WEBVTT - Stiglitz on Common Currency Threatening Europe Future (Audio)

0:00:00.720 --> 0:00:04.200
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to Taking Style with pin Box at Kathleen

0:00:04.280 --> 0:00:08.720
<v Speaker 1>Hayes on Bluemberg Radio. Our next guest has come a

0:00:08.760 --> 0:00:12.520
<v Speaker 1>long way from Gary, Indiana. He is a professor of

0:00:12.600 --> 0:00:17.560
<v Speaker 1>economics at Columbia University. He is a Nobel Prize winning economist,

0:00:17.640 --> 0:00:21.120
<v Speaker 1>and he has a new book entitled The Euro Common

0:00:21.160 --> 0:00:26.239
<v Speaker 1>Currency Threatens the Future of Europe. We welcome Joseph Stieglitz.

0:00:26.560 --> 0:00:28.880
<v Speaker 1>Professor Stiglitz, thank you for for being with us. I

0:00:28.880 --> 0:00:31.200
<v Speaker 1>wonder if you could just start off by asking you

0:00:31.440 --> 0:00:35.840
<v Speaker 1>why did you decide to write this book? Well, UH,

0:00:36.040 --> 0:00:40.040
<v Speaker 1>Like a lot of books, it comes out of a

0:00:40.159 --> 0:00:46.240
<v Speaker 1>series of uh uh lectures and ideas that I've discussed

0:00:46.240 --> 0:00:50.880
<v Speaker 1>for years. UH. I get invited off into Europe. UH

0:00:50.960 --> 0:00:54.800
<v Speaker 1>and uh the failings of the European economy are on

0:00:54.880 --> 0:00:59.000
<v Speaker 1>the minds of everybody there. And the question was why

0:00:59.120 --> 0:01:02.960
<v Speaker 1>is Europe doing so much more poorly than the United States,

0:01:04.000 --> 0:01:08.320
<v Speaker 1>Especially since two thousand and eight the crisis started into

0:01:08.360 --> 0:01:10.880
<v Speaker 1>the United States. You would have thought we would have

0:01:10.959 --> 0:01:16.080
<v Speaker 1>had the hardest time Europe. Uh has been basically stagnating

0:01:16.640 --> 0:01:19.800
<v Speaker 1>for almost a decade now. And the answer came out.

0:01:19.920 --> 0:01:25.000
<v Speaker 1>It was the euro and UH as I talked to people,

0:01:25.040 --> 0:01:28.120
<v Speaker 1>it became clear that there was not as clear an

0:01:28.160 --> 0:01:32.520
<v Speaker 1>understanding of why the Euro was was giving rise to

0:01:32.560 --> 0:01:35.520
<v Speaker 1>all these problems. Well, Joe, you know, uh you did.

0:01:35.720 --> 0:01:39.440
<v Speaker 1>You were one of the few two who questioned the

0:01:39.440 --> 0:01:45.000
<v Speaker 1>the European project, who questioned the initiation of the Euro Area,

0:01:45.160 --> 0:01:50.120
<v Speaker 1>the single currency, financial and monetary union, etcetera. There were

0:01:50.160 --> 0:01:52.600
<v Speaker 1>many at the time though, or I maybe I shouldn't

0:01:52.640 --> 0:01:54.360
<v Speaker 1>say many, but there was a big debate when the

0:01:54.400 --> 0:01:57.640
<v Speaker 1>Euro Area was set up. Because from a theoretical side

0:01:57.680 --> 0:02:00.880
<v Speaker 1>of economics, you think of Ronald McKinnon, for sample, a

0:02:00.960 --> 0:02:04.520
<v Speaker 1>prominent economist at Stanford University for so many years. Many

0:02:04.560 --> 0:02:06.760
<v Speaker 1>of the morning Look, if you have if you have

0:02:06.840 --> 0:02:12.359
<v Speaker 1>economies with low inflation versus very high inflation, you can't

0:02:12.400 --> 0:02:16.200
<v Speaker 1>put them in a common currency. And yet over and

0:02:16.280 --> 0:02:20.440
<v Speaker 1>over and over that's what the officials in these countries

0:02:20.480 --> 0:02:22.560
<v Speaker 1>seem to have done. They seems that they they've planted

0:02:22.560 --> 0:02:25.880
<v Speaker 1>the seeds for their own issues, their own problems. I

0:02:25.919 --> 0:02:29.200
<v Speaker 1>agree with you in a way, it was uh they

0:02:29.240 --> 0:02:35.280
<v Speaker 1>thought of themselves as visionaries, uh uh, pushing aside these

0:02:35.280 --> 0:02:40.360
<v Speaker 1>people who are raising h nippicking points and creating a

0:02:40.400 --> 0:02:45.480
<v Speaker 1>single currency that would create the momentum that would lead

0:02:45.520 --> 0:02:50.760
<v Speaker 1>to more and more political and economic integration. But even

0:02:51.440 --> 0:02:57.160
<v Speaker 1>no matter how good your intentions and how strong your ambitions,

0:02:57.960 --> 0:03:02.120
<v Speaker 1>you can't ignore the roles of that comics and the acts.

0:03:02.160 --> 0:03:05.120
<v Speaker 1>I think was the fundamental thing. It was a political

0:03:05.160 --> 0:03:08.800
<v Speaker 1>project in which the politics was not strong enough to

0:03:08.880 --> 0:03:14.480
<v Speaker 1>create institutions that would make Hero work Professor Stiglett's Does

0:03:14.520 --> 0:03:17.760
<v Speaker 1>this mean that Europe will break apart into the kind

0:03:17.760 --> 0:03:22.839
<v Speaker 1>of factionalism that has led to two World Wars? No? No,

0:03:22.840 --> 0:03:27.000
<v Speaker 1>not not by any means. I mean, I think in fact, uh,

0:03:27.200 --> 0:03:30.400
<v Speaker 1>what I worry about is the continuation of the Euro

0:03:31.240 --> 0:03:35.880
<v Speaker 1>is likely to be more very is being very divisive.

0:03:35.960 --> 0:03:41.400
<v Speaker 1>You know, I've been traveling to Europe regularly for roma's

0:03:41.440 --> 0:03:44.760
<v Speaker 1>half century, and I've never seen the level of divisiveness

0:03:44.800 --> 0:03:47.800
<v Speaker 1>that I've seen in recent years because of the Euro,

0:03:48.360 --> 0:03:52.600
<v Speaker 1>because of what it is doing to uh make the

0:03:52.720 --> 0:03:55.960
<v Speaker 1>rich richer the poor poor, both within and between countries

0:03:56.480 --> 0:04:01.040
<v Speaker 1>and with basically economic policy, and so many of the

0:04:01.040 --> 0:04:07.360
<v Speaker 1>countries like Italy, Spain and and Greece being dictated from

0:04:07.720 --> 0:04:12.000
<v Speaker 1>Germany and next inevitably going to increase resentment where you

0:04:12.040 --> 0:04:14.920
<v Speaker 1>get the buyings between creditors and debtors. That's going to

0:04:15.080 --> 0:04:20.200
<v Speaker 1>cause resentment. And so the Europe was supposed to promote convergings.

0:04:20.720 --> 0:04:23.400
<v Speaker 1>You know, you talked about large differences. It was supposed

0:04:23.440 --> 0:04:28.800
<v Speaker 1>to make them more similar. In fact, E exacerbated the differences. Well,

0:04:28.800 --> 0:04:30.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, Joe, I really like the E r M

0:04:30.600 --> 0:04:33.320
<v Speaker 1>back of the nineties exchange rate mechanism where it wasn't

0:04:33.360 --> 0:04:36.680
<v Speaker 1>a single currency, but there were bands that each country

0:04:36.680 --> 0:04:38.560
<v Speaker 1>had to keep their currency within and they could use

0:04:38.600 --> 0:04:41.240
<v Speaker 1>their monetary policy, they could use the exchange rate policy

0:04:41.480 --> 0:04:45.080
<v Speaker 1>to achieve that. Again, you in your book, your brand

0:04:45.080 --> 0:04:47.880
<v Speaker 1>new book The Euro How Common Currency Threatens the Future

0:04:47.960 --> 0:04:51.640
<v Speaker 1>of Europe, you do offer a couple of ideas for

0:04:51.720 --> 0:04:53.840
<v Speaker 1>what could be done. What's the number one idea? Isn't

0:04:53.920 --> 0:04:56.840
<v Speaker 1>is there any chance that will happen? Well, in a way,

0:04:56.960 --> 0:04:59.559
<v Speaker 1>one of the ideas that I put forward to which

0:04:59.640 --> 0:05:04.240
<v Speaker 1>I call the flexible Europe, is very reminiscent of the

0:05:04.520 --> 0:05:08.000
<v Speaker 1>R A M. With one difference. What I'm calling for

0:05:08.279 --> 0:05:12.640
<v Speaker 1>is the creation of some institutions that would help stabilize

0:05:12.680 --> 0:05:16.440
<v Speaker 1>the currencies within the narrow band, and over time, if

0:05:16.480 --> 0:05:23.280
<v Speaker 1>those institutions work, if there's enough Uh, coordination and collaboration. Uh.

0:05:23.400 --> 0:05:25.599
<v Speaker 1>They might be able to actually to make a single

0:05:25.640 --> 0:05:28.800
<v Speaker 1>currency work, but they're not there yet. So they in

0:05:28.839 --> 0:05:32.920
<v Speaker 1>a way, they put the cart before their horse. So. UM.

0:05:33.200 --> 0:05:35.680
<v Speaker 1>The question, the last question you ask is is really

0:05:35.680 --> 0:05:39.520
<v Speaker 1>the hardest, Uh. Where And it's it's one about more

0:05:39.560 --> 0:05:43.039
<v Speaker 1>about politics, and or as much about politics as it

0:05:43.160 --> 0:05:48.840
<v Speaker 1>is about economics. Um, where will they go? It's been

0:05:48.920 --> 0:05:54.320
<v Speaker 1>very frustrating to watch the stagnation in Europe and the

0:05:54.440 --> 0:05:58.440
<v Speaker 1>leaders not being willing to revisit some of the key

0:05:58.480 --> 0:06:02.200
<v Speaker 1>issues to key policy is the structural reform of the

0:06:02.240 --> 0:06:09.440
<v Speaker 1>Euro and trying to blame the problems on the individual countries. UH.

0:06:09.600 --> 0:06:13.240
<v Speaker 1>So that makes me a little bit pessimistic. What I

0:06:13.279 --> 0:06:19.400
<v Speaker 1>think is the most likely thing to happen beyond muddling through,

0:06:20.279 --> 0:06:24.599
<v Speaker 1>is that at one point or another, the voters will

0:06:24.640 --> 0:06:29.400
<v Speaker 1>get fed up. UH. And already we're seeing in many

0:06:29.520 --> 0:06:32.800
<v Speaker 1>of the countries a move from the centrist parties to

0:06:32.880 --> 0:06:37.000
<v Speaker 1>the extreme right and extreme left. Uh. And on both

0:06:37.080 --> 0:06:41.279
<v Speaker 1>of those two uh, there is very strong support for

0:06:41.400 --> 0:06:47.560
<v Speaker 1>leaving the Euro. So what what I think uh is

0:06:47.600 --> 0:06:53.119
<v Speaker 1>a realistic scenario unless the leaders change course, and that's

0:06:53.160 --> 0:06:56.760
<v Speaker 1>mainly germanying some of the other Northern European countries. Unless

0:06:56.800 --> 0:07:01.520
<v Speaker 1>they change course, there will be a demo cratic movement

0:07:02.120 --> 0:07:07.440
<v Speaker 1>that will upset the strategy, if you can call it

0:07:07.520 --> 0:07:11.000
<v Speaker 1>that of muddling through. You said a democratic movement. What

0:07:11.080 --> 0:07:13.960
<v Speaker 1>happens if there's not a democratic movement instead of voters

0:07:14.040 --> 0:07:17.480
<v Speaker 1>making their voice heard, what if demonstrations and violent protests

0:07:17.760 --> 0:07:21.560
<v Speaker 1>makes their voice heard, just as it was in Greece. Uh,

0:07:21.680 --> 0:07:24.680
<v Speaker 1>back's another example of what I call democratic, I mean

0:07:25.000 --> 0:07:28.040
<v Speaker 1>either grassroot or electoral. You noticed in in Greece it

0:07:28.120 --> 0:07:34.440
<v Speaker 1>was the people voted against the austerity policies, but in

0:07:34.520 --> 0:07:39.560
<v Speaker 1>the end, the structure of the euro and the Eurozone

0:07:40.320 --> 0:07:42.880
<v Speaker 1>meant that the voices of the majority of the citizens

0:07:42.920 --> 0:07:45.720
<v Speaker 1>couldn't be heard. And that is a real problem. That

0:07:45.880 --> 0:07:49.000
<v Speaker 1>is to say that what has been happening is that

0:07:49.400 --> 0:07:56.120
<v Speaker 1>the voters constantly vote for a change in economic policy,

0:07:56.600 --> 0:07:58.560
<v Speaker 1>and what happens is they said, oh, no, you can't

0:07:58.600 --> 0:08:04.560
<v Speaker 1>change economic policies. Uh, We've delegated those economic policies uh

0:08:04.760 --> 0:08:11.120
<v Speaker 1>to Germany, to Brussels. And that that I think is

0:08:12.080 --> 0:08:15.520
<v Speaker 1>deeply disturbing to democratic processes. I just want to switch

0:08:15.560 --> 0:08:18.040
<v Speaker 1>heres here, Joe. We have about a minute or so left,

0:08:18.040 --> 0:08:20.400
<v Speaker 1>because I want to ask you about the Bank of Japan.

0:08:20.520 --> 0:08:24.040
<v Speaker 1>Governor Corota did an interview published over the weekend saying

0:08:24.080 --> 0:08:27.240
<v Speaker 1>that as they reassess their policy of negative rates and

0:08:27.760 --> 0:08:31.160
<v Speaker 1>someone call it unprecedented quantitative easing, that the Bank of

0:08:31.240 --> 0:08:35.800
<v Speaker 1>Japan can go further more easing deeper negative rates when

0:08:35.800 --> 0:08:38.280
<v Speaker 1>they meet next month. What do you make of that?

0:08:38.360 --> 0:08:41.720
<v Speaker 1>Is that a good move or a mistake? Well, I

0:08:41.760 --> 0:08:49.840
<v Speaker 1>think it illustrates that that the monetary policy is reaching ulmics.

0:08:50.200 --> 0:08:53.640
<v Speaker 1>Uh as you notice, uh, you know, it hasn't succeeded

0:08:53.720 --> 0:08:58.200
<v Speaker 1>in really resuscitating the growth of Japan. Although uh, in

0:08:58.240 --> 0:09:02.360
<v Speaker 1>many ways, Japan is not the basket case that sometimes describe.

0:09:02.840 --> 0:09:06.120
<v Speaker 1>Once you take into account and the fact that they're

0:09:06.120 --> 0:09:11.320
<v Speaker 1>working population, working age population has been growing much more slowly.

0:09:11.480 --> 0:09:14.920
<v Speaker 1>In fact, its declining while that and say United States

0:09:14.920 --> 0:09:17.720
<v Speaker 1>has been increasing. Once you take account of that, javan

0:09:17.920 --> 0:09:21.480
<v Speaker 1>is not really doing that uh poorly. But what is

0:09:21.520 --> 0:09:25.640
<v Speaker 1>clear is that monetary policy is not enough to restuscitate

0:09:25.720 --> 0:09:29.680
<v Speaker 1>the economy. And I think it was a good move

0:09:29.760 --> 0:09:34.440
<v Speaker 1>of Bobby to postpone the increase in the consumption tax.

0:09:34.880 --> 0:09:38.640
<v Speaker 1>What they really need is a more comprehensive strategy which

0:09:39.160 --> 0:09:46.360
<v Speaker 1>includes I think uh A a carbon tax that would

0:09:46.360 --> 0:09:51.240
<v Speaker 1>stimulate investment in green technology. Joe Stiglets, thank you so

0:09:51.400 --> 0:09:55.240
<v Speaker 1>very much for joining us. Joseph Stiglas, Professor of economics

0:09:55.240 --> 0:09:58.360
<v Speaker 1>at clumb University, when are the two thousand one Nobel

0:09:58.440 --> 0:10:01.120
<v Speaker 1>Prize in Economics, Talking to a about his new book

0:10:01.160 --> 0:10:03.880
<v Speaker 1>The Euro How a common currency threatens the future of Europe.

0:10:03.960 --> 0:10:06.600
<v Speaker 1>He said, the Europeans need to find ways to create

0:10:06.600 --> 0:10:11.120
<v Speaker 1>more economic divergence than convergence. Rather than divergence, This is

0:10:11.120 --> 0:10:11.679
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg