WEBVTT - I'm Still On Team Glug Glug Glug

0:00:01.840 --> 0:00:06.080
<v Speaker 1>Broadcasting live from the Abraham Lincoln Radio Studio the George

0:00:06.160 --> 0:00:10.240
<v Speaker 1>Washington Broadcast Center, Jack Armstrong and Joe Getty.

0:00:10.200 --> 0:00:23.479
<v Speaker 2>Arm Strong and Katty enough he Armstrong and Getty. I

0:00:23.520 --> 0:00:27.800
<v Speaker 2>think my lazy husband hot dogs. I start by adding

0:00:27.840 --> 0:00:31.560
<v Speaker 2>onion and bell peppers and seasoning, of course, and then

0:00:31.600 --> 0:00:34.640
<v Speaker 2>I fry them up and at cheese, and then I

0:00:34.720 --> 0:00:38.360
<v Speaker 2>add extra seasoning. Anyway, it was fun watching him eat him.

0:00:38.400 --> 0:00:39.360
<v Speaker 2>I mean, who knows which one?

0:00:39.400 --> 0:00:43.360
<v Speaker 1>The cat looked all right. So there was a twist

0:00:43.360 --> 0:00:46.400
<v Speaker 1>at the end there vocal fry lady explaining some hot

0:00:46.400 --> 0:00:47.320
<v Speaker 1>dog recipe.

0:00:47.920 --> 0:00:50.720
<v Speaker 2>She uses a vocal fryer apparently to cook her hot dogs.

0:00:52.440 --> 0:00:57.160
<v Speaker 1>That's funny. Added some cheese.

0:00:59.200 --> 0:01:02.639
<v Speaker 2>Katie, you do pretty Yeah, it's like that. We it's

0:01:02.680 --> 0:01:05.000
<v Speaker 2>like that clip we play from louder Milk wieces.

0:01:05.600 --> 0:01:06.800
<v Speaker 1>Why do you talk like that?

0:01:06.840 --> 0:01:09.840
<v Speaker 2>How do you talk like that? I talk like this?

0:01:12.120 --> 0:01:14.160
<v Speaker 3>I guess the backstory there is she in the video

0:01:14.240 --> 0:01:15.840
<v Speaker 3>she throws one of the hot dogs on the floor,

0:01:15.880 --> 0:01:17.040
<v Speaker 3>and then that's why at the end she got that

0:01:17.080 --> 0:01:18.600
<v Speaker 3>we'll dine out which one the Catholic?

0:01:19.200 --> 0:01:21.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you're pretty good at that. You could slip into

0:01:21.800 --> 0:01:26.080
<v Speaker 2>that person. Yes, you're a terrible person.

0:01:26.560 --> 0:01:28.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that that lady. I want not to be on earth.

0:01:28.959 --> 0:01:30.560
<v Speaker 1>I won't do anything about it because you know I

0:01:30.600 --> 0:01:33.119
<v Speaker 1>have borer violence. But Michael, do we have that Louder

0:01:33.160 --> 0:01:35.800
<v Speaker 1>milk clip. It's just so magically I do the one

0:01:35.800 --> 0:01:39.959
<v Speaker 1>I have, though it's a minute fourteen first that I

0:01:39.959 --> 0:01:43.080
<v Speaker 1>don't care if it's an hour fourteen. It's so so great.

0:01:45.000 --> 0:01:45.840
<v Speaker 1>What can I get you?

0:01:46.880 --> 0:01:49.520
<v Speaker 2>I've left the large coffee okay, so howt coffee?

0:01:50.160 --> 0:01:55.240
<v Speaker 1>Hot coffee, okay, room for cream, totally, room for cree.

0:01:55.960 --> 0:01:56.400
<v Speaker 2>Why are you.

0:01:56.440 --> 0:01:57.120
<v Speaker 4>Talking like that?

0:01:57.200 --> 0:01:59.960
<v Speaker 1>Why are you talking like that? Because this is my voice,

0:02:00.160 --> 0:02:01.240
<v Speaker 1>this is my wise.

0:02:01.760 --> 0:02:02.200
<v Speaker 2>No, it's not.

0:02:02.240 --> 0:02:03.320
<v Speaker 3>I heard you talking a minute ago.

0:02:03.360 --> 0:02:05.000
<v Speaker 1>I know you don't talk like that. Neither do you,

0:02:05.000 --> 0:02:08.160
<v Speaker 1>because nobody actually talks like this. You choose to talk

0:02:08.240 --> 0:02:10.440
<v Speaker 1>like this, and today I chose to talk like this.

0:02:10.480 --> 0:02:15.040
<v Speaker 1>It's pretty annoying, isn't that. Man? Just stop doing that.

0:02:15.360 --> 0:02:16.800
<v Speaker 1>I can help us my voice.

0:02:17.040 --> 0:02:21.600
<v Speaker 5>No, it's not. It's an affectation that annoying teenagers and

0:02:21.720 --> 0:02:23.760
<v Speaker 5>rich people use to sound like they don't give the

0:02:23.840 --> 0:02:26.400
<v Speaker 5>sh except you work in a coffee shop, so I

0:02:26.480 --> 0:02:28.400
<v Speaker 5>know you're not rich and you don't look like a

0:02:28.440 --> 0:02:32.360
<v Speaker 5>teenager unless you're units Kennedy Shreiver knock it off.

0:02:32.960 --> 0:02:34.640
<v Speaker 1>So just because I talk like this, I mean they

0:02:34.680 --> 0:02:37.440
<v Speaker 1>don't give ah and what exactly I'm I supposed to

0:02:37.480 --> 0:02:38.240
<v Speaker 1>knoki about?

0:02:38.520 --> 0:02:42.280
<v Speaker 5>That's an excellent question to ask yourself in your actual voice.

0:02:42.639 --> 0:02:49.799
<v Speaker 1>Excuse me, some of us would like to order you're

0:02:49.800 --> 0:02:55.040
<v Speaker 1>a total dick man. There there you go. Good, you're talking.

0:02:58.760 --> 0:03:04.240
<v Speaker 2>That's a great question to ask yourself and your actual voice.

0:03:04.400 --> 0:03:06.320
<v Speaker 1>I gotta go back to that show. I really enjoyed

0:03:06.320 --> 0:03:09.160
<v Speaker 1>the handful of episodes. Oh you know, we got something

0:03:09.280 --> 0:03:12.280
<v Speaker 1>very important, something vital did the Americans seem to talk about?

0:03:12.320 --> 0:03:18.520
<v Speaker 1>But just a small gripe, a mini rant. I'm looking for,

0:03:18.680 --> 0:03:21.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, the big show to watch and binge, especially

0:03:21.160 --> 0:03:23.000
<v Speaker 1>if it's something both my wife and I enjoy. But

0:03:23.560 --> 0:03:28.400
<v Speaker 1>the show i'm watching Severance, which got a fair amount

0:03:28.440 --> 0:03:31.760
<v Speaker 1>of attention. It's executed and produced by Ben Stiller, kind

0:03:31.760 --> 0:03:35.480
<v Speaker 1>of sci fi ish, weirdish mystery ish thing. But it's

0:03:35.880 --> 0:03:40.360
<v Speaker 1>showing every sign of being the never ending story arc,

0:03:40.640 --> 0:03:43.920
<v Speaker 1>the arc that doesn't arc. Every time it starts to

0:03:43.960 --> 0:03:47.600
<v Speaker 1>get towards something like a conclusion, a revelation, they just

0:03:47.720 --> 0:03:50.400
<v Speaker 1>introduce more red herrings than the rest of it. And

0:03:50.440 --> 0:03:54.080
<v Speaker 1>I just maybe it's well, maybe it's me. Maybe it's

0:03:54.200 --> 0:03:56.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't have unlimited time for entertainment because I don't

0:03:56.640 --> 0:03:59.520
<v Speaker 1>allow myself to. I limit it because I have stuff

0:03:59.520 --> 0:04:03.840
<v Speaker 1>I want to do. You cannot string me along for

0:04:03.920 --> 0:04:07.240
<v Speaker 1>the next five years of my life a story arc.

0:04:08.080 --> 0:04:12.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean, like Plato talked about that thousands of years ago.

0:04:13.400 --> 0:04:16.440
<v Speaker 1>You know you're not allowed to perpetually. It's not an

0:04:16.440 --> 0:04:17.679
<v Speaker 1>effing soap opera.

0:04:17.800 --> 0:04:19.599
<v Speaker 2>You need a wedding, you need a death, you need

0:04:19.640 --> 0:04:22.880
<v Speaker 2>a you need a baby's being born, something, and then

0:04:22.880 --> 0:04:23.800
<v Speaker 2>there yet the end.

0:04:24.320 --> 0:04:27.760
<v Speaker 1>Who are the mysterious harm scarms? You gotta tell me eventually.

0:04:28.240 --> 0:04:30.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm not I haven't signed, we're not married. I'm not

0:04:30.920 --> 0:04:33.200
<v Speaker 1>here for life. I want to enjoy your show for

0:04:33.200 --> 0:04:36.120
<v Speaker 1>a little while to choose another one. And I don't know.

0:04:36.520 --> 0:04:38.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm getting the idea that they're just gonna string this

0:04:39.000 --> 0:04:41.320
<v Speaker 1>biatcha along until nobody's watching anymore.

0:04:41.560 --> 0:04:43.800
<v Speaker 2>So Louder Milk, if you've never seen it, is about

0:04:43.839 --> 0:04:46.440
<v Speaker 2>a sober alcoholic, and I know a lot of sober alcoholics,

0:04:46.480 --> 0:04:51.320
<v Speaker 2>and it is dead on because things were highly annoyed

0:04:51.320 --> 0:04:53.600
<v Speaker 2>by the world. But drank to get through it. Now

0:04:53.600 --> 0:04:56.719
<v Speaker 2>you don't drink anymore, and you're still very annoyed with

0:04:56.760 --> 0:05:00.520
<v Speaker 2>everything in the world, and they're often very so sarcastic

0:05:00.640 --> 0:05:01.039
<v Speaker 2>like he is.

0:05:02.279 --> 0:05:06.479
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I admire your ability to do that. I'm still

0:05:06.520 --> 0:05:11.680
<v Speaker 1>on team Glug La Glug speaking for meself. Let's see,

0:05:11.680 --> 0:05:13.520
<v Speaker 1>we don't really have time to do topic A. We

0:05:13.520 --> 0:05:19.320
<v Speaker 1>can do it after the break. Let's see what could

0:05:19.360 --> 0:05:22.560
<v Speaker 1>we do. You know, I'd love to get more into

0:05:22.560 --> 0:05:26.800
<v Speaker 1>Columbia University and the poor beleaguered interim president trying to

0:05:26.880 --> 0:05:32.360
<v Speaker 1>corral her insane radical Marxist faculty. Good luck with that, sweetheart,

0:05:33.000 --> 0:05:35.880
<v Speaker 1>good luck not going well.

0:05:36.839 --> 0:05:41.480
<v Speaker 2>I'm disappointed that today's National Security hearing turned into an

0:05:41.520 --> 0:05:48.280
<v Speaker 2>investigation of the chat thread and how a journalists ended

0:05:48.360 --> 0:05:50.560
<v Speaker 2>up and did they disclose war plans and all that

0:05:50.600 --> 0:05:52.280
<v Speaker 2>sort of stuff. That story the big story of the

0:05:52.360 --> 0:05:54.839
<v Speaker 2>day because it was supposed to be the big National

0:05:54.880 --> 0:05:59.360
<v Speaker 2>Threats hearing that happens every single year, and I really

0:05:59.480 --> 0:06:01.080
<v Speaker 2>like it. Know, a bunch of people get up there

0:06:01.080 --> 0:06:03.240
<v Speaker 2>and say, hey, look, we're doing war games. We'll lose

0:06:03.279 --> 0:06:05.760
<v Speaker 2>to China, or you know, Russia's doing this or what

0:06:05.920 --> 0:06:07.159
<v Speaker 2>you know, what do we need to be afraid of.

0:06:07.200 --> 0:06:08.719
<v Speaker 2>I love that and paying attention to that.

0:06:08.839 --> 0:06:11.600
<v Speaker 1>So I hope they get to that at some point,

0:06:12.040 --> 0:06:16.239
<v Speaker 1>right right, not just partisan name calling and points scoring.

0:06:16.760 --> 0:06:19.200
<v Speaker 1>Although this is a pretty good scandal, scandals go and

0:06:19.640 --> 0:06:21.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, at least to some extent. So this is

0:06:22.000 --> 0:06:24.360
<v Speaker 1>this is the perfect length. I thought this was so good.

0:06:26.040 --> 0:06:28.240
<v Speaker 1>You know, the feeling. One minute, you're into your date,

0:06:28.839 --> 0:06:31.600
<v Speaker 1>their jokes land perfectly, their smile seems charming, and you're

0:06:31.640 --> 0:06:35.280
<v Speaker 1>excited about seeing them again. Then boom, they awkwardly sneeze

0:06:35.360 --> 0:06:37.760
<v Speaker 1>in a weird way you've never seen someone sneeze, and

0:06:38.200 --> 0:06:41.200
<v Speaker 1>something in you just die, or they say a phrase

0:06:41.240 --> 0:06:43.840
<v Speaker 1>that makes you crings so hard you nearly pull a muscle.

0:06:44.120 --> 0:06:46.960
<v Speaker 1>Suddenly you can't stand them. You've caught the ick.

0:06:47.800 --> 0:06:49.359
<v Speaker 2>Wow, I don't think I've ever done that.

0:06:50.960 --> 0:06:55.159
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, they're they're talking about it's it's actually a

0:06:55.200 --> 0:06:58.280
<v Speaker 1>scientific study from a ZUSA Pacific university.

0:06:58.480 --> 0:07:00.320
<v Speaker 2>It's got to be more common for women and to

0:07:00.400 --> 0:07:05.479
<v Speaker 2>react that way than men to react that way, because

0:07:05.480 --> 0:07:07.359
<v Speaker 2>I've known lots of women who said, yeah, I was

0:07:07.360 --> 0:07:09.120
<v Speaker 2>really liking him and then I sneezed and they didn't

0:07:09.120 --> 0:07:10.040
<v Speaker 2>say God bless you.

0:07:10.080 --> 0:07:13.160
<v Speaker 1>So that was it, or yeah, it's it's Larry David

0:07:13.240 --> 0:07:14.200
<v Speaker 1>persona fi Yeah.

0:07:14.280 --> 0:07:16.960
<v Speaker 2>Or I watched him man hands. Yeah, I watched him

0:07:16.960 --> 0:07:19.080
<v Speaker 2>cut his meat and I saw his fingernails were dirty, dirty,

0:07:19.120 --> 0:07:22.080
<v Speaker 2>So that was it. I liked everything else about him, yes, Katie,

0:07:22.160 --> 0:07:23.120
<v Speaker 2>But yes.

0:07:23.560 --> 0:07:26.400
<v Speaker 3>There was a guy that I thought everything about him

0:07:26.440 --> 0:07:29.640
<v Speaker 3>was great until we started texting and he could not

0:07:30.240 --> 0:07:34.400
<v Speaker 3>do they are they're there there properly and it was over.

0:07:35.520 --> 0:07:40.400
<v Speaker 1>You've made a good move, Katie. Yeah, good decision, bad grammar.

0:07:40.480 --> 0:07:44.160
<v Speaker 1>It's over. H. So what's interesting about this study is

0:07:44.200 --> 0:07:47.040
<v Speaker 1>they figured out your personality traits matter. People with high

0:07:47.160 --> 0:07:51.960
<v Speaker 1>disgust sensitivity in a lot of different ways, narcissism or

0:07:52.040 --> 0:07:56.160
<v Speaker 1>perfectionism are more likely to experience the ick in dating.

0:07:56.320 --> 0:07:58.080
<v Speaker 2>I don't know, is she hot? She could have mentioned

0:07:58.120 --> 0:08:00.160
<v Speaker 2>dog fighting, I'd be fine.

0:08:01.040 --> 0:08:05.120
<v Speaker 1>Well, obviously you don't have that high disgust sensitivity that

0:08:05.520 --> 0:08:09.559
<v Speaker 1>or it can be overcome, you know, by your inner

0:08:09.640 --> 0:08:10.280
<v Speaker 1>horn dog.

0:08:10.640 --> 0:08:12.840
<v Speaker 2>Not as bad as being trapped in a hominem l

0:08:13.040 --> 0:08:14.200
<v Speaker 2>like Katie, almost.

0:08:15.840 --> 0:08:18.440
<v Speaker 1>The it has real consequences. Sixty eight percent of people

0:08:18.440 --> 0:08:22.320
<v Speaker 1>had relationships and relationships after experiencing it, showing how small

0:08:22.400 --> 0:08:27.280
<v Speaker 1>kirks can derail potential connections, and they think that in

0:08:27.320 --> 0:08:30.680
<v Speaker 1>the past it used to be like your deep lizard

0:08:30.720 --> 0:08:34.000
<v Speaker 1>brain saying we should not breathe this person is not

0:08:34.080 --> 0:08:36.560
<v Speaker 1>good as a mate, dangerous as a mate, whatever. But

0:08:36.800 --> 0:08:43.599
<v Speaker 1>now it's it can be triggered by really superficial, modern

0:08:43.880 --> 0:08:49.240
<v Speaker 1>social media type tendencies and habits in a way that's

0:08:49.520 --> 0:08:52.200
<v Speaker 1>probably pretty stupid because it has nothing to do with

0:08:52.280 --> 0:08:54.760
<v Speaker 1>your success as a couple, and they're trying to figure out,

0:08:54.800 --> 0:08:57.760
<v Speaker 1>all right, it is something gone wrong permanently, or what.

0:08:58.280 --> 0:09:01.120
<v Speaker 2>She could say, I had a dogfight fundraiser for the

0:09:01.160 --> 0:09:03.880
<v Speaker 2>Harris Walls ticket, and I'd say, is tuesday you're free.

0:09:03.920 --> 0:09:07.200
<v Speaker 2>Tuesday you're giving me the ick.

0:09:07.840 --> 0:09:10.360
<v Speaker 1>Now, now here's something we can all tune into and

0:09:10.400 --> 0:09:12.480
<v Speaker 1>be interested in. The science is a little vague, but

0:09:12.800 --> 0:09:16.640
<v Speaker 1>the research team analyzed eighty six popular TikTok videos about

0:09:16.679 --> 0:09:21.360
<v Speaker 1>the ick to identify common triggers. Women frequently reported to

0:09:21.600 --> 0:09:28.000
<v Speaker 1>getting the ick when women displayed feminine behaviors, embarrassed themselves

0:09:28.000 --> 0:09:32.720
<v Speaker 1>in public, or had annoying speech patterns. Men meanwhile, reported

0:09:32.720 --> 0:09:36.120
<v Speaker 1>a version of women being overly trending, doing embarrassing things

0:09:36.160 --> 0:09:40.000
<v Speaker 1>in public, or using irritating speech it's very similar.

0:09:40.040 --> 0:09:43.440
<v Speaker 2>I think it's interesting the men using effeminine behavior of

0:09:43.480 --> 0:09:46.520
<v Speaker 2>some sort turning women off. That doesn't surprise me. I

0:09:46.559 --> 0:09:48.240
<v Speaker 2>wonder what particularly it is.

0:09:50.200 --> 0:09:54.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, gosh, the poor young lads have been sold

0:09:55.559 --> 0:09:59.280
<v Speaker 1>so hard on this idea of you know, all masculinity

0:09:59.360 --> 0:10:02.440
<v Speaker 1>is toxic. Man masculinity, be as a feminine as possible.

0:10:02.760 --> 0:10:04.960
<v Speaker 1>Don't act like a dude. That's the worst thing you

0:10:05.000 --> 0:10:09.280
<v Speaker 1>can do. Fellas you relied to by radical lunatics. Well,

0:10:09.320 --> 0:10:13.640
<v Speaker 1>and your testosterone is low according to studies. So anyway,

0:10:14.000 --> 0:10:21.120
<v Speaker 1>go box, go box. Somebody. Danger, excitement, athletic endeavors raise

0:10:21.160 --> 0:10:22.440
<v Speaker 1>your testosterone levels.

0:10:22.679 --> 0:10:26.640
<v Speaker 3>Yes, yeah, I feel bad for the TikTok generation because

0:10:26.679 --> 0:10:29.200
<v Speaker 3>I keep seeing these groups of like three to four

0:10:29.240 --> 0:10:32.400
<v Speaker 3>guy friends that are all trying to look super hot

0:10:32.440 --> 0:10:35.440
<v Speaker 3>like boy bandish, and their lip syncing and dancing, And

0:10:35.480 --> 0:10:37.800
<v Speaker 3>I will tell you right now, every girl that's watching

0:10:37.840 --> 0:10:38.280
<v Speaker 3>that is.

0:10:38.679 --> 0:10:42.520
<v Speaker 2>Running right not good. Yeah, so media portrays you that

0:10:42.600 --> 0:10:46.040
<v Speaker 2>the whole androgynous thing. What was the term about Timothy

0:10:46.040 --> 0:10:50.719
<v Speaker 2>Shallamy noodle boys, That that's the attractive thing. It might

0:10:50.760 --> 0:10:52.080
<v Speaker 2>be for some people, but I don't think it is

0:10:52.080 --> 0:10:52.720
<v Speaker 2>for most women.

0:10:53.480 --> 0:10:57.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that may be a weird, but great example of

0:10:57.640 --> 0:11:01.520
<v Speaker 1>the perception you get from the media versus reality in

0:11:01.559 --> 0:11:05.320
<v Speaker 1>American society. So, speaking of men and women, we've got

0:11:05.320 --> 0:11:08.839
<v Speaker 1>a gender bending madness update New Science out as if

0:11:08.880 --> 0:11:13.520
<v Speaker 1>it were necessary, pointing out that no, dudes shouldn't be

0:11:13.520 --> 0:11:17.480
<v Speaker 1>competing against girls in girls' sports. You lunatics stay with us.

0:11:17.520 --> 0:11:19.480
<v Speaker 2>And the Democrats are in bigger trouble than they even

0:11:19.559 --> 0:11:23.040
<v Speaker 2>think holding, according to Ezracline of the New York Times,

0:11:23.040 --> 0:11:28.680
<v Speaker 2>So stay tuned. So there have been a number of

0:11:28.679 --> 0:11:31.440
<v Speaker 2>pieces written in the last week about the trouble. The

0:11:31.480 --> 0:11:34.760
<v Speaker 2>Democratic Party is in lowest approval rating it's ever had,

0:11:35.920 --> 0:11:38.080
<v Speaker 2>and a lot of movers and shakers in the party

0:11:38.160 --> 0:11:41.160
<v Speaker 2>saying they're the lowest they've been in a half century. Well,

0:11:41.160 --> 0:11:45.040
<v Speaker 2>there's some data to back that up, according to lefties

0:11:45.240 --> 0:11:47.679
<v Speaker 2>like as Recline of the New York Times. I got

0:11:47.679 --> 0:11:50.240
<v Speaker 2>some details on that coming up, really quite amazing. I

0:11:50.240 --> 0:11:51.880
<v Speaker 2>don't know how long it'll take them to dig out

0:11:51.880 --> 0:11:52.080
<v Speaker 2>of this.

0:11:54.040 --> 0:11:57.520
<v Speaker 1>I can't imagine why they're reeling like they are, having

0:11:57.600 --> 0:12:00.960
<v Speaker 1>run a corpse and then a half way for president

0:12:01.200 --> 0:12:06.760
<v Speaker 1>in succession. A corpse and a half Oh wow, but hey,

0:12:06.880 --> 0:12:08.720
<v Speaker 1>that's coming up in a moment or two. But first

0:12:08.800 --> 0:12:15.800
<v Speaker 1>it's time for a gender bending men as update. This

0:12:16.000 --> 0:12:26.400
<v Speaker 1>was science based sund It's funny this is a eighty

0:12:26.559 --> 0:12:31.720
<v Speaker 1>twenty issue in America these days, but the Democratic Party,

0:12:31.800 --> 0:12:35.800
<v Speaker 1>speaking of that fine institution, has had difficulty separating itself

0:12:35.840 --> 0:12:39.680
<v Speaker 1>from its progressive wing on the issue. And apparently, for

0:12:39.800 --> 0:12:43.520
<v Speaker 1>the good of womankind and girls in sports and America

0:12:43.559 --> 0:12:46.199
<v Speaker 1>and our souls, we need to keep fighting this fight.

0:12:47.440 --> 0:12:49.760
<v Speaker 1>But in an effort to move beyond politics and focus

0:12:49.800 --> 0:12:52.960
<v Speaker 1>on facts, indisputable facts which are self evident to anybody

0:12:53.000 --> 0:12:56.840
<v Speaker 1>with sanity. A new paper and exercise in Sports Sciences

0:12:56.960 --> 0:13:02.280
<v Speaker 1>Reviews titled Evidence on Sex Differences and Sports Performance has

0:13:02.360 --> 0:13:04.599
<v Speaker 1>come out and offers a timely end up look in

0:13:04.760 --> 0:13:07.920
<v Speaker 1>depth look at the biological differences between males and females

0:13:07.960 --> 0:13:11.800
<v Speaker 1>in sports, and it is written by a panel of

0:13:11.840 --> 0:13:17.960
<v Speaker 1>experts in physiology and sports medicine and just end the discussion.

0:13:20.160 --> 0:13:23.240
<v Speaker 1>One of the paper's main findings challenges a popular argument

0:13:23.280 --> 0:13:26.400
<v Speaker 1>made by some inclusion advocates that male athletes who block

0:13:26.440 --> 0:13:30.920
<v Speaker 1>puberty before adolescents can compete fairly against females. In reality,

0:13:30.960 --> 0:13:34.200
<v Speaker 1>the evidence shows that meaningful performance differences between boys and

0:13:34.240 --> 0:13:39.559
<v Speaker 1>girls exist even before puberty begins, and though they're smaller

0:13:39.600 --> 0:13:42.720
<v Speaker 1>than the difference is observed in adulthood, they are significant.

0:13:43.120 --> 0:13:46.040
<v Speaker 1>And they just say no, sorry, that's not good enough.

0:13:46.120 --> 0:13:48.480
<v Speaker 1>If you're born in a boy you play boy sports

0:13:48.920 --> 0:13:51.080
<v Speaker 1>or you get in an open league, but you're not

0:13:51.120 --> 0:13:54.840
<v Speaker 1>playing girls' sports period. Just for what it's worth, as

0:13:54.880 --> 0:13:59.920
<v Speaker 1>a guy who coached youth sports, you know, pre pubescent

0:14:00.240 --> 0:14:03.520
<v Speaker 1>and then as teenagers. But when I coached young kids,

0:14:03.679 --> 0:14:06.000
<v Speaker 1>I would frequently be like the head coach of a

0:14:06.000 --> 0:14:09.440
<v Speaker 1>boys soccer team and be assisting with a girl's soccer team.

0:14:09.559 --> 0:14:13.040
<v Speaker 1>And as I've said many times, the speed and violence

0:14:13.640 --> 0:14:16.680
<v Speaker 1>with which ten year old boys play sports compared to

0:14:16.679 --> 0:14:20.200
<v Speaker 1>ten year old girls is it's the difference between you know,

0:14:20.800 --> 0:14:24.400
<v Speaker 1>black and white, an elephant in a mouse. It is unmistakable.

0:14:24.640 --> 0:14:31.040
<v Speaker 1>You watch for thirty seconds, it's unmistakable. Anyway, to this

0:14:31.120 --> 0:14:35.720
<v Speaker 1>study they had, I think it's several different conclusions. Number one,

0:14:35.760 --> 0:14:40.200
<v Speaker 1>males consistently outperform females in events dependent on strength, speed,

0:14:40.400 --> 0:14:44.120
<v Speaker 1>and endurance. No way, Yeah, I know. The performance gap

0:14:44.160 --> 0:14:46.880
<v Speaker 1>between top male and female athletes ranges from about ten

0:14:46.920 --> 0:14:50.240
<v Speaker 1>percent over forty percent, depending on the sport These are

0:14:50.280 --> 0:14:54.040
<v Speaker 1>not random or anecdotal. They're consistent and grounded in biology.

0:14:54.120 --> 0:14:55.960
<v Speaker 2>Wow, there are.

0:14:56.000 --> 0:15:01.240
<v Speaker 1>Some women who can beat some men is frequently the

0:15:02.440 --> 0:15:05.800
<v Speaker 1>idiotic non argument preferred by you know, poor young people

0:15:05.840 --> 0:15:07.960
<v Speaker 1>who've been in doctor and aiden into this stuff. Honestly.

0:15:09.000 --> 0:15:12.960
<v Speaker 1>Number two, the male female performance gap appears before puberty.

0:15:13.680 --> 0:15:17.680
<v Speaker 1>Among elite pre pubescent athletes in the US, boys outperformed

0:15:17.680 --> 0:15:20.520
<v Speaker 1>girls by three to ten percent in running and jumping events,

0:15:20.800 --> 0:15:24.000
<v Speaker 1>up to five percent in swimming. Some of these differences

0:15:24.000 --> 0:15:27.000
<v Speaker 1>may be influenced by behavioral factors, such as greater participation

0:15:27.080 --> 0:15:31.600
<v Speaker 1>by boys in various physical vigorous physical activity. Clear biological

0:15:31.600 --> 0:15:37.000
<v Speaker 1>disparities are already present early hormonal influences, differences in muscle development,

0:15:37.160 --> 0:15:40.640
<v Speaker 1>patterns of physical activity, et cent. And this is all,

0:15:40.960 --> 0:15:44.400
<v Speaker 1>by the way, supported by all sorts of great experts,

0:15:44.480 --> 0:15:45.960
<v Speaker 1>and it's peer reviewed and the rest of it.

0:15:46.280 --> 0:15:49.320
<v Speaker 2>Yes, for Smer, I was just thinking about the back

0:15:49.320 --> 0:15:50.960
<v Speaker 2>when I used to be at the playground every single

0:15:51.040 --> 0:15:52.480
<v Speaker 2>day pick up my kids from school, and they'd hang

0:15:52.520 --> 0:15:55.880
<v Speaker 2>around play in the playground. I never one time saw

0:15:56.040 --> 0:15:59.760
<v Speaker 2>girls having like a stick fight where they each got

0:15:59.760 --> 0:16:04.960
<v Speaker 2>two sticks in there, like sword fighting. Right, never one

0:16:05.080 --> 0:16:07.280
<v Speaker 2>time but the boys were constantly doing it.

0:16:07.920 --> 0:16:11.400
<v Speaker 1>Let me squeeze in the rest of the conclusions. Three,

0:16:11.840 --> 0:16:18.960
<v Speaker 1>Puberty dramatically increases the performance gap that's already there. Boost speed, strength,

0:16:19.000 --> 0:16:23.520
<v Speaker 1>and endurance, hearts, longer bones, more red blood cells, bigger lungs,

0:16:23.560 --> 0:16:26.920
<v Speaker 1>et cetera, et cetera. Testosterone is the main driver of

0:16:26.920 --> 0:16:31.880
<v Speaker 1>male athletic advantage, but and female physiology constrained athletic performance.

0:16:31.920 --> 0:16:33.400
<v Speaker 1>I'd like to get into more detail on this, but

0:16:33.440 --> 0:16:37.520
<v Speaker 1>we're running out of time. And testosterone suppression reduces but

0:16:37.640 --> 0:16:42.720
<v Speaker 1>does not eliminate male advantage at any age, at any level.

0:16:42.880 --> 0:16:43.760
<v Speaker 2>That's the key there.

0:16:44.760 --> 0:16:48.640
<v Speaker 1>It diminishes it, it does not eliminate it. And finally,

0:16:48.760 --> 0:16:53.400
<v Speaker 1>female doping with testosterone improves performance but falls significantly short

0:16:53.840 --> 0:16:57.000
<v Speaker 1>short of male levels. You can't turn a male into

0:16:57.000 --> 0:16:59.880
<v Speaker 1>a female, and you can't turn a female into a male.

0:17:00.800 --> 0:17:04.600
<v Speaker 2>Duh, transphobe, sad.

0:17:07.920 --> 0:17:12.200
<v Speaker 5>Armstrong and getty just she had sply is young people

0:17:12.240 --> 0:17:12.960
<v Speaker 5>all over the country.

0:17:13.000 --> 0:17:16.000
<v Speaker 1>Would you like to see her joining the Senate right now?

0:17:16.080 --> 0:17:17.919
<v Speaker 2>We have, as I said, just a whole lot of

0:17:17.920 --> 0:17:19.200
<v Speaker 2>people in the compass.

0:17:19.280 --> 0:17:22.240
<v Speaker 1>Okay, Jonavan, thanks, way, I got one that's important. Well,

0:17:22.280 --> 0:17:25.359
<v Speaker 1>I asked you Okay, you know you want to do nonsense.

0:17:25.800 --> 0:17:28.800
<v Speaker 1>So is a cranky octogenarian socialist with a voice like

0:17:28.840 --> 0:17:32.160
<v Speaker 1>an incontinent tuba the party's future or is it AOC?

0:17:32.760 --> 0:17:35.080
<v Speaker 1>And this isn't just about Republicans.

0:17:35.600 --> 0:17:39.000
<v Speaker 3>We need a Democratic Party that farts fights harder for

0:17:39.119 --> 0:17:39.560
<v Speaker 3>us too.

0:17:41.840 --> 0:17:46.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm with her. She thought gas stoves were a problems.

0:17:46.480 --> 0:17:48.159
<v Speaker 2>She better not let a match near an eighty three

0:17:48.240 --> 0:17:48.640
<v Speaker 2>year old.

0:17:50.240 --> 0:17:51.840
<v Speaker 1>Wow, childish.

0:17:51.960 --> 0:17:53.960
<v Speaker 2>So the only energy that's been seen out of the

0:17:54.000 --> 0:17:58.719
<v Speaker 2>Democratic Party in recent months is uh, the Bernie Sanders

0:17:58.800 --> 0:18:04.040
<v Speaker 2>AOC tour, the all art stop, the Oligarchs tour. And

0:18:05.440 --> 0:18:08.560
<v Speaker 2>this piece of axios yesterday from Mike Allen, who is

0:18:08.680 --> 0:18:12.639
<v Speaker 2>is plugged into the big time thinkers and the Democratic

0:18:12.680 --> 0:18:16.560
<v Speaker 2>Party as anybody in America, and his headline was behind

0:18:16.560 --> 0:18:19.760
<v Speaker 2>the curtain DEM's dark, deep hole. And again this is

0:18:19.800 --> 0:18:23.479
<v Speaker 2>from top Democrats. This is not Fox's view of things.

0:18:23.760 --> 0:18:26.560
<v Speaker 2>This is people that want their party succeeds view of

0:18:26.560 --> 0:18:29.760
<v Speaker 2>their own party. Top Democrats tell us the party is

0:18:29.760 --> 0:18:32.159
<v Speaker 2>in the deepest toll it's been in fifty years, and

0:18:32.200 --> 0:18:34.800
<v Speaker 2>they fear things are going to get worse.

0:18:35.480 --> 0:18:37.560
<v Speaker 1>Who worse than this, which is the heck of a thing.

0:18:37.600 --> 0:18:39.240
<v Speaker 2>To say, and they go through some stuff that has

0:18:39.280 --> 0:18:41.280
<v Speaker 2>been talked about a lot. They've got the lowest favorability

0:18:41.359 --> 0:18:46.879
<v Speaker 2>rating that they've had maybe ever. No popular national leader

0:18:46.920 --> 0:18:51.800
<v Speaker 2>currently has emerged. Supreme Court ain't changing anytime soon.

0:18:53.040 --> 0:18:53.320
<v Speaker 1>To me.

0:18:53.520 --> 0:18:57.199
<v Speaker 2>The biggest one that is the biggest change, the dwindling

0:18:57.359 --> 0:19:00.919
<v Speaker 2>influence over the media ecosystem. My whole life, all of

0:19:00.920 --> 0:19:04.679
<v Speaker 2>our whole life. They dominated the big newspapers, in the

0:19:04.800 --> 0:19:07.760
<v Speaker 2>big TV shows, were so much in part and they

0:19:07.800 --> 0:19:09.760
<v Speaker 2>just don't matter anymore, hardly at all.

0:19:09.840 --> 0:19:14.160
<v Speaker 1>Right, So even if you weren't particularly showing signs of

0:19:14.280 --> 0:19:17.600
<v Speaker 1>life or regeneration, the media would say you were and

0:19:17.960 --> 0:19:20.720
<v Speaker 1>continue to hammer the other side to pave the way.

0:19:21.160 --> 0:19:24.560
<v Speaker 2>Or when that emerging star eventually comes, and they will.

0:19:26.480 --> 0:19:28.720
<v Speaker 2>I just don't have the booster system that they used

0:19:28.760 --> 0:19:29.520
<v Speaker 2>to have to.

0:19:29.520 --> 0:19:32.920
<v Speaker 1>Reach other Yeah, yeah, a built in gigantic pr team.

0:19:33.320 --> 0:19:37.720
<v Speaker 2>Young voters are growing dramatically more conservative according to all polls.

0:19:37.960 --> 0:19:40.680
<v Speaker 2>This is why Democratic leaders think things are going to

0:19:40.720 --> 0:19:44.560
<v Speaker 2>get worse. So I mentioned that earlier, but further on

0:19:45.560 --> 0:19:50.400
<v Speaker 2>As Recline of The New York Times noted that if

0:19:50.440 --> 0:19:54.480
<v Speaker 2>the current population patterns hold, and they probably will for

0:19:54.480 --> 0:19:58.160
<v Speaker 2>at least five more years, Democrats will suffer a devastating

0:19:58.200 --> 0:20:01.399
<v Speaker 2>blow after the twenty thirty cent. The party will lose

0:20:01.840 --> 0:20:05.480
<v Speaker 2>as many as a dozen House seats and electoral votes

0:20:06.440 --> 0:20:08.920
<v Speaker 2>a dozen in just five years.

0:20:09.320 --> 0:20:13.880
<v Speaker 1>Because of people's migration patterns, in essence, Americans, not illegal immigrants.

0:20:13.960 --> 0:20:17.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so they'll be down a dozen House seats from

0:20:17.119 --> 0:20:20.520
<v Speaker 2>where they are currently. And he points out if that happens,

0:20:20.720 --> 0:20:24.920
<v Speaker 2>and it probably will in the electoral college, Democrats could

0:20:24.920 --> 0:20:31.520
<v Speaker 2>win all of the states at Kamala Harris one plus Michigan, Pennsylvania,

0:20:31.560 --> 0:20:34.760
<v Speaker 2>and Wisconsin and still lose the White House. That's how

0:20:34.840 --> 0:20:40.160
<v Speaker 2>much a difference it would make in close election. Other things,

0:20:40.200 --> 0:20:43.240
<v Speaker 2>they point out Democrats are losing working class voters, which

0:20:43.320 --> 0:20:46.080
<v Speaker 2>was their bread and butter forever. That's according to Derek

0:20:46.160 --> 0:20:49.439
<v Speaker 2>Thompson of the New Liberal Blueprint or some whatever that is.

0:20:50.640 --> 0:20:53.000
<v Speaker 2>They're seeing their margins among non white voters a road

0:20:53.040 --> 0:20:55.879
<v Speaker 2>and vanished. They're losing young voters. Something is wrong in

0:20:55.920 --> 0:21:02.040
<v Speaker 2>the Democratic Party. Says that strategists by the numbers, A

0:21:02.080 --> 0:21:06.560
<v Speaker 2>deep comprehensive poll by Democratic poster David Shore, who gets

0:21:06.640 --> 0:21:10.640
<v Speaker 2>a lot of attention because he's predicted a number of elections,

0:21:12.000 --> 0:21:16.880
<v Speaker 2>did a study based on twenty six million online responses.

0:21:17.359 --> 0:21:21.159
<v Speaker 2>That's a thorough poll. That's not your polled one thousand

0:21:21.200 --> 0:21:27.639
<v Speaker 2>people and extrapolated twenty six million. Anyway, he said on

0:21:27.840 --> 0:21:30.440
<v Speaker 2>Ezra Klein's podcast the other day that his most striking

0:21:30.520 --> 0:21:33.760
<v Speaker 2>finding and the one most worsted to him as a

0:21:33.760 --> 0:21:36.960
<v Speaker 2>guy who wants Democrats to win, is the surging pro

0:21:37.040 --> 0:21:41.440
<v Speaker 2>Trump maga Republican views and voting patterns of young men, immigrants,

0:21:41.640 --> 0:21:45.840
<v Speaker 2>and anyone other than strident liberals. That gets to the

0:21:45.880 --> 0:21:51.560
<v Speaker 2>whole Trump increased his vote in every single county, even

0:21:51.600 --> 0:21:54.760
<v Speaker 2>the ones he lost. He did better than he did

0:21:54.760 --> 0:21:57.280
<v Speaker 2>the last time around in the whole country.

0:21:57.720 --> 0:22:01.040
<v Speaker 1>And did in every demographic group. Pix secon Yeah, college education,

0:22:01.200 --> 0:22:01.920
<v Speaker 1>whom I.

0:22:01.840 --> 0:22:04.720
<v Speaker 2>Think, Yeah, so as it says here other than strident liberals,

0:22:04.760 --> 0:22:11.200
<v Speaker 2>which is highly educated women. So yeah, it's it's surging

0:22:11.280 --> 0:22:15.600
<v Speaker 2>to the right among really everybody but strident liberals. And

0:22:15.640 --> 0:22:17.399
<v Speaker 2>that number is small and not going to grow a

0:22:17.400 --> 0:22:20.080
<v Speaker 2>lot because I never have kids, for one thing. Sure,

0:22:20.240 --> 0:22:25.080
<v Speaker 2>This upholster estimates a twenty three point swing against Democrats

0:22:25.080 --> 0:22:30.280
<v Speaker 2>among immigrants. The swing is very pronounced among Hispanics, who

0:22:30.359 --> 0:22:37.119
<v Speaker 2>consider themselves conservatives. Democratic support dropped by fifty percent five zero.

0:22:38.720 --> 0:22:43.520
<v Speaker 1>That's enormous. I mean, in your wildest dreams, if you're

0:22:43.520 --> 0:22:45.840
<v Speaker 1>a Republican, you couldn't even hope for that.

0:22:47.400 --> 0:22:51.520
<v Speaker 2>Right. So let it be a lesson for life that

0:22:51.640 --> 0:22:53.560
<v Speaker 2>a lot of a lot of things that you assume

0:22:53.680 --> 0:22:56.439
<v Speaker 2>don't turn out to be true. The Democratic Party and

0:22:56.520 --> 0:23:00.480
<v Speaker 2>the Republican Party, everybody's been assuming for my whole adult

0:23:00.640 --> 0:23:03.760
<v Speaker 2>like that is, the country got browner. The Democrats, who

0:23:03.800 --> 0:23:05.600
<v Speaker 2>are going to maybe get into a position where they'd

0:23:05.600 --> 0:23:09.680
<v Speaker 2>never lose another election, turns out why of these Hispanic

0:23:09.720 --> 0:23:12.800
<v Speaker 2>people decide I'm not down with the liberal crap. I'm

0:23:12.840 --> 0:23:14.240
<v Speaker 2>more of a conservative than a liberal.

0:23:14.920 --> 0:23:18.159
<v Speaker 1>Speaking of David Shore, I don't know if you remember.

0:23:18.200 --> 0:23:21.600
<v Speaker 1>I only have remember this. He was canceled by the

0:23:21.640 --> 0:23:24.720
<v Speaker 1>Democrats and the Progressives back in twenty twenty for going

0:23:24.760 --> 0:23:26.719
<v Speaker 1>against the grain of the doctrine.

0:23:26.800 --> 0:23:29.680
<v Speaker 2>Well, he said something that was true and got canceled

0:23:29.680 --> 0:23:29.879
<v Speaker 2>for it.

0:23:30.880 --> 0:23:35.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, exactly, Yeah. But he continuing on with some of

0:23:35.280 --> 0:23:40.560
<v Speaker 1>his data, he came to a really shocking conclusion. Trump

0:23:40.560 --> 0:23:43.760
<v Speaker 1>would have won by a bigger margin if everyone had

0:23:43.800 --> 0:23:45.959
<v Speaker 1>shown up to the polls. Quote, the reality is, if

0:23:46.000 --> 0:23:48.360
<v Speaker 1>all registered voters had turned out, then Donald Trump would

0:23:48.359 --> 0:23:51.320
<v Speaker 1>have won the popular vote by five points instead of

0:23:51.320 --> 0:23:53.680
<v Speaker 1>the one point seven points that he won by. There's

0:23:53.800 --> 0:23:56.640
<v Speaker 1>long but an idea, and idea the Dems just need

0:23:56.640 --> 0:23:59.600
<v Speaker 1>to get out the vote. But the truth for Democrats

0:23:59.600 --> 0:24:03.240
<v Speaker 1>is that under no circumstances should the vote be gotten

0:24:03.240 --> 0:24:06.560
<v Speaker 1>out anymore. And quoting Nelly Bowls of the Free Press,

0:24:06.680 --> 0:24:08.800
<v Speaker 1>next cycle, we will see rich ladies heading to the

0:24:08.800 --> 0:24:12.400
<v Speaker 1>Philly suburbs to padlock people inside their homes. Celebrities will

0:24:12.400 --> 0:24:15.200
<v Speaker 1>hold concerts hundreds of miles from the nearest polling place.

0:24:15.720 --> 0:24:17.920
<v Speaker 1>Candidates will shake the hand of a working class man

0:24:17.960 --> 0:24:20.359
<v Speaker 1>in Ohio and tell them the blind of votes longer

0:24:20.359 --> 0:24:22.400
<v Speaker 1>than ten minutes, just call it good and go home.

0:24:24.080 --> 0:24:26.800
<v Speaker 2>The rock the vote era is over, at least for

0:24:26.920 --> 0:24:27.359
<v Speaker 2>the left.

0:24:28.160 --> 0:24:31.680
<v Speaker 1>Right now, you'll see them saying, yeah, not only ID

0:24:31.880 --> 0:24:35.040
<v Speaker 1>is required for voting. You should have two id's. Yeah. Yeah,

0:24:35.359 --> 0:24:39.040
<v Speaker 1>not having ideas discriminates against black people or something. Yeah,

0:24:39.160 --> 0:24:42.119
<v Speaker 1>make it harder to vote. There's only three minutes. The

0:24:42.119 --> 0:24:43.959
<v Speaker 1>pole should be open on election day. That's it.

0:24:44.080 --> 0:24:47.520
<v Speaker 2>Ah, I've got two more stunning pieces of information that

0:24:47.560 --> 0:24:49.520
<v Speaker 2>if I's a Democrat, I'd think we're in bad shape

0:24:49.560 --> 0:24:51.080
<v Speaker 2>and then I'll be done with this. This is really

0:24:51.160 --> 0:24:51.800
<v Speaker 2>quite amazing.

0:24:52.160 --> 0:24:54.280
<v Speaker 1>Go I'll be the judge of whether they're stunning or not.

0:24:54.480 --> 0:24:58.200
<v Speaker 2>It's the rise of conservatism among young people, mainly men,

0:24:58.280 --> 0:25:02.359
<v Speaker 2>that spooks him. The most young voters, regardless of race

0:25:02.400 --> 0:25:07.199
<v Speaker 2>and gender, have become more Republican director of research at

0:25:07.880 --> 0:25:13.639
<v Speaker 2>Blue Rose Research told Axios that millennials were one of

0:25:13.680 --> 0:25:16.760
<v Speaker 2>the most progressive generations in our nation's history, and it

0:25:16.800 --> 0:25:19.720
<v Speaker 2>looks like gen Z is about to be one of

0:25:19.760 --> 0:25:24.479
<v Speaker 2>the most conservative that we've experienced in maybe fifty to

0:25:24.560 --> 0:25:25.439
<v Speaker 2>sixty years.

0:25:27.520 --> 0:25:30.800
<v Speaker 1>I've got to believe that's a reaction to the insane

0:25:30.840 --> 0:25:36.760
<v Speaker 1>progressivism they've grown up seeing an and because kids aren't stupid,

0:25:36.800 --> 0:25:41.000
<v Speaker 1>even if they're not like sophisticated in political analysis, they

0:25:41.119 --> 0:25:44.720
<v Speaker 1>see the results of the policies that have been advocated

0:25:45.480 --> 0:25:48.600
<v Speaker 1>around them in their lives, on the streets, in their towns,

0:25:48.600 --> 0:25:49.440
<v Speaker 1>in their schools.

0:25:50.240 --> 0:25:53.040
<v Speaker 2>This is a guy, this sure guy. Again. He used

0:25:53.080 --> 0:25:58.560
<v Speaker 2>a data from twenty what was it, twenty three million surveys.

0:25:58.760 --> 0:26:02.680
<v Speaker 2>Gen Z is potentially the most conservative generation we've experienced

0:26:02.680 --> 0:26:06.600
<v Speaker 2>in this country in fifty to sixty years. That is something,

0:26:06.680 --> 0:26:08.560
<v Speaker 2>isn't it? You know?

0:26:08.640 --> 0:26:08.680
<v Speaker 1>What.

0:26:08.920 --> 0:26:13.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's so obvious. I think you overplayed your freaking hand.

0:26:14.240 --> 0:26:16.640
<v Speaker 2>And not only did you overplay your freaking hand. As

0:26:16.640 --> 0:26:19.800
<v Speaker 2>super progressives, you know, it's unfair to label all Democrats

0:26:19.880 --> 0:26:22.600
<v Speaker 2>like this because I know plenty of like your working

0:26:22.640 --> 0:26:25.199
<v Speaker 2>class democrats. They weren't down with all this crap. They

0:26:25.200 --> 0:26:27.919
<v Speaker 2>didn't want to talk about boys and girls, sports and

0:26:27.960 --> 0:26:32.760
<v Speaker 2>all this nonsense and latenx and pronouns. It's just all

0:26:32.800 --> 0:26:36.000
<v Speaker 2>this nut job stuff. But anyway, you overplayed your hand,

0:26:36.080 --> 0:26:38.359
<v Speaker 2>and you had the media boost in you the whole time,

0:26:38.400 --> 0:26:41.479
<v Speaker 2>acting like everybody believed this crap. Oh and then how

0:26:41.480 --> 0:26:43.840
<v Speaker 2>about the George the summer at George Floyd. What did

0:26:43.880 --> 0:26:47.200
<v Speaker 2>that do to the Generation Z? The school shutdowns, all

0:26:47.200 --> 0:26:48.000
<v Speaker 2>this different.

0:26:47.680 --> 0:26:52.760
<v Speaker 1>Stuff, right? Yeah, and again the very small number of

0:26:52.920 --> 0:26:58.320
<v Speaker 1>extremely vicious and ideologically extreme progressives who believe this stuff

0:26:58.359 --> 0:27:01.800
<v Speaker 1>were amplified by the you know they're brethren in the media,

0:27:01.880 --> 0:27:04.879
<v Speaker 1>to the point that everybody was cowed. Not everybody, hello,

0:27:05.920 --> 0:27:09.200
<v Speaker 1>so many people were cowed into obedience or not resisting, thinking, Wow,

0:27:09.320 --> 0:27:13.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm in the minority. I hear these messages that everybody

0:27:13.640 --> 0:27:16.440
<v Speaker 1>either believes this or should every I'm being dragged into

0:27:16.880 --> 0:27:22.760
<v Speaker 1>white people are evil training at my employer. Oh my god,

0:27:22.800 --> 0:27:28.680
<v Speaker 1>they they capitalized on a moment in time so disproportionate

0:27:28.720 --> 0:27:34.760
<v Speaker 1>to A their numbers and b any sanity. God, I'm

0:27:34.760 --> 0:27:38.520
<v Speaker 1>thinking surrounding their crazy ass views. It was amazing to

0:27:38.560 --> 0:27:40.640
<v Speaker 1>have witnessed it. I hope it's on the back foot.

0:27:40.640 --> 0:27:43.360
<v Speaker 1>And boy, anybody who lost their career during that horrifying

0:27:43.880 --> 0:27:46.400
<v Speaker 1>period of Black Lives Matter and the rest of it, oh,

0:27:46.440 --> 0:27:47.280
<v Speaker 1>I ache for you.

0:27:48.000 --> 0:27:52.400
<v Speaker 2>I'm thinking about my own kids, who are certainly more

0:27:52.440 --> 0:27:54.720
<v Speaker 2>conservative than I was at that age. I never even

0:27:54.760 --> 0:27:57.080
<v Speaker 2>thought about this sort of stuff. But I also didn't,

0:27:57.160 --> 0:28:00.560
<v Speaker 2>you know, confront a whole bunch of weird section stuff

0:28:00.560 --> 0:28:03.800
<v Speaker 2>in school that they don't want. And they were they've

0:28:03.800 --> 0:28:05.760
<v Speaker 2>been able to figure out, you know, which party is

0:28:05.800 --> 0:28:07.919
<v Speaker 2>for that and which is against it, or all the

0:28:07.960 --> 0:28:11.080
<v Speaker 2>homeless people around in the park and whatever, which party

0:28:11.119 --> 0:28:12.760
<v Speaker 2>allowed this and which parties against it?

0:28:13.160 --> 0:28:18.280
<v Speaker 1>They figured that out right, right, all the crime and

0:28:18.280 --> 0:28:20.240
<v Speaker 1>all the goods being locked up in the story?

0:28:20.480 --> 0:28:24.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, absolutely, or the how come we can't do this

0:28:24.720 --> 0:28:27.160
<v Speaker 2>because we'll get sued. They're afraid we'll get sued. They

0:28:27.200 --> 0:28:29.400
<v Speaker 2>know what parties behind that and what's not.

0:28:30.480 --> 0:28:37.000
<v Speaker 1>Right, right, I'm just picturing all the poor kids, and

0:28:37.040 --> 0:28:39.880
<v Speaker 1>who knows what the numbers are? Eighty twenty seventy thirty

0:28:40.200 --> 0:28:47.760
<v Speaker 1>who When the teachers spouted the utterly horrific progressive neo

0:28:47.760 --> 0:28:52.640
<v Speaker 1>Marxist doctrine at them in schools, the fifteen twenty percent,

0:28:52.760 --> 0:28:55.320
<v Speaker 1>thirty percent who are down with it shouted yes, yes,

0:28:55.760 --> 0:28:58.200
<v Speaker 1>that's right. And anybody who denies it as a racist

0:28:58.240 --> 0:29:00.680
<v Speaker 1>and a bigot and horrible and will them for you.

0:29:01.680 --> 0:29:03.840
<v Speaker 1>And then the seventy percent of the kids just sitting

0:29:03.840 --> 0:29:08.080
<v Speaker 1>there thinking this is insane, but I don't dare say anything.

0:29:09.400 --> 0:29:13.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm hoping, you know, as they reach adulthood they expressed

0:29:13.240 --> 0:29:17.400
<v Speaker 1>their distaste for that, you know, at the ballot box,

0:29:17.440 --> 0:29:19.959
<v Speaker 1>and have found the courage to be vocal about it.

0:29:20.840 --> 0:29:23.600
<v Speaker 2>I thought that was really some stunning information. So Millennials

0:29:23.720 --> 0:29:26.440
<v Speaker 2>one of the most progressive generations ever gen z the

0:29:26.480 --> 0:29:29.080
<v Speaker 2>most conservative in a half century or more.

0:29:30.400 --> 0:29:33.760
<v Speaker 1>For what is worth, My oldest kid is thirty two

0:29:34.080 --> 0:29:37.320
<v Speaker 1>now going on thirty three. My youngest is twenty five.

0:29:37.640 --> 0:29:41.400
<v Speaker 2>None of these numbers are possible. That can't be true.

0:29:41.520 --> 0:29:43.960
<v Speaker 1>Oh, I know, have you checked that? Somebody should check

0:29:43.960 --> 0:29:49.160
<v Speaker 1>that doing the math? Yeah, twenty five Yeah, they grew

0:29:49.240 --> 0:29:55.000
<v Speaker 1>up in a significantly different moment in time from each other.

0:29:56.480 --> 0:30:02.400
<v Speaker 1>The beginning and heyday of the insanity versus the last

0:30:02.440 --> 0:30:06.280
<v Speaker 1>Cup innings of it, if you will. Baseball season's about

0:30:06.280 --> 0:30:10.680
<v Speaker 1>to start, very excited. Yeah wow, how interesting. Well, you know,

0:30:10.760 --> 0:30:14.080
<v Speaker 1>I during the worst of it twenty twenty twenty one,

0:30:14.160 --> 0:30:18.640
<v Speaker 1>the George Floyd Riots, the mostly peaceful, fiery, murdery, looting,

0:30:19.120 --> 0:30:20.560
<v Speaker 1>lawless insane.

0:30:21.160 --> 0:30:22.280
<v Speaker 2>Kicked in right after that.

0:30:24.120 --> 0:30:26.120
<v Speaker 1>Oh my god, men beating the hell out of women

0:30:26.200 --> 0:30:29.160
<v Speaker 1>on sports fields because they called themselves a woman yesterday.

0:30:29.520 --> 0:30:33.040
<v Speaker 1>That the stupidity of it bothers me more than the

0:30:33.080 --> 0:30:38.560
<v Speaker 1>extremism of it. Yeah. Yeah, during all of that, I

0:30:38.600 --> 0:30:45.160
<v Speaker 1>really thought sanity has got to prevail. Reality has to

0:30:45.240 --> 0:30:45.800
<v Speaker 1>bat last.

0:30:45.880 --> 0:30:48.840
<v Speaker 2>I didn't think it would this fast.

0:30:49.440 --> 0:30:52.080
<v Speaker 1>Well, it ain't done yet, folks. Remember the universities are

0:30:52.120 --> 0:30:54.880
<v Speaker 1>still teaching this as fast as they can.

0:30:55.200 --> 0:30:59.440
<v Speaker 2>Well, they're that tiny sliver the insanity. Yeah, we'll finish strong.

0:30:59.200 --> 0:31:06.440
<v Speaker 4>NEXTI former University of Michigan assistant football coach Matthew Weiss

0:31:06.480 --> 0:31:10.320
<v Speaker 4>in court facing federal hacking charges. Wise is accused of

0:31:10.400 --> 0:31:14.520
<v Speaker 4>targeting female athletes, downloading their intimate photos, and of taking

0:31:14.560 --> 0:31:18.200
<v Speaker 4>notes commenting on their bodies and their sexual preferences, according

0:31:18.240 --> 0:31:22.040
<v Speaker 4>to prosecutors. Prosecutors say over an eight year period, Weiss

0:31:22.160 --> 0:31:24.760
<v Speaker 4>hacked into the database of more than one hundred colleges

0:31:25.080 --> 0:31:28.920
<v Speaker 4>and cracked the encryption protecting the passwords. If convicted, he

0:31:28.960 --> 0:31:30.760
<v Speaker 4>could face decades in prison.

0:31:31.640 --> 0:31:33.760
<v Speaker 1>There are half a dozen different angles you can take

0:31:33.760 --> 0:31:36.320
<v Speaker 1>to that story. I'm kidding, what a nuts job with

0:31:36.480 --> 0:31:39.600
<v Speaker 1>omnipresent porn? What is it about? Oh, these are real

0:31:39.720 --> 0:31:42.760
<v Speaker 1>people who are not porn people, and I'm looking at

0:31:42.800 --> 0:31:43.600
<v Speaker 1>their privots.

0:31:43.840 --> 0:31:48.520
<v Speaker 2>So you're getting much like less access to see a

0:31:48.640 --> 0:31:54.400
<v Speaker 2>human's body parts than you could get you with a

0:31:54.440 --> 0:31:55.360
<v Speaker 2>couple of clicks on.

0:31:55.320 --> 0:31:58.480
<v Speaker 1>Your computer, is what he Allen used to say of pornography.

0:31:58.520 --> 0:32:03.760
<v Speaker 2>And it's so poorly lit, it's just h But I

0:32:03.800 --> 0:32:07.840
<v Speaker 2>guess because it's gonna be some sort of power dynamic.

0:32:09.000 --> 0:32:13.719
<v Speaker 1>Or I don't know, it's it's I mean, anybody with

0:32:13.760 --> 0:32:16.240
<v Speaker 1>a little experience in life, have been around the block

0:32:16.360 --> 0:32:21.600
<v Speaker 1>knows the difference between porn and actual sex and sexual

0:32:21.640 --> 0:32:25.720
<v Speaker 1>response is It's like the difference between looking at food

0:32:25.720 --> 0:32:29.000
<v Speaker 1>and eating it. I mean, And I pity kids who

0:32:29.000 --> 0:32:33.360
<v Speaker 1>are just think porn is love and life anyway.

0:32:33.800 --> 0:32:35.719
<v Speaker 2>What that they may be ruined for life on one

0:32:35.720 --> 0:32:38.680
<v Speaker 2>of the most interesting and enjoyable aspects of it.

0:32:39.120 --> 0:32:41.640
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, yeah. And the losing out on the bonding

0:32:41.680 --> 0:32:43.520
<v Speaker 1>with another human being and the rest of it for

0:32:43.600 --> 0:32:47.600
<v Speaker 1>both the boys and the girls. Oh yeah, one hundred yeah.

0:32:47.640 --> 0:32:50.920
<v Speaker 1>So you could look at that angle of sexual response.

0:32:51.160 --> 0:32:56.040
<v Speaker 1>You could look at a guy who's that gifted with

0:32:56.800 --> 0:33:02.440
<v Speaker 1>the computer arts and is living his dream career and

0:33:02.560 --> 0:33:07.760
<v Speaker 1>decides to devote his expertise and risk his career over

0:33:07.960 --> 0:33:15.840
<v Speaker 1>that sexual need. It's just wow. What human beings are?

0:33:15.880 --> 0:33:19.400
<v Speaker 1>Strange beasts? Special. Guy's a football coach. He's not the

0:33:19.440 --> 0:33:22.440
<v Speaker 1>head coach, but he's a football coach the University of Michigan.

0:33:23.480 --> 0:33:29.000
<v Speaker 1>You are a top mount Everest.

0:33:29.120 --> 0:33:33.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's weird. Jackie Clark, GISs time stop.

0:33:34.600 --> 0:33:38.720
<v Speaker 1>Jack and Joe Live, got go and if they don't

0:33:38.880 --> 0:33:41.360
<v Speaker 1>give can they'll be back tomorrow.

0:33:43.000 --> 0:33:44.840
<v Speaker 2>Here's your host for final thoughts, Joe Getty.

0:33:45.520 --> 0:33:47.440
<v Speaker 1>Hey, let's get a final thought from everybody on the crew.

0:33:47.480 --> 0:33:51.560
<v Speaker 1>There is Michaelangelo, our technical director directing is technically Michael,

0:33:51.680 --> 0:33:53.880
<v Speaker 1>what is your final thoughts? Earlier in the show, we

0:33:53.920 --> 0:33:57.000
<v Speaker 1>were talking about robots doing medical procedures. What about them

0:33:57.040 --> 0:34:00.360
<v Speaker 1>doing dentistry. They go to pull your teeth and maybe

0:34:00.400 --> 0:34:03.120
<v Speaker 1>you know there's a malfunction that they plot several by mistake,

0:34:04.240 --> 0:34:07.000
<v Speaker 1>right or pull out your eyeballs or I don't sure.

0:34:07.720 --> 0:34:09.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, this is what's gonna happen.

0:34:09.560 --> 0:34:12.719
<v Speaker 1>What the what? Katie Green or a Steve Newes woman.

0:34:12.760 --> 0:34:14.320
<v Speaker 1>As a final thought, Katie, if.

0:34:14.160 --> 0:34:16.279
<v Speaker 3>You'd like to wash that thought out of your brain,

0:34:16.360 --> 0:34:18.840
<v Speaker 3>go to Armstrong getty dot com. Check out Katie's corner.

0:34:18.880 --> 0:34:20.839
<v Speaker 3>I have the video of the baby Sopranos on there.

0:34:21.719 --> 0:34:23.520
<v Speaker 2>It's very cute. If you haven't seen any of.

0:34:23.520 --> 0:34:26.480
<v Speaker 1>Those now, okay, all right, yeah, I gotta check it out.

0:34:26.560 --> 0:34:27.760
<v Speaker 1>Jack a final thought.

0:34:27.560 --> 0:34:29.840
<v Speaker 2>For us, So we're talking about how long will college

0:34:29.880 --> 0:34:32.640
<v Speaker 2>sports last, you know, because things have changed a lot.

0:34:32.640 --> 0:34:36.279
<v Speaker 2>In March, madness is going on. For instance, this Maryland's

0:34:36.280 --> 0:34:40.000
<v Speaker 2>players were asked in the postgame conference what makes Kevin

0:34:40.040 --> 0:34:42.000
<v Speaker 2>Weiller to coach worth listening to? And one of the

0:34:42.000 --> 0:34:45.400
<v Speaker 2>players said, well, he do pay us the money.

0:34:46.200 --> 0:34:49.839
<v Speaker 1>Oh, I did not think that's what you were going

0:34:49.920 --> 0:34:53.160
<v Speaker 1>to say. I let my guard down and he hit

0:34:53.200 --> 0:34:55.839
<v Speaker 1>me running a bread basket doubled over.

0:34:57.080 --> 0:34:57.200
<v Speaker 2>Uh.

0:34:57.400 --> 0:35:03.440
<v Speaker 1>My final thought and look the whole using snap vine Chat, discord,

0:35:03.560 --> 0:35:07.920
<v Speaker 1>athonogram or whatever they are using the legality of that,

0:35:08.000 --> 0:35:10.480
<v Speaker 1>the wisdom of that. Letting Jeffrey Goldberg in that is

0:35:11.160 --> 0:35:13.799
<v Speaker 1>probably bad and needs to be looked into. On the

0:35:13.800 --> 0:35:16.640
<v Speaker 1>other hand, I'm looking at more and more examples of

0:35:16.640 --> 0:35:19.600
<v Speaker 1>what was said by whom and when and how, and

0:35:19.640 --> 0:35:27.440
<v Speaker 1>it's an incredibly balanced and respectful exchange of ideas among

0:35:27.520 --> 0:35:30.560
<v Speaker 1>people who don't always agree with each other, and arriving

0:35:30.600 --> 0:35:33.960
<v Speaker 1>at a policy and executing the president's foreign policy. It's

0:35:34.280 --> 0:35:36.120
<v Speaker 1>a very healthy discussion.

0:35:36.840 --> 0:35:38.640
<v Speaker 2>Are you're feeling like this is more of a scandal

0:35:38.719 --> 0:35:40.720
<v Speaker 2>or less of a scandal than when we started.

0:35:42.920 --> 0:35:44.480
<v Speaker 1>I think it'll go away pretty quickly.

0:35:44.640 --> 0:35:46.760
<v Speaker 2>Ye see tomorrow, God bless America.

0:35:48.560 --> 0:35:51.160
<v Speaker 5>Every single intelligence agency use I'm.

0:35:51.000 --> 0:35:57.280
<v Speaker 1>Strong and Getty is outrageous. It's absolutely unthinkable. It's an embarrassment.

0:35:57.320 --> 0:35:59.400
<v Speaker 1>This was a huge mistake.

0:35:59.680 --> 0:36:04.040
<v Speaker 2>Correct, No, get the hell out of here, whatever.

0:36:04.239 --> 0:36:07.920
<v Speaker 1>Hold on to the truth and hope like when you

0:36:07.920 --> 0:36:09.160
<v Speaker 1>say that, like you mean like that be.

0:36:09.280 --> 0:36:13.280
<v Speaker 2>I that was even dumber and more annoying than usually

0:36:13.760 --> 0:36:17.440
<v Speaker 2>so story. Okay, cheers Armstrong and Getty