1
00:00:00,120 --> 00:00:02,600
Speaker 1: Let's get to our guest, Bill Lee, chief economist at

2
00:00:02,720 --> 00:00:07,960
Speaker 1: Milken Institute. So given that that's those are the headlines, Bill,

3
00:00:08,119 --> 00:00:11,639
Speaker 1: let me paint a slightly different picture here, that it's

4
00:00:11,880 --> 00:00:17,000
Speaker 1: different this time and two very interesting dynamics. One, inflation

5
00:00:17,400 --> 00:00:21,639
Speaker 1: maybe stickier than what we're used to, particularly because of

6
00:00:21,680 --> 00:00:23,840
Speaker 1: all these bottlenecks we see in supply and a lot

7
00:00:23,840 --> 00:00:27,520
Speaker 1: of things like Ukraine that are outside the Fed's control.

8
00:00:27,880 --> 00:00:32,080
Speaker 1: And secondly, the recession might be very different too, in that,

9
00:00:32,240 --> 00:00:35,199
Speaker 1: if indeed we are going into it, it's with a

10
00:00:35,240 --> 00:00:38,239
Speaker 1: lot stronger job market than we're used to, and maybe

11
00:00:38,840 --> 00:00:43,720
Speaker 1: maybe that means we can weather it better. Your thoughts, absolutely, Brian,

12
00:00:43,760 --> 00:00:46,040
Speaker 1: I mean that that picture is exactly the picture that

13
00:00:46,080 --> 00:00:50,040
Speaker 1: I have in my mind. Uh, this about of stipulation

14
00:00:50,159 --> 00:00:53,720
Speaker 1: echoes the seventies, but it's nowhere near where what it

15
00:00:53,800 --> 00:00:56,360
Speaker 1: was like before. It's going to take the FED quite

16
00:00:56,360 --> 00:00:59,520
Speaker 1: a bit of effort to get rid of the inflation

17
00:00:59,520 --> 00:01:01,600
Speaker 1: because it's we've been hit by so much on the

18
00:01:01,600 --> 00:01:04,640
Speaker 1: supply side. The study from the San Francisco FET shows

19
00:01:04,680 --> 00:01:08,000
Speaker 1: that about half of the inflation can be attributed to

20
00:01:08,840 --> 00:01:11,800
Speaker 1: supply and about half from them demand. Actually a third

21
00:01:11,840 --> 00:01:14,440
Speaker 1: a third and in between a third that's sort of mixed.

22
00:01:14,760 --> 00:01:17,399
Speaker 1: And and because of these supply side elements that continue

23
00:01:17,440 --> 00:01:19,560
Speaker 1: to get worse. I mean, after all, here we have

24
00:01:19,720 --> 00:01:22,880
Speaker 1: shoot food shortages being caused by the cutoff of the

25
00:01:22,880 --> 00:01:25,880
Speaker 1: wheat exports from the Ukraine. We just had an agreement

26
00:01:25,920 --> 00:01:28,760
Speaker 1: that said, oh, we could resume food exports, especially to

27
00:01:28,800 --> 00:01:31,959
Speaker 1: the starving emerging markets, and then all of a sudden,

28
00:01:32,000 --> 00:01:34,759
Speaker 1: the port facilities in Odessa are bombed. Now that kind

29
00:01:34,760 --> 00:01:37,480
Speaker 1: of supply shock, you know, you go crazy trying to

30
00:01:37,480 --> 00:01:40,920
Speaker 1: forecast what's gonna happen to food inflation, um and similarly

31
00:01:40,959 --> 00:01:44,000
Speaker 1: for for energy. So so I think these continued bounds

32
00:01:44,040 --> 00:01:47,720
Speaker 1: of supply constraints, the fact that China doesn't really open

33
00:01:47,880 --> 00:01:51,600
Speaker 1: because it keeps playing around with zero COVID policies, uh

34
00:01:51,760 --> 00:01:56,800
Speaker 1: makes the the forecast of inflation for sure more persistent

35
00:01:57,080 --> 00:01:59,520
Speaker 1: than anybody would have expected. And I think the FED

36
00:02:00,040 --> 00:02:03,560
Speaker 1: causes so committed right now to putting inflation back to

37
00:02:03,600 --> 00:02:05,560
Speaker 1: his two percent target, or at least on a clear

38
00:02:05,600 --> 00:02:07,960
Speaker 1: path to two percent. It has to deal with the

39
00:02:08,000 --> 00:02:10,720
Speaker 1: demand side. It has to weaken demand so much that

40
00:02:10,760 --> 00:02:14,359
Speaker 1: it compensates for these continued supply side shocks. So Bill,

41
00:02:14,400 --> 00:02:16,520
Speaker 1: that leads into the fact that we are expecting seventy

42
00:02:16,560 --> 00:02:19,320
Speaker 1: five basis points this week. But what happens after that?

43
00:02:19,360 --> 00:02:21,720
Speaker 1: In there forward guidance, did they continue with these really

44
00:02:21,760 --> 00:02:25,079
Speaker 1: aggressive hikes or do they pull back? Well, Juliet I

45
00:02:25,320 --> 00:02:28,320
Speaker 1: would have said, prior to the spring, because the FED

46
00:02:28,400 --> 00:02:31,480
Speaker 1: has had become so wokeish and and and and emphasize

47
00:02:31,520 --> 00:02:34,560
Speaker 1: so much the the spread of employment benefits, I would

48
00:02:34,600 --> 00:02:37,600
Speaker 1: have said, they might blink. But right now the FED

49
00:02:37,680 --> 00:02:40,560
Speaker 1: noses behind the curve. The FED knows as credibility is

50
00:02:40,600 --> 00:02:42,800
Speaker 1: on the line, and it's going to go out of

51
00:02:42,840 --> 00:02:46,400
Speaker 1: its way to to to keep policies tight and perhaps

52
00:02:46,400 --> 00:02:48,760
Speaker 1: even tighter. I think a hundred basis points can be

53
00:02:48,800 --> 00:02:52,959
Speaker 1: on the table. Um if inflation persists and and and

54
00:02:53,080 --> 00:02:55,800
Speaker 1: gets even worse, and I think that's something that the

55
00:02:55,840 --> 00:02:59,359
Speaker 1: markets are not ready for. I mentioned two parts. Um.

56
00:02:59,480 --> 00:03:02,360
Speaker 1: You address the first part rather well, but the second part.

57
00:03:02,720 --> 00:03:06,000
Speaker 1: It was basically that we have so many people employed,

58
00:03:06,040 --> 00:03:07,880
Speaker 1: and we have more jobs than we have people to

59
00:03:08,000 --> 00:03:11,120
Speaker 1: stick in them, that that maybe we're stronger and we

60
00:03:11,200 --> 00:03:13,840
Speaker 1: handle it better this time. Do you want to refute

61
00:03:13,840 --> 00:03:17,919
Speaker 1: that or not at all? Brian Bryant, If I would

62
00:03:17,960 --> 00:03:21,040
Speaker 1: say double up on that. UM, I have never seen

63
00:03:21,240 --> 00:03:24,359
Speaker 1: a recession start with the unemployment rate is three and

64
00:03:24,360 --> 00:03:27,400
Speaker 1: a half percent UM. And not only that, I mean

65
00:03:27,440 --> 00:03:30,560
Speaker 1: Paul talks about so many vacancies out for for the

66
00:03:30,600 --> 00:03:34,000
Speaker 1: number of unemployed, and despite those vacancies, firms are not

67
00:03:34,320 --> 00:03:37,240
Speaker 1: increasing the pace of hiring UM because they're looking for

68
00:03:37,320 --> 00:03:39,560
Speaker 1: better workers. So there's a sort of like a micro

69
00:03:39,600 --> 00:03:43,839
Speaker 1: economic dislocation in that labor market. People are are up

70
00:03:43,680 --> 00:03:47,120
Speaker 1: upping the quality and and and and the workers themselves

71
00:03:47,240 --> 00:03:49,600
Speaker 1: are looking for better jobs. So so I think everyone

72
00:03:49,680 --> 00:03:52,960
Speaker 1: is looking for higher wage jobs and higher proctivity jobs.

73
00:03:53,240 --> 00:03:56,640
Speaker 1: And I think the tightening by the FED may not

74
00:03:56,840 --> 00:03:59,080
Speaker 1: result in the kind of pain and angst that we

75
00:03:59,120 --> 00:04:02,720
Speaker 1: had in previous sessions because people are looking for better jobs,

76
00:04:02,720 --> 00:04:05,520
Speaker 1: they're qualified for better jobs, and and and companies have

77
00:04:05,720 --> 00:04:09,000
Speaker 1: invested in technology and changed their business models in a

78
00:04:09,040 --> 00:04:11,480
Speaker 1: way that would allow workers to be more productive. So

79
00:04:11,520 --> 00:04:14,200
Speaker 1: I think the combination of these factors makes the next

80
00:04:14,240 --> 00:04:17,520
Speaker 1: recession much less painful than would have been in the past.

81
00:04:17,839 --> 00:04:20,000
Speaker 1: And people have money to spend. I mean every where

82
00:04:20,000 --> 00:04:23,400
Speaker 1: you go, and that's globally. Airports are packed. Restaurants are

83
00:04:23,440 --> 00:04:26,520
Speaker 1: packed too, so in that sense of the consumer. How

84
00:04:26,600 --> 00:04:29,920
Speaker 1: much does that custion a deeper recession. Well, Juliet, I

85
00:04:30,120 --> 00:04:33,039
Speaker 1: think that shows sort of the huge split in our

86
00:04:33,080 --> 00:04:35,919
Speaker 1: in our economy, the dual economies that we have a

87
00:04:36,000 --> 00:04:38,440
Speaker 1: lot of people in the middle class and upper middle

88
00:04:38,440 --> 00:04:40,760
Speaker 1: class have so much to spend. I mean, don't forget

89
00:04:40,960 --> 00:04:43,920
Speaker 1: during during COVID, there was a shortage of pelotons. Now

90
00:04:43,920 --> 00:04:46,680
Speaker 1: that a peloton, I'm sorry, is not a necessity of life,

91
00:04:46,920 --> 00:04:49,479
Speaker 1: but there are so many people who are poor, uh,

92
00:04:49,520 --> 00:04:52,320
Speaker 1: struggling day to day to try to make ends beat

93
00:04:52,360 --> 00:04:55,600
Speaker 1: by buying gasoline and food and then asking myself, am

94
00:04:55,640 --> 00:04:57,680
Speaker 1: I gonna be able to pay today this month's rent

95
00:04:57,720 --> 00:05:00,080
Speaker 1: because the rent increase just came through. Um So, So

96
00:05:00,160 --> 00:05:03,640
Speaker 1: I think that the dual economy shows that that the

97
00:05:03,680 --> 00:05:06,720
Speaker 1: pain is being felt by a lot of people, even

98
00:05:06,760 --> 00:05:09,320
Speaker 1: because even now because of these high prices and we

99
00:05:09,360 --> 00:05:11,919
Speaker 1: don't have any layoffs yet. But but you're right, a

100
00:05:11,960 --> 00:05:14,240
Speaker 1: lot of people have a lot of money to spend. Yeah,

101
00:05:14,440 --> 00:05:16,520
Speaker 1: And I think the scenario that we've been talking about

102
00:05:16,520 --> 00:05:19,839
Speaker 1: for most of this interview is it's sort of augers

103
00:05:19,920 --> 00:05:24,720
Speaker 1: for muddling through. And if we're actually able to muddle through. Okay,

104
00:05:24,880 --> 00:05:29,640
Speaker 1: then there's too much negativity around. Oh. In the financial markets,

105
00:05:29,760 --> 00:05:32,400
Speaker 1: no doubt, and especially in the equity markets. If you

106
00:05:32,440 --> 00:05:34,839
Speaker 1: look at the bond markets, I would say the Fed

107
00:05:34,880 --> 00:05:37,280
Speaker 1: has regained his credibility. The break evens now are down

108
00:05:37,320 --> 00:05:38,920
Speaker 1: to about two and a half five year break evens

109
00:05:38,960 --> 00:05:40,600
Speaker 1: or two and a half percent, down from three and

110
00:05:40,640 --> 00:05:43,839
Speaker 1: a half percent several months ago. So the bond markets

111
00:05:43,839 --> 00:05:46,480
Speaker 1: are I think I have pricing in the belief that

112
00:05:46,520 --> 00:05:49,920
Speaker 1: we are going to come back to target inflation fairly quickly.

113
00:05:50,080 --> 00:05:52,720
Speaker 1: Now it could be because of the recession, but regardless

114
00:05:52,839 --> 00:05:55,599
Speaker 1: that pricing in the kind of stability and inflation in

115
00:05:55,640 --> 00:05:58,080
Speaker 1: a fairly rapid period of time. Equity markets have not

116
00:05:58,160 --> 00:06:01,000
Speaker 1: gotten the message yet because we're well below where we

117
00:06:01,000 --> 00:06:04,640
Speaker 1: were before. And in terms of what we kind of

118
00:06:04,680 --> 00:06:07,480
Speaker 1: see with people trying to position what this kind of

119
00:06:07,520 --> 00:06:10,760
Speaker 1: downturn will be, where do you see potential upside moves

120
00:06:10,800 --> 00:06:13,680
Speaker 1: for equity mon It has to be in these high

121
00:06:13,680 --> 00:06:16,039
Speaker 1: growth companies that have been so hard hit because of

122
00:06:16,040 --> 00:06:18,640
Speaker 1: this fear of inflation, fear of high interest rates, and

123
00:06:18,640 --> 00:06:21,120
Speaker 1: the fear that these companies would not be able to

124
00:06:21,200 --> 00:06:25,240
Speaker 1: raise prices and have revenues in line with cost increases,

125
00:06:25,560 --> 00:06:28,240
Speaker 1: I think of the coverage like Tesla have have shown

126
00:06:28,279 --> 00:06:30,680
Speaker 1: over and over again they can raise prices as much

127
00:06:30,720 --> 00:06:34,120
Speaker 1: as they want and and and maintain their profit margins. Now,

128
00:06:34,200 --> 00:06:36,400
Speaker 1: the things that could kill them would be another shutdown

129
00:06:36,400 --> 00:06:39,520
Speaker 1: in China which would completely shut off their production, and

130
00:06:39,560 --> 00:06:41,440
Speaker 1: that they would have no revenues because they don't have

131
00:06:41,480 --> 00:06:44,160
Speaker 1: any production, not because they don't have any ability to

132
00:06:44,240 --> 00:06:47,720
Speaker 1: raise prices. All right, Bill, thanks very much for joining us.

133
00:06:47,920 --> 00:06:49,839
Speaker 1: We've got to get you back here to Hong Kong

134
00:06:49,960 --> 00:06:52,880
Speaker 1: sometime soon. Be sure to come into our studios when

135
00:06:52,880 --> 00:06:56,160
Speaker 1: you do. Bill Lead, chief economists at Milken Institute, with

136
00:06:56,240 --> 00:06:58,760
Speaker 1: us live here on Bloomberg Daybreak Asia