WEBVTT - The 10 Best NFL Prop Bets for Week 10: Rashid Shaheed, George Pickens, Javonte Williams & MORE! (Ep. 384)

0:00:00.880 --> 0:00:04.480
<v Speaker 1>Hello, friends, and welcome into Betting Pros. It's time to

0:00:04.519 --> 0:00:07.280
<v Speaker 1>get our props on. We're propping it and I have

0:00:07.400 --> 0:00:10.119
<v Speaker 1>got Andrew Aeron propping these two up. I got Andrew Rickson,

0:00:10.200 --> 0:00:13.560
<v Speaker 1>Scott Bogman Fantasy Pros and Betting Pros own as we

0:00:13.720 --> 0:00:16.400
<v Speaker 1>are going to make some bets. The bets are on.

0:00:16.800 --> 0:00:19.279
<v Speaker 1>If they're not with Joe Piezapia, he'll be back next week.

0:00:19.320 --> 0:00:21.440
<v Speaker 1>So I am in the host chair. It's Chris Welsh.

0:00:21.480 --> 0:00:24.400
<v Speaker 1>Thank you guys for hanging out with us. Ericson is

0:00:25.520 --> 0:00:29.200
<v Speaker 1>there a potential ladder bet that we might talk about

0:00:29.240 --> 0:00:32.080
<v Speaker 1>here in a little bit? Can we promo and tease

0:00:32.400 --> 0:00:33.120
<v Speaker 1>a ladder bet?

0:00:33.920 --> 0:00:36.760
<v Speaker 2>I think so, but I'm gonna be honest, We're not

0:00:36.760 --> 0:00:38.840
<v Speaker 2>gonna wait that long because it's my first best bet,

0:00:38.960 --> 0:00:41.879
<v Speaker 2>you know, with my my player props. So I want

0:00:41.920 --> 0:00:43.640
<v Speaker 2>to get straight to the point because I'm really excited

0:00:43.680 --> 0:00:44.760
<v Speaker 2>about this particular player.

0:00:46.000 --> 0:00:49.159
<v Speaker 3>Table or chairs bets either, So ladders like.

0:00:49.080 --> 0:00:51.240
<v Speaker 1>A TLC like a table, lighters and chair match.

0:00:51.280 --> 0:00:52.000
<v Speaker 3>Well you know that.

0:00:52.120 --> 0:00:54.880
<v Speaker 1>Actually I came up with this idea. Erics and I

0:00:54.960 --> 0:00:57.480
<v Speaker 1>were doing the live stream on Fantasy Pros on Thursday,

0:00:57.840 --> 0:01:00.480
<v Speaker 1>and I had done this a week prior where I

0:01:00.560 --> 0:01:02.320
<v Speaker 1>took There was one week where I really liked a

0:01:02.360 --> 0:01:04.880
<v Speaker 1>guy for a ladder bet and we also had Christian

0:01:04.880 --> 0:01:06.960
<v Speaker 1>Watson in that week. Didn't work out, But I love

0:01:07.000 --> 0:01:10.840
<v Speaker 1>the idea of taking the alt yards like high, like

0:01:10.880 --> 0:01:13.240
<v Speaker 1>about eighty yards on a guy that usually has one

0:01:13.280 --> 0:01:18.000
<v Speaker 1>around forty, taking your three favorites, and then that gets

0:01:18.040 --> 0:01:20.520
<v Speaker 1>you like thirty five hundred. We should call that the

0:01:20.560 --> 0:01:23.440
<v Speaker 1>TLC the tables, ladders and chairs bet instead of just

0:01:23.480 --> 0:01:26.559
<v Speaker 1>the ladder bet. And it's three guys with high alt

0:01:26.600 --> 0:01:29.200
<v Speaker 1>props that you think can beat their marker. You get

0:01:29.240 --> 0:01:32.280
<v Speaker 1>crazy odds, just like a tables, ladders and chair match.

0:01:32.319 --> 0:01:35.080
<v Speaker 1>So yes, that is officially it. We are jumping from

0:01:35.120 --> 0:01:38.000
<v Speaker 1>the rafters for some of these bets. Bogs is a.

0:01:38.440 --> 0:01:40.559
<v Speaker 1>Is this one of those really exciting good prop weeks.

0:01:40.600 --> 0:01:43.399
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes it's really rough on books. Looks like there's some

0:01:43.600 --> 0:01:46.480
<v Speaker 1>unders that are in play, there's some great reception props.

0:01:46.520 --> 0:01:48.720
<v Speaker 1>There's just a lot of stuff. It feels like to bet.

0:01:48.920 --> 0:01:51.360
<v Speaker 4>I feel, you know, the further we get into the season,

0:01:51.400 --> 0:01:54.040
<v Speaker 4>the more we discover about these teams, more is revealed

0:01:54.080 --> 0:01:58.240
<v Speaker 4>about these teams. Obviously, stuff changes too with coaches leaving

0:01:58.280 --> 0:02:00.680
<v Speaker 4>getting fired, players can geting injured.

0:02:01.040 --> 0:02:02.520
<v Speaker 3>So but this week, I.

0:02:03.720 --> 0:02:07.240
<v Speaker 4>Haven't even looked at the defensive bets yet, and I

0:02:07.400 --> 0:02:09.679
<v Speaker 4>have some for here, I have some for our show

0:02:09.720 --> 0:02:10.520
<v Speaker 4>I bet this league.

0:02:10.840 --> 0:02:12.440
<v Speaker 3>So I feel like there's a lot of stuff to

0:02:12.480 --> 0:02:14.040
<v Speaker 3>pick from this week. I do feel like this is

0:02:14.040 --> 0:02:15.760
<v Speaker 3>a pretty solid proper week. All right.

0:02:15.800 --> 0:02:17.920
<v Speaker 1>Well, if you guys are as ready as we are,

0:02:18.040 --> 0:02:20.800
<v Speaker 1>make sure you hit the subscribe button on the YouTube

0:02:20.880 --> 0:02:23.640
<v Speaker 1>channel if you're watching on the YouTube, and if you

0:02:23.680 --> 0:02:26.400
<v Speaker 1>do that while making a comment, you have an opportunity

0:02:26.440 --> 0:02:29.799
<v Speaker 1>to win a free one year premium Betting Pro subscription.

0:02:30.440 --> 0:02:32.960
<v Speaker 1>That's all you gotta do. You're sitting here hanging just

0:02:33.000 --> 0:02:36.280
<v Speaker 1>hit subscribe, make a comment, make it nice, maybe make

0:02:36.320 --> 0:02:37.920
<v Speaker 1>it a bet. Maybe you could throw out some bets

0:02:37.960 --> 0:02:39.920
<v Speaker 1>that you want to do. We'll be announcing winners right

0:02:39.919 --> 0:02:41.359
<v Speaker 1>here on this channel. To make sure you turn on

0:02:41.440 --> 0:02:44.760
<v Speaker 1>notifications so you are alerted when new episodes are up

0:02:44.800 --> 0:02:47.000
<v Speaker 1>and you can claim your prize. And guess what, We're

0:02:47.040 --> 0:02:51.519
<v Speaker 1>always given out awesome prizes, not just picks from manys.

0:02:51.720 --> 0:02:54.840
<v Speaker 1>Speaking of, let's get right to it, Andrew Rickson, you

0:02:55.000 --> 0:02:57.639
<v Speaker 1>tease one of your favorite bets of the week, and

0:02:57.800 --> 0:03:02.919
<v Speaker 1>we might be climbing. Bet Number one on the prop

0:03:02.960 --> 0:03:03.440
<v Speaker 1>market is.

0:03:03.440 --> 0:03:07.680
<v Speaker 2>What Rashid Shaheed over thirty and a half receiving yards

0:03:07.720 --> 0:03:12.320
<v Speaker 2>over at Fandels Sportsbook at minus one fourteen. Look, Shaheed dominates.

0:03:12.680 --> 0:03:15.240
<v Speaker 2>He dominates against zone coverage like that is where he

0:03:15.280 --> 0:03:17.359
<v Speaker 2>scores the most of his fantasy points. He's the best

0:03:17.480 --> 0:03:19.600
<v Speaker 2>in terms of the most efficient receiver on the Saints

0:03:19.760 --> 0:03:23.480
<v Speaker 2>when they're playing zone defenses. Vikings are mostly zone coverage

0:03:23.480 --> 0:03:25.639
<v Speaker 2>top ten zone rate covered rate, third team. Anelsel likes

0:03:25.639 --> 0:03:27.440
<v Speaker 2>the blitz a lot. What happens when you blitz a

0:03:27.480 --> 0:03:30.160
<v Speaker 2>lot get burned deep a lot of the time. So

0:03:30.639 --> 0:03:33.400
<v Speaker 2>the Vikings, with their defense is deployed, they give up

0:03:33.440 --> 0:03:36.560
<v Speaker 2>a lot of yards and targets to number three receivers

0:03:37.000 --> 0:03:39.520
<v Speaker 2>thirteen yards per game to opposing number three receivers. We

0:03:39.560 --> 0:03:41.840
<v Speaker 2>know Shaheed based on snaps and routes as the number

0:03:41.840 --> 0:03:44.560
<v Speaker 2>three guy on the Saints. The Vikings are also allowing

0:03:44.560 --> 0:03:47.800
<v Speaker 2>the fourth most targets to number three receivers. So yes,

0:03:48.120 --> 0:03:49.920
<v Speaker 2>the matchup is perfect. I think for Shahid to just

0:03:49.960 --> 0:03:52.120
<v Speaker 2>go absolutely nuclear in this matchup. We just look at

0:03:52.320 --> 0:03:54.440
<v Speaker 2>trends because the betting shows so obviously we're gonna talk

0:03:54.440 --> 0:03:57.680
<v Speaker 2>about trends. Last two games, Shaheed has gone off road

0:03:57.720 --> 0:04:01.560
<v Speaker 2>games playing in domes after he failed to put up

0:04:01.600 --> 0:04:05.280
<v Speaker 2>thirty yards the week before. That's the rint and repeat

0:04:05.320 --> 0:04:08.160
<v Speaker 2>with rashi Jaheid. That's the pattern we're following here, the

0:04:08.240 --> 0:04:10.920
<v Speaker 2>pattern for a ladder bet because when you look at Shahid,

0:04:11.160 --> 0:04:14.240
<v Speaker 2>he either finished under thirty five receiving yards or gone

0:04:14.320 --> 0:04:17.240
<v Speaker 2>over sixty three years receiving yards in his nine games played.

0:04:17.240 --> 0:04:19.600
<v Speaker 2>So he's like the typical like cookie cutter boom er

0:04:19.640 --> 0:04:23.080
<v Speaker 2>bus receiver that if it's not eighty yards, you.

0:04:23.080 --> 0:04:25.440
<v Speaker 3>Is gonna your last? Is that what you're saying? Yes?

0:04:25.720 --> 0:04:28.240
<v Speaker 2>First, yeah, first, your last, Rashik Jaheid. So when he

0:04:28.279 --> 0:04:30.760
<v Speaker 2>goes over, he goes well over, and all the points

0:04:30.839 --> 0:04:33.279
<v Speaker 2>suggest that it's gonna go over this week. So let's

0:04:33.360 --> 0:04:33.839
<v Speaker 2>ladder bet.

0:04:34.320 --> 0:04:37.200
<v Speaker 1>So the play here is the thirty and a half

0:04:37.200 --> 0:04:38.840
<v Speaker 1>for everybody. But if you want to get into the

0:04:38.920 --> 0:04:41.000
<v Speaker 1>ladder betty market, I happen to be looking on a

0:04:41.120 --> 0:04:45.720
<v Speaker 1>DK sportsbook. You've got twenty five plus yards and minus

0:04:45.760 --> 0:04:48.920
<v Speaker 1>two fifteen. They didn't give you the thirty, but then

0:04:48.960 --> 0:04:52.279
<v Speaker 1>they start at forty plus at plus one thirty fifty

0:04:52.279 --> 0:04:55.480
<v Speaker 1>plus yards to twenty five sixty plus is plus three

0:04:55.480 --> 0:04:58.640
<v Speaker 1>point fifty seventy plus at five fifty. Remember that eighty

0:04:58.680 --> 0:05:02.719
<v Speaker 1>Mark right talked about plus nine hundred nine to one.

0:05:02.960 --> 0:05:06.120
<v Speaker 1>So what is your again? People should know at this point.

0:05:06.160 --> 0:05:11.040
<v Speaker 1>But ladder betting is theoretically taking the lowest number the

0:05:11.040 --> 0:05:13.440
<v Speaker 1>bad odds, doing like a two unit, So you would

0:05:13.440 --> 0:05:14.839
<v Speaker 1>do like twenty five. If you want to do the

0:05:14.880 --> 0:05:17.440
<v Speaker 1>twenty five, you do like two units on twenty five,

0:05:17.760 --> 0:05:20.560
<v Speaker 1>and then at the forty maybe do one unit, fifty,

0:05:20.640 --> 0:05:23.760
<v Speaker 1>do half a unit, sixty to a quarter unit. Those

0:05:23.800 --> 0:05:25.760
<v Speaker 1>are versions of how people like the ladder bet it.

0:05:26.160 --> 0:05:30.040
<v Speaker 1>What would be your ladder bet of choice here, mister Rickson?

0:05:30.800 --> 0:05:32.440
<v Speaker 2>I think it probably just for what you just said,

0:05:32.520 --> 0:05:34.360
<v Speaker 2>you know, I'll just really kind of hammer in at

0:05:34.400 --> 0:05:36.880
<v Speaker 2>the lower amount and he'll get that on one catch

0:05:37.120 --> 0:05:40.320
<v Speaker 2>and then everything after that is just pouring on the gravy. Man.

0:05:40.360 --> 0:05:42.679
<v Speaker 2>Thanksgivings coming up, So I'm looking forward to it.

0:05:43.600 --> 0:05:45.320
<v Speaker 1>All right. I love it, and we'll see if we

0:05:45.360 --> 0:05:48.400
<v Speaker 1>can create the TLC. We'll do Shaheed as one of

0:05:48.400 --> 0:05:52.200
<v Speaker 1>our TLC pieces here. Maybe even just drop like a

0:05:52.640 --> 0:05:54.760
<v Speaker 1>the sixty plus yards because we're getting three and a

0:05:54.800 --> 0:05:56.880
<v Speaker 1>half on our money here and we'll see if we

0:05:56.920 --> 0:05:59.040
<v Speaker 1>can put those together. Bagman, let's go over to you

0:05:59.040 --> 0:06:01.839
<v Speaker 1>your number one or number one on your prop picks

0:06:01.839 --> 0:06:02.320
<v Speaker 1>for the week.

0:06:02.880 --> 0:06:05.400
<v Speaker 4>I'm gonna go with Rashad White over three and a

0:06:05.440 --> 0:06:09.159
<v Speaker 4>half receptions and he's hit this the last three weeks

0:06:09.200 --> 0:06:12.120
<v Speaker 4>four seven and six. Over the last three weeks. The

0:06:12.960 --> 0:06:15.840
<v Speaker 4>Bucks have been getting him more involved in the passing game.

0:06:16.080 --> 0:06:20.080
<v Speaker 4>And Chris Godwin didn't look right last week. A lot

0:06:20.120 --> 0:06:22.520
<v Speaker 4>didn't look right. But this is against Tennessee as well.

0:06:22.560 --> 0:06:26.400
<v Speaker 4>In Tennessee's defense is you know, I don't know that

0:06:26.440 --> 0:06:29.760
<v Speaker 4>they play better than they probably should because Mike Frabel's

0:06:29.800 --> 0:06:31.440
<v Speaker 4>a good coach and there's a lot of rumors that

0:06:31.480 --> 0:06:34.400
<v Speaker 4>maybe he's gonna be your next head coach, Erickson of

0:06:34.440 --> 0:06:37.760
<v Speaker 4>your Patriots there, but we'll see what happens there. But yeah,

0:06:37.760 --> 0:06:40.040
<v Speaker 4>I mean, Rashad White has been getting more involved in this.

0:06:41.360 --> 0:06:43.640
<v Speaker 4>It's starting to look more like the offense we saw

0:06:43.720 --> 0:06:46.440
<v Speaker 4>last year with Leonard Fournette getting all of these dump offfs.

0:06:46.480 --> 0:06:49.280
<v Speaker 4>And I think Baker Mayfield is tired of scrambling and

0:06:49.320 --> 0:06:52.400
<v Speaker 4>getting hit and taking some of these big shots, so

0:06:52.520 --> 0:06:55.800
<v Speaker 4>he is finding more outlets underneath and Rashad White is

0:06:55.800 --> 0:06:57.919
<v Speaker 4>that guy, So I think that's gonna end up happening

0:06:57.960 --> 0:07:00.359
<v Speaker 4>again this week against Tennessee. So this one's it for

0:07:00.360 --> 0:07:02.640
<v Speaker 4>you because I know you love this bet every single week.

0:07:02.680 --> 0:07:05.160
<v Speaker 1>Wellsh yeah, I do love. I do love running back

0:07:05.320 --> 0:07:07.800
<v Speaker 1>reception receiving yard props when you can get it. I

0:07:07.880 --> 0:07:12.280
<v Speaker 1>love Rashad White every single week Little Juiced minus won twenty.

0:07:12.320 --> 0:07:14.760
<v Speaker 1>But I'm definitely down with that one. And I tend

0:07:14.800 --> 0:07:18.080
<v Speaker 1>to like to find two running backs that have, you know,

0:07:18.240 --> 0:07:22.080
<v Speaker 1>perceivably solid reception yard props. Frankly, I like this, and

0:07:22.320 --> 0:07:26.480
<v Speaker 1>me personally, maybe throw it with ramondre Stevenson receptions, which

0:07:26.520 --> 0:07:29.080
<v Speaker 1>is at three and a half at plus money take that.

0:07:29.160 --> 0:07:30.880
<v Speaker 1>Put those two together, have a little bit of fun

0:07:30.920 --> 0:07:33.720
<v Speaker 1>with it, all right, Coming in at number two on

0:07:33.760 --> 0:07:35.880
<v Speaker 1>your favorite props ericson where are we going?

0:07:36.480 --> 0:07:40.280
<v Speaker 2>Taking an under here, because when you set expectations for

0:07:40.280 --> 0:07:42.960
<v Speaker 2>players to fail, you're gonna come out and agree more

0:07:43.000 --> 0:07:45.080
<v Speaker 2>often than not. So George pickens under three and a

0:07:45.120 --> 0:07:48.000
<v Speaker 2>half receptions because this man does not get targeted nearly

0:07:48.000 --> 0:07:50.080
<v Speaker 2>as much when Deontay Johnson is healthy and active in

0:07:50.080 --> 0:07:52.720
<v Speaker 2>the lineup. Talked about this on the Fantasy show where

0:07:52.960 --> 0:07:55.640
<v Speaker 2>you look at Pickens, what he's done. His fantasy finishes

0:07:55.720 --> 0:07:58.120
<v Speaker 2>with DJ in the lineup by receiver fifty one by

0:07:58.160 --> 0:08:00.960
<v Speaker 2>receiver nineteen barx here forty five sever one hundred and three,

0:08:01.440 --> 0:08:03.960
<v Speaker 2>his seventeen percent target share with healthy Deonta Johnson, He's

0:08:03.960 --> 0:08:07.120
<v Speaker 2>averaging just three point two to five catches per contest.

0:08:07.520 --> 0:08:10.280
<v Speaker 2>Don't like the matchup against the Packers, tougher matchup overall

0:08:10.640 --> 0:08:14.000
<v Speaker 2>seventh best first perimeter receivers the season and overall to

0:08:14.200 --> 0:08:18.080
<v Speaker 2>over all wide receivers, and the way that Pickts gets

0:08:18.080 --> 0:08:20.840
<v Speaker 2>targets and bogs You correct if I'm wrong, Like it's

0:08:20.880 --> 0:08:23.400
<v Speaker 2>just not conducive to him catching a lot of receptions,

0:08:23.400 --> 0:08:29.000
<v Speaker 2>like they're all sideline grabsery is to make highlight reel, right, Yeah,

0:08:29.040 --> 0:08:30.400
<v Speaker 2>And so that is the result that he has the

0:08:30.440 --> 0:08:32.720
<v Speaker 2>third worst catch rate at fifty three percent, the sixth

0:08:32.760 --> 0:08:35.760
<v Speaker 2>worst catchable target rate. So it's not even just on him,

0:08:35.880 --> 0:08:38.240
<v Speaker 2>like the balls are not in his radius where he

0:08:38.240 --> 0:08:41.000
<v Speaker 2>can actually come down with the football. So, and he

0:08:41.040 --> 0:08:44.440
<v Speaker 2>has also struggled again zone coverage for PFF sixty fifth

0:08:44.440 --> 0:08:47.320
<v Speaker 2>among all receivers and fantasy points per route run versus zone.

0:08:47.559 --> 0:08:51.079
<v Speaker 2>Green Bay's a top ten zone defense. So I'm just

0:08:51.080 --> 0:08:52.559
<v Speaker 2>taking the under on George Pickens.

0:08:53.320 --> 0:08:55.920
<v Speaker 4>And I've heard the the thing I've heard this week

0:08:56.000 --> 0:08:58.920
<v Speaker 4>ericson a lot is the squeaky wheel gets the cheese right.

0:08:58.920 --> 0:09:01.960
<v Speaker 3>Because he's complaining. This is not a J. Brown. I

0:09:02.080 --> 0:09:03.600
<v Speaker 3>like George Pickens a lot. I think he's a very

0:09:03.640 --> 0:09:05.800
<v Speaker 3>good player, but this is not a J. Brown. This

0:09:05.880 --> 0:09:07.679
<v Speaker 3>is not that level of player yet.

0:09:07.920 --> 0:09:11.040
<v Speaker 4>So maybe they try to make it a focus to

0:09:11.040 --> 0:09:12.880
<v Speaker 4>get him the ball because he's complaining and being a

0:09:12.880 --> 0:09:15.320
<v Speaker 4>big cry baby and all that stuff. But I just

0:09:15.400 --> 0:09:17.840
<v Speaker 4>don't think that he is at the level where, oh, well,

0:09:17.840 --> 0:09:21.560
<v Speaker 4>we have to get Georgia ball because looking him crying. No, sorry,

0:09:21.600 --> 0:09:23.800
<v Speaker 4>if you're not open, or you're not going to be

0:09:23.800 --> 0:09:25.480
<v Speaker 4>involved in the game plan, or you're just going to

0:09:25.520 --> 0:09:26.800
<v Speaker 4>be a decoy, that's fine.

0:09:26.840 --> 0:09:27.720
<v Speaker 3>You're not a J. Brown.

0:09:27.880 --> 0:09:31.120
<v Speaker 2>So Tom cares about one thing and it's called winning.

0:09:31.760 --> 0:09:34.240
<v Speaker 3>It doesn't matter how And Tom.

0:09:34.280 --> 0:09:37.800
<v Speaker 1>Also had mentioned he said, you know, the crying was nothing.

0:09:37.840 --> 0:09:40.720
<v Speaker 1>He wasn't worried about it. He wants players that want

0:09:40.760 --> 0:09:45.000
<v Speaker 1>the ball. But he's also acknowledging like he's unaffected by

0:09:45.000 --> 0:09:46.520
<v Speaker 1>the crying about it. He's like, great, that's fine that

0:09:46.559 --> 0:09:48.320
<v Speaker 1>you're doing it. It's not going to change anything. With

0:09:48.400 --> 0:09:49.320
<v Speaker 1>Tomlin about.

0:09:49.120 --> 0:09:51.040
<v Speaker 3>He said, it's a great story for you guys, but

0:09:51.120 --> 0:09:53.160
<v Speaker 3>we do not care. Yeah, exactly does.

0:09:53.360 --> 0:09:56.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, he's not giving any tissues out. He doesn't care.

0:09:56.200 --> 0:09:57.959
<v Speaker 1>Cry all you want. He's got some work.

0:09:58.160 --> 0:10:02.120
<v Speaker 4>We want volunteers, not hostage hostages. The standard is the standard,

0:10:02.280 --> 0:10:04.360
<v Speaker 4>such his life in the NFL. I just did a

0:10:04.440 --> 0:10:05.360
<v Speaker 4>Mike Tomlin interview.

0:10:05.640 --> 0:10:08.360
<v Speaker 1>You go, all right, Bob, you're up here your second

0:10:08.400 --> 0:10:09.400
<v Speaker 1>prop of the week.

0:10:09.640 --> 0:10:11.760
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I'm gonna go with Javonte Williams over fifty four

0:10:11.760 --> 0:10:14.040
<v Speaker 4>and a half rushing yards. It's minus one fifteen. They

0:10:14.040 --> 0:10:16.560
<v Speaker 4>are on the road at Buffalo, and this is because

0:10:16.600 --> 0:10:19.040
<v Speaker 4>a couple of things. We talked to Deepak about Javante

0:10:19.080 --> 0:10:21.720
<v Speaker 4>and we know that he is now in the spot

0:10:21.760 --> 0:10:25.840
<v Speaker 4>where he should be one hundred percent recovered from his injury,

0:10:26.240 --> 0:10:28.679
<v Speaker 4>his knee injury. And the workload has gone up fifteen

0:10:28.720 --> 0:10:32.319
<v Speaker 4>for eighty two two weeks ago, twenty seven for eighty five,

0:10:33.200 --> 0:10:37.240
<v Speaker 4>So the massive workload has been moved up and up

0:10:37.280 --> 0:10:40.760
<v Speaker 4>for him. And Buffalo is below average statistically against the run.

0:10:40.800 --> 0:10:43.240
<v Speaker 4>They come in at eighteenth allowing over. I think it's

0:10:43.240 --> 0:10:45.880
<v Speaker 4>one hundred and fourteen yards per game and grade twenty

0:10:45.920 --> 0:10:48.160
<v Speaker 4>first against run on PFF as well, So it's not

0:10:48.280 --> 0:10:50.720
<v Speaker 4>just like a you know, teams have to play catch

0:10:50.760 --> 0:10:52.920
<v Speaker 4>up with them. Maybe that's a little bit part of it,

0:10:53.360 --> 0:10:54.880
<v Speaker 4>but they're just not that good against the run.

0:10:54.920 --> 0:10:55.320
<v Speaker 3>This year.

0:10:55.360 --> 0:10:58.960
<v Speaker 4>They have more pass rushing, you know, better pass rushing

0:10:59.000 --> 0:11:01.520
<v Speaker 4>options on the defensive line than run stoppers. So I

0:11:01.559 --> 0:11:04.240
<v Speaker 4>think if you are the moroncos in this game, knowing

0:11:04.280 --> 0:11:06.600
<v Speaker 4>your defense is weak, you try to run the ball.

0:11:06.640 --> 0:11:08.520
<v Speaker 4>You try to keep Josh Allen on the sideline, try

0:11:08.559 --> 0:11:10.640
<v Speaker 4>to make him panic and throw those picks because he's

0:11:10.679 --> 0:11:12.800
<v Speaker 4>not holding the ball. So I think the strategy is

0:11:12.800 --> 0:11:14.280
<v Speaker 4>going to be to hand the ball off to Javonte

0:11:14.360 --> 0:11:17.240
<v Speaker 4>twenty times. So I think he hits this total fairly easily.

0:11:18.040 --> 0:11:20.319
<v Speaker 1>If you guys have not already gone and checked it out,

0:11:20.360 --> 0:11:23.520
<v Speaker 1>go and get the Betting pros app today over on

0:11:23.600 --> 0:11:27.040
<v Speaker 1>iOS or really anywhere that you can download, whatever phone

0:11:27.080 --> 0:11:29.800
<v Speaker 1>service you're using. Go and check out Betting Pros Now.

0:11:29.800 --> 0:11:32.800
<v Speaker 1>We got great new features. The community section up. It's

0:11:32.840 --> 0:11:35.559
<v Speaker 1>got top rated betters, betters that are on hot streaks,

0:11:35.600 --> 0:11:40.320
<v Speaker 1>betters that are actual experts. You can follow It's one

0:11:40.360 --> 0:11:43.000
<v Speaker 1>of my favorite things that Betting Pros allows you to do.

0:11:43.280 --> 0:11:45.880
<v Speaker 1>When you bust open the app, you can then follow

0:11:45.920 --> 0:11:48.000
<v Speaker 1>some of your favorite people. You can follow ericson, you

0:11:48.000 --> 0:11:50.360
<v Speaker 1>can follow Bagman, you can see what people are betting,

0:11:50.400 --> 0:11:53.319
<v Speaker 1>and you can tail it yourself. You can follow the feed,

0:11:53.559 --> 0:11:55.840
<v Speaker 1>view a feed of bets from everyone that you follow.

0:11:56.400 --> 0:11:59.120
<v Speaker 1>You can get instant notification when new bets are placed.

0:11:59.160 --> 0:12:02.400
<v Speaker 1>You can track your bets, enjoy improved live tracking of

0:12:02.400 --> 0:12:05.319
<v Speaker 1>your bets across sports books to help you monitor your performance.

0:12:05.600 --> 0:12:08.839
<v Speaker 1>And you've got prop bet hit rates. You can sort

0:12:08.920 --> 0:12:12.000
<v Speaker 1>out prop bet cheat sheet by overall percentage and under

0:12:12.000 --> 0:12:14.400
<v Speaker 1>percentage the last like fifteen games to be on the

0:12:14.440 --> 0:12:17.600
<v Speaker 1>right side of the recent trends. There is so much

0:12:17.840 --> 0:12:20.160
<v Speaker 1>that you can do with the Betting Pros app, so

0:12:20.240 --> 0:12:23.199
<v Speaker 1>download it today. It is one of the best tools

0:12:23.200 --> 0:12:25.120
<v Speaker 1>to get you not only in the betting market, but

0:12:25.160 --> 0:12:28.680
<v Speaker 1>the prop market. Betting Pros app store, go and do

0:12:28.800 --> 0:12:30.880
<v Speaker 1>it now. One of the things I would love for

0:12:30.960 --> 0:12:33.439
<v Speaker 1>us to add. They've always got great features. I want

0:12:33.480 --> 0:12:35.839
<v Speaker 1>to add our ladder betting on there. We need to

0:12:35.840 --> 0:12:38.160
<v Speaker 1>get that feature added into the near future. So the

0:12:38.200 --> 0:12:40.240
<v Speaker 1>quick break here since we don't have any more. Let

0:12:40.240 --> 0:12:42.520
<v Speaker 1>me present this to you guys for a second for

0:12:42.640 --> 0:12:44.880
<v Speaker 1>our TLC bet. We've already got a ladder bet of

0:12:44.920 --> 0:12:48.800
<v Speaker 1>the day for Rashid Shahed going up to sixty to seventy.

0:12:49.280 --> 0:12:53.400
<v Speaker 1>My TLCT bet is the tables, ladders and chairs of

0:12:53.679 --> 0:12:59.520
<v Speaker 1>alt yards for players. If I present you with Rashid

0:12:59.520 --> 0:13:05.760
<v Speaker 1>Shahed sixty plus receiving yards, Zay Flowers sixty plus receiving

0:13:05.840 --> 0:13:11.000
<v Speaker 1>yards and dare I do this? Andrew Rickson? Christian Watson

0:13:11.080 --> 0:13:14.439
<v Speaker 1>at sixty plus receiving yards only sixty plus on all them?

0:13:14.480 --> 0:13:16.920
<v Speaker 1>I love Zay Flowers this week his prop is around

0:13:16.920 --> 0:13:20.679
<v Speaker 1>forty three. I'm going sixty on all three. We are

0:13:20.760 --> 0:13:25.320
<v Speaker 1>almost getting fifty to one. It is forty nine to

0:13:25.440 --> 0:13:30.040
<v Speaker 1>one to bet those three parlayed together. Can I interest

0:13:30.080 --> 0:13:33.000
<v Speaker 1>in you in a TLC match? And or Andrew Erickson?

0:13:33.440 --> 0:13:35.400
<v Speaker 2>I'm in you in, come.

0:13:35.240 --> 0:13:38.439
<v Speaker 4>In for that fifty I mean throw ten bucks on it,

0:13:38.720 --> 0:13:39.280
<v Speaker 4>you know what I mean?

0:13:39.520 --> 0:13:40.640
<v Speaker 3>Like, what are we doing?

0:13:41.400 --> 0:13:45.680
<v Speaker 1>Kristian Watson, Kristin Watson, Zay Flowers, Rashid Shaheed all yard

0:13:45.760 --> 0:13:47.520
<v Speaker 1>sixty plus, Bogman, You're in.

0:13:48.040 --> 0:13:50.840
<v Speaker 4>Get that blood pumping absolutely, I'm in. Yeah, all right,

0:13:51.000 --> 0:13:53.720
<v Speaker 4>like we said, you know, a quarter, ye and a half,

0:13:53.720 --> 0:13:56.080
<v Speaker 4>you know, whatever, whatever you got, put put it on

0:13:56.120 --> 0:13:57.440
<v Speaker 4>that and have a little fun.

0:13:57.600 --> 0:13:59.960
<v Speaker 1>We're the Dudley Boys over here. It's Matt and Jeff Hard.

0:14:00.120 --> 0:14:02.280
<v Speaker 1>We're jumping off the tables, ladders and chairs. If you

0:14:02.320 --> 0:14:04.440
<v Speaker 1>guys want to have some fun with us. Rashid Shaheed,

0:14:04.600 --> 0:14:08.520
<v Speaker 1>Zay Flowers, Christian Watson sixty plus almost fifty to one.

0:14:08.960 --> 0:14:11.520
<v Speaker 1>Let's go. That is not though on the big bets

0:14:11.559 --> 0:14:14.480
<v Speaker 1>here as far as the top five, so ericson number

0:14:14.559 --> 0:14:17.360
<v Speaker 1>three on your favorite props of the week. What he got?

0:14:17.679 --> 0:14:20.640
<v Speaker 2>Jalen Rager is bad at football, So I'm taking me

0:14:20.720 --> 0:14:22.720
<v Speaker 2>under out his receiving yards. I can't. I was shocked

0:14:22.760 --> 0:14:24.360
<v Speaker 2>they can put a receiving yards prop out for him.

0:14:24.400 --> 0:14:26.640
<v Speaker 2>I was like, this is this is great. Jalen Rager

0:14:26.720 --> 0:14:28.760
<v Speaker 2>under twenty one and a half receiving yards actually opened

0:14:28.760 --> 0:14:30.680
<v Speaker 2>at twenty two and a half. But sharps are all

0:14:30.720 --> 0:14:32.960
<v Speaker 2>over right. They're taking me under on Jalen Rager because

0:14:32.960 --> 0:14:35.640
<v Speaker 2>he sucks at football, Like he's just not very good.

0:14:35.960 --> 0:14:37.680
<v Speaker 2>He was a first round bus for a reason, and

0:14:37.720 --> 0:14:40.080
<v Speaker 2>for some reason, the Patriots are continuing to trot him

0:14:40.080 --> 0:14:42.680
<v Speaker 2>out there. As a starter in their offense because maybe

0:14:42.720 --> 0:14:45.480
<v Speaker 2>they're tanking. I don't know. But even when he's been

0:14:45.520 --> 0:14:48.360
<v Speaker 2>playing in the offense over the last three weeks, he's

0:14:48.400 --> 0:14:51.520
<v Speaker 2>been under this number in three straight games. So I

0:14:51.520 --> 0:14:53.200
<v Speaker 2>know he had six targets last week. I know he

0:14:53.280 --> 0:14:55.920
<v Speaker 2>dropped a long pass that could have easily gotten him over.

0:14:56.200 --> 0:15:00.360
<v Speaker 2>Jalen No, exactly, not Jalen Reager dropping a p What

0:15:00.360 --> 0:15:02.400
<v Speaker 2>are you talking about. The thing that I want to

0:15:02.440 --> 0:15:06.000
<v Speaker 2>point out here is when guys get targets and then

0:15:06.120 --> 0:15:08.760
<v Speaker 2>don't do anything with them. The team doesn't go back

0:15:08.840 --> 0:15:10.760
<v Speaker 2>to the film be like, you know what, we got

0:15:10.760 --> 0:15:12.640
<v Speaker 2>to keep getting in the ball man, Like we gotta

0:15:12.680 --> 0:15:14.640
<v Speaker 2>feed this guy to the ball. It's like no, They're like,

0:15:14.760 --> 0:15:17.680
<v Speaker 2>we need to get this guy on the bench. So

0:15:18.360 --> 0:15:20.160
<v Speaker 2>I was telling the guys before we hopped on here,

0:15:20.200 --> 0:15:21.840
<v Speaker 2>like the only way I see this not hitting for

0:15:21.920 --> 0:15:24.080
<v Speaker 2>us is that Jalen Rager is just like a healthy scratch.

0:15:24.640 --> 0:15:26.280
<v Speaker 2>It doesn't play, which case is a push to get

0:15:26.280 --> 0:15:29.600
<v Speaker 2>your money back. Yeah, yeah, So Jalen Rager. I'm gonna

0:15:29.600 --> 0:15:33.360
<v Speaker 2>spend my Sunday morning watching the Patriots probably lose to

0:15:33.400 --> 0:15:36.120
<v Speaker 2>the Colts, but I'm gonna be a winner. Because Jalen

0:15:36.200 --> 0:15:38.320
<v Speaker 2>Rager is gonna go out put up a goose egg.

0:15:38.600 --> 0:15:39.680
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna feel great about it.

0:15:39.920 --> 0:15:42.400
<v Speaker 3>What if he's just like the best player in Germany,

0:15:42.760 --> 0:15:44.600
<v Speaker 3>Like how your level of anger?

0:15:44.880 --> 0:15:47.200
<v Speaker 4>If he like goes to Germany and something clicks and

0:15:47.240 --> 0:15:49.640
<v Speaker 4>he has one hundred and fifty receiving Yet if it leads.

0:15:49.440 --> 0:15:51.760
<v Speaker 2>To Patriots victory, then I'll be okay with it.

0:15:53.240 --> 0:15:55.800
<v Speaker 3>By the way, this is how I drown my sorrows here.

0:15:55.880 --> 0:15:58.320
<v Speaker 1>Yes, yes, I'm gonna throw out a seven and a

0:15:58.360 --> 0:16:01.440
<v Speaker 1>half to one bet for Eric's in here. All yards

0:16:01.560 --> 0:16:05.560
<v Speaker 1>Rashid Shaheed sixty plus Jalen Reger under twenty one and

0:16:05.560 --> 0:16:07.920
<v Speaker 1>a half. You get seven and a half to one

0:16:08.040 --> 0:16:10.040
<v Speaker 1>on your money if you parlay those two together. I'm

0:16:10.040 --> 0:16:11.720
<v Speaker 1>not trying to be a big advocate of parlays, by

0:16:11.720 --> 0:16:13.280
<v Speaker 1>the way, because straight out of the safe.

0:16:13.120 --> 0:16:15.200
<v Speaker 3>Way you only mentioned one every single bet. But yeah,

0:16:15.280 --> 0:16:15.680
<v Speaker 3>that's time.

0:16:16.240 --> 0:16:18.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm have some fun here and this sounds like.

0:16:18.520 --> 0:16:21.440
<v Speaker 3>Their that's why we're here, right, I like that bet?

0:16:21.480 --> 0:16:24.240
<v Speaker 1>All right, Bobs, what you got for number? I think

0:16:24.240 --> 0:16:25.200
<v Speaker 1>we're a number three here.

0:16:25.280 --> 0:16:25.840
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, let's go.

0:16:25.960 --> 0:16:27.640
<v Speaker 4>I know it's a big number, but ceedee lamb over

0:16:27.680 --> 0:16:30.920
<v Speaker 4>seventy seventy seventy seven and a half receiving yards against

0:16:30.920 --> 0:16:31.680
<v Speaker 4>the New York Giants.

0:16:31.680 --> 0:16:34.840
<v Speaker 3>That is minus one fifteen. And look for all of our.

0:16:34.760 --> 0:16:38.120
<v Speaker 4>Anger that we've put towards Tony Pollard and him being

0:16:38.160 --> 0:16:41.920
<v Speaker 4>ineffective coming out of the bye, they have been peppering

0:16:42.640 --> 0:16:45.760
<v Speaker 4>Ceedee Lamb with targets this last three games seven for

0:16:45.800 --> 0:16:49.760
<v Speaker 4>one to seventeen on seven targets, fourteen targets, twelve catches,

0:16:49.800 --> 0:16:51.520
<v Speaker 4>one hundred and fifty eight yards and two touchdowns. That

0:16:51.600 --> 0:16:55.040
<v Speaker 4>was off the bye, and then last week sixteen targets

0:16:55.080 --> 0:16:57.480
<v Speaker 4>for eleven catches and one hundred and ninety one yards.

0:16:57.720 --> 0:17:00.920
<v Speaker 4>Like Erickson just said, if it ain't broke, don't fix it, right.

0:17:01.400 --> 0:17:03.600
<v Speaker 4>We want to keep getting the ball to ceed Lamb

0:17:03.640 --> 0:17:07.800
<v Speaker 4>because it keeps making it work. So I mean, maybe

0:17:07.800 --> 0:17:09.280
<v Speaker 4>you have to get your work done in the first

0:17:09.280 --> 0:17:11.880
<v Speaker 4>half here against the Giants because they are so terrible,

0:17:12.200 --> 0:17:14.600
<v Speaker 4>But I mean they're going to get it done, and

0:17:14.640 --> 0:17:16.359
<v Speaker 4>Ceedee Lamb's going to be a big part of it.

0:17:16.800 --> 0:17:20.320
<v Speaker 4>He gets another seven to ten targets and I think

0:17:20.359 --> 0:17:23.000
<v Speaker 4>he easily hits this number. This could be a halftime

0:17:23.080 --> 0:17:25.680
<v Speaker 4>number again for Ceedee Lamb. I would expect it not

0:17:25.760 --> 0:17:27.800
<v Speaker 4>to be. I think third fourth quarter is probably where

0:17:27.800 --> 0:17:30.240
<v Speaker 4>he gets it. But I mean I think, ceedee, Lamb is,

0:17:31.080 --> 0:17:33.200
<v Speaker 4>I've hit this three weeks in a row, so I'm

0:17:33.240 --> 0:17:34.800
<v Speaker 4>just gonna keep taking it till it doesn't hit.

0:17:35.080 --> 0:17:37.040
<v Speaker 1>That's sometimes at the end of the year, you just

0:17:37.080 --> 0:17:38.440
<v Speaker 1>got to take a look at some of the bets

0:17:38.440 --> 0:17:40.600
<v Speaker 1>at work, and you may not hit every single week,

0:17:40.640 --> 0:17:43.760
<v Speaker 1>but you get that sixty five seventy plus percent hit rate,

0:17:43.800 --> 0:17:45.760
<v Speaker 1>you can take some of those losses on some of

0:17:45.800 --> 0:17:49.080
<v Speaker 1>these just chalky bets. So that is that's probably your

0:17:49.160 --> 0:17:51.439
<v Speaker 1>chalkiest of bets that you got going here. Let's go

0:17:51.480 --> 0:17:53.359
<v Speaker 1>to number four on the best props of the week,

0:17:53.640 --> 0:17:55.199
<v Speaker 1>Andrew Rickson. Let's hear it.

0:17:55.640 --> 0:17:58.520
<v Speaker 2>Austin Eckler under fifty one and a half rushing yards.

0:17:58.640 --> 0:18:01.439
<v Speaker 2>So since Eckler's come back from this ankle injury he

0:18:01.440 --> 0:18:03.400
<v Speaker 2>suffered at the beginning of the season, it's been four

0:18:03.440 --> 0:18:05.720
<v Speaker 2>straight unders. You know, under fifty one a half rushing

0:18:05.760 --> 0:18:08.760
<v Speaker 2>yards in four straight games. The Chargers cannot run the football.

0:18:09.000 --> 0:18:12.840
<v Speaker 2>In big surprise, this very ineffective rushing the ball, and

0:18:13.760 --> 0:18:15.600
<v Speaker 2>the lines are not It's not the same lines run

0:18:15.640 --> 0:18:17.560
<v Speaker 2>defense I've picked on for years and years and years

0:18:17.600 --> 0:18:19.439
<v Speaker 2>with fantasy football, like the Lions have one of the

0:18:19.440 --> 0:18:22.040
<v Speaker 2>better run defense in the NFL, playing the second fewest

0:18:22.080 --> 0:18:24.680
<v Speaker 2>rushing yards per game to running backs at fifty seven

0:18:24.680 --> 0:18:27.320
<v Speaker 2>point five. Only two running backs they faced all year

0:18:27.480 --> 0:18:30.480
<v Speaker 2>have gotten over sixty rushing yards against them, So again

0:18:30.480 --> 0:18:31.800
<v Speaker 2>it's a trend. It's four in a row and thinks

0:18:31.840 --> 0:18:33.760
<v Speaker 2>give me five in a row because the Chargers can't

0:18:33.800 --> 0:18:36.120
<v Speaker 2>run the football. So Austin Eckler under fifty one half

0:18:36.160 --> 0:18:38.320
<v Speaker 2>rushing yards to get the set fan duel at minus

0:18:38.320 --> 0:18:38.920
<v Speaker 2>one fourteen.

0:18:39.160 --> 0:18:40.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna have. I'm gonna give you the nickname of

0:18:40.880 --> 0:18:41.960
<v Speaker 1>Andrew Ericksson.

0:18:42.240 --> 0:18:42.760
<v Speaker 3>I love.

0:18:44.160 --> 0:18:45.439
<v Speaker 1>Ericson baby oh.

0:18:45.440 --> 0:18:48.040
<v Speaker 3>My, that is stretching.

0:18:48.440 --> 0:18:50.920
<v Speaker 1>No, I think it's great. It might be stretching great,

0:18:51.240 --> 0:18:54.640
<v Speaker 1>but you know what low like. I think it speaks

0:18:54.760 --> 0:19:00.600
<v Speaker 1>very well to Andrew. Andrew Erickson's complete understand in your face,

0:19:00.760 --> 0:19:04.440
<v Speaker 1>but your understanding of this market because we love overs

0:19:04.480 --> 0:19:07.080
<v Speaker 1>and to be able to pinpoint the unders is a

0:19:07.160 --> 0:19:11.240
<v Speaker 1>complete understanding of game planning and prop betting. I say

0:19:11.240 --> 0:19:14.680
<v Speaker 1>it the best, most affectionate way, because you don't listen

0:19:14.720 --> 0:19:18.200
<v Speaker 1>to a lot of shows where they're smacking unders for props,

0:19:19.000 --> 0:19:21.800
<v Speaker 1>sides and totals. It's kind of a completely different market,

0:19:21.840 --> 0:19:25.320
<v Speaker 1>but there's a very sneaky market out there for the unders.

0:19:25.680 --> 0:19:30.040
<v Speaker 1>So we affectionately say we need like under we need

0:19:30.040 --> 0:19:31.320
<v Speaker 1>like a sound marker too.

0:19:31.400 --> 0:19:34.679
<v Speaker 4>For Andrew Ericsson, we are getting a shirt that says

0:19:34.760 --> 0:19:37.359
<v Speaker 4>life is too short to bet the unders courtesy of

0:19:37.440 --> 0:19:39.520
<v Speaker 4>Joe Pisap and myself. So because I say it all

0:19:39.560 --> 0:19:40.760
<v Speaker 4>the time and Piz and p is like, we got

0:19:40.800 --> 0:19:42.200
<v Speaker 4>to get a shirt, we do. I guess they are

0:19:42.359 --> 0:19:42.800
<v Speaker 4>going to make it.

0:19:42.840 --> 0:19:45.359
<v Speaker 1>So can I can? I request from betting pros and

0:19:45.359 --> 0:19:47.760
<v Speaker 1>fantas bros? Can we get Andrew Erickson? I will wear

0:19:47.840 --> 0:19:50.560
<v Speaker 1>it on a show. I know he's loving that. Andrew Erickson,

0:19:50.880 --> 0:19:53.520
<v Speaker 1>please give me that shirt. I'm betting it, but I

0:19:53.640 --> 0:19:56.959
<v Speaker 1>just hate to say it's two really good undersay Andrew

0:19:56.960 --> 0:19:58.320
<v Speaker 1>has put up there? All right, Bobs, what do you

0:19:58.359 --> 0:19:59.879
<v Speaker 1>got here for number four? On your favorite?

0:20:00.400 --> 0:20:02.520
<v Speaker 4>Let's go Marquise Brown over fifty three and a half

0:20:02.560 --> 0:20:05.480
<v Speaker 4>receiving yards against Atlanta And this one is because we

0:20:05.560 --> 0:20:09.320
<v Speaker 4>got three turn of Marquise Brown of Kyler Murray. Excuse

0:20:09.359 --> 0:20:12.080
<v Speaker 4>me with Marquis Brown and last season in seven games

0:20:12.080 --> 0:20:15.240
<v Speaker 4>they've played together, Marquis Brown averaged seventy five point eight

0:20:15.320 --> 0:20:16.040
<v Speaker 4>yards per game.

0:20:16.080 --> 0:20:16.800
<v Speaker 3>And I know it's a.

0:20:16.720 --> 0:20:19.320
<v Speaker 4>Different offense, of course, but this is a connection that

0:20:19.320 --> 0:20:23.320
<v Speaker 4>has been going together since college at Oklahoma. So I think,

0:20:23.720 --> 0:20:25.960
<v Speaker 4>you know, especially in his first game back, he's gonna

0:20:25.960 --> 0:20:28.040
<v Speaker 4>be looking for familiar targets and stuff like that. So

0:20:28.160 --> 0:20:29.960
<v Speaker 4>I think Marquis Brown is going to get peppered with

0:20:30.040 --> 0:20:32.640
<v Speaker 4>targets in this game against Atlanta. And I think he

0:20:32.720 --> 0:20:35.199
<v Speaker 4>hits this total. I mean, this is fifty three and

0:20:35.200 --> 0:20:37.240
<v Speaker 4>a half. If we get the ball in his hands

0:20:37.280 --> 0:20:39.879
<v Speaker 4>five times, I don't see how he doesn't hit this total.

0:20:40.040 --> 0:20:41.520
<v Speaker 4>And I think he's going to have at least five

0:20:41.560 --> 0:20:45.040
<v Speaker 4>catches in this game. So I think this one's pretty easy.

0:20:45.320 --> 0:20:46.879
<v Speaker 1>You know, one other I just wanted to ask real

0:20:46.960 --> 0:20:49.240
<v Speaker 1>quick ericson do you think there's any play I think

0:20:49.240 --> 0:20:51.280
<v Speaker 1>you and I maybe slightly did this on the live

0:20:51.280 --> 0:20:54.040
<v Speaker 1>stream Michael Wilson, do you think there's anything in play

0:20:54.040 --> 0:20:56.240
<v Speaker 1>for Michael Wilson. It's a low number thirty six and

0:20:56.280 --> 0:20:58.200
<v Speaker 1>a half this week. Is there anything that you would

0:20:58.240 --> 0:20:59.560
<v Speaker 1>jump in on that? Or do you do you like

0:20:59.560 --> 0:21:00.280
<v Speaker 1>that Marquis Brown?

0:21:00.320 --> 0:21:02.760
<v Speaker 2>One I like the Markis Brown one that actually was

0:21:02.800 --> 0:21:05.560
<v Speaker 2>on my on my sheet as well, but I saw

0:21:05.600 --> 0:21:07.000
<v Speaker 2>Box had already taken it, so I don't want to

0:21:07.040 --> 0:21:09.000
<v Speaker 2>have a repeat bet, so I just went with another

0:21:09.080 --> 0:21:11.040
<v Speaker 2>under because you know Andre Erickson, That's what I do.

0:21:12.320 --> 0:21:16.679
<v Speaker 2>Michael Wilson. Michael Wilson, I would say, I guess I

0:21:16.720 --> 0:21:18.800
<v Speaker 2>just don't know what the connection is like between him

0:21:18.960 --> 0:21:21.800
<v Speaker 2>and Murray would be my hesitance about it. He's been

0:21:21.840 --> 0:21:23.639
<v Speaker 2>super efficient with his targets as well. I think he

0:21:23.680 --> 0:21:25.439
<v Speaker 2>still has like a perfect passer rating when he's been

0:21:25.440 --> 0:21:27.880
<v Speaker 2>targeted this season, so he's been super efficient. Now does

0:21:27.880 --> 0:21:30.800
<v Speaker 2>that regress with a new quarterback. I actually really like

0:21:30.840 --> 0:21:33.400
<v Speaker 2>Trade McBride honestly a lot more than as that other

0:21:33.520 --> 0:21:36.280
<v Speaker 2>kind of secondary pass catcher in the Cardinal's office, because

0:21:36.280 --> 0:21:38.240
<v Speaker 2>we saw McBride. McBride's been with the team, he's played

0:21:38.280 --> 0:21:41.800
<v Speaker 2>with Kyler Murray before, whereas Michael Wilson again never seen

0:21:41.800 --> 0:21:43.280
<v Speaker 2>with Murray. So that's the only reason I would be

0:21:43.480 --> 0:21:44.960
<v Speaker 2>slightly hesitant on that one, and.

0:21:44.920 --> 0:21:46.400
<v Speaker 1>That's where I was gonna I was gonna even bring

0:21:46.440 --> 0:21:49.159
<v Speaker 1>in to McBride. It's forty and a half on the

0:21:49.160 --> 0:21:51.680
<v Speaker 1>receiving yards three and a half receptions.

0:21:51.720 --> 0:21:54.680
<v Speaker 2>Now the exceptions is what I like because especially against

0:21:54.680 --> 0:21:57.800
<v Speaker 2>the Falcons, the Falcons defense is bleeds to tight ends.

0:21:58.240 --> 0:21:58.960
<v Speaker 3>It's just juiced.

0:22:00.080 --> 0:22:03.159
<v Speaker 4>Landman isn't good at covering tight ends here, What are

0:22:03.200 --> 0:22:04.760
<v Speaker 4>you sayingelievable?

0:22:04.720 --> 0:22:07.679
<v Speaker 1>I would again like when you get the superjuiced reception,

0:22:07.920 --> 0:22:10.120
<v Speaker 1>it's minus one sixty. So that's a pretty hard bet

0:22:10.160 --> 0:22:11.600
<v Speaker 1>to go with. You want to have a little bit

0:22:11.640 --> 0:22:14.040
<v Speaker 1>of fun. I think that's a pretty chocky one that

0:22:14.160 --> 0:22:16.439
<v Speaker 1>maybe you pair that with another reception prop that you

0:22:16.560 --> 0:22:19.520
<v Speaker 1>really like. Or again, if you just want to in

0:22:20.960 --> 0:22:25.240
<v Speaker 1>Andrew ericson spirit take like Jalen reagor under and pair

0:22:25.320 --> 0:22:29.280
<v Speaker 1>that together with Trey McBride. Maybe receptions all right, final

0:22:29.280 --> 0:22:30.800
<v Speaker 1>ones on the top five. Then we'll look at our

0:22:30.840 --> 0:22:33.520
<v Speaker 1>anytime touchdowns. Andrew, what do you got for your fifth

0:22:33.560 --> 0:22:34.359
<v Speaker 1>on the prop bets?

0:22:34.960 --> 0:22:37.320
<v Speaker 2>Going to go with it over because we want to

0:22:37.359 --> 0:22:37.920
<v Speaker 2>have some fun.

0:22:38.640 --> 0:22:40.159
<v Speaker 1>I shamed you. I shamed you into it.

0:22:40.240 --> 0:22:42.800
<v Speaker 3>I'm too short to bet the unders. Yeah, let's go

0:22:42.840 --> 0:22:43.280
<v Speaker 3>with it over.

0:22:43.480 --> 0:22:45.320
<v Speaker 2>I'm going with Jared Goff over thirty three and a

0:22:45.359 --> 0:22:48.960
<v Speaker 2>half passing attempts. Look at the Chargers this season, they

0:22:49.000 --> 0:22:51.520
<v Speaker 2>have become one of these pass funnel defenses. So they've

0:22:51.600 --> 0:22:54.240
<v Speaker 2>really stifled against running backs, but they've been giving it

0:22:54.320 --> 0:22:56.840
<v Speaker 2>up through the air. You look at the quarterbacks that

0:22:56.840 --> 0:22:59.000
<v Speaker 2>they have faced the season, five of seven have gone

0:22:59.000 --> 0:23:01.960
<v Speaker 2>over their passing attempts. All of them has gone over

0:23:01.960 --> 0:23:05.439
<v Speaker 2>their passing yards props. So Jared Goff, he's gone over

0:23:05.480 --> 0:23:07.639
<v Speaker 2>three to three attempts in three straight games, projected for

0:23:07.640 --> 0:23:10.600
<v Speaker 2>thirty six pass attempts in this spot here. And I

0:23:10.640 --> 0:23:13.639
<v Speaker 2>know that Bogs likes say certain lines wide receiver as well,

0:23:13.760 --> 0:23:16.239
<v Speaker 2>So we've been talking about parlays. This one's just this

0:23:16.280 --> 0:23:19.320
<v Speaker 2>one was made for the show. So I like Jared Goff,

0:23:19.320 --> 0:23:21.000
<v Speaker 2>and I'll throw it to Box with his receiver that

0:23:21.040 --> 0:23:21.400
<v Speaker 2>he likes.

0:23:21.400 --> 0:23:24.040
<v Speaker 3>In his matchup, I'm honors Saint Brown.

0:23:24.200 --> 0:23:27.560
<v Speaker 4>It's over six and a half receptions, it is minus

0:23:27.560 --> 0:23:28.160
<v Speaker 4>one twenty five.

0:23:28.200 --> 0:23:29.200
<v Speaker 3>But it's the Chargers.

0:23:29.560 --> 0:23:32.000
<v Speaker 4>And we just heard Ericson lay out the argument for

0:23:32.280 --> 0:23:34.720
<v Speaker 4>all those pass attempts from Shared Goff, who's catching those?

0:23:34.880 --> 0:23:38.040
<v Speaker 4>Most of them are gonna be caught by Amna Saint Brown,

0:23:38.040 --> 0:23:41.920
<v Speaker 4>who over the last couple of games six, twelve, and thirteen.

0:23:41.560 --> 0:23:44.400
<v Speaker 2>He's been absolute. I was like looking at the game box,

0:23:44.440 --> 0:23:46.040
<v Speaker 2>I was like I was reading, it was like he's

0:23:46.040 --> 0:23:48.439
<v Speaker 2>gone over like eighty yards and like seventy percent of

0:23:48.480 --> 0:23:49.320
<v Speaker 2>his games.

0:23:49.000 --> 0:23:51.639
<v Speaker 4>Like what it's like hundred yards, one hundred yards, one

0:23:51.680 --> 0:23:54.680
<v Speaker 4>hundred Well, we keep waiting for the second guy to

0:23:55.119 --> 0:23:57.760
<v Speaker 4>the second wide receiver to break out. We wanted it

0:23:57.840 --> 0:24:00.560
<v Speaker 4>to be Jamison Williams and that has no worked out.

0:24:00.800 --> 0:24:04.640
<v Speaker 4>Reynolds has come in and disappeared. They just traded for DPJ,

0:24:04.880 --> 0:24:07.760
<v Speaker 4>which makes me think that second wide receiver spot has

0:24:07.840 --> 0:24:10.760
<v Speaker 4>not really been working for them. So what are we

0:24:10.800 --> 0:24:14.840
<v Speaker 4>gonna do? Yeah, so we're gonna go to a minor

0:24:14.880 --> 0:24:17.880
<v Speaker 4>Saint Brown. We're gonna go to Sam Laporta and Jamier Gibbs.

0:24:17.920 --> 0:24:20.399
<v Speaker 4>I think, speaking of funnels, I think that is your

0:24:20.400 --> 0:24:23.600
<v Speaker 4>funnel system if you're the Detroit Lions offense in this game,

0:24:23.920 --> 0:24:25.840
<v Speaker 4>is throw it to our three best players. And I

0:24:25.840 --> 0:24:27.919
<v Speaker 4>think that's what's gonna end up happening a lot in

0:24:27.920 --> 0:24:30.119
<v Speaker 4>this game. And a manra I think this is another,

0:24:30.320 --> 0:24:33.400
<v Speaker 4>you know, somewhere in the neighborhood of fourteen fifteen targets

0:24:33.440 --> 0:24:35.399
<v Speaker 4>game for him, and he's easily going to hit that

0:24:35.440 --> 0:24:38.640
<v Speaker 4>six and a half if he gets that number of targets.

0:24:38.440 --> 0:24:41.600
<v Speaker 1>I've been waiting. These cowards will not release Jamiir Gibbs

0:24:41.640 --> 0:24:45.320
<v Speaker 1>receiving yards or receptions. That's all I'm waiting for because

0:24:45.320 --> 0:24:47.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm with you on what you're saying here. I love

0:24:47.119 --> 0:24:50.520
<v Speaker 1>the honor of Saint Brown, but these cowards release it.

0:24:50.960 --> 0:24:52.840
<v Speaker 1>Grandma's not getting out of the cage until we get

0:24:52.880 --> 0:24:56.000
<v Speaker 1>Jamiir Gibb reception yard prop I'm telling you, I'm looking

0:24:56.040 --> 0:24:58.720
<v Speaker 1>for that. We'll see what the number is. I love

0:24:58.760 --> 0:25:00.560
<v Speaker 1>all of those. I really like those. You could maybe

0:25:00.560 --> 0:25:03.440
<v Speaker 1>same game parlay both golf and a mon ross Saint

0:25:03.440 --> 0:25:04.200
<v Speaker 1>Brown to get.

0:25:04.200 --> 0:25:05.040
<v Speaker 2>We love the Lions.

0:25:05.560 --> 0:25:08.800
<v Speaker 3>The Lions this week, Yeah, that they better not disappoint.

0:25:09.200 --> 0:25:11.359
<v Speaker 1>I think go number one over on like the main slate, right,

0:25:11.400 --> 0:25:13.520
<v Speaker 1>it might be on the week. I think it's near

0:25:13.560 --> 0:25:15.800
<v Speaker 1>the tippy top here the total, yeah yeah on the

0:25:15.800 --> 0:25:20.120
<v Speaker 1>total final up here. We got any time touchdowns ericson

0:25:20.359 --> 0:25:22.000
<v Speaker 1>what's your bet on anytime touchdown?

0:25:22.200 --> 0:25:24.920
<v Speaker 2>Do you get Metcalf. I talked about him on the

0:25:24.960 --> 0:25:28.320
<v Speaker 2>Start Shit Show about how I just love his matchup

0:25:28.320 --> 0:25:30.679
<v Speaker 2>against the Commanders this week. Allowing the second most receiving

0:25:30.680 --> 0:25:33.159
<v Speaker 2>touchdowns to wide receivers, metcalf has tied for fourth in

0:25:33.160 --> 0:25:35.639
<v Speaker 2>the NFL and red zone targets. He hasn't scored since

0:25:35.880 --> 0:25:38.680
<v Speaker 2>Week four. Tyre Lockett's banged up, Jackson's the jig was

0:25:38.680 --> 0:25:40.360
<v Speaker 2>banged up, and No, Metcal's banged up a little bit too.

0:25:40.400 --> 0:25:42.840
<v Speaker 2>But he's a gamer. I think that he's gonna show

0:25:42.880 --> 0:25:44.480
<v Speaker 2>up big in this spot. I think that the Seahawks

0:25:44.600 --> 0:25:47.080
<v Speaker 2>role here against the Commander's defense, and I think Metcalf's

0:25:47.119 --> 0:25:49.560
<v Speaker 2>gonna have a huge game. So anytime touchdown for me

0:25:49.640 --> 0:25:50.840
<v Speaker 2>at plus one to forty.

0:25:50.560 --> 0:25:53.000
<v Speaker 1>Five, bagman, who do you got for your anytime?

0:25:53.680 --> 0:25:55.960
<v Speaker 4>I'm gonna go with Taysom Hill because I like the choice.

0:25:55.960 --> 0:25:59.640
<v Speaker 4>It's plus two twenty. This is against Minnesota, and outside

0:25:59.640 --> 0:26:01.440
<v Speaker 4>of some of the like the big time running backs

0:26:01.440 --> 0:26:06.760
<v Speaker 4>like Derrick Henry and Christian McCaffrey, maybe Jalen Hurts obviously

0:26:06.800 --> 0:26:09.320
<v Speaker 4>with the touch push and all that stuff, I don't

0:26:09.320 --> 0:26:11.119
<v Speaker 4>know if there's a player that's more likely to score

0:26:11.160 --> 0:26:13.919
<v Speaker 4>a touchdown than Taysom Hill because they use him in

0:26:13.960 --> 0:26:17.080
<v Speaker 4>all those like jet sweeps and he can catch a touchdown,

0:26:17.119 --> 0:26:19.280
<v Speaker 4>and he can run one in and he can pass

0:26:19.320 --> 0:26:21.480
<v Speaker 4>for one like. They use him around the goal line

0:26:21.600 --> 0:26:24.119
<v Speaker 4>so much, and it's a good way to take Derek

0:26:24.160 --> 0:26:25.960
<v Speaker 4>Carr off the field and know he's not gonna get

0:26:26.000 --> 0:26:28.720
<v Speaker 4>smashed trying to make a play near the end zone.

0:26:28.720 --> 0:26:30.480
<v Speaker 4>So I like Taysom Hill to get in the end

0:26:30.520 --> 0:26:32.680
<v Speaker 4>zone once again this week, and I think there's multiple

0:26:32.720 --> 0:26:35.080
<v Speaker 4>outs to it, and it's doubling up your money.

0:26:35.160 --> 0:26:36.040
<v Speaker 3>So I like that one.

0:26:36.240 --> 0:26:39.399
<v Speaker 1>Since you guys asked, I gonna go with Deebo Samuel,

0:26:39.400 --> 0:26:41.440
<v Speaker 1>give me Deebo Samuel. Forty nine ers coming off the

0:26:41.480 --> 0:26:44.320
<v Speaker 1>by I think they are going to do some Roland

0:26:44.400 --> 0:26:46.600
<v Speaker 1>get back on track. How do you do that? You

0:26:46.640 --> 0:26:49.760
<v Speaker 1>do that with a healthier Deebo Samuel. You end around,

0:26:49.880 --> 0:26:51.919
<v Speaker 1>you throw the ball, he does some damage. I think

0:26:51.920 --> 0:26:53.439
<v Speaker 1>there'll be a lot of focus on Brandon. I you

0:26:53.520 --> 0:26:56.280
<v Speaker 1>Christian McCaffrey is the best bet, but you get about

0:26:56.280 --> 0:26:58.359
<v Speaker 1>one and a half on your money for Deebo Samuel.

0:26:58.400 --> 0:26:59.800
<v Speaker 1>So that one's also a shout out to my boy

0:26:59.840 --> 0:27:01.720
<v Speaker 1>d bro who loves debo.

0:27:02.160 --> 0:27:05.320
<v Speaker 2>This week before we saw actually one last thing before

0:27:05.320 --> 0:27:08.000
<v Speaker 2>we signed off. Okay, it's Tony Pollard gonna score a

0:27:08.000 --> 0:27:11.240
<v Speaker 2>touchdown this week. It's it's minus one fifty, despite the

0:27:11.240 --> 0:27:12.040
<v Speaker 2>fact that he still.

0:27:11.840 --> 0:27:14.960
<v Speaker 1>Doesn't score minus one fifty.

0:27:14.880 --> 0:27:17.520
<v Speaker 2>Anytime touchdowns minus one fifty for Tony Pollard?

0:27:17.960 --> 0:27:20.600
<v Speaker 4>How could you bet it? That's my question is how

0:27:20.640 --> 0:27:23.040
<v Speaker 4>could you possibly bet it? The juice is terrible?

0:27:23.440 --> 0:27:24.640
<v Speaker 2>Oh yeah, no, it's horrible.

0:27:24.680 --> 0:27:26.320
<v Speaker 1>But I mean is he gonna score?

0:27:26.359 --> 0:27:28.119
<v Speaker 2>But like ultimately, like we're talking about value, but it's like,

0:27:28.160 --> 0:27:29.639
<v Speaker 2>is he gonna score? Like that's what I want to know.

0:27:29.960 --> 0:27:33.560
<v Speaker 1>I'll say no, I'll say yes, yes, let's go, Yes,

0:27:33.640 --> 0:27:36.160
<v Speaker 1>let's go, let's go. I actually I'm not gonna lie

0:27:36.359 --> 0:27:38.600
<v Speaker 1>while like we were like in the middle of the show,

0:27:38.720 --> 0:27:40.320
<v Speaker 1>I went to look, I was like, what's that rushing

0:27:40.400 --> 0:27:43.200
<v Speaker 1>yard prop for Tony Pollard? Just to look like sixty nine?

0:27:43.680 --> 0:27:45.359
<v Speaker 2>They're gonna be I mean, if they're gonna score like

0:27:45.400 --> 0:27:47.960
<v Speaker 2>forty points, like they might as well give him a touchdown.

0:27:47.680 --> 0:27:50.639
<v Speaker 4>Like come on, yeah, Sneedie Lamb scores three none for

0:27:50.720 --> 0:27:51.480
<v Speaker 4>Tony when.

0:27:51.359 --> 0:27:54.240
<v Speaker 1>Ric O'Donnell's scores, We're gonna scream.

0:27:53.280 --> 0:27:54.359
<v Speaker 2>In the shot.

0:27:54.440 --> 0:27:56.879
<v Speaker 1>So it's gonna happened to yeah exactly. All right, Well,

0:27:56.880 --> 0:27:58.600
<v Speaker 1>thank you guys for hanging out with us. Those are

0:27:58.640 --> 0:28:01.600
<v Speaker 1>your bets. Let me give you a little recap here

0:28:01.720 --> 0:28:03.800
<v Speaker 1>for everybody if you want to get on the props

0:28:03.800 --> 0:28:07.320
<v Speaker 1>here going over to mister Scott Bagman. Scott Bagman has

0:28:07.320 --> 0:28:10.680
<v Speaker 1>got Rashad White over receptions, Javonte Williams over rushing yards

0:28:10.720 --> 0:28:13.159
<v Speaker 1>fifty four and a half, Ceedee Lamb over receiving seventy

0:28:13.200 --> 0:28:16.359
<v Speaker 1>seven and a half, Marquise over receiving fifty three and

0:28:16.400 --> 0:28:18.800
<v Speaker 1>a half, a Monroe Saint Brown six and a half

0:28:18.840 --> 0:28:22.320
<v Speaker 1>on the receptions, and Taysom Hill anytime touchdowns. Rickson's got

0:28:22.400 --> 0:28:25.439
<v Speaker 1>Rashid Shaheed over thirty and a half receiving yards, George

0:28:25.440 --> 0:28:29.560
<v Speaker 1>Pickens under three and a half receptions, Jalen Riger under

0:28:30.119 --> 0:28:32.760
<v Speaker 1>twenty and one and a half receiving yards, Austin Eckler

0:28:33.560 --> 0:28:36.160
<v Speaker 1>under fifty one and a half rushing yards, Jared Goff

0:28:36.200 --> 0:28:39.680
<v Speaker 1>thirty three and over passing attempts, and dk Metcalf anytime touchdown.

0:28:39.960 --> 0:28:42.800
<v Speaker 1>And if you want to t l see it with us,

0:28:43.080 --> 0:28:46.520
<v Speaker 1>you can go Rashid Shaheed sixty plus receiving yards, Ze

0:28:46.640 --> 0:28:50.200
<v Speaker 1>Flowers sixty plus receiving yards and Christian Watson sixty plus

0:28:50.200 --> 0:28:53.680
<v Speaker 1>receiving yards and you can get around forty nine toh

0:28:53.720 --> 0:28:56.000
<v Speaker 1>one on your money. If you want to be a psychopath,

0:28:56.040 --> 0:28:58.560
<v Speaker 1>you can join us and do that. Find these guys

0:28:58.800 --> 0:29:02.480
<v Speaker 1>on the ex Twitter Andrew Ericsson underscore Bogman Sports. You

0:29:02.480 --> 0:29:04.560
<v Speaker 1>can find me at ZiT the Welsh. Make sure you

0:29:04.560 --> 0:29:07.200
<v Speaker 1>guys are subscribed to the YouTube channel your opportunity to

0:29:07.240 --> 0:29:09.240
<v Speaker 1>win cool stuff and go and download the Betting Pros

0:29:09.240 --> 0:29:12.480
<v Speaker 1>apps today. Go in some money. We release you now

0:29:12.520 --> 0:29:15.040
<v Speaker 1>to make all the bets. Until next time it's Betting Pros.

0:29:15.160 --> 0:29:17.040
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for hanging with us by friends.

0:29:17.640 --> 0:29:19.800
<v Speaker 3>Thanks for listening to the Betting Pros podcast.

0:29:20.040 --> 0:29:22.640
<v Speaker 4>Follow us on x and TikTok at Betting Pros and

0:29:22.760 --> 0:29:24.600
<v Speaker 4>Instagram at Betting Pros NFL.

0:29:25.040 --> 0:29:26.080
<v Speaker 3>Also subscribe to our

0:29:26.120 --> 0:29:29.000
<v Speaker 4>YouTube channel at YouTube dot com slash Betting Pros