 0:36:53.839
<v Speaker 12>natural gas assets with carbon capture, but they're also kind

0:36:53.840 --> 0:36:57.759
<v Speaker 12>of taking this first mover run into the direct air

0:36:57.800 --> 0:37:01.160
<v Speaker 12>capture space. So that's really interesting company to watch in

0:37:01.200 --> 0:37:04.840
<v Speaker 12>that kind of little corner. There's also you know, like

0:37:05.040 --> 0:37:08.560
<v Speaker 12>air products for hydrogen excelon MO. It's primarily these oil

0:37:08.560 --> 0:37:11.759
<v Speaker 12>and gas majors that are moving around in the market

0:37:11.800 --> 0:37:15.520
<v Speaker 12>because they have you know, just previous expertise, but they

0:37:15.520 --> 0:37:18.279
<v Speaker 12>also understand the geology, how to store these things, how

0:37:18.320 --> 0:37:21.520
<v Speaker 12>to build you know, these big expensive projects.

0:37:21.560 --> 0:37:24.279
<v Speaker 8>So yeah, air products oxy All right.

0:37:24.280 --> 0:37:27.480
<v Speaker 3>Thanks to Brenda Casey, Bloomberg bn EF Carbon Capture Analyst.

0:37:27.719 --> 0:37:30.439
<v Speaker 1>That's this week's edition of Bloomberg Intelligence on Bloomberg Radio

0:37:30.719 --> 0:37:33.280
<v Speaker 1>providing in depth research and data on two thousand companies

0:37:33.280 --> 0:37:34.560
<v Speaker 1>and one hundred and thirty industries.

0:37:34.760 --> 0:37:37.480
<v Speaker 3>And remember you can access Bloomberg Intelligence through Big on

0:37:37.520 --> 0:37:39.160
<v Speaker 3>the terminal. I'm Alex Steel.

0:37:39.080 --> 0:37:41.600
<v Speaker 1>And I'm Paul Sweet. Stay with us. Today's top stories

0:37:41.600 --> 0:37:43.960
<v Speaker 1>and global business headlines are coming up right now