WEBVTT - The Sad Trombonesky 0:00:01.160 --> 0:00:04.880 Welcome to Fantasy Football Weekly, a production of I Heart Radio. 0:00:06.760 --> 0:00:10.480 Time now for Fantasy Football Weekly from I Heart Radio, 0:00:10.880 --> 0:00:14.720 your weekly source for the nation's best fantasy speculation and advice. 0:00:15.200 --> 0:00:18.600 Now along with the guys from fanball dot com, here's 0:00:18.680 --> 0:00:23.040 the host for Fantasy Football Weekly. It is time for 0:00:23.079 --> 0:00:26.720 America's longest running fantasy show, Fantasy Football Weekly. I'm your host, 0:00:26.760 --> 0:00:29.120 Paul Charchy and from fanball dot Com. My co host 0:00:29.160 --> 0:00:33.800 of this week are Scott Fish and Matt Harrison. Hello, guys, 0:00:34.240 --> 0:00:36.519 what's going on? Char Um? What I'm talking to you? 0:00:36.560 --> 0:00:39.560 That's what's going on. We're bringing week ten fantasy advice 0:00:39.600 --> 0:00:42.200 to people. It's very exciting. Big pull of that caffeinated 0:00:42.280 --> 0:00:45.680 beverage and I'm ready, all right, go yeah, bring it on, baby. 0:00:46.080 --> 0:00:49.200 If you can't do it, the caffeine can, it will. 0:00:49.200 --> 0:00:51.400 Over the course of today, we're gonna break down every 0:00:51.479 --> 0:00:54.440 game fantasy style. Like always, we give you letter grades 0:00:54.480 --> 0:00:57.120 on every meaningful player. We tell you are rationale behind 0:00:57.200 --> 0:00:59.160 those grades, so you can decide if you agree with 0:00:59.280 --> 0:01:02.240 us or not. We'll answer three tough questions. We'll give 0:01:02.280 --> 0:01:04.720 you nine players upon whom which you can take a chance, 0:01:04.800 --> 0:01:08.560 and we will jump into our time machine and give 0:01:08.600 --> 0:01:11.920 you some premature speculation is to who to pick up 0:01:12.440 --> 0:01:15.080 this week. Everybody else we'll be trying to pick up 0:01:15.240 --> 0:01:18.480 next week. That's uh. I think we rocked it last week. 0:01:18.480 --> 0:01:19.760 By the way, I think we had some good ones 0:01:19.800 --> 0:01:21.360 on there, but I don't remember who they were, but 0:01:21.480 --> 0:01:23.600 I remember Kareem Hunt was one of them. I think 0:01:23.640 --> 0:01:25.440 that's gonna work out. Well. It wasn't the two of 0:01:25.520 --> 0:01:27.720 us on the show with you last week, so of 0:01:27.760 --> 0:01:31.120 course there wasn't good. We didn't listen at all. Thank you. Yes, 0:01:31.280 --> 0:01:33.440 that's that's a heck of an endorsement for our show. 0:01:34.080 --> 0:01:36.399 Let's jump into the matchups, Matt, beginning with you your 0:01:36.400 --> 0:01:39.800 first Ravens taking on the Bengals. The Bengals run defense 0:01:39.840 --> 0:01:41.840 has been terrible. Their past defense has been good, and 0:01:41.840 --> 0:01:43.720 here comes the Ravens who love to run the ball. 0:01:44.160 --> 0:01:47.400 It's weird because my first note is on the Ravens side, 0:01:47.520 --> 0:01:51.919 start everyone who runs the ball ye perfect mark Ingram 0:01:51.920 --> 0:01:54.560 gets an A grade. Gus Edwards is even startable in 0:01:54.600 --> 0:01:57.760 a pinch. It's a sixteen by week. Yeah, I think 0:01:57.760 --> 0:02:01.440 it's a great matchup, is for sure. Take on I 0:02:01.520 --> 0:02:04.040 almost I was my take on for a while. Yeah. 0:02:04.080 --> 0:02:05.559 By the way, for those that are new to the show, 0:02:05.600 --> 0:02:08.480 take on take a chance on me players. Yes, yes, 0:02:08.880 --> 0:02:11.880 So the Bengals are bottom five in rushing attempts allowed, 0:02:12.040 --> 0:02:17.760 yards per game, allowed, yards per carry, rushing touchdowns, yards 0:02:18.040 --> 0:02:20.960 to running backs, and receiving touchdowns allowed to running backs. 0:02:21.080 --> 0:02:23.679 Edwards iszier to take a chance on a guy. That's 0:02:23.680 --> 0:02:26.840 weird because normally we'd throw this match up later. Anyway, 0:02:26.919 --> 0:02:28.840 Gus Edwards, you can start him too, he's started. Just 0:02:28.880 --> 0:02:32.040 take a chance on me. Lamar Jackson, by the way, 0:02:32.080 --> 0:02:34.119 he gets an A grade, he's probably chart his top 0:02:34.200 --> 0:02:38.280 quarterback this week, I would imagine, pretty close. Two. Bengals 0:02:38.280 --> 0:02:41.280 have only given up eleven touchdowns through the air this year, 0:02:41.440 --> 0:02:44.760 but have allowed one and forty more rushing yards to 0:02:44.840 --> 0:02:48.160 opposing quarterbacks than any other team in the league. And 0:02:48.280 --> 0:02:51.639 that's mostly due to Lamar Jackson torching them for one 0:02:51.720 --> 0:02:54.200 fifty two and a score in the earlier meeting about 0:02:54.200 --> 0:02:57.480 three weeks ago. Uh. The only other start grade on 0:02:57.520 --> 0:03:00.440 the on the raven side I have is Mark Andrews, 0:03:00.480 --> 0:03:03.680 and it's kind of a tepid B grade because there's 0:03:03.680 --> 0:03:06.760 a tight end waste land this this week and Andrews 0:03:06.800 --> 0:03:08.640 is still a good starter. I think he's still the 0:03:08.680 --> 0:03:11.720 top tight end there. Despite Nick Boyle having twice as 0:03:11.720 --> 0:03:14.800 many targets and catches last week, Andrews has been dinged 0:03:14.840 --> 0:03:17.359 up a little bit. Um. It's concerning that he only 0:03:17.360 --> 0:03:19.760 had thirty percent of the snaps last week and only 0:03:19.840 --> 0:03:22.320 ran fourteen routes against the Patriots, but that was the 0:03:22.320 --> 0:03:24.239 Patriots and maybe they were playing a different kind of 0:03:24.280 --> 0:03:27.359 ball game. But he's basically the only tight end that's 0:03:27.360 --> 0:03:30.480 done anything against the Bengals this year. Um. He had 0:03:30.520 --> 0:03:33.239 six in the first meeting, and Dawson Knox was the 0:03:33.280 --> 0:03:35.280 only tight end to score against the Bengals this year, 0:03:36.040 --> 0:03:38.280 So you haven't needed to use a tight end to 0:03:38.280 --> 0:03:40.640 beat the Bengals. So that's why Mark Andrews is only 0:03:40.760 --> 0:03:42.880 just a B grade. And that's really I don't think 0:03:42.880 --> 0:03:45.120 the Bengals are a great past defense and just don't 0:03:45.160 --> 0:03:47.960 have to pass, so teams don't. You don't, and that's 0:03:47.960 --> 0:03:51.520 why I'm benching all the wide receivers. No Baltimore wide 0:03:51.520 --> 0:03:54.560 receiver has more than five targets in a game since 0:03:54.640 --> 0:03:59.400 Week four. That's ridiculous. The last time these teams played 0:03:59.800 --> 0:04:02.800 my else Boykin's two catches for twenty eight yards was 0:04:02.840 --> 0:04:07.000 the top fantasy day for all wide receivers. On the 0:04:07.000 --> 0:04:10.400 other side, A J. Green had a setback. He's out indefinitely. 0:04:10.560 --> 0:04:13.760 Some say his ankle responded poorly to practice this week. 0:04:13.960 --> 0:04:16.800 Others think his ankle responded poorly to seeing Ryan Finley 0:04:16.839 --> 0:04:21.120 taking first team reps. We'll have the ankle or baby, 0:04:21.160 --> 0:04:23.839 he just saw Jalen Ramsey sit out and get a contract, 0:04:23.880 --> 0:04:29.520 And yeah, Finlay's on the bench. By the way, eight 0:04:29.520 --> 0:04:31.720 of the nine quarterbacks to face the Ravens have been 0:04:31.720 --> 0:04:34.440 held to zero or one touchdown passes, and over the 0:04:34.480 --> 0:04:37.600 last five games, the Ravens has have had as many 0:04:37.640 --> 0:04:42.320 picks as touchdowns allowed, which means Tyler Boyd and out 0:04:42.360 --> 0:04:45.040 In Tate aren't doing very good. Tate had the bigger 0:04:45.080 --> 0:04:47.760 game last time these teams faced, registering five catches for 0:04:47.839 --> 0:04:50.359 ninety one yards on twelve targets, but that was with 0:04:50.400 --> 0:04:53.520 Andy Dalton. Boyd was targeted seven times and only had 0:04:53.560 --> 0:04:56.359 three catches for ten of the two. I'd give Boyd 0:04:56.440 --> 0:04:59.120 the tepid see. The Ravens have allowed big days to 0:04:59.200 --> 0:05:03.680 a handful of slot receivers, including Landry Kirk Fitzgerald, Juju 0:05:03.880 --> 0:05:07.279 s new Edelman Lockett. Yeah, I'll mention this, and this 0:05:07.360 --> 0:05:09.000 goes back to one of the long held beliefs of 0:05:09.000 --> 0:05:13.279 this show, Fantasy Football Weekly. What what's when something is 0:05:13.400 --> 0:05:15.719 bad for an offense, it's bad for all the players 0:05:15.760 --> 0:05:18.120 on the office. When a J. Green is out, you 0:05:18.200 --> 0:05:22.680 get far less productivity from Tyler Boyd historically than when 0:05:22.720 --> 0:05:25.240 a J. Green is in. I can't imagine Ryan Finley 0:05:25.279 --> 0:05:27.920 is good for the offense either. It might that's that's 0:05:27.960 --> 0:05:30.040 not it's not a good They might just focus on 0:05:30.080 --> 0:05:32.719 Tyler Boyd or something like that. But Joe Mixon I 0:05:32.760 --> 0:05:34.640 only gave a C grade two and it's more it's 0:05:34.640 --> 0:05:36.560 closer to a bench Mixing had his best day of 0:05:36.560 --> 0:05:40.360 the year last week, but only logged of the offensive 0:05:40.400 --> 0:05:43.560 snaps and managed only three point seven yards per carry. 0:05:43.839 --> 0:05:46.680 He only got thirty nine yards on ten touches in 0:05:46.680 --> 0:05:50.120 the last meeting with the Ravens. That's about the floor. Unfortunately, 0:05:50.160 --> 0:05:53.080 it's like my basement apartment in college where the ceiling 0:05:53.160 --> 0:05:55.400 and the floor are really close to each other. I 0:05:55.440 --> 0:05:57.720 think you had like two yards. The Ravens are only 0:05:57.760 --> 0:06:00.440 allowing fifty six point eight rushing yards to the running 0:06:00.440 --> 0:06:02.960 back position over their last four games. I think that's 0:06:03.000 --> 0:06:06.000 the high water market. It's about fifty seven yards for Joe. 0:06:06.440 --> 0:06:09.279 So it's it's just bad all around. And since yeah, 0:06:09.400 --> 0:06:12.240 it's it's been a it's I hate, I hate this. 0:06:12.240 --> 0:06:17.200 This is I'm just I'm not. I'm not. Joe's gonna 0:06:17.240 --> 0:06:19.160 go it. We told you Joe Mixon was sitting on 0:06:19.200 --> 0:06:21.120 a bad season. The offensive line is gonna make it 0:06:21.200 --> 0:06:24.600 really hard for him. If you can still happy Joe 0:06:24.680 --> 0:06:28.520 Mixon in a dynasty or an empire, yeah, need go 0:06:28.560 --> 0:06:30.800 out and look for him because they're probably gonna have 0:06:30.800 --> 0:06:33.240 a quarterback. They're probably gonna spend some high draft picks 0:06:33.240 --> 0:06:35.400 on the offensive line. It's fair. I think Zach Taylor 0:06:35.480 --> 0:06:38.599 is probably a good offensive mine. It's gonna it's gonna 0:06:38.640 --> 0:06:43.640 come back around that man. That the management I think. 0:06:43.880 --> 0:06:45.680 I think Matt's right though. I think this is a 0:06:45.880 --> 0:06:48.120 it's gonna be historically, we'll look back and go this 0:06:48.160 --> 0:06:51.560 with the by low moment. Joe Mixon, Yeah, I think 0:06:51.600 --> 0:06:53.599 this is the time to go grab him. Chiefs take 0:06:53.680 --> 0:06:56.960 on the Titans, and the Chiefs will get Patrick Mahomes back. 0:06:57.080 --> 0:06:59.119 He's got the injurneed. So he's gonna be wearing a brace, 0:06:59.160 --> 0:07:03.280 and that means that mahomes mobility will be limited at 0:07:03.400 --> 0:07:06.760 least somewhat, and that does sap some of his productivity here. 0:07:07.000 --> 0:07:10.440 He's not like my normal number one quarterback for the week. Um, 0:07:10.440 --> 0:07:13.160 but he does get an A grade. Titan secondaries of 0:07:13.200 --> 0:07:16.080 middle of the pack unit allowing exactly two touchdowns in 0:07:16.200 --> 0:07:20.160 five different games, including the last three games straight two touchdowns. 0:07:20.200 --> 0:07:22.840 So um, one of the reasons I do like Mahomes though, 0:07:23.720 --> 0:07:26.840 Titans just put Malcolm Butler on. I are Tyreek Hill 0:07:27.080 --> 0:07:30.560 kind of just run through this defense. I like Tyree 0:07:30.640 --> 0:07:32.560 Hill a lot. He also gets an A grade. He's 0:07:32.560 --> 0:07:35.440 averaged one eight yards with a score in the two 0:07:35.480 --> 0:07:38.680 games started by Matt Moore and has scored four times 0:07:38.680 --> 0:07:40.880 in his many games since his return from injury. We 0:07:41.040 --> 0:07:44.240 like all of those numbers. No Malcolm Butler, as I mentioned, Um, 0:07:44.280 --> 0:07:46.360 this is a great opportunity for Tyreek Hill, who's an 0:07:46.360 --> 0:07:49.520 A grade, and so's Travis Kelsey, who averages twenty extra 0:07:49.680 --> 0:07:52.559 yards and Mahomes games as opposed to Matt Moore games, 0:07:52.760 --> 0:07:55.640 and he goes back to being an obvious A starter. Now. 0:07:55.720 --> 0:07:59.800 Sammy Watkins shows up here. As an opportunity as well. Again, 0:08:00.400 --> 0:08:02.680 um he, I think the Malcolm Butler loss will be 0:08:02.840 --> 0:08:06.360 will at least sometimes affect Sammy Watkins. But he also 0:08:06.480 --> 0:08:08.080 runs out of the slot a lot, and that puts 0:08:08.160 --> 0:08:10.800 him up against Logan Ryan, who is surrendered just one 0:08:10.840 --> 0:08:13.360 score in his last seven games. So a C start 0:08:13.400 --> 0:08:16.160 on Sammy Watkins, but he is startable here. Let's go 0:08:16.200 --> 0:08:21.320 to Damian Williams, who ripped off that er last week. 0:08:21.840 --> 0:08:26.680 A reminder that outside of that run, Damian Williams has 0:08:26.720 --> 0:08:31.240 been dreadful, averaging two point three yards per carry and 0:08:31.320 --> 0:08:37.160 maybe more importantly, eight carries per game. That's it, do 0:08:37.240 --> 0:08:41.880 not chase last week's yard or it's there's one exception 0:08:41.920 --> 0:08:46.720 to that. If well, yeah, maybe then go ahead and 0:08:46.720 --> 0:08:51.120 start against me. Um. The Titans are an excellent run defense, 0:08:51.559 --> 0:08:55.600 but only when they're starting defensive tackle Drill Casey is playing. 0:08:55.760 --> 0:08:58.480 If he if he has a setback and does not play, 0:08:58.520 --> 0:09:00.400 we think he's gonna play. If he doesn't play, then 0:09:00.480 --> 0:09:03.600 Damian Williams would be elevated up to a higher status. 0:09:03.640 --> 0:09:05.319 As it is right now, I have a begrudging C 0:09:05.480 --> 0:09:08.600 grade on him because Lashawn McCoy is not even a 0:09:08.640 --> 0:09:12.800 factor in this offense anymore diminishing workload in four straight games, 0:09:12.880 --> 0:09:16.199 he's on the bench. Me Cole Hardman averaging ten plays 0:09:16.320 --> 0:09:19.960 per game. Since Sammy Watkins came back, he's on the bench. 0:09:20.280 --> 0:09:23.160 And DeMarcus Robinson has head diminishing snap counts in six 0:09:23.200 --> 0:09:25.600 straight games, he's on the bench. Got a fun staff 0:09:25.600 --> 0:09:27.840 for you on McCoy alright's here. Since he fumbled two 0:09:27.880 --> 0:09:30.480 games ago, he's had six touches. Yeah, there you go. 0:09:31.080 --> 0:09:36.120 In a standard redraft league twelve teamer, how many Chiefs 0:09:36.120 --> 0:09:39.120 are rosterable right now? Well, you got mahomes Hill and 0:09:39.200 --> 0:09:42.200 Kelsey Bank they're in, and then after that it's it's 0:09:42.240 --> 0:09:46.800 you've got Sammy Watkins, the middling starter, and then Damian Williams. 0:09:46.920 --> 0:09:50.840 As a Damian Williams hit waiver wires in some leagues, 0:09:50.840 --> 0:09:55.400 I would understand that, but it's still the starting running 0:09:55.400 --> 0:09:58.640 back on a Chief's offense, so I you know, I 0:09:58.640 --> 0:10:00.959 wouldn't drop him by any stretch. All right, let's go 0:10:01.000 --> 0:10:03.520 to the Tennessee side. Derrick Henry is an obvious A 0:10:03.679 --> 0:10:06.400 grade here. The Chiefs run defense has been better over 0:10:06.400 --> 0:10:09.600 the last three games, holding quality runners. Philip Lindsay, Aaron 0:10:09.679 --> 0:10:11.600 Jones and Dalvin Cook to an average of fifty eight 0:10:11.679 --> 0:10:15.520 rushing yards, none of them scored. Still, I'm not ready 0:10:15.559 --> 0:10:17.959 to say that this is a stopper run defense in 0:10:18.040 --> 0:10:21.240 Kansas City. Henry has seen his rushing attempts, rushing yards, 0:10:21.240 --> 0:10:23.960 and snap percentage decrease in three consecutive games, but his 0:10:24.040 --> 0:10:27.079 yards per carry is increases being more effective on fewer carries, 0:10:27.240 --> 0:10:30.720 and he's still a workhorse getting who's yielding no runs 0:10:30.760 --> 0:10:34.199 to Dan Lewis whatsoever. And Henry is the only Tennessee 0:10:34.240 --> 0:10:36.040 back with a carry inside the five yard line when 0:10:36.080 --> 0:10:38.200 he touchdowns will go to him. He isn't a grade 0:10:38.520 --> 0:10:40.480 for the passing game. I've only got two players you 0:10:40.520 --> 0:10:42.920 could start, and that's Ryan Tannehill with a C grade, 0:10:43.360 --> 0:10:46.040 even though he's been good over the last three weeks, 0:10:46.440 --> 0:10:49.839 averaging depending on your scoring system, roughly quarterback five, quarterback six, 0:10:49.920 --> 0:10:53.680 quarterback seven. That's awfully good for Ryan Tannehill since becoming 0:10:53.720 --> 0:10:57.240 the starter. But the Kansas City secondary is much improved 0:10:57.240 --> 0:10:59.880 from last year. Even though they allowed back to back 0:11:00.000 --> 0:11:02.520 re touchdown games, they've played way better than those box 0:11:02.520 --> 0:11:05.000 scores suggest, and prior to those games, they'd allowed just 0:11:05.040 --> 0:11:06.959 one point one touchdowns per game. I've got a C 0:11:07.120 --> 0:11:09.960 grade in Ryan Tannehill. A C grade on A. J. Brown, 0:11:10.000 --> 0:11:13.240 who's commanded at least seven targets and two of Tannehill's 0:11:13.280 --> 0:11:16.000 three games while notching at least sixty four yards and 0:11:16.120 --> 0:11:19.520 or he touchdown in each of those games. It's again, 0:11:19.920 --> 0:11:22.800 Chief secondary has been good um over the last five weeks. 0:11:22.800 --> 0:11:25.480 Only the Chicago Bears have yielded fewer fantasy points per 0:11:25.480 --> 0:11:28.440 game to opposing receivers in Kansas City. So it is 0:11:28.760 --> 0:11:31.880 it is only a C grade on A. J. Brown. 0:11:31.920 --> 0:11:34.280 Corey Davis is got a hip injury and he is 0:11:34.280 --> 0:11:36.880 not expected to play in this game. One other guy 0:11:36.960 --> 0:11:40.000 I I missed this on page two, another C grade, 0:11:40.200 --> 0:11:42.880 John Nu Smith Delanny Walker, expected to miss this game. 0:11:43.000 --> 0:11:45.800 Smith's been getting sev of the tight end snap since 0:11:45.800 --> 0:11:48.760 Walker left. Opposing teams have been targeting the tight end 0:11:48.800 --> 0:11:51.280 against the Chiefs. They're tied for the league lead in 0:11:51.640 --> 0:11:55.280 tight end targets against them. They've had eight seven tight 0:11:55.400 --> 0:11:57.720 end pass has come their way this year, only three 0:11:57.760 --> 0:12:00.800 TV tight ends of top thirty nine yard though, so 0:12:00.840 --> 0:12:02.720 even though there's a lot of attempts, they aren't necessarily 0:12:02.760 --> 0:12:06.200 being super productive in a six team by week JONU 0:12:06.280 --> 0:12:11.400 Smith C grade. Let's go to the Cardinals taking on 0:12:11.720 --> 0:12:14.040 the Bucks, and I know where you want to start 0:12:14.080 --> 0:12:18.600 with this Scott Fantasy Football's highest scoring kicker going up 0:12:18.600 --> 0:12:21.680 against the defense allowing the most points to kickers. Yes, 0:12:21.760 --> 0:12:26.520 I'm sure that's it's all about the kicker analysis for you. 0:12:27.000 --> 0:12:29.679 That's where you're going to Zane Gonzalez. Isn't a grade, 0:12:29.679 --> 0:12:31.880 It's Scott fish Bowl next year going to be like 0:12:32.000 --> 0:12:35.559 two kicker positions for each team. It's yeah, kicker, all 0:12:35.640 --> 0:12:39.400 kicker flexes. That's all it is. Uh No, we're not 0:12:39.400 --> 0:12:43.199 going to start their charge. I honestly, this game is 0:12:43.240 --> 0:12:44.840 gonna be fun to watch, though. I want to inject 0:12:44.840 --> 0:12:47.240 the shootout potential of this game in my veins because 0:12:47.240 --> 0:12:52.199 it's it's like it doesn't sound good, but but but 0:12:52.559 --> 0:12:57.400 I'm touching my arm to it was disgusting. The over 0:12:57.480 --> 0:13:00.600 under this game is fifty two. Uh The rich combined 0:13:00.640 --> 0:13:04.160 scores in our Arizona Cardinals games fifty points. The average 0:13:04.160 --> 0:13:07.760 point combined points scored in Bucks games this year sixty points. 0:13:07.840 --> 0:13:10.200 There's a lot of scoring, and when when these two 0:13:10.200 --> 0:13:12.960 are meet, there should be a lot of scoring. Both 0:13:12.960 --> 0:13:15.200 teams in the match. In this matchup are bottom four 0:13:15.280 --> 0:13:18.240 in a bunch of categories against quarterbacks. So I have 0:13:18.240 --> 0:13:21.360 Winston and Murray with a's. I'm gonna flip side there. 0:13:21.480 --> 0:13:25.480 I have them both with A grades. Um, let's stay 0:13:25.480 --> 0:13:28.319 on the Cardinals side though, I'm gonna I'm gonna give 0:13:28.320 --> 0:13:31.160 B grades to both his two main options. Kirk did 0:13:31.200 --> 0:13:33.520 get shut down against San Francisco, but he had double 0:13:33.559 --> 0:13:36.720 digit targets the prior week, and three of the games 0:13:36.720 --> 0:13:38.959 he's played with Kyler he's had double digit targets. That's 0:13:38.960 --> 0:13:41.280 three of his five or six games. Christian Kirk's available 0:13:41.280 --> 0:13:43.880 on a lot of leaks. That's standard absence of his 0:13:44.040 --> 0:13:46.959 He is a great opportunity. First, He's actually had more 0:13:47.000 --> 0:13:50.439 targets uh than Fitzgerald in each of the last three 0:13:50.480 --> 0:13:53.520 games they played together. Because you know Kirks sometimes. It's 0:13:53.520 --> 0:13:55.920 just been a pretty big disappointment this year and I 0:13:55.960 --> 0:13:58.320 am I'm still giving him a B grade because of 0:13:58.360 --> 0:14:01.319 the matchup. The Bucks have allowed ten wide receiver touchdowns 0:14:01.320 --> 0:14:03.920 in just the last five games, and five wide receivers 0:14:03.960 --> 0:14:06.880 went over a D and twenty yards. Thirteen different wide 0:14:06.880 --> 0:14:09.679 receivers in those five weeks. Top seventy yards or scored 0:14:09.920 --> 0:14:13.120 in five weeks, thirteen of them. Now, the Bucks slot 0:14:13.120 --> 0:14:15.640 cornerback for the last two seasons has been m J. Stewart, 0:14:15.640 --> 0:14:19.120 but he was so bad that they benched him and 0:14:19.160 --> 0:14:22.160 they've been cobbling together other other help in the slot 0:14:22.280 --> 0:14:24.760 the Bucks have. But now here comes. Here comes the 0:14:24.840 --> 0:14:27.120 Cardinals with two slot receivers, as there are number one 0:14:27.160 --> 0:14:31.000 and number two receiving targets slot receivers. So Matt might 0:14:31.000 --> 0:14:32.720 put m J. Stewart back on the field and that 0:14:32.760 --> 0:14:37.040 would be a huge bonus for either Fitzgerald or Kirk. Yeah, 0:14:37.360 --> 0:14:39.600 it's it's a match if I like for both of them, 0:14:39.600 --> 0:14:42.600 but I'm giving them both B grades. I do think 0:14:42.680 --> 0:14:45.320 Mary gets it done, though, I've Clay on the bench. 0:14:45.640 --> 0:14:48.160 Bucks are might be bad against tight ends, but you're 0:14:48.160 --> 0:14:53.600 not trustee Joss Clay for anything. Um Johnson and Drake Man. 0:14:54.040 --> 0:14:58.720 The Bucks rundy is actually pretty decent. This very good. Yeah, 0:14:58.760 --> 0:15:01.080 three point three yards per are in just four total 0:15:01.160 --> 0:15:05.640 running back touchdowns. My even McCaffrey was held to fifty 0:15:05.680 --> 0:15:08.600 seven total yards and he had two of those four touchdowns. 0:15:09.200 --> 0:15:12.520 So I actually have both of them on the bench. 0:15:13.120 --> 0:15:15.640 I can see giving them a C grade dart throw 0:15:15.680 --> 0:15:18.680 because there's six teams on by. I know that David 0:15:18.720 --> 0:15:20.640 Johnson was working out of the slot a lot this 0:15:20.680 --> 0:15:22.800 week in practice with with Kennyan Drake, and they were 0:15:22.880 --> 0:15:24.280 trying to get them both on the field, so that 0:15:24.320 --> 0:15:26.800 could be interesting. But I'm worried against a good run 0:15:26.880 --> 0:15:29.400 dy that it'll sap both of them. So I think 0:15:29.440 --> 0:15:32.640 that's fair over on the over. On the buck side, 0:15:33.080 --> 0:15:35.200 Evans is an A and Godwin's an A. I really 0:15:35.200 --> 0:15:37.040 don't feel like we need to talk about that much, 0:15:37.120 --> 0:15:41.040 do we. It's against certainly not Evans, who's been red hot. Yeah, 0:15:41.080 --> 0:15:44.160 now for Godwin. You know a lot of Evans. When 0:15:44.160 --> 0:15:48.000 Evans is having these blow up monster games, Godwin's not. Yeah, 0:15:48.080 --> 0:15:51.080 god they both come. I think two games they've had 0:15:51.120 --> 0:15:54.080 that both of them were had decent games. But in 0:15:54.120 --> 0:15:56.440 this one, three of the four one yard games against 0:15:56.480 --> 0:15:59.720 the Cardinals came from the slot um and Godwin does 0:15:59.720 --> 0:16:02.640 play all over, but it's from this lot, So I 0:16:03.000 --> 0:16:05.000 like his matchup there. I'm still giving an A grade. 0:16:05.480 --> 0:16:07.760 Uh you're not. You're not betching him, all right. I 0:16:08.080 --> 0:16:10.440 brought a prop that won't work well on radio here, 0:16:10.480 --> 0:16:14.800 but between Brighton. Howard's not your veins is Nope, you 0:16:14.960 --> 0:16:18.080 start all tight ends against the Cardinals. Yes, but you 0:16:18.120 --> 0:16:20.800 have Cameron Braid and O J. Howard coming back. But 0:16:21.080 --> 0:16:22.800 I don't know if this I don't know if Braid's 0:16:22.840 --> 0:16:28.360 gonna play. Yeah, there's that well flipping the Yeah, it 0:16:28.400 --> 0:16:31.560 says to start O J. Howard. There we go. That's 0:16:31.560 --> 0:16:35.280 award and it says to start break too. I don't 0:16:35.280 --> 0:16:40.360 know if I'm believing. I think you should start Howard 0:16:40.400 --> 0:16:45.520 over Brad's healthy grade there. Uh. In the Running game, 0:16:46.240 --> 0:16:50.080 Oh wow. I'll talk about the Running Game later because 0:16:50.080 --> 0:16:52.280 that's my take a chance on me running Okay, alright, 0:16:52.360 --> 0:16:56.040 we'll come back that. Yeah, we'll talk about that next 0:16:56.040 --> 0:17:00.680 segment a little bit. The bucks I assume, Well, we'll 0:17:00.720 --> 0:17:03.840 find out. It'll be it'll be a big surprise speaking 0:17:04.000 --> 0:17:07.359 next segment. Uh, it's called take a chance on Me 0:17:07.560 --> 0:17:10.480 to nine players you wouldn't ordinarily start, but you can 0:17:10.600 --> 0:17:13.600 this week. One of them, maybe a Buccaneers running back. 0:17:13.680 --> 0:17:16.640 One of them maybe a Raven's running. We'll find out 0:17:18.359 --> 0:17:21.760 after absolutely everything charged is available at fambile dot com. 0:17:21.760 --> 0:17:24.640 By going to fambile dot com slash charge, you get 0:17:24.640 --> 0:17:27.600 instant access to my weekly rankings, my free one tho 0:17:27.840 --> 0:17:30.679 dollar weekly contest, or podcasts, and plenty more. You are 0:17:30.760 --> 0:17:53.800 listening to Fantasy Football Weekly, Fantasy Football Weekly Returns. I 0:17:53.840 --> 0:17:55.480 am Paul Charchy and you can find me on Twitter 0:17:55.520 --> 0:17:58.280 at Paul Charchy and I am with Matt Harrison, he 0:17:58.359 --> 0:18:03.000 is explosive output. And Scott Fish. I'm Scottish on Twitter 0:18:03.080 --> 0:18:05.879 at Scott Fish twenty four on Twitter. Nine players not 0:18:05.920 --> 0:18:07.480 normally in your starting line at many of whom are 0:18:07.480 --> 0:18:09.800 available on the waiver wire to take a chance on me. 0:18:10.080 --> 0:18:12.240 And it's a very royalty free version, as we like 0:18:12.320 --> 0:18:17.000 to say. These three sleeper quarterbacks, running back and receivers 0:18:17.400 --> 0:18:19.840 when they hit paid her. You pay us exactly what 0:18:19.880 --> 0:18:24.960 we paid for this crappy song. Zero dollars nothing, not 0:18:25.119 --> 0:18:27.480 even a penny, not even a piece of a penny. 0:18:27.600 --> 0:18:31.600 I wonder if people could send us more song. That 0:18:31.600 --> 0:18:33.680 would be what do you mean? Do you mean not 0:18:33.680 --> 0:18:36.040 not covering this song, but just different take a chance 0:18:36.080 --> 0:18:38.240 on the type of song I mean, if they change 0:18:38.280 --> 0:18:41.879 their mind, will be the first in line, because honey, 0:18:41.920 --> 0:18:46.160 I'm still free? Are you free? Which haba was free? 0:18:46.280 --> 0:18:47.920 It would be great. You could take a chance on 0:18:48.040 --> 0:18:50.159 you know we needy be Sam Dark his music hit 0:18:50.200 --> 0:18:52.640 the public domain, isn't aren't these songs old enough now 0:18:52.680 --> 0:18:56.520 to hit the public dombay hundred years? God, wait a while. 0:18:56.520 --> 0:18:58.960 All right, let's go to the quarterback position, Matt, who's 0:18:58.960 --> 0:19:01.640 your take chance in the QUARTERBA is Sam Donald? Who 0:19:01.640 --> 0:19:04.600 I put a big in parentheses yuck next to when 0:19:04.600 --> 0:19:07.359 I did this? Um. The trends are going in the 0:19:07.359 --> 0:19:09.919 correct direction, and in his last three games for him, 0:19:09.960 --> 0:19:12.520 they're not Yeah. For him, he's gone from eighty six 0:19:12.600 --> 0:19:17.760 yards passing to eighteen to sixty, and he's gone from 0:19:17.800 --> 0:19:23.600 four interceptions to three interceptions to only one. Last and 0:19:23.760 --> 0:19:26.360 guess what, the Giants defense has allowed an NFL high 0:19:26.440 --> 0:19:29.840 eight point nine yards per pass attempt plus four of 0:19:29.880 --> 0:19:32.280 the last five quarterbacks who have faced the Giants have 0:19:32.359 --> 0:19:36.040 thrown for three yards or multiple scores, and that includes 0:19:36.119 --> 0:19:38.760 three touchdown passes to each of the quarterbacks in the 0:19:38.800 --> 0:19:42.200 last two weeks. Sam Donald, all right, Scott, you'll take 0:19:42.200 --> 0:19:43.960 a chance at a quarterback. I know what I'm going with. 0:19:44.040 --> 0:19:47.160 Jimmy g a lot of people. I am really shocked 0:19:47.160 --> 0:19:51.960 by his ownership. It's like like he's available out there. 0:19:52.000 --> 0:19:54.920 But more importantly, people aren't starting very much because the 0:19:55.400 --> 0:19:57.680 four nine they don't need him to throw. They're running 0:19:57.680 --> 0:20:00.280 a lot. This game against Seattle, he's gon to have 0:20:00.440 --> 0:20:04.000 to pass. Seattle's averaging twenty seven points per game. Um 0:20:04.520 --> 0:20:08.000 he in his career went forced to attempt more than 0:20:08.040 --> 0:20:11.360 thirty three passes. Here's what Jimmy Garoppolo averages three thirty 0:20:11.440 --> 0:20:13.920 yards and two touchdowns. Oh, I like it. We'd take that. 0:20:14.359 --> 0:20:16.920 Call him three and two. Uh, because he's gonna throw 0:20:17.040 --> 0:20:20.560 more than call it. I'm calling it all right, okay. Uh. 0:20:20.640 --> 0:20:23.960 Sales allowed the second most completions, most attempts, and fourth 0:20:24.000 --> 0:20:26.080 most past yards over the last five games. I like it. 0:20:26.119 --> 0:20:28.639 I've got Daniel Jones going up against the Jets, the 0:20:28.680 --> 0:20:32.480 aforementioned Jets, and Sam Darnold. Jones faces a Jets defense 0:20:32.520 --> 0:20:36.600 that was obliterated by Gardner Minshew and Ryan Fitzpatrick over 0:20:36.640 --> 0:20:39.359 the last two weeks. Gardner Minshew was just benched and 0:20:39.440 --> 0:20:43.000 Ryan fitzpa was benched earlier the season. Put Gardner Minshew 0:20:43.040 --> 0:20:46.439 in the same category as Ryan Fitzpatrick. He's not close. 0:20:46.760 --> 0:20:48.640 I've got a long way to go. First of all, 0:20:48.920 --> 0:20:51.919 Fitzpatrick's got way more facial hair. I mean it's not 0:20:51.960 --> 0:20:56.760 even close right now, minshewash I think he's the stew 0:20:56.800 --> 0:20:58.520 want to be. But I kind of like to sue 0:20:58.520 --> 0:21:01.359 Steu Statche when I remember that. UM. Over the past 0:21:01.400 --> 0:21:06.320 two weeks, Minshew and Fitzpatrick three touchdowns each over two 0:21:06.800 --> 0:21:09.840 eight yards each against the Jets. They just put starting 0:21:10.119 --> 0:21:13.959 cornerback Tremaine Johnson on I R. Every opposing quarterback has 0:21:14.000 --> 0:21:17.040 scored against the Jets, and Daniel Jones is throwing a 0:21:17.080 --> 0:21:19.200