WEBVTT - Scanning Every Muscle to Help Olympians Get Stronger

0:00:08.240 --> 0:00:19.440
<v Speaker 1>Hushkin, what's one surprising thing your work has taught you

0:00:19.600 --> 0:00:21.079
<v Speaker 1>about elite athletes?

0:00:22.160 --> 0:00:24.680
<v Speaker 2>I never thought I would see muscles that were so

0:00:25.560 --> 0:00:30.520
<v Speaker 2>developed they broke our scale. Wow.

0:00:31.960 --> 0:00:34.159
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, like it was just too big the machine, the

0:00:34.240 --> 0:00:35.839
<v Speaker 1>AI couldn't figure out what it is.

0:00:35.960 --> 0:00:38.159
<v Speaker 2>Well, no, the AI found it, but we are like

0:00:38.240 --> 0:00:39.600
<v Speaker 2>our kind of rating system.

0:00:40.200 --> 0:00:43.280
<v Speaker 1>Wow. Was there a particular athlete or a particular sport

0:00:43.360 --> 0:00:44.400
<v Speaker 1>or particular muscle?

0:00:44.520 --> 0:00:44.680
<v Speaker 2>What?

0:00:44.680 --> 0:00:46.320
<v Speaker 1>What? What muscle broke the scale?

0:00:47.400 --> 0:00:49.720
<v Speaker 2>Uh? The gluteus maximus breaks it A.

0:00:49.760 --> 0:00:53.040
<v Speaker 1>Fair kidding fantastic.

0:00:53.120 --> 0:00:54.639
<v Speaker 2>Yes, it's a pain in my butt.

0:00:56.800 --> 0:00:58.360
<v Speaker 1>Like because it's too big.

0:00:58.880 --> 0:01:00.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's just so big.

0:01:06.680 --> 0:01:09.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm Jacob Goldstein and this is what's your Problem? This

0:01:09.600 --> 0:01:12.520
<v Speaker 1>month a bunch of Pushkin podcasts are coming out with

0:01:12.680 --> 0:01:17.839
<v Speaker 1>Olympics inspired shows. Revisionist History has a series about America's

0:01:17.840 --> 0:01:22.640
<v Speaker 1>decision to participate in Hitler's Berlin Olympics in nineteen thirty six.

0:01:23.200 --> 0:01:25.960
<v Speaker 1>The Happiness Lab has an interview with a coach who

0:01:26.000 --> 0:01:29.959
<v Speaker 1>coaches coaches and here on What's Your Problem, We're going

0:01:30.040 --> 0:01:32.200
<v Speaker 1>to be talking with people who are working at the

0:01:32.240 --> 0:01:38.560
<v Speaker 1>frontiers of technology to help elite athletes perform better. For example,

0:01:39.360 --> 0:01:43.760
<v Speaker 1>today my guest is Sylvia Blemker. She's a professor of

0:01:43.800 --> 0:01:47.760
<v Speaker 1>biomechanical engineering at the University of Virginia, and she's the

0:01:47.800 --> 0:01:52.200
<v Speaker 1>co founder of a company called Springbok Analytics. Sylvia's problem

0:01:52.320 --> 0:01:55.880
<v Speaker 1>is this, how do you combine MRI scans and artificial

0:01:55.920 --> 0:01:59.560
<v Speaker 1>intelligence to generate new insights that can help both elite

0:01:59.600 --> 0:02:03.440
<v Speaker 1>athletes and people suffering from diseases that affect the muscles.

0:02:04.280 --> 0:02:09.400
<v Speaker 1>Springbox clients include medical researchers, Olympic athletes, major League baseball,

0:02:09.760 --> 0:02:13.920
<v Speaker 1>and several professional basketball and soccer teams. You'll hear about

0:02:13.960 --> 0:02:16.440
<v Speaker 1>all that on the show, but first we're going to

0:02:16.520 --> 0:02:20.000
<v Speaker 1>pick up where we left off in the conversation. We

0:02:20.000 --> 0:02:25.480
<v Speaker 1>were discussing the extraordinarily large muscles of elite athletes, and

0:02:25.520 --> 0:02:28.840
<v Speaker 1>then Sylvia told me something even more surprising.

0:02:30.000 --> 0:02:32.960
<v Speaker 2>The other thing is that they have some tiny muscles too, Huh.

0:02:33.360 --> 0:02:36.839
<v Speaker 1>Like they have like smaller than a normal person's muscle.

0:02:36.880 --> 0:02:37.440
<v Speaker 2>Much smaller.

0:02:37.560 --> 0:02:38.040
<v Speaker 1>Huh.

0:02:38.120 --> 0:02:39.639
<v Speaker 2>They put their muscle where they need it.

0:02:40.120 --> 0:02:42.640
<v Speaker 1>What's an example, Like what muscle is tiny and what

0:02:42.720 --> 0:02:43.440
<v Speaker 1>kind of athletes?

0:02:44.320 --> 0:02:49.239
<v Speaker 2>Calf muscles are small in most fast athletes huh? And

0:02:49.360 --> 0:02:53.399
<v Speaker 2>ether you look at a sprinter or like a running back.

0:02:53.960 --> 0:02:57.279
<v Speaker 1>It's just all quad no calf, all.

0:02:57.040 --> 0:03:00.880
<v Speaker 2>Like thigh no calf, yeah, THI And it kind of

0:03:00.880 --> 0:03:03.000
<v Speaker 2>makes sense because you know, if you're trying to run fast,

0:03:03.000 --> 0:03:04.840
<v Speaker 2>you wouldn't want to put a lot of mass like

0:03:04.960 --> 0:03:07.240
<v Speaker 2>at the end of your leg. It's like as a

0:03:07.240 --> 0:03:08.959
<v Speaker 2>lot of inertia to like move your leg.

0:03:09.240 --> 0:03:09.520
<v Speaker 1>Huh.

0:03:09.960 --> 0:03:12.880
<v Speaker 2>Because you know, the muscles are important for sprinting, that's

0:03:12.919 --> 0:03:16.440
<v Speaker 2>the interesting thing, but they just don't they're small, very.

0:03:16.600 --> 0:03:20.520
<v Speaker 1>H huh uh huh. So I'm particularly interested at this

0:03:20.680 --> 0:03:27.679
<v Speaker 1>moment in the sports piece of what you do. I'm curious,

0:03:27.800 --> 0:03:31.160
<v Speaker 1>by the way. Do you work with any Olympic teams

0:03:31.240 --> 0:03:33.520
<v Speaker 1>or Olympic athletes? Yeah?

0:03:33.639 --> 0:03:38.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, We've actually been working with several different Olympic athletes.

0:03:39.440 --> 0:03:42.000
<v Speaker 2>The ones that probably that come to mind most are

0:03:42.160 --> 0:03:45.760
<v Speaker 2>multiple players on the US women's national soccer team.

0:03:46.000 --> 0:03:48.720
<v Speaker 1>Oh cool, tell me, like, tell me the story of

0:03:48.760 --> 0:03:52.440
<v Speaker 1>that of that work. So they came to you, what

0:03:52.480 --> 0:03:54.160
<v Speaker 1>did what did they what do they want when they

0:03:54.160 --> 0:03:55.800
<v Speaker 1>came to you? Like, how did that? How did that begin?

0:03:57.840 --> 0:04:01.240
<v Speaker 2>They came to us along with their team. So the

0:04:01.280 --> 0:04:04.200
<v Speaker 2>technology we provide, you know, an athlete could understand it,

0:04:04.240 --> 0:04:07.760
<v Speaker 2>but really with their team to help them figure out

0:04:07.840 --> 0:04:10.120
<v Speaker 2>how to keep athletes healthy.

0:04:10.320 --> 0:04:12.920
<v Speaker 1>So what did they what did they say? What did

0:04:12.960 --> 0:04:13.960
<v Speaker 1>they say when they came to.

0:04:14.880 --> 0:04:19.679
<v Speaker 2>So, for example, one athlete that's coming to mind had

0:04:20.560 --> 0:04:24.960
<v Speaker 2>a known imbalance side to side that based on a

0:04:25.120 --> 0:04:28.400
<v Speaker 2>history of injury, and they really wanted to know where

0:04:28.400 --> 0:04:29.960
<v Speaker 2>that imbalance was coming from.

0:04:30.080 --> 0:04:32.960
<v Speaker 1>So the woman had had hurt one of her legs,

0:04:33.000 --> 0:04:35.480
<v Speaker 1>and that leg was even after she came back, that

0:04:35.560 --> 0:04:38.320
<v Speaker 1>leg was weaker essentially than the other. I mean, is

0:04:38.360 --> 0:04:40.960
<v Speaker 1>that the sort of gross you know, macro.

0:04:41.040 --> 0:04:43.520
<v Speaker 2>Way, Yeah, exactly, that's a that's a nice way to

0:04:43.520 --> 0:04:43.720
<v Speaker 2>put it.

0:04:43.800 --> 0:04:47.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And and they wanted a sort of finder like, okay,

0:04:47.240 --> 0:04:49.359
<v Speaker 1>but we can see that, but what's going on on

0:04:49.400 --> 0:04:53.200
<v Speaker 1>the inside, like muscle by muscle tell us that, yes.

0:04:53.080 --> 0:04:55.800
<v Speaker 2>Exactly, that's precisely what we do. We go on the

0:04:55.839 --> 0:05:00.760
<v Speaker 2>inside because on the outside you see perhaps that her

0:05:01.120 --> 0:05:04.640
<v Speaker 2>knee extents or quads seem weaker on one side than

0:05:04.680 --> 0:05:08.719
<v Speaker 2>the other. But there's four quads, quadre steps, four muscles,

0:05:09.160 --> 0:05:11.400
<v Speaker 2>and so it's not clear which of those muscles are

0:05:11.440 --> 0:05:15.839
<v Speaker 2>actually the culprit for that imbalance and in what way.

0:05:15.560 --> 0:05:19.760
<v Speaker 1>Good So this is their question, and then what happens next?

0:05:20.160 --> 0:05:23.960
<v Speaker 2>So This first step is an MRI scan, and so

0:05:24.960 --> 0:05:32.000
<v Speaker 2>with these athletes or teams, we have ways to connect

0:05:32.040 --> 0:05:35.480
<v Speaker 2>them with an MRI machine, whether it be through an

0:05:35.480 --> 0:05:39.400
<v Speaker 2>imaging center that they partner with, or we've even actually

0:05:39.400 --> 0:05:45.440
<v Speaker 2>brought MRI mobile trucks to sites to make it.

0:05:45.040 --> 0:05:47.760
<v Speaker 1>Like players run off the field and get an MRI

0:05:48.000 --> 0:05:51.200
<v Speaker 1>and go back and keep playing. Yeah, yeah, kind yeah, yeah.

0:05:51.520 --> 0:05:54.440
<v Speaker 2>It helps just with the timing of things. But so

0:05:54.520 --> 0:05:57.960
<v Speaker 2>first we connect them there, so it takes about ten minutes.

0:05:58.560 --> 0:06:03.000
<v Speaker 2>Then they send those pictures up into the cloud into

0:06:03.080 --> 0:06:06.560
<v Speaker 2>our server and then we crunched through it and then

0:06:06.640 --> 0:06:10.680
<v Speaker 2>we send back a report on their muscles. We also

0:06:10.920 --> 0:06:14.799
<v Speaker 2>have what we call it interactive Viewer, and it's presented

0:06:14.880 --> 0:06:18.520
<v Speaker 2>in the form of a three D model. Three dimensional model,

0:06:18.560 --> 0:06:22.120
<v Speaker 2>so you actually see your own legs, the muscles and bones,

0:06:22.200 --> 0:06:26.280
<v Speaker 2>your own muscles and bones that we've identified from the

0:06:26.320 --> 0:06:30.960
<v Speaker 2>images going through a process called segmentation where we find

0:06:31.000 --> 0:06:33.160
<v Speaker 2>all the muscles and bones and then we reconstruct them,

0:06:33.160 --> 0:06:35.040
<v Speaker 2>so it's kind of like a digital twin of that

0:06:35.080 --> 0:06:38.479
<v Speaker 2>person that they can see on their computer. And so

0:06:38.680 --> 0:06:41.240
<v Speaker 2>along with it or a number or all these metrics

0:06:41.320 --> 0:06:47.880
<v Speaker 2>that helps them understand their balance. The development or strength

0:06:47.920 --> 0:06:50.120
<v Speaker 2>of the muscles and the health of the muscles.

0:06:50.520 --> 0:06:52.880
<v Speaker 1>So tell me about this report, they get like, what

0:06:52.920 --> 0:06:54.360
<v Speaker 1>does it? What does it say?

0:06:55.960 --> 0:06:57.920
<v Speaker 2>So the basis of that is actually a lot of

0:06:57.960 --> 0:07:01.479
<v Speaker 2>research that we did over many years, because you need

0:07:01.520 --> 0:07:06.400
<v Speaker 2>to understand where somebody falls relative to a normal essentially

0:07:06.440 --> 0:07:09.320
<v Speaker 2>to give them. Essentially, we have a scoring system for

0:07:09.560 --> 0:07:13.200
<v Speaker 2>the muscles and that's based on comparing with a large

0:07:13.280 --> 0:07:18.440
<v Speaker 2>data set of healthy individuals. And so we know for

0:07:18.480 --> 0:07:23.920
<v Speaker 2>a given person, based on their sex, age, height and weight,

0:07:24.680 --> 0:07:27.280
<v Speaker 2>how big we expect all the muscles to be. And

0:07:27.760 --> 0:07:30.320
<v Speaker 2>that's through a lot of previous research. So then we

0:07:30.360 --> 0:07:34.120
<v Speaker 2>can say, okay, here's where you land each particular muscle

0:07:34.520 --> 0:07:38.240
<v Speaker 2>compared to this nor what we call a normative database,

0:07:38.840 --> 0:07:40.520
<v Speaker 2>so we call it a spring box score.

0:07:40.880 --> 0:07:42.560
<v Speaker 1>Do you do it for every muscle in the leg.

0:07:42.480 --> 0:07:46.360
<v Speaker 2>Or we do it? So our primary product that we

0:07:46.400 --> 0:07:50.240
<v Speaker 2>started with was every muscle in the legs essentially from

0:07:50.320 --> 0:07:54.520
<v Speaker 2>belly to feet, no muscle left behind. They're all important.

0:07:54.720 --> 0:07:56.400
<v Speaker 1>How many muscles are there.

0:07:56.960 --> 0:07:58.120
<v Speaker 2>Thirty five per leg?

0:07:58.200 --> 0:08:01.800
<v Speaker 1>So seven okay, okay, yeah, more than I would have guessed,

0:08:01.960 --> 0:08:07.840
<v Speaker 1>but a lot. Yeah, all important, okay. So, and so

0:08:08.080 --> 0:08:12.000
<v Speaker 1>it's basically, how strong and healthy is every one of

0:08:12.040 --> 0:08:15.800
<v Speaker 1>those seventy muscles relative to baseline?

0:08:16.080 --> 0:08:19.960
<v Speaker 2>Right, And then the asymmetry comes where you can compare

0:08:20.080 --> 0:08:22.280
<v Speaker 2>side to side. So for each of the thirty five

0:08:22.360 --> 0:08:24.920
<v Speaker 2>muscles that they exist on each leg, we can say

0:08:25.520 --> 0:08:27.960
<v Speaker 2>which side is bigger, which side is smaller, and by

0:08:28.000 --> 0:08:31.280
<v Speaker 2>how much? And then we also have normative values for

0:08:31.400 --> 0:08:34.080
<v Speaker 2>that because we're all just slightly asymmetric.

0:08:34.320 --> 0:08:38.120
<v Speaker 1>Uh huh, And presumably some muscles are more asymmetric than others,

0:08:38.160 --> 0:08:41.000
<v Speaker 1>And so you want to know kind of how how

0:08:41.120 --> 0:08:46.880
<v Speaker 1>asymmetric relative to baseline is this particular pair of muscles exactly? Yeah,

0:08:47.360 --> 0:08:50.520
<v Speaker 1>And and so in the in the case of this

0:08:50.880 --> 0:08:53.920
<v Speaker 1>uh soccer player who came to you who you know,

0:08:54.120 --> 0:08:56.560
<v Speaker 1>knew knew she had some kind of problem with her

0:08:56.640 --> 0:08:58.839
<v Speaker 1>quadriceps on one side, but didn't know what was going on.

0:08:59.320 --> 0:09:00.200
<v Speaker 1>What did you find?

0:09:01.640 --> 0:09:05.880
<v Speaker 2>We found some imbalances, and actually not just in those muscles.

0:09:06.640 --> 0:09:10.080
<v Speaker 2>It turns out that, you know, it's all connected. So

0:09:11.679 --> 0:09:14.679
<v Speaker 2>if you have a weakness or an imbalance and one

0:09:14.720 --> 0:09:17.000
<v Speaker 2>set of muscles, usually some other set of muscles are

0:09:17.000 --> 0:09:18.200
<v Speaker 2>compensating in someone.

0:09:18.360 --> 0:09:21.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, well, it's like when you like mess up. Even

0:09:21.280 --> 0:09:24.600
<v Speaker 1>if you're just a recreational athlete, right Like, if you

0:09:24.640 --> 0:09:26.800
<v Speaker 1>mess up something, you mess up your ankle, then you

0:09:26.840 --> 0:09:29.280
<v Speaker 1>start walking funny, and then like your back hurts because

0:09:29.280 --> 0:09:32.240
<v Speaker 1>you're walking funny. Right Like, that is a very anecdotally

0:09:32.240 --> 0:09:33.000
<v Speaker 1>apparent thing.

0:09:33.080 --> 0:09:35.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, we all know that, but that you know

0:09:35.240 --> 0:09:37.440
<v Speaker 2>it shows through in the skin. But the thing is

0:09:37.480 --> 0:09:41.600
<v Speaker 2>that it's not very intuitive from the outside which muscles

0:09:41.720 --> 0:09:45.520
<v Speaker 2>have been affected, how they've compensated, and it looks different

0:09:45.559 --> 0:09:46.680
<v Speaker 2>for every single person.

0:09:46.920 --> 0:09:47.439
<v Speaker 1>Huh.

0:09:47.480 --> 0:09:50.280
<v Speaker 2>So that's why the report is very valuable because for

0:09:50.400 --> 0:09:54.360
<v Speaker 2>that person, they know exactly which muscles are the ones

0:09:54.400 --> 0:09:56.360
<v Speaker 2>that they really need to target, both the ones that

0:09:56.400 --> 0:09:59.360
<v Speaker 2>they already thought maybe were an issue, but then all

0:09:59.360 --> 0:10:03.160
<v Speaker 2>the other ones that showed up and they didn't really realize.

0:10:03.240 --> 0:10:05.040
<v Speaker 1>And so in the case of this soccer player, was

0:10:05.080 --> 0:10:09.720
<v Speaker 1>it like one particular quadrcep on one side that was

0:10:09.800 --> 0:10:11.560
<v Speaker 1>like the core thing and you could figure out which

0:10:11.559 --> 0:10:12.040
<v Speaker 1>one it was.

0:10:12.440 --> 0:10:14.200
<v Speaker 2>There was a few mess It wasn't just that. I

0:10:14.200 --> 0:10:18.480
<v Speaker 2>think there were at least one calf muscle and then

0:10:18.679 --> 0:10:22.319
<v Speaker 2>some in especially in the deep hip, those were impacted.

0:10:23.240 --> 0:10:26.199
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, it kind of shows up everywhere.

0:10:26.679 --> 0:10:30.000
<v Speaker 1>And so you have this essentially diagnosis, right, a very

0:10:30.040 --> 0:10:33.679
<v Speaker 1>sort of fine grained kind of diagnosis. Do you also

0:10:33.840 --> 0:10:35.920
<v Speaker 1>have a have a prescription? Do you have sort of

0:10:36.240 --> 0:10:41.280
<v Speaker 1>particular kinds of training to address these very fine grained things,

0:10:41.360 --> 0:10:44.040
<v Speaker 1>or do you leave that to the trainers or whoever?

0:10:44.600 --> 0:10:47.080
<v Speaker 2>We leave that to the trainers, because I think that

0:10:47.160 --> 0:10:49.800
<v Speaker 2>it's also important to have all the other information about

0:10:49.840 --> 0:10:53.319
<v Speaker 2>the athlete. We're not arguing that it replaces everything else.

0:10:53.640 --> 0:10:57.280
<v Speaker 2>And people pair it with lots of different other types

0:10:57.320 --> 0:11:02.320
<v Speaker 2>of measurements depending on the application or in the setting,

0:11:02.400 --> 0:11:06.000
<v Speaker 2>Like some people pair it with let's say, metrics of

0:11:06.720 --> 0:11:11.120
<v Speaker 2>jump performance. I'm shifting over to basketball here, but that's

0:11:11.160 --> 0:11:12.959
<v Speaker 2>just one that came to mind, where you can look

0:11:12.960 --> 0:11:16.680
<v Speaker 2>at the asymmetry about how how an athlete jumps, but

0:11:16.720 --> 0:11:18.760
<v Speaker 2>then you can also compare it to the asymmetry of

0:11:18.760 --> 0:11:22.840
<v Speaker 2>their muscles and get some insight. So it definitely, you know,

0:11:23.080 --> 0:11:24.640
<v Speaker 2>plugs in with a lot of other things.

0:11:25.000 --> 0:11:29.760
<v Speaker 1>And to what extent can trainers or you know, strength

0:11:29.840 --> 0:11:36.680
<v Speaker 1>coaches develop programs that are sufficiently kind of fine grained

0:11:36.679 --> 0:11:39.840
<v Speaker 1>to match the kind of fine grained findings you're having, right, Like,

0:11:39.880 --> 0:11:42.920
<v Speaker 1>for example, if you find, as I understand you did

0:11:43.400 --> 0:11:48.120
<v Speaker 1>that a soccer player has one particular quadricep that is weak. Like,

0:11:48.400 --> 0:11:51.120
<v Speaker 1>are there workouts that target a single quadricep and not

0:11:51.160 --> 0:11:51.600
<v Speaker 1>the others?

0:11:52.120 --> 0:11:52.800
<v Speaker 2>Yep, there are.

0:11:53.200 --> 0:11:57.240
<v Speaker 1>That's cool for whichever quadricepp you're just like, just for fun,

0:11:57.320 --> 0:11:58.160
<v Speaker 1>give me an example.

0:11:59.520 --> 0:12:01.840
<v Speaker 2>You know. One one way that it's very simple is

0:12:01.920 --> 0:12:07.480
<v Speaker 2>using something called biofeedback. Huh. So you can measure whether

0:12:07.600 --> 0:12:11.360
<v Speaker 2>you use something called EMG, which is a way to

0:12:11.360 --> 0:12:14.199
<v Speaker 2>measure how much electrical activity is a muscle, and then

0:12:14.240 --> 0:12:17.280
<v Speaker 2>you can see which muscles you're using for a given task.

0:12:17.840 --> 0:12:20.120
<v Speaker 2>So if you give people the feedback of which of

0:12:20.120 --> 0:12:23.640
<v Speaker 2>those muscles they're using and say, oh, no, you're not

0:12:23.760 --> 0:12:26.880
<v Speaker 2>using this one, use this one more, that actually works

0:12:27.000 --> 0:12:27.760
<v Speaker 2>very effectively.

0:12:27.920 --> 0:12:32.280
<v Speaker 1>Oh really, So you can basically use your brain if

0:12:32.320 --> 0:12:36.760
<v Speaker 1>you're getting the feedback to focus on which quadricep you're training.

0:12:37.000 --> 0:12:39.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and there's other ways you can give the feedback

0:12:39.880 --> 0:12:42.240
<v Speaker 2>in other different ways, but yeah, our brains are very

0:12:42.600 --> 0:12:44.880
<v Speaker 2>good at that. Once they get feedback, they're very good

0:12:44.920 --> 0:12:45.520
<v Speaker 2>at learning.

0:12:46.160 --> 0:12:49.080
<v Speaker 1>That's cool, especially somehow to think of what elead athletes right,

0:12:49.080 --> 0:12:52.080
<v Speaker 1>because they are already presumably like super dialed in in

0:12:52.160 --> 0:12:54.920
<v Speaker 1>terms of like the relationship between their brain and their

0:12:54.960 --> 0:12:57.120
<v Speaker 1>body at this very elite level exactly.

0:12:57.520 --> 0:13:00.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. The other I was going to mention a lot

0:13:00.960 --> 0:13:05.199
<v Speaker 2>of players and teams use this not just one time,

0:13:05.280 --> 0:13:09.640
<v Speaker 2>but overtime. So they'll get a scan, figure out a plan,

0:13:10.760 --> 0:13:14.400
<v Speaker 2>work on that for maybe three months or six months,

0:13:14.440 --> 0:13:16.559
<v Speaker 2>and then do another scan and see how things are

0:13:16.559 --> 0:13:20.839
<v Speaker 2>progressing and adjust accordingly. So that's definitely another way to

0:13:21.000 --> 0:13:24.160
<v Speaker 2>in the long term see if what they're doing is

0:13:24.240 --> 0:13:26.600
<v Speaker 2>resulting in the change that they're hoping to see.

0:13:27.280 --> 0:13:29.839
<v Speaker 1>So, what happened with that soccer player who had the

0:13:30.120 --> 0:13:33.960
<v Speaker 1>weak quadricep and other related Yeah, No, I.

0:13:34.000 --> 0:13:39.800
<v Speaker 2>Think she's doing great, like staying healthy and and you know,

0:13:39.880 --> 0:13:40.480
<v Speaker 2>getting ready.

0:13:41.000 --> 0:13:42.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. So I know you can't tell us her name,

0:13:42.640 --> 0:13:47.120
<v Speaker 1>but will we see her in the Olympics this time? Great? So,

0:13:47.240 --> 0:13:48.800
<v Speaker 1>as you were talking about that, I mean there was

0:13:48.840 --> 0:13:51.319
<v Speaker 1>a moment where it was like, Okay, the athlete goes

0:13:51.320 --> 0:13:55.120
<v Speaker 1>and gets the MRI and then you get the scan.

0:13:55.320 --> 0:13:57.400
<v Speaker 1>You get the scan, and then you said, like, you

0:13:57.440 --> 0:13:59.440
<v Speaker 1>crunch through the numbers and then you make the report.

0:14:00.000 --> 0:14:03.960
<v Speaker 1>Ssumably you crunching through the numbers is like the result

0:14:04.000 --> 0:14:06.120
<v Speaker 1>of many many years of work and kind of the

0:14:06.120 --> 0:14:08.760
<v Speaker 1>core of what your company does. So I want to

0:14:08.800 --> 0:14:10.920
<v Speaker 1>talk a little bit more about that and kind of

0:14:10.960 --> 0:14:15.000
<v Speaker 1>how you how you got here, Like how did you

0:14:15.040 --> 0:14:16.040
<v Speaker 1>come to start the company?

0:14:16.440 --> 0:14:21.840
<v Speaker 2>Mm hmm? How long do I have a while?

0:14:22.000 --> 0:14:23.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean it's not you know, it's not the radio,

0:14:23.720 --> 0:14:24.520
<v Speaker 1>it's a podcast.

0:14:25.360 --> 0:14:27.720
<v Speaker 2>You. I am a professor too, so I can go on.

0:14:27.920 --> 0:14:29.960
<v Speaker 1>Let me ask you this, What was the moment when

0:14:29.960 --> 0:14:31.600
<v Speaker 1>you decided to start the company?

0:14:32.880 --> 0:14:35.520
<v Speaker 2>I can give you one moment and then we can

0:14:36.080 --> 0:14:36.720
<v Speaker 2>do a.

0:14:36.640 --> 0:14:42.640
<v Speaker 1>Couple of moments. Yeah, that's what's what a good story is,

0:14:42.680 --> 0:14:44.080
<v Speaker 1>like three moments.

0:14:43.720 --> 0:14:45.680
<v Speaker 2>In time, right right? Three not four?

0:14:46.440 --> 0:14:48.360
<v Speaker 1>Four is a tricky number. We could do five, or

0:14:48.360 --> 0:14:52.160
<v Speaker 1>we could do one. I think I think is better.

0:14:52.600 --> 0:14:55.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Yeah. So I'm a professor. I run a lab

0:14:56.000 --> 0:14:59.960
<v Speaker 2>and form my entire career. I've been fascinated with must

0:15:00.960 --> 0:15:05.680
<v Speaker 2>and how it works, and fascinated by something that we

0:15:05.800 --> 0:15:09.640
<v Speaker 2>all in like the muscle field. We call form function relationships.

0:15:10.280 --> 0:15:13.080
<v Speaker 2>So the idea that the way a muscle is shaped

0:15:13.600 --> 0:15:15.760
<v Speaker 2>and the way it's structured and how big it is

0:15:16.360 --> 0:15:20.000
<v Speaker 2>influences how well it works or how well it functions,

0:15:20.040 --> 0:15:22.760
<v Speaker 2>how strong it is, how well it behaves. And there's

0:15:22.800 --> 0:15:24.640
<v Speaker 2>a lot too there, and there's a lot of nuance.

0:15:24.680 --> 0:15:27.480
<v Speaker 2>And that's like I've spent a career studying that in

0:15:27.520 --> 0:15:30.520
<v Speaker 2>lots of different ways. So I've always been interested in

0:15:30.600 --> 0:15:33.520
<v Speaker 2>quantifying muscle and figuring out how that influence is, how

0:15:33.520 --> 0:15:36.800
<v Speaker 2>it works, and both in healthy people or in athletes,

0:15:36.920 --> 0:15:41.800
<v Speaker 2>and also in different patient populations different In particular, I

0:15:41.880 --> 0:15:47.400
<v Speaker 2>have an interest in movement disorders, so neuromuscular diseases that

0:15:47.560 --> 0:15:53.400
<v Speaker 2>lead to impairments and mobility and movement ability. So one

0:15:53.400 --> 0:15:56.400
<v Speaker 2>of the light bulb moments for this was the fact

0:15:56.440 --> 0:15:59.600
<v Speaker 2>that I'd been using MRI to study muscle in my

0:15:59.640 --> 0:16:03.680
<v Speaker 2>research for a long time. It's kind of a ubiquitous

0:16:03.720 --> 0:16:09.080
<v Speaker 2>tool or like often use tool and research. But I

0:16:09.160 --> 0:16:14.160
<v Speaker 2>was struck by the fact that I was hearing from,

0:16:14.200 --> 0:16:18.320
<v Speaker 2>in particular a surgeon collaborator, and the surgeon was telling

0:16:18.360 --> 0:16:21.920
<v Speaker 2>me about his work and helping kids with cerebral palsy

0:16:22.080 --> 0:16:26.280
<v Speaker 2>improve their movement where they had hindered movement and largely

0:16:26.400 --> 0:16:31.320
<v Speaker 2>because their muscles are impacted. Not only do they have

0:16:32.160 --> 0:16:35.680
<v Speaker 2>an impaired ability to control their muscles, but their muscles

0:16:35.800 --> 0:16:38.840
<v Speaker 2>end up with impairments in their structure or their form,

0:16:39.440 --> 0:16:42.680
<v Speaker 2>which then influences how well they work. So surgeons have

0:16:42.760 --> 0:16:44.920
<v Speaker 2>to go in and do surgeries to try to change that.

0:16:45.560 --> 0:16:49.200
<v Speaker 2>They do things like modify tendons to try to make

0:16:49.320 --> 0:16:53.960
<v Speaker 2>muscles less stiff, or they transfer muscles to make them

0:16:53.960 --> 0:16:56.960
<v Speaker 2>do a new thing. But one of the big tricky

0:16:57.000 --> 0:17:00.240
<v Speaker 2>parts is that oftentimes some of those muscles are very week.

0:17:00.920 --> 0:17:03.600
<v Speaker 2>So if they choose the wrong muscle, then they'll make

0:17:03.600 --> 0:17:07.359
<v Speaker 2>a weak muscle even weaker. Huh, And that's catastrophic. So

0:17:07.400 --> 0:17:10.280
<v Speaker 2>it's a very fine line that a surgeon has to

0:17:10.280 --> 0:17:11.639
<v Speaker 2>figure out and they have to go in. You know,

0:17:11.720 --> 0:17:14.399
<v Speaker 2>we just talked about there's thirty five muscle muscles in

0:17:14.440 --> 0:17:16.359
<v Speaker 2>each leg, So which of the muscles are the ones

0:17:16.400 --> 0:17:19.480
<v Speaker 2>that should be operated on and which ones should be avoided?

0:17:20.200 --> 0:17:25.320
<v Speaker 2>And so what my collaborator, a guy named doctor Mark Abel,

0:17:26.119 --> 0:17:30.440
<v Speaker 2>fantastic surgeon. He was telling me, Yeah, like, it's very hard,

0:17:30.480 --> 0:17:32.480
<v Speaker 2>and I don't he didn't have a way to see that.

0:17:32.720 --> 0:17:34.840
<v Speaker 2>All that he could do is look from the outside.

0:17:35.280 --> 0:17:37.960
<v Speaker 2>No technology could give him the information he needed to

0:17:38.080 --> 0:17:40.840
<v Speaker 2>figure out which muscles he should focus on and which

0:17:40.840 --> 0:17:41.240
<v Speaker 2>ones to.

0:17:41.200 --> 0:17:44.240
<v Speaker 1>Avoid, because it's not obvious by looking what's a strong

0:17:44.320 --> 0:17:47.240
<v Speaker 1>muscle and what's a weak one. Yeah, I guess that's

0:17:47.240 --> 0:17:52.920
<v Speaker 1>surprising to me on some level, Like I don't I've

0:17:52.960 --> 0:17:55.600
<v Speaker 1>never thought about it. But naively, I would think you

0:17:55.680 --> 0:17:59.080
<v Speaker 1>could look at a muscle and say it looks strong

0:17:59.160 --> 0:17:59.720
<v Speaker 1>or it looks weak.

0:17:59.760 --> 0:18:02.200
<v Speaker 2>Not right, because you just see it from the surface.

0:18:02.320 --> 0:18:06.000
<v Speaker 2>You don't see it on the inside. And the other challenges.

0:18:06.640 --> 0:18:10.879
<v Speaker 2>For every joint, there's many muscles. So like we just

0:18:10.880 --> 0:18:13.439
<v Speaker 2>said that quadrceps has four muscles on the back of

0:18:13.440 --> 0:18:18.040
<v Speaker 2>the leg, ham strings, there's three hamstrings muscles. There's other

0:18:18.119 --> 0:18:21.480
<v Speaker 2>muscles that are in the thigh. So you're just seeing

0:18:21.520 --> 0:18:24.520
<v Speaker 2>what's an impairment and the overall movement, let's say of

0:18:24.560 --> 0:18:26.960
<v Speaker 2>a joint. But then there could be many muscles or

0:18:27.000 --> 0:18:29.119
<v Speaker 2>combinations of muscles that are leading to that, and you

0:18:29.160 --> 0:18:32.679
<v Speaker 2>don't know when you look from the outside. Our body

0:18:32.720 --> 0:18:34.640
<v Speaker 2>is designed that way actually to be somewhat we call

0:18:34.640 --> 0:18:37.440
<v Speaker 2>it redundant. We have more muscles than we need probably,

0:18:37.560 --> 0:18:41.560
<v Speaker 2>but if you think about imbalances, then any one of

0:18:41.600 --> 0:18:43.879
<v Speaker 2>those muscles could create it create some trouble.

0:18:44.119 --> 0:18:48.320
<v Speaker 1>So, okay, so the surgeon describes this problem he's having,

0:18:48.880 --> 0:18:50.520
<v Speaker 1>and then and then what do you do?

0:18:50.840 --> 0:18:53.359
<v Speaker 2>So then I was thinking, well, you know, that's the

0:18:53.400 --> 0:18:57.200
<v Speaker 2>information that we generate all the time. When we're doing

0:18:57.240 --> 0:19:03.240
<v Speaker 2>our research. We take MRIs, quantify, we identify muscles, we

0:19:03.359 --> 0:19:06.240
<v Speaker 2>create three dimensional models of the muscles, we figure out

0:19:06.240 --> 0:19:10.719
<v Speaker 2>how they're working from that. But I was struck by

0:19:10.760 --> 0:19:12.560
<v Speaker 2>the fact that none of that was something that a

0:19:12.600 --> 0:19:16.320
<v Speaker 2>clinician could use, despite the fact that MRI is obviously

0:19:16.440 --> 0:19:20.399
<v Speaker 2>ubiquitous in healthcare. Right, yeah, you can't go to a

0:19:20.400 --> 0:19:23.639
<v Speaker 2>hospital without finding multiple MRIs, but there's no way to

0:19:23.760 --> 0:19:26.000
<v Speaker 2>use those MRIs and the way that I was using

0:19:26.000 --> 0:19:30.200
<v Speaker 2>them for my research, And I thought, well, that's too bad,

0:19:30.280 --> 0:19:33.840
<v Speaker 2>because this would be very useful to the surgeon in

0:19:33.920 --> 0:19:38.560
<v Speaker 2>figuring out how to treat these patients. So that was

0:19:38.640 --> 0:19:41.439
<v Speaker 2>one light bulb at the beginning. So a lot of

0:19:41.480 --> 0:19:43.439
<v Speaker 2>it was figuring out how to take something that we

0:19:43.600 --> 0:19:48.240
<v Speaker 2>use in research for very specific, targeted basic science questions

0:19:48.560 --> 0:19:51.560
<v Speaker 2>and turn it into something that is useful clinically.

0:19:52.040 --> 0:19:55.080
<v Speaker 1>And again this is like my ignorance, Like I might

0:19:55.119 --> 0:19:58.119
<v Speaker 1>have thought, well, you could just do an MRI and

0:19:58.200 --> 0:20:02.280
<v Speaker 1>see how big or not big the muscles are, and

0:20:02.359 --> 0:20:04.920
<v Speaker 1>infer from how big or not big the muscles are,

0:20:05.800 --> 0:20:10.480
<v Speaker 1>how strong or not strong they are. And that sounds straightforward,

0:20:11.920 --> 0:20:14.960
<v Speaker 1>but clearly it's not, like, why is it harder than that?

0:20:16.320 --> 0:20:20.040
<v Speaker 2>So a couple of reasons. One is going taking the

0:20:20.160 --> 0:20:23.119
<v Speaker 2>MRI pictures and figuring out how big the muscles is

0:20:23.160 --> 0:20:27.800
<v Speaker 2>a very challenging problem. So in order to accurately get

0:20:27.840 --> 0:20:31.520
<v Speaker 2>how big the muscles are, you have to essentially generate

0:20:31.560 --> 0:20:33.840
<v Speaker 2>its shape in three dimensions, so you have to get

0:20:33.840 --> 0:20:37.000
<v Speaker 2>the whole length of the muscle, and so you do

0:20:37.119 --> 0:20:40.800
<v Speaker 2>that off of multiple MRI pictures. So the MRI essentially

0:20:40.840 --> 0:20:45.520
<v Speaker 2>kind of takes pictures through the body at multiple different

0:20:45.680 --> 0:20:49.960
<v Speaker 2>slices we call them, going from you know, the abdomen

0:20:50.000 --> 0:20:52.600
<v Speaker 2>all the way down to the feet, sort of going

0:20:52.840 --> 0:20:55.840
<v Speaker 2>cross sectionally we call it. And so we usually have

0:20:56.240 --> 0:21:00.439
<v Speaker 2>over two hundred images. So in each image you have

0:21:00.480 --> 0:21:03.480
<v Speaker 2>to find each muscle, and so for any given image

0:21:03.520 --> 0:21:08.800
<v Speaker 2>there's probably at least fifteen muscles or more.

0:21:09.359 --> 0:21:11.439
<v Speaker 1>So it wasn't like you could just push the like

0:21:11.840 --> 0:21:14.440
<v Speaker 1>show me the muscles button on the MRI and it

0:21:14.440 --> 0:21:15.359
<v Speaker 1>would show you the muscles.

0:21:15.359 --> 0:21:15.399
<v Speaker 2>Like.

0:21:15.440 --> 0:21:18.440
<v Speaker 1>Nobody had done that, and there was no obvious way

0:21:18.480 --> 0:21:21.560
<v Speaker 1>to do it, certainly not for a surgeon. Ordering a

0:21:21.920 --> 0:21:23.880
<v Speaker 1>standard MRON just didn't exist.

0:21:24.240 --> 0:21:25.159
<v Speaker 2>It did not exist.

0:21:25.560 --> 0:21:30.840
<v Speaker 1>So okay, so you realize this, what happens? How do

0:21:30.840 --> 0:21:31.520
<v Speaker 1>you make it happen?

0:21:32.280 --> 0:21:34.720
<v Speaker 2>So, you know, one of our first tasks was to

0:21:34.760 --> 0:21:38.480
<v Speaker 2>figure out how to get many muscles. So one of

0:21:38.520 --> 0:21:41.320
<v Speaker 2>the things that we had done on the research side

0:21:41.400 --> 0:21:43.920
<v Speaker 2>is really focus on a couple of muscles, but I

0:21:44.000 --> 0:21:46.600
<v Speaker 2>knew for this application that wasn't going to work. We

0:21:46.720 --> 0:21:49.840
<v Speaker 2>have to be able to identify any muscle. That was

0:21:49.840 --> 0:21:52.600
<v Speaker 2>really the problem is that like you don't know which

0:21:52.600 --> 0:21:54.399
<v Speaker 2>one's the problem, so you don't know which one to

0:21:54.440 --> 0:21:56.040
<v Speaker 2>look at. So you got to look at all of them.

0:21:56.520 --> 0:21:59.000
<v Speaker 2>And then the next task was to figure out all

0:21:59.000 --> 0:22:01.840
<v Speaker 2>those muscles and figure out a process to go from

0:22:01.880 --> 0:22:04.920
<v Speaker 2>the you know, identifying each and every muscle and each

0:22:04.960 --> 0:22:08.359
<v Speaker 2>and every image. So it's called developing an atlas.

0:22:08.560 --> 0:22:10.840
<v Speaker 1>And is that an AI problem?

0:22:12.080 --> 0:22:14.320
<v Speaker 2>So now we have an AI, and it's the type

0:22:14.320 --> 0:22:18.640
<v Speaker 2>of AI as supervised learning, where they can you essentially

0:22:18.800 --> 0:22:21.520
<v Speaker 2>train the computer to do what the person would do.

0:22:22.000 --> 0:22:23.879
<v Speaker 2>But in order to do that, you need to do

0:22:23.960 --> 0:22:28.680
<v Speaker 2>what the person would do first. And so we did

0:22:28.720 --> 0:22:32.920
<v Speaker 2>that all manually at first, in order to generate one

0:22:32.960 --> 0:22:36.159
<v Speaker 2>of these reports. At first, it took us about fifty

0:22:36.200 --> 0:22:38.800
<v Speaker 2>hours per person.

0:22:39.320 --> 0:22:42.920
<v Speaker 1>Just going through image after image after image and saying

0:22:42.920 --> 0:22:45.720
<v Speaker 1>this is this muscle, that is that muscle exactly.

0:22:45.960 --> 0:22:48.560
<v Speaker 2>So we needed to develop that. But the other piece

0:22:48.600 --> 0:22:51.840
<v Speaker 2>we needed is this back to this normative database I

0:22:51.880 --> 0:22:55.920
<v Speaker 2>talked about, because if I just told you how big

0:22:55.960 --> 0:22:58.959
<v Speaker 2>your muscle is in milli leaders in volume, what are

0:22:58.960 --> 0:23:00.000
<v Speaker 2>you going to do with that information?

0:23:00.600 --> 0:23:03.720
<v Speaker 1>Like, oh, great, and nobody knew And it's interesting. It's

0:23:03.720 --> 0:23:05.800
<v Speaker 1>one of those things you always think, oh, surely there's

0:23:05.800 --> 0:23:08.000
<v Speaker 1>some data in the world that everybody knows X. But

0:23:08.040 --> 0:23:10.600
<v Speaker 1>so you're saying, nobody knew what was the kind of

0:23:10.960 --> 0:23:15.399
<v Speaker 1>medium size of a particular quadricept for whatever, a healthy

0:23:15.440 --> 0:23:17.520
<v Speaker 1>twelve year old boy or whatever. Nobody knew that at

0:23:17.600 --> 0:23:18.960
<v Speaker 1>that time. Well, all of.

0:23:18.920 --> 0:23:22.879
<v Speaker 2>The information up until then, for the most part, was

0:23:22.920 --> 0:23:24.680
<v Speaker 2>based on dissecting cadavers.

0:23:24.960 --> 0:23:25.320
<v Speaker 1>Uh huh.

0:23:25.760 --> 0:23:32.520
<v Speaker 2>Was based on taking cadavers and dissecting muscles, weighing the muscles.

0:23:33.040 --> 0:23:35.080
<v Speaker 2>And you know, one of the big challenges with that

0:23:35.240 --> 0:23:40.399
<v Speaker 2>is usually cadavers are older adults, and so they're not

0:23:40.480 --> 0:23:46.320
<v Speaker 2>really representative of a younger, healthy population. And I will

0:23:46.320 --> 0:23:48.600
<v Speaker 2>tell you at that time that that was a lot

0:23:48.640 --> 0:23:50.800
<v Speaker 2>of work and we had I had people saying, like,

0:23:50.840 --> 0:23:54.080
<v Speaker 2>why are you doing that. Uh, like that seems like

0:23:54.119 --> 0:23:58.160
<v Speaker 2>a waste of time. That's crazy. You know, I had

0:23:58.160 --> 0:24:00.760
<v Speaker 2>this vision and I trusted that it was going to

0:24:01.040 --> 0:24:04.200
<v Speaker 2>turn into something at least useful to the research community,

0:24:04.200 --> 0:24:06.800
<v Speaker 2>and you know, I'm thankful that we stuck with it.

0:24:08.600 --> 0:24:10.840
<v Speaker 1>There's lots more to come on the show, including but

0:24:11.040 --> 0:24:14.199
<v Speaker 1>not limited to the work Sylvia and her colleagues are

0:24:14.200 --> 0:24:18.840
<v Speaker 1>doing with major league pitchers, college football players, and patients

0:24:18.920 --> 0:24:33.760
<v Speaker 1>with degenerative muscle disease. Sylvia and her colleagues trained an

0:24:33.800 --> 0:24:36.840
<v Speaker 1>AI model to do what had previously taken a human

0:24:37.320 --> 0:24:41.560
<v Speaker 1>fifty hours for every person who got scanned, and they

0:24:41.680 --> 0:24:45.800
<v Speaker 1>expanded from working with patients with cerebral palsy to working

0:24:45.840 --> 0:24:50.640
<v Speaker 1>with elite athletes. Today, their clients include not just Olympic athletes,

0:24:51.000 --> 0:24:54.520
<v Speaker 1>but teams in the NBA and the Premier League. Also,

0:24:54.720 --> 0:24:57.040
<v Speaker 1>she told me they're working on a project with Major

0:24:57.119 --> 0:24:57.800
<v Speaker 1>League Baseball.

0:24:58.600 --> 0:25:02.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so we're working with the MLB studying pictures and

0:25:02.080 --> 0:25:05.800
<v Speaker 2>we're getting essentially a normative database, whole body scan of pictures.

0:25:05.840 --> 0:25:09.159
<v Speaker 1>And is that partly because like pitchers mess up their

0:25:09.280 --> 0:25:13.040
<v Speaker 1>arms so badly? Is that kind of the motivation there, Yes.

0:25:12.920 --> 0:25:17.840
<v Speaker 2>There's definitely a lot of issue with with injury and surgery.

0:25:17.960 --> 0:25:21.800
<v Speaker 2>And so the idea here is that by taking these scans,

0:25:21.840 --> 0:25:25.280
<v Speaker 2>we can really figure out where there might be weaknesses

0:25:25.440 --> 0:25:29.680
<v Speaker 2>and sort of potential areas for mitigating the injuries.

0:25:30.080 --> 0:25:34.159
<v Speaker 1>So when you do work for a whole team, like

0:25:34.240 --> 0:25:38.119
<v Speaker 1>say the Bulls, you know, a basketball team, an NBA team, Like,

0:25:38.359 --> 0:25:40.679
<v Speaker 1>what's the nature of that of that work? What do

0:25:40.720 --> 0:25:41.960
<v Speaker 1>you do for a team like that?

0:25:42.720 --> 0:25:46.359
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, we're they will do a baseline of the whole

0:25:46.359 --> 0:25:46.960
<v Speaker 2>team and.

0:25:47.320 --> 0:25:52.639
<v Speaker 1>They basically tailor the athletes training presumably strength training in

0:25:52.680 --> 0:25:57.600
<v Speaker 1>particular on a muscle by muscle basis, based on the

0:25:57.640 --> 0:25:58.880
<v Speaker 1>reports that you're sending them.

0:25:59.040 --> 0:25:59.399
<v Speaker 2>Correct.

0:25:59.480 --> 0:26:03.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, And I mean you can imagine like better

0:26:03.880 --> 0:26:09.880
<v Speaker 1>performance being one outcome. Reduced risk of injury seems plausible, right,

0:26:10.080 --> 0:26:13.720
<v Speaker 1>Like it seems obvious that like a big asymmetry could

0:26:14.119 --> 0:26:16.680
<v Speaker 1>make you more likely to be injured. I mean, are

0:26:16.720 --> 0:26:19.199
<v Speaker 1>you at a point now where you can predict the

0:26:19.280 --> 0:26:22.640
<v Speaker 1>risk of injury?

0:26:22.760 --> 0:26:24.159
<v Speaker 2>That's like a whole can of worms.

0:26:24.560 --> 0:26:28.760
<v Speaker 1>I won't say, I mean, is that interesting to you?

0:26:28.920 --> 0:26:30.800
<v Speaker 1>Or is that like too much? Or yeah?

0:26:30.880 --> 0:26:33.280
<v Speaker 2>No, no, no, this is something we think about a lot,

0:26:34.000 --> 0:26:38.480
<v Speaker 2>and let me I want to so first, I'll tell

0:26:38.480 --> 0:26:40.359
<v Speaker 2>you why it's a can of worms. Yeah yeah, And

0:26:40.359 --> 0:26:41.960
<v Speaker 2>I'll tell you what project.

0:26:42.200 --> 0:26:43.760
<v Speaker 1>Tell me about the can. We'll look at it from

0:26:43.760 --> 0:26:44.359
<v Speaker 1>the outside of.

0:26:44.400 --> 0:26:46.199
<v Speaker 2>It, so from the cannon. Like, there's a lot of

0:26:46.240 --> 0:26:49.840
<v Speaker 2>technologies out there that will say that they're predicting injury risk.

0:26:50.400 --> 0:26:53.920
<v Speaker 2>They'll give you numbers, and they're just not based on anything,

0:26:55.960 --> 0:26:58.560
<v Speaker 2>and so I don't know, it's there's.

0:26:58.359 --> 0:27:02.320
<v Speaker 1>A lot of the yeah.

0:27:02.160 --> 0:27:05.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, yeah. So that's not what we're about, Like,

0:27:05.480 --> 0:27:10.080
<v Speaker 2>we're about like providing actual things that matter. And so

0:27:10.680 --> 0:27:14.920
<v Speaker 2>the question is like can you do do these muscle scans?

0:27:16.119 --> 0:27:20.919
<v Speaker 2>Do they correlate with injury likelihood in some way? And

0:27:20.960 --> 0:27:24.280
<v Speaker 2>so we actually have a project to address that very question.

0:27:24.640 --> 0:27:28.600
<v Speaker 2>It's actually funded by the NFL. Uh. We're actually in

0:27:28.640 --> 0:27:34.000
<v Speaker 2>that project. We're working with college teams called college football

0:27:34.000 --> 0:27:38.880
<v Speaker 2>teams baselining entire rosters at the beginning of the season

0:27:39.560 --> 0:27:43.800
<v Speaker 2>and then tracking hamstring injuries and then if a if

0:27:43.800 --> 0:27:46.240
<v Speaker 2>an athlete gets injured, they come back for a scan

0:27:46.600 --> 0:27:49.399
<v Speaker 2>at the time of injury and then return to sport.

0:27:50.160 --> 0:27:52.720
<v Speaker 2>And so one of our questions is based on the

0:27:53.240 --> 0:27:57.600
<v Speaker 2>baseline scan, can we predict who's more likely to get

0:27:57.640 --> 0:28:01.400
<v Speaker 2>an injury, an initial injury index injury, and then then

0:28:01.440 --> 0:28:04.040
<v Speaker 2>the secondary question is can we predict who will be

0:28:04.160 --> 0:28:07.639
<v Speaker 2>re injured? I was saying that we often pairt people

0:28:07.680 --> 0:28:09.920
<v Speaker 2>pair it with other things. In this project, we're always

0:28:09.960 --> 0:28:13.840
<v Speaker 2>also doing that. Each athlete is getting an assessment of

0:28:13.880 --> 0:28:17.199
<v Speaker 2>their sprint mechanics, so kind of the biomechanics of how

0:28:17.240 --> 0:28:22.119
<v Speaker 2>they run, and then also assessment of their strength of

0:28:22.160 --> 0:28:25.639
<v Speaker 2>their hamstring muscles, so like kind of measured strength. Obviously

0:28:25.720 --> 0:28:27.960
<v Speaker 2>you can't do that when they have an injury, of course,

0:28:28.080 --> 0:28:30.240
<v Speaker 2>but you can you know when they're healthy.

0:28:30.400 --> 0:28:33.840
<v Speaker 1>So that biomechanics piece seems like something that has been

0:28:33.840 --> 0:28:39.760
<v Speaker 1>developing in parallel with your work, also driven by computer vision, right, that,

0:28:40.000 --> 0:28:47.800
<v Speaker 1>like markerless motion captures, seems like a big world that

0:28:47.800 --> 0:28:52.200
<v Speaker 1>that overlaps with your world some Yeah, So tell me

0:28:52.240 --> 0:28:56.720
<v Speaker 1>about your work with female athletes versus male athletes and

0:28:55.960 --> 0:28:58.440
<v Speaker 1>how that plays a role.

0:28:59.200 --> 0:29:02.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I will say probably the biggest thing that we've

0:29:02.680 --> 0:29:07.360
<v Speaker 2>been focused on is making sure that our data addresses that.

0:29:07.600 --> 0:29:13.360
<v Speaker 2>So our normative database is uh separated by sex, so

0:29:13.760 --> 0:29:18.320
<v Speaker 2>and it is different because like women aren't small men, right,

0:29:19.000 --> 0:29:22.800
<v Speaker 2>So it's important that we have that basis to compare

0:29:22.880 --> 0:29:26.960
<v Speaker 2>that's like for women and not comparing to some average

0:29:27.080 --> 0:29:30.760
<v Speaker 2>or primarily male data sets. So that's that's one huge

0:29:30.800 --> 0:29:34.360
<v Speaker 2>important thing is that it's it's compared to the normative

0:29:34.400 --> 0:29:41.000
<v Speaker 2>values for the female population. And then in terms of

0:29:41.080 --> 0:29:43.680
<v Speaker 2>like working with the female athletes, I think, you know,

0:29:43.760 --> 0:29:46.280
<v Speaker 2>one of the big ones is is really just ability

0:29:46.360 --> 0:29:53.720
<v Speaker 2>to personalize and provide this like really accurate detailed assessment

0:29:53.800 --> 0:29:56.960
<v Speaker 2>of their of their bodies. And you know, a lot

0:29:57.000 --> 0:30:00.840
<v Speaker 2>of the you know, knowledge about like appropriate body composition

0:30:02.080 --> 0:30:06.120
<v Speaker 2>historically has been based on studies and men, and but

0:30:06.160 --> 0:30:09.320
<v Speaker 2>then we're applying them to women and making us feel

0:30:09.320 --> 0:30:14.360
<v Speaker 2>really bad about ourselves. So really motivated to move away

0:30:14.400 --> 0:30:18.520
<v Speaker 2>from that and sort of acknowledge the muscular physiology and

0:30:18.600 --> 0:30:22.560
<v Speaker 2>anatomy of the female and also the female athlete to

0:30:22.600 --> 0:30:26.800
<v Speaker 2>really understand understand that. You know, I think one thing

0:30:26.840 --> 0:30:29.800
<v Speaker 2>obviously that we've seen is, you know, acl injuries are

0:30:30.120 --> 0:30:35.520
<v Speaker 2>more common in women than men, and examining how these

0:30:35.640 --> 0:30:39.280
<v Speaker 2>like recovery profiles look on how they differ between men

0:30:39.320 --> 0:30:42.720
<v Speaker 2>and women. That's something that we're observing and seeing how

0:30:42.760 --> 0:30:46.720
<v Speaker 2>those things shake out. But we're motivated by really providing

0:30:46.760 --> 0:30:48.600
<v Speaker 2>that information that's specific to women.

0:30:49.720 --> 0:30:53.560
<v Speaker 1>So what are some of the non sports things you're

0:30:53.600 --> 0:30:55.480
<v Speaker 1>working on, things you're trying to figure out.

0:30:55.760 --> 0:31:00.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, one that's I'm really interested in is

0:31:01.560 --> 0:31:04.720
<v Speaker 2>this area that we're applying to in clinical trials for

0:31:04.840 --> 0:31:09.680
<v Speaker 2>muscle disease. So we've been working in a specific muscle

0:31:09.720 --> 0:31:15.920
<v Speaker 2>disease called fascioscapulo humoral muscular district f SHD, which is

0:31:15.960 --> 0:31:21.000
<v Speaker 2>a slowly progressing muscle disease genetic and basis, and so

0:31:22.280 --> 0:31:26.760
<v Speaker 2>eventually people with f SHD need a wheelchair. Just life

0:31:26.800 --> 0:31:30.480
<v Speaker 2>is very difficult, and so it's pretty devastating. But the

0:31:30.520 --> 0:31:33.520
<v Speaker 2>other exciting thing is there are some new treatments out there,

0:31:33.680 --> 0:31:37.400
<v Speaker 2>some in particular gene therapies coming online. And now the

0:31:37.480 --> 0:31:41.560
<v Speaker 2>challenges do they work because the problem is in these

0:31:41.600 --> 0:31:45.200
<v Speaker 2>diseases because they're pretty slowly progressing. If you want to

0:31:45.240 --> 0:31:50.160
<v Speaker 2>see if a drug is helping somebody, it's very hard

0:31:50.200 --> 0:31:52.080
<v Speaker 2>to see that in a slowly progressing.

0:31:51.840 --> 0:31:55.120
<v Speaker 1>Right and the clinical manifestations are hard to pick up.

0:31:55.760 --> 0:32:00.640
<v Speaker 1>If it makes your muscles shrink more slowly, it's going

0:32:00.720 --> 0:32:01.360
<v Speaker 1>to be hard to see.

0:32:01.520 --> 0:32:04.600
<v Speaker 2>It's very hard to see, especially from like rudimentary measures.

0:32:04.880 --> 0:32:07.840
<v Speaker 2>But with the MRIs. We've been able to provide this

0:32:07.960 --> 0:32:11.840
<v Speaker 2>really detailed insight about the disease date of each muscle

0:32:11.880 --> 0:32:15.280
<v Speaker 2>and how it's progressing over time. And so you know,

0:32:15.320 --> 0:32:17.400
<v Speaker 2>one of our goals is to really lean in on

0:32:17.520 --> 0:32:21.720
<v Speaker 2>IS and help figure out exactly how people should look

0:32:21.720 --> 0:32:24.240
<v Speaker 2>at all this data and figure out if a drug

0:32:24.320 --> 0:32:27.960
<v Speaker 2>is working or not. It's really profoundly important because without that,

0:32:28.320 --> 0:32:31.040
<v Speaker 2>these these clinical trials just won't move forward.

0:32:32.720 --> 0:32:37.120
<v Speaker 1>What else are you sort of still trying to figure out?

0:32:37.680 --> 0:32:42.440
<v Speaker 2>So we talked about predicting injury but having all the

0:32:42.520 --> 0:32:45.520
<v Speaker 2>data needed to show like if you do if your

0:32:45.520 --> 0:32:47.680
<v Speaker 2>scan looks like this, and if you do this, you

0:32:47.720 --> 0:32:50.000
<v Speaker 2>will be able to improve your jump high by height.

0:32:50.080 --> 0:32:52.800
<v Speaker 1>By that, yeah, you'll be able to throw a fastball

0:32:53.320 --> 0:32:57.200
<v Speaker 1>two miles an hour faster. Like that would be wildly valuable.

0:32:57.440 --> 0:32:59.640
<v Speaker 2>That would be very and we do have data in

0:32:59.680 --> 0:33:04.720
<v Speaker 2>our search. We were able to show that these muscle

0:33:04.840 --> 0:33:09.080
<v Speaker 2>scores correlate with performance metrics such as jump, hide, and speed.

0:33:09.400 --> 0:33:12.240
<v Speaker 2>So we for sure see that The question is then

0:33:12.280 --> 0:33:15.720
<v Speaker 2>the spin on like observing how how that plays out,

0:33:15.840 --> 0:33:20.680
<v Speaker 2>Like if you then strengthen the appropriate muscles, how how

0:33:20.760 --> 0:33:22.840
<v Speaker 2>much faster do you get? And you just need more

0:33:22.920 --> 0:33:26.080
<v Speaker 2>and more data to really like to go after that.

0:33:26.120 --> 0:33:29.040
<v Speaker 2>But that's one thing that I'm fascinated by. One of

0:33:29.080 --> 0:33:32.280
<v Speaker 2>the other interesting ones, Can I go off on a tangent.

0:33:32.040 --> 0:33:35.320
<v Speaker 1>Anything you want?

0:33:35.320 --> 0:33:38.800
<v Speaker 2>One of our research partners that's interested in how muscles

0:33:38.840 --> 0:33:42.400
<v Speaker 2>adapt to strength training and different interventions and what influences

0:33:42.440 --> 0:33:46.040
<v Speaker 2>that had a really interesting finding that I think is

0:33:46.120 --> 0:33:50.080
<v Speaker 2>quite profound but also obvious. So everybody if there, if

0:33:50.120 --> 0:33:55.040
<v Speaker 2>they're targeted training their quadrceps and hamstrings, those muscles got bigger,

0:33:56.040 --> 0:33:59.520
<v Speaker 2>that makes sense, but in a fair number of the people,

0:33:59.680 --> 0:34:04.560
<v Speaker 2>some muscles got smaller. And then you know, he had

0:34:04.640 --> 0:34:10.719
<v Speaker 2>done some controlling and in documentation of nutrition intake, and

0:34:10.760 --> 0:34:15.480
<v Speaker 2>he found that people that had higher caloric and protein

0:34:15.520 --> 0:34:18.760
<v Speaker 2>intake had less of that effect.

0:34:19.120 --> 0:34:21.319
<v Speaker 1>So all that, all the Jim bros. Telling you to

0:34:21.360 --> 0:34:25.120
<v Speaker 1>eat a lot of protein are validated by this guy's study.

0:34:25.239 --> 0:34:27.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, but they're not. It's not necessarily to make

0:34:27.600 --> 0:34:29.719
<v Speaker 2>that muscle that you're working bigger so you don't lose

0:34:29.760 --> 0:34:30.400
<v Speaker 2>the other muscles.

0:34:30.480 --> 0:34:35.400
<v Speaker 1>Uh huh. That's a good one. And was he using

0:34:35.440 --> 0:34:36.960
<v Speaker 1>your scans to figure out that?

0:34:37.280 --> 0:34:39.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah? Yeah, he was using our scans and and the

0:34:39.480 --> 0:34:42.560
<v Speaker 2>thing that was cool. Is that Normally in research you

0:34:42.600 --> 0:34:45.000
<v Speaker 2>wouldn't bother looking at those other muscles. You would just

0:34:45.000 --> 0:34:47.040
<v Speaker 2>look at the ones that were targeted, right, because those

0:34:47.080 --> 0:34:49.000
<v Speaker 2>are the ones that you just think about. But by

0:34:49.040 --> 0:34:52.480
<v Speaker 2>getting the entire extent of the of all the muscles,

0:34:52.920 --> 0:34:56.200
<v Speaker 2>you see these impacts that you wouldn't necessarily.

0:34:55.680 --> 0:34:57.880
<v Speaker 1>Have known, Like he wasn't even looking for it.

0:34:58.160 --> 0:35:02.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's it's quite profound because somebody's strength training recovering

0:35:02.320 --> 0:35:06.360
<v Speaker 2>from an injury. That really means like that, the nutritional

0:35:06.400 --> 0:35:10.960
<v Speaker 2>elements important because you could be strengthening some muscles but

0:35:11.000 --> 0:35:13.520
<v Speaker 2>weakening others if you're not. If you're not, you know,

0:35:13.520 --> 0:35:14.600
<v Speaker 2>playing your cards right there.

0:35:18.000 --> 0:35:20.040
<v Speaker 1>We'll be back in a minute with the lightning round.

0:35:21.080 --> 0:35:32.640
<v Speaker 1>M h, I want to finish with the lightning round.

0:35:33.000 --> 0:35:34.959
<v Speaker 1>I won't take too long. It'll be fun.

0:35:35.320 --> 0:35:38.200
<v Speaker 2>Okay, what I don't know what that is?

0:35:38.440 --> 0:35:40.360
<v Speaker 1>Well, you'll find out right now.

0:35:41.760 --> 0:35:42.840
<v Speaker 2>Does this have to be fast?

0:35:44.800 --> 0:35:47.200
<v Speaker 1>I could call it the random round? Okay, I like

0:35:47.239 --> 0:35:51.560
<v Speaker 1>that random. Have you scanned yourself?

0:35:52.200 --> 0:35:57.399
<v Speaker 2>Yes? Well times? Oh of course that's what kind of thing.

0:35:58.280 --> 0:36:00.279
<v Speaker 2>Probably I've been in an MRI machine, I don't know,

0:36:00.360 --> 0:36:01.360
<v Speaker 2>maybe a hundred times.

0:36:01.400 --> 0:36:04.359
<v Speaker 1>Like it's not radiation. Right, it's not like an X ray.

0:36:04.440 --> 0:36:05.640
<v Speaker 1>You could do it every day.

0:36:05.520 --> 0:36:06.239
<v Speaker 2>As much as you want.

0:36:06.320 --> 0:36:08.399
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, what'd you learn?

0:36:09.840 --> 0:36:13.360
<v Speaker 2>So I actually used it? You know, I've learned lots

0:36:13.440 --> 0:36:15.800
<v Speaker 2>over the years, but I will tell you one anecdote.

0:36:15.840 --> 0:36:21.360
<v Speaker 2>I have a hip replacement. I have a genetic condition

0:36:21.440 --> 0:36:26.240
<v Speaker 2>that leads to early arthritis. And so I was before

0:36:26.320 --> 0:36:28.799
<v Speaker 2>I got my hip replacement, I got a scan. I

0:36:28.920 --> 0:36:31.600
<v Speaker 2>knew I was getting weak, but holy cow, was I

0:36:31.680 --> 0:36:34.960
<v Speaker 2>really weak on that side. What was profound was how

0:36:36.040 --> 0:36:41.040
<v Speaker 2>weak my hip flexers were very weak. And I you know,

0:36:41.080 --> 0:36:42.960
<v Speaker 2>I think a lot of times people talk about hip

0:36:42.960 --> 0:36:46.280
<v Speaker 2>flexures being tight, and that's kind of what I thought

0:36:46.360 --> 0:36:49.600
<v Speaker 2>was happening. I felt pain and I felt like I

0:36:49.680 --> 0:36:51.800
<v Speaker 2>was having a lot of tightness, but it was actually

0:36:52.320 --> 0:36:57.560
<v Speaker 2>weakness and they were like super small on both sides,

0:36:57.600 --> 0:36:59.680
<v Speaker 2>but really especially on the on the side that was

0:36:59.680 --> 0:37:03.400
<v Speaker 2>effect it. So that was one thing that I worked

0:37:03.440 --> 0:37:03.959
<v Speaker 2>on a lot.

0:37:04.360 --> 0:37:07.240
<v Speaker 1>Do that genetic condition you have, did that influence your

0:37:07.920 --> 0:37:10.400
<v Speaker 1>your work and all your decision to go into the field.

0:37:13.560 --> 0:37:17.080
<v Speaker 2>I mean it's like loosely maybe because my dad had

0:37:17.120 --> 0:37:21.360
<v Speaker 2>the same thing, which actually caused him to go blind. Oh,

0:37:21.480 --> 0:37:23.920
<v Speaker 2>it has like a multiple different issues, and so I

0:37:23.920 --> 0:37:26.640
<v Speaker 2>think that at an early age got me interested in

0:37:27.960 --> 0:37:35.000
<v Speaker 2>medicine and disabilities and like helping helping people, so that

0:37:35.000 --> 0:37:37.359
<v Speaker 2>that might be broadly speaking, I didn't and I knew

0:37:37.400 --> 0:37:39.680
<v Speaker 2>I had some eye problems. I didn't know the genetic thing.

0:37:40.200 --> 0:37:41.640
<v Speaker 2>We didn't discover that till later.

0:37:41.719 --> 0:37:47.239
<v Speaker 1>But huh. Interesting. What's the most underrated muscle in the

0:37:47.320 --> 0:37:47.960
<v Speaker 1>human body?

0:37:48.600 --> 0:37:56.120
<v Speaker 2>Hmm, that's a hard one. So I have a few

0:37:56.160 --> 0:37:57.040
<v Speaker 2>favorite muscles.

0:37:57.560 --> 0:37:58.760
<v Speaker 1>Okay, what's your favorite muscle?

0:37:58.920 --> 0:38:02.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so the so muscle so as major it's it's

0:38:02.120 --> 0:38:04.839
<v Speaker 2>a hip flexer, okay, but it also it's really cool

0:38:05.239 --> 0:38:09.080
<v Speaker 2>it actually it's also a back lower back muscle, so

0:38:09.120 --> 0:38:12.800
<v Speaker 2>it attaches to the lumbar vertebrae. But then it also

0:38:13.560 --> 0:38:16.000
<v Speaker 2>crosses the front of your hip. It's really hard to

0:38:16.080 --> 0:38:18.600
<v Speaker 2>find because it's like really back deep in your hip.

0:38:19.160 --> 0:38:20.839
<v Speaker 2>It goes right over your.

0:38:20.640 --> 0:38:24.439
<v Speaker 1>Your in the middle of your body kind of yeah,

0:38:24.640 --> 0:38:25.280
<v Speaker 1>right in the middle.

0:38:25.440 --> 0:38:28.680
<v Speaker 2>It kind of connects everything, sort of connects your lower

0:38:28.719 --> 0:38:31.200
<v Speaker 2>extremity to the rest of your body in some ways.

0:38:31.719 --> 0:38:39.680
<v Speaker 1>Okay, last one, why do you hate astrophysicist Barbie?

0:38:40.320 --> 0:38:46.920
<v Speaker 2>I don't hate anything. I mean, well, it's too perfect.

0:38:47.200 --> 0:38:50.799
<v Speaker 2>It's kind of like this, you know idea that like, oh,

0:38:51.200 --> 0:38:53.880
<v Speaker 2>you know, you can, you can inspire girls to go

0:38:54.000 --> 0:38:57.080
<v Speaker 2>into science by showing them that Barbie does too. But

0:38:57.200 --> 0:39:00.600
<v Speaker 2>Barbie's like fictitious, so it kind of tells you that,

0:39:02.160 --> 0:39:07.480
<v Speaker 2>like it like promotes the idea of perfectionism in society

0:39:07.480 --> 0:39:10.799
<v Speaker 2>but definitely in girls. And you know, what we really

0:39:10.800 --> 0:39:13.560
<v Speaker 2>want to promote is almost the opposite of that is

0:39:13.600 --> 0:39:18.560
<v Speaker 2>taking risks and and not worrying about being perfect and

0:39:18.640 --> 0:39:22.920
<v Speaker 2>just doing something that matters to you. So yeah, I

0:39:22.960 --> 0:39:24.600
<v Speaker 2>don't know. I mean, I don't hate it. I had

0:39:24.600 --> 0:39:26.719
<v Speaker 2>Barbies when I was a kid, but I just it

0:39:26.840 --> 0:39:27.200
<v Speaker 2>kind of.

0:39:27.160 --> 0:39:32.680
<v Speaker 1>Like wrote you wrote a whole column about it.

0:39:34.760 --> 0:39:38.719
<v Speaker 2>That was I was very proud of that. Yeah, no,

0:39:38.840 --> 0:39:41.800
<v Speaker 2>and really that, you know, the astrophysicist part, honestly was

0:39:41.840 --> 0:39:45.400
<v Speaker 2>more of a hook. The article I had written already

0:39:45.520 --> 0:39:49.160
<v Speaker 2>before that Astrophysicist Barbie came to be. It was about

0:39:49.200 --> 0:39:55.000
<v Speaker 2>the issue of perfectionism and how that dissuades girls to

0:39:55.040 --> 0:39:57.640
<v Speaker 2>go into stem and research.

0:39:58.280 --> 0:40:01.879
<v Speaker 1>Well, a good hook is important, and you found.

0:40:03.200 --> 0:40:03.399
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:40:07.280 --> 0:40:10.280
<v Speaker 1>Sylvia Bleimker is a professor at the University of Virginia

0:40:10.480 --> 0:40:14.799
<v Speaker 1>and the co founder of Springbok analytics. Next week on

0:40:14.840 --> 0:40:17.960
<v Speaker 1>What's Your Problem, I'll be talking to Jimmy Buffy. He

0:40:18.120 --> 0:40:21.840
<v Speaker 1>is using AI to bring the insights of biomechanics to

0:40:21.960 --> 0:40:26.400
<v Speaker 1>professional athletes. Jimmy told me that before the advent of AI,

0:40:26.760 --> 0:40:30.200
<v Speaker 1>when biomechanics experts tried to work with athletes, it could

0:40:30.239 --> 0:40:33.400
<v Speaker 1>be somewhat awkward. So You've got like a picture in

0:40:33.440 --> 0:40:36.719
<v Speaker 1>his underwear with a bunch of little metal balls, Take

0:40:36.840 --> 0:40:39.239
<v Speaker 1>them and they're like, just pitch like you always pitched right.

0:40:39.239 --> 0:40:40.920
<v Speaker 3>And the state of the art for tracking it was

0:40:41.000 --> 0:40:43.200
<v Speaker 3>an awful experience for the people you.

0:40:43.160 --> 0:40:43.839
<v Speaker 2>Were trying to track.

0:40:45.000 --> 0:40:45.920
<v Speaker 1>So what changes?

0:40:46.600 --> 0:40:50.840
<v Speaker 3>The big inflection point was computer vision, basically using artificial

0:40:50.880 --> 0:40:55.800
<v Speaker 3>intelligence to identify where those joints are in a camera image,

0:40:55.920 --> 0:40:59.640
<v Speaker 3>rather than needing to paste those reflective markers.

0:41:00.960 --> 0:41:04.400
<v Speaker 1>Today's show was produced by Gabriel Hunter Chang, edited by

0:41:04.480 --> 0:41:08.640
<v Speaker 1>Lydia Jean Kott, and engineered by Sarah Bugero. You can

0:41:08.640 --> 0:41:13.240
<v Speaker 1>email us at Problem at Pushkin dot FM. I'm Jacob Goldstein.

0:41:13.320 --> 0:41:15.640
<v Speaker 1>We'll be back next week with another episode of What's

0:41:15.680 --> 0:41:29.160
<v Speaker 1>Your Problem.