WEBVTT - Frackalachia and the Great Fracking Jobs Myth

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:02.360
<v Speaker 1>If you live in the region, you only have to

0:00:02.400 --> 0:00:05.320
<v Speaker 1>walk through the downtowns to see what I'm saying. Whether

0:00:05.360 --> 0:00:11.799
<v Speaker 1>it's you know, Steubenville, Ohio, Balero, Ohio, Wheeling, West Virginia, Waynesburg, Pennsylvania,

0:00:12.320 --> 0:00:16.120
<v Speaker 1>all of those downtowns are hollowed out shells of what

0:00:16.200 --> 0:00:16.840
<v Speaker 1>they once were.

0:00:31.200 --> 0:00:34.720
<v Speaker 2>Hey, there, this is drilled. I'm Amy Westervelt and that

0:00:34.920 --> 0:00:39.240
<v Speaker 2>was Sean O'Leary from the Ohio River Valley Institute. O'Leary

0:00:39.440 --> 0:00:44.080
<v Speaker 2>is a native West Virginian who's watched firsthand what first

0:00:44.200 --> 0:00:48.519
<v Speaker 2>coal and then gas did to his community. He doesn't

0:00:48.600 --> 0:00:53.080
<v Speaker 2>live in West Virginia anymore, and that has become a

0:00:53.240 --> 0:00:57.840
<v Speaker 2>topic of criticism from people who did not appreciate some

0:00:57.920 --> 0:01:02.000
<v Speaker 2>of his recent work. Last month, a leary and the

0:01:02.120 --> 0:01:05.440
<v Speaker 2>organization he works for released a report that really made

0:01:05.480 --> 0:01:07.800
<v Speaker 2>the oil and gas guys mad. It takes on a

0:01:07.840 --> 0:01:13.280
<v Speaker 2>simple question, did the fracking boom actually deliver all those

0:01:13.319 --> 0:01:17.040
<v Speaker 2>economic benefits we've heard the industry talk so much about.

0:01:17.480 --> 0:01:21.440
<v Speaker 2>The report specifically looks at the region O'Leary has dubbed Frakalacia,

0:01:21.840 --> 0:01:26.080
<v Speaker 2>encompassing parts of the Ohio River Valley in Ohio, Pennsylvania,

0:01:26.120 --> 0:01:30.840
<v Speaker 2>and West Virginia. As you might recall from every election

0:01:31.000 --> 0:01:34.680
<v Speaker 2>cycle in the last decade, whenever people start talking about

0:01:34.720 --> 0:01:37.560
<v Speaker 2>the environmental impacts of fracking or the potential of a

0:01:37.600 --> 0:01:41.319
<v Speaker 2>fracking ban, the industry has the same response.

0:01:41.640 --> 0:01:44.160
<v Speaker 3>The amount of jobs that are created by this technology

0:01:44.160 --> 0:01:47.360
<v Speaker 3>cannot be overstated. The United States Chamber of Commerce, for instance,

0:01:47.400 --> 0:01:50.960
<v Speaker 3>tells me doing a way with this one technology would

0:01:51.040 --> 0:01:53.920
<v Speaker 3>lead to the loss of nearly nineteen million jobs here

0:01:53.960 --> 0:01:54.840
<v Speaker 3>in the United States.

0:01:55.080 --> 0:01:57.720
<v Speaker 2>The US is now the leading producer in the world

0:01:57.880 --> 0:02:01.160
<v Speaker 2>of natural gas and of oil, and that has powered

0:02:01.440 --> 0:02:03.280
<v Speaker 2>benefits in our economy.

0:02:03.080 --> 0:02:06.120
<v Speaker 3>Tens of thousands of jobs paying an average salary of

0:02:06.160 --> 0:02:09.880
<v Speaker 3>fifty thousand dollars. That's what the Ohio Shale Coalition says

0:02:10.160 --> 0:02:11.239
<v Speaker 3>is coming to Ohio.

0:02:11.480 --> 0:02:15.760
<v Speaker 2>But O'Leary and his colleagues analyzed economic data from before, during,

0:02:15.800 --> 0:02:18.880
<v Speaker 2>and after the fracking boom in the Ohio River Valley

0:02:19.080 --> 0:02:20.800
<v Speaker 2>and found something else.

0:02:21.520 --> 0:02:27.960
<v Speaker 1>Measures of local economic prosperity, starting with jobs, also personal income,

0:02:28.040 --> 0:02:32.160
<v Speaker 1>and finally population were underwhelming to the point of being

0:02:32.240 --> 0:02:33.079
<v Speaker 1>non existence.

0:02:33.520 --> 0:02:37.840
<v Speaker 2>Oleary joined me to explain the report, the research behind it,

0:02:37.919 --> 0:02:40.400
<v Speaker 2>and what it means for the region and for other

0:02:40.440 --> 0:02:44.400
<v Speaker 2>oil and gas regions. That conversation coming up right after

0:02:44.480 --> 0:02:52.239
<v Speaker 2>this quick breaking I'd love to have you just kind

0:02:52.280 --> 0:02:54.600
<v Speaker 2>of give people a little bit of the lay of

0:02:54.639 --> 0:02:56.920
<v Speaker 2>the land. You know, what is this report that you

0:02:57.080 --> 0:03:00.520
<v Speaker 2>just wrote and what were the key findings from it?

0:03:01.639 --> 0:03:06.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, the report was an analysis of the economic impacts

0:03:06.720 --> 0:03:11.639
<v Speaker 1>of the natural gas fracking boom in Appalachia on particularly

0:03:11.840 --> 0:03:15.160
<v Speaker 1>the counties in the region, the twenty two counties in

0:03:15.200 --> 0:03:19.200
<v Speaker 1>the region from which over ninety percent of the gas

0:03:19.240 --> 0:03:23.720
<v Speaker 1>is being produced. Because there have, as anyone who's paid attention,

0:03:23.960 --> 0:03:29.160
<v Speaker 1>for instance, in the recent presidential campaign knows a number

0:03:29.200 --> 0:03:33.840
<v Speaker 1>of claims about a huge number of jobs associated with fracking,

0:03:34.560 --> 0:03:37.920
<v Speaker 1>and so we went in specifically for the purpose to see,

0:03:38.400 --> 0:03:42.200
<v Speaker 1>in fact, how many jobs has fracking created and what

0:03:42.280 --> 0:03:46.000
<v Speaker 1>other economic benefits has fracking helped produce in those counties,

0:03:46.840 --> 0:03:51.520
<v Speaker 1>and what the report discovered. What we found was that

0:03:51.760 --> 0:03:57.360
<v Speaker 1>despite an immense increase in economic output is measured by GDP,

0:03:58.560 --> 0:04:03.400
<v Speaker 1>which was roughly three times the rate of growth in

0:04:03.440 --> 0:04:06.880
<v Speaker 1>the American economy as a whole, despite that immense spike

0:04:06.920 --> 0:04:14.200
<v Speaker 1>in productivity, the measures of local economic prosperity, starting with jobs,

0:04:15.240 --> 0:04:20.200
<v Speaker 1>also personal income, and finally population were underwhelming to the

0:04:20.240 --> 0:04:23.520
<v Speaker 1>point of being non existence. And so the conclusion the

0:04:23.560 --> 0:04:29.080
<v Speaker 1>report came to was that there's virtually no correlation between

0:04:29.320 --> 0:04:34.520
<v Speaker 1>economic growth as driven by the natural gas industry and

0:04:35.320 --> 0:04:40.920
<v Speaker 1>actual prosperity positive economic outcomes on the ground. And yes,

0:04:41.000 --> 0:04:43.560
<v Speaker 1>that has stirred up quite a bit of controversy in

0:04:43.600 --> 0:04:44.040
<v Speaker 1>the region.

0:04:44.400 --> 0:04:48.880
<v Speaker 2>That's super interesting. The big cell for fracking forever has

0:04:49.000 --> 0:04:52.880
<v Speaker 2>been this idea that the jobs it creates outweighs the

0:04:53.040 --> 0:04:56.239
<v Speaker 2>impacts that it might have on the environment, or on water,

0:04:56.640 --> 0:05:00.560
<v Speaker 2>or on communities and things like that. What are you

0:05:00.680 --> 0:05:05.039
<v Speaker 2>hearing from, especially the people who have been pushing that

0:05:05.160 --> 0:05:08.400
<v Speaker 2>idea both kind of you know, oil and gas executives

0:05:08.440 --> 0:05:10.880
<v Speaker 2>and politicians in some states.

0:05:11.200 --> 0:05:19.520
<v Speaker 1>Well, when they're not calling me names. Basically, the reactions

0:05:19.560 --> 0:05:25.000
<v Speaker 1>so far, you know, have been pretty fervent. A couple

0:05:25.000 --> 0:05:29.640
<v Speaker 1>of congressmen have issued press releases and others basically attempting

0:05:29.720 --> 0:05:33.120
<v Speaker 1>to refute the findings of the study. The problem is

0:05:33.320 --> 0:05:37.039
<v Speaker 1>that none of them yet have actually contested any of

0:05:37.040 --> 0:05:41.000
<v Speaker 1>the quantitative findings in the study. Instead, what they've done

0:05:41.320 --> 0:05:46.280
<v Speaker 1>is point to other statistics in an effort to basically

0:05:46.560 --> 0:05:52.040
<v Speaker 1>offset what the study found. And so, for instance, there

0:05:51.160 --> 0:05:55.159
<v Speaker 1>are probably the three statistics that they point to most

0:05:55.200 --> 0:06:00.520
<v Speaker 1>often are that the unemployment rate in much of the

0:06:00.560 --> 0:06:04.400
<v Speaker 1>region that we've been talking about has declined significantly in

0:06:04.440 --> 0:06:08.520
<v Speaker 1>the last decade. They also point to the level of

0:06:08.560 --> 0:06:13.200
<v Speaker 1>investment that the fracking industry has made in the region,

0:06:13.800 --> 0:06:19.760
<v Speaker 1>the billions of dollars of investment. And finally, they point

0:06:19.839 --> 0:06:23.800
<v Speaker 1>to what they say is the total number of jobs

0:06:23.839 --> 0:06:27.320
<v Speaker 1>provided in the states of Ohio, Pennsylvania, and West Virginia,

0:06:29.120 --> 0:06:32.599
<v Speaker 1>those who are both jobs that are directly attributable to

0:06:32.680 --> 0:06:39.040
<v Speaker 1>the industry and also indirect and induced jobs, which they

0:06:39.080 --> 0:06:43.800
<v Speaker 1>say in those states number in the hundreds of thousands. That, however,

0:06:43.880 --> 0:06:47.200
<v Speaker 1>has been even before our report, a subject of considerable

0:06:47.279 --> 0:06:51.680
<v Speaker 1>contention in the area for quite some time. The problem

0:06:51.760 --> 0:06:56.440
<v Speaker 1>with the statistics that they cite, in addition to the

0:06:56.600 --> 0:07:00.640
<v Speaker 1>pre existing dispute about the total number of jobs, is

0:07:01.120 --> 0:07:06.520
<v Speaker 1>that the unemployment rate figures that they cite, and also

0:07:06.920 --> 0:07:12.320
<v Speaker 1>the investment dollar figures that they cite, are immensely misleading.

0:07:12.640 --> 0:07:16.320
<v Speaker 1>In a sense, you really shouldn't have needed this report

0:07:16.560 --> 0:07:20.760
<v Speaker 1>to understand that there is no huge boom in jobs

0:07:20.840 --> 0:07:25.040
<v Speaker 1>or economic revival going on in northeastern Pennsylvania or in

0:07:25.080 --> 0:07:27.880
<v Speaker 1>the greater Ohio Valley, because all you have to do

0:07:28.000 --> 0:07:32.880
<v Speaker 1>is walk through the downtowns and you see it. The

0:07:32.920 --> 0:07:37.160
<v Speaker 1>downtowns there are greatly reduced from what they were, certainly

0:07:37.200 --> 0:07:39.400
<v Speaker 1>at the time that I was growing up years ago.

0:07:40.520 --> 0:07:43.280
<v Speaker 1>And it's really sad to see for those of us

0:07:43.360 --> 0:07:47.400
<v Speaker 1>who are from the area and who have hopes that

0:07:47.480 --> 0:07:51.440
<v Speaker 1>the area can be revived and can prosper again. And

0:07:52.080 --> 0:07:57.840
<v Speaker 1>I despair that so many policymakers and leaders in the

0:07:57.880 --> 0:08:01.720
<v Speaker 1>area are continuing to go down the line of pursuing

0:08:02.400 --> 0:08:06.840
<v Speaker 1>the petrochemical industry and possible fuel industries as means to

0:08:06.880 --> 0:08:07.360
<v Speaker 1>get there.

0:08:08.240 --> 0:08:12.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I wanted to ask you about the petrochemical build out.

0:08:12.800 --> 0:08:16.680
<v Speaker 2>I saw that that release today about the fact that,

0:08:16.960 --> 0:08:20.200
<v Speaker 2>you know, one of the major companies looking at building

0:08:20.200 --> 0:08:24.720
<v Speaker 2>an ethane cracker in this region is delaying once again,

0:08:24.920 --> 0:08:27.800
<v Speaker 2>and you know, talking about needing to make it makes

0:08:27.840 --> 0:08:32.400
<v Speaker 2>sense economically. But I feel like you're also seeing this

0:08:32.480 --> 0:08:37.080
<v Speaker 2>repeat right of the same kind of overblown jobs numbers thing,

0:08:37.360 --> 0:08:39.760
<v Speaker 2>when I don't know, it seems to me that they

0:08:39.880 --> 0:08:44.240
<v Speaker 2>often include temporary jobs in that and not and are

0:08:45.040 --> 0:08:48.240
<v Speaker 2>misleading about how many permanent jobs any of these things create.

0:08:48.720 --> 0:08:50.760
<v Speaker 1>Well, and that's why I mean, one of the points

0:08:50.800 --> 0:08:56.760
<v Speaker 1>that I'm making is that the report I said in

0:08:56.760 --> 0:09:00.400
<v Speaker 1>an interview that there's not much math going on here,

0:09:01.559 --> 0:09:05.160
<v Speaker 1>which is a statement for which I've since been dinged

0:09:05.200 --> 0:09:07.679
<v Speaker 1>by those who won't approve of the report.

0:09:07.840 --> 0:09:11.120
<v Speaker 2>But I like to just say the math math in Yeah.

0:09:11.480 --> 0:09:13.840
<v Speaker 1>But the point that I was trying to make was

0:09:14.480 --> 0:09:20.400
<v Speaker 1>that the report that we issued is not the product

0:09:20.440 --> 0:09:26.840
<v Speaker 1>of an inferential model. We aren't predicting, you know, we

0:09:26.880 --> 0:09:32.040
<v Speaker 1>aren't using statistical techniques to predict what has happened or

0:09:32.120 --> 0:09:36.280
<v Speaker 1>may happen. We literally just went to the numbers as

0:09:36.600 --> 0:09:40.360
<v Speaker 1>reported to the quarterly senses of employment and wages. These

0:09:40.400 --> 0:09:43.800
<v Speaker 1>are the numbers. And for that reason, it makes the

0:09:43.840 --> 0:09:48.719
<v Speaker 1>report pretty difficult to criticize because there aren't any assumptions

0:09:48.760 --> 0:09:52.240
<v Speaker 1>being made. There aren't any inferences being made. It's simply

0:09:52.280 --> 0:09:55.719
<v Speaker 1>reporting the facts. Now, the you know, the question the

0:09:55.800 --> 0:09:58.360
<v Speaker 1>challenge for the industry is, Okay, well, how do we

0:09:59.000 --> 0:10:02.080
<v Speaker 1>how do we counter that? And so, for instance, you know,

0:10:02.200 --> 0:10:07.520
<v Speaker 1>they have been saying they've pointed to the unemployment rate

0:10:07.559 --> 0:10:11.720
<v Speaker 1>in particular, which has in fact gone down, And in

0:10:11.800 --> 0:10:14.320
<v Speaker 1>pointing to the unemployment rate, they usually start with the

0:10:14.360 --> 0:10:20.360
<v Speaker 1>year twenty and ten, which is a couple years after

0:10:20.480 --> 0:10:23.520
<v Speaker 1>the fracking booms started in the region, at least in

0:10:23.600 --> 0:10:26.880
<v Speaker 1>most parts of the region. But it also happens to

0:10:26.920 --> 0:10:29.760
<v Speaker 1>be the bottom of the Great Recession in terms of

0:10:29.800 --> 0:10:34.760
<v Speaker 1>employment and the unemployment rate in the US nationally, and

0:10:35.520 --> 0:10:38.599
<v Speaker 1>so that, you know, puts them somewhat at an advantage

0:10:38.600 --> 0:10:40.960
<v Speaker 1>with that number. But there's a more insidious thing that

0:10:40.960 --> 0:10:44.040
<v Speaker 1>they're doing and citing that number, which is that there

0:10:44.040 --> 0:10:46.959
<v Speaker 1>are two ways that you can make your unemployment rate

0:10:47.000 --> 0:10:50.360
<v Speaker 1>go down. There's the good way, and that is you

0:10:50.400 --> 0:10:53.480
<v Speaker 1>can add more jobs to your economy. But there's also

0:10:53.559 --> 0:10:57.360
<v Speaker 1>a bad way, and that is you can reduce the denominator,

0:10:57.840 --> 0:11:01.280
<v Speaker 1>you can get rid of workers, can lose workers from

0:11:01.280 --> 0:11:06.080
<v Speaker 1>your economy even faster than you lose jobs, in which

0:11:06.120 --> 0:11:09.080
<v Speaker 1>case your unemployment rate will go down as well. And

0:11:09.160 --> 0:11:11.880
<v Speaker 1>that the latter is what has happened in this region.

0:11:12.280 --> 0:11:15.360
<v Speaker 1>And so even though they do have a declining unemployment rate,

0:11:15.640 --> 0:11:19.920
<v Speaker 1>it's not because they've added jobs. It's because they've lost workers.

0:11:20.520 --> 0:11:23.400
<v Speaker 2>What does that mean when you say they've lost workers.

0:11:23.720 --> 0:11:25.880
<v Speaker 1>People have moved out of the region or dropped out

0:11:25.920 --> 0:11:29.760
<v Speaker 1>of the labor pool. When the unemployment rate, you know,

0:11:29.800 --> 0:11:32.840
<v Speaker 1>when we hear the unemployment rate on a monthly basis

0:11:33.240 --> 0:11:36.920
<v Speaker 1>announced from the Bureau of Labor Statistics. The unemployment rate

0:11:37.080 --> 0:11:40.080
<v Speaker 1>is literally the number of people who are in the

0:11:40.200 --> 0:11:44.640
<v Speaker 1>job market and without a job, divided by the total

0:11:44.720 --> 0:11:49.440
<v Speaker 1>number of people in the job market who The people

0:11:49.440 --> 0:11:51.839
<v Speaker 1>who are excluded from that are people who are not

0:11:51.960 --> 0:11:55.439
<v Speaker 1>looking for jobs. And that's why occasionally you'll hear reports

0:11:55.559 --> 0:12:00.400
<v Speaker 1>about the workforce shrinking or declining, and in this case,

0:12:00.440 --> 0:12:03.840
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about an area in which the workforce has

0:12:04.120 --> 0:12:09.360
<v Speaker 1>shrunk even faster than the number of jobs has So

0:12:09.400 --> 0:12:11.960
<v Speaker 1>it's really a case of addition by subtraction.

0:12:12.320 --> 0:12:15.040
<v Speaker 2>What kind of positive attention have you gotten?

0:12:15.520 --> 0:12:19.200
<v Speaker 1>Well, positive attention, and there has been quite a lot,

0:12:19.360 --> 0:12:24.400
<v Speaker 1>because I don't know that it comes through to folks

0:12:24.480 --> 0:12:28.079
<v Speaker 1>who live outside the region, but it would be difficult

0:12:28.160 --> 0:12:33.280
<v Speaker 1>to exaggerate just how ambivalent people in the region are

0:12:33.320 --> 0:12:36.960
<v Speaker 1>about fracking and frankly, how opposed to it many of

0:12:37.000 --> 0:12:40.920
<v Speaker 1>them are. And from that sector, we're getting a lot

0:12:40.960 --> 0:12:45.640
<v Speaker 1>of people who are basically responding with thank god, I

0:12:45.760 --> 0:12:49.680
<v Speaker 1>knew it, and I'm glad someone is finally saying it,

0:12:49.800 --> 0:12:52.640
<v Speaker 1>because as I said before, if you live in the region,

0:12:53.040 --> 0:12:55.679
<v Speaker 1>you only have to walk through the downtowns to see

0:12:55.679 --> 0:12:59.720
<v Speaker 1>what I'm saying, whether it's you know, Steubenville, Ohio, Balero, Ohio,

0:13:00.040 --> 0:13:05.240
<v Speaker 1>yel In West Virginia, Waynesburg, Pennsylvania, all of those downtowns

0:13:05.720 --> 0:13:09.440
<v Speaker 1>are hollowed out shells of what they once were, and

0:13:09.520 --> 0:13:15.000
<v Speaker 1>people know that, and so for them, they at least

0:13:15.000 --> 0:13:19.240
<v Speaker 1>feel validated by this because there is another hope out there,

0:13:19.280 --> 0:13:23.760
<v Speaker 1>and the hope is that you know, policymakers, political leaders

0:13:23.800 --> 0:13:29.080
<v Speaker 1>in the area well hopefully begin to recognize that the

0:13:29.120 --> 0:13:33.520
<v Speaker 1>fossil fuel industry is a pretty lousy foundation upon which

0:13:33.600 --> 0:13:37.640
<v Speaker 1>to try to build economic growth and prosperity, and that

0:13:38.000 --> 0:13:42.640
<v Speaker 1>this area, above perhaps all areas in the country, desperately

0:13:42.760 --> 0:13:46.160
<v Speaker 1>needs to turn its attention to the energy transition and

0:13:46.200 --> 0:13:49.400
<v Speaker 1>to the opportunities that are offered by the transition, which

0:13:49.440 --> 0:13:50.400
<v Speaker 1>are considerable.

0:13:50.720 --> 0:13:52.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, could you talk about that a little bit about

0:13:53.360 --> 0:13:57.000
<v Speaker 2>you know, maybe some sectors that are potential job creators

0:13:57.040 --> 0:13:59.360
<v Speaker 2>that get a lot less attention for.

0:14:00.360 --> 0:14:04.160
<v Speaker 1>So it might help to understand a little bit about

0:14:05.000 --> 0:14:08.360
<v Speaker 1>why all the money spent to pump all of the

0:14:08.400 --> 0:14:11.520
<v Speaker 1>gas and all of the revenue that's been generated from

0:14:11.559 --> 0:14:14.640
<v Speaker 1>the sale of that gas, why so little of that

0:14:14.800 --> 0:14:19.000
<v Speaker 1>money has actually hit the ground locally and entery local economies.

0:14:19.320 --> 0:14:25.160
<v Speaker 1>Because then we can contrast that with energy transition related

0:14:25.960 --> 0:14:29.640
<v Speaker 1>opportunities and understand I think a little better about why

0:14:29.680 --> 0:14:33.400
<v Speaker 1>there in fact are better and more promising and also

0:14:33.680 --> 0:14:39.760
<v Speaker 1>cleaner opportunities to get out there. Yeah, because you know

0:14:39.800 --> 0:14:42.440
<v Speaker 1>the real mystery. I mean, first we have to kind

0:14:42.440 --> 0:14:45.160
<v Speaker 1>of step back and say, well, wait, you know, did

0:14:45.200 --> 0:14:47.960
<v Speaker 1>the gas get pumped? Right? I mean the ten years

0:14:48.000 --> 0:14:51.200
<v Speaker 1>ago there were economic impact studies from the American Petroleum

0:14:51.200 --> 0:14:53.840
<v Speaker 1>and Institute and others saying that this is going to

0:14:53.840 --> 0:14:56.840
<v Speaker 1>create and I'm not exaggerating when I say this, this

0:14:57.000 --> 0:14:59.560
<v Speaker 1>is going to create in the states of Ohio, Pennsylvania,

0:14:59.560 --> 0:15:03.160
<v Speaker 1>and West for Rginia somewhere in the neighborhood of four

0:15:03.240 --> 0:15:07.680
<v Speaker 1>hundred and fifty thousand new jobs. I mean, that's an

0:15:07.720 --> 0:15:16.000
<v Speaker 1>immense number. And the irony is that the amount of

0:15:16.120 --> 0:15:19.240
<v Speaker 1>natural gas that has been produced in the period in

0:15:19.280 --> 0:15:23.240
<v Speaker 1>the ten years since those studies is actually even greater

0:15:23.880 --> 0:15:27.640
<v Speaker 1>than the studies themselves assumed, which means that, if anything,

0:15:28.440 --> 0:15:31.080
<v Speaker 1>the number of jobs and the level of economic activity

0:15:31.240 --> 0:15:34.040
<v Speaker 1>should have been greater than were projected in those studies.

0:15:35.040 --> 0:15:39.080
<v Speaker 1>And so the point is that the gas got produced,

0:15:39.200 --> 0:15:42.640
<v Speaker 1>the money was invested, The industry came to Appalachia, it

0:15:42.920 --> 0:15:48.800
<v Speaker 1>drilled thousands and thousands of wells, it produced an immense

0:15:48.840 --> 0:15:52.200
<v Speaker 1>amount of gas that's now almost forty percent of all

0:15:52.240 --> 0:15:57.480
<v Speaker 1>the natural gas produced in the United States, and that

0:15:57.520 --> 0:16:00.120
<v Speaker 1>gas got sold. And so there's a lot of money

0:16:00.160 --> 0:16:03.920
<v Speaker 1>going on here, literally tens of billions of dollars. And

0:16:03.960 --> 0:16:08.040
<v Speaker 1>so the real question is, since the money happened, why

0:16:08.080 --> 0:16:11.760
<v Speaker 1>didn't it hit the ground at least locally in these economies?

0:16:11.840 --> 0:16:16.760
<v Speaker 1>Where did the money go? And so we haven't quantified

0:16:16.760 --> 0:16:20.720
<v Speaker 1>this yet, but we know having gone through at least

0:16:20.720 --> 0:16:24.880
<v Speaker 1>what the leakage or potential leakage points are, both from

0:16:24.960 --> 0:16:29.360
<v Speaker 1>the front end of the process when we're talking about

0:16:29.480 --> 0:16:32.920
<v Speaker 1>companies investing in the region, going through to the back

0:16:33.000 --> 0:16:36.000
<v Speaker 1>end when the gas is actually pumped and sold. And

0:16:36.040 --> 0:16:39.160
<v Speaker 1>so what we see on the front end when companies,

0:16:39.360 --> 0:16:41.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, when an executive shows up in a county

0:16:41.880 --> 0:16:45.240
<v Speaker 1>commissioner's office and says, hey, I want to invest a

0:16:45.320 --> 0:16:49.440
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars in your county, to which you know, any

0:16:50.000 --> 0:16:54.400
<v Speaker 1>rational county commissioner who has been through three decades of

0:16:54.440 --> 0:16:58.640
<v Speaker 1>economic decline is probably going to respond with gee, tell

0:16:58.720 --> 0:17:03.000
<v Speaker 1>me how I can help you. And so what happens

0:17:03.160 --> 0:17:08.760
<v Speaker 1>is that drilling rigs come in and crews start sinking

0:17:08.800 --> 0:17:13.080
<v Speaker 1>wells throughout the area, and that is all money that

0:17:13.320 --> 0:17:16.199
<v Speaker 1>is invested in the area in a sense. And in

0:17:16.240 --> 0:17:19.440
<v Speaker 1>addition to that, processing plants get built and other forms

0:17:19.440 --> 0:17:24.359
<v Speaker 1>of infrastructure get built, and that's all characterized at least

0:17:24.440 --> 0:17:28.199
<v Speaker 1>as investment in the area that adds to GDP. The

0:17:28.359 --> 0:17:33.840
<v Speaker 1>problem with it is that much of the investment actually

0:17:34.200 --> 0:17:40.800
<v Speaker 1>goes to suppliers and to service providers and to workers

0:17:40.960 --> 0:17:44.320
<v Speaker 1>who are from outside the region. And so, for instance,

0:17:44.359 --> 0:17:46.560
<v Speaker 1>many of the crews that came into the region came

0:17:46.640 --> 0:17:49.720
<v Speaker 1>up from the Gulf Coast in the Southwest, where many

0:17:49.800 --> 0:17:53.240
<v Speaker 1>drilling companies are located, because there isn't a heritage of

0:17:53.280 --> 0:17:56.639
<v Speaker 1>fracking or drilling in the Northeast, and so many of

0:17:56.680 --> 0:18:00.320
<v Speaker 1>them brought in lots of workers from out of state

0:18:00.560 --> 0:18:03.960
<v Speaker 1>and outside the region. The second thing is that of

0:18:03.960 --> 0:18:08.080
<v Speaker 1>course there are many you know, they need raw materials,

0:18:08.119 --> 0:18:11.360
<v Speaker 1>they need equipment and parts to do all of this stuff.

0:18:11.840 --> 0:18:12.000
<v Speaker 3>Well.

0:18:12.040 --> 0:18:17.480
<v Speaker 1>Again, similarly, there is an entire ecosystem in the Southwest,

0:18:17.800 --> 0:18:21.600
<v Speaker 1>in states like Texas, Louisiana, and Oklahoma of companies that

0:18:21.680 --> 0:18:26.240
<v Speaker 1>provide support services to drilling, and so again they relied

0:18:26.359 --> 0:18:29.719
<v Speaker 1>heavily on those services to come into the region and

0:18:29.760 --> 0:18:33.399
<v Speaker 1>do the work that needed to be done. And you

0:18:33.440 --> 0:18:37.359
<v Speaker 1>can make the same observation with respect to professional services,

0:18:37.400 --> 0:18:42.520
<v Speaker 1>whether it's you know, finance, real estate, insurance. In other words,

0:18:42.760 --> 0:18:45.680
<v Speaker 1>there's a great deal on the front end that ostensibly

0:18:46.440 --> 0:18:50.840
<v Speaker 1>was investment quote unquote in the region or in the county,

0:18:50.920 --> 0:18:56.560
<v Speaker 1>which in fact was the acquisition of services from sources

0:18:56.600 --> 0:18:59.639
<v Speaker 1>that were far outside the county, and so that portion

0:18:59.720 --> 0:19:03.320
<v Speaker 1>of them money would never have hit locally. But then

0:19:03.520 --> 0:19:06.080
<v Speaker 1>even when you kick through to the backside of this, Okay,

0:19:06.119 --> 0:19:09.840
<v Speaker 1>we've sunk the well and we're now producing gas and

0:19:09.920 --> 0:19:13.200
<v Speaker 1>we're going out and selling it in the marketplace. Well,

0:19:13.240 --> 0:19:18.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, part of the promise of economic prosperity was

0:19:18.520 --> 0:19:20.199
<v Speaker 1>based on the notion that there were going to be

0:19:20.359 --> 0:19:23.240
<v Speaker 1>a lot of property owners in the region who were

0:19:23.240 --> 0:19:29.800
<v Speaker 1>going to get quite wealthy as a result of royalties

0:19:30.000 --> 0:19:33.280
<v Speaker 1>and lease payments from the companies for the gas that's produced.

0:19:33.640 --> 0:19:36.879
<v Speaker 1>And that between you know, that income on the backside

0:19:36.880 --> 0:19:41.359
<v Speaker 1>and lots of new workers having jobs and money to

0:19:41.440 --> 0:19:44.440
<v Speaker 1>spend locally, that it was going to create this immense

0:19:44.560 --> 0:19:48.639
<v Speaker 1>surge in employment in the region as those dollars filtered

0:19:48.680 --> 0:19:52.120
<v Speaker 1>their way through the economy and the multiplier effect kicked in.

0:19:52.680 --> 0:19:57.000
<v Speaker 1>The problem was on the backside, on the revenue side.

0:19:57.240 --> 0:20:00.720
<v Speaker 1>That first of all, the price of gas that was

0:20:00.880 --> 0:20:04.160
<v Speaker 1>anticipated back in two thousand and nine and twenty ten,

0:20:04.640 --> 0:20:09.040
<v Speaker 1>even after the fracking boom took place, was never expected

0:20:09.080 --> 0:20:11.640
<v Speaker 1>to fall below about four and a half dollars per

0:20:11.720 --> 0:20:16.800
<v Speaker 1>million BTUs, And I'm quoting now, by the way, from

0:20:16.880 --> 0:20:22.919
<v Speaker 1>the Energy Information Administration, And at that time the EIA

0:20:23.240 --> 0:20:26.920
<v Speaker 1>expected that after kind of bottoming out at about four fifty,

0:20:27.119 --> 0:20:29.919
<v Speaker 1>gas would prices by the end of the decade or

0:20:30.119 --> 0:20:34.960
<v Speaker 1>now essentially, would generally return to anywhere between about six

0:20:35.040 --> 0:20:39.439
<v Speaker 1>and seven and a half dollars per million BTUs. Well,

0:20:39.560 --> 0:20:42.600
<v Speaker 1>the problem, of course, is that that's not what happened.

0:20:43.080 --> 0:20:47.160
<v Speaker 1>The price of gas dropped to at times below two

0:20:47.240 --> 0:20:53.320
<v Speaker 1>dollars and have never recovered consistently to more than the

0:20:53.440 --> 0:20:57.680
<v Speaker 1>upper twos, sometimes hitting three dollars, which is where we

0:20:57.720 --> 0:21:02.360
<v Speaker 1>are about right now. In other words, words, the assumption

0:21:04.520 --> 0:21:07.800
<v Speaker 1>of revenue coming in from the sale of gas was

0:21:08.040 --> 0:21:12.960
<v Speaker 1>basically at least twice what the actual revenue figures were,

0:21:13.600 --> 0:21:16.840
<v Speaker 1>so you kind of cut that big nut, that big

0:21:16.960 --> 0:21:21.359
<v Speaker 1>economic uh, you know, input of energy into the economy

0:21:21.600 --> 0:21:24.399
<v Speaker 1>by half, right off the top. But then another a

0:21:24.440 --> 0:21:27.560
<v Speaker 1>bunch of other factors kick in. The first is that

0:21:27.720 --> 0:21:31.800
<v Speaker 1>a lot of property, it turns out on which wells

0:21:31.880 --> 0:21:36.560
<v Speaker 1>are sunk, isn't actually owned by local people. In many cases,

0:21:36.600 --> 0:21:42.120
<v Speaker 1>it's owned by companies corporations that may have a significant

0:21:42.119 --> 0:21:45.200
<v Speaker 1>local presence or not. And sometimes you know, the property

0:21:45.240 --> 0:21:48.080
<v Speaker 1>is owned by individuals from out who live outside the region,

0:21:48.920 --> 0:21:51.720
<v Speaker 1>and so much of that money does not enter the

0:21:51.760 --> 0:21:55.760
<v Speaker 1>local economy. And then on top of that, you also

0:21:55.880 --> 0:22:00.320
<v Speaker 1>run into another interesting issue, which is that for those

0:22:00.320 --> 0:22:02.800
<v Speaker 1>people who do live in the region and who do

0:22:02.920 --> 0:22:06.760
<v Speaker 1>own the property and who do receive royalties, many of

0:22:06.800 --> 0:22:10.040
<v Speaker 1>them don't spend a lot of that money. And so,

0:22:10.520 --> 0:22:13.399
<v Speaker 1>you know, starting with the fact that the price of

0:22:13.480 --> 0:22:17.479
<v Speaker 1>gas is only about half or less than what it

0:22:17.520 --> 0:22:20.320
<v Speaker 1>was originally expected to be, and then you look at

0:22:20.359 --> 0:22:24.640
<v Speaker 1>those other leakage points, it's frankly quite likely that the

0:22:24.720 --> 0:22:29.480
<v Speaker 1>actual amount of money entering local economies was only about

0:22:30.560 --> 0:22:34.800
<v Speaker 1>ten to perhaps twenty percent of what it was anticipated

0:22:34.800 --> 0:22:38.000
<v Speaker 1>to be when the economic impact studies were done. There's

0:22:38.040 --> 0:22:41.760
<v Speaker 1>almost no downstream effect as a result of this economically,

0:22:42.200 --> 0:22:44.600
<v Speaker 1>and that's important because the other thing we know is

0:22:45.000 --> 0:22:48.639
<v Speaker 1>that the number of jobs that the industry was expected

0:22:48.640 --> 0:22:51.760
<v Speaker 1>to create directly never got as large as it was

0:22:51.800 --> 0:22:55.320
<v Speaker 1>supposed to. And moreover, many of the jobs that were

0:22:55.359 --> 0:23:00.280
<v Speaker 1>created were taken by out of state workers. And so

0:23:00.720 --> 0:23:04.240
<v Speaker 1>when you put all of those factors together, what you

0:23:04.320 --> 0:23:06.679
<v Speaker 1>come up with as a scenario in which, yes, it

0:23:06.800 --> 0:23:11.760
<v Speaker 1>is actually understandable. There's not really a mystery about how

0:23:12.560 --> 0:23:16.159
<v Speaker 1>literally tens of billions of dollars seems to have just

0:23:16.200 --> 0:23:20.399
<v Speaker 1>evaporated from the economy. There actually are rational explanations for

0:23:20.480 --> 0:23:24.000
<v Speaker 1>how it could have happened. There are profound structural reasons

0:23:24.480 --> 0:23:28.320
<v Speaker 1>why this particular extractive industry, and for that matter, other

0:23:28.400 --> 0:23:33.399
<v Speaker 1>extractive industries, are really lousy platforms for economic revival and

0:23:33.480 --> 0:23:37.240
<v Speaker 1>job creation. And it starts frankly with the fact that

0:23:37.320 --> 0:23:39.840
<v Speaker 1>even when you look at Bureau of Labor Statistics numbers,

0:23:40.560 --> 0:23:44.760
<v Speaker 1>when you look specifically at the mining sector generally, which

0:23:44.760 --> 0:23:49.320
<v Speaker 1>includes oil and natural gas extraction, it's only about twenty

0:23:49.359 --> 0:23:54.680
<v Speaker 1>two cents of every dollar in GDP that it creates

0:23:55.040 --> 0:23:59.919
<v Speaker 1>that is actually allocated to labor, to wages and salaries,

0:24:00.720 --> 0:24:05.280
<v Speaker 1>and that's an remarkably low figure compared to other industries

0:24:05.320 --> 0:24:09.639
<v Speaker 1>like construction, for instance, that number seventy five percent. Most

0:24:09.680 --> 0:24:13.360
<v Speaker 1>other industries are somewhere in the forty to sixty percent range.

0:24:13.800 --> 0:24:16.080
<v Speaker 1>And so if you had to pick an industry upon

0:24:16.200 --> 0:24:21.920
<v Speaker 1>which you know, to try to build a job rich economy,

0:24:22.119 --> 0:24:24.000
<v Speaker 1>this would be one of the worst ones that you

0:24:24.040 --> 0:24:27.200
<v Speaker 1>could pick, even right out the gate. And then on

0:24:27.280 --> 0:24:30.080
<v Speaker 1>top of that you add in all of those other

0:24:30.160 --> 0:24:34.240
<v Speaker 1>factors that I just went through. And so that's the

0:24:34.320 --> 0:24:38.040
<v Speaker 1>reason why we say there are other, better, more sustainable

0:24:38.320 --> 0:24:42.640
<v Speaker 1>choices out there, because when you look at many of

0:24:42.680 --> 0:24:46.560
<v Speaker 1>the energy transition industries that are out there, you know,

0:24:46.600 --> 0:24:50.200
<v Speaker 1>which include not just renewable energy like wind and solar power,

0:24:50.480 --> 0:24:54.760
<v Speaker 1>but also, and very importantly for this region, energy efficiency.

0:24:56.520 --> 0:25:00.360
<v Speaker 1>We're talking about industries that not only have our much

0:25:00.400 --> 0:25:04.919
<v Speaker 1>more labor intensive and less capital intensive, but we're also

0:25:05.040 --> 0:25:11.560
<v Speaker 1>talking about businesses that in which the suppliers are local.

0:25:12.040 --> 0:25:15.359
<v Speaker 1>I mean literally, if you talk about, Okay, we're going

0:25:15.440 --> 0:25:18.960
<v Speaker 1>to do a great energy efficiency project, We're going to

0:25:19.000 --> 0:25:22.800
<v Speaker 1>go in and retro fit you know, thousands of houses

0:25:22.880 --> 0:25:25.800
<v Speaker 1>or buildings in the region, and in this particular region,

0:25:25.840 --> 0:25:29.400
<v Speaker 1>there are many, many thousands of older buildings and houses

0:25:29.440 --> 0:25:34.040
<v Speaker 1>that can benefit from retrofitting. One of the beauties of

0:25:34.400 --> 0:25:39.800
<v Speaker 1>energy efficiency is that these are shovel ready projects. You

0:25:39.840 --> 0:25:42.600
<v Speaker 1>can go in and start insulating and replacing lighting and

0:25:42.600 --> 0:25:46.639
<v Speaker 1>appliances tomorrow. It doesn't require a lot of planning. It

0:25:46.680 --> 0:25:49.920
<v Speaker 1>doesn't require a lot of stuff that we hear about

0:25:49.920 --> 0:25:52.360
<v Speaker 1>when we're talking about, you know, how do we invest

0:25:52.440 --> 0:25:56.960
<v Speaker 1>stimulus dollars, we'll find shovel ready projects. Energy efficiency is

0:25:57.000 --> 0:26:01.520
<v Speaker 1>shovel ready all the time. The second thing is that

0:26:02.400 --> 0:26:06.960
<v Speaker 1>energy efficiency, and for that matter, distributed solar and other things,

0:26:07.600 --> 0:26:13.760
<v Speaker 1>these are services that are provided by predominantly local suppliers.

0:26:14.640 --> 0:26:18.520
<v Speaker 1>You know, we have local insulators, we have local home

0:26:18.560 --> 0:26:22.679
<v Speaker 1>remodeling firms, we have local firms that do windows and

0:26:22.760 --> 0:26:28.320
<v Speaker 1>door replacements. And so one of the other beneficial effects

0:26:28.720 --> 0:26:35.720
<v Speaker 1>of pursuing the transition economy and energy is that more

0:26:35.840 --> 0:26:39.719
<v Speaker 1>of the dollars that are spent actually stay in the community,

0:26:41.080 --> 0:26:44.199
<v Speaker 1>as opposed to dollars that are spent on you know,

0:26:44.280 --> 0:26:47.560
<v Speaker 1>paying your electric bill, which probably goes to some far

0:26:47.600 --> 0:26:51.640
<v Speaker 1>away utility. And so there really is you know, there's

0:26:51.760 --> 0:26:53.320
<v Speaker 1>kind of a triple benefit here.

0:26:53.520 --> 0:26:56.040
<v Speaker 2>What do you think about the I've heard this floated

0:26:56.040 --> 0:27:00.600
<v Speaker 2>a few times, this idea that you could employ people,

0:27:01.680 --> 0:27:05.240
<v Speaker 2>you know, capping and remediating wells, especially as more and

0:27:05.280 --> 0:27:10.040
<v Speaker 2>more of the kind of early fracking companies go bankrupt

0:27:10.400 --> 0:27:13.040
<v Speaker 2>or you know, just decide that these wells are not

0:27:13.280 --> 0:27:15.600
<v Speaker 2>worth keeping productive anymore.

0:27:15.680 --> 0:27:22.760
<v Speaker 1>We, yeah, actually are looking at what the employment opportunity

0:27:22.840 --> 0:27:27.440
<v Speaker 1>would be based upon the number of abandoned and norphand

0:27:27.480 --> 0:27:31.480
<v Speaker 1>wells in the region to pursue that. And by the way,

0:27:31.480 --> 0:27:36.200
<v Speaker 1>we're also again talking about an area that is historically

0:27:36.280 --> 0:27:40.120
<v Speaker 1>a coal producing region, and there is also my coal

0:27:40.160 --> 0:27:46.480
<v Speaker 1>mine remediation opportunity as well. So yes, it is potentially

0:27:46.720 --> 0:27:50.439
<v Speaker 1>a great generator of jobs in the region. And one

0:27:50.480 --> 0:27:53.120
<v Speaker 1>of the things that's most appealing about it is it's

0:27:53.160 --> 0:27:56.240
<v Speaker 1>the kind These are the kinds of jobs for which

0:27:56.560 --> 0:28:01.639
<v Speaker 1>people who currently work in the fossil fuel industry and

0:28:01.720 --> 0:28:05.480
<v Speaker 1>who might otherwise and who might be vulnerable to losing

0:28:06.080 --> 0:28:10.639
<v Speaker 1>their current jobs and livelihood as we transition to renewable

0:28:10.680 --> 0:28:16.040
<v Speaker 1>resources of energy. These would very likely be opportunities for

0:28:16.160 --> 0:28:19.640
<v Speaker 1>them to take on a new form of employment and

0:28:20.760 --> 0:28:24.200
<v Speaker 1>they could be paid as well for doing that. And frankly,

0:28:24.280 --> 0:28:26.960
<v Speaker 1>given the number of wells as there are out there,

0:28:27.720 --> 0:28:31.400
<v Speaker 1>these are jobs that very likely would continue for years.

0:28:31.640 --> 0:28:32.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:28:32.240 --> 0:28:35.239
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's one of the most appealing things of this

0:28:35.400 --> 0:28:38.520
<v Speaker 1>because you know, we're talking about a region and I mean,

0:28:38.680 --> 0:28:41.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, I'm a native West Virginia, right, I was

0:28:41.880 --> 0:28:47.280
<v Speaker 1>born in nineteen fifty six. West Virginia's population in nineteen

0:28:47.400 --> 0:28:52.840
<v Speaker 1>fifty six was bigger then than it is now. Zero

0:28:53.000 --> 0:28:57.760
<v Speaker 1>population growth in the last sixty years, and that's because

0:28:58.920 --> 0:29:03.320
<v Speaker 1>for lack of opportunity, for lack of economic opportunity, many

0:29:03.400 --> 0:29:08.840
<v Speaker 1>people move away, and so jobs have always been an

0:29:08.840 --> 0:29:11.320
<v Speaker 1>issue in West Virginia. And one of the things that

0:29:11.360 --> 0:29:15.520
<v Speaker 1>makes the energy transition, you know, so exciting, especially to

0:29:15.600 --> 0:29:19.280
<v Speaker 1>someone like me who cares deeply about you know, my

0:29:19.440 --> 0:29:24.800
<v Speaker 1>home and my people, is that it does offer opportunity

0:29:24.800 --> 0:29:26.120
<v Speaker 1>for revival in the region.

0:29:26.960 --> 0:29:31.920
<v Speaker 2>I did a story recently around, like kind of around

0:29:32.000 --> 0:29:35.400
<v Speaker 2>the jobs thing across the fossil fuel industry in general,

0:29:35.640 --> 0:29:40.960
<v Speaker 2>and the fact that I feel like almost I don't know,

0:29:41.080 --> 0:29:44.400
<v Speaker 2>almost every story I read about, you know, fossil fuel jobs,

0:29:44.440 --> 0:29:48.600
<v Speaker 2>people neglect to mention that the industry was shedding jobs

0:29:48.640 --> 0:29:52.320
<v Speaker 2>like crazy because of automation, you know, over the last

0:29:52.400 --> 0:29:57.160
<v Speaker 2>five years too, So I wonder what you've seen on

0:29:57.200 --> 0:29:59.560
<v Speaker 2>that front, what impact that has all had.

0:30:00.360 --> 0:30:02.600
<v Speaker 1>Okay, this is where the West Virginian in me is

0:30:02.640 --> 0:30:07.280
<v Speaker 1>going to come out, because you know my town. You know,

0:30:07.320 --> 0:30:10.640
<v Speaker 1>I lived on top of a coal mine. My town

0:30:10.760 --> 0:30:17.880
<v Speaker 1>is dying, and up until recently, it was dying not

0:30:18.040 --> 0:30:21.720
<v Speaker 1>because coal wasn't being produced. It was exactly what you

0:30:21.840 --> 0:30:25.520
<v Speaker 1>just talked about, Amy, it was automation. Back when I

0:30:25.680 --> 0:30:30.400
<v Speaker 1>was born in West Virginia, the coal industry employed directly

0:30:31.040 --> 0:30:34.680
<v Speaker 1>about one hundred and forty thousand people, which is a

0:30:34.720 --> 0:30:38.560
<v Speaker 1>remarkable number because the state only has one point eight

0:30:38.600 --> 0:30:43.960
<v Speaker 1>million residents. I mean, you're talking about an immensely pervasive

0:30:43.960 --> 0:30:47.880
<v Speaker 1>industry there. And the amount of coal that was being

0:30:47.920 --> 0:30:52.200
<v Speaker 1>produced at that time stayed more or less constant until

0:30:52.200 --> 0:30:56.640
<v Speaker 1>the beginning of this last decade. And it's just been

0:30:56.680 --> 0:31:00.120
<v Speaker 1>really in the last eight years that coal production has

0:31:00.160 --> 0:31:03.600
<v Speaker 1>started to significantly decline in the United States. But what

0:31:03.800 --> 0:31:09.160
<v Speaker 1>happened during that time is, and I'm not exaggerating, is

0:31:09.200 --> 0:31:12.680
<v Speaker 1>that in the coal industry, ninety percent of the jobs

0:31:12.680 --> 0:31:15.440
<v Speaker 1>were lost. In West Virginia. We went from one hundred

0:31:15.440 --> 0:31:20.240
<v Speaker 1>and forty thousand workers down to about fifteen thousand workers

0:31:20.880 --> 0:31:26.320
<v Speaker 1>before the volume of coal being produced actually started to

0:31:26.360 --> 0:31:32.400
<v Speaker 1>go into decline. And that effect was entirely attributable to automation,

0:31:33.880 --> 0:31:36.920
<v Speaker 1>to the advent of strip mining in a large way,

0:31:37.120 --> 0:31:41.440
<v Speaker 1>to mountaintop removal and other forms of mining that are

0:31:41.520 --> 0:31:46.360
<v Speaker 1>less labor intensive than underground mining, which was West Virginia's heritage.

0:31:47.080 --> 0:31:52.760
<v Speaker 1>And so the devastation, economic devastation has been happening for

0:31:52.920 --> 0:31:57.640
<v Speaker 1>a long long time in this region. And you know,

0:31:57.680 --> 0:31:59.960
<v Speaker 1>even when you talk about and that's one of the reasons,

0:32:00.080 --> 0:32:01.640
<v Speaker 1>by the way, that when I'm going back to what

0:32:01.680 --> 0:32:06.200
<v Speaker 1>I said before about natural gas production being such a

0:32:06.320 --> 0:32:11.400
<v Speaker 1>labor intensive business, or rather a capital intensive business, the

0:32:11.440 --> 0:32:14.240
<v Speaker 1>flip side of that is it's not very labor intensive.

0:32:14.440 --> 0:32:17.280
<v Speaker 1>It actually doesn't provide much in the way of jobs.

0:32:18.400 --> 0:32:22.880
<v Speaker 1>The ones it does provide, yeah, they're well paying, absolutely true,

0:32:23.520 --> 0:32:26.800
<v Speaker 1>but it doesn't help it doesn't provide many of them.

0:32:27.080 --> 0:32:30.280
<v Speaker 1>And moreover, and this is another issue we frankly should

0:32:30.360 --> 0:32:35.240
<v Speaker 1>talk about, is that because of what economists call the

0:32:35.440 --> 0:32:43.600
<v Speaker 1>externalities associated yeah with fossil fuel businesses, local pollution, a

0:32:43.680 --> 0:32:47.640
<v Speaker 1>variety of issues, it appears and again this is also

0:32:47.880 --> 0:32:50.800
<v Speaker 1>hinted at at least in the results that we found,

0:32:51.560 --> 0:32:56.320
<v Speaker 1>it appears that natural gas may in some respects actually

0:32:56.480 --> 0:32:59.440
<v Speaker 1>discourage other forms of economic development.

0:33:00.000 --> 0:33:02.800
<v Speaker 2>This is weird tendency, I think sometimes for people to

0:33:02.840 --> 0:33:06.560
<v Speaker 2>talk about environmental impacts as things that don't also impact

0:33:06.920 --> 0:33:08.160
<v Speaker 2>the economy.

0:33:12.640 --> 0:33:16.320
<v Speaker 1>One of the things that we're least good at in

0:33:16.920 --> 0:33:24.000
<v Speaker 1>economics is in incorporating these these effects that we're calling externalities.

0:33:24.720 --> 0:33:28.880
<v Speaker 1>They're only externalities in the sense that neither the buyer

0:33:29.040 --> 0:33:33.880
<v Speaker 1>nor the seller pays for them, but somebody does. And

0:33:34.080 --> 0:33:37.360
<v Speaker 1>one of our great weaknesses is that we don't do

0:33:37.400 --> 0:33:42.120
<v Speaker 1>a great job of incorporating those externalities into our economic modeling,

0:33:42.160 --> 0:33:45.000
<v Speaker 1>into the economic impact studies. And so if you go

0:33:45.120 --> 0:33:49.000
<v Speaker 1>back again and you look at the American Petroleum Institute

0:33:49.080 --> 0:33:52.520
<v Speaker 1>studies from ten years ago, or the American Chemistry Council

0:33:52.600 --> 0:33:58.680
<v Speaker 1>studies on petrochemicals, now, you won't see any recognition of

0:33:59.280 --> 0:34:03.960
<v Speaker 1>any externalities associated with that. They're simply not taken into account.

0:34:04.160 --> 0:34:06.880
<v Speaker 1>And even when they are, frankly, usually what people do

0:34:07.000 --> 0:34:11.560
<v Speaker 1>is plug in some number, like, you know, fifty dollars

0:34:11.600 --> 0:34:16.960
<v Speaker 1>per ton of carbon as a social cost of carbon factor,

0:34:17.520 --> 0:34:19.959
<v Speaker 1>which is, you know, is better than nothing. But even

0:34:20.000 --> 0:34:22.680
<v Speaker 1>that does not get at the issues that you just

0:34:22.760 --> 0:34:27.200
<v Speaker 1>talked about, the noise pollution, the water pollution, the local

0:34:27.239 --> 0:34:31.200
<v Speaker 1>particulate air pollution, that that does not get covered in

0:34:31.239 --> 0:34:35.800
<v Speaker 1>that fifty dollars you know, per ton of carbon, social

0:34:35.840 --> 0:34:40.720
<v Speaker 1>cost of carbon factor. And in fact, it really does

0:34:40.800 --> 0:34:46.040
<v Speaker 1>seem as though, whether you're talking about coal mining or

0:34:46.600 --> 0:34:52.760
<v Speaker 1>also natural gas drilling, there's at least prime efacia reason

0:34:52.840 --> 0:34:55.719
<v Speaker 1>to believe that they could have depressive effects on other

0:34:55.800 --> 0:34:57.680
<v Speaker 1>forms of economic development.

0:35:18.800 --> 0:35:21.600
<v Speaker 2>That's it for this time. Thanks for listening. If you

0:35:21.680 --> 0:35:26.000
<v Speaker 2>are not already subscribed to the podcast, do that. We

0:35:26.120 --> 0:35:29.480
<v Speaker 2>are working on our next narrative season, which will actually

0:35:29.480 --> 0:35:34.000
<v Speaker 2>be about the gas industry, starting with the fracking boom

0:35:34.040 --> 0:35:38.360
<v Speaker 2>and ending with the ethane and plastic boom. If you

0:35:38.400 --> 0:35:41.000
<v Speaker 2>don't want to miss that, make sure you're subscribed wherever

0:35:41.040 --> 0:35:44.800
<v Speaker 2>you get your podcasts. Also, please leave us a rating

0:35:45.040 --> 0:35:48.520
<v Speaker 2>or review wherever you listen. It really helps us find

0:35:48.680 --> 0:35:52.720
<v Speaker 2>new listeners and it helps us combat the little armies

0:35:52.760 --> 0:35:56.760
<v Speaker 2>of climate denier trolls that we occasionally encounter on podcast apps.

0:35:57.239 --> 0:36:02.600
<v Speaker 2>I want to thank some of our most Patreon patrons,

0:36:02.960 --> 0:36:09.040
<v Speaker 2>Munira Jasani, Daniel Stubbs, Stephanie Cass Luke Austin, Jason Grant,

0:36:09.320 --> 0:36:16.000
<v Speaker 2>Rachel Lower, JJ's Starr Annie b Sean O'Leary, Elliott Glist,

0:36:16.480 --> 0:36:23.000
<v Speaker 2>Tom Kapin, Weston Anderson, Rachel see Zebulon Hanley, Dan Walsh,

0:36:23.160 --> 0:36:26.880
<v Speaker 2>Adam bin Nunn, and Zach Johnson. Thank you guys so

0:36:27.000 --> 0:36:30.560
<v Speaker 2>much for your support. If you would like to support

0:36:30.640 --> 0:36:35.120
<v Speaker 2>our work, please go over to patreon dot com slash Drilled.

0:36:35.440 --> 0:36:39.400
<v Speaker 2>We put ad free podcast episodes there. We will be

0:36:39.480 --> 0:36:43.760
<v Speaker 2>adding more and more bonus content. Patrons also get access

0:36:43.840 --> 0:36:48.200
<v Speaker 2>to exclusive Drilled merchandise. There's a little something with each tier.

0:36:48.600 --> 0:36:51.160
<v Speaker 2>Thanks for that and thanks for listening, and we'll see

0:36:51.200 --> 0:36:53.000
<v Speaker 2>you next week.