WEBVTT - How This Hedge Fund Manager Finds ‘Diamonds in the Dust’

0:00:03.160 --> 0:00:08.920
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, Radio News.

0:00:10.240 --> 0:00:12.600
<v Speaker 2>Welcome to Maren Talks Money, the podcast in which people

0:00:12.600 --> 0:00:15.320
<v Speaker 2>who know the markets explain the markets. I'm Maren zum

0:00:15.400 --> 0:00:18.000
<v Speaker 2>zet Web. This week we've beat with Sean Pesh, portfolio

0:00:18.120 --> 0:00:20.680
<v Speaker 2>manager and founder at rand Moore Fund Management. Pest has

0:00:20.680 --> 0:00:23.840
<v Speaker 2>been in the investment industry since nineteen ninety seven, working

0:00:23.840 --> 0:00:27.120
<v Speaker 2>at a variety of institutions. He established ran More Fund Management,

0:00:27.200 --> 0:00:29.360
<v Speaker 2>his own company, in two thousand and eight. It's worth

0:00:29.400 --> 0:00:32.960
<v Speaker 2>noting he has a fairly stellar record of outperformance, outperforming

0:00:33.000 --> 0:00:36.640
<v Speaker 2>the index since inception and over pretty much every time

0:00:36.680 --> 0:00:39.360
<v Speaker 2>period since, except for the last twelve months, which we'll

0:00:39.400 --> 0:00:48.599
<v Speaker 2>discuss as we go. Sean, welcome, thanks for joining us.

0:00:49.040 --> 0:00:50.520
<v Speaker 1>Thanks Miren, lovely to be here.

0:00:50.760 --> 0:00:54.640
<v Speaker 2>Now listen, you have achieved fairly spectacular, as I said,

0:00:54.720 --> 0:01:00.000
<v Speaker 2>outperformance over the last decade plus, despite being a value

0:01:00.320 --> 0:01:02.960
<v Speaker 2>fund manager in a period when being a value fund

0:01:03.000 --> 0:01:06.000
<v Speaker 2>manager has been an absolutely terrible thing to be. This

0:01:06.080 --> 0:01:09.120
<v Speaker 2>has been a time for growth. Yeah, somehow you've succeeded

0:01:09.240 --> 0:01:11.280
<v Speaker 2>as a value manager. So let's talk a little bit

0:01:11.280 --> 0:01:12.680
<v Speaker 2>about how on earth you've done that.

0:01:13.360 --> 0:01:16.520
<v Speaker 1>I guess if we'd had this interview back in the

0:01:16.560 --> 0:01:19.000
<v Speaker 1>middle of the pandemic, when everybody was sitting at home

0:01:19.080 --> 0:01:21.640
<v Speaker 1>buying Apple iPhones and ordering stuff on Amazon will be

0:01:21.680 --> 0:01:25.200
<v Speaker 1>a different conversation. But we just try and invest in

0:01:25.480 --> 0:01:29.240
<v Speaker 1>decent companies that are generating cash with management on our

0:01:29.319 --> 0:01:33.120
<v Speaker 1>side and not paying too much for them. And it has,

0:01:33.160 --> 0:01:36.560
<v Speaker 1>as you rightly say, been a challenging time for value managers,

0:01:36.600 --> 0:01:39.039
<v Speaker 1>and I guess, I guess there are three reasons for that.

0:01:39.120 --> 0:01:42.760
<v Speaker 1>The first is, if you go back to nineteen seventy four,

0:01:42.800 --> 0:01:46.600
<v Speaker 1>when these indices first started, value outperformed growth with a

0:01:46.600 --> 0:01:48.920
<v Speaker 1>couple of hiccups along the way, pretty much in a

0:01:48.960 --> 0:01:51.200
<v Speaker 1>straight line up to the end of two thousand and seven.

0:01:51.320 --> 0:01:54.280
<v Speaker 1>And then you had the global financial crisis, and what

0:01:54.400 --> 0:01:57.360
<v Speaker 1>happened after that was quantitative easing, and that meant interest

0:01:57.480 --> 0:02:02.120
<v Speaker 1>rates collapsed and until late twenty one or so, and

0:02:02.200 --> 0:02:04.800
<v Speaker 1>so during that period, if you plot the if you

0:02:04.880 --> 0:02:08.720
<v Speaker 1>overlay those two average interest rates and value versus growth,

0:02:08.840 --> 0:02:12.119
<v Speaker 1>you'll see that value underperformed in during quantitative easing. That's

0:02:12.120 --> 0:02:15.119
<v Speaker 1>the first reason. The second reason is you had these

0:02:15.240 --> 0:02:19.720
<v Speaker 1>fast growing companies Microsoft, Amazon, those kind of guys at

0:02:19.720 --> 0:02:21.480
<v Speaker 1>the same time as you had low interest rates, and

0:02:21.520 --> 0:02:24.400
<v Speaker 1>so that meant their growth rates were discounted at lower rates,

0:02:24.800 --> 0:02:29.639
<v Speaker 1>and they became hugely huge companies in the markets. And

0:02:29.680 --> 0:02:31.880
<v Speaker 1>the third reason is at that very time that you

0:02:32.000 --> 0:02:36.280
<v Speaker 1>had these massive companies with huge market caps, passive investing

0:02:36.680 --> 0:02:38.680
<v Speaker 1>just exploded. When I started the business, I think it

0:02:38.720 --> 0:02:41.680
<v Speaker 1>was a trillion in dollars in passive investing is awfter

0:02:41.720 --> 0:02:44.800
<v Speaker 1>something nearly twelve, And so you had this wall of

0:02:44.840 --> 0:02:48.560
<v Speaker 1>money just moving into these companies, propelling them ever further.

0:02:49.200 --> 0:02:53.640
<v Speaker 1>Now what's changed. Quantitative easing is over. Okay, we saw

0:02:53.680 --> 0:02:56.520
<v Speaker 1>that reference to that in the FED statement last week.

0:02:56.639 --> 0:02:59.040
<v Speaker 1>The second thing is these companies are getting hard. It's

0:02:59.040 --> 0:03:02.760
<v Speaker 1>harder for them to grow. Microsoft grew revenue ten grew

0:03:02.800 --> 0:03:08.000
<v Speaker 1>earning specially ten percent last quarter. Costco grew revenue one

0:03:08.080 --> 0:03:11.240
<v Speaker 1>percent last quarter the other day. You've seen Nike falling

0:03:12.000 --> 0:03:14.240
<v Speaker 1>the other day. So you know, it's just getting harder

0:03:14.240 --> 0:03:17.120
<v Speaker 1>and harder for these giant companies to carry on out

0:03:17.120 --> 0:03:19.880
<v Speaker 1>performing in the way they have. And so we think

0:03:19.919 --> 0:03:22.280
<v Speaker 1>that's a really good time to focus and turn the

0:03:22.320 --> 0:03:24.440
<v Speaker 1>attention to value investing. You've got to be you've got

0:03:24.480 --> 0:03:26.200
<v Speaker 1>to go where the puck is going to be. This

0:03:26.240 --> 0:03:28.200
<v Speaker 1>is what way in Gretzky said, not where the puck's been.

0:03:28.560 --> 0:03:31.280
<v Speaker 1>The puck has been in quality and growth. The puck

0:03:31.360 --> 0:03:33.000
<v Speaker 1>is going to value. We firmly believe that.

0:03:33.400 --> 0:03:35.680
<v Speaker 2>But nonetheless you haven't been in those companies. I want.

0:03:35.720 --> 0:03:37.720
<v Speaker 2>The thing that really strikes me when I look at

0:03:37.760 --> 0:03:41.040
<v Speaker 2>your fact sheet is the very very small level of

0:03:41.040 --> 0:03:43.000
<v Speaker 2>exposure you have to the US. So if we look

0:03:43.040 --> 0:03:47.160
<v Speaker 2>at the MSCI world, that's seventy three percent US, right,

0:03:47.280 --> 0:03:49.200
<v Speaker 2>and an awful lot of that, of course is the

0:03:49.760 --> 0:03:52.880
<v Speaker 2>megasavan is the huge technology stocks in the US, but

0:03:53.120 --> 0:03:55.680
<v Speaker 2>you don't have that. You're about seventeen percent in the US.

0:03:55.680 --> 0:03:58.200
<v Speaker 2>And if I spin my eye over to your sector

0:03:58.280 --> 0:04:02.839
<v Speaker 2>exposure information technology three percent, that's against bround twenty five

0:04:02.840 --> 0:04:06.440
<v Speaker 2>percent in the MSCI. So you are very very far

0:04:06.480 --> 0:04:08.120
<v Speaker 2>away from the index, which is great, by the way,

0:04:08.120 --> 0:04:09.680
<v Speaker 2>and nothing we love more than a fund that doesn't

0:04:09.720 --> 0:04:11.400
<v Speaker 2>touch the index. If we wanted the index, we just

0:04:11.400 --> 0:04:13.200
<v Speaker 2>buy the index, right, So we love a fund that's

0:04:13.240 --> 0:04:15.840
<v Speaker 2>far away from it. But you know, you're you've really

0:04:15.880 --> 0:04:17.440
<v Speaker 2>differentiated yourself, then.

0:04:17.640 --> 0:04:20.720
<v Speaker 1>We have, and and I guess you know there are

0:04:20.720 --> 0:04:22.880
<v Speaker 1>a couple of points, So how we managed to generate

0:04:22.920 --> 0:04:27.760
<v Speaker 1>those returns well? The first is that we will typically

0:04:27.800 --> 0:04:31.359
<v Speaker 1>go where people are less interested because that's where we

0:04:31.360 --> 0:04:34.000
<v Speaker 1>find the value. So, you know, we made good money

0:04:34.040 --> 0:04:36.359
<v Speaker 1>in Japan in recent years. We were quite early in

0:04:36.520 --> 0:04:40.040
<v Speaker 1>moving into Japan. When the world was focused in Japan

0:04:40.160 --> 0:04:42.520
<v Speaker 1>with Warren Buffett and all of that, you know, we

0:04:42.520 --> 0:04:47.160
<v Speaker 1>were actually selling and redeploying those assets into China. And

0:04:47.240 --> 0:04:49.240
<v Speaker 1>so even last month, you know, we had more in

0:04:49.400 --> 0:04:53.280
<v Speaker 1>China than the US Hong Kong listed stocks. So what

0:04:53.320 --> 0:04:55.080
<v Speaker 1>we so, I guess there's two ways to make money.

0:04:55.120 --> 0:04:56.960
<v Speaker 1>The one is you can buy a company that you

0:04:57.040 --> 0:04:59.720
<v Speaker 1>think is a fabulous business and hold it forever, and

0:04:59.760 --> 0:05:03.280
<v Speaker 1>that company will compound its earnings. What we prefer to

0:05:03.279 --> 0:05:07.160
<v Speaker 1>do is find an undervalued business, invest at the right time,

0:05:07.240 --> 0:05:11.560
<v Speaker 1>ideally the right time, and when the value is fully realized,

0:05:11.600 --> 0:05:15.440
<v Speaker 1>we will then sell that and compound the capital. Okay,

0:05:15.480 --> 0:05:18.080
<v Speaker 1>because sometimes you can be stuck in these businesses. You

0:05:18.080 --> 0:05:20.320
<v Speaker 1>think it's a great business, and look at Nike, look

0:05:20.320 --> 0:05:23.839
<v Speaker 1>at st Order, look at you know, Diageo or Unilever

0:05:23.920 --> 0:05:26.200
<v Speaker 1>in recent years, and things come unstuck. And so we

0:05:26.279 --> 0:05:29.120
<v Speaker 1>prefer to compound the capital and we move the capital around.

0:05:29.160 --> 0:05:32.120
<v Speaker 1>So we really don't shy away from from moving our

0:05:32.240 --> 0:05:34.799
<v Speaker 1>assets around the world based on where we find value,

0:05:34.960 --> 0:05:37.520
<v Speaker 1>and we're not scared of our turnover either. You know,

0:05:37.560 --> 0:05:39.520
<v Speaker 1>if I look at some of my some of the

0:05:39.520 --> 0:05:43.960
<v Speaker 1>best money managers in the world, the likes who've survived

0:05:44.040 --> 0:05:47.240
<v Speaker 1>and got fantastic crack records over multi decades, not just

0:05:47.360 --> 0:05:49.880
<v Speaker 1>in in recent years. You know, the likes of Paul

0:05:49.880 --> 0:05:54.119
<v Speaker 1>Tudor Jones and Bruce Kovner and David Tepper and those guys.

0:05:54.160 --> 0:05:56.919
<v Speaker 1>I've never ever seen a single quote from them about

0:05:56.960 --> 0:05:58.240
<v Speaker 1>low turnover being an answer.

0:05:59.200 --> 0:06:01.360
<v Speaker 2>That's intering because as a big part of the industry

0:06:01.400 --> 0:06:04.360
<v Speaker 2>that believe exactly that your buffet style you buy great

0:06:04.400 --> 0:06:07.040
<v Speaker 2>companies and you keep them in definitely, and you let

0:06:07.120 --> 0:06:10.400
<v Speaker 2>them compound until you're super rich. But of course I'm

0:06:10.600 --> 0:06:13.719
<v Speaker 2>the answer to that. Your answer might be, well, companies change.

0:06:13.760 --> 0:06:16.320
<v Speaker 2>A great company doesn't stay a great company, and you

0:06:16.360 --> 0:06:17.640
<v Speaker 2>have to be prepared to move out of it as

0:06:17.680 --> 0:06:19.800
<v Speaker 2>soon as you see signs that it's not great anymore.

0:06:19.920 --> 0:06:23.120
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely, And Warren Buffett said, my favorite holding periods wherever

0:06:23.440 --> 0:06:25.400
<v Speaker 1>you didn't say, I'm my only holding periods wherever, and

0:06:25.400 --> 0:06:27.640
<v Speaker 1>he sold half his apple every day. You know he's

0:06:27.640 --> 0:06:30.840
<v Speaker 1>selling bank of America. He's sold many positions along the way,

0:06:30.880 --> 0:06:33.520
<v Speaker 1>So I think people confuse that, I mean take it

0:06:33.560 --> 0:06:36.640
<v Speaker 1>to the extreme. Some of the early good businesses that

0:06:36.680 --> 0:06:40.760
<v Speaker 1>everybody knew about and loved were railroads and you know

0:06:40.800 --> 0:06:43.560
<v Speaker 1>those steel manufacturing et cetera. Where would you be today

0:06:43.600 --> 0:06:46.560
<v Speaker 1>if you'd own those forever. So, you know, we think

0:06:46.640 --> 0:06:50.039
<v Speaker 1>the right business at the right time, and we very

0:06:51.000 --> 0:06:53.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, things change. So we are not in that

0:06:53.880 --> 0:06:56.160
<v Speaker 1>camp where you think you can find a great business

0:06:56.160 --> 0:06:58.400
<v Speaker 1>and hold it forever, because we don't know what the

0:06:58.400 --> 0:07:00.200
<v Speaker 1>future is. And as I said, you can use look

0:07:00.240 --> 0:07:02.799
<v Speaker 1>at Nike. You know, Nike had the lunch to themselves.

0:07:02.920 --> 0:07:06.360
<v Speaker 1>Now you've got competitors with on Running and Hokka and

0:07:06.440 --> 0:07:09.039
<v Speaker 1>Sketches and those kind of guys. So the environment is

0:07:09.080 --> 0:07:10.920
<v Speaker 1>always changing and you have to be alert to that.

0:07:11.520 --> 0:07:14.440
<v Speaker 1>And so we're not in the sit in the zide

0:07:14.480 --> 0:07:15.400
<v Speaker 1>and do nothing camp.

0:07:16.120 --> 0:07:18.080
<v Speaker 2>Well, let's step back a little bit because you mentioned

0:07:18.160 --> 0:07:20.040
<v Speaker 2>Japan earlier, and I know a lot of our listeners

0:07:20.160 --> 0:07:22.600
<v Speaker 2>are very interested investing in Japan, have been for a while,

0:07:22.640 --> 0:07:24.680
<v Speaker 2>and John and I were like you very on it

0:07:24.720 --> 0:07:27.120
<v Speaker 2>when it was very cheap. You know, this is value etc.

0:07:27.560 --> 0:07:29.160
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to Tokyo next week, by the way, I'll

0:07:29.200 --> 0:07:31.600
<v Speaker 2>report back. But in the meantime, you say you're no

0:07:31.640 --> 0:07:33.920
<v Speaker 2>longer really invested in Japan, do you not consider that

0:07:33.960 --> 0:07:35.520
<v Speaker 2>to be a value opportunity anymore?

0:07:35.880 --> 0:07:39.520
<v Speaker 1>Oh? No, we are definitely still in Japan, and we

0:07:39.640 --> 0:07:41.720
<v Speaker 1>a little overweight there. What I'm saying is we've taken

0:07:41.760 --> 0:07:45.160
<v Speaker 1>profits on many of our positions and redeployed those. So no,

0:07:45.240 --> 0:07:47.680
<v Speaker 1>we still like Japan. In fact, I know we bought

0:07:47.720 --> 0:07:50.080
<v Speaker 1>some Mazda the other day. That again, you've got to

0:07:50.080 --> 0:07:53.000
<v Speaker 1>look at the second level thinking that hard Marks talks about.

0:07:53.960 --> 0:07:56.360
<v Speaker 1>You know, a lot of the Japanese companies fell in

0:07:56.400 --> 0:07:59.640
<v Speaker 1>a heap when the yen rallied and the exporters, et cetera. Well,

0:07:59.640 --> 0:08:03.160
<v Speaker 1>you get businesses that have used the week in and

0:08:03.200 --> 0:08:06.080
<v Speaker 1>that's how they've generated revenue and profit growth, and some

0:08:06.160 --> 0:08:09.200
<v Speaker 1>businesses that are growing. And you know, you look at

0:08:09.480 --> 0:08:12.400
<v Speaker 1>the company like Mazda, I mean it's US sales of

0:08:12.440 --> 0:08:16.600
<v Speaker 1>its current range is up thirty percent in the last months,

0:08:16.760 --> 0:08:18.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, and that's been like that for a little while,

0:08:18.840 --> 0:08:21.160
<v Speaker 1>with huge amounts of cash on the balance sheet. So

0:08:21.480 --> 0:08:24.400
<v Speaker 1>there's still lots of value to be unlocked. In Japan,

0:08:24.720 --> 0:08:27.160
<v Speaker 1>some of our companies had just we felt had run

0:08:27.200 --> 0:08:29.800
<v Speaker 1>the course and reached fair value, and so we redeployed

0:08:29.800 --> 0:08:31.080
<v Speaker 1>it to compound their capital.

0:08:31.240 --> 0:08:33.240
<v Speaker 2>Okay, let's move on to China, then, where you did

0:08:33.240 --> 0:08:36.320
<v Speaker 2>deploy some of that capital. There's one of the ongoing

0:08:36.320 --> 0:08:39.880
<v Speaker 2>conversations John and I always have about something maybe cheap,

0:08:39.880 --> 0:08:42.720
<v Speaker 2>but is it investable? Can you invest some webs of China,

0:08:42.920 --> 0:08:46.520
<v Speaker 2>like China where you don't necessarily have the same kind

0:08:46.559 --> 0:08:49.880
<v Speaker 2>of regulatory security that you might have somewhere else. And

0:08:49.960 --> 0:08:52.320
<v Speaker 2>John and might have this conversation around Russia and I said,

0:08:52.400 --> 0:08:54.160
<v Speaker 2>yes you can, and he said no you can't, and

0:08:54.200 --> 0:08:57.120
<v Speaker 2>he was right. And on China, I say yes you can,

0:08:57.200 --> 0:08:59.480
<v Speaker 2>he says, no, you can't. And this week at least,

0:09:00.000 --> 0:09:00.439
<v Speaker 2>I'm right.

0:09:03.280 --> 0:09:06.760
<v Speaker 1>I love the dynamic between you guys. Yeah, and I mean,

0:09:06.840 --> 0:09:09.880
<v Speaker 1>unfortunately included in our track record, we lost just over

0:09:09.920 --> 0:09:13.240
<v Speaker 1>ten percent in Russia, but we recovered in twenty twenty two,

0:09:13.360 --> 0:09:16.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, And that's our process. And those stocks are

0:09:16.240 --> 0:09:18.280
<v Speaker 1>still in the portfolio, but written down to zero. So

0:09:18.800 --> 0:09:21.920
<v Speaker 1>sometimes we get it wrong. In fact, portfolio managers, you

0:09:22.040 --> 0:09:25.520
<v Speaker 1>often get it wrong. And so we China, we thought,

0:09:25.640 --> 0:09:27.200
<v Speaker 1>and it's an interesting point. I think there was a

0:09:27.360 --> 0:09:30.120
<v Speaker 1>there was a conference in feb two thy or twenty

0:09:30.400 --> 0:09:35.160
<v Speaker 1>twenty four at a Goldman Sachs conference, and they surveyed

0:09:35.559 --> 0:09:39.320
<v Speaker 1>the participants and forty percent said China was uninvestable. Now,

0:09:39.360 --> 0:09:41.840
<v Speaker 1>when people tell us some market's uninvestable, you know, that

0:09:41.880 --> 0:09:45.240
<v Speaker 1>peaks our interest because there's got to be some diamonds

0:09:45.240 --> 0:09:48.959
<v Speaker 1>in the dust. And what's interesting is, you know, government

0:09:49.040 --> 0:09:51.560
<v Speaker 1>interference and regulation and all of that. And then you

0:09:51.600 --> 0:09:53.520
<v Speaker 1>stand back and think about it and you go, well,

0:09:53.880 --> 0:09:57.719
<v Speaker 1>when natural gas prices rallied Ireland and the UK and

0:09:57.800 --> 0:10:02.680
<v Speaker 1>posed windfall taxes on you know, oil companies here just

0:10:02.720 --> 0:10:07.520
<v Speaker 1>the other day, President Macron is in favor of of

0:10:07.600 --> 0:10:10.800
<v Speaker 1>taxes on large French companies. You've got the US Department

0:10:10.840 --> 0:10:14.560
<v Speaker 1>of Justice and you know, attacking the US tech companies.

0:10:14.600 --> 0:10:18.800
<v Speaker 1>You've got the Fair Trade commit Trade Commission FTC attacking

0:10:19.200 --> 0:10:22.240
<v Speaker 1>or trying to prevent mergers and takeovers. So I think

0:10:22.520 --> 0:10:25.360
<v Speaker 1>I think this government interference and regulation all the rest

0:10:25.400 --> 0:10:28.200
<v Speaker 1>is overplayed. It's around the world. It's not just in China.

0:10:28.720 --> 0:10:31.960
<v Speaker 1>And so that's our point to that. And in fact,

0:10:32.000 --> 0:10:34.080
<v Speaker 1>what you don't have in many of these Asian markets,

0:10:34.080 --> 0:10:38.640
<v Speaker 1>you don't have greedy management teams taking huge, you know,

0:10:39.000 --> 0:10:43.800
<v Speaker 1>swaths of share options and diluting shareholders, and you don't

0:10:43.800 --> 0:10:45.400
<v Speaker 1>have the short term thinking that you have in many

0:10:45.400 --> 0:10:48.240
<v Speaker 1>of the Western markets. So one needs to balance the

0:10:48.679 --> 0:10:52.080
<v Speaker 1>pros and the cons And when you get companies I mean,

0:10:52.080 --> 0:10:55.520
<v Speaker 1>I'll give you an example. In early September, we I

0:10:55.559 --> 0:10:57.640
<v Speaker 1>mean we owned Ali, Baba and Bider. You see those

0:10:57.679 --> 0:11:00.959
<v Speaker 1>in the top ten last month's fact sheet. But in

0:11:00.960 --> 0:11:04.000
<v Speaker 1>early September were buying ping An and ping An here

0:11:04.080 --> 0:11:07.280
<v Speaker 1>at five times earnings, with an eight percent dividend yield,

0:11:07.320 --> 0:11:10.200
<v Speaker 1>and trading below tangible book value for pretty much the

0:11:10.240 --> 0:11:12.760
<v Speaker 1>first time ever. You know, that's how deeply out of

0:11:12.800 --> 0:11:15.160
<v Speaker 1>favor it was. And we were buying it at thirty

0:11:15.200 --> 0:11:16.760
<v Speaker 1>three and you know we're selling it the other day

0:11:16.760 --> 0:11:19.440
<v Speaker 1>at fifty five. You make sixty percent in a month. Now,

0:11:19.600 --> 0:11:21.640
<v Speaker 1>we would quite happily hold it. We didn't want it

0:11:21.720 --> 0:11:24.280
<v Speaker 1>only hold ping An for a month. But when when

0:11:24.320 --> 0:11:27.679
<v Speaker 1>you've had this kind of move, you've been over awarded

0:11:27.679 --> 0:11:30.400
<v Speaker 1>in a short space of time, we are happy to

0:11:30.480 --> 0:11:30.800
<v Speaker 1>move on.

0:11:31.200 --> 0:11:34.280
<v Speaker 2>Okay, And the other market that until very recently we

0:11:34.400 --> 0:11:37.120
<v Speaker 2>kept being told was uninvestable, I kept being told, particularly

0:11:37.160 --> 0:11:40.640
<v Speaker 2>by American investors in the odd unreconciled remainer, that the

0:11:40.760 --> 0:11:43.920
<v Speaker 2>UK was an uninvestable market. We don't hear that so

0:11:44.000 --> 0:11:46.960
<v Speaker 2>much anymore. We're hearing much more positivity around the UK.

0:11:47.080 --> 0:11:48.160
<v Speaker 2>You invested here.

0:11:48.160 --> 0:11:50.880
<v Speaker 1>We are and you know we meaningfully overweight. I think

0:11:50.880 --> 0:11:54.840
<v Speaker 1>we're at six percent versus just less than four. Not

0:11:54.960 --> 0:11:56.679
<v Speaker 1>that we worry, as I said, we worry too much

0:11:56.679 --> 0:12:01.600
<v Speaker 1>about the benchmark. And you know we we bottom up investors,

0:12:01.600 --> 0:12:04.880
<v Speaker 1>so we less worried about the top down and interest

0:12:04.960 --> 0:12:08.480
<v Speaker 1>rates and you know, those kind of put political goings on.

0:12:08.600 --> 0:12:10.640
<v Speaker 1>I suppose that's the other thing is that China's had

0:12:10.679 --> 0:12:12.199
<v Speaker 1>quite a stable It's one of the few places in

0:12:12.240 --> 0:12:14.199
<v Speaker 1>the world that hasn't had an election this year. But

0:12:15.240 --> 0:12:19.560
<v Speaker 1>some of the companies there meren which might be of interest.

0:12:20.640 --> 0:12:22.679
<v Speaker 1>And again my compliance office or shot of me if

0:12:22.679 --> 0:12:25.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't say this is obviously not advice. But where

0:12:25.120 --> 0:12:29.240
<v Speaker 1>we do have some positions is in the and what's

0:12:29.320 --> 0:12:31.720
<v Speaker 1>deeply out of favor are the UK asset managers.

0:12:32.000 --> 0:12:33.840
<v Speaker 2>Why do you think that's out of favor? Why do

0:12:33.880 --> 0:12:35.360
<v Speaker 2>you think you look at that and you see the

0:12:35.440 --> 0:12:36.680
<v Speaker 2>value and other people do not.

0:12:37.400 --> 0:12:40.560
<v Speaker 1>Well, I think if you've owned Aberdeen all the way

0:12:40.640 --> 0:12:44.000
<v Speaker 1>for years and you've seen one corporate acquisition after another

0:12:44.160 --> 0:12:48.800
<v Speaker 1>just go wrong. You are biased and trying to avoid

0:12:48.880 --> 0:12:51.280
<v Speaker 1>biases is a key part of what we do. And

0:12:51.840 --> 0:12:54.000
<v Speaker 1>so if you come in fresh and you know you

0:12:54.080 --> 0:12:57.199
<v Speaker 1>haven't got that historic baggage, that helps you to look

0:12:57.200 --> 0:12:58.960
<v Speaker 1>at things with a fresh pair of eyes. And so

0:12:59.040 --> 0:13:01.160
<v Speaker 1>we'll do that. But we don't bet the ranch. We

0:13:01.360 --> 0:13:05.040
<v Speaker 1>are not in the high conviction camp. You know, we

0:13:05.120 --> 0:13:07.840
<v Speaker 1>are fully aware that stuff comes out of nowhere, but

0:13:07.920 --> 0:13:09.200
<v Speaker 1>we think we're getting paid to wait.

0:13:09.559 --> 0:13:12.480
<v Speaker 2>Now, the other back to traveling. Another stock that I

0:13:12.520 --> 0:13:14.320
<v Speaker 2>see that you are now holding is Ryan Air.

0:13:15.000 --> 0:13:18.320
<v Speaker 1>Yes, yes, yes, well Ryanair. I mean that's you know,

0:13:19.000 --> 0:13:21.720
<v Speaker 1>I remember when I first got over here from South

0:13:21.760 --> 0:13:24.400
<v Speaker 1>Africa in early two thousand and two thousand and one.

0:13:24.480 --> 0:13:26.439
<v Speaker 1>I mean, here was this business. It was highly highly

0:13:26.520 --> 0:13:28.600
<v Speaker 1>rated and we thought, goodness me, can you believe it?

0:13:28.800 --> 0:13:32.040
<v Speaker 1>But look at what Michael Earliery and his team have done.

0:13:32.200 --> 0:13:34.720
<v Speaker 1>And you know the interesting thing for us is we

0:13:34.760 --> 0:13:37.920
<v Speaker 1>don't meet management. But you didn't have to meet management.

0:13:38.280 --> 0:13:40.640
<v Speaker 1>You just have to look at the return on equity

0:13:40.920 --> 0:13:43.400
<v Speaker 1>that here Michael O'Leary and his team have generated in

0:13:43.440 --> 0:13:47.360
<v Speaker 1>the toughest of industries. That he's built this business from

0:13:47.360 --> 0:13:51.000
<v Speaker 1>pretty much nothing to transporting something like two hundred and

0:13:51.040 --> 0:13:54.840
<v Speaker 1>twenty five million passengers a year. It's just been phenomenal

0:13:54.960 --> 0:13:58.280
<v Speaker 1>and that they didn't need, you know, lifelines from governments

0:13:58.360 --> 0:14:03.520
<v Speaker 1>during the pandemic Etcter survived. So phenomenal management team in

0:14:03.559 --> 0:14:06.120
<v Speaker 1>a great business. And I guess if the economy is tough,

0:14:06.520 --> 0:14:09.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, people will trade down to Ryan Air. You

0:14:09.640 --> 0:14:11.959
<v Speaker 1>might not be going on first class on some other

0:14:12.040 --> 0:14:15.160
<v Speaker 1>airline but betrayed going on holiday on RHINEIR. So people

0:14:15.160 --> 0:14:18.960
<v Speaker 1>want to go on holiday. Great great management team, strong

0:14:19.040 --> 0:14:21.840
<v Speaker 1>balance sheet, reasonably priced, buying back shares because they've got

0:14:21.880 --> 0:14:24.840
<v Speaker 1>excess capital. And the other thing which is interesting is

0:14:24.840 --> 0:14:28.000
<v Speaker 1>there's capacity constraints because you know, Boeing and Airbus are

0:14:28.160 --> 0:14:29.760
<v Speaker 1>struggling to get aircraft out the door.

0:14:30.760 --> 0:14:33.320
<v Speaker 2>You say you don't meet management. Now, I find this

0:14:33.560 --> 0:14:36.160
<v Speaker 2>very interesting and I think I understand why you do it.

0:14:36.200 --> 0:14:37.880
<v Speaker 2>But I speak to an awful lot of fund managers

0:14:37.880 --> 0:14:41.160
<v Speaker 2>who's usp is how many management teams they took to,

0:14:41.240 --> 0:14:43.760
<v Speaker 2>and they tell me endlessly about well, this is what

0:14:43.800 --> 0:14:46.400
<v Speaker 2>I do. I visit sixty companies a year. Or one

0:14:46.440 --> 0:14:48.680
<v Speaker 2>hundred companies a year, and I look the management in

0:14:48.720 --> 0:14:50.920
<v Speaker 2>the eye. I have conversations with them, and I can

0:14:50.960 --> 0:14:52.920
<v Speaker 2>see if they're honest, and I can well, I'm not

0:14:52.960 --> 0:14:55.560
<v Speaker 2>getting inside information. I can pick up bits and bobs

0:14:55.560 --> 0:14:58.320
<v Speaker 2>of levels of confidence that other people can't see. And

0:14:58.440 --> 0:15:01.680
<v Speaker 2>that is my value you as a fund manager. That's

0:15:01.720 --> 0:15:03.800
<v Speaker 2>how they sell themselves, how a lot of the industry

0:15:04.080 --> 0:15:06.920
<v Speaker 2>sells itself right, And you're just saying, Nah, I'm gonna

0:15:06.960 --> 0:15:08.520
<v Speaker 2>bother with that. I'm again to set my office and

0:15:08.520 --> 0:15:09.480
<v Speaker 2>play with spreadsheets.

0:15:11.320 --> 0:15:13.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Maria, next time one of those fund managers tells

0:15:13.560 --> 0:15:15.560
<v Speaker 1>you that, please ask them to send a scatter plot

0:15:15.880 --> 0:15:18.840
<v Speaker 1>with the wire access showing our performance and the x

0:15:18.880 --> 0:15:21.080
<v Speaker 1>acts is showing the number of meetings. And let's see

0:15:21.080 --> 0:15:23.800
<v Speaker 1>if there's a direy correlation, because I suspect there probably isn't,

0:15:24.160 --> 0:15:26.920
<v Speaker 1>just as there isn't a direct correlation between large teams

0:15:26.920 --> 0:15:29.600
<v Speaker 1>and our performance. It sounds so good and it sounds

0:15:29.600 --> 0:15:31.800
<v Speaker 1>so obvious. Oh, we meet management, I mean in many

0:15:31.880 --> 0:15:34.960
<v Speaker 1>cases they're meeting investor relations. You know, we want management

0:15:35.000 --> 0:15:36.880
<v Speaker 1>teams to be out there running the business, not speaking

0:15:36.880 --> 0:15:39.520
<v Speaker 1>to fund managers all the time. Now that said you know,

0:15:39.560 --> 0:15:41.840
<v Speaker 1>we read conference call transcripts. We read a lot of them.

0:15:41.880 --> 0:15:44.280
<v Speaker 1>So it's not like we ignore what management say. We

0:15:44.400 --> 0:15:46.960
<v Speaker 1>like to look and say, okay, well what are these

0:15:47.000 --> 0:15:51.400
<v Speaker 1>What is management saying it quarterly reports, reporting portback periods

0:15:51.480 --> 0:15:55.080
<v Speaker 1>or semi annual report back periods. But I don't want to.

0:15:55.280 --> 0:15:57.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to meet management and then think oh

0:15:57.920 --> 0:15:59.960
<v Speaker 1>they're a good guy and be more and more patient.

0:16:00.120 --> 0:16:02.920
<v Speaker 1>We can evaluate management based on the numbers. We can

0:16:02.920 --> 0:16:05.680
<v Speaker 1>see when did this management team take over, what we're

0:16:05.680 --> 0:16:08.240
<v Speaker 1>return on assets and what we're operating margins? Then what

0:16:08.360 --> 0:16:10.640
<v Speaker 1>was market share and what is it now? Have they

0:16:10.680 --> 0:16:13.840
<v Speaker 1>added value? Have they detracted value? Have they done decent deals?

0:16:14.240 --> 0:16:17.520
<v Speaker 1>Or have they destroyed value? You know, you and you

0:16:17.560 --> 0:16:20.160
<v Speaker 1>look at that and you go, yeah, I mean it helps,

0:16:20.480 --> 0:16:23.560
<v Speaker 1>it helps me. That's how we evaluate management. So if

0:16:23.560 --> 0:16:26.560
<v Speaker 1>a company is doing a stupid deal and paying way

0:16:26.560 --> 0:16:28.680
<v Speaker 1>over the odds for an acquisition, you know, look at

0:16:28.800 --> 0:16:33.720
<v Speaker 1>Unilever acquiring Dollar Shave Club for a billion dollars was

0:16:33.720 --> 0:16:36.000
<v Speaker 1>a loss making business. You know, you just go, this

0:16:36.080 --> 0:16:39.160
<v Speaker 1>is going to destroy return on assets, is using company

0:16:39.200 --> 0:16:42.480
<v Speaker 1>cash to go and overpay for an acquisition, and this

0:16:42.680 --> 0:16:46.240
<v Speaker 1>indicates a management are you know, or not of the

0:16:46.280 --> 0:16:49.560
<v Speaker 1>caliber we'd like. So that's how we evaluate management, the

0:16:49.600 --> 0:16:52.640
<v Speaker 1>numbers and we leave the niceties to everybody else.

0:16:52.680 --> 0:16:55.040
<v Speaker 2>And I suppose it helps you avoid being caught up

0:16:55.040 --> 0:16:58.240
<v Speaker 2>in stories and that you know, really investing is just

0:16:58.280 --> 0:17:01.200
<v Speaker 2>about stories, right, stories you believe, stories you don't believe.

0:17:01.440 --> 0:17:04.000
<v Speaker 2>And the extent to which a charismatic CEO can tell

0:17:04.040 --> 0:17:06.640
<v Speaker 2>a good story. I mean, that's that's the story of tech.

0:17:06.760 --> 0:17:10.040
<v Speaker 1>For example, when the story lines up with the numbers, fantastic.

0:17:10.119 --> 0:17:12.879
<v Speaker 1>But so often what will happen is, you know, you

0:17:12.960 --> 0:17:15.320
<v Speaker 1>look at the numbers and you'll go, okay, things are tough,

0:17:15.320 --> 0:17:17.359
<v Speaker 1>and you read the conference called transcript and you go,

0:17:17.400 --> 0:17:20.280
<v Speaker 1>my goodness, am I reading this my quarter out? Is

0:17:20.280 --> 0:17:22.920
<v Speaker 1>this the same period? You know? Is this the same company?

0:17:23.280 --> 0:17:26.000
<v Speaker 1>So they often, you know, they can be quite a spin.

0:17:26.520 --> 0:17:31.040
<v Speaker 1>And I mean even to the extent that that management

0:17:31.040 --> 0:17:36.480
<v Speaker 1>teams know that that analysts and AI are trawling through

0:17:36.560 --> 0:17:39.640
<v Speaker 1>conference called transcripts looking for those little you know, trying

0:17:39.680 --> 0:17:42.920
<v Speaker 1>to work out of is the call positive or negative?

0:17:43.000 --> 0:17:47.840
<v Speaker 1>Extracting positive phrases and negative phrases, so they gear things accordingly.

0:17:48.359 --> 0:17:51.600
<v Speaker 1>If you attach yourself to a narrative to a story. Okay,

0:17:51.720 --> 0:17:53.960
<v Speaker 1>how do you know when you're wrong? So if you'd

0:17:53.960 --> 0:17:56.960
<v Speaker 1>said I want to buy wind because it's part of

0:17:57.000 --> 0:17:59.920
<v Speaker 1>the energy transition, it's going to play an important part. Great,

0:18:00.880 --> 0:18:02.640
<v Speaker 1>it's still going to play an important part. But you've

0:18:02.640 --> 0:18:05.040
<v Speaker 1>lost seventy percent of you brought some of the go

0:18:05.040 --> 0:18:08.119
<v Speaker 1>go windstocks, you know, the Vestus and those types of

0:18:08.160 --> 0:18:10.920
<v Speaker 1>companies way back when, or the Solar. I mean, look

0:18:10.920 --> 0:18:14.359
<v Speaker 1>at what a disaster solely is. So it's hard to

0:18:14.400 --> 0:18:17.240
<v Speaker 1>identify when you're wrong. If you just focus on the story,

0:18:17.560 --> 0:18:20.000
<v Speaker 1>the numbers will tell you when you're wrong. Margins are falling,

0:18:20.080 --> 0:18:22.840
<v Speaker 1>revenue is falling, it's too overpriced, et cetera. You know,

0:18:23.320 --> 0:18:26.040
<v Speaker 1>look at these obesity drugs at the moment, what's the story.

0:18:26.040 --> 0:18:29.239
<v Speaker 1>The story is, we've got an obese population and there

0:18:29.240 --> 0:18:31.639
<v Speaker 1>are only a couple of them that have been approved,

0:18:31.800 --> 0:18:34.880
<v Speaker 1>and they're going to make a hundred billion of you know,

0:18:35.440 --> 0:18:39.919
<v Speaker 1>in the next couple of years. In terms of like that,

0:18:40.080 --> 0:18:44.320
<v Speaker 1>that basically is blue sky. Well, well, let's see, but

0:18:44.400 --> 0:18:47.480
<v Speaker 1>there's one hundred and seventy competitors all trying to develop

0:18:48.480 --> 0:18:51.800
<v Speaker 1>obesity drugs, and sooner or later that lunch will get

0:18:51.800 --> 0:18:53.720
<v Speaker 1>eaten by the new competitors. And so if you're paying

0:18:53.760 --> 0:18:55.919
<v Speaker 1>forty times earnings for the likes of Nova and ORDERSK,

0:18:56.320 --> 0:18:57.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's going to be hard to make a return,

0:18:58.240 --> 0:18:59.000
<v Speaker 1>we think, or.

0:18:59.200 --> 0:19:02.000
<v Speaker 2>At some point everyone's going to be thin. The things

0:19:02.040 --> 0:19:04.919
<v Speaker 2>work right, then that'll be that right. And then of

0:19:04.960 --> 0:19:06.960
<v Speaker 2>course there are not one facts like that. The diet

0:19:07.000 --> 0:19:11.280
<v Speaker 2>book industry collapses, maybe the gym business collapses.

0:19:10.960 --> 0:19:14.200
<v Speaker 1>Well let's see. But you know, the problem is paying

0:19:14.200 --> 0:19:17.120
<v Speaker 1>too much for stories is not a good thing, and

0:19:17.160 --> 0:19:19.639
<v Speaker 1>it is hazardous to your health. And so we go

0:19:19.720 --> 0:19:23.000
<v Speaker 1>to whatever steps we can to avoid over pain for strap.

0:19:23.040 --> 0:19:24.960
<v Speaker 2>There's a lot of stories around around in the world

0:19:24.960 --> 0:19:28.320
<v Speaker 2>of energy transition. You just mentioned that you've stayed stayed

0:19:28.359 --> 0:19:30.960
<v Speaker 2>out of wind, stayed out of solar. How are you

0:19:30.960 --> 0:19:33.440
<v Speaker 2>playing the transition or are you just sticking with oil?

0:19:33.840 --> 0:19:35.600
<v Speaker 1>Well we've got a little bit of oil. But I mean,

0:19:35.640 --> 0:19:37.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, one of the one of the stories is

0:19:37.520 --> 0:19:40.000
<v Speaker 1>will go by the utilities because we're going to have

0:19:40.040 --> 0:19:41.679
<v Speaker 1>to They're going to have to generate all the power

0:19:42.320 --> 0:19:46.199
<v Speaker 1>that that is that these AI data centers are going

0:19:46.280 --> 0:19:48.200
<v Speaker 1>to use. Until you look at the balance sheets of

0:19:48.240 --> 0:19:50.879
<v Speaker 1>these utilities and see how much debt they've got from

0:19:51.040 --> 0:19:55.120
<v Speaker 1>having you know, installed solar and wind farms at high prices,

0:19:55.200 --> 0:19:56.359
<v Speaker 1>and you go, well, I don't know if I'm going

0:19:56.440 --> 0:19:58.600
<v Speaker 1>to go there. I mean, we do have we do

0:19:58.720 --> 0:20:03.720
<v Speaker 1>have a small position in Kazat and Prom Kazakhstan uranium minus.

0:20:03.800 --> 0:20:06.879
<v Speaker 1>I guess there's a bit of energy there. But but

0:20:06.920 --> 0:20:09.720
<v Speaker 1>we're not doing that because we think that AI demand

0:20:09.840 --> 0:20:12.520
<v Speaker 1>is going to drive energy usage. You know, again that's

0:20:12.560 --> 0:20:14.960
<v Speaker 1>a theme and we're not really we're not thematic investors

0:20:16.320 --> 0:20:18.640
<v Speaker 1>because it comes back to that story. We're rather the stock.

0:20:18.680 --> 0:20:21.200
<v Speaker 1>Each stock has to has to make it on its

0:20:21.240 --> 0:20:21.880
<v Speaker 1>own merits.

0:20:22.000 --> 0:20:25.120
<v Speaker 2>Okay, let's talk a little bit about South America where

0:20:25.160 --> 0:20:27.520
<v Speaker 2>again looking at your waiting as relative to the ending.

0:20:27.560 --> 0:20:29.639
<v Speaker 2>So it's a big fat zero in the MSCI world

0:20:30.000 --> 0:20:32.720
<v Speaker 2>and it's eleven percent in your portfolio. What does that

0:20:32.840 --> 0:20:35.240
<v Speaker 2>mean or is that just Petro bast.

0:20:35.480 --> 0:20:38.240
<v Speaker 1>Well, we're not just Petro Brass, and we've got ins.

0:20:38.480 --> 0:20:40.640
<v Speaker 1>We've got you know, bank at Columbia. It's a good

0:20:40.720 --> 0:20:45.160
<v Speaker 1>bank at an attractive price. Petro Brass. You know, people

0:20:45.240 --> 0:20:48.960
<v Speaker 1>were ignoring Petro Brass everybody after that. Again it was

0:20:48.960 --> 0:20:51.400
<v Speaker 1>a concern. You know, there's always an opportunity if there

0:20:51.280 --> 0:20:54.800
<v Speaker 1>that if you if you can the difference between perception

0:20:54.920 --> 0:20:57.720
<v Speaker 1>and reality. The concern was, oh, Lula's coming back and

0:20:57.760 --> 0:21:00.040
<v Speaker 1>he's going to do a lot of bad stuff and

0:21:00.080 --> 0:21:04.440
<v Speaker 1>for skate shares or whatever. It was shortly after you'd

0:21:04.480 --> 0:21:06.639
<v Speaker 1>had the goings on in Russia and people were running

0:21:06.640 --> 0:21:12.120
<v Speaker 1>from emerging markets. But yet enshrined in their articles is

0:21:12.160 --> 0:21:15.119
<v Speaker 1>that they'll pay out over twenty five percent of cash

0:21:15.119 --> 0:21:18.960
<v Speaker 1>flow as dividends. And so here are you buying a

0:21:19.000 --> 0:21:21.480
<v Speaker 1>lower one of the lowest cost producers that had paid

0:21:21.520 --> 0:21:24.320
<v Speaker 1>off used their cash in recent years to pay off

0:21:24.640 --> 0:21:28.560
<v Speaker 1>their vast amounts of debt which that incurred from from

0:21:28.560 --> 0:21:32.440
<v Speaker 1>building up their fields in you know, from twenty fourteen

0:21:32.680 --> 0:21:36.160
<v Speaker 1>the next ten years or so, and that's paying huge

0:21:36.160 --> 0:21:38.400
<v Speaker 1>amounts of dividends and and so I mean, I think

0:21:38.400 --> 0:21:40.560
<v Speaker 1>in the first year we got many forty percent of

0:21:40.560 --> 0:21:44.520
<v Speaker 1>our money back from dividends. And so you know, who

0:21:44.560 --> 0:21:47.240
<v Speaker 1>knows where oil is going to go. I guess if

0:21:47.280 --> 0:21:49.879
<v Speaker 1>you'd said to me a year ago that we're going

0:21:49.920 --> 0:21:53.439
<v Speaker 1>to have China stimulus and you know, lots of tension

0:21:53.520 --> 0:21:55.880
<v Speaker 1>and war in the Middle East and the Ukraine war

0:21:55.920 --> 0:21:58.199
<v Speaker 1>on the go, what's oil price going to be I

0:21:58.240 --> 0:22:00.960
<v Speaker 1>probably wouldn't. I'd guess a lot higher than the current price.

0:22:01.520 --> 0:22:04.320
<v Speaker 1>So you know, one's got to always recognize that these

0:22:04.359 --> 0:22:07.560
<v Speaker 1>cheap solar panels are displacing some of this oil demand

0:22:09.200 --> 0:22:11.120
<v Speaker 1>and so that's uncertain. So if you're not sure where

0:22:11.119 --> 0:22:12.040
<v Speaker 1>it's going to go, well then you want to go

0:22:12.040 --> 0:22:14.679
<v Speaker 1>with the lowest cost producer, and petro Brass is one

0:22:14.720 --> 0:22:17.960
<v Speaker 1>of those. And you're paying you know, very low single

0:22:17.960 --> 0:22:20.800
<v Speaker 1>digit multiple for that, so with with dividends, so we'll

0:22:20.880 --> 0:22:21.399
<v Speaker 1>we'll buy that.

0:22:21.800 --> 0:22:26.040
<v Speaker 2>We're talking about so many different companies, so many different sectors,

0:22:26.080 --> 0:22:30.000
<v Speaker 2>so many different countries. You're quite a small fund and

0:22:30.040 --> 0:22:33.000
<v Speaker 2>I think you're quite a small team. How on earth

0:22:33.040 --> 0:22:35.200
<v Speaker 2>are you covering the entire world?

0:22:35.560 --> 0:22:37.480
<v Speaker 1>We don't waste mony time meeting manage.

0:22:37.200 --> 0:22:38.359
<v Speaker 2>Well, okay, fine, do management.

0:22:41.119 --> 0:22:43.560
<v Speaker 1>No, but I guess it's a bit like it's a

0:22:43.600 --> 0:22:45.280
<v Speaker 1>bit like saying, well, hang on you if you're the

0:22:45.720 --> 0:22:48.119
<v Speaker 1>coach of the English cricket team, Harneth, you know all

0:22:48.119 --> 0:22:49.679
<v Speaker 1>the cricketers in England.

0:22:49.920 --> 0:22:51.760
<v Speaker 2>Excellent question as well. I don't know the answer to

0:22:51.800 --> 0:22:52.359
<v Speaker 2>that one either.

0:22:52.520 --> 0:22:54.640
<v Speaker 1>No, you've just got to know what you're looking for

0:22:55.200 --> 0:22:57.960
<v Speaker 1>and and of course, you know, you've got to know

0:22:57.960 --> 0:23:00.000
<v Speaker 1>what you're looking for, have set up your screens, and

0:23:00.040 --> 0:23:02.359
<v Speaker 1>then you wait until the fish swim into your pond,

0:23:02.880 --> 0:23:05.280
<v Speaker 1>and then you know those companies. And so that's what

0:23:05.320 --> 0:23:07.560
<v Speaker 1>we do. You know, we're not out there worrying about

0:23:07.600 --> 0:23:10.760
<v Speaker 1>benchmarks and worrying that we haven't got meta rights and

0:23:10.800 --> 0:23:13.080
<v Speaker 1>metas big in the index and we need, you know,

0:23:13.840 --> 0:23:15.800
<v Speaker 1>form of view. If meta doesn't take our boxes, we

0:23:15.840 --> 0:23:18.760
<v Speaker 1>don't look at better end off. So that's how we

0:23:18.800 --> 0:23:21.280
<v Speaker 1>do it. We just focus on the fish that swim

0:23:21.320 --> 0:23:23.000
<v Speaker 1>into our pond and know those fish.

0:23:23.119 --> 0:23:25.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and you don't have to worry about the index.

0:23:25.040 --> 0:23:28.480
<v Speaker 2>I wrote a column recently about about active versus passive.

0:23:28.520 --> 0:23:30.560
<v Speaker 2>When I say a column, I mean another column, and

0:23:30.600 --> 0:23:33.399
<v Speaker 2>I've written so many of them over the years, and

0:23:33.480 --> 0:23:36.720
<v Speaker 2>this one was about some data that someone said me

0:23:36.800 --> 0:23:40.920
<v Speaker 2>showing that funds that are genuinely active I have an

0:23:41.040 --> 0:23:44.560
<v Speaker 2>active share of seventy five plus and that shows that

0:23:44.600 --> 0:23:48.520
<v Speaker 2>they're very diverse from the index, outperform on average over

0:23:48.600 --> 0:23:51.600
<v Speaker 2>pretty much every time scale, and your active share is

0:23:51.600 --> 0:23:54.520
<v Speaker 2>about ninety nine. So on that basis.

0:23:54.119 --> 0:23:58.560
<v Speaker 1>Alone, Well, look, I read that article and I thoroughly

0:23:58.640 --> 0:24:00.879
<v Speaker 1>enjoyed it. And there's one there's one topic I'd love

0:24:00.920 --> 0:24:03.879
<v Speaker 1>you to explore in detail. Maybe you haven't, I've missed it.

0:24:03.920 --> 0:24:07.040
<v Speaker 1>But there's this notion of active fee, which is how

0:24:07.119 --> 0:24:10.359
<v Speaker 1>much you pay for your active share. And I think

0:24:10.400 --> 0:24:13.160
<v Speaker 1>that's the answer because if we you know, if our

0:24:13.600 --> 0:24:16.280
<v Speaker 1>OCF is just over one percent, but we got ninety

0:24:16.320 --> 0:24:18.879
<v Speaker 1>nine percent active share, well that's one thing. But if

0:24:18.880 --> 0:24:20.639
<v Speaker 1>you've got a fun next door which has got an

0:24:20.640 --> 0:24:23.359
<v Speaker 1>OCF of seventy five BIPs, but they've got fifty percent

0:24:23.400 --> 0:24:27.960
<v Speaker 1>active share, well actually you're paying them more for the

0:24:28.040 --> 0:24:30.400
<v Speaker 1>active component to their portfolio than you are for us.

0:24:31.160 --> 0:24:34.919
<v Speaker 1>And and so active fee, I think is an important

0:24:35.000 --> 0:24:37.439
<v Speaker 1>number that a lot of people miss. Half the funds

0:24:37.480 --> 0:24:41.000
<v Speaker 1>don't put their active share on their fact sheets, you know,

0:24:41.200 --> 0:24:43.480
<v Speaker 1>and don't update it on a number of things. So

0:24:43.560 --> 0:24:45.720
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a hard number to come after. But

0:24:46.359 --> 0:24:48.480
<v Speaker 1>this notion of you know, at the end of the day,

0:24:48.960 --> 0:24:51.439
<v Speaker 1>it's all about your returns, isn't it, you know? And

0:24:51.480 --> 0:24:53.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean I had a conversation with somebody recently and

0:24:53.720 --> 0:24:55.640
<v Speaker 1>they said, all you're twenty five BIPs. Your twenty five

0:24:55.680 --> 0:24:57.600
<v Speaker 1>basis points out the running I said, do you know

0:24:57.640 --> 0:25:00.480
<v Speaker 1>that that is a five percent move on a five

0:25:00.520 --> 0:25:02.960
<v Speaker 1>percent position the whole year. I mean that is a

0:25:03.000 --> 0:25:06.439
<v Speaker 1>rounding error. So if that's what's moving your the needle,

0:25:06.640 --> 0:25:10.920
<v Speaker 1>then you know, let's focus on something else. But there

0:25:11.000 --> 0:25:15.360
<v Speaker 1>is this, I think, this excess focus on costs because

0:25:15.640 --> 0:25:19.080
<v Speaker 1>and this excess focus on benchmarks, because people seem to

0:25:19.080 --> 0:25:22.400
<v Speaker 1>have forgotten, you know, we only that benchmarks also fall.

0:25:22.520 --> 0:25:25.879
<v Speaker 1>I mean, since I've been running ran more the the

0:25:26.400 --> 0:25:29.119
<v Speaker 1>S and P five hundred, I think is up double

0:25:29.160 --> 0:25:32.440
<v Speaker 1>digits nine of the fifteen years and only down double

0:25:32.440 --> 0:25:35.680
<v Speaker 1>digits one and that was twenty twenty two, and three

0:25:35.720 --> 0:25:39.360
<v Speaker 1>months later you had AI, you know, removing that bad memory.

0:25:39.520 --> 0:25:43.280
<v Speaker 1>So people have forgotten that benchmarks also fall. And performing

0:25:43.280 --> 0:25:45.840
<v Speaker 1>in line with the benchmarks is not the be all

0:25:45.880 --> 0:25:48.480
<v Speaker 1>and end all. It's it's am I getting wealthier in

0:25:48.560 --> 0:25:51.480
<v Speaker 1>real terms is the key question? And if I happen

0:25:51.560 --> 0:25:54.040
<v Speaker 1>to beat the benchmark, fantastic. If I don't, but I'm

0:25:54.040 --> 0:25:56.480
<v Speaker 1>still getting wealthier in real terms, Well isn't that more important,

0:25:57.040 --> 0:25:59.320
<v Speaker 1>you know than going down twenty percent when in the

0:25:59.320 --> 0:26:01.959
<v Speaker 1>benchmarks full you know, twenty five and thinking you've got

0:26:01.960 --> 0:26:04.480
<v Speaker 1>a good, good result. I mean, one of the things

0:26:04.520 --> 0:26:08.400
<v Speaker 1>that you know as we're a boutique. We've got some

0:26:08.440 --> 0:26:12.359
<v Speaker 1>three hundred and eighty million, eighty five million dollars under management.

0:26:12.480 --> 0:26:14.760
<v Speaker 1>And when you're a small fund, obviously the costs are

0:26:14.760 --> 0:26:17.639
<v Speaker 1>a higher component, but it also means that you can

0:26:17.960 --> 0:26:20.199
<v Speaker 1>you know, you're a speedboat not a container ship, and

0:26:20.240 --> 0:26:22.359
<v Speaker 1>you're not going to get stuck in the sewers canal

0:26:22.480 --> 0:26:25.520
<v Speaker 1>and so you can move. But you know, with small funds,

0:26:25.840 --> 0:26:27.920
<v Speaker 1>I think there needs to be a little bit of

0:26:28.000 --> 0:26:31.399
<v Speaker 1>latitude for the small funds who you know, to be

0:26:31.440 --> 0:26:34.840
<v Speaker 1>able to have a slightly higher OCF to to accommodate

0:26:34.880 --> 0:26:36.600
<v Speaker 1>the fact that they are you know, this will going

0:26:36.640 --> 0:26:37.280
<v Speaker 1>to keep the lights on.

0:26:37.400 --> 0:26:38.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, I do think this is a very

0:26:38.840 --> 0:26:41.520
<v Speaker 2>interesting point. It's really tough to start a new funder

0:26:41.560 --> 0:26:43.960
<v Speaker 2>these days in Abertique because a lot of the wealth

0:26:44.000 --> 0:26:46.280
<v Speaker 2>managers and people who might have given you seed capll

0:26:46.359 --> 0:26:48.879
<v Speaker 2>previously are not going to do it if that if

0:26:48.920 --> 0:26:50.879
<v Speaker 2>the cost come in over one percent, because that doesn't

0:26:50.920 --> 0:26:53.160
<v Speaker 2>work for them. So you've got that, and then you've

0:26:53.200 --> 0:26:57.600
<v Speaker 2>got the increasingly intense regulatory over lay to opening a

0:26:57.640 --> 0:26:59.359
<v Speaker 2>new fund. So there does seem to be quite a

0:26:59.400 --> 0:27:02.280
<v Speaker 2>competitive mote these days. Do you think that if you

0:27:02.320 --> 0:27:05.680
<v Speaker 2>were starting right now, you would find it more difficult

0:27:05.760 --> 0:27:06.400
<v Speaker 2>to get going.

0:27:06.840 --> 0:27:10.720
<v Speaker 1>Definitely, I mean definitely. It's you know, it takes you

0:27:10.720 --> 0:27:13.800
<v Speaker 1>a few years to get a rating or whatever rating.

0:27:14.040 --> 0:27:16.919
<v Speaker 1>Some financial advisors won't look at you until you have

0:27:16.960 --> 0:27:20.240
<v Speaker 1>a rating. You know, there is the whole scale element,

0:27:20.400 --> 0:27:23.520
<v Speaker 1>so you'd have to absorb in the management company would

0:27:23.560 --> 0:27:26.840
<v Speaker 1>have to absorb a lot of the costs themselves. And

0:27:27.240 --> 0:27:29.840
<v Speaker 1>you've got to be doing something different, you know. I mean,

0:27:29.880 --> 0:27:32.800
<v Speaker 1>how many quality growth companies are there? I look at

0:27:33.040 --> 0:27:36.000
<v Speaker 1>our value peer there's only fifty one value funds according

0:27:36.000 --> 0:27:37.560
<v Speaker 1>to this morning start at I'm looking at that have

0:27:37.600 --> 0:27:40.360
<v Speaker 1>been around since we started, whereas if you look at

0:27:40.480 --> 0:27:42.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, IA Global, there's one hundred and sixty seven.

0:27:43.240 --> 0:27:45.520
<v Speaker 1>So it's you've got to be doing something different if

0:27:45.560 --> 0:27:48.000
<v Speaker 1>you wanted to start today, and you've got to have

0:27:48.000 --> 0:27:49.840
<v Speaker 1>some passioned capital, that's for certain.

0:27:50.320 --> 0:27:52.480
<v Speaker 2>Is there anything that would persuade you to go out

0:27:52.520 --> 0:27:53.480
<v Speaker 2>and buy n video?

0:27:53.840 --> 0:27:55.320
<v Speaker 1>Do you know? I'm going to tell you something. A

0:27:55.400 --> 0:27:58.000
<v Speaker 1>cram myself to sleep at night knowing that in twenty

0:27:58.160 --> 0:28:01.159
<v Speaker 1>fourteen it was one of our largest positions. Wow, how

0:28:01.200 --> 0:28:04.719
<v Speaker 1>about that? And so we spotted it a way back

0:28:04.760 --> 0:28:08.280
<v Speaker 1>when when nobody else wanted it because they had licensed

0:28:08.320 --> 0:28:10.920
<v Speaker 1>some technology to Intel and Intel was a big portion

0:28:10.960 --> 0:28:13.199
<v Speaker 1>of their revenue, and everybody said, oh, they're not going

0:28:13.200 --> 0:28:14.960
<v Speaker 1>to be able to renew that and all the rest,

0:28:15.000 --> 0:28:18.040
<v Speaker 1>and you could buy Innvidia on ten times earnings. Of course,

0:28:18.080 --> 0:28:21.639
<v Speaker 1>I had no idea that it was it was going to,

0:28:22.600 --> 0:28:24.639
<v Speaker 1>you know, reach the levels that it has done. But

0:28:24.720 --> 0:28:29.480
<v Speaker 1>it does highlight that and we made money out of it,

0:28:29.520 --> 0:28:32.679
<v Speaker 1>but we moved on, and so you know that's that

0:28:32.880 --> 0:28:34.240
<v Speaker 1>is going to happen, and people say, well, you know it,

0:28:34.240 --> 0:28:36.240
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't it be wonderful if you were buy and hold investor,

0:28:36.240 --> 0:28:38.560
<v Speaker 1>you could have held on to Nvidia and be three

0:28:38.600 --> 0:28:41.600
<v Speaker 1>times a size of the fund. But there are a

0:28:41.600 --> 0:28:43.720
<v Speaker 1>couple of other stocks. I'm glad we didn't hold onto you.

0:28:44.160 --> 0:28:46.520
<v Speaker 1>So you know, you take it as it comes. You're

0:28:46.520 --> 0:28:47.760
<v Speaker 1>going to get some right and you're going to get

0:28:47.800 --> 0:28:50.320
<v Speaker 1>some wrong. But the good thing is our process identified it.

0:28:51.440 --> 0:28:54.840
<v Speaker 1>So no Novidia, no, I mean, and you know, Meren

0:28:55.120 --> 0:28:57.080
<v Speaker 1>you what And this is a problem with many of

0:28:57.080 --> 0:28:59.480
<v Speaker 1>the tech companies and I'm actually writing a piece on

0:28:59.520 --> 0:29:01.360
<v Speaker 1>this at the moment. Is I think they're far more

0:29:01.400 --> 0:29:04.720
<v Speaker 1>expensive than people think they are, because what happens is

0:29:04.880 --> 0:29:08.560
<v Speaker 1>in these technology companies, you've got your stock based compensation,

0:29:08.720 --> 0:29:12.840
<v Speaker 1>they give you performance unit stock units or whatever and

0:29:13.320 --> 0:29:17.080
<v Speaker 1>to the staff, so call it share options, and so

0:29:17.240 --> 0:29:19.840
<v Speaker 1>in accounting terms and the income statement, that's included as

0:29:19.880 --> 0:29:23.440
<v Speaker 1>a cost. But these companies love to focus on free

0:29:23.440 --> 0:29:27.560
<v Speaker 1>cash flow because in free cash flow that is added back. Okay,

0:29:27.760 --> 0:29:30.160
<v Speaker 1>the problem is what are the companies doing with the

0:29:30.200 --> 0:29:33.360
<v Speaker 1>cash flow. They're buying back shares, but the buyback of

0:29:33.400 --> 0:29:36.280
<v Speaker 1>shares is after the free cash flow number, and so

0:29:36.720 --> 0:29:38.920
<v Speaker 1>these companies are buying back shares, but who they're buying

0:29:38.920 --> 0:29:40.280
<v Speaker 1>the shares back from when they're not buying in the

0:29:40.360 --> 0:29:43.320
<v Speaker 1>open market. Effectively, they're buying them back from employees who

0:29:43.320 --> 0:29:48.960
<v Speaker 1>exercising the options. So you have removed the cost, you know,

0:29:49.000 --> 0:29:51.200
<v Speaker 1>in terms of how profitable these businesses are from the

0:29:51.200 --> 0:29:52.960
<v Speaker 1>free cash flow. But then they're using all the cash

0:29:52.960 --> 0:29:55.600
<v Speaker 1>to buy back the shares. And I think I'm right

0:29:55.600 --> 0:29:58.280
<v Speaker 1>in saying that. Well, one of the tech companies, I mean,

0:29:58.360 --> 0:30:00.800
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a video. Two thirds of the shares

0:30:00.960 --> 0:30:05.280
<v Speaker 1>that they're bought back last quarter were you know, options

0:30:05.360 --> 0:30:08.000
<v Speaker 1>that have been exercised. So these companies are way more

0:30:08.040 --> 0:30:11.000
<v Speaker 1>expensive than you think. They're not returning cash to shareholders.

0:30:11.000 --> 0:30:13.040
<v Speaker 1>They're giving cash to employees.

0:30:13.320 --> 0:30:16.680
<v Speaker 2>Effectively, they're not they're not returning cash to shareholders. They're

0:30:16.720 --> 0:30:19.560
<v Speaker 2>bumping up their wage bill. But it doesn't quite come

0:30:19.560 --> 0:30:20.000
<v Speaker 2>out like that.

0:30:20.360 --> 0:30:22.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Meta, the last time I looked there, you know,

0:30:22.800 --> 0:30:26.040
<v Speaker 1>they'd spent almost all their free cash for Biomax shares

0:30:26.040 --> 0:30:28.240
<v Speaker 1>and the share can't had not fallen. So you know,

0:30:28.320 --> 0:30:30.480
<v Speaker 1>this is the thing. So what you actually wanted to do,

0:30:30.520 --> 0:30:32.480
<v Speaker 1>you've got to look at that. And so that just

0:30:32.520 --> 0:30:34.800
<v Speaker 1>means these companies are more expensive. And so you know

0:30:34.920 --> 0:30:37.280
<v Speaker 1>every day Jensen Wong is selling one hundred and twenty

0:30:37.280 --> 0:30:40.120
<v Speaker 1>thousand shares. Now that's a rounding eraror according to his holding.

0:30:40.560 --> 0:30:43.080
<v Speaker 1>But you know, here you've got a company with Nvidio.

0:30:43.280 --> 0:30:45.880
<v Speaker 1>Every single one of their large customers is trying to

0:30:46.360 --> 0:30:48.760
<v Speaker 1>eat their lunch. You know, the tech bubble. And not

0:30:48.840 --> 0:30:50.720
<v Speaker 1>to say that we're in a tech bubble at the moment,

0:30:50.760 --> 0:30:53.840
<v Speaker 1>but but you didn't have with Cisco and you know,

0:30:53.920 --> 0:30:56.400
<v Speaker 1>custom their customers being at and T and Verizon and

0:30:56.440 --> 0:30:58.880
<v Speaker 1>the guys, they weren't trying to develop their own router

0:30:59.080 --> 0:31:02.240
<v Speaker 1>and switch. But yet in the video. All the customers

0:31:02.280 --> 0:31:06.760
<v Speaker 1>are trying to develop AI, their own AI, chips, Apple, Meta, Amazon,

0:31:06.800 --> 0:31:09.520
<v Speaker 1>the whole lot. And so why on earth do I

0:31:09.520 --> 0:31:13.280
<v Speaker 1>want to pay thirty five times sales when I'm up

0:31:13.280 --> 0:31:16.920
<v Speaker 1>against my biggest customers who are cash flash and cash generative,

0:31:17.640 --> 0:31:18.520
<v Speaker 1>trying to eat my lunch.

0:31:19.000 --> 0:31:22.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, particularly when you can build a portfolio very significantly

0:31:22.440 --> 0:31:24.960
<v Speaker 2>lower valuations that you have higher expectations for.

0:31:25.320 --> 0:31:27.800
<v Speaker 1>My son was reading the Little Book of Value Investing

0:31:27.840 --> 0:31:29.719
<v Speaker 1>the other day and I said, Tom, what are your

0:31:29.760 --> 0:31:33.000
<v Speaker 1>key takeaways? And he said, the future is unfocostable. Don't

0:31:33.040 --> 0:31:34.520
<v Speaker 1>pay too much for it. And I said, well, that's

0:31:34.560 --> 0:31:38.600
<v Speaker 1>exactly it. The future is unforecastable. Don't pay too much

0:31:38.600 --> 0:31:41.720
<v Speaker 1>for it. You know, don't be too convinced that you

0:31:41.800 --> 0:31:45.080
<v Speaker 1>know what's around the corner, because history keeps reminding us

0:31:45.080 --> 0:31:47.280
<v Speaker 1>we don't. And so the only way you can protect

0:31:47.560 --> 0:31:50.600
<v Speaker 1>against that is not is by not paying too much

0:31:50.600 --> 0:31:50.880
<v Speaker 1>for it.

0:31:51.080 --> 0:31:53.000
<v Speaker 2>Sean, I know that I have to ask. I have

0:31:53.080 --> 0:31:55.880
<v Speaker 2>to ask what everybody is thinking, How old is your son?

0:31:56.080 --> 0:31:58.160
<v Speaker 1>My son is twenty okay.

0:31:57.920 --> 0:31:59.880
<v Speaker 2>All right, And I'm glad he's not a teenager because

0:32:00.280 --> 0:32:04.040
<v Speaker 2>that makes me feel a lot better about my own teenagers. Gosh,

0:32:04.120 --> 0:32:07.680
<v Speaker 2>they're not reading investment books of an evening. They're absolutely not.

0:32:08.120 --> 0:32:10.720
<v Speaker 2>Now listen, we have one last question. You've got ten years.

0:32:10.760 --> 0:32:13.160
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna give you a choice of two things, gold

0:32:13.240 --> 0:32:13.800
<v Speaker 2>or bitcoin.

0:32:14.280 --> 0:32:17.040
<v Speaker 1>It is definitely gonna be gold. I am not in

0:32:17.080 --> 0:32:20.239
<v Speaker 1>the bitcoin camp. I'm afraid, Merron, and I'm disappointed. I'm

0:32:20.240 --> 0:32:22.640
<v Speaker 1>sorry we don't have more gold mine at where we

0:32:22.680 --> 0:32:25.320
<v Speaker 1>don't have any gold miners in the portfolio. But there

0:32:25.320 --> 0:32:29.160
<v Speaker 1>have not been great businesses, you know, they very difficult businesses.

0:32:29.360 --> 0:32:31.520
<v Speaker 1>But if I had to go for if it's either

0:32:31.680 --> 0:32:33.160
<v Speaker 1>or it's gold all the way.

0:32:33.160 --> 0:32:36.600
<v Speaker 2>Okay, And what would make you change your mind on bitcoin?

0:32:36.920 --> 0:32:37.240
<v Speaker 1>Nothing?

0:32:37.920 --> 0:32:39.600
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely nothing, nothing.

0:32:40.040 --> 0:32:42.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm with Charlie Mungo all the way on bitcoin. And

0:32:43.280 --> 0:32:45.200
<v Speaker 1>it's a family radio, so I bit not repeat what

0:32:45.200 --> 0:32:45.680
<v Speaker 1>he said, but.

0:32:46.280 --> 0:32:48.480
<v Speaker 2>Okay, all right, we'll repeat that when we get to

0:32:48.520 --> 0:32:56.840
<v Speaker 2>the end. Family Radio. I wish thanks for listening to

0:32:56.840 --> 0:32:59.000
<v Speaker 2>this week's Maren Talks Money. If you like us show,

0:32:59.080 --> 0:33:01.640
<v Speaker 2>rate review and whatever, you listen to podcasts and keep

0:33:01.640 --> 0:33:03.560
<v Speaker 2>sending your questions and your comments to marrin Money at

0:33:03.560 --> 0:33:05.920
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg dot net. You can also follow me and John

0:33:05.920 --> 0:33:08.320
<v Speaker 2>on Twitter or x I'm at Marinas W and John

0:33:08.440 --> 0:33:11.800
<v Speaker 2>is John Underscore Steppek. This episode was hosted by me

0:33:11.880 --> 0:33:15.000
<v Speaker 2>Marrin's Unset Web. It was produced by Somesidi and Isabella Ward.

0:33:15.200 --> 0:33:18.120
<v Speaker 2>Production support and sound designed by Murders and Them and

0:33:18.240 --> 0:33:28.720
<v Speaker 2>special thanks to Sean Tsh