WEBVTT - Why the Cost of Shipping Goods From China Is Suddenly Soaring

0:00:11.160 --> 0:00:14.640
<v Speaker 1>Hello, and welcome to another episode of the Odd Lots Podcast.

0:00:14.720 --> 0:00:19.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm Tracy Alloway and I'm Joe Wisen't thal So, Joe,

0:00:19.840 --> 0:00:23.160
<v Speaker 1>I have something to admit to you. Oh boy, here

0:00:23.200 --> 0:00:26.880
<v Speaker 1>we go. Okay, I'm worried you're going to think less

0:00:26.920 --> 0:00:30.160
<v Speaker 1>of me. There's no chance of that. Just just tell So.

0:00:30.400 --> 0:00:34.320
<v Speaker 1>One of my long held ambitions in life is to

0:00:34.840 --> 0:00:39.400
<v Speaker 1>travel via container ship perfectly, you know, a long journey

0:00:39.400 --> 0:00:43.239
<v Speaker 1>across the Pacific. I think I know someone who did that.

0:00:43.360 --> 0:00:47.360
<v Speaker 1>I think I know someone who went from Japan to

0:00:47.479 --> 0:00:53.440
<v Speaker 1>the US as a traveler on a industrial contender ship. Yeah,

0:00:53.600 --> 0:00:56.279
<v Speaker 1>it's something you can do, or I should say you

0:00:56.360 --> 0:01:00.480
<v Speaker 1>were able to do it before the global pandemic. I'm

0:01:00.520 --> 0:01:04.080
<v Speaker 1>sure it's not allowed right now for many reasons. Obviously,

0:01:04.120 --> 0:01:07.280
<v Speaker 1>you have restrictions on travel, you have border restrictions. But

0:01:07.360 --> 0:01:11.480
<v Speaker 1>the other big reason is that global shipping is kind

0:01:11.520 --> 0:01:15.319
<v Speaker 1>of just a mess at the moment, right and that's

0:01:15.319 --> 0:01:19.520
<v Speaker 1>related to the pandemic and the supply chain disruptions, and

0:01:19.600 --> 0:01:22.000
<v Speaker 1>of course they've been happening for about a year now,

0:01:22.560 --> 0:01:25.720
<v Speaker 1>but they don't seem to be abating like the general

0:01:25.760 --> 0:01:28.640
<v Speaker 1>disruptions that we've seen. I mean, the world seems to

0:01:28.680 --> 0:01:32.040
<v Speaker 1>be getting by, and maybe we haven't had as severe

0:01:32.160 --> 0:01:36.000
<v Speaker 1>shortages of things that we might have feared last spring,

0:01:36.520 --> 0:01:40.160
<v Speaker 1>but there are still all kinds of reports about how

0:01:40.560 --> 0:01:43.520
<v Speaker 1>sort of messed up everything. Yeah, and I think people

0:01:43.600 --> 0:01:46.479
<v Speaker 1>were expecting it to get better. So, as you mentioned,

0:01:46.520 --> 0:01:49.840
<v Speaker 1>when the pandemic first started, we saw a bunch of

0:01:49.840 --> 0:01:53.600
<v Speaker 1>countries suddenly close their borders, and this meant that ships

0:01:53.640 --> 0:01:56.920
<v Speaker 1>that were supposed to head somewhere and then head somewhere else,

0:01:57.280 --> 0:01:59.360
<v Speaker 1>we're all sort of knocked out of place. So it

0:01:59.400 --> 0:02:01.520
<v Speaker 1>takes a lot long time to get them back into

0:02:01.560 --> 0:02:04.559
<v Speaker 1>position and to get them on the routes that they're

0:02:04.600 --> 0:02:08.480
<v Speaker 1>supposed to be going. But now what we're seeing is

0:02:08.560 --> 0:02:11.440
<v Speaker 1>that even you know, almost a year on from the

0:02:11.480 --> 0:02:14.800
<v Speaker 1>start of the pandemic, at least in China, this problem

0:02:14.840 --> 0:02:17.320
<v Speaker 1>seems to be getting worse. And I'm looking at a

0:02:17.360 --> 0:02:21.720
<v Speaker 1>headline on Bloomberg right now saying that surging shipping rates

0:02:22.160 --> 0:02:25.919
<v Speaker 1>are a new headwind for the global economy. So it's

0:02:25.960 --> 0:02:29.920
<v Speaker 1>gotten so bad that we could actually feel an outsized

0:02:29.960 --> 0:02:34.919
<v Speaker 1>economic impact from all of this. Yeah, you know, it's

0:02:34.960 --> 0:02:38.760
<v Speaker 1>funny like when when the crisis first hit, there was

0:02:38.800 --> 0:02:41.400
<v Speaker 1>a lot of talk here in the US about, oh,

0:02:41.440 --> 0:02:44.560
<v Speaker 1>are we gonna start reshoring more of our manufacturing? Are

0:02:44.600 --> 0:02:47.520
<v Speaker 1>we gonna buy less from China over time? And maybe

0:02:47.960 --> 0:02:50.280
<v Speaker 1>that will happen at some point, who knows. But in

0:02:50.360 --> 0:02:53.880
<v Speaker 1>the meantime, people are spending a lot on e commerce.

0:02:54.120 --> 0:02:57.799
<v Speaker 1>They're buying things. They're buying things from Walmart dot com

0:02:57.800 --> 0:03:00.560
<v Speaker 1>and Amazon dot com, and a lot of those things

0:03:00.560 --> 0:03:04.160
<v Speaker 1>come from China. So there is an extraordinary amount of

0:03:04.240 --> 0:03:08.919
<v Speaker 1>demand for imports ship from China. I don't think there's

0:03:08.960 --> 0:03:10.960
<v Speaker 1>as much going in the other direction, and I think

0:03:11.000 --> 0:03:13.200
<v Speaker 1>that's sort of like part of the story is that

0:03:13.639 --> 0:03:16.959
<v Speaker 1>although there has been this revival of economic activity, it's

0:03:17.040 --> 0:03:20.160
<v Speaker 1>not the same patterns as it was before, and so

0:03:20.240 --> 0:03:24.680
<v Speaker 1>this sort of like equilibrium stability of global global supply

0:03:24.760 --> 0:03:29.520
<v Speaker 1>lines has not been established yet. No, that's exactly right.

0:03:29.560 --> 0:03:32.840
<v Speaker 1>I think I saw some anecdote about how it's cheaper

0:03:32.960 --> 0:03:37.800
<v Speaker 1>to send a container from the US to China empty.

0:03:37.880 --> 0:03:41.000
<v Speaker 1>So you ship something over to the US a full container,

0:03:41.240 --> 0:03:42.800
<v Speaker 1>but then when it gets there, you just send it

0:03:42.800 --> 0:03:46.040
<v Speaker 1>back empty because you can make more money by making

0:03:46.160 --> 0:03:49.040
<v Speaker 1>more trips versus actually spending the time to load it

0:03:49.160 --> 0:03:54.360
<v Speaker 1>up in the US. So it's stuff like that. Well, anyway,

0:03:54.400 --> 0:03:56.760
<v Speaker 1>that's a good one. That's a good one. On this podcast,

0:03:56.800 --> 0:03:59.200
<v Speaker 1>we're going to hit all of these big themes. So

0:03:59.360 --> 0:04:03.040
<v Speaker 1>we're going to hit it um, how shipping actually works,

0:04:03.320 --> 0:04:05.880
<v Speaker 1>what's going on now? And you know when we say

0:04:05.880 --> 0:04:10.520
<v Speaker 1>stuff like the rate on a standard container has quadrupled

0:04:10.640 --> 0:04:13.880
<v Speaker 1>versus a year ago, what do we actually mean by

0:04:13.960 --> 0:04:17.039
<v Speaker 1>a standard container? And how did we get into a

0:04:17.080 --> 0:04:21.440
<v Speaker 1>place where shipping and global trade was standardized in this way?

0:04:21.480 --> 0:04:23.919
<v Speaker 1>So we're going to talk to someone who has actually

0:04:24.160 --> 0:04:28.320
<v Speaker 1>fulfilled my ambition in life, someone who has traveled on

0:04:28.400 --> 0:04:32.039
<v Speaker 1>container ship. We're gonna talk to Mark Levinson. He's an

0:04:32.040 --> 0:04:35.559
<v Speaker 1>economist and a historian and the author of a really

0:04:35.560 --> 0:04:38.200
<v Speaker 1>good book that I read quite a few years ago,

0:04:38.240 --> 0:04:41.000
<v Speaker 1>but it's called The Box, How the shipping Container made

0:04:41.040 --> 0:04:44.240
<v Speaker 1>the World smaller and the World economy bigger. He also

0:04:44.279 --> 0:04:48.000
<v Speaker 1>has a new book called Outside the Box, How globalization

0:04:48.120 --> 0:04:52.160
<v Speaker 1>changed from moving stuff to spreading ideas. So the perfect

0:04:52.160 --> 0:04:57.080
<v Speaker 1>person to talk about this, all right, Marca, Welcome to

0:04:57.080 --> 0:05:01.360
<v Speaker 1>odd Bots. Good to be with you, Tracy. So it's

0:05:01.440 --> 0:05:05.479
<v Speaker 1>nice to meet someone who shares my affinity for container shipping.

0:05:05.560 --> 0:05:09.200
<v Speaker 1>Could you maybe explain how you got into this as

0:05:09.279 --> 0:05:12.640
<v Speaker 1>an area of interest because I think, I mean, I'm

0:05:12.640 --> 0:05:16.000
<v Speaker 1>pretty sure that your book is well one of the

0:05:16.040 --> 0:05:18.039
<v Speaker 1>only ones that I know of certainly that deals in

0:05:18.080 --> 0:05:22.520
<v Speaker 1>the history of container shipping. Sure, I'm I'm not a

0:05:22.560 --> 0:05:26.520
<v Speaker 1>shipping person. I'm a trade person. I'm very interested in

0:05:26.680 --> 0:05:32.400
<v Speaker 1>international economics and international trade. And my observation was that

0:05:32.800 --> 0:05:37.800
<v Speaker 1>economists paid a whole lot of attention to things that

0:05:37.960 --> 0:05:41.320
<v Speaker 1>governments did as being responsible for the growth in trade,

0:05:41.360 --> 0:05:45.040
<v Speaker 1>for example, cutting tariffs, and that they really hadn't paid

0:05:45.120 --> 0:05:48.920
<v Speaker 1>much attention to these changes in transport costs and the

0:05:49.240 --> 0:05:53.120
<v Speaker 1>greater reliability that came with container shipping. So I decided

0:05:53.160 --> 0:05:55.159
<v Speaker 1>to take a look at that, and that's really where

0:05:56.360 --> 0:05:59.640
<v Speaker 1>my book The Box came from, was really trying to

0:05:59.720 --> 0:06:04.200
<v Speaker 1>under stand how this technology developed and how it then

0:06:04.240 --> 0:06:10.120
<v Speaker 1>affected the international economy. My argument that globalization as we

0:06:10.160 --> 0:06:12.880
<v Speaker 1>know it today wouldn't have been possible without the container

0:06:13.600 --> 0:06:16.080
<v Speaker 1>originally struck a lot of people as strange, but I

0:06:16.120 --> 0:06:19.000
<v Speaker 1>think many people have come around to understand that that's true.

0:06:20.920 --> 0:06:24.680
<v Speaker 1>What is the core thesis of the book, that this

0:06:24.960 --> 0:06:29.480
<v Speaker 1>standardized container that can guard ships and rail is so

0:06:29.600 --> 0:06:33.160
<v Speaker 1>crucial to globalization as we know it? The core thesis

0:06:33.320 --> 0:06:38.880
<v Speaker 1>is that the shipping container made such a huge difference

0:06:39.200 --> 0:06:42.720
<v Speaker 1>in not only the cost of shipping but in the

0:06:42.800 --> 0:06:48.320
<v Speaker 1>reliability of shipping, that it led businesses to adopt new strategies.

0:06:49.240 --> 0:06:53.680
<v Speaker 1>The containerization made what we think of today as long

0:06:53.720 --> 0:06:58.400
<v Speaker 1>distance value chains possible. The idea that you would ship

0:06:59.600 --> 0:07:03.080
<v Speaker 1>inter idiot goods from here to their products that have

0:07:03.200 --> 0:07:06.040
<v Speaker 1>been partially processed and they're being sent to some place

0:07:06.080 --> 0:07:09.080
<v Speaker 1>else to be incorporated into a component, which will be

0:07:09.160 --> 0:07:12.320
<v Speaker 1>sent someplace else to be incorporated into a finished product.

0:07:12.920 --> 0:07:17.120
<v Speaker 1>That wasn't common before containerization came along, because the transport

0:07:17.280 --> 0:07:21.840
<v Speaker 1>was too expensive and too unreliable. And so this type

0:07:21.840 --> 0:07:27.320
<v Speaker 1>of globalization is really a consequence of containerization. So you

0:07:27.440 --> 0:07:29.680
<v Speaker 1>made the point in the book, or I mean a

0:07:29.680 --> 0:07:32.200
<v Speaker 1>big chunk of the book is actually about this. The

0:07:32.280 --> 0:07:37.160
<v Speaker 1>standardized container didn't just happen. Someone had the idea for it,

0:07:37.400 --> 0:07:42.360
<v Speaker 1>and then actually getting it adopted in the wider roles

0:07:42.360 --> 0:07:45.640
<v Speaker 1>of trade took a lot of investment and and quite

0:07:45.680 --> 0:07:48.720
<v Speaker 1>a bit of time. Could you describe that process? Where

0:07:48.720 --> 0:07:52.280
<v Speaker 1>does the container actually come from? And how was it

0:07:52.600 --> 0:07:58.200
<v Speaker 1>uh spread around the world. The container was actually not

0:07:58.400 --> 0:08:02.720
<v Speaker 1>a new invention by any stretch. There's evidence of the

0:08:02.840 --> 0:08:07.040
<v Speaker 1>use of containers to ship goods more efficiently since the

0:08:07.160 --> 0:08:11.880
<v Speaker 1>eighteenth century, and it makes sense, right. It's more efficient

0:08:11.920 --> 0:08:15.240
<v Speaker 1>to handle things once like a box with a lot

0:08:15.240 --> 0:08:18.320
<v Speaker 1>of little boxes inside, than to handle each of these

0:08:18.400 --> 0:08:21.880
<v Speaker 1>different boxes. So there's been a lot of use of

0:08:21.960 --> 0:08:25.920
<v Speaker 1>containers in different ways, including in the United States, but

0:08:26.160 --> 0:08:28.760
<v Speaker 1>none of these made any money. It proved to be

0:08:28.880 --> 0:08:32.840
<v Speaker 1>not a very efficient way to move goods. And then

0:08:32.880 --> 0:08:39.280
<v Speaker 1>what happened Starting in ninety six, US entrepreneurs, notably a

0:08:39.320 --> 0:08:45.720
<v Speaker 1>trucking industry magnet named Malcolm McClain, began to use containers

0:08:45.760 --> 0:08:54.280
<v Speaker 1>aboard purpose built ships and tied the container into a system,

0:08:54.360 --> 0:08:57.960
<v Speaker 1>so it wasn't simply uh, something that went on a

0:08:58.040 --> 0:09:00.880
<v Speaker 1>ship but could also be put on top of a

0:09:01.040 --> 0:09:04.320
<v Speaker 1>rail car, could be attached to a truck, and you

0:09:04.679 --> 0:09:09.160
<v Speaker 1>then had the development of intermodal freight. Containers were a

0:09:09.240 --> 0:09:13.600
<v Speaker 1>domestic US phenomenon for a dozen years, and then starting

0:09:13.600 --> 0:09:18.560
<v Speaker 1>in n there was international container shipping, first across the

0:09:18.600 --> 0:09:23.560
<v Speaker 1>Atlantic and then across the Pacific, and this led to

0:09:23.920 --> 0:09:28.480
<v Speaker 1>a steep drop. I think readers may not recall, but

0:09:28.920 --> 0:09:34.320
<v Speaker 1>before containers came along, doc work was very, very labor intensive.

0:09:34.920 --> 0:09:37.720
<v Speaker 1>To load a ship, the ship had to spend a

0:09:37.760 --> 0:09:41.120
<v Speaker 1>couple of weeks at the dock, and you had workers

0:09:41.200 --> 0:09:46.280
<v Speaker 1>literally handling two hundred thousand separate items, getting them out

0:09:46.280 --> 0:09:48.280
<v Speaker 1>of the warehouse and into the ship, and then at

0:09:48.320 --> 0:09:51.240
<v Speaker 1>the other end of the trip doing the reverse. So

0:09:51.400 --> 0:09:55.760
<v Speaker 1>shipping things took a long time. Many things got lost, stolen, broken,

0:09:56.480 --> 0:09:59.840
<v Speaker 1>and the cost was extremely high. And what that meant

0:09:59.880 --> 0:10:03.360
<v Speaker 1>was a lot of things just weren't worth shipping. Once

0:10:03.679 --> 0:10:08.160
<v Speaker 1>container shipping developed internationally, then all of a sudden it

0:10:08.240 --> 0:10:12.800
<v Speaker 1>made sense to send things like socks and cheap wine

0:10:13.000 --> 0:10:17.720
<v Speaker 1>and electric fans and other relatively inexpensive goods around the world,

0:10:17.760 --> 0:10:22.600
<v Speaker 1>and so the container really made that possible. Was Season

0:10:22.679 --> 0:10:26.880
<v Speaker 1>two of The Wire a pretty accurate depiction of them,

0:10:27.400 --> 0:10:31.439
<v Speaker 1>sort of the intersection of new shipping technology against or

0:10:31.600 --> 0:10:35.920
<v Speaker 1>sort of with sort of traditional union power and workers strongholds.

0:10:37.600 --> 0:10:42.880
<v Speaker 1>It was different in every country. Typically, the pattern prior

0:10:42.960 --> 0:10:49.040
<v Speaker 1>to containerization was that doc work paid well when there

0:10:49.120 --> 0:10:52.560
<v Speaker 1>was work, but because of the nature of shipping that

0:10:52.679 --> 0:10:57.000
<v Speaker 1>was fairly labor intensive, there was this it was necessary

0:10:57.000 --> 0:11:00.480
<v Speaker 1>to have a surplus of workers. So you have all

0:11:00.520 --> 0:11:04.760
<v Speaker 1>of these guys showing up at the dock every day

0:11:04.760 --> 0:11:07.960
<v Speaker 1>trying to find work. Some days there was work for

0:11:08.000 --> 0:11:10.920
<v Speaker 1>everybody because the ship had just come in. Some days

0:11:10.960 --> 0:11:13.800
<v Speaker 1>there was work for only a handful of guys. And

0:11:13.920 --> 0:11:17.000
<v Speaker 1>so then how do I get a job while you

0:11:17.040 --> 0:11:20.360
<v Speaker 1>get your job for your friend? And and it became

0:11:20.520 --> 0:11:24.720
<v Speaker 1>rather a racket infested in some countries. Uh, that was,

0:11:24.960 --> 0:11:29.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, definitely an issue. Um. In other countries, this

0:11:29.559 --> 0:11:31.760
<v Speaker 1>was simply an important source of work, and there was

0:11:31.800 --> 0:11:35.199
<v Speaker 1>a lot of resistance to these jobs disappearing. So every

0:11:35.240 --> 0:11:39.320
<v Speaker 1>country had to resolve this in its own way. So

0:11:40.240 --> 0:11:44.680
<v Speaker 1>I think you've laid out the importance of standardized shipping

0:11:45.040 --> 0:11:50.080
<v Speaker 1>to global trade beautifully. If we fast forward to today

0:11:50.840 --> 0:11:53.559
<v Speaker 1>and the disruptions that Joe and I were talking about

0:11:53.720 --> 0:11:58.280
<v Speaker 1>in the intro, what's your understanding of what's going on

0:11:58.480 --> 0:12:04.280
<v Speaker 1>right now and how much of a problem is it. Well,

0:12:04.400 --> 0:12:07.600
<v Speaker 1>let me give you just a little very recent history

0:12:07.760 --> 0:12:11.720
<v Speaker 1>of containerization, and this is some of what I deal

0:12:11.760 --> 0:12:15.200
<v Speaker 1>with in my my new book, Outside the Box. Starting

0:12:16.000 --> 0:12:21.000
<v Speaker 1>in the early two thousand's, the container ship lines built

0:12:21.360 --> 0:12:25.520
<v Speaker 1>bigger and bigger and bigger ships. Okay, the first ship

0:12:25.880 --> 0:12:33.000
<v Speaker 1>that carried only containers back in carrying sixty eight containers. Okay,

0:12:34.240 --> 0:12:39.920
<v Speaker 1>now the biggest carry more than twelve thousand containers what

0:12:39.960 --> 0:12:43.640
<v Speaker 1>they call twenty ft units, and it was really in

0:12:43.679 --> 0:12:47.080
<v Speaker 1>the early two thousands, around two thousand, five thousand six

0:12:47.120 --> 0:12:50.800
<v Speaker 1>of these big ships started to come online, and then

0:12:50.800 --> 0:12:54.480
<v Speaker 1>they got bigger and bigger over time. These were built

0:12:54.559 --> 0:12:57.640
<v Speaker 1>on the assumption that international trade would continue to grow

0:12:57.800 --> 0:13:03.680
<v Speaker 1>very quickly, as it had for decades up until that time.

0:13:04.400 --> 0:13:09.479
<v Speaker 1>What happened then was in the financial crisis, trade crashed,

0:13:09.840 --> 0:13:14.200
<v Speaker 1>and after that the growth of trade never recovered. Okay,

0:13:14.240 --> 0:13:17.840
<v Speaker 1>international trade as a share of the world's GDP actually

0:13:17.880 --> 0:13:21.520
<v Speaker 1>peaked back in two thousand eight, and so there was

0:13:21.640 --> 0:13:26.120
<v Speaker 1>all his excess capacity in shipping, and every time a

0:13:26.200 --> 0:13:29.040
<v Speaker 1>new ship came online that had the capacity to carry

0:13:29.080 --> 0:13:33.640
<v Speaker 1>thousands of containers, the excess capacity got worse, to the

0:13:33.720 --> 0:13:37.120
<v Speaker 1>point that you can send a container across the Pacific

0:13:37.360 --> 0:13:40.640
<v Speaker 1>for for under a thousand dollars. At one point when

0:13:40.640 --> 0:13:45.000
<v Speaker 1>this happened, many ship lines went bust or else found

0:13:45.120 --> 0:13:49.679
<v Speaker 1>merger partners, and so what had been a very competitive

0:13:49.720 --> 0:13:54.120
<v Speaker 1>industry was transformed into what's basically an oligopola. To day,

0:13:54.960 --> 0:13:58.880
<v Speaker 1>there are three groups of ship lines, and between them

0:13:58.920 --> 0:14:03.000
<v Speaker 1>they probably can troll five or so percent of the

0:14:03.080 --> 0:14:08.720
<v Speaker 1>trade on the major trade routes, and that means that

0:14:08.800 --> 0:14:13.240
<v Speaker 1>they are able to control over capacity. You don't have

0:14:13.640 --> 0:14:16.000
<v Speaker 1>as many ships being built as you had a few

0:14:16.080 --> 0:14:19.440
<v Speaker 1>years ago because of these three big groups kind of

0:14:19.520 --> 0:14:23.840
<v Speaker 1>keep a handle on things, and so that means that

0:14:24.880 --> 0:14:27.160
<v Speaker 1>when all of a sudden there's a spike in demand,

0:14:27.280 --> 0:14:31.520
<v Speaker 1>as there was towards the middle of that, rates are

0:14:31.520 --> 0:14:36.200
<v Speaker 1>going to go up. That's really what's happened. After years

0:14:36.200 --> 0:14:40.680
<v Speaker 1>and years of extremely low rates, rates really popped starting

0:14:41.320 --> 0:14:45.480
<v Speaker 1>in August or September of last year. Why did this

0:14:45.560 --> 0:14:49.080
<v Speaker 1>happen aside from the demand, Well, in the early days

0:14:49.120 --> 0:14:52.880
<v Speaker 1>of COVID, there were a lot of foul ups. Trade

0:14:53.600 --> 0:14:57.680
<v Speaker 1>dropped off precipitously for a brief period, uh, and then

0:14:58.320 --> 0:15:01.640
<v Speaker 1>that it picked up again. And at the same time,

0:15:01.680 --> 0:15:05.440
<v Speaker 1>you had consumers in the wealthy countries who couldn't spend

0:15:05.560 --> 0:15:09.080
<v Speaker 1>on services. So you actually had in the midst of

0:15:09.120 --> 0:15:12.520
<v Speaker 1>this crisis, people with a lot of money to spend.

0:15:12.680 --> 0:15:16.080
<v Speaker 1>They couldn't go out to dinner, they couldn't go on vacation,

0:15:16.720 --> 0:15:20.160
<v Speaker 1>they couldn't go to the theater, they could buy things,

0:15:20.640 --> 0:15:25.560
<v Speaker 1>and so that actually increased the demand for physical products,

0:15:25.840 --> 0:15:27.760
<v Speaker 1>and that's a lot of what we're seeing now in

0:15:27.840 --> 0:15:48.480
<v Speaker 1>this um sudden surge of exports from China. Let me

0:15:48.480 --> 0:15:51.320
<v Speaker 1>ask you a sort of technical question, because I'm sort

0:15:51.360 --> 0:15:55.680
<v Speaker 1>of fascinated about where prices come from. So you know,

0:15:55.720 --> 0:15:58.360
<v Speaker 1>I have a Bloomberg terminal and I can look up

0:15:58.440 --> 0:16:04.120
<v Speaker 1>the Shanghai Shipping Exchange Containerized Freight Index, and I see

0:16:04.200 --> 0:16:07.720
<v Speaker 1>that now that long ago as a thousand. Anyway, now

0:16:07.880 --> 0:16:13.080
<v Speaker 1>it's significantly higher than that. It's exploded. Where do these

0:16:13.160 --> 0:16:16.360
<v Speaker 1>numbers come from? If I'm trying to think how I

0:16:16.360 --> 0:16:18.920
<v Speaker 1>want to phrase the question, if a manufacturer of a

0:16:18.920 --> 0:16:21.400
<v Speaker 1>good or a buyer of a good, is there a

0:16:21.400 --> 0:16:25.840
<v Speaker 1>transparent price? Did they negotiate directly with the shippers? And

0:16:25.880 --> 0:16:30.080
<v Speaker 1>then how did those get fed into a unified index.

0:16:31.480 --> 0:16:35.800
<v Speaker 1>That's a terrific question, Uh, Joe. If you show up

0:16:35.840 --> 0:16:39.360
<v Speaker 1>at the dock with a container and you say, hey,

0:16:39.480 --> 0:16:43.200
<v Speaker 1>I want to send this off to Hamburg or Long Beach,

0:16:44.360 --> 0:16:48.320
<v Speaker 1>well the ship line will do business with you reluctantly.

0:16:48.400 --> 0:16:51.880
<v Speaker 1>But that's not really how the shipping business works. Okay,

0:16:52.160 --> 0:16:57.800
<v Speaker 1>the shipping business works almost entirely under contract, which is

0:16:57.840 --> 0:17:06.240
<v Speaker 1>to say, a big shipper Walmart for um Caterpillar will

0:17:06.240 --> 0:17:11.040
<v Speaker 1>reach an agreement with either a ship line or with

0:17:11.119 --> 0:17:13.640
<v Speaker 1>a freight forward or which will negotiate with the ship

0:17:13.680 --> 0:17:18.879
<v Speaker 1>line on its behalf. These agreements typically last six months,

0:17:18.920 --> 0:17:23.840
<v Speaker 1>sometimes longer, and they're typically filled with contingencies, which means

0:17:24.240 --> 0:17:27.119
<v Speaker 1>you can't actually know what the cost of the shipment is.

0:17:28.440 --> 0:17:33.919
<v Speaker 1>A typical contract might say something like the shipper, that is,

0:17:33.920 --> 0:17:38.600
<v Speaker 1>the company with the goods export, agrees to have at

0:17:38.720 --> 0:17:44.639
<v Speaker 1>least fifty containers on the dock going from Shanghai to

0:17:45.760 --> 0:17:50.600
<v Speaker 1>Los Angeles every Tuesday, and any week in which it

0:17:50.640 --> 0:17:55.680
<v Speaker 1>has less than fifty containers, the agreed price will be higher.

0:17:56.320 --> 0:17:59.920
<v Speaker 1>And if over the entire six months of the pure

0:18:00.080 --> 0:18:04.240
<v Speaker 1>it uh it has fewer than so and so many containers,

0:18:04.400 --> 0:18:07.639
<v Speaker 1>the price will be this much higher. And if the

0:18:07.680 --> 0:18:10.560
<v Speaker 1>ship line misses a sailing, then it will have to

0:18:10.600 --> 0:18:14.240
<v Speaker 1>pay a penalty of so much per container. And those

0:18:14.359 --> 0:18:17.400
<v Speaker 1>kinds of contingencies, and there are many of them, then

0:18:17.520 --> 0:18:22.399
<v Speaker 1>determine what the total prices. So actually a company can't

0:18:22.440 --> 0:18:25.000
<v Speaker 1>tell you what it would cost to send a container

0:18:25.520 --> 0:18:30.040
<v Speaker 1>from Shanghai to Los Angeles today. It will only know

0:18:30.359 --> 0:18:32.960
<v Speaker 1>at the end of the six months when it adds

0:18:33.040 --> 0:18:35.879
<v Speaker 1>up all of the payments that's made, all of the

0:18:35.920 --> 0:18:39.480
<v Speaker 1>penalty payments that's received from the other party, and and

0:18:39.520 --> 0:18:43.880
<v Speaker 1>then it becomes obvious in retrospect what the actual cost

0:18:43.920 --> 0:18:47.879
<v Speaker 1>per container was. So this is not public information. Just sorry.

0:18:48.000 --> 0:18:50.359
<v Speaker 1>So then like I'm looking at this chart again, so

0:18:50.480 --> 0:18:54.760
<v Speaker 1>is it a thousand and now it's it's not public information.

0:18:55.440 --> 0:18:59.560
<v Speaker 1>How does it then get fed into an observable index?

0:19:01.440 --> 0:19:04.639
<v Speaker 1>What you're looking at is the market forecast of a

0:19:04.640 --> 0:19:09.200
<v Speaker 1>spot rate. Okay, as some of the contracts are pegged

0:19:09.200 --> 0:19:13.040
<v Speaker 1>to that index, some are not. Uh, And and there's

0:19:13.040 --> 0:19:16.720
<v Speaker 1>a question here about what kind of information and index

0:19:16.800 --> 0:19:20.199
<v Speaker 1>like this has. Okay, you may have some players in

0:19:20.240 --> 0:19:23.800
<v Speaker 1>the industry who want this information to get out about

0:19:23.840 --> 0:19:26.360
<v Speaker 1>what they actually are paying for freight. You have some

0:19:26.480 --> 0:19:28.680
<v Speaker 1>players in the index in the industry who don't want

0:19:28.680 --> 0:19:32.080
<v Speaker 1>it to get out. And so this is, as is

0:19:32.119 --> 0:19:36.159
<v Speaker 1>the case with many other traded commodities, many of the

0:19:36.200 --> 0:19:41.040
<v Speaker 1>transactions occur in private and what is known in the

0:19:41.119 --> 0:19:44.560
<v Speaker 1>public sphere is not the full story. You don't really

0:19:44.600 --> 0:19:49.560
<v Speaker 1>know what what the actual prices are or were. So

0:19:49.760 --> 0:19:53.120
<v Speaker 1>we described it the outset this idea that the pandemic

0:19:53.359 --> 0:19:57.399
<v Speaker 1>had caused chaos in shipping in part by putting a

0:19:57.440 --> 0:19:59.840
<v Speaker 1>bunch of the big container ships out of place. So

0:20:00.160 --> 0:20:02.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, they expected to go somewhere, they were turned

0:20:02.080 --> 0:20:04.920
<v Speaker 1>away at the border, or they got stuck somewhere, and

0:20:05.000 --> 0:20:09.000
<v Speaker 1>so you have like all these ships out of position.

0:20:09.920 --> 0:20:15.439
<v Speaker 1>How difficult is it to get them back online and

0:20:15.480 --> 0:20:19.280
<v Speaker 1>sort of going where they need to be going? I guess,

0:20:19.400 --> 0:20:23.000
<v Speaker 1>I guess. My question is how flexible are these giant

0:20:23.080 --> 0:20:27.440
<v Speaker 1>container ships. There are a couple of things that make

0:20:27.560 --> 0:20:32.880
<v Speaker 1>them not very flexible. One is that these big ships

0:20:33.800 --> 0:20:39.200
<v Speaker 1>don't necessarily fit at all ports on some routes, they're

0:20:39.240 --> 0:20:42.680
<v Speaker 1>simply not enough demand to handle a ship that can

0:20:42.760 --> 0:20:46.399
<v Speaker 1>carry ten thousand containers, or perhaps the harbor in some

0:20:46.440 --> 0:20:50.320
<v Speaker 1>places isn't deep enough to handle that ship, and so

0:20:50.400 --> 0:20:53.040
<v Speaker 1>a ship that can serve one route may not be

0:20:53.080 --> 0:20:57.439
<v Speaker 1>able to serve another route profitably. The other factor to

0:20:57.520 --> 0:21:01.919
<v Speaker 1>understand here is that no one in the container shipping

0:21:01.920 --> 0:21:07.119
<v Speaker 1>business sends out a ship. When a ship line is

0:21:07.240 --> 0:21:12.240
<v Speaker 1>offering a route, it's offering a regular service. Okay, So

0:21:12.720 --> 0:21:17.000
<v Speaker 1>every Tuesday, to take an example, there will be a

0:21:17.160 --> 0:21:22.080
<v Speaker 1>ship that leaves ching Dao in China and it will

0:21:22.160 --> 0:21:26.200
<v Speaker 1>stop in this place, and it will stop in that place,

0:21:26.320 --> 0:21:29.920
<v Speaker 1>and it will stop in Singapore so many days later,

0:21:30.000 --> 0:21:34.159
<v Speaker 1>and it will stop in Umhis Sirius in Spain so

0:21:34.240 --> 0:21:37.639
<v Speaker 1>many days later, and eventually, so many days later, it

0:21:37.640 --> 0:21:40.040
<v Speaker 1>will end up in Rotterdam. And it will do that

0:21:40.119 --> 0:21:42.800
<v Speaker 1>on the same day every week, and it will be

0:21:43.200 --> 0:21:46.600
<v Speaker 1>a ship of the same design every week in most cases.

0:21:47.320 --> 0:21:51.080
<v Speaker 1>So this is called a string in the shipping industry.

0:21:51.520 --> 0:21:56.400
<v Speaker 1>And so if you have a ship that sales between

0:21:57.080 --> 0:22:00.679
<v Speaker 1>China and Rotterdam and my example, every Tuesday, you're probably

0:22:00.720 --> 0:22:04.600
<v Speaker 1>going to have seven or eight versions of the same

0:22:04.640 --> 0:22:08.880
<v Speaker 1>ship about the same size ready to go on that date,

0:22:08.960 --> 0:22:11.680
<v Speaker 1>and you're trying to keep on the schedule, which means

0:22:12.440 --> 0:22:14.880
<v Speaker 1>if one or two or three of them are out

0:22:14.880 --> 0:22:17.240
<v Speaker 1>of position, it takes a while to get back on

0:22:17.320 --> 0:22:20.960
<v Speaker 1>that regular rotation. You can't just put any old ship

0:22:21.040 --> 0:22:24.720
<v Speaker 1>on that run, because that's not what the traffic requires.

0:22:24.960 --> 0:22:30.439
<v Speaker 1>Coordinating these is quite a task. Typically these days, ships

0:22:30.480 --> 0:22:32.760
<v Speaker 1>are built with the idea that they will be used

0:22:32.760 --> 0:22:36.800
<v Speaker 1>on a specific route, uh and and so you don't

0:22:36.840 --> 0:22:41.439
<v Speaker 1>want to just plug them in any place. So you know,

0:22:41.480 --> 0:22:43.200
<v Speaker 1>there's sort of I guess a couple of things going

0:22:43.240 --> 0:22:47.360
<v Speaker 1>on here at once. There's the acute disruption that we're

0:22:47.359 --> 0:22:50.480
<v Speaker 1>still working through. I mean, the coronavirus crisis isn't over.

0:22:51.119 --> 0:22:54.880
<v Speaker 1>Basically nobody's economy has really returned to normal, so we're

0:22:54.920 --> 0:22:59.040
<v Speaker 1>dealing with the aftermath of that, and that's obviously snarled

0:22:59.480 --> 0:23:04.440
<v Speaker 1>shipping and uh scrambled the situation. What about I mean,

0:23:04.560 --> 0:23:08.040
<v Speaker 1>is there any prospect long term for there to actually

0:23:08.160 --> 0:23:13.960
<v Speaker 1>be a sustained capacity shortage if the economies around the world,

0:23:14.080 --> 0:23:16.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, you have like lots of governments doing fiscal

0:23:16.520 --> 0:23:19.920
<v Speaker 1>stimulus and they're going to need supplies and so forth,

0:23:19.920 --> 0:23:21.640
<v Speaker 1>that if we have this sort of boom, I mean,

0:23:22.320 --> 0:23:26.960
<v Speaker 1>perhaps could we have a sustained capacity constraint the likes

0:23:27.040 --> 0:23:30.040
<v Speaker 1>we haven't seen since prior to the Great Financial Crisis.

0:23:32.320 --> 0:23:36.159
<v Speaker 1>The capacity shortage such as it is, comes from the

0:23:36.200 --> 0:23:39.320
<v Speaker 1>fact that you've really only got these three alliances, and

0:23:39.400 --> 0:23:42.520
<v Speaker 1>so people are not building so many ships now because

0:23:42.520 --> 0:23:45.440
<v Speaker 1>they don't have to worry about their competitors so much.

0:23:46.640 --> 0:23:50.199
<v Speaker 1>I think though in the longer term the concerns are

0:23:50.200 --> 0:23:54.480
<v Speaker 1>actually in the other direction. We had for many, many

0:23:54.560 --> 0:23:59.159
<v Speaker 1>years international trade growing probably twice as fast as the

0:23:59.160 --> 0:24:04.919
<v Speaker 1>world economy since two thousand eight, international trade has grown

0:24:04.960 --> 0:24:07.879
<v Speaker 1>more slowly than the world economy. And I think that's

0:24:07.880 --> 0:24:10.960
<v Speaker 1>going to continue, and the growth of international trade is

0:24:11.000 --> 0:24:14.920
<v Speaker 1>going to slow down even more. And and that means

0:24:15.040 --> 0:24:21.280
<v Speaker 1>that we have the prospect of overcapacity returning as the

0:24:21.400 --> 0:24:24.000
<v Speaker 1>pandemic receipts. You know, I think that there are a

0:24:24.040 --> 0:24:27.520
<v Speaker 1>couple of reasons for this in the long run. One

0:24:27.640 --> 0:24:32.359
<v Speaker 1>is that you've got demographics right in a world in

0:24:32.400 --> 0:24:36.080
<v Speaker 1>which most countries except in Africa, are filling up with

0:24:36.200 --> 0:24:40.719
<v Speaker 1>older people. There's less demand for physical products. People are

0:24:40.760 --> 0:24:44.160
<v Speaker 1>spending more and more of their money on services, and

0:24:44.880 --> 0:24:47.119
<v Speaker 1>I think that that's really just going to affect the

0:24:47.160 --> 0:24:51.400
<v Speaker 1>amount of trade in physical goods over the long run.

0:24:52.400 --> 0:24:57.840
<v Speaker 1>You're seeing a lot of manufacturers and retailers change their

0:24:57.880 --> 0:25:01.520
<v Speaker 1>sourcing decisions in way that will affect the demand for

0:25:01.640 --> 0:25:06.000
<v Speaker 1>container shipping. One of the things I write about is

0:25:06.320 --> 0:25:10.320
<v Speaker 1>that there was a lot of misjudgment of risk in globalization.

0:25:10.680 --> 0:25:14.280
<v Speaker 1>A lot of companies looked at production costs and transport

0:25:14.359 --> 0:25:18.040
<v Speaker 1>costs and said, we've got to make these things in China.

0:25:18.920 --> 0:25:21.440
<v Speaker 1>People have now taken risk on board, you know, they

0:25:21.520 --> 0:25:24.720
<v Speaker 1>understand that risk has to be factored into their calculations,

0:25:24.760 --> 0:25:27.880
<v Speaker 1>because if the good zone arrive on time, it can

0:25:27.960 --> 0:25:30.480
<v Speaker 1>really be very bad for the bottom line, and it

0:25:30.520 --> 0:25:33.840
<v Speaker 1>can harm their reputation in the long term. You've had

0:25:33.880 --> 0:25:38.520
<v Speaker 1>many companies now starting to diversifying. There's a lot of

0:25:38.520 --> 0:25:42.960
<v Speaker 1>talk in the States about reshoring. It's not exactly re shoring, though.

0:25:43.359 --> 0:25:48.760
<v Speaker 1>What's going on is rather redundancy. Firms are concerned about

0:25:49.160 --> 0:25:53.280
<v Speaker 1>making a product only in one place, being reliant only

0:25:53.280 --> 0:25:55.840
<v Speaker 1>on one supplier, or on one ship line, or on

0:25:55.840 --> 0:26:00.399
<v Speaker 1>one board, and so people are looking for options in

0:26:00.480 --> 0:26:04.480
<v Speaker 1>case something goes wrong somewhere. This raises production costs a

0:26:04.480 --> 0:26:09.840
<v Speaker 1>little bit, but provides better insurance effectively in case there's

0:26:09.840 --> 0:26:13.760
<v Speaker 1>a fire, a hurricane, a strike, ship sinks, whatever the

0:26:14.440 --> 0:26:17.240
<v Speaker 1>issue is. And then the other big thing you've got

0:26:17.280 --> 0:26:22.240
<v Speaker 1>obviously coming along is a concern about climate change, and

0:26:22.359 --> 0:26:27.760
<v Speaker 1>as the costs of making production and transportation more sustainable

0:26:28.080 --> 0:26:30.560
<v Speaker 1>but begin to be felt, that's going to raise the

0:26:30.600 --> 0:26:35.040
<v Speaker 1>cost of international shipping and domestic freight transportation and is

0:26:35.040 --> 0:26:37.760
<v Speaker 1>going to make these long distance value chains more costly

0:26:37.800 --> 0:26:40.960
<v Speaker 1>to operate. I have a dumb question, but what's the

0:26:41.119 --> 0:26:45.399
<v Speaker 1>downside of over capacity of mega ships? So you know,

0:26:45.440 --> 0:26:49.160
<v Speaker 1>I could see it maybe hitting profits of the big

0:26:49.160 --> 0:26:52.320
<v Speaker 1>three shipping companies. But why is that bad for the

0:26:52.400 --> 0:26:58.240
<v Speaker 1>overall global economy? Well, I wouldn't say necessarily that it's

0:26:58.320 --> 0:27:02.240
<v Speaker 1>bad for the overall global economy, but it's really bad

0:27:02.440 --> 0:27:08.160
<v Speaker 1>for a ship lines for sure. But be these mega

0:27:08.240 --> 0:27:13.919
<v Speaker 1>ships have generally fouled up the transportation system. Okay, you

0:27:14.040 --> 0:27:18.680
<v Speaker 1>actually have fewer ships calling at most ports today than

0:27:18.760 --> 0:27:22.240
<v Speaker 1>you used to have. They're much bigger, and so think

0:27:22.280 --> 0:27:25.359
<v Speaker 1>of what this does to the operation of the port.

0:27:25.880 --> 0:27:28.560
<v Speaker 1>You don't have a smooth flow of cargo going through

0:27:28.560 --> 0:27:32.200
<v Speaker 1>the port. Now you've got nothing happening in the port.

0:27:32.240 --> 0:27:35.520
<v Speaker 1>It's dead today, and then tomorrow a ship shows up

0:27:35.560 --> 0:27:38.960
<v Speaker 1>and it wants to unload three thousand containers in your port.

0:27:39.800 --> 0:27:41.360
<v Speaker 1>What do you do with this? How do you get

0:27:41.400 --> 0:27:44.840
<v Speaker 1>it unloaded? Where do you put the containers? One thing

0:27:44.880 --> 0:27:48.800
<v Speaker 1>that's happened is that ships spend more time in port,

0:27:48.880 --> 0:27:51.640
<v Speaker 1>which is very wasteful because it just takes more time

0:27:51.680 --> 0:27:56.119
<v Speaker 1>to get so many containers on and off. The trucks

0:27:56.160 --> 0:27:59.440
<v Speaker 1>are lined up at the gate because there's so many

0:27:59.440 --> 0:28:02.520
<v Speaker 1>containers to bring in to send out on these ships

0:28:02.520 --> 0:28:07.040
<v Speaker 1>are so many containers to deliver the railroads can't handle

0:28:07.720 --> 0:28:11.680
<v Speaker 1>this sudden flood of containers, so you have the cargoes

0:28:11.720 --> 0:28:14.680
<v Speaker 1>sitting around longer before it gets removed from the port.

0:28:15.480 --> 0:28:18.959
<v Speaker 1>All of these things have tended to make transit times

0:28:19.040 --> 0:28:24.480
<v Speaker 1>longer uh and have made it harder for shippers to

0:28:24.680 --> 0:28:26.760
<v Speaker 1>get their freight where it's supposed to be on deadline,

0:28:27.040 --> 0:28:30.280
<v Speaker 1>and that's bad for everybody. Who are the three big

0:28:30.320 --> 0:28:34.439
<v Speaker 1>players right now in shipping and is there hold on

0:28:34.480 --> 0:28:37.760
<v Speaker 1>the industry? Like is it sustainable? Do you expect in

0:28:37.880 --> 0:28:39.600
<v Speaker 1>ten years from now it will probably just be those

0:28:39.640 --> 0:28:46.560
<v Speaker 1>three big players. Still, the big players have formed what

0:28:46.720 --> 0:28:53.000
<v Speaker 1>are called alliances. So these alliances have kind of squeezed

0:28:53.080 --> 0:28:56.440
<v Speaker 1>most of the smaller players out of the business. One

0:28:56.480 --> 0:29:02.200
<v Speaker 1>alliance involves IMMERSK, the Danish company, and Mediterranean Shipping, which

0:29:02.240 --> 0:29:06.040
<v Speaker 1>is based in Switzerland, and between them those two companies

0:29:06.080 --> 0:29:08.600
<v Speaker 1>have a little bit over a third of all of

0:29:08.640 --> 0:29:13.040
<v Speaker 1>the container shipping in the world. There's another alliance that

0:29:13.200 --> 0:29:17.880
<v Speaker 1>has um Costco, the China Ocean Shipping Company, the French

0:29:17.920 --> 0:29:21.280
<v Speaker 1>company m c M a c GM, and Evergreen, a

0:29:21.360 --> 0:29:26.200
<v Speaker 1>Taiwanese company, and it has about of the world's shipping.

0:29:26.760 --> 0:29:30.400
<v Speaker 1>And then there's another alliance that has the German company

0:29:30.440 --> 0:29:34.760
<v Speaker 1>HAPAG Lloyd and the Japanese lines and the Korean line,

0:29:35.440 --> 0:29:39.120
<v Speaker 1>and it has about so if you put those three

0:29:39.280 --> 0:29:44.280
<v Speaker 1>alliances together, their market share and container shipping is close

0:29:44.320 --> 0:29:49.160
<v Speaker 1>to Will those alliances stay together. At the moment, the

0:29:49.200 --> 0:29:52.480
<v Speaker 1>system looks pretty stable. You can imagine that at some

0:29:52.520 --> 0:29:54.840
<v Speaker 1>point a government will step in and say you, guys

0:29:54.880 --> 0:29:58.920
<v Speaker 1>can no longer have this alliance. It's anti competitive. But

0:29:59.040 --> 0:30:17.560
<v Speaker 1>so far that hasn't had them. Is there anything that

0:30:17.600 --> 0:30:21.680
<v Speaker 1>shipping companies could do right now to unsnarl traffic and

0:30:21.840 --> 0:30:26.640
<v Speaker 1>get it going again? A part of the snarling of

0:30:26.720 --> 0:30:32.600
<v Speaker 1>traffic is due to things beyond their control. For example,

0:30:33.200 --> 0:30:36.840
<v Speaker 1>traffic into and out of the UK is totally snarled

0:30:36.920 --> 0:30:40.760
<v Speaker 1>for reasons related more to Brexit than to problems with

0:30:40.880 --> 0:30:46.240
<v Speaker 1>container shipping. I think that in general, ship lines have

0:30:46.800 --> 0:30:51.680
<v Speaker 1>decided that these giant ships were not a brilliant idea,

0:30:52.240 --> 0:30:56.719
<v Speaker 1>and so we're seeing now that the ship lines are

0:30:56.760 --> 0:31:00.160
<v Speaker 1>interested in building vessels that were a bit smaller. You know,

0:31:00.240 --> 0:31:04.480
<v Speaker 1>as I mentioned earlier, the average ship size went from

0:31:04.520 --> 0:31:08.760
<v Speaker 1>carrying the equivalent of containers to the equivalent of twelve

0:31:08.760 --> 0:31:12.360
<v Speaker 1>thousand truck size containers in the in the span of

0:31:13.040 --> 0:31:16.720
<v Speaker 1>a dozen years. But I think the ship lines have

0:31:16.840 --> 0:31:22.560
<v Speaker 1>discovered that these ships that have twenty thousand, two thousand

0:31:22.640 --> 0:31:25.280
<v Speaker 1>t e u s okay divide by two for the

0:31:25.360 --> 0:31:29.720
<v Speaker 1>number of containers, that those ships really don't work very well.

0:31:30.160 --> 0:31:32.400
<v Speaker 1>It takes too long to load them, it takes too

0:31:32.440 --> 0:31:35.040
<v Speaker 1>long to unload them, there are too many places they

0:31:35.080 --> 0:31:38.719
<v Speaker 1>can't go. It's too often the case that they're not needed.

0:31:39.280 --> 0:31:43.280
<v Speaker 1>And so the ship lines are interested in building vessels

0:31:43.280 --> 0:31:46.840
<v Speaker 1>that are somewhat smaller than that. Now, as that happens,

0:31:46.880 --> 0:31:49.360
<v Speaker 1>I think that may resolve a lot of these problems

0:31:49.400 --> 0:31:52.760
<v Speaker 1>that are caused by these ships just being too damn big.

0:31:53.400 --> 0:31:57.560
<v Speaker 1>Is that just the bigness? Was that just unanticipation of

0:31:58.520 --> 0:32:01.600
<v Speaker 1>a sort of never ending in world trade such as

0:32:01.680 --> 0:32:07.040
<v Speaker 1>we saw pre grade financial crisis, Like had that vision materialized,

0:32:07.120 --> 0:32:11.000
<v Speaker 1>had that continued, had the so called bricks got bigger

0:32:11.000 --> 0:32:13.560
<v Speaker 1>and bigger and the commodity boom gone on, would that

0:32:13.640 --> 0:32:15.360
<v Speaker 1>have made sense? And it was just that was a

0:32:15.400 --> 0:32:18.840
<v Speaker 1>different world, and now the equipment build for that world

0:32:18.880 --> 0:32:23.560
<v Speaker 1>and making an increasingly less sense. The slump in the

0:32:23.600 --> 0:32:28.240
<v Speaker 1>growth of trade wasn't really the only factor here. Ship lines,

0:32:28.320 --> 0:32:33.440
<v Speaker 1>like companies in many other industries have relentlessly pursued economies

0:32:33.480 --> 0:32:37.200
<v Speaker 1>of scale. Bigger was better, and it was true. When

0:32:37.240 --> 0:32:40.120
<v Speaker 1>you could build a ship that could carry three thousand

0:32:40.120 --> 0:32:43.760
<v Speaker 1>containers instead of two thousand containers, the costs per container

0:32:43.880 --> 0:32:46.240
<v Speaker 1>dropped a lot. And when you could build a ship

0:32:46.280 --> 0:32:49.480
<v Speaker 1>that could carry ten rather than five, the cost per

0:32:49.520 --> 0:32:55.040
<v Speaker 1>container was much lower. So ship lines were aggressively pursuing

0:32:55.040 --> 0:32:58.560
<v Speaker 1>economies of scale. What they didn't count on was that

0:32:58.640 --> 0:33:01.880
<v Speaker 1>at some point the hstles would get so big that

0:33:02.000 --> 0:33:05.680
<v Speaker 1>diseconomies of scale would set in. And that's what's happened

0:33:05.680 --> 0:33:10.560
<v Speaker 1>in shipping. The point at which ships got built beyond

0:33:10.720 --> 0:33:14.920
<v Speaker 1>perhaps seventeen or eighteen thousand tu s was the point

0:33:14.920 --> 0:33:17.440
<v Speaker 1>at which they just got too big, and that's when

0:33:17.440 --> 0:33:20.200
<v Speaker 1>you started to have this confusion in the ports. That's

0:33:20.200 --> 0:33:23.360
<v Speaker 1>when you started to have these delays in shipping. That's

0:33:23.400 --> 0:33:26.880
<v Speaker 1>when you start to have h the the entire industry

0:33:26.960 --> 0:33:32.480
<v Speaker 1>become less reliable, and the diminished reliability is one of

0:33:32.480 --> 0:33:37.520
<v Speaker 1>the things that is leading manufacturers and retailers to have

0:33:38.040 --> 0:33:41.920
<v Speaker 1>a new sourcing pattern, to make their products in different places,

0:33:41.960 --> 0:33:46.920
<v Speaker 1>and to have redundant value chains. Size isn't everything, and

0:33:47.080 --> 0:33:49.880
<v Speaker 1>many of the ship lines mistakenly thought that it was

0:33:50.640 --> 0:33:54.520
<v Speaker 1>there any other sort of key idea, mark that you

0:33:54.560 --> 0:33:56.680
<v Speaker 1>think we're sort of missing or that would help us

0:33:56.880 --> 0:34:01.760
<v Speaker 1>understand the current situation. There is a lot of concern

0:34:01.920 --> 0:34:06.600
<v Speaker 1>now about shortages of containers and shortages of chassisas and

0:34:06.680 --> 0:34:10.040
<v Speaker 1>that sort of thing. In general. Part of this is

0:34:10.080 --> 0:34:11.960
<v Speaker 1>that the ship lines have gotten out of that business

0:34:11.960 --> 0:34:16.520
<v Speaker 1>and left it to other people to to to deal with. Yeah,

0:34:16.760 --> 0:34:21.839
<v Speaker 1>there is a huge amount of of confusion. And let

0:34:21.840 --> 0:34:26.320
<v Speaker 1>me put this way, international trade after all these years,

0:34:26.360 --> 0:34:31.120
<v Speaker 1>still doesn't work very smoothly. There are still lots and

0:34:31.239 --> 0:34:34.680
<v Speaker 1>lots of manual steps in the process of arranging a shipment.

0:34:35.200 --> 0:34:39.080
<v Speaker 1>There are still lots and lots of unexpected delays, and

0:34:39.080 --> 0:34:41.799
<v Speaker 1>and this situation really hasn't gotten better in recent years.

0:34:42.680 --> 0:34:44.200
<v Speaker 1>You would have thought that we'd be better at it

0:34:44.239 --> 0:34:47.760
<v Speaker 1>by you would think so. What happens in a system

0:34:47.920 --> 0:34:51.720
<v Speaker 1>like we've got in shipping is that the ship lines

0:34:52.200 --> 0:34:56.560
<v Speaker 1>built ships that they thought were best for their own needs.

0:34:57.880 --> 0:35:02.600
<v Speaker 1>They didn't really give much consideration shan to the system.

0:35:02.640 --> 0:35:07.200
<v Speaker 1>And the system includes the container terminals in the ports.

0:35:07.280 --> 0:35:11.560
<v Speaker 1>It concerns the ports themselves, It concerns the railroads that

0:35:11.600 --> 0:35:13.719
<v Speaker 1>pick up and deliver to the ports. It concerns the

0:35:13.760 --> 0:35:16.680
<v Speaker 1>truck lines that pick up and deliver to the ports,

0:35:16.719 --> 0:35:19.960
<v Speaker 1>and various other players in the business, the companies that

0:35:20.040 --> 0:35:24.600
<v Speaker 1>provide containers, the companies that provide the chassis that trucks use.

0:35:25.080 --> 0:35:28.399
<v Speaker 1>All of those folks are players in this ecosystem. And

0:35:28.640 --> 0:35:32.960
<v Speaker 1>what was most efficient for the ship lines alone hasn't

0:35:32.960 --> 0:35:35.600
<v Speaker 1>been most efficient for this whole system. It's really made

0:35:35.600 --> 0:35:40.319
<v Speaker 1>it less efficient over time. Well, Mark, that was a

0:35:40.400 --> 0:35:44.560
<v Speaker 1>fantastic conversation, and I'm always grateful for the opportunity to

0:35:44.600 --> 0:35:47.360
<v Speaker 1>talk about shipping. And I don't know, part of me

0:35:47.440 --> 0:35:51.840
<v Speaker 1>I understand it's still kind of crazy that global shipping

0:35:51.920 --> 0:35:54.680
<v Speaker 1>isn't as smooth as you might think it would be

0:35:54.760 --> 0:35:57.600
<v Speaker 1>given the amount of global trade that we currently do.

0:35:57.880 --> 0:36:01.320
<v Speaker 1>But part of me also likes the romance of having,

0:36:01.560 --> 0:36:04.399
<v Speaker 1>you know, a system that's very physically based where you're

0:36:04.440 --> 0:36:07.600
<v Speaker 1>moving goods, uh, you know, in these big packages and

0:36:07.600 --> 0:36:09.239
<v Speaker 1>you can kind of see the flow of goods, you

0:36:09.280 --> 0:36:12.440
<v Speaker 1>can see them unloaded up ports. I don't know, I

0:36:12.520 --> 0:36:15.040
<v Speaker 1>kind of like that in the modern economy. It's nice

0:36:15.040 --> 0:36:17.600
<v Speaker 1>that there's something still analys Do you recommend everyone at

0:36:17.680 --> 0:36:20.399
<v Speaker 1>least do that one to take a global ship as

0:36:20.440 --> 0:36:23.640
<v Speaker 1>a as a passenger? Is that a fun experience? Are

0:36:23.719 --> 0:36:26.040
<v Speaker 1>you asking me? Yeah, I will tell you the truth.

0:36:26.080 --> 0:36:29.080
<v Speaker 1>I've not done that. Oh oh sorry, I thought I

0:36:29.080 --> 0:36:31.640
<v Speaker 1>thought Tracy said that you did. No, I was not

0:36:31.640 --> 0:36:34.920
<v Speaker 1>going to contradict Tracy on the air. No, I have

0:36:35.040 --> 0:36:39.800
<v Speaker 1>not done that. Uh. And you know most of what happens.

0:36:39.880 --> 0:36:42.520
<v Speaker 1>There have been several people have tried to write books

0:36:42.560 --> 0:36:47.040
<v Speaker 1>about the experience of traveling on a container ship, and

0:36:47.600 --> 0:36:53.479
<v Speaker 1>they're not very good books because nothing happens. Yeah. Well,

0:36:53.960 --> 0:36:57.120
<v Speaker 1>you know what. One of the books turned out to

0:36:57.160 --> 0:37:00.640
<v Speaker 1>be an interesting book because the author wrote about things

0:37:00.640 --> 0:37:02.640
<v Speaker 1>that didn't happen on the container ship that she was

0:37:02.680 --> 0:37:05.360
<v Speaker 1>traveling on, but she had heard happened on other container ships.

0:37:06.800 --> 0:37:08.440
<v Speaker 1>But I mean, what do you do? Look? Was that

0:37:08.480 --> 0:37:11.160
<v Speaker 1>because I think I'm I think I was thinking about

0:37:11.160 --> 0:37:14.000
<v Speaker 1>a different book where it starts out with the author

0:37:14.200 --> 0:37:18.720
<v Speaker 1>taking like this big container ship journey. That Rose George

0:37:18.719 --> 0:37:21.200
<v Speaker 1>wrote a book on container shipping a few years a

0:37:21.239 --> 0:37:24.000
<v Speaker 1>couple of years after I did. Yeah, that must be it.

0:37:24.200 --> 0:37:27.160
<v Speaker 1>I think I've read both of them. And Rose George's

0:37:27.200 --> 0:37:30.799
<v Speaker 1>book was called in the US Everything, it had a

0:37:30.800 --> 0:37:34.239
<v Speaker 1>different name. In the UK and what she found and

0:37:34.360 --> 0:37:36.360
<v Speaker 1>it was it was a fun book to read. But

0:37:36.640 --> 0:37:38.840
<v Speaker 1>her conceit was that she was going to write about

0:37:38.840 --> 0:37:41.880
<v Speaker 1>what went on during this voyage and the book wasn't

0:37:42.040 --> 0:37:45.800
<v Speaker 1>successful in that sense because nothing went on during the voyage,

0:37:46.840 --> 0:37:49.479
<v Speaker 1>which is typical of you know. So she was talking

0:37:49.480 --> 0:37:52.920
<v Speaker 1>about piracy that had occurred on other ships and problems

0:37:52.920 --> 0:37:56.400
<v Speaker 1>with the treatment of workers on other ships. A ship

0:37:56.440 --> 0:38:01.480
<v Speaker 1>from Shanghai to Los Angeles, it takes the days somewhere

0:38:02.040 --> 0:38:05.080
<v Speaker 1>U sixteen seventeen days. It actually takes a couple of

0:38:05.160 --> 0:38:08.840
<v Speaker 1>days longer than it did twenty years ago. The price

0:38:08.880 --> 0:38:12.120
<v Speaker 1>of fuel is one of the most expensive costs in shipping,

0:38:12.920 --> 0:38:18.160
<v Speaker 1>and so initially the ship lines slowed down their vessels

0:38:18.760 --> 0:38:20.920
<v Speaker 1>when the price of fuel went up. This was called

0:38:21.000 --> 0:38:26.000
<v Speaker 1>slow steaming and UH the idea was that they would

0:38:26.000 --> 0:38:31.720
<v Speaker 1>operate more slowly to hold down the total cost of fuel. UH.

0:38:31.760 --> 0:38:35.440
<v Speaker 1>Then newer generations of vessels were built, like these ships

0:38:35.480 --> 0:38:40.160
<v Speaker 1>that carry EU, and they were built to steam slowly,

0:38:40.640 --> 0:38:44.040
<v Speaker 1>so they can't speed up. And one of the reasons

0:38:44.160 --> 0:38:47.600
<v Speaker 1>for these delays is that it's harder now than it

0:38:47.719 --> 0:38:51.560
<v Speaker 1>used to be for a ship to make up time. Okay,

0:38:51.560 --> 0:38:53.920
<v Speaker 1>It used to be that a ship would sail let's say,

0:38:53.920 --> 0:38:57.400
<v Speaker 1>an average of twenty one knots, but if it got behind,

0:38:57.440 --> 0:38:59.399
<v Speaker 1>it could sail it, it could steam it twenty four

0:38:59.440 --> 0:39:02.680
<v Speaker 1>knots for a while to get back on schedule. The

0:39:02.719 --> 0:39:06.120
<v Speaker 1>ships can't do that anymore. They're typically sailing at seventeen

0:39:06.200 --> 0:39:09.600
<v Speaker 1>knots and they can't go much faster than that, so

0:39:09.760 --> 0:39:12.799
<v Speaker 1>once they're behind, there behind. I'm glad we brought this

0:39:12.920 --> 0:39:15.520
<v Speaker 1>up because I it really is painting this picture of

0:39:16.160 --> 0:39:21.040
<v Speaker 1>global trade is a complicated problem and why even after

0:39:21.080 --> 0:39:24.479
<v Speaker 1>all these years, it's not an efficient solved one, Because

0:39:24.520 --> 0:39:27.000
<v Speaker 1>even something like that, it makes total sense the trajectory.

0:39:27.320 --> 0:39:29.360
<v Speaker 1>They concerned about fuel costs, but then you end up

0:39:29.360 --> 0:39:34.719
<v Speaker 1>building these boats that can't accelerate. Super interesting and sort

0:39:34.719 --> 0:39:37.960
<v Speaker 1>of just really sort of drives home how how tough

0:39:38.000 --> 0:39:40.839
<v Speaker 1>this whole thing is, and probably helps explain why these

0:39:40.840 --> 0:39:42.840
<v Speaker 1>prices are so volatile, because I mean, I know, like

0:39:42.880 --> 0:39:44.799
<v Speaker 1>when I pull up these charts, I mean they just

0:39:44.960 --> 0:39:48.839
<v Speaker 1>swing back and forth all the time. Yeah. One thing

0:39:49.080 --> 0:39:52.359
<v Speaker 1>that hasn't come to the four yet because interest rates

0:39:52.400 --> 0:39:56.000
<v Speaker 1>are very low, but it will is that this drives

0:39:56.120 --> 0:40:01.240
<v Speaker 1>up inventory costs. Uh, you think about time you're goods

0:40:01.280 --> 0:40:04.759
<v Speaker 1>spend on the ship, right, that's those are goods in inventory,

0:40:05.200 --> 0:40:08.600
<v Speaker 1>and so if it's taking you three days longer to

0:40:08.680 --> 0:40:14.160
<v Speaker 1>send your stuff, then your cost is effectively higher. Well,

0:40:14.239 --> 0:40:18.400
<v Speaker 1>right now, with money going out for free, that's not

0:40:18.520 --> 0:40:22.600
<v Speaker 1>really a big deal. But if interest rates become significant again,

0:40:23.560 --> 0:40:26.480
<v Speaker 1>this is will be a cost burden. It'll be costly

0:40:26.520 --> 0:40:30.000
<v Speaker 1>to have their their goods sitting on these vessels. All right, Well, Mark,

0:40:30.080 --> 0:40:32.200
<v Speaker 1>I think we're gonna have to leave it there. But

0:40:32.840 --> 0:40:36.520
<v Speaker 1>absolutely a great conversation. Yeah, I really appreciate it, and

0:40:36.560 --> 0:40:38.319
<v Speaker 1>you've laid it out very clear. Well, I've enjoyed it.

0:40:38.760 --> 0:40:41.319
<v Speaker 1>I've enjoyed it. Thank you very much for having me on.

0:40:41.840 --> 0:41:01.960
<v Speaker 1>Thanks Mark. I can't believe if I mixed up the

0:41:02.000 --> 0:41:04.919
<v Speaker 1>intros of these two books on shipping that I've read,

0:41:04.920 --> 0:41:06.840
<v Speaker 1>but yeah, one of them started with someone going on

0:41:06.880 --> 0:41:09.680
<v Speaker 1>an actual container journey and the other one didn't. Both

0:41:09.719 --> 0:41:12.799
<v Speaker 1>are are pretty good, although I mean Mark laid out

0:41:12.840 --> 0:41:17.200
<v Speaker 1>his thesis in a really great, clear and concise way,

0:41:17.400 --> 0:41:20.520
<v Speaker 1>and I think he was very good at illustrating why

0:41:21.080 --> 0:41:24.920
<v Speaker 1>global trade the shipping industry isn't as flexible or as

0:41:24.960 --> 0:41:27.640
<v Speaker 1>efficient as you might think it should be at this

0:41:27.719 --> 0:41:30.879
<v Speaker 1>point in time. Yeah, absolutely, I mean, like I would

0:41:30.880 --> 0:41:33.400
<v Speaker 1>not have guessed that at all. Like I, you know,

0:41:33.440 --> 0:41:37.640
<v Speaker 1>I sort of had some intuition that prices were volatile

0:41:37.760 --> 0:41:43.600
<v Speaker 1>because okay, you you can't just supply that fast relative

0:41:43.680 --> 0:41:45.680
<v Speaker 1>to demand, and so you could have a modest hit

0:41:45.760 --> 0:41:49.200
<v Speaker 1>to demand and then suddenly of a glut and vice versa.

0:41:49.640 --> 0:41:52.880
<v Speaker 1>But then adding in all the different layers of why

0:41:52.960 --> 0:41:56.879
<v Speaker 1>it's so complicated and delays at the ports and all

0:41:56.920 --> 0:41:58.719
<v Speaker 1>that kind of stuff, you really started to see and

0:41:58.840 --> 0:42:00.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, anyone should just sort of look up some

0:42:00.760 --> 0:42:03.799
<v Speaker 1>of these great index charts and you can see they

0:42:03.840 --> 0:42:06.399
<v Speaker 1>really like swing wildly in a way that very few

0:42:06.400 --> 0:42:09.160
<v Speaker 1>things do. And I think he laid it out very well.

0:42:09.360 --> 0:42:12.319
<v Speaker 1>And of course, right now all of these charts are

0:42:12.360 --> 0:42:16.640
<v Speaker 1>basically you know, surgery. I guess the other question is

0:42:16.640 --> 0:42:20.440
<v Speaker 1>whether or not the current experience, the gridlock and the

0:42:20.480 --> 0:42:23.799
<v Speaker 1>snarling that we've described, whether or not that does leave

0:42:24.239 --> 0:42:28.040
<v Speaker 1>lead to a reconsideration for the shipping industry about how

0:42:28.040 --> 0:42:31.040
<v Speaker 1>they do things. So Mark mentioned this idea that everyone's

0:42:31.080 --> 0:42:33.920
<v Speaker 1>been obsessed with mega ships because they were more efficient

0:42:34.080 --> 0:42:37.640
<v Speaker 1>for the shipping companies themselves, but they don't actually work

0:42:37.680 --> 0:42:40.400
<v Speaker 1>that well for a lot of the customers, and he

0:42:40.520 --> 0:42:43.080
<v Speaker 1>made a pretty convincing argument about why they might not

0:42:43.320 --> 0:42:47.920
<v Speaker 1>work well in a sort of post coronavirus, post globalization

0:42:48.239 --> 0:42:52.520
<v Speaker 1>trade environment where things become a lot more localized. People

0:42:52.560 --> 0:42:55.160
<v Speaker 1>need to be more nimble, people are worried about supply

0:42:55.239 --> 0:43:00.239
<v Speaker 1>chain vulnerability. You can see an argument for going smaller. Yeah,

0:43:00.320 --> 0:43:01.839
<v Speaker 1>you know, we didn't get into it, but I once

0:43:02.000 --> 0:43:05.640
<v Speaker 1>watched a reality TV show on like Discover channel about

0:43:05.760 --> 0:43:11.600
<v Speaker 1>ship building that also seems insanely complicated and really, you know,

0:43:11.719 --> 0:43:14.600
<v Speaker 1>really difficult, and not many people like actually know how

0:43:14.640 --> 0:43:18.399
<v Speaker 1>to like engineer the process of a big building a ship.

0:43:18.480 --> 0:43:21.400
<v Speaker 1>So we didn't get into that. But another aspect of

0:43:21.400 --> 0:43:24.640
<v Speaker 1>this that seems very hard. Yeah, Actually, that reminds me

0:43:24.760 --> 0:43:27.520
<v Speaker 1>there's one other really important aspect of this, which is

0:43:27.600 --> 0:43:30.680
<v Speaker 1>that because all these ships are out of position and

0:43:30.719 --> 0:43:34.280
<v Speaker 1>in some cases stuck off the coast of various countries,

0:43:34.719 --> 0:43:37.719
<v Speaker 1>there are people working on the ships who have been

0:43:37.719 --> 0:43:40.359
<v Speaker 1>stuck on them for months at a time, you know,

0:43:40.440 --> 0:43:43.840
<v Speaker 1>in some cases, without medical care, in some cases, without

0:43:43.880 --> 0:43:47.560
<v Speaker 1>being paid, while they have families back at home. That's

0:43:47.560 --> 0:43:52.360
<v Speaker 1>been a humanitarian crisis that we've actually been writing about it. Bloomberg.

0:43:52.440 --> 0:43:56.000
<v Speaker 1>We've done a series on this topic. It also lays

0:43:56.000 --> 0:44:00.000
<v Speaker 1>out some of the problems and issues in getting um

0:44:00.080 --> 0:44:03.439
<v Speaker 1>these ships back into into position. The idea of who

0:44:03.480 --> 0:44:07.480
<v Speaker 1>bears responsibility for the crew and for the vessel itself

0:44:07.600 --> 0:44:11.359
<v Speaker 1>is not as clear cut as you might imagine. But

0:44:11.480 --> 0:44:15.440
<v Speaker 1>if you're interested in this topic, you know, google Seafarers

0:44:15.520 --> 0:44:19.799
<v Speaker 1>and Bloomberg and you'll get some really good stories on this.

0:44:19.520 --> 0:44:22.759
<v Speaker 1>H this issue, all right, uh, and this crisis just

0:44:22.840 --> 0:44:25.640
<v Speaker 1>needs to take Yeah, it's a sad note. Yeah, it's

0:44:25.640 --> 0:44:27.279
<v Speaker 1>a sad note to end on, but you know there

0:44:27.360 --> 0:44:31.160
<v Speaker 1>is a humanitarian cost to global shipping as well. Okay,

0:44:31.360 --> 0:44:34.279
<v Speaker 1>let's leave it there. This has been another episode of

0:44:34.320 --> 0:44:37.280
<v Speaker 1>the All Thoughts Podcast. I'm Tracy Alloway. You can follow

0:44:37.320 --> 0:44:41.680
<v Speaker 1>me on Twitter at Tracy Alloway. I'm Joe Wisn'tal. You

0:44:41.680 --> 0:44:45.160
<v Speaker 1>can follow me on Twitter at the Stalwart. You should

0:44:45.200 --> 0:44:49.000
<v Speaker 1>check out our guest Mark Levinson. Check out his UH books,

0:44:49.000 --> 0:44:51.120
<v Speaker 1>particularly At the Box, as well as his new one

0:44:51.239 --> 0:44:55.200
<v Speaker 1>Outside the Box. Follow our producer Laura Carlson. She's at

0:44:55.280 --> 0:44:58.880
<v Speaker 1>Laura M. Carlson. Follow the Bloomberg head of podcast, Francesca

0:44:58.960 --> 0:45:02.000
<v Speaker 1>Levie at frances Good Today and check out all of

0:45:02.040 --> 0:45:06.479
<v Speaker 1>our podcasts at Bloomberg unto the handle at podcasts. Thanks

0:45:06.520 --> 0:45:07.000
<v Speaker 1>for listening.