1 00:00:02,480 --> 00:00:06,800 Speaker 1: Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio news. 2 00:00:09,640 --> 00:00:12,840 Speaker 2: This is the Bloomberg Daybreak Asia podcast. I'm Doug Krisner. 3 00:00:12,920 --> 00:00:15,400 Speaker 2: You can join Brian Curtis and myself for the stories, 4 00:00:15,440 --> 00:00:18,520 Speaker 2: making news and moving markets in the APAC region. You 5 00:00:18,600 --> 00:00:21,439 Speaker 2: can subscribe to the show anywhere you get your podcast 6 00:00:21,520 --> 00:00:24,919 Speaker 2: and always on Bloomberg Radio, the Bloomberg Terminal, and the 7 00:00:24,920 --> 00:00:28,640 Speaker 2: Bloomberg Business App. Let's bring in our guest. I'm Ed 8 00:00:28,680 --> 00:00:32,040 Speaker 2: de Riesgo is with us. He is the CIO of Insignio, 9 00:00:32,200 --> 00:00:36,199 Speaker 2: joining us from Miami, Florida. Ahmed, thank you so much 10 00:00:36,240 --> 00:00:38,280 Speaker 2: for being with us. Help me make sense of some 11 00:00:38,400 --> 00:00:40,960 Speaker 2: of the price action that we have seen in the 12 00:00:41,040 --> 00:00:43,640 Speaker 2: last several hours. I mean, a lot of the yen 13 00:00:43,760 --> 00:00:46,720 Speaker 2: carried trade being on wound, concern about the FED being 14 00:00:46,840 --> 00:00:50,440 Speaker 2: behind the curve, maybe some criticism on the part of 15 00:00:50,479 --> 00:00:52,279 Speaker 2: the Bank of Japan. How do you make sense of this? 16 00:00:53,520 --> 00:00:53,720 Speaker 3: Right? 17 00:00:53,800 --> 00:00:57,080 Speaker 4: So, obviously, when markets have the run that they've had 18 00:00:57,080 --> 00:00:59,320 Speaker 4: over the past couple of days, people are always searching 19 00:00:59,360 --> 00:01:03,840 Speaker 4: and grasping for answers. Let's kind of cut through the noise. Certainly, 20 00:01:03,920 --> 00:01:07,959 Speaker 4: there's been a repricing of US recessionary risks. A lot 21 00:01:08,000 --> 00:01:10,959 Speaker 4: of that due to the weak employment report, but you're 22 00:01:11,000 --> 00:01:14,840 Speaker 4: seeing some of the moves being exacerbated by technicals and 23 00:01:14,959 --> 00:01:18,760 Speaker 4: other trading elements, such as the unwinding of yen carry 24 00:01:18,800 --> 00:01:22,080 Speaker 4: trades around the world, which have exacerbated the losses in 25 00:01:22,120 --> 00:01:24,880 Speaker 4: some of the more high flying sectors. And usually when 26 00:01:24,959 --> 00:01:26,720 Speaker 4: you do get a margin call and you need to 27 00:01:26,760 --> 00:01:31,119 Speaker 4: unwind carry trade, you usually seek to sell what has 28 00:01:31,160 --> 00:01:33,360 Speaker 4: been performing the best, and obviously the MAC seven, the 29 00:01:33,400 --> 00:01:36,479 Speaker 4: megacap techs would certainly qualify for that a little lately, 30 00:01:36,520 --> 00:01:38,600 Speaker 4: they've obviously given back a lot of their gains for 31 00:01:38,680 --> 00:01:39,000 Speaker 4: the year. 32 00:01:40,400 --> 00:01:44,200 Speaker 1: What is your sense of the recession risks in the 33 00:01:44,319 --> 00:01:47,360 Speaker 1: US now given the jobs print though, I mean, the 34 00:01:47,400 --> 00:01:51,240 Speaker 1: market reaction has been seen as a bit overdone. People 35 00:01:51,280 --> 00:01:54,680 Speaker 1: have called it an overreaction, but some of the recession 36 00:01:54,800 --> 00:01:57,480 Speaker 1: indicators are also flashing warning signs. 37 00:01:58,560 --> 00:02:01,240 Speaker 4: Yeah. So we've sort of had the long held view 38 00:02:01,320 --> 00:02:04,480 Speaker 4: here at Insignia throughout the year that the market has 39 00:02:04,520 --> 00:02:09,040 Speaker 4: been systematically under pricing recession risks. The market was basically 40 00:02:09,520 --> 00:02:12,839 Speaker 4: priced for a Goldilock scenario, a situation where the FED 41 00:02:12,919 --> 00:02:15,440 Speaker 4: was going to be able to cut rates and the 42 00:02:15,480 --> 00:02:18,880 Speaker 4: economy was going to slow but slow just enough to 43 00:02:18,880 --> 00:02:21,880 Speaker 4: not trigger an outright contraction. We always thought that that 44 00:02:22,080 --> 00:02:25,240 Speaker 4: was a little bit too thin of a needle to thread, 45 00:02:25,560 --> 00:02:27,760 Speaker 4: and so we do think that some of those ricks 46 00:02:27,800 --> 00:02:31,040 Speaker 4: are being priced in currently where things stand in our 47 00:02:31,200 --> 00:02:34,280 Speaker 4: subjective recession and probabilities, we kind of have the probability 48 00:02:34,280 --> 00:02:37,440 Speaker 4: of a US recession packed at forty percent, So we 49 00:02:37,520 --> 00:02:42,000 Speaker 4: still think it's there's some runway for this to price out. 50 00:02:42,200 --> 00:02:44,120 Speaker 4: I think this growth scare is going to last for 51 00:02:44,160 --> 00:02:45,960 Speaker 4: a while, and the volatility in markets is going to 52 00:02:46,000 --> 00:02:48,320 Speaker 4: last for a while until we definitively get some word 53 00:02:48,440 --> 00:02:50,680 Speaker 4: as to whether or not finally the US will fall 54 00:02:50,720 --> 00:02:51,640 Speaker 4: into recession or not. 55 00:02:52,280 --> 00:02:56,959 Speaker 1: Okay, amid this period of adjustment, for I think both 56 00:02:57,080 --> 00:03:01,400 Speaker 1: monetary policy into the economy as well as the market reaction. 57 00:03:02,000 --> 00:03:04,400 Speaker 1: Do you think the Federal Reserve is, you know, just 58 00:03:04,400 --> 00:03:06,560 Speaker 1: going to ignore what we're seeing in markets. 59 00:03:07,720 --> 00:03:10,840 Speaker 4: Well, they have to uh again here, they also need 60 00:03:10,880 --> 00:03:13,480 Speaker 4: to walk a fine line because the FED has ramored 61 00:03:13,480 --> 00:03:17,320 Speaker 4: two mandates. It's not just obviously preventing recessions but also 62 00:03:17,520 --> 00:03:20,400 Speaker 4: maintaining inflation under control. I think if you were to 63 00:03:20,520 --> 00:03:24,480 Speaker 4: ask the FED in a quiet room with with with 64 00:03:24,520 --> 00:03:27,560 Speaker 4: no reporters, they would probably tell you, Look, we're willing 65 00:03:27,600 --> 00:03:29,880 Speaker 4: to risk the chances of a mild recession as long 66 00:03:29,919 --> 00:03:33,560 Speaker 4: as we get inflation under control and inflation expectations under control. 67 00:03:33,800 --> 00:03:36,880 Speaker 4: They don't want those unanchored. It's much more difficult for 68 00:03:36,920 --> 00:03:40,160 Speaker 4: the FED to bring those back under control. If they 69 00:03:40,200 --> 00:03:42,520 Speaker 4: were to shoot up again, then it is for the 70 00:03:42,560 --> 00:03:45,280 Speaker 4: FED to cut rates in the face of a mild recession. 71 00:03:45,320 --> 00:03:48,360 Speaker 4: So the risks to them, I think they rather err 72 00:03:48,440 --> 00:03:50,880 Speaker 4: on the side of causing a mild recession if that 73 00:03:51,080 --> 00:03:55,080 Speaker 4: means finally being able to put it put the inflation 74 00:03:55,160 --> 00:03:56,080 Speaker 4: genie back in the bottle. 75 00:03:56,120 --> 00:03:56,320 Speaker 1: Now. 76 00:03:56,360 --> 00:04:00,320 Speaker 4: Obviously they would prefer the scenario where they can thread 77 00:04:00,320 --> 00:04:02,720 Speaker 4: the needle, but that is exceedingly difficult to do. 78 00:04:02,920 --> 00:04:04,960 Speaker 2: So I'm seeing a recovery right now in the many 79 00:04:05,040 --> 00:04:07,960 Speaker 2: futures contracts for the American market that would imply some 80 00:04:08,000 --> 00:04:12,240 Speaker 2: positivity in the Tuesday session. Does tech regain leadership here 81 00:04:12,280 --> 00:04:14,360 Speaker 2: on the upside, Well. 82 00:04:14,200 --> 00:04:16,159 Speaker 4: I think you could see a bit of a bounce 83 00:04:16,680 --> 00:04:19,200 Speaker 4: in tech. Obviously they've had a very strong sell off, 84 00:04:19,240 --> 00:04:23,159 Speaker 4: so the technicals look oversold in that space. Now for 85 00:04:23,240 --> 00:04:26,240 Speaker 4: them to regain market leadership the way that they were 86 00:04:26,279 --> 00:04:29,120 Speaker 4: earlier in the year that I also find exceedingly difficult. 87 00:04:29,120 --> 00:04:31,839 Speaker 4: I think it's much more likely that you've passed the 88 00:04:31,839 --> 00:04:34,839 Speaker 4: baton onto new sectors. Some of the sectors we like 89 00:04:34,960 --> 00:04:36,760 Speaker 4: for the rest of the year are some of the 90 00:04:36,760 --> 00:04:40,200 Speaker 4: more defensive sectors of the market. We especially like utilities, 91 00:04:40,800 --> 00:04:44,440 Speaker 4: we like healthcare, and we like the consumer staples. 92 00:04:44,880 --> 00:04:47,039 Speaker 1: What about the price action that we've been seeing in 93 00:04:47,080 --> 00:04:52,240 Speaker 1: the past three sessions today excluding in Japan, do you 94 00:04:52,279 --> 00:04:56,400 Speaker 1: think that is also an overreaction by markets or is 95 00:04:56,440 --> 00:04:58,840 Speaker 1: it more this triple whammy of the FED moving to 96 00:04:58,960 --> 00:05:01,800 Speaker 1: slow and the boj maybe being too aggressive on hikes. 97 00:05:02,680 --> 00:05:05,040 Speaker 4: Yeah. I think what you're likely to see here in 98 00:05:05,120 --> 00:05:08,320 Speaker 4: the days ahead, which is, if the end continues its 99 00:05:08,440 --> 00:05:12,320 Speaker 4: meteoric rise, you could put you could potentially see some 100 00:05:12,440 --> 00:05:16,359 Speaker 4: central bank intervention, led by the Bank of Japan, because 101 00:05:16,360 --> 00:05:18,120 Speaker 4: I do think you know, just a few days ago, 102 00:05:18,360 --> 00:05:21,279 Speaker 4: the central bank governor in Japan was was was warning 103 00:05:21,279 --> 00:05:25,279 Speaker 4: that the end was too weak. Now it's you know, 104 00:05:25,400 --> 00:05:29,240 Speaker 4: too strong to move is important. Remember with currency moves, uh, 105 00:05:29,560 --> 00:05:32,200 Speaker 4: the magnitude is important, and the slope of the curve 106 00:05:32,279 --> 00:05:36,000 Speaker 4: is important. If they're too quick, too fast, that's disruptive 107 00:05:36,040 --> 00:05:39,840 Speaker 4: for the financial system. It's disruptive for societies, so central 108 00:05:39,839 --> 00:05:41,960 Speaker 4: banks don't like to see that. So yes, I would 109 00:05:42,000 --> 00:05:45,120 Speaker 4: think that some of that trade would slightly be reversed 110 00:05:45,120 --> 00:05:48,520 Speaker 4: here and you could see the Japanese equity market rebound here. 111 00:05:48,600 --> 00:05:51,800 Speaker 4: I have to say, on a longer term basis, we 112 00:05:51,880 --> 00:05:54,440 Speaker 4: do find the Japanese equity market to be quite attractive. 113 00:05:54,440 --> 00:05:57,359 Speaker 4: We think some of the fundamentals there position it for 114 00:05:57,440 --> 00:06:00,000 Speaker 4: being for being one of the better performing equity marks 115 00:06:00,400 --> 00:06:03,120 Speaker 4: over the next several years despite this current episode. 116 00:06:03,200 --> 00:06:04,880 Speaker 2: I'm ed good stuff. Thank you so much for being 117 00:06:04,880 --> 00:06:09,160 Speaker 2: with us. I'm Ed Riesgo. He is the CIO of Insignio, 118 00:06:09,279 --> 00:06:19,760 Speaker 2: joining us from Miami, Florida. Nick showen Maker, he is 119 00:06:19,880 --> 00:06:24,520 Speaker 2: client portfolio manager at Drummond Capital. He joins us from Sydney, Neck. 120 00:06:24,560 --> 00:06:27,600 Speaker 2: Thanks for making time. It seems like a perfect storm 121 00:06:27,760 --> 00:06:30,359 Speaker 2: over the last couple of hours. I mean, how do 122 00:06:30,400 --> 00:06:32,360 Speaker 2: you make sense of the price action right now? 123 00:06:33,920 --> 00:06:37,120 Speaker 5: Yeah, good morning. Thanks for having me back on certainly 124 00:06:37,320 --> 00:06:39,599 Speaker 5: massive amounts of volatility. And if you're putting things in 125 00:06:39,600 --> 00:06:42,600 Speaker 5: a context, it was only just recently that markets were 126 00:06:42,600 --> 00:06:46,239 Speaker 5: certainly seasling and we had a positive surprise on US GDP. 127 00:06:46,440 --> 00:06:49,320 Speaker 5: So I think there's a few things going on at 128 00:06:49,320 --> 00:06:52,719 Speaker 5: the moment. You had weak economic data, this seasonal weakness, 129 00:06:53,320 --> 00:06:59,000 Speaker 5: stretch positioning, there was crowding in AI, underwhelming earnings with 130 00:06:59,120 --> 00:07:02,560 Speaker 5: six of the seven seven disappointing, and on top of that, 131 00:07:02,600 --> 00:07:06,279 Speaker 5: we've seen massive amounts of volatility manifest itself through the 132 00:07:06,279 --> 00:07:09,560 Speaker 5: currency markets, given the unwinding of the yen carry trade. 133 00:07:09,560 --> 00:07:11,000 Speaker 5: And I guess one thing I'd say on that is 134 00:07:11,000 --> 00:07:15,480 Speaker 5: that usually when you have volatility manifested through currency markets, 135 00:07:15,480 --> 00:07:17,800 Speaker 5: to sell off in equities tend to be very sharp, 136 00:07:18,680 --> 00:07:21,560 Speaker 5: but not too prolonged. So I think fears of recession 137 00:07:21,560 --> 00:07:24,080 Speaker 5: at this stage are probably a little bit overdone, as 138 00:07:24,160 --> 00:07:29,800 Speaker 5: is the easing priced into the US rate market at 139 00:07:29,840 --> 00:07:30,200 Speaker 5: the moment. 140 00:07:31,480 --> 00:07:33,760 Speaker 1: What do you mean of the concerns that, I mean, 141 00:07:33,840 --> 00:07:37,680 Speaker 1: maybe US recession fears might be overdone, but that the 142 00:07:37,720 --> 00:07:40,240 Speaker 1: FED is behind the curve given what we're seeing in 143 00:07:40,280 --> 00:07:41,200 Speaker 1: the jobs market. 144 00:07:42,720 --> 00:07:45,320 Speaker 5: Yeah, look, it's good. It's a good point, and it's 145 00:07:45,400 --> 00:07:48,560 Speaker 5: you know, it is one data print. And as you 146 00:07:48,640 --> 00:07:51,360 Speaker 5: were mentioning just on the call earlier on we did 147 00:07:51,360 --> 00:07:56,800 Speaker 5: see that IM services data surprised to the outside just yesterday. Look, 148 00:07:56,800 --> 00:07:59,800 Speaker 5: there's nothing structurally broken. If we go back to periods 149 00:07:59,800 --> 00:08:02,880 Speaker 5: like two thousand and eight in the gc at issue 150 00:08:02,920 --> 00:08:05,320 Speaker 5: in the housing market. If we go back to two 151 00:08:05,360 --> 00:08:09,200 Speaker 5: thousand where we had exuberants in tech, there's obviously massive 152 00:08:09,200 --> 00:08:13,320 Speaker 5: differences now with earnings and valuation. So nothing in terms 153 00:08:13,320 --> 00:08:16,480 Speaker 5: of the fundamentals has changed too much from just one 154 00:08:16,560 --> 00:08:19,280 Speaker 5: data print now. But if we saw a second consecutive 155 00:08:19,760 --> 00:08:23,520 Speaker 5: week non farm payrolls report, then those fifty basis points 156 00:08:23,560 --> 00:08:26,880 Speaker 5: cuts being now priced in in both September and November 157 00:08:26,960 --> 00:08:29,520 Speaker 5: could come to materialize. But I think it's a little 158 00:08:29,560 --> 00:08:30,240 Speaker 5: bit premature. 159 00:08:30,520 --> 00:08:32,680 Speaker 2: April and I were talking a short while ago about 160 00:08:32,679 --> 00:08:34,960 Speaker 2: the sell off that we had Monday in Japan with 161 00:08:34,960 --> 00:08:39,480 Speaker 2: a NIEK down twelve percent. Yeah, a lot of that Yan, Carrie, 162 00:08:39,559 --> 00:08:43,320 Speaker 2: we know was being unwound. I'm wondering whether or not 163 00:08:43,440 --> 00:08:48,760 Speaker 2: you're concerned about possible problems in the banking system in Japan, 164 00:08:49,000 --> 00:08:51,200 Speaker 2: whether there may be a little bit of stress going 165 00:08:51,240 --> 00:08:54,160 Speaker 2: on under the hood. One of the reasons that financials 166 00:08:54,160 --> 00:08:56,240 Speaker 2: were a very hard hit in the Monday session. I 167 00:08:56,240 --> 00:08:58,720 Speaker 2: think the entire group was down about sixteen percent. 168 00:09:00,360 --> 00:09:03,560 Speaker 5: Yeah, that was really the driver of the weakness in 169 00:09:03,880 --> 00:09:07,000 Speaker 5: Japanese equities yesterday, which I think again you may have 170 00:09:07,000 --> 00:09:09,719 Speaker 5: said earlier programs the weakest day that we've seen since 171 00:09:09,800 --> 00:09:13,040 Speaker 5: nineteen eighty seven in Japan. So with lower policy rates, 172 00:09:13,080 --> 00:09:15,160 Speaker 5: you know you had the ten year JGB, you'ld get 173 00:09:15,160 --> 00:09:18,960 Speaker 5: back down below one percent. It's about nine now, So 174 00:09:19,040 --> 00:09:23,240 Speaker 5: lower yields tend to be problematic for banks that look. 175 00:09:23,320 --> 00:09:26,040 Speaker 5: This whole yen carry trade thing something we've been watching 176 00:09:26,120 --> 00:09:30,600 Speaker 5: for a few years now because it's been a massive 177 00:09:30,640 --> 00:09:33,120 Speaker 5: phenomena for many many many many yearsn't it and it 178 00:09:33,200 --> 00:09:36,040 Speaker 5: can ultimately affect every asset class. Despite the fact that 179 00:09:36,400 --> 00:09:40,760 Speaker 5: we've seen these massive rallies in US treasuries, Japan is 180 00:09:40,800 --> 00:09:43,839 Speaker 5: the biggest buyer and owner of US treasuries. They're massive 181 00:09:43,880 --> 00:09:47,000 Speaker 5: buyser structured credit, so it actually can be a major 182 00:09:47,040 --> 00:09:49,600 Speaker 5: global macro event. They can affect every asset class, but 183 00:09:49,640 --> 00:09:56,320 Speaker 5: it's so far being transmitted through equities and some currency. 184 00:09:56,400 --> 00:09:59,319 Speaker 5: So watching the bond market, both rates and credit is 185 00:09:59,440 --> 00:10:02,079 Speaker 5: really important. And with the en carry trade, and I 186 00:10:02,600 --> 00:10:04,480 Speaker 5: think the Bank of Japan has done the right thing, 187 00:10:05,080 --> 00:10:07,599 Speaker 5: taking rates first to all out of negative territory and 188 00:10:07,640 --> 00:10:10,559 Speaker 5: then having them ount twenty five basis points. Their inflation 189 00:10:10,640 --> 00:10:12,920 Speaker 5: targets been within their band for over a couple of 190 00:10:13,040 --> 00:10:15,920 Speaker 5: years now, so it didn't make sense to have such 191 00:10:16,040 --> 00:10:18,720 Speaker 5: ultracommnitive policy setting where the rest of the G ten 192 00:10:19,480 --> 00:10:22,320 Speaker 5: has got materially high rates that was obviously always going 193 00:10:22,360 --> 00:10:26,400 Speaker 5: to lead to financial systemic risk in the system, which 194 00:10:26,440 --> 00:10:27,840 Speaker 5: is starting to be unwound. 195 00:10:29,480 --> 00:10:32,520 Speaker 1: Well, there's been you know, the boding has been coming 196 00:10:32,600 --> 00:10:34,960 Speaker 1: under fire, especially with the market sell off in the 197 00:10:34,960 --> 00:10:38,480 Speaker 1: past few days, that it pulled the finger too early. 198 00:10:39,000 --> 00:10:41,760 Speaker 1: I mean, if you look at the data, maybe inflation, yes, 199 00:10:42,000 --> 00:10:44,920 Speaker 1: kind of in line coming up, but consumer spending is 200 00:10:44,920 --> 00:10:48,680 Speaker 1: still weak in Japan. And there's also been criticism that 201 00:10:48,760 --> 00:10:51,840 Speaker 1: the bog might have been you know, listening more to 202 00:10:51,920 --> 00:10:55,040 Speaker 1: some of what these top politicians and rare statements coming 203 00:10:55,040 --> 00:10:57,800 Speaker 1: out and talking about the yen weakness, maybe they were 204 00:10:57,800 --> 00:11:00,959 Speaker 1: playing into that crowd. What do you make of that? 205 00:11:02,920 --> 00:11:06,200 Speaker 5: Yeah, so I guess there's a big generational shift that 206 00:11:06,320 --> 00:11:09,040 Speaker 5: needs to take place in Japan. One thing is just 207 00:11:09,120 --> 00:11:12,480 Speaker 5: corporates getting used to passing on price increases because you 208 00:11:12,600 --> 00:11:18,600 Speaker 5: had deflation for so many decades. So I think just 209 00:11:18,720 --> 00:11:20,880 Speaker 5: with the weakness that you saw in the end for 210 00:11:20,920 --> 00:11:23,240 Speaker 5: such a prolonged period of time now going back really 211 00:11:23,320 --> 00:11:26,440 Speaker 5: to about twenty twenty two, there was the risk that 212 00:11:26,480 --> 00:11:31,319 Speaker 5: you kept getting higher inflation from important energy costs. So 213 00:11:31,840 --> 00:11:34,280 Speaker 5: I do believe the Bank of Japan did the right 214 00:11:34,360 --> 00:11:37,120 Speaker 5: thing moving It was seen to be a little bit hawkish, 215 00:11:37,160 --> 00:11:40,160 Speaker 5: moving fifteen basis points on the policy right versus ten, 216 00:11:41,160 --> 00:11:44,880 Speaker 5: and they're looking to reduce their essentially QI by half 217 00:11:44,920 --> 00:11:48,680 Speaker 5: over the next couple of years. Again, I think it 218 00:11:48,840 --> 00:11:51,480 Speaker 5: was reasonable what they did. But what will probably happen 219 00:11:51,520 --> 00:11:54,719 Speaker 5: now given the market moves that we've seen is that 220 00:11:54,760 --> 00:11:58,360 Speaker 5: they're a little bit cautious with their next policy moves 221 00:11:58,400 --> 00:11:59,160 Speaker 5: from here on. 222 00:12:00,400 --> 00:12:03,199 Speaker 1: So no hike in October, is that what you're seeing. 223 00:12:04,760 --> 00:12:08,199 Speaker 5: It's looking that it would. You'd have to see some 224 00:12:08,400 --> 00:12:11,520 Speaker 5: pretty strong data I think again perhaps on wages, but 225 00:12:11,520 --> 00:12:15,240 Speaker 5: that's already through now for I think to make another 226 00:12:15,559 --> 00:12:18,679 Speaker 5: hike in the shorter term overcoming months, just given some 227 00:12:18,760 --> 00:12:20,440 Speaker 5: of the extreme moves that we've seen. 228 00:12:21,320 --> 00:12:25,080 Speaker 2: Well, speaking of central banks, RBA decision later today, Nick, 229 00:12:25,559 --> 00:12:27,959 Speaker 2: given everything that we've seen in global markets over the 230 00:12:28,040 --> 00:12:31,440 Speaker 2: last couple of hours, what are your expectations here? 231 00:12:33,200 --> 00:12:35,560 Speaker 5: I would say that they're going to be on hold 232 00:12:35,600 --> 00:12:39,000 Speaker 5: for now. We did have some inflation out of that 233 00:12:39,120 --> 00:12:41,560 Speaker 5: just came out that was a little bit lower than 234 00:12:41,640 --> 00:12:44,679 Speaker 5: expectations over the last fortnite. It is higher than again 235 00:12:45,080 --> 00:12:48,920 Speaker 5: most of the G ten with true meat inflation or 236 00:12:48,960 --> 00:12:52,440 Speaker 5: core inflation closer to four percent, but I think they're 237 00:12:52,480 --> 00:12:55,160 Speaker 5: more most likely to be on hold for now. 238 00:12:56,960 --> 00:13:01,320 Speaker 1: What about what we're seeing in the you bound, in 239 00:13:01,400 --> 00:13:04,280 Speaker 1: Japanese equities. I think we're seeing the Nike up five percent. 240 00:13:05,040 --> 00:13:08,160 Speaker 1: Do you think this is going to be sustainable? Given 241 00:13:08,240 --> 00:13:10,360 Speaker 1: how you know, we need to kind of get a 242 00:13:10,400 --> 00:13:13,080 Speaker 1: sense of how much further strength we can see in 243 00:13:13,080 --> 00:13:17,320 Speaker 1: the Japanese currency, the unwinding of carry before this, you know, 244 00:13:17,679 --> 00:13:19,320 Speaker 1: we can determine where there has legs. 245 00:13:20,960 --> 00:13:23,000 Speaker 5: Yeah, well, I guess what happened is that just to 246 00:13:23,040 --> 00:13:26,160 Speaker 5: triggered a massive leveraging event, so there's going to be 247 00:13:26,960 --> 00:13:30,040 Speaker 5: some reversal of that. There was very crowded positioning in 248 00:13:30,120 --> 00:13:32,760 Speaker 5: kind of short again long Japanese equities, so again that 249 00:13:32,840 --> 00:13:34,640 Speaker 5: was unwound and a bit of that will start to 250 00:13:34,679 --> 00:13:39,080 Speaker 5: come back. So it's hard to say for now exactly 251 00:13:39,120 --> 00:13:42,760 Speaker 5: how that will transpire overcoming days, but it was very 252 00:13:42,840 --> 00:13:44,800 Speaker 5: very sharp. Again, as you've said, just even with the 253 00:13:44,800 --> 00:13:49,560 Speaker 5: equity moves yesterday down twelve percent, you would expect some 254 00:13:50,080 --> 00:13:51,800 Speaker 5: recovery in the shorter term. 255 00:13:51,679 --> 00:13:54,160 Speaker 2: Nick, Thank you so much, Nick, Shawn Maker there from 256 00:13:54,240 --> 00:14:04,440 Speaker 2: Drummond Capital. Israel is bracing for a possible attack from Iran. 257 00:14:04,600 --> 00:14:08,960 Speaker 2: This would be in retaliation for those assassinations of officials 258 00:14:09,000 --> 00:14:14,560 Speaker 2: associated with both Hezbollah and Hamas. Let's take a closer 259 00:14:14,559 --> 00:14:18,400 Speaker 2: look now with our guest Monica, because Kaita she is 260 00:14:18,760 --> 00:14:22,960 Speaker 2: the public policy director at Key Elements Group. She joins 261 00:14:23,040 --> 00:14:26,120 Speaker 2: us from London. Monica, thank you so much for being 262 00:14:26,120 --> 00:14:28,960 Speaker 2: with us. What is the degree of risk right now 263 00:14:29,000 --> 00:14:31,400 Speaker 2: that this is going to escalate quite dramatically. 264 00:14:34,040 --> 00:14:35,960 Speaker 3: Yeah, so thank you for having me first of all, 265 00:14:36,000 --> 00:14:38,840 Speaker 3: and escalation and all out war is not in the 266 00:14:38,880 --> 00:14:42,520 Speaker 3: interest of any player in the region or the US. However, 267 00:14:42,640 --> 00:14:44,960 Speaker 3: right now we see that the sticks and temperatures are 268 00:14:45,000 --> 00:14:47,240 Speaker 3: really high in the region and things can get out 269 00:14:47,240 --> 00:14:51,880 Speaker 3: of control quickly and not an a calculated be Even so, 270 00:14:51,920 --> 00:14:55,840 Speaker 3: now further escalation will really depend on Iranian coordinating action 271 00:14:56,800 --> 00:15:00,840 Speaker 3: given that Iran and its intelligence services have been humiliated 272 00:15:00,880 --> 00:15:04,560 Speaker 3: with Israel's assassination as you mentioned of Hamas political leader 273 00:15:04,640 --> 00:15:07,880 Speaker 3: is Mael Hanea, and because of that, Iran's response can 274 00:15:07,960 --> 00:15:10,320 Speaker 3: be greater than what we have seen for example, in 275 00:15:10,360 --> 00:15:14,440 Speaker 3: April on April thirteenth, and Iran also born Israel of 276 00:15:14,520 --> 00:15:17,480 Speaker 3: a missile strike and executed the strike. However, it was 277 00:15:17,520 --> 00:15:21,080 Speaker 3: intercepted by the Iron Domes successfully and this time it 278 00:15:21,120 --> 00:15:25,600 Speaker 3: was unprecedented assassination of the Hamas political leader. It was sophisticated, 279 00:15:25,920 --> 00:15:29,640 Speaker 3: done from within, and indeed exposed all the weaknesses of 280 00:15:29,880 --> 00:15:33,960 Speaker 3: Iranian security services and the regime, as well as humiliated 281 00:15:34,080 --> 00:15:37,320 Speaker 3: Iran international stage. Because of that, Iran has promised to 282 00:15:37,320 --> 00:15:42,200 Speaker 3: punish Israel and it will take substantial action. However, we 283 00:15:42,320 --> 00:15:45,120 Speaker 3: have to remember that Iran will be very careful of 284 00:15:45,160 --> 00:15:48,640 Speaker 3: the actions and exact targets that it chooses, because Iran 285 00:15:48,640 --> 00:15:52,280 Speaker 3: would not want the US to get involved and have 286 00:15:52,320 --> 00:15:55,800 Speaker 3: a collision between Israel and the best because this is 287 00:15:55,840 --> 00:15:58,040 Speaker 3: the type of collision that Iranian regime would not be 288 00:15:58,120 --> 00:16:01,479 Speaker 3: able to counter and survive such retaliation. 289 00:16:01,640 --> 00:16:04,880 Speaker 2: Yeah, US Secretary of State Antoning Blenken was discussing the 290 00:16:05,000 --> 00:16:07,480 Speaker 2: urgent need for de escalation in the Mid East, and 291 00:16:07,520 --> 00:16:11,160 Speaker 2: I'm wondering about the role that countries like Cutter and 292 00:16:11,280 --> 00:16:14,120 Speaker 2: Jordan may play in this. Is there a chance for 293 00:16:14,200 --> 00:16:17,920 Speaker 2: some type of diplomacy that will bring the temperature down, 294 00:16:19,480 --> 00:16:20,320 Speaker 2: so diplomacy, of. 295 00:16:20,360 --> 00:16:23,480 Speaker 3: Course always has a chance to bring temperatures down. However, 296 00:16:23,600 --> 00:16:26,800 Speaker 3: right now the station is extremely fragile and diplomatic means 297 00:16:27,040 --> 00:16:30,720 Speaker 3: may not simply be enough to lower the tensions. And 298 00:16:30,840 --> 00:16:33,080 Speaker 3: a lot of countries now including the US, of course, 299 00:16:33,120 --> 00:16:36,440 Speaker 3: are pressuring Israel to go for a ceasfire deal, some 300 00:16:36,480 --> 00:16:39,440 Speaker 3: sort of peace deal. However, we believe that it is 301 00:16:39,520 --> 00:16:42,400 Speaker 3: unlikely at the moment because both sites has reasons not 302 00:16:42,480 --> 00:16:45,800 Speaker 3: to be escalated and not to do it. For Hamas again, 303 00:16:46,640 --> 00:16:50,240 Speaker 3: they have been humiliated internationally because of the leader being 304 00:16:50,280 --> 00:16:53,640 Speaker 3: killed by Israel plus a high blow. And for Israel, 305 00:16:53,840 --> 00:16:56,680 Speaker 3: they do want their hostages back from Hamas, but at 306 00:16:56,720 --> 00:16:59,000 Speaker 3: the same time they want to destroy Hamas, and because 307 00:16:59,000 --> 00:17:00,840 Speaker 3: of that, it is very different go to achieve both 308 00:17:00,840 --> 00:17:03,840 Speaker 3: at the same time. And because of that, the escalation 309 00:17:04,119 --> 00:17:08,800 Speaker 3: or ceasefire agreement does not seem highly likely, regardless of 310 00:17:08,840 --> 00:17:11,960 Speaker 3: the other actors that are being involved in the US 311 00:17:12,000 --> 00:17:15,480 Speaker 3: international actress pushing for such type of the escalation or 312 00:17:15,520 --> 00:17:17,919 Speaker 3: diplomatic resolution at the moment, It's. 313 00:17:17,800 --> 00:17:21,240 Speaker 2: Been amazing that the demonstration on the part of Israel 314 00:17:21,359 --> 00:17:23,720 Speaker 2: in the way in which it was able to assassinate 315 00:17:23,760 --> 00:17:27,520 Speaker 2: one of these officials right inside Tehran. I mean that 316 00:17:27,640 --> 00:17:32,639 Speaker 2: goes a long way in kind of underscoring the capabilities 317 00:17:32,720 --> 00:17:34,320 Speaker 2: that Israel has, does it not? 318 00:17:35,960 --> 00:17:39,760 Speaker 3: Of course, Israel has great capabilities, and this type of 319 00:17:39,800 --> 00:17:43,439 Speaker 3: operation that has been planned for months, as you're rightfully mentioned, 320 00:17:43,480 --> 00:17:46,280 Speaker 3: it has been done from within. So that's a way unprecedented. 321 00:17:46,320 --> 00:17:49,760 Speaker 3: And what it shows to Iran, to Hamas, to Hasbola 322 00:17:49,920 --> 00:17:53,040 Speaker 3: is that no one is really safe, because Israel definitely 323 00:17:53,160 --> 00:17:58,320 Speaker 3: has means if it needs to take action and assassinate 324 00:17:58,440 --> 00:18:03,040 Speaker 3: their leaders or other really important personnel, or even conduct 325 00:18:03,200 --> 00:18:05,960 Speaker 3: other types of attacks. However, we have to remember that 326 00:18:06,200 --> 00:18:09,880 Speaker 3: Israel also does not necessarily want to escalate into an 327 00:18:09,880 --> 00:18:12,200 Speaker 3: all out war. What they want is to stop theirsm 328 00:18:12,240 --> 00:18:16,520 Speaker 3: against their country, and they are targeting specific targets and 329 00:18:16,600 --> 00:18:19,240 Speaker 3: they have concrete intelligence missions. 330 00:18:19,320 --> 00:18:23,000 Speaker 2: Do that does the new President Iran, who is perceived 331 00:18:23,000 --> 00:18:25,960 Speaker 2: to be a little bit more moderate, does that change 332 00:18:26,520 --> 00:18:29,440 Speaker 2: anything about the situation at all? I know that the 333 00:18:29,520 --> 00:18:32,560 Speaker 2: Supreme Leader is carrying most of the authority right now, 334 00:18:32,560 --> 00:18:35,680 Speaker 2: but I'm wondering whether the president could help in any way. 335 00:18:37,200 --> 00:18:39,080 Speaker 3: So, as you're right well, I mentioned the Supreme Leader 336 00:18:39,119 --> 00:18:41,880 Speaker 3: does hold the power in Iran, and at the same time, 337 00:18:42,240 --> 00:18:45,520 Speaker 3: with having new president, there's a chance that he will 338 00:18:45,560 --> 00:18:49,560 Speaker 3: want to show that Iran is not humiliated on the 339 00:18:49,600 --> 00:18:52,480 Speaker 3: international stage. So I do not think that this will 340 00:18:52,520 --> 00:18:54,679 Speaker 3: help in a way to do escalate. If anything, this 341 00:18:54,800 --> 00:18:58,240 Speaker 3: might mean that he will want to show Israel's sorry, 342 00:18:58,240 --> 00:19:02,320 Speaker 3: Iran's power and to strike back simply rather than the escalate. 343 00:19:03,160 --> 00:19:05,760 Speaker 2: If you had to speculate, and I hate to put 344 00:19:05,800 --> 00:19:09,199 Speaker 2: you in that position, what is the outcome of the 345 00:19:09,240 --> 00:19:11,440 Speaker 2: situation that we're dealing with right now? How do you 346 00:19:11,480 --> 00:19:12,400 Speaker 2: see this playing out? 347 00:19:14,119 --> 00:19:18,720 Speaker 3: So I do think that escalation is possible because as 348 00:19:18,720 --> 00:19:21,760 Speaker 3: I mentioned that, in the situation, Iran will have to 349 00:19:21,800 --> 00:19:24,560 Speaker 3: respond on someday or another. However, I do think that 350 00:19:24,960 --> 00:19:27,960 Speaker 3: Iran will think carefully what type of targets to select, 351 00:19:27,960 --> 00:19:31,480 Speaker 3: whether it would be infrastructure, civilians, or military targets, because 352 00:19:31,480 --> 00:19:34,320 Speaker 3: if civilians are targeted, we know that Israel will also 353 00:19:35,200 --> 00:19:38,640 Speaker 3: respond and this will just lead to further escalation. And 354 00:19:39,200 --> 00:19:41,800 Speaker 3: because of that, Iran might be more careful to choose 355 00:19:41,840 --> 00:19:44,879 Speaker 3: specific targets. And we also know that last time and 356 00:19:44,960 --> 00:19:48,480 Speaker 3: Iran was attacking Israel on April thirteenth, they have warned 357 00:19:48,960 --> 00:19:51,480 Speaker 3: Israel about the looming attack and this time as well. 358 00:19:51,600 --> 00:19:54,800 Speaker 3: Jerusalem Post has reported that actually Iran has communicated by 359 00:19:54,880 --> 00:19:58,280 Speaker 3: the Minister for the Affairs of Hungary that they will 360 00:19:58,280 --> 00:20:01,080 Speaker 3: be attacking Israel, and Israel has been noted of that. 361 00:20:01,520 --> 00:20:04,120 Speaker 3: So if Iran was going for an all out response, 362 00:20:04,160 --> 00:20:06,719 Speaker 3: an all out war, then they would not be warning 363 00:20:06,840 --> 00:20:08,920 Speaker 3: Israel about the blooming attack. So I think that the 364 00:20:09,080 --> 00:20:12,520 Speaker 3: Nians are calibrating their response and whereas there will be 365 00:20:12,520 --> 00:20:15,280 Speaker 3: a response, it will not necessarily lead to an all 366 00:20:15,320 --> 00:20:15,760 Speaker 3: out war. 367 00:20:16,359 --> 00:20:19,000 Speaker 2: We'll be tracking this closely. Monica. Thank you so much 368 00:20:19,000 --> 00:20:20,879 Speaker 2: for staying up late. I know it's one thirty in 369 00:20:20,920 --> 00:20:22,720 Speaker 2: the morning in London where you are, and we really 370 00:20:22,760 --> 00:20:27,080 Speaker 2: appreciate you joining us here on Daybreak Asia, Monica, because Kaita, 371 00:20:27,119 --> 00:20:31,960 Speaker 2: who is public policy director for Key Elements Group in London. 372 00:20:33,800 --> 00:20:36,760 Speaker 2: This has been the Bloomberg Daybreak Asia podcast, bringing you 373 00:20:36,800 --> 00:20:39,920 Speaker 2: the stories making news and moving markets in the Asia Pacific. 374 00:20:40,440 --> 00:20:43,560 Speaker 2: Visit the Bloomberg Podcast channel on YouTube to get more 375 00:20:43,560 --> 00:20:47,199 Speaker 2: episodes of this and other shows from Bloomberg. Subscribe to 376 00:20:47,200 --> 00:20:51,000 Speaker 2: the podcast on Apple, Spotify or anywhere else you listen, 377 00:20:51,119 --> 00:20:54,200 Speaker 2: and always on Bloomberg Radio, the Bloomberg Terminal and the 378 00:20:54,200 --> 00:20:55,320 Speaker 2: Bloomberg Business app,