WEBVTT - Million Dollar Bets

0:00:02.040 --> 0:00:04.720
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the solid verbal.

0:00:04.880 --> 0:00:08.440
<v Speaker 2>I'm that for me. I'm a man, I'm forty. I've

0:00:08.480 --> 0:00:10.680
<v Speaker 2>heard so many players say, well, I want to be happy.

0:00:10.800 --> 0:00:13.440
<v Speaker 2>You want to be happy for dake Edo State. Is

0:00:13.520 --> 0:00:14.920
<v Speaker 2>that woo woom?

0:00:14.960 --> 0:00:20.160
<v Speaker 1>And Dan and Tye welcome back to the solid verb

0:00:20.200 --> 0:00:22.880
<v Speaker 1>of boys and girls. My name is Ty Hildenbrand, joining

0:00:22.880 --> 0:00:26.560
<v Speaker 1>me as always over there in beautiful New York City,

0:00:26.600 --> 0:00:29.680
<v Speaker 1>my man Dan Rubinstein, Sir, how are.

0:00:29.600 --> 0:00:33.720
<v Speaker 2>You you know? Ty? You sound especially clear, you sound

0:00:33.960 --> 0:00:37.839
<v Speaker 2>especially punchy, bouncy, and you know what I think that is.

0:00:38.920 --> 0:00:42.040
<v Speaker 2>I think it's the Sweeney effect. Yeah, I think it's

0:00:42.080 --> 0:00:45.080
<v Speaker 2>the Sweeney effect. That is. First of all, that is

0:00:45.120 --> 0:00:48.400
<v Speaker 2>a reference that almost nobody is going to understand. We're

0:00:48.440 --> 0:00:51.839
<v Speaker 2>going to talk about this, but we are going to

0:00:51.880 --> 0:00:54.680
<v Speaker 2>attribute so much to the Sweeney effect in twenty nineteen.

0:00:55.880 --> 0:00:59.680
<v Speaker 2>I'm good, Ty, I can't complain. I am busy, but

0:00:59.760 --> 0:01:02.840
<v Speaker 2>I'm I'm very excited about tonight's show. Let's make some

0:01:02.960 --> 0:01:05.880
<v Speaker 2>pretend money for ourselves and for everybody listening.

0:01:05.959 --> 0:01:08.880
<v Speaker 1>Let's make some cash. That's what we're gonna do here

0:01:09.560 --> 0:01:13.080
<v Speaker 1>on the podcast. This evening A fun show planned. Hello,

0:01:13.200 --> 0:01:16.160
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the show. I'm Ty he's Dan. You can

0:01:16.200 --> 0:01:18.520
<v Speaker 1>find our website at solidverbal dot com if you're a

0:01:18.560 --> 0:01:20.520
<v Speaker 1>new listener and want to figure out what this is

0:01:20.640 --> 0:01:25.039
<v Speaker 1>all about. We've also got plenty of social media. You

0:01:25.080 --> 0:01:29.120
<v Speaker 1>can find us on Twitter, the redesigned Facebook apparently as

0:01:29.120 --> 0:01:32.520
<v Speaker 1>well as Instagram. There is a subreddit that some of

0:01:32.560 --> 0:01:36.120
<v Speaker 1>our most fervent supporters have started out at reddit dot

0:01:36.120 --> 0:01:40.360
<v Speaker 1>com slash our slash solid Verbal, And of course, if

0:01:40.360 --> 0:01:42.600
<v Speaker 1>you want to make sure that you're up to speed

0:01:42.640 --> 0:01:46.600
<v Speaker 1>with every last nugget of Solid Verbal goodness, going out

0:01:46.600 --> 0:01:50.160
<v Speaker 1>to our website and sign up for our newsletter of intent.

0:01:50.280 --> 0:01:52.600
<v Speaker 1>We have not sent one of these out in months,

0:01:52.760 --> 0:01:56.760
<v Speaker 1>but but I have a sneaking suspicion that once we

0:01:56.800 --> 0:01:59.120
<v Speaker 1>get things going with shirts and a few other things

0:01:59.280 --> 0:02:02.440
<v Speaker 1>are working on the laboratory, we'll be sending that out

0:02:02.440 --> 0:02:04.720
<v Speaker 1>a few times here over the course of the next

0:02:04.720 --> 0:02:06.200
<v Speaker 1>couple weeks and months.

0:02:06.360 --> 0:02:08.440
<v Speaker 2>We're getting closer on shirt number two, by the way,

0:02:08.480 --> 0:02:11.800
<v Speaker 2>so we're hoping for late spring early summer, rolling everything

0:02:12.440 --> 0:02:14.880
<v Speaker 2>out with that, hopefully with our friends at Cotton Bureau.

0:02:16.440 --> 0:02:19.000
<v Speaker 2>So tonight's show, first of all, is there any news

0:02:19.040 --> 0:02:19.760
<v Speaker 2>you want to discuss?

0:02:19.800 --> 0:02:21.799
<v Speaker 1>I would love to talk about the sweety Effect. Dan.

0:02:22.000 --> 0:02:27.520
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so I sent you this this morning, Okay, a

0:02:27.600 --> 0:02:32.080
<v Speaker 2>PowerPoint leaks from I guess Clemson. This is I'm sure

0:02:32.120 --> 0:02:35.480
<v Speaker 2>with intention. Yeah, perfect story for our podcast. Okay, so

0:02:35.560 --> 0:02:38.920
<v Speaker 2>let's back up even more. Davos Sweeney has earned himself

0:02:38.960 --> 0:02:42.200
<v Speaker 2>a ten year, ninety three million dollars. That's the reported

0:02:42.639 --> 0:02:46.160
<v Speaker 2>new deal that he has earned for himself. And it's

0:02:46.200 --> 0:02:49.040
<v Speaker 2>hard to argue against the results and to the place

0:02:49.560 --> 0:02:52.320
<v Speaker 2>to which Clemson has climbed in the college football universe.

0:02:52.320 --> 0:02:55.400
<v Speaker 2>The defending national champions, the recruiting like crazy, they're raising

0:02:55.440 --> 0:02:59.399
<v Speaker 2>money like crazy, that the enrollment is way up at Clemson,

0:02:59.639 --> 0:03:02.880
<v Speaker 2>like what happens at most big schools when football is

0:03:03.360 --> 0:03:05.800
<v Speaker 2>you know, in front of millions that there's an excitement

0:03:05.840 --> 0:03:09.040
<v Speaker 2>about being part of something around the program, around the school.

0:03:09.120 --> 0:03:12.000
<v Speaker 2>So things are are very I believe this is the word.

0:03:12.040 --> 0:03:15.200
<v Speaker 2>They're bullish right now for Clemson and Clemson football. Yes,

0:03:15.800 --> 0:03:21.360
<v Speaker 2>so Nick Saban is no longer the most well paid

0:03:22.160 --> 0:03:26.160
<v Speaker 2>per year head coach, and Jimbo's close, but it's it's

0:03:26.200 --> 0:03:29.040
<v Speaker 2>Dabosweeney and he's making about nine million when you when

0:03:29.080 --> 0:03:31.800
<v Speaker 2>you consider all of the base salaries and bonuses and

0:03:31.840 --> 0:03:35.440
<v Speaker 2>incentive structures about nine a little over nine million dollars

0:03:35.440 --> 0:03:38.960
<v Speaker 2>a year for the next decade and has I think

0:03:39.280 --> 0:03:42.080
<v Speaker 2>it's what's a two million dollar on top of his

0:03:42.200 --> 0:03:46.000
<v Speaker 2>normal buyout buyout if he goes to Alabama and that

0:03:46.040 --> 0:03:48.120
<v Speaker 2>goes down by half a million a year after a

0:03:48.160 --> 0:03:50.880
<v Speaker 2>couple of years. So that is that is the new deal.

0:03:51.360 --> 0:03:56.120
<v Speaker 2>And people were sort of reacting with, Wow, that's no

0:03:56.200 --> 0:03:58.080
<v Speaker 2>money to pay the players, no money for this, and

0:03:58.160 --> 0:04:01.480
<v Speaker 2>that we got money for that, huh. And what happened

0:04:01.480 --> 0:04:04.320
<v Speaker 2>was the athletic department went to the Clemson board per

0:04:04.360 --> 0:04:06.800
<v Speaker 2>I saw this on Football Scoop. I don't know where

0:04:06.840 --> 0:04:08.240
<v Speaker 2>exactly it broke, so I apologize.

0:04:08.240 --> 0:04:10.320
<v Speaker 1>Think it broke on the athletic It.

0:04:10.280 --> 0:04:12.320
<v Speaker 2>Was on the athletic Okay, good to know, good people

0:04:12.320 --> 0:04:17.560
<v Speaker 2>over there at the athletic and PowerPoint slides leaked of

0:04:17.600 --> 0:04:21.200
<v Speaker 2>the presentation that the athletic department gave the Clemson whatever

0:04:21.240 --> 0:04:22.960
<v Speaker 2>board of trustees, directors, what have you?

0:04:23.160 --> 0:04:26.159
<v Speaker 1>This is so good and perfect.

0:04:26.160 --> 0:04:30.960
<v Speaker 2>The underlying artwork is the Sweeney effect that it's just

0:04:31.120 --> 0:04:35.479
<v Speaker 2>when revenue for football is up, revenue for donations is up,

0:04:36.200 --> 0:04:40.560
<v Speaker 2>enrollment is up, and just ratings and everything is it's

0:04:40.600 --> 0:04:44.760
<v Speaker 2>a non stop upward trajectory for Clemson, and there is

0:04:44.839 --> 0:04:47.159
<v Speaker 2>one man, and one man only who it can be

0:04:47.160 --> 0:04:52.600
<v Speaker 2>traced back to. This is not necessarily false, but wow,

0:04:52.839 --> 0:04:55.080
<v Speaker 2>the Sweeney effect is what it says along the bottom

0:04:55.120 --> 0:04:55.880
<v Speaker 2>of these slides.

0:04:56.640 --> 0:05:01.680
<v Speaker 1>I am excited to use this in perpetue. Yeah, on

0:05:01.720 --> 0:05:05.680
<v Speaker 1>this podcast. When anything goes right, we're going to attribute

0:05:05.680 --> 0:05:07.479
<v Speaker 1>it to the Sweeney effect. The other thing that I

0:05:07.480 --> 0:05:09.680
<v Speaker 1>should add as part of this, and I promise we're

0:05:09.680 --> 0:05:12.320
<v Speaker 1>going to move on to the actual content of our

0:05:12.360 --> 0:05:13.160
<v Speaker 1>show this evening.

0:05:13.520 --> 0:05:13.920
<v Speaker 2>M hmm.

0:05:14.480 --> 0:05:16.440
<v Speaker 1>You and I had what I would describe as a

0:05:16.520 --> 0:05:21.480
<v Speaker 1>rather productive and fruitful g chat discussion earlier today, because,

0:05:21.520 --> 0:05:25.720
<v Speaker 1>as you know, as many of our listeners know, PowerPoint

0:05:25.960 --> 0:05:28.599
<v Speaker 1>slides look about eighty percent the same.

0:05:29.440 --> 0:05:32.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, a few bullet points in there, star wipe here

0:05:32.560 --> 0:05:33.120
<v Speaker 2>and there.

0:05:33.800 --> 0:05:36.080
<v Speaker 1>About eighty percent the same. You've seen one, you've you've

0:05:36.160 --> 0:05:39.400
<v Speaker 1>kind of seen them all. You can recognize other power points.

0:05:39.440 --> 0:05:42.440
<v Speaker 2>Do you make PowerPoint presentations for your do I miss

0:05:42.440 --> 0:05:42.880
<v Speaker 2>stay job?

0:05:42.960 --> 0:05:43.159
<v Speaker 1>Yeah?

0:05:43.200 --> 0:05:43.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah?

0:05:43.720 --> 0:05:44.080
<v Speaker 1>I do?

0:05:44.320 --> 0:05:44.880
<v Speaker 2>How often?

0:05:45.760 --> 0:05:49.880
<v Speaker 1>Uh, fairly often I'd say, oh man, that's a that's

0:05:49.880 --> 0:05:50.520
<v Speaker 1>a blind spot.

0:05:50.560 --> 0:05:53.040
<v Speaker 2>For a couple of times. I don't think I've ever

0:05:53.360 --> 0:05:56.640
<v Speaker 2>for a serious situation. Whenever I've had to pitch or

0:05:56.680 --> 0:05:59.719
<v Speaker 2>present things, it's either I guess in video form or

0:05:59.720 --> 0:06:02.560
<v Speaker 2>I'm just speaking and that no visual aids.

0:06:02.600 --> 0:06:05.599
<v Speaker 1>For the live show, we use a different tool, but I.

0:06:05.600 --> 0:06:07.640
<v Speaker 2>Guess technically, yes, we're in that same boat.

0:06:08.080 --> 0:06:11.080
<v Speaker 1>Power Point is something I'm very familiar with, so I'm

0:06:11.080 --> 0:06:13.120
<v Speaker 1>sure a lot of our listeners, a lot of them

0:06:13.120 --> 0:06:17.680
<v Speaker 1>look the same. And we had a rather lengthy discussion

0:06:17.680 --> 0:06:23.480
<v Speaker 1>on g chat about which cheesy Microsoft animation the producers

0:06:23.520 --> 0:06:27.560
<v Speaker 1>of said slide deck use to unveil the Sweeney effect

0:06:28.240 --> 0:06:31.640
<v Speaker 1>on the slide deck effect. And I took a screencap

0:06:31.680 --> 0:06:35.080
<v Speaker 1>of my work computer. Hope, I'm not breaking any rules

0:06:35.120 --> 0:06:38.599
<v Speaker 1>by saying that. And you and I had a lengthy

0:06:38.640 --> 0:06:42.320
<v Speaker 1>discussion about which of these transition effects we believe they

0:06:42.360 --> 0:06:45.880
<v Speaker 1>applied for the unveiling of this of this effect.

0:06:46.720 --> 0:06:49.760
<v Speaker 2>Well, I think it's Easter time, and so I had

0:06:49.800 --> 0:06:53.640
<v Speaker 2>the appear effect right as my go to my go

0:06:53.680 --> 0:06:56.560
<v Speaker 2>to guess for this situation for Dabbo. Just because it

0:06:56.600 --> 0:07:00.240
<v Speaker 2>all connects really really nicely timing wise, I could see

0:07:00.240 --> 0:07:03.279
<v Speaker 2>them using you can put in sounds right as something

0:07:03.800 --> 0:07:05.200
<v Speaker 2>a swoosh gets it.

0:07:05.120 --> 0:07:08.520
<v Speaker 1>Gets a little more complicated, a little more complicated, but

0:07:08.640 --> 0:07:10.680
<v Speaker 1>yes you can technically all right.

0:07:10.880 --> 0:07:14.200
<v Speaker 2>So that's what I'm going with is they're probably doing

0:07:14.240 --> 0:07:16.040
<v Speaker 2>it minimally because they want to say this is a

0:07:16.040 --> 0:07:19.320
<v Speaker 2>big professional guy, this is a very serious presentation. We're

0:07:19.320 --> 0:07:22.040
<v Speaker 2>not doing star wipes. But I think on certain sides

0:07:22.080 --> 0:07:24.520
<v Speaker 2>they couldn't help themselves, like a little.

0:07:25.600 --> 0:07:28.800
<v Speaker 1>Star wipe is a good transition effect. I went with

0:07:28.920 --> 0:07:34.040
<v Speaker 1>grow in Turn because there's some significance there that's true.

0:07:34.320 --> 0:07:37.400
<v Speaker 2>Grow in turn, Yeah, where the program is growing, the

0:07:37.400 --> 0:07:39.640
<v Speaker 2>school is growing. We're turning over a new leaf and

0:07:39.960 --> 0:07:42.400
<v Speaker 2>really making Dabbo feel appreciated.

0:07:42.520 --> 0:07:45.520
<v Speaker 1>Okay, I am most interested in knowing if they applied

0:07:45.520 --> 0:07:48.520
<v Speaker 1>any transitions to the slides. Not so much the actual

0:07:48.560 --> 0:07:51.440
<v Speaker 1>content or the Sweeney effect, but the transitions to me

0:07:51.520 --> 0:07:52.160
<v Speaker 1>are key here.

0:07:52.360 --> 0:07:55.960
<v Speaker 2>With how much money they've poured into that program. And

0:07:56.120 --> 0:07:59.000
<v Speaker 2>granted I'm definitely one not to speak as an Oregon fan,

0:07:59.240 --> 0:08:01.040
<v Speaker 2>but with how much money they've put it into the program,

0:08:01.040 --> 0:08:05.000
<v Speaker 2>with the new facility, if they really really wanted to

0:08:05.080 --> 0:08:08.800
<v Speaker 2>go for it and sort of loosen things up, you

0:08:08.960 --> 0:08:13.560
<v Speaker 2>probably go with with Will Ferrell and John c Riley

0:08:13.600 --> 0:08:16.760
<v Speaker 2>from Step Brothers. Right, you probably have them do the

0:08:16.840 --> 0:08:22.120
<v Speaker 2>presentation or something like maybe entertainment What is entertainment seven

0:08:22.160 --> 0:08:25.640
<v Speaker 2>to twenty from Parks and rec So you either have

0:08:25.880 --> 0:08:29.280
<v Speaker 2>what was the step Brothers production company? Oh god, I forget,

0:08:29.560 --> 0:08:33.800
<v Speaker 2>I know, I know they did boats and hose. Yeah, yeah, yeah,

0:08:33.960 --> 0:08:35.840
<v Speaker 2>Now I'm looking this up. This is going to bother me.

0:08:36.960 --> 0:08:39.400
<v Speaker 1>Let us know what you think. Yeah, I'm going to

0:08:39.480 --> 0:08:45.200
<v Speaker 1>post this screencap on our worldwide Prestige Worlds Worldwide. That's it.

0:08:45.240 --> 0:08:48.439
<v Speaker 2>They should have gone with Prestige Worldwide if they really

0:08:48.480 --> 0:08:52.520
<v Speaker 2>wanted to spend melt the hearts and minds of the

0:08:52.520 --> 0:08:55.520
<v Speaker 2>board of directors and have and have the two of

0:08:55.559 --> 0:08:58.120
<v Speaker 2>them really go for it. Boats and hoes and more

0:08:58.160 --> 0:08:59.199
<v Speaker 2>money for dabos.

0:08:59.600 --> 0:09:03.960
<v Speaker 1>I am going to post this screencap of all possible

0:09:04.000 --> 0:09:08.360
<v Speaker 1>transition effects very vaguely on our Twitter account and see.

0:09:08.160 --> 0:09:10.440
<v Speaker 2>What happened, right, Okay, I like it.

0:09:11.040 --> 0:09:13.040
<v Speaker 1>Sneak peek at tonight's show. Here you go.

0:09:14.760 --> 0:09:18.400
<v Speaker 2>Brennan and Dale dough Back. I think I know it's

0:09:18.440 --> 0:09:20.880
<v Speaker 2>Dale do Back. I think it's Brennan, not Brendan, but Brennan.

0:09:21.040 --> 0:09:22.360
<v Speaker 2>Oh God, Step Brothers. Just good.

0:09:22.400 --> 0:09:28.560
<v Speaker 1>Okay, So tonight's show, tonight's actual show. Daniel let's make

0:09:28.920 --> 0:09:32.920
<v Speaker 1>some bets now before we get there, we've got a

0:09:32.920 --> 0:09:36.080
<v Speaker 1>bit a of a rivalry going on here. Now. I

0:09:36.120 --> 0:09:38.280
<v Speaker 1>came home from the mysterious day job, where I was

0:09:38.320 --> 0:09:40.960
<v Speaker 1>doing productive things like screen capping and sending to you

0:09:41.520 --> 0:09:46.120
<v Speaker 1>transition effects in the Microsoft power Point program. I only

0:09:46.200 --> 0:09:48.320
<v Speaker 1>had a few seconds to come up with the sound,

0:09:49.160 --> 0:09:51.520
<v Speaker 1>and so I pulled this one out. It's a betting show.

0:09:51.559 --> 0:09:53.920
<v Speaker 1>Hopefully we're going to be making some money. I pulled

0:09:53.920 --> 0:09:57.640
<v Speaker 1>this one out, plain and simple cash register right, just

0:09:57.679 --> 0:09:59.719
<v Speaker 1>sounds like you're walking into a peer one imports. I

0:09:59.720 --> 0:10:03.760
<v Speaker 1>would say in about one eighth the time that I

0:10:03.800 --> 0:10:06.800
<v Speaker 1>thought that one up and downloaded it. Yeah, you sent

0:10:06.920 --> 0:10:07.520
<v Speaker 1>this one over.

0:10:10.280 --> 0:10:13.079
<v Speaker 2>Ah.

0:10:13.480 --> 0:10:16.839
<v Speaker 1>Now, I'm a competitive soul, mind you. But if we're

0:10:16.840 --> 0:10:21.280
<v Speaker 1>picking between the two, while mine is probably easier on

0:10:21.360 --> 0:10:23.360
<v Speaker 1>the ears, if we're going to play it about ten times,

0:10:23.400 --> 0:10:26.000
<v Speaker 1>yours is definitely more annoying and interesting. So I think

0:10:26.040 --> 0:10:26.360
<v Speaker 1>you win.

0:10:27.080 --> 0:10:29.480
<v Speaker 2>That's why that sound is why I don't go to Vegas.

0:10:29.559 --> 0:10:31.520
<v Speaker 2>I'd love to go to Vegas and eat my head off,

0:10:31.559 --> 0:10:33.559
<v Speaker 2>but that sound keeps me away.

0:10:34.280 --> 0:10:38.800
<v Speaker 1>All right, Tonight's show, Dan and I have both very

0:10:38.880 --> 0:10:45.199
<v Speaker 1>fortuitously inherited stumbled upon found in a basket outside our

0:10:45.200 --> 0:10:48.640
<v Speaker 1>front door one million dollars.

0:10:48.880 --> 0:10:51.600
<v Speaker 2>Think about what you would actually spend with your newly

0:10:51.800 --> 0:10:53.760
<v Speaker 2>acquired one million dollars. Well, we'll get to that at

0:10:53.760 --> 0:10:55.120
<v Speaker 2>the end of what we're doing. I would buy a

0:10:55.120 --> 0:10:56.000
<v Speaker 2>million dollar car.

0:10:57.320 --> 0:11:03.680
<v Speaker 1>Good one million solid verbal bufus, and we have all

0:11:03.720 --> 0:11:06.920
<v Speaker 1>of the future's bets atter disposal. For the upcoming twenty

0:11:07.040 --> 0:11:11.719
<v Speaker 1>nineteen college football season. There are some game lines, specific

0:11:11.760 --> 0:11:14.120
<v Speaker 1>game lines that have been released, at least according to

0:11:14.120 --> 0:11:18.760
<v Speaker 1>bettonline dot Ag. We've also got some Heisman odds. We've

0:11:18.800 --> 0:11:22.040
<v Speaker 1>got some over undertotals for teams out there. We're not

0:11:22.080 --> 0:11:23.840
<v Speaker 1>going to be going through all of them, but we're

0:11:23.840 --> 0:11:25.959
<v Speaker 1>going to be going through the ones that we feel

0:11:25.960 --> 0:11:28.760
<v Speaker 1>most confident about. So I've got a list here. You've

0:11:28.760 --> 0:11:31.560
<v Speaker 1>got a list there. Neither you nor I have examined

0:11:31.920 --> 0:11:35.560
<v Speaker 1>the other's list, but we solicited a couple answers out

0:11:35.600 --> 0:11:38.240
<v Speaker 1>there on Twitter. Some of them actually coincide with mine.

0:11:38.240 --> 0:11:45.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure yours as well, So Danielle tell me by away.

0:11:46.320 --> 0:11:50.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I was definitely inspired last night when watching James

0:11:50.280 --> 0:11:53.560
<v Speaker 2>holdshawer Holts Tower. Yeah, yeah, I'm jeopardy because he's at

0:11:53.600 --> 0:11:55.920
<v Speaker 2>one point four million, so he's over a million. He's

0:11:55.960 --> 0:12:00.320
<v Speaker 2>a professional sports gambler. He wagers for a living. And

0:12:00.400 --> 0:12:02.000
<v Speaker 2>this was when we were texting about what we were

0:12:02.000 --> 0:12:04.040
<v Speaker 2>going to do today, so it all clicked for me.

0:12:04.200 --> 0:12:06.679
<v Speaker 2>So we're going to compare notes by the end of

0:12:06.720 --> 0:12:09.439
<v Speaker 2>the year and see who's done more with their million dollars.

0:12:09.679 --> 0:12:12.240
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to start with the lowest. So all I

0:12:12.280 --> 0:12:14.400
<v Speaker 2>said was, and I posted this on Twitter as well,

0:12:14.920 --> 0:12:17.280
<v Speaker 2>is each bet has to be at least one hundred

0:12:17.280 --> 0:12:19.679
<v Speaker 2>thousand dollars. Now you have a bunch there, and I

0:12:19.679 --> 0:12:21.160
<v Speaker 2>don't think you've determined your denomination.

0:12:21.240 --> 0:12:22.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to be making this up on the fly,

0:12:22.600 --> 0:12:25.240
<v Speaker 1>but I like the cut of your jib. Here.

0:12:24.960 --> 0:12:28.280
<v Speaker 2>We're whales here, we are really going for We are

0:12:28.280 --> 0:12:31.240
<v Speaker 2>big spenders. Each bet has to be over one hundred K,

0:12:31.880 --> 0:12:33.800
<v Speaker 2>and we have to make at least five of them.

0:12:34.640 --> 0:12:36.760
<v Speaker 2>You can decide how you're going to spend your money

0:12:36.760 --> 0:12:38.199
<v Speaker 2>and how you're going to separate it all out as

0:12:38.240 --> 0:12:41.840
<v Speaker 2>we do it. I guess I'll start with my lowest bet,

0:12:42.280 --> 0:12:44.719
<v Speaker 2>which is the minimum one hundred k. I actually have

0:12:44.760 --> 0:12:49.800
<v Speaker 2>two hundred K bets. The first sam Ellinger plus sixteen

0:12:49.840 --> 0:12:50.480
<v Speaker 2>hundred to win the.

0:12:50.480 --> 0:12:52.800
<v Speaker 1>High you dog, I have it on mine too.

0:12:53.440 --> 0:12:56.400
<v Speaker 2>Forty one. I believe forty one total touchdowns last year.

0:12:57.000 --> 0:13:01.320
<v Speaker 2>Promising young receivers Colin Johnson returns Van DuVernay, you know,

0:13:01.600 --> 0:13:05.520
<v Speaker 2>has potential as a burner, and they're getting better at

0:13:05.600 --> 0:13:08.880
<v Speaker 2>running back and defensively they take a step back. It

0:13:08.960 --> 0:13:11.120
<v Speaker 2>looks like in the secondary. I love their safeties, but

0:13:11.240 --> 0:13:13.560
<v Speaker 2>corner a little inexperience, so they could get torched a

0:13:13.559 --> 0:13:16.239
<v Speaker 2>little bit in the Big twelve. Could get some shootouts

0:13:16.240 --> 0:13:18.880
<v Speaker 2>on our hands and they and they keep giving the

0:13:18.880 --> 0:13:21.720
<v Speaker 2>ball to Sam Ellinger in the red zone, so he's vulturing.

0:13:21.920 --> 0:13:23.880
<v Speaker 2>So the numbers are going to be there. You can

0:13:23.880 --> 0:13:24.880
<v Speaker 2>get to fifty this year.

0:13:25.120 --> 0:13:26.000
<v Speaker 1>I like this a lot.

0:13:26.040 --> 0:13:27.520
<v Speaker 2>And he doesn't turn the ball over either.

0:13:27.920 --> 0:13:31.040
<v Speaker 1>I like this a lot. See here's my problem. By

0:13:31.080 --> 0:13:33.800
<v Speaker 1>the way, there's not much value right now in the

0:13:33.800 --> 0:13:38.240
<v Speaker 1>heisman market. And I'm not exactly a shark, whatever a

0:13:38.280 --> 0:13:39.360
<v Speaker 1>pro gambler is considered.

0:13:39.400 --> 0:13:40.360
<v Speaker 2>I'm not sharp shark.

0:13:40.480 --> 0:13:45.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah sharp, yeah, thank you, sharp, not shark. There is

0:13:45.120 --> 0:13:48.800
<v Speaker 1>not a lot of value in the heisman market right now. No,

0:13:49.120 --> 0:13:51.120
<v Speaker 1>it's tough to bet the Heisman because there's always so

0:13:51.160 --> 0:13:54.280
<v Speaker 1>many different names. Right now, the favorite is Trevor Lawrence.

0:13:54.320 --> 0:13:56.480
<v Speaker 1>He's about three and a half to one, and there's

0:13:56.480 --> 0:13:58.640
<v Speaker 1>some other names that, of course you'll recognize that are

0:13:58.760 --> 0:14:01.880
<v Speaker 1>in pretty close proximity. Tua is up there as well,

0:14:02.000 --> 0:14:04.640
<v Speaker 1>Jake fromm I saw as on the list. You can

0:14:04.679 --> 0:14:07.160
<v Speaker 1>guess who is on that list. The only one that

0:14:07.240 --> 0:14:10.079
<v Speaker 1>I saw, as you did as well, is that Sam

0:14:10.080 --> 0:14:12.600
<v Speaker 1>Ellinger is at sixteen to one and probably I think

0:14:12.640 --> 0:14:15.959
<v Speaker 1>the most valued of all those in terms of odds.

0:14:16.080 --> 0:14:21.120
<v Speaker 2>So what conferences the last have the last two Heisman

0:14:21.120 --> 0:14:21.880
<v Speaker 2>winners come from?

0:14:22.520 --> 0:14:24.720
<v Speaker 1>They've come I was gonna say Oklahoma, but the answer

0:14:24.840 --> 0:14:25.560
<v Speaker 1>is the Big Twelve.

0:14:25.720 --> 0:14:28.200
<v Speaker 2>They've come from the Big Twelve. And I guess it

0:14:28.240 --> 0:14:33.600
<v Speaker 2>looks like what I'm counting right now on the show one, two, three, four, five, six, seven,

0:14:33.920 --> 0:14:36.520
<v Speaker 2>Eight of the last nine have played what position?

0:14:36.840 --> 0:14:37.360
<v Speaker 1>Quarterback?

0:14:37.840 --> 0:14:41.320
<v Speaker 2>That's true, This is absolutely true. So sam Ellinger I

0:14:41.320 --> 0:14:43.240
<v Speaker 2>think is decent value. I think he's right at sixteen

0:14:43.240 --> 0:14:45.480
<v Speaker 2>to one is what Justin Herbert is getting as well.

0:14:45.800 --> 0:14:47.080
<v Speaker 2>I'd rather take Ellinger here.

0:14:47.160 --> 0:14:49.280
<v Speaker 1>I agree. I agree, Okay, So here is the way

0:14:49.360 --> 0:14:50.320
<v Speaker 1>this is going to work.

0:14:50.360 --> 0:14:52.960
<v Speaker 2>And has a chance and has that big big September

0:14:52.960 --> 0:14:55.800
<v Speaker 2>matchup to really get them square in the crosshairs of

0:14:55.840 --> 0:14:58.120
<v Speaker 2>the HeiG Heisman committee hosting LSU.

0:14:58.840 --> 0:15:00.680
<v Speaker 1>So we're going to write these down to keep track

0:15:00.720 --> 0:15:04.160
<v Speaker 1>of this on my notepad and hopefully I can throw

0:15:04.200 --> 0:15:05.960
<v Speaker 1>it over the fence to our good friends on the

0:15:06.000 --> 0:15:08.440
<v Speaker 1>subreddit and they'd be willing to track these over the

0:15:08.440 --> 0:15:10.080
<v Speaker 1>course of the calendar year for us.

0:15:10.680 --> 0:15:11.960
<v Speaker 2>Are you going big with this bet?

0:15:12.000 --> 0:15:14.120
<v Speaker 1>By the way, I think I'm gonna go real big

0:15:14.160 --> 0:15:17.120
<v Speaker 1>with this bet, so WHOA. I want you to keep

0:15:17.200 --> 0:15:20.880
<v Speaker 1>something in mind. When I'm looking at team win totals,

0:15:20.880 --> 0:15:24.120
<v Speaker 1>when I'm looking at over unders, I'm not so much

0:15:24.280 --> 0:15:27.960
<v Speaker 1>looking at what happens if it all goes right for

0:15:28.000 --> 0:15:31.240
<v Speaker 1>a team right, I'm looking at a schedule, and I'm

0:15:31.280 --> 0:15:33.280
<v Speaker 1>trying to come up in my head with what could

0:15:33.360 --> 0:15:37.800
<v Speaker 1>all possibly go wrong? And even in the worst possible instance,

0:15:38.400 --> 0:15:44.160
<v Speaker 1>will this bet lose? I have Oklahoma State over six wins.

0:15:44.640 --> 0:15:45.600
<v Speaker 2>It does seem low.

0:15:46.000 --> 0:15:49.280
<v Speaker 1>It seems extraordinarily low, which does frighten me a bit.

0:15:50.560 --> 0:15:53.000
<v Speaker 1>But in order for that bet not to win or

0:15:53.040 --> 0:15:58.160
<v Speaker 1>at least push Mike Gundhy is going five and seven

0:15:58.600 --> 0:16:00.800
<v Speaker 1>and he's not going to a bowl game for the

0:16:00.800 --> 0:16:03.920
<v Speaker 1>first time in the last fourteen years. He's made thirteen

0:16:03.960 --> 0:16:07.200
<v Speaker 1>consecutive bowl games. The only year he was head coach

0:16:07.240 --> 0:16:09.720
<v Speaker 1>at Oklahoma State that he didn't make a bull was

0:16:09.760 --> 0:16:12.600
<v Speaker 1>his very first season. So I feel pretty confident that

0:16:12.640 --> 0:16:14.720
<v Speaker 1>he's going to find a way to cobble it together.

0:16:15.320 --> 0:16:18.120
<v Speaker 1>There is clearly some concern the over under is very low,

0:16:18.840 --> 0:16:24.400
<v Speaker 1>but six wins Dan, six wins feels more than attainable

0:16:24.440 --> 0:16:27.520
<v Speaker 1>to me for Mike Gundy. He's got the track record.

0:16:27.960 --> 0:16:30.720
<v Speaker 1>I am going to go large with two hundred K

0:16:30.840 --> 0:16:31.360
<v Speaker 1>on this one.

0:16:31.480 --> 0:16:34.720
<v Speaker 2>Whoa Okay, Oregon State, McNeice and Tulsa and the non

0:16:34.800 --> 0:16:38.240
<v Speaker 2>con So we're saying three and zero pretty confidently going

0:16:38.240 --> 0:16:40.760
<v Speaker 2>into the Texas game in Austin. So they have to

0:16:40.760 --> 0:16:44.160
<v Speaker 2>go four and five in Big twelve play for this

0:16:44.240 --> 0:16:44.600
<v Speaker 2>to hit.

0:16:45.360 --> 0:16:45.800
<v Speaker 1>That's right.

0:16:46.840 --> 0:16:49.720
<v Speaker 2>That seems very attainable, especially when you have you have

0:16:49.760 --> 0:16:54.560
<v Speaker 2>Peter Hoffman's Sean Gleeson's Oklahoma State offense. That's right. That's

0:16:54.600 --> 0:16:57.160
<v Speaker 2>a very obscure reference, but shout out Peter Hoffman, who

0:16:57.600 --> 0:17:02.440
<v Speaker 2>got He's approaching McKissick. He is approaching mckissions in terms

0:17:02.480 --> 0:17:04.720
<v Speaker 2>of valued verballer apps.

0:17:04.720 --> 0:17:07.960
<v Speaker 1>We need a sound though we can't use the mckissicks.

0:17:08.040 --> 0:17:10.160
<v Speaker 2>Sound no, no, no, We'll come up with something new which

0:17:10.160 --> 0:17:12.280
<v Speaker 2>would have worked well for the Cowboys. But oh well, I.

0:17:12.240 --> 0:17:13.960
<v Speaker 1>Have an odea. We'll talk after the show.

0:17:14.000 --> 0:17:17.240
<v Speaker 2>All right, I am with my first win total. I'm

0:17:17.240 --> 0:17:20.000
<v Speaker 2>going Nebraska with So you're going over Oklahoma State. I'm

0:17:20.000 --> 0:17:23.400
<v Speaker 2>gonna go with a former Big twelve opponent of Oklahoma State, Nebraska.

0:17:23.440 --> 0:17:27.760
<v Speaker 2>I'm going under eight wins, staying on brand. So that's

0:17:27.800 --> 0:17:31.080
<v Speaker 2>plus one ten so not huge, huge plus number, but

0:17:31.080 --> 0:17:33.879
<v Speaker 2>you're getting plus money. So bet one hundred, get one

0:17:33.960 --> 0:17:36.920
<v Speaker 2>hundred and ten back. I'm going with one hundred and

0:17:36.960 --> 0:17:40.600
<v Speaker 2>twenty five k on this whoa, So not huge money,

0:17:41.320 --> 0:17:44.600
<v Speaker 2>but since you went over there to the win totals,

0:17:44.600 --> 0:17:49.199
<v Speaker 2>Nebraska has still a tricky schedule coming off of the

0:17:49.240 --> 0:17:51.560
<v Speaker 2>season which certainly was moving in the right direction, but

0:17:51.640 --> 0:17:55.359
<v Speaker 2>defensively they had some very rough moments. They've got Colorado,

0:17:55.400 --> 0:17:58.800
<v Speaker 2>they have Northern Illinois. Northern Illinois new head coach, but

0:17:59.440 --> 0:18:02.199
<v Speaker 2>I think Callo is going to be okay, especially early on.

0:18:02.359 --> 0:18:04.800
<v Speaker 2>They have I think arguably either the best if you

0:18:05.359 --> 0:18:07.639
<v Speaker 2>don't think Jerry Judy is as good as Labisca chanlt

0:18:07.800 --> 0:18:11.800
<v Speaker 2>or second best receiver in the Country. They have Ohio

0:18:11.840 --> 0:18:14.200
<v Speaker 2>State and that's the only one of the really big

0:18:14.400 --> 0:18:17.280
<v Speaker 2>four or five whatever. They have Wisconsin later on in

0:18:17.320 --> 0:18:21.520
<v Speaker 2>the season. But going through their schedule, they have Ohio State,

0:18:21.560 --> 0:18:25.160
<v Speaker 2>they go two Minnesota and improving Minnesota, they host Wisconsin,

0:18:25.320 --> 0:18:27.840
<v Speaker 2>and then they finish with obviously, as they do every year, Iowa.

0:18:28.440 --> 0:18:30.560
<v Speaker 2>It's a lot. When I went through this schedule and

0:18:30.560 --> 0:18:32.720
<v Speaker 2>I didn't do best case, I didn't do worst case.

0:18:33.080 --> 0:18:35.240
<v Speaker 2>I was seeing six or seven, which is still really

0:18:35.320 --> 0:18:38.720
<v Speaker 2>nice improvement. Great, But I'm going to take the under

0:18:38.720 --> 0:18:40.160
<v Speaker 2>of eight for Nebraska.

0:18:40.440 --> 0:18:40.840
<v Speaker 1>Wow.

0:18:41.880 --> 0:18:44.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, So I'm betting one hundred and twenty five k

0:18:44.920 --> 0:18:45.920
<v Speaker 2>on that at plus money.

0:18:45.920 --> 0:18:49.840
<v Speaker 1>I think it's good value, decent value. Okay, moving on,

0:18:49.960 --> 0:18:51.880
<v Speaker 1>let's do another over under. Dan. I'm going to play

0:18:51.920 --> 0:18:58.800
<v Speaker 1>the sound here because I'm feeling saucy again, continuing with

0:18:58.960 --> 0:19:02.560
<v Speaker 1>my thought from earlier. Yeah, I'm looking at Clemson's schedule

0:19:02.640 --> 0:19:06.000
<v Speaker 1>this year, and I am not seeing any losses on

0:19:06.000 --> 0:19:09.439
<v Speaker 1>this schedule. Now, what's interesting to me, like Washington from

0:19:09.480 --> 0:19:13.640
<v Speaker 1>a few years ago, right right, that's part of the issue. Yeah,

0:19:13.720 --> 0:19:18.399
<v Speaker 1>they're overunder is eleven, which means that in order for

0:19:18.440 --> 0:19:22.199
<v Speaker 1>this bet to try it, really it's eleven. Wow. In

0:19:22.320 --> 0:19:25.240
<v Speaker 1>order for Clemson to truly lose this bet, in order

0:19:25.280 --> 0:19:28.160
<v Speaker 1>for you to actually lose your money and not just tie,

0:19:28.600 --> 0:19:32.359
<v Speaker 1>they need to go ten and two. Yeah, so worst

0:19:32.440 --> 0:19:34.440
<v Speaker 1>case scenario if they lose one game, you don't win

0:19:34.600 --> 0:19:37.960
<v Speaker 1>any new money, but you don't lose the old eleven wins.

0:19:38.119 --> 0:19:38.840
<v Speaker 2>How about that?

0:19:39.040 --> 0:19:42.919
<v Speaker 1>Okay, eleven wins is the overunder. And here is what

0:19:42.960 --> 0:19:47.119
<v Speaker 1>their schedule looks like. They got Georgia Tech at home.

0:19:47.840 --> 0:19:50.840
<v Speaker 1>They've got A and M at home. Second week of

0:19:50.840 --> 0:19:52.639
<v Speaker 1>the year. Should be an interesting game, maybe more of

0:19:52.680 --> 0:19:54.520
<v Speaker 1>a measuring stick for A and M than Clemson.

0:19:54.600 --> 0:19:57.320
<v Speaker 2>But I believe Georgia Tech that game kicks off the

0:19:57.359 --> 0:20:01.280
<v Speaker 2>ACC network their existence ACC app State did.

0:20:01.359 --> 0:20:05.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, We're at Syracuse a week after A and M,

0:20:05.359 --> 0:20:09.880
<v Speaker 1>which could be interesting. Carrier Dom Charlotte, then they're at

0:20:09.920 --> 0:20:13.560
<v Speaker 1>North Carolina. Then there's a bye before Florida State at home.

0:20:13.600 --> 0:20:19.919
<v Speaker 1>Mind you at Louisville home against Boston College home against Wafford,

0:20:20.560 --> 0:20:25.959
<v Speaker 1>at NC State home against Wake, then a bye before

0:20:26.000 --> 0:20:29.399
<v Speaker 1>they get to their road tilt against South Carolina. I

0:20:29.440 --> 0:20:32.600
<v Speaker 1>don't see two losses on that schedule for Clemson, not

0:20:32.640 --> 0:20:34.960
<v Speaker 1>with all they've got coming back, Not with Trevor Lawrence

0:20:35.000 --> 0:20:37.840
<v Speaker 1>on the roster, So I feel pretty good about that.

0:20:38.359 --> 0:20:42.960
<v Speaker 1>I am gonna say one fifty, one hundred and fifty

0:20:43.080 --> 0:20:47.000
<v Speaker 1>large on Clemson over eleven wins.

0:20:47.240 --> 0:20:49.520
<v Speaker 2>So what you're basically banking on here if you feel

0:20:49.560 --> 0:20:53.040
<v Speaker 2>that confident is they're gonna pull Trevor Lawrence as soon

0:20:53.040 --> 0:20:55.840
<v Speaker 2>as they go up twenty seventeen in some of these games.

0:20:56.080 --> 0:20:57.439
<v Speaker 2>Because if Trevor Lawrence goes.

0:20:57.320 --> 0:20:59.399
<v Speaker 1>Down twenty to seventeen, no they're not.

0:21:00.160 --> 0:21:02.760
<v Speaker 2>I'm saying up seventeen or twenty points.

0:21:02.920 --> 0:21:04.600
<v Speaker 1>Continue, yes, continue.

0:21:04.200 --> 0:21:08.080
<v Speaker 2>The margin is seventeen or twenty points because I don't

0:21:08.320 --> 0:21:11.480
<v Speaker 2>is it's still Chase Bryce behind Trevor Lawrence. Will further investigate,

0:21:11.560 --> 0:21:15.440
<v Speaker 2>but yes, the depth there isn't where say last year

0:21:15.480 --> 0:21:18.680
<v Speaker 2>with with Tua and having Jalen Hurts behind him. So

0:21:19.040 --> 0:21:23.280
<v Speaker 2>that's a concern. The two losses are really hard to find.

0:21:23.640 --> 0:21:26.639
<v Speaker 2>You really have to squint, you gotta swin to find.

0:21:26.680 --> 0:21:30.160
<v Speaker 2>You gotta maybe look for a weird I mean, it's

0:21:30.200 --> 0:21:32.399
<v Speaker 2>the carrier in A and M It's September is the

0:21:32.440 --> 0:21:33.000
<v Speaker 2>tough month.

0:21:33.200 --> 0:21:38.920
<v Speaker 1>September's tough, the carrier domes weird. Maybe Louisville week after

0:21:39.000 --> 0:21:39.680
<v Speaker 1>Florida State.

0:21:40.600 --> 0:21:42.640
<v Speaker 2>No, I don't see that, And I mean Louis's probably

0:21:42.680 --> 0:21:45.280
<v Speaker 2>better than they're better than the record in nu keiats.

0:21:47.200 --> 0:21:50.000
<v Speaker 2>It's a and M syracusan to me. South Carolina who

0:21:50.080 --> 0:21:53.480
<v Speaker 2>moved the ball really well at times, just getting blown

0:21:53.480 --> 0:21:55.640
<v Speaker 2>out last season, but they're not losing two of those.

0:21:56.560 --> 0:21:59.600
<v Speaker 2>I don't see it. So it feels pushy to me.

0:21:59.680 --> 0:22:02.240
<v Speaker 2>So if you'll stay away ish to me. But I

0:22:02.280 --> 0:22:03.639
<v Speaker 2>get it now.

0:22:03.840 --> 0:22:08.560
<v Speaker 1>I should also add that the line here, the money

0:22:08.600 --> 0:22:10.760
<v Speaker 1>line is you've got it at minus one forty, which

0:22:10.800 --> 0:22:14.239
<v Speaker 1>means that if I'm betting one hundred and fifty k

0:22:14.400 --> 0:22:16.080
<v Speaker 1>on this, I'm not getting.

0:22:15.960 --> 0:22:16.880
<v Speaker 2>No, you're not get much.

0:22:16.960 --> 0:22:19.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm not getting as much in return. But you know what,

0:22:20.200 --> 0:22:22.400
<v Speaker 1>if the minimum is one hundred and I can still

0:22:22.440 --> 0:22:24.960
<v Speaker 1>get a lot in return, I'm gonna take that.

0:22:24.960 --> 0:22:27.600
<v Speaker 2>That's right. No, that's a good amount of college.

0:22:27.720 --> 0:22:29.880
<v Speaker 1>Let me go one more time here, let me take

0:22:29.960 --> 0:22:34.399
<v Speaker 1>one more spin on the over underwheel. If I could,

0:22:35.640 --> 0:22:37.840
<v Speaker 1>I just invented an over underwheel there, and I hope

0:22:37.840 --> 0:22:38.320
<v Speaker 1>that's okay.

0:22:40.560 --> 0:22:41.080
<v Speaker 2>I like it.

0:22:41.280 --> 0:22:44.000
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk about let's talk about Florida State. Also in

0:22:44.000 --> 0:22:48.520
<v Speaker 1>the ACC Florida State's over I'm ready is seven and

0:22:48.520 --> 0:22:53.679
<v Speaker 1>a half now. Look listen, I know it didn't go

0:22:53.760 --> 0:22:58.359
<v Speaker 1>well for Florida State a year ago, but over seven

0:22:58.400 --> 0:23:00.639
<v Speaker 1>and a half means that they need to get to

0:23:00.720 --> 0:23:04.760
<v Speaker 1>eight wins. They can lose four games on their schedule,

0:23:04.800 --> 0:23:10.320
<v Speaker 1>and here's what their schedule looks like. First and foremost,

0:23:10.520 --> 0:23:12.760
<v Speaker 1>a neutral syche game, but more of a home game

0:23:12.840 --> 0:23:17.680
<v Speaker 1>really when Boise State comes into town Week one in Jacksonville,

0:23:18.320 --> 0:23:20.160
<v Speaker 1>sort of a home game.

0:23:20.600 --> 0:23:21.360
<v Speaker 2>A home game it is.

0:23:22.240 --> 0:23:29.000
<v Speaker 1>We've got the ULM Warhawks at Virginia, at Virginia Louisville,

0:23:29.200 --> 0:23:35.960
<v Speaker 1>NC State, at Clemson, at Wake QS Miami, Boston College,

0:23:36.000 --> 0:23:42.840
<v Speaker 1>Alabama State, and at Florida. A decidedly more difficult schedule

0:23:42.880 --> 0:23:44.920
<v Speaker 1>than what we just saw from Clemson. Not trying to

0:23:45.000 --> 0:23:47.680
<v Speaker 1>not Clemson, but I think that's a much more difficult schedule.

0:23:48.680 --> 0:23:52.199
<v Speaker 1>Do you think Florida State loses more than four of

0:23:52.240 --> 0:23:56.680
<v Speaker 1>those games? It seems like it's a good number, but

0:23:56.760 --> 0:23:59.560
<v Speaker 1>more than four seems like a stretch, especially after things

0:23:59.600 --> 0:24:01.359
<v Speaker 1>win a South as they did a year ago. For

0:24:01.400 --> 0:24:04.000
<v Speaker 1>Willie Taggert, I think he gets them back on the

0:24:04.040 --> 0:24:06.560
<v Speaker 1>straight and narrow and at eighty four should be more

0:24:06.640 --> 0:24:07.320
<v Speaker 1>than attainable.

0:24:07.720 --> 0:24:11.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you have Kendall Briles. How can you not nice,

0:24:11.200 --> 0:24:17.800
<v Speaker 2>straight and narrow. So Boise, Clemson, Miami Florida, Syracuse are

0:24:17.840 --> 0:24:19.760
<v Speaker 2>you're if they're going seven and five and what that

0:24:19.800 --> 0:24:20.480
<v Speaker 2>would go under?

0:24:21.400 --> 0:24:22.160
<v Speaker 1>That would go under?

0:24:22.520 --> 0:24:26.280
<v Speaker 2>Yes, those seem like the most obvious with what Syracuse

0:24:26.320 --> 0:24:27.720
<v Speaker 2>did to them last year. Granted it was in the

0:24:27.760 --> 0:24:32.280
<v Speaker 2>Carrier Dome. Miami Florida and Clemson have comparable, if not superior, talent,

0:24:32.800 --> 0:24:36.320
<v Speaker 2>and Boise State has even though they definitely struggled last

0:24:36.359 --> 0:24:40.680
<v Speaker 2>year against Oklahoma State, they have acquitted themselves relatively well

0:24:40.760 --> 0:24:44.120
<v Speaker 2>against teams that are clearly more talented than them, which

0:24:44.160 --> 0:24:46.680
<v Speaker 2>Florida State is, and especially getting them. I think that's

0:24:46.720 --> 0:24:50.560
<v Speaker 2>still in August, so you can pencil in six and

0:24:50.600 --> 0:24:53.480
<v Speaker 2>six pretty not confidently, but it makes sense.

0:24:55.640 --> 0:25:00.920
<v Speaker 1>Givee eight and four. Wow, Okay, right now it's at

0:25:01.160 --> 0:25:03.600
<v Speaker 1>seven and a half. I'm going to take the over

0:25:03.640 --> 0:25:04.520
<v Speaker 1>at minus one ten.

0:25:05.680 --> 0:25:07.679
<v Speaker 2>So which of those? So you you think Boise's a win,

0:25:07.760 --> 0:25:09.159
<v Speaker 2>then I assume, well, I.

0:25:09.160 --> 0:25:12.240
<v Speaker 1>Don't know which one's will win. Okay, I'm gonna take you.

0:25:12.200 --> 0:25:13.720
<v Speaker 2>Have them beating Boise or Syracuse.

0:25:13.840 --> 0:25:17.200
<v Speaker 1>You have to essentially, yes, Yeah, I think I think

0:25:17.200 --> 0:25:20.199
<v Speaker 1>they can beat Boise in Week one. Boise's got some

0:25:20.240 --> 0:25:23.120
<v Speaker 1>of their own turnover that they need to deal with. Uh,

0:25:23.200 --> 0:25:26.320
<v Speaker 1>But you know, I mean there, Look, where Florida State's

0:25:26.359 --> 0:25:29.600
<v Speaker 1>coming from is obviously very different from where Clemson's coming from.

0:25:30.040 --> 0:25:32.800
<v Speaker 1>There's a game on the road Week three at Virginia.

0:25:32.920 --> 0:25:35.480
<v Speaker 1>Who knows what happens in that game, all right, Virginia

0:25:35.520 --> 0:25:36.160
<v Speaker 1>had some stuff to.

0:25:36.080 --> 0:25:38.800
<v Speaker 2>Do the history of there losing to Virginia and Charlottesville,

0:25:38.840 --> 0:25:39.200
<v Speaker 2>all right.

0:25:39.280 --> 0:25:43.159
<v Speaker 1>So there are more games on this schedule that frighten

0:25:43.240 --> 0:25:46.359
<v Speaker 1>me clearly than on the Clemson side. But I still

0:25:46.400 --> 0:25:49.560
<v Speaker 1>feel like Florida State's got so much talent. Willie Taggart

0:25:49.640 --> 0:25:52.159
<v Speaker 1>still a good coach. Last year didn't go well. He

0:25:52.320 --> 0:25:55.359
<v Speaker 1>spent a considerable amount of energy in the offseason trying

0:25:55.359 --> 0:25:58.439
<v Speaker 1>to retool things. Added a little bit of depth at

0:25:58.480 --> 0:26:00.959
<v Speaker 1>quarterback with Hornybrook. Please don't make me go into that

0:26:01.000 --> 0:26:03.119
<v Speaker 1>discussion again, Alex Horneybrook.

0:26:02.880 --> 0:26:05.639
<v Speaker 2>But yeah, Blackman or Hornybrook, yep. Or they get a

0:26:05.680 --> 0:26:09.000
<v Speaker 2>Louisville waiver maybe from there the transfer from Louisville, who knows.

0:26:09.320 --> 0:26:11.960
<v Speaker 1>Look, last year, I said Florida State was going to

0:26:12.000 --> 0:26:14.480
<v Speaker 1>go six and six, and I hedged because I didn't

0:26:14.480 --> 0:26:16.880
<v Speaker 1>feel good about it, but it ended up being mostly right.

0:26:17.359 --> 0:26:20.080
<v Speaker 1>This year. I look at the team. I like the talent.

0:26:20.560 --> 0:26:24.240
<v Speaker 1>The schedule doesn't set up like the easiest schedule in

0:26:24.280 --> 0:26:25.960
<v Speaker 1>the world, but I do believe in Willie Taggart and

0:26:26.000 --> 0:26:27.880
<v Speaker 1>the talent they've got in Tallahassee. So I'm going over.

0:26:28.160 --> 0:26:31.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm going over. I'm gonna I believe less one hundred k.

0:26:31.800 --> 0:26:33.560
<v Speaker 1>That takes me up to four hundred and fifty K

0:26:33.720 --> 0:26:34.640
<v Speaker 1>in total bets here.

0:26:35.600 --> 0:26:40.359
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, my Sam sam Ellinger bet was one hundred. My

0:26:40.400 --> 0:26:44.240
<v Speaker 2>Nebraska under was one twenty five. I have usc over

0:26:44.960 --> 0:26:48.480
<v Speaker 2>seven and a half wins really at plus money plus

0:26:48.520 --> 0:26:51.040
<v Speaker 2>one thirty, so about one hundred get one hundred and

0:26:51.080 --> 0:26:55.919
<v Speaker 2>thirty back. I only have one hundred K there. But

0:26:56.640 --> 0:26:59.680
<v Speaker 2>in this situation, I'm betting on talent. Even though I'm

0:26:59.720 --> 0:27:03.640
<v Speaker 2>never a believer in the Hail Mary coordinator higher to fix.

0:27:03.800 --> 0:27:06.920
<v Speaker 2>You know, I am still scarred from the Brady Oak era,

0:27:07.040 --> 0:27:08.879
<v Speaker 2>and I think Graham Harold's a lot more talented with

0:27:08.920 --> 0:27:12.280
<v Speaker 2>offense than Brady Hope loves with defense. But I am

0:27:12.280 --> 0:27:16.479
<v Speaker 2>a believer in JD. Daniels JT. Daniels taking a step forward,

0:27:16.520 --> 0:27:20.280
<v Speaker 2>even though the team necessarily didn't necessarily want him starting

0:27:20.359 --> 0:27:23.960
<v Speaker 2>last year. I think the players seem to want Sears

0:27:24.160 --> 0:27:27.199
<v Speaker 2>if I remember correctly, rather than J. T. Daniels stepping

0:27:27.200 --> 0:27:32.160
<v Speaker 2>in based on camp, but usc it's one of tricky

0:27:32.200 --> 0:27:36.879
<v Speaker 2>September Fresno State, Stanford BYU Utah. But I still really

0:27:36.960 --> 0:27:39.720
<v Speaker 2>like the talent, especially upfront on defense with how they've

0:27:39.760 --> 0:27:43.320
<v Speaker 2>recruited down recruiting class this year, for sure, but upfront

0:27:43.320 --> 0:27:46.840
<v Speaker 2>they still clancy Pendergast. I still like them at receiver,

0:27:47.119 --> 0:27:50.000
<v Speaker 2>even though they're thinner there. I think there's still enough

0:27:50.040 --> 0:27:54.080
<v Speaker 2>talent in a downpack twelve. They have the Utah than

0:27:54.160 --> 0:27:56.320
<v Speaker 2>at Washington and then a bye week and then at

0:27:56.359 --> 0:27:59.679
<v Speaker 2>Notre Dame. Stretch for sure, tricky, but if you're betting

0:27:59.680 --> 0:28:03.040
<v Speaker 2>on up side and you're getting plus money the back

0:28:03.040 --> 0:28:06.000
<v Speaker 2>half of their schedule, they have essentially one and a

0:28:06.080 --> 0:28:10.320
<v Speaker 2>half pretty good teams in Oregon and ASU. I don't

0:28:10.320 --> 0:28:13.280
<v Speaker 2>consider Cal to be a full team. So them going

0:28:13.280 --> 0:28:18.320
<v Speaker 2>eight and four and losing to say, Fresno, Stanford, Utah,

0:28:18.920 --> 0:28:24.800
<v Speaker 2>Notre Dame, I think it's possible for sure. Okay, I

0:28:24.800 --> 0:28:28.000
<v Speaker 2>think they can beat Oregon, they can beat Cal UCLA

0:28:28.040 --> 0:28:30.840
<v Speaker 2>Arizona State, Colorado, Arizona. They can beat Washington. We don't

0:28:30.880 --> 0:28:34.600
<v Speaker 2>know what's going with Washington's quarterback situation. So I am

0:28:35.680 --> 0:28:40.120
<v Speaker 2>and UA loses a ton on defense. I think just

0:28:40.160 --> 0:28:42.040
<v Speaker 2>in terms of value, it's pretty decent.

0:28:42.280 --> 0:28:45.920
<v Speaker 1>All Right, So you're saying eight and four at minimum correct?

0:28:45.920 --> 0:28:49.120
<v Speaker 1>Here is the operative question? Then, yeah, eight and four.

0:28:49.480 --> 0:28:51.160
<v Speaker 1>Is Clay Hilton back in twenty twenty?

0:28:51.640 --> 0:28:56.160
<v Speaker 2>No he's not. Yeah, I agree, he makes less money

0:28:56.400 --> 0:28:58.040
<v Speaker 2>or he actually he probably is in a great situation

0:28:58.040 --> 0:29:00.320
<v Speaker 2>with his buyout. But I definitely make pretend mine to hear.

0:29:01.560 --> 0:29:06.960
<v Speaker 1>All right, before we go any further, Dan, Yes, let's talk.

0:29:07.480 --> 0:29:08.280
<v Speaker 2>Oh I'm ready.

0:29:09.040 --> 0:29:12.000
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk about your new luggage.

0:29:12.800 --> 0:29:14.920
<v Speaker 2>Oh, I am ready to do this. Yes.

0:29:15.040 --> 0:29:20.960
<v Speaker 1>Away Away offers high quality luggage at a much lower

0:29:21.000 --> 0:29:26.360
<v Speaker 1>price by cutting out the middleman and selling directly to you.

0:29:26.360 --> 0:29:29.040
<v Speaker 1>You can choose from nine colors and four sizes. They've

0:29:29.040 --> 0:29:32.080
<v Speaker 1>got to carry on, the bigger carry on, both of which,

0:29:32.120 --> 0:29:35.800
<v Speaker 1>by the way, are compliant with all major airlines US airlines.

0:29:35.840 --> 0:29:38.400
<v Speaker 1>I should add they've got the medium in the large,

0:29:38.400 --> 0:29:42.560
<v Speaker 1>so very literally named. All suitcases are made with premium

0:29:42.640 --> 0:29:47.600
<v Speaker 1>German polycarbonate, which is lightweight and unrivaled in strength and

0:29:47.760 --> 0:29:51.480
<v Speaker 1>impact resistance. They've also got three hundred and sixty degrees

0:29:51.560 --> 0:29:56.680
<v Speaker 1>spinner wheels, which are guaranteed for a smooth ride. Oh,

0:29:56.880 --> 0:30:00.400
<v Speaker 1>try it for one hundred days, and if at any

0:30:00.440 --> 0:30:02.920
<v Speaker 1>point you decide it's not for you, you can return

0:30:02.960 --> 0:30:09.440
<v Speaker 1>it for a full refund. Dan no questions asked. Full disclosure.

0:30:10.280 --> 0:30:14.440
<v Speaker 1>Solid Wife Kate has two away bags in the room

0:30:14.480 --> 0:30:16.000
<v Speaker 1>adjacent to the studio.

0:30:15.640 --> 0:30:18.640
<v Speaker 2>Here already did before they even became a partner with

0:30:18.640 --> 0:30:19.720
<v Speaker 2>the Solid Phal.

0:30:19.400 --> 0:30:22.120
<v Speaker 1>True story, before they ever became a sponsor.

0:30:22.600 --> 0:30:24.440
<v Speaker 2>Big traveler, Solid Wife Kate.

0:30:24.440 --> 0:30:28.040
<v Speaker 1>She's traveled a lot for her mysterious day job, and

0:30:28.120 --> 0:30:30.280
<v Speaker 1>we've got two away bags next door.

0:30:30.760 --> 0:30:32.920
<v Speaker 2>Before she's head of NBA Officiating.

0:30:34.120 --> 0:30:38.080
<v Speaker 1>Before she went on a recent international business trip, she

0:30:38.240 --> 0:30:41.320
<v Speaker 1>demanded that we get another away bag for her for

0:30:41.360 --> 0:30:44.400
<v Speaker 1>her travels, and we did because she's enjoyed it so much.

0:30:44.480 --> 0:30:48.400
<v Speaker 1>So so I've seen her enjoy it, yep, And I

0:30:48.440 --> 0:30:49.680
<v Speaker 1>believe you've got one as well.

0:30:50.600 --> 0:30:52.880
<v Speaker 2>I do now have one, and I wish I had

0:30:52.880 --> 0:30:55.840
<v Speaker 2>it sooner because I just traveled with the Solid Baby

0:30:55.920 --> 0:30:58.760
<v Speaker 2>and Jody with and I to both California and to

0:30:58.840 --> 0:31:02.480
<v Speaker 2>Chicago on the the grandparent and family and friends tour

0:31:02.840 --> 0:31:06.440
<v Speaker 2>meeting the Solid Baby. But because I work on the

0:31:06.440 --> 0:31:08.560
<v Speaker 2>Solid Verbal and I work on the new show, I

0:31:08.640 --> 0:31:12.440
<v Speaker 2>do sports Wars and am recording constantly. I actually brought

0:31:12.480 --> 0:31:16.320
<v Speaker 2>out my newish little mixer and my microphone, my big

0:31:16.360 --> 0:31:18.720
<v Speaker 2>microphone sometimes I use a travel microphone. So I had

0:31:18.760 --> 0:31:22.000
<v Speaker 2>my full podcast setup and I was stuffing it inside

0:31:22.040 --> 0:31:26.000
<v Speaker 2>of towels and sweatshirts whatever, just paranoid because we were

0:31:26.040 --> 0:31:28.840
<v Speaker 2>checking that bag that it was going to be thrown around,

0:31:28.880 --> 0:31:30.880
<v Speaker 2>and I have, you know, I've had it for a while,

0:31:31.360 --> 0:31:35.920
<v Speaker 2>a softer cloth suitcase, so I was a little bit

0:31:35.960 --> 0:31:38.440
<v Speaker 2>worried about this is an expensive mixer. I want to

0:31:38.480 --> 0:31:40.720
<v Speaker 2>sound good. I want everything to work out, especially since

0:31:40.760 --> 0:31:42.080
<v Speaker 2>I had to do so much work while I was

0:31:42.080 --> 0:31:44.600
<v Speaker 2>on the road. And as soon as I got my

0:31:44.720 --> 0:31:50.120
<v Speaker 2>away suitcase, I was so thankful and grateful that to

0:31:50.160 --> 0:31:53.640
<v Speaker 2>have a hard shell when traveling with expensive audio or

0:31:53.680 --> 0:31:57.160
<v Speaker 2>electronic gear, it's such a peace of mind, and I'm

0:31:57.200 --> 0:31:59.640
<v Speaker 2>so excited. And then not to mention, it has the

0:31:59.680 --> 0:32:03.360
<v Speaker 2>bill in USB charger that's right, that's right into the suitcase.

0:32:03.440 --> 0:32:06.120
<v Speaker 2>So when you're sitting around delayed and your phone's dial

0:32:06.400 --> 0:32:09.600
<v Speaker 2>dwindling down battery wise, you can just plug that sucker

0:32:09.600 --> 0:32:12.920
<v Speaker 2>into your suitcase and boom red to green, no problem.

0:32:12.920 --> 0:32:17.160
<v Speaker 1>It charges your cell phone. Sleek and ultra durable material.

0:32:17.280 --> 0:32:20.880
<v Speaker 1>It's an internal design that helps keep items neat and organized, and.

0:32:20.800 --> 0:32:21.480
<v Speaker 2>You lock it up.

0:32:21.760 --> 0:32:25.640
<v Speaker 1>You can lock it up. Twenty dollars off a suitcase

0:32:26.320 --> 0:32:27.720
<v Speaker 1>is what you can get right now if you go

0:32:27.800 --> 0:32:32.440
<v Speaker 1>to away Travel dot com slash solid and then use

0:32:32.480 --> 0:32:36.560
<v Speaker 1>the promo code solid during checkout. That's Away Travel aw

0:32:36.680 --> 0:32:39.480
<v Speaker 1>A Y T R A V E L all one

0:32:39.520 --> 0:32:43.120
<v Speaker 1>word Away Travel dot Com slash Solid. Use the promo

0:32:43.200 --> 0:32:46.920
<v Speaker 1>code solid for twenty bucks off a suitcase. Dan.

0:32:47.280 --> 0:32:51.040
<v Speaker 2>It's such a smooth ride too. I'm I don't love traveling,

0:32:51.200 --> 0:32:54.240
<v Speaker 2>especially now that I have a gosh solid baby's three

0:32:54.240 --> 0:32:57.040
<v Speaker 2>months old, but this kind of gets me excited to

0:32:57.040 --> 0:32:58.160
<v Speaker 2>go back back in the air.

0:32:58.200 --> 0:32:59.840
<v Speaker 1>By the way, you're not implying that you're putting the

0:32:59.840 --> 0:33:01.280
<v Speaker 1>baby in the suitcase, right.

0:33:01.360 --> 0:33:03.960
<v Speaker 2>I can either confirm nor deny that's not Dare you

0:33:04.080 --> 0:33:07.280
<v Speaker 2>question all parenting styles are different?

0:33:07.480 --> 0:33:10.200
<v Speaker 1>That is not listed on their benefit sheet here that

0:33:10.240 --> 0:33:10.840
<v Speaker 1>they provided.

0:33:10.920 --> 0:33:13.240
<v Speaker 2>Just define high baby's not meant to travel in a

0:33:13.240 --> 0:33:14.680
<v Speaker 2>wast suitcases.

0:33:14.600 --> 0:33:18.920
<v Speaker 1>Also Dan very quickly. We talked about this last week.

0:33:19.000 --> 0:33:22.320
<v Speaker 1>Important safety message. If you're ever stopped at a railway crossing,

0:33:23.160 --> 0:33:25.440
<v Speaker 1>some of you out there might be right this very minute.

0:33:26.400 --> 0:33:30.280
<v Speaker 1>You got the crossing signals flashing, you don't see the train.

0:33:30.960 --> 0:33:33.840
<v Speaker 1>Maybe it's a slow moving train. You're thinking you can

0:33:33.840 --> 0:33:36.720
<v Speaker 1>get across the tracks before the train comes. Think about

0:33:36.720 --> 0:33:41.560
<v Speaker 1>this alone. In twenty eighteen, two hundred and seventy people

0:33:41.600 --> 0:33:46.560
<v Speaker 1>were killed at railroad crossings. It's horrible. Two hundred and seventy.

0:33:46.640 --> 0:33:47.120
<v Speaker 2>It's awful.

0:33:48.920 --> 0:33:53.600
<v Speaker 1>The message to you is very simple, stop because trains can't.

0:33:54.200 --> 0:33:56.440
<v Speaker 1>That's from our good friends over at the National Highway

0:33:56.680 --> 0:33:59.160
<v Speaker 1>Traffic Safety Administration, Dan nitz.

0:33:59.000 --> 0:34:02.560
<v Speaker 2>I gotta tell you I love stopping in plenty of

0:34:02.600 --> 0:34:05.560
<v Speaker 2>time for a train. I'm being very serious right now.

0:34:05.960 --> 0:34:10.200
<v Speaker 2>I love a good stop before the train because when

0:34:10.239 --> 0:34:13.360
<v Speaker 2>the train starts coming by, chugging by. I don't know

0:34:13.360 --> 0:34:16.920
<v Speaker 2>if that's the correct verb anymore, sure, but you get

0:34:16.920 --> 0:34:19.759
<v Speaker 2>to say the same thing to yourself every time. If

0:34:19.760 --> 0:34:21.720
<v Speaker 2>it's not a passenger, if it's not like an Amtrak

0:34:21.800 --> 0:34:23.920
<v Speaker 2>or something, you get to say, I wonder what they're hauling.

0:34:24.760 --> 0:34:30.920
<v Speaker 2>I wonder what's going Probably some lumber lumber. Yeah, I

0:34:30.960 --> 0:34:33.080
<v Speaker 2>don't know. That's what I just assume, but yeah, I

0:34:33.120 --> 0:34:36.560
<v Speaker 2>like to I like a good long view of a train.

0:34:37.520 --> 0:34:40.439
<v Speaker 1>All right, Dan, I'm gonna move on. Okay, I don't

0:34:40.480 --> 0:34:41.360
<v Speaker 1>mean to cut you off.

0:34:41.719 --> 0:34:44.120
<v Speaker 2>You ever take any long train rides there? Ty, No,

0:34:44.360 --> 0:34:47.680
<v Speaker 2>I haven't, really, no, never have. I think I've mentioned

0:34:47.680 --> 0:34:50.080
<v Speaker 2>this before, but nine to eleven happened right before I

0:34:50.120 --> 0:34:52.400
<v Speaker 2>was supposed to fly to Eugene, Oregon to go to college.

0:34:52.920 --> 0:34:55.600
<v Speaker 2>All flights grounded. Had to take a train to college

0:34:55.920 --> 0:34:57.280
<v Speaker 2>long ride in southern California.

0:34:57.400 --> 0:35:00.120
<v Speaker 1>As a long ride, it could have been a.

0:35:00.120 --> 0:35:02.239
<v Speaker 2>Lot more uncomfortable. I had a good time on that train.

0:35:02.760 --> 0:35:06.280
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's move on. I'm gonna give my fourth

0:35:07.120 --> 0:35:15.879
<v Speaker 1>bet for oh, y'all h my ears, Dan, I don't

0:35:15.880 --> 0:35:18.520
<v Speaker 1>want to jinx your team at all, but let's go

0:35:18.600 --> 0:35:23.800
<v Speaker 1>Oregon plus one at usc OH November the second. I

0:35:23.880 --> 0:35:28.120
<v Speaker 1>don't hate that this seems like an egregiously low line.

0:35:28.160 --> 0:35:30.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm not saying it's going to get to ten, but

0:35:30.760 --> 0:35:34.080
<v Speaker 1>at one point it's basically a pick them. At this

0:35:34.200 --> 0:35:38.200
<v Speaker 1>point in the season, and especially in light of so

0:35:38.280 --> 0:35:40.399
<v Speaker 1>many of the questions we have about USC, they could

0:35:40.440 --> 0:35:42.600
<v Speaker 1>go eight for they could hit your over under and

0:35:42.640 --> 0:35:46.000
<v Speaker 1>still very well lose this game at home to Oregon. Oregon,

0:35:46.040 --> 0:35:47.600
<v Speaker 1>by the way, is one of those teams in the

0:35:47.640 --> 0:35:50.640
<v Speaker 1>PAC twelve North that stands a pretty good chance at

0:35:50.640 --> 0:35:53.920
<v Speaker 1>making a run at least at the North, sure certainly

0:35:53.960 --> 0:35:56.480
<v Speaker 1>at the PAC twelve. And who knows, they were a

0:35:56.520 --> 0:35:59.200
<v Speaker 1>trendy pick a couple months ago as a dark horse

0:35:59.200 --> 0:36:02.400
<v Speaker 1>playoff team. We could debate the merits of that, but

0:36:02.440 --> 0:36:05.680
<v Speaker 1>they've got a pretty good team coming back and only

0:36:05.719 --> 0:36:09.160
<v Speaker 1>a one point favorite against the USC team. By that point,

0:36:09.160 --> 0:36:12.440
<v Speaker 1>it'll be late in the year. Hopefully Clay Hilt will

0:36:12.480 --> 0:36:15.000
<v Speaker 1>have some of their issues sorted out. But there just

0:36:15.120 --> 0:36:17.640
<v Speaker 1>isn't a whole lot to give you the warm fuzzies

0:36:18.040 --> 0:36:20.000
<v Speaker 1>that they're gonna be able to beat a team like Oregon.

0:36:21.719 --> 0:36:24.399
<v Speaker 1>So I feel pretty good about Oregon. Plus one, it's

0:36:24.400 --> 0:36:28.600
<v Speaker 1>on November the second. I'm going to go one hundred

0:36:28.600 --> 0:36:29.879
<v Speaker 1>and fifty k on that one.

0:36:31.200 --> 0:36:34.439
<v Speaker 2>Okay, Yeah, Oregon's in a good position to travel well,

0:36:34.560 --> 0:36:37.080
<v Speaker 2>which they didn't last year. And then Justin Herbert's getting

0:36:37.080 --> 0:36:39.680
<v Speaker 2>a lot of the attention and somewhat rightfully so. But

0:36:40.040 --> 0:36:42.799
<v Speaker 2>they're deep at running back. The offensive line is all

0:36:43.040 --> 0:36:46.160
<v Speaker 2>super I mean, Pinay Sewell is a true sophomore, but

0:36:46.239 --> 0:36:48.280
<v Speaker 2>I think the rest of them are fifth year seniors

0:36:48.280 --> 0:36:50.560
<v Speaker 2>and they're all back from last season, so they have

0:36:50.600 --> 0:36:52.680
<v Speaker 2>a good chance with a new defensive coordinator to be

0:36:52.760 --> 0:36:56.080
<v Speaker 2>unpredictable and really good on defense and run the ball

0:36:56.120 --> 0:37:01.080
<v Speaker 2>really well which typically travels, you know. Respect. So I

0:37:01.080 --> 0:37:04.040
<v Speaker 2>don't hate that pick at all, especially since USC by

0:37:04.120 --> 0:37:06.760
<v Speaker 2>what do you say was November second. Yeah, if USC

0:37:06.880 --> 0:37:09.560
<v Speaker 2>is just an abject disaster, you're not gonna have much

0:37:09.560 --> 0:37:12.839
<v Speaker 2>of a home field by November twod and Oregon could

0:37:12.880 --> 0:37:14.680
<v Speaker 2>comfortably win that game. It's not unreasonable.

0:37:14.960 --> 0:37:18.200
<v Speaker 1>You could have interim coach Graham Harrell by that point. Absolutely,

0:37:18.239 --> 0:37:21.600
<v Speaker 1>you could never know, all right, So I'm in right now,

0:37:21.680 --> 0:37:27.440
<v Speaker 1>I've got what is this six hundred k in imaginary bets.

0:37:28.120 --> 0:37:30.120
<v Speaker 1>My hunch is that you've got some big instill on

0:37:30.120 --> 0:37:30.520
<v Speaker 1>the board.

0:37:31.000 --> 0:37:35.400
<v Speaker 2>I do. My next pick is, I'm getting nine points

0:37:36.200 --> 0:37:40.520
<v Speaker 2>Auburn at home against Georgia. Nine points. I know Auburn

0:37:40.600 --> 0:37:43.520
<v Speaker 2>is retooling the linebacking corps, but up front they've got

0:37:43.560 --> 0:37:47.359
<v Speaker 2>at least a couple first, second, third round lineman and

0:37:48.120 --> 0:37:52.440
<v Speaker 2>you're you're essentially gambling on either was Joey Gatewood or

0:37:52.480 --> 0:37:55.480
<v Speaker 2>bow Nicks being pretty good. But you also have the

0:37:55.560 --> 0:37:59.120
<v Speaker 2>reassurance that it appears that Gus Malson is going to

0:37:59.120 --> 0:38:00.960
<v Speaker 2>be in charge of the off once again, like he

0:38:01.080 --> 0:38:03.040
<v Speaker 2>was in the bowl game against Purdue and like he

0:38:03.239 --> 0:38:07.000
<v Speaker 2>was when Auburn had an offense. And so there is

0:38:07.000 --> 0:38:10.600
<v Speaker 2>something pretty exciting about plus money. Even though I really

0:38:10.640 --> 0:38:13.799
<v Speaker 2>love Georgia this year, it's a lot of points for

0:38:13.840 --> 0:38:17.000
<v Speaker 2>what looks to be another good defense at home in

0:38:17.040 --> 0:38:19.560
<v Speaker 2>a tough place to play, in a rivalry game, pushing

0:38:19.600 --> 0:38:22.160
<v Speaker 2>double ditch. I know the comfortable I know the Bulldogs

0:38:22.160 --> 0:38:24.560
<v Speaker 2>comfortably won last year, but that was in Athens, and

0:38:26.080 --> 0:38:28.200
<v Speaker 2>that's too many points for me. So I'm I'm gonna

0:38:28.200 --> 0:38:31.080
<v Speaker 2>comfortably take those nine. And I have that as a

0:38:31.120 --> 0:38:32.279
<v Speaker 2>buck twenty five as well.

0:38:33.160 --> 0:38:36.080
<v Speaker 1>Wow, okay, so you're up to five point fifty later

0:38:36.160 --> 0:38:39.440
<v Speaker 1>on in the season, Yes, in imaginary cullivery.

0:38:39.040 --> 0:38:41.919
<v Speaker 2>And I think that's I believe that's after the two

0:38:42.000 --> 0:38:43.919
<v Speaker 2>games leading up to it. If you're a body blow

0:38:44.000 --> 0:38:47.960
<v Speaker 2>believer triple B, the real triple B, that's after Florida

0:38:47.960 --> 0:38:50.759
<v Speaker 2>and after Miszoo, who gave Georgia some trouble last year.

0:38:50.960 --> 0:38:54.080
<v Speaker 2>So it's it's a road. It's a road to get

0:38:54.080 --> 0:38:55.399
<v Speaker 2>to a rivalry game. That's tough.

0:38:56.440 --> 0:39:00.840
<v Speaker 1>Let's go to the what is it second week of

0:39:00.920 --> 0:39:04.800
<v Speaker 1>the year. Okay, a lot of interesting non conference games

0:39:05.840 --> 0:39:08.720
<v Speaker 1>in the early part of September, as as always. Really

0:39:09.480 --> 0:39:14.080
<v Speaker 1>and I looked at this game, I did a double take.

0:39:14.800 --> 0:39:17.600
<v Speaker 1>I went, I looked at depth charts, I looked at

0:39:17.600 --> 0:39:20.440
<v Speaker 1>some notes that I've taken here in the infancy of

0:39:20.480 --> 0:39:25.160
<v Speaker 1>the preseason. I really like Stanford minus two and a

0:39:25.200 --> 0:39:29.320
<v Speaker 1>half at UCF. It's an interesting matchup. Yeah, I'm sure

0:39:29.920 --> 0:39:32.680
<v Speaker 1>that it's gonna get a ton of attention because it's

0:39:32.719 --> 0:39:36.360
<v Speaker 1>a very interesting non conference game. Let's be honest, Stanford

0:39:36.440 --> 0:39:38.840
<v Speaker 1>is not without some of their own questions. For a

0:39:38.840 --> 0:39:42.560
<v Speaker 1>long time, one of the biggest strengths for Stanford has

0:39:42.560 --> 0:39:45.680
<v Speaker 1>been the offensive line in the running game. Yeah, Bryce

0:39:45.760 --> 0:39:48.440
<v Speaker 1>Love is obviously gone. He's dealing with his own injury

0:39:48.480 --> 0:39:50.960
<v Speaker 1>issues or trying to come back from injury as he

0:39:51.000 --> 0:39:53.080
<v Speaker 1>now moves on into the NFL. And I believe Stanford

0:39:53.200 --> 0:39:55.640
<v Speaker 1>loses something like four or five offensive linemen.

0:39:55.760 --> 0:39:58.360
<v Speaker 2>So, yeah, Walker Little's back. He's probably gonna be a

0:39:58.360 --> 0:39:59.600
<v Speaker 2>top fifteen pick next year.

0:40:00.000 --> 0:40:02.799
<v Speaker 1>Oh, they're sort of retooling. They also lose our boy

0:40:02.880 --> 0:40:05.080
<v Speaker 1>jj arthega white Side.

0:40:05.760 --> 0:40:07.160
<v Speaker 2>Did you get that one right?

0:40:08.480 --> 0:40:10.680
<v Speaker 1>So there are a lot of questions on the Stanford side,

0:40:11.239 --> 0:40:13.839
<v Speaker 1>and UCF will of course be without Mackenzie Milton, who's

0:40:13.840 --> 0:40:16.279
<v Speaker 1>still recovering from his own terrible injury that we saw

0:40:16.320 --> 0:40:17.440
<v Speaker 1>towards the end of last season.

0:40:17.760 --> 0:40:19.080
<v Speaker 2>He's not playing in this game.

0:40:19.120 --> 0:40:21.600
<v Speaker 1>He's not playing in It sucks, but yeah, it does suck.

0:40:21.680 --> 0:40:25.280
<v Speaker 1>Dariel mack will be the quarterback unless he is usurped

0:40:25.280 --> 0:40:28.040
<v Speaker 1>by one Brandon Winbush or someone else on the roster.

0:40:28.239 --> 0:40:32.200
<v Speaker 1>But I like Stanford's chances here. I think this is

0:40:32.239 --> 0:40:36.480
<v Speaker 1>a big game for UCF. It's at is it at home?

0:40:36.520 --> 0:40:37.239
<v Speaker 1>Where's this game?

0:40:37.480 --> 0:40:38.719
<v Speaker 2>It's in Orlando.

0:40:39.160 --> 0:40:40.640
<v Speaker 1>This game is in Orlando.

0:40:41.160 --> 0:40:41.480
<v Speaker 2>M hm.

0:40:42.960 --> 0:40:45.680
<v Speaker 1>A lot working on the UCF side. But Stanford has

0:40:45.719 --> 0:40:48.640
<v Speaker 1>been in these games before. I think they can grind

0:40:48.640 --> 0:40:50.959
<v Speaker 1>it out. I think they can win by a field goal.

0:40:51.080 --> 0:40:52.759
<v Speaker 1>I think they win by more than a field goal.

0:40:52.800 --> 0:40:56.040
<v Speaker 1>I really like kJ Costello. I think they win this

0:40:56.080 --> 0:40:59.200
<v Speaker 1>one going away by seven to ten points over UCF.

0:40:59.440 --> 0:41:02.279
<v Speaker 1>So I'm going to a let's go one hundred k

0:41:02.400 --> 0:41:03.040
<v Speaker 1>on this one.

0:41:03.400 --> 0:41:06.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, no Whiteside, No, Parkinson that you know they're down

0:41:06.640 --> 0:41:11.120
<v Speaker 2>there too. They're two big tight ends. Ah, Stanford's a

0:41:11.120 --> 0:41:14.400
<v Speaker 2>tricky team this year because I love kJ Costello Whiteside

0:41:14.480 --> 0:41:17.719
<v Speaker 2>and that is his name to me. Yeah, and I

0:41:17.760 --> 0:41:20.479
<v Speaker 2>still like UCF. I still like Josh Hypel, I still

0:41:20.520 --> 0:41:23.680
<v Speaker 2>like their ability. Dariel Mack did look, you know, outside

0:41:23.719 --> 0:41:26.520
<v Speaker 2>of some very certain quarters against LSU, but near the

0:41:26.600 --> 0:41:28.160
<v Speaker 2>end of the season when he was thrown into duty,

0:41:28.200 --> 0:41:31.359
<v Speaker 2>he had some huge, huge moments. That's tough for me.

0:41:31.440 --> 0:41:34.000
<v Speaker 2>Stanford has been a slow starter. If I could bet

0:41:34.000 --> 0:41:36.719
<v Speaker 2>against them, is there a line for the Northwestern game? Didn't?

0:41:36.840 --> 0:41:39.839
<v Speaker 2>I know they're at home, so it's not body clock, man.

0:41:39.880 --> 0:41:41.960
<v Speaker 2>I would love to bet Northwestern in that. So the

0:41:42.239 --> 0:41:45.160
<v Speaker 2>case against Stanford against UCF, it's also a second straight

0:41:45.239 --> 0:41:47.880
<v Speaker 2>road game after the USC game, so they could go

0:41:47.880 --> 0:41:50.280
<v Speaker 2>into LA and beat USC and then you're just prime letdown,

0:41:50.320 --> 0:41:53.480
<v Speaker 2>potential confident going into Orlando and they have Oregon the

0:41:53.560 --> 0:41:56.840
<v Speaker 2>following week, I believe. So it's this weird. I wouldn't

0:41:56.840 --> 0:41:58.680
<v Speaker 2>call it a full let down look ahead Sandwich, but

0:41:58.680 --> 0:42:02.520
<v Speaker 2>maybe a let down look ahead slow Okay, yeah, because

0:42:02.560 --> 0:42:04.840
<v Speaker 2>you're going to take UCF on the road. Seriously, of course,

0:42:05.200 --> 0:42:09.040
<v Speaker 2>So I don't love that as much as you do,

0:42:09.200 --> 0:42:11.279
<v Speaker 2>is what I'm saying. I'll have to get closer before

0:42:11.280 --> 0:42:13.400
<v Speaker 2>I fully decide. But that doesn't jump out to me

0:42:13.440 --> 0:42:14.400
<v Speaker 2>in the way it does Free What.

0:42:14.800 --> 0:42:16.799
<v Speaker 1>Jumps out to me about that game, Then we'll move on.

0:42:18.160 --> 0:42:21.960
<v Speaker 1>Even though I have real serious questions about Stanford in

0:42:22.000 --> 0:42:27.280
<v Speaker 1>the trenches, particularly on offense, I still feel like whatever

0:42:27.320 --> 0:42:29.759
<v Speaker 1>they bring in, whoever their new starters are on the

0:42:29.760 --> 0:42:34.480
<v Speaker 1>offensive line, they're going to be able to push against UCF.

0:42:34.480 --> 0:42:38.279
<v Speaker 1>There's been the one knock against UCF. They've gotten better defensively,

0:42:38.360 --> 0:42:41.040
<v Speaker 1>that's where the real gap still exists. They've been able

0:42:41.080 --> 0:42:44.040
<v Speaker 1>to outscore teams, but defensively, if you got a ball

0:42:44.080 --> 0:42:47.839
<v Speaker 1>control team potentially like Stanford who can't control the ball

0:42:47.960 --> 0:42:51.160
<v Speaker 1>can play their game. I think that works their advantage

0:42:51.200 --> 0:42:55.000
<v Speaker 1>in a big way here. So one K Stanford minus

0:42:55.000 --> 0:42:56.719
<v Speaker 1>two and a half second week of the year road

0:42:56.800 --> 0:42:58.160
<v Speaker 1>tilt against UCF.

0:42:59.440 --> 0:43:04.080
<v Speaker 2>Okay, I've got another interesting I'm not going with the

0:43:04.160 --> 0:43:06.360
<v Speaker 2>road team here, but I've got another interesting line. What

0:43:06.360 --> 0:43:09.000
<v Speaker 2>do I have this as? I have this as Oh,

0:43:09.040 --> 0:43:11.120
<v Speaker 2>there's some big money here. You want me to get

0:43:11.160 --> 0:43:12.800
<v Speaker 2>into this two hundred K pick? Or you want me

0:43:12.800 --> 0:43:15.520
<v Speaker 2>to get into one hundred and fifty K win total

0:43:15.920 --> 0:43:18.520
<v Speaker 2>two hundred K. I have Penn State plus four and

0:43:18.560 --> 0:43:22.439
<v Speaker 2>a half at home against Michigan, and I love home

0:43:22.480 --> 0:43:26.000
<v Speaker 2>dogs with promising talented defenses. Tyler, you know this about me.

0:43:26.280 --> 0:43:27.400
<v Speaker 1>I do. So.

0:43:27.480 --> 0:43:30.319
<v Speaker 2>This will be the second straight Michigan road game during

0:43:30.320 --> 0:43:32.160
<v Speaker 2>this part of the schedule, and it's a week before

0:43:32.280 --> 0:43:35.000
<v Speaker 2>Notre Dame. Not to say this is a letdown look

0:43:35.000 --> 0:43:37.240
<v Speaker 2>ahead sandwich for Michigan, but it is a week before

0:43:37.320 --> 0:43:39.919
<v Speaker 2>Notre Dame. And even though Penn State is going through

0:43:39.960 --> 0:43:44.040
<v Speaker 2>a ton of new faces, new ideas whatever on offense,

0:43:44.200 --> 0:43:47.560
<v Speaker 2>with new quarterback, new starting running back, you know, trying

0:43:47.560 --> 0:43:50.880
<v Speaker 2>to get the receiving situation in order around kJ Hammler,

0:43:52.200 --> 0:43:55.000
<v Speaker 2>I still I'm just going to go with the system

0:43:55.080 --> 0:43:58.200
<v Speaker 2>that works for me, and that is taking that good

0:43:58.239 --> 0:44:00.239
<v Speaker 2>talented defense. Penn State by the end of the year

0:44:00.280 --> 0:44:02.080
<v Speaker 2>looked like they had a what top ten, top twelve

0:44:02.160 --> 0:44:05.120
<v Speaker 2>defense nationally? That's right, Yeah, it's good enough for me,

0:44:05.360 --> 0:44:08.160
<v Speaker 2>especially when Michigan loses a ton of pieces on their

0:44:08.160 --> 0:44:11.440
<v Speaker 2>own defense. So I'm I'm gonna roll with that, especially

0:44:11.480 --> 0:44:13.480
<v Speaker 2>with the confidence that some of the guys who played

0:44:13.480 --> 0:44:16.000
<v Speaker 2>in this game the last time it was in Happy Valley.

0:44:16.200 --> 0:44:20.319
<v Speaker 2>Will be playing with because they murdered Michigan two years ago.

0:44:20.480 --> 0:44:21.839
<v Speaker 2>Don't look up what happened last year?

0:44:22.280 --> 0:44:23.399
<v Speaker 1>Interesting? Okay, Dan?

0:44:23.640 --> 0:44:25.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, how do you feel about that? As somebody closer

0:44:26.200 --> 0:44:28.960
<v Speaker 2>and like closer attention to Penn State than I do.

0:44:29.160 --> 0:44:31.759
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I'm pretty high on Michigan this year. Now. I

0:44:31.840 --> 0:44:34.200
<v Speaker 1>did look at that game. I had a hard time

0:44:34.239 --> 0:44:36.840
<v Speaker 1>pulling the trigger. It was intriguing to me because obviously

0:44:36.840 --> 0:44:38.720
<v Speaker 1>we've got to think for home dogs in this program.

0:44:38.840 --> 0:44:39.919
<v Speaker 2>Lous money love a home dog.

0:44:40.000 --> 0:44:43.960
<v Speaker 1>I thought about it. I love their defense. I've got

0:44:44.000 --> 0:44:47.600
<v Speaker 1>some other games here featuring Michigan that I am I

0:44:47.600 --> 0:44:49.759
<v Speaker 1>would say more strongly considering you look.

0:44:49.640 --> 0:44:51.479
<v Speaker 2>At a week three. I looked at that one as well.

0:44:51.840 --> 0:44:56.680
<v Speaker 1>No, oh, okay, I've got one later in the year

0:44:56.680 --> 0:44:58.880
<v Speaker 1>that I'm looking at right now. I'm not sure if

0:44:58.920 --> 0:45:00.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to do it or not. I am going

0:45:00.560 --> 0:45:07.719
<v Speaker 1>to stay within the state of Michigan. Though. Let's go

0:45:08.000 --> 0:45:11.960
<v Speaker 1>back to the well and back to September the fourteenth.

0:45:12.040 --> 0:45:14.120
<v Speaker 2>We better do better do sort of.

0:45:15.600 --> 0:45:21.760
<v Speaker 1>Arizona State plus six. They're getting plus odds at plus

0:45:21.800 --> 0:45:24.960
<v Speaker 1>one oh five, which means again, you put down ten bucks,

0:45:25.880 --> 0:45:28.160
<v Speaker 1>if you win and you get ten to fifty back,

0:45:28.719 --> 0:45:33.799
<v Speaker 1>you'd value ASU plus six. Second week of the year

0:45:33.880 --> 0:45:39.440
<v Speaker 1>at Michigan State. Listen, le, Michigan State could well win

0:45:39.520 --> 0:45:43.160
<v Speaker 1>this game. There's no at home Sidney Slansing tough place

0:45:43.239 --> 0:45:48.640
<v Speaker 1>to win. It's at home weird road tilt for ASU.

0:45:48.960 --> 0:45:51.520
<v Speaker 1>ASU did not let me down. They were not the

0:45:51.640 --> 0:45:55.200
<v Speaker 1>laughing stock last year that I expected them to be

0:45:55.320 --> 0:45:59.520
<v Speaker 1>with the new KERM Edwards model of coaching in college football.

0:46:00.280 --> 0:46:05.120
<v Speaker 1>Actually okay, by and large, right, oh totally.

0:46:05.200 --> 0:46:07.680
<v Speaker 2>I mean they were inconsistent and as soon as they

0:46:07.719 --> 0:46:10.280
<v Speaker 2>looked good, they kind of looked terrible. But that that'll happen.

0:46:10.360 --> 0:46:14.080
<v Speaker 1>They started out really strongly and then fizzled a little bit.

0:46:14.120 --> 0:46:16.719
<v Speaker 1>But by and large, is not a bad debut for

0:46:16.760 --> 0:46:20.680
<v Speaker 1>one Herm Edwards Michigan State. I don't know what happened

0:46:20.719 --> 0:46:21.720
<v Speaker 1>last year in Michigan State.

0:46:22.480 --> 0:46:25.080
<v Speaker 2>I do couldn't move the ball in the correct direction.

0:46:25.440 --> 0:46:28.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what happened in Michigan State last year. Yeah,

0:46:29.080 --> 0:46:33.640
<v Speaker 1>early season tilt strikes me as an ugly game. Six

0:46:33.719 --> 0:46:36.680
<v Speaker 1>points is a lot in a game like that where

0:46:36.719 --> 0:46:39.920
<v Speaker 1>neither team has fully figured themselves out. I'm gonna go

0:46:39.960 --> 0:46:43.520
<v Speaker 1>ASU one hundred K plus the points.

0:46:43.400 --> 0:46:47.240
<v Speaker 2>So Arizona State. They finished the season really well, actually,

0:46:47.560 --> 0:46:49.439
<v Speaker 2>so it was really the middle point, the early middle

0:46:49.440 --> 0:46:53.280
<v Speaker 2>point of the season where they weren't but Herm Edwards

0:46:53.280 --> 0:46:56.040
<v Speaker 2>and his staff inherited what felt like a seventh year

0:46:56.120 --> 0:47:01.120
<v Speaker 2>starting quarterback in Manny Wilkins, the clear best receiver who

0:47:01.120 --> 0:47:03.759
<v Speaker 2>played the entire con the entire year, leaviscu Chnot was

0:47:03.760 --> 0:47:06.200
<v Speaker 2>the best, but in terms of production wise, Nikhil Harry

0:47:06.640 --> 0:47:09.520
<v Speaker 2>was that guy. He's no longer there. So offensively, they're

0:47:09.520 --> 0:47:11.880
<v Speaker 2>gonna look different, and they might be starting a true freshman,

0:47:11.920 --> 0:47:14.120
<v Speaker 2>a talented true freshman, but a true freshman, nonetheless a

0:47:14.200 --> 0:47:20.239
<v Speaker 2>quarterback to go against that defense as what's the spread

0:47:20.280 --> 0:47:24.040
<v Speaker 2>against six and a half seven points, six points? Yeah,

0:47:24.040 --> 0:47:26.799
<v Speaker 2>it's hard to see Michigan State separating themselves with such

0:47:26.800 --> 0:47:31.759
<v Speaker 2>a huge, huge margin for them. But gosh, I'm not

0:47:32.280 --> 0:47:35.200
<v Speaker 2>super crazy about as U yet. I'll need some time

0:47:35.239 --> 0:47:35.520
<v Speaker 2>to talk.

0:47:35.600 --> 0:47:38.320
<v Speaker 1>Look at this one though, he definitely looked at this one.

0:47:38.520 --> 0:47:38.880
<v Speaker 1>I know you.

0:47:39.000 --> 0:47:41.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Well, when you have something as inept as Michigan

0:47:41.719 --> 0:47:45.760
<v Speaker 2>State's offense was last year, that's a tantalizing situation.

0:47:45.840 --> 0:47:48.959
<v Speaker 1>A bet against that's going to be an overlooked game

0:47:49.000 --> 0:47:52.600
<v Speaker 1>two yeah, in week two, but it's it's an interesting matchup,

0:47:52.600 --> 0:47:55.359
<v Speaker 1>at least for Thorks like us. I'm up to eight

0:47:55.440 --> 0:47:58.680
<v Speaker 1>hundred K in bets. All right, I can go one

0:47:58.760 --> 0:48:02.879
<v Speaker 1>big in or two smalls here to close out our

0:48:02.920 --> 0:48:03.439
<v Speaker 1>little show.

0:48:03.960 --> 0:48:08.000
<v Speaker 2>So I have three hundred K left. I've got me

0:48:08.040 --> 0:48:10.480
<v Speaker 2>three fifty. Seven to fifty is what I've got for

0:48:10.560 --> 0:48:14.120
<v Speaker 2>you. You've I've got seven to fifty left, seven fifty okay,

0:48:14.160 --> 0:48:16.400
<v Speaker 2>so all right. I've made seven to fifty, so I

0:48:16.400 --> 0:48:18.600
<v Speaker 2>have two hundred and fifty if my way works out.

0:48:18.680 --> 0:48:21.440
<v Speaker 1>Hold on, I'm not good at math. That's two twenty five,

0:48:22.200 --> 0:48:26.319
<v Speaker 1>three twenty five okay, So you've got six fifty left.

0:48:26.360 --> 0:48:28.080
<v Speaker 2>I've got six fifty okay math.

0:48:28.280 --> 0:48:29.719
<v Speaker 1>Three fifty left? Yeah?

0:48:29.760 --> 0:48:31.160
<v Speaker 2>Sorry, all right, I don't know if you want to

0:48:31.160 --> 0:48:34.879
<v Speaker 2>play the sound hmm there shots.

0:48:37.480 --> 0:48:38.160
<v Speaker 1>Shoot me straight.

0:48:38.200 --> 0:48:41.400
<v Speaker 2>Then when you got value wise, I don't fully believe this,

0:48:41.560 --> 0:48:44.279
<v Speaker 2>but value wise I like it. I've got LSU and

0:48:44.360 --> 0:48:48.920
<v Speaker 2>the under of nine wins, wow, and the under of

0:48:49.040 --> 0:48:52.920
<v Speaker 2>nine wins. I'm going to Texas. I've got one hundred

0:48:52.920 --> 0:48:57.120
<v Speaker 2>and fifty k on this YO. So going to Texas

0:48:58.280 --> 0:48:59.600
<v Speaker 2>Utah State, it won't be as good as they were

0:48:59.680 --> 0:49:04.120
<v Speaker 2>last probably, but we'll see Vanderbilt's fine on the road.

0:49:04.160 --> 0:49:07.200
<v Speaker 2>They should win that. But Florida at Mississippi State, Auburn,

0:49:07.320 --> 0:49:11.760
<v Speaker 2>Alabama that's a rough October early November, and they finished

0:49:11.760 --> 0:49:16.120
<v Speaker 2>with A and M. So best case scenario for LSU,

0:49:16.320 --> 0:49:20.240
<v Speaker 2>they're getting ten wins probably right they're losing something random

0:49:20.239 --> 0:49:22.839
<v Speaker 2>and they're losing at Alabama. That's just how it works now,

0:49:24.320 --> 0:49:26.680
<v Speaker 2>So that's best case. You're beating it by your best

0:49:26.680 --> 0:49:31.320
<v Speaker 2>case is barely covering this. So I think a medium

0:49:31.360 --> 0:49:34.600
<v Speaker 2>case is seven and five. A medium case for LSU

0:49:34.680 --> 0:49:39.239
<v Speaker 2>this year, especially without the heartbeat of their defense from

0:49:39.320 --> 0:49:41.200
<v Speaker 2>last year, I think they'll still be very good up front.

0:49:41.239 --> 0:49:44.680
<v Speaker 2>They recruited incredibly well. Their best cover corner from last season.

0:49:46.080 --> 0:49:46.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't know.

0:49:46.560 --> 0:49:48.279
<v Speaker 2>I like Chris Curry and what he might add to

0:49:48.280 --> 0:49:51.520
<v Speaker 2>the offense, a new running back to run over everybody,

0:49:52.200 --> 0:49:55.839
<v Speaker 2>but that's tough sledding when you add in that tough

0:49:55.880 --> 0:50:00.239
<v Speaker 2>non conference game. So I think there's good value you

0:50:00.320 --> 0:50:02.480
<v Speaker 2>going under nine and going seven to five, eight and four.

0:50:03.239 --> 0:50:05.399
<v Speaker 1>Why do you give me another one? All right? Both

0:50:05.440 --> 0:50:07.720
<v Speaker 1>have this big one. Give me your big one.

0:50:07.600 --> 0:50:11.440
<v Speaker 2>Two hundred k. So the other pick that I had

0:50:11.560 --> 0:50:13.600
<v Speaker 2>at two hundred k was Penn State plus four and

0:50:13.640 --> 0:50:16.520
<v Speaker 2>a half by the way against Michigan. I have Georgia

0:50:16.560 --> 0:50:19.759
<v Speaker 2>winning the national championship at plus seven hundred seven to

0:50:19.760 --> 0:50:23.359
<v Speaker 2>one odds right now for Georgia, which I like a lot.

0:50:23.480 --> 0:50:25.520
<v Speaker 1>So you're really high on Georgia. You weren't kidtens.

0:50:25.800 --> 0:50:28.680
<v Speaker 2>So I'm going home with one point four million dollars

0:50:29.400 --> 0:50:30.120
<v Speaker 2>if this hits.

0:50:31.680 --> 0:50:33.800
<v Speaker 1>I like cut of your jib here how I.

0:50:33.719 --> 0:50:36.880
<v Speaker 2>Really like and I've liked him since since basically the

0:50:36.920 --> 0:50:39.439
<v Speaker 2>Notre Dame game from his freshman year. I love Jake

0:50:39.480 --> 0:50:42.960
<v Speaker 2>from I love the recruiting around him, even though they

0:50:43.000 --> 0:50:47.160
<v Speaker 2>lose key pieces, you know, offensive skill wise and on defense,

0:50:47.239 --> 0:50:51.560
<v Speaker 2>big cogs. I just the talent level is so high

0:50:51.600 --> 0:50:56.080
<v Speaker 2>with Georgia that it makes sense to me that maybe

0:50:56.080 --> 0:50:58.960
<v Speaker 2>Alabama is only an eleven and one team this year,

0:50:59.520 --> 0:51:03.479
<v Speaker 2>and maybe after two years of just doing something either

0:51:03.600 --> 0:51:05.880
<v Speaker 2>boneheaded like they did last year or just giving up

0:51:05.920 --> 0:51:07.800
<v Speaker 2>the perfect play like they did the year before the

0:51:07.880 --> 0:51:10.759
<v Speaker 2>last play of the game. There's something about this year's

0:51:10.840 --> 0:51:14.239
<v Speaker 2>Georgia team, the depth, you know, My big thing is

0:51:14.320 --> 0:51:16.600
<v Speaker 2>quarterback and defense. I like the line in front of

0:51:16.680 --> 0:51:19.000
<v Speaker 2>Jake from a good deal. I don't. They have Notre

0:51:19.080 --> 0:51:22.279
<v Speaker 2>Dame at home, I believe, but that's not Week one

0:51:22.360 --> 0:51:24.280
<v Speaker 2>or two. They have some time to get into a rhythm.

0:51:24.800 --> 0:51:26.480
<v Speaker 2>They go to Tennessee, which I think is going to

0:51:26.560 --> 0:51:29.160
<v Speaker 2>be tricky. They go to Auburn in the rivalry game,

0:51:29.200 --> 0:51:32.000
<v Speaker 2>which not gonna be easy at all. They go to Tech,

0:51:32.040 --> 0:51:33.440
<v Speaker 2>but this is a good year to get Tech as

0:51:33.480 --> 0:51:37.200
<v Speaker 2>they rebuild and retool. I like it. They don't have

0:51:37.239 --> 0:51:41.080
<v Speaker 2>Bama during the regular season and a random crossover they'll

0:51:41.120 --> 0:51:43.799
<v Speaker 2>have to go through, most likely Alabama in the championship game.

0:51:45.239 --> 0:51:49.360
<v Speaker 2>And then I just the elite teams in college football

0:51:49.400 --> 0:51:52.359
<v Speaker 2>don't jump out to me as obvious right now. Who

0:51:52.440 --> 0:51:54.279
<v Speaker 2>is it in the Pac twelve? Who is it in

0:51:54.280 --> 0:51:56.839
<v Speaker 2>the Big twelve? I mean, probably still Oklahoma with their

0:51:56.840 --> 0:51:59.680
<v Speaker 2>recent track record. But you're buying in Jalen Hurts in

0:51:59.719 --> 0:52:03.480
<v Speaker 2>a new system year one. I think Justin Fields is

0:52:03.480 --> 0:52:06.560
<v Speaker 2>going to be a clear step back from Dwayne Haskins.

0:52:06.600 --> 0:52:08.279
<v Speaker 2>I don't think he is a plug and play at all.

0:52:08.520 --> 0:52:12.360
<v Speaker 2>I think I think you're under selling Dwayne haskins specialness

0:52:12.480 --> 0:52:15.040
<v Speaker 2>from last year. If you think that, you know the

0:52:15.080 --> 0:52:18.120
<v Speaker 2>same questions about Michigan still linger. You know, Clemson is

0:52:18.160 --> 0:52:22.120
<v Speaker 2>the clear, clear, clear elite, But I don't know. I

0:52:22.120 --> 0:52:25.120
<v Speaker 2>think there's value there plus seven hundred quarterback and defense

0:52:25.120 --> 0:52:27.879
<v Speaker 2>and talent. Well you know what, Dan and a team

0:52:27.920 --> 0:52:30.120
<v Speaker 2>that's been there recently. They've been there recently. If you're

0:52:30.120 --> 0:52:33.279
<v Speaker 2>getting balls, I feel like I got it's not even

0:52:33.280 --> 0:52:35.239
<v Speaker 2>that balls. Well it's not ballsy, but it's I think

0:52:35.480 --> 0:52:36.800
<v Speaker 2>the third most likely team.

0:52:36.960 --> 0:52:39.759
<v Speaker 1>It's no, it's it's balls because first off, it's not

0:52:39.840 --> 0:52:43.359
<v Speaker 1>Clemson er Alabama, and second right, it's two hundred k

0:52:43.480 --> 0:52:46.480
<v Speaker 1>on seven to one. That's a sure thing they're correct.

0:52:47.920 --> 0:52:50.440
<v Speaker 1>So if you're doing it, I'm gonna do it too.

0:52:50.440 --> 0:52:53.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna break my own rule here. You've taken me

0:52:53.680 --> 0:52:57.600
<v Speaker 1>off my game. Wow, I'm gonna go two hundred large

0:52:57.600 --> 0:52:59.719
<v Speaker 1>on Trevor Lawrence to win the heis minute three and

0:52:59.760 --> 0:53:05.480
<v Speaker 1>a half to one. Now he is the favorite. I

0:53:05.560 --> 0:53:10.040
<v Speaker 1>also openly hate the Heisman Trophy.

0:53:10.080 --> 0:53:11.840
<v Speaker 2>But you like earning money.

0:53:12.080 --> 0:53:17.000
<v Speaker 1>I like earning money, especially fake cliverbal bumps. Yeah, but

0:53:17.320 --> 0:53:19.719
<v Speaker 1>if I win, if I hit this one with my

0:53:19.840 --> 0:53:22.879
<v Speaker 1>two hundred K, that I'm putting on it, that would

0:53:23.000 --> 0:53:26.040
<v Speaker 1>essentially amount to what seven hundred k?

0:53:26.719 --> 0:53:28.279
<v Speaker 2>The math checks out three and a half.

0:53:28.440 --> 0:53:31.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that would fund some of the other losing bets

0:53:31.880 --> 0:53:37.120
<v Speaker 1>that I have most assuredly made. Trevor Lawrences. I have

0:53:37.200 --> 0:53:40.400
<v Speaker 1>been high on Trevor Lawrence ever since he was recruited.

0:53:41.080 --> 0:53:43.920
<v Speaker 1>There was a moment, a brief moment towards the beginning

0:53:43.960 --> 0:53:48.040
<v Speaker 1>part of last year where I wasn't sure, but then

0:53:48.320 --> 0:53:51.040
<v Speaker 1>second half the season he clearly found his own. The

0:53:51.120 --> 0:53:54.480
<v Speaker 1>playoff against Notre Dame, I'm not going to say was

0:53:54.520 --> 0:53:57.120
<v Speaker 1>a coming out party, but it was certainly the biggest

0:53:57.160 --> 0:53:59.440
<v Speaker 1>game we had seen him play in his young career,

0:53:59.600 --> 0:54:02.600
<v Speaker 1>and he didn't miss a beat. They killed Notre Dame

0:54:02.640 --> 0:54:05.239
<v Speaker 1>in that game, and then they killed Alabama in the

0:54:05.320 --> 0:54:08.879
<v Speaker 1>National Championship. He left me so impressed. The only thing

0:54:08.960 --> 0:54:13.320
<v Speaker 1>stopping him from winning more national championships or the Heisman Trophy,

0:54:13.400 --> 0:54:16.359
<v Speaker 1>especially with his receiving corps that he's got coming back

0:54:16.400 --> 0:54:19.239
<v Speaker 1>in twenty nineteen, is probably an injury and no one's

0:54:19.320 --> 0:54:19.959
<v Speaker 1>rooting for that.

0:54:20.719 --> 0:54:22.960
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely correct? Is there? I mean, I'll have to think

0:54:22.960 --> 0:54:24.560
<v Speaker 2>about it and go back. Is there a better duo

0:54:24.880 --> 0:54:28.000
<v Speaker 2>right now than t Higgins? And Justin Ross No, I

0:54:28.000 --> 0:54:31.759
<v Speaker 2>mean individually, maybe Laviska Shenault and Jerry Judy are there.

0:54:32.280 --> 0:54:35.160
<v Speaker 1>No, And then when you factor in Travis Etn out

0:54:35.200 --> 0:54:38.640
<v Speaker 1>of the backfield, who is also also on that list

0:54:38.680 --> 0:54:42.640
<v Speaker 1>of Heisman front runners, it's just a murderer's row of

0:54:42.640 --> 0:54:45.360
<v Speaker 1>offensive weapons for Trevor Lawrence. He's going to have a

0:54:45.360 --> 0:54:47.879
<v Speaker 1>great support system around him. Three and a half to one.

0:54:48.440 --> 0:54:51.799
<v Speaker 1>Not the best value for the Heisman, granted, certainly not

0:54:51.840 --> 0:54:54.600
<v Speaker 1>as good as value as Sam Ellinger. I think I

0:54:54.680 --> 0:54:58.360
<v Speaker 1>talked myself off Trevor Lawrence earlier, but now that I

0:54:58.400 --> 0:55:00.920
<v Speaker 1>see you get in ballsy with it. Two hundred K

0:55:01.040 --> 0:55:04.600
<v Speaker 1>for me on Trevor Lawrence to win the Heisman Trophy

0:55:04.960 --> 0:55:05.439
<v Speaker 1>and that takes.

0:55:05.480 --> 0:55:09.560
<v Speaker 2>So you also have a new look starting defensive line.

0:55:09.560 --> 0:55:11.400
<v Speaker 2>I know they rotate in a ton, so a new

0:55:11.400 --> 0:55:14.480
<v Speaker 2>look starting defensive line, and some key defensive pieces from

0:55:14.520 --> 0:55:17.200
<v Speaker 2>last year also have moved on. They're not dead, they're

0:55:17.239 --> 0:55:22.280
<v Speaker 2>just graduated or moved on to the NFL. We could

0:55:22.320 --> 0:55:26.560
<v Speaker 2>see more. Oh, it's thirty four twenty one halfway through

0:55:26.560 --> 0:55:29.279
<v Speaker 2>the fourth where it would have been thirty four to

0:55:29.320 --> 0:55:33.560
<v Speaker 2>seven poll Trevor Lawrence last year. So there could be

0:55:33.600 --> 0:55:36.600
<v Speaker 2>some stat padding, you know, to get an extra eighty

0:55:36.640 --> 0:55:39.880
<v Speaker 2>three yards laid and touchdown, you know, get an extra

0:55:40.000 --> 0:55:42.400
<v Speaker 2>twenty seven yards on a scramble out of bounds, something

0:55:42.440 --> 0:55:46.160
<v Speaker 2>like that. That it makes sense. I don't think they're

0:55:46.200 --> 0:55:48.000
<v Speaker 2>going to be super aggressive with him because of the

0:55:48.080 --> 0:55:50.560
<v Speaker 2>quarterback depth. Like I said earlier, I think he gets

0:55:50.680 --> 0:55:54.920
<v Speaker 2>old entirely possible. But even still, if his efficiency is

0:55:55.000 --> 0:55:58.480
<v Speaker 2>you know, if he's eleven yards per attempt and he's

0:55:58.560 --> 0:56:01.240
<v Speaker 2>you know, throwing touchdown pass is at an impressive clip,

0:56:01.960 --> 0:56:04.560
<v Speaker 2>as long as the right people know that, he should

0:56:04.560 --> 0:56:08.239
<v Speaker 2>be fine. The thing is, Kyler Murray had enough shootouts

0:56:08.320 --> 0:56:12.160
<v Speaker 2>last year that his efficiency and his total numbers covered

0:56:12.200 --> 0:56:15.560
<v Speaker 2>all bases. And hopefully that's the case with Trevor Lawrence.

0:56:15.600 --> 0:56:17.840
<v Speaker 2>I hope he has just a crazy good year, and

0:56:18.200 --> 0:56:21.280
<v Speaker 2>I think the remake of this this Clemson the remade

0:56:21.280 --> 0:56:23.200
<v Speaker 2>element of this Clemson defense will help him.

0:56:23.560 --> 0:56:26.720
<v Speaker 1>To your point, though from earlier, eight of the last

0:56:26.960 --> 0:56:31.040
<v Speaker 1>nine Heisman trophies have gone to quarterbacks. Yep, outside Trevor

0:56:31.160 --> 0:56:35.439
<v Speaker 1>Lawrence and two a tongue of II loa tonge, you're

0:56:35.480 --> 0:56:39.600
<v Speaker 1>looking at guys like Jalen Hurts. I don't know if

0:56:39.600 --> 0:56:42.560
<v Speaker 1>he's a Heisman caliber quarterback, but.

0:56:42.640 --> 0:56:43.840
<v Speaker 2>He's in a Heisman situation.

0:56:43.880 --> 0:56:46.959
<v Speaker 1>He's in a Heisman situation. I still feel better about

0:56:46.960 --> 0:56:49.040
<v Speaker 1>Trevor Lawrence. You're looking at Jake from who's a very

0:56:49.040 --> 0:56:53.000
<v Speaker 1>good quarterback in his own right, but probably won't have

0:56:53.040 --> 0:56:56.840
<v Speaker 1>the stats of either Trevor Lawrence or Tua right, and

0:56:56.880 --> 0:57:00.000
<v Speaker 1>then outside maybe Sam Ellnger or Boy or Justin hurt

0:57:00.000 --> 0:57:03.399
<v Speaker 1>Herbert your boy. It ain't going to Ian Book, doug Hey,

0:57:03.480 --> 0:57:07.600
<v Speaker 1>Khalil Tate's still around. Khalil Tate's still around. We got

0:57:07.600 --> 0:57:09.719
<v Speaker 1>some names on here that are interesting, but I don't

0:57:09.719 --> 0:57:12.399
<v Speaker 1>think any rise to that level. So give me Trevor

0:57:12.480 --> 0:57:13.520
<v Speaker 1>Lawrence three and a half to one.

0:57:14.120 --> 0:57:16.840
<v Speaker 2>God so boring, I'm looking. I'm gonna give you another

0:57:16.960 --> 0:57:20.800
<v Speaker 2>name just because got it. Kelly Bryan at Maszoo. I

0:57:20.800 --> 0:57:23.400
<v Speaker 2>don't really fully see it. No, with that Ian Book now.

0:57:23.760 --> 0:57:26.120
<v Speaker 1>I really wanted to go Adrian Martinez. The problem with

0:57:26.160 --> 0:57:29.240
<v Speaker 1>Adrian Martinez, though, is that Nebraska would need to be

0:57:29.280 --> 0:57:32.080
<v Speaker 1>at least something of a contender to get real consideration

0:57:32.800 --> 0:57:34.320
<v Speaker 1>for Amart and I don't see that happening.

0:57:34.920 --> 0:57:38.160
<v Speaker 2>That's tough. Well, I mean, the defense could be kind

0:57:38.200 --> 0:57:40.120
<v Speaker 2>of a disaster, but which would mean a lot of

0:57:40.160 --> 0:57:42.760
<v Speaker 2>like fifty to forty seven type games, I guess, but

0:57:42.760 --> 0:57:44.760
<v Speaker 2>that would require the other Big Ten team to score

0:57:44.800 --> 0:57:48.120
<v Speaker 2>them many points. Jonathan Taylor. I think there's decent value

0:57:48.240 --> 0:57:52.120
<v Speaker 2>if the quarterbacks are all sort of mushed together and

0:57:52.160 --> 0:57:56.440
<v Speaker 2>they're all pretty good, but nobody is a spark Jonathan Taylor.

0:57:56.440 --> 0:57:59.480
<v Speaker 2>If he goes for over two thousand yards or and

0:57:59.520 --> 0:58:01.439
<v Speaker 2>does something. I mean he's not in the return game,

0:58:01.440 --> 0:58:04.640
<v Speaker 2>but if he is, that's sort of like, yeah, Derek

0:58:04.760 --> 0:58:07.440
<v Speaker 2>Henry candidate, where this's just not a good quarterback year,

0:58:07.680 --> 0:58:10.320
<v Speaker 2>seeing Wisconsin's pretty good and he just goes for twenty

0:58:10.320 --> 0:58:11.000
<v Speaker 2>three fifty.

0:58:11.320 --> 0:58:14.400
<v Speaker 1>If I could get like ten to one odds fifteen

0:58:14.440 --> 0:58:17.520
<v Speaker 1>to one odds on Rondale Moore going to New York

0:58:18.600 --> 0:58:22.280
<v Speaker 1>being partner the ceremony, yeah, that is a bet that

0:58:22.400 --> 0:58:25.000
<v Speaker 1>might interest me. But at thirty three to one to

0:58:25.080 --> 0:58:27.720
<v Speaker 1>win it with all the AMMO in front of him,

0:58:27.720 --> 0:58:28.440
<v Speaker 1>it ain't happening.

0:58:29.360 --> 0:58:31.520
<v Speaker 2>I saw Notre Dame and I think it's nine and

0:58:31.520 --> 0:58:34.960
<v Speaker 2>a half right over under win total. Yes, how did

0:58:35.040 --> 0:58:38.600
<v Speaker 2>you feel about that? Because it was interesting to me

0:58:38.640 --> 0:58:40.960
<v Speaker 2>because I, on one hand, I feel like they are

0:58:41.000 --> 0:58:46.320
<v Speaker 2>built to They've had so much regular season success, but

0:58:46.520 --> 0:58:49.040
<v Speaker 2>they lose what the premier dude at every level on

0:58:49.080 --> 0:58:52.000
<v Speaker 2>their defense. They lose what Julian Love and Drew Tranquill

0:58:52.160 --> 0:58:54.840
<v Speaker 2>and Jerry Tillery like big, big deal names for Notre

0:58:54.920 --> 0:58:55.600
<v Speaker 2>Dame's defense.

0:58:55.800 --> 0:59:01.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I'm looking at the schedule now. Yeah, the Georgia

0:59:01.360 --> 0:59:04.560
<v Speaker 1>game terrifies me, as a Michigan game on the road

0:59:05.000 --> 0:59:08.560
<v Speaker 1>terrifies me. And Stanford on the road last game of

0:59:08.600 --> 0:59:11.760
<v Speaker 1>the year should concern every Notre Dame Fame because they

0:59:11.760 --> 0:59:13.960
<v Speaker 1>always yeah, yeah, when it's in pala Azto, for sure,

0:59:13.960 --> 0:59:17.520
<v Speaker 1>they always sleeves that freaking game. So this is not

0:59:18.160 --> 0:59:20.000
<v Speaker 1>the schedule we saw last year. This is a much

0:59:20.000 --> 0:59:24.680
<v Speaker 1>more difficult schedule. The road tilts at Michigan and Georgia

0:59:24.720 --> 0:59:27.960
<v Speaker 1>are going to be bloodbass. Plus you've got a game

0:59:28.000 --> 0:59:31.560
<v Speaker 1>in there against usc m H. You got a game

0:59:31.600 --> 0:59:33.360
<v Speaker 1>in there against Virginia Tech. I don't know if Virginia

0:59:33.400 --> 0:59:34.160
<v Speaker 1>Tech's gonna look like this.

0:59:34.200 --> 0:59:37.120
<v Speaker 2>Are they going to start Braxton Burmeister? Is that what

0:59:37.160 --> 0:59:38.640
<v Speaker 2>I am understanding at this moment.

0:59:38.760 --> 0:59:41.400
<v Speaker 1>I hope not, But I would enjoy saying the name again.

0:59:41.440 --> 0:59:43.360
<v Speaker 2>I would love if he's just awesome. That'd be such

0:59:43.400 --> 0:59:45.720
<v Speaker 2>a cool story. Maybe just Oregon just wasn't for him,

0:59:46.160 --> 0:59:49.520
<v Speaker 2>and he's just he finds himself in Blacksburg.

0:59:49.560 --> 0:59:52.560
<v Speaker 1>Who knows there's a sneaky Virginia game in here nine

0:59:52.600 --> 0:59:53.960
<v Speaker 1>and a half right now.

0:59:54.840 --> 0:59:57.200
<v Speaker 2>Oh man, that Virginia game. If Notre Dame beats Georgia

0:59:57.320 --> 0:59:59.040
<v Speaker 2>in Athens losing a.

0:59:59.040 --> 1:00:02.439
<v Speaker 1>Virginia huge letdown game, I would be inclined to say

1:00:02.520 --> 1:00:04.600
<v Speaker 1>nine to three at this point. I would not want

1:00:04.600 --> 1:00:05.040
<v Speaker 1>to touch.

1:00:04.920 --> 1:00:05.960
<v Speaker 2>That slight under.

1:00:06.120 --> 1:00:08.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I would not want to go over nine and

1:00:08.480 --> 1:00:08.840
<v Speaker 1>a half.

1:00:09.080 --> 1:00:13.920
<v Speaker 2>So Georgia, Michigan, Stanford. Yeah, they've got BC the week

1:00:14.040 --> 1:00:17.400
<v Speaker 2>after Navy, which is your other traditional big fear game,

1:00:18.520 --> 1:00:20.600
<v Speaker 2>so no week off there. I was looking at Wisconsin.

1:00:21.320 --> 1:00:23.880
<v Speaker 2>Wisconsin's plus money at home. I believe they're at home

1:00:23.920 --> 1:00:27.360
<v Speaker 2>against Michigan this year, and that is after Michigan plays Army.

1:00:27.480 --> 1:00:29.920
<v Speaker 2>But Michigan has a bye week. So that's the only

1:00:29.960 --> 1:00:32.200
<v Speaker 2>reason I didn't go with that. All right, So here's

1:00:32.200 --> 1:00:32.680
<v Speaker 2>what we got.

1:00:32.680 --> 1:00:35.560
<v Speaker 1>You've got stem Melinger at sixteen to one to win

1:00:35.600 --> 1:00:41.160
<v Speaker 1>the Heisman, Nebraska under eight wins USC over seven and

1:00:41.160 --> 1:00:46.640
<v Speaker 1>a half, Auburn plus nine against Georgia. Penn stayed at

1:00:46.680 --> 1:00:51.120
<v Speaker 1>home plus four and a half against Michigan LSU under

1:00:51.240 --> 1:00:54.480
<v Speaker 1>nine wins, and then to close it out your dogs

1:00:54.720 --> 1:00:57.360
<v Speaker 1>at seven to one to win the national championship. For me,

1:00:58.120 --> 1:01:02.640
<v Speaker 1>I've got Oklahoma State over the win totally six wins.

1:01:03.120 --> 1:01:07.280
<v Speaker 1>I've got Clemson over eleven wins. I've got Florida State

1:01:07.360 --> 1:01:10.200
<v Speaker 1>over seven and a half wins, Oregon plus one over

1:01:10.320 --> 1:01:13.840
<v Speaker 1>USC Stanford minus two and a half on the road

1:01:13.880 --> 1:01:17.600
<v Speaker 1>second week of the year over UCF. I've got Arizona

1:01:17.640 --> 1:01:20.439
<v Speaker 1>State also second week of the year plus six at

1:01:20.440 --> 1:01:23.720
<v Speaker 1>Michigan State. And then to close it out, got ballsy,

1:01:23.760 --> 1:01:26.360
<v Speaker 1>but not all that ballsy, going with Trevor Lawrence two

1:01:26.480 --> 1:01:28.880
<v Speaker 1>hundred k three and a half to one to win

1:01:28.880 --> 1:01:29.720
<v Speaker 1>the Heisman Trophy.

1:01:30.000 --> 1:01:32.800
<v Speaker 2>Not balls at all. You went with the favorite, not

1:01:32.920 --> 1:01:37.040
<v Speaker 2>balls at all. Can I tell you something that has

1:01:37.040 --> 1:01:39.760
<v Speaker 2>been buzzing me for weeks please, and it's solid verbal related.

1:01:39.800 --> 1:01:41.800
<v Speaker 2>Before we got I do it, you did not do

1:01:41.840 --> 1:01:45.600
<v Speaker 2>it at all. I neglected to include something on our

1:01:45.640 --> 1:01:48.720
<v Speaker 2>Hot and Bothered episode. Yes that every time I think

1:01:48.760 --> 1:01:50.480
<v Speaker 2>about it, because there's a file on my computer. We

1:01:50.480 --> 1:01:52.720
<v Speaker 2>don't need to play the file. But our Hot and

1:01:52.760 --> 1:01:58.360
<v Speaker 2>Bothered episode was basically game things, something that happens. Sorry,

1:01:58.680 --> 1:02:01.920
<v Speaker 2>thank you. So that's great game things that we just

1:02:02.000 --> 1:02:06.000
<v Speaker 2>get excited about. We just like it could be happening

1:02:06.000 --> 1:02:10.080
<v Speaker 2>in any game. And if it happens, whether it's you know,

1:02:10.360 --> 1:02:14.160
<v Speaker 2>a defensive back celebrating after giving up a twenty three

1:02:14.240 --> 1:02:17.439
<v Speaker 2>yard huge pass but he has a huge hit, that's

1:02:17.480 --> 1:02:19.640
<v Speaker 2>just like, it's so fun and ridiculous. How can you

1:02:19.680 --> 1:02:21.560
<v Speaker 2>not love it? Some of them are genuine, some of

1:02:21.600 --> 1:02:24.400
<v Speaker 2>them are sort of petty, like that mine is genuine.

1:02:24.800 --> 1:02:28.080
<v Speaker 2>And I forgot to mention when a team has fourth

1:02:28.080 --> 1:02:31.920
<v Speaker 2>in inches in an enormous moment and they line up

1:02:31.920 --> 1:02:34.440
<v Speaker 2>in some sort of jumbo package, like they have two

1:02:34.520 --> 1:02:36.840
<v Speaker 2>defensive linemen in as fullbacks whatever, and they're just going

1:02:36.880 --> 1:02:40.520
<v Speaker 2>to do everything possible to get those you know, that

1:02:40.560 --> 1:02:43.000
<v Speaker 2>foot and a half whatever it is, and they do.

1:02:43.080 --> 1:02:47.080
<v Speaker 2>They play action and somebody's wide open behind the defense's

1:02:47.160 --> 1:02:48.960
<v Speaker 2>cover zero or something, and it goes for like a

1:02:49.000 --> 1:02:53.840
<v Speaker 2>seventy one yard play, the James Brown play. Do you

1:02:53.840 --> 1:02:54.280
<v Speaker 2>remember this?

1:02:54.520 --> 1:02:54.680
<v Speaker 1>Yes?

1:02:54.720 --> 1:02:58.479
<v Speaker 2>And the Big twelve Championship ever, way way back when

1:02:59.520 --> 1:03:03.600
<v Speaker 2>was so so damn great that I went back and

1:03:03.680 --> 1:03:06.800
<v Speaker 2>watched the clip a million and a half times and

1:03:07.480 --> 1:03:12.000
<v Speaker 2>that to me when a team just has giant, giant

1:03:12.120 --> 1:03:16.120
<v Speaker 2>kohones in a spot like that. Sometimes the naked bootleg,

1:03:16.360 --> 1:03:18.120
<v Speaker 2>that's great, like when Alex Smith did it against I

1:03:18.160 --> 1:03:20.040
<v Speaker 2>think it was the Saints in the playoffs in the NFL.

1:03:20.480 --> 1:03:24.840
<v Speaker 2>That's pretty great. But that little pass, that little flick

1:03:24.880 --> 1:03:27.520
<v Speaker 2>when it looks like they're just going to throw ten

1:03:27.640 --> 1:03:30.720
<v Speaker 2>thousand rhinos at the line of scrimmage. Yeah, that's my

1:03:30.800 --> 1:03:34.320
<v Speaker 2>favorite thing. That's my favorite favorite thing. And I forgot

1:03:34.320 --> 1:03:36.360
<v Speaker 2>to mention that during the show, and I wanted to

1:03:36.400 --> 1:03:38.960
<v Speaker 2>make sure everybody knew just how hot and bothered that

1:03:39.000 --> 1:03:40.960
<v Speaker 2>made me think it was against Nebraska, right.

1:03:40.920 --> 1:03:45.120
<v Speaker 1>Yes, yes, I also have one. Okay, wow, it's not

1:03:45.280 --> 1:03:47.880
<v Speaker 1>nearly a spicy I've actually been thinking about it for

1:03:47.960 --> 1:03:51.480
<v Speaker 1>a couple of weeks now. M It's an aesthetically pleasing

1:03:51.520 --> 1:03:51.960
<v Speaker 1>thing to me.

1:03:52.480 --> 1:03:53.280
<v Speaker 2>Oh that's fine.

1:03:53.800 --> 1:03:57.480
<v Speaker 1>Tiger Stadium at LSU, yep, they have the numbers every

1:03:57.520 --> 1:03:58.680
<v Speaker 1>five yards instead of ten.

1:03:59.400 --> 1:03:59.960
<v Speaker 2>I do like that.

1:04:01.000 --> 1:04:02.480
<v Speaker 1>It's just different. It's unique.

1:04:02.760 --> 1:04:04.240
<v Speaker 2>I like that a lot. And you know what else

1:04:04.280 --> 1:04:05.840
<v Speaker 2>I like about the field. If we're going to talk

1:04:05.840 --> 1:04:08.720
<v Speaker 2>about the field at Tiger Stadium and Death Valley, I

1:04:08.800 --> 1:04:10.960
<v Speaker 2>love how the middle of the field is that I

1:04:11.400 --> 1:04:12.520
<v Speaker 2>I have the Tiger, but.

1:04:12.760 --> 1:04:14.680
<v Speaker 1>With a little Grady and effect on it. It's nice.

1:04:14.800 --> 1:04:16.800
<v Speaker 2>They blended so well. I don't know.

1:04:16.960 --> 1:04:18.480
<v Speaker 1>I need to know how they do that.

1:04:19.320 --> 1:04:22.400
<v Speaker 2>I have to think about my favorite fields in a

1:04:22.400 --> 1:04:26.040
<v Speaker 2>pretty serious way because I fancy myself a college football

1:04:26.040 --> 1:04:26.600
<v Speaker 2>Do you want to do.

1:04:26.560 --> 1:04:28.120
<v Speaker 1>Our favorite fields episode?

1:04:28.200 --> 1:04:31.400
<v Speaker 2>We could do, God, just just a full episode dedicated

1:04:31.440 --> 1:04:32.120
<v Speaker 2>to aesthetics.

1:04:32.200 --> 1:04:32.680
<v Speaker 1>We could get it.

1:04:32.760 --> 1:04:34.439
<v Speaker 2>Yes, we can get a audience show.

1:04:34.520 --> 1:04:36.320
<v Speaker 1>We could get people on this show that would actually

1:04:36.320 --> 1:04:37.760
<v Speaker 1>that's true a conversation.

1:04:38.560 --> 1:04:40.840
<v Speaker 2>I think LSU has my favorite field, but I'm gonna

1:04:40.880 --> 1:04:42.760
<v Speaker 2>have to give it. I'm not willing to fully commit

1:04:42.800 --> 1:04:45.160
<v Speaker 2>to that, all right. I love I love the every

1:04:45.160 --> 1:04:46.360
<v Speaker 2>five yard things. That's a great call.

1:04:46.520 --> 1:04:50.720
<v Speaker 1>Every five yards. The checkerboard at Neiland Stateiu's pretty cool too,

1:04:50.920 --> 1:04:52.040
<v Speaker 1>But I'm rewatching.

1:04:52.160 --> 1:04:54.960
<v Speaker 2>So as I described they call it role left. This

1:04:55.120 --> 1:04:58.440
<v Speaker 2>huge play, there are two, not one, but two fullbacks

1:04:58.440 --> 1:05:02.960
<v Speaker 2>in for Texas. Every single member of the Nebraska defense

1:05:03.440 --> 1:05:07.080
<v Speaker 2>is within Let's see, the safety is about four yards back,

1:05:07.560 --> 1:05:10.200
<v Speaker 2>so the safety is barely in at a linebacker depth,

1:05:10.960 --> 1:05:15.200
<v Speaker 2>and James Brown rolls out but doesn't even really sell

1:05:15.240 --> 1:05:19.400
<v Speaker 2>the handoff, rolls away from his strong side. And when

1:05:19.880 --> 1:05:22.120
<v Speaker 2>got number eighty two, I apologize for not knowing who

1:05:22.160 --> 1:05:26.560
<v Speaker 2>caught this pass. When he catches it, he's lidecying Nebraska.

1:05:26.600 --> 1:05:30.840
<v Speaker 2>There is not a Nebraska player in the frame. Nebraska

1:05:30.920 --> 1:05:33.440
<v Speaker 2>is the field goal block. They essentially went with the

1:05:33.560 --> 1:05:35.400
<v Speaker 2>NC doble, and you know, good for Nebraska. I think

1:05:35.440 --> 1:05:37.560
<v Speaker 2>they got him down around the five yard line. Ten

1:05:37.680 --> 1:05:41.480
<v Speaker 2>yard line, so great, But man was out a thing.

1:05:41.800 --> 1:05:45.800
<v Speaker 2>Whenever somebody gets lidcied, it's beautiful, all right, Well it

1:05:45.880 --> 1:05:46.480
<v Speaker 2>was bothering me.

1:05:47.040 --> 1:05:51.560
<v Speaker 1>Soliverbo at gmail dot com is as always the email address.

1:05:51.960 --> 1:05:54.640
<v Speaker 1>Don't forget to follow us if you haven't already on Twitter,

1:05:54.680 --> 1:05:58.120
<v Speaker 1>on Facebook, on Instagram, and if you're really into the show,

1:05:59.080 --> 1:06:01.479
<v Speaker 1>really into the show, going out to Reddit dot com

1:06:01.480 --> 1:06:05.240
<v Speaker 1>slash Yeah, slash solid. It is started by it is

1:06:05.320 --> 1:06:09.400
<v Speaker 1>run by our favorite verballers. We pop in from time

1:06:09.440 --> 1:06:12.160
<v Speaker 1>to time to say hello yeah, and of course you

1:06:12.200 --> 1:06:14.360
<v Speaker 1>want to get more info on the forthcoming shirts and

1:06:14.360 --> 1:06:17.040
<v Speaker 1>all the other cool stuff we're cooking up. Going out

1:06:17.080 --> 1:06:19.600
<v Speaker 1>to the site at soliverbal dot com. Fill out the

1:06:19.680 --> 1:06:23.040
<v Speaker 1>form join our newsletter of intent. We promise not to

1:06:23.080 --> 1:06:27.120
<v Speaker 1>spam you, Daniel. That's all I got man all right,

1:06:27.200 --> 1:06:30.960
<v Speaker 1>same here, fun show tonight. Yeah, I will do my

1:06:31.000 --> 1:06:34.800
<v Speaker 1>best to try and list out these picks somewhere. Surely

1:06:34.920 --> 1:06:37.200
<v Speaker 1>no one really cares other than us.

1:06:37.560 --> 1:06:39.560
<v Speaker 2>Let's see who makes more money, though, But let's.

1:06:39.360 --> 1:06:41.960
<v Speaker 1>See who makes more fake, solid verbal dollars For that

1:06:42.000 --> 1:06:45.960
<v Speaker 1>guy over there, my good friend Dan Rubinstein. For myself,

1:06:46.160 --> 1:06:48.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm Tie hilden Brand over here in eastern Pennsylvania. Will

1:06:48.600 --> 1:06:53.040
<v Speaker 1>catch you all next week. In the meantime, stay solid, hey,