WEBVTT - SEC's Gary Gensler and an AI Future

0:00:01.440 --> 0:00:05.760
<v Speaker 1>From Mahart where Innovation, Money and power Collie in Silicon

0:00:05.840 --> 0:00:10.280
<v Speaker 1>Vallet NBN. This is Bloomberg Technology with Caroline Hyde and

0:00:10.520 --> 0:00:11.600
<v Speaker 1>Ed Ludlow.

0:00:25.840 --> 0:00:29.120
<v Speaker 2>Live from London and San Francisco. This is Bloomberg Technology

0:00:29.200 --> 0:00:33.640
<v Speaker 2>coming up ASML's CEO on how the US China relationship

0:00:33.880 --> 0:00:35.360
<v Speaker 2>could shape the chip industry.

0:00:36.400 --> 0:00:39.400
<v Speaker 3>The future of sec Oversight will be joined live by

0:00:39.520 --> 0:00:41.320
<v Speaker 3>chair Gary Gensler.

0:00:42.000 --> 0:00:44.760
<v Speaker 2>And SAP shares saw to a new record thanks to

0:00:44.800 --> 0:00:48.280
<v Speaker 2>AI driving cloud revenue. We have that and many more

0:00:48.280 --> 0:00:51.280
<v Speaker 2>earnings for you. But first, let's just check on these markets.

0:00:51.280 --> 0:00:53.600
<v Speaker 2>We shine a light on the Nasdaq, which is currently

0:00:53.640 --> 0:00:55.120
<v Speaker 2>off by about a tenth per percent. The S and

0:00:55.160 --> 0:00:57.400
<v Speaker 2>P five founded off for two straight days. That's the

0:00:57.440 --> 0:00:59.840
<v Speaker 2>first back to back losses we've seen in six weeks.

0:01:00.160 --> 0:01:02.560
<v Speaker 2>There's some caution about where the Federal Reserve goes from here.

0:01:02.640 --> 0:01:04.280
<v Speaker 2>Does it continue to cut rates in the face of

0:01:04.319 --> 0:01:07.120
<v Speaker 2>resilient US economy even as the IMF warns of a

0:01:07.200 --> 0:01:10.160
<v Speaker 2>global slow down ed? But we see tech just off

0:01:10.200 --> 0:01:12.679
<v Speaker 2>a little bit. What's risk sentiment like for some of.

0:01:12.600 --> 0:01:13.440
<v Speaker 4>The names you're watching?

0:01:14.000 --> 0:01:17.360
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, interesting, I'm probably top story is ASML, the Dutch

0:01:17.400 --> 0:01:20.280
<v Speaker 3>producer of chip making equipment. We're about to get right

0:01:20.319 --> 0:01:23.240
<v Speaker 3>to a critical interview with the CEO. But the shares

0:01:23.240 --> 0:01:25.640
<v Speaker 3>are worth looking at because at the high of the

0:01:25.680 --> 0:01:27.920
<v Speaker 3>session in Europe they are up more than three percent.

0:01:27.959 --> 0:01:30.720
<v Speaker 3>They've paired that gain to one percent, but it's worth

0:01:30.760 --> 0:01:34.560
<v Speaker 3>noting we're down still more than fifteen percent since that

0:01:34.680 --> 0:01:37.400
<v Speaker 3>kind of fateful early release of earnings that we covered

0:01:37.400 --> 0:01:40.600
<v Speaker 3>so deeply last week. Intense focus on this name in

0:01:40.640 --> 0:01:43.600
<v Speaker 3>the context of AI and what's happening with chip investment

0:01:43.640 --> 0:01:44.280
<v Speaker 3>around the world.

0:01:44.400 --> 0:01:45.720
<v Speaker 4>Bring us the details, Carra.

0:01:46.680 --> 0:01:49.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, let's get to the ASML CEO Christal Fouquet, who

0:01:49.960 --> 0:01:53.320
<v Speaker 2>spoke this morning at the Bloomberg Tech Summit with our

0:01:53.360 --> 0:01:55.960
<v Speaker 2>own Tom Giles. It was right here in London. He

0:01:56.000 --> 0:01:58.520
<v Speaker 2>discussed the future of the chip industry more broadly in China,

0:01:58.520 --> 0:02:01.960
<v Speaker 2>in particular the future revenues and the impact of US regulation.

0:02:02.120 --> 0:02:02.680
<v Speaker 5>Just take a lessen.

0:02:04.520 --> 0:02:08.960
<v Speaker 6>The focus of China is on mainstream semiconductor. The demand

0:02:09.000 --> 0:02:13.000
<v Speaker 6>for that has boomed in twenty twenty one twenty two.

0:02:13.520 --> 0:02:15.240
<v Speaker 1>As a resource, the demand we.

0:02:15.160 --> 0:02:17.320
<v Speaker 6>Had in China in twenty twenty one twenty two has

0:02:17.320 --> 0:02:20.440
<v Speaker 6>boomed as well, and twenty one twenty two was the

0:02:20.520 --> 0:02:25.640
<v Speaker 6>time if you recall where the demand was extremely high

0:02:25.960 --> 0:02:32.000
<v Speaker 6>and SMR was struggling to deliver tools to everyone. Therefore

0:02:32.040 --> 0:02:35.000
<v Speaker 6>we couldn't deliver a large part of the demand in China.

0:02:35.600 --> 0:02:40.480
<v Speaker 6>Backlog in China grew twenty twenty three the rest of markets,

0:02:40.480 --> 0:02:43.840
<v Speaker 6>so offten we got tools we could ship to China,

0:02:44.840 --> 0:02:48.040
<v Speaker 6>same in twenty twenty four. So the level of business

0:02:48.080 --> 0:02:50.480
<v Speaker 6>we had with Chine twenty three twenty four was more

0:02:50.720 --> 0:02:54.040
<v Speaker 6>of a resource of the non delivered capacity in twenty

0:02:54.040 --> 0:02:58.200
<v Speaker 6>two twenty one than anything else. And we've always explained that,

0:02:58.280 --> 0:03:02.400
<v Speaker 6>you know, our fifty percent of the business in China,

0:03:02.520 --> 0:03:05.320
<v Speaker 6>or most fifty percent, this was not normal. This was

0:03:05.320 --> 0:03:09.200
<v Speaker 6>a peak resulting from basically.

0:03:09.520 --> 0:03:11.040
<v Speaker 1>A lack of a bittervery before.

0:03:11.720 --> 0:03:14.840
<v Speaker 6>The normal business in China is around twenty twenty five percent,

0:03:15.200 --> 0:03:19.440
<v Speaker 6>and that's the normal demand related to mainstreams to be conductor,

0:03:19.480 --> 0:03:20.919
<v Speaker 6>and I think we're going to go back to those

0:03:21.000 --> 0:03:21.800
<v Speaker 6>number over time.

0:03:22.040 --> 0:03:25.320
<v Speaker 7>But there is something artificial about the way we think

0:03:25.360 --> 0:03:29.240
<v Speaker 7>about China as a as a purchaser of equipment like asmls,

0:03:29.480 --> 0:03:33.760
<v Speaker 7>in the sense that many countries around the world US

0:03:33.800 --> 0:03:41.080
<v Speaker 7>principally have have have been exerting export controls on the country.

0:03:41.160 --> 0:03:45.640
<v Speaker 7>Are those controls going to become even more stringent? For example,

0:03:47.720 --> 0:03:50.200
<v Speaker 7>China is not able to buy your most advanced machines.

0:03:50.320 --> 0:03:54.200
<v Speaker 7>Is it possible that those restrictions could extend to the

0:03:54.280 --> 0:03:59.360
<v Speaker 7>DUV level, which is used for more mainstream products.

0:04:00.320 --> 0:04:00.520
<v Speaker 8>Yeah.

0:04:00.600 --> 0:04:03.880
<v Speaker 6>So if you go back to the root cause of

0:04:03.960 --> 0:04:07.200
<v Speaker 6>the say, the prime motivation of export ConTroll it to

0:04:07.280 --> 0:04:10.080
<v Speaker 6>us to prevent China to have access to advanced technology.

0:04:11.160 --> 0:04:12.360
<v Speaker 1>EWE is not in China.

0:04:13.320 --> 0:04:18.400
<v Speaker 6>By not having you in China, we pretty much stop

0:04:18.720 --> 0:04:22.760
<v Speaker 6>the ability of China to go beyond the five maybe

0:04:22.800 --> 0:04:26.719
<v Speaker 6>three nonometer note may be able to do a few chips.

0:04:26.920 --> 0:04:28.240
<v Speaker 1>You may see some of that in.

0:04:28.200 --> 0:04:31.440
<v Speaker 6>The press because of of course everyone is watching very carefully.

0:04:32.120 --> 0:04:37.719
<v Speaker 6>But fundamentally, by not having EUV, we have placed China.

0:04:38.120 --> 0:04:40.800
<v Speaker 6>The regulation have placed China I would say ten to

0:04:40.839 --> 0:04:44.919
<v Speaker 6>fifteen years behind when it comes to advanced technology. We

0:04:44.960 --> 0:04:48.599
<v Speaker 6>always talk about China. We usually forget to mention the

0:04:48.680 --> 0:04:52.120
<v Speaker 6>fact that while those restrictions have applied on China and UV,

0:04:52.920 --> 0:04:57.159
<v Speaker 6>a lot of work has been done with other player

0:04:57.200 --> 0:05:02.240
<v Speaker 6>and industry Intel, TSMC, Samsung on the most advanced EUV

0:05:02.400 --> 0:05:05.720
<v Speaker 6>technology as we know it today, et.

0:05:05.720 --> 0:05:06.279
<v Speaker 1>Cetera, et cetera.

0:05:06.440 --> 0:05:08.960
<v Speaker 6>So there's been a lot of work down every single

0:05:09.080 --> 0:05:13.400
<v Speaker 6>day to continue to widen if you want this technology gap.

0:05:13.279 --> 0:05:17.080
<v Speaker 7>Based on your interaction with the Prime Minister of the

0:05:17.120 --> 0:05:22.080
<v Speaker 7>Netherlands with the Foreign Ministry, is it your expectation that

0:05:22.160 --> 0:05:28.120
<v Speaker 7>the restrictions will become even more limiting on China's ability

0:05:28.160 --> 0:05:30.960
<v Speaker 7>to purchase machinery like asmls.

0:05:31.520 --> 0:05:35.720
<v Speaker 6>Well, if you look at the geopolitic landscape, I think

0:05:35.760 --> 0:05:38.719
<v Speaker 6>it's clear that the United States will continue to apply

0:05:38.839 --> 0:05:43.240
<v Speaker 6>pressure on their life for more restriction. Now, the question

0:05:44.000 --> 0:05:47.200
<v Speaker 6>the discussion we have with the Dutch Prime minister, I

0:05:47.240 --> 0:05:51.800
<v Speaker 6>would say the European political leader, because at the end

0:05:51.839 --> 0:05:56.320
<v Speaker 6>of the day, we are technology champion company, right, So

0:05:56.480 --> 0:05:59.480
<v Speaker 6>these other people we have this discussion with, and the

0:05:59.560 --> 0:06:03.480
<v Speaker 6>question is what is right for the Netherlands, what is

0:06:03.560 --> 0:06:06.160
<v Speaker 6>right for Europe and as a results, what is right

0:06:06.200 --> 0:06:06.800
<v Speaker 6>for SML.

0:06:07.640 --> 0:06:10.159
<v Speaker 1>So what restriction makes sense when.

0:06:10.040 --> 0:06:13.200
<v Speaker 6>It comes to national security, which has been the prime argument,

0:06:14.480 --> 0:06:17.440
<v Speaker 6>and where does it stop right because, like I said,

0:06:17.440 --> 0:06:19.440
<v Speaker 6>a lot of the focus in China today is on

0:06:19.520 --> 0:06:25.520
<v Speaker 6>mainstream semiconductor and this is very different from you know AI.

0:06:26.160 --> 0:06:28.200
<v Speaker 6>So that's the discussion we have is if the pressure

0:06:28.240 --> 0:06:31.359
<v Speaker 6>will continue to be there because you know, if you

0:06:31.400 --> 0:06:34.680
<v Speaker 6>look at the landscape, that's what it is. But I

0:06:34.680 --> 0:06:38.440
<v Speaker 6>think that the discussion will get more sophisticated over time,

0:06:39.279 --> 0:06:40.680
<v Speaker 6>the stake will become higher.

0:06:43.279 --> 0:06:47.400
<v Speaker 3>That was asmlco Crystal fuqu earlier today at the Bloomberg

0:06:47.640 --> 0:06:50.000
<v Speaker 3>Summer in London. Let's discuss this a bit more. Ioko

0:06:50.080 --> 0:06:54.760
<v Speaker 3>Yoshioka is portfolio consulting director a wealth Enhancement group. I

0:06:54.800 --> 0:06:56.640
<v Speaker 3>took a quick glance down at my Bloomberg terminal.

0:06:56.720 --> 0:06:57.240
<v Speaker 8>I think you.

0:06:57.160 --> 0:07:01.600
<v Speaker 3>Guys have a small exposure to the ADRs of ASML.

0:07:02.200 --> 0:07:05.920
<v Speaker 3>But listening to that intense conversation, the themes are clear, right.

0:07:06.279 --> 0:07:06.960
<v Speaker 8>Will there be.

0:07:07.000 --> 0:07:10.600
<v Speaker 3>More export controls from the US to China when it

0:07:10.600 --> 0:07:13.560
<v Speaker 3>relates to the lead edge of chips? Will there be

0:07:13.640 --> 0:07:16.760
<v Speaker 3>increased tensions in the supply chain? When you listen to

0:07:16.760 --> 0:07:20.400
<v Speaker 3>that interview, how do you think about a name like ASML?

0:07:20.520 --> 0:07:22.040
<v Speaker 9>Good morning, Good morning ED.

0:07:22.520 --> 0:07:24.840
<v Speaker 10>So you know, when we think about just the overall

0:07:24.880 --> 0:07:29.000
<v Speaker 10>semiconductor chip equipment industry, you know, I think one of

0:07:29.040 --> 0:07:32.560
<v Speaker 10>the key things that the CEO of ASML focus on

0:07:32.680 --> 0:07:36.080
<v Speaker 10>is the mainstream versus AI. You know, we are seeing

0:07:36.120 --> 0:07:40.040
<v Speaker 10>that growth on the AI side. We like names like

0:07:40.160 --> 0:07:43.440
<v Speaker 10>LAM Research as well, which has you know, some etching

0:07:43.480 --> 0:07:46.840
<v Speaker 10>tools for DRAM, which is used a little bit more

0:07:46.840 --> 0:07:49.560
<v Speaker 10>on the AI side, So you know, one area is

0:07:49.960 --> 0:07:53.080
<v Speaker 10>growing a lot more. I think the mainstream side is

0:07:53.080 --> 0:07:55.720
<v Speaker 10>trying to normalize a little bit, especially with everything that's

0:07:55.760 --> 0:07:58.000
<v Speaker 10>going on in China, and you just have to find

0:07:58.040 --> 0:08:01.120
<v Speaker 10>a balance between the two as we look at what

0:08:01.160 --> 0:08:03.680
<v Speaker 10>the chip industry is going to look like going forward.

0:08:05.400 --> 0:08:08.440
<v Speaker 2>Looking at it going forward, do you have any view

0:08:08.480 --> 0:08:13.640
<v Speaker 2>that it'll change post November the fifth, sixth, when we

0:08:13.720 --> 0:08:16.440
<v Speaker 2>have a different outcome from an election and post January

0:08:16.480 --> 0:08:18.320
<v Speaker 2>when we have a different administration in the US.

0:08:18.760 --> 0:08:22.000
<v Speaker 10>You know, it's definitely something that we and our clients

0:08:22.040 --> 0:08:24.080
<v Speaker 10>talk about a lot in terms of what are the

0:08:24.080 --> 0:08:27.760
<v Speaker 10>potential regulatory issues as well as what are the policies

0:08:27.760 --> 0:08:31.240
<v Speaker 10>that might get put in place, whether it's tariffs and whatnot.

0:08:31.360 --> 0:08:35.160
<v Speaker 10>And it can change things going forward, but we have

0:08:35.240 --> 0:08:37.959
<v Speaker 10>to wait and see what the actual details will be

0:08:38.840 --> 0:08:41.320
<v Speaker 10>once we know who's in office and what types of

0:08:41.360 --> 0:08:44.080
<v Speaker 10>policies they're going to be able to get past, just

0:08:44.160 --> 0:08:47.760
<v Speaker 10>also depending on the composition of Congress.

0:08:48.200 --> 0:08:51.680
<v Speaker 2>What has been so abundantly clear is that there is

0:08:51.760 --> 0:08:55.199
<v Speaker 2>the AI perspective of chips, and then there's everything else,

0:08:55.679 --> 0:08:58.520
<v Speaker 2>And from your perspective, is it investable in the everything

0:08:58.520 --> 0:09:00.760
<v Speaker 2>else at the moment when we are still seeing inventory

0:09:00.800 --> 0:09:04.280
<v Speaker 2>weigh so heavily, whether it's the auto exposure, whether it's

0:09:04.320 --> 0:09:05.319
<v Speaker 2>consumer exposure.

0:09:06.040 --> 0:09:07.760
<v Speaker 10>So in the near term, I think it's a little

0:09:07.800 --> 0:09:10.439
<v Speaker 10>bit tougher. You know, in the near term we are

0:09:10.480 --> 0:09:14.480
<v Speaker 10>seeing an oversupply of autos and some of the industrials

0:09:14.520 --> 0:09:18.120
<v Speaker 10>are still sort of struggling. So in market wise, you know,

0:09:18.280 --> 0:09:20.720
<v Speaker 10>it's not as great as it was back in twenty

0:09:20.760 --> 0:09:23.720
<v Speaker 10>twenty year, twenty twenty one. But you know, I think

0:09:23.760 --> 0:09:26.720
<v Speaker 10>going forward, as rates come down and as we see

0:09:26.760 --> 0:09:29.559
<v Speaker 10>the economy continue to stay strong, I think you can

0:09:29.600 --> 0:09:32.240
<v Speaker 10>see a lot of that continuing to grow over the

0:09:32.280 --> 0:09:36.280
<v Speaker 10>long term. You know, these cyclical industries go through these

0:09:36.280 --> 0:09:38.040
<v Speaker 10>ebbs and flows and you just have to kind of

0:09:38.240 --> 0:09:38.880
<v Speaker 10>play through that.

0:09:39.720 --> 0:09:42.640
<v Speaker 3>So that's why Caroline's question is so interesting, The conversation

0:09:42.760 --> 0:09:47.280
<v Speaker 3>is so interesting. They are historically cyclical industries, and forget

0:09:47.400 --> 0:09:50.240
<v Speaker 3>sort of the equity market portion of this. You know,

0:09:50.520 --> 0:09:53.240
<v Speaker 3>the impact of the Chips Act, what's happening in Europe,

0:09:53.240 --> 0:09:56.720
<v Speaker 3>all the money in capex commitment, is there a risk

0:09:56.800 --> 0:09:59.199
<v Speaker 3>that it's overdone, over invested.

0:10:00.120 --> 0:10:02.120
<v Speaker 10>So I think the big risk is that some of

0:10:02.120 --> 0:10:05.840
<v Speaker 10>these hyperscalers do pause and take a little bit of

0:10:05.880 --> 0:10:09.400
<v Speaker 10>their foot off the pedal when it comes to overall

0:10:09.640 --> 0:10:13.400
<v Speaker 10>capax investing on the AI side, because then you have

0:10:13.760 --> 0:10:17.840
<v Speaker 10>the cyclical low on the mainstream side and a pause

0:10:18.000 --> 0:10:21.959
<v Speaker 10>potentially on the AI side. So that would be the

0:10:22.000 --> 0:10:24.319
<v Speaker 10>biggest concern. But I think when you look at it

0:10:24.559 --> 0:10:27.360
<v Speaker 10>in a three to five year outlook, it will all

0:10:27.400 --> 0:10:30.640
<v Speaker 10>sort of equal out and provide growth on both sides.

0:10:31.520 --> 0:10:33.839
<v Speaker 3>You know what we don't talk as much about sometimes

0:10:33.920 --> 0:10:37.840
<v Speaker 3>oko is the technology bit. I'm pretty sure that Monsieur

0:10:37.880 --> 0:10:42.040
<v Speaker 3>Fouquet would say that ASML is at the absolute cutting

0:10:42.120 --> 0:10:44.959
<v Speaker 3>edge of extreme ultra violet lithography. And I bring that

0:10:45.040 --> 0:10:47.240
<v Speaker 3>up because he'd probably also say that there is no

0:10:47.360 --> 0:10:51.000
<v Speaker 3>company in China that could do what they do. So

0:10:51.040 --> 0:10:53.160
<v Speaker 3>in all of this, all the risk and the chaos

0:10:53.240 --> 0:10:56.480
<v Speaker 3>and the politics, is that not something worth considering if

0:10:56.520 --> 0:10:58.480
<v Speaker 3>you're an investor in the technology sector.

0:10:59.000 --> 0:11:02.960
<v Speaker 10>Absolutely, And you know, these chip equipment makers are down

0:11:03.000 --> 0:11:06.120
<v Speaker 10>substantially from their highs, and so I believe that they

0:11:06.280 --> 0:11:09.760
<v Speaker 10>are providing at least the stocks are providing an opportunity

0:11:09.840 --> 0:11:12.960
<v Speaker 10>to get in for investors, and the near term might not,

0:11:13.200 --> 0:11:16.040
<v Speaker 10>you know, be as rewarding as you might think right away,

0:11:16.080 --> 0:11:18.320
<v Speaker 10>but I think over the long term you can see

0:11:18.320 --> 0:11:21.160
<v Speaker 10>that benefit of these chip makers. There are not a

0:11:21.160 --> 0:11:23.360
<v Speaker 10>lot of them out there. There's only a few of

0:11:23.400 --> 0:11:27.400
<v Speaker 10>them that can do what they do from a technological standpoint.

0:11:28.400 --> 0:11:32.240
<v Speaker 2>And there in lies the heart of ultimately competition, which

0:11:32.240 --> 0:11:34.880
<v Speaker 2>is what Ed's getting at. And what's so interesting is

0:11:34.920 --> 0:11:38.000
<v Speaker 2>not just competition coming from chip makers against chip makers,

0:11:38.000 --> 0:11:42.440
<v Speaker 2>but eventually these hyperscalers, whether we see them remain committed

0:11:42.520 --> 0:11:45.080
<v Speaker 2>to purchasing in vidio chips at the rate that they are,

0:11:45.400 --> 0:11:47.760
<v Speaker 2>what about making their own chips? What that means to

0:11:47.800 --> 0:11:48.800
<v Speaker 2>the ecosystem?

0:11:48.840 --> 0:11:49.319
<v Speaker 1>How are you.

0:11:49.400 --> 0:11:51.960
<v Speaker 2>Trying to see that out over the next three to

0:11:52.000 --> 0:11:52.760
<v Speaker 2>five years as well?

0:11:52.880 --> 0:11:55.360
<v Speaker 10>Okay, sure, I think you have to, you know, keep

0:11:56.320 --> 0:11:58.680
<v Speaker 10>your pulse on all of it, because you know, from

0:11:58.960 --> 0:12:01.920
<v Speaker 10>the hyper scalers perspective, I don't think anybody wants to

0:12:01.960 --> 0:12:05.800
<v Speaker 10>be solely reliant on in Nvidia, and especially given some

0:12:05.840 --> 0:12:08.600
<v Speaker 10>of the supply issues that they've had as well, So

0:12:09.000 --> 0:12:11.360
<v Speaker 10>you know, it's it's something that we continue to monitor

0:12:11.400 --> 0:12:14.959
<v Speaker 10>on a quarter by quarter basis and do our research on.

0:12:16.520 --> 0:12:17.440
<v Speaker 4>On your research.

0:12:17.640 --> 0:12:21.080
<v Speaker 3>The invitations the CES have started going out this week

0:12:21.400 --> 0:12:23.480
<v Speaker 3>and heading into the U. I just wondered if you

0:12:23.520 --> 0:12:27.480
<v Speaker 3>suspect we'll be talking about exactly the same stuff in January,

0:12:27.800 --> 0:12:29.600
<v Speaker 3>or if we might have moved on to something new

0:12:29.640 --> 0:12:32.160
<v Speaker 3>that you've found through your research.

0:12:33.040 --> 0:12:35.120
<v Speaker 10>I think we're going to continue to be talking a

0:12:35.120 --> 0:12:38.040
<v Speaker 10>lot about AI for quite some time. I think there's

0:12:38.040 --> 0:12:41.840
<v Speaker 10>still a lot of areas to, you know, unfold. There

0:12:41.840 --> 0:12:46.200
<v Speaker 10>could be a killer app that potentially surprises us at CES.

0:12:47.040 --> 0:12:49.200
<v Speaker 10>You know, we never know, and I think that's why

0:12:49.280 --> 0:12:50.640
<v Speaker 10>you have to keep your finger.

0:12:50.400 --> 0:12:50.960
<v Speaker 1>On the pulse.

0:12:52.200 --> 0:12:54.400
<v Speaker 2>Oh, We're only gonna be talking about quantum them, I'm sure.

0:12:54.600 --> 0:12:57.320
<v Speaker 2>I Oka, yes, Ka, We thank you so much. Portfolio

0:12:57.360 --> 0:12:59.320
<v Speaker 2>Consulting director over at Wealthy Enhancement Group.

0:12:59.480 --> 0:13:00.080
<v Speaker 5>We need to have.

0:13:00.480 --> 0:13:03.439
<v Speaker 2>Coming up we're going to be hearing from the essay PCFO.

0:13:03.480 --> 0:13:08.560
<v Speaker 2>That's Dominique Assam. What's now Europe's biggest software company with

0:13:08.640 --> 0:13:09.439
<v Speaker 2>some stellar numbers.

0:13:09.440 --> 0:13:10.960
<v Speaker 5>This is bluem Meg Technology.

0:13:25.320 --> 0:13:28.520
<v Speaker 2>SAP shares jumping to a record after the company announced

0:13:28.520 --> 0:13:31.480
<v Speaker 2>a twenty five percent increase in cloud revenue over the year.

0:13:31.880 --> 0:13:35.160
<v Speaker 2>The company's CFO Dominique Assam spoke with Bloomberg earlier.

0:13:35.200 --> 0:13:35.760
<v Speaker 5>Take a listen.

0:13:36.320 --> 0:13:40.400
<v Speaker 11>We had actually, if you adjust for currency fluctuation, constant

0:13:40.400 --> 0:13:44.800
<v Speaker 11>currency cloud revenue growth of twenty seven percent, and by

0:13:44.840 --> 0:13:48.520
<v Speaker 11>now have actually more cloud revenues in our total revenue

0:13:48.559 --> 0:13:51.880
<v Speaker 11>base than any other source of revenue. So we can

0:13:51.920 --> 0:13:55.440
<v Speaker 11>say after four years of heavy transformation towards the cloud,

0:13:55.480 --> 0:13:58.520
<v Speaker 11>our strategy is paying off handsomely. If you look at

0:13:58.520 --> 0:14:02.000
<v Speaker 11>the composition where that comes from, eighty four percent of

0:14:02.040 --> 0:14:05.400
<v Speaker 11>that cloud revenue is generated but by what we call

0:14:05.480 --> 0:14:08.080
<v Speaker 11>Cloud year Peace feed, which is the core cloud offering

0:14:08.160 --> 0:14:11.760
<v Speaker 11>of SAP, that has actually growing thirty six percent in

0:14:11.840 --> 0:14:15.520
<v Speaker 11>constant currency terms, and that's the eleventh quarter where that

0:14:15.559 --> 0:14:18.520
<v Speaker 11>growth has exceeded the thirty percent growth mark. So that's

0:14:18.559 --> 0:14:21.440
<v Speaker 11>really the core engine powering our growth. And what is

0:14:21.600 --> 0:14:25.240
<v Speaker 11>even better, our so called CCB current cloud backlog, which

0:14:25.280 --> 0:14:30.560
<v Speaker 11>is the twelve months ahead committed subscription revenue is roaring

0:14:30.640 --> 0:14:34.600
<v Speaker 11>at twenty nine percent, so there's also good visibility on

0:14:34.680 --> 0:14:35.800
<v Speaker 11>the growth lying ahead.

0:14:37.200 --> 0:14:39.200
<v Speaker 12>When it comes to the market, to the market cap,

0:14:39.360 --> 0:14:41.000
<v Speaker 12>the stock is up about fifty percent a little over

0:14:41.040 --> 0:14:43.120
<v Speaker 12>fifty percent year today, so you can you can take

0:14:43.640 --> 0:14:45.680
<v Speaker 12>something of a victory lap on that front. The market

0:14:45.680 --> 0:14:47.720
<v Speaker 12>cap is up about one hundred billion US or one

0:14:47.760 --> 0:14:51.840
<v Speaker 12>hundred billion euros since this time last year. It means

0:14:51.880 --> 0:14:54.680
<v Speaker 12>that on your listing you're bumping up against that fifteen

0:14:54.760 --> 0:14:58.320
<v Speaker 12>percent cap. Is Germany still a good place to be listed?

0:14:58.600 --> 0:15:00.600
<v Speaker 12>That is a bit of a challenge for at this point,

0:15:00.640 --> 0:15:00.920
<v Speaker 12>is it not?

0:15:02.080 --> 0:15:03.320
<v Speaker 1>Well, you're right, we.

0:15:03.280 --> 0:15:05.400
<v Speaker 11>Would like to see that kind of fifteen percent cap

0:15:05.480 --> 0:15:08.680
<v Speaker 11>disappear because it constrains a little bit the demand in Germany.

0:15:08.960 --> 0:15:11.880
<v Speaker 11>But we are really focusing on the large pools of

0:15:11.960 --> 0:15:14.240
<v Speaker 11>capital available in the United States. There are still a

0:15:14.240 --> 0:15:16.120
<v Speaker 11>lot of runway, a lot of room for us to

0:15:16.240 --> 0:15:19.800
<v Speaker 11>grow and attract new investors. We would like not to

0:15:19.840 --> 0:15:23.200
<v Speaker 11>exit Germany, but to the country attract capital into Germany,

0:15:23.320 --> 0:15:25.480
<v Speaker 11>and on that front, I have to agree the fifteen

0:15:25.480 --> 0:15:28.440
<v Speaker 11>percent cap in the decks is not very helpful. There's

0:15:28.520 --> 0:15:31.400
<v Speaker 11>other regulation in Europe, for instance, on so called use

0:15:31.400 --> 0:15:34.480
<v Speaker 11>its funds which are actively managed. Many of them are

0:15:34.520 --> 0:15:36.680
<v Speaker 11>actively managed, which are also a little bit constraining, and

0:15:36.720 --> 0:15:39.960
<v Speaker 11>we are currently trying to convince those who run these indecs,

0:15:40.200 --> 0:15:44.400
<v Speaker 11>those in charge of legislation, to reconsider that cap.

0:15:46.240 --> 0:15:50.200
<v Speaker 3>There was sap CFO Dominique Assam earlier on Bloomberg also

0:15:50.240 --> 0:15:53.760
<v Speaker 3>speaking say m CEO Rene Haas, who says he's open

0:15:53.960 --> 0:15:56.360
<v Speaker 3>to a secondary listener listing listen to this.

0:15:57.320 --> 0:16:00.400
<v Speaker 13>We listed in New York over a year ago, and

0:16:00.480 --> 0:16:03.000
<v Speaker 13>at that time are comments where we would look at

0:16:03.000 --> 0:16:06.440
<v Speaker 13>a secondary listening. We're still open to it. It's not

0:16:06.520 --> 0:16:09.920
<v Speaker 13>something that's top of mind right now quite candidly, but

0:16:10.440 --> 0:16:12.680
<v Speaker 13>will continue to have discussions with both stakeholders and the

0:16:12.720 --> 0:16:14.480
<v Speaker 13>government and in the local change.

0:16:16.800 --> 0:16:20.720
<v Speaker 2>Another conversation we had was with tech investment Giant Process,

0:16:20.760 --> 0:16:24.640
<v Speaker 2>the CEO Fabricio Bluisi. We talked about the current roadblocks

0:16:24.680 --> 0:16:28.120
<v Speaker 2>facing adopting generative AI and where he will continue to

0:16:28.160 --> 0:16:29.240
<v Speaker 2>invest in the technology.

0:16:29.280 --> 0:16:32.480
<v Speaker 5>He's just part of our conversation the leaders.

0:16:32.960 --> 0:16:35.000
<v Speaker 14>The leaders have to stop being the guy that say

0:16:35.480 --> 0:16:37.360
<v Speaker 14>or the woman that's say I'm going to invest a

0:16:37.400 --> 0:16:39.520
<v Speaker 14>billion dollars or one hundred million dollars and be the

0:16:39.520 --> 0:16:43.640
<v Speaker 14>person that leads using spend time understanding what is the technology,

0:16:43.680 --> 0:16:46.640
<v Speaker 14>spend time understanding that we are just starting that is

0:16:46.720 --> 0:16:48.040
<v Speaker 14>so much development ahead.

0:16:48.640 --> 0:16:49.640
<v Speaker 8>They should lead.

0:16:49.760 --> 0:16:53.760
<v Speaker 14>They should show how they use AI to be more productive,

0:16:54.120 --> 0:16:57.200
<v Speaker 14>to distribute more in the company.

0:16:57.240 --> 0:17:00.080
<v Speaker 8>Will follow. Actually, the younger people, they.

0:17:00.280 --> 0:17:02.400
<v Speaker 14>Even at the state why we're having this discussion, They

0:17:02.480 --> 0:17:05.280
<v Speaker 14>use share, GPT or other things every day or week

0:17:05.560 --> 0:17:11.760
<v Speaker 14>to study. More So leaders lead showing what is a

0:17:11.800 --> 0:17:16.000
<v Speaker 14>good usage of AI instead of just writing mayuse about

0:17:17.280 --> 0:17:18.640
<v Speaker 14>how much you are investing on that.

0:17:18.800 --> 0:17:21.920
<v Speaker 2>You're going to invest in anymore General to AI companies, we.

0:17:21.920 --> 0:17:23.560
<v Speaker 8>Are going to invest a lot.

0:17:23.840 --> 0:17:26.680
<v Speaker 14>Process has a very big investment capacity, and we want

0:17:26.760 --> 0:17:30.040
<v Speaker 14>to help the own emerging market and growth markets to

0:17:30.320 --> 0:17:33.080
<v Speaker 14>lead this new revolution happening right now.

0:17:33.119 --> 0:17:34.840
<v Speaker 8>We can't afford to be out of that.

0:17:37.240 --> 0:17:40.960
<v Speaker 2>Process. And aspecy of Abricia Luisi there of course biggest

0:17:41.000 --> 0:17:43.960
<v Speaker 2>holder of Tencent as a stockholder, but have so many

0:17:44.000 --> 0:17:46.720
<v Speaker 2>investments said across the emerging market. So really a conversation

0:17:46.760 --> 0:17:49.840
<v Speaker 2>about how in Africa, South Africa, how also in Poland

0:17:49.840 --> 0:17:52.040
<v Speaker 2>they're adopting general to AI. In fact they say, look

0:17:52.080 --> 0:17:55.080
<v Speaker 2>they're cutting costs by some thirty percent thanks to the implementation.

0:17:56.119 --> 0:17:59.360
<v Speaker 3>YEP also exposure in not just ten Cent but other

0:17:59.440 --> 0:18:02.280
<v Speaker 3>parts in year Southeast Asia. And he's a CEO to

0:18:02.320 --> 0:18:06.320
<v Speaker 3>watch why moonshot package worth tracking his progress.

0:18:06.600 --> 0:18:07.240
<v Speaker 1>Another story that.

0:18:07.240 --> 0:18:10.199
<v Speaker 3>We're watching here on Bloomberg Technology, Chipotle rolling out an

0:18:10.280 --> 0:18:15.920
<v Speaker 3>artificial intelligence assistant aimed at improving efficiency. It's called Avocado

0:18:16.560 --> 0:18:20.040
<v Speaker 3>and will cover many administrative tasks in the recruiting process.

0:18:20.359 --> 0:18:22.000
<v Speaker 3>The chain hopes will cut the time it takes to

0:18:22.119 --> 0:18:25.159
<v Speaker 3>hire workers by as much as seventy five percent. It

0:18:25.160 --> 0:18:28.880
<v Speaker 3>will be powered by conversational AI from tech firm Paradox.

0:18:37.040 --> 0:18:41.080
<v Speaker 3>Meta is fighting back against fake celebrity scams, deploying facial

0:18:41.119 --> 0:18:45.600
<v Speaker 3>recognition technology to weed out the imposters bloombers Kirkwagner joins

0:18:45.680 --> 0:18:47.600
<v Speaker 3>us with the details, and I guess what is the

0:18:47.640 --> 0:18:50.600
<v Speaker 3>kind of malicious activity that Meta is trying to counter

0:18:50.680 --> 0:18:52.960
<v Speaker 3>here in terms of celebrity image.

0:18:53.840 --> 0:18:57.919
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, so sometimes scammers will run that links to like

0:18:57.960 --> 0:19:00.520
<v Speaker 9>a scammy website right where they'll try to steal your data,

0:19:00.560 --> 0:19:02.719
<v Speaker 9>they'll try to get you to, you know, send money,

0:19:03.200 --> 0:19:05.720
<v Speaker 9>and they will use as part of the ad pictures

0:19:05.760 --> 0:19:08.120
<v Speaker 9>of real celebrities to try and make it seem more

0:19:08.200 --> 0:19:09.560
<v Speaker 9>authentic or more legitimate.

0:19:09.640 --> 0:19:09.720
<v Speaker 15>Right.

0:19:09.880 --> 0:19:12.639
<v Speaker 9>Oftentimes people will see an image of a celebrity and

0:19:12.680 --> 0:19:14.879
<v Speaker 9>therefore think, oh, it's an endorsement by them, or it's

0:19:14.880 --> 0:19:17.280
<v Speaker 9>someone they're familiar with, and they're more likely to click.

0:19:17.600 --> 0:19:19.879
<v Speaker 9>And so in this case, Meta saying, hey, we notice

0:19:19.920 --> 0:19:22.359
<v Speaker 9>these ads are happening. We know these scams are happening,

0:19:22.680 --> 0:19:25.919
<v Speaker 9>and so they're now going to use facial recognition software

0:19:26.000 --> 0:19:28.439
<v Speaker 9>to try and match is there a celebrity in this

0:19:28.560 --> 0:19:31.479
<v Speaker 9>ad doesn't match up with the celebrity on the service,

0:19:31.480 --> 0:19:33.800
<v Speaker 9>and if Stowe, you know, maybe that's a scam. We

0:19:33.840 --> 0:19:35.160
<v Speaker 9>should try to take that ad down.

0:19:36.480 --> 0:19:38.560
<v Speaker 2>And then for anyone who's ever been locked out of

0:19:38.600 --> 0:19:41.840
<v Speaker 2>their accounts many of us have, you're no longer going

0:19:41.880 --> 0:19:44.160
<v Speaker 2>to have to suddenly get your passport ready. They might

0:19:44.240 --> 0:19:46.440
<v Speaker 2>use the technology for that as well.

0:19:46.560 --> 0:19:48.679
<v Speaker 9>That's right, So they're going to start testing this idea

0:19:48.720 --> 0:19:51.520
<v Speaker 9>of sending in a video sell fie right, So it's

0:19:51.520 --> 0:19:53.399
<v Speaker 9>pretty much exactly what it sounds like. You hold up

0:19:53.440 --> 0:19:56.760
<v Speaker 9>your phone, take a short video of your face, send

0:19:56.840 --> 0:20:00.359
<v Speaker 9>it into Meta. They will then match that video two

0:20:00.359 --> 0:20:03.720
<v Speaker 9>photos associated with the account. If there's a match, they'll say, okay,

0:20:03.720 --> 0:20:05.960
<v Speaker 9>this is indeed you know Kurt's account.

0:20:06.080 --> 0:20:07.080
<v Speaker 4>And you can get back in.

0:20:07.119 --> 0:20:09.320
<v Speaker 9>They said the whole thing could take about a minute,

0:20:09.359 --> 0:20:12.320
<v Speaker 9>and they'll delete the video and any data associated with

0:20:12.359 --> 0:20:15.359
<v Speaker 9>it immediately after. This is something that they're trying to

0:20:15.400 --> 0:20:18.200
<v Speaker 9>do to expedite this process because as you mentioned, Caroline,

0:20:18.240 --> 0:20:20.359
<v Speaker 9>right now, they have other ways to verify identity, but

0:20:20.400 --> 0:20:22.120
<v Speaker 9>it's a lot more cumbersome. You might have to send

0:20:22.119 --> 0:20:24.480
<v Speaker 9>in a picture of your ID or a passport or

0:20:24.520 --> 0:20:26.600
<v Speaker 9>something like that. And so they're thinking that this could

0:20:26.640 --> 0:20:29.679
<v Speaker 9>be a faster way of getting people back into their

0:20:29.680 --> 0:20:31.840
<v Speaker 9>accounts automatically if they do get locked out.

0:20:32.760 --> 0:20:36.359
<v Speaker 3>Kurt, why does Meta do this? What's the motivation for them?

0:20:37.119 --> 0:20:39.959
<v Speaker 9>Well, I think think of the scale that met operates on, right,

0:20:40.000 --> 0:20:45.680
<v Speaker 9>there's almost, I believe three point three billion users across Instagram, Facebook, WhatsApp,

0:20:45.680 --> 0:20:48.399
<v Speaker 9>all of their different services, and so people are getting

0:20:48.400 --> 0:20:50.919
<v Speaker 9>locked out every single day. They can't keep up with

0:20:50.960 --> 0:20:54.560
<v Speaker 9>this from a human standpoint, right, they need to automate

0:20:54.600 --> 0:20:56.400
<v Speaker 9>these things, and I think as AI has gotten better

0:20:56.440 --> 0:20:58.840
<v Speaker 9>as their technology has gotten better, they're seen, hey, here's

0:20:58.880 --> 0:21:01.080
<v Speaker 9>a way to do this much quicker. Presumably in the

0:21:01.119 --> 0:21:03.400
<v Speaker 9>future you've been much cheaper, you don't need humans involved,

0:21:04.119 --> 0:21:05.639
<v Speaker 9>and so, you know, I think it's just part of

0:21:05.640 --> 0:21:08.560
<v Speaker 9>their overall push toward AI and these advancements and technology

0:21:08.560 --> 0:21:09.520
<v Speaker 9>to help people out.

0:21:10.600 --> 0:21:11.719
<v Speaker 5>In just thirty seconds.

0:21:11.720 --> 0:21:15.160
<v Speaker 2>Though, Kat, there is a complex relationship with facial recognition

0:21:15.200 --> 0:21:16.040
<v Speaker 2>technology and META.

0:21:16.080 --> 0:21:19.119
<v Speaker 9>In the past well, MET has been sued several times

0:21:19.160 --> 0:21:22.200
<v Speaker 9>in the past for using this technology to profit without

0:21:22.240 --> 0:21:27.560
<v Speaker 9>really giving users appropriate recognition, appropriate way to opt in, right,

0:21:27.640 --> 0:21:30.400
<v Speaker 9>and so this is a type of technology they've sort

0:21:30.440 --> 0:21:33.040
<v Speaker 9>of been hammered on in the past. They've walked away

0:21:33.040 --> 0:21:34.399
<v Speaker 9>from it for a couple of years, and now it

0:21:34.440 --> 0:21:36.359
<v Speaker 9>feels like they're sort of dipping their toe back into it.

0:21:36.400 --> 0:21:39.160
<v Speaker 9>So it'll be interesting to see if there's a more

0:21:39.520 --> 0:21:42.119
<v Speaker 9>lawsuits that ultimately come of them trying to kind of

0:21:42.160 --> 0:21:44.439
<v Speaker 9>give back into the facial recognition space.

0:21:45.560 --> 0:21:49.120
<v Speaker 2>Looking at you, Illinois and Texas, Kerle Wagner, great reporting,

0:21:49.200 --> 0:21:49.800
<v Speaker 2>We thank you.

0:21:50.680 --> 0:21:53.560
<v Speaker 3>We want to welcome our Bloomberg Radio and television audience

0:21:53.640 --> 0:21:57.080
<v Speaker 3>right now to a special conversation with us SEC Chair

0:21:57.600 --> 0:22:01.600
<v Speaker 3>Gary Glentzler and mister Gensler. The SEC clearly looking closer

0:22:02.119 --> 0:22:04.480
<v Speaker 3>at the use of AI tools in finance. We know

0:22:04.600 --> 0:22:09.400
<v Speaker 3>that from the agency's latest exam priorities. But in parallel

0:22:09.400 --> 0:22:12.920
<v Speaker 3>a year ago, you embarked on this rule making process,

0:22:13.119 --> 0:22:15.199
<v Speaker 3>and I want to start by asking what sort of

0:22:15.320 --> 0:22:20.280
<v Speaker 3>additional authority or power you feel you need through a

0:22:20.400 --> 0:22:24.960
<v Speaker 3>rule that you wouldn't be able to regulate through through

0:22:25.040 --> 0:22:26.960
<v Speaker 3>examinations so.

0:22:27.840 --> 0:22:28.439
<v Speaker 4>Let me say this.

0:22:28.560 --> 0:22:31.920
<v Speaker 16>I think that the use of artificial intelligence, which has

0:22:32.280 --> 0:22:36.600
<v Speaker 16>been around for at least ten years, has taken on

0:22:36.840 --> 0:22:40.240
<v Speaker 16>and it's an important transformative part of our economy.

0:22:40.359 --> 0:22:41.879
<v Speaker 4>Every bit is transformative.

0:22:41.960 --> 0:22:46.080
<v Speaker 16>Is the Internet, probably more every bit is transformative as

0:22:46.320 --> 0:22:50.080
<v Speaker 16>one hundred years ago when we electrified so many things

0:22:50.080 --> 0:22:53.720
<v Speaker 16>in our markets. Our factory is the automobile, the refrigerator.

0:22:54.040 --> 0:22:59.040
<v Speaker 16>That transformative. In finance, it's being used today by many

0:23:00.280 --> 0:23:06.120
<v Speaker 16>brokerage apps and investment advisors when they're selling to the public,

0:23:06.440 --> 0:23:06.879
<v Speaker 16>just as.

0:23:06.880 --> 0:23:08.720
<v Speaker 4>When we're looking at.

0:23:09.720 --> 0:23:12.360
<v Speaker 16>Movie apps that have figured out long ago that I'm

0:23:12.359 --> 0:23:14.159
<v Speaker 16>a rom com type of guy and I want to

0:23:14.200 --> 0:23:17.720
<v Speaker 16>watch those movies, and so it's it's to ensure that

0:23:17.960 --> 0:23:22.000
<v Speaker 16>in the algorithm, in the actual math of the algorithm,

0:23:22.520 --> 0:23:26.080
<v Speaker 16>that they ensure that they put the public's interest, their

0:23:26.119 --> 0:23:29.879
<v Speaker 16>customers interest, ahead of the investment advisor and broker dealer.

0:23:30.440 --> 0:23:31.520
<v Speaker 4>That's it in a nutshell.

0:23:33.400 --> 0:23:37.640
<v Speaker 2>In a nutshell, do you think that there's financial systemic

0:23:37.800 --> 0:23:41.199
<v Speaker 2>risk still looming large because of adoption of AI and

0:23:41.280 --> 0:23:44.800
<v Speaker 2>AI models ultimately being too similar from one brokerage to

0:23:44.800 --> 0:23:45.200
<v Speaker 2>the next.

0:23:45.600 --> 0:23:46.520
<v Speaker 4>I do think.

0:23:46.560 --> 0:23:46.639
<v Speaker 15>So.

0:23:46.880 --> 0:23:49.080
<v Speaker 16>I said I liked rom coms, so I'll just go

0:23:49.160 --> 0:23:52.560
<v Speaker 16>with that wonderful movie her when Scarlett Johansson, you know,

0:23:52.640 --> 0:23:56.600
<v Speaker 16>played this virtual assistant when she went offline late in

0:23:56.640 --> 0:24:01.280
<v Speaker 16>the movie eight three hundred and six teen, folks were

0:24:01.280 --> 0:24:05.400
<v Speaker 16>broken hearted. We could see that in finance there's right

0:24:05.440 --> 0:24:09.640
<v Speaker 16>now two or three large cloud providers that are backing

0:24:09.720 --> 0:24:13.920
<v Speaker 16>some of the biggest investments in what's called generative AI.

0:24:14.520 --> 0:24:17.000
<v Speaker 4>As the financial sector more and more.

0:24:16.880 --> 0:24:23.000
<v Speaker 16>Relies on those big base models, it is not only

0:24:23.320 --> 0:24:27.600
<v Speaker 16>possible but likely that some financial crisis in the future

0:24:27.720 --> 0:24:30.960
<v Speaker 16>is that everybody's relying on it. And whether it's like

0:24:31.040 --> 0:24:35.080
<v Speaker 16>Scarlett Johansson going offline or if Scarlett Johanson of the

0:24:35.119 --> 0:24:40.119
<v Speaker 16>future I'm talking about the AA model is hurting and

0:24:40.160 --> 0:24:45.439
<v Speaker 16>taking the capital markets off of some various cliff and

0:24:45.520 --> 0:24:49.119
<v Speaker 16>I think that's a hard project to solve because of

0:24:49.160 --> 0:24:52.800
<v Speaker 16>the dominance of a few base models likely in the future.

0:24:54.600 --> 0:24:56.600
<v Speaker 2>Do therefore more clear rules need.

0:24:56.520 --> 0:24:58.200
<v Speaker 4>To be envisaged.

0:24:58.240 --> 0:25:00.560
<v Speaker 2>Here is examination the tool of choice.

0:25:00.800 --> 0:25:05.160
<v Speaker 4>So I'm separating out there's important.

0:25:04.920 --> 0:25:08.720
<v Speaker 16>Investor protection issues directly about the conflicts, and I think

0:25:08.760 --> 0:25:12.600
<v Speaker 16>we can do that and proceed for I've asked staff

0:25:12.600 --> 0:25:16.040
<v Speaker 16>for recommendations on a reproposal of that role. I think

0:25:16.080 --> 0:25:18.360
<v Speaker 16>a secondary we didn't talk about is fraud.

0:25:19.280 --> 0:25:20.159
<v Speaker 4>Fraud is fraud.

0:25:20.160 --> 0:25:22.760
<v Speaker 16>If you use the algorithm and the AI model to

0:25:22.760 --> 0:25:25.200
<v Speaker 16>defraud the public, it's still fraud. But I think that

0:25:25.200 --> 0:25:28.239
<v Speaker 16>that's going to play out not only for US, but

0:25:28.320 --> 0:25:31.840
<v Speaker 16>in other agencies around the country, the Federal Trade Commission

0:25:31.880 --> 0:25:35.720
<v Speaker 16>and elsewhere, but on these systemic issues. On these systemic issues,

0:25:36.440 --> 0:25:40.800
<v Speaker 16>I think it's a tough challenge that global regulators need

0:25:40.840 --> 0:25:44.080
<v Speaker 16>to come together and how do we protect against what

0:25:44.200 --> 0:25:51.280
<v Speaker 16>is likely to be a very concentrated, interconnected system that's

0:25:51.320 --> 0:25:55.199
<v Speaker 16>relying you know, like I say, three hundred and sixteen,

0:25:55.280 --> 0:25:58.800
<v Speaker 16>relying on Scarlet Johansson for their love was one thing

0:25:58.840 --> 0:26:00.240
<v Speaker 16>in a fictional movie.

0:26:00.320 --> 0:26:01.399
<v Speaker 4>But what do we do here?

0:26:02.720 --> 0:26:05.200
<v Speaker 3>If you're just joining us on Bloomberg Television and radio,

0:26:05.280 --> 0:26:09.399
<v Speaker 3>we're speaking with the SEC chair, Gary Gensler and mister Ginsley.

0:26:09.440 --> 0:26:12.680
<v Speaker 3>You're also busy in parallel with the crypto industry. I

0:26:12.680 --> 0:26:16.919
<v Speaker 3>think there's consensus on the eve of an election that

0:26:17.880 --> 0:26:20.760
<v Speaker 3>all of those parties involved in responsible want to hammer

0:26:20.800 --> 0:26:25.920
<v Speaker 3>out some sort of new jurisdictional framework for crypto regulators

0:26:26.760 --> 0:26:31.280
<v Speaker 3>to make some progress on settling oversight of that industry.

0:26:31.520 --> 0:26:33.399
<v Speaker 3>Can you talk to us about the work you're doing

0:26:33.600 --> 0:26:37.440
<v Speaker 3>there and if you're making any progress in that field.

0:26:37.680 --> 0:26:46.359
<v Speaker 16>Look, there's nothing incompatible about the ledger technology. You know,

0:26:46.440 --> 0:26:49.440
<v Speaker 16>it's just this Halloween, it will be sixteen years since

0:26:49.760 --> 0:26:56.399
<v Speaker 16>Toshinakamaldo wrote that white paper, So happy sweet sixteen in

0:26:56.400 --> 0:27:01.680
<v Speaker 16>a week. There's nothing incompatible about a ledger technology, decentralized

0:27:01.720 --> 0:27:05.560
<v Speaker 16>ledger technology, and the securities laws. And it's important that

0:27:05.760 --> 0:27:09.199
<v Speaker 16>in the securities market that investors get to decide on

0:27:09.240 --> 0:27:11.959
<v Speaker 16>their investments, but they get the proper disclosure that we

0:27:12.000 --> 0:27:14.800
<v Speaker 16>goard against conflicts of interest.

0:27:14.560 --> 0:27:15.040
<v Speaker 4>And the like.

0:27:15.800 --> 0:27:17.879
<v Speaker 16>And we're going to continue to do that at the

0:27:17.920 --> 0:27:21.199
<v Speaker 16>Securities and Exchange Commission. If a market's ever going to

0:27:21.240 --> 0:27:24.720
<v Speaker 16>have trust, it also needs to come into compliance. And

0:27:24.800 --> 0:27:27.480
<v Speaker 16>a lot of this field, and we've seen the challenges

0:27:27.480 --> 0:27:29.679
<v Speaker 16>in this field where a lot of people have lost money.

0:27:30.359 --> 0:27:33.959
<v Speaker 16>Regular investors have lost money in a field that's not

0:27:34.960 --> 0:27:39.920
<v Speaker 16>providing the fundamental disclosure about their projects, about these these

0:27:40.320 --> 0:27:46.719
<v Speaker 16>investment contracts and these schemes, and that a field that

0:27:46.760 --> 0:27:48.680
<v Speaker 16>has a lot of conflicts in the middle of it.

0:27:49.640 --> 0:27:51.880
<v Speaker 3>Something interesting has been happening over the last year where

0:27:51.920 --> 0:27:56.480
<v Speaker 3>you've been focusing on policy and regulation in the Fifth

0:27:56.520 --> 0:27:59.920
<v Speaker 3>Circuit Court of Appeals, there have been many suits file

0:28:00.480 --> 0:28:03.680
<v Speaker 3>in what is a kind of business friendly courts? How

0:28:03.720 --> 0:28:06.119
<v Speaker 3>do you have to respond to that and adjust the

0:28:06.160 --> 0:28:09.240
<v Speaker 3>policy side in response to the litigation side.

0:28:09.240 --> 0:28:12.520
<v Speaker 16>Misticenza No, No, I think ed it's a really good question.

0:28:13.280 --> 0:28:15.600
<v Speaker 16>We do everything we do within the law and how.

0:28:15.440 --> 0:28:16.719
<v Speaker 4>The courts interpret the law.

0:28:16.760 --> 0:28:20.960
<v Speaker 16>If the courts interpret it differently, we adjust.

0:28:21.200 --> 0:28:22.040
<v Speaker 4>That's what we do.

0:28:23.040 --> 0:28:28.200
<v Speaker 16>It's part of our great democracy. But I do think

0:28:28.280 --> 0:28:31.159
<v Speaker 16>that we're focused every day on how we drive lower

0:28:31.200 --> 0:28:34.240
<v Speaker 16>cost in the system. That's why we did equity market reform,

0:28:34.320 --> 0:28:37.119
<v Speaker 16>I would note unanimously through our five member commission.

0:28:37.320 --> 0:28:38.320
<v Speaker 4>That's why we've.

0:28:38.080 --> 0:28:42.560
<v Speaker 16>Worked so hard on the treasury markets, this twenty eight

0:28:42.560 --> 0:28:45.240
<v Speaker 16>trillion dollar market at the base of our capital markets,

0:28:45.480 --> 0:28:49.120
<v Speaker 16>and driving lower cost which is called efficiency, and lower

0:28:49.200 --> 0:28:54.560
<v Speaker 16>risk which is called resiliency in these really consequential, significant markets.

0:28:56.760 --> 0:28:59.760
<v Speaker 2>Just for a moment reminding our TV and radio audience

0:28:59.800 --> 0:29:02.920
<v Speaker 2>were in a conversation with SEC Chair Gary Gensler, and

0:29:03.000 --> 0:29:05.400
<v Speaker 2>just to stick with the crypto aspect for a moment more.

0:29:06.280 --> 0:29:09.160
<v Speaker 2>There is, though this ongoing narrative that you haven't changed

0:29:09.200 --> 0:29:11.760
<v Speaker 2>that much. You haven't adjusted much in terms of it

0:29:11.800 --> 0:29:14.880
<v Speaker 2>is regulation via enforcement. Will that change?

0:29:14.960 --> 0:29:15.480
<v Speaker 5>Ultimately?

0:29:15.560 --> 0:29:18.840
<v Speaker 2>Do you see laws coming to bear from Congress rather

0:29:18.880 --> 0:29:23.360
<v Speaker 2>than you having to enforce via enforced and regulate Caroline.

0:29:23.640 --> 0:29:29.480
<v Speaker 16>We have benefited for nine decades from robust laws from

0:29:29.520 --> 0:29:34.320
<v Speaker 16>Congress and rules from various agencies, not just the SEC,

0:29:34.520 --> 0:29:41.040
<v Speaker 16>but the Commodity Future's Trading Commission, another significant and great

0:29:41.120 --> 0:29:44.640
<v Speaker 16>agency that I was honored a chair, to help promote

0:29:44.680 --> 0:29:50.680
<v Speaker 16>the markets, to protect investors, to promote capital formation, and

0:29:50.720 --> 0:29:51.880
<v Speaker 16>the markets in the middle.

0:29:51.920 --> 0:29:53.560
<v Speaker 4>And that's what will continue to do.

0:29:54.000 --> 0:29:58.280
<v Speaker 16>Whether it's related to the stock markets fifty sixty trillion

0:29:58.320 --> 0:30:01.920
<v Speaker 16>dollars stock markets, whether it's related to the treasury markets

0:30:01.920 --> 0:30:04.960
<v Speaker 16>as I said, nearly thirty trillion dollars, whether it's related

0:30:05.000 --> 0:30:09.320
<v Speaker 16>to the bonds and fixed income markets, and yes, even

0:30:09.400 --> 0:30:14.040
<v Speaker 16>related to this newer market, where as I said, all

0:30:14.120 --> 0:30:17.200
<v Speaker 16>too many people have been hurt, All too many people

0:30:17.280 --> 0:30:20.120
<v Speaker 16>have lost money and lined up in bankruptcy court to

0:30:21.000 --> 0:30:26.320
<v Speaker 16>deal with their claims. And fundamentally, what President Roosevelt laid

0:30:26.320 --> 0:30:31.320
<v Speaker 16>out and has been looked at over the years, Congress

0:30:31.320 --> 0:30:34.640
<v Speaker 16>could adjust, but at the fundamentally it's about disclosure to

0:30:34.720 --> 0:30:37.760
<v Speaker 16>the public. So the public can decide, and then guarding

0:30:37.800 --> 0:30:42.719
<v Speaker 16>the public against the conflicts and the fraud and things

0:30:42.720 --> 0:30:47.120
<v Speaker 16>that happen in the capital markets that are unregulated. We

0:30:47.200 --> 0:30:50.120
<v Speaker 16>saw that happen in the nineteen twenties. None of us

0:30:50.120 --> 0:30:54.160
<v Speaker 16>were alive, but you can read about it, and we

0:30:54.240 --> 0:30:57.120
<v Speaker 16>don't want that to happen to the investing public and

0:30:57.320 --> 0:31:00.320
<v Speaker 16>undermine the trust in the overall it's hapital mark markets

0:31:00.360 --> 0:31:02.120
<v Speaker 16>as we know them.

0:31:02.160 --> 0:31:05.880
<v Speaker 2>Talking of disclosures, one disclosure from former President Trump is

0:31:05.880 --> 0:31:10.320
<v Speaker 2>that he would fire you ultimately unsurprising to you, I'm sure.

0:31:10.440 --> 0:31:13.360
<v Speaker 2>But also he's got some plans purported plans, of course,

0:31:13.400 --> 0:31:16.000
<v Speaker 2>to introduce his own crypto platform and has been working

0:31:16.000 --> 0:31:16.200
<v Speaker 2>on it.

0:31:16.240 --> 0:31:17.040
<v Speaker 8>What do you make of that.

0:31:17.720 --> 0:31:22.600
<v Speaker 16>I'm not going to comment on any one project. I

0:31:22.640 --> 0:31:26.800
<v Speaker 16>think your viewing audience can appreciate that. It's just not

0:31:27.840 --> 0:31:31.560
<v Speaker 16>well we do and so our Caroline, I'll let you

0:31:31.600 --> 0:31:32.640
<v Speaker 16>go to your next question.

0:31:33.320 --> 0:31:34.960
<v Speaker 4>Well missed against I'll jump in.

0:31:35.040 --> 0:31:37.960
<v Speaker 3>You talked about the investing public that you serve, right,

0:31:38.200 --> 0:31:42.640
<v Speaker 3>and there is something happening where private credit firms are

0:31:42.720 --> 0:31:47.640
<v Speaker 3>taking private market assets where you could debate the real valuation,

0:31:48.520 --> 0:31:52.240
<v Speaker 3>and they're wrapping them in products like ETFs that are

0:31:52.320 --> 0:31:56.959
<v Speaker 3>somewhat sort of more retail friendly. It's a newer area,

0:31:57.000 --> 0:31:59.479
<v Speaker 3>it's something interesting happening, and I know it's an intense

0:31:59.520 --> 0:32:02.560
<v Speaker 3>interest our audience. How do you regulate that and how

0:32:02.640 --> 0:32:05.120
<v Speaker 3>much are you personally thinking about that right now?

0:32:05.640 --> 0:32:09.160
<v Speaker 16>Let me put it in context our dollar credit markets,

0:32:09.200 --> 0:32:14.600
<v Speaker 16>where you can your commercial credit and you're borrowing probably

0:32:14.640 --> 0:32:19.200
<v Speaker 16>worldwide in excess of thirty trillion dollars, and banks and

0:32:19.280 --> 0:32:23.120
<v Speaker 16>non banks alike play important roles in that. And so

0:32:23.160 --> 0:32:26.600
<v Speaker 16>what we've private credit existed when I started at Goldman

0:32:26.640 --> 0:32:28.120
<v Speaker 16>Sachs forty some years ago.

0:32:28.200 --> 0:32:29.959
<v Speaker 4>I mean, there were direct.

0:32:29.440 --> 0:32:33.280
<v Speaker 16>Loans that could be made outside of the banking system.

0:32:33.440 --> 0:32:39.160
<v Speaker 16>But today you've seen a growing share involved in that.

0:32:39.440 --> 0:32:43.680
<v Speaker 16>I think that competition is good for borrowers, investors, savers

0:32:43.680 --> 0:32:47.160
<v Speaker 16>and the like. That's competition in our capital markets, but

0:32:47.200 --> 0:32:49.560
<v Speaker 16>it still has to sort of comply with the basic

0:32:49.640 --> 0:32:55.360
<v Speaker 16>tenants of risk management, disclosure, transparency and the like. Our

0:32:55.480 --> 0:33:00.480
<v Speaker 16>role in it is a capital markets oversight is an

0:33:00.520 --> 0:33:06.360
<v Speaker 16>important one. But I think the competition is actually benefiting

0:33:06.440 --> 0:33:10.120
<v Speaker 16>a lot of borrowers. I would note this, it hasn't

0:33:10.240 --> 0:33:13.240
<v Speaker 16>at this size, it hasn't lived through a downturn, so

0:33:14.040 --> 0:33:17.520
<v Speaker 16>it hasn't been tested in you know, the inevitable at

0:33:17.520 --> 0:33:21.520
<v Speaker 16>some point downturns that would come. There's also some intersections

0:33:21.560 --> 0:33:26.720
<v Speaker 16>between this private credit merging system and the insurance sector

0:33:27.160 --> 0:33:30.320
<v Speaker 16>and the banking sector. But particularly it's intersection with the

0:33:30.320 --> 0:33:35.360
<v Speaker 16>insurance sector. That's you know, bears look and ratings as

0:33:35.400 --> 0:33:38.160
<v Speaker 16>well the use of private letter.

0:33:38.040 --> 0:33:39.200
<v Speaker 4>Ratings on some of this.

0:33:39.400 --> 0:33:42.280
<v Speaker 16>So we're looking at some of this, but I think

0:33:42.320 --> 0:33:47.719
<v Speaker 16>overall it's capital markets benefiting and the public benefiting from competition.

0:33:48.600 --> 0:33:52.000
<v Speaker 3>Apollo and State Street have such a private market ETF

0:33:52.040 --> 0:33:56.080
<v Speaker 3>pending before the SEC. My colleagues tell me it's controversial.

0:33:56.560 --> 0:33:59.080
<v Speaker 3>What can you tell me about that specific case study.

0:33:59.200 --> 0:34:00.720
<v Speaker 16>I guess I could tell you the same thing I

0:34:00.760 --> 0:34:04.040
<v Speaker 16>told Caroline earlier that you know, in a role like mine,

0:34:05.360 --> 0:34:08.719
<v Speaker 16>i'm a very asked to be disciplined. I try to

0:34:08.719 --> 0:34:13.400
<v Speaker 16>state this one. I don't comment on specific prod ducts

0:34:13.520 --> 0:34:16.160
<v Speaker 16>or projects that may be in front of the staff

0:34:16.239 --> 0:34:18.040
<v Speaker 16>or in front of our five member commission.

0:34:18.120 --> 0:34:19.640
<v Speaker 4>So I'm going to demure on that.

0:34:19.680 --> 0:34:25.160
<v Speaker 16>But I hope you're listening public understands why.

0:34:23.520 --> 0:34:26.680
<v Speaker 2>Do you worry about that ill liquidity mismatch? Though a

0:34:26.680 --> 0:34:27.759
<v Speaker 2>potential one.

0:34:27.520 --> 0:34:31.440
<v Speaker 16>Look there's an illiquidity mismatch in banks. So our twenty

0:34:31.480 --> 0:34:35.160
<v Speaker 16>six trillion dollar banking system in the US has twenty

0:34:35.160 --> 0:34:38.319
<v Speaker 16>trillion dollars in deposits runnable deposits.

0:34:38.960 --> 0:34:39.839
<v Speaker 4>Of course, a lot of.

0:34:39.760 --> 0:34:42.279
<v Speaker 16>Them are insured, but a lot of them are uninsured.

0:34:42.600 --> 0:34:49.520
<v Speaker 16>And so banks themselves transform liquidity, transform what's called maturity

0:34:49.600 --> 0:34:50.320
<v Speaker 16>or duration.

0:34:51.040 --> 0:34:52.359
<v Speaker 4>And then you think about it.

0:34:52.560 --> 0:34:56.400
<v Speaker 16>In the non bank sector, you have, frankly, a better

0:34:56.560 --> 0:35:02.120
<v Speaker 16>match of maturity of the the liability side of a

0:35:02.160 --> 0:35:04.840
<v Speaker 16>private fund and the assets they hold.

0:35:05.000 --> 0:35:08.520
<v Speaker 4>So it may it's not without risk, but it might

0:35:08.560 --> 0:35:09.239
<v Speaker 4>be in.

0:35:10.440 --> 0:35:12.680
<v Speaker 16>A part of the market that they can better bear

0:35:12.800 --> 0:35:14.240
<v Speaker 16>that illiquidity risk.

0:35:16.160 --> 0:35:19.120
<v Speaker 2>It's really interesting how you've got this is a line

0:35:19.160 --> 0:35:23.560
<v Speaker 2>of sight, but also everything we've just articulated AI crypto

0:35:23.760 --> 0:35:26.319
<v Speaker 2>private markets a lot to get on with. And your

0:35:26.400 --> 0:35:30.120
<v Speaker 2>term is what until June twenty twenty six? But will

0:35:30.120 --> 0:35:32.880
<v Speaker 2>it run until then? Many feel that perhaps not. What

0:35:32.920 --> 0:35:35.320
<v Speaker 2>do you want to get done in the remaining months

0:35:35.400 --> 0:35:35.600
<v Speaker 2>or so?

0:35:35.840 --> 0:35:38.640
<v Speaker 16>Look, I think it's the greatest privilege of my life,

0:35:38.640 --> 0:35:41.160
<v Speaker 16>other than having these three wonderful daughters that I have.

0:35:41.280 --> 0:35:45.120
<v Speaker 16>But I'm talking about professional privilege. And so every day

0:35:45.160 --> 0:35:48.520
<v Speaker 16>I come into work and think with my colleagues and

0:35:48.560 --> 0:35:51.279
<v Speaker 16>fellow commissioners, how do we get things done for the

0:35:51.320 --> 0:35:57.000
<v Speaker 16>investing public and the issuing public that the markets in

0:35:57.040 --> 0:36:00.239
<v Speaker 16>the middle work for them, not that the issue and

0:36:00.280 --> 0:36:03.160
<v Speaker 16>the investors are working for the intermediaries and the markets

0:36:03.160 --> 0:36:06.080
<v Speaker 16>in the middle, but the markets work for them. So

0:36:06.080 --> 0:36:11.319
<v Speaker 16>that's like lowering cost through competition, transparency and the like,

0:36:11.719 --> 0:36:15.759
<v Speaker 16>and access to the markets, and then resiliency trying to

0:36:15.880 --> 0:36:19.000
<v Speaker 16>use like central clearing and so forth, the backside and

0:36:19.000 --> 0:36:23.360
<v Speaker 16>the plumbing. So we've gotten We laid out an agenda

0:36:23.400 --> 0:36:26.440
<v Speaker 16>of fifty or fifty five projects three and a half

0:36:26.560 --> 0:36:26.959
<v Speaker 16>years ago.

0:36:27.000 --> 0:36:28.120
<v Speaker 4>We've actually gotten.

0:36:27.920 --> 0:36:31.280
<v Speaker 16>Across the line, proposed and adopted forty three of those.

0:36:31.800 --> 0:36:35.280
<v Speaker 4>You can do the math. The other projects, a number

0:36:35.320 --> 0:36:35.840
<v Speaker 4>of them.

0:36:35.719 --> 0:36:39.400
<v Speaker 16>I've asked staff to we consider possible reproposals.

0:36:39.800 --> 0:36:40.680
<v Speaker 4>But we're still.

0:36:40.480 --> 0:36:45.680
<v Speaker 16>Working on some rules around market structure of the treasury markets,

0:36:45.760 --> 0:36:50.360
<v Speaker 16>some rules around central clearing and segregation of funds and

0:36:50.360 --> 0:36:53.520
<v Speaker 16>the like. But we're going to continue to move forward,

0:36:54.520 --> 0:36:57.400
<v Speaker 16>you know, And elections have consequences. That's a great thing

0:36:57.440 --> 0:36:59.719
<v Speaker 16>of our democracy.

0:37:00.120 --> 0:37:00.480
<v Speaker 5>They do.

0:37:00.920 --> 0:37:03.560
<v Speaker 2>SEC Chair Gary Gensler, I'll let you return to some

0:37:03.640 --> 0:37:08.160
<v Speaker 2>rom coms. Thank you so much for us. Coming up,

0:37:08.360 --> 0:37:10.080
<v Speaker 2>we're going to talk a little bit more about though

0:37:10.120 --> 0:37:12.279
<v Speaker 2>we were just were crypto. At least Colleen founder and

0:37:12.360 --> 0:37:14.319
<v Speaker 2>managing partner is still Mark joins us.

0:37:14.320 --> 0:37:37.040
<v Speaker 5>Next. That's a good big technology.

0:37:43.480 --> 0:37:45.680
<v Speaker 2>Let's check in on crypto for you. Bitcoin at one

0:37:45.719 --> 0:37:48.680
<v Speaker 2>point was almost at seventy thousand yesterday. We're now training

0:37:48.680 --> 0:37:52.600
<v Speaker 2>about sixty seven thousand dollars level right now. We're looking

0:37:52.640 --> 0:37:55.920
<v Speaker 2>at ETF inflows. Of course resurgence there more than two

0:37:55.960 --> 0:37:58.520
<v Speaker 2>billion dollars in recent week or so. But what does

0:37:58.520 --> 0:38:01.400
<v Speaker 2>the election mean for crypto deed regulation? At least Colleen

0:38:01.440 --> 0:38:03.879
<v Speaker 2>found a managing partner at Stillmont. You are listening into

0:38:03.880 --> 0:38:06.799
<v Speaker 2>that conversation with Gary Gensler, and I'm interested as to

0:38:06.960 --> 0:38:09.080
<v Speaker 2>what you think the election means for your space.

0:38:11.160 --> 0:38:14.000
<v Speaker 15>The election means that we are going to be attending

0:38:14.080 --> 0:38:18.960
<v Speaker 15>to the disposition of a new administration towards innovation, and

0:38:19.000 --> 0:38:21.080
<v Speaker 15>that includes bitcoin innovation.

0:38:21.360 --> 0:38:24.240
<v Speaker 17>So what we're hoping to see, regardless of the.

0:38:24.200 --> 0:38:29.160
<v Speaker 15>Administration INSIDU, is that they take a thoughtful approach, that

0:38:29.200 --> 0:38:33.240
<v Speaker 15>they take a studied approach, and that they are discerning

0:38:33.440 --> 0:38:37.040
<v Speaker 15>and how they apply regulation within the bitcoin ecosystem and

0:38:37.200 --> 0:38:40.800
<v Speaker 15>industry to make sure that we are updating rules of

0:38:40.840 --> 0:38:43.400
<v Speaker 15>the past so that they fit well with the current innovation,

0:38:43.960 --> 0:38:47.360
<v Speaker 15>that they are not just protecting investors and participants in

0:38:47.360 --> 0:38:51.040
<v Speaker 15>the ecosystem, but that they are also fostering innovation so

0:38:51.080 --> 0:38:53.240
<v Speaker 15>that America can continue to lead here.

0:38:55.400 --> 0:38:58.480
<v Speaker 2>Does it continued to lead from your perspective with the

0:38:58.520 --> 0:39:04.520
<v Speaker 2>regulatory environment and suddenly, the potential next President, Donald Trump,

0:39:04.840 --> 0:39:08.240
<v Speaker 2>he's certainly saying he wants us to be the crypto capital.

0:39:08.880 --> 0:39:11.960
<v Speaker 2>If regulation stays as it is, var enforcement, will it

0:39:12.000 --> 0:39:12.480
<v Speaker 2>remain so.

0:39:14.200 --> 0:39:14.439
<v Speaker 12>Well?

0:39:14.560 --> 0:39:17.720
<v Speaker 15>So the US has an advantage now and that many

0:39:17.760 --> 0:39:21.280
<v Speaker 15>of the top founders, the most innovative companies in the space,

0:39:21.360 --> 0:39:26.080
<v Speaker 15>including those advancing bitcoins payment technology, for example, are based

0:39:26.080 --> 0:39:29.759
<v Speaker 15>in the United States. They can continue to innovate from

0:39:29.800 --> 0:39:33.760
<v Speaker 15>here with a regulator that sees the advantages of having

0:39:34.760 --> 0:39:38.200
<v Speaker 15>that activity in the US, and we are hopeful that,

0:39:38.280 --> 0:39:43.280
<v Speaker 15>regardless of the administration, that those involved will be looking

0:39:43.280 --> 0:39:46.600
<v Speaker 15>to foster such innovation. I also want to note that,

0:39:46.680 --> 0:39:50.120
<v Speaker 15>of course, the coin innovation is not happening in the silo.

0:39:50.239 --> 0:39:54.560
<v Speaker 15>It's relevant to other industries that are of national relevance,

0:39:55.239 --> 0:40:00.239
<v Speaker 15>such as the transition to renewable energy the explosion of

0:40:00.400 --> 0:40:03.520
<v Speaker 15>interest and opportunity and generative AI and l A.

0:40:03.600 --> 0:40:04.000
<v Speaker 17>Lambs.

0:40:05.120 --> 0:40:09.360
<v Speaker 15>Bitcoin's relevance to that brings more attention to bitcoin.

0:40:09.040 --> 0:40:12.000
<v Speaker 17>Technologies itself, and regulators will.

0:40:11.840 --> 0:40:15.360
<v Speaker 15>Hopefully respond to take themselves a studied approach to the

0:40:15.360 --> 0:40:16.120
<v Speaker 15>bitcoin space.

0:40:17.280 --> 0:40:19.960
<v Speaker 3>What we could have asked SEC chair Against there a

0:40:19.960 --> 0:40:22.279
<v Speaker 3>few moments ago, at least so I suspect he would

0:40:22.320 --> 0:40:26.440
<v Speaker 3>have declined to answer, was his understanding of the relative

0:40:26.520 --> 0:40:31.240
<v Speaker 3>policy platforms of Vice President Harris and former President Trump

0:40:31.320 --> 0:40:35.359
<v Speaker 3>when it comes to crypto and the fundamental differences between them.

0:40:35.840 --> 0:40:38.000
<v Speaker 3>We won't get that answer, but do you have that

0:40:38.120 --> 0:40:41.919
<v Speaker 3>kind of clear understanding of what either outcome might mean

0:40:42.000 --> 0:40:43.360
<v Speaker 3>from a policy perspective.

0:40:44.800 --> 0:40:48.319
<v Speaker 15>I'm quite happy that both candidates are paying attention to

0:40:49.360 --> 0:40:54.400
<v Speaker 15>participants in the ecosystem. They both have advanced policy agendas

0:40:55.040 --> 0:40:56.160
<v Speaker 15>and let us.

0:40:56.040 --> 0:40:58.879
<v Speaker 17>Know that they're paying attention to the space now.

0:40:59.000 --> 0:41:04.080
<v Speaker 15>Instead of evaluating policies during a campaign, what we're really

0:41:04.120 --> 0:41:07.160
<v Speaker 15>looking to see and to participate in and then to

0:41:07.280 --> 0:41:12.840
<v Speaker 15>evaluate is the inaction of policy itself and action rather

0:41:12.960 --> 0:41:17.280
<v Speaker 15>than campaign promises. And it looks to us as though

0:41:18.680 --> 0:41:22.000
<v Speaker 15>both campaigns have an intention to partner with the industry

0:41:22.719 --> 0:41:27.440
<v Speaker 15>to study and to apply a thoughtful approach. And now

0:41:27.440 --> 0:41:30.799
<v Speaker 15>we'll have to look at the rest of the candidates

0:41:30.840 --> 0:41:35.520
<v Speaker 15>in their administrations, the potential administration's behavior, so that we

0:41:35.520 --> 0:41:39.759
<v Speaker 15>can decide whether optimism is deserved. But I think there's

0:41:39.760 --> 0:41:44.080
<v Speaker 15>a reason to be optimistic regardless of the outcome of

0:41:44.080 --> 0:41:44.600
<v Speaker 15>this election.

0:41:46.000 --> 0:41:49.600
<v Speaker 3>That conversation was about, I guess regulatory in the context

0:41:49.600 --> 0:41:54.880
<v Speaker 3>of the risks crypto poses to the financial system, rather

0:41:55.000 --> 0:41:58.480
<v Speaker 3>than how we use the underlying technology against the called

0:41:58.480 --> 0:42:03.520
<v Speaker 3>it the ledger right in the financial system, modernizing global finance.

0:42:04.080 --> 0:42:04.600
<v Speaker 8>Do you think we.

0:42:04.600 --> 0:42:06.520
<v Speaker 3>Should kind of go back to talking about that a

0:42:06.560 --> 0:42:06.960
<v Speaker 3>little bit?

0:42:08.440 --> 0:42:09.680
<v Speaker 17>I think so again.

0:42:09.800 --> 0:42:15.040
<v Speaker 15>Gary Gensler also spoke about his concerns about the stability

0:42:15.080 --> 0:42:20.760
<v Speaker 15>of core technologies like LLM models, and as he's thinking

0:42:20.800 --> 0:42:24.200
<v Speaker 15>about that, or as perhaps the next to take his

0:42:24.320 --> 0:42:27.400
<v Speaker 15>seat is thinking the same, they should be looking to

0:42:27.440 --> 0:42:31.239
<v Speaker 15>how bitcoin can support the robustness of a generative AI

0:42:31.400 --> 0:42:36.680
<v Speaker 15>and LLM ecosystem. So, for example, here energy stabilities, so

0:42:36.719 --> 0:42:42.200
<v Speaker 15>the stability of the grid, the demands that LMS and

0:42:42.840 --> 0:42:45.760
<v Speaker 15>applications running on top of them will have for energy

0:42:46.080 --> 0:42:51.759
<v Speaker 15>will require robustness of the supply, and bitcoin can help

0:42:51.840 --> 0:42:55.520
<v Speaker 15>facilitate that. Of course, we know that bitcoin is an

0:42:55.560 --> 0:42:58.560
<v Speaker 15>off taker of energy in the same way that AI

0:42:59.800 --> 0:43:00.439
<v Speaker 15>is as well.

0:43:00.440 --> 0:43:02.600
<v Speaker 17>But the difference here is that bitcoin.

0:43:02.239 --> 0:43:05.680
<v Speaker 15>Is price responsive, and what that means is that bitcoin

0:43:05.760 --> 0:43:08.520
<v Speaker 15>can off take energy at low prices when there's low

0:43:08.600 --> 0:43:11.600
<v Speaker 15>demand that can shut off and peak times. So bitcoin

0:43:11.640 --> 0:43:15.359
<v Speaker 15>will not contribute to peak times in the grid, which

0:43:15.400 --> 0:43:18.520
<v Speaker 15>means that it will not destabilize the grid and can

0:43:18.560 --> 0:43:23.279
<v Speaker 15>allow for instead healthy growth of renewable generation in a

0:43:23.280 --> 0:43:28.640
<v Speaker 15>way that contributes also to the LM ecosystem's.

0:43:27.920 --> 0:43:30.560
<v Speaker 17>Own stability, a place where Gensler express concern.

0:43:32.400 --> 0:43:34.719
<v Speaker 2>It's interesting that, of course a proof of work, proof

0:43:34.760 --> 0:43:36.800
<v Speaker 2>of stake, that's something in other parts of the crypto

0:43:36.880 --> 0:43:40.520
<v Speaker 2>ecosystem that have to deal with their energy impact. But

0:43:40.719 --> 0:43:43.520
<v Speaker 2>more broadly, everyone is waiting when the killer app is

0:43:43.520 --> 0:43:46.000
<v Speaker 2>really going to be here. From your perspective, does it

0:43:46.040 --> 0:43:49.200
<v Speaker 2>remain as an asset class as an area to invest

0:43:49.200 --> 0:43:51.600
<v Speaker 2>in if you're worried about inflation and that's why you

0:43:51.600 --> 0:43:54.520
<v Speaker 2>get into gold and crypto, or does at some point

0:43:54.560 --> 0:43:57.400
<v Speaker 2>what you're investing in, the projects you invest in end

0:43:57.520 --> 0:43:59.520
<v Speaker 2>up being of service to society.

0:44:00.320 --> 0:44:03.239
<v Speaker 15>This is a great question. So there's two things happening here.

0:44:03.320 --> 0:44:07.680
<v Speaker 15>In terms of advancement of the ecosystem. We've seen, of course,

0:44:07.680 --> 0:44:11.200
<v Speaker 15>the bitcoin is a store of value has matured. At

0:44:11.640 --> 0:44:15.600
<v Speaker 15>the Bitcoin ETF has reached over twenty billion in aggregate

0:44:15.680 --> 0:44:19.840
<v Speaker 15>assets in less than the year's time, which exceeds what

0:44:19.960 --> 0:44:22.920
<v Speaker 15>goal dts did on their launch. And of course the

0:44:22.920 --> 0:44:26.960
<v Speaker 15>Bitcoin spot ETF launch was one of the most successful

0:44:26.960 --> 0:44:31.680
<v Speaker 15>in history. So Bitcoin as a store of value has

0:44:31.760 --> 0:44:36.520
<v Speaker 15>secured its place in history. But what's also happening, of course,

0:44:36.760 --> 0:44:41.359
<v Speaker 15>is that we've seen stable coins find product market fit

0:44:42.680 --> 0:44:44.279
<v Speaker 15>both internationally and.

0:44:46.160 --> 0:44:48.759
<v Speaker 17>Within the US. At the same time the.

0:44:48.719 --> 0:44:51.560
<v Speaker 15>Stable coins have achieved this product market fit, they're coming

0:44:51.680 --> 0:44:55.680
<v Speaker 15>to the bitcoin payment system, which is Likening Network. In July,

0:44:55.960 --> 0:45:01.600
<v Speaker 15>Likening Network launched payment channels that can hand other assets,

0:45:01.640 --> 0:45:06.840
<v Speaker 15>including stable coins, which brings the market that Lightning Network

0:45:06.840 --> 0:45:11.200
<v Speaker 15>has been able to achieve. For example, their Lightning Network

0:45:11.280 --> 0:45:14.840
<v Speaker 15>processes over two hundred thousand transactions a day, over eighty

0:45:14.880 --> 0:45:18.080
<v Speaker 15>million dollars in value a month. And now stable coins

0:45:18.080 --> 0:45:20.799
<v Speaker 15>are coming to the Lightning Network. And so when we're

0:45:20.840 --> 0:45:23.640
<v Speaker 15>looking about what the killer app is for Bitcoin, and

0:45:23.840 --> 0:45:27.520
<v Speaker 15>we're thinking about bitcoin asystore of value and Bitcoin technologies

0:45:27.520 --> 0:45:28.719
<v Speaker 15>for stable coins.

0:45:29.560 --> 0:45:33.480
<v Speaker 2>Ane Colleen founder and managing partner of Stillmock, inter Twining

0:45:33.480 --> 0:45:35.800
<v Speaker 2>stable Coins and Clote. We thank you very much. Indeed,

0:45:35.800 --> 0:45:39.120
<v Speaker 2>now that does it for this edition of Bloomberg Technology.

0:45:38.800 --> 0:45:40.919
<v Speaker 3>Ed jam packed with the interviews. Check out the pod

0:45:41.000 --> 0:45:43.239
<v Speaker 3>you know exactly where to find it. From London in

0:45:43.280 --> 0:45:45.600
<v Speaker 3>San Francisco, this is Bloomberg Technology