WEBVTT - Ask HTM - Overrated HSA, 13% Dividend Yields, & Getting Into Real Estate #1183

0:00:00.040 --> 0:00:01.200
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Hout of Money.

0:00:01.280 --> 0:00:03.800
<v Speaker 2>I'm Joel and I am Matt.

0:00:04.040 --> 0:00:13.640
<v Speaker 1>Today we're answering your listener questions. That's right, Joel, We've

0:00:13.640 --> 0:00:15.640
<v Speaker 1>got listener questions to get to. Today.

0:00:16.120 --> 0:00:17.920
<v Speaker 3>We're gonna hear from a listener who is wondering if

0:00:18.040 --> 0:00:24.600
<v Speaker 3>hsas are overrated. Another listener he's been snagging a thirteen

0:00:24.640 --> 0:00:26.520
<v Speaker 3>percent dividend yield.

0:00:26.800 --> 0:00:27.320
<v Speaker 2>Uh huh.

0:00:27.480 --> 0:00:30.160
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, we're gonna talk about some single stock investing. Another

0:00:30.240 --> 0:00:34.199
<v Speaker 3>listener is interested in the steps to get into real

0:00:34.320 --> 0:00:36.520
<v Speaker 3>estate investing. We'll get to all that and more during

0:00:36.640 --> 0:00:40.640
<v Speaker 3>our Listener Question Monday episode. Here at how to Money.

0:00:41.200 --> 0:00:44.479
<v Speaker 1>Two different kinds of real estate investing, one which actually

0:00:44.600 --> 0:00:46.720
<v Speaker 1>takes more effort than the other, which is kind of,

0:00:46.920 --> 0:00:49.839
<v Speaker 1>you know, pretty simple right through, done through your keyboard.

0:00:49.920 --> 0:00:53.080
<v Speaker 1>And we have different opinions on both quick, frugal, frugal

0:00:53.120 --> 0:00:55.520
<v Speaker 1>or cheap for you though, Matt, you just had your anniversary.

0:00:55.560 --> 0:00:58.680
<v Speaker 1>Congrats nineteen years Yeah, thank you, thank you. It's impressive.

0:00:58.720 --> 0:01:00.680
<v Speaker 1>We've told Kate for a long time she could do better.

0:01:00.720 --> 0:01:01.840
<v Speaker 1>She never listened to us.

0:01:03.080 --> 0:01:06.160
<v Speaker 3>That's what I That's what I told her. It's it's

0:01:06.200 --> 0:01:08.080
<v Speaker 3>the best, it's not a heist. What do you call it,

0:01:08.080 --> 0:01:10.440
<v Speaker 3>it's the I've pulled it off for nineteen years.

0:01:10.720 --> 0:01:13.880
<v Speaker 1>Wool over her eyes. Yes, you have so sour. Our

0:01:13.920 --> 0:01:18.120
<v Speaker 1>anniversary's coming up in the fall, and we just it's

0:01:18.120 --> 0:01:21.600
<v Speaker 1>been a minute since we've had a adults only the

0:01:21.600 --> 0:01:24.360
<v Speaker 1>two of us trip, like an awesome one, and so

0:01:25.000 --> 0:01:28.000
<v Speaker 1>I my mom was telling me about, Wow, this is

0:01:28.120 --> 0:01:30.440
<v Speaker 1>like really cute place north of Niagara Falls. You should

0:01:30.520 --> 0:01:31.920
<v Speaker 1>check it out. And I started to look it up.

0:01:31.959 --> 0:01:34.040
<v Speaker 1>I was like, this place, it's awesome. So I think

0:01:34.080 --> 0:01:34.399
<v Speaker 1>we're going.

0:01:34.400 --> 0:01:37.280
<v Speaker 2>To go there, and sounds very romantic.

0:01:37.280 --> 0:01:38.600
<v Speaker 3>I feel like there's got to be a spot near

0:01:38.680 --> 0:01:42.160
<v Speaker 3>Niagara Falls called Lover's Leap. She should probably go visit

0:01:42.240 --> 0:01:45.880
<v Speaker 3>because somebody one hundred years ago jumped to their death

0:01:45.959 --> 0:01:48.960
<v Speaker 3>because somebody would marry them or something, right.

0:01:48.880 --> 0:01:50.960
<v Speaker 1>Carve our initials into a tree or something like that

0:01:51.000 --> 0:01:55.120
<v Speaker 1>to mark the occasion. Well, I was I got the

0:01:55.160 --> 0:01:57.200
<v Speaker 1>okay for Emily, but I'm curious to hear your take

0:01:57.200 --> 0:02:01.560
<v Speaker 1>on this. Because the by far, the cheapest ticket to

0:02:01.640 --> 0:02:07.280
<v Speaker 1>get up there to Buffalo, New York was using Frontier Airlines,

0:02:07.880 --> 0:02:14.440
<v Speaker 1>and the round trip price on Frontier round trip NonStop

0:02:14.720 --> 0:02:18.160
<v Speaker 1>from Atlanta was eighty eight dollars eighty eight. Oh my gosh,

0:02:18.280 --> 0:02:21.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, you has a steal, dude. And then at

0:02:21.320 --> 0:02:25.000
<v Speaker 1>every other airline was at least triple that often quadruple

0:02:25.080 --> 0:02:27.600
<v Speaker 1>or more. Wow, they had the best flight times, And

0:02:27.639 --> 0:02:29.320
<v Speaker 1>it was like, you just got to go to Buffalo.

0:02:29.800 --> 0:02:33.839
<v Speaker 1>But yes, and of course with Frontier, like you pay

0:02:33.919 --> 0:02:39.120
<v Speaker 1>extra foreverything. So you want to bring a bag on

0:02:39.240 --> 0:02:41.320
<v Speaker 1>board to carry on, You're gonna have to pay quite

0:02:41.320 --> 0:02:42.040
<v Speaker 1>a bit of money for that.

0:02:42.520 --> 0:02:43.960
<v Speaker 2>Okay, I know what your question is.

0:02:44.080 --> 0:02:45.440
<v Speaker 1>I talked to Emily about this and I was like,

0:02:45.440 --> 0:02:47.480
<v Speaker 1>you said, friguler cheap. I'll say we can get this

0:02:48.160 --> 0:02:50.480
<v Speaker 1>great B and B we can pay more eat at

0:02:50.480 --> 0:02:54.359
<v Speaker 1>this nice restaurant. But are you down with jumping through

0:02:54.400 --> 0:02:56.480
<v Speaker 1>the Frontier hoops so we can save a ton of

0:02:56.480 --> 0:02:57.400
<v Speaker 1>money on the flight?

0:02:57.440 --> 0:02:57.680
<v Speaker 4>There?

0:02:58.200 --> 0:02:59.640
<v Speaker 1>Is it frugal? Chief for me to try to do

0:02:59.680 --> 0:03:01.360
<v Speaker 1>that on anniversary right out.

0:03:01.280 --> 0:03:01.720
<v Speaker 5>Of the gate?

0:03:01.880 --> 0:03:05.120
<v Speaker 3>Frugal dude? Because you you led with the punchline, which

0:03:05.120 --> 0:03:07.560
<v Speaker 3>is that Emily approved it, so there's nothing to discuss.

0:03:07.800 --> 0:03:09.440
<v Speaker 3>If it's okay with her, then it's so it should

0:03:09.480 --> 0:03:10.640
<v Speaker 3>be okay with you. It's okay with me.

0:03:10.840 --> 0:03:13.239
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, she debated it, though you know she was. She

0:03:13.639 --> 0:03:17.040
<v Speaker 1>was not like one hundred percent sure off the bat. Yes,

0:03:17.080 --> 0:03:19.720
<v Speaker 1>this is a great idea, but I think part of

0:03:19.760 --> 0:03:22.119
<v Speaker 1>it was they were they were truly the best flights.

0:03:22.360 --> 0:03:25.320
<v Speaker 1>But then the story she doesn't care whether or it's

0:03:25.360 --> 0:03:26.040
<v Speaker 1>the best flights.

0:03:26.120 --> 0:03:28.080
<v Speaker 3>She cares about whether or not she can take whatever

0:03:28.120 --> 0:03:29.840
<v Speaker 3>she wants to wear on your trip.

0:03:30.000 --> 0:03:32.639
<v Speaker 1>You know, like you don't want to get on this

0:03:33.280 --> 0:03:34.920
<v Speaker 1>flight to come home, right right?

0:03:35.000 --> 0:03:35.880
<v Speaker 2>Right? Oh gotcha?

0:03:36.040 --> 0:03:37.880
<v Speaker 3>So the best flight from the Yeah, yeah, I'm paying

0:03:37.880 --> 0:03:39.000
<v Speaker 3>my attention to that as well.

0:03:39.320 --> 0:03:39.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I used to.

0:03:40.120 --> 0:03:41.960
<v Speaker 3>I used to always look at, okay, whatever is the

0:03:41.960 --> 0:03:46.320
<v Speaker 3>most affordable. Yeah, I am prioritizing now. Uh, just fast,

0:03:46.640 --> 0:03:50.840
<v Speaker 3>fastest overall flight time. To me, that's the biggest thing.

0:03:50.840 --> 0:03:52.800
<v Speaker 3>I just don't want to spend and I don't care

0:03:52.840 --> 0:03:56.720
<v Speaker 3>if it's I'll even do a uh what do you

0:03:56.760 --> 0:03:59.880
<v Speaker 3>call it layover? If it means because sometimes they'll be

0:03:59.920 --> 0:04:03.520
<v Speaker 3>a direct flight that wait, does that even make sense?

0:04:03.600 --> 0:04:05.320
<v Speaker 3>Is there a direct flight that's sometimes slower?

0:04:05.640 --> 0:04:09.280
<v Speaker 1>No, But but there's some like especially with Southwest, there

0:04:09.280 --> 0:04:11.840
<v Speaker 1>are some layovers where you don't even get off the plane,

0:04:12.200 --> 0:04:14.960
<v Speaker 1>where you stay on. I don't care. Yeah, it's they're

0:04:15.000 --> 0:04:17.680
<v Speaker 1>just turning the plane and and they take some passengers

0:04:17.800 --> 0:04:19.839
<v Speaker 1>getting off, new passengers getting on. I've done that before

0:04:19.880 --> 0:04:21.520
<v Speaker 1>and it saves so much money. Was it was well

0:04:21.520 --> 0:04:25.520
<v Speaker 1>worth it? Sadly though, Sadly Frontier emails me like days

0:04:25.600 --> 0:04:28.440
<v Speaker 1>later and they're like, we have completely changed your itinerary

0:04:28.680 --> 0:04:32.240
<v Speaker 1>and now it's like one stop in Florida and it's

0:04:32.279 --> 0:04:33.440
<v Speaker 1>a much longer trip.

0:04:33.600 --> 0:04:35.640
<v Speaker 2>Wait, you're going down to Florida to go to New York.

0:04:36.120 --> 0:04:39.039
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's all gotten way worse. It's gotten so much worse.

0:04:39.080 --> 0:04:41.640
<v Speaker 1>So I had to cancel these tickets that were such

0:04:41.680 --> 0:04:43.880
<v Speaker 1>a deal, and I had to book a more expensive

0:04:44.120 --> 0:04:47.240
<v Speaker 1>airline anyway, which was just really annoying to a frugal

0:04:47.279 --> 0:04:47.719
<v Speaker 1>guy like me.

0:04:48.240 --> 0:04:52.240
<v Speaker 2>Well who'd you end up booking Delta? Oh my gosh,

0:04:52.360 --> 0:04:53.680
<v Speaker 2>so primo?

0:04:54.040 --> 0:04:57.640
<v Speaker 1>There no other options, man, I think I don't think

0:04:57.680 --> 0:04:59.960
<v Speaker 1>there was legitimate options.

0:05:00.200 --> 0:05:02.480
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, well what Also?

0:05:02.520 --> 0:05:04.120
<v Speaker 3>The other thing I was going to say is that

0:05:04.240 --> 0:05:05.880
<v Speaker 3>how much how much does it cost to check a

0:05:05.880 --> 0:05:06.719
<v Speaker 3>bag with Frontier?

0:05:07.600 --> 0:05:10.320
<v Speaker 1>Well it depends. There are like packages that you can

0:05:10.320 --> 0:05:11.000
<v Speaker 1>buy ahead of time.

0:05:11.000 --> 0:05:12.719
<v Speaker 3>Ahead of time, like obviously if they do it at

0:05:12.760 --> 0:05:15.080
<v Speaker 3>the gate, they really stuck you. Oh wait, did we

0:05:15.080 --> 0:05:18.039
<v Speaker 3>fly Frontier When we went down to the Dominican we did,

0:05:18.200 --> 0:05:20.240
<v Speaker 3>and the people in front of us it was too big,

0:05:20.279 --> 0:05:21.680
<v Speaker 3>and then they hit them with like was it one

0:05:21.720 --> 0:05:22.320
<v Speaker 3>hundred bucks?

0:05:22.400 --> 0:05:22.640
<v Speaker 2>It was.

0:05:22.680 --> 0:05:24.760
<v Speaker 1>It was at least one hundred dollars. Yeah, it was

0:05:24.800 --> 0:05:28.080
<v Speaker 1>on the way, Yeah it was. So you really got

0:05:28.080 --> 0:05:29.880
<v Speaker 1>to know that your bag's gonna fit, and you could

0:05:29.920 --> 0:05:33.120
<v Speaker 1>check ahead of time, like our Codo Pacsi twenty eight.

0:05:33.120 --> 0:05:34.120
<v Speaker 2>Lead leader outa.

0:05:34.920 --> 0:05:37.200
<v Speaker 1>They're they're perfect because they do fit in there if

0:05:37.200 --> 0:05:40.360
<v Speaker 1>it's not overpacked. But you gotta you gotta know your

0:05:40.400 --> 0:05:43.160
<v Speaker 1>luggage dimension size before you fly fly Frontier and try

0:05:43.160 --> 0:05:44.040
<v Speaker 1>to jump through those hoops.

0:05:44.400 --> 0:05:47.680
<v Speaker 3>I will say one additional factor is the time of

0:05:47.800 --> 0:05:49.960
<v Speaker 3>year that you go, because if it's during the summer

0:05:50.520 --> 0:05:52.960
<v Speaker 3>and you're not wearing a whole lot of layers, guess

0:05:53.000 --> 0:05:56.359
<v Speaker 3>what your ability to pack light easy?

0:05:56.560 --> 0:05:56.720
<v Speaker 2>Right?

0:05:56.760 --> 0:05:59.480
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, But I'm thinking about the trip Kate and I

0:05:59.480 --> 0:06:01.640
<v Speaker 3>would like we outside. We'velown into Denver, which is a

0:06:01.720 --> 0:06:04.680
<v Speaker 3>very affordable flight out of Atlanta, and because of that,

0:06:04.720 --> 0:06:08.359
<v Speaker 3>we've gone there multiple times. Let the deal and dictate

0:06:08.360 --> 0:06:12.520
<v Speaker 3>where it is you travel. But we've gone hiking late

0:06:12.640 --> 0:06:16.680
<v Speaker 3>in the fall where there's like it's snowed right multiple inches,

0:06:16.839 --> 0:06:19.839
<v Speaker 3>which means like we've got specialty gear, We've got lots

0:06:19.839 --> 0:06:23.120
<v Speaker 3>of layers that is more difficult to pull off. With

0:06:23.160 --> 0:06:25.800
<v Speaker 3>the coat of Pacci, you have to really limit your

0:06:25.800 --> 0:06:29.559
<v Speaker 3>footwear and whatever else you're bringing if if it's winter months,

0:06:29.560 --> 0:06:32.640
<v Speaker 3>but if it's uh, yeah, summer months, it's easier to

0:06:32.640 --> 0:06:33.480
<v Speaker 3>pull off the carrier.

0:06:34.160 --> 0:06:36.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, we were going to have to wear our coats

0:06:36.800 --> 0:06:38.400
<v Speaker 1>because that's what we're gonna be able to pack them.

0:06:38.480 --> 0:06:40.320
<v Speaker 1>But now we don't have that problem. The only problem

0:06:40.400 --> 0:06:42.760
<v Speaker 1>is I spent too much money. So should we mention

0:06:42.839 --> 0:06:44.200
<v Speaker 1>the beer math that we're having on this episode?

0:06:44.320 --> 0:06:45.320
<v Speaker 2>Let's do it. Let's do it.

0:06:46.920 --> 0:06:50.880
<v Speaker 1>This one is called the Lakeside kolsh By Lake of

0:06:50.880 --> 0:06:54.080
<v Speaker 1>the Woods Brewing Company. Matt's who the beautiful turquoise can?

0:06:54.400 --> 0:06:56.440
<v Speaker 3>It is a pretty it's a pretty can. I just

0:06:56.440 --> 0:06:58.600
<v Speaker 3>decided that from now on, what we'll say is would

0:06:58.640 --> 0:07:01.320
<v Speaker 3>you like to introduce because when you say let's or

0:07:01.360 --> 0:07:06.160
<v Speaker 3>should we first person plural is not specific enough. So

0:07:06.200 --> 0:07:08.960
<v Speaker 3>from now on I shall say, Joel, you want to

0:07:09.440 --> 0:07:11.440
<v Speaker 3>tell listeners how it is that they can send us

0:07:11.440 --> 0:07:12.200
<v Speaker 3>their listener question.

0:07:12.560 --> 0:07:15.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm happy to do that. So if you have a

0:07:15.720 --> 0:07:17.720
<v Speaker 1>money question. We'd love to take it on the next

0:07:17.800 --> 0:07:19.760
<v Speaker 1>ask htm episode. Just go to how to money dot

0:07:19.760 --> 0:07:22.840
<v Speaker 1>com slash ask for the simple directions, or literally just

0:07:22.880 --> 0:07:25.360
<v Speaker 1>record your voice memo on the app on your phone,

0:07:25.400 --> 0:07:27.200
<v Speaker 1>email it over to us how to moneypot at gmail

0:07:27.240 --> 0:07:29.000
<v Speaker 1>dot com. Let's get to a bunch of good ones.

0:07:29.000 --> 0:07:33.920
<v Speaker 2>Matt, Uh. Yeah.

0:07:34.160 --> 0:07:38.880
<v Speaker 1>First one is going to specifically be about hsas. Somebody

0:07:39.040 --> 0:07:40.480
<v Speaker 1>is like, I've heard you talk about them for so long,

0:07:40.520 --> 0:07:41.640
<v Speaker 1>but I still got some questions.

0:07:41.960 --> 0:07:43.480
<v Speaker 2>That's the kind of introduction I was looking for.

0:07:43.680 --> 0:07:45.880
<v Speaker 6>There we go, Hey, Matt and Joel, this is El

0:07:46.040 --> 0:07:48.520
<v Speaker 6>in Minneapolis. I feel like every time I have a

0:07:48.560 --> 0:07:51.960
<v Speaker 6>money question, I reach out to you, So here is

0:07:52.120 --> 0:07:55.600
<v Speaker 6>yet another one. I have a question about HSA's after

0:07:55.720 --> 0:07:59.680
<v Speaker 6>listening to yesterday's episode. I don't have access to an HSA,

0:07:59.800 --> 0:08:03.920
<v Speaker 6>but I'm still curious. Nonetheless, you talk about the benefits

0:08:03.960 --> 0:08:07.840
<v Speaker 6>of HSA and all of the triple tax savings because

0:08:08.000 --> 0:08:11.240
<v Speaker 6>basically the money is never taxed, and I understand all

0:08:11.280 --> 0:08:16.160
<v Speaker 6>those benefits. However, the thing I don't understand is how

0:08:16.200 --> 0:08:20.200
<v Speaker 6>can these accounts be so beneficial if the money in

0:08:20.280 --> 0:08:24.360
<v Speaker 6>there can only be used for medical expenses? So, say,

0:08:24.440 --> 0:08:28.120
<v Speaker 6>if I pay one hundred dollars bill now with cash,

0:08:28.200 --> 0:08:30.640
<v Speaker 6>and I don't use my HSA, But then I use

0:08:30.720 --> 0:08:34.439
<v Speaker 6>that receipt later and get one hundred dollars, That money

0:08:34.600 --> 0:08:39.240
<v Speaker 6>is going to be worth less when I try to

0:08:39.280 --> 0:08:44.040
<v Speaker 6>cash in in twenty years. So I understand that the

0:08:44.400 --> 0:08:47.120
<v Speaker 6>HSA account in general has more money in it because

0:08:47.120 --> 0:08:49.040
<v Speaker 6>that one hundred dollars was able to be in the

0:08:49.040 --> 0:08:53.079
<v Speaker 6>stock market, et cetera. But if I can only get

0:08:53.080 --> 0:08:56.920
<v Speaker 6>the money out for medical expenses, is the benefit that

0:08:57.080 --> 0:09:00.280
<v Speaker 6>my medical expenses when I'm older are going to be

0:09:00.360 --> 0:09:06.040
<v Speaker 6>more and so overall I'm spending less or what is

0:09:06.080 --> 0:09:10.520
<v Speaker 6>the true benefit if it's only from medical expenses. Putting

0:09:10.520 --> 0:09:13.280
<v Speaker 6>aside that if you reach a certain age, you can

0:09:13.320 --> 0:09:16.000
<v Speaker 6>take the money out and treat it like a traditional wrath,

0:09:16.840 --> 0:09:19.199
<v Speaker 6>which why not just put.

0:09:19.000 --> 0:09:20.319
<v Speaker 2>Money into a traditional wroth?

0:09:20.920 --> 0:09:24.520
<v Speaker 6>Okay, if you can convince me, that would be great.

0:09:25.080 --> 0:09:26.280
<v Speaker 2>Bye, Matt.

0:09:26.320 --> 0:09:27.280
<v Speaker 1>Do you're best convincing?

0:09:28.720 --> 0:09:31.880
<v Speaker 3>Well, I'll first say that Elle said in what you

0:09:31.880 --> 0:09:34.400
<v Speaker 3>say in twenty years it will be worth less. She

0:09:34.440 --> 0:09:38.160
<v Speaker 3>didn't say it'd be worthless. It'd be worth less because

0:09:38.200 --> 0:09:41.199
<v Speaker 3>I'm assuming she's talking about inflation. But yeah, well, thank

0:09:41.200 --> 0:09:43.720
<v Speaker 3>you for your question, and we will convince you. I

0:09:43.800 --> 0:09:48.400
<v Speaker 3>generally say too that most people's HSA will be worth

0:09:48.960 --> 0:09:53.120
<v Speaker 3>less in twenty years because most people aren't investing in

0:09:53.160 --> 0:09:53.480
<v Speaker 3>their age.

0:09:53.480 --> 0:09:54.640
<v Speaker 2>They're not investing the dollars.

0:09:54.679 --> 0:09:56.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and when you look at the numbers, I think

0:09:56.400 --> 0:09:58.839
<v Speaker 1>a report just came out, it's somewhare, depending on who

0:09:58.880 --> 0:10:01.760
<v Speaker 1>you believe, fifteen to eight ten percent of people invest

0:10:01.800 --> 0:10:04.200
<v Speaker 1>the money that's in their HSA. So the vast majority

0:10:04.200 --> 0:10:05.920
<v Speaker 1>of people who have in HSAC and are sticking money

0:10:05.920 --> 0:10:09.120
<v Speaker 1>in there, they're not investing that money, and so they

0:10:09.120 --> 0:10:10.720
<v Speaker 1>are not taking full advantage of the account.

0:10:10.720 --> 0:10:11.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, okay.

0:10:11.360 --> 0:10:14.000
<v Speaker 3>So on that note, then, so I punched the numbers

0:10:14.000 --> 0:10:16.080
<v Speaker 3>in and the example she gave was one hundred bucks,

0:10:16.920 --> 0:10:19.880
<v Speaker 3>and were you to actually invest those dollars, assuming an

0:10:19.920 --> 0:10:22.920
<v Speaker 3>eight percent rate of return on that one hundred bucks,

0:10:23.080 --> 0:10:26.200
<v Speaker 3>in twenty years, you're not looking at it being worth less.

0:10:26.280 --> 0:10:27.880
<v Speaker 3>I guess we don't know what inflation is going to be,

0:10:27.920 --> 0:10:30.640
<v Speaker 3>but it's gonna be worth more at four hundred and

0:10:30.640 --> 0:10:33.880
<v Speaker 3>sixty six bucks, okay, And so you can easily apply that.

0:10:34.120 --> 0:10:36.080
<v Speaker 3>So instead of one hundred, you're looking at a thousand.

0:10:36.160 --> 0:10:39.679
<v Speaker 3>It's worth four thousand six hundred and sixty dollars even

0:10:39.800 --> 0:10:42.160
<v Speaker 3>more right if you attack on a few extra years

0:10:42.160 --> 0:10:45.520
<v Speaker 3>from twenty to twenty five, maybe even to thirty and so,

0:10:46.240 --> 0:10:48.560
<v Speaker 3>I don't know, I'm not going I'm to me, that's

0:10:48.600 --> 0:10:52.600
<v Speaker 3>an oppressive amount of money, right, it's not like life changing,

0:10:52.880 --> 0:10:56.240
<v Speaker 3>but the power of compounding is still there in Dell,

0:10:56.280 --> 0:10:59.120
<v Speaker 3>I want to make sure that you fully understand that,

0:10:59.200 --> 0:11:02.240
<v Speaker 3>like truly you will see your money grows substantially by

0:11:02.360 --> 0:11:04.240
<v Speaker 3>making sure that you are investing it as opposed to

0:11:04.320 --> 0:11:06.520
<v Speaker 3>it sitting there as cash.

0:11:06.600 --> 0:11:09.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, when it adds that first important to mention that

0:11:09.520 --> 0:11:13.000
<v Speaker 1>it's tax free compounding, right, because the money goes in

0:11:13.440 --> 0:11:15.360
<v Speaker 1>and you don't pay tax, the money grows, you don't

0:11:15.360 --> 0:11:17.120
<v Speaker 1>pay tax on that, and you don't pay tax when

0:11:17.480 --> 0:11:20.200
<v Speaker 1>you pull the money out. But Matt, that is that

0:11:20.320 --> 0:11:22.760
<v Speaker 1>is the benefit. But why if you had access to

0:11:22.800 --> 0:11:26.440
<v Speaker 1>an HSA, would you potentially go with the HSA over

0:11:26.840 --> 0:11:29.240
<v Speaker 1>a roth iray like El saying that seems like the

0:11:29.240 --> 0:11:32.000
<v Speaker 1>most straightforward the thing is to stick it in the

0:11:32.080 --> 0:11:34.360
<v Speaker 1>roth ira and just bypass the HSA.

0:11:34.480 --> 0:11:37.079
<v Speaker 3>Well, that's another point that I think there might be

0:11:37.120 --> 0:11:39.400
<v Speaker 3>some lack of clarity.

0:11:39.480 --> 0:11:41.120
<v Speaker 2>I guess which l you can do both.

0:11:41.440 --> 0:11:41.640
<v Speaker 7>Right.

0:11:42.160 --> 0:11:44.280
<v Speaker 3>It sounds like you understand the basics of how the

0:11:44.440 --> 0:11:47.400
<v Speaker 3>HSA works, right, you keep up with your medical expenses

0:11:47.440 --> 0:11:50.160
<v Speaker 3>and essentially you reimburse yourself down the road. But the

0:11:50.160 --> 0:11:52.240
<v Speaker 3>fact is you can do that HSA in addition to

0:11:52.920 --> 0:11:55.400
<v Speaker 3>your roth ira. And so that means for this year,

0:11:55.440 --> 0:11:58.680
<v Speaker 3>you've got a seventy five hundred dollars maximum contribution.

0:11:58.280 --> 0:11:58.840
<v Speaker 2>To your wrath.

0:11:59.880 --> 0:12:02.120
<v Speaker 3>You're the way you're talking, it makes me sound like

0:12:02.120 --> 0:12:05.080
<v Speaker 3>maybe this is just for you, so not NATUSA for

0:12:05.120 --> 0:12:08.000
<v Speaker 3>a family, which means you can contribute an additional forty

0:12:08.000 --> 0:12:10.520
<v Speaker 3>four hundred dollars if you do have a family, and

0:12:10.800 --> 0:12:12.760
<v Speaker 3>I'm just not aware of that. It's eighty seven fifty

0:12:12.840 --> 0:12:16.320
<v Speaker 3>I believe. But that's in addition to the roth ira.

0:12:16.559 --> 0:12:18.480
<v Speaker 3>So yes, not only are we talking about the roth

0:12:18.520 --> 0:12:22.880
<v Speaker 3>ira roth ira contributions, which are great, but the HSA,

0:12:23.000 --> 0:12:25.320
<v Speaker 3>which has the triple tax advantage, which is even better.

0:12:25.440 --> 0:12:27.959
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, yeah, it's it's the bothand approach, right, and

0:12:28.440 --> 0:12:31.560
<v Speaker 1>and that is ideal, right, And that means even on

0:12:31.600 --> 0:12:33.640
<v Speaker 1>top of that, if you're going to actually be able

0:12:33.679 --> 0:12:36.319
<v Speaker 1>to utilize the HSA the way the way we would

0:12:36.360 --> 0:12:39.480
<v Speaker 1>like you to, maybe not the way it's intended, because

0:12:39.840 --> 0:12:42.600
<v Speaker 1>I think, for truly I don't. I don't know that

0:12:43.000 --> 0:12:45.600
<v Speaker 1>the people who created the HSA foresaw that people would

0:12:45.679 --> 0:12:49.560
<v Speaker 1>be investing and using it the way that personal finance

0:12:49.600 --> 0:12:51.880
<v Speaker 1>nerds have turned it. You know, they've turned it into

0:12:51.920 --> 0:12:54.280
<v Speaker 1>this glorious account for retirement. I don't think that's the

0:12:54.320 --> 0:12:58.320
<v Speaker 1>way it was planned at the beginning. But the great

0:12:58.320 --> 0:13:01.840
<v Speaker 1>thing is, yes, you avoid complete taxation the whole way

0:13:01.880 --> 0:13:05.160
<v Speaker 1>through the other thing that she mentioned in here, well,

0:13:05.320 --> 0:13:07.280
<v Speaker 1>what if I don't have enough healthcare expenses? Well, I

0:13:07.320 --> 0:13:09.600
<v Speaker 1>will say this. There is a cap right forty four

0:13:09.640 --> 0:13:13.560
<v Speaker 1>hundred dollars a year, and let's say over twenty five years,

0:13:13.600 --> 0:13:15.880
<v Speaker 1>you were to put in that amount of money mass

0:13:15.920 --> 0:13:17.520
<v Speaker 1>you did an example of one hundred dollars. Well, if

0:13:17.520 --> 0:13:19.559
<v Speaker 1>you put forty four hundred dollars in up to the max,

0:13:19.800 --> 0:13:22.120
<v Speaker 1>you would have something like four hundred thousand dollars after

0:13:22.120 --> 0:13:24.760
<v Speaker 1>twenty five years. And you might say that is so

0:13:24.880 --> 0:13:26.640
<v Speaker 1>much money. I don't know that I'm going to incur

0:13:26.880 --> 0:13:30.480
<v Speaker 1>all the medical costs. That would mean that I could

0:13:30.679 --> 0:13:34.880
<v Speaker 1>redeem it and actually not pay tax. And that might

0:13:34.920 --> 0:13:37.960
<v Speaker 1>be true if you're an incredibly healthy person, but you

0:13:38.000 --> 0:13:41.360
<v Speaker 1>also have to look at what is available, like in

0:13:41.440 --> 0:13:46.960
<v Speaker 1>terms of what qualifies as a deductible expense for an HSA.

0:13:47.120 --> 0:13:50.880
<v Speaker 1>So it's worth digging in to see because there are

0:13:51.520 --> 0:13:57.840
<v Speaker 1>what lasik surgery copays, flu shots, ibuprofen potentially even with

0:13:57.880 --> 0:14:01.400
<v Speaker 1>a doctor's note, like gyms and massage. And then when

0:14:01.400 --> 0:14:05.640
<v Speaker 1>you go down the road when healthcare expenses are getting

0:14:05.720 --> 0:14:08.920
<v Speaker 1>even are becoming even larger in your life, talking about

0:14:09.120 --> 0:14:11.880
<v Speaker 1>long term care, talking about Medicare premiums. I mean, there

0:14:11.880 --> 0:14:14.720
<v Speaker 1>are all sorts of things, ways in which your health

0:14:14.720 --> 0:14:17.920
<v Speaker 1>costs in all likelihood on average, are going to balloon

0:14:18.400 --> 0:14:21.640
<v Speaker 1>in your older age, and you'll be glad that you

0:14:21.760 --> 0:14:24.520
<v Speaker 1>socked away. I think, this big stash of money to

0:14:24.560 --> 0:14:26.640
<v Speaker 1>pay for those health care costs, and you're not worried

0:14:26.640 --> 0:14:29.760
<v Speaker 1>about increasing your tax bill by pulling that money out.

0:14:29.840 --> 0:14:31.800
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, I don't know that it's an either or.

0:14:31.840 --> 0:14:33.640
<v Speaker 1>I think it is a kind of a both, and

0:14:33.840 --> 0:14:37.400
<v Speaker 1>ideally that you use both accounts. But even if let's

0:14:37.400 --> 0:14:40.440
<v Speaker 1>say over the next over the next ten to fifteen years,

0:14:40.480 --> 0:14:45.280
<v Speaker 1>you're only accumulating fifty grand worth of cost in terms

0:14:45.280 --> 0:14:47.600
<v Speaker 1>of medical expenses, I think later on in life you're

0:14:47.600 --> 0:14:49.200
<v Speaker 1>going to see a big uptick and it'll be nice

0:14:49.200 --> 0:14:50.240
<v Speaker 1>to have the stash.

0:14:50.440 --> 0:14:51.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's nice.

0:14:51.440 --> 0:14:53.680
<v Speaker 3>And like a second ago, you said something about the

0:14:53.800 --> 0:14:57.280
<v Speaker 3>you know, the fact that this is a glorious retirement account.

0:14:57.960 --> 0:15:00.440
<v Speaker 3>And I think the core of what El's getting at

0:15:00.640 --> 0:15:03.680
<v Speaker 3>is that it's just not that much money based on

0:15:03.720 --> 0:15:07.120
<v Speaker 3>the way she's currently spending, right, And that's kind of

0:15:07.160 --> 0:15:11.360
<v Speaker 3>based on the fact that she gave an example of Hey,

0:15:11.400 --> 0:15:14.400
<v Speaker 3>I've got one hundred dollars, Like, okay, what's that going

0:15:14.400 --> 0:15:16.000
<v Speaker 3>to turn into? And I gave example of like fouruner

0:15:16.040 --> 0:15:20.000
<v Speaker 3>and sixty six bucks. It's like big whoop, fourner sixty

0:15:20.040 --> 0:15:23.080
<v Speaker 3>six bucks, right, Like that is not very much money.

0:15:23.240 --> 0:15:26.360
<v Speaker 3>And so all and if she is healthy, and if

0:15:26.360 --> 0:15:30.760
<v Speaker 3>she does continue to be healthy, does not have medical expenses,

0:15:30.960 --> 0:15:34.040
<v Speaker 3>I will, like I agree that it's not going to

0:15:34.120 --> 0:15:36.160
<v Speaker 3>make as big of a difference. And so depending on

0:15:36.200 --> 0:15:40.600
<v Speaker 3>the person, I will readily concede that the benefit is

0:15:40.720 --> 0:15:44.680
<v Speaker 3>more in principle as opposed to how much you're actually

0:15:44.720 --> 0:15:47.480
<v Speaker 3>going to be able to set aside in practice if

0:15:47.520 --> 0:15:52.360
<v Speaker 3>you don't aggressively sock money away within your HSA, and so.

0:15:52.520 --> 0:15:55.400
<v Speaker 1>In that even if you even if you only contribute

0:15:55.560 --> 0:15:57.320
<v Speaker 1>up to fifty percent of the cap. And let's say

0:15:57.320 --> 0:16:00.240
<v Speaker 1>you have two hundred thousand dollars in retirement and you

0:16:00.280 --> 0:16:03.680
<v Speaker 1>can tap those receipts and it's super flexible. That I

0:16:03.720 --> 0:16:05.960
<v Speaker 1>love the flexibility the account. And then what she mentioned

0:16:06.040 --> 0:16:09.520
<v Speaker 1>too is that at age sixty five, you can turn

0:16:09.560 --> 0:16:11.720
<v Speaker 1>the account. I think she said a traditional wrath but

0:16:11.760 --> 0:16:15.400
<v Speaker 1>into essentially what is a traditional IRA that you will

0:16:15.440 --> 0:16:18.320
<v Speaker 1>get taxed on. But that's great, Like that just means

0:16:18.360 --> 0:16:21.440
<v Speaker 1>it's got an even extra added lever of flexibility.

0:16:21.640 --> 0:16:21.800
<v Speaker 2>Ex.

0:16:21.920 --> 0:16:24.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, you'll be taxed on it, given if that is

0:16:24.640 --> 0:16:27.880
<v Speaker 1>what happens down the pike for you, But that is

0:16:27.960 --> 0:16:30.240
<v Speaker 1>better than it being It's kind of like the way

0:16:30.240 --> 0:16:34.000
<v Speaker 1>the five twenty nine like has added flexibility. Now this

0:16:34.240 --> 0:16:37.160
<v Speaker 1>is still a flexible account, even if it's not ideal

0:16:37.240 --> 0:16:40.840
<v Speaker 1>to use it under those traditional IRA circumstances. It doesn't

0:16:40.880 --> 0:16:43.400
<v Speaker 1>mean that that's a loss. I think that means.

0:16:43.320 --> 0:16:45.720
<v Speaker 3>It's definitely not a loss. It's just it doesn't quite

0:16:45.760 --> 0:16:49.360
<v Speaker 3>have the appeal or the ring. I think if and

0:16:49.680 --> 0:16:51.880
<v Speaker 3>I'm going to assume that she is this is just

0:16:51.920 --> 0:16:54.440
<v Speaker 3>for herself, you're looking at forty four hundred dollars versus

0:16:54.880 --> 0:16:56.720
<v Speaker 3>I mean, it's all relative, right, if you've got and

0:16:56.760 --> 0:16:59.040
<v Speaker 3>most people have a relatively limited amount of money that

0:16:59.080 --> 0:17:01.560
<v Speaker 3>they can set aside for retirement. You compare a forty

0:17:01.560 --> 0:17:05.600
<v Speaker 3>four hundred dollars cap to employer sponsored for one K.

0:17:05.760 --> 0:17:08.200
<v Speaker 3>That's a tremendous amount of money, right, Like it makes

0:17:08.200 --> 0:17:11.520
<v Speaker 3>me think about it's like minitoring, and it's majoring in

0:17:11.560 --> 0:17:13.800
<v Speaker 3>the minors, you know, and kind of being overly fixated

0:17:13.840 --> 0:17:16.400
<v Speaker 3>on some of the smaller details, like if you if

0:17:16.400 --> 0:17:20.080
<v Speaker 3>somebody's if somebody says, hey, oh, yesterday, I was able

0:17:20.119 --> 0:17:22.639
<v Speaker 3>to get a fifty percent discount when I filled up

0:17:22.640 --> 0:17:25.320
<v Speaker 3>at the gas station, I'm like, all right, hook me up,

0:17:25.359 --> 0:17:26.840
<v Speaker 3>like tell me where to go. That's a great deal.

0:17:27.080 --> 0:17:29.720
<v Speaker 3>But there's a big difference between that and someone saying, hey,

0:17:30.080 --> 0:17:32.280
<v Speaker 3>I just got a five percent discount when I bought

0:17:32.359 --> 0:17:36.800
<v Speaker 3>my car yesterday. Okay, Well, on paper, the fifty percent

0:17:37.040 --> 0:17:40.280
<v Speaker 3>is a bigger discount, but we're talking about a smaller

0:17:40.320 --> 0:17:42.840
<v Speaker 3>sum of money as opposed to a five percent discount

0:17:42.960 --> 0:17:45.320
<v Speaker 3>on a larger purchase, which is going to be much

0:17:45.359 --> 0:17:48.040
<v Speaker 3>more significant. So in practice, that's I guess that's that's

0:17:48.080 --> 0:17:51.240
<v Speaker 3>kind of what I'm getting at that on paper and principle,

0:17:51.520 --> 0:17:54.399
<v Speaker 3>you look at that triple tax advantage, quadruple tax advantage.

0:17:54.400 --> 0:17:56.199
<v Speaker 3>If you're talking about this coming straight out of your

0:17:56.200 --> 0:18:00.080
<v Speaker 3>paycheck where it's not even getting hit with payroll tax,

0:18:00.560 --> 0:18:04.040
<v Speaker 3>you cannot beat it. Yes, And I'm not gonna let

0:18:04.040 --> 0:18:06.639
<v Speaker 3>that one go, like there is nothing else that is

0:18:06.680 --> 0:18:09.399
<v Speaker 3>treated that favorably. But I think it comes down to

0:18:09.440 --> 0:18:12.160
<v Speaker 3>how individuals are going to use it, how much they're

0:18:12.200 --> 0:18:14.720
<v Speaker 3>willing to set aside, and the additional work right, like

0:18:14.920 --> 0:18:18.360
<v Speaker 3>the additional keeping up with the expenses, keeping the Excel

0:18:19.320 --> 0:18:22.080
<v Speaker 3>file on hand, or the Google sheet keeping that updated.

0:18:23.640 --> 0:18:26.399
<v Speaker 3>It's just another step that I think is a barrier

0:18:26.440 --> 0:18:30.880
<v Speaker 3>for some folks. It's absolutely the most tax efficient, optimized

0:18:30.920 --> 0:18:33.520
<v Speaker 3>way to go about doing it, but depending on your

0:18:33.520 --> 0:18:36.800
<v Speaker 3>medical spending and how much you're prioritizing your other accounts.

0:18:37.119 --> 0:18:40.760
<v Speaker 3>I can understand if in practice some folks are less

0:18:40.760 --> 0:18:43.640
<v Speaker 3>excited about it, that's all. Yeah, Yeah, and I get

0:18:43.640 --> 0:18:47.240
<v Speaker 3>that too. I guess I think Elle has just she

0:18:47.280 --> 0:18:49.800
<v Speaker 3>seemed to really understand how the account works by the

0:18:49.840 --> 0:18:52.600
<v Speaker 3>way she praised her question, and then still there was

0:18:52.640 --> 0:18:55.080
<v Speaker 3>a disconnect between does this account make sense? And it

0:18:55.119 --> 0:18:57.120
<v Speaker 3>sounded like I think she said she doesn't even have one.

0:18:57.160 --> 0:18:59.679
<v Speaker 3>She's just kind of theorizing, what if I do have,

0:18:59.680 --> 0:19:01.760
<v Speaker 3>actis to one at some point. And I think the

0:19:01.840 --> 0:19:05.480
<v Speaker 3>kind of person that she is, based on her depth

0:19:05.520 --> 0:19:08.200
<v Speaker 3>of knowledge of this account and the way she thinks

0:19:08.200 --> 0:19:11.280
<v Speaker 3>about her money, it probably is an account you want

0:19:11.320 --> 0:19:13.040
<v Speaker 3>to take advantage of if you're the kind of person

0:19:13.080 --> 0:19:16.040
<v Speaker 3>who's like I can't max out my ROTH yet I'm

0:19:16.040 --> 0:19:18.200
<v Speaker 3>barely getting the match in my four O one K. Well,

0:19:18.240 --> 0:19:20.400
<v Speaker 3>the HSA is a can to kick down the road

0:19:20.520 --> 0:19:22.680
<v Speaker 3>for another day, and it's a great goal to have

0:19:23.160 --> 0:19:25.080
<v Speaker 3>for years down the road, for you to be able

0:19:25.119 --> 0:19:28.040
<v Speaker 3>to contribute at least something to it. But even though

0:19:28.080 --> 0:19:30.160
<v Speaker 3>I get what you're saying, and I think it makes

0:19:30.160 --> 0:19:34.639
<v Speaker 3>total sense, even if you have access to the HSA,

0:19:35.040 --> 0:19:37.440
<v Speaker 3>it doesn't mean it's the first place to go, even

0:19:37.480 --> 0:19:40.560
<v Speaker 3>though it has the best tax benefits. That's right, all right,

0:19:40.600 --> 0:19:42.040
<v Speaker 3>we got more to get to. We're gonna hear from

0:19:42.040 --> 0:19:46.520
<v Speaker 3>a listener who is interested in rehabbing her home. We'll

0:19:46.560 --> 0:19:48.480
<v Speaker 3>get to that question in more right after this.

0:19:58.240 --> 0:20:00.600
<v Speaker 1>All right, we're back, Matt. We're taking a listener questions

0:20:00.680 --> 0:20:02.720
<v Speaker 1>and this is a great one. I'm looking forward to

0:20:02.720 --> 0:20:05.320
<v Speaker 1>taking this one. It is specifically out. What if I've

0:20:05.320 --> 0:20:08.480
<v Speaker 1>invested in a single position and I'm underwater.

0:20:09.400 --> 0:20:11.479
<v Speaker 7>Hey, Matt and Joel, this is Alex and I've been

0:20:11.520 --> 0:20:15.040
<v Speaker 7>a listener since twenty eighteen, and my craft beer equivalent

0:20:15.359 --> 0:20:19.159
<v Speaker 7>is craft beer. Although I don't trick as much these days.

0:20:20.000 --> 0:20:23.760
<v Speaker 7>Stuff is expensive. I'm trying to save and invest more

0:20:23.920 --> 0:20:27.320
<v Speaker 7>these days so I can be more financially stable when

0:20:27.359 --> 0:20:31.520
<v Speaker 7>I moved to the Philippines whenever, that is any who.

0:20:31.880 --> 0:20:33.760
<v Speaker 7>My question is that I'm kind of locked in with

0:20:33.840 --> 0:20:37.960
<v Speaker 7>a rate stock, specifically A G and C for the

0:20:38.000 --> 0:20:41.440
<v Speaker 7>past few years. I bought more and more shares in

0:20:41.480 --> 0:20:44.000
<v Speaker 7>the early twenty twenties. Stock was going up and up

0:20:44.000 --> 0:20:47.399
<v Speaker 7>in those years, but has since decreased to pre COVID days,

0:20:48.119 --> 0:20:51.760
<v Speaker 7>but I still collect the monthly dividends as reats do.

0:20:53.200 --> 0:20:55.800
<v Speaker 7>My current plan with the stock is keep it until

0:20:55.800 --> 0:20:58.480
<v Speaker 7>it goes up to the break given point and sell

0:20:58.560 --> 0:21:02.560
<v Speaker 7>some day. Meantime, I bought more shares when the market

0:21:02.600 --> 0:21:06.240
<v Speaker 7>dipped after the tariff announcements last year, so you know,

0:21:06.560 --> 0:21:09.919
<v Speaker 7>buy low, sell high. So I'm still buying lower than

0:21:09.920 --> 0:21:13.280
<v Speaker 7>the average price with the dividends I receive from that rout.

0:21:13.960 --> 0:21:16.439
<v Speaker 7>Should I stick to this plan or is there a

0:21:16.440 --> 0:21:19.720
<v Speaker 7>bear way out? Thanks for all you guys do. If

0:21:19.720 --> 0:21:22.199
<v Speaker 7>you guys ever find yourselves in your neighborhood to the

0:21:22.240 --> 0:21:25.560
<v Speaker 7>north in Chattanooga, I'll buy you guys a few beers

0:21:25.560 --> 0:21:27.400
<v Speaker 7>from the bruise here cheers.

0:21:28.520 --> 0:21:31.120
<v Speaker 1>That was the Joe Suburb, a suburb of Atlanta, right,

0:21:31.600 --> 0:21:32.200
<v Speaker 1>try to Nigga.

0:21:32.240 --> 0:21:34.439
<v Speaker 3>Basically, you were up there all the time, Joel, I

0:21:34.440 --> 0:21:36.040
<v Speaker 3>feel like you might be able to take Alex.

0:21:35.880 --> 0:21:36.520
<v Speaker 2>Up on his offer.

0:21:36.960 --> 0:21:39.280
<v Speaker 1>True. Now, I am My sister lives there, so I

0:21:39.440 --> 0:21:41.280
<v Speaker 1>try to make it up there a couple times a

0:21:41.320 --> 0:21:44.040
<v Speaker 1>year at least, and I love that little town.

0:21:44.480 --> 0:21:44.840
<v Speaker 2>Hit up.

0:21:45.520 --> 0:21:49.280
<v Speaker 3>What's the bakery? Need Love's Bakery Place is awesome? Sell

0:21:49.520 --> 0:21:51.600
<v Speaker 3>They also do coffee really well there. You know what

0:21:51.640 --> 0:21:53.439
<v Speaker 3>we need to do is get up to Cloudland Canyon

0:21:53.480 --> 0:21:55.920
<v Speaker 3>and do like a double digit run.

0:21:56.920 --> 0:21:58.480
<v Speaker 1>There's fifty k in December.

0:21:58.520 --> 0:22:00.439
<v Speaker 3>Come on, we don't need to do that. We just

0:22:00.440 --> 0:22:02.760
<v Speaker 3>need all to do which ye do. Let's just let's

0:22:02.760 --> 0:22:04.600
<v Speaker 3>just do like a cool fifteen miles, you and me

0:22:05.200 --> 0:22:07.640
<v Speaker 3>and anybody else who wants to join. Uh for any

0:22:07.720 --> 0:22:09.119
<v Speaker 3>question of it, how about that, maybe.

0:22:09.000 --> 0:22:09.720
<v Speaker 2>We can cut it down.

0:22:09.760 --> 0:22:12.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm down for that, Uh, well, actually, by the way,

0:22:12.760 --> 0:22:15.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm random. Speaking of Chattaningga. My sister said, there's a

0:22:15.560 --> 0:22:18.520
<v Speaker 1>new French bakery that is off the chain, super good.

0:22:19.040 --> 0:22:21.720
<v Speaker 2>Another one like a new one, what about Yeah, I think.

0:22:21.560 --> 0:22:23.600
<v Speaker 1>It's on the same stretch as need Loves, like another

0:22:24.800 --> 0:22:29.359
<v Speaker 1>French baker. Yeah, so Chattanoo firt it out punches its

0:22:29.400 --> 0:22:33.720
<v Speaker 1>size in terms of kind of culture and food, music

0:22:34.160 --> 0:22:36.720
<v Speaker 1>outdoors compared to a lot of other cities its size.

0:22:36.840 --> 0:22:39.159
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, well, Alex, let's let's.

0:22:39.080 --> 0:22:39.560
<v Speaker 2>Kick it off.

0:22:39.640 --> 0:22:41.600
<v Speaker 3>I appreciate you sharing what it is that you've been

0:22:41.640 --> 0:22:43.960
<v Speaker 3>doing with your money, how you've been investing. And the

0:22:43.960 --> 0:22:46.680
<v Speaker 3>first thing that I want to say is it depends

0:22:47.160 --> 0:22:49.640
<v Speaker 3>I think our response or our response is maybe the same,

0:22:50.119 --> 0:22:52.840
<v Speaker 3>I guess, but the seriousness in which you take our

0:22:52.840 --> 0:22:55.359
<v Speaker 3>advice depends a lot on how much of this you own.

0:22:55.520 --> 0:22:57.240
<v Speaker 3>And I don't think did he say how much of

0:22:57.280 --> 0:22:58.560
<v Speaker 3>it he owns Joel.

0:22:58.440 --> 0:22:59.880
<v Speaker 1>Or how much his port?

0:23:00.880 --> 0:23:04.520
<v Speaker 3>Okay, So that being said, you know that magnitude it

0:23:04.560 --> 0:23:06.520
<v Speaker 3>makes a big difference, because if we're talking about five

0:23:06.520 --> 0:23:07.720
<v Speaker 3>percent or less, I.

0:23:07.640 --> 0:23:10.200
<v Speaker 2>Don't really care. Alex is not a big deal.

0:23:10.400 --> 0:23:14.479
<v Speaker 3>Like I own some stupid stocks and they don't make

0:23:14.560 --> 0:23:16.960
<v Speaker 3>up more than five percent of my overall portfolio.

0:23:17.040 --> 0:23:19.520
<v Speaker 2>I think have I shared on the schedule that I

0:23:19.520 --> 0:23:21.359
<v Speaker 2>bought some Fox stock.

0:23:22.240 --> 0:23:23.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if he did.

0:23:23.040 --> 0:23:25.560
<v Speaker 3>Fox Entertainment basically, And this is the kind of dumb

0:23:25.600 --> 0:23:28.439
<v Speaker 3>stuff that people do and they call it investing. I

0:23:28.640 --> 0:23:30.439
<v Speaker 3>do it, and I think it's just fun. Right, this

0:23:30.480 --> 0:23:32.080
<v Speaker 3>isn't a part of my retirement. But I'm sitting there

0:23:32.080 --> 0:23:35.320
<v Speaker 3>watching the World Cup and I'm like, oh my gosh, Yeah,

0:23:35.359 --> 0:23:39.000
<v Speaker 3>there are so many ads because of the new FIFA

0:23:39.160 --> 0:23:45.199
<v Speaker 3>hydration breaks and they're like tripling their ad revenue, and

0:23:45.240 --> 0:23:47.000
<v Speaker 3>I thought, oh my gosh, I bet Fox is going to.

0:23:47.040 --> 0:23:47.720
<v Speaker 2>Have a good quarter.

0:23:48.880 --> 0:23:52.360
<v Speaker 3>Maybe they've already even released their earnings. I'm less good

0:23:52.359 --> 0:23:54.720
<v Speaker 3>about checking in on it after the fact I goes,

0:23:56.000 --> 0:23:57.280
<v Speaker 3>but I was just like, let me buy a few

0:23:57.320 --> 0:23:59.840
<v Speaker 3>shares of that? Why not just as like a point

0:23:59.840 --> 0:24:03.040
<v Speaker 3>of interest. That's totally fine, Alex. If you're talking about

0:24:03.080 --> 0:24:04.760
<v Speaker 3>if you've got a little bit, you know, not too

0:24:04.880 --> 0:24:07.720
<v Speaker 3>much of that rate, then I'm fine with that. But

0:24:08.119 --> 0:24:09.920
<v Speaker 3>if not, if you've got more than that, then you

0:24:10.240 --> 0:24:12.920
<v Speaker 3>definitely need to make some changes I think to your portfolio.

0:24:13.080 --> 0:24:15.560
<v Speaker 1>Well, and that is Matt, you just described. I think

0:24:15.600 --> 0:24:17.879
<v Speaker 1>one of the reasons that single stock investing can be

0:24:17.920 --> 0:24:21.119
<v Speaker 1>perilous is because you buy because you have an expectation

0:24:21.400 --> 0:24:25.199
<v Speaker 1>or you see maybe an opportunity, and then keeping up

0:24:25.200 --> 0:24:30.440
<v Speaker 1>with the company and knowing when selling makes sense is harder. Right,

0:24:30.520 --> 0:24:32.720
<v Speaker 1>It's easier to find the see the opportunity on the

0:24:32.760 --> 0:24:36.000
<v Speaker 1>front end, and even that is not easy. But I

0:24:36.000 --> 0:24:39.600
<v Speaker 1>think the best question for Alex is if he had

0:24:39.640 --> 0:24:43.439
<v Speaker 1>the current cash value of this rut today in hand,

0:24:43.840 --> 0:24:46.679
<v Speaker 1>would he still put money in that direction? Would he

0:24:46.760 --> 0:24:49.720
<v Speaker 1>buy the same amount that he holds now? And I

0:24:49.760 --> 0:24:50.440
<v Speaker 1>think there.

0:24:50.440 --> 0:24:53.199
<v Speaker 2>Is sunk cost fallacy, right, Yeah?

0:24:53.240 --> 0:24:57.440
<v Speaker 1>And I think there is this. A lot of investors

0:24:57.640 --> 0:25:00.560
<v Speaker 1>have it if they're underwater in a position, they just

0:25:00.600 --> 0:25:04.040
<v Speaker 1>at least wanted to get back to the price at

0:25:04.040 --> 0:25:07.000
<v Speaker 1>which they purchased it. And I understand where that comes

0:25:07.000 --> 0:25:08.840
<v Speaker 1>from mentally, but I think you have to push back

0:25:08.880 --> 0:25:12.160
<v Speaker 1>against that because if then you're falling prey to sun

0:25:12.200 --> 0:25:14.320
<v Speaker 1>cost fallacy, or you're saying, once it gets back there,

0:25:14.400 --> 0:25:17.760
<v Speaker 1>then I'll then I'll sell. Well, why not once it's

0:25:17.840 --> 0:25:21.359
<v Speaker 1>up ten percent or up twenty percent? And the truth is,

0:25:22.000 --> 0:25:24.040
<v Speaker 1>maybe it gets there, maybe it doesn't. Are you looking

0:25:24.119 --> 0:25:27.320
<v Speaker 1>at the right metrics, and I think for a lot

0:25:27.320 --> 0:25:30.360
<v Speaker 1>of people, the best thing to do, it's not hey,

0:25:30.560 --> 0:25:32.160
<v Speaker 1>is this the should I keep it until it gets

0:25:32.200 --> 0:25:33.960
<v Speaker 1>back to zero? It's is there a better place for

0:25:34.000 --> 0:25:37.960
<v Speaker 1>my money to be right now than than continuing to

0:25:38.000 --> 0:25:40.120
<v Speaker 1>exist inside of the street one percent?

0:25:40.240 --> 0:25:40.440
<v Speaker 2>Man?

0:25:40.520 --> 0:25:42.639
<v Speaker 3>And uh, that was a perfect segue for the direction

0:25:42.720 --> 0:25:46.040
<v Speaker 3>I wanted to go in, because specifically, I think what

0:25:46.200 --> 0:25:50.399
<v Speaker 3>Alex got sucked in by or where the dividends? And

0:25:50.440 --> 0:25:54.600
<v Speaker 3>he mentioned the dividends specifically, and I I forget even that.

0:25:55.080 --> 0:25:57.639
<v Speaker 3>Oh I would have done a GNC and I was like, Okay,

0:25:57.760 --> 0:25:59.879
<v Speaker 3>who is this AGENC? And I looked it up and

0:26:00.119 --> 0:26:02.840
<v Speaker 3>this like the subheading like when you pull up search

0:26:02.880 --> 0:26:06.439
<v Speaker 3>them up on pull them up on Google is now?

0:26:06.440 --> 0:26:08.680
<v Speaker 3>I wrote it down here where is it? We are

0:26:08.760 --> 0:26:12.160
<v Speaker 3>an internally managed mortgage rate built to generate favorable long

0:26:12.280 --> 0:26:17.400
<v Speaker 3>term stalkholder returns with a substantial yield components. It's literally

0:26:17.600 --> 0:26:19.760
<v Speaker 3>written there in on the description. The fact that I

0:26:19.800 --> 0:26:24.639
<v Speaker 3>think Alex has been very attracted to that dividend, and

0:26:24.640 --> 0:26:26.960
<v Speaker 3>I think because of that, it's it's got him not

0:26:27.040 --> 0:26:29.760
<v Speaker 3>looking at the overall price. And you got to you

0:26:29.760 --> 0:26:32.359
<v Speaker 3>gotta look at look at both aspects of it. But

0:26:33.000 --> 0:26:34.479
<v Speaker 3>at the end of the day, man, you look at

0:26:34.480 --> 0:26:37.520
<v Speaker 3>the performance of that versus the S and P five hundred,

0:26:37.520 --> 0:26:40.000
<v Speaker 3>and I ran the numbers not surprising. You look at

0:26:40.040 --> 0:26:42.920
<v Speaker 3>the past decade, the past ten years of performance of

0:26:43.800 --> 0:26:47.440
<v Speaker 3>A G and C versus VU the S and P

0:26:47.560 --> 0:26:50.120
<v Speaker 3>five hundred. Over the past ten years, you're looking at

0:26:50.240 --> 0:26:53.879
<v Speaker 3>annualized growth of six point three percent with a G

0:26:54.040 --> 0:26:56.320
<v Speaker 3>and C. And you're like, Okay, it's not bad. That's

0:26:56.359 --> 0:26:59.959
<v Speaker 3>not bad versus fifteen point four percent.

0:27:00.359 --> 0:27:00.639
<v Speaker 6>Wow.

0:27:01.440 --> 0:27:04.200
<v Speaker 3>So that's had you taken ten thousand dollars and invested it,

0:27:04.520 --> 0:27:07.640
<v Speaker 3>invested it back in twenty sixteen, on one hand, you'd

0:27:07.680 --> 0:27:10.800
<v Speaker 3>have eighteen thousand dollars, and again you're like, okay, not

0:27:10.920 --> 0:27:17.920
<v Speaker 3>bad versus forty two thousand dollars eighteen versus forty two. Man,

0:27:18.040 --> 0:27:18.760
<v Speaker 3>And here's the deal.

0:27:19.000 --> 0:27:20.800
<v Speaker 1>I didn't even look to see what the cost the

0:27:20.840 --> 0:27:22.000
<v Speaker 1>price is on this either.

0:27:22.080 --> 0:27:22.639
<v Speaker 2>Dude.

0:27:23.280 --> 0:27:25.399
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, yeah, you're you're kind of basing it more on principle.

0:27:25.640 --> 0:27:27.560
<v Speaker 3>But I was just like, there's no way that the

0:27:27.600 --> 0:27:31.480
<v Speaker 3>principle isn't going to deliver real life results. And this

0:27:31.680 --> 0:27:35.480
<v Speaker 3>is also with the dividends reinvested and so someone might say, well, no, no, no,

0:27:35.520 --> 0:27:38.600
<v Speaker 3>that's paying a higher that's paying a higher dividend yield.

0:27:39.440 --> 0:27:42.440
<v Speaker 3>At the top of the episode, it's thirteen percent versus

0:27:42.760 --> 0:27:45.520
<v Speaker 3>vus is something like one point something percent, And you're like,

0:27:45.560 --> 0:27:47.239
<v Speaker 3>oh my gosh, well, why wouldn't you want to do that,

0:27:47.640 --> 0:27:50.840
<v Speaker 3>just because you haven't seen price appreciation. So you take

0:27:50.880 --> 0:27:52.639
<v Speaker 3>both of those stocks, you look at ten years of

0:27:54.640 --> 0:27:57.920
<v Speaker 3>sticker price performance plus dividends, and that's the difference you're

0:27:57.920 --> 0:28:01.280
<v Speaker 3>looking at. So that's a big difference. And this isn't

0:28:01.320 --> 0:28:03.200
<v Speaker 3>to guarantee that things are going to continue the way

0:28:03.200 --> 0:28:06.560
<v Speaker 3>that they've been, but you got to let history inform

0:28:06.640 --> 0:28:07.879
<v Speaker 3>the decisions that you make today.

0:28:08.160 --> 0:28:11.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and I just like the idea of saying one

0:28:11.720 --> 0:28:14.280
<v Speaker 1>not being overexposed. So, like you mentioned in the beginning,

0:28:14.280 --> 0:28:16.760
<v Speaker 1>if you have too much, too high a percentage of

0:28:16.800 --> 0:28:20.800
<v Speaker 1>your overall assets in this one real estate investment trust

0:28:20.920 --> 0:28:23.879
<v Speaker 1>versus the overall stock market, then you need to sell

0:28:24.160 --> 0:28:28.000
<v Speaker 1>just for that reason alone, even if you haven't gotten

0:28:28.040 --> 0:28:32.120
<v Speaker 1>back to parody from where you bought it. So that's

0:28:32.160 --> 0:28:36.880
<v Speaker 1>one thing for sure, But also, hey, do I think

0:28:36.920 --> 0:28:39.320
<v Speaker 1>that this rate is going to produce creator returns over

0:28:39.360 --> 0:28:42.400
<v Speaker 1>the next decade or do I care? Is this just

0:28:42.400 --> 0:28:42.920
<v Speaker 1>fun money?

0:28:43.000 --> 0:28:43.160
<v Speaker 2>Right?

0:28:43.240 --> 0:28:46.400
<v Speaker 1>Is this just that kind of speculative five percent where

0:28:46.440 --> 0:28:48.880
<v Speaker 1>I allow myself to invest in fun stuff that I

0:28:49.040 --> 0:28:51.520
<v Speaker 1>enjoy and this rate was just attractive to me for

0:28:51.560 --> 0:28:54.280
<v Speaker 1>other reasons. In that case, don't worry about it. Like

0:28:54.320 --> 0:28:57.120
<v Speaker 1>if this is one to two percent of your overall

0:28:57.160 --> 0:29:00.640
<v Speaker 1>investment portfolio and it's the goof a round side, who cares.

0:29:01.160 --> 0:29:03.720
<v Speaker 1>But otherwise I would say, if you're serious about this

0:29:03.880 --> 0:29:08.520
<v Speaker 1>and you want to maximize returns and minimize costs, I

0:29:08.560 --> 0:29:13.240
<v Speaker 1>would be selling this position and redeploying that capital into

0:29:13.280 --> 0:29:15.280
<v Speaker 1>an investing position. I felt more confident.

0:29:14.920 --> 0:29:16.080
<v Speaker 2>About one hundred percent.

0:29:16.120 --> 0:29:18.720
<v Speaker 3>Man, Yeah, if it was me, same sort of thing,

0:29:18.920 --> 0:29:21.680
<v Speaker 3>I would be taking the information the past performance and

0:29:21.760 --> 0:29:24.160
<v Speaker 3>help allowing that to inform what I do now, which is,

0:29:24.360 --> 0:29:26.000
<v Speaker 3>if it was me, I think I would be cutting bait,

0:29:27.000 --> 0:29:32.120
<v Speaker 3>looking to redeploy those dollars towards something else, unless I

0:29:32.160 --> 0:29:34.600
<v Speaker 3>will say, if it's a smaller let's say he's at

0:29:34.640 --> 0:29:38.040
<v Speaker 3>like ten percent of his overall portfolio, is an AG

0:29:38.200 --> 0:29:41.000
<v Speaker 3>and C and maybe there's a soft you got a

0:29:41.000 --> 0:29:43.440
<v Speaker 3>little sautpart in your heart for it, Like whatever reason

0:29:43.480 --> 0:29:45.360
<v Speaker 3>you chose to buy in the first place. Maybe it

0:29:45.440 --> 0:29:47.000
<v Speaker 3>was a friend who's a part of the company, or

0:29:47.040 --> 0:29:50.120
<v Speaker 3>I don't know, maybe it was recommended maintain those positions.

0:29:50.160 --> 0:29:52.280
<v Speaker 3>And if you can contribute to a low cost, widely

0:29:52.320 --> 0:29:55.760
<v Speaker 3>diversified index fund or voo whatever it is, the entire

0:29:55.760 --> 0:29:58.120
<v Speaker 3>stock market, and if you can essentially right size your

0:29:58.160 --> 0:30:04.240
<v Speaker 3>portfolio by investing more in some of the avenues that

0:30:04.280 --> 0:30:07.560
<v Speaker 3>we would typically recommend, I'm fine with that. Yeah, I

0:30:07.560 --> 0:30:07.800
<v Speaker 3>think that.

0:30:08.000 --> 0:30:10.800
<v Speaker 1>Just find a way to diminish the size of this

0:30:10.880 --> 0:30:15.040
<v Speaker 1>in your work phone exactly, whether that's through selling, cutting bait, redeploying,

0:30:15.320 --> 0:30:18.560
<v Speaker 1>or by you saying, looking ahead, oh man, I'm about

0:30:18.560 --> 0:30:19.520
<v Speaker 1>to get a bonus at work.

0:30:19.560 --> 0:30:22.040
<v Speaker 3>Oh man, I'm about to get Mary. We're going to

0:30:22.080 --> 0:30:24.960
<v Speaker 3>combine our incomes cut expenses because now we only have

0:30:25.000 --> 0:30:26.960
<v Speaker 3>one rent to pay. If there could be a number

0:30:27.000 --> 0:30:29.160
<v Speaker 3>of factors that could lead you to realize I'm about

0:30:29.200 --> 0:30:31.840
<v Speaker 3>to have the ability to invest so many more dollars,

0:30:32.000 --> 0:30:36.120
<v Speaker 3>and if you're able to funnel those towards something like view,

0:30:36.520 --> 0:30:37.920
<v Speaker 3>then yeah, I think that.

0:30:37.920 --> 0:30:39.440
<v Speaker 2>Would be okay as well.

0:30:39.760 --> 0:30:42.840
<v Speaker 1>All right, speaking of real estate, let's get to a

0:30:42.920 --> 0:30:46.120
<v Speaker 1>listener in New York who wants to kind of start

0:30:46.200 --> 0:30:49.520
<v Speaker 1>her real estate journey with physical real estate, not in

0:30:49.800 --> 0:30:51.160
<v Speaker 1>reats that you trade publicly.

0:30:51.200 --> 0:30:53.800
<v Speaker 4>Hey guys, this is Katie calling from It area in

0:30:53.800 --> 0:30:54.520
<v Speaker 4>New York State.

0:30:55.200 --> 0:30:58.640
<v Speaker 5>I've been listening to your podcast for about a year

0:30:58.640 --> 0:31:02.520
<v Speaker 5>and a half, somewhat active in the Facebook group as well.

0:31:03.280 --> 0:31:06.320
<v Speaker 4>Love everything that you do. I've learned a ton, so

0:31:06.480 --> 0:31:06.800
<v Speaker 4>thank you.

0:31:08.600 --> 0:31:13.320
<v Speaker 5>My question today, or questions rather, are regarding real estate investing.

0:31:14.000 --> 0:31:16.640
<v Speaker 5>My husband and I own our home currently. We will

0:31:16.680 --> 0:31:18.800
<v Speaker 5>be done paying off our mortgage in eight years in

0:31:18.880 --> 0:31:22.720
<v Speaker 5>year twenty thirty four. The plan is to start with

0:31:22.760 --> 0:31:27.000
<v Speaker 5>this house, do some renovations, learn a little bit, move

0:31:27.040 --> 0:31:30.680
<v Speaker 5>from this place, rent it out to a single family,

0:31:31.200 --> 0:31:33.480
<v Speaker 5>and then sort of do the same thing with a

0:31:33.520 --> 0:31:37.400
<v Speaker 5>second property and sort of go from there. We're talking

0:31:37.440 --> 0:31:40.720
<v Speaker 5>pretty small scale, but I want to do it right

0:31:40.920 --> 0:31:44.960
<v Speaker 5>and specific questions I have one, how do I determine

0:31:45.000 --> 0:31:47.840
<v Speaker 5>whether an area is a good place to buy a property.

0:31:48.960 --> 0:31:52.920
<v Speaker 5>I'm wondering if there are any resources I can find

0:31:53.240 --> 0:31:59.760
<v Speaker 5>regarding quality of life rating scals regarding growth of a

0:32:00.000 --> 0:32:05.600
<v Speaker 5>specific specific area. Second question, what should I expect in

0:32:05.680 --> 0:32:09.840
<v Speaker 5>terms of monthly profit? How does this get determined? Which

0:32:09.920 --> 0:32:13.800
<v Speaker 5>is reasonable? Third question? I hear a lot about tax

0:32:13.840 --> 0:32:15.720
<v Speaker 5>advantages of real estate investing.

0:32:16.880 --> 0:32:18.560
<v Speaker 4>Can you talk about this for a little bit.

0:32:19.600 --> 0:32:23.520
<v Speaker 5>And fourth question, I think I know what the answer

0:32:23.560 --> 0:32:27.040
<v Speaker 5>is going to be about this. But you know, we

0:32:27.120 --> 0:32:28.880
<v Speaker 5>have a good amount of equity built up in our

0:32:28.920 --> 0:32:33.200
<v Speaker 5>current home. What are your thoughts on using some of

0:32:33.200 --> 0:32:37.480
<v Speaker 5>that equity to pay for a down payment for a

0:32:37.520 --> 0:32:40.320
<v Speaker 5>second home? That sort of thing? And should we repeat

0:32:40.360 --> 0:32:43.960
<v Speaker 5>that process? You know, please tell me about that. Any

0:32:44.000 --> 0:32:46.440
<v Speaker 5>of the resources you guys have or any other ideas,

0:32:47.240 --> 0:32:47.960
<v Speaker 5>please share them.

0:32:48.480 --> 0:32:50.280
<v Speaker 4>Thanks so much. Really love this community.

0:32:51.440 --> 0:32:54.200
<v Speaker 2>Basically, please don't keep them to yourself, Joel.

0:32:55.360 --> 0:32:57.480
<v Speaker 1>There are so many, so many questions to hear, Matt.

0:32:57.520 --> 0:32:59.360
<v Speaker 1>We better get to share, share the wealth, share the well.

0:32:59.400 --> 0:33:02.000
<v Speaker 3>But yes, men, Sorry, I hit the voice the voice

0:33:02.000 --> 0:33:04.440
<v Speaker 3>memo before you finished the introduction there.

0:33:04.480 --> 0:33:05.680
<v Speaker 2>I know you're a rabbit cut off.

0:33:05.720 --> 0:33:06.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm an idiot.

0:33:07.280 --> 0:33:09.320
<v Speaker 3>So it takes a second before you hit click play

0:33:09.680 --> 0:33:12.920
<v Speaker 3>and it actually plays you know this, and so you

0:33:13.000 --> 0:33:15.000
<v Speaker 3>kind of like lead into it slightly, and then you're like,

0:33:15.000 --> 0:33:16.600
<v Speaker 3>oh crap, he said some more words.

0:33:16.400 --> 0:33:19.040
<v Speaker 1>So I apologize, my friend. The how to Money Facebook group,

0:33:19.120 --> 0:33:22.200
<v Speaker 1>by the way, is an excellent place to go for

0:33:22.400 --> 0:33:24.520
<v Speaker 1>with your money questions. And we'll get to a Facebook

0:33:24.600 --> 0:33:26.440
<v Speaker 1>question here and just a bit. The first thing I

0:33:26.480 --> 0:33:29.160
<v Speaker 1>wanted to say to Katie is that real estate can

0:33:29.200 --> 0:33:32.320
<v Speaker 1>be intimidating, and I love that her goal is to

0:33:32.360 --> 0:33:34.800
<v Speaker 1>start small. I think that is the best way to go.

0:33:34.960 --> 0:33:36.680
<v Speaker 1>That's the best way to start. And there are a

0:33:36.760 --> 0:33:40.000
<v Speaker 1>lot of real estate influencers out there who talk about

0:33:40.560 --> 0:33:43.200
<v Speaker 1>how much size matters and if you don't have eighty

0:33:43.240 --> 0:33:45.800
<v Speaker 1>two units, then you're just not doing it right. And

0:33:45.960 --> 0:33:49.080
<v Speaker 1>a lot of those people are I've seen it firsthand,

0:33:49.120 --> 0:33:52.480
<v Speaker 1>people who are who are really smart, who have big followings,

0:33:52.640 --> 0:33:56.560
<v Speaker 1>who make investments, and behind the scenes, they're sweating bullets

0:33:56.800 --> 0:34:01.160
<v Speaker 1>because they they had too rosia prediction about and they

0:34:01.160 --> 0:34:03.760
<v Speaker 1>were over leveraged, and they find themselves in a tight

0:34:03.760 --> 0:34:06.040
<v Speaker 1>spot when the market doesn't do what they were hoping

0:34:06.120 --> 0:34:08.799
<v Speaker 1>or expecting. That has happened a lot in the past

0:34:08.840 --> 0:34:11.680
<v Speaker 1>few years for real estate investors who bought at the

0:34:11.719 --> 0:34:16.240
<v Speaker 1>top higher interest rates, projecting rent increases that didn't materialize,

0:34:16.320 --> 0:34:18.840
<v Speaker 1>and so follow a guy like like Chad Carson is

0:34:19.200 --> 0:34:22.120
<v Speaker 1>one of my pieces of advice because he's all about

0:34:22.160 --> 0:34:26.239
<v Speaker 1>helping small time real estate investors, and that's what she

0:34:26.320 --> 0:34:29.400
<v Speaker 1>want to be so pick a person that you admire

0:34:29.400 --> 0:34:32.279
<v Speaker 1>in the space, who offers really good, credible information and

0:34:32.280 --> 0:34:34.480
<v Speaker 1>who's doing what you want to do. Don't tune out

0:34:34.520 --> 0:34:37.560
<v Speaker 1>all of the other real estate people that don't have

0:34:37.640 --> 0:34:40.279
<v Speaker 1>that same kind of motto, mindset and mentality that you have.

0:34:40.360 --> 0:34:40.720
<v Speaker 2>Katie.

0:34:41.440 --> 0:34:44.320
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I'll see if I can seguey from that, because

0:34:44.760 --> 0:34:48.520
<v Speaker 3>her first actual question was asking about determining good areas

0:34:48.560 --> 0:34:51.680
<v Speaker 3>to buy, like determining quality of life, that kind of stuff.

0:34:51.960 --> 0:34:54.080
<v Speaker 3>And one of the things that's interesting about Chad Carson

0:34:54.160 --> 0:34:55.680
<v Speaker 3>is that he is in a part of the country

0:34:55.719 --> 0:34:56.920
<v Speaker 3>where you are seeing a.

0:34:56.800 --> 0:34:57.560
<v Speaker 2>Lot of growth.

0:34:58.040 --> 0:35:00.799
<v Speaker 3>And so Katie, she's up in York, and I don't

0:35:00.800 --> 0:35:03.040
<v Speaker 3>know specifically where she is in New York, but I

0:35:03.080 --> 0:35:04.160
<v Speaker 3>think she generally.

0:35:04.360 --> 0:35:06.160
<v Speaker 2>Poughkeepsie is alway, she said, Poughkeepsie.

0:35:06.160 --> 0:35:09.280
<v Speaker 3>I think so generally speaking, I mean, folks are moving

0:35:09.360 --> 0:35:13.120
<v Speaker 3>from the northern cities right like we're seeing massive population

0:35:13.280 --> 0:35:20.080
<v Speaker 3>declines in Baltimore, Philadelphia, Detroit, and so you got to

0:35:20.120 --> 0:35:23.240
<v Speaker 3>look at some of these bigger macro trends as opposed

0:35:23.239 --> 0:35:25.760
<v Speaker 3>to what like the cities that are seeing massive amounts

0:35:25.760 --> 0:35:27.719
<v Speaker 3>of growth, they're all in the South, They're on the

0:35:27.719 --> 0:35:30.919
<v Speaker 3>sun Belt, you're like Joel, you syndicate invest Like, where

0:35:30.920 --> 0:35:32.920
<v Speaker 3>where are those syndication deals? A lot of them are

0:35:32.960 --> 0:35:35.040
<v Speaker 3>in the sun belt states you're looking at. You look

0:35:35.040 --> 0:35:37.400
<v Speaker 3>at what's happened with some of those sunbelts. Some of

0:35:37.400 --> 0:35:39.480
<v Speaker 3>those have imploded as well, some of those have done.

0:35:39.600 --> 0:35:42.120
<v Speaker 3>Really look at Austin. Everyone's like, Austin's the hot place.

0:35:42.160 --> 0:35:44.279
<v Speaker 3>Everyone's moving to Austin, and then guess what happens? It

0:35:44.320 --> 0:35:45.080
<v Speaker 3>gets overbuilt.

0:35:45.120 --> 0:35:47.480
<v Speaker 1>So that's another one of those things you have to consider,

0:35:47.600 --> 0:35:49.960
<v Speaker 1>is like does everyone else think the same thing? Are

0:35:49.960 --> 0:35:53.440
<v Speaker 1>people building in outrageous amounts because everyone sees the opportunity

0:35:53.440 --> 0:35:53.760
<v Speaker 1>in Austin.

0:35:54.000 --> 0:35:54.640
<v Speaker 2>There's also a.

0:35:54.560 --> 0:35:58.920
<v Speaker 3>Difference between multi massive, multi family apartments and single family,

0:35:58.960 --> 0:36:01.040
<v Speaker 3>which is what she's looking at. But you are seeing

0:36:01.040 --> 0:36:05.360
<v Speaker 3>tons of people multiple towns in Texas, Tennessee, Atlanta is

0:36:05.360 --> 0:36:08.719
<v Speaker 3>seeing a lot of growth, North Carolina, Florida, even and

0:36:08.719 --> 0:36:11.840
<v Speaker 3>so I think that's really important keeping that in mind

0:36:11.920 --> 0:36:13.960
<v Speaker 3>a little bit. It can be difficult, I think, to

0:36:13.960 --> 0:36:17.560
<v Speaker 3>get into real estate, especially the rental game, if you

0:36:17.600 --> 0:36:20.920
<v Speaker 3>are looking at managing properties in an area where there

0:36:20.960 --> 0:36:24.239
<v Speaker 3>are folks departing, where we're seeing more people move out

0:36:24.239 --> 0:36:27.440
<v Speaker 3>than move in. That can make it difficult, right, you're

0:36:27.480 --> 0:36:31.560
<v Speaker 3>just fighting this ongoing headwind. But then beyond that, I mean,

0:36:31.600 --> 0:36:33.760
<v Speaker 3>you can look at some of the different scorecards out there,

0:36:34.600 --> 0:36:37.480
<v Speaker 3>but I think it comes down to if you're saying, well,

0:36:37.520 --> 0:36:39.440
<v Speaker 3>this is something we want to pursue, and she mentioned

0:36:39.440 --> 0:36:41.839
<v Speaker 3>that she's very interested in doing this, it comes down

0:36:41.880 --> 0:36:44.680
<v Speaker 3>to knowing not just the neighborhood, but even the street

0:36:44.840 --> 0:36:48.839
<v Speaker 3>and even specific houses. Any deal Joel that you got

0:36:48.840 --> 0:36:51.200
<v Speaker 3>a great deal on, why was it because you looked

0:36:51.200 --> 0:36:54.360
<v Speaker 3>at some overall general scorecard or was it because you

0:36:54.440 --> 0:36:58.400
<v Speaker 3>spend a lot of time walking, driving the streets, visiting

0:36:58.400 --> 0:37:00.719
<v Speaker 3>the parks even that are in the neighborhood that you're

0:37:00.719 --> 0:37:05.680
<v Speaker 3>thinking about purchasing in. That's a little disc off, shout out, but.

0:37:05.840 --> 0:37:09.440
<v Speaker 1>Knowing knowing, knowing what businesses are are coming into that

0:37:09.480 --> 0:37:13.160
<v Speaker 1>neighborhood and how much likely they're gonna they're gonna raise

0:37:13.360 --> 0:37:17.200
<v Speaker 1>just kind of the expectations and the cool factor right

0:37:17.320 --> 0:37:21.040
<v Speaker 1>of that community. I agree. The other great thing about

0:37:21.080 --> 0:37:23.560
<v Speaker 1>knowing a place street to street and buying where you live, Matt,

0:37:23.560 --> 0:37:26.280
<v Speaker 1>as you know, is you get to self manage and

0:37:26.280 --> 0:37:29.600
<v Speaker 1>and that has just such a huge impact versus you

0:37:29.600 --> 0:37:32.040
<v Speaker 1>could say, oh, the best market to buy in right

0:37:32.080 --> 0:37:35.279
<v Speaker 1>now is Cincinnati, and so I'm going to hire a

0:37:35.280 --> 0:37:37.400
<v Speaker 1>property manager and I'm going to figure out how to

0:37:37.400 --> 0:37:41.359
<v Speaker 1>buy properties in Cincinnati, Ohio. But there are a lot

0:37:41.400 --> 0:37:45.359
<v Speaker 1>of additional costs that come with buying in even if

0:37:45.360 --> 0:37:47.480
<v Speaker 1>it even if the numbers look better on some of

0:37:47.520 --> 0:37:50.560
<v Speaker 1>those homes, those numbers are going to not look nearly

0:37:50.600 --> 0:37:52.480
<v Speaker 1>as good when you factor in property management in the

0:37:52.480 --> 0:37:54.680
<v Speaker 1>fact that you don't know that place nearly as well.

0:37:55.080 --> 0:37:57.840
<v Speaker 1>So is Poughkeepsie as great of a place to invest

0:37:57.920 --> 0:38:01.759
<v Speaker 1>right now as maybe a dozen other cities that I

0:38:01.800 --> 0:38:05.120
<v Speaker 1>could mention to you. Maybe not, but Poughkeepsie has some

0:38:05.160 --> 0:38:07.759
<v Speaker 1>great things going for it, and it's still find a deal,

0:38:08.280 --> 0:38:10.239
<v Speaker 1>they'll want it, And you can always you can find

0:38:10.239 --> 0:38:12.360
<v Speaker 1>a deal in any market, in any place if you

0:38:13.560 --> 0:38:16.080
<v Speaker 1>take the time to really get to know that area

0:38:16.080 --> 0:38:19.840
<v Speaker 1>and you know what you're looking for. But I think

0:38:19.880 --> 0:38:23.279
<v Speaker 1>that the fact that you could self manage and it

0:38:23.360 --> 0:38:25.440
<v Speaker 1>sounds like too one of the things she's intent on

0:38:25.520 --> 0:38:29.480
<v Speaker 1>doing that paying off her mortgage and renting out the

0:38:29.520 --> 0:38:32.040
<v Speaker 1>home they currently live in and buying something else, which

0:38:32.440 --> 0:38:35.000
<v Speaker 1>makes me think that she's going to stay local, be

0:38:35.040 --> 0:38:37.680
<v Speaker 1>able to have this paid off rental property that now

0:38:37.719 --> 0:38:41.439
<v Speaker 1>she is renting out that she knows incredibly well, and

0:38:41.520 --> 0:38:43.799
<v Speaker 1>we have said it doesn't even have to be paid off.

0:38:43.840 --> 0:38:46.400
<v Speaker 1>But like that is the best way for most people

0:38:46.400 --> 0:38:48.719
<v Speaker 1>to get into the rental property game is to own

0:38:48.719 --> 0:38:51.320
<v Speaker 1>a single family home. You've got better financing on that

0:38:51.360 --> 0:38:53.239
<v Speaker 1>property already, You're going to get better financing on the

0:38:53.280 --> 0:38:56.440
<v Speaker 1>next property you buy by renting that puppy out. So

0:38:56.480 --> 0:38:59.120
<v Speaker 1>I think that is investing where you live. That is

0:38:59.160 --> 0:39:02.560
<v Speaker 1>at least a future bar check marks in those boxes

0:39:02.920 --> 0:39:03.960
<v Speaker 1>for going in that direction.

0:39:04.560 --> 0:39:06.680
<v Speaker 3>I will say I'll push back slightly on that and

0:39:06.760 --> 0:39:10.480
<v Speaker 3>say that I want what's Katie. I want Katie to

0:39:10.480 --> 0:39:16.520
<v Speaker 3>consider not just renovating and then renting these properties, Like, Katie,

0:39:16.560 --> 0:39:20.080
<v Speaker 3>I want you to consider renovating and then selling the properties.

0:39:20.320 --> 0:39:22.600
<v Speaker 3>Because in this kind of segues into one of your questions,

0:39:22.640 --> 0:39:26.480
<v Speaker 3>you're asking about, like the tax advantages of owning real estate,

0:39:26.920 --> 0:39:31.000
<v Speaker 3>and there definitely are some right depreciation writing off expenses.

0:39:32.680 --> 0:39:35.760
<v Speaker 3>Even becoming a full time real estate professional, there's a

0:39:35.880 --> 0:39:37.920
<v Speaker 3>high hurdle as far as the number of hours that

0:39:37.960 --> 0:39:40.560
<v Speaker 3>are required in order for you to actually qualify for that.

0:39:41.000 --> 0:39:45.000
<v Speaker 3>In the eyes of the irs. But in my opinion,

0:39:45.040 --> 0:39:47.319
<v Speaker 3>I think the biggest superpower is that when you sell

0:39:47.360 --> 0:39:49.759
<v Speaker 3>your primary home, which means that you've lived in it

0:39:49.760 --> 0:39:52.880
<v Speaker 3>for at least two years as and you mentioned your husband,

0:39:53.400 --> 0:39:56.360
<v Speaker 3>that you two combined can exclude up to five hundred

0:39:56.440 --> 0:39:59.560
<v Speaker 3>thousand dollars in capital gains. There are very few people

0:39:59.600 --> 0:40:01.560
<v Speaker 3>who are willing to do this. But you even mentioned

0:40:02.280 --> 0:40:04.239
<v Speaker 3>you said that you want to move out of the

0:40:04.239 --> 0:40:06.000
<v Speaker 3>house that you're currently in, like you are wanting to

0:40:06.040 --> 0:40:09.440
<v Speaker 3>do this sort of this rinse and repeat sort of method,

0:40:09.680 --> 0:40:11.920
<v Speaker 3>and most people aren't willing to do that.

0:40:12.160 --> 0:40:14.759
<v Speaker 2>And so the fact that you have this desire to like.

0:40:14.719 --> 0:40:16.120
<v Speaker 3>Oh, we want to move in, we want to get

0:40:16.160 --> 0:40:19.799
<v Speaker 3>it looking nice, I think your real superpower is going

0:40:19.840 --> 0:40:23.040
<v Speaker 3>to be the ability to then sell those properties at

0:40:23.080 --> 0:40:27.640
<v Speaker 3>a premium, focusing on neighborhoods that are seeing appreciation their

0:40:27.719 --> 0:40:29.640
<v Speaker 3>up and coming. They're not they're not at the top

0:40:29.640 --> 0:40:32.520
<v Speaker 3>of the market, but they're also not properties where you

0:40:32.600 --> 0:40:34.400
<v Speaker 3>might have to wait a full decade in order to

0:40:34.440 --> 0:40:38.160
<v Speaker 3>see some appreciation there. And as opposed to seeing those

0:40:38.480 --> 0:40:41.759
<v Speaker 3>recurring revenues at cash flow monthly, man, I think you

0:40:41.880 --> 0:40:45.959
<v Speaker 3>have a tremendous ability here, especially if you're leaning into

0:40:45.960 --> 0:40:47.880
<v Speaker 3>doing this with your husband and you're like, oh no,

0:40:47.960 --> 0:40:49.839
<v Speaker 3>we're we like doing stuff around the house. We want

0:40:49.880 --> 0:40:51.640
<v Speaker 3>it to make we want to to make it look.

0:40:51.520 --> 0:40:54.080
<v Speaker 2>A certain way. It's tough to do.

0:40:54.000 --> 0:40:57.040
<v Speaker 3>All that backbreaking work and then start to rent it

0:40:57.560 --> 0:40:59.600
<v Speaker 3>and then see a renter move in who's not going

0:40:59.640 --> 0:41:03.840
<v Speaker 3>to take care that nearly as much as as you did,

0:41:04.000 --> 0:41:08.000
<v Speaker 3>as opposed to listing it and earning all of that

0:41:08.080 --> 0:41:12.120
<v Speaker 3>money tax free. In my opinion, I want you too

0:41:12.120 --> 0:41:16.040
<v Speaker 3>seriously consider doing that as opposed to renting. And maybe

0:41:16.040 --> 0:41:17.680
<v Speaker 3>you're not considering because you didn't know about it. So

0:41:17.760 --> 0:41:19.520
<v Speaker 3>hopefully this at least puts it on your radar.

0:41:19.840 --> 0:41:21.719
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and the Live and Flip, it's something we've talked

0:41:21.719 --> 0:41:24.080
<v Speaker 1>about when we had Carl, our friend mister fifteen hundred

0:41:24.080 --> 0:41:26.080
<v Speaker 1>on the show Jensen, probably a couple of years ago

0:41:26.080 --> 0:41:28.080
<v Speaker 1>at this point, but this is the pattern that he

0:41:28.120 --> 0:41:29.960
<v Speaker 1>lives by, and I think it's a great way to invest,

0:41:30.200 --> 0:41:33.239
<v Speaker 1>especially given kind of the way Katie's talking about this.

0:41:33.360 --> 0:41:36.840
<v Speaker 1>Maybe maybe she doesn't want to manage tenants, but she

0:41:37.680 --> 0:41:39.680
<v Speaker 1>likes to live in the place. They like to diy

0:41:39.800 --> 0:41:42.720
<v Speaker 1>some of these fixes, which means it reduces the cost

0:41:42.760 --> 0:41:44.560
<v Speaker 1>instead of hiring people to come in and do it,

0:41:44.800 --> 0:41:47.640
<v Speaker 1>and you have a longer timeline, which means that you're

0:41:47.680 --> 0:41:51.000
<v Speaker 1>letting the market. General market appreciation is when to you're back,

0:41:51.280 --> 0:41:53.239
<v Speaker 1>along with the fact that you're spending less to do

0:41:53.360 --> 0:41:56.239
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of this renovation work because you've got plenty

0:41:56.280 --> 0:41:57.919
<v Speaker 1>of time to do it. You're doing over the course

0:41:58.280 --> 0:42:00.520
<v Speaker 1>of years, and it's putting a roof over your head

0:42:00.560 --> 0:42:02.280
<v Speaker 1>at the same time. So I think the living flip

0:42:02.800 --> 0:42:05.680
<v Speaker 1>is so underrated, and you're right, Matt. It gives one

0:42:05.680 --> 0:42:08.279
<v Speaker 1>of the best tax advantages that most people don't really

0:42:08.320 --> 0:42:08.719
<v Speaker 1>think about.

0:42:08.800 --> 0:42:11.520
<v Speaker 2>You got a five hundreds or two thousand dollars man, Yeah.

0:42:11.360 --> 0:42:14.120
<v Speaker 1>Like that is just the other best tax benefit incredible

0:42:14.160 --> 0:42:16.399
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't get talked about as much as it should

0:42:16.440 --> 0:42:18.560
<v Speaker 1>is when you die, you get to you get to

0:42:18.560 --> 0:42:20.759
<v Speaker 1>pass on that house tax free if you still if

0:42:20.800 --> 0:42:22.560
<v Speaker 1>you own it. So that's if you have a long

0:42:22.640 --> 0:42:24.759
<v Speaker 1>term rental property where you have tenants in it. The

0:42:25.120 --> 0:42:27.160
<v Speaker 1>step up basis to your airs is a big tax

0:42:27.200 --> 0:42:28.040
<v Speaker 1>benefit of real estate.

0:42:28.400 --> 0:42:31.840
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and then she asked about the equity aspect of it,

0:42:31.840 --> 0:42:33.759
<v Speaker 3>and obviously, if you you know she's talking about hanging

0:42:33.760 --> 0:42:37.600
<v Speaker 3>onto properties, pulling pulling equity out of homes like that

0:42:37.680 --> 0:42:39.319
<v Speaker 3>just comes down to personal risk. It comes down to

0:42:39.360 --> 0:42:41.239
<v Speaker 3>what your financing looks like on this properties, because a

0:42:41.280 --> 0:42:43.000
<v Speaker 3>lot of times you're not going to get nearly as

0:42:43.040 --> 0:42:43.960
<v Speaker 3>good of.

0:42:43.960 --> 0:42:48.080
<v Speaker 2>A rates if you have to pull some of that equity.

0:42:48.520 --> 0:42:50.919
<v Speaker 3>She seems pretty conservative, and so I doubt she's gonna

0:42:50.920 --> 0:42:55.280
<v Speaker 3>put herself in a position to where they're in massively

0:42:55.840 --> 0:42:58.480
<v Speaker 3>disadvantaged sort of loan in order to pull that equity

0:42:58.640 --> 0:43:02.840
<v Speaker 3>equity out to gain the next piece of property. But ultimately,

0:43:02.880 --> 0:43:04.879
<v Speaker 3>I mean, if you think about it, even if you're

0:43:04.880 --> 0:43:07.920
<v Speaker 3>doing the renovate and sell sort of approach, like I

0:43:07.920 --> 0:43:09.760
<v Speaker 3>don't know, like what are you doing with that equity?

0:43:10.800 --> 0:43:12.920
<v Speaker 3>A lot of times you're taking some of those earnings

0:43:12.920 --> 0:43:15.240
<v Speaker 3>and rolling that into the next purchase. Right, maybe it's

0:43:15.239 --> 0:43:18.160
<v Speaker 3>another property that's oh, this one's oh, it's going to

0:43:18.239 --> 0:43:20.560
<v Speaker 3>require a bigger down payment. It's a one hundred two

0:43:20.600 --> 0:43:24.960
<v Speaker 3>hundred thousand dollars more more house, which could also lead

0:43:25.000 --> 0:43:28.560
<v Speaker 3>to even larger amounts of appreciation. So I don't know

0:43:28.560 --> 0:43:30.480
<v Speaker 3>that that was my big on Once I realized that

0:43:30.920 --> 0:43:34.360
<v Speaker 3>they were willing to move every two years, like my

0:43:34.400 --> 0:43:38.240
<v Speaker 3>mind immediately went to the Carl Jensen Live and Flip

0:43:38.320 --> 0:43:41.799
<v Speaker 3>Mister fifteen hundred method, and we'll link to conversations that

0:43:41.800 --> 0:43:43.960
<v Speaker 3>we've had with Carl and the show notes for this episode.

0:43:44.360 --> 0:43:44.640
<v Speaker 2>Katie.

0:43:44.680 --> 0:43:47.120
<v Speaker 1>But it's an underrated thing. I think most people that's

0:43:47.160 --> 0:43:51.040
<v Speaker 1>not kind of the way their mind thinks about. We'll

0:43:51.080 --> 0:43:53.719
<v Speaker 1>do that, but it sure sounds like based on your

0:43:53.800 --> 0:43:57.760
<v Speaker 1>right like to identify that that the way Katie and

0:43:57.880 --> 0:44:02.200
<v Speaker 1>her partner are thinking about the real estate investing future,

0:44:02.840 --> 0:44:04.520
<v Speaker 1>that really could be right up their alley.

0:44:05.160 --> 0:44:07.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, all right, kick us to the brake jewel.

0:44:07.239 --> 0:44:09.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, let's do it. Okay, we got another question specifically,

0:44:09.480 --> 0:44:11.320
<v Speaker 1>we don't talk about this very often, but the bucket

0:44:11.320 --> 0:44:16.239
<v Speaker 1>approach for retirement and how you amass the cash that

0:44:16.280 --> 0:44:19.320
<v Speaker 1>you need. We'll get to questions, more questions, your listener

0:44:19.400 --> 0:44:29.800
<v Speaker 1>questions right after this. All right, buddy, we are.

0:44:30.200 --> 0:44:32.000
<v Speaker 3>Back from the break and it is now time for

0:44:32.000 --> 0:44:35.080
<v Speaker 3>the Facebook Question of the Week and the scene they

0:44:35.120 --> 0:44:37.840
<v Speaker 3>pull it up here. This is from Joe, who writes,

0:44:38.600 --> 0:44:41.000
<v Speaker 3>I often read that when you retire, you should aim

0:44:41.040 --> 0:44:43.880
<v Speaker 3>to hold a significant amount of cash for annual expenses

0:44:43.920 --> 0:44:47.480
<v Speaker 3>between one and three years of expenses to minimize sequence

0:44:47.520 --> 0:44:50.400
<v Speaker 3>of returns risk and avoid rating your retirement accounts in

0:44:50.440 --> 0:44:53.560
<v Speaker 3>a possible market downturn. What I haven't seen explained is

0:44:54.000 --> 0:44:56.880
<v Speaker 3>how to get these cash reserves. Is it something you

0:44:56.920 --> 0:44:59.840
<v Speaker 3>should be building up across a few years before you retire,

0:45:00.200 --> 0:45:03.480
<v Speaker 3>presumably by scaling back investments in favor of holding cash.

0:45:04.000 --> 0:45:06.880
<v Speaker 3>Or are you supposed to make a significant sale of

0:45:06.960 --> 0:45:10.440
<v Speaker 3>mutual funds ets from the accounts you're already able to

0:45:10.560 --> 0:45:13.520
<v Speaker 3>tap right when you retire.

0:45:13.480 --> 0:45:14.440
<v Speaker 2>Right out of the gates.

0:45:14.600 --> 0:45:18.800
<v Speaker 3>I'll just say, Joe, don't wait until you retire, because

0:45:19.719 --> 0:45:21.560
<v Speaker 3>if you do that, you haven't eliminated the sequence of

0:45:21.560 --> 0:45:24.680
<v Speaker 3>returns resk. You've essentially what like, waited until it's retirement time,

0:45:24.719 --> 0:45:26.879
<v Speaker 3>and then all of a sudden you're supposed to sell

0:45:26.920 --> 0:45:28.919
<v Speaker 3>and move to cash. Well, what if the market's down,

0:45:29.280 --> 0:45:31.160
<v Speaker 3>so I would say to gradually ramp it up.

0:45:31.520 --> 0:45:36.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, you're still creating a legitimate point in time where

0:45:36.520 --> 0:45:39.400
<v Speaker 1>you're freaking out about where the market is and whether

0:45:39.560 --> 0:45:42.680
<v Speaker 1>or not you're going to have the have to sell

0:45:42.760 --> 0:45:46.160
<v Speaker 1>right when stocks are down, which is what you want

0:45:46.200 --> 0:45:50.560
<v Speaker 1>to avoid ultimately retirement, And that is what there's a

0:45:50.560 --> 0:45:53.560
<v Speaker 1>two bucket there's a three bucket system that different people

0:45:53.560 --> 0:45:57.719
<v Speaker 1>have discussed. Christine Benz from morning Star has written specifically

0:45:58.120 --> 0:46:01.040
<v Speaker 1>a lot about the bucket approach to funding retirement, and

0:46:01.800 --> 0:46:04.040
<v Speaker 1>it's worth looking into because it at least kind of

0:46:04.040 --> 0:46:10.840
<v Speaker 1>helps you understand how best to allocate certain your money

0:46:11.000 --> 0:46:13.560
<v Speaker 1>in terms of these like, well, there's cash, there's medium

0:46:13.640 --> 0:46:15.359
<v Speaker 1>termament that there's long term. You still want to have

0:46:15.400 --> 0:46:18.719
<v Speaker 1>a good bit of money allocated towards stocks in order

0:46:18.760 --> 0:46:20.920
<v Speaker 1>to fund the rest of your retirement. You want to

0:46:20.960 --> 0:46:25.080
<v Speaker 1>go all conservative all at once. But Joe is specifically

0:46:25.120 --> 0:46:27.920
<v Speaker 1>asking about that first bucket, the cash approach, and I

0:46:27.920 --> 0:46:31.520
<v Speaker 1>think you're right, man. I think increasing cash exposure the

0:46:31.600 --> 0:46:34.040
<v Speaker 1>closer you get to retirement it matters.

0:46:34.080 --> 0:46:34.359
<v Speaker 2>And so.

0:46:35.920 --> 0:46:38.560
<v Speaker 1>You want to have that money, and it depends on

0:46:38.880 --> 0:46:43.600
<v Speaker 1>your risk tolerance. It depends on your overall financial situation,

0:46:43.880 --> 0:46:45.920
<v Speaker 1>Like how many years worth of expenses do you want

0:46:45.920 --> 0:46:48.040
<v Speaker 1>to have on hand in cash, Just like when it

0:46:48.080 --> 0:46:50.759
<v Speaker 1>comes to an emergency fund, three months is kind of right,

0:46:50.800 --> 0:46:53.719
<v Speaker 1>the bare bones of expenses you want to have. Some

0:46:53.760 --> 0:46:56.200
<v Speaker 1>people say I want nine to twelve months. That's what

0:46:56.239 --> 0:46:58.840
<v Speaker 1>makes me feel secure. So you want to think about

0:46:58.840 --> 0:47:01.200
<v Speaker 1>what that looks like you and what's going to make

0:47:01.280 --> 0:47:06.000
<v Speaker 1>retirement not feel like this frightening reality that you've just entered,

0:47:06.680 --> 0:47:08.480
<v Speaker 1>but you do want to be building up that cash

0:47:08.480 --> 0:47:13.480
<v Speaker 1>bucket years potentially in all likelihood before you get there,

0:47:13.719 --> 0:47:15.560
<v Speaker 1>instead of feeling like you have to make a buy

0:47:15.600 --> 0:47:18.319
<v Speaker 1>or sell decision kind of bright when you hit that point.

0:47:18.600 --> 0:47:21.719
<v Speaker 2>That's right. Yeah, the profession is out there will also.

0:47:21.520 --> 0:47:25.280
<v Speaker 3>Say that it doesn't have to be fully in cash,

0:47:25.360 --> 0:47:27.200
<v Speaker 3>because what essentially you want is that you want to

0:47:27.200 --> 0:47:32.000
<v Speaker 3>diversify away from away from stocks, away from securities, so

0:47:32.040 --> 0:47:34.080
<v Speaker 3>that if the market tanks, you've got something else to

0:47:34.160 --> 0:47:37.919
<v Speaker 3>draw on, right, And so bonds, t bills, those are

0:47:38.239 --> 0:47:43.280
<v Speaker 3>that's the other option. Personally, I mean, I'm not retired.

0:47:44.040 --> 0:47:46.960
<v Speaker 3>I haven't gotten to the point to where, you know,

0:47:47.360 --> 0:47:50.000
<v Speaker 3>I'm having to deal with the emotions of what this

0:47:50.080 --> 0:47:54.759
<v Speaker 3>feels like. But I love the idea of staying very aggressive,

0:47:54.840 --> 0:48:00.719
<v Speaker 3>staying very aggressive with securities, staying invested in stocks, not

0:48:00.840 --> 0:48:03.799
<v Speaker 3>having bonds or any T bills or anything like that,

0:48:04.040 --> 0:48:06.440
<v Speaker 3>and only having the cash on hand, maybe having a

0:48:06.440 --> 0:48:09.879
<v Speaker 3>slightly larger cash cushion to be able to offset any

0:48:09.920 --> 0:48:12.360
<v Speaker 3>potential downturns and to allow for the market to be

0:48:12.400 --> 0:48:15.719
<v Speaker 3>able to rebound to at most maybe three years before

0:48:15.719 --> 0:48:18.839
<v Speaker 3>you see the market recover. But what you're giving up

0:48:18.840 --> 0:48:23.560
<v Speaker 3>there is the comfort of having something that's less aggressively

0:48:23.600 --> 0:48:25.719
<v Speaker 3>because on one end you got very aggressively invested. On

0:48:25.760 --> 0:48:28.359
<v Speaker 3>the other hand, you have something that's completely cash, that's

0:48:28.440 --> 0:48:32.120
<v Speaker 3>very liquid, very accessible, and then you've got the in between,

0:48:32.680 --> 0:48:35.800
<v Speaker 3>and there's something about the two buckets, like all stocks

0:48:35.880 --> 0:48:39.600
<v Speaker 3>and then all cash. I like the simplicity of that.

0:48:39.800 --> 0:48:43.520
<v Speaker 3>We'll see if and when or when I get to retirement,

0:48:43.520 --> 0:48:46.479
<v Speaker 3>if that's something that I'm comfortable with, I might change

0:48:46.480 --> 0:48:47.040
<v Speaker 3>my tune.

0:48:47.239 --> 0:48:49.359
<v Speaker 2>But I don't know. Personally, I like that.

0:48:49.840 --> 0:48:51.880
<v Speaker 1>I think one of the things that's worth maybe doing

0:48:51.960 --> 0:48:54.319
<v Speaker 1>is going through an exercise with the amount of money

0:48:54.320 --> 0:48:56.080
<v Speaker 1>that you have on hand. You can even use an

0:48:56.120 --> 0:48:59.279
<v Speaker 1>AI model to kind of help you help you look

0:48:59.320 --> 0:49:01.319
<v Speaker 1>at this. But if you were to say, live through

0:49:01.800 --> 0:49:05.160
<v Speaker 1>the Great Recession of two thousand and nine, what would

0:49:05.160 --> 0:49:07.919
<v Speaker 1>happen to your portfolio if you were one hundred percent

0:49:08.000 --> 0:49:10.000
<v Speaker 1>stocks in two years worth of cash on hand, and

0:49:10.040 --> 0:49:12.000
<v Speaker 1>how would you feel about that? How would you feel

0:49:12.080 --> 0:49:15.600
<v Speaker 1>about a fifty three percent decline that's probably roughly what

0:49:15.640 --> 0:49:20.040
<v Speaker 1>you would have experienced four years right where the market

0:49:20.040 --> 0:49:23.880
<v Speaker 1>would not have gotten back to two two thousand and

0:49:23.920 --> 0:49:27.360
<v Speaker 1>seven levels until I don't know, twenty fourteen. So I

0:49:28.360 --> 0:49:33.200
<v Speaker 1>think it's worth running through those experiments to see, okay,

0:49:33.400 --> 0:49:35.560
<v Speaker 1>based on if I were to go through that exact

0:49:35.600 --> 0:49:37.279
<v Speaker 1>same scenario, because it's really easy to look at the

0:49:37.320 --> 0:49:39.719
<v Speaker 1>last six years and say or the last fifteen kind

0:49:39.760 --> 0:49:41.080
<v Speaker 1>of and say, well, we had that you know, one

0:49:41.160 --> 0:49:42.759
<v Speaker 1>or two down years, but for the most part, it's

0:49:42.800 --> 0:49:44.600
<v Speaker 1>been up into the right. Well, what if we do

0:49:44.680 --> 0:49:47.400
<v Speaker 1>go through some sort of extended downturn, how would you

0:49:47.400 --> 0:49:51.120
<v Speaker 1>feel selling stocks when they're down thirty forty percent? And

0:49:51.239 --> 0:49:54.200
<v Speaker 1>if that would be untenable and you would quickly run

0:49:54.239 --> 0:49:58.719
<v Speaker 1>out of money because you did encounter that sequence of

0:49:58.719 --> 0:50:00.200
<v Speaker 1>returns risk and you ate into a lot of that

0:50:00.239 --> 0:50:03.800
<v Speaker 1>capital that has long term consequences. So you have to understand,

0:50:03.800 --> 0:50:07.520
<v Speaker 1>like what you're comfortable with and Matt's level of comfort

0:50:07.560 --> 0:50:10.080
<v Speaker 1>with more risk on it might not be where you're at.

0:50:10.200 --> 0:50:11.880
<v Speaker 1>And that's where something else to Matt. And actually I'm

0:50:11.880 --> 0:50:14.080
<v Speaker 1>going to talk about this with Gene Chatsky soon on

0:50:14.120 --> 0:50:18.480
<v Speaker 1>the show. She talks about a portion of the money

0:50:18.480 --> 0:50:23.520
<v Speaker 1>that you have allocated for retirement keeping a big a

0:50:23.560 --> 0:50:26.560
<v Speaker 1>bunch of it in stocks, taking Social Security obviously, but

0:50:26.600 --> 0:50:29.880
<v Speaker 1>then annuititizing a portion of it. And she talks about

0:50:29.880 --> 0:50:33.120
<v Speaker 1>how the paying a little bit more money and limiting

0:50:33.120 --> 0:50:36.000
<v Speaker 1>your upside will create this steady paycheck that allows you

0:50:36.040 --> 0:50:38.320
<v Speaker 1>to continue spending no matter what, and it allows you

0:50:38.360 --> 0:50:40.920
<v Speaker 1>to kind of stay risk on with that big stock

0:50:40.960 --> 0:50:44.040
<v Speaker 1>section of your assets. And I think there's some wisdom

0:50:44.080 --> 0:50:46.160
<v Speaker 1>there too. It's not for everyone, but I do think

0:50:46.160 --> 0:50:46.960
<v Speaker 1>it's for some people.

0:50:47.160 --> 0:50:47.919
<v Speaker 2>Totally. Yeah.

0:50:48.280 --> 0:50:51.320
<v Speaker 3>I mean we've touched on this last Friday, the pensonification

0:50:51.600 --> 0:50:52.759
<v Speaker 3>of four ks, and.

0:50:54.239 --> 0:50:55.719
<v Speaker 2>But oh, I wanted to also say.

0:50:55.760 --> 0:50:58.879
<v Speaker 3>It comes down to so I as I was thinking

0:50:58.880 --> 0:51:01.960
<v Speaker 3>about myself and imagining what I would feel like, I

0:51:02.040 --> 0:51:06.560
<v Speaker 3>realized that I was I'm also picturing myself the age

0:51:06.560 --> 0:51:09.719
<v Speaker 3>I am, which is Joel. I still feel like a

0:51:09.760 --> 0:51:11.920
<v Speaker 3>young buck and I know you do too, but your

0:51:11.960 --> 0:51:16.920
<v Speaker 3>ability to generate income if you need to, right, So

0:51:17.320 --> 0:51:21.000
<v Speaker 3>I think about Okay, let's Joel, Joe, let's say the iHeart.

0:51:21.200 --> 0:51:23.520
<v Speaker 3>They're tired of us, they're tired of the banter. They

0:51:23.560 --> 0:51:25.560
<v Speaker 3>don't like us helping folks out when it comes to

0:51:25.560 --> 0:51:28.200
<v Speaker 3>personal finances, and they want to cut us free. We

0:51:28.239 --> 0:51:31.480
<v Speaker 3>can't work out a deal Okay, I don't know. We're

0:51:31.600 --> 0:51:33.120
<v Speaker 3>you and I were kind of coast fire. We're kind

0:51:33.160 --> 0:51:35.520
<v Speaker 3>of we're kind of fully fire to a certain extent.

0:51:35.520 --> 0:51:37.480
<v Speaker 3>Depending on what our future expenses are going to look like,

0:51:37.560 --> 0:51:39.920
<v Speaker 3>right like, there are changes we can make and modifications

0:51:40.160 --> 0:51:41.879
<v Speaker 3>to where we can just be like, all right, we're done.

0:51:42.800 --> 0:51:45.880
<v Speaker 3>But let's say the market tanks and we're like, oh, shoot,

0:51:46.080 --> 0:51:47.200
<v Speaker 3>I wasn't counting on that.

0:51:47.760 --> 0:51:48.480
<v Speaker 2>I don't have my.

0:51:48.440 --> 0:51:51.080
<v Speaker 3>Three years of cash on hand even that. Well, my

0:51:51.200 --> 0:51:53.719
<v Speaker 3>ability to get back out into the market and find

0:51:53.719 --> 0:51:56.560
<v Speaker 3>a way to generate income in order to offset some

0:51:56.680 --> 0:51:59.719
<v Speaker 3>of those sequence of returns risk, that's really important too.

0:51:59.719 --> 0:52:03.360
<v Speaker 3>And you can't overly rely on that, because right like,

0:52:03.400 --> 0:52:06.360
<v Speaker 3>you're fully relying on your human capital and your ability

0:52:06.400 --> 0:52:10.000
<v Speaker 3>to get out their work. But that's another consideration. And

0:52:10.040 --> 0:52:12.960
<v Speaker 3>for someone like Joe who maybe is a little bit

0:52:13.000 --> 0:52:16.720
<v Speaker 3>younger like us and still has ten twenty year maybe

0:52:16.760 --> 0:52:22.520
<v Speaker 3>more of decades two three decades worth of his career left, gosh,

0:52:22.560 --> 0:52:24.640
<v Speaker 3>you know, you can start to move it in that

0:52:24.719 --> 0:52:27.920
<v Speaker 3>direction of moving towards cash, or you could also continue

0:52:27.920 --> 0:52:30.520
<v Speaker 3>to stay aggressively invested and say, oh, right, sure do

0:52:30.560 --> 0:52:33.480
<v Speaker 3>I even if I'm not making the optimal top dollar amount.

0:52:33.719 --> 0:52:35.239
<v Speaker 3>Do I still have a way to cover some of

0:52:35.280 --> 0:52:37.319
<v Speaker 3>the basic expenses? And I think a lot of folks

0:52:37.360 --> 0:52:38.759
<v Speaker 3>would say, oh yeah, I think I could. I think

0:52:38.760 --> 0:52:42.080
<v Speaker 3>I could do that. That actually sounds desirable as opposed to

0:52:42.480 --> 0:52:46.120
<v Speaker 3>flipping the switch and going all in on retirement, right

0:52:46.160 --> 0:52:48.400
<v Speaker 3>retirement maxing, We're not going to do that. Instead, let's like,

0:52:48.800 --> 0:52:49.799
<v Speaker 3>let's ease into it.

0:52:49.920 --> 0:52:52.880
<v Speaker 1>Right's the one I think the operation is key inhering

0:52:52.920 --> 0:52:55.719
<v Speaker 1>in this question is like, as I'm getting closer to retirement,

0:52:55.800 --> 0:52:58.480
<v Speaker 1>and the truth is, your value in the marketplace is different,

0:52:58.480 --> 0:53:02.160
<v Speaker 1>looks different when you're sixty five or than it does

0:53:02.200 --> 0:53:04.920
<v Speaker 1>when you're forty, and your confidence level that you can

0:53:04.960 --> 0:53:06.680
<v Speaker 1>go out there and earn the income you used to

0:53:06.800 --> 0:53:09.600
<v Speaker 1>if you were to say, lose your job, or just

0:53:09.719 --> 0:53:12.560
<v Speaker 1>the kind of level of gumption you have to go

0:53:12.640 --> 0:53:15.960
<v Speaker 1>out there and slay like you used to. Like it

0:53:16.080 --> 0:53:19.000
<v Speaker 1>just goes it just goes down, I think later on

0:53:19.200 --> 0:53:21.840
<v Speaker 1>in life for a lot of people. And so that's

0:53:21.880 --> 0:53:25.960
<v Speaker 1>why you have to kind of at least plan and

0:53:26.239 --> 0:53:30.239
<v Speaker 1>incorporate worst case scenarios or tough scenarios into the way

0:53:30.280 --> 0:53:33.239
<v Speaker 1>that you plan, because yeah, you're not guaranteed to find

0:53:33.239 --> 0:53:35.319
<v Speaker 1>the job that pays as much as you had if

0:53:35.320 --> 0:53:37.680
<v Speaker 1>you were to lose one in your late fifties early sixties.

0:53:37.719 --> 0:53:39.560
<v Speaker 1>And so there is a certain amount of kind of

0:53:39.640 --> 0:53:42.000
<v Speaker 1>flexibility you have to have, I think in your approach

0:53:42.040 --> 0:53:46.520
<v Speaker 1>to bucket planning and how you think about retirement and

0:53:46.800 --> 0:53:49.520
<v Speaker 1>the flexibility you want versus the returns you want to see.

0:53:50.160 --> 0:53:53.840
<v Speaker 1>But so I think there is no like one simple

0:53:53.880 --> 0:53:57.040
<v Speaker 1>easy answer, but these are all things worth considering as

0:53:57.080 --> 0:53:58.000
<v Speaker 1>you're making your own plan.

0:53:58.480 --> 0:54:00.920
<v Speaker 3>Totally agree, all right, dude, should we wrap this up

0:54:00.960 --> 0:54:02.800
<v Speaker 3>and get to the beer that you and I enjoyed

0:54:03.400 --> 0:54:07.080
<v Speaker 3>during this episode. This is a lakeside coolsh by Lake

0:54:07.120 --> 0:54:10.279
<v Speaker 3>of the Woods Brewing Company. And again this was a

0:54:10.280 --> 0:54:16.600
<v Speaker 3>beer that was sent to us by David S in Keswick, Ontario. David,

0:54:16.680 --> 0:54:19.080
<v Speaker 3>are you trying to get us canceled? Because Joel, what

0:54:19.080 --> 0:54:22.359
<v Speaker 3>we didn't talk about was last week because the name

0:54:22.400 --> 0:54:28.000
<v Speaker 3>of the beer was borderline profane. We never said it,

0:54:29.080 --> 0:54:32.839
<v Speaker 3>but I stupidly perhaps included the name of the beer

0:54:32.840 --> 0:54:34.080
<v Speaker 3>in the show notes because I just didn't That's just

0:54:34.120 --> 0:54:36.839
<v Speaker 3>what I always do. Should have done a with two

0:54:36.880 --> 0:54:39.040
<v Speaker 3>dollars signs, Matt, Well, I know that now or like

0:54:39.040 --> 0:54:43.359
<v Speaker 3>the two asterisks, but that episode got flagged. We had

0:54:43.360 --> 0:54:45.920
<v Speaker 3>the E next to it, like straight out of Compton,

0:54:46.000 --> 0:54:48.840
<v Speaker 3>you know, so, and that limits our reach and so

0:54:48.920 --> 0:54:51.800
<v Speaker 3>we're absolutely I don't know. We can have fun conversation,

0:54:51.920 --> 0:54:54.319
<v Speaker 3>colorful conversations more, we're not rolling, but I don't want

0:54:54.320 --> 0:54:58.760
<v Speaker 3>to do anything to jeopardize our ability to help people. David,

0:54:59.160 --> 0:55:02.120
<v Speaker 3>did Apple ever or take that off the episode?

0:55:02.200 --> 0:55:05.800
<v Speaker 2>Or no, I don't. I didn't check. We should probably

0:55:05.800 --> 0:55:06.239
<v Speaker 2>care more.

0:55:06.640 --> 0:55:09.280
<v Speaker 3>I think I think it's fine, maybe because I changed

0:55:09.280 --> 0:55:11.279
<v Speaker 3>it because once I saw that that morning, I changed

0:55:11.280 --> 0:55:14.560
<v Speaker 3>it immediately to I took off the S S and

0:55:14.880 --> 0:55:15.279
<v Speaker 3>left the A.

0:55:17.160 --> 0:55:19.920
<v Speaker 1>It's so funny. Yeah, we're trying to anyway create an

0:55:19.920 --> 0:55:23.239
<v Speaker 1>explicit podcast mostly mass Mom will be disappointed, and we

0:55:23.239 --> 0:55:24.680
<v Speaker 1>don't want to do that to hert.

0:55:24.719 --> 0:55:26.040
<v Speaker 3>We need all the help we can get. We need

0:55:26.080 --> 0:55:28.719
<v Speaker 3>all the viewers, all the listeners. So what do you

0:55:28.719 --> 0:55:29.399
<v Speaker 3>think about this beer?

0:55:29.400 --> 0:55:29.600
<v Speaker 5>Though?

0:55:30.200 --> 0:55:34.080
<v Speaker 1>I man, it was light. We had like a juicy

0:55:34.160 --> 0:55:36.320
<v Speaker 1>quality to it that I wasn't expecting. It was crisp,

0:55:36.320 --> 0:55:39.040
<v Speaker 1>but it also had this kind of lemone juiciness underbelly,

0:55:39.480 --> 0:55:43.480
<v Speaker 1>so very wet. Yeah, I was kind of not expecting

0:55:43.520 --> 0:55:46.880
<v Speaker 1>that from a coolsh This had more flavor than I

0:55:47.000 --> 0:55:47.839
<v Speaker 1>was anticipating.

0:55:47.960 --> 0:55:51.319
<v Speaker 3>I I loved it, very delicious. They had they got

0:55:51.320 --> 0:55:54.799
<v Speaker 3>like a little like outboard boat motor on the on

0:55:54.840 --> 0:55:56.440
<v Speaker 3>the cannart. That's what that is, by the way, if

0:55:56.440 --> 0:55:58.640
<v Speaker 3>you didn't recognize that. But this is totally kind of

0:55:58.680 --> 0:56:01.120
<v Speaker 3>beer that you would enjoy lakeside, sitting on the dock

0:56:01.480 --> 0:56:04.440
<v Speaker 3>out cruising with your friends, even though I haven't done

0:56:04.480 --> 0:56:08.719
<v Speaker 3>that in like fifteen years. Do you ever do y'all

0:56:08.719 --> 0:56:10.600
<v Speaker 3>ever go out on the boat, like rent a boat

0:56:10.719 --> 0:56:11.359
<v Speaker 3>or have friends?

0:56:11.360 --> 0:56:11.879
<v Speaker 2>I have a boat.

0:56:12.280 --> 0:56:14.440
<v Speaker 1>No, I did when I was a kid, and I

0:56:14.719 --> 0:56:17.520
<v Speaker 1>remember having the best time. My wife's fund similarly had

0:56:17.520 --> 0:56:20.320
<v Speaker 1>the best memories from that. But it's it's.

0:56:20.120 --> 0:56:22.319
<v Speaker 3>Just not tafe. Yeah, it's not part of all life either.

0:56:22.360 --> 0:56:23.840
<v Speaker 3>I take it back that we went out with some

0:56:23.880 --> 0:56:27.239
<v Speaker 3>friends end of the school year, like two years ago

0:56:27.280 --> 0:56:29.360
<v Speaker 3>or something like that. But it's not, Yes, it's not.

0:56:29.400 --> 0:56:33.359
<v Speaker 3>We're not like a boat family, so extended family. They

0:56:33.360 --> 0:56:33.919
<v Speaker 3>are a boat family.

0:56:33.920 --> 0:56:35.840
<v Speaker 1>But because you're trying not to be poor, that's why,

0:56:36.120 --> 0:56:39.120
<v Speaker 1>because I want sitting boats makes you want to get

0:56:39.160 --> 0:56:43.040
<v Speaker 1>fully retired before I start just pure fully hemorrhaging money,

0:56:43.040 --> 0:56:44.400
<v Speaker 1>which is what happens.

0:56:44.040 --> 0:56:45.600
<v Speaker 3>When you get a boat and then have to pay

0:56:45.600 --> 0:56:48.920
<v Speaker 3>for the slip, and then your entire day is dedicated

0:56:49.000 --> 0:56:50.839
<v Speaker 3>to taking care of the book. Actually, if anyone's got

0:56:50.840 --> 0:56:52.600
<v Speaker 3>any good boat stories out there, once you send them

0:56:52.640 --> 0:56:55.359
<v Speaker 3>away at how to Money Pod at gmail dot com.

0:56:55.360 --> 0:56:57.480
<v Speaker 3>That's also how you can send us your voice memo

0:56:57.880 --> 0:57:00.920
<v Speaker 3>if you want us to answer your question here on

0:57:00.960 --> 0:57:04.760
<v Speaker 3>the show, also here on YouTube for all the viewers

0:57:04.800 --> 0:57:07.719
<v Speaker 3>out there as well, head over to the how to

0:57:07.800 --> 0:57:11.800
<v Speaker 3>Money Pod channel at YouTube or slowly but surely getting

0:57:11.800 --> 0:57:13.960
<v Speaker 3>this thing dialed in. Even though we kind of had

0:57:13.960 --> 0:57:16.000
<v Speaker 3>a rough start for this one, I would say, Joel,

0:57:17.600 --> 0:57:19.720
<v Speaker 3>but we'd love it if you joined us over there.

0:57:20.480 --> 0:57:22.000
<v Speaker 2>And is that it?

0:57:22.480 --> 0:57:25.840
<v Speaker 1>That's it, man a Right until next time? Best friends out.

0:57:25.880 --> 0:57:29.960
<v Speaker 2>Best friends out? Oh shoot the music? Where is it?

0:57:30.280 --> 0:57:30.720
<v Speaker 2>Here we go?

0:57:32.520 --> 0:57:33.280
<v Speaker 1>We're so good at this.

0:57:38.000 --> 0:57:40.200
<v Speaker 3>I was just bragging about how like we've gotten better,

0:57:40.240 --> 0:57:41.720
<v Speaker 3>and then I just totally botch it there at.

0:57:41.680 --> 0:57:44.120
<v Speaker 1>The end of you can't be perfect, can't be perfect?

0:57:44.480 --> 0:57:45.160
<v Speaker 2>All right, Later