WEBVTT - The Department of Justice V Google Ads: Part 1

0:00:02.320 --> 0:00:03.440
<v Speaker 1>Also media.

0:00:05.040 --> 0:00:17.599
<v Speaker 2>Hello and welcome to Better Offline. I'm your host edzit Charn. Yes,

0:00:20.320 --> 0:00:23.000
<v Speaker 2>and today I'm joined by Jason Kent, the CEO of

0:00:23.000 --> 0:00:25.919
<v Speaker 2>the Trade Association DC. And Jason, thank you for joining me.

0:00:26.560 --> 0:00:27.960
<v Speaker 1>Pleased to be here, Thanks for having me.

0:00:28.480 --> 0:00:31.560
<v Speaker 2>So Jason is joining us today and we'll be joining

0:00:31.640 --> 0:00:35.280
<v Speaker 2>us more regularly to talk through the massive antitrust trial

0:00:35.360 --> 0:00:37.960
<v Speaker 2>going on with Google, the second of them. Jason, why

0:00:37.960 --> 0:00:40.199
<v Speaker 2>don't you set the scene of what's going on?

0:00:40.760 --> 0:00:43.479
<v Speaker 1>Yeah? Sure, thanks Ed. Yeah, we just wrapped up getting

0:00:43.479 --> 0:00:47.040
<v Speaker 1>the opinion on the first trial, which was the search trial,

0:00:47.960 --> 0:00:54.040
<v Speaker 1>where Judge Meta decided an issued an opinion that Google

0:00:54.080 --> 0:00:56.480
<v Speaker 1>has a monopoly in search and a monopoly and search

0:00:57.120 --> 0:01:00.480
<v Speaker 1>text ads. So this is trial number two. It's going

0:01:00.480 --> 0:01:03.480
<v Speaker 1>to be starting on Monday the ninth in the Eastern

0:01:03.480 --> 0:01:06.760
<v Speaker 1>District of Virginia. And this one is focused on the

0:01:06.800 --> 0:01:10.600
<v Speaker 1>ad tech part of Google's business and everything related to it.

0:01:10.920 --> 0:01:12.880
<v Speaker 2>So how does that How is that different because a

0:01:12.880 --> 0:01:16.480
<v Speaker 2>lot of people see them kind of as one homogeneous entity.

0:01:16.920 --> 0:01:19.640
<v Speaker 1>Sure, yeah, I mean the advertising for people to understand,

0:01:19.640 --> 0:01:24.160
<v Speaker 1>the advertising business for digital has now become almost entirely

0:01:24.240 --> 0:01:27.680
<v Speaker 1>a live kind of auction marketplace. Where if you think

0:01:27.680 --> 0:01:30.920
<v Speaker 1>of all these ad units across the web, they are

0:01:30.959 --> 0:01:33.840
<v Speaker 1>being bought and sold in near real time to the

0:01:33.880 --> 0:01:38.000
<v Speaker 1>highest bidder. And Google as a company has both the

0:01:38.040 --> 0:01:41.480
<v Speaker 1>software and a lot of the data that powers the

0:01:41.560 --> 0:01:44.480
<v Speaker 1>decision making. And so if you think about kind of

0:01:44.480 --> 0:01:46.880
<v Speaker 1>on the buy side, a bunch of companies bidding on

0:01:47.000 --> 0:01:50.920
<v Speaker 1>advertising units that they want to own to get in

0:01:50.960 --> 0:01:53.160
<v Speaker 1>front of consumers, and on the other end, you've got

0:01:53.560 --> 0:01:56.280
<v Speaker 1>the owners of those units, whether it be publishers or

0:01:56.320 --> 0:02:00.280
<v Speaker 1>Google itself. Google is the largest player on both sides

0:02:00.320 --> 0:02:02.640
<v Speaker 1>of those transactions, and they also run most of the

0:02:02.680 --> 0:02:03.440
<v Speaker 1>auctions too.

0:02:04.720 --> 0:02:06.559
<v Speaker 2>So what is happening in this trial?

0:02:07.720 --> 0:02:11.760
<v Speaker 1>So the Department of Justice started investing in Google back

0:02:11.800 --> 0:02:17.760
<v Speaker 1>in twenty eighteen, and they spent a few years doing it.

0:02:18.120 --> 0:02:21.680
<v Speaker 1>The state attorneys General, led by Texas filed a lawsuit

0:02:21.720 --> 0:02:25.080
<v Speaker 1>back at the end of twenty twenty saying that Google's

0:02:25.120 --> 0:02:29.440
<v Speaker 1>ad tech business violating I trust laws, and since then,

0:02:29.480 --> 0:02:32.560
<v Speaker 1>the Department of Justice filed its own lawsuit back in

0:02:32.680 --> 0:02:35.920
<v Speaker 1>January of twenty twenty three, so just eighteen months ago.

0:02:36.800 --> 0:02:39.880
<v Speaker 1>And they did it in Virginia, where it's kind of

0:02:39.880 --> 0:02:43.200
<v Speaker 1>known as the nickname is the Rocket docket because it

0:02:43.240 --> 0:02:46.000
<v Speaker 1>moves so fast, and so in less than eighteen months,

0:02:46.000 --> 0:02:48.400
<v Speaker 1>this one's gone. It's gotten to the point where now

0:02:48.400 --> 0:02:52.320
<v Speaker 1>we're about to have a trial starting on Monday, and

0:02:52.400 --> 0:02:56.120
<v Speaker 1>they'll present their arguments to take about four weeks, and

0:02:56.440 --> 0:02:58.920
<v Speaker 1>the look the judge there, the district judge, will determine

0:02:59.280 --> 0:03:02.560
<v Speaker 1>an issue, our opinion on whether or not the various

0:03:04.080 --> 0:03:07.639
<v Speaker 1>charges that are in the complaint she agrees with them,

0:03:07.680 --> 0:03:09.799
<v Speaker 1>and and whether or not they'll be remedies for it.

0:03:10.120 --> 0:03:12.560
<v Speaker 2>And what are the judges roughly speaking.

0:03:13.200 --> 0:03:18.000
<v Speaker 1>The judge judge, what are the charges? Yes, that Google

0:03:18.040 --> 0:03:22.160
<v Speaker 1>has a monopoly and I believe three different areas of

0:03:22.200 --> 0:03:26.960
<v Speaker 1>the advertising supply chain. And so that's the software that

0:03:27.000 --> 0:03:32.079
<v Speaker 1>publishers use, that's the software that runs the auctions, and

0:03:32.120 --> 0:03:36.400
<v Speaker 1>that's the software on the buy side that's being used

0:03:36.400 --> 0:03:40.000
<v Speaker 1>to bid on the on the ads. And in those

0:03:40.040 --> 0:03:42.520
<v Speaker 1>areas that they've also abused that monopoly power.

0:03:42.960 --> 0:03:45.040
<v Speaker 2>How have they been abusing it? Let's get into it,

0:03:45.360 --> 0:03:47.920
<v Speaker 2>get into it. Well, you know, let's let's see how

0:03:47.920 --> 0:03:48.960
<v Speaker 2>they're abusing I.

0:03:48.880 --> 0:03:52.400
<v Speaker 1>Think, I mean, I think one thing that's helpful and

0:03:52.640 --> 0:03:57.080
<v Speaker 1>and you know, fortunately and maybe unfortunately for Google, their

0:03:57.120 --> 0:03:59.760
<v Speaker 1>own employees and some of the discovery for the lawsuits

0:04:00.320 --> 0:04:02.920
<v Speaker 1>did a comparison to the stock market. When you think

0:04:02.920 --> 0:04:07.400
<v Speaker 1>about this kind of live marketplace, anybody that's all flashboys

0:04:07.480 --> 0:04:11.560
<v Speaker 1>and or read the book on high speed trading, this

0:04:11.680 --> 0:04:14.280
<v Speaker 1>is is that plus maybe even more intense.

0:04:14.040 --> 0:04:16.960
<v Speaker 2>And say a little bit about what that means for

0:04:16.960 --> 0:04:17.599
<v Speaker 2>those who might know.

0:04:17.680 --> 0:04:20.760
<v Speaker 1>Of sure, that means that if you think about these

0:04:20.839 --> 0:04:25.479
<v Speaker 1>advertising units that sit there across the web, that there

0:04:25.560 --> 0:04:28.560
<v Speaker 1>is incredibly high speed trading of those units that are

0:04:28.560 --> 0:04:32.960
<v Speaker 1>happening in milliseconds, meaning that you know, in a blink

0:04:33.279 --> 0:04:36.600
<v Speaker 1>of the eye, there are parties that are both bidding

0:04:36.640 --> 0:04:39.760
<v Speaker 1>on and then delivering on ad units based on a

0:04:39.800 --> 0:04:44.920
<v Speaker 1>whole range of targeting requirements and pricing, and then there's

0:04:45.000 --> 0:04:49.039
<v Speaker 1>rules around those auctions. And so if you think about

0:04:49.440 --> 0:04:51.200
<v Speaker 1>kind of the way a stock market works, which is

0:04:51.240 --> 0:04:54.200
<v Speaker 1>also happens and in real time, people are buying and

0:04:54.240 --> 0:04:58.200
<v Speaker 1>selling stock using machine, entirely using machines that have been

0:04:59.200 --> 0:05:04.600
<v Speaker 1>programmed to handle the bidding and the marketplace. Google is

0:05:04.640 --> 0:05:07.560
<v Speaker 1>doing that for the entire supply chain, both the buy

0:05:07.640 --> 0:05:11.280
<v Speaker 1>side and the cell side. And so you know, the

0:05:11.400 --> 0:05:14.479
<v Speaker 1>comparison that the Google employee made and also the Assistant

0:05:14.480 --> 0:05:17.560
<v Speaker 1>Attorney General did when they announced the lawsuit was to

0:05:17.640 --> 0:05:20.760
<v Speaker 1>the stock market as if Google, you know, was both buying,

0:05:21.120 --> 0:05:23.600
<v Speaker 1>was leading and on a majority of the software, both

0:05:23.600 --> 0:05:27.000
<v Speaker 1>for buying and for selling and for running the actual

0:05:27.040 --> 0:05:27.920
<v Speaker 1>auctions themselves.

0:05:28.640 --> 0:05:30.800
<v Speaker 2>And so what's happened so far? You've been so you're

0:05:30.880 --> 0:05:33.480
<v Speaker 2>quite close that you're about twenty minutes in the courthouse Rougher.

0:05:33.400 --> 0:05:36.400
<v Speaker 1>Maybe about twenty minutes. Like what else? There's been a

0:05:36.520 --> 0:05:38.880
<v Speaker 1>number of pre what they call pre trial motions for

0:05:38.920 --> 0:05:41.919
<v Speaker 1>a variety of things to kind of figure out the

0:05:41.960 --> 0:05:44.120
<v Speaker 1>rules of the road for the trial when it starts Monday.

0:05:44.279 --> 0:05:46.360
<v Speaker 1>Some of that's just logistics. Some of that's really important

0:05:46.360 --> 0:05:48.560
<v Speaker 1>in terms of like what evidence will be allowed and

0:05:48.640 --> 0:05:52.080
<v Speaker 1>not allowed, who will testify and not testify, et cetera.

0:05:52.960 --> 0:05:55.760
<v Speaker 2>So what have you actually witnessed so far, like what

0:05:56.320 --> 0:05:59.160
<v Speaker 2>you've been in a few of these pre trial motions?

0:05:59.200 --> 0:06:03.440
<v Speaker 1>Even yeah, I mean, well that's one thing. I just

0:06:03.440 --> 0:06:08.240
<v Speaker 1>start with the judge because this actually a little bit

0:06:08.320 --> 0:06:11.599
<v Speaker 1>in the weeds here. But this lawsuit originally start out

0:06:12.040 --> 0:06:14.640
<v Speaker 1>it was going to go before a jury of Americans

0:06:14.680 --> 0:06:17.279
<v Speaker 1>to make the decision. So you think about the just

0:06:17.320 --> 0:06:20.839
<v Speaker 1>Department having to explain this topic to the average American

0:06:22.279 --> 0:06:25.839
<v Speaker 1>that that changed a few months ago based on a

0:06:25.920 --> 0:06:28.880
<v Speaker 1>legal maneuver that Google did. And so now the judge

0:06:28.960 --> 0:06:31.279
<v Speaker 1>is going to be actually the one that will issue

0:06:31.320 --> 0:06:34.560
<v Speaker 1>the verdict and make the decision. And you know, my

0:06:34.720 --> 0:06:38.680
<v Speaker 1>observation is she is incredibly experienced. She's been a judge

0:06:38.680 --> 0:06:41.680
<v Speaker 1>for quite some time, and she's had some you know,

0:06:42.160 --> 0:06:47.279
<v Speaker 1>very very significant cases over her career, you know, involving

0:06:47.560 --> 0:06:51.719
<v Speaker 1>from al Qaeda terrorists on down to to you know,

0:06:52.680 --> 0:06:58.360
<v Speaker 1>nine to eleven related cases. So she's not intimidated at

0:06:58.360 --> 0:07:00.960
<v Speaker 1>all by anybody in the room, including Google for sure,

0:07:02.120 --> 0:07:05.039
<v Speaker 1>and so in that regard, you know, I'm very optimimistic.

0:07:05.440 --> 0:07:08.120
<v Speaker 1>She seems to only care about the law and justice,

0:07:08.160 --> 0:07:09.680
<v Speaker 1>which is what you want to see from a judge.

0:07:10.880 --> 0:07:13.600
<v Speaker 1>You know, Google, like with the Search trial, has the

0:07:13.640 --> 0:07:17.080
<v Speaker 1>best and the brightest attorneys that are out there. You know,

0:07:17.160 --> 0:07:19.320
<v Speaker 1>three or four firms working for them, and they've got

0:07:19.320 --> 0:07:22.800
<v Speaker 1>half the room full of their people. This is really

0:07:22.800 --> 0:07:24.880
<v Speaker 1>really important to them. The Just Department wants to break

0:07:24.960 --> 0:07:26.680
<v Speaker 1>up I mean, the outcome they want is they want

0:07:26.680 --> 0:07:29.679
<v Speaker 1>to break up Google, and so that's what this trial

0:07:29.720 --> 0:07:30.280
<v Speaker 1>is all about.

0:07:30.840 --> 0:07:32.880
<v Speaker 2>How do you think how do you see that chances?

0:07:34.120 --> 0:07:36.400
<v Speaker 1>You know, if you asked me, and I'm sure I

0:07:36.480 --> 0:07:38.840
<v Speaker 1>was on the record about this back a year ago,

0:07:38.880 --> 0:07:40.800
<v Speaker 1>I would have said that the chances for this one

0:07:40.840 --> 0:07:44.160
<v Speaker 1>were higher than the search the search lawsuit that they

0:07:44.240 --> 0:07:48.240
<v Speaker 1>just won. And so I also felt pretty optimistic about

0:07:48.240 --> 0:07:51.920
<v Speaker 1>the search lawsuits once they finished closing arguments, because I

0:07:51.920 --> 0:07:54.120
<v Speaker 1>thought they did a really good job explaining their case.

0:07:54.760 --> 0:07:57.640
<v Speaker 1>This one, I think it's even more obvious going in,

0:07:57.680 --> 0:08:00.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean to put in real numbers around. I mean,

0:08:00.800 --> 0:08:05.480
<v Speaker 1>they they the just Department's analysis and their experts analysis

0:08:05.600 --> 0:08:11.000
<v Speaker 1>is that Google has over ninety percent of the software

0:08:11.080 --> 0:08:14.360
<v Speaker 1>that publishers use to serve the ads, and then they've

0:08:14.360 --> 0:08:17.800
<v Speaker 1>got over they've got ninety eight percent of the mobile queries.

0:08:18.000 --> 0:08:20.760
<v Speaker 1>We learned that from the last decision. And so on

0:08:20.800 --> 0:08:23.440
<v Speaker 1>the buy side, they've got you know, almost you know,

0:08:23.520 --> 0:08:27.280
<v Speaker 1>ninety eight percent of the advertising demand that's coming through

0:08:27.320 --> 0:08:30.680
<v Speaker 1>from search ads. So like on both sides of the market,

0:08:30.840 --> 0:08:32.880
<v Speaker 1>they've you know, and then they get to write the rules.

0:08:33.160 --> 0:08:35.000
<v Speaker 1>So it's a problem.

0:08:35.920 --> 0:08:39.320
<v Speaker 2>And as far as the original allegations go, can you

0:08:39.400 --> 0:08:42.679
<v Speaker 2>kind of break those down at all and explain what

0:08:42.880 --> 0:08:46.320
<v Speaker 2>the what the specific things that you would consider the

0:08:46.320 --> 0:08:47.640
<v Speaker 2>most important parts of this trial.

0:08:48.880 --> 0:08:54.199
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, sure, you know that one that they took the

0:08:54.960 --> 0:09:00.719
<v Speaker 1>market power that they had on the advertising demand side,

0:09:01.080 --> 0:09:05.560
<v Speaker 1>and that they used that in order to create market

0:09:05.600 --> 0:09:08.920
<v Speaker 1>power dominance, if you will, in other parts of the

0:09:09.000 --> 0:09:13.200
<v Speaker 1>supply chain. And so one that I think is really

0:09:13.240 --> 0:09:16.200
<v Speaker 1>important is that we now have a decision from the

0:09:16.240 --> 0:09:20.120
<v Speaker 1>other court on that dominance on the demand side. And

0:09:20.200 --> 0:09:23.040
<v Speaker 1>so you know, JUDGMENTA already did the work of saying,

0:09:23.720 --> 0:09:26.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, he believes that Google. You know, they proved

0:09:26.320 --> 0:09:29.120
<v Speaker 1>the case just part of the case that Google has

0:09:29.480 --> 0:09:33.800
<v Speaker 1>a monopoly in search and in search text ads and

0:09:33.920 --> 0:09:36.800
<v Speaker 1>that they abuse that. And so that decision is no

0:09:36.840 --> 0:09:41.120
<v Speaker 1>longer just allegations as it relates to Google, and this

0:09:41.240 --> 0:09:45.920
<v Speaker 1>case claims that they use that market power to to

0:09:46.000 --> 0:09:49.000
<v Speaker 1>create dominance elsewhere. And so they walk in I think

0:09:49.080 --> 0:09:51.600
<v Speaker 1>in a much better place based on the prior opinion

0:09:51.600 --> 0:09:55.679
<v Speaker 1>that came out in August. You know, second thing I'll

0:09:55.720 --> 0:09:58.040
<v Speaker 1>hit on is that they tied you know that to

0:09:58.280 --> 0:10:00.320
<v Speaker 1>other parts of the business. So the exchange in the

0:10:01.080 --> 0:10:05.240
<v Speaker 1>in the ad server business in order to so basically

0:10:05.240 --> 0:10:08.560
<v Speaker 1>to force people to use the other products. So as

0:10:08.559 --> 0:10:12.120
<v Speaker 1>an example, you know, the argument or the allegation is.

0:10:12.080 --> 0:10:16.400
<v Speaker 3>That you weren't able to get access to any of

0:10:16.400 --> 0:10:20.880
<v Speaker 3>that demand unless you use Google's addex product, right, And

0:10:20.960 --> 0:10:24.480
<v Speaker 3>so you know, the evidence looks pretty clear on that,

0:10:24.520 --> 0:10:28.160
<v Speaker 3>but they're gonna have to present that case, you know.

0:10:28.240 --> 0:10:30.600
<v Speaker 1>I think a third area that hit on is that

0:10:30.600 --> 0:10:33.760
<v Speaker 1>that the market itself is properly defined. That's always important

0:10:33.760 --> 0:10:37.400
<v Speaker 1>for NIT trust trials in cases. And so this case

0:10:37.480 --> 0:10:41.480
<v Speaker 1>is all about something called open web display advertising, and

0:10:41.600 --> 0:10:45.160
<v Speaker 1>Google will try to to blur that line, but I

0:10:45.160 --> 0:10:46.320
<v Speaker 1>think that's also what's is.

0:10:46.240 --> 0:10:47.800
<v Speaker 2>Open web display advertizing?

0:10:48.080 --> 0:10:50.080
<v Speaker 1>Well, I guess it's easier to explain the way it's not.

0:10:50.360 --> 0:10:52.680
<v Speaker 1>And that's what that's what bothers Google is. You know,

0:10:52.720 --> 0:10:56.559
<v Speaker 1>it's not closed platforms. So it's not advertising on TikTok

0:10:56.760 --> 0:11:01.800
<v Speaker 1>or not advertising on Facebook. It's advertise that's available over

0:11:02.360 --> 0:11:07.760
<v Speaker 1>the web browser in which companies can participate in auctions

0:11:07.840 --> 0:11:11.280
<v Speaker 1>on the buy side or they can participate auctions on

0:11:11.320 --> 0:11:14.760
<v Speaker 1>the cell side. And you know, and those are auctions

0:11:14.760 --> 0:11:18.080
<v Speaker 1>that are happening for display advertising units on websites.

0:11:19.000 --> 0:11:20.920
<v Speaker 2>So it's a good time to actually take a step

0:11:20.920 --> 0:11:23.800
<v Speaker 2>back and ask how does Google make money from advertising?

0:11:23.840 --> 0:11:26.880
<v Speaker 2>What are their advertising units? Because you've mentioned there's the

0:11:26.880 --> 0:11:30.240
<v Speaker 2>bidding process. But where do we see Google advertising?

0:11:31.040 --> 0:11:33.160
<v Speaker 1>Well, they, you know, a majority of the advertising, and

0:11:33.200 --> 0:11:36.760
<v Speaker 1>it's become more and more over each year, is actually

0:11:36.800 --> 0:11:40.360
<v Speaker 1>on Google's own properties, so entertained out that's where they

0:11:40.360 --> 0:11:42.640
<v Speaker 1>make the most money because they don't have to share

0:11:42.640 --> 0:11:45.760
<v Speaker 1>it with anybody else, right, And so so you've got

0:11:45.840 --> 0:11:48.079
<v Speaker 1>the ads on Search, you've got the ads on Gmail,

0:11:48.120 --> 0:11:51.000
<v Speaker 1>you've got the ads on YouTube. So it's on what

0:11:51.040 --> 0:11:55.280
<v Speaker 1>they call their owned and operated properties. And then also

0:11:55.400 --> 0:11:59.360
<v Speaker 1>Google serves ads across the rest of the web, and

0:11:59.400 --> 0:12:01.800
<v Speaker 1>that's where they get a lot of scale and a

0:12:01.800 --> 0:12:05.440
<v Speaker 1>lot of data. And then they take a percentage of

0:12:05.480 --> 0:12:07.959
<v Speaker 1>the action on the byside, percentage of the action cell side,

0:12:08.000 --> 0:12:10.720
<v Speaker 1>percentage of the action and the auctions, and that all

0:12:10.760 --> 0:12:14.760
<v Speaker 1>adds up so that they're taking you know, allegedly thirty

0:12:14.960 --> 0:12:19.280
<v Speaker 1>to thirty two percent of the revenue or just the

0:12:19.400 --> 0:12:22.920
<v Speaker 1>technology that's being used in order to serve those ads.

0:12:23.240 --> 0:12:26.079
<v Speaker 2>Does the suit suggest does it give any idea of

0:12:26.160 --> 0:12:27.920
<v Speaker 2>what the balance so that you said that most of

0:12:27.960 --> 0:12:31.600
<v Speaker 2>their advertising goes through their own properties, does it balance

0:12:31.640 --> 0:12:32.920
<v Speaker 2>that out? It's all? Does it explain?

0:12:33.920 --> 0:12:36.439
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think it's it's in there, and it's certainly

0:12:36.440 --> 0:12:39.560
<v Speaker 1>in their sec filings. You know, I think you know,

0:12:39.720 --> 0:12:42.480
<v Speaker 1>this gets to kind of one of the arguments I

0:12:42.480 --> 0:12:45.160
<v Speaker 1>think you'll hear Google make, and that certainly their their

0:12:45.200 --> 0:12:48.560
<v Speaker 1>proxies and kind of their advocates are making, is that

0:12:49.320 --> 0:12:53.720
<v Speaker 1>the part of their revenue that serves on other people's

0:12:53.760 --> 0:12:58.920
<v Speaker 1>properties on publisher sites is only about fifteen you know,

0:12:58.920 --> 0:13:01.480
<v Speaker 1>it's say fifteen percent or so of the revenue, and

0:13:01.520 --> 0:13:05.360
<v Speaker 1>it's declining the last couple of years, so it's not growing,

0:13:05.520 --> 0:13:07.680
<v Speaker 1>it's flat to declining. It's not that material.

0:13:08.280 --> 0:13:09.760
<v Speaker 2>That's the off property revenue.

0:13:09.880 --> 0:13:11.040
<v Speaker 1>That's off property revenue.

0:13:11.440 --> 0:13:13.400
<v Speaker 2>That's very bad for them.

0:13:13.800 --> 0:13:17.160
<v Speaker 1>But the common sense piece, well, yeah, but that's where

0:13:17.160 --> 0:13:18.880
<v Speaker 1>they also have the lower margin because they don't have

0:13:18.920 --> 0:13:21.760
<v Speaker 1>they have to share it with people. The common sense

0:13:21.840 --> 0:13:25.120
<v Speaker 1>piece is that, well, one, if that wasn't that important

0:13:25.120 --> 0:13:27.319
<v Speaker 1>to them, then they'd be offloading it, right because why

0:13:27.320 --> 0:13:30.280
<v Speaker 1>would you want to go get suited by the United

0:13:30.280 --> 0:13:33.959
<v Speaker 1>States j JUSTAHS Department and potentially broken up if it's

0:13:34.000 --> 0:13:38.760
<v Speaker 1>not that important to you. And then two that ignores

0:13:38.920 --> 0:13:41.360
<v Speaker 1>that's just the revenue piece. But I think it's important

0:13:41.360 --> 0:13:43.439
<v Speaker 1>to understand it that like and this will come out.

0:13:43.480 --> 0:13:45.840
<v Speaker 1>I think in a lot of the documents that the

0:13:45.960 --> 0:13:50.680
<v Speaker 1>data that they get from those auctions and from serving

0:13:50.720 --> 0:13:54.280
<v Speaker 1>ads across the web and from tracking users across the web.

0:13:54.679 --> 0:13:56.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean, there's this important moment in time that will

0:13:56.640 --> 0:13:59.960
<v Speaker 1>come up in the trial. I believe we're in twenty sixteen.

0:14:00.760 --> 0:14:03.840
<v Speaker 1>Google merged all of the ad tech data they have,

0:14:04.040 --> 0:14:06.240
<v Speaker 1>with all the search data they have, with all the

0:14:06.640 --> 0:14:09.720
<v Speaker 1>location data they have, with all the Android data, and

0:14:09.800 --> 0:14:12.839
<v Speaker 1>all the Chrome browsing data into one single profile, which

0:14:12.880 --> 0:14:14.640
<v Speaker 1>they promised they wouldn't do, and they went ahead and

0:14:14.640 --> 0:14:17.160
<v Speaker 1>did it. And if you think about the value of

0:14:17.200 --> 0:14:19.960
<v Speaker 1>that data that underpins it, that's really important.

0:14:20.200 --> 0:14:24.840
<v Speaker 2>So when you say unites those profiles, is they have

0:14:24.880 --> 0:14:27.600
<v Speaker 2>a profile on you and me? Is it? Do we

0:14:27.680 --> 0:14:28.160
<v Speaker 2>just not know?

0:14:29.800 --> 0:14:32.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean we expect that they know whether it's a

0:14:32.280 --> 0:14:36.800
<v Speaker 1>synonymous indicator or a placeholder for that user, But they

0:14:37.400 --> 0:14:42.920
<v Speaker 1>know enough that it's this device which is attached to

0:14:42.960 --> 0:14:46.200
<v Speaker 1>a person, and I know all this other information about it.

0:14:46.240 --> 0:14:49.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, this person may resemble that because I see in

0:14:49.280 --> 0:14:54.560
<v Speaker 2>twenty sixteen they dumped a ban on PII personally identify

0:14:54.640 --> 0:14:57.320
<v Speaker 2>them information. But is this separate to that? Is it

0:14:57.920 --> 0:14:59.760
<v Speaker 2>the combination of everything else.

0:15:00.200 --> 0:15:02.880
<v Speaker 1>That I mean, that's what the reporting was in twenty sixteen,

0:15:02.920 --> 0:15:06.720
<v Speaker 1>and that's what the evidence that's starting to bubble up was.

0:15:06.720 --> 0:15:09.040
<v Speaker 1>Was this they call it Project Narnia is what we

0:15:09.160 --> 0:15:13.280
<v Speaker 1>just learned it. But that they merged, they dropped their

0:15:13.280 --> 0:15:16.720
<v Speaker 1>ban on PII being merged with search. Juliet Anglin from

0:15:16.760 --> 0:15:19.640
<v Speaker 1>public and I think did the report and and so

0:15:20.680 --> 0:15:23.040
<v Speaker 1>that you know, that was removing the guardrails basically, and

0:15:23.440 --> 0:15:25.080
<v Speaker 1>at least in my mind, and I think that will

0:15:25.120 --> 0:15:26.640
<v Speaker 1>be a part of the evidence.

0:15:36.680 --> 0:15:41.240
<v Speaker 2>So within this, is there anything particularly surprising within the

0:15:41.280 --> 0:15:44.080
<v Speaker 2>first few Well, actually, let me take that back. I'm

0:15:44.080 --> 0:15:47.280
<v Speaker 2>sure there's surprising stuff, But what happens now? So we're

0:15:47.280 --> 0:15:50.560
<v Speaker 2>pushing this episode out on September ninth, the day of

0:15:50.600 --> 0:15:53.240
<v Speaker 2>the first trial. So what happens then and what happens

0:15:53.240 --> 0:15:53.600
<v Speaker 2>after that?

0:15:54.480 --> 0:15:56.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, So the first couple of weeks, the just Department

0:15:56.680 --> 0:15:59.040
<v Speaker 1>will present what they call their case in chief. It's there,

0:15:59.520 --> 0:16:02.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, their evidence. So they're going to have a

0:16:02.320 --> 0:16:08.200
<v Speaker 1>slew of witnesses that have already been identified, both Google employees,

0:16:08.320 --> 0:16:12.680
<v Speaker 1>ex Google employees, you know, CEOs and top founders of

0:16:12.720 --> 0:16:16.400
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the competitive at tech companies, experts, et

0:16:16.480 --> 0:16:19.880
<v Speaker 1>cetera that you know probably have already been deposed and

0:16:20.040 --> 0:16:23.600
<v Speaker 1>will will now answer questions on the witness stand, and

0:16:23.640 --> 0:16:26.400
<v Speaker 1>they'll have a ton of exhibits that you know, we've

0:16:26.440 --> 0:16:29.120
<v Speaker 1>probably seen less than five percent of them, i'd say

0:16:29.200 --> 0:16:33.560
<v Speaker 1>at this point to prove their case, and Google have

0:16:33.560 --> 0:16:35.840
<v Speaker 1>a chance to ask questions too throughout, and then they'll

0:16:35.840 --> 0:16:39.440
<v Speaker 1>present their defense. I expect you'll take about four weeks total.

0:16:40.240 --> 0:16:42.800
<v Speaker 1>I think important things for people to know going into

0:16:42.800 --> 0:16:45.160
<v Speaker 1>the trial. You know I already covered that. I think

0:16:45.160 --> 0:16:47.960
<v Speaker 1>the judges is perfect for a case like this, so

0:16:48.000 --> 0:16:52.480
<v Speaker 1>that's very optimistic at this point. Also, I would say

0:16:52.520 --> 0:16:56.040
<v Speaker 1>it's very important to know that there was an important,

0:16:56.160 --> 0:17:01.880
<v Speaker 1>important hearing last week in which it's happened with multiple

0:17:01.960 --> 0:17:06.520
<v Speaker 1>lawsuits against Google, where Google guid in trouble for not

0:17:06.720 --> 0:17:12.199
<v Speaker 1>preserving documents. I was going to say, yeah, yeah, and

0:17:12.280 --> 0:17:16.760
<v Speaker 1>so Google at a point a number of years ago

0:17:17.359 --> 0:17:21.080
<v Speaker 1>issued a memo from their chief league officer and change

0:17:21.119 --> 0:17:24.400
<v Speaker 1>their systems so that any chat messages would by default

0:17:24.400 --> 0:17:27.480
<v Speaker 1>delete after twenty four hours, is the way it's been alleged,

0:17:27.920 --> 0:17:32.919
<v Speaker 1>and unless the employee actually proactively turned on their history

0:17:32.920 --> 0:17:36.920
<v Speaker 1>and turned off that purging because they run her a

0:17:36.920 --> 0:17:41.400
<v Speaker 1>litigation hole. Then the evidence was lost, and so the judge,

0:17:42.119 --> 0:17:46.320
<v Speaker 1>the judge very much expressed her concern about this had

0:17:46.359 --> 0:17:48.919
<v Speaker 1>happened and that probably a lot of evidence had been

0:17:48.960 --> 0:17:53.440
<v Speaker 1>deleted and that throughout the trials she's going to have

0:17:53.520 --> 0:17:56.239
<v Speaker 1>to take that into account whenever Google sends somebody up

0:17:56.240 --> 0:17:58.639
<v Speaker 1>to this with a stand that she's going to have

0:17:58.720 --> 0:18:01.000
<v Speaker 1>to have her own informtays and whether or not this

0:18:01.119 --> 0:18:04.240
<v Speaker 1>is a reliable testimony and whether or not there's you know,

0:18:04.320 --> 0:18:07.240
<v Speaker 1>information and exhibits that were not available to her because

0:18:07.280 --> 0:18:10.680
<v Speaker 1>of this policy. That's like really bad for Google going

0:18:10.720 --> 0:18:15.720
<v Speaker 1>into a trial, you know, like there already well, I

0:18:15.760 --> 0:18:18.880
<v Speaker 1>think that you know, ultimately she could decide to infer

0:18:19.680 --> 0:18:22.400
<v Speaker 1>that what they call a verse inferences, She could basically

0:18:22.440 --> 0:18:26.960
<v Speaker 1>decide that that there has been evidence that's been purged

0:18:27.040 --> 0:18:31.200
<v Speaker 1>in her mind, and therefore therefore Google was trying to

0:18:31.320 --> 0:18:33.560
<v Speaker 1>hide stuff that would have been incriminating to them or

0:18:33.600 --> 0:18:34.960
<v Speaker 1>prove the case of this department.

0:18:35.200 --> 0:18:39.400
<v Speaker 2>So doesn't that weaken the case potentially on like appeal

0:18:39.520 --> 0:18:41.040
<v Speaker 2>if she does that a lot, or would it be

0:18:41.359 --> 0:18:42.520
<v Speaker 2>very carefully used?

0:18:42.760 --> 0:18:44.800
<v Speaker 1>It would probably be carefully used. I think, you know,

0:18:45.160 --> 0:18:49.160
<v Speaker 1>anderstanding off. Judge Meta had the same concern and decision

0:18:49.800 --> 0:18:53.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, coming out of the search opinion, but he

0:18:53.119 --> 0:18:55.400
<v Speaker 1>said that he didn't need it, you know, he didn't

0:18:55.400 --> 0:18:57.840
<v Speaker 1>actually need to rely on it, that he was going

0:18:57.920 --> 0:19:00.919
<v Speaker 1>to find against Google, that it would monopoly and abused

0:19:00.960 --> 0:19:04.199
<v Speaker 1>its power without it, So he didn't need to have

0:19:04.240 --> 0:19:06.960
<v Speaker 1>that intent. She says, the intent is really important a

0:19:07.000 --> 0:19:09.159
<v Speaker 1>case like this, So we'll see how she how heavily

0:19:09.200 --> 0:19:10.240
<v Speaker 1>she weighs on it.

0:19:10.359 --> 0:19:13.199
<v Speaker 2>At the end of the day. So on the ninth,

0:19:13.280 --> 0:19:15.800
<v Speaker 2>they are going the Homement of Justice will make their

0:19:15.800 --> 0:19:18.040
<v Speaker 2>first will begin making that case.

0:19:18.400 --> 0:19:20.160
<v Speaker 1>They will, they will. Yep.

0:19:21.000 --> 0:19:24.480
<v Speaker 2>So has anything interesting come out yet as far as

0:19:25.080 --> 0:19:28.600
<v Speaker 2>the initial motion and have we seen any e any

0:19:28.640 --> 0:19:30.679
<v Speaker 2>of the exhibits provided in ad once.

0:19:30.960 --> 0:19:32.840
<v Speaker 1>Sure, Yeah, we've seen, I mean even their initial the

0:19:33.200 --> 0:19:37.159
<v Speaker 1>original complaint. We've seen and through reporting we've seen some

0:19:37.320 --> 0:19:40.679
<v Speaker 1>of the the evidence in details on a lot of

0:19:40.760 --> 0:19:43.880
<v Speaker 1>projects that Google had. This one's a lot of there's

0:19:43.880 --> 0:19:46.119
<v Speaker 1>a lot of code name projects which will make it

0:19:46.119 --> 0:19:48.760
<v Speaker 1>hard to keep up to, but keep up with. But

0:19:49.560 --> 0:19:52.520
<v Speaker 1>there's things like you know, Perot and Bernanki and all

0:19:52.520 --> 0:19:54.359
<v Speaker 1>these like fancy names Belle and they each have a

0:19:54.400 --> 0:19:58.600
<v Speaker 1>little clever story behind them. Jedi Jedi Blue.

0:19:57.760 --> 0:20:03.560
<v Speaker 4>And behind those fancy names are typically experiments, they would

0:20:03.560 --> 0:20:06.920
<v Speaker 4>call it. Where Google is testing making changes to its

0:20:06.920 --> 0:20:10.880
<v Speaker 4>auctions in order to drive some sort of outcome, whether

0:20:10.920 --> 0:20:12.840
<v Speaker 4>it be more revenue for Google, whether it be more

0:20:12.840 --> 0:20:17.359
<v Speaker 4>market power or more business for Google, you know, driving

0:20:17.400 --> 0:20:19.760
<v Speaker 4>more revenue to the publishers or the advertisers. Like it's

0:20:19.760 --> 0:20:22.560
<v Speaker 4>them playing with the auctions.

0:20:22.600 --> 0:20:24.920
<v Speaker 1>And so we've seen some of the details of those.

0:20:25.760 --> 0:20:27.040
<v Speaker 1>I think what we're going to see now is some

0:20:27.080 --> 0:20:29.919
<v Speaker 1>of the intent behind them and some of the communications

0:20:29.920 --> 0:20:31.000
<v Speaker 1>internally about them.

0:20:31.600 --> 0:20:34.720
<v Speaker 2>I'd be interested. So Jedi Blue, that was the collusion

0:20:34.720 --> 0:20:36.000
<v Speaker 2>with Facebook.

0:20:35.520 --> 0:20:38.959
<v Speaker 1>Right, that was the alleged collusion with Facebook. It's very

0:20:39.080 --> 0:20:39.960
<v Speaker 1>much still around.

0:20:40.960 --> 0:20:44.640
<v Speaker 2>Well I thought that that got kind of dismissed in Europe.

0:20:45.040 --> 0:20:50.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so Google has made that communication argument through some

0:20:50.840 --> 0:20:55.320
<v Speaker 1>of their proxies. It actually was dismissed in the the state.

0:20:55.359 --> 0:20:57.679
<v Speaker 1>AGS had their own case I mentioned was filed at

0:20:57.680 --> 0:21:00.359
<v Speaker 1>the end of twenty twenty in the Eastern District, Texas,

0:21:00.400 --> 0:21:02.600
<v Speaker 1>which was then moved to New York Southern just New York,

0:21:02.920 --> 0:21:07.280
<v Speaker 1>and while it was there that was dismissed from the case.

0:21:07.800 --> 0:21:11.080
<v Speaker 1>I won't go into why or when that was accurate,

0:21:12.440 --> 0:21:17.400
<v Speaker 1>but it was that specific charge which had potential criminal

0:21:19.680 --> 0:21:24.520
<v Speaker 1>criminal implications for them was dismissed. That the complaint then

0:21:24.800 --> 0:21:28.080
<v Speaker 1>and the lawsuit then moved back to Texas for a

0:21:28.080 --> 0:21:34.000
<v Speaker 1>different reason, and that discovery was reopened up about four

0:21:34.040 --> 0:21:38.080
<v Speaker 1>months ago, i'd say, on Facebook. And it also led

0:21:38.080 --> 0:21:42.240
<v Speaker 1>to a deposition of Sudar Pakai, the CEO of Google,

0:21:42.400 --> 0:21:44.359
<v Speaker 1>because he has unique knowledge about that deal.

0:21:45.320 --> 0:21:47.639
<v Speaker 2>It also led and what was the deal.

0:21:48.080 --> 0:21:54.320
<v Speaker 1>The deal as alleged was that Google Jedi. Project Jedi was,

0:21:54.680 --> 0:21:59.720
<v Speaker 1>as we understand, it was Google's attempt to match or

0:22:00.280 --> 0:22:03.280
<v Speaker 1>have their version of what's called header bitting, which was

0:22:03.320 --> 0:22:07.200
<v Speaker 1>this coding layer at the top of a web page

0:22:07.240 --> 0:22:09.920
<v Speaker 1>that opened up auctions so that other parties could compete

0:22:09.920 --> 0:22:13.000
<v Speaker 1>and participate in auctions, live auctions. And it was a

0:22:13.040 --> 0:22:16.600
<v Speaker 1>threat to Google's business because it meant that a publisher

0:22:16.680 --> 0:22:20.200
<v Speaker 1>could could participate put on their header of their web

0:22:20.240 --> 0:22:24.199
<v Speaker 1>page this code which would allow them to open up

0:22:24.200 --> 0:22:26.600
<v Speaker 1>their auctions to outside parties, so it didn't have to

0:22:26.600 --> 0:22:31.120
<v Speaker 1>go through Google Jedi Blue. So if you think about

0:22:31.119 --> 0:22:33.320
<v Speaker 1>that as a threat to Google, Jedi Blue was a

0:22:33.320 --> 0:22:36.800
<v Speaker 1>way to keep to do a deal with Facebook, as alleged,

0:22:36.800 --> 0:22:40.800
<v Speaker 1>so that Facebook would not support header bitting, that Facebook

0:22:40.840 --> 0:22:44.480
<v Speaker 1>would instead not participate in header evading, which would be

0:22:44.480 --> 0:22:47.760
<v Speaker 1>bad for header bitting, and would instead, you know, exchange

0:22:47.840 --> 0:22:50.159
<v Speaker 1>value with Google. And that value, as I understood it

0:22:50.200 --> 0:22:54.720
<v Speaker 1>from the complaints was and the reporting was that Facebook

0:22:54.760 --> 0:22:59.840
<v Speaker 1>would get additional matching of users and the auctions that

0:23:00.000 --> 0:23:04.000
<v Speaker 1>Google ran, and they would get speed preferences in the auction.

0:23:04.160 --> 0:23:07.119
<v Speaker 1>So if you think about the timing of bids.

0:23:07.160 --> 0:23:09.240
<v Speaker 2>But auctions within Google's ad.

0:23:09.119 --> 0:23:11.760
<v Speaker 1>Product, within Google system. Yeah, so that is.

0:23:11.680 --> 0:23:15.560
<v Speaker 2>An obvious that's an obvious use of monopoly power that

0:23:15.640 --> 0:23:18.199
<v Speaker 2>one feels. How has that being I'm shocked that that

0:23:18.240 --> 0:23:19.880
<v Speaker 2>hasn't caused more problems for them.

0:23:19.960 --> 0:23:22.639
<v Speaker 1>Well, and where it got the Smiths it was it

0:23:22.720 --> 0:23:27.280
<v Speaker 1>was narrowly read by the judge as normal. You know,

0:23:27.280 --> 0:23:29.120
<v Speaker 1>these are two companies that are competing with each other

0:23:29.160 --> 0:23:31.880
<v Speaker 1>still at the end of the day, and and they

0:23:31.880 --> 0:23:35.000
<v Speaker 1>were both getting a value exchange that that made sense

0:23:35.040 --> 0:23:37.960
<v Speaker 1>for them, and Facebook was acting the best interest of

0:23:38.840 --> 0:23:43.679
<v Speaker 1>its business. You know, it was a questionable ruling, but

0:23:43.800 --> 0:23:46.560
<v Speaker 1>what's important to understand is that still it is part

0:23:46.600 --> 0:23:49.240
<v Speaker 1>of the conduct for the just Department case starting next week.

0:23:49.600 --> 0:23:51.119
<v Speaker 1>It's a part of the conduct for the State a

0:23:51.200 --> 0:23:56.240
<v Speaker 1>g case and Sinndarbakai has now been deposed about it

0:23:56.280 --> 0:24:01.120
<v Speaker 1>in the last two months, and the attorneys all flew

0:24:01.160 --> 0:24:05.080
<v Speaker 1>over the night Kingdom to depose Facebook's project manager on it,

0:24:05.480 --> 0:24:08.560
<v Speaker 1>who also believed Mark Zuckerberg ahead of his met with Sundarbakai.

0:24:08.680 --> 0:24:12.560
<v Speaker 1>And so you know, it's very much in the in

0:24:12.600 --> 0:24:15.080
<v Speaker 1>the documents. When you dig in, there's stuff moving very

0:24:15.119 --> 0:24:16.920
<v Speaker 1>quickly that Facebook was trying to fight and we was

0:24:16.960 --> 0:24:20.680
<v Speaker 1>trying to fight, and that project manager from Facebook is

0:24:20.680 --> 0:24:23.240
<v Speaker 1>is on the witness list for the Justice Department in the.

0:24:23.200 --> 0:24:26.280
<v Speaker 2>Next few baby. I could not wait for that. As

0:24:26.359 --> 0:24:29.560
<v Speaker 2>discussed listeners, Jyson is going to be back quite a

0:24:29.560 --> 0:24:31.640
<v Speaker 2>few times in the next few weeks to discuss the stuff.

0:24:31.680 --> 0:24:35.560
<v Speaker 2>I'm quite excited by this. So, what are some other

0:24:35.640 --> 0:24:39.600
<v Speaker 2>any other like notable projects on there, notable like Perroh

0:24:39.680 --> 0:24:40.880
<v Speaker 2>and such that you mentioned.

0:24:41.480 --> 0:24:45.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, you know, there's there's there's a project in which

0:24:46.560 --> 0:24:49.320
<v Speaker 1>the you know, I don't know how much you went

0:24:49.359 --> 0:24:52.560
<v Speaker 1>get into like the way auctions work, but typically okay,

0:24:53.000 --> 0:24:55.520
<v Speaker 1>so a lot of these auctions and and certainly Google's

0:24:55.600 --> 0:24:58.080
<v Speaker 1>auctions for their search ads from the very beginning, I've

0:24:58.080 --> 0:25:02.359
<v Speaker 1>always been second price auctions. So so the company that

0:25:02.440 --> 0:25:05.920
<v Speaker 1>the bidder that bids the highest doesn't actually pay their bid.

0:25:06.000 --> 0:25:10.440
<v Speaker 1>They pay the second highest bid plus a penny. Chymically

0:25:10.480 --> 0:25:13.320
<v Speaker 1>how it happens, right, And so there's all sorts of

0:25:13.640 --> 0:25:18.040
<v Speaker 1>rationale behind that. And so there's a project in which

0:25:18.440 --> 0:25:22.320
<v Speaker 1>the actual price that was paid was basically the third

0:25:23.200 --> 0:25:27.840
<v Speaker 1>the third highest, and then the dollar amounts. So they

0:25:27.840 --> 0:25:29.840
<v Speaker 1>paid the second highest, I'm sorry, and then they delivered

0:25:30.040 --> 0:25:33.879
<v Speaker 1>the third highest, and so they kept the margin in

0:25:33.920 --> 0:25:40.760
<v Speaker 1>between and then reinvested it back into boosting other auctions

0:25:40.800 --> 0:25:44.719
<v Speaker 1>basically bids. It was called Bernanke I think that was

0:25:44.840 --> 0:25:47.639
<v Speaker 1>the plane Bernanky, and then there was another flavor of that,

0:25:48.440 --> 0:25:51.119
<v Speaker 1>but it basically was like, you know, re routing some

0:25:51.160 --> 0:25:55.359
<v Speaker 1>of the margin between the second and third highest back

0:25:55.400 --> 0:25:58.080
<v Speaker 1>into the system to increase other bids.

0:25:58.240 --> 0:26:03.280
<v Speaker 2>That makes sense, so but sorry if I misunderstand. How

0:26:03.320 --> 0:26:05.720
<v Speaker 2>did that benefit Google upon Mike.

0:26:06.160 --> 0:26:10.640
<v Speaker 1>Well, it it allowed them. The allegations are that by

0:26:10.680 --> 0:26:13.400
<v Speaker 1>then rerouting that money back in and boosting other bids,

0:26:13.920 --> 0:26:19.720
<v Speaker 1>it allowed Google's system to win more auctions. So it

0:26:19.760 --> 0:26:22.200
<v Speaker 1>was the same money flowing, but it allowed them to

0:26:22.240 --> 0:26:24.120
<v Speaker 1>win more auctions which help them take market share.

0:26:24.600 --> 0:26:28.199
<v Speaker 2>That's it's crazy. It's crazy that it seems not just

0:26:28.400 --> 0:26:31.680
<v Speaker 2>it seems like an outright cone in so many places.

0:26:32.320 --> 0:26:34.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you know, Google will try to argue for

0:26:34.760 --> 0:26:38.720
<v Speaker 1>each of these some sort of benefit to the advertisers

0:26:38.840 --> 0:26:40.960
<v Speaker 1>or to the publishers on one side or the other.

0:26:41.800 --> 0:26:44.360
<v Speaker 1>But I think ultimately what we'll see and I think

0:26:44.400 --> 0:26:46.800
<v Speaker 1>will be most damage into Google will there's there's likely

0:26:46.840 --> 0:26:49.800
<v Speaker 1>to be evidence that will show both of those considerations,

0:26:49.840 --> 0:26:52.919
<v Speaker 1>going into some math to say how does this help Google?

0:26:53.400 --> 0:26:55.360
<v Speaker 1>You know, And so you know, if you're if you're

0:26:55.359 --> 0:26:57.840
<v Speaker 1>able to see both sides of the transaction, you have

0:26:57.880 --> 0:27:01.679
<v Speaker 1>a clear conflict of interest and you're able to to

0:27:02.080 --> 0:27:05.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, manipulate the both sides of the business rather

0:27:05.600 --> 0:27:07.760
<v Speaker 1>than acting the best interests of both sides of the

0:27:07.760 --> 0:27:10.520
<v Speaker 1>business individually in a way to benefit yourself.

0:27:10.640 --> 0:27:12.800
<v Speaker 2>So do we know yet who's going to get the

0:27:12.840 --> 0:27:14.240
<v Speaker 2>post or a cross examined.

0:27:15.200 --> 0:27:17.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, we have, we have a witness list for sure.

0:27:17.320 --> 0:27:19.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, who you're looking forward to.

0:27:21.800 --> 0:27:25.639
<v Speaker 1>You know, there's a couple ex Googlers that actually tried

0:27:25.640 --> 0:27:31.719
<v Speaker 1>to get their testimonies uh quashed. But that didn't happen today,

0:27:32.480 --> 0:27:36.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean so last week, I guess now so. But

0:27:36.960 --> 0:27:39.000
<v Speaker 1>there's a few ex employees.

0:27:39.080 --> 0:27:40.800
<v Speaker 5>That know a lot about the advents that have been

0:27:40.800 --> 0:27:44.440
<v Speaker 5>around a long time. I think it's like Lesala, There's

0:27:44.440 --> 0:27:49.040
<v Speaker 5>a guy named Chris Scott Spencer. They just know a lot.

0:27:49.160 --> 0:27:53.680
<v Speaker 5>And uh, you know Neil Mohan who ran the double

0:27:53.720 --> 0:27:56.000
<v Speaker 5>click business that was then bought by Google and ran

0:27:56.040 --> 0:27:58.760
<v Speaker 5>the ad business for a long time. I think will

0:27:58.800 --> 0:28:00.159
<v Speaker 5>be super interesting.

0:28:00.240 --> 0:28:03.560
<v Speaker 1>I think the Facebook witness that I mentioned just to

0:28:03.640 --> 0:28:06.040
<v Speaker 1>get an answer whether or not Jedi Blue was a

0:28:06.080 --> 0:28:07.920
<v Speaker 1>problem or not once in for all, I think will

0:28:07.920 --> 0:28:11.119
<v Speaker 1>be interesting. So there's a long list. There's you know,

0:28:11.119 --> 0:28:14.760
<v Speaker 1>there's key players from the ad tech business that have

0:28:14.880 --> 0:28:17.439
<v Speaker 1>competed against Google over the years or tried to the

0:28:17.480 --> 0:28:23.600
<v Speaker 1>guy that ran app Nexus, the guy that runs index Exchange.

0:28:23.880 --> 0:28:27.760
<v Speaker 1>These are like, you know, people that are very, very

0:28:27.800 --> 0:28:30.560
<v Speaker 1>knowledgeable in the entire history of the att tech business

0:28:31.200 --> 0:28:32.359
<v Speaker 1>that will be on the standard.

0:28:33.359 --> 0:28:35.800
<v Speaker 2>So there's a dumb question, how big a deal is this?

0:28:36.400 --> 0:28:40.200
<v Speaker 2>How as far as his history of the tech industry goes,

0:28:40.320 --> 0:28:41.320
<v Speaker 2>how big is this?

0:28:42.800 --> 0:28:47.520
<v Speaker 1>Well, I mean the Google antitrust suits themselves actually use

0:28:47.560 --> 0:28:52.440
<v Speaker 1>the description of the Assistant Attorney General cant Or. He

0:28:52.440 --> 0:28:56.080
<v Speaker 1>He described it as on the mount rushmore of anti

0:28:56.120 --> 0:28:59.480
<v Speaker 1>trust cases. You know, I think with Standard Oil, AT

0:28:59.560 --> 0:29:03.320
<v Speaker 1>and T and Microsoft was was Google. You know, this

0:29:03.440 --> 0:29:10.040
<v Speaker 1>is their advertising business, and you know, the actual advertising

0:29:10.080 --> 0:29:13.240
<v Speaker 1>revenue business is two hundred and fifty billion dollars quarter

0:29:13.240 --> 0:29:16.240
<v Speaker 1>of a trillion dollars. They'll argue this is just their

0:29:16.240 --> 0:29:18.160
<v Speaker 1>ad tech part of the business, so they'll say it's

0:29:18.200 --> 0:29:22.240
<v Speaker 1>thirty or forty billion. You know, as I mentioned, I

0:29:22.240 --> 0:29:25.640
<v Speaker 1>think the data fuels and I think this enables the

0:29:25.640 --> 0:29:28.600
<v Speaker 1>rest of their business in any way. So this is

0:29:28.600 --> 0:29:30.440
<v Speaker 1>a really big deal. And this is you know, this

0:29:30.480 --> 0:29:33.320
<v Speaker 1>is what funds journalism, entertainment across the internet.

0:29:34.520 --> 0:29:37.080
<v Speaker 2>Good that not in turn, I'm not I'm not I

0:29:37.080 --> 0:29:39.680
<v Speaker 2>think Google should get broken up. But is there a

0:29:39.720 --> 0:29:42.920
<v Speaker 2>world where this is better for journalism if.

0:29:42.800 --> 0:29:45.000
<v Speaker 1>They get broken up? I think absolutely. Yeah. I think

0:29:45.000 --> 0:29:51.560
<v Speaker 1>there's short term concerns in any breakup outcome, because it's

0:29:51.600 --> 0:29:53.840
<v Speaker 1>going to be a headache and you know, the benefits

0:29:53.840 --> 0:29:56.680
<v Speaker 1>are going to take some time to start to play out.

0:29:56.760 --> 0:30:00.600
<v Speaker 1>But if you just if you just use the man sense,

0:30:00.640 --> 0:30:02.600
<v Speaker 1>do you think about the stock market or any sort

0:30:02.640 --> 0:30:06.720
<v Speaker 1>of marketplace having a company that's on the buy side

0:30:06.760 --> 0:30:10.200
<v Speaker 1>and the cell side and developing the rules. Ultimately, they're

0:30:10.200 --> 0:30:11.640
<v Speaker 1>going to take more and more money out of the

0:30:11.800 --> 0:30:15.560
<v Speaker 1>supply chain, right and so so. A world in which

0:30:16.200 --> 0:30:17.920
<v Speaker 1>the company on the buy side or the company on

0:30:17.920 --> 0:30:19.800
<v Speaker 1>the sell side have to act in the best interest

0:30:19.840 --> 0:30:22.840
<v Speaker 1>of the advertiser, whether it be the small, small mom

0:30:22.840 --> 0:30:26.920
<v Speaker 1>and pop store buying advertising, or the publisher on the

0:30:26.960 --> 0:30:29.840
<v Speaker 1>other end, being the local newspaper or national player or whatever,

0:30:30.640 --> 0:30:33.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, having to act in their best interests is

0:30:33.400 --> 0:30:38.720
<v Speaker 1>a really really important, you know, and common sense sort

0:30:38.760 --> 0:30:44.520
<v Speaker 1>of marketplace rule where you actually have competition that are

0:30:44.560 --> 0:30:46.160
<v Speaker 1>serving the best interests of the parties.

0:30:58.720 --> 0:31:01.760
<v Speaker 2>Do you think that this could kill Google? Because I

0:31:01.800 --> 0:31:05.480
<v Speaker 2>have this ongoing theory about this company that they can't

0:31:05.480 --> 0:31:08.480
<v Speaker 2>survive without their monopolies. I just don't. I don't know anything. Yeah,

0:31:09.120 --> 0:31:11.560
<v Speaker 2>in the sense that they make more than half of

0:31:11.600 --> 0:31:14.080
<v Speaker 2>their revenue from a from search, which they have a

0:31:14.120 --> 0:31:16.560
<v Speaker 2>monopoly on, connect to ads, which they have a monopoly

0:31:16.640 --> 0:31:19.040
<v Speaker 2>on where they hold all the data and completely rig

0:31:19.120 --> 0:31:22.400
<v Speaker 2>the dice for themselves. I don't see how Google survives

0:31:22.440 --> 0:31:25.600
<v Speaker 2>this in its current form. I don't even mean just

0:31:25.640 --> 0:31:27.480
<v Speaker 2>breaking them up. I just mean, if they are no

0:31:27.560 --> 0:31:30.400
<v Speaker 2>longer allowed to rig dice quite how they've been rigging them?

0:31:30.960 --> 0:31:34.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah to a quite. I mean, you know, in a

0:31:34.480 --> 0:31:37.080
<v Speaker 1>breakup scenario, then I think your answer is right that

0:31:37.120 --> 0:31:39.520
<v Speaker 1>they don't survive it. And you know, and maybe it's

0:31:39.520 --> 0:31:42.480
<v Speaker 1>best for shareholders anyway, if you if you study you know,

0:31:42.520 --> 0:31:46.360
<v Speaker 1>AT and T and other standard oil et cetera, you

0:31:46.400 --> 0:31:49.320
<v Speaker 1>know it could release more value anyway, if there's if

0:31:49.320 --> 0:31:52.200
<v Speaker 1>YouTube separated or any of the ad tech businesses separated,

0:31:54.200 --> 0:31:56.440
<v Speaker 1>how reliant are they? I mean that takes me back

0:31:56.480 --> 0:31:58.080
<v Speaker 1>a little bit aded to the search trial. I mean,

0:31:58.200 --> 0:32:01.480
<v Speaker 1>my my biggest obs arevation out of the search trial,

0:32:01.480 --> 0:32:03.680
<v Speaker 1>and I spent a lot of time studying it and

0:32:03.720 --> 0:32:07.200
<v Speaker 1>being in the courtroom that I think hasn't been totally

0:32:07.280 --> 0:32:13.280
<v Speaker 1>appreciated yet. Is that how important Google's scale in terms

0:32:13.320 --> 0:32:17.240
<v Speaker 1>of search queries is. And so they have ninety eight

0:32:17.280 --> 0:32:21.880
<v Speaker 1>percent of the mobile search queries eight percent, and.

0:32:22.880 --> 0:32:25.440
<v Speaker 2>That ability search market the.

0:32:25.480 --> 0:32:28.959
<v Speaker 1>Queries themselves being asked into search prompts on mobile.

0:32:29.520 --> 0:32:32.160
<v Speaker 2>And so just to be clear, you mean across every

0:32:32.200 --> 0:32:33.200
<v Speaker 2>single search engine?

0:32:33.360 --> 0:32:36.360
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, sorry, yes, across general search engines.

0:32:36.400 --> 0:32:38.640
<v Speaker 2>Is the way it was defined that is completely insane

0:32:38.720 --> 0:32:39.520
<v Speaker 2>and so I and.

0:32:39.520 --> 0:32:43.760
<v Speaker 1>You think about the scale of that, and importantly for

0:32:43.880 --> 0:32:47.040
<v Speaker 1>what they call tail queries. So a tail query for

0:32:47.080 --> 0:32:50.000
<v Speaker 1>the listeners, if they're not aware, is a query that's

0:32:50.040 --> 0:32:52.680
<v Speaker 1>never been asked before, right.

0:32:52.680 --> 0:32:55.600
<v Speaker 2>And that makes up like what certain amount, like this

0:32:55.800 --> 0:32:56.960
<v Speaker 2>surprisingly large amount of.

0:32:57.040 --> 0:32:59.680
<v Speaker 1>Fifteen percent is what you know, what we learn in

0:32:59.680 --> 0:33:02.560
<v Speaker 1>a the UK's investigation of Google was that fifteen percent

0:33:02.640 --> 0:33:06.840
<v Speaker 1>of the queries any given day are tail queries. And

0:33:07.760 --> 0:33:10.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, those are the things I've never been asked

0:33:10.120 --> 0:33:13.520
<v Speaker 1>before in a search prompt. And so Judge Meta used

0:33:13.760 --> 0:33:16.760
<v Speaker 1>several times during the trial and the fall, used the

0:33:16.800 --> 0:33:21.160
<v Speaker 1>example of Taylor Swift and Travis Kelsey like that there

0:33:21.160 --> 0:33:22.880
<v Speaker 1>was a moment in time where nobody had ever put

0:33:22.920 --> 0:33:27.120
<v Speaker 1>those two names together in a prompt before, right, And

0:33:27.240 --> 0:33:30.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how quick it was after they started dating,

0:33:30.080 --> 0:33:33.120
<v Speaker 1>but it was a new query and unless you actually

0:33:33.120 --> 0:33:36.520
<v Speaker 1>had some context for it, you didn't know what it meant.

0:33:37.120 --> 0:33:39.400
<v Speaker 1>And so if you take that to the fifteen percent

0:33:39.480 --> 0:33:43.320
<v Speaker 1>of the billions of queries they're happying, you know, maybe

0:33:43.320 --> 0:33:47.320
<v Speaker 1>given a week on Google, their ability to understand those

0:33:47.400 --> 0:33:51.560
<v Speaker 1>queries and because of their scale and to decide what

0:33:51.680 --> 0:33:53.960
<v Speaker 1>to do with them in terms of driving clicks where

0:33:53.960 --> 0:33:57.680
<v Speaker 1>they go to satisfy the users and to target advertising

0:33:58.480 --> 0:34:05.200
<v Speaker 1>is extraordinary, very relative to anyone else, including nineteen times

0:34:05.560 --> 0:34:08.160
<v Speaker 1>on mobile, nineteen times more than the rest of the

0:34:08.200 --> 0:34:12.160
<v Speaker 1>market combined. And the rest of the market includes Microsoft right,

0:34:12.239 --> 0:34:13.560
<v Speaker 1>a three trillion dollar company.

0:34:13.640 --> 0:34:16.799
<v Speaker 2>So so they just have this massive dates or advantage

0:34:16.840 --> 0:34:18.640
<v Speaker 2>that no one else could possibly have.

0:34:18.840 --> 0:34:23.080
<v Speaker 1>Right, And it's in particularly valuable in terms of recency

0:34:23.160 --> 0:34:26.120
<v Speaker 1>of data and queries like the new stuff.

0:34:26.120 --> 0:34:29.120
<v Speaker 2>That being a yeah, so you can anticipate what adds

0:34:29.200 --> 0:34:30.040
<v Speaker 2>people might be.

0:34:31.000 --> 0:34:32.920
<v Speaker 1>Right or just where they want to go on the

0:34:32.920 --> 0:34:34.280
<v Speaker 1>internet when that search happens.

0:34:35.480 --> 0:34:37.600
<v Speaker 2>But how can they use that dates to help themselves?

0:34:37.760 --> 0:34:42.160
<v Speaker 1>Well, one, it locks them in because there's nothing more

0:34:42.200 --> 0:34:45.840
<v Speaker 1>frustrating than searching for something that's a new, fresh search.

0:34:46.239 --> 0:34:49.120
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's typically really interesting, it's typically related to news, right,

0:34:49.160 --> 0:34:51.879
<v Speaker 1>it's things that are happening in society in a given

0:34:51.960 --> 0:34:55.399
<v Speaker 1>day that probably journalists are actually the ones doing all

0:34:55.400 --> 0:34:58.120
<v Speaker 1>the work and carrying the cost and burden of And

0:34:58.200 --> 0:35:00.840
<v Speaker 1>then you know, if the search engine know the answer,

0:35:01.120 --> 0:35:03.279
<v Speaker 1>or if it gives you back results that aren't very good,

0:35:03.760 --> 0:35:06.279
<v Speaker 1>you get frustrated, right, So you end up back on

0:35:06.360 --> 0:35:09.839
<v Speaker 1>Google because they're better at it and they just lock

0:35:09.960 --> 0:35:13.200
<v Speaker 1>that in. And so you know that ninety eight percent

0:35:13.520 --> 0:35:15.480
<v Speaker 1>if you take that and apply it to the future,

0:35:15.520 --> 0:35:18.400
<v Speaker 1>and it's particularly AI world where everybody talks about in

0:35:18.400 --> 0:35:22.520
<v Speaker 1>the AI world how valuable capital is, right, so, and

0:35:22.560 --> 0:35:26.360
<v Speaker 1>how valuable compute is Amazon Meta. You know, these companies

0:35:26.400 --> 0:35:31.480
<v Speaker 1>have enormous compute, Microsoft, Google and enormous capital. But what

0:35:31.520 --> 0:35:33.320
<v Speaker 1>they don't have is what Google has, which is that

0:35:33.840 --> 0:35:38.080
<v Speaker 1>that query scale. And so Google's ability, when it wants

0:35:38.120 --> 0:35:41.799
<v Speaker 1>to to entrench itself even further is pretty significant in

0:35:41.880 --> 0:35:46.160
<v Speaker 1>terms of training large language models and and you know,

0:35:46.360 --> 0:35:49.279
<v Speaker 1>being able to respond appropriately to a prompt in the

0:35:49.320 --> 0:35:52.879
<v Speaker 1>AI world. And so they could ultimately and I think,

0:35:53.000 --> 0:35:54.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, based on what I was seeing, they could

0:35:54.440 --> 0:35:58.319
<v Speaker 1>squash even Microsoft and open AI when they want to, right,

0:35:58.480 --> 0:36:00.040
<v Speaker 1>and so.

0:35:59.320 --> 0:36:00.879
<v Speaker 2>So do you think that they'll do? Do you think

0:36:00.920 --> 0:36:03.240
<v Speaker 2>that this could have wider ramifications than just Google.

0:36:04.600 --> 0:36:05.440
<v Speaker 1>I think it could.

0:36:05.600 --> 0:36:05.839
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:36:05.880 --> 0:36:07.879
<v Speaker 1>I mean I think if you're watching this in your

0:36:07.920 --> 0:36:12.279
<v Speaker 1>Microsoft or your Apple, for sure you're thinking really hard

0:36:12.320 --> 0:36:15.040
<v Speaker 1>about how this could unlock opportunity for you. So I

0:36:15.080 --> 0:36:16.080
<v Speaker 1>think this is a big one.

0:36:17.400 --> 0:36:19.560
<v Speaker 2>So what are you excited about What is the part

0:36:19.600 --> 0:36:21.239
<v Speaker 2>of the trial as we go into this, what are

0:36:21.280 --> 0:36:23.799
<v Speaker 2>you really looking forward to as a sports fan.

0:36:25.239 --> 0:36:28.760
<v Speaker 1>As a sports fan, you know, I think the great

0:36:28.840 --> 0:36:31.920
<v Speaker 1>challenge and I think the just Department did a phenomenal

0:36:32.040 --> 0:36:34.959
<v Speaker 1>job of this and the Search trial is being able

0:36:34.960 --> 0:36:37.920
<v Speaker 1>to tell the story and explain it to the judge

0:36:37.920 --> 0:36:40.800
<v Speaker 1>in the room right into the public, explain their case.

0:36:40.880 --> 0:36:42.840
<v Speaker 1>And I think, you know, they did that in the

0:36:42.880 --> 0:36:47.120
<v Speaker 1>complaint very very well. I think people should know as

0:36:47.200 --> 0:36:50.080
<v Speaker 1>much as as much as there's this reputation that goes

0:36:50.120 --> 0:36:54.120
<v Speaker 1>back a long time that people in DC, whether it

0:36:54.200 --> 0:36:59.520
<v Speaker 1>be lawmakers or regulators, don't really understand technology. I would

0:36:59.560 --> 0:37:03.520
<v Speaker 1>just really strongly suggests that they're wrong on this one.

0:37:03.680 --> 0:37:06.960
<v Speaker 1>And the attorneys that are involved, and they were involved

0:37:07.000 --> 0:37:08.640
<v Speaker 1>in the Search trial and now involved in this ad

0:37:08.640 --> 0:37:12.879
<v Speaker 1>tech trial, they really have done their homework. These are

0:37:13.000 --> 0:37:17.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, these are really really strong, you know, strong

0:37:18.680 --> 0:37:21.879
<v Speaker 1>and competently tech, you know, technical folks that can dive

0:37:21.920 --> 0:37:24.040
<v Speaker 1>in and understand how things work. And they've they've done

0:37:24.080 --> 0:37:26.920
<v Speaker 1>their homework over the years. The questions that they were

0:37:26.960 --> 0:37:30.600
<v Speaker 1>asking back in twenty eighteen were already pretty impressive. I mean,

0:37:30.600 --> 0:37:33.200
<v Speaker 1>they are the questions that that the top ad tech

0:37:33.200 --> 0:37:35.600
<v Speaker 1>company people wouldn't be asking, you know, the people into

0:37:35.600 --> 0:37:37.719
<v Speaker 1>the industry would be asking. And then they've been you know,

0:37:37.880 --> 0:37:41.160
<v Speaker 1>studying that for now almost five you know, five years

0:37:41.239 --> 0:37:44.479
<v Speaker 1>before they filed their lawsuit, and so I'm really interested

0:37:44.520 --> 0:37:46.440
<v Speaker 1>in how they present their case and tell the story

0:37:46.920 --> 0:37:50.719
<v Speaker 1>for sure. You know, one thing that also will be

0:37:50.760 --> 0:37:53.600
<v Speaker 1>interesting is the chill I guess I described as the

0:37:53.680 --> 0:37:55.720
<v Speaker 1>chill over the room.

0:37:56.640 --> 0:37:56.800
<v Speaker 4>You know.

0:37:56.880 --> 0:37:59.400
<v Speaker 1>I I don't think it's a secret that I was

0:37:59.440 --> 0:38:02.160
<v Speaker 1>involved or or you had means with the just Department

0:38:02.200 --> 0:38:05.200
<v Speaker 1>over the years on this on this case. And one

0:38:05.200 --> 0:38:07.880
<v Speaker 1>of the things I told them very early on was

0:38:08.040 --> 0:38:11.759
<v Speaker 1>that probably the greatest symptom would just be the lack

0:38:11.840 --> 0:38:15.719
<v Speaker 1>of people willing to talk to them. Right that everybody

0:38:15.840 --> 0:38:19.160
<v Speaker 1>does business with Google, and Google is probably the most

0:38:19.200 --> 0:38:22.799
<v Speaker 1>important business partner for most companies in terms of their

0:38:23.360 --> 0:38:25.880
<v Speaker 1>news and information being found, in terms of their advertising

0:38:25.920 --> 0:38:30.360
<v Speaker 1>being delivered, et cetera, et cetera. So you're gonna have

0:38:30.360 --> 0:38:33.040
<v Speaker 1>a lot of witnesses that are under subpoenas and and

0:38:33.360 --> 0:38:35.719
<v Speaker 1>are there because they were ordered by the court to

0:38:35.760 --> 0:38:38.720
<v Speaker 1>be there, and they're gonna have to testify to the facts,

0:38:39.520 --> 0:38:41.480
<v Speaker 1>and that will be interesting to see. I don't think

0:38:41.480 --> 0:38:44.360
<v Speaker 1>they'll be talking much in the press about about these issues.

0:38:45.040 --> 0:38:47.840
<v Speaker 2>And do you think you've kind of hinted the press

0:38:47.880 --> 0:38:50.000
<v Speaker 2>hasn't been covering like they've been covering it, Just to

0:38:50.000 --> 0:38:52.200
<v Speaker 2>be clear, But why do you think that this is

0:38:52.680 --> 0:38:55.160
<v Speaker 2>This feels like it should be the only story everywhere,

0:38:55.160 --> 0:38:58.000
<v Speaker 2>But it's quite quiet out there. Again, people are still

0:38:58.080 --> 0:38:58.640
<v Speaker 2>covering it.

0:39:01.880 --> 0:39:04.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think that the chill piece plays into

0:39:04.080 --> 0:39:09.680
<v Speaker 1>that too, and and so you know both. I don't

0:39:09.680 --> 0:39:11.759
<v Speaker 1>want to say they're fearful of covering it, but at

0:39:11.880 --> 0:39:14.880
<v Speaker 1>least some of the trade press. Google is an important

0:39:14.960 --> 0:39:18.440
<v Speaker 1>advertiser for their events and for their for their publications

0:39:19.880 --> 0:39:22.239
<v Speaker 1>the d C Press. Google is probably one of the

0:39:22.239 --> 0:39:25.799
<v Speaker 1>biggest sponsors of of their their sites and their newsletters,

0:39:26.360 --> 0:39:30.839
<v Speaker 1>and so that doesn't motivate them probably to be there.

0:39:31.360 --> 0:39:36.719
<v Speaker 1>And then on top of that, the resources are constrained

0:39:37.000 --> 0:39:39.359
<v Speaker 1>because Google sucked up a lot of the revenue, so

0:39:40.120 --> 0:39:42.120
<v Speaker 1>most newsrooms don't have enough back. We're now in the

0:39:42.200 --> 0:39:45.960
<v Speaker 1>day where all the local you know, Chicago, La, New York,

0:39:46.040 --> 0:39:49.839
<v Speaker 1>all these different publishers could all send their reporters, so

0:39:49.880 --> 0:39:52.719
<v Speaker 1>they instead rely on like the Associated Press or some

0:39:52.760 --> 0:39:58.040
<v Speaker 1>sort of wire reporter. Right, Yeah, so that's difficult.

0:39:58.239 --> 0:40:00.880
<v Speaker 2>It's a difficult. I find it's quite difficult to analyze

0:40:00.880 --> 0:40:03.359
<v Speaker 2>because even like asking you how is Google will use

0:40:03.400 --> 0:40:09.280
<v Speaker 2>this monopoly, it's a multifaceted answer, and it almost feels

0:40:09.360 --> 0:40:13.360
<v Speaker 2>like people don't really realize how big Google is despite

0:40:13.480 --> 0:40:16.279
<v Speaker 2>knowing it ninety eight you just so I'm clear to

0:40:16.320 --> 0:40:19.800
<v Speaker 2>repeat this, it's ninety eight percent of all searches on mobile.

0:40:20.040 --> 0:40:20.480
<v Speaker 1>That's right.

0:40:20.920 --> 0:40:25.080
<v Speaker 2>That is insane. Yeah, yeah, that is like Ford, every

0:40:25.400 --> 0:40:29.520
<v Speaker 2>every single truck being made by Ford other than like

0:40:29.800 --> 0:40:33.319
<v Speaker 2>a tiny amount, but also every road also being made.

0:40:33.520 --> 0:40:35.120
<v Speaker 2>It boggles the mind.

0:40:35.640 --> 0:40:38.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Yeah. And then the data that comes with it.

0:40:38.280 --> 0:40:40.680
<v Speaker 1>They'll talk about the revenue from that, but then the

0:40:41.239 --> 0:40:43.560
<v Speaker 1>data is what underpins all of this, and it's in

0:40:43.640 --> 0:40:46.719
<v Speaker 1>the case throughout an end, and the importance of that

0:40:46.840 --> 0:40:47.640
<v Speaker 1>data and the.

0:40:47.560 --> 0:40:52.120
<v Speaker 2>Scale almost feels as if the money isn't quite as important,

0:40:52.480 --> 0:40:55.080
<v Speaker 2>or it is, but just the money is not enough

0:40:55.719 --> 0:40:56.360
<v Speaker 2>to analyze it.

0:40:56.400 --> 0:40:58.879
<v Speaker 1>I agree, I agree, I mean I think the data

0:40:58.920 --> 0:41:03.600
<v Speaker 1>pieces as every as important and and it informs and

0:41:03.640 --> 0:41:06.759
<v Speaker 1>gives unique advantages that no one else has. If you

0:41:06.840 --> 0:41:11.400
<v Speaker 1>think about being able to merge that mobile query data

0:41:11.480 --> 0:41:15.040
<v Speaker 1>with the att tech data, with the browsing data, you know,

0:41:15.480 --> 0:41:22.120
<v Speaker 1>with the Android data. So yeah, so the press, I

0:41:22.160 --> 0:41:24.879
<v Speaker 1>think I'm optimistic that there will be more trade press

0:41:24.920 --> 0:41:27.360
<v Speaker 1>because this is advertising specific that will show up at

0:41:27.440 --> 0:41:29.560
<v Speaker 1>least for the first week, and that will be good.

0:41:30.520 --> 0:41:33.480
<v Speaker 1>On the flip side, I think also it's important to

0:41:33.520 --> 0:41:36.480
<v Speaker 1>know that this courthouse is fairly unique in that it

0:41:36.520 --> 0:41:39.040
<v Speaker 1>doesn't allow any devices in the building.

0:41:39.440 --> 0:41:42.759
<v Speaker 2>Any any but you put them, you just don't bring them.

0:41:42.840 --> 0:41:44.560
<v Speaker 1>You don't you're not allowed to bring in the building.

0:41:44.800 --> 0:41:46.319
<v Speaker 2>And so jesus.

0:41:46.520 --> 0:41:49.160
<v Speaker 1>So there's no streaming, there's no recording, there's nothing.

0:41:50.320 --> 0:41:52.400
<v Speaker 2>Is there a live broadcast or anything.

0:41:53.000 --> 0:41:55.520
<v Speaker 1>There is an overflow room where they will have a

0:41:55.560 --> 0:41:57.960
<v Speaker 1>broadcast into the other room for people that are in

0:41:58.000 --> 0:41:59.080
<v Speaker 1>the overflow room.

0:41:59.080 --> 0:42:01.359
<v Speaker 2>But you can't a device to recall that.

0:42:01.480 --> 0:42:03.040
<v Speaker 1>You're not all the right device into the building.

0:42:03.280 --> 0:42:04.440
<v Speaker 2>What's the Russian now with that?

0:42:06.000 --> 0:42:11.319
<v Speaker 1>I think it's old school court rules and uh, you

0:42:11.360 --> 0:42:15.080
<v Speaker 1>know it does it limits the ability for the public

0:42:15.160 --> 0:42:19.000
<v Speaker 1>to watch the witnesses and get visions. And so I

0:42:19.040 --> 0:42:22.640
<v Speaker 1>think that way this this courthouse is you know, this

0:42:23.160 --> 0:42:25.760
<v Speaker 1>may be interesting from a Google perspective. I mean, it's

0:42:25.880 --> 0:42:28.960
<v Speaker 1>it sees a lot of very sensitive cases. It's in

0:42:29.000 --> 0:42:32.560
<v Speaker 1>northern Virginia. So I think the CIA, the Pentagon, like

0:42:33.000 --> 0:42:35.960
<v Speaker 1>this judge, you know, as I mentioned, dealt with some

0:42:35.960 --> 0:42:40.480
<v Speaker 1>pretty sensitive matters, criminal matters over the years, and so

0:42:40.480 --> 0:42:43.480
<v Speaker 1>so I think that's the way they're they're used to operating.

0:42:43.719 --> 0:42:45.319
<v Speaker 1>It was it was kind of an amusing moment this

0:42:45.400 --> 0:42:47.600
<v Speaker 1>morning when Google tried to put in the last minute

0:42:47.600 --> 0:42:50.880
<v Speaker 1>request to have an extra laptop or two in the

0:42:51.000 --> 0:42:53.000
<v Speaker 1>room for the lawyers to be able to look up

0:42:53.000 --> 0:42:55.759
<v Speaker 1>stuff really quickly exhibits, and she denied it, and oh, so.

0:42:55.760 --> 0:42:58.160
<v Speaker 2>It's gonna be it's gonna be like, just to be clear,

0:42:58.360 --> 0:43:02.279
<v Speaker 2>regular lawyers also print out stuff anyway, but it's going

0:43:02.320 --> 0:43:05.680
<v Speaker 2>to be just completely analog the whole way down.

0:43:06.080 --> 0:43:08.600
<v Speaker 1>Google will be allowed and the problem will be allowed

0:43:08.640 --> 0:43:12.120
<v Speaker 1>to have a device and a backup device to put

0:43:12.239 --> 0:43:14.640
<v Speaker 1>exhibits up on the screen so that people in the

0:43:14.640 --> 0:43:17.719
<v Speaker 1>courtroom will be able to see the visual exhibits on

0:43:17.760 --> 0:43:18.360
<v Speaker 1>the screens.

0:43:19.000 --> 0:43:21.120
<v Speaker 2>So you have to write down a lot, you have

0:43:21.120 --> 0:43:21.919
<v Speaker 2>to write down a line.

0:43:22.000 --> 0:43:24.200
<v Speaker 1>And she said that Google wasn't allowed to have any

0:43:24.239 --> 0:43:28.080
<v Speaker 1>other devices beyond those because that's not the way we

0:43:28.120 --> 0:43:28.719
<v Speaker 1>do things here.

0:43:28.840 --> 0:43:34.040
<v Speaker 2>So so just a clear for our listeners. Jason will

0:43:34.080 --> 0:43:37.520
<v Speaker 2>be joining me every week to go through the happenings

0:43:37.520 --> 0:43:39.239
<v Speaker 2>of this case because I feel like it's the most

0:43:39.239 --> 0:43:42.640
<v Speaker 2>important thing happening in tech while also being one of

0:43:42.719 --> 0:43:44.240
<v Speaker 2>the more difficult things to pull apart.

0:43:45.160 --> 0:43:47.240
<v Speaker 1>I agree, I agree. Well, thank you for the interest.

0:43:47.320 --> 0:43:51.279
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, of course. So Jason, where can people find you?

0:43:51.320 --> 0:43:53.440
<v Speaker 2>Because you're going to be following along and dropping stuff

0:43:53.440 --> 0:43:54.280
<v Speaker 2>on Twitter as well.

0:43:54.640 --> 0:43:57.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it will be I'm mad, Jason underscore kin't knt.

0:43:58.440 --> 0:44:00.520
<v Speaker 1>I also would do a plug if you don't mind for.

0:44:00.640 --> 0:44:04.920
<v Speaker 2>Please, that's one we're asking US v Google ads dot com.

0:44:05.000 --> 0:44:09.239
<v Speaker 1>Us v Google ads dot Com. There's a coalition of

0:44:09.600 --> 0:44:12.160
<v Speaker 1>organizations that are trying to make sure that the public

0:44:12.200 --> 0:44:16.480
<v Speaker 1>interest is met to and so there's those exhibits are

0:44:16.480 --> 0:44:19.399
<v Speaker 1>being posted there, and witness lists and and all sorts

0:44:19.440 --> 0:44:22.799
<v Speaker 1>of documents that as they come out. So I think

0:44:22.840 --> 0:44:25.400
<v Speaker 1>the goal that of that website is to make sure

0:44:25.480 --> 0:44:27.600
<v Speaker 1>that you know some of the challenges in the search

0:44:27.640 --> 0:44:30.359
<v Speaker 1>trial are are overcome for this one.

0:44:31.080 --> 0:44:33.480
<v Speaker 2>Well, Jason, good luck in there, bring your pen and

0:44:33.560 --> 0:44:36.520
<v Speaker 2>paper and we'll speak next week and get an update.

0:44:37.040 --> 0:44:37.440
<v Speaker 1>Excellent.

0:44:37.440 --> 0:44:48.279
<v Speaker 2>Thanks for having me in, Thanks so much. Thank you

0:44:48.320 --> 0:44:51.000
<v Speaker 2>for listening to Better Offline. The editor and composer of

0:44:51.040 --> 0:44:54.000
<v Speaker 2>the Better Offline theme song is Matasowski. You can check

0:44:54.040 --> 0:44:57.000
<v Speaker 2>out more of his music and audio projects at Matasowski

0:44:57.040 --> 0:45:00.520
<v Speaker 2>dot com, M A T T O. S O w

0:45:00.840 --> 0:45:04.399
<v Speaker 2>Ski dot com. You can email me at easy at

0:45:04.400 --> 0:45:07.080
<v Speaker 2>Better offline dot com or visit Better Offline dot com

0:45:07.080 --> 0:45:09.520
<v Speaker 2>to find more podcast links and of course, my newsletter.

0:45:09.920 --> 0:45:12.440
<v Speaker 2>I also really recommend you go to chat dot Where's

0:45:12.440 --> 0:45:14.920
<v Speaker 2>youreaed dot at to visit the discord, and go to

0:45:14.960 --> 0:45:18.359
<v Speaker 2>our slash Better Offline to check out our reddit. Thank

0:45:18.400 --> 0:45:21.800
<v Speaker 2>you so much for listening. Better Offline is a production

0:45:21.880 --> 0:45:24.280
<v Speaker 2>of cool Zone Media. For more from cool Zone Media,

0:45:24.640 --> 0:45:27.799
<v Speaker 2>visit our website cool Zonemedia dot com, or check us

0:45:27.800 --> 0:45:30.799
<v Speaker 2>out on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you

0:45:30.840 --> 0:45:31.960
<v Speaker 2>get your podcasts.