Speaker 1: Broadcasting live from the Abraham Lincoln Radio Studio the George
Speaker 1: Washington Broadcast Center, Jack Armstrong and Joe Getty.
Speaker 2: Arm Strong and Katty enough he Armstrong and Getty. I
Speaker 2: think my lazy husband hot dogs. I start by adding
Speaker 2: onion and bell peppers and seasoning, of course, and then
Speaker 2: I fry them up and at cheese, and then I
Speaker 2: add extra seasoning. Anyway, it was fun watching him eat him.
Speaker 2: I mean, who knows which one?
Speaker 1: The cat looked all right. So there was a twist
Speaker 1: at the end there vocal fry lady explaining some hot
Speaker 1: dog recipe.
Speaker 2: She uses a vocal fryer apparently to cook her hot dogs.
Speaker 1: That's funny. Added some cheese.
Speaker 2: Katie, you do pretty Yeah, it's like that. We it's
Speaker 2: like that clip we play from louder Milk wieces.
Speaker 1: Why do you talk like that?
Speaker 2: How do you talk like that? I talk like this?
Speaker 3: I guess the backstory there is she in the video
Speaker 3: she throws one of the hot dogs on the floor,
Speaker 3: and then that's why at the end she got that
Speaker 3: we'll dine out which one the Catholic?
Speaker 2: Yeah, you're pretty good at that. You could slip into
Speaker 2: that person. Yes, you're a terrible person.
Speaker 1: Yeah, that that lady. I want not to be on earth.
Speaker 1: I won't do anything about it because you know I
Speaker 1: have borer violence. But Michael, do we have that Louder
Speaker 1: milk clip. It's just so magically I do the one
Speaker 1: I have, though it's a minute fourteen first that I
Speaker 1: don't care if it's an hour fourteen. It's so so great.
Speaker 1: What can I get you?
Speaker 2: I've left the large coffee okay, so howt coffee?
Speaker 1: Hot coffee, okay, room for cream, totally, room for cree.
Speaker 2: Why are you.
Speaker 4: Talking like that?
Speaker 1: Why are you talking like that? Because this is my voice,
Speaker 1: this is my wise.
Speaker 2: No, it's not.
Speaker 3: I heard you talking a minute ago.
Speaker 1: I know you don't talk like that. Neither do you,
Speaker 1: because nobody actually talks like this. You choose to talk
Speaker 1: like this, and today I chose to talk like this.
Speaker 1: It's pretty annoying, isn't that. Man? Just stop doing that.
Speaker 1: I can help us my voice.
Speaker 5: No, it's not. It's an affectation that annoying teenagers and
Speaker 5: rich people use to sound like they don't give the
Speaker 5: sh except you work in a coffee shop, so I
Speaker 5: know you're not rich and you don't look like a
Speaker 5: teenager unless you're units Kennedy Shreiver knock it off.
Speaker 1: So just because I talk like this, I mean they
Speaker 1: don't give ah and what exactly I'm I supposed to
Speaker 1: knoki about?
Speaker 5: That's an excellent question to ask yourself in your actual voice.
Speaker 1: Excuse me, some of us would like to order you're
Speaker 1: a total dick man. There there you go. Good, you're talking.
Speaker 2: That's a great question to ask yourself and your actual voice.
Speaker 1: I gotta go back to that show. I really enjoyed
Speaker 1: the handful of episodes. Oh you know, we got something
Speaker 1: very important, something vital did the Americans seem to talk about?
Speaker 1: But just a small gripe, a mini rant. I'm looking for,
Speaker 1: you know, the big show to watch and binge, especially
Speaker 1: if it's something both my wife and I enjoy. But
Speaker 1: the show i'm watching Severance, which got a fair amount
Speaker 1: of attention. It's executed and produced by Ben Stiller, kind
Speaker 1: of sci fi ish, weirdish mystery ish thing. But it's
Speaker 1: showing every sign of being the never ending story arc,
Speaker 1: the arc that doesn't arc. Every time it starts to
Speaker 1: get towards something like a conclusion, a revelation, they just
Speaker 1: introduce more red herrings than the rest of it. And
Speaker 1: I just maybe it's well, maybe it's me. Maybe it's
Speaker 1: I don't have unlimited time for entertainment because I don't
Speaker 1: allow myself to. I limit it because I have stuff
Speaker 1: I want to do. You cannot string me along for
Speaker 1: the next five years of my life a story arc.
Speaker 1: I mean, like Plato talked about that thousands of years ago.
Speaker 1: You know you're not allowed to perpetually. It's not an
Speaker 1: effing soap opera.
Speaker 2: You need a wedding, you need a death, you need
Speaker 2: a you need a baby's being born, something, and then
Speaker 2: there yet the end.
Speaker 1: Who are the mysterious harm scarms? You gotta tell me eventually.
Speaker 1: I'm not I haven't signed, we're not married. I'm not
Speaker 1: here for life. I want to enjoy your show for
Speaker 1: a little while to choose another one. And I don't know.
Speaker 1: I'm getting the idea that they're just gonna string this
Speaker 1: biatcha along until nobody's watching anymore.
Speaker 2: So Louder Milk, if you've never seen it, is about
Speaker 2: a sober alcoholic, and I know a lot of sober alcoholics,
Speaker 2: and it is dead on because things were highly annoyed
Speaker 2: by the world. But drank to get through it. Now
Speaker 2: you don't drink anymore, and you're still very annoyed with
Speaker 2: everything in the world, and they're often very so sarcastic
Speaker 2: like he is.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I admire your ability to do that. I'm still
Speaker 1: on team Glug La Glug speaking for meself. Let's see,
Speaker 1: we don't really have time to do topic A. We
Speaker 1: can do it after the break. Let's see what could
Speaker 1: we do. You know, I'd love to get more into
Speaker 1: Columbia University and the poor beleaguered interim president trying to
Speaker 1: corral her insane radical Marxist faculty. Good luck with that, sweetheart,
Speaker 1: good luck not going well.
Speaker 2: I'm disappointed that today's National Security hearing turned into an
Speaker 2: investigation of the chat thread and how a journalists ended
Speaker 2: up and did they disclose war plans and all that
Speaker 2: sort of stuff. That story the big story of the
Speaker 2: day because it was supposed to be the big National
Speaker 2: Threats hearing that happens every single year, and I really
Speaker 2: like it. Know, a bunch of people get up there
Speaker 2: and say, hey, look, we're doing war games. We'll lose
Speaker 2: to China, or you know, Russia's doing this or what
Speaker 2: you know, what do we need to be afraid of.
Speaker 2: I love that and paying attention to that.
Speaker 1: So I hope they get to that at some point,
Speaker 1: right right, not just partisan name calling and points scoring.
Speaker 1: Although this is a pretty good scandal, scandals go and
Speaker 1: you know, at least to some extent. So this is
Speaker 1: this is the perfect length. I thought this was so good.
Speaker 1: You know, the feeling. One minute, you're into your date,
Speaker 1: their jokes land perfectly, their smile seems charming, and you're
Speaker 1: excited about seeing them again. Then boom, they awkwardly sneeze
Speaker 1: in a weird way you've never seen someone sneeze, and
Speaker 1: something in you just die, or they say a phrase
Speaker 1: that makes you crings so hard you nearly pull a muscle.
Speaker 1: Suddenly you can't stand them. You've caught the ick.
Speaker 2: Wow, I don't think I've ever done that.
Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, they're they're talking about it's it's actually a
Speaker 1: scientific study from a ZUSA Pacific university.
Speaker 2: It's got to be more common for women and to
Speaker 2: react that way than men to react that way, because
Speaker 2: I've known lots of women who said, yeah, I was
Speaker 2: really liking him and then I sneezed and they didn't
Speaker 2: say God bless you.
Speaker 1: So that was it, or yeah, it's it's Larry David
Speaker 1: persona fi Yeah.
Speaker 2: Or I watched him man hands. Yeah, I watched him
Speaker 2: cut his meat and I saw his fingernails were dirty, dirty,
Speaker 2: So that was it. I liked everything else about him, yes, Katie,
Speaker 2: But yes.
Speaker 3: There was a guy that I thought everything about him
Speaker 3: was great until we started texting and he could not
Speaker 3: do they are they're there there properly and it was over.
Speaker 1: You've made a good move, Katie. Yeah, good decision, bad grammar.
Speaker 1: It's over. H. So what's interesting about this study is
Speaker 1: they figured out your personality traits matter. People with high
Speaker 1: disgust sensitivity in a lot of different ways, narcissism or
Speaker 1: perfectionism are more likely to experience the ick in dating.
Speaker 2: I don't know, is she hot? She could have mentioned
Speaker 2: dog fighting, I'd be fine.
Speaker 1: Well, obviously you don't have that high disgust sensitivity that
Speaker 1: or it can be overcome, you know, by your inner
Speaker 1: horn dog.
Speaker 2: Not as bad as being trapped in a hominem l
Speaker 2: like Katie, almost.
Speaker 1: The it has real consequences. Sixty eight percent of people
Speaker 1: had relationships and relationships after experiencing it, showing how small
Speaker 1: kirks can derail potential connections, and they think that in
Speaker 1: the past it used to be like your deep lizard
Speaker 1: brain saying we should not breathe this person is not
Speaker 1: good as a mate, dangerous as a mate, whatever. But
Speaker 1: now it's it can be triggered by really superficial, modern
Speaker 1: social media type tendencies and habits in a way that's
Speaker 1: probably pretty stupid because it has nothing to do with
Speaker 1: your success as a couple, and they're trying to figure out,
Speaker 1: all right, it is something gone wrong permanently, or what.
Speaker 2: She could say, I had a dogfight fundraiser for the
Speaker 2: Harris Walls ticket, and I'd say, is tuesday you're free.
Speaker 2: Tuesday you're giving me the ick.
Speaker 1: Now, now here's something we can all tune into and
Speaker 1: be interested in. The science is a little vague, but
Speaker 1: the research team analyzed eighty six popular TikTok videos about
Speaker 1: the ick to identify common triggers. Women frequently reported to
Speaker 1: getting the ick when women displayed feminine behaviors, embarrassed themselves
Speaker 1: in public, or had annoying speech patterns. Men meanwhile, reported
Speaker 1: a version of women being overly trending, doing embarrassing things
Speaker 1: in public, or using irritating speech it's very similar.
Speaker 2: I think it's interesting the men using effeminine behavior of
Speaker 2: some sort turning women off. That doesn't surprise me. I
Speaker 2: wonder what particularly it is.
Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, gosh, the poor young lads have been sold
Speaker 1: so hard on this idea of you know, all masculinity
Speaker 1: is toxic. Man masculinity, be as a feminine as possible.
Speaker 1: Don't act like a dude. That's the worst thing you
Speaker 1: can do. Fellas you relied to by radical lunatics. Well,
Speaker 1: and your testosterone is low according to studies. So anyway,
Speaker 1: go box, go box. Somebody. Danger, excitement, athletic endeavors raise
Speaker 1: your testosterone levels.
Speaker 3: Yes, yeah, I feel bad for the TikTok generation because
Speaker 3: I keep seeing these groups of like three to four
Speaker 3: guy friends that are all trying to look super hot
Speaker 3: like boy bandish, and their lip syncing and dancing, And
Speaker 3: I will tell you right now, every girl that's watching
Speaker 3: that is.
Speaker 2: Running right not good. Yeah, so media portrays you that
Speaker 2: the whole androgynous thing. What was the term about Timothy
Speaker 2: Shallamy noodle boys, That that's the attractive thing. It might
Speaker 2: be for some people, but I don't think it is
Speaker 2: for most women.
Speaker 1: Yeah, that may be a weird, but great example of
Speaker 1: the perception you get from the media versus reality in
Speaker 1: American society. So, speaking of men and women, we've got
Speaker 1: a gender bending madness update New Science out as if
Speaker 1: it were necessary, pointing out that no, dudes shouldn't be
Speaker 1: competing against girls in girls' sports. You lunatics stay with us.
Speaker 2: And the Democrats are in bigger trouble than they even
Speaker 2: think holding, according to Ezracline of the New York Times,
Speaker 2: So stay tuned. So there have been a number of
Speaker 2: pieces written in the last week about the trouble. The
Speaker 2: Democratic Party is in lowest approval rating it's ever had,
Speaker 2: and a lot of movers and shakers in the party
Speaker 2: saying they're the lowest they've been in a half century. Well,
Speaker 2: there's some data to back that up, according to lefties
Speaker 2: like as Recline of the New York Times. I got
Speaker 2: some details on that coming up, really quite amazing. I
Speaker 2: don't know how long it'll take them to dig out
Speaker 2: of this.
Speaker 1: I can't imagine why they're reeling like they are, having
Speaker 1: run a corpse and then a half way for president
Speaker 1: in succession. A corpse and a half Oh wow, but hey,
Speaker 1: that's coming up in a moment or two. But first
Speaker 1: it's time for a gender bending men as update. This
Speaker 1: was science based sund It's funny this is a eighty
Speaker 1: twenty issue in America these days, but the Democratic Party,
Speaker 1: speaking of that fine institution, has had difficulty separating itself
Speaker 1: from its progressive wing on the issue. And apparently, for
Speaker 1: the good of womankind and girls in sports and America
Speaker 1: and our souls, we need to keep fighting this fight.
Speaker 1: But in an effort to move beyond politics and focus
Speaker 1: on facts, indisputable facts which are self evident to anybody
Speaker 1: with sanity. A new paper and exercise in Sports Sciences
Speaker 1: Reviews titled Evidence on Sex Differences and Sports Performance has
Speaker 1: come out and offers a timely end up look in
Speaker 1: depth look at the biological differences between males and females
Speaker 1: in sports, and it is written by a panel of
Speaker 1: experts in physiology and sports medicine and just end the discussion.
Speaker 1: One of the paper's main findings challenges a popular argument
Speaker 1: made by some inclusion advocates that male athletes who block
Speaker 1: puberty before adolescents can compete fairly against females. In reality,
Speaker 1: the evidence shows that meaningful performance differences between boys and
Speaker 1: girls exist even before puberty begins, and though they're smaller
Speaker 1: than the difference is observed in adulthood, they are significant.
Speaker 1: And they just say no, sorry, that's not good enough.
Speaker 1: If you're born in a boy you play boy sports
Speaker 1: or you get in an open league, but you're not
Speaker 1: playing girls' sports period. Just for what it's worth, as
Speaker 1: a guy who coached youth sports, you know, pre pubescent
Speaker 1: and then as teenagers. But when I coached young kids,
Speaker 1: I would frequently be like the head coach of a
Speaker 1: boys soccer team and be assisting with a girl's soccer team.
Speaker 1: And as I've said many times, the speed and violence
Speaker 1: with which ten year old boys play sports compared to
Speaker 1: ten year old girls is it's the difference between you know,
Speaker 1: black and white, an elephant in a mouse. It is unmistakable.
Speaker 1: You watch for thirty seconds, it's unmistakable. Anyway, to this
Speaker 1: study they had, I think it's several different conclusions. Number one,
Speaker 1: males consistently outperform females in events dependent on strength, speed,
Speaker 1: and endurance. No way, Yeah, I know. The performance gap
Speaker 1: between top male and female athletes ranges from about ten
Speaker 1: percent over forty percent, depending on the sport These are
Speaker 1: not random or anecdotal. They're consistent and grounded in biology.
Speaker 2: Wow, there are.
Speaker 1: Some women who can beat some men is frequently the
Speaker 1: idiotic non argument preferred by you know, poor young people
Speaker 1: who've been in doctor and aiden into this stuff. Honestly.
Speaker 1: Number two, the male female performance gap appears before puberty.
Speaker 1: Among elite pre pubescent athletes in the US, boys outperformed
Speaker 1: girls by three to ten percent in running and jumping events,
Speaker 1: up to five percent in swimming. Some of these differences
Speaker 1: may be influenced by behavioral factors, such as greater participation
Speaker 1: by boys in various physical vigorous physical activity. Clear biological
Speaker 1: disparities are already present early hormonal influences, differences in muscle development,
Speaker 1: patterns of physical activity, et cent. And this is all,
Speaker 1: by the way, supported by all sorts of great experts,
Speaker 1: and it's peer reviewed and the rest of it.
Speaker 2: Yes, for Smer, I was just thinking about the back
Speaker 2: when I used to be at the playground every single
Speaker 2: day pick up my kids from school, and they'd hang
Speaker 2: around play in the playground. I never one time saw
Speaker 2: girls having like a stick fight where they each got
Speaker 2: two sticks in there, like sword fighting. Right, never one
Speaker 2: time but the boys were constantly doing it.
Speaker 1: Let me squeeze in the rest of the conclusions. Three,
Speaker 1: Puberty dramatically increases the performance gap that's already there. Boost speed, strength,
Speaker 1: and endurance, hearts, longer bones, more red blood cells, bigger lungs,
Speaker 1: et cetera, et cetera. Testosterone is the main driver of
Speaker 1: male athletic advantage, but and female physiology constrained athletic performance.
Speaker 1: I'd like to get into more detail on this, but
Speaker 1: we're running out of time. And testosterone suppression reduces but
Speaker 1: does not eliminate male advantage at any age, at any level.
Speaker 2: That's the key there.
Speaker 1: It diminishes it, it does not eliminate it. And finally,
Speaker 1: female doping with testosterone improves performance but falls significantly short
Speaker 1: short of male levels. You can't turn a male into
Speaker 1: a female, and you can't turn a female into a male.
Speaker 2: Duh, transphobe, sad.
Speaker 5: Armstrong and getty just she had sply is young people
Speaker 5: all over the country.
Speaker 1: Would you like to see her joining the Senate right now?
Speaker 2: We have, as I said, just a whole lot of
Speaker 2: people in the compass.
Speaker 1: Okay, Jonavan, thanks, way, I got one that's important. Well,
Speaker 1: I asked you Okay, you know you want to do nonsense.
Speaker 1: So is a cranky octogenarian socialist with a voice like
Speaker 1: an incontinent tuba the party's future or is it AOC?
Speaker 1: And this isn't just about Republicans.
Speaker 3: We need a Democratic Party that farts fights harder for
Speaker 3: us too.
Speaker 1: I'm with her. She thought gas stoves were a problems.
Speaker 2: She better not let a match near an eighty three
Speaker 2: year old.
Speaker 1: Wow, childish.
Speaker 2: So the only energy that's been seen out of the
Speaker 2: Democratic Party in recent months is uh, the Bernie Sanders
Speaker 2: AOC tour, the all art stop, the Oligarchs tour. And
Speaker 2: this piece of axios yesterday from Mike Allen, who is
Speaker 2: is plugged into the big time thinkers and the Democratic
Speaker 2: Party as anybody in America, and his headline was behind
Speaker 2: the curtain DEM's dark, deep hole. And again this is
Speaker 2: from top Democrats. This is not Fox's view of things.
Speaker 2: This is people that want their party succeeds view of
Speaker 2: their own party. Top Democrats tell us the party is
Speaker 2: in the deepest toll it's been in fifty years, and
Speaker 2: they fear things are going to get worse.
Speaker 1: Who worse than this, which is the heck of a thing.
Speaker 2: To say, and they go through some stuff that has
Speaker 2: been talked about a lot. They've got the lowest favorability
Speaker 2: rating that they've had maybe ever. No popular national leader
Speaker 2: currently has emerged. Supreme Court ain't changing anytime soon.
Speaker 1: To me.
Speaker 2: The biggest one that is the biggest change, the dwindling
Speaker 2: influence over the media ecosystem. My whole life, all of
Speaker 2: our whole life. They dominated the big newspapers, in the
Speaker 2: big TV shows, were so much in part and they
Speaker 2: just don't matter anymore, hardly at all.
Speaker 1: Right, So even if you weren't particularly showing signs of
Speaker 1: life or regeneration, the media would say you were and
Speaker 1: continue to hammer the other side to pave the way.
Speaker 2: Or when that emerging star eventually comes, and they will.
Speaker 2: I just don't have the booster system that they used
Speaker 2: to have to.
Speaker 1: Reach other Yeah, yeah, a built in gigantic pr team.
Speaker 2: Young voters are growing dramatically more conservative according to all polls.
Speaker 2: This is why Democratic leaders think things are going to
Speaker 2: get worse. So I mentioned that earlier, but further on
Speaker 2: As Recline of The New York Times noted that if
Speaker 2: the current population patterns hold, and they probably will for
Speaker 2: at least five more years, Democrats will suffer a devastating
Speaker 2: blow after the twenty thirty cent. The party will lose
Speaker 2: as many as a dozen House seats and electoral votes
Speaker 2: a dozen in just five years.
Speaker 1: Because of people's migration patterns, in essence, Americans, not illegal immigrants.
Speaker 2: Yeah, so they'll be down a dozen House seats from
Speaker 2: where they are currently. And he points out if that happens,
Speaker 2: and it probably will in the electoral college, Democrats could
Speaker 2: win all of the states at Kamala Harris one plus Michigan, Pennsylvania,
Speaker 2: and Wisconsin and still lose the White House. That's how
Speaker 2: much a difference it would make in close election. Other things,
Speaker 2: they point out Democrats are losing working class voters, which
Speaker 2: was their bread and butter forever. That's according to Derek
Speaker 2: Thompson of the New Liberal Blueprint or some whatever that is.
Speaker 2: They're seeing their margins among non white voters a road
Speaker 2: and vanished. They're losing young voters. Something is wrong in
Speaker 2: the Democratic Party. Says that strategists by the numbers, A
Speaker 2: deep comprehensive poll by Democratic poster David Shore, who gets
Speaker 2: a lot of attention because he's predicted a number of elections,
Speaker 2: did a study based on twenty six million online responses.
Speaker 2: That's a thorough poll. That's not your polled one thousand
Speaker 2: people and extrapolated twenty six million. Anyway, he said on
Speaker 2: Ezra Klein's podcast the other day that his most striking
Speaker 2: finding and the one most worsted to him as a
Speaker 2: guy who wants Democrats to win, is the surging pro
Speaker 2: Trump maga Republican views and voting patterns of young men, immigrants,
Speaker 2: and anyone other than strident liberals. That gets to the
Speaker 2: whole Trump increased his vote in every single county, even
Speaker 2: the ones he lost. He did better than he did
Speaker 2: the last time around in the whole country.
Speaker 1: And did in every demographic group. Pix secon Yeah, college education,
Speaker 1: whom I.
Speaker 2: Think, Yeah, so as it says here other than strident liberals,
Speaker 2: which is highly educated women. So yeah, it's it's surging
Speaker 2: to the right among really everybody but strident liberals. And
Speaker 2: that number is small and not going to grow a
Speaker 2: lot because I never have kids, for one thing. Sure,
Speaker 2: This upholster estimates a twenty three point swing against Democrats
Speaker 2: among immigrants. The swing is very pronounced among Hispanics, who
Speaker 2: consider themselves conservatives. Democratic support dropped by fifty percent five zero.
Speaker 1: That's enormous. I mean, in your wildest dreams, if you're
Speaker 1: a Republican, you couldn't even hope for that.
Speaker 2: Right. So let it be a lesson for life that
Speaker 2: a lot of a lot of things that you assume
Speaker 2: don't turn out to be true. The Democratic Party and
Speaker 2: the Republican Party, everybody's been assuming for my whole adult
Speaker 2: like that is, the country got browner. The Democrats, who
Speaker 2: are going to maybe get into a position where they'd
Speaker 2: never lose another election, turns out why of these Hispanic
Speaker 2: people decide I'm not down with the liberal crap. I'm
Speaker 2: more of a conservative than a liberal.
Speaker 1: Speaking of David Shore, I don't know if you remember.
Speaker 1: I only have remember this. He was canceled by the
Speaker 1: Democrats and the Progressives back in twenty twenty for going
Speaker 1: against the grain of the doctrine.
Speaker 2: Well, he said something that was true and got canceled
Speaker 2: for it.
Speaker 1: Yeah, exactly, Yeah. But he continuing on with some of
Speaker 1: his data, he came to a really shocking conclusion. Trump
Speaker 1: would have won by a bigger margin if everyone had
Speaker 1: shown up to the polls. Quote, the reality is, if
Speaker 1: all registered voters had turned out, then Donald Trump would
Speaker 1: have won the popular vote by five points instead of
Speaker 1: the one point seven points that he won by. There's
Speaker 1: long but an idea, and idea the Dems just need
Speaker 1: to get out the vote. But the truth for Democrats
Speaker 1: is that under no circumstances should the vote be gotten
Speaker 1: out anymore. And quoting Nelly Bowls of the Free Press,
Speaker 1: next cycle, we will see rich ladies heading to the
Speaker 1: Philly suburbs to padlock people inside their homes. Celebrities will
Speaker 1: hold concerts hundreds of miles from the nearest polling place.
Speaker 1: Candidates will shake the hand of a working class man
Speaker 1: in Ohio and tell them the blind of votes longer
Speaker 1: than ten minutes, just call it good and go home.
Speaker 2: The rock the vote era is over, at least for
Speaker 2: the left.
Speaker 1: Right now, you'll see them saying, yeah, not only ID
Speaker 1: is required for voting. You should have two id's. Yeah. Yeah,
Speaker 1: not having ideas discriminates against black people or something. Yeah,
Speaker 1: make it harder to vote. There's only three minutes. The
Speaker 1: pole should be open on election day. That's it.
Speaker 2: Ah, I've got two more stunning pieces of information that
Speaker 2: if I's a Democrat, I'd think we're in bad shape
Speaker 2: and then I'll be done with this. This is really
Speaker 2: quite amazing.
Speaker 1: Go I'll be the judge of whether they're stunning or not.
Speaker 2: It's the rise of conservatism among young people, mainly men,
Speaker 2: that spooks him. The most young voters, regardless of race
Speaker 2: and gender, have become more Republican director of research at
Speaker 2: Blue Rose Research told Axios that millennials were one of
Speaker 2: the most progressive generations in our nation's history, and it
Speaker 2: looks like gen Z is about to be one of
Speaker 2: the most conservative that we've experienced in maybe fifty to
Speaker 2: sixty years.
Speaker 1: I've got to believe that's a reaction to the insane
Speaker 1: progressivism they've grown up seeing an and because kids aren't stupid,
Speaker 1: even if they're not like sophisticated in political analysis, they
Speaker 1: see the results of the policies that have been advocated
Speaker 1: around them in their lives, on the streets, in their towns,
Speaker 1: in their schools.
Speaker 2: This is a guy, this sure guy. Again. He used
Speaker 2: a data from twenty what was it, twenty three million surveys.
Speaker 2: Gen Z is potentially the most conservative generation we've experienced
Speaker 2: in this country in fifty to sixty years. That is something,
Speaker 2: isn't it? You know?
Speaker 1: What.
Speaker 2: Yeah, it's so obvious. I think you overplayed your freaking hand.
Speaker 2: And not only did you overplay your freaking hand. As
Speaker 2: super progressives, you know, it's unfair to label all Democrats
Speaker 2: like this because I know plenty of like your working
Speaker 2: class democrats. They weren't down with all this crap. They
Speaker 2: didn't want to talk about boys and girls, sports and
Speaker 2: all this nonsense and latenx and pronouns. It's just all
Speaker 2: this nut job stuff. But anyway, you overplayed your hand,
Speaker 2: and you had the media boost in you the whole time,
Speaker 2: acting like everybody believed this crap. Oh and then how
Speaker 2: about the George the summer at George Floyd. What did
Speaker 2: that do to the Generation Z? The school shutdowns, all
Speaker 2: this different.
Speaker 1: Stuff, right? Yeah, and again the very small number of
Speaker 1: extremely vicious and ideologically extreme progressives who believe this stuff
Speaker 1: were amplified by the you know they're brethren in the media,
Speaker 1: to the point that everybody was cowed. Not everybody, hello,
Speaker 1: so many people were cowed into obedience or not resisting, thinking, Wow,
Speaker 1: I'm in the minority. I hear these messages that everybody
Speaker 1: either believes this or should every I'm being dragged into
Speaker 1: white people are evil training at my employer. Oh my god,
Speaker 1: they they capitalized on a moment in time so disproportionate
Speaker 1: to A their numbers and b any sanity. God, I'm
Speaker 1: thinking surrounding their crazy ass views. It was amazing to
Speaker 1: have witnessed it. I hope it's on the back foot.
Speaker 1: And boy, anybody who lost their career during that horrifying
Speaker 1: period of Black Lives Matter and the rest of it, oh,
Speaker 1: I ache for you.
Speaker 2: I'm thinking about my own kids, who are certainly more
Speaker 2: conservative than I was at that age. I never even
Speaker 2: thought about this sort of stuff. But I also didn't,
Speaker 2: you know, confront a whole bunch of weird section stuff
Speaker 2: in school that they don't want. And they were they've
Speaker 2: been able to figure out, you know, which party is
Speaker 2: for that and which is against it, or all the
Speaker 2: homeless people around in the park and whatever, which party
Speaker 2: allowed this and which parties against it?
Speaker 1: They figured that out right, right, all the crime and
Speaker 1: all the goods being locked up in the story?
Speaker 2: Yeah, absolutely, or the how come we can't do this
Speaker 2: because we'll get sued. They're afraid we'll get sued. They
Speaker 2: know what parties behind that and what's not.
Speaker 1: Right, right, I'm just picturing all the poor kids, and
Speaker 1: who knows what the numbers are? Eighty twenty seventy thirty
Speaker 1: who When the teachers spouted the utterly horrific progressive neo
Speaker 1: Marxist doctrine at them in schools, the fifteen twenty percent,
Speaker 1: thirty percent who are down with it shouted yes, yes,
Speaker 1: that's right. And anybody who denies it as a racist
Speaker 1: and a bigot and horrible and will them for you.
Speaker 1: And then the seventy percent of the kids just sitting
Speaker 1: there thinking this is insane, but I don't dare say anything.
Speaker 1: I'm hoping, you know, as they reach adulthood they expressed
Speaker 1: their distaste for that, you know, at the ballot box,
Speaker 1: and have found the courage to be vocal about it.
Speaker 2: I thought that was really some stunning information. So Millennials
Speaker 2: one of the most progressive generations ever gen z the
Speaker 2: most conservative in a half century or more.
Speaker 1: For what is worth, My oldest kid is thirty two
Speaker 1: now going on thirty three. My youngest is twenty five.
Speaker 2: None of these numbers are possible. That can't be true.
Speaker 1: Oh, I know, have you checked that? Somebody should check
Speaker 1: that doing the math? Yeah, twenty five Yeah, they grew
Speaker 1: up in a significantly different moment in time from each other.
Speaker 1: The beginning and heyday of the insanity versus the last
Speaker 1: Cup innings of it, if you will. Baseball season's about
Speaker 1: to start, very excited. Yeah wow, how interesting. Well, you know,
Speaker 1: I during the worst of it twenty twenty twenty one,
Speaker 1: the George Floyd Riots, the mostly peaceful, fiery, murdery, looting,
Speaker 1: lawless insane.
Speaker 2: Kicked in right after that.
Speaker 1: Oh my god, men beating the hell out of women
Speaker 1: on sports fields because they called themselves a woman yesterday.
Speaker 1: That the stupidity of it bothers me more than the
Speaker 1: extremism of it. Yeah. Yeah, during all of that, I
Speaker 1: really thought sanity has got to prevail. Reality has to
Speaker 1: bat last.
Speaker 2: I didn't think it would this fast.
Speaker 1: Well, it ain't done yet, folks. Remember the universities are
Speaker 1: still teaching this as fast as they can.
Speaker 2: Well, they're that tiny sliver the insanity. Yeah, we'll finish strong.
Speaker 4: NEXTI former University of Michigan assistant football coach Matthew Weiss
Speaker 4: in court facing federal hacking charges. Wise is accused of
Speaker 4: targeting female athletes, downloading their intimate photos, and of taking
Speaker 4: notes commenting on their bodies and their sexual preferences, according
Speaker 4: to prosecutors. Prosecutors say over an eight year period, Weiss
Speaker 4: hacked into the database of more than one hundred colleges
Speaker 4: and cracked the encryption protecting the passwords. If convicted, he
Speaker 4: could face decades in prison.
Speaker 1: There are half a dozen different angles you can take
Speaker 1: to that story. I'm kidding, what a nuts job with
Speaker 1: omnipresent porn? What is it about? Oh, these are real
Speaker 1: people who are not porn people, and I'm looking at
Speaker 1: their privots.
Speaker 2: So you're getting much like less access to see a
Speaker 2: human's body parts than you could get you with a
Speaker 2: couple of clicks on.
Speaker 1: Your computer, is what he Allen used to say of pornography.
Speaker 2: And it's so poorly lit, it's just h But I
Speaker 2: guess because it's gonna be some sort of power dynamic.
Speaker 1: Or I don't know, it's it's I mean, anybody with
Speaker 1: a little experience in life, have been around the block
Speaker 1: knows the difference between porn and actual sex and sexual
Speaker 1: response is It's like the difference between looking at food
Speaker 1: and eating it. I mean, And I pity kids who
Speaker 1: are just think porn is love and life anyway.
Speaker 2: What that they may be ruined for life on one
Speaker 2: of the most interesting and enjoyable aspects of it.
Speaker 1: Oh yeah, yeah. And the losing out on the bonding
Speaker 1: with another human being and the rest of it for
Speaker 1: both the boys and the girls. Oh yeah, one hundred yeah.
Speaker 1: So you could look at that angle of sexual response.
Speaker 1: You could look at a guy who's that gifted with
Speaker 1: the computer arts and is living his dream career and
Speaker 1: decides to devote his expertise and risk his career over
Speaker 1: that sexual need. It's just wow. What human beings are?
Speaker 1: Strange beasts? Special. Guy's a football coach. He's not the
Speaker 1: head coach, but he's a football coach the University of Michigan.
Speaker 1: You are a top mount Everest.
Speaker 2: Yeah, that's weird. Jackie Clark, GISs time stop.
Speaker 1: Jack and Joe Live, got go and if they don't
Speaker 1: give can they'll be back tomorrow.
Speaker 2: Here's your host for final thoughts, Joe Getty.
Speaker 1: Hey, let's get a final thought from everybody on the crew.
Speaker 1: There is Michaelangelo, our technical director directing is technically Michael,
Speaker 1: what is your final thoughts? Earlier in the show, we
Speaker 1: were talking about robots doing medical procedures. What about them
Speaker 1: doing dentistry. They go to pull your teeth and maybe
Speaker 1: you know there's a malfunction that they plot several by mistake,
Speaker 1: right or pull out your eyeballs or I don't sure.
Speaker 2: Yeah, this is what's gonna happen.
Speaker 1: What the what? Katie Green or a Steve Newes woman.
Speaker 1: As a final thought, Katie, if.
Speaker 3: You'd like to wash that thought out of your brain,
Speaker 3: go to Armstrong getty dot com. Check out Katie's corner.
Speaker 3: I have the video of the baby Sopranos on there.
Speaker 2: It's very cute. If you haven't seen any of.
Speaker 1: Those now, okay, all right, yeah, I gotta check it out.
Speaker 1: Jack a final thought.
Speaker 2: For us, So we're talking about how long will college
Speaker 2: sports last, you know, because things have changed a lot.
Speaker 2: In March, madness is going on. For instance, this Maryland's
Speaker 2: players were asked in the postgame conference what makes Kevin
Speaker 2: Weiller to coach worth listening to? And one of the
Speaker 2: players said, well, he do pay us the money.
Speaker 1: Oh, I did not think that's what you were going
Speaker 1: to say. I let my guard down and he hit
Speaker 1: me running a bread basket doubled over.
Speaker 2: Uh.
Speaker 1: My final thought and look the whole using snap vine Chat, discord,
Speaker 1: athonogram or whatever they are using the legality of that,
Speaker 1: the wisdom of that. Letting Jeffrey Goldberg in that is
Speaker 1: probably bad and needs to be looked into. On the
Speaker 1: other hand, I'm looking at more and more examples of
Speaker 1: what was said by whom and when and how, and
Speaker 1: it's an incredibly balanced and respectful exchange of ideas among
Speaker 1: people who don't always agree with each other, and arriving
Speaker 1: at a policy and executing the president's foreign policy. It's
Speaker 1: a very healthy discussion.
Speaker 2: Are you're feeling like this is more of a scandal
Speaker 2: or less of a scandal than when we started.
Speaker 1: I think it'll go away pretty quickly.
Speaker 2: Ye see tomorrow, God bless America.
Speaker 5: Every single intelligence agency use I'm.
Speaker 1: Strong and Getty is outrageous. It's absolutely unthinkable. It's an embarrassment.
Speaker 1: This was a huge mistake.
Speaker 2: Correct, No, get the hell out of here, whatever.
Speaker 1: Hold on to the truth and hope like when you
Speaker 1: say that, like you mean like that be.
Speaker 2: I that was even dumber and more annoying than usually
Speaker 2: so story. Okay, cheers Armstrong and Getty