WEBVTT - Equities, Cannabis, Chips, And Geopolitics (Podcast)

0:00:00.800 --> 0:00:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney, alongside

0:00:04.040 --> 0:00:06.920
<v Speaker 1>my co host Matt Miller. Every business day we bring

0:00:06.960 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>you interviews from CEOs, market pros, and Bloomberg experts, along

0:00:11.520 --> 0:00:15.600
<v Speaker 1>with essential market moving news. Find the Bloomberg Markets Podcast

0:00:15.600 --> 0:00:18.439
<v Speaker 1>on Apple Podcasts or wherever you listen to podcasts, and

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:23.400
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com slash podcast. Kind of mixed open

0:00:23.800 --> 0:00:27.360
<v Speaker 1>here for the first forty five minutes or so of

0:00:27.640 --> 0:00:29.560
<v Speaker 1>trading here, looks like folks are kind of waiting on

0:00:29.600 --> 0:00:31.720
<v Speaker 1>some of the big echo data. It's gonna get a

0:00:31.760 --> 0:00:34.319
<v Speaker 1>little sense of kind of how this market's performing, how

0:00:34.360 --> 0:00:36.919
<v Speaker 1>it may discount some of this echo data we will

0:00:36.960 --> 0:00:40.400
<v Speaker 1>get this week, most notably CPI Data as well's pp

0:00:40.520 --> 0:00:44.040
<v Speaker 1>I as well. Cameron christ macro strategists for Bloomberg News

0:00:44.159 --> 0:00:48.839
<v Speaker 1>and Gina Martin Adams, chief equity strategist for Bloomberg Intelligence.

0:00:48.920 --> 0:00:50.919
<v Speaker 1>They both join us here. We're gonna round table this thing.

0:00:52.240 --> 0:00:56.279
<v Speaker 1>I want to record this. Yeah, I think we do

0:00:56.360 --> 0:00:59.160
<v Speaker 1>that on a daily basis. Then we pot it as

0:00:59.280 --> 0:01:02.000
<v Speaker 1>kids say, all right, Cameron, um, we got a lot

0:01:02.040 --> 0:01:05.760
<v Speaker 1>of eco data here today. What are you going to

0:01:05.800 --> 0:01:07.560
<v Speaker 1>be looking for? What do you think I guess more importantly,

0:01:07.600 --> 0:01:09.080
<v Speaker 1>what do you think your federal Reserve is gonna be

0:01:09.120 --> 0:01:13.880
<v Speaker 1>looking for? Well, obviously the CPI is the highlight of

0:01:13.959 --> 0:01:17.080
<v Speaker 1>the of the week. Uh. Yeah, they made it pretty

0:01:17.080 --> 0:01:19.080
<v Speaker 1>clear that they need to see more than one or

0:01:19.120 --> 0:01:23.760
<v Speaker 1>two friendly prints to switch switch course. Um, but last

0:01:23.800 --> 0:01:27.280
<v Speaker 1>month wouldn't even get a friendly print. So uh, it

0:01:27.319 --> 0:01:30.680
<v Speaker 1>would be the first step on a on the journey.

0:01:30.800 --> 0:01:32.840
<v Speaker 1>Could be the sort of the beginning of the end

0:01:33.360 --> 0:01:35.839
<v Speaker 1>of the cycle if we start to see some significant

0:01:35.880 --> 0:01:39.399
<v Speaker 1>downside prints and cp I. But as this year has

0:01:39.440 --> 0:01:41.720
<v Speaker 1>taught us, it is very, very costly to try to

0:01:41.760 --> 0:01:45.479
<v Speaker 1>preempt that. So, Gina, what does an investor do here?

0:01:45.640 --> 0:01:49.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Um, it seems like every data point out

0:01:49.160 --> 0:01:52.440
<v Speaker 1>backs up the Fed actually doing what they say, which

0:01:52.480 --> 0:01:55.680
<v Speaker 1>is shocking to the markets. And then, um, it turns

0:01:55.680 --> 0:01:58.840
<v Speaker 1>out when we get a drop in inflation, at least

0:01:58.840 --> 0:02:01.800
<v Speaker 1>according to UM a bunch of research on the street,

0:02:02.560 --> 0:02:06.200
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be horrible for earnings. Well, I think

0:02:06.280 --> 0:02:09.600
<v Speaker 1>that remains to be seen for a start. UM, inflation

0:02:09.680 --> 0:02:12.680
<v Speaker 1>is usually a lagging indicator of growth. Inflation has been

0:02:12.720 --> 0:02:15.200
<v Speaker 1>in a bizarre position this year relative to the past

0:02:15.200 --> 0:02:18.239
<v Speaker 1>twenty years, so any forecasters that really have a strong

0:02:18.360 --> 0:02:21.959
<v Speaker 1>sense of of what inflation is doing probably would would

0:02:22.040 --> 0:02:25.679
<v Speaker 1>use a model that is not accurately going to forecast

0:02:25.800 --> 0:02:28.840
<v Speaker 1>the reality over the next couple of quarters. I think

0:02:28.880 --> 0:02:30.840
<v Speaker 1>that's the sort of the reality of the earning stream

0:02:30.960 --> 0:02:34.720
<v Speaker 1>is that inflation has been a big pain point for earnings.

0:02:34.800 --> 0:02:38.440
<v Speaker 1>Revenues have been growing, but margins have been contracting amid

0:02:38.560 --> 0:02:41.440
<v Speaker 1>the rising input cost pressure, even though companies have been

0:02:41.480 --> 0:02:44.520
<v Speaker 1>able to pass on some price increases. So we might

0:02:44.600 --> 0:02:47.520
<v Speaker 1>be somewhat surprised by the degree to which to drop

0:02:47.560 --> 0:02:51.280
<v Speaker 1>an inflation can actually soothe some of those margin pressure

0:02:51.280 --> 0:02:54.400
<v Speaker 1>margin pressures going forward. And frankly, that is not what's

0:02:54.440 --> 0:02:56.320
<v Speaker 1>happened for the last twenty years. What's happened for the

0:02:56.360 --> 0:03:00.400
<v Speaker 1>last twenty years is company earnings weakness does not come

0:03:00.440 --> 0:03:03.959
<v Speaker 1>about because inflation is too fast. It comes out about

0:03:04.040 --> 0:03:07.400
<v Speaker 1>because we see a demand demand drop, right, And so

0:03:07.520 --> 0:03:10.680
<v Speaker 1>I think that we've got this really mass confusion going

0:03:10.680 --> 0:03:14.440
<v Speaker 1>on with respect to the earning stream. Um Also, a

0:03:14.520 --> 0:03:18.640
<v Speaker 1>lot of the earning strength has come from energy. Specifically,

0:03:19.440 --> 0:03:22.359
<v Speaker 1>energy is very tied not just to inflation, the inflation

0:03:22.360 --> 0:03:25.480
<v Speaker 1>out but look, but what's happening with the input price, right,

0:03:25.560 --> 0:03:29.800
<v Speaker 1>and our oil prices actually falling. Now are input prices

0:03:29.800 --> 0:03:32.040
<v Speaker 1>actually falling in the energy space is a big question

0:03:32.080 --> 0:03:35.360
<v Speaker 1>mark for the outlook. So I would characterize the current

0:03:35.400 --> 0:03:39.840
<v Speaker 1>outlook is sort of earnings confusion. Um that earnings confusion

0:03:39.880 --> 0:03:42.960
<v Speaker 1>probably persists into the next quarter, but companies can do

0:03:43.040 --> 0:03:45.760
<v Speaker 1>a lot to clear up that earning's confusion, and that's

0:03:45.760 --> 0:03:48.160
<v Speaker 1>what we'll be looking for in the upcoming earning season.

0:03:48.200 --> 0:03:51.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean, today, for example, UBS said forward profit will

0:03:51.960 --> 0:03:55.720
<v Speaker 1>drop fifty this year. That sounds less like confusion and

0:03:55.840 --> 0:04:00.960
<v Speaker 1>just like a huge loss, right, Yeah, Well, I mean, look,

0:04:01.440 --> 0:04:03.800
<v Speaker 1>we would be remiss not to note that what's been

0:04:03.880 --> 0:04:07.400
<v Speaker 1>happening in the auto space has also been completely contrary

0:04:07.400 --> 0:04:11.200
<v Speaker 1>to historical experience over a cycle. We can't get cars.

0:04:11.960 --> 0:04:15.040
<v Speaker 1>Cars aren't coming into the United States. They're going to

0:04:15.120 --> 0:04:16.960
<v Speaker 1>start coming into the United States at a point in

0:04:17.000 --> 0:04:20.320
<v Speaker 1>time where interest rates are increasing. This is just completely

0:04:20.440 --> 0:04:24.040
<v Speaker 1>bizarre and a bizarre experience in the earning stream. So

0:04:24.080 --> 0:04:26.880
<v Speaker 1>do you really want to take a forward example as

0:04:26.960 --> 0:04:31.360
<v Speaker 1>indicative of what's going to happen for tech companies, healthcare companies,

0:04:31.720 --> 0:04:34.760
<v Speaker 1>consumer companies at large. I mean, I think this is

0:04:34.800 --> 0:04:38.120
<v Speaker 1>what I mean by inflation, By inflation and earnings confusion.

0:04:38.960 --> 0:04:41.680
<v Speaker 1>This is a very very difficult point to take any

0:04:41.720 --> 0:04:44.919
<v Speaker 1>individual companies as a representative of what's going to happen

0:04:44.960 --> 0:04:46.840
<v Speaker 1>for the market at large, and that's been the case

0:04:46.839 --> 0:04:49.200
<v Speaker 1>for much of two all right, well, how about let's

0:04:49.200 --> 0:04:51.760
<v Speaker 1>take Mike Wilson's point on you know, he says, when

0:04:51.760 --> 0:04:54.920
<v Speaker 1>inflation comes down, um, the parts that are going to

0:04:55.000 --> 0:04:59.040
<v Speaker 1>remain resilient our shelter, wages and some services, and then

0:04:59.279 --> 0:05:02.360
<v Speaker 1>goods will con any decelery. And that's not a constructive

0:05:02.400 --> 0:05:06.040
<v Speaker 1>picture for the sp It's definitely not a constructive picture

0:05:06.080 --> 0:05:10.520
<v Speaker 1>for the goods centric industries within the SNP five completely

0:05:10.560 --> 0:05:17.000
<v Speaker 1>agree with that scenario. Did centric consumer companies generally indicative

0:05:17.000 --> 0:05:18.880
<v Speaker 1>of what's going to happen at the market at large?

0:05:19.000 --> 0:05:22.359
<v Speaker 1>Is my point of contention with that piece. Hey, Cameron, So,

0:05:22.440 --> 0:05:24.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I guess the issue is do we have

0:05:24.120 --> 0:05:26.839
<v Speaker 1>a risk material risk this week of being like really

0:05:26.880 --> 0:05:30.920
<v Speaker 1>negatively surprised the inflation comes in really hot? Of course,

0:05:31.240 --> 0:05:33.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean I would say that any analysis is looking

0:05:33.839 --> 0:05:36.080
<v Speaker 1>at the last twenty or thirty years of inflation what

0:05:36.120 --> 0:05:39.000
<v Speaker 1>it means for earnings isn't particularly useful because this is

0:05:39.000 --> 0:05:43.640
<v Speaker 1>a completely different inflation regime, um than than we've had, uh,

0:05:43.800 --> 0:05:46.599
<v Speaker 1>you know, central bankers Allen Greenspan kind of defined price

0:05:46.640 --> 0:05:52.640
<v Speaker 1>stability is that level of inflation that doesn't materially impact

0:05:52.720 --> 0:05:56.400
<v Speaker 1>the decisions of consumers and businesses in the economy. And

0:05:56.440 --> 0:05:59.039
<v Speaker 1>that's more or less been the case, um from the

0:05:59.080 --> 0:06:04.640
<v Speaker 1>late eighties, uh really through until last year. UM. So

0:06:05.080 --> 0:06:08.240
<v Speaker 1>this is a very different scenario to what we've experienced

0:06:08.240 --> 0:06:11.520
<v Speaker 1>in the nineties, uh and the naughties and and the

0:06:11.520 --> 0:06:13.800
<v Speaker 1>teams on the one hand and on the other hand,

0:06:14.440 --> 0:06:18.120
<v Speaker 1>referencing demand, I mean, the fact stated intention is to

0:06:18.200 --> 0:06:21.560
<v Speaker 1>reduce demand, to break it in the supply um. I

0:06:21.600 --> 0:06:24.480
<v Speaker 1>mean they haven't. They couldn't be any more clear on

0:06:24.520 --> 0:06:28.080
<v Speaker 1>what they're trying to accomplish. Is that in the Is

0:06:28.120 --> 0:06:31.400
<v Speaker 1>that in the price of the stock market? I think

0:06:31.440 --> 0:06:35.320
<v Speaker 1>that's that's really really debatable. Certainly it is not embedded

0:06:35.880 --> 0:06:39.479
<v Speaker 1>in the level of earnings expectations. I think over the

0:06:39.520 --> 0:06:42.599
<v Speaker 1>next over the next few years, and if you look

0:06:42.720 --> 0:06:46.400
<v Speaker 1>at market valuations based on the on the present value

0:06:46.400 --> 0:06:49.719
<v Speaker 1>of those future earnings expectations, the market is not cheap,

0:06:49.960 --> 0:06:52.640
<v Speaker 1>all right. Camera great stuff camera christ Macro strategist, Bloomberg

0:06:52.680 --> 0:06:58.400
<v Speaker 1>News Gina Martin Adams, Bloomberg intelligence equity strategist. This is Bloomberg.

0:07:02.720 --> 0:07:05.039
<v Speaker 1>Let's get over right now to Chris Beal's he's the

0:07:05.080 --> 0:07:08.880
<v Speaker 1>CEO of weed Maps. It's nasdack listed. The ticker is

0:07:09.160 --> 0:07:12.800
<v Speaker 1>m A p S. And to me this seems like

0:07:12.800 --> 0:07:16.400
<v Speaker 1>a growth story. Chris. We just got you know, legal

0:07:16.440 --> 0:07:20.920
<v Speaker 1>weed starting to sell around New York. Um, not entirely

0:07:21.000 --> 0:07:24.960
<v Speaker 1>legally yet, but I guess people will use your app

0:07:25.320 --> 0:07:29.240
<v Speaker 1>to find a place where they can uh safely and

0:07:29.320 --> 0:07:33.800
<v Speaker 1>securely buy weed and um, you know, get reliable quality.

0:07:33.840 --> 0:07:36.920
<v Speaker 1>Is that is that the case? Yeah? Well, actually one

0:07:36.960 --> 0:07:39.160
<v Speaker 1>step further, it's sort of what we provide is sort

0:07:39.200 --> 0:07:41.680
<v Speaker 1>of like Amazon or door Dash for cannabis. So it

0:07:41.760 --> 0:07:46.640
<v Speaker 1>let's retailers and brands showcase their products and enable online ordering,

0:07:47.240 --> 0:07:48.800
<v Speaker 1>and then we have a bunch of software that helps

0:07:48.840 --> 0:07:52.080
<v Speaker 1>them do delivery, post order follow ups, CRM, that sort

0:07:52.080 --> 0:07:54.880
<v Speaker 1>of thing. But yeah, the idea is to take something

0:07:54.920 --> 0:07:58.440
<v Speaker 1>that's traditionally been scary, hard to understand and make it

0:07:58.480 --> 0:08:01.920
<v Speaker 1>easy to shop for consumer is online. So you know

0:08:02.000 --> 0:08:04.360
<v Speaker 1>how many states are you active in? Can you get

0:08:04.360 --> 0:08:07.320
<v Speaker 1>delivery service? I mean, delivery service has been the only

0:08:07.400 --> 0:08:10.080
<v Speaker 1>way to get weed in New York for like thirty years,

0:08:10.080 --> 0:08:14.960
<v Speaker 1>but can you actually get legal delivery service now here? Yeah,

0:08:15.080 --> 0:08:17.440
<v Speaker 1>so when in this varies from state to state. Some

0:08:17.560 --> 0:08:20.400
<v Speaker 1>states only allow in store pick up that sort of thing,

0:08:20.400 --> 0:08:22.680
<v Speaker 1>but in New York they will allow delivery. So you'll

0:08:22.680 --> 0:08:25.840
<v Speaker 1>be able to order on weed maps, on the app

0:08:25.880 --> 0:08:28.200
<v Speaker 1>on your phone, put stuff in a cart. You will

0:08:28.240 --> 0:08:31.360
<v Speaker 1>be able to or you are able to. You will

0:08:31.440 --> 0:08:34.719
<v Speaker 1>be able to win adult use open So right now,

0:08:34.720 --> 0:08:37.160
<v Speaker 1>it's just medical so you could right now just for

0:08:37.240 --> 0:08:40.360
<v Speaker 1>medical shops if you have a medical card. But when

0:08:40.400 --> 0:08:43.520
<v Speaker 1>adult use, these disposies that can sell you know, for

0:08:43.600 --> 0:08:47.400
<v Speaker 1>basically recreational open up. You'll be able to get order

0:08:47.440 --> 0:08:50.120
<v Speaker 1>on the phone and get delivery right to your door. Chris,

0:08:50.160 --> 0:08:53.640
<v Speaker 1>are you active in states that have been open for

0:08:54.640 --> 0:08:58.160
<v Speaker 1>recreational cannabis like Colorado for example, And if so, kind

0:08:58.160 --> 0:09:02.439
<v Speaker 1>of what's your experience been. Yeah, So, so we're ubiquitous.

0:09:02.520 --> 0:09:06.439
<v Speaker 1>We're in all thirty seven states that have cannabis legalization.

0:09:06.480 --> 0:09:08.760
<v Speaker 1>We're actually a fourteen year old company. Were started out

0:09:08.800 --> 0:09:13.160
<v Speaker 1>in California, and we're we operate internationally and seven international

0:09:13.240 --> 0:09:16.240
<v Speaker 1>jurisdictions at this point as well. So yeah, we're in Colorado.

0:09:16.920 --> 0:09:20.680
<v Speaker 1>Interestingly enough, Colorado has very limited delivery. Despite what people

0:09:20.760 --> 0:09:23.600
<v Speaker 1>might think, they're really kind of just rolling out pilots

0:09:23.640 --> 0:09:26.280
<v Speaker 1>for it um. But we see we operate in all

0:09:26.320 --> 0:09:28.760
<v Speaker 1>these different states, and we see very big differences in

0:09:28.840 --> 0:09:31.360
<v Speaker 1>how the businesses operate, and our software has to deal

0:09:31.400 --> 0:09:34.880
<v Speaker 1>with the different rules and compliance regulations um. And then

0:09:34.880 --> 0:09:36.959
<v Speaker 1>the way consumer shop varies a lot. I think New

0:09:37.040 --> 0:09:40.880
<v Speaker 1>York will be very similar in terms of consumers shopping

0:09:40.920 --> 0:09:43.920
<v Speaker 1>habits to California, which makes sense because New York has

0:09:43.920 --> 0:09:47.480
<v Speaker 1>been buying California cannabis for the last thirty years. So,

0:09:47.720 --> 0:09:51.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean my experience is when I was a kid,

0:09:51.320 --> 0:09:53.319
<v Speaker 1>you know what we You'd have a delivery guy come

0:09:53.400 --> 0:09:56.240
<v Speaker 1>and meet you, come to your door, you'd get in

0:09:56.240 --> 0:10:00.240
<v Speaker 1>his car, whatever. But now that these dispensries are opening up,

0:10:00.840 --> 0:10:03.040
<v Speaker 1>it's too much fun to go there. Why would I

0:10:03.040 --> 0:10:05.960
<v Speaker 1>want to get delivery? It's going to Empire is like

0:10:06.000 --> 0:10:09.960
<v Speaker 1>going to the Dylan's candy store of weed? Um. Is

0:10:10.000 --> 0:10:12.080
<v Speaker 1>that gonna wear off? Am I gonna get tired of

0:10:12.120 --> 0:10:15.200
<v Speaker 1>that and want to go for delivery later on? Well?

0:10:15.679 --> 0:10:17.520
<v Speaker 1>So the thing is is avengeal for a lot of

0:10:17.520 --> 0:10:21.040
<v Speaker 1>people when they become regular cannabis consumers. And look, we're

0:10:21.040 --> 0:10:24.079
<v Speaker 1>seeing a lot of that people who are substituting cannabis

0:10:24.080 --> 0:10:26.880
<v Speaker 1>for alcohol as a healthier alternative. You know what you

0:10:26.920 --> 0:10:28.760
<v Speaker 1>want or you want to you don't want to go

0:10:28.800 --> 0:10:30.400
<v Speaker 1>through the hassle and going to the dispensary and a

0:10:30.520 --> 0:10:33.080
<v Speaker 1>dispensaries the lines can be long, and it can be

0:10:33.440 --> 0:10:35.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, a bit confusing. But the other big use

0:10:35.400 --> 0:10:38.920
<v Speaker 1>case we're seeing in mature states, the average cannabis dispensary

0:10:38.960 --> 0:10:41.679
<v Speaker 1>has over a thousands skews, and so we see a

0:10:41.679 --> 0:10:43.880
<v Speaker 1>lot of people pulling out weed maps when they're in

0:10:43.880 --> 0:10:47.319
<v Speaker 1>the store just to go through and understand what are

0:10:47.360 --> 0:10:49.600
<v Speaker 1>all these different products? Because you know, to go from

0:10:49.640 --> 0:10:52.000
<v Speaker 1>that that guy saying, hey, come get in my car,

0:10:52.600 --> 0:10:54.839
<v Speaker 1>he only has what he can carry in his backpack

0:10:55.320 --> 0:10:57.760
<v Speaker 1>to a dispensary, you got over a thousand different things.

0:10:57.760 --> 0:11:01.200
<v Speaker 1>And you look at segments like uh concentrates and all

0:11:01.200 --> 0:11:03.520
<v Speaker 1>these new types of concentrates. Look at edibles, there's a

0:11:03.600 --> 0:11:05.760
<v Speaker 1>huge growth in the beverage segment. How do you as

0:11:05.800 --> 0:11:07.679
<v Speaker 1>a consumer makes sense of all of that? I mean,

0:11:07.679 --> 0:11:09.840
<v Speaker 1>and a lot of times the dispensary doesn't even fully

0:11:09.880 --> 0:11:12.760
<v Speaker 1>understand everything because the brand explosion is just in the

0:11:12.800 --> 0:11:15.160
<v Speaker 1>early innings right now, and it's accelerating. By the way,

0:11:15.160 --> 0:11:18.239
<v Speaker 1>do you have a team of people reviewing these products

0:11:18.559 --> 0:11:21.679
<v Speaker 1>or do you rely on you know, written in reviews

0:11:21.679 --> 0:11:25.640
<v Speaker 1>from consumers. So what we do is we rely on

0:11:25.760 --> 0:11:28.599
<v Speaker 1>written in reviews from verified purchasers. So people who have

0:11:28.960 --> 0:11:31.480
<v Speaker 1>it's it's I have to be careful. I say this

0:11:31.480 --> 0:11:34.439
<v Speaker 1>because Amazon, the Amazon review systems fallen under a lot

0:11:34.440 --> 0:11:36.560
<v Speaker 1>of I think rightful criticism. But what we do is

0:11:36.559 --> 0:11:40.960
<v Speaker 1>we look at consumers who have purchased online through weed Maps,

0:11:40.960 --> 0:11:43.920
<v Speaker 1>through the marketplace, and then say, give us feedback, give

0:11:44.000 --> 0:11:48.120
<v Speaker 1>us reviews on things like how it clinically affected you,

0:11:48.200 --> 0:11:50.760
<v Speaker 1>how was your store experience, how is the delivery experience,

0:11:51.040 --> 0:11:52.800
<v Speaker 1>and there's other things we can do. We do have

0:11:52.840 --> 0:11:55.880
<v Speaker 1>a content and learning part of the site to learn

0:11:55.880 --> 0:11:58.360
<v Speaker 1>about strains, to learn about new products, where we do

0:11:58.400 --> 0:12:01.040
<v Speaker 1>have expert reviewers in common taters and we can pull

0:12:01.080 --> 0:12:04.480
<v Speaker 1>some of that across. The other thing is um A

0:12:04.520 --> 0:12:05.679
<v Speaker 1>lot of what we do is we have one of

0:12:05.720 --> 0:12:08.040
<v Speaker 1>the largest brand catalogs out there. So many times the

0:12:08.120 --> 0:12:11.480
<v Speaker 1>brands will write, they'll provide the images, they'll provide the

0:12:11.520 --> 0:12:15.400
<v Speaker 1>descriptions and more than that the ascribed clinical effects, and

0:12:15.400 --> 0:12:18.200
<v Speaker 1>then we syndicate that through all the retailers who carry

0:12:18.240 --> 0:12:21.080
<v Speaker 1>those branded products. Chris, As far as the stock, what

0:12:21.360 --> 0:12:25.200
<v Speaker 1>is going on. You're trading for less than sales, you know,

0:12:25.400 --> 0:12:28.560
<v Speaker 1>three times earnings right now, These are not numbers that

0:12:28.600 --> 0:12:33.079
<v Speaker 1>we typically see, even for companies that are distressed. Yeah,

0:12:33.120 --> 0:12:35.400
<v Speaker 1>and on top of that, we've been profitable for essentially

0:12:35.440 --> 0:12:39.000
<v Speaker 1>our entire history. Uh. We were effectively bootstrapped until we

0:12:39.040 --> 0:12:41.720
<v Speaker 1>went public. Uh. You know, look, I think what you

0:12:41.840 --> 0:12:44.480
<v Speaker 1>see it's it's frustrating to me. And I think it's

0:12:44.480 --> 0:12:46.840
<v Speaker 1>one of those reminders of as a CEO, you have

0:12:46.920 --> 0:12:49.480
<v Speaker 1>to control what you can control, which is us growing

0:12:49.480 --> 0:12:52.160
<v Speaker 1>adoption of the marketplace and that. But I think partially

0:12:52.160 --> 0:12:54.640
<v Speaker 1>what you're seeing is a reflection of stigma. There's still

0:12:54.679 --> 0:12:57.680
<v Speaker 1>a lot of institutional investors who won't invest in the sector,

0:12:57.840 --> 0:13:02.640
<v Speaker 1>even for a NASDAQ listed UH technology and sillery provider

0:13:02.760 --> 0:13:05.920
<v Speaker 1>like maps UH. And I think you know at the

0:13:06.000 --> 0:13:07.720
<v Speaker 1>end of the day that the market is a factor

0:13:07.760 --> 0:13:11.000
<v Speaker 1>of supply and demand, and on the demand side, Uh,

0:13:11.040 --> 0:13:13.600
<v Speaker 1>there's just far too many funds who are reluctant to

0:13:13.600 --> 0:13:15.720
<v Speaker 1>invest in the cannabis spector despite the fact that some

0:13:15.800 --> 0:13:18.400
<v Speaker 1>people estimate that's going to be a hundred billion dollar

0:13:18.480 --> 0:13:22.400
<v Speaker 1>industry at the end of this decade UM. So you know,

0:13:22.440 --> 0:13:25.040
<v Speaker 1>we're out there trying to educate people, make them understand

0:13:25.080 --> 0:13:28.440
<v Speaker 1>that there's very deep modes around this business in terms

0:13:28.520 --> 0:13:32.240
<v Speaker 1>of the regulatory requirements, the data science you have to do.

0:13:32.440 --> 0:13:35.040
<v Speaker 1>You know, we're solving problems that Frankly, Go Puff and

0:13:35.040 --> 0:13:39.199
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of other online market places haven't solved because

0:13:39.200 --> 0:13:41.560
<v Speaker 1>we need to we Yeah, we can't touch the actual

0:13:41.600 --> 0:13:44.120
<v Speaker 1>cannabis product or do we ever want to. So, but

0:13:44.200 --> 0:13:46.920
<v Speaker 1>we had President Biden recently kind of you know, say,

0:13:47.120 --> 0:13:51.800
<v Speaker 1>you know he's gonna expunge federal marijuana convictions. I mean

0:13:51.800 --> 0:13:55.160
<v Speaker 1>that had to be a step in the right direction. Yeah,

0:13:55.280 --> 0:13:57.319
<v Speaker 1>it looks I think there's a lot of twists and

0:13:57.400 --> 0:14:00.320
<v Speaker 1>turns to that because I think it is potentially less

0:14:00.360 --> 0:14:02.800
<v Speaker 1>impactful than people think on the part in side, because

0:14:02.840 --> 0:14:05.559
<v Speaker 1>there aren't a lot of federal prisoners who are under

0:14:05.840 --> 0:14:09.319
<v Speaker 1>federal custody for simple possession. A lot of its trafficking,

0:14:09.440 --> 0:14:11.320
<v Speaker 1>or they'll attack on other charges to get a plea.

0:14:11.559 --> 0:14:16.240
<v Speaker 1>But the promise to reschedule if they follow through on

0:14:16.280 --> 0:14:19.720
<v Speaker 1>that could meaningfully change things. Um, you know, when we've

0:14:19.720 --> 0:14:23.840
<v Speaker 1>tried to sponsor scientific research on cannabis, those researchers have

0:14:24.200 --> 0:14:27.480
<v Speaker 1>in some cases gotten threats to have their National Science

0:14:27.480 --> 0:14:30.080
<v Speaker 1>Foundation or in i H grants funding polled because they're

0:14:30.120 --> 0:14:32.960
<v Speaker 1>doing cannabis research. So the rescheduling would help there. But

0:14:32.960 --> 0:14:35.000
<v Speaker 1>but the biggest thing that I think people are missing

0:14:35.080 --> 0:14:38.240
<v Speaker 1>is it's a stigma reduction. When you look at why

0:14:38.360 --> 0:14:41.920
<v Speaker 1>funds aren't investing in cannabis names, it's not because they can't.

0:14:42.120 --> 0:14:44.640
<v Speaker 1>It's a stigma thing. When you look at why major

0:14:44.680 --> 0:14:48.200
<v Speaker 1>credit card providers don't bank or don't provide credit for

0:14:48.280 --> 0:14:50.960
<v Speaker 1>financial side, it's that all right. Chris great stuff, Chris

0:14:50.960 --> 0:14:59.160
<v Speaker 1>Bal's CEO of Weed Maps on the cannabis business. One

0:14:59.240 --> 0:15:01.880
<v Speaker 1>talk technology, you here, and I'm gonna talk us China

0:15:01.960 --> 0:15:03.800
<v Speaker 1>supply chain is But we found out the beginning of

0:15:03.800 --> 0:15:07.040
<v Speaker 1>the pandemic that it is not good to be overreliant

0:15:07.080 --> 0:15:09.400
<v Speaker 1>on one source of stuff. And like we saw it

0:15:09.400 --> 0:15:13.280
<v Speaker 1>into technology space with chips and so woulgin Hoe, which

0:15:13.320 --> 0:15:14.960
<v Speaker 1>by the way, is my favorite name on Wall Street.

0:15:14.960 --> 0:15:18.560
<v Speaker 1>Wuginhoe is a senior technology analyst for Bloomberg Intelligence. He's

0:15:18.560 --> 0:15:22.880
<v Speaker 1>got a research report out entitled Untangling US China tech

0:15:23.240 --> 0:15:27.480
<v Speaker 1>supply chain issues. He says it's difficult but doable. Wulgin,

0:15:27.560 --> 0:15:30.240
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much for joining us here. Talk to us

0:15:30.280 --> 0:15:32.280
<v Speaker 1>about kind of what we've learned over the last two

0:15:32.280 --> 0:15:35.960
<v Speaker 1>and a half three years about that supply chain reliance

0:15:36.040 --> 0:15:38.840
<v Speaker 1>on China and maybe how some of the technology companies

0:15:38.880 --> 0:15:41.920
<v Speaker 1>are trying to untangle that right now. Thanks for having

0:15:41.960 --> 0:15:46.040
<v Speaker 1>me on, Paul so Um. It's it's clear over the

0:15:46.080 --> 0:15:49.520
<v Speaker 1>past couple of years that China is a main supplier

0:15:49.640 --> 0:15:54.920
<v Speaker 1>not only for for chips, but more importantly electronics manufacturing.

0:15:55.000 --> 0:15:58.440
<v Speaker 1>If in our research support that I worked with our

0:15:58.560 --> 0:16:04.720
<v Speaker 1>Asia UH Boomberg Tmt colleagues, is that roughly of all

0:16:04.760 --> 0:16:07.280
<v Speaker 1>of the electronics manufacturing source of of China. And it

0:16:07.360 --> 0:16:10.760
<v Speaker 1>kind of makes sense right over the years manufacturing shifted

0:16:10.760 --> 0:16:14.040
<v Speaker 1>over from US and Mexico and it and moved over

0:16:14.080 --> 0:16:17.600
<v Speaker 1>to China because of economies of scales, because what we

0:16:17.640 --> 0:16:20.280
<v Speaker 1>are fair and focused on margin and trying to unentangle

0:16:20.320 --> 0:16:23.360
<v Speaker 1>that is going to be uh quite a task. We

0:16:23.440 --> 0:16:26.600
<v Speaker 1>also have Brendon Murray with us. Uh he is the

0:16:26.640 --> 0:16:30.200
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg trades are out of Atlanta? Is that right in Lanta? Brendon.

0:16:31.800 --> 0:16:36.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm in London. Oh in London, sorry, um, uh in London, Brendon,

0:16:37.440 --> 0:16:41.600
<v Speaker 1>What do we know about um President Biden right now?

0:16:41.800 --> 0:16:44.680
<v Speaker 1>And the rules on chip makers? Are the rules on

0:16:44.760 --> 0:16:48.760
<v Speaker 1>technological access by companies in China? Yeah, Well, what we

0:16:48.840 --> 0:16:51.800
<v Speaker 1>know right now is that that pre President Biden is

0:16:51.840 --> 0:16:55.960
<v Speaker 1>trying to make some of those decisions for uh, for

0:16:55.960 --> 0:16:59.480
<v Speaker 1>for industry rather than uh, you know, basically to try

0:16:59.520 --> 0:17:02.000
<v Speaker 1>to make it more difficult for for China to produce

0:17:02.040 --> 0:17:05.360
<v Speaker 1>its chips and easier for Eric companies to get these

0:17:05.359 --> 0:17:08.160
<v Speaker 1>semiconductors that you know, going just about you know, every

0:17:08.240 --> 0:17:12.520
<v Speaker 1>household appliance that we buy. So that's that's the administration

0:17:12.640 --> 0:17:15.160
<v Speaker 1>stance right now. It's it's you know, some of it's

0:17:15.160 --> 0:17:18.000
<v Speaker 1>borrowed from the Trump administration to uh, you know, try

0:17:18.040 --> 0:17:21.719
<v Speaker 1>to sort of create our own industries here that you know,

0:17:21.760 --> 0:17:25.000
<v Speaker 1>many of them migrated away. So so the tech supply

0:17:25.160 --> 0:17:29.600
<v Speaker 1>chains you know, are definitely well embedded in China and

0:17:29.640 --> 0:17:33.399
<v Speaker 1>elsewhere in Asia, but they can they can make some

0:17:33.520 --> 0:17:38.120
<v Speaker 1>progress on them with government incentives and and uh and

0:17:38.119 --> 0:17:43.840
<v Speaker 1>and penalties um, you know against Chinese producers. But what

0:17:43.960 --> 0:17:45.920
<v Speaker 1>is this? First of all, I thought you were I

0:17:46.040 --> 0:17:48.520
<v Speaker 1>mistakenly thought you were in Atlanta because you used to

0:17:48.520 --> 0:17:52.359
<v Speaker 1>write for the Atlanta Business Chronicle, So that was I

0:17:52.359 --> 0:17:56.919
<v Speaker 1>guess a while back. But what does this mean for

0:17:56.960 --> 0:18:00.119
<v Speaker 1>the chip industry in China? I mean, is this a

0:18:00.240 --> 0:18:04.119
<v Speaker 1>huge blow? Um? You know, will it whither away or

0:18:04.240 --> 0:18:06.800
<v Speaker 1>is it still going to be I mean, I assume

0:18:06.840 --> 0:18:11.480
<v Speaker 1>it's the main place that chips are made globally. Yeah,

0:18:11.520 --> 0:18:13.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think judging by the market reaction in

0:18:14.119 --> 0:18:18.160
<v Speaker 1>China today to the news from the US on Friday

0:18:18.280 --> 0:18:21.119
<v Speaker 1>through the weekend, you know, investors do expect it to

0:18:21.119 --> 0:18:23.560
<v Speaker 1>be uh, you know, to to to you know, to

0:18:23.560 --> 0:18:28.400
<v Speaker 1>to to cause some cause some problems for the Chinese producers. Hey,

0:18:28.440 --> 0:18:30.440
<v Speaker 1>would you know I think you know, at some point

0:18:31.160 --> 0:18:33.800
<v Speaker 1>during this pandemic, when this this issue, the supply chain

0:18:33.840 --> 0:18:37.480
<v Speaker 1>issues relates to chips became you know, really prevalent, everybody

0:18:37.520 --> 0:18:40.199
<v Speaker 1>was just saying, well, just let's onshore this stuff. And

0:18:40.400 --> 0:18:43.120
<v Speaker 1>there's been some announcements in the great state of Ohio,

0:18:43.440 --> 0:18:45.560
<v Speaker 1>in the state of New York about maybe bringing some

0:18:45.600 --> 0:18:48.560
<v Speaker 1>of these fabs onshore. Is that really a thing, Is

0:18:48.560 --> 0:18:51.119
<v Speaker 1>that a solution or is that just more kind of

0:18:51.200 --> 0:18:56.359
<v Speaker 1>rhetoric and politics? Well, UM. Well, the Biding administration is

0:18:56.400 --> 0:18:59.080
<v Speaker 1>actually putting their money where the mouth is, right, the

0:18:59.080 --> 0:19:01.800
<v Speaker 1>fifty two billion doll the Chips Act is supposed to

0:19:01.840 --> 0:19:07.240
<v Speaker 1>help UM initiate an investment into UH some of these

0:19:07.240 --> 0:19:12.000
<v Speaker 1>facts and manufacture these UM advanced technology chips. Right, So,

0:19:12.000 --> 0:19:14.200
<v Speaker 1>so they are trying to onshore some of that to

0:19:14.200 --> 0:19:17.040
<v Speaker 1>to lessen the reliance. Now, now, you know, just just

0:19:17.160 --> 0:19:21.119
<v Speaker 1>to pick it back on on Brandon's point that the

0:19:21.119 --> 0:19:23.159
<v Speaker 1>one thing I will say is that they're trying to

0:19:23.400 --> 0:19:25.040
<v Speaker 1>what the US is trying to do with some of

0:19:25.080 --> 0:19:29.679
<v Speaker 1>the I guess renewed UM sanctions on China is to

0:19:29.760 --> 0:19:32.879
<v Speaker 1>slow down the manufacture of advanced ships. Now, now the

0:19:32.920 --> 0:19:36.480
<v Speaker 1>one China doesn't really make many advanced ships. It's it's

0:19:36.480 --> 0:19:39.399
<v Speaker 1>it's mostly Taiwan and and if anything, is UM the

0:19:39.520 --> 0:19:44.920
<v Speaker 1>US trying to mitigate the reliance on UM on Taiwan

0:19:45.000 --> 0:19:49.040
<v Speaker 1>on some of these advanced ships because of the geo politics. UM.

0:19:49.080 --> 0:19:51.600
<v Speaker 1>These are two issues, well, the supply chain and chips

0:19:51.640 --> 0:19:56.320
<v Speaker 1>are two issues that have become conflated and intertwined over

0:19:56.359 --> 0:19:59.639
<v Speaker 1>the crisis. But UM, we should keep them separate. I

0:19:59.640 --> 0:20:01.960
<v Speaker 1>guess right, Brendan, Because you have a great, big story

0:20:02.000 --> 0:20:04.640
<v Speaker 1>out in the Bloomberg today showing that we could see

0:20:04.680 --> 0:20:08.280
<v Speaker 1>the supply chain returning to some sense of normalcy. And

0:20:08.880 --> 0:20:13.520
<v Speaker 1>throughout the story you talk about the reduction in weight

0:20:13.600 --> 0:20:18.080
<v Speaker 1>times that ships have outside of harbors. Yeah, we definitely

0:20:18.160 --> 0:20:20.520
<v Speaker 1>need to make a distinction between tech supply chains and

0:20:21.320 --> 0:20:24.160
<v Speaker 1>normal supply chains. You know that they are they are

0:20:24.200 --> 0:20:27.040
<v Speaker 1>inter linked to some extent, but but tech supply chains

0:20:27.080 --> 0:20:31.240
<v Speaker 1>are very you know, very complex and and and difficult

0:20:31.280 --> 0:20:34.560
<v Speaker 1>to replicate in other countries. But but for other things,

0:20:35.200 --> 0:20:37.959
<v Speaker 1>more basic sort of lower value goods or you know,

0:20:38.119 --> 0:20:41.439
<v Speaker 1>textiles or things that don't require you know, lots of

0:20:41.880 --> 0:20:45.639
<v Speaker 1>you know, complicated machinery or engineering can be can be

0:20:45.720 --> 0:20:48.200
<v Speaker 1>produced and are being produced and have been shifting out

0:20:48.200 --> 0:20:51.000
<v Speaker 1>of China for you know, many years, even before the

0:20:51.000 --> 0:20:54.480
<v Speaker 1>pandemic and the US Trade Board with with with China,

0:20:54.640 --> 0:20:58.080
<v Speaker 1>So so that shift has been ongoing and and and

0:20:58.119 --> 0:21:00.600
<v Speaker 1>what we're seeing now is, uh, you know, if you

0:21:00.640 --> 0:21:03.600
<v Speaker 1>set the tech supply chain aside for a second, we're

0:21:03.600 --> 0:21:07.720
<v Speaker 1>seeing the demand cooling around around Europe and the US

0:21:07.760 --> 0:21:10.399
<v Speaker 1>in particular. So so we're seeing a lot of that

0:21:10.520 --> 0:21:12.800
<v Speaker 1>congestion that we saw. You know that most of US

0:21:12.840 --> 0:21:16.560
<v Speaker 1>is sort of transportation related as opposed to production related.

0:21:16.640 --> 0:21:19.320
<v Speaker 1>So some of that is freeing up just because there's

0:21:19.400 --> 0:21:22.760
<v Speaker 1>there's demand that's coming off. You know, the peak, the

0:21:22.800 --> 0:21:24.520
<v Speaker 1>peak levels that it is seen over the past couple

0:21:24.520 --> 0:21:26.960
<v Speaker 1>of years. All right, Brendan, great stuff, Really appreciate you.

0:21:26.960 --> 0:21:30.280
<v Speaker 1>You're taking a time. Brendan Murray Trades are for Bloomberg

0:21:30.440 --> 0:21:32.600
<v Speaker 1>News based in London, and Bloomberg News is all over

0:21:32.600 --> 0:21:35.480
<v Speaker 1>this global supply chain issue, as is Bloomberg Intelligence Investment

0:21:35.520 --> 0:21:39.600
<v Speaker 1>Research Wujinho technology analysts for Bloomberg Intelligence. They have a big,

0:21:39.600 --> 0:21:47.120
<v Speaker 1>big report out on the terminal bond market, closed equity

0:21:47.119 --> 0:21:49.959
<v Speaker 1>market open. Who's in charge out there? I mean, somebody's

0:21:49.960 --> 0:21:52.960
<v Speaker 1>got to get it together. Here, let's continue our discussion

0:21:53.080 --> 0:21:56.720
<v Speaker 1>of technology. It's time we're keep our focus on the

0:21:56.800 --> 0:22:00.600
<v Speaker 1>chip business, um because a lot of industries penned upon

0:22:00.880 --> 0:22:03.199
<v Speaker 1>the chip business. You didn't think so until we had

0:22:03.240 --> 0:22:05.359
<v Speaker 1>this pandemic. Then you're like, oh yeah, chips are and everything.

0:22:05.359 --> 0:22:08.560
<v Speaker 1>Men Deep Seeing, senior technology analyst for Bloomberg Intelligence joins

0:22:08.600 --> 0:22:10.920
<v Speaker 1>us here in a Bloomberg Interactive broker studio and we

0:22:11.000 --> 0:22:13.040
<v Speaker 1>talked about chips. We always like to talk about the

0:22:13.040 --> 0:22:16.280
<v Speaker 1>auto industry because Matt truck was stuck in somewhere in

0:22:16.400 --> 0:22:18.760
<v Speaker 1>Mexico because you couldn't get enough chips for I don't

0:22:18.760 --> 0:22:21.959
<v Speaker 1>know what, the electric windows not because of that, probably

0:22:21.960 --> 0:22:23.800
<v Speaker 1>some other reasons. But Kevin Tyning, he's got all the

0:22:23.800 --> 0:22:27.080
<v Speaker 1>answers when it comes to the auto business, senior automotive

0:22:27.119 --> 0:22:30.560
<v Speaker 1>analysts with Bloomberg Intelligence. So, man, deep, I'm looking again

0:22:30.600 --> 0:22:34.359
<v Speaker 1>the Philly Semiconductor Index, the socks. It's down again today,

0:22:34.400 --> 0:22:39.040
<v Speaker 1>the lowest since October. What's going on in the chip business?

0:22:39.080 --> 0:22:42.280
<v Speaker 1>I thought we needed these things well. Of what happened

0:22:42.359 --> 0:22:45.160
<v Speaker 1>last week was m D pre announced and they said

0:22:45.440 --> 0:22:49.439
<v Speaker 1>their client segment revenue will be half of what they

0:22:49.480 --> 0:22:52.960
<v Speaker 1>expected back in August, So not a lot of time

0:22:53.000 --> 0:22:56.600
<v Speaker 1>had passed from their prior guidance, and within two months

0:22:56.600 --> 0:22:58.840
<v Speaker 1>they come out and say it will be a billion

0:22:58.840 --> 0:23:01.480
<v Speaker 1>dollars lower and most likely that will be the case

0:23:01.520 --> 0:23:04.000
<v Speaker 1>for the fourth quarter as well, So not just one

0:23:04.040 --> 0:23:06.880
<v Speaker 1>billion lowerd for the year, but two billion. And so

0:23:06.920 --> 0:23:10.760
<v Speaker 1>what that translates into is, you know, pieces shipments being

0:23:10.800 --> 0:23:14.520
<v Speaker 1>down almost fifty sixty million, but PCs, I mean, who

0:23:14.640 --> 0:23:18.480
<v Speaker 1>uses a PC anymore? What? What is this? Is it? Motorola?

0:23:18.640 --> 0:23:20.679
<v Speaker 1>Is it a Nokia PC and come on, give me

0:23:20.680 --> 0:23:24.960
<v Speaker 1>a break. Chips are used in electric vehicles and cellular

0:23:25.000 --> 0:23:27.600
<v Speaker 1>telephones other than Nokia. Um, you know, they're used in

0:23:27.640 --> 0:23:32.000
<v Speaker 1>a million other products besides personal computers. I'm not running DOSS.

0:23:32.040 --> 0:23:36.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't care about PCs. So well, these businesses are

0:23:36.960 --> 0:23:40.000
<v Speaker 1>much more diversified now than they were five years back.

0:23:40.040 --> 0:23:42.480
<v Speaker 1>And so m D does have a data center business,

0:23:42.640 --> 0:23:46.080
<v Speaker 1>they have gaming business. Gaming is going down as well,

0:23:46.280 --> 0:23:49.119
<v Speaker 1>so data center is what is holding off Fell. But

0:23:49.200 --> 0:23:52.720
<v Speaker 1>guess what when everything is going down, the cloud guys,

0:23:52.720 --> 0:23:55.240
<v Speaker 1>the hyper skillers are gonna say, okay, why are we

0:23:55.359 --> 0:23:58.280
<v Speaker 1>spending thirty billion dollars on capex, you know, setting up

0:23:58.280 --> 0:24:01.400
<v Speaker 1>these new servers when the overall demand is going down.

0:24:01.440 --> 0:24:04.280
<v Speaker 1>So eventually they'll pair back as well, and that's why

0:24:04.320 --> 0:24:07.240
<v Speaker 1>you see such violence stock reaction. All right, Kevin Tynan,

0:24:07.960 --> 0:24:10.399
<v Speaker 1>you've been whining, Matt's been winding, all the gearheads have

0:24:10.440 --> 0:24:13.560
<v Speaker 1>been whining that they can't get their vehicles because there's

0:24:13.560 --> 0:24:15.520
<v Speaker 1>not enough chips out there. What are the good folks

0:24:15.560 --> 0:24:18.800
<v Speaker 1>in Detroit telling you? Yeah, I mean, I'm more of

0:24:18.840 --> 0:24:22.280
<v Speaker 1>the opinion and this is just my opinion that look,

0:24:22.359 --> 0:24:27.680
<v Speaker 1>this is the the constrained output by the manufacturers is

0:24:27.720 --> 0:24:30.000
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more orchestrated than people like to think.

0:24:30.000 --> 0:24:33.560
<v Speaker 1>And it's not that there isn't a chip shortage. I

0:24:33.680 --> 0:24:37.080
<v Speaker 1>just think that our at least our domestic manufacturers are

0:24:37.119 --> 0:24:40.639
<v Speaker 1>managing it such that it's enabling them to move up

0:24:40.720 --> 0:24:45.040
<v Speaker 1>market basically in every you know, vehicle architecture they can.

0:24:45.560 --> 0:24:48.119
<v Speaker 1>So there's not a chip shortage. According to m D

0:24:48.200 --> 0:24:50.280
<v Speaker 1>there's not. They wish there was a chip shortage, right

0:24:50.800 --> 0:24:54.680
<v Speaker 1>specific pockets there is. So for autos there is still

0:24:54.720 --> 0:24:58.639
<v Speaker 1>a shortage. But for PCs, well, which one is is

0:24:58.680 --> 0:25:01.920
<v Speaker 1>autos the pocket and PCs is like the whole enchilada,

0:25:02.160 --> 0:25:06.800
<v Speaker 1>or is PCs a pocket? Autos is much smaller. Are

0:25:06.840 --> 0:25:08.800
<v Speaker 1>you hearing from Detroit and from the other companies that

0:25:08.880 --> 0:25:12.080
<v Speaker 1>they can in fact get the chips. Well, here's the thing, right,

0:25:12.160 --> 0:25:14.040
<v Speaker 1>I can get the chips I need for the expensive

0:25:14.119 --> 0:25:16.960
<v Speaker 1>vehicles that have all the margin for me, right, and

0:25:17.000 --> 0:25:19.840
<v Speaker 1>I can build those. But those darn things that you

0:25:19.880 --> 0:25:22.320
<v Speaker 1>know I can sell for eighteen thousand dollars that I

0:25:22.359 --> 0:25:25.320
<v Speaker 1>lose money on, I can't find enough chips for those.

0:25:25.840 --> 0:25:27.879
<v Speaker 1>And then this is what you get is that you know,

0:25:28.080 --> 0:25:32.360
<v Speaker 1>everybody talking about affordability and that automakers are missing out

0:25:32.440 --> 0:25:35.360
<v Speaker 1>because they're going to have an affordability crisis. And I'm

0:25:35.359 --> 0:25:39.560
<v Speaker 1>saying they're making the affordability crisis. This is exactly where

0:25:39.600 --> 0:25:41.879
<v Speaker 1>they want to be. They they want to be selling

0:25:41.920 --> 0:25:44.880
<v Speaker 1>you sixty five tho dollar pickup trucks instead of eighteen

0:25:44.880 --> 0:25:49.600
<v Speaker 1>thousand dollar small coops and sedans. So you know, the

0:25:49.640 --> 0:25:54.880
<v Speaker 1>idea that that the automakers will produce more if there

0:25:54.920 --> 0:25:57.280
<v Speaker 1>were more chips, I think is I think it's wrong.

0:25:57.520 --> 0:26:00.159
<v Speaker 1>I think this is where they want production going to

0:26:00.240 --> 0:26:05.959
<v Speaker 1>be relative to demand, keep it in balance. Where they

0:26:05.960 --> 0:26:07.520
<v Speaker 1>don't want it to take a year to get your

0:26:07.560 --> 0:26:10.600
<v Speaker 1>sixty pickup truck. They don't want you to wait two

0:26:10.680 --> 0:26:13.840
<v Speaker 1>years to get your Bronco. Right. But if but if

0:26:13.880 --> 0:26:15.840
<v Speaker 1>you do have to wait and you're gonna pay over sticker,

0:26:15.880 --> 0:26:18.440
<v Speaker 1>then we'll take that trade, I guess for a time being.

0:26:18.880 --> 0:26:21.440
<v Speaker 1>But the bottom line is these are two different conversations.

0:26:21.480 --> 0:26:25.119
<v Speaker 1>I mean no offense to Eric, but man Deep and

0:26:25.240 --> 0:26:29.000
<v Speaker 1>Kevin no I shouldn't necessarily be round table because Kevin

0:26:29.080 --> 0:26:32.879
<v Speaker 1>is worried about at least automakers saying there aren't enough chips,

0:26:32.920 --> 0:26:35.119
<v Speaker 1>and man Deep is talking about the company's he covers,

0:26:35.119 --> 0:26:39.720
<v Speaker 1>saying like we're swimming in chips, as chips are in everything,

0:26:39.840 --> 0:26:43.920
<v Speaker 1>and I didn't even care about a chip until now,

0:26:43.960 --> 0:26:46.400
<v Speaker 1>Like I'm looking at looking under every hood, every nook

0:26:46.400 --> 0:26:49.440
<v Speaker 1>and cranny, deceive there's a microchip hiding there. Man, deep

0:26:49.440 --> 0:26:51.919
<v Speaker 1>are they ever gonna is this? You know, in the

0:26:52.040 --> 0:26:54.760
<v Speaker 1>great state of Ohio, in the state of New York

0:26:54.760 --> 0:26:57.480
<v Speaker 1>they're talking about building fabs. Is that what you guys

0:26:57.520 --> 0:27:00.639
<v Speaker 1>call them, Like the manufacturing plans for making these chips,

0:27:00.760 --> 0:27:02.399
<v Speaker 1>is that it really going to be a thing that

0:27:02.400 --> 0:27:06.120
<v Speaker 1>can move the needle? It will and these require you know, planning,

0:27:06.240 --> 0:27:09.960
<v Speaker 1>So by the time you know the Ohio fabs come online,

0:27:09.960 --> 0:27:14.280
<v Speaker 1>there will be But at the same time, the good

0:27:14.320 --> 0:27:16.960
<v Speaker 1>thing is, you know, at the geopolitical level, you see

0:27:16.960 --> 0:27:20.520
<v Speaker 1>these tensions and you know the direction where things are aheaded.

0:27:20.640 --> 0:27:23.560
<v Speaker 1>So eventually you know there will be a point when

0:27:23.560 --> 0:27:27.200
<v Speaker 1>the US based fabs will have a higher utilization, and

0:27:27.280 --> 0:27:29.560
<v Speaker 1>you know you can do a lot more here because look,

0:27:29.640 --> 0:27:34.080
<v Speaker 1>these are asset intensive businesses and you require the cap expense.

0:27:34.080 --> 0:27:36.959
<v Speaker 1>So it's great that the government is involved now because

0:27:37.240 --> 0:27:39.359
<v Speaker 1>companies can do it on their own. Kevin I just

0:27:39.480 --> 0:27:42.560
<v Speaker 1>literally just twenty seconds here. Uh, is ubs right? Is

0:27:42.600 --> 0:27:45.280
<v Speaker 1>Ford's profits going to get cut in half next year? Well?

0:27:45.440 --> 0:27:48.159
<v Speaker 1>My so my question is where is this you know,

0:27:48.400 --> 0:27:51.560
<v Speaker 1>overproduction coming from. Is it because demand falls through the

0:27:51.600 --> 0:27:57.480
<v Speaker 1>floor or because they think that automakers once there are chips, um,

0:27:57.600 --> 0:28:01.800
<v Speaker 1>they're just gonna accidentally overproduce and it's gonna kill affordability

0:28:01.840 --> 0:28:03.919
<v Speaker 1>and pricing and everything. And I'm saying that's just not

0:28:04.000 --> 0:28:06.639
<v Speaker 1>how it's gonna work, all right. Kevin Tyne and good stuff.

0:28:06.640 --> 0:28:09.840
<v Speaker 1>He covers the auto industry, which is basically a technology

0:28:10.080 --> 0:28:12.840
<v Speaker 1>industry with four wheels. I'm convinced. Uh. And then Man

0:28:12.880 --> 0:28:15.920
<v Speaker 1>Deep saying he is a senior tech analyst covers all

0:28:15.920 --> 0:28:19.320
<v Speaker 1>things technology for Bloomberg Intelligence. He was actually in studio

0:28:19.400 --> 0:28:22.080
<v Speaker 1>today as he is most as gold star for for

0:28:22.160 --> 0:28:26.520
<v Speaker 1>Man Deep. And thanks to Kevin Tyne. Time to go

0:28:26.720 --> 0:28:30.720
<v Speaker 1>with geopolitics right here, we're gonna roundtable this series of stories.

0:28:30.800 --> 0:28:34.439
<v Speaker 1>Dr Ariel Cohen, Senior Fellow at the Atlantic Council Eurisa Center,

0:28:34.880 --> 0:28:39.640
<v Speaker 1>joins us as well as Roz Matheson. She covers Bloomberg News.

0:28:39.640 --> 0:28:43.680
<v Speaker 1>Executive editor for Internet International Government joins us here to

0:28:43.720 --> 0:28:45.840
<v Speaker 1>talk about a whole host of geopolitical issues, and let's

0:28:45.840 --> 0:28:49.360
<v Speaker 1>start with Ukraine because it seems to ratchet it up

0:28:49.920 --> 0:28:52.120
<v Speaker 1>over the weekend and Dr ConA like to start there.

0:28:52.200 --> 0:28:53.840
<v Speaker 1>Just give us your thoughts on kind of how you

0:28:53.920 --> 0:28:57.040
<v Speaker 1>see the situation in Ukraine, maybe the events over the weekend,

0:28:57.080 --> 0:29:02.280
<v Speaker 1>and maybe what's next to come. Okay, So on the

0:29:02.360 --> 0:29:07.720
<v Speaker 1>eighth of October, one day after putting seventeenth birthday, there

0:29:07.800 --> 0:29:12.480
<v Speaker 1>was an explosion on the Kirsch Bridge. That's a bridge

0:29:13.000 --> 0:29:19.080
<v Speaker 1>that connected Crimean peninsula with the mainland. Uh and um

0:29:19.120 --> 0:29:22.080
<v Speaker 1>it disrupted the traffic on the bridge. Most of the

0:29:22.080 --> 0:29:27.480
<v Speaker 1>traffic is repaired now it's a multi media bridge. It

0:29:27.560 --> 0:29:33.960
<v Speaker 1>has UM cars, railroad, electricity and whatnot. Uh So it's

0:29:33.960 --> 0:29:37.880
<v Speaker 1>a strategic supply line for the Russian military in the

0:29:37.960 --> 0:29:41.840
<v Speaker 1>Crimea and in the south of Ukraine, in the Carson region.

0:29:42.400 --> 0:29:47.720
<v Speaker 1>After that UM, the Russian started bombarding Kiev, the capital

0:29:47.720 --> 0:29:51.800
<v Speaker 1>of Ukraine, Kharkiv, the second largest city, and Viv, the

0:29:51.880 --> 0:29:55.720
<v Speaker 1>third largest city, as well as other cities all over Ukraine,

0:29:56.160 --> 0:30:01.480
<v Speaker 1>primarily taking out the energy infrastructure. So we have reports

0:30:01.520 --> 0:30:05.880
<v Speaker 1>of electricity being shut down in the major Ukrainian cities.

0:30:05.920 --> 0:30:09.280
<v Speaker 1>And I don't need to explain to our audience. How

0:30:09.440 --> 0:30:12.760
<v Speaker 1>devastating it is for the civilians. Also a lot of

0:30:12.800 --> 0:30:19.680
<v Speaker 1>these missile hits were against civilian targets. You know, That's

0:30:19.720 --> 0:30:23.040
<v Speaker 1>what I don't get. I don't understand why, you know, um,

0:30:23.040 --> 0:30:28.440
<v Speaker 1>taking out the bridge to um To to block one

0:30:28.520 --> 0:30:34.479
<v Speaker 1>place where Russian troops come into the theater makes sense.

0:30:34.640 --> 0:30:38.720
<v Speaker 1>That's a strategic move. Why does Putin then turn around

0:30:38.800 --> 0:30:43.800
<v Speaker 1>and attack civilians as if that bridge was somehow off limits.

0:30:45.800 --> 0:30:50.000
<v Speaker 1>The bridge, of course is not off limits because the

0:30:50.080 --> 0:30:53.080
<v Speaker 1>troops of fuel the AMMA are all going into the

0:30:53.080 --> 0:30:57.920
<v Speaker 1>theater through that bridge. Um. But attacking civilians is the

0:30:58.000 --> 0:31:00.600
<v Speaker 1>last time I checked. It's a war cron and I

0:31:00.640 --> 0:31:04.640
<v Speaker 1>think one of the responses that Biden administration and the

0:31:04.680 --> 0:31:08.600
<v Speaker 1>Europeans need to do now is to start identifying who

0:31:08.720 --> 0:31:13.040
<v Speaker 1>are the war criminals of this war. The Ukrainians are

0:31:13.080 --> 0:31:16.040
<v Speaker 1>doing some of that work, of course, but I think

0:31:16.120 --> 0:31:18.600
<v Speaker 1>this needs to be escalated because these people need to

0:31:18.720 --> 0:31:23.560
<v Speaker 1>understand that as long as this war is continuing, they're

0:31:23.600 --> 0:31:29.320
<v Speaker 1>piling up what may lead to their life uh sentences

0:31:29.360 --> 0:31:31.480
<v Speaker 1>in the hade Ros I want to bring you in.

0:31:31.560 --> 0:31:34.720
<v Speaker 1>Roz Matheson, Executive editor for International Government of Bloomberg News

0:31:35.040 --> 0:31:37.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, ros has been I guess, you know, always

0:31:37.120 --> 0:31:39.520
<v Speaker 1>a concern in the back of folks mind that maybe

0:31:39.520 --> 0:31:44.160
<v Speaker 1>President Putin will get so desperate that the nuclear option

0:31:44.280 --> 0:31:47.960
<v Speaker 1>maybe on the table. What's the latest reporting there? Of course,

0:31:47.960 --> 0:31:50.720
<v Speaker 1>that remains the concern, But he's been threatening that in

0:31:50.800 --> 0:31:53.800
<v Speaker 1>some shape or films since the war began. The question

0:31:53.880 --> 0:31:57.040
<v Speaker 1>is how much is he's back against the war the war,

0:31:57.160 --> 0:31:59.800
<v Speaker 1>and how much does the war continue to go against

0:32:00.040 --> 0:32:02.640
<v Speaker 1>him on the ground, and therefore, what are his options

0:32:02.680 --> 0:32:05.520
<v Speaker 1>really to get any kind of result. I mean, what

0:32:05.600 --> 0:32:09.240
<v Speaker 1>he's had some success in so far is sort of

0:32:09.280 --> 0:32:12.400
<v Speaker 1>sowing a bit of disarray within EU more broadly over

0:32:12.520 --> 0:32:16.400
<v Speaker 1>energy access going into winter, certainly cutting off energy supplies

0:32:16.880 --> 0:32:19.680
<v Speaker 1>two countries um and as we can see within Ukraine

0:32:19.680 --> 0:32:23.560
<v Speaker 1>itself as we're just hearing cutting off electricity supply with

0:32:23.680 --> 0:32:26.680
<v Speaker 1>some of his attacks today. And if you want to

0:32:26.720 --> 0:32:29.200
<v Speaker 1>splinter Europe further and you want to really push them

0:32:29.200 --> 0:32:31.840
<v Speaker 1>on the unity question with Ukraine, do you go so

0:32:31.920 --> 0:32:35.400
<v Speaker 1>far as to use a nuclear weapon in Ukraine to

0:32:35.520 --> 0:32:38.160
<v Speaker 1>sort of see what the response would be, And that

0:32:38.240 --> 0:32:41.240
<v Speaker 1>maybe the question right now, there's no there's no sense

0:32:41.280 --> 0:32:44.800
<v Speaker 1>that he's moving nuclear assets towards that, but certainly he's

0:32:44.880 --> 0:32:48.280
<v Speaker 1>leaving that option open, and that's really putting us in

0:32:48.360 --> 0:32:51.080
<v Speaker 1>quite a dangerous phase. As you can see today from

0:32:51.080 --> 0:32:53.320
<v Speaker 1>the extent of the missile attacks that have gone on

0:32:53.880 --> 0:32:58.960
<v Speaker 1>across Ukraine. He's suffered numerous personal prestige blows. The bridge himself,

0:32:59.280 --> 0:33:01.920
<v Speaker 1>that was something you drive a truck over when it

0:33:01.960 --> 0:33:04.760
<v Speaker 1>was opened, after it was built, So for him it's personal.

0:33:05.560 --> 0:33:11.560
<v Speaker 1>Dr Cohen, what's the likelihood of the Russians using nuclear weapons? Well,

0:33:11.600 --> 0:33:15.600
<v Speaker 1>this is UH sixty four billion dollar question. And I'm

0:33:15.640 --> 0:33:19.960
<v Speaker 1>not talking about the Democratic Party fundraiser at which President

0:33:20.000 --> 0:33:24.840
<v Speaker 1>Biden found it appropriate to discuss this dire and grave topic.

0:33:25.200 --> 0:33:28.520
<v Speaker 1>I think the conversation about whether puts In is using

0:33:28.640 --> 0:33:33.240
<v Speaker 1>tactical nukes or god forbid, it escalates to strategic nuclear exchange.

0:33:33.240 --> 0:33:36.120
<v Speaker 1>We should could should not be done as a part

0:33:36.120 --> 0:33:39.720
<v Speaker 1>of a fundraiser. It should be a serious conversation, probably

0:33:39.720 --> 0:33:43.360
<v Speaker 1>in a speech to the nation by the President. UM.

0:33:43.400 --> 0:33:47.160
<v Speaker 1>I think the chances are all my contacts in Russia,

0:33:47.240 --> 0:33:50.760
<v Speaker 1>outside of Russia in the US government are saying that

0:33:50.840 --> 0:33:57.520
<v Speaker 1>the probability of this is growing. We started UH several

0:33:57.560 --> 0:34:02.440
<v Speaker 1>months ago talking about I was talking about people corrected

0:34:02.480 --> 0:34:05.120
<v Speaker 1>me and said, no, thirty now I think it's over.

0:34:05.960 --> 0:34:10.200
<v Speaker 1>It's quite possible that Russia will use tactical nuclear weapons.

0:34:10.400 --> 0:34:13.799
<v Speaker 1>And the big question is, of course, what's dex Are

0:34:13.880 --> 0:34:17.200
<v Speaker 1>we going to respond, How are we going to respond?

0:34:17.440 --> 0:34:20.640
<v Speaker 1>How Natal allies are going to respond? And this these

0:34:20.680 --> 0:34:25.319
<v Speaker 1>are the uncharted waters. This is more grave and more

0:34:25.400 --> 0:34:28.720
<v Speaker 1>diet than the Cuban missile crisis, in which nuclear weapons

0:34:28.719 --> 0:34:32.600
<v Speaker 1>were not used. And and and how do Russian allies respond?

0:34:32.640 --> 0:34:35.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean Risal And let me ask you, um, how

0:34:35.719 --> 0:34:39.919
<v Speaker 1>has the Russian relationship with China fair throughout this war?

0:34:40.160 --> 0:34:42.840
<v Speaker 1>And you know, if we get there, they have to

0:34:42.920 --> 0:34:46.080
<v Speaker 1>probably reas the Chinese probably have to reassess their their

0:34:46.120 --> 0:34:49.440
<v Speaker 1>support for Putin. We have to imagine that the Chinese

0:34:49.480 --> 0:34:51.960
<v Speaker 1>president is not particularly happy that this is going on,

0:34:52.040 --> 0:34:54.399
<v Speaker 1>or certainly that it's dragged on so long. Right as

0:34:54.440 --> 0:34:58.000
<v Speaker 1>he goes into his own leadership moment in China next

0:34:58.040 --> 0:35:00.719
<v Speaker 1>week where he wants to be reindorsed for a third

0:35:00.840 --> 0:35:03.240
<v Speaker 1>term because he doesn't need this kind of mess occurring,

0:35:03.280 --> 0:35:06.480
<v Speaker 1>does he particularly care about the war in Ukraine. That's

0:35:06.600 --> 0:35:10.360
<v Speaker 1>up for debate. Um, certainly, Um. He has continued to

0:35:10.400 --> 0:35:13.320
<v Speaker 1>do business with Russia. As of other countries, including India

0:35:13.800 --> 0:35:17.040
<v Speaker 1>for example, UM in trading. But China has been pretty

0:35:17.040 --> 0:35:20.200
<v Speaker 1>careful not to step too much into the bounds of sanctions,

0:35:20.320 --> 0:35:22.200
<v Speaker 1>even if they haven't signed up for them. They're being

0:35:22.239 --> 0:35:25.560
<v Speaker 1>pretty careful. UM and he in some ways he and

0:35:25.640 --> 0:35:28.320
<v Speaker 1>Russia do still need each other, um as sort of

0:35:28.360 --> 0:35:31.719
<v Speaker 1>a bulwalk against against the West as we move into

0:35:31.760 --> 0:35:36.240
<v Speaker 1>a really truly multipolar world. UM that there's vested interests

0:35:36.239 --> 0:35:38.799
<v Speaker 1>there is he probably particularly happy with the way that

0:35:39.120 --> 0:35:42.080
<v Speaker 1>Vladimir Putin is conducting this. You would you would think not,

0:35:42.160 --> 0:35:46.040
<v Speaker 1>and he's probably expressed that privately. Will he publicly criticized

0:35:46.120 --> 0:35:49.200
<v Speaker 1>Russia if they test, if they do, if they do

0:35:49.239 --> 0:35:52.439
<v Speaker 1>a nuclear weapon potentially, But there's still a relationship there,

0:35:53.200 --> 0:35:56.200
<v Speaker 1>all right, So sobering discussion points there. Again, the odds

0:35:56.239 --> 0:35:58.640
<v Speaker 1>of a new from Dr Cohen are much higher than

0:35:58.719 --> 0:36:00.880
<v Speaker 1>I would have thought. Dr Ariel O and senior fellow

0:36:00.920 --> 0:36:04.480
<v Speaker 1>Atlantic Council Eurasia Center and Ros Math is an executive

0:36:04.560 --> 0:36:08.080
<v Speaker 1>editor for International Government for Bloomberg News. With again some

0:36:08.160 --> 0:36:14.080
<v Speaker 1>sobering assessments of the situation in Ukraine. Thanks for listening

0:36:14.120 --> 0:36:17.600
<v Speaker 1>to the Bloomberg Markets podcast. You can subscribe and listen

0:36:17.640 --> 0:36:21.920
<v Speaker 1>to interviews at Apple Podcasts or whatever podcast platform you prefer.

0:36:22.320 --> 0:36:26.839
<v Speaker 1>I'm Matt Miller. I'm on Twitter at Matt Miller. Put

0:36:26.920 --> 0:36:29.520
<v Speaker 1>on fall Sweeney I'm on Twitter at pt Sweeney. Before

0:36:29.520 --> 0:36:32.400
<v Speaker 1>the podcast, you can always catch us worldwide at Bloomberg

0:36:32.440 --> 0:36:32.680
<v Speaker 1>Radio