1 00:00:00,280 --> 00:00:02,599 Speaker 1: So Dan, before we get started today, we just wanted 2 00:00:02,600 --> 00:00:05,320 Speaker 1: to take a moment to let everyone know about something 3 00:00:05,440 --> 00:00:07,360 Speaker 1: new from Bloomberg. Do you want to hear what it is? 4 00:00:07,680 --> 00:00:11,520 Speaker 1: Go for it? Well. Starting now, you can actually use 5 00:00:11,560 --> 00:00:15,320 Speaker 1: our Io s app or Bloomberg's Google Chrome extension to 6 00:00:15,480 --> 00:00:20,640 Speaker 1: scan any news story on any website, instantly revealing relevant 7 00:00:20,640 --> 00:00:24,280 Speaker 1: news and market data from Bloomberg and other sources related 8 00:00:24,320 --> 00:00:28,160 Speaker 1: to the companies and the people you're reading about. So really, 9 00:00:28,320 --> 00:00:30,680 Speaker 1: no matter where you're reading the news, you can bring 10 00:00:30,720 --> 00:00:33,680 Speaker 1: the power of Bloomberg's news and data with you. It's 11 00:00:33,720 --> 00:00:37,440 Speaker 1: pretty amazing. Download our Io s app or search for 12 00:00:37,440 --> 00:00:40,640 Speaker 1: the Bloomberg extension on the Chrome Store to try it out. 13 00:00:41,240 --> 00:00:46,560 Speaker 1: Learn more at bloomberg dot com. Backslash lanes. Just about 14 00:00:46,600 --> 00:00:49,800 Speaker 1: every indicator of the US labor market shows that jobs 15 00:00:49,800 --> 00:00:52,880 Speaker 1: are plentiful and we're pushing the limits of how many 16 00:00:52,920 --> 00:00:57,200 Speaker 1: people can be employed. But many Americans still aren't seeing 17 00:00:57,280 --> 00:00:59,440 Speaker 1: the kind of lift to their wallets that were used 18 00:00:59,480 --> 00:01:02,320 Speaker 1: to with these kinds of numbers in the labor market. 19 00:01:02,880 --> 00:01:07,080 Speaker 1: One possible explanation is that Americans are not organized in 20 00:01:07,200 --> 00:01:10,200 Speaker 1: labor unions like they used to be. While unions have 21 00:01:10,319 --> 00:01:13,640 Speaker 1: had some notable successes, like this year's deal by Hollywood 22 00:01:13,640 --> 00:01:17,080 Speaker 1: writers that averted a strike, or the victory by forty 23 00:01:17,120 --> 00:01:22,160 Speaker 1: thou unionized Verizon workers last year. Most American workers lack 24 00:01:22,280 --> 00:01:25,160 Speaker 1: the bargaining power that they had throughout much of the 25 00:01:25,160 --> 00:01:29,400 Speaker 1: twenty century. Today on Benchmark, we're speaking with an expert 26 00:01:29,440 --> 00:01:33,039 Speaker 1: on this subject, Jared Bernstein, the former chief economist to 27 00:01:33,160 --> 00:01:47,680 Speaker 1: Vice President Joe Biden. I'm Scott Landman and economics editor 28 00:01:47,760 --> 00:01:50,800 Speaker 1: for Bloomberg News in Washington. Joining me as a guest 29 00:01:50,880 --> 00:01:54,000 Speaker 1: co host today is Patricia Leiah, a reporter covering the U. 30 00:01:54,080 --> 00:01:57,160 Speaker 1: S economy, also here in d C. Patty, thanks for 31 00:01:57,200 --> 00:01:59,200 Speaker 1: being here, h I'm really happy to be here. Thank 32 00:01:59,240 --> 00:02:02,840 Speaker 1: you so. Patty, You've just covered the latest US employment 33 00:02:02,880 --> 00:02:06,000 Speaker 1: report that came out last Friday. What stood out to 34 00:02:06,040 --> 00:02:08,680 Speaker 1: you in that report? Yeah, so the headline number for 35 00:02:08,800 --> 00:02:12,280 Speaker 1: April was pretty good, especially after a disappointing March that 36 00:02:12,440 --> 00:02:15,799 Speaker 1: was partly caused by that snowstorm we saw that affected 37 00:02:15,840 --> 00:02:18,840 Speaker 1: most of the northeast Stella. But even as the main 38 00:02:18,919 --> 00:02:22,960 Speaker 1: headline number came above, estimates, on the jobless rate fell, 39 00:02:23,000 --> 00:02:26,120 Speaker 1: which growth was still a bit disappointing. It's just not 40 00:02:26,240 --> 00:02:29,600 Speaker 1: at the level where it used to be in previous recoveries, right, 41 00:02:29,639 --> 00:02:31,560 Speaker 1: and that's been a puzzle for a while. Now the 42 00:02:31,639 --> 00:02:34,640 Speaker 1: labor market is getting tighter and tighter, but we're just 43 00:02:34,680 --> 00:02:37,320 Speaker 1: not seeing the kind of three percent four percent pay 44 00:02:37,400 --> 00:02:40,520 Speaker 1: gains that had happened in previous expansions when we had 45 00:02:40,560 --> 00:02:42,760 Speaker 1: a tight labor market that kind of looked like this. 46 00:02:43,440 --> 00:02:46,079 Speaker 1: So for more on this now, let's bring in Jared Bernstein, 47 00:02:46,400 --> 00:02:49,680 Speaker 1: since he has been a senior fellow at the Center 48 00:02:49,760 --> 00:02:52,880 Speaker 1: on Budget and Policy Priorities, and before working in the 49 00:02:52,919 --> 00:02:56,760 Speaker 1: Obama administration, he was at the Economic Policy Institute and 50 00:02:56,840 --> 00:03:00,280 Speaker 1: was also Deputy Chief Economist at the Labor to Artment 51 00:03:00,360 --> 00:03:03,760 Speaker 1: during the Clinton years. He's also a pretty good basketball player, 52 00:03:03,760 --> 00:03:06,560 Speaker 1: as I found out some years ago. Jared joins us 53 00:03:06,560 --> 00:03:09,640 Speaker 1: by phone from his office in Washington. Now, Jared, thanks 54 00:03:09,639 --> 00:03:12,520 Speaker 1: for spending time with us on Benchmark. My pleasure, though 55 00:03:12,560 --> 00:03:14,800 Speaker 1: I have to say my teammates last night would not 56 00:03:14,880 --> 00:03:18,160 Speaker 1: describe me as a pretty good basketball player. But at 57 00:03:18,160 --> 00:03:21,960 Speaker 1: any rate, I'm I'm better at the labor market stuff. 58 00:03:21,960 --> 00:03:25,959 Speaker 1: I guess, well we'll focus on that today. Good. So, 59 00:03:26,320 --> 00:03:28,640 Speaker 1: there there are lots of things, Jared that are different 60 00:03:28,720 --> 00:03:32,480 Speaker 1: about having a job in America today compared with forty 61 00:03:32,560 --> 00:03:35,680 Speaker 1: or fifty years ago. Was it really better back then? 62 00:03:35,920 --> 00:03:40,680 Speaker 1: Or are we looking through rose colored glasses at the past. Well, 63 00:03:40,720 --> 00:03:44,880 Speaker 1: in terms of the connection between wages and the job market, 64 00:03:45,400 --> 00:03:49,960 Speaker 1: things were better for various groups of workers, not everybody. 65 00:03:50,560 --> 00:03:53,520 Speaker 1: In fact, if you look at the gender wage differential, 66 00:03:54,320 --> 00:03:57,839 Speaker 1: women were earning a lot less than men for comparable, 67 00:03:57,920 --> 00:04:00,280 Speaker 1: comparable work back then than they are now. There was 68 00:04:00,320 --> 00:04:03,920 Speaker 1: still discrimination in the job market in other ways as well. 69 00:04:04,120 --> 00:04:08,240 Speaker 1: But if you're simply talking about basically two things, the 70 00:04:08,240 --> 00:04:11,880 Speaker 1: tightness in the labor market and the way that tightness 71 00:04:12,040 --> 00:04:15,960 Speaker 1: mapped onto people's paychecks, Yeah, that was that was better 72 00:04:16,000 --> 00:04:18,960 Speaker 1: back then. So let me give you a pretty mind 73 00:04:18,960 --> 00:04:22,240 Speaker 1: blowing statistic on this. Uh it used to be the case, 74 00:04:22,360 --> 00:04:24,599 Speaker 1: I was Patty was saying, at least by some metrics, 75 00:04:25,320 --> 00:04:27,920 Speaker 1: the current job market might be described as being at 76 00:04:27,960 --> 00:04:30,080 Speaker 1: full employment. I'm not sure I quite see it, but 77 00:04:30,120 --> 00:04:34,760 Speaker 1: that's a certainly a legitimate thing to declare. Well, since 78 00:04:34,839 --> 00:04:37,599 Speaker 1: nineteen eighty, we've been at full employment less than thirty 79 00:04:37,600 --> 00:04:42,200 Speaker 1: percent of the time. Before eight, say, the late forties 80 00:04:42,240 --> 00:04:44,760 Speaker 1: to nineteen eighty, we were at full employment almost seventy 81 00:04:44,839 --> 00:04:47,400 Speaker 1: percent of the time, so we were much more likely 82 00:04:47,440 --> 00:04:49,880 Speaker 1: to have a tight labor market, and a tight labor 83 00:04:49,920 --> 00:04:53,280 Speaker 1: market delivers some bargaining cloud to uh middle and lower 84 00:04:53,360 --> 00:04:56,279 Speaker 1: rage workers. Of course, as you kind of mentioned in 85 00:04:56,320 --> 00:04:59,360 Speaker 1: your intro, we were more unionized back then as well, 86 00:05:00,120 --> 00:05:04,679 Speaker 1: so economic growth mapped onto the paychecks of middle wage 87 00:05:04,720 --> 00:05:10,280 Speaker 1: workers more uh robustly then than it does now. Let 88 00:05:10,320 --> 00:05:12,960 Speaker 1: me share some facts with our listeners from the Bureau 89 00:05:12,960 --> 00:05:17,159 Speaker 1: of Labor Statistics. The union membership rate was at ten 90 00:05:17,200 --> 00:05:23,360 Speaker 1: point seven percent in it was over three and even 91 00:05:23,400 --> 00:05:25,839 Speaker 1: the state with the highest union membership, New York, is 92 00:05:25,839 --> 00:05:30,479 Speaker 1: at uh just under the lowest of South Carolina at 93 00:05:30,560 --> 00:05:33,960 Speaker 1: one point six When when you think about the economy 94 00:05:34,000 --> 00:05:37,600 Speaker 1: being at full employment, how how has that particular change 95 00:05:37,800 --> 00:05:41,880 Speaker 1: affected the American worker? Are people not organized in unions 96 00:05:41,920 --> 00:05:44,040 Speaker 1: to be able to take advantage of a full employment 97 00:05:44,080 --> 00:05:46,599 Speaker 1: situation like they used to be? Well, I guess the 98 00:05:46,600 --> 00:05:48,680 Speaker 1: way I look at it is a little bit differently, 99 00:05:48,720 --> 00:05:53,800 Speaker 1: and the the in American style job markets, you know, 100 00:05:53,839 --> 00:05:56,800 Speaker 1: we have a kind of a more rigorous version of 101 00:05:56,880 --> 00:06:01,800 Speaker 1: capitalism than they do in in other more social democracies. Uh, 102 00:06:01,920 --> 00:06:06,040 Speaker 1: your paycheck is not just a function of how skilled, 103 00:06:06,120 --> 00:06:08,760 Speaker 1: you are, your value added. That's kind of what they 104 00:06:08,760 --> 00:06:11,960 Speaker 1: teach you an economics class. But that's part of it, 105 00:06:12,000 --> 00:06:14,840 Speaker 1: no question. But it's also a matter of your bargaining power, 106 00:06:14,880 --> 00:06:18,919 Speaker 1: your bargaining clout. And historically there have been two factors 107 00:06:18,960 --> 00:06:21,640 Speaker 1: that have contributed to the bargaining clout of middle and 108 00:06:21,720 --> 00:06:24,880 Speaker 1: lower wage workers, or at least two factors. One is 109 00:06:25,000 --> 00:06:28,560 Speaker 1: very tight labor market and f I mentioned earlier, that's 110 00:06:28,560 --> 00:06:32,240 Speaker 1: been very much the exception, not the rule, over the 111 00:06:32,279 --> 00:06:36,560 Speaker 1: last few decades, um and And the other is unionization. 112 00:06:36,760 --> 00:06:41,320 Speaker 1: And your numbers are correct, I would simply um add 113 00:06:41,360 --> 00:06:43,360 Speaker 1: to them that in the private sector, which is where 114 00:06:43,360 --> 00:06:47,159 Speaker 1: most people work, uh, the unionization rate is only seven percent. 115 00:06:47,480 --> 00:06:52,240 Speaker 1: So that's that's you know, getting a way below not 116 00:06:52,360 --> 00:06:53,880 Speaker 1: only where it used to be, but where it is 117 00:06:53,920 --> 00:06:57,520 Speaker 1: in in other advanced economies. There are some other factors 118 00:06:57,520 --> 00:06:59,719 Speaker 1: that help determine wages at the level of the minimum 119 00:06:59,720 --> 00:07:02,680 Speaker 1: way age, to the extent to which labor standards are enforced, 120 00:07:03,040 --> 00:07:06,479 Speaker 1: the structure of employment. You've got the gig work that 121 00:07:06,600 --> 00:07:09,760 Speaker 1: can sometimes play out in paychecks and ways that are 122 00:07:10,440 --> 00:07:12,920 Speaker 1: negative for workers. But if you put it all together, 123 00:07:13,280 --> 00:07:17,240 Speaker 1: the factors that used to give workers, more bargaining power, 124 00:07:17,360 --> 00:07:22,160 Speaker 1: tight labor markets, high unionization rates, rigorously enforced labor standards. 125 00:07:22,520 --> 00:07:25,800 Speaker 1: Many of those are things of the past. Right, you 126 00:07:25,920 --> 00:07:27,920 Speaker 1: think that would be pretty good to be in an union. 127 00:07:27,960 --> 00:07:29,640 Speaker 1: If you're a worker at a D and T, you 128 00:07:29,720 --> 00:07:33,120 Speaker 1: have a pension, you have ritary health benefits, you probably 129 00:07:33,120 --> 00:07:35,040 Speaker 1: have a bunch of other parts that people in the 130 00:07:35,040 --> 00:07:39,280 Speaker 1: rest of corporate America gave up a long time ago. Right, Well, yes, 131 00:07:39,440 --> 00:07:42,440 Speaker 1: there are definitely some unions that are still able to 132 00:07:42,480 --> 00:07:46,440 Speaker 1: deliver that those kinds of benefits to their members. Um. 133 00:07:46,640 --> 00:07:50,080 Speaker 1: Public sector unions often do a pretty good job, which 134 00:07:50,120 --> 00:07:53,600 Speaker 1: is one reason why they're under siege and many states 135 00:07:53,600 --> 00:07:58,880 Speaker 1: throughout the throughout the nation. Uh. And if you compare 136 00:07:59,480 --> 00:08:02,920 Speaker 1: union workers to non union workers just based on their wages, 137 00:08:02,960 --> 00:08:06,720 Speaker 1: controlling for everything else, there's still a significant premium there somewhere, 138 00:08:06,720 --> 00:08:10,320 Speaker 1: I guess between ten and fiftent at least. But an 139 00:08:10,360 --> 00:08:13,960 Speaker 1: interesting finding that that's germained to our conversation is that 140 00:08:14,040 --> 00:08:18,280 Speaker 1: when unionization rates get higher, so right now they're about 141 00:08:19,000 --> 00:08:22,680 Speaker 1: as you said here, but back when they're or if 142 00:08:22,720 --> 00:08:25,160 Speaker 1: you go over to Europe and you see uh, union 143 00:08:25,280 --> 00:08:28,360 Speaker 1: rates that are considerably higher than that you end up 144 00:08:28,400 --> 00:08:31,440 Speaker 1: with a lot more pattern bargaining or collective bargaining where 145 00:08:32,040 --> 00:08:36,000 Speaker 1: union wages enforced the pay of workers outside the union sector. 146 00:08:36,280 --> 00:08:38,520 Speaker 1: So there's a spill over there that can happen as well. 147 00:08:38,559 --> 00:08:40,240 Speaker 1: And you certainly don't see that when you're down to 148 00:08:40,240 --> 00:08:43,360 Speaker 1: the kind of levels of of collective bargaining that we 149 00:08:43,400 --> 00:08:49,439 Speaker 1: have our nations with that still have higher union membership 150 00:08:49,559 --> 00:08:54,960 Speaker 1: rates experiencing faster wage growth than the United States has 151 00:08:55,000 --> 00:08:58,480 Speaker 1: been with declining union membership, or has it been fairly 152 00:08:58,520 --> 00:09:02,360 Speaker 1: consistent worldwide? Well, I think on average you wouldn't really 153 00:09:02,400 --> 00:09:07,280 Speaker 1: find that UM, But I think if you look distributionally, 154 00:09:07,840 --> 00:09:12,199 Speaker 1: their their wage distributions tend to be UM tighter, less 155 00:09:12,240 --> 00:09:16,360 Speaker 1: dispersed than ours, They have less wage inequality, less less 156 00:09:16,400 --> 00:09:20,679 Speaker 1: earnings dispersion UM, and in fact, in many cases, as 157 00:09:20,679 --> 00:09:23,080 Speaker 1: their unionization rates go down, they end up with more 158 00:09:23,120 --> 00:09:27,679 Speaker 1: of that UM. An important early study found that about 159 00:09:27,679 --> 00:09:31,360 Speaker 1: a fifth of the increase in in wage dispersion, at 160 00:09:31,400 --> 00:09:34,920 Speaker 1: least among men, was attributed to the decline in unionization. 161 00:09:35,280 --> 00:09:37,680 Speaker 1: Now fifth may not sound like a ton, but that 162 00:09:37,760 --> 00:09:40,400 Speaker 1: was the largest factor that I think anyone's ever uncovered 163 00:09:40,400 --> 00:09:43,920 Speaker 1: in that in that research. Is it harder to organize 164 00:09:43,960 --> 00:09:47,280 Speaker 1: labor unions these days, or oh yes, yeah, is there 165 00:09:47,320 --> 00:09:50,679 Speaker 1: more apathy among workers or what is it? Well, I 166 00:09:50,760 --> 00:09:53,840 Speaker 1: don't know that there's more apathy among workers. And in fact, 167 00:09:54,559 --> 00:09:57,960 Speaker 1: if you pull people depending on the question, you know, 168 00:09:58,000 --> 00:10:01,000 Speaker 1: these surveys can be a little squirrelly. Many people will 169 00:10:01,080 --> 00:10:04,720 Speaker 1: say something to the effect of, we recognize that we 170 00:10:04,800 --> 00:10:09,520 Speaker 1: need some form of an organization to push back on 171 00:10:10,280 --> 00:10:13,040 Speaker 1: UM the kinds of things that our employers are trying 172 00:10:13,040 --> 00:10:14,559 Speaker 1: to do to us. Now. They might not like the 173 00:10:14,600 --> 00:10:18,200 Speaker 1: word union, but that's a pretty consistent finding. I think 174 00:10:18,240 --> 00:10:22,000 Speaker 1: what's really different now is that there is a depocketed, 175 00:10:22,120 --> 00:10:27,280 Speaker 1: multi billion dollar union avoidance industry, and you know, you'll 176 00:10:27,320 --> 00:10:33,080 Speaker 1: see stores like Walmart closed down a franchise somewhere if 177 00:10:33,120 --> 00:10:37,480 Speaker 1: they're worried that it's going to become unionized. So the UH, 178 00:10:37,520 --> 00:10:43,960 Speaker 1: the anti union initiatives taken by UM employers, not not all, 179 00:10:44,000 --> 00:10:46,319 Speaker 1: by the way, but those who are particularly averse to 180 00:10:46,600 --> 00:10:50,880 Speaker 1: UH to union membership UM have gotten a lot more aggressive. 181 00:10:51,120 --> 00:10:55,800 Speaker 1: I do think that workers probably think differently about unions 182 00:10:55,800 --> 00:10:57,240 Speaker 1: than they used to. I know there was a case 183 00:10:57,280 --> 00:11:00,960 Speaker 1: pretty recently, I think it was Volkswagen in maybe Tennessee, 184 00:11:01,280 --> 00:11:05,920 Speaker 1: where the workers voted not to form a bargaining unit unit. 185 00:11:06,800 --> 00:11:09,880 Speaker 1: And I wonder if some of what was going on 186 00:11:09,920 --> 00:11:11,640 Speaker 1: there was a sense that the you know, the union 187 00:11:11,679 --> 00:11:14,400 Speaker 1: wasn't going to really help them all that much. Let's 188 00:11:14,480 --> 00:11:16,560 Speaker 1: drill down a little bit further into some of the 189 00:11:16,559 --> 00:11:20,520 Speaker 1: wage data you have. By all indicators a tight labor market. 190 00:11:20,920 --> 00:11:24,600 Speaker 1: The retail sector is a major is a fairly significant 191 00:11:24,600 --> 00:11:27,679 Speaker 1: part of our employment. I think it's around fourteen fifteen 192 00:11:27,720 --> 00:11:32,520 Speaker 1: million people are employed in retail. Uh, they're fairly low paid. UH. 193 00:11:32,640 --> 00:11:34,840 Speaker 1: Maybe the wage gains, at least in some of the 194 00:11:34,880 --> 00:11:38,480 Speaker 1: recent data have been have been pretty flat. Would could 195 00:11:38,559 --> 00:11:43,400 Speaker 1: would they be potentially faster if there was more union 196 00:11:43,559 --> 00:11:47,040 Speaker 1: organization in that sector or do you think there are 197 00:11:47,040 --> 00:11:51,680 Speaker 1: other forces at play? I think that you'll find union 198 00:11:51,760 --> 00:11:55,360 Speaker 1: wages are higher, as I mentioned earlier, that there's a 199 00:11:55,440 --> 00:11:59,400 Speaker 1: premium there. Whether they're growing faster or not. UM, that's 200 00:11:59,440 --> 00:12:02,240 Speaker 1: probably a tougher call. I don't I don't know that 201 00:12:02,320 --> 00:12:04,680 Speaker 1: I've seen so much of that in the data. So 202 00:12:04,880 --> 00:12:07,440 Speaker 1: probably more of a level story than a growth story. 203 00:12:08,000 --> 00:12:11,360 Speaker 1: I think, you know, economists are scratching our heads over 204 00:12:11,440 --> 00:12:14,600 Speaker 1: the the what we call the flatness of the Phillips curve, 205 00:12:14,640 --> 00:12:16,840 Speaker 1: which is just a fancy way of saying the breakdown 206 00:12:16,840 --> 00:12:20,720 Speaker 1: and the correlation between tight labor markets and price growth 207 00:12:20,800 --> 00:12:24,439 Speaker 1: and wage growth. Uh, whether you're looking at prices or wages, 208 00:12:25,040 --> 00:12:28,800 Speaker 1: you might expect there to be more uh growth when 209 00:12:28,840 --> 00:12:31,319 Speaker 1: you're you're down at an unemployment rate that's four point 210 00:12:31,360 --> 00:12:34,360 Speaker 1: four percent. But there are many explanations for that, by 211 00:12:34,400 --> 00:12:37,440 Speaker 1: the way. One is that the federal reserves, at least 212 00:12:37,480 --> 00:12:40,079 Speaker 1: in terms of inflation or prices, has kind of locked 213 00:12:40,080 --> 00:12:42,360 Speaker 1: in everybody's heads that are going to target two percent 214 00:12:42,720 --> 00:12:45,840 Speaker 1: no matter what, so inflation is really quote well anchored. 215 00:12:46,200 --> 00:12:48,800 Speaker 1: Another is, of course, the bargaining power story that I've 216 00:12:48,840 --> 00:12:52,520 Speaker 1: I've been talking about we've been discussing throughout our our conversation. 217 00:12:53,160 --> 00:12:58,280 Speaker 1: Uh and UH. Another is the bargaining power discussion that 218 00:12:58,400 --> 00:13:02,439 Speaker 1: we've been having uh throughout our conversation. UH. And then 219 00:13:02,480 --> 00:13:06,520 Speaker 1: there is kind of a sectual story, as you were suggesting, UM, 220 00:13:06,559 --> 00:13:11,480 Speaker 1: there are sectors in our economy that are facing a 221 00:13:11,520 --> 00:13:14,160 Speaker 1: set of pressures they didn't face fourty or fifty years ago. 222 00:13:14,280 --> 00:13:18,640 Speaker 1: For instance, our manufacturers are in much more of a 223 00:13:18,640 --> 00:13:23,520 Speaker 1: global competitive situation than they were back in those days 224 00:13:23,559 --> 00:13:26,800 Speaker 1: of you know, literally two and three percent unemployment rates 225 00:13:26,840 --> 00:13:30,240 Speaker 1: if you go back to the nineteen sixties. UM and so, 226 00:13:30,559 --> 00:13:34,880 Speaker 1: uh what what While globalization has many upsides, no question, 227 00:13:35,000 --> 00:13:41,360 Speaker 1: particularly in terms of the supply of resources, liquid supply 228 00:13:41,480 --> 00:13:46,360 Speaker 1: chains and all that, UM, for many workers, blue collar workers, 229 00:13:46,400 --> 00:13:50,240 Speaker 1: production workers, workers and manufacturing, that kind of wage competition 230 00:13:50,320 --> 00:13:53,760 Speaker 1: has hurt them. M. That's become a very politically salient 231 00:13:53,960 --> 00:13:57,480 Speaker 1: effect in recent years. Need I say, Jared, In some 232 00:13:57,559 --> 00:14:00,520 Speaker 1: cases corporations are you for unions and not for the 233 00:14:00,559 --> 00:14:03,800 Speaker 1: best reasons. I used to report in Mexico, and there's 234 00:14:03,800 --> 00:14:07,120 Speaker 1: a practice they're called protection contracts, which has become standard. 235 00:14:07,200 --> 00:14:10,120 Speaker 1: It's basically an agreement between a company, in these case 236 00:14:10,160 --> 00:14:15,080 Speaker 1: automakers and an union that doesn't legitimately represent workers, UM, 237 00:14:15,120 --> 00:14:17,880 Speaker 1: which agrees even years before they break ground on the plant, 238 00:14:17,960 --> 00:14:21,360 Speaker 1: to keep wages really, really low. I'm wondering if you've 239 00:14:21,360 --> 00:14:24,320 Speaker 1: ever seen anything similar in the US, or basically if 240 00:14:24,360 --> 00:14:28,600 Speaker 1: you haven't, what's the bad side of unionizing. Yeah, I 241 00:14:28,640 --> 00:14:32,320 Speaker 1: think that those are these kind of basically management kind 242 00:14:32,360 --> 00:14:36,120 Speaker 1: of puppet unions UM. And I don't know that we've 243 00:14:36,160 --> 00:14:40,000 Speaker 1: had so much of that in this country. We've certainly 244 00:14:40,040 --> 00:14:44,240 Speaker 1: seen that in UM countries without much of the kind 245 00:14:44,240 --> 00:14:48,560 Speaker 1: of more industrialized union base that got started here in 246 00:14:48,600 --> 00:14:51,440 Speaker 1: the in in the Great Depression, UH, and you know, 247 00:14:51,520 --> 00:14:56,600 Speaker 1: fought their way off and violently into a much more 248 00:14:57,120 --> 00:15:00,320 Speaker 1: solid part of the job market, at least until their 249 00:15:00,320 --> 00:15:04,200 Speaker 1: membership really started to erode back in the in the 250 00:15:04,840 --> 00:15:07,200 Speaker 1: eighties or so with the pat Co strike. But if 251 00:15:07,240 --> 00:15:10,800 Speaker 1: you go back to the days of early unionism and 252 00:15:10,880 --> 00:15:13,880 Speaker 1: to sit down strike at Flint in the nineteen thirties, UM, 253 00:15:14,520 --> 00:15:19,640 Speaker 1: there was these were militant unions sometimes and militant management 254 00:15:19,680 --> 00:15:21,800 Speaker 1: by the way on the other side, and they were 255 00:15:21,800 --> 00:15:25,800 Speaker 1: fighting tooth and nail for UM what I'm calling bargaining power. 256 00:15:25,840 --> 00:15:28,280 Speaker 1: But back then they would have very much have seen 257 00:15:28,800 --> 00:15:32,960 Speaker 1: as h pushing back on essentially a corrupt system that 258 00:15:33,200 --> 00:15:37,080 Speaker 1: wasn't affording them the UH the pay that they believe 259 00:15:37,120 --> 00:15:40,920 Speaker 1: they deserved. So we we have to my knowledge, and 260 00:15:41,240 --> 00:15:43,920 Speaker 1: I must say that I haven't focused on this as much, 261 00:15:44,000 --> 00:15:47,120 Speaker 1: especially as unionization rates have gotten so low, But we 262 00:15:47,160 --> 00:15:49,640 Speaker 1: haven't had the kind of company union so much here 263 00:15:49,680 --> 00:15:54,000 Speaker 1: that you're describing in Mexico, Jared. When we originally were 264 00:15:54,040 --> 00:15:58,080 Speaker 1: coming up with the idea for this topic on this podcast, 265 00:15:58,440 --> 00:16:02,600 Speaker 1: we were looking at the the Hollywood writers, the TV writers, 266 00:16:02,640 --> 00:16:04,680 Speaker 1: and they were threatening to go on strike, and we 267 00:16:04,680 --> 00:16:06,600 Speaker 1: were going to do a show about how they were 268 00:16:06,640 --> 00:16:09,200 Speaker 1: on strike and what that says about the economy. And 269 00:16:09,280 --> 00:16:11,320 Speaker 1: in fact, at the very last minute, they reached a 270 00:16:11,360 --> 00:16:15,840 Speaker 1: settlement with the studios and and got some uh what 271 00:16:15,840 --> 00:16:19,320 Speaker 1: what seemed like some some decent pay increases or benefit 272 00:16:19,640 --> 00:16:22,640 Speaker 1: or benefits from that deal. And also a year ago 273 00:16:22,920 --> 00:16:26,120 Speaker 1: we had this big Verizon strike and even though both 274 00:16:26,120 --> 00:16:30,240 Speaker 1: sides claimed victory, there was some indication that that this 275 00:16:30,280 --> 00:16:33,720 Speaker 1: strike was able to get some benefits for for the 276 00:16:33,800 --> 00:16:36,920 Speaker 1: Verizon workers that maybe they wouldn't have had if they 277 00:16:36,920 --> 00:16:40,440 Speaker 1: weren't able to get organized. Now, putting these events together, 278 00:16:40,560 --> 00:16:45,560 Speaker 1: are these two things representative of what unions can still 279 00:16:45,600 --> 00:16:47,800 Speaker 1: do in the economy or they really kind of the 280 00:16:47,880 --> 00:16:51,720 Speaker 1: exception to the rule when it comes to workers bargaining 281 00:16:51,960 --> 00:16:57,600 Speaker 1: power these days, more the exception than the rule. Uh. Interestingly, 282 00:16:57,720 --> 00:17:01,360 Speaker 1: I think the way people in the union movement are 283 00:17:01,400 --> 00:17:04,159 Speaker 1: starting to think about the way forward. And remember, we 284 00:17:04,240 --> 00:17:07,240 Speaker 1: talked about a seven percent unionization rate in the private sector, 285 00:17:07,480 --> 00:17:11,040 Speaker 1: and that's as we've been saying, that's a multi decade trend. 286 00:17:11,119 --> 00:17:13,600 Speaker 1: And those kinds of trends are hard to turn around. 287 00:17:13,680 --> 00:17:16,480 Speaker 1: So folks are trying to think outside the box, and 288 00:17:16,520 --> 00:17:20,200 Speaker 1: they're thinking less about well, actually, in a way, it's 289 00:17:20,240 --> 00:17:22,280 Speaker 1: it's less about the kind of the Brizon model and 290 00:17:22,359 --> 00:17:26,520 Speaker 1: more the writer's model. That is, UH, instead of thinking 291 00:17:26,560 --> 00:17:31,359 Speaker 1: about organizing an industry, organizing a sector, organizing fast food, 292 00:17:31,560 --> 00:17:36,159 Speaker 1: or organizing retail, they're thinking about how they can organize 293 00:17:36,560 --> 00:17:39,000 Speaker 1: place by place. Now, this would take a change in 294 00:17:39,080 --> 00:17:42,080 Speaker 1: labor law, UM, and so you're not going to see 295 00:17:42,080 --> 00:17:46,080 Speaker 1: that from this administration. But the idea is that especially 296 00:17:46,080 --> 00:17:49,679 Speaker 1: with a more sort of what some people call the 297 00:17:49,680 --> 00:17:52,919 Speaker 1: the fisher economy or the gig economy, the the W 298 00:17:53,080 --> 00:17:56,639 Speaker 1: two economy, the idea that you're working maybe less for 299 00:17:56,680 --> 00:18:02,919 Speaker 1: a particular employer, there's more UM of self employment, UH, 300 00:18:03,160 --> 00:18:06,720 Speaker 1: independent contracting, things like that. UM. With with with those 301 00:18:06,800 --> 00:18:10,080 Speaker 1: kinds of developments going on, UM, people are starting to 302 00:18:10,119 --> 00:18:15,879 Speaker 1: think more about trying to form unions at a particular 303 00:18:16,040 --> 00:18:21,199 Speaker 1: restaurant versus UH the restaurant industry. UM that that if 304 00:18:21,240 --> 00:18:23,480 Speaker 1: they're able to pull that off, that may may give 305 00:18:23,520 --> 00:18:28,800 Speaker 1: them some uh may give them some success. So Jerry, 306 00:18:28,800 --> 00:18:30,960 Speaker 1: we definitely have a tight labor market. We saw a 307 00:18:31,040 --> 00:18:34,440 Speaker 1: high number of openings and quits this morning. So with 308 00:18:34,720 --> 00:18:36,840 Speaker 1: or without unions, what's it gonna take for us to 309 00:18:36,840 --> 00:18:39,080 Speaker 1: see higher wages in the US? Well, I think the 310 00:18:39,080 --> 00:18:43,320 Speaker 1: wage story is a really interesting one. Um. Uh. Wages 311 00:18:43,359 --> 00:18:47,320 Speaker 1: have accelerated, as I'm sure you know, if you go back, 312 00:18:48,200 --> 00:18:50,800 Speaker 1: uh a year and a half or so, wages we're 313 00:18:50,800 --> 00:18:54,040 Speaker 1: growing two percent year over year nominal. Uh. Now they're 314 00:18:54,080 --> 00:18:57,520 Speaker 1: growing somewhere between two point five and three percent. I 315 00:18:57,560 --> 00:18:59,880 Speaker 1: have an index that I put together which takes five 316 00:19:00,000 --> 00:19:03,119 Speaker 1: different series and smashes it together in some sort of 317 00:19:03,440 --> 00:19:08,159 Speaker 1: sophisticated waiting way. Um, and uh, it's it's growing. It 318 00:19:08,320 --> 00:19:11,760 Speaker 1: was growing two percent, now it's growing two point eight percent. Um. 319 00:19:11,800 --> 00:19:17,040 Speaker 1: So we're getting some some uh bump. But the thing 320 00:19:17,080 --> 00:19:19,520 Speaker 1: that's got me nervous now, and this is only a 321 00:19:19,520 --> 00:19:22,560 Speaker 1: few months so these numbers, as you know, are jumpy, 322 00:19:22,760 --> 00:19:25,200 Speaker 1: is that if you look at the blue collar wage 323 00:19:25,320 --> 00:19:29,520 Speaker 1: or the wage of non managers and services, so of 324 00:19:29,560 --> 00:19:32,800 Speaker 1: the workforce that's not in the that that's that's in 325 00:19:32,840 --> 00:19:36,880 Speaker 1: those categories. Um, they went from two to two point 326 00:19:36,920 --> 00:19:39,080 Speaker 1: five and they've just been sitting at two point five 327 00:19:39,119 --> 00:19:41,800 Speaker 1: for a number of months, even as the jobless rate 328 00:19:41,840 --> 00:19:44,280 Speaker 1: has come down. Now, if you look at the other 329 00:19:45,000 --> 00:19:48,239 Speaker 1: of the workforce with higher wages, they've started growing at 330 00:19:48,280 --> 00:19:50,720 Speaker 1: a pace that's closer to three or even north of three. 331 00:19:51,280 --> 00:19:55,480 Speaker 1: And so I'm worried that there's this wage inequality problem evolving. Uh, 332 00:19:55,480 --> 00:19:59,359 Speaker 1: and I gotta be watching that. It's definitely a story 333 00:19:59,520 --> 00:20:02,520 Speaker 1: that we will will continue to follow here at Bloomberg 334 00:20:02,640 --> 00:20:05,960 Speaker 1: and on Benchmark. Jared Bernstein, thank you so much for 335 00:20:06,040 --> 00:20:09,400 Speaker 1: being with us today. My pleasure Benchmark will be back 336 00:20:09,440 --> 00:20:11,320 Speaker 1: next week and until then, you can find us on 337 00:20:11,359 --> 00:20:15,000 Speaker 1: the Bloomberg terminal, Bloomberg dot com, or Bloomberg App, as 338 00:20:15,040 --> 00:20:19,040 Speaker 1: well as on Apple podcast, Pocketcast, Stitcher, or wherever you 339 00:20:19,080 --> 00:20:22,159 Speaker 1: might enjoy listening to podcasts. While you're there, take a 340 00:20:22,200 --> 00:20:24,520 Speaker 1: minute to rate and review the show so more listeners 341 00:20:24,520 --> 00:20:26,920 Speaker 1: can find us and let us know what you thought 342 00:20:26,920 --> 00:20:29,200 Speaker 1: of the show. You can follow me on Twitter at 343 00:20:29,240 --> 00:20:33,760 Speaker 1: at Scott Landman Patty you are at Patty Lea, and 344 00:20:34,080 --> 00:20:38,240 Speaker 1: our guest Jared Bernstein is at at icon. Jared Benchmark 345 00:20:38,320 --> 00:20:41,240 Speaker 1: is produced by Sarah Patterson. The head of Bloomberg Podcast 346 00:20:41,400 --> 00:20:44,440 Speaker 1: is Alec McKay. Thanks for listening to you. Next time, 347 00:21:00,160 --> 00:21:00,200 Speaker 1: n