1 00:00:03,520 --> 00:00:06,880 Speaker 1: From the heart of where innovation, money and power collive 2 00:00:07,640 --> 00:00:12,159 Speaker 1: in Silicon Valley and beyond. This is Bloomberg Technology with 3 00:00:12,240 --> 00:00:28,240 Speaker 1: Emily Jay. I'm Emily checking San Francisco, and this is 4 00:00:28,240 --> 00:00:31,840 Speaker 1: Bloomberg Technology coming up the next hour, Tech stops plunge, 5 00:00:32,000 --> 00:00:35,800 Speaker 1: Amazon shares having their worst day since two thousand and six, 6 00:00:35,960 --> 00:00:39,560 Speaker 1: the nasdack sinking. We will point pinpoint the biggest pain 7 00:00:39,640 --> 00:00:43,280 Speaker 1: points for big tech going forward. Plus e Lad Musk 8 00:00:43,360 --> 00:00:45,560 Speaker 1: sells eight and a half billion dollars worth of Tesla 9 00:00:45,640 --> 00:00:47,519 Speaker 1: shares to pay for Twitter, but he's still got to 10 00:00:47,560 --> 00:00:51,840 Speaker 1: come up with billions more. Tesla shares are down since 11 00:00:51,840 --> 00:00:55,200 Speaker 1: he disclosed his Twitter steak, and Twitter shares are trading 12 00:00:55,280 --> 00:00:58,440 Speaker 1: lower than is offered price. Can Musk make the tricky 13 00:00:58,520 --> 00:01:02,520 Speaker 1: math add up? And over to Musk's other company. We 14 00:01:02,560 --> 00:01:05,479 Speaker 1: are watching this SpaceX rocket about to take off from 15 00:01:05,760 --> 00:01:09,200 Speaker 1: Cape Canaveral. It is poised to make history, marking the 16 00:01:09,240 --> 00:01:13,240 Speaker 1: fastest turnaround time for a refurbished rocket ever. We will 17 00:01:13,240 --> 00:01:16,800 Speaker 1: bring it all to you live meantime for tech investors, 18 00:01:16,920 --> 00:01:19,480 Speaker 1: worst start to the year in two decades. If you 19 00:01:19,520 --> 00:01:21,160 Speaker 1: take a look at the bigger picture, As Taylor mentioned, 20 00:01:21,200 --> 00:01:24,600 Speaker 1: the NAZAC one hundred hammered this year, wiping out more 21 00:01:24,600 --> 00:01:28,600 Speaker 1: than one point eight trillion dollars in value in April alone. 22 00:01:29,000 --> 00:01:31,600 Speaker 1: How much more volatility will the tech sector? See Mark 23 00:01:31,680 --> 00:01:34,560 Speaker 1: Mheney of ever Core with us now to discuss Mark, 24 00:01:34,600 --> 00:01:38,200 Speaker 1: how much more? How much more are we going to see? Well, 25 00:01:38,240 --> 00:01:41,199 Speaker 1: we still have FED decisions coming up this next week week, 26 00:01:41,400 --> 00:01:43,480 Speaker 1: and then one shoot that has not yet Followen and 27 00:01:43,560 --> 00:01:46,440 Speaker 1: Taylor just started to tease this out, is whether the 28 00:01:46,480 --> 00:01:50,600 Speaker 1: consumer really weakens. Look, everything's been thrown against UH tech 29 00:01:50,640 --> 00:01:53,600 Speaker 1: stocks so far except for a global recession. But we 30 00:01:53,640 --> 00:01:57,000 Speaker 1: know we've had decades high inflation rates, we've got surgy 31 00:01:57,240 --> 00:02:02,000 Speaker 1: interest rates, we've had um We've had a war breakout 32 00:02:02,040 --> 00:02:05,200 Speaker 1: in Europe that has dampened at least some demand so far, 33 00:02:05,520 --> 00:02:08,200 Speaker 1: just dampen. It hasn't crusted yet, has dampened it. And 34 00:02:08,200 --> 00:02:11,040 Speaker 1: then you've got supply chain issues out of out of China, 35 00:02:11,080 --> 00:02:14,640 Speaker 1: and so it's hit Apple, it's hit Amazon, it's at Google, Facebook, 36 00:02:14,720 --> 00:02:17,400 Speaker 1: you know, Microsoft, even all of the major tech stocks. 37 00:02:17,520 --> 00:02:20,960 Speaker 1: I don't think it abates quickly. It does abate unless 38 00:02:21,040 --> 00:02:23,320 Speaker 1: we get another shoot to drop with the consumer really 39 00:02:23,400 --> 00:02:25,200 Speaker 1: falling off a clip. We haven't seen evidence of that 40 00:02:25,320 --> 00:02:28,079 Speaker 1: yet I hope it doesn't happen. Now. You cover so 41 00:02:28,120 --> 00:02:32,320 Speaker 1: many big tech companies, Amazon, Alphabet, Meta, Twitter, Netflix, when 42 00:02:32,320 --> 00:02:34,440 Speaker 1: you look at the broader landscape, what are the most 43 00:02:34,480 --> 00:02:40,680 Speaker 1: alarming pain points that you see? Well, I also when 44 00:02:40,720 --> 00:02:42,400 Speaker 1: I want to put this in context, Look, this is 45 00:02:42,440 --> 00:02:44,639 Speaker 1: the third bear market that you and I've gone through 46 00:02:44,680 --> 00:02:46,679 Speaker 1: just in the last five years. We had one in 47 00:02:46,760 --> 00:02:49,120 Speaker 1: eighteen of course during COVID the beginning of COVID, and 48 00:02:49,160 --> 00:02:51,000 Speaker 1: we have one now. But you know we've had I 49 00:02:51,000 --> 00:02:52,720 Speaker 1: don't know, I've lived through seven or eight of these. 50 00:02:52,960 --> 00:02:55,680 Speaker 1: Uh So they almost all are fundamentally driven and there 51 00:02:55,720 --> 00:02:58,400 Speaker 1: are these confluence of events coming up. I think of 52 00:02:58,400 --> 00:03:00,240 Speaker 1: all those stocks that you mentioned, probably the one that 53 00:03:00,320 --> 00:03:03,680 Speaker 1: most fundamentally surprised me was Netflix that just hit a wall. 54 00:03:03,720 --> 00:03:06,080 Speaker 1: And I think that was because they just didn't have 55 00:03:06,160 --> 00:03:08,320 Speaker 1: a plan B or a plan C at least not 56 00:03:08,800 --> 00:03:11,160 Speaker 1: ready to go and uh and they sort of hit 57 00:03:11,160 --> 00:03:13,839 Speaker 1: a little bit of market maturation and lots of competition. 58 00:03:14,080 --> 00:03:16,079 Speaker 1: I don't think that's the case actually with Facebook or 59 00:03:16,400 --> 00:03:19,200 Speaker 1: Google or Amazon. I think these are dips that you 60 00:03:19,400 --> 00:03:21,400 Speaker 1: as a growth investor. Me as a growth investor, I 61 00:03:21,440 --> 00:03:23,000 Speaker 1: want to be buying. I call these d h q 62 00:03:23,160 --> 00:03:26,280 Speaker 1: s dislocated high quality opportunities. I know everything is being 63 00:03:26,320 --> 00:03:29,480 Speaker 1: thrown against Amazon now. I mean this is This is 64 00:03:29,520 --> 00:03:31,399 Speaker 1: about as big of a macro place you can find. 65 00:03:31,400 --> 00:03:33,840 Speaker 1: They got one point six million employees. So if wage 66 00:03:33,880 --> 00:03:36,400 Speaker 1: inflation is going up and shipping inflation is going up 67 00:03:36,400 --> 00:03:38,760 Speaker 1: and fuel inflation is going up, if all that happens, 68 00:03:38,840 --> 00:03:42,240 Speaker 1: Amazon is definitely negatively impacted. I just don't think this 69 00:03:42,320 --> 00:03:44,760 Speaker 1: is a structural change in Amazon's business model, and I 70 00:03:44,760 --> 00:03:46,760 Speaker 1: think they'll start scaling through it, and you want to 71 00:03:46,800 --> 00:03:48,520 Speaker 1: be buying them when this is. I mean, this is 72 00:03:48,520 --> 00:03:50,680 Speaker 1: about as bad as it gets, and all of the 73 00:03:50,680 --> 00:03:53,120 Speaker 1: stock is gonna work as things get less less worse 74 00:03:53,200 --> 00:03:56,200 Speaker 1: going forwards, and I think they will barring the global recession. 75 00:03:56,960 --> 00:03:59,480 Speaker 1: Is Netflix going to be able to peel itself off 76 00:03:59,520 --> 00:04:04,800 Speaker 1: the wall and get some momentum back. Yes, at some 77 00:04:04,840 --> 00:04:06,760 Speaker 1: point I'm sure they will be able to. To me, 78 00:04:06,840 --> 00:04:09,560 Speaker 1: this is like if you remember Emily price Line, which 79 00:04:09,600 --> 00:04:12,280 Speaker 1: turned into Booking dot Com. There was a wonderful stock 80 00:04:12,400 --> 00:04:14,640 Speaker 1: for a decade like Netflix was, and then it went 81 00:04:14,840 --> 00:04:18,279 Speaker 1: x premium growth. They stopped growing above and they just 82 00:04:18,360 --> 00:04:20,600 Speaker 1: kind of did this ten percent revenue growth, and they 83 00:04:20,640 --> 00:04:23,760 Speaker 1: traded fine in line with the market, but they didn't outperform. 84 00:04:23,839 --> 00:04:25,719 Speaker 1: And I sort of think the same thing happens here 85 00:04:25,760 --> 00:04:29,080 Speaker 1: with Netflix. And the challenge with Netflix is it went 86 00:04:29,120 --> 00:04:32,160 Speaker 1: into its kind of an exited, you know, premium growth 87 00:04:32,480 --> 00:04:34,679 Speaker 1: from a very high multiple, so you had this wicked 88 00:04:34,680 --> 00:04:37,279 Speaker 1: correction down. Now you've got this thing trading at like 89 00:04:37,400 --> 00:04:40,720 Speaker 1: fifteen sixteen seventeen times earnings. That's about right for an 90 00:04:40,720 --> 00:04:42,640 Speaker 1: asset like this, So I think it kind of hugs 91 00:04:42,640 --> 00:04:45,200 Speaker 1: the market for the foreseeable future. I you know, I 92 00:04:45,480 --> 00:04:48,520 Speaker 1: downgrade the stock earlier this year, and uh, this is 93 00:04:49,080 --> 00:04:51,279 Speaker 1: my history tells me this stays that you stand on 94 00:04:51,279 --> 00:04:53,120 Speaker 1: the sidelines on the name like this for at least 95 00:04:53,120 --> 00:04:57,200 Speaker 1: a year. Meantime, got to talk about Twitter Musk trying 96 00:04:57,200 --> 00:05:00,360 Speaker 1: to buy to sell more shares to get the money 97 00:05:00,360 --> 00:05:04,520 Speaker 1: he needs to do this deal. Twitter earnings, though, you know, 98 00:05:04,640 --> 00:05:06,839 Speaker 1: didn't look great. Do you think he's really committed to 99 00:05:07,640 --> 00:05:11,840 Speaker 1: owning and running a money losing asset or or does 100 00:05:11,880 --> 00:05:14,200 Speaker 1: he want to turn this into a profitable business? And 101 00:05:14,240 --> 00:05:17,200 Speaker 1: can he get the deal done even as Tesla shares 102 00:05:17,480 --> 00:05:22,040 Speaker 1: continue to decline? Well, um, I think he can get 103 00:05:22,040 --> 00:05:24,280 Speaker 1: the deal done. I think he's got enough personal wealth 104 00:05:24,320 --> 00:05:25,960 Speaker 1: that he can he can get the deal done. It 105 00:05:26,000 --> 00:05:28,039 Speaker 1: may not be as attractive as he first thought. The 106 00:05:28,080 --> 00:05:29,799 Speaker 1: second thing is, I don't know whether he early wants 107 00:05:29,960 --> 00:05:32,719 Speaker 1: wants to run it as a profitable enterprise. Is public 108 00:05:32,800 --> 00:05:35,760 Speaker 1: statements indicate that he hasn't. That said that this person 109 00:05:35,920 --> 00:05:40,400 Speaker 1: is an enormously successful entrepreneur. The difference here, however, Emily, 110 00:05:40,480 --> 00:05:43,360 Speaker 1: is that he didn't build this company from the ground up. 111 00:05:43,400 --> 00:05:46,520 Speaker 1: He's acquiring an asset and so then you go through it. 112 00:05:46,600 --> 00:05:48,440 Speaker 1: I mean, you do in that big M and a deal, 113 00:05:48,520 --> 00:05:51,000 Speaker 1: you're going to have to figure out cultures. Uh. You know, 114 00:05:51,080 --> 00:05:53,520 Speaker 1: this is a very different business model than he's run before. 115 00:05:53,800 --> 00:05:57,880 Speaker 1: I know he's extremely intimately knowledgeable about how Twitter works 116 00:05:57,920 --> 00:06:00,479 Speaker 1: as a user, but you know, there's a side of 117 00:06:00,480 --> 00:06:02,120 Speaker 1: the business here. I mean, the people who pay the 118 00:06:02,120 --> 00:06:06,080 Speaker 1: bills to Twitter are advertisers, and that's a very different mindset, 119 00:06:06,400 --> 00:06:08,120 Speaker 1: very different set of skills. And I don't know what 120 00:06:08,440 --> 00:06:10,880 Speaker 1: Musk wants to do about that. If he doesn't care 121 00:06:10,920 --> 00:06:13,080 Speaker 1: about the advertisers, they're they're not gonna care about him, 122 00:06:13,400 --> 00:06:15,800 Speaker 1: and you're gonna have ad dollars decline. And by the way, 123 00:06:15,839 --> 00:06:18,640 Speaker 1: that that's your cash flow. So I I think the 124 00:06:18,680 --> 00:06:20,800 Speaker 1: operational challenge here is gonna be greater. And I don't 125 00:06:20,800 --> 00:06:23,039 Speaker 1: know whether that bother bothers must or not, but it's 126 00:06:23,200 --> 00:06:25,920 Speaker 1: it's gonna if it's if it's a financial imparative for 127 00:06:25,960 --> 00:06:27,799 Speaker 1: him to get the this is gonna be a bigger 128 00:06:27,839 --> 00:06:29,480 Speaker 1: challenge for him. If he really wants to run the 129 00:06:29,520 --> 00:06:31,280 Speaker 1: business properly, this is gonna be this is gonna be 130 00:06:31,279 --> 00:06:34,400 Speaker 1: a challenge for him. And quickly twitters are still trading 131 00:06:34,440 --> 00:06:37,479 Speaker 1: below his offer price. Do you think investors don't think 132 00:06:37,520 --> 00:06:40,279 Speaker 1: he can get the deal done? I think there's always 133 00:06:40,279 --> 00:06:41,640 Speaker 1: a little bit of a gap in these M and 134 00:06:41,680 --> 00:06:43,600 Speaker 1: A deals. You know, this deal is not going to 135 00:06:43,680 --> 00:06:46,080 Speaker 1: probably close for a couple of months. Something could still 136 00:06:46,120 --> 00:06:49,320 Speaker 1: come up regulatory wise. Uh, so there's always gonna be 137 00:06:49,360 --> 00:06:50,919 Speaker 1: a little bit of a discount. I don't see it 138 00:06:50,960 --> 00:06:54,800 Speaker 1: as that glaring the gap here. So yeah, I'm not 139 00:06:54,839 --> 00:06:56,560 Speaker 1: surprised that there's a gap. I would expect it to 140 00:06:56,680 --> 00:06:58,600 Speaker 1: narrow as you get closer to whenever this thing is 141 00:06:58,640 --> 00:07:00,280 Speaker 1: supposed to close. I think the thing is going to 142 00:07:00,320 --> 00:07:02,080 Speaker 1: close pretty quickly in the next couple of months, though 143 00:07:02,160 --> 00:07:06,200 Speaker 1: next month or two. Interesting why quickly. I don't know 144 00:07:06,200 --> 00:07:08,040 Speaker 1: what stops it. I mean, there's no other bidder here, 145 00:07:08,080 --> 00:07:11,080 Speaker 1: so it's only regulatory approval. The board has agreed to this. 146 00:07:11,440 --> 00:07:13,960 Speaker 1: I think the largest shareholders have signed up. I don't 147 00:07:13,960 --> 00:07:16,160 Speaker 1: know that for a fact, but I'm guessing that that's 148 00:07:16,200 --> 00:07:18,200 Speaker 1: the last series of events that caused the board to 149 00:07:18,240 --> 00:07:21,119 Speaker 1: say okay. Deals done because they heard from their largest 150 00:07:21,120 --> 00:07:24,800 Speaker 1: shareholders that they want this. This deal completed, so there's 151 00:07:24,800 --> 00:07:28,920 Speaker 1: nothing to really stop it except for the regulatory approval process. Interesting. 152 00:07:29,000 --> 00:07:31,320 Speaker 1: Mark Mhoney of aver Cores always going to have you 153 00:07:31,320 --> 00:07:43,440 Speaker 1: happy Friday, Mark, thanks for joining us. Elon Mosk sold 154 00:07:43,440 --> 00:07:45,840 Speaker 1: an additional four and a half billion dollars worth of 155 00:07:45,880 --> 00:07:49,000 Speaker 1: Tesla stock, according to new regulatory filings. That makes his 156 00:07:49,160 --> 00:07:52,160 Speaker 1: total sales this week eight and a half billion dollars, 157 00:07:52,200 --> 00:07:55,040 Speaker 1: bringing him one step closer to making his deal to 158 00:07:55,080 --> 00:07:58,080 Speaker 1: buy Twitter a reality. Mosque has already discussed some of 159 00:07:58,120 --> 00:08:01,360 Speaker 1: the changes he'd make to Twitter on Twitter, most notably 160 00:08:01,520 --> 00:08:05,040 Speaker 1: his now pin tweet about free speech and censorship. There's 161 00:08:05,040 --> 00:08:07,200 Speaker 1: been some excitement and a lot of concerns about what 162 00:08:07,240 --> 00:08:10,080 Speaker 1: Twitter might look like under Musk, especially when it comes 163 00:08:10,080 --> 00:08:14,080 Speaker 1: to changing Twitter's moderation policies. My next guest actually helped 164 00:08:14,120 --> 00:08:16,720 Speaker 1: Twitter's Trust and Safety Council shape those policies. And I'm 165 00:08:16,800 --> 00:08:21,200 Speaker 1: joined now by Brianna Wou, executive director Rebellion Pack, one 166 00:08:21,360 --> 00:08:24,280 Speaker 1: time congressional candidate and a woman who unfortunately knows a 167 00:08:24,320 --> 00:08:27,520 Speaker 1: thing or two about harassment. And Brianna, I just want 168 00:08:27,560 --> 00:08:30,200 Speaker 1: to remind our viewers that not only did you become 169 00:08:30,200 --> 00:08:33,880 Speaker 1: a target of vicious trolls on Twitter as a result 170 00:08:34,080 --> 00:08:37,360 Speaker 1: of gamer Gate, your harassers came after you in person 171 00:08:37,400 --> 00:08:41,160 Speaker 1: and tried to, you know, physically harm you. In the 172 00:08:41,200 --> 00:08:44,199 Speaker 1: wake of that, you help Twitter shape its moderation policies. 173 00:08:44,400 --> 00:08:46,599 Speaker 1: How do you feel about handing that over now to 174 00:08:46,760 --> 00:08:51,640 Speaker 1: Elon Musk Well, I'm obviously very very concerned. Um, you know, 175 00:08:51,760 --> 00:08:54,920 Speaker 1: something I talked about two NBC News this week was 176 00:08:55,440 --> 00:08:59,280 Speaker 1: kind of history of Twitter's moderation policies improving in the 177 00:08:59,280 --> 00:09:02,559 Speaker 1: wake of gamer Game. I talked to Del Harvey and 178 00:09:02,600 --> 00:09:06,040 Speaker 1: a lot of other people at Twitter from really extensively 179 00:09:06,120 --> 00:09:11,800 Speaker 1: from about until about eighteen trying to basically fix some 180 00:09:11,880 --> 00:09:14,800 Speaker 1: of the things that went wrong at Twitter, and something 181 00:09:14,840 --> 00:09:18,520 Speaker 1: I really was stressed everyone watching you on Bloomberg is 182 00:09:18,880 --> 00:09:21,920 Speaker 1: ultimately this was a u X problem. We were trying 183 00:09:21,920 --> 00:09:25,479 Speaker 1: to solve a user experience problem. This was not political, 184 00:09:25,640 --> 00:09:29,040 Speaker 1: It was not a left versus right screaming match. This 185 00:09:29,240 --> 00:09:32,360 Speaker 1: was people on Twitter are having a bad user experience 186 00:09:32,360 --> 00:09:35,840 Speaker 1: and we need to fix it. So I'm really worried 187 00:09:35,920 --> 00:09:39,600 Speaker 1: that all the progress we made to basically let a 188 00:09:39,600 --> 00:09:43,040 Speaker 1: lot of people use this service and not get death threats, 189 00:09:43,240 --> 00:09:47,800 Speaker 1: rape threats, you know, their their personal information published. I'm 190 00:09:47,880 --> 00:09:50,800 Speaker 1: extremely concerned that's going to take a step backwards. And 191 00:09:50,880 --> 00:09:54,160 Speaker 1: because this is Bloomberg, I think ultimately that's going to 192 00:09:54,440 --> 00:09:59,240 Speaker 1: really affect Twitter's stock price, in their profitability. If you 193 00:09:59,320 --> 00:10:03,760 Speaker 1: could give Unmusk some advice, what would it be. I 194 00:10:03,840 --> 00:10:06,200 Speaker 1: think the main thing I would say is listen to 195 00:10:06,240 --> 00:10:09,480 Speaker 1: the professionals on the trust and Safety team. I cannot 196 00:10:09,559 --> 00:10:13,440 Speaker 1: emphasize to you enough. These are data driven professionals. They're 197 00:10:13,440 --> 00:10:17,680 Speaker 1: not ideologues. They sit there and they comb through literally 198 00:10:17,960 --> 00:10:20,640 Speaker 1: large freams of data every single day trying to figure 199 00:10:20,640 --> 00:10:24,360 Speaker 1: out how to make the product better, what the shortcomings are. 200 00:10:24,600 --> 00:10:27,520 Speaker 1: It's almost like cyber warfare in a sense, you know, 201 00:10:27,920 --> 00:10:31,400 Speaker 1: where you've trolls poking at the defenses of Twitter's trust 202 00:10:31,400 --> 00:10:34,280 Speaker 1: and safety policies all day and trying to figure out 203 00:10:34,360 --> 00:10:36,560 Speaker 1: how to get around it. I would say listen to 204 00:10:36,600 --> 00:10:41,120 Speaker 1: those professionals. What concerns me is, judging from miss tweets, 205 00:10:41,600 --> 00:10:44,640 Speaker 1: it seems like he's coming in with basically a political, 206 00:10:45,120 --> 00:10:50,240 Speaker 1: uh political crusade that he's trying to bring to the platform, 207 00:10:50,360 --> 00:10:53,360 Speaker 1: rather than just trying to empower his professionals that are 208 00:10:53,360 --> 00:10:56,920 Speaker 1: trying to solve this from a non political point of view. Now, 209 00:10:56,960 --> 00:11:03,040 Speaker 1: Elon Musk is inarguably an innovator and has you know, 210 00:11:03,200 --> 00:11:07,120 Speaker 1: brought some of the most difficult ideas in history to fruition. 211 00:11:07,440 --> 00:11:12,640 Speaker 1: Why shouldn't we think he could actually make Twitter better? Well, 212 00:11:12,720 --> 00:11:16,480 Speaker 1: you know, if we were talking about making a tech product, 213 00:11:16,520 --> 00:11:18,800 Speaker 1: I think I would have a lot more faith in him. 214 00:11:19,000 --> 00:11:22,000 Speaker 1: I think it's also worth saying Elon Musk is also 215 00:11:22,040 --> 00:11:24,960 Speaker 1: someone that makes really big promises that don't seem to 216 00:11:25,000 --> 00:11:27,560 Speaker 1: go anywhere if you listen to him. We're going to 217 00:11:27,640 --> 00:11:31,920 Speaker 1: have uh, you know, Optimius robots, these fully autonomous robots 218 00:11:31,960 --> 00:11:35,800 Speaker 1: that can act with artificial intelligence, walk around on two legs. 219 00:11:36,040 --> 00:11:38,720 Speaker 1: Those will be out I believe next year. According to 220 00:11:38,760 --> 00:11:42,200 Speaker 1: his public statements, uh, he said Tesla will be a 221 00:11:42,240 --> 00:11:45,720 Speaker 1: fully self drivable car every single year for the last 222 00:11:45,760 --> 00:11:48,800 Speaker 1: six years. I think there's a real credibility gap when 223 00:11:48,840 --> 00:11:53,120 Speaker 1: it comes to his very large pronouncements on this UH 224 00:11:53,160 --> 00:11:56,600 Speaker 1: in something that's I really want to stress Emily Ultimately, 225 00:11:56,760 --> 00:12:01,199 Speaker 1: most of the policies that changed at Twitter happened because 226 00:12:01,320 --> 00:12:04,760 Speaker 1: the Twitter leadership was invested in it. You know, from 227 00:12:05,679 --> 00:12:10,240 Speaker 1: to about they were very incentivized, not just you know, 228 00:12:10,280 --> 00:12:14,080 Speaker 1: from users, but from the stock price to address harassment. 229 00:12:14,200 --> 00:12:17,800 Speaker 1: If you remember, they tried to sell themselves to UH 230 00:12:17,800 --> 00:12:20,120 Speaker 1: I believe it was ABC and Distinc. At one point 231 00:12:20,160 --> 00:12:23,319 Speaker 1: Twitter did, and the deal fell through in part because 232 00:12:23,320 --> 00:12:26,840 Speaker 1: of the congeneral harassment on the platform. So you know, 233 00:12:27,000 --> 00:12:30,199 Speaker 1: ultimately this isn't just a user safety issue, it's a 234 00:12:30,240 --> 00:12:34,640 Speaker 1: stock price issue. Now. Jack Dorsey just posted a long 235 00:12:34,880 --> 00:12:39,040 Speaker 1: Twitter thread taking responsibility for mistakes he has, you know, 236 00:12:39,200 --> 00:12:40,800 Speaker 1: talked a little bit about the handling of the New 237 00:12:40,840 --> 00:12:44,600 Speaker 1: York Post article mentioning Hunter Biden. But of course there 238 00:12:44,640 --> 00:12:48,080 Speaker 1: are many many other issues um that Elon Musk seems 239 00:12:48,080 --> 00:12:51,200 Speaker 1: to be taking issue with. Jack says a transparent system, 240 00:12:51,200 --> 00:12:53,480 Speaker 1: both in policy and operations, is the right way to 241 00:12:53,520 --> 00:12:56,440 Speaker 1: earn trust, whether it's owned by a company or an 242 00:12:56,440 --> 00:13:00,559 Speaker 1: open protocol doesn't matter as much as deliberately deciding to 243 00:13:00,559 --> 00:13:02,800 Speaker 1: be open about every decision and why it was made. 244 00:13:02,920 --> 00:13:06,240 Speaker 1: It is not easy to do, but it must happen. 245 00:13:07,040 --> 00:13:09,199 Speaker 1: What do you what do you think he means by that? 246 00:13:09,320 --> 00:13:14,640 Speaker 1: And is it really possible? I don't know how possible 247 00:13:14,679 --> 00:13:16,480 Speaker 1: it is, but I think it's a good ideal to 248 00:13:16,600 --> 00:13:19,640 Speaker 1: strive for. I think a lot of the misconceptions about 249 00:13:19,640 --> 00:13:23,600 Speaker 1: the trust and safety policy happen because there is this, uh, 250 00:13:23,800 --> 00:13:27,400 Speaker 1: this this, then this veil between what happens on that 251 00:13:27,440 --> 00:13:30,280 Speaker 1: team in the public. I find it very notable of 252 00:13:30,400 --> 00:13:32,840 Speaker 1: my work with them. I was really encouraged to not 253 00:13:32,960 --> 00:13:36,120 Speaker 1: speak about it ever, Um. I only spoke about it 254 00:13:36,200 --> 00:13:38,600 Speaker 1: this week because I felt the stakes were so high 255 00:13:38,720 --> 00:13:42,440 Speaker 1: and that it was worth worth kind of talking about 256 00:13:42,480 --> 00:13:45,960 Speaker 1: my experiences on that team because of these this misconception 257 00:13:46,120 --> 00:13:48,800 Speaker 1: that you know, it's a bunch of democratic people behind 258 00:13:48,840 --> 00:13:53,479 Speaker 1: the scenes trying to silence conservatives. Absolutely not my experience 259 00:13:53,480 --> 00:13:56,280 Speaker 1: at all. Um. I think that if we had these 260 00:13:56,320 --> 00:14:00,679 Speaker 1: policies applied more transparently, I think that that would be 261 00:14:00,720 --> 00:14:04,160 Speaker 1: good for getting the trust of all users. You know, 262 00:14:04,320 --> 00:14:09,679 Speaker 1: what if find is so interesting, Emily is from my perception. Um, 263 00:14:09,720 --> 00:14:13,120 Speaker 1: if you look at Twitter and their ability to solve 264 00:14:14,120 --> 00:14:16,280 Speaker 1: address things that we all agree should not be on 265 00:14:16,360 --> 00:14:19,960 Speaker 1: that platform, things like death threat and rape threats, I 266 00:14:20,000 --> 00:14:22,280 Speaker 1: think they do a much better job than many of 267 00:14:22,320 --> 00:14:25,640 Speaker 1: their competitors. They certainly do better than Facebook and read it, 268 00:14:26,040 --> 00:14:29,160 Speaker 1: but they've never really gotten the public credit. I feel 269 00:14:29,200 --> 00:14:31,920 Speaker 1: that they deserved for that. I think that being more 270 00:14:31,920 --> 00:14:35,000 Speaker 1: open with that would definitely help it. I would say 271 00:14:35,000 --> 00:14:38,000 Speaker 1: in my own experience as a user, Twitter's moderation has 272 00:14:38,000 --> 00:14:40,560 Speaker 1: gotten better, at least from my perspective and the tweets 273 00:14:40,560 --> 00:14:45,000 Speaker 1: that I personally see. You know, I think the folks 274 00:14:45,000 --> 00:14:48,240 Speaker 1: who are really excited about Elon's vision seem to think 275 00:14:48,280 --> 00:14:51,760 Speaker 1: that Twitter has made a lot of political decisions over 276 00:14:51,800 --> 00:14:55,600 Speaker 1: the last several years. Even even Jack himself says, you know, 277 00:14:55,720 --> 00:14:59,400 Speaker 1: he generally isn't a fan of band banning someone, and 278 00:14:59,440 --> 00:15:04,920 Speaker 1: Twitter is the platform that banned President Trump permanently. Do 279 00:15:04,960 --> 00:15:07,840 Speaker 1: you think the decisions that Twitter has made are political 280 00:15:07,920 --> 00:15:11,960 Speaker 1: or were politicized? You know, when I come on your show, 281 00:15:12,000 --> 00:15:15,760 Speaker 1: I try not to make things partisan. But since you asked, 282 00:15:15,800 --> 00:15:19,560 Speaker 1: I'll tell you my honest impression. In gamer Gate, I 283 00:15:19,680 --> 00:15:25,360 Speaker 1: felt that these policies were the all right versus normal people. Right, 284 00:15:25,600 --> 00:15:28,800 Speaker 1: it was the trolls versus just professionals trying to get 285 00:15:28,840 --> 00:15:34,960 Speaker 1: their job done. I think unfortunately, since we have seen 286 00:15:36,080 --> 00:15:40,320 Speaker 1: these issues become partisan, as some people are kind of 287 00:15:41,440 --> 00:15:45,120 Speaker 1: becoming their worst selves online, so I think unfortunately this 288 00:15:45,200 --> 00:15:48,720 Speaker 1: has become another left versus right screaming match. I can't 289 00:15:48,720 --> 00:15:51,920 Speaker 1: think of any problem in America that's gotten better on 290 00:15:52,040 --> 00:15:54,960 Speaker 1: its become a partisan screaming match rather than a problem 291 00:15:55,040 --> 00:16:01,840 Speaker 1: to solve. Brianna Wu Rebellion Pack executive director, UM, longtime 292 00:16:01,880 --> 00:16:14,280 Speaker 1: crusader for better moderation policies. Thank you Apple warning it 293 00:16:14,320 --> 00:16:17,520 Speaker 1: could lose billions this quarter due to supply shortages, specifically 294 00:16:17,600 --> 00:16:21,480 Speaker 1: tied to China and it's strict lockdown policy. I'm joined 295 00:16:21,480 --> 00:16:24,000 Speaker 1: now by Bloomberg's Mark German, who of course covers all 296 00:16:24,040 --> 00:16:27,720 Speaker 1: things Apple for us. So Mark, just exactly how bad 297 00:16:27,760 --> 00:16:31,120 Speaker 1: did Apple say these supply chain issues are going to 298 00:16:31,200 --> 00:16:35,960 Speaker 1: get and is it all because of COVID in China? Well? 299 00:16:36,000 --> 00:16:39,080 Speaker 1: Pretty bad, right, They're guiding between four billion and eight billion. 300 00:16:39,080 --> 00:16:41,320 Speaker 1: And if you listen to the call, it seemed like 301 00:16:41,360 --> 00:16:43,680 Speaker 1: Tim Cook and look at my Austry the CFO, they 302 00:16:43,720 --> 00:16:46,520 Speaker 1: really weren't sure how big of an impact it really 303 00:16:46,520 --> 00:16:49,040 Speaker 1: would be, right, That's why they gave that big four 304 00:16:49,080 --> 00:16:51,680 Speaker 1: to eight billion range. Now. They've been giving these ranges 305 00:16:51,680 --> 00:16:54,080 Speaker 1: of supply chain impact now for a few quarters, but 306 00:16:54,240 --> 00:16:57,280 Speaker 1: this up to eight billion dollar marker, that's the biggest one. 307 00:16:57,280 --> 00:17:00,080 Speaker 1: Now analysts still think that Apple could beat in terms 308 00:17:00,080 --> 00:17:03,680 Speaker 1: of year over year, right, But we'll see how ultimately 309 00:17:03,720 --> 00:17:06,720 Speaker 1: Apple shakes out. I think it's a combination of the 310 00:17:06,760 --> 00:17:10,000 Speaker 1: supply chain in China, which definitely has a long way 311 00:17:10,040 --> 00:17:13,000 Speaker 1: to go in terms of the overall strategy final assembly. 312 00:17:13,040 --> 00:17:16,440 Speaker 1: There's obviously a bottleneck in recent years. I'm sure we'll 313 00:17:16,440 --> 00:17:19,199 Speaker 1: get more into that. I also think it has to 314 00:17:19,240 --> 00:17:23,080 Speaker 1: do with global economic conditions, the war Ukraine, inflation, people 315 00:17:23,080 --> 00:17:25,600 Speaker 1: trying to hold onto their money, and also in terms 316 00:17:25,600 --> 00:17:28,280 Speaker 1: of you know, products in some sense, right, like people 317 00:17:28,320 --> 00:17:32,000 Speaker 1: are anticipating big iPhone, fourteen, big iPad and Apple Watch 318 00:17:32,080 --> 00:17:34,800 Speaker 1: changes later in the year, as Apple always does, so 319 00:17:34,840 --> 00:17:37,240 Speaker 1: people could be holding onto that too as well. Q 320 00:17:37,480 --> 00:17:41,239 Speaker 1: three is traditionally one of Apple's more soft quarters. How 321 00:17:41,280 --> 00:17:43,240 Speaker 1: do you think investors are going to handle this given that, 322 00:17:43,320 --> 00:17:46,359 Speaker 1: you know, Apple's learnings generally were pretty good if you 323 00:17:46,400 --> 00:17:50,040 Speaker 1: look at how dismally bad the results have been from 324 00:17:50,080 --> 00:17:53,720 Speaker 1: other tech companies like Amazon. Yeah, I think investors are 325 00:17:53,720 --> 00:17:56,280 Speaker 1: probably going to wait to really, you know, make their 326 00:17:56,320 --> 00:17:59,840 Speaker 1: long term decisions on Apple until the Q three results, right. 327 00:17:59,880 --> 00:18:01,639 Speaker 1: I think they want to see how things shake out. 328 00:18:01,920 --> 00:18:04,200 Speaker 1: You know, Tim Cook and Luca were they were vague 329 00:18:04,320 --> 00:18:06,240 Speaker 1: enough to indicate, you know what, maybe it won't be 330 00:18:06,280 --> 00:18:08,959 Speaker 1: eight billion, maybe less than four billion, Right, That's why 331 00:18:09,000 --> 00:18:11,080 Speaker 1: they give that being ranged. They didn't really seem sure. 332 00:18:11,400 --> 00:18:13,480 Speaker 1: So if Apple is not entirely sure, I'm not sure 333 00:18:13,480 --> 00:18:16,159 Speaker 1: investors and analysts can be entirely sure too. So I 334 00:18:16,160 --> 00:18:18,199 Speaker 1: think they're gonna wait until late July to see how 335 00:18:18,240 --> 00:18:20,760 Speaker 1: things really shake out. Obviously, there is a lot of 336 00:18:20,760 --> 00:18:23,520 Speaker 1: reason to be optimistic about Apple, but an eight billion 337 00:18:23,560 --> 00:18:27,000 Speaker 1: dollar hit yet again on the supply chain indicates that 338 00:18:27,040 --> 00:18:29,119 Speaker 1: Apple really needs to be making some tweaks to that 339 00:18:29,160 --> 00:18:32,439 Speaker 1: overall strategy. There and Tim Cook, the architect of the 340 00:18:32,440 --> 00:18:35,320 Speaker 1: Apple supply chain over the last twenty years and change, 341 00:18:35,640 --> 00:18:39,080 Speaker 1: he was again defensive about the supply chain strategy. And 342 00:18:39,119 --> 00:18:41,160 Speaker 1: so we'll see, you know, if Apple does make those 343 00:18:41,240 --> 00:18:44,200 Speaker 1: changes that they clearly need to make, And what are 344 00:18:44,240 --> 00:18:47,520 Speaker 1: the products that you are most excited about coming year 345 00:18:47,760 --> 00:18:51,879 Speaker 1: September quickly, Yeah, I'm particularly excited about the Apple Watch, right. 346 00:18:51,920 --> 00:18:53,840 Speaker 1: I think there's gonna be three new models this year, 347 00:18:54,080 --> 00:18:57,200 Speaker 1: including a new ruggedized model maybe with some satellite connectivity 348 00:18:57,200 --> 00:18:59,880 Speaker 1: features so that will be pretty nifty, and new iPad 349 00:19:00,000 --> 00:19:02,560 Speaker 1: pro and also the a R headset at some point. 350 00:19:03,320 --> 00:19:06,439 Speaker 1: All right, Mark German, who of course covers Apple for US, 351 00:19:06,440 --> 00:19:08,480 Speaker 1: will be on the lookout for all of those things. 352 00:19:08,560 --> 00:19:10,560 Speaker 1: And now we're about a minute and a half to 353 00:19:10,760 --> 00:19:15,320 Speaker 1: launch of that SpaceX Falcon nine rocket carrying fifty three 354 00:19:15,359 --> 00:19:18,440 Speaker 1: Starlink satellites. We're looking at a live look there of 355 00:19:19,200 --> 00:19:25,080 Speaker 1: Cape Canaveral Space Force Station in Florida taking off as 356 00:19:25,160 --> 00:19:31,800 Speaker 1: planned at this point at five twenty seven pm Eastern time. 357 00:19:31,840 --> 00:19:34,919 Speaker 1: I want to bring in Bloomberg's Justin Bachman, who covers 358 00:19:34,920 --> 00:19:38,159 Speaker 1: the space industry for us. This would be a history 359 00:19:38,200 --> 00:19:41,040 Speaker 1: making mission, justin correct, and that this would be the 360 00:19:41,080 --> 00:19:46,160 Speaker 1: fastest turnaround time for a refurbished rocket ever. That's true. Yeah, 361 00:19:46,240 --> 00:19:49,800 Speaker 1: they have shaved their previous record of twenty seven days 362 00:19:49,800 --> 00:19:52,040 Speaker 1: down in twenty one days. So it is a record. 363 00:19:52,040 --> 00:19:55,560 Speaker 1: When you put it like that, it sounds pretty well, um, 364 00:19:55,600 --> 00:19:57,520 Speaker 1: you know, what's curious is we don't know what their 365 00:19:57,840 --> 00:20:01,719 Speaker 1: what their target is. It's it's interesting to see if 366 00:20:02,560 --> 00:20:04,960 Speaker 1: you know, this becomes more of a two week or 367 00:20:05,000 --> 00:20:08,480 Speaker 1: even a one week turnaround. Um for when they you know, 368 00:20:08,560 --> 00:20:11,160 Speaker 1: land these rockets and they're ready to fly them again. Um, 369 00:20:11,200 --> 00:20:13,040 Speaker 1: and I think they're learning. It's it's one of those 370 00:20:13,080 --> 00:20:16,800 Speaker 1: open questions. How many times can I falcondine fly? And 371 00:20:17,119 --> 00:20:20,159 Speaker 1: how quickly can you can you get the refurbishment? How 372 00:20:20,240 --> 00:20:22,199 Speaker 1: much do you need to do versus what you can? 373 00:20:23,840 --> 00:20:28,840 Speaker 1: Justin here we go five seconds to go two one 374 00:20:29,320 --> 00:20:44,240 Speaker 1: pigniction on sorry pie vehicles catching count range and when 375 00:20:44,280 --> 00:21:03,560 Speaker 1: D chamber pressure is nominal. Yes, Falcon nine has successfully 376 00:21:03,640 --> 00:21:07,240 Speaker 1: lifted off from Space Launch Complex Party carrying our fifty 377 00:21:07,320 --> 00:21:11,560 Speaker 1: three Sterlink satellites. Now although a liftoff, gravity is pulling 378 00:21:11,760 --> 00:21:16,160 Speaker 1: the vehicle straight right, the rocket is on its way 379 00:21:16,640 --> 00:21:20,359 Speaker 1: twenty seven days after its last trip. This is the 380 00:21:20,520 --> 00:21:26,360 Speaker 1: sixth flight ever for this particular rocket, now carrying fifty 381 00:21:26,480 --> 00:21:31,879 Speaker 1: three satellites. Starlink satellites into orbit. Are Justin Bachman, who 382 00:21:31,960 --> 00:21:36,000 Speaker 1: covers the space industry for US now justin how significant 383 00:21:36,320 --> 00:21:41,560 Speaker 1: is this milestone? I think it's fairly significant because you're 384 00:21:41,560 --> 00:21:45,160 Speaker 1: seeing SpaceX learning. They fly a lot, and they learn 385 00:21:45,160 --> 00:21:47,399 Speaker 1: a lot, and you know, one of the questions that 386 00:21:47,480 --> 00:21:49,879 Speaker 1: the company has got to be, what is what is 387 00:21:49,920 --> 00:21:52,560 Speaker 1: the minimal amount that's required to have a safe flight 388 00:21:52,800 --> 00:21:56,000 Speaker 1: for not only our payloads but for customer payloads. UH. 389 00:21:56,160 --> 00:21:59,159 Speaker 1: And the faster you can do that, it's you know, 390 00:21:59,200 --> 00:22:03,320 Speaker 1: a lower's cost. And this is really a business more 391 00:22:03,440 --> 00:22:06,159 Speaker 1: than a novelty. And when you make it a business, 392 00:22:06,200 --> 00:22:08,560 Speaker 1: you're always looking to lower costs and this is an 393 00:22:08,560 --> 00:22:10,760 Speaker 1: important part of it. How quickly can you refurbish it? 394 00:22:10,840 --> 00:22:13,920 Speaker 1: What's the minimum how quickly can you fly? Um? And 395 00:22:14,040 --> 00:22:15,840 Speaker 1: today they're you know, they're taking out pay load that's 396 00:22:15,840 --> 00:22:18,680 Speaker 1: going to contribute to their their constellation and that's more money. 397 00:22:18,760 --> 00:22:21,200 Speaker 1: So it's it's a business that works. And I think 398 00:22:21,240 --> 00:22:23,600 Speaker 1: we're seeing a lot of the on the cost side 399 00:22:23,760 --> 00:22:28,240 Speaker 1: with with these kind of refurbishments. So we're about thirty 400 00:22:28,320 --> 00:22:33,240 Speaker 1: seconds away from the first stage main engine getting cut 401 00:22:33,280 --> 00:22:36,199 Speaker 1: off here, and I'd like to talk a little bit 402 00:22:36,240 --> 00:22:39,440 Speaker 1: about how this fits into the bigger mission of elon 403 00:22:39,520 --> 00:22:43,520 Speaker 1: Musk and SpaceX. UH. The goal is to have these 404 00:22:43,600 --> 00:22:47,800 Speaker 1: taken off as frequently as airplanes take off on Earth. 405 00:22:48,040 --> 00:22:51,119 Speaker 1: Can you paint the picture for us just justin of 406 00:22:51,200 --> 00:22:56,920 Speaker 1: what this future space economy will look like. Yeah, you're 407 00:22:56,960 --> 00:22:59,600 Speaker 1: you're telling about an era not too many years into 408 00:22:59,640 --> 00:23:01,879 Speaker 1: the few sure if you believe a lot of the 409 00:23:02,119 --> 00:23:06,520 Speaker 1: ambitious proposals and optimists, where you do have rockets that 410 00:23:06,600 --> 00:23:09,280 Speaker 1: take off as frequently as airplanes, because there is a 411 00:23:10,040 --> 00:23:15,040 Speaker 1: burgeoning commercial industrial base where people are not only living 412 00:23:15,240 --> 00:23:18,240 Speaker 1: and you know, space tourism is a small part of it, 413 00:23:18,600 --> 00:23:22,040 Speaker 1: but you have companies that are actively manufacturing and doing 414 00:23:22,119 --> 00:23:25,800 Speaker 1: other things with micro gravity UM and using you know, 415 00:23:25,880 --> 00:23:28,359 Speaker 1: a hard vacuum of space is a very useful tool 416 00:23:28,560 --> 00:23:31,240 Speaker 1: in a lot of research. UM. So you have this 417 00:23:31,400 --> 00:23:33,639 Speaker 1: economy where you have a lot of things going to 418 00:23:33,760 --> 00:23:37,840 Speaker 1: and from space, uh, mostly high end, high value products 419 00:23:37,880 --> 00:23:41,720 Speaker 1: and services where you know they're they're using the environment 420 00:23:41,840 --> 00:23:46,360 Speaker 1: for specific reasons. And you know, pharmaceuticals, UM and tissue 421 00:23:46,760 --> 00:23:49,760 Speaker 1: oregan growth is one area that we've we've heard a 422 00:23:49,800 --> 00:23:54,000 Speaker 1: lot about UM. So that's what you know frequent launches are. 423 00:23:54,119 --> 00:23:56,920 Speaker 1: And the Falcon Knight itself is going to be retired, um. 424 00:23:57,600 --> 00:24:00,000 Speaker 1: You know, not not too many years in the future, 425 00:24:00,080 --> 00:24:03,440 Speaker 1: or where you know, if they're starship machine works as 426 00:24:03,520 --> 00:24:06,000 Speaker 1: intended that's going to take over, and that's a much 427 00:24:06,119 --> 00:24:09,800 Speaker 1: larger UM rocket, much more reusable even than this one. 428 00:24:10,280 --> 00:24:13,520 Speaker 1: And so you're gonna see other companies internet space as well, 429 00:24:13,800 --> 00:24:17,800 Speaker 1: and it's gonna be a you know, a market where 430 00:24:17,920 --> 00:24:20,919 Speaker 1: you have frequent launches and we probably won't talk about 431 00:24:21,680 --> 00:24:25,119 Speaker 1: UM each one as a novelty because it becomes so routine. 432 00:24:25,200 --> 00:24:28,120 Speaker 1: And I think that's the goal. UM Nobody is there 433 00:24:28,200 --> 00:24:31,560 Speaker 1: yet and it's not exactly at hand, but I think 434 00:24:31,720 --> 00:24:34,480 Speaker 1: that you're seeing SpaceX build the blocks where that does 435 00:24:34,600 --> 00:24:38,080 Speaker 1: become the ultimate destin stay with us. I want to 436 00:24:38,080 --> 00:24:41,800 Speaker 1: bring Lisa rich In, the co founder and CEO of Explore. 437 00:24:41,920 --> 00:24:44,800 Speaker 1: This is a company that provides space as a service 438 00:24:44,880 --> 00:24:49,399 Speaker 1: by hosting payloads in Earth orbit and beyond. Lisa, this 439 00:24:49,560 --> 00:24:53,360 Speaker 1: rocket flu just twenty one days ago, So that timeline 440 00:24:53,440 --> 00:24:56,639 Speaker 1: is getting tighter and tighter and tighter. You know, you 441 00:24:56,680 --> 00:24:59,960 Speaker 1: know what exactly does this signify in terms of what's 442 00:25:00,040 --> 00:25:05,560 Speaker 1: BaseX and the team there has accomplished, Thank you, Emily. 443 00:25:05,880 --> 00:25:09,119 Speaker 1: What we're seeing is what Justin was referring to, is 444 00:25:09,440 --> 00:25:13,119 Speaker 1: this becoming the business of space that we are able 445 00:25:13,200 --> 00:25:18,520 Speaker 1: to launch frequently and this becomes an enabler for commercial 446 00:25:18,600 --> 00:25:23,439 Speaker 1: space companies to be flying payloads. We're not only flying 447 00:25:23,640 --> 00:25:27,200 Speaker 1: other people's payloads at our company, but we're flying our 448 00:25:27,280 --> 00:25:31,399 Speaker 1: own uh sensors that allow us to provide data and 449 00:25:31,520 --> 00:25:34,760 Speaker 1: bring that data back from space. That enables companies like 450 00:25:35,280 --> 00:25:40,760 Speaker 1: the oil and gas industry, insurance industries, logistics industries that 451 00:25:40,880 --> 00:25:43,840 Speaker 1: can help us with supply chain issues or you know, 452 00:25:44,440 --> 00:25:48,840 Speaker 1: issues with even disaster responsiveness. So all of this. You know, 453 00:25:48,920 --> 00:25:51,679 Speaker 1: we watched the launches and it's exciting to see the launch, 454 00:25:52,040 --> 00:25:54,320 Speaker 1: but we'd love to tell the story of you know, 455 00:25:54,440 --> 00:25:57,920 Speaker 1: the high capability of what's flying and what that means 456 00:25:58,040 --> 00:26:04,760 Speaker 1: back here on Earth. Fifty three satellites going into orbit today, 457 00:26:05,119 --> 00:26:08,400 Speaker 1: and thank you for explaining just how important these satellites are. 458 00:26:08,760 --> 00:26:10,399 Speaker 1: You look up in the sky on any given night 459 00:26:10,440 --> 00:26:12,320 Speaker 1: and you see them, and I wonder, are we getting 460 00:26:12,359 --> 00:26:16,280 Speaker 1: concerned that it's getting a little crowded up there? Uh 461 00:26:16,560 --> 00:26:19,359 Speaker 1: that you know are there? You know, once the space 462 00:26:19,400 --> 00:26:24,399 Speaker 1: economy becomes more rich, are their concerns about about crashes 463 00:26:24,520 --> 00:26:29,919 Speaker 1: and traffic going forward? Well, I'm glad you bring that up, 464 00:26:29,960 --> 00:26:34,240 Speaker 1: because space traffic management is an important part of the process, 465 00:26:34,800 --> 00:26:37,680 Speaker 1: and we're going to be getting better at this by 466 00:26:37,960 --> 00:26:43,800 Speaker 1: improving our regulatory process. So improving the regulatory process actually 467 00:26:44,040 --> 00:26:48,280 Speaker 1: makes us more competitive, and we have folks working very 468 00:26:48,480 --> 00:26:52,560 Speaker 1: hard to make this UM have more ease of use. 469 00:26:52,880 --> 00:26:56,560 Speaker 1: Right right now, when a company flies as spacecraft or 470 00:26:56,640 --> 00:27:00,840 Speaker 1: satellite as we call these satellites, uh, you here, if 471 00:27:00,880 --> 00:27:05,280 Speaker 1: there's a conjunction event or possible collision event, you're notified 472 00:27:05,520 --> 00:27:09,119 Speaker 1: of that. But the company itself isn't necessarily able to 473 00:27:09,240 --> 00:27:12,159 Speaker 1: track it. They're going to be notified. So in the future, 474 00:27:12,200 --> 00:27:14,360 Speaker 1: you know, we're going to have that process. I think 475 00:27:14,720 --> 00:27:17,840 Speaker 1: opening up a little more for awareness that allows us 476 00:27:17,920 --> 00:27:22,480 Speaker 1: to avoid uh these potential collisions. But is it a 477 00:27:22,600 --> 00:27:26,000 Speaker 1: danger now or five years from now, I'm not so 478 00:27:26,200 --> 00:27:29,000 Speaker 1: sure it will be because our systems are all improving 479 00:27:29,040 --> 00:27:32,560 Speaker 1: in the technology and awareness of where satellites are is 480 00:27:32,640 --> 00:27:36,800 Speaker 1: improving all the time. So a space is a big place. 481 00:27:37,119 --> 00:27:39,840 Speaker 1: There's a lot of space and space uh, so I 482 00:27:40,000 --> 00:27:42,119 Speaker 1: don't find that a concern and I don't think a 483 00:27:42,160 --> 00:27:46,639 Speaker 1: lot of satellite operators do necessarily today. So we just 484 00:27:46,760 --> 00:27:50,280 Speaker 1: saw the entry burn process there that is now shut 485 00:27:50,359 --> 00:27:55,359 Speaker 1: down and complete. First stage landing burn uh will start 486 00:27:55,560 --> 00:28:00,119 Speaker 1: at about eight minutes, so we're thirty seconds away from that. US. 487 00:28:00,200 --> 00:28:03,800 Speaker 1: In so far, everything seems to be going as planned. 488 00:28:03,880 --> 00:28:06,720 Speaker 1: Walk us through the rest of this mission given the 489 00:28:06,760 --> 00:28:10,119 Speaker 1: point we're at right now. Yeah, it does seem to 490 00:28:10,160 --> 00:28:12,440 Speaker 1: be going to plan. Um. So what you'll see coming 491 00:28:12,480 --> 00:28:15,359 Speaker 1: up next is as you mentioned, is the the landing 492 00:28:15,400 --> 00:28:17,920 Speaker 1: burn where you know, this needs to slow down. It 493 00:28:18,040 --> 00:28:21,840 Speaker 1: is still you know, supersonic vehicle at this point, and 494 00:28:21,920 --> 00:28:24,399 Speaker 1: it needs to shed a lot of speed still and 495 00:28:24,720 --> 00:28:26,960 Speaker 1: to do that, it's gonna you know, fire a rocket 496 00:28:27,119 --> 00:28:30,840 Speaker 1: engine again, um, vertically coming down. And then after that 497 00:28:30,920 --> 00:28:33,720 Speaker 1: you have the landing bird. Um, you know, complete where 498 00:28:33,720 --> 00:28:35,720 Speaker 1: we've we've seen it, but that you know, that's a 499 00:28:35,760 --> 00:28:38,400 Speaker 1: crucial part of it. And you're seeing that start right 500 00:28:38,480 --> 00:28:44,120 Speaker 1: there for first stage landing burn happening now. Um. You know, 501 00:28:45,440 --> 00:28:48,360 Speaker 1: you know, at this point, what are the things that 502 00:28:48,440 --> 00:28:51,600 Speaker 1: could could could there? It is there, it is coming 503 00:28:51,640 --> 00:28:55,360 Speaker 1: back down. UM. You know, at what point do we 504 00:28:55,440 --> 00:29:00,440 Speaker 1: consider this a success? I think it's a that's when 505 00:29:00,480 --> 00:29:03,640 Speaker 1: they get their satellites deployed, uh and going where they 506 00:29:03,680 --> 00:29:06,360 Speaker 1: want to and you know this this booster is gonna 507 00:29:06,360 --> 00:29:11,040 Speaker 1: fly another day maybe soon. Alright. The goal I would 508 00:29:11,040 --> 00:29:13,480 Speaker 1: guess is sooner than twenty one days, because that's how 509 00:29:13,560 --> 00:29:17,640 Speaker 1: long this booster took to turn around. Lisa, you know 510 00:29:19,080 --> 00:29:22,160 Speaker 1: just how quickly, Uh do you think turnaround can get 511 00:29:22,440 --> 00:29:28,000 Speaker 1: if SpaceX UH does its job right? Yeah? I think 512 00:29:28,080 --> 00:29:32,040 Speaker 1: that they probably can keep shaving time off because that 513 00:29:32,280 --> 00:29:34,320 Speaker 1: is what they do. They're looking for all of these 514 00:29:34,480 --> 00:29:39,040 Speaker 1: incremental ways to keep lowering the turnaround time and increasing 515 00:29:39,160 --> 00:29:41,960 Speaker 1: the usage and the reusability. So for this to have 516 00:29:42,080 --> 00:29:46,680 Speaker 1: been six times to fly, that's phenomenal. You know. They 517 00:29:47,200 --> 00:29:50,360 Speaker 1: have the same mindset as my company explore where we're 518 00:29:50,400 --> 00:29:54,280 Speaker 1: looking at, you know, low cost and high capability, and 519 00:29:54,440 --> 00:29:57,320 Speaker 1: they're proving this out every day by showing us that 520 00:29:57,440 --> 00:29:59,760 Speaker 1: they can turn around in twenty one days. You know, 521 00:29:59,840 --> 00:30:03,120 Speaker 1: I have visited these. They're extraordinary to see upfront. Um 522 00:30:03,520 --> 00:30:09,400 Speaker 1: did the manufacturing capability and refurbishment now, Um, they're working 523 00:30:09,480 --> 00:30:11,760 Speaker 1: like clockwork and I love to see that. It just 524 00:30:12,000 --> 00:30:16,240 Speaker 1: opens up the doors for commercial Those satellites will be 525 00:30:16,320 --> 00:30:22,520 Speaker 1: deployed about an hour into the flight. UH. Justin what's 526 00:30:22,560 --> 00:30:25,840 Speaker 1: next for the SpaceX team now that this booster is 527 00:30:26,160 --> 00:30:30,520 Speaker 1: back on Earth. Uh, they'll be looking for another Starlink 528 00:30:30,600 --> 00:30:33,200 Speaker 1: launch in short order. I think maybe next week if 529 00:30:33,280 --> 00:30:35,840 Speaker 1: I recall correctly, but um, you know, more to build 530 00:30:35,880 --> 00:30:38,800 Speaker 1: out that constellation and and add new customers. They just 531 00:30:38,880 --> 00:30:42,000 Speaker 1: added their first two airline customers in the past week 532 00:30:43,200 --> 00:30:47,480 Speaker 1: with an airline called JSX and Hawaiian Airlines. So they're 533 00:30:47,520 --> 00:30:50,680 Speaker 1: moving into aviation. They want to get into cargo ships 534 00:30:50,720 --> 00:30:55,000 Speaker 1: and other maritime applications. UM, so you're seeing starlink become 535 00:30:55,600 --> 00:30:59,000 Speaker 1: more of a non residential but also a you know, 536 00:30:59,120 --> 00:31:02,360 Speaker 1: commercial business product as well. All right, well, we'll be 537 00:31:02,440 --> 00:31:06,960 Speaker 1: watching for those satellites to successfully deploy, but so far 538 00:31:07,560 --> 00:31:11,880 Speaker 1: it looks like a rave success for this latest SpaceX mission. 539 00:31:12,120 --> 00:31:15,240 Speaker 1: Justin Bachmann for Bloomberg. Lisa Richard, co founder and CEO 540 00:31:15,560 --> 00:31:19,520 Speaker 1: of Explore, thank you both for helping us narrate that journey. 541 00:31:28,760 --> 00:31:32,640 Speaker 1: There's been growing concern that pandemic fuel demand for PCs 542 00:31:33,040 --> 00:31:36,400 Speaker 1: is sputtering. Intel underscoring that coming out with a disappointing 543 00:31:36,600 --> 00:31:40,160 Speaker 1: second quarter forecast. I spoke with Intel CEO Pat Kelsinger 544 00:31:40,200 --> 00:31:43,800 Speaker 1: earlier and asked him why, despite this, he's still optimistic 545 00:31:43,880 --> 00:31:46,200 Speaker 1: about the second half of the year. Take a listen. 546 00:31:47,280 --> 00:31:51,080 Speaker 1: We see continued strowth, strength and growth in our data 547 00:31:51,160 --> 00:31:55,800 Speaker 1: center business, our network and edge business. Very strong first 548 00:31:55,880 --> 00:31:57,960 Speaker 1: quarter and we just see that growing throughout the year. 549 00:31:58,280 --> 00:32:01,480 Speaker 1: We also have our new growth business is an accelerated 550 00:32:01,520 --> 00:32:05,840 Speaker 1: computing and graphics, the new area of foundry and Mobile I. 551 00:32:06,040 --> 00:32:09,040 Speaker 1: All of those had very good quarters and we forecast growth, 552 00:32:09,520 --> 00:32:11,280 Speaker 1: very strong growth for all of those as we go 553 00:32:11,400 --> 00:32:14,080 Speaker 1: into the second half, and then the PC business after 554 00:32:14,160 --> 00:32:16,920 Speaker 1: the inventory correction is done, we expect in Q two. 555 00:32:17,320 --> 00:32:19,520 Speaker 1: We expect the stronger second half. We have a lot 556 00:32:19,600 --> 00:32:22,520 Speaker 1: of visibility into where our O e M inventory levels is, 557 00:32:23,080 --> 00:32:25,640 Speaker 1: and we're also seeing that the strength of our product 558 00:32:25,760 --> 00:32:29,120 Speaker 1: line are old Lake products ramping ahead of schedule, you know, 559 00:32:29,280 --> 00:32:33,240 Speaker 1: the Raptor Lake products already being broadly sampled into the industry. 560 00:32:33,480 --> 00:32:35,640 Speaker 1: And you know, the second half of the year will 561 00:32:35,680 --> 00:32:39,720 Speaker 1: be highlighted by a commercial refresh. You know, we're way 562 00:32:39,840 --> 00:32:42,840 Speaker 1: overdue in the commercial segment for a refresh, and you know, 563 00:32:42,920 --> 00:32:45,160 Speaker 1: with people coming back into the workplace, we see very 564 00:32:45,280 --> 00:32:48,880 Speaker 1: strong outlook for the commercial portion, where our market share 565 00:32:49,240 --> 00:32:52,680 Speaker 1: and our pricing is a stronger. So overall, we're very confident. 566 00:32:52,880 --> 00:32:56,480 Speaker 1: Reaffirmed the second half of the year and the overall number, 567 00:32:56,600 --> 00:32:59,320 Speaker 1: so we're feeling very good about the business and the execution. 568 00:32:59,400 --> 00:33:03,040 Speaker 1: In Q one with a modest beat despite all the turbulence, 569 00:33:03,120 --> 00:33:06,560 Speaker 1: just reinforces our confidence that the execution machine and Intel 570 00:33:06,920 --> 00:33:09,200 Speaker 1: is rebuilding and we have confidence in the rest of 571 00:33:09,240 --> 00:33:12,000 Speaker 1: the year now. I spoke to Apple CEO Tim Cook 572 00:33:12,240 --> 00:33:15,520 Speaker 1: yesterday who said, you know, they're still seeing supply issues 573 00:33:15,680 --> 00:33:19,760 Speaker 1: and they're really almost exclusively related to chips that impacted 574 00:33:19,800 --> 00:33:21,640 Speaker 1: several of their products. They also said on the call 575 00:33:21,720 --> 00:33:24,040 Speaker 1: that supply issues could dent sales as much as eight 576 00:33:24,120 --> 00:33:27,840 Speaker 1: billion dollars in part due to these continuing COVID lockdowns 577 00:33:27,880 --> 00:33:30,560 Speaker 1: in China. You said the shortage will last longer than 578 00:33:30,600 --> 00:33:33,360 Speaker 1: even you thought. How much longer and what more color 579 00:33:33,760 --> 00:33:36,160 Speaker 1: can you give us? Yeah, And I think there's two 580 00:33:36,240 --> 00:33:38,560 Speaker 1: different questions there, Emily. One is some of these near 581 00:33:38,720 --> 00:33:41,479 Speaker 1: term lockdowns and we're starting to see the port open up. 582 00:33:41,720 --> 00:33:44,440 Speaker 1: We're getting some positive news there from China in that regard, 583 00:33:44,520 --> 00:33:47,440 Speaker 1: which is you know, particularly challenging for all of like 584 00:33:47,600 --> 00:33:49,280 Speaker 1: the p C, O, E, M, S and Apple a 585 00:33:49,400 --> 00:33:51,320 Speaker 1: lot of business going through there and a fair amount 586 00:33:51,320 --> 00:33:54,840 Speaker 1: of our business as well. Overall, though, the big story 587 00:33:55,000 --> 00:33:58,719 Speaker 1: is around building up the semiconductor capacity, and we had 588 00:33:58,840 --> 00:34:02,400 Speaker 1: felt like twenty three we'd start to see that equilibrium now, 589 00:34:02,560 --> 00:34:05,520 Speaker 1: and no small part because of some of the equipment shortages, 590 00:34:05,800 --> 00:34:08,400 Speaker 1: the equipment that goes into the fabs that we're building. 591 00:34:08,680 --> 00:34:11,960 Speaker 1: We're seeing those lead times push out substantially, and as 592 00:34:12,000 --> 00:34:15,920 Speaker 1: a result, we expect the overall semiconductor shortage to not 593 00:34:16,160 --> 00:34:20,319 Speaker 1: be resolved until four now as some of those capacities 594 00:34:20,400 --> 00:34:22,600 Speaker 1: come online. Now, I know you're still bullish on the 595 00:34:22,640 --> 00:34:24,719 Speaker 1: PC market, and I'm so curious what makes you think 596 00:34:24,800 --> 00:34:28,360 Speaker 1: it's going to remain strong as we come out of 597 00:34:28,440 --> 00:34:32,160 Speaker 1: the pandemic, given that we're facing inflation and ongoing war, 598 00:34:32,280 --> 00:34:35,600 Speaker 1: a rising gas prices, and more pressure on consumers than 599 00:34:35,680 --> 00:34:38,440 Speaker 1: we've seen in a really long time. Yeah. I think 600 00:34:38,480 --> 00:34:40,920 Speaker 1: there's a variety of things there. And the range of 601 00:34:41,040 --> 00:34:44,279 Speaker 1: the PC market outlooks was pretty wide and now it's 602 00:34:44,320 --> 00:34:47,000 Speaker 1: quite narrow. All of the analysts, all of the O 603 00:34:47,160 --> 00:34:50,000 Speaker 1: E M s, and I think Sacha reaffirmed this on 604 00:34:50,200 --> 00:34:53,000 Speaker 1: his on the Microsoft Arneys call this week. It's a 605 00:34:53,160 --> 00:34:57,800 Speaker 1: structurally larger market now and refresh rates, you know, the 606 00:34:57,960 --> 00:35:01,000 Speaker 1: essential role that it plays and work, learn and play. 607 00:35:01,280 --> 00:35:04,240 Speaker 1: We just see the PC market as a larger market, 608 00:35:04,520 --> 00:35:07,000 Speaker 1: and as I've already emphasized, we're way overdue on a 609 00:35:07,080 --> 00:35:11,960 Speaker 1: commercial refresh Windows eleven key new products like alder Lake 610 00:35:12,040 --> 00:35:15,040 Speaker 1: and Raptor Lake from Intel, and I'd say that three 611 00:35:15,480 --> 00:35:18,279 Speaker 1: and fifty million is about a million PCs a day. 612 00:35:18,719 --> 00:35:21,840 Speaker 1: Everybody's in a pretty tight range around that. I'd say, finally, 613 00:35:21,920 --> 00:35:24,880 Speaker 1: we just have better visibility. We know our product builds. 614 00:35:25,280 --> 00:35:29,040 Speaker 1: Many of the other components like WiFi, Bluetooth are made 615 00:35:29,120 --> 00:35:32,000 Speaker 1: by Intel. You know. Now our position and graphics is 616 00:35:32,120 --> 00:35:34,600 Speaker 1: very strong as well. So all of these taken together, 617 00:35:34,680 --> 00:35:37,720 Speaker 1: we have great insight into what that looks like. Great 618 00:35:37,880 --> 00:35:40,400 Speaker 1: alignment with our customers are O E M S as 619 00:35:40,440 --> 00:35:43,279 Speaker 1: well as the other ecosystem partners. So we feel very 620 00:35:43,320 --> 00:35:47,000 Speaker 1: good that it's you know, about flat market year on year, 621 00:35:47,440 --> 00:35:50,080 Speaker 1: and we're confident that we're gonna be able to execute 622 00:35:50,160 --> 00:35:52,279 Speaker 1: gain share in that market as we did the last 623 00:35:52,400 --> 00:35:55,040 Speaker 1: quarters of last year. So overall, we feel good about 624 00:35:55,080 --> 00:36:07,880 Speaker 1: our business outlook there an Pat Calson are there. Monday, 625 00:36:08,000 --> 00:36:11,280 Speaker 1: Twitter officially accepted Elon Musk's offer to buy the company, 626 00:36:11,320 --> 00:36:14,680 Speaker 1: and it's been a long week since as users, business leaders, 627 00:36:14,719 --> 00:36:17,840 Speaker 1: and politicians alike have debated the pros and the cons. 628 00:36:18,360 --> 00:36:21,360 Speaker 1: My next guest has a very special understanding of the company. 629 00:36:21,440 --> 00:36:24,320 Speaker 1: Ali Roghani is currently the Managing director and CEO of 630 00:36:24,480 --> 00:36:28,120 Speaker 1: the y Combinator Continuity Fund uh and joins us now 631 00:36:28,280 --> 00:36:32,000 Speaker 1: the former c O O and c f O at Twitter. 632 00:36:32,080 --> 00:36:34,480 Speaker 1: So I'm so curious as a former executive what you 633 00:36:34,600 --> 00:36:39,000 Speaker 1: read on this is, Well, it's quite the spectacle. I mean, 634 00:36:39,080 --> 00:36:42,960 Speaker 1: the world richest man swooping in out of nowhere uh 635 00:36:43,120 --> 00:36:46,759 Speaker 1: and taking Twitter private billion dollars. Just the speed of 636 00:36:46,840 --> 00:36:51,120 Speaker 1: the transaction, uh, the ambition uh, and the scale. Um. 637 00:36:51,440 --> 00:36:53,200 Speaker 1: I think I think it caught a lot of people 638 00:36:53,200 --> 00:36:56,120 Speaker 1: off guard. I think it's really and it will be 639 00:36:56,200 --> 00:36:59,520 Speaker 1: an interesting open question where he takes the platform from here. 640 00:37:00,120 --> 00:37:01,920 Speaker 1: I think a lot of folks that have experienced at 641 00:37:01,920 --> 00:37:06,520 Speaker 1: Twitter find some of his public pronouncements about, hey, I 642 00:37:06,640 --> 00:37:09,560 Speaker 1: just want to make the platform, uh, you know, stand 643 00:37:09,640 --> 00:37:12,160 Speaker 1: for more free speech. I think a lot of us 644 00:37:12,160 --> 00:37:14,600 Speaker 1: find it a little bit naive in terms of what 645 00:37:14,719 --> 00:37:17,640 Speaker 1: he said, uh, and they it doesn't reflect kind of 646 00:37:17,680 --> 00:37:20,799 Speaker 1: the complexity of the issue. UM. And I would even 647 00:37:20,880 --> 00:37:25,520 Speaker 1: argue it's not the main issue facing Twitter. Moderation isn't 648 00:37:25,920 --> 00:37:29,040 Speaker 1: I think the main issue. I think the main issue 649 00:37:29,080 --> 00:37:32,640 Speaker 1: facing Twitter in light of Facebook and Instagram and Snapchat 650 00:37:32,880 --> 00:37:36,840 Speaker 1: and um TikTok and so on. How does the platform 651 00:37:36,920 --> 00:37:39,840 Speaker 1: continue to grow and be increasingly relevant? You know, the 652 00:37:40,160 --> 00:37:45,320 Speaker 1: platform punches above its weight, meaning above its size, because 653 00:37:45,440 --> 00:37:48,040 Speaker 1: of the prominent users that it has and because it's 654 00:37:48,080 --> 00:37:53,239 Speaker 1: public and it's really a media property. I think partially, um, 655 00:37:53,920 --> 00:37:58,640 Speaker 1: but you know, it hasn't really grown robustly for several years, 656 00:37:59,000 --> 00:38:03,560 Speaker 1: and I think in the maturing social media landscape, that's 657 00:38:03,560 --> 00:38:06,040 Speaker 1: actually the biggest problem. I think I think that the 658 00:38:06,600 --> 00:38:09,000 Speaker 1: risk that Twitter faces it just becomes so much smaller 659 00:38:09,080 --> 00:38:11,240 Speaker 1: than some of the other platforms that it gradually loses 660 00:38:11,280 --> 00:38:14,160 Speaker 1: its relevance. And I think the growth problem is the 661 00:38:14,200 --> 00:38:18,080 Speaker 1: primary problem for Elon disolved. Roger McNamee, you know, longtime 662 00:38:18,120 --> 00:38:20,560 Speaker 1: tech investor, came on saying something similar. I want you 663 00:38:20,600 --> 00:38:22,640 Speaker 1: to take a quick listen to what he had to say. 664 00:38:23,800 --> 00:38:28,200 Speaker 1: Twitter is never successfully monetized itself. The company, I believes 665 00:38:28,200 --> 00:38:32,040 Speaker 1: still has a huge net loss cumulatively since it was started, 666 00:38:32,480 --> 00:38:39,160 Speaker 1: and given its influence with politicians, celebrities and journalists, Twitter 667 00:38:39,280 --> 00:38:41,600 Speaker 1: should have been able to find a path to much 668 00:38:41,680 --> 00:38:46,920 Speaker 1: greater profitability than its head. It's so influential, Ali, why 669 00:38:47,080 --> 00:38:49,880 Speaker 1: don't you think that has happened, and obviously I know 670 00:38:50,040 --> 00:38:54,920 Speaker 1: that in those earlier days you tried to make that happen. Well. 671 00:38:54,960 --> 00:38:58,320 Speaker 1: I mean, look, Twitter is as an advertising business, it 672 00:38:58,440 --> 00:39:01,600 Speaker 1: is at quite some scale. I think it lacks a 673 00:39:01,760 --> 00:39:05,319 Speaker 1: certain characteristics that Facebook has that make it you know, uh, 674 00:39:05,640 --> 00:39:08,840 Speaker 1: you know that lend itself to being a better monetization platform. Namely, 675 00:39:09,239 --> 00:39:11,640 Speaker 1: Facebook's insistence on gathering a huge amount of data on 676 00:39:11,719 --> 00:39:14,680 Speaker 1: its users. It's useful to advertisers all the tracking they 677 00:39:14,760 --> 00:39:17,839 Speaker 1: do off the site, uh, and their insistence on real 678 00:39:17,920 --> 00:39:21,400 Speaker 1: identity uh, none of which Twitter Twitter does, and so 679 00:39:21,520 --> 00:39:24,440 Speaker 1: as an advertising platform, relative to the things that Facebook does, 680 00:39:24,880 --> 00:39:28,000 Speaker 1: it never quite had as much power. Um. And as 681 00:39:28,040 --> 00:39:30,400 Speaker 1: I said before, I think the fact that the platform 682 00:39:30,560 --> 00:39:35,920 Speaker 1: isn't growing robustly um relative to the growth at Snapchat, Instagram, Twitter, 683 00:39:36,360 --> 00:39:39,440 Speaker 1: among others have seen, means that it's a less exciting 684 00:39:39,520 --> 00:39:42,960 Speaker 1: place for advertisers to be um as a and a 685 00:39:43,080 --> 00:39:44,880 Speaker 1: in a place that really can't drive the kind of 686 00:39:45,000 --> 00:39:47,520 Speaker 1: growth in advertising revenue that some of these other platforms 687 00:39:47,560 --> 00:39:51,600 Speaker 1: have driven. Having said that, you know, it's a fairly significant, 688 00:39:51,640 --> 00:39:54,040 Speaker 1: you know, in the billions of dollars of advertising revenue, 689 00:39:54,320 --> 00:39:56,920 Speaker 1: uh scale business. So it's not a small company. And 690 00:39:57,040 --> 00:40:00,399 Speaker 1: if the priority were to drive Twitter to profitability, like uh, 691 00:40:00,920 --> 00:40:04,160 Speaker 1: Roger maybe indicates should be I'm sure there's a way 692 00:40:04,200 --> 00:40:06,560 Speaker 1: to do that by just drinking the size of the company. UM. 693 00:40:06,640 --> 00:40:08,520 Speaker 1: I just think that the various people who run the 694 00:40:08,560 --> 00:40:11,279 Speaker 1: company have always been motivated by a bigger ambition and 695 00:40:11,360 --> 00:40:15,160 Speaker 1: have hence, you know, uh invested in in growing the 696 00:40:15,239 --> 00:40:18,319 Speaker 1: size of the company. UM. And you know, for right 697 00:40:18,400 --> 00:40:21,360 Speaker 1: or wrong, what do you think the chances are that 698 00:40:21,440 --> 00:40:25,200 Speaker 1: Elon Musk can unlock that potential? You know, it's a 699 00:40:25,280 --> 00:40:27,839 Speaker 1: fascinating question, like how much he even cares about near 700 00:40:27,920 --> 00:40:31,080 Speaker 1: term profitability? I mean, certainly if he can find it, 701 00:40:31,280 --> 00:40:34,359 Speaker 1: he's really accountable with no one he's taking the company private. Um, 702 00:40:34,600 --> 00:40:38,960 Speaker 1: he has unlimited personal resources. Uh. And he certainly hasn't 703 00:40:39,000 --> 00:40:41,279 Speaker 1: talked about Twitter as a business very much. Has talked 704 00:40:41,320 --> 00:40:43,480 Speaker 1: about Twitter as a social platform, you know, he's talked 705 00:40:43,480 --> 00:40:45,320 Speaker 1: about the importance of freedom of speech, Twitter as a 706 00:40:45,360 --> 00:40:50,520 Speaker 1: global He's talked about subscription potentially as an avenue. Yep. Ye. 707 00:40:51,200 --> 00:40:53,480 Speaker 1: So you know, I don't know, I think I'm sort 708 00:40:53,520 --> 00:40:56,000 Speaker 1: of interested to see what he does too. But you know, 709 00:40:56,200 --> 00:40:59,400 Speaker 1: my read of it is, UM, the sort of business 710 00:40:59,440 --> 00:41:02,680 Speaker 1: of Twitter probably isn't his number one priority in the 711 00:41:02,760 --> 00:41:05,359 Speaker 1: near term. I could be wrong, but just judging, uh, 712 00:41:05,680 --> 00:41:08,080 Speaker 1: you know, from some of the common cities made, he 713 00:41:08,120 --> 00:41:11,759 Speaker 1: seems to be more interested in a more transparent, a 714 00:41:11,840 --> 00:41:15,400 Speaker 1: more free platform. Uh, you know, making certain things open source. 715 00:41:15,480 --> 00:41:17,080 Speaker 1: And you know, kind of all these ideas that he's 716 00:41:17,520 --> 00:41:21,160 Speaker 1: that he's sort of um mentioned. And this is a 717 00:41:21,280 --> 00:41:24,360 Speaker 1: very unique situation because you know, with the world's richest 718 00:41:24,400 --> 00:41:27,560 Speaker 1: man buying this platform, he can kind of do whatever 719 00:41:27,640 --> 00:41:30,440 Speaker 1: he wants you at least for a period of time. Uh. 720 00:41:30,600 --> 00:41:34,480 Speaker 1: And I don't think he's behold in the way a 721 00:41:34,560 --> 00:41:38,080 Speaker 1: financial investor, a private equity investor would be to you know, 722 00:41:38,600 --> 00:41:41,799 Speaker 1: near term metrics or near term profitability. So I think 723 00:41:41,840 --> 00:41:43,880 Speaker 1: it's a fascinating question to see what he does. A 724 00:41:44,000 --> 00:41:49,279 Speaker 1: minute left, Ali, any advice for Elon Musk, I think 725 00:41:49,320 --> 00:41:51,040 Speaker 1: the advice I would give is the advice he probably 726 00:41:51,080 --> 00:41:53,879 Speaker 1: would would have a very hard time taking. Uh. Look, 727 00:41:53,920 --> 00:41:55,800 Speaker 1: I don't think some of the tweets he's made recently 728 00:41:55,920 --> 00:41:58,120 Speaker 1: about criticizing some of the employees of the company, and 729 00:41:58,360 --> 00:42:02,319 Speaker 1: and uh, I think he has a different responsibility now 730 00:42:02,400 --> 00:42:05,520 Speaker 1: as the owner of Twitter. Uh, in terms of how 731 00:42:05,640 --> 00:42:09,400 Speaker 1: he behaves on the platform itself, um, and it's clearly 732 00:42:09,440 --> 00:42:12,719 Speaker 1: fun for him or he gets some value out of 733 00:42:12,960 --> 00:42:15,200 Speaker 1: the off color kind of things he does and says, 734 00:42:15,760 --> 00:42:17,919 Speaker 1: like you know, Ray Kuel and Bill Gates or whatever 735 00:42:18,000 --> 00:42:20,400 Speaker 1: it might be. I just don't think that helps him 736 00:42:20,680 --> 00:42:23,600 Speaker 1: now as the owner of Twitter. Um. I don't think 737 00:42:23,600 --> 00:42:25,120 Speaker 1: it helps him with employees. I don't think it helps 738 00:42:25,160 --> 00:42:27,840 Speaker 1: him with perspective employees. Uh, and I don't think it 739 00:42:27,960 --> 00:42:31,360 Speaker 1: helps the platform itself. So I would say, you know, 740 00:42:31,600 --> 00:42:34,239 Speaker 1: let's just stick to business and try to try to 741 00:42:34,360 --> 00:42:37,000 Speaker 1: take this platform to where really it should be in 742 00:42:37,200 --> 00:42:41,120 Speaker 1: terms of its importance in the world. All right, Oli 743 00:42:41,239 --> 00:42:45,160 Speaker 1: ROGANI for more Twitter CFO and see oh appreciate you 744 00:42:45,239 --> 00:42:50,080 Speaker 1: sharing that with us here today. That does it For 745 00:42:50,120 --> 00:42:53,759 Speaker 1: the sedition of Bloomberg Technology Wall Street Week. Coming up next, 746 00:42:53,800 --> 00:42:56,480 Speaker 1: we're gonna talk to Larry Summers. He's got some thoughts 747 00:42:56,560 --> 00:42:59,719 Speaker 1: on the Elon deal. And don't forget to check out 748 00:42:59,840 --> 00:43:03,200 Speaker 1: a podcast. You can find it daily anywhere you get 749 00:43:03,320 --> 00:43:05,160 Speaker 1: your podcasts. Happy Friday, everyone,