WEBVTT - Trump's Decisive Victory: What Does It Tell Us and What Comes Next?

0:00:03.120 --> 0:00:18.520
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio News. Welcome to our twenty

0:00:18.560 --> 0:00:22.320
<v Speaker 1>twenty four US election edition of voter Nomics, the Bloomberg

0:00:22.360 --> 0:00:26.560
<v Speaker 1>podcast where politics and economics collide. All year, we've been

0:00:26.600 --> 0:00:29.080
<v Speaker 1>talking about how voters around the world have the ability

0:00:29.120 --> 0:00:33.440
<v Speaker 1>to affect markets, countries, and economies like never before. We're

0:00:33.440 --> 0:00:36.800
<v Speaker 1>going to focus on arguably the biggest of them all,

0:00:37.040 --> 0:00:41.239
<v Speaker 1>the American election. As we speak, victory has just been

0:00:41.280 --> 0:00:44.920
<v Speaker 1>called for Donald Trump. It came as he won Wisconsin.

0:00:45.360 --> 0:00:49.160
<v Speaker 1>The SMP five hundred reacted positively, did the News, as

0:00:49.200 --> 0:00:53.599
<v Speaker 1>did companies like Tesla. Donald Trump's fellow Republicans won control

0:00:53.720 --> 0:00:56.240
<v Speaker 1>of the Senate, and in every state where most votes

0:00:56.280 --> 0:01:00.000
<v Speaker 1>had been counted, Trump's performance was stronger than in twenty twenty.

0:01:00.520 --> 0:01:03.440
<v Speaker 1>So on today's Votomics, we're sharing an episode from The

0:01:03.440 --> 0:01:07.479
<v Speaker 1>Big Take podcast, Bloomberg's daily podcast, which features in depth

0:01:07.600 --> 0:01:11.319
<v Speaker 1>original reporting from around the globe. In their quick reaction

0:01:11.600 --> 0:01:15.640
<v Speaker 1>US election special, Big Take hosts Sarah Holder and Bloomberg's

0:01:15.640 --> 0:01:20.120
<v Speaker 1>Wendy Benjaminson break down how election Day played out and

0:01:20.160 --> 0:01:23.440
<v Speaker 1>get reactions from around the world, plus what we can

0:01:23.520 --> 0:01:27.560
<v Speaker 1>expect from a second Trump administration. But before all of that,

0:01:27.920 --> 0:01:29.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm a Lego Stratton and I made.

0:01:29.600 --> 0:01:31.199
<v Speaker 2>Room waldron Oge.

0:01:31.400 --> 0:01:32.360
<v Speaker 1>Did you get any sleep?

0:01:32.640 --> 0:01:36.120
<v Speaker 2>I didn't. Actually, I was very foolish because I started

0:01:36.200 --> 0:01:40.080
<v Speaker 2>just looking at my twitter feed, x feed, whatever you

0:01:40.160 --> 0:01:43.120
<v Speaker 2>want to call it, at about midnight, and that I

0:01:43.120 --> 0:01:47.319
<v Speaker 2>did a musk feed and I didn't stop, unfortunately, until

0:01:47.440 --> 0:01:49.720
<v Speaker 2>until about four point thirty five in the morning. I

0:01:49.800 --> 0:01:52.480
<v Speaker 2>just I just I just kept going because what we

0:01:52.480 --> 0:01:55.600
<v Speaker 2>were seeing in real time was a very surprising story.

0:01:56.480 --> 0:01:58.800
<v Speaker 1>Because it wasn't night Federal Quintine exactly.

0:01:58.840 --> 0:02:02.800
<v Speaker 2>I mean, we people had expect did either Harris victory

0:02:03.200 --> 0:02:05.840
<v Speaker 2>or a very very close election, which we'd still be

0:02:05.920 --> 0:02:08.720
<v Speaker 2>litigating at the moment, And what we saw was clear,

0:02:09.120 --> 0:02:11.360
<v Speaker 2>was very clear, and it was a clear Trump victory.

0:02:11.480 --> 0:02:14.760
<v Speaker 2>I don't think many pundits were expecting that at all.

0:02:14.960 --> 0:02:18.440
<v Speaker 1>And the inquest started very quickly as well, certainly in

0:02:18.480 --> 0:02:23.640
<v Speaker 1>the corresponds, I was getting around how did the left

0:02:23.760 --> 0:02:27.720
<v Speaker 1>or Democrats misjudge this, and whether or not it's worse

0:02:27.760 --> 0:02:30.680
<v Speaker 1>for them than the Hillary Clinton defeat. I mean, certainly

0:02:30.720 --> 0:02:34.320
<v Speaker 1>that sense that America wasn't yet ready for a female president,

0:02:34.520 --> 0:02:36.400
<v Speaker 1>whether or not that is the take home point in

0:02:36.440 --> 0:02:40.960
<v Speaker 1>the days ahead, but it feels that there's questions around

0:02:40.960 --> 0:02:43.440
<v Speaker 1>gender as well as questions around whether she was the

0:02:43.520 --> 0:02:44.160
<v Speaker 1>right candidate.

0:02:44.440 --> 0:02:46.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, we had a very peculiar sort of set of

0:02:46.280 --> 0:02:50.320
<v Speaker 2>expectations because Kamala Harris did very well in the debate

0:02:50.480 --> 0:02:53.840
<v Speaker 2>with Trump and her stocks rose, and in the last

0:02:53.960 --> 0:02:56.480
<v Speaker 2>few days before the vote, it looked as though she

0:02:56.560 --> 0:03:00.000
<v Speaker 2>was really regaining momentum, partly because of the Madison Square

0:03:00.200 --> 0:03:04.280
<v Speaker 2>Gardens absurdities, and probably because Trump seemed to be losing

0:03:04.360 --> 0:03:07.520
<v Speaker 2>a bit of his focus and flair. But clearly that

0:03:07.639 --> 0:03:11.119
<v Speaker 2>was absolutely wrong. One of the big stories of this

0:03:11.400 --> 0:03:16.840
<v Speaker 2>election is that the democratic notion of what democratic politics

0:03:16.880 --> 0:03:20.680
<v Speaker 2>is about has been exploded. They have basically been an

0:03:20.720 --> 0:03:26.160
<v Speaker 2>alliance between the educated, upper middle class elite and various

0:03:26.160 --> 0:03:28.760
<v Speaker 2>ethnic minorities. And their assumption was that they could just

0:03:28.880 --> 0:03:32.240
<v Speaker 2>keep adding ethnic minorities. They've got a big advantage with

0:03:32.400 --> 0:03:34.639
<v Speaker 2>black voters, and they could just add more and more

0:03:34.639 --> 0:03:37.800
<v Speaker 2>and more Latinos or whoever was coming in, and that's

0:03:37.840 --> 0:03:43.000
<v Speaker 2>clearly not the case. You saw Black voters voting in

0:03:43.640 --> 0:03:46.880
<v Speaker 2>surprising numbers for Trump, you saw Latino voters voting in

0:03:47.080 --> 0:03:52.120
<v Speaker 2>very surprising numbers for Trump, and Asian voters also shifting

0:03:52.200 --> 0:03:55.560
<v Speaker 2>in some significant ways. We haven't seen numbers like this since,

0:03:55.720 --> 0:03:58.760
<v Speaker 2>you know, for the Latino since since George W. Bush.

0:03:58.960 --> 0:04:02.960
<v Speaker 2>And that's as really skewered the whole way of thinking

0:04:03.160 --> 0:04:05.680
<v Speaker 2>of Democrats, because Democrats tend to think of these people

0:04:05.720 --> 0:04:08.800
<v Speaker 2>as being exploited, as being victims, as in some way

0:04:08.840 --> 0:04:12.920
<v Speaker 2>being marginal. They certainly think of the immigration issue cutting

0:04:13.440 --> 0:04:16.080
<v Speaker 2>in favor of the Democrats, and this hasn't happened. I

0:04:16.120 --> 0:04:20.240
<v Speaker 2>think it's partly because class is the overriding thing. And

0:04:20.640 --> 0:04:24.960
<v Speaker 2>I think that what the liberal elite, hyper educated, hyperwoke,

0:04:25.839 --> 0:04:29.120
<v Speaker 2>very status conscious liberal elite has done is it's basically

0:04:29.200 --> 0:04:32.839
<v Speaker 2>driven the white working class out of the Democratic coalition.

0:04:32.839 --> 0:04:35.560
<v Speaker 2>They've shifted to the Republicans. And now it's doing exactly

0:04:35.560 --> 0:04:39.600
<v Speaker 2>the same thing for ethnic minorities, slowly but very significantly.

0:04:39.839 --> 0:04:41.839
<v Speaker 1>So if we just take the helicopter view of what

0:04:41.920 --> 0:04:44.280
<v Speaker 1>this podcast why You and I and Stephanie when she's

0:04:44.279 --> 0:04:46.520
<v Speaker 1>with us, have been discussing over the last year, through

0:04:46.640 --> 0:04:49.160
<v Speaker 1>lots of ballots, lots of different elections, is this or

0:04:49.200 --> 0:04:52.200
<v Speaker 1>not since this fact that incumbents have struggled, is this

0:04:52.320 --> 0:04:55.440
<v Speaker 1>that trend playing out? Kamala Harris came in, took over

0:04:55.480 --> 0:04:59.040
<v Speaker 1>from Biden, ran very, very tight and well executed hundred

0:04:59.080 --> 0:05:02.360
<v Speaker 1>days the less probably realized too late she had to

0:05:02.440 --> 0:05:05.440
<v Speaker 1>convey that she was changed. She didn't manage to do that.

0:05:05.600 --> 0:05:08.719
<v Speaker 1>So my question is was it just she felt foul

0:05:08.800 --> 0:05:11.920
<v Speaker 1>of that tide that is beating up on the incumbent,

0:05:11.920 --> 0:05:14.279
<v Speaker 1>by which we mean the people in power they just

0:05:14.680 --> 0:05:17.680
<v Speaker 1>the electra and not feeling they're benefiting doing well enough

0:05:17.760 --> 0:05:20.400
<v Speaker 1>out of it. Or was it actually she wasn't good

0:05:20.480 --> 0:05:21.599
<v Speaker 1>enough or was it both?

0:05:21.760 --> 0:05:26.560
<v Speaker 2>I think economic discontent and inflation underlay this. People just

0:05:26.880 --> 0:05:30.280
<v Speaker 2>felt poorer and they felt angry because they felt poorer.

0:05:30.440 --> 0:05:32.640
<v Speaker 2>But there are a lot of important cultural issues as well.

0:05:32.680 --> 0:05:35.960
<v Speaker 2>There was the immigration issue that people felt that Biden

0:05:36.120 --> 0:05:39.800
<v Speaker 2>and Harris, by implication, had not taken that seriously enough.

0:05:40.000 --> 0:05:42.400
<v Speaker 2>And there's a sort of set of cultural issues that

0:05:42.640 --> 0:05:45.960
<v Speaker 2>also motivated people to sern that you might feel grumpy

0:05:46.000 --> 0:05:48.560
<v Speaker 2>and angry about inflation, but do you go to rallies

0:05:48.600 --> 0:05:51.880
<v Speaker 2>and cheer. Do you really turn out and wave banners

0:05:52.000 --> 0:05:55.160
<v Speaker 2>just because you're angry about the economy. I think Trump

0:05:55.279 --> 0:05:59.240
<v Speaker 2>was motivating a lot of resentment about the way a

0:05:59.360 --> 0:06:01.839
<v Speaker 2>very insula to the elite has been running the country

0:06:01.839 --> 0:06:05.440
<v Speaker 2>in ways that go against the opinions of large numbers

0:06:05.440 --> 0:06:08.560
<v Speaker 2>of people. So yes, underlying it all inflation and the

0:06:08.600 --> 0:06:12.839
<v Speaker 2>economy driving all of this, but we're a very rich man.

0:06:12.920 --> 0:06:17.520
<v Speaker 1>He's incredibly successful at conveying the the underdog, and it's

0:06:17.800 --> 0:06:20.760
<v Speaker 1>it's both economic, but it's also a vibe he has

0:06:20.960 --> 0:06:25.480
<v Speaker 1>that he just cuts through the blandness of the political establishment.

0:06:25.480 --> 0:06:30.880
<v Speaker 2>So you have a very sort of twee cultivated, cerebral,

0:06:31.240 --> 0:06:34.440
<v Speaker 2>rather bossy political elite out there, and you have this

0:06:34.720 --> 0:06:38.360
<v Speaker 2>vulgan we do, we do, but you have this vulgar,

0:06:38.640 --> 0:06:43.400
<v Speaker 2>boisterous man and people identify with him. They more identified

0:06:43.680 --> 0:06:45.359
<v Speaker 2>with him rather than with the Harvard yachts than in

0:06:45.400 --> 0:06:49.520
<v Speaker 2>the nineteenth century. And he's brilliant at summing up big

0:06:49.560 --> 0:06:52.680
<v Speaker 2>things in small phrases. I mean, make America great again.

0:06:52.720 --> 0:06:55.040
<v Speaker 2>It's just such a powerful thing. He's a demagogue.

0:06:55.200 --> 0:06:58.640
<v Speaker 1>Just on this question about Kamala Harris and the kind

0:06:58.680 --> 0:07:02.400
<v Speaker 1>of aloofness, did she do everything she possibly could?

0:07:02.600 --> 0:07:05.120
<v Speaker 2>I thought she was a terribly weak candidate in the

0:07:05.200 --> 0:07:08.520
<v Speaker 2>sense that she didn't really have a set of policies

0:07:08.560 --> 0:07:11.040
<v Speaker 2>and a gender. She did very well in the debate,

0:07:11.360 --> 0:07:13.800
<v Speaker 2>and then she sort of fizzled out. If you don't

0:07:13.880 --> 0:07:17.320
<v Speaker 2>present a compelling message as to why you should be

0:07:17.400 --> 0:07:19.880
<v Speaker 2>voted for, and if you don't present a set of

0:07:19.920 --> 0:07:23.120
<v Speaker 2>policies to solve people's problems, particularly the problem of the border,

0:07:23.360 --> 0:07:26.080
<v Speaker 2>then it looks as though you assume that you should

0:07:26.080 --> 0:07:28.320
<v Speaker 2>be voted for just because of the person that you are.

0:07:28.600 --> 0:07:32.120
<v Speaker 2>Now we go back to Biden. Had Biden stepped down

0:07:32.320 --> 0:07:35.840
<v Speaker 2>when he should have done, had he created an open

0:07:35.880 --> 0:07:40.360
<v Speaker 2>primary system, had the strongest democrat one, then that would

0:07:40.400 --> 0:07:45.360
<v Speaker 2>have been possible, even in difficult circumstances, for a democratic victory.

0:07:45.680 --> 0:07:47.559
<v Speaker 1>One of the things we will see in the coming

0:07:47.640 --> 0:07:50.480
<v Speaker 1>days when we do the kind of analysis of the

0:07:50.520 --> 0:07:56.320
<v Speaker 1>demographics is I think we thought and expected that women

0:07:56.520 --> 0:08:00.200
<v Speaker 1>on mass would come out for Kamala Harris across the

0:08:00.240 --> 0:08:06.240
<v Speaker 1>divide concerned about abortion rights being restricted. I wonder in

0:08:06.280 --> 0:08:08.480
<v Speaker 1>the end whether that wasn't strong enough either. You certainly

0:08:08.520 --> 0:08:11.400
<v Speaker 1>saw Kamala Harris make it front and center of many

0:08:11.400 --> 0:08:11.960
<v Speaker 1>things she did.

0:08:12.120 --> 0:08:15.760
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely. I think we will know more over the next

0:08:15.760 --> 0:08:19.080
<v Speaker 2>few days about the precise demographic makeup, but I think

0:08:19.120 --> 0:08:23.680
<v Speaker 2>Soccer Mum's women did not turn out for Harris in

0:08:23.760 --> 0:08:27.040
<v Speaker 2>the sort of numbers that we expected. Also, underneath it all.

0:08:27.080 --> 0:08:30.600
<v Speaker 2>Do people care more about that issue or do they

0:08:30.600 --> 0:08:32.920
<v Speaker 2>care more about immigration? And I think it's immigration.

0:08:33.160 --> 0:08:36.520
<v Speaker 1>When you glance at the polls and the returns on

0:08:36.559 --> 0:08:39.400
<v Speaker 1>why the things that motivated people to vote, democracy comes up,

0:08:39.520 --> 0:08:43.080
<v Speaker 1>and at first glance, the kind of complacent view is

0:08:43.080 --> 0:08:46.400
<v Speaker 1>that that favored Kamala Harris. But actually you dig deeper,

0:08:46.400 --> 0:08:48.760
<v Speaker 1>and if you've done any reporting around either America or

0:08:48.800 --> 0:08:52.320
<v Speaker 1>the UK or lots of countries, actually it does us

0:08:52.320 --> 0:08:54.760
<v Speaker 1>stand to reason that that might be something that motivated

0:08:54.760 --> 0:08:56.920
<v Speaker 1>people to vote for Trump. This sense, as you've been

0:08:56.960 --> 0:08:59.920
<v Speaker 1>talking eloquently throughout the podcast about this sense that it

0:09:00.160 --> 0:09:02.640
<v Speaker 1>was sort of, you know, the establishment was a done deal,

0:09:02.720 --> 0:09:05.199
<v Speaker 1>sewn up and an impenetrable fortress that you couldn't get

0:09:05.200 --> 0:09:08.400
<v Speaker 1>into if you were normal working pass Absolutely no, there's

0:09:08.400 --> 0:09:11.800
<v Speaker 1>this extraordinary result, which was I think the number.

0:09:11.520 --> 0:09:15.560
<v Speaker 2>Two issue that people were worried about after the economy

0:09:15.640 --> 0:09:17.600
<v Speaker 2>was the state of democracy. And you think, well, that's

0:09:17.600 --> 0:09:21.040
<v Speaker 2>a very very good indicator for Harris, and then in

0:09:21.080 --> 0:09:25.200
<v Speaker 2>fact those people broke towards Trump. So you know, we

0:09:25.320 --> 0:09:27.680
<v Speaker 2>in the media tend to think about January the sixth

0:09:27.679 --> 0:09:30.560
<v Speaker 2>and Trump's sort of contempt for due process. But in fact,

0:09:30.559 --> 0:09:33.520
<v Speaker 2>what a lot of people believe is that the media

0:09:33.920 --> 0:09:37.160
<v Speaker 2>is part of a cartel which tells a story to

0:09:37.240 --> 0:09:39.680
<v Speaker 2>other members of the media and doesn't really relate to

0:09:39.760 --> 0:09:41.600
<v Speaker 2>ordinary people. And I think this is a huge problem

0:09:41.640 --> 0:09:45.960
<v Speaker 2>for our profession that I think thirteen percent of Republicans

0:09:46.280 --> 0:09:50.240
<v Speaker 2>now believe the mainstream media, and the mainstream media quite

0:09:50.240 --> 0:09:53.760
<v Speaker 2>Franklin was in the tank for Kamala all the way

0:09:53.800 --> 0:09:56.520
<v Speaker 2>through this election. I think there's a crisis of confidence

0:09:56.640 --> 0:10:00.480
<v Speaker 2>that we have to as a profession, get out of bubble,

0:10:00.920 --> 0:10:05.080
<v Speaker 2>report on the country, on America, report on the actual

0:10:05.200 --> 0:10:09.040
<v Speaker 2>angs and Anxietism, worries about regular people, and do a

0:10:09.080 --> 0:10:12.040
<v Speaker 2>better job of reflecting what's going on out there rather

0:10:12.040 --> 0:10:13.040
<v Speaker 2>than talking to each other.

0:10:13.120 --> 0:10:15.880
<v Speaker 1>But Adrian, I mean everything you've just said, you could

0:10:15.880 --> 0:10:18.360
<v Speaker 1>have said after the Brexit vote. You could have said

0:10:18.400 --> 0:10:20.439
<v Speaker 1>after the first Trump victory. When do we learn?

0:10:20.960 --> 0:10:25.240
<v Speaker 2>And it's the corporations, the universities, the professional elite, and

0:10:25.240 --> 0:10:27.160
<v Speaker 2>they've got to reconnect with their country or we'll keep

0:10:27.160 --> 0:10:29.839
<v Speaker 2>getting these sort of surprises, not only in the United States,

0:10:29.880 --> 0:10:30.720
<v Speaker 2>but also in Europe.

0:10:31.080 --> 0:10:33.520
<v Speaker 1>Taking a step across the pond, back across the pond,

0:10:33.600 --> 0:10:36.160
<v Speaker 1>we're in London. We're in the UK reflecting on all

0:10:36.200 --> 0:10:39.480
<v Speaker 1>of this and what about the impact it has on

0:10:39.800 --> 0:10:43.880
<v Speaker 1>UK politics? Not UK politics, Actually, I think more interesting

0:10:44.040 --> 0:10:46.560
<v Speaker 1>is the economic impact. I think this morning has been

0:10:46.640 --> 0:10:48.320
<v Speaker 1>quite expensive for the government.

0:10:48.440 --> 0:10:51.199
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely. I mean I think it's all in the short term,

0:10:51.280 --> 0:10:53.240
<v Speaker 2>or in the simplest sense, it's a disaster for the

0:10:53.320 --> 0:10:56.640
<v Speaker 2>Labor Party. Because the Labor Party is interlinked with the

0:10:56.679 --> 0:10:59.880
<v Speaker 2>Democratic Party but also very hostile to Trump.

0:11:00.000 --> 0:11:02.439
<v Speaker 1>People have been speculating there might be a star a reshuffler.

0:11:02.480 --> 0:11:04.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I would have thought so. I think it's very

0:11:04.400 --> 0:11:07.640
<v Speaker 2>difficult to keep this current position in place. But also

0:11:07.679 --> 0:11:10.600
<v Speaker 2>we're interlinked economies. We're going to get a big economic

0:11:10.600 --> 0:11:13.959
<v Speaker 2>boom in the United States, lower corporation tax, lower personal tax.

0:11:14.200 --> 0:11:18.000
<v Speaker 2>I think a lot of talent will shift from this country,

0:11:18.040 --> 0:11:20.880
<v Speaker 2>which is being more and more heavily taxed, to the

0:11:21.040 --> 0:11:22.800
<v Speaker 2>United States. So that to Trump world.

0:11:22.920 --> 0:11:24.839
<v Speaker 1>It is the case that Labor has pledged to spend

0:11:24.840 --> 0:11:28.000
<v Speaker 1>more on defense, but that number wasn't actually in last

0:11:28.040 --> 0:11:30.600
<v Speaker 1>week's budget, And when you look at last week's budget

0:11:30.679 --> 0:11:34.080
<v Speaker 1>and how her head room was reduced in it, it's

0:11:34.120 --> 0:11:36.680
<v Speaker 1>hard to see that she has much room for maneuver well.

0:11:36.679 --> 0:11:38.960
<v Speaker 2>I think there's a bigger European problem over the defense

0:11:39.000 --> 0:11:41.640
<v Speaker 2>because Europe as a whole has to face the fact

0:11:41.720 --> 0:11:45.640
<v Speaker 2>that it is in hawk to Trump to defend it.

0:11:45.679 --> 0:11:51.760
<v Speaker 2>That Trump is not a stable or predictable or reliable ally,

0:11:52.120 --> 0:11:54.960
<v Speaker 2>And I think that Europe and Britain will have to

0:11:54.960 --> 0:11:57.200
<v Speaker 2>get closer and closer together. They'll have to put aside

0:11:57.200 --> 0:12:00.440
<v Speaker 2>their quarrels and really deal with this defense isship. Whatever

0:12:00.480 --> 0:12:02.840
<v Speaker 2>Trump does, and I think there is a big set

0:12:02.880 --> 0:12:06.600
<v Speaker 2>of variables in what Trump does, we can't presume that

0:12:06.640 --> 0:12:07.120
<v Speaker 2>you'll do so.

0:12:07.240 --> 0:12:10.440
<v Speaker 1>At the last time round, internationally, there was some softening

0:12:10.480 --> 0:12:13.120
<v Speaker 1>of his joy. They say things to get into power.

0:12:13.280 --> 0:12:16.720
<v Speaker 2>And he likes to say very extravagant and provocative things.

0:12:16.760 --> 0:12:19.640
<v Speaker 2>But nevertheless, even if he's not as radical as he

0:12:19.679 --> 0:12:22.880
<v Speaker 2>claims he is, can we continue to be in hock

0:12:23.040 --> 0:12:24.640
<v Speaker 2>to a country that's so unpredictable.

0:12:24.760 --> 0:12:25.960
<v Speaker 1>Well, we're going to pick up on a lot of

0:12:26.000 --> 0:12:28.240
<v Speaker 1>these themes in a special edition we're going to do

0:12:28.600 --> 0:12:32.600
<v Speaker 1>next week to close the year of these elections that

0:12:32.640 --> 0:12:35.920
<v Speaker 1>we have been covering in depth, and we look forward

0:12:35.920 --> 0:12:38.280
<v Speaker 1>to hearing from Steph again. Steph right now is I

0:12:38.320 --> 0:12:42.199
<v Speaker 1>don't know, recovering retreating from a spin room somewhere anyway,

0:12:42.760 --> 0:12:44.920
<v Speaker 1>Now on to the rest of the show. This is

0:12:44.960 --> 0:12:48.440
<v Speaker 1>our Big Take special podcast on the American election.

0:12:57.000 --> 0:13:00.000
<v Speaker 3>At around two thirty on Wednesday morning, Donald Trump took

0:13:00.080 --> 0:13:02.720
<v Speaker 3>the stage at his campaign headquarters in mar A Lago

0:13:03.120 --> 0:13:05.680
<v Speaker 3>to claim victory in the US presidential election.

0:13:06.280 --> 0:13:07.360
<v Speaker 4>Look what happened?

0:13:07.440 --> 0:13:08.199
<v Speaker 5>Is this crazy?

0:13:14.640 --> 0:13:19.160
<v Speaker 4>But it's a political victory that our country has never

0:13:19.200 --> 0:13:21.800
<v Speaker 4>seen before, nothing like this. I want to thank the

0:13:21.840 --> 0:13:26.520
<v Speaker 4>American people for the extraordinary honor of being elected your

0:13:27.400 --> 0:13:30.679
<v Speaker 4>forty seventh president, and you're forty fifth president.

0:13:31.040 --> 0:13:34.360
<v Speaker 3>Earlier, as the campaign watch party for Vice President Kamala

0:13:34.360 --> 0:13:38.280
<v Speaker 3>Harris wound down at her alma mater, Howard University, her

0:13:38.320 --> 0:13:42.280
<v Speaker 3>campaign co chair Cedric Richmond, briefly addressed the crowd.

0:13:42.120 --> 0:13:47.520
<v Speaker 4>So you won't hear from the Vice president tonight, but

0:13:47.679 --> 0:13:50.720
<v Speaker 4>you will hear from her tomorrow.

0:13:51.960 --> 0:13:55.200
<v Speaker 3>When Trump spoke alongside his family, in her circle and

0:13:55.280 --> 0:13:58.960
<v Speaker 3>running mate JD. Vance, he'd already secured two hundred and

0:13:59.000 --> 0:14:02.320
<v Speaker 3>sixty seven of the two hundred and seventy Electoral College

0:14:02.400 --> 0:14:06.120
<v Speaker 3>votes he needed, clinching wins in the key battleground states

0:14:06.160 --> 0:14:11.559
<v Speaker 3>of Georgia, North Carolina, and Pennsylvania. And at five thirty am,

0:14:11.679 --> 0:14:15.800
<v Speaker 3>Trump was declared the projected winner of Wisconsin's ten electoral

0:14:15.840 --> 0:14:19.920
<v Speaker 3>College votes, bringing his total to two hundred and seventy seven.

0:14:20.400 --> 0:14:23.680
<v Speaker 3>As the results came into focus, markets reacted and the

0:14:23.720 --> 0:14:29.120
<v Speaker 3>so called Trump trade searched. Bitcoin spiked, the dollar posted

0:14:29.160 --> 0:14:33.400
<v Speaker 3>its biggest gain against major currencies since twenty twenty, clean

0:14:33.560 --> 0:14:40.800
<v Speaker 3>energy took a hit, and Treasury bonds humbled. Today on

0:14:40.840 --> 0:14:45.080
<v Speaker 3>the show how Election Day played out, reactions from around

0:14:45.120 --> 0:14:48.320
<v Speaker 3>the world, and what we can expect from a second

0:14:48.440 --> 0:14:51.640
<v Speaker 3>Trump term, I'm Sarah Holder, and this is the big

0:14:51.680 --> 0:15:00.360
<v Speaker 3>take from Bloomberg News. It's four am in walk Washington,

0:15:00.400 --> 0:15:05.640
<v Speaker 3>d C. I'm joined by Bloomberg Senior Washington editor Wendy Benjaminson. So, Wendy,

0:15:05.800 --> 0:15:10.680
<v Speaker 3>for people waking up today and catching up what happened overnight.

0:15:11.200 --> 0:15:14.280
<v Speaker 5>Donald Trump has won the presidency. It was not as

0:15:14.320 --> 0:15:16.520
<v Speaker 5>close as we expected it to be.

0:15:16.880 --> 0:15:19.520
<v Speaker 3>Well, Wendy, how does this year's Trump win compared to

0:15:19.560 --> 0:15:21.720
<v Speaker 3>his path to victory in twenty sixteen.

0:15:22.400 --> 0:15:27.720
<v Speaker 5>Well, it's not that dissimilar. He took all of the South,

0:15:28.480 --> 0:15:33.480
<v Speaker 5>he took a large swath of the Midwest, the Plain States,

0:15:34.080 --> 0:15:38.880
<v Speaker 5>and this time again he managed to break through that

0:15:39.160 --> 0:15:41.400
<v Speaker 5>so called blue wall. I think we're going to have

0:15:41.400 --> 0:15:45.880
<v Speaker 5>to rename that now because in twenty sixteen, Hillary Clinton

0:15:46.000 --> 0:15:50.680
<v Speaker 5>failed to get all of the Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin, that

0:15:50.800 --> 0:15:54.640
<v Speaker 5>industrial blue wall the Democrats have to win, and it

0:15:54.720 --> 0:15:58.880
<v Speaker 5>appears that Donald Trump succeeded in that blue wall.

0:15:59.200 --> 0:16:02.120
<v Speaker 3>What was Trump to do this campaign cycle that he

0:16:02.200 --> 0:16:03.880
<v Speaker 3>failed to do in twenty twenty.

0:16:04.200 --> 0:16:06.960
<v Speaker 5>Well, this is one of those weird Donald Trump can

0:16:07.040 --> 0:16:11.120
<v Speaker 5>get away with stuff sort of elections. He fared far

0:16:11.200 --> 0:16:14.920
<v Speaker 5>better with Hispanic voters than he did in twenty sixteen

0:16:15.000 --> 0:16:18.280
<v Speaker 5>or twenty twenty. And remember, in twenty sixteen, one of

0:16:18.320 --> 0:16:21.640
<v Speaker 5>his famous lines was Mexico is sending us their criminals

0:16:21.640 --> 0:16:24.840
<v Speaker 5>and rapists, and a lot of Hispanic voters took events

0:16:24.880 --> 0:16:29.960
<v Speaker 5>to that. The Sunday before October twenty seventh, he held

0:16:30.000 --> 0:16:32.640
<v Speaker 5>a rally of Madison Square Garden where a comedian called

0:16:32.640 --> 0:16:36.560
<v Speaker 5>Puerto Rico a floating island of garbage. And yet he

0:16:36.640 --> 0:16:40.120
<v Speaker 5>fared far better, according to exit polls with Latino voters

0:16:40.360 --> 0:16:41.360
<v Speaker 5>than he ever has.

0:16:41.720 --> 0:16:43.840
<v Speaker 3>That didn't seem to matter in the way that people

0:16:43.840 --> 0:16:44.560
<v Speaker 3>thought it might.

0:16:44.920 --> 0:16:50.480
<v Speaker 5>Right, And remember Donald Trump also won this time against

0:16:50.520 --> 0:16:56.360
<v Speaker 5>twenty sixteen with thirty four felony convictions, a civil claim

0:16:56.520 --> 0:17:00.920
<v Speaker 5>holding him responsible for rape, appointing Supreme or justices who

0:17:00.960 --> 0:17:05.359
<v Speaker 5>overturned Roe versus Wade, and a number of other comments

0:17:05.400 --> 0:17:08.440
<v Speaker 5>that he's made or proposals that he has put forward

0:17:08.880 --> 0:17:13.200
<v Speaker 5>that seem anathema to most Americans. And yet here we are,

0:17:13.640 --> 0:17:17.840
<v Speaker 5>and while the gender gap and reproductive rights were the

0:17:17.920 --> 0:17:20.399
<v Speaker 5>issues that were going to push her over the top,

0:17:21.080 --> 0:17:25.639
<v Speaker 5>it failed to materialize against the popular support that Donald

0:17:25.680 --> 0:17:26.720
<v Speaker 5>Trump seems to have had.

0:17:26.960 --> 0:17:29.240
<v Speaker 3>You mentioned some of these issues that didn't seem to

0:17:29.240 --> 0:17:31.280
<v Speaker 3>face voters when it came to Donald Trump. But let's

0:17:31.280 --> 0:17:33.919
<v Speaker 3>talk about some of the issues that did decide this election.

0:17:34.480 --> 0:17:37.240
<v Speaker 3>We've been talking all election season about the polls, including

0:17:37.240 --> 0:17:40.280
<v Speaker 3>the Bloomberg News Morning Consult polls that showed that voters

0:17:40.359 --> 0:17:44.840
<v Speaker 3>considered the economy their number one issue. Abortion also ranked

0:17:44.880 --> 0:17:48.159
<v Speaker 3>highly immigration. What do we know at this point about

0:17:48.280 --> 0:17:51.760
<v Speaker 3>how those issues specifically impacted the results we saw tonight?

0:17:52.040 --> 0:17:57.680
<v Speaker 5>Donald Trump he pinned the economy, the post COVID economy,

0:17:57.720 --> 0:18:02.960
<v Speaker 5>even though it has recovered by all all measures. He

0:18:03.080 --> 0:18:06.200
<v Speaker 5>pinned that on Joe Biden and by extension, Kamala Harris.

0:18:06.440 --> 0:18:10.160
<v Speaker 5>He kept doing that over and over again, even though

0:18:10.200 --> 0:18:15.280
<v Speaker 5>his rhetoric on immigration was authoritarian, talking about deporting millions

0:18:15.320 --> 0:18:18.600
<v Speaker 5>of people, closing the border, building the wall, all those

0:18:18.600 --> 0:18:23.119
<v Speaker 5>sort of things. Voters want a secure border, and he

0:18:23.280 --> 0:18:28.679
<v Speaker 5>talked about it constantly, even down to the falsehoods about

0:18:29.160 --> 0:18:33.040
<v Speaker 5>Haitian immigrants eating cats in Springfield, Ohio. It all spoke

0:18:33.119 --> 0:18:37.840
<v Speaker 5>to voters deep fears about the other. In quotes coming in,

0:18:38.280 --> 0:18:43.679
<v Speaker 5>Kamala Harris talked a little about immigration, saying that she

0:18:43.760 --> 0:18:47.359
<v Speaker 5>would sign the bill that Donald Trump killed last year

0:18:47.480 --> 0:18:52.159
<v Speaker 5>in Congress. She talked about a caring economy and opportunity economy.

0:18:52.760 --> 0:18:55.959
<v Speaker 5>But a lot of the time the Democrats focused on

0:18:56.160 --> 0:18:59.920
<v Speaker 5>just how awful Donald Trump is, and people who think

0:19:00.080 --> 0:19:03.560
<v Speaker 5>he's awful already think he's awful the people. Then there

0:19:03.560 --> 0:19:06.200
<v Speaker 5>are people who think he's an awful person, but they

0:19:06.320 --> 0:19:09.159
<v Speaker 5>like his policies. And then there's the people who actually

0:19:09.200 --> 0:19:13.800
<v Speaker 5>don't think he's awful. Donald Trump is awful is now

0:19:13.840 --> 0:19:18.800
<v Speaker 5>a proven two time losing strategy, And yet the Democrats

0:19:18.880 --> 0:19:21.119
<v Speaker 5>kept doing that over and over again.

0:19:21.359 --> 0:19:24.720
<v Speaker 3>And here we are, well, what about Trump's economic policies

0:19:24.920 --> 0:19:27.200
<v Speaker 3>attracted voters and how much are we going to see

0:19:27.240 --> 0:19:28.040
<v Speaker 3>the results.

0:19:28.720 --> 0:19:31.480
<v Speaker 5>Well, that's going to be the big question, Sarah, because

0:19:31.720 --> 0:19:36.480
<v Speaker 5>his economic policies he promised to offer. He offered so

0:19:36.600 --> 0:19:39.520
<v Speaker 5>many tax cuts that if every single one of them

0:19:39.520 --> 0:19:42.720
<v Speaker 5>were enacted, I'm not even sure the US government could

0:19:42.760 --> 0:19:46.080
<v Speaker 5>function because there just wouldn't be enough money coming in.

0:19:46.720 --> 0:19:49.879
<v Speaker 5>So some of those will be enacted, but it couldn't

0:19:49.920 --> 0:19:53.560
<v Speaker 5>be all of them. The tariffs he is proposing, placing

0:19:53.640 --> 0:19:57.560
<v Speaker 5>sixty percent tariffs or more on imports from China that

0:19:58.280 --> 0:20:01.800
<v Speaker 5>many economists say is going to raise prices for consumers.

0:20:02.680 --> 0:20:07.320
<v Speaker 5>And his immigration policy if he carries out the deportation

0:20:07.480 --> 0:20:12.960
<v Speaker 5>of twelve million undocumented workers in this country, an undertaking

0:20:13.480 --> 0:20:16.400
<v Speaker 5>that I don't even know how something like that works

0:20:16.480 --> 0:20:19.680
<v Speaker 5>or how long it would take. Nevertheless, that is going

0:20:19.760 --> 0:20:23.920
<v Speaker 5>to put a huge hole in the construction industry, in

0:20:24.119 --> 0:20:28.520
<v Speaker 5>the agricultural industry, and could possibly hurt the American economy.

0:20:28.880 --> 0:20:33.080
<v Speaker 5>So we'll see how popular these ideas are after he

0:20:33.160 --> 0:20:34.200
<v Speaker 5>begins to enact them.

0:20:34.480 --> 0:20:38.080
<v Speaker 3>Well, despite these long term concerns, and even before some

0:20:38.160 --> 0:20:41.119
<v Speaker 3>of these key states we're talking about were called, we

0:20:41.200 --> 0:20:46.800
<v Speaker 3>saw markets responding to Trump's lead. How did they respond well?

0:20:46.920 --> 0:20:51.200
<v Speaker 5>The dollar got stronger overnight in preparation for these tariffs

0:20:51.400 --> 0:20:55.640
<v Speaker 5>to be enacted. It's very good news for bitcoin. He's

0:20:55.680 --> 0:20:59.160
<v Speaker 5>a huge supporter of crypto, and a number of markets

0:20:59.400 --> 0:21:03.240
<v Speaker 5>rose and anticipation of certainty. I think it is not

0:21:03.320 --> 0:21:06.480
<v Speaker 5>necessarily that they are happy Donald Trump won. It's they

0:21:06.520 --> 0:21:09.959
<v Speaker 5>know who the president is and they are reacting to them.

0:21:11.560 --> 0:21:14.520
<v Speaker 3>After the break will dig deeper into the Trump campaign

0:21:14.640 --> 0:21:19.199
<v Speaker 3>promises that could become the administration's policies and what it

0:21:19.240 --> 0:21:30.240
<v Speaker 3>all means for the global economy. Wendy What if Donald

0:21:30.320 --> 0:21:34.199
<v Speaker 3>Trump's promises on the campaign trail told us about what

0:21:34.359 --> 0:21:38.919
<v Speaker 3>his next administration is likely to prioritize in office.

0:21:39.000 --> 0:21:42.840
<v Speaker 5>His priorities will certainly be the economy and immigration first

0:21:42.880 --> 0:21:47.080
<v Speaker 5>and foremost. The difference this time is that in twenty sixteen,

0:21:47.240 --> 0:21:50.040
<v Speaker 5>a lot of traditional Republicans, because that was the only

0:21:50.160 --> 0:21:53.879
<v Speaker 5>kind there was in twenty sixteen, joined his cabinet, joined

0:21:53.880 --> 0:21:58.880
<v Speaker 5>his administration because they wanted to show this newcomer how

0:21:59.080 --> 0:22:02.800
<v Speaker 5>government works and set up some guard rails for some

0:22:02.840 --> 0:22:06.639
<v Speaker 5>of his more outlandish ideas. That's not happening this time.

0:22:07.080 --> 0:22:09.600
<v Speaker 5>This time, he is going to be surrounded by people

0:22:09.600 --> 0:22:13.200
<v Speaker 5>who are loyal to him. Loyal to him is the keyword,

0:22:13.280 --> 0:22:16.560
<v Speaker 5>not the Constitution, the rule of law, things like that.

0:22:17.040 --> 0:22:19.399
<v Speaker 5>So I think there is some fear out there about

0:22:19.440 --> 0:22:22.600
<v Speaker 5>the disappearing of the guard rails that were there in

0:22:22.640 --> 0:22:23.400
<v Speaker 5>his first term.

0:22:23.720 --> 0:22:27.240
<v Speaker 3>What do tonight's results say about the future of abortion

0:22:27.400 --> 0:22:28.760
<v Speaker 3>access in this country?

0:22:29.480 --> 0:22:32.240
<v Speaker 5>Well, it is certainly now a state's issue. There is

0:22:32.400 --> 0:22:36.560
<v Speaker 5>not enough Democrats or pro reproductive rights members of Congress

0:22:36.800 --> 0:22:40.440
<v Speaker 5>to codify Roe Versus Way to put abortion rights back

0:22:40.520 --> 0:22:44.400
<v Speaker 5>into law, and so the Supreme Court decision to send

0:22:44.480 --> 0:22:46.800
<v Speaker 5>it to the states and have a patchwork of laws

0:22:46.800 --> 0:22:50.520
<v Speaker 5>all over the country seems to be now the way

0:22:50.560 --> 0:22:54.400
<v Speaker 5>it is. Remember also that there are still two Supreme

0:22:54.400 --> 0:22:58.800
<v Speaker 5>Court justices who are nearing the age at which they

0:22:58.920 --> 0:23:04.679
<v Speaker 5>might retire or pass on, and Donald Trump will have

0:23:04.760 --> 0:23:08.679
<v Speaker 5>an opportunity with a Republican Senate, at least for the

0:23:08.680 --> 0:23:14.840
<v Speaker 5>first two years, to appoint two more conservative justices on

0:23:14.880 --> 0:23:18.880
<v Speaker 5>the Supreme Court, which would of course make the Supreme

0:23:18.880 --> 0:23:21.320
<v Speaker 5>Court one of the most conservative in US history.

0:23:21.600 --> 0:23:24.960
<v Speaker 3>So if Republicans do maintain control of both chambers of

0:23:25.000 --> 0:23:28.320
<v Speaker 3>Congress and the Presidency, what will it mean for US

0:23:28.359 --> 0:23:32.280
<v Speaker 3>spending on geopolitical conflicts like the war in Ukraine or

0:23:32.400 --> 0:23:33.200
<v Speaker 3>in the Middle East.

0:23:33.760 --> 0:23:37.160
<v Speaker 5>Well, the Ukrainian President Vladimir Lensky put out a statement

0:23:37.200 --> 0:23:42.160
<v Speaker 5>this morning congratulating Trump and looking forward to his decisive leadership,

0:23:42.200 --> 0:23:45.639
<v Speaker 5>and that was the right thing to say. Diplomatically, Donald

0:23:45.680 --> 0:23:49.679
<v Speaker 5>Trump is very much into making deals. He wants to

0:23:49.680 --> 0:23:52.200
<v Speaker 5>make a deal with Putin. He wants Putin and Zelenski

0:23:52.280 --> 0:23:54.960
<v Speaker 5>to come to a table and come to terms. Those

0:23:55.080 --> 0:23:59.680
<v Speaker 5>terms would end up probably being more favorable to Russia

0:23:59.720 --> 0:24:03.080
<v Speaker 5>than to Ukraine, and the US would no longer support

0:24:03.160 --> 0:24:06.320
<v Speaker 5>Ukraine and its fight against the invasion. It is also

0:24:06.359 --> 0:24:09.439
<v Speaker 5>extremely good news for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin net Niyaho.

0:24:10.000 --> 0:24:15.080
<v Speaker 5>Kamala Harris had at least suggested some interest in the

0:24:15.160 --> 0:24:19.840
<v Speaker 5>humanitarian crisis going on in Gaza, and what former President

0:24:19.840 --> 0:24:25.080
<v Speaker 5>Trump has said is that bb Netanyaho's nickname Bib, needs

0:24:25.119 --> 0:24:29.000
<v Speaker 5>to finish the job in Gaza. And so despite the

0:24:29.040 --> 0:24:31.359
<v Speaker 5>fact that I think he got more Arab American support

0:24:31.400 --> 0:24:34.359
<v Speaker 5>than one would have suspected, I think this is a

0:24:34.440 --> 0:24:36.840
<v Speaker 5>very good day for Putin and Netanyahu.

0:24:40.520 --> 0:24:43.800
<v Speaker 3>This is the big take from Bloomberg News. I'm Sarah Holder.

0:24:44.359 --> 0:24:47.399
<v Speaker 3>This episode was produced by David Fox, Thomas lou and

0:24:47.520 --> 0:24:51.640
<v Speaker 3>Julia Press. It was edited by Aaron Edwards and Wendy Benjaminson.

0:24:52.200 --> 0:24:55.200
<v Speaker 3>This episode was mixed by Alex Zuguia. It was fact

0:24:55.280 --> 0:24:59.000
<v Speaker 3>checked by Thomas Lou, Julia Press, and Jessica Beck. Our

0:24:59.040 --> 0:25:02.920
<v Speaker 3>senior producer is Taomi Shavin. Our senior editor is Elizabeth Ponso.

0:25:03.280 --> 0:25:07.159
<v Speaker 3>Our executive producer is Nicole beemster Boor. Sage Bauman is

0:25:07.160 --> 0:25:10.720
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg's head of podcasts. If you liked this episode, make

0:25:10.760 --> 0:25:13.439
<v Speaker 3>sure to subscribe and review The Big Take wherever you

0:25:13.480 --> 0:25:16.840
<v Speaker 3>listen to podcasts. It helps people find the show. Thanks

0:25:16.880 --> 0:25:19.359
<v Speaker 3>for listening. We'll be back tomorrow.