WEBVTT - David Eagleman

0:00:00.120 --> 0:00:04.400
<v Speaker 1>The Craig Ferguson Pants on Fire Tour is on sale now.

0:00:04.559 --> 0:00:07.880
<v Speaker 1>It's a new show, it's new material, but I'm afraid

0:00:07.920 --> 0:00:12.440
<v Speaker 1>it's still only me, Craig Ferguson on my own, standing

0:00:12.480 --> 0:00:15.760
<v Speaker 1>on a stage telling comedy words. Come and see me,

0:00:16.040 --> 0:00:18.520
<v Speaker 1>buy tickets, bring your loved ones, or don't come and

0:00:18.560 --> 0:00:21.400
<v Speaker 1>see me. Don't buy tickets and don't bring your loved ones.

0:00:21.480 --> 0:00:23.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm not your dad. You come or don't come, but

0:00:24.120 --> 0:00:26.120
<v Speaker 1>you should at least know what's happening, and it is.

0:00:26.440 --> 0:00:30.120
<v Speaker 1>The tour kicks off late September and goes through the

0:00:30.320 --> 0:00:33.960
<v Speaker 1>end of the year and beyond. Tickets are available at

0:00:34.040 --> 0:00:37.440
<v Speaker 1>the Craig Ferguson Show dot com slash tour. They're available

0:00:37.440 --> 0:00:40.720
<v Speaker 1>at the Craig Ferguson show dot com slash tour or

0:00:40.760 --> 0:00:45.080
<v Speaker 1>at your local outlet in your region. My name is

0:00:45.080 --> 0:00:49.879
<v Speaker 1>Craig Ferguson. The name of this podcast is Joy. I

0:00:50.040 --> 0:00:53.600
<v Speaker 1>talk to interest in people about what brings them happiness.

0:00:56.400 --> 0:01:00.680
<v Speaker 1>On the podcast today, my guest is David Eagleman.

0:01:01.200 --> 0:01:06.000
<v Speaker 2>Professor David Eagleman to be precise. Professor Eagleman, or David

0:01:06.000 --> 0:01:09.240
<v Speaker 2>as I call him, is a neuroscientist he knows a

0:01:09.240 --> 0:01:11.280
<v Speaker 2>lot about the human brain, but as it turns out,

0:01:11.280 --> 0:01:13.679
<v Speaker 2>he knows a lot about artificial brains too.

0:01:13.880 --> 0:01:15.240
<v Speaker 3>He's just a very brainy guy.

0:01:15.440 --> 0:01:17.280
<v Speaker 4>So I'm going to sound a bit more stupid than

0:01:17.360 --> 0:01:29.279
<v Speaker 4>usual in Jomi, David. Let me just say this before

0:01:29.280 --> 0:01:29.800
<v Speaker 4>we start.

0:01:30.120 --> 0:01:32.959
<v Speaker 1>Do I call you David? Do I call you mister Eagleman?

0:01:33.080 --> 0:01:35.440
<v Speaker 1>Do I call you doctor Eagleman? Or do you call

0:01:35.480 --> 0:01:36.839
<v Speaker 1>you professor Eagleman?

0:01:37.520 --> 0:01:41.480
<v Speaker 3>Or sir? Please call me David. All right? Is it

0:01:42.000 --> 0:01:44.600
<v Speaker 3>a doctor? By the way, you're doctor? Yeah? Doctor Eagelman

0:01:44.680 --> 0:01:48.320
<v Speaker 3>would be what yes, but my mother would call me yes.

0:01:50.320 --> 0:01:53.240
<v Speaker 1>Now I gotta apologize because I'm going to not so

0:01:53.360 --> 0:01:55.320
<v Speaker 1>much to you personally, because I think you'll probably be

0:01:55.400 --> 0:01:59.360
<v Speaker 1>able to handle it, but to people who already know

0:01:59.600 --> 0:02:03.320
<v Speaker 1>and and understand what you do, I'm going to come

0:02:03.360 --> 0:02:07.520
<v Speaker 1>across as someone who doesn't know anything about what you do. Now,

0:02:07.840 --> 0:02:11.440
<v Speaker 1>let's just say that I actually do know what you're doing.

0:02:11.560 --> 0:02:16.440
<v Speaker 1>I know everything about your studies and and what you

0:02:16.560 --> 0:02:20.239
<v Speaker 1>kind of do. And I'm not an ideot, but everybody

0:02:20.280 --> 0:02:26.079
<v Speaker 1>knows I kind of a little bit. Because neuroscience is

0:02:26.320 --> 0:02:30.720
<v Speaker 1>I barely understand the Dictionary definition of neuroscience correct me

0:02:30.720 --> 0:02:34.720
<v Speaker 1>if I'm wrong. I think it is the study of

0:02:34.800 --> 0:02:38.160
<v Speaker 1>how the brain works due to the physicality of the brain.

0:02:38.240 --> 0:02:42.639
<v Speaker 3>Is that. Yeah, you don't even need the second half.

0:02:42.800 --> 0:02:44.320
<v Speaker 3>Just trying to figure out how the brain works, trying

0:02:44.320 --> 0:02:46.440
<v Speaker 3>to figure out what's going on with the brain. And

0:02:46.480 --> 0:02:50.800
<v Speaker 3>it can be anything from understanding how vision works, are hearing,

0:02:51.160 --> 0:02:55.399
<v Speaker 3>to understanding decision making, to understanding emotions, to understanding why

0:02:55.400 --> 0:02:59.000
<v Speaker 3>we have consciousness or how we perceive time. Any of

0:02:59.040 --> 0:03:02.440
<v Speaker 3>that falls under the umbrella of neuroscience.

0:03:02.840 --> 0:03:04.880
<v Speaker 1>But it's interesting because it seems to me to be

0:03:05.000 --> 0:03:08.720
<v Speaker 1>something that it's an interesting science because it seems to

0:03:08.800 --> 0:03:13.160
<v Speaker 1>kind of wonder the theology and metaphysics, and because everything

0:03:13.240 --> 0:03:16.880
<v Speaker 1>is perception. Even the study of neuroscience is perception. So

0:03:18.160 --> 0:03:21.760
<v Speaker 1>how do you feel like you kind of examining yourself

0:03:21.800 --> 0:03:22.760
<v Speaker 1>from the inside.

0:03:23.240 --> 0:03:25.919
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that's right. Well, I would say at the edges,

0:03:26.040 --> 0:03:30.960
<v Speaker 3>neuroscience scratches lots of things, certainly philosophy, maybe theology, but

0:03:31.160 --> 0:03:36.640
<v Speaker 3>the you know, the way you can do things is

0:03:36.720 --> 0:03:39.720
<v Speaker 3>set things up objectively in the real world where you

0:03:39.760 --> 0:03:44.120
<v Speaker 3>can verify. Look, I have, you know, three circles that

0:03:44.160 --> 0:03:47.560
<v Speaker 3>are the color red, you know, projecting this wavelength on

0:03:47.600 --> 0:03:50.480
<v Speaker 3>the screen and you know, what are people seeing. That's

0:03:50.840 --> 0:03:52.920
<v Speaker 3>still example, But the point is we can set things

0:03:53.000 --> 0:03:58.680
<v Speaker 3>up in the world and understand what people are individually experiencing.

0:03:59.240 --> 0:04:00.840
<v Speaker 3>I'll give you an example. One of the things I

0:04:00.840 --> 0:04:03.640
<v Speaker 3>study is called synesthesia, and that's where people have a

0:04:04.200 --> 0:04:07.400
<v Speaker 3>blending of the senses. So they might look at letters

0:04:07.480 --> 0:04:10.160
<v Speaker 3>on the page and it triggers a color experience for them,

0:04:10.440 --> 0:04:13.800
<v Speaker 3>so they'll see Jay is purple, and why is blue?

0:04:13.880 --> 0:04:18.400
<v Speaker 3>And m is red and so on, and you know,

0:04:18.480 --> 0:04:21.080
<v Speaker 3>it's just an internal experience that they're having. We can

0:04:21.240 --> 0:04:23.040
<v Speaker 3>verify what's going on in the real world. We can

0:04:23.040 --> 0:04:25.680
<v Speaker 3>compare people to each other. About three percent of the

0:04:25.680 --> 0:04:29.240
<v Speaker 3>population has synesthesia. But there are lots of things like

0:04:29.279 --> 0:04:33.400
<v Speaker 3>this that we do where we study across people to

0:04:33.520 --> 0:04:38.240
<v Speaker 3>understand how perception differs. You know, there are other things

0:04:38.320 --> 0:04:43.480
<v Speaker 3>like if I ask you Craig to imagine a you know,

0:04:43.560 --> 0:04:46.960
<v Speaker 3>an ant crawling our red and white table cloth towards

0:04:47.440 --> 0:04:50.760
<v Speaker 3>jar of purple jelly. How do you perceive that in

0:04:50.760 --> 0:04:52.760
<v Speaker 3>your head? Is it clear like a movie or is

0:04:52.800 --> 0:04:55.680
<v Speaker 3>it you don't really see anything at all, it's just conceptual.

0:04:56.080 --> 0:04:59.080
<v Speaker 1>Does it involve you then? And like, for example, you

0:04:59.160 --> 0:05:02.039
<v Speaker 1>just gave me the the ant on the If you say,

0:05:02.120 --> 0:05:05.240
<v Speaker 1>is it clear like a movie, it's such a weirdly Uh,

0:05:05.720 --> 0:05:08.400
<v Speaker 1>it's semantics because I mean, if I do I imagine

0:05:08.440 --> 0:05:10.800
<v Speaker 1>a clear iPhone film?

0:05:11.120 --> 0:05:15.320
<v Speaker 3>Is it show on? Is a sixteen millimeters or print?

0:05:15.480 --> 0:05:17.000
<v Speaker 3>Is it? Do you know what I mean? Is it

0:05:17.040 --> 0:05:19.159
<v Speaker 3>black and white? Right? So, if you had to have

0:05:19.200 --> 0:05:22.000
<v Speaker 3>if there was a spectrum from no picture at all

0:05:22.080 --> 0:05:24.840
<v Speaker 3>in your head to a movie at you know, at

0:05:24.880 --> 0:05:27.120
<v Speaker 3>the other end of the extreme, where would where would

0:05:27.160 --> 0:05:30.000
<v Speaker 3>you be with the ant on the paper? Yeah, the

0:05:30.040 --> 0:05:30.880
<v Speaker 3>on on the table cloth.

0:05:31.120 --> 0:05:33.680
<v Speaker 1>I think I could get myself right up to imax

0:05:33.920 --> 0:05:35.200
<v Speaker 1>with the end on the paper.

0:05:36.279 --> 0:05:39.120
<v Speaker 3>Okay, that's that's amazing. So it turns out that there

0:05:39.200 --> 0:05:42.640
<v Speaker 3>is a spectrum across the population. Everyone's spread pretty evenly

0:05:43.120 --> 0:05:48.039
<v Speaker 3>across this in terms of how how visually you imagine

0:05:48.240 --> 0:05:50.920
<v Speaker 3>things on the inside. And again, this is something that

0:05:50.920 --> 0:05:53.400
<v Speaker 3>we can test across the population, and we can also

0:05:53.520 --> 0:05:57.920
<v Speaker 3>test it objectively using grain imaging to see how much

0:05:57.960 --> 0:06:00.400
<v Speaker 3>activity there is in the visual part of the brain.

0:06:00.880 --> 0:06:04.880
<v Speaker 3>And we see that across anything we measure people exist

0:06:05.000 --> 0:06:08.560
<v Speaker 3>on a spectrum. For example, if I ask you how

0:06:09.120 --> 0:06:12.440
<v Speaker 3>loud or intrusive is your internal voice? You know, everyone

0:06:12.480 --> 0:06:15.640
<v Speaker 3>has a dialogue with themselves, right right? Are you aware

0:06:15.680 --> 0:06:17.920
<v Speaker 3>of your internal voice all the time or hardly? Ever?

0:06:18.600 --> 0:06:22.400
<v Speaker 1>I would say that that is very much situationally dependent.

0:06:22.520 --> 0:06:26.320
<v Speaker 1>When I'm you know, when I'm calm, not at all.

0:06:26.480 --> 0:06:31.200
<v Speaker 1>When I'm angry, probably not at all. And when i'm

0:06:31.320 --> 0:06:33.919
<v Speaker 1>you know, when I'm trying to make a difficult or

0:06:34.040 --> 0:06:39.960
<v Speaker 1>political decision a lot, you know so, or or am

0:06:39.960 --> 0:06:41.480
<v Speaker 1>I thinking about the wrong thing?

0:06:41.680 --> 0:06:44.359
<v Speaker 3>No? No, that's that's right. That's a good observation that

0:06:44.480 --> 0:06:47.640
<v Speaker 3>it differs moment to moment. But across the population, we

0:06:47.720 --> 0:06:50.240
<v Speaker 3>also find, you know, some people are really overwhelmed by

0:06:50.279 --> 0:06:55.880
<v Speaker 3>their internal radio. Other people have what's called an endophasia,

0:06:55.920 --> 0:06:59.000
<v Speaker 3>which means no internal voice. They just know it's totally

0:06:59.040 --> 0:07:03.400
<v Speaker 3>silent in there. Essentially, across anything we measure, we find

0:07:03.400 --> 0:07:05.799
<v Speaker 3>that people have very different results. Or how about your memory?

0:07:05.839 --> 0:07:08.600
<v Speaker 3>Are you do you have a great autobiographical memory? Can

0:07:08.640 --> 0:07:11.320
<v Speaker 3>you remember exactly what you were doing at this time

0:07:11.400 --> 0:07:13.000
<v Speaker 3>last year or five years ago?

0:07:14.560 --> 0:07:17.720
<v Speaker 1>And I think it's deteriorating as well. Actually as I age,

0:07:17.760 --> 0:07:20.720
<v Speaker 1>I really am beginning to think there may be something

0:07:20.760 --> 0:07:21.040
<v Speaker 1>in that.

0:07:21.760 --> 0:07:24.280
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, yeah, you just said that three minutes ago. No,

0:07:24.280 --> 0:07:28.240
<v Speaker 3>I'm kidding her. Yeah, that's the thing. But you know,

0:07:28.280 --> 0:07:31.080
<v Speaker 3>some people like Mary Lou Henner the actress, and you

0:07:31.080 --> 0:07:36.200
<v Speaker 3>know somebody I have this, you know, untaxable autobiographical memory

0:07:36.600 --> 0:07:37.800
<v Speaker 3>and everywhere in between.

0:07:38.200 --> 0:07:40.280
<v Speaker 1>I talked to Mary Lou Henna rctly and asked her

0:07:40.280 --> 0:07:43.480
<v Speaker 1>about that, and she I tested her because I had

0:07:43.520 --> 0:07:46.400
<v Speaker 1>worked with her years before on a different show. This

0:07:46.520 --> 0:07:48.360
<v Speaker 1>was and I talked to her on late night and

0:07:48.400 --> 0:07:50.000
<v Speaker 1>she had been on the drink, you know why. I

0:07:50.000 --> 0:07:51.880
<v Speaker 1>got even remember why I was talking to her about it.

0:07:51.960 --> 0:07:55.760
<v Speaker 1>But she really she really could do that. It's kind

0:07:55.800 --> 0:07:59.960
<v Speaker 1>of it's like a weird trick. It's very it's impressive.

0:08:00.120 --> 0:08:03.040
<v Speaker 1>I guess is a genetic I guess it's genetics.

0:08:02.640 --> 0:08:06.400
<v Speaker 3>Right, yeah, yeah, and so and actually so are all

0:08:06.440 --> 0:08:08.440
<v Speaker 3>these things, at least as far as we can tell,

0:08:08.520 --> 0:08:11.520
<v Speaker 3>you know, all this. But what it goes to illustrate

0:08:11.520 --> 0:08:13.960
<v Speaker 3>is that people are very different from one another on

0:08:14.040 --> 0:08:16.160
<v Speaker 3>the inside. And one of the this has been one

0:08:16.160 --> 0:08:18.680
<v Speaker 3>of my eras of interest in neuroscience is figuring out

0:08:19.520 --> 0:08:23.160
<v Speaker 3>why what are the genes or what are the experiences

0:08:23.480 --> 0:08:25.120
<v Speaker 3>or you know, what is the thing that has led

0:08:25.160 --> 0:08:28.880
<v Speaker 3>to different circuitry in Mary Leeu's brain in your brain,

0:08:29.360 --> 0:08:31.880
<v Speaker 3>that would lead you to have different experiences of what

0:08:31.960 --> 0:08:32.559
<v Speaker 3>memory is.

0:08:33.240 --> 0:08:37.079
<v Speaker 1>What would happen or have you ever encountered anithon divid

0:08:37.320 --> 0:08:40.680
<v Speaker 1>I can imagine that it could be potentially very explosive

0:08:41.400 --> 0:08:45.000
<v Speaker 1>if you say you know, well you know, because it

0:08:45.000 --> 0:08:48.040
<v Speaker 1>could lead you into horrible areas of racism. Like you say,

0:08:48.920 --> 0:08:52.040
<v Speaker 1>Medisranean people tend their brains stand to be like this,

0:08:52.480 --> 0:08:54.760
<v Speaker 1>or Nordic people their brains stand to.

0:08:54.760 --> 0:08:56.800
<v Speaker 3>Be like this. Is that a real thing or is

0:08:56.840 --> 0:09:03.400
<v Speaker 3>that made up by Nazis? The general story is, you know,

0:09:03.520 --> 0:09:06.520
<v Speaker 3>Homo sapiens have only spread around the earth very recently.

0:09:06.880 --> 0:09:10.040
<v Speaker 3>So you know, we originated in Africa about two hudred

0:09:10.040 --> 0:09:12.000
<v Speaker 3>fift thousand years ago. We came out the top and

0:09:12.040 --> 0:09:14.600
<v Speaker 3>half the people turned left and half turned right and

0:09:14.760 --> 0:09:19.720
<v Speaker 3>became you know, Europeans or Asians. But on the inside,

0:09:20.000 --> 0:09:22.640
<v Speaker 3>the organ that we have, that three pound mission control

0:09:22.679 --> 0:09:27.120
<v Speaker 3>center hasn't changed. That's the same same thing. Why because

0:09:27.120 --> 0:09:30.120
<v Speaker 3>two hundred fift thousand years just isn't enough time. In

0:09:30.160 --> 0:09:32.800
<v Speaker 3>the same way that people's hearts and lungs and kidneys

0:09:32.880 --> 0:09:35.360
<v Speaker 3>are the same as you go around the world. So

0:09:36.000 --> 0:09:40.480
<v Speaker 3>while there's an enormous amount of difference between people, there

0:09:40.520 --> 0:09:43.800
<v Speaker 3>aren't between groups of people. On average. You find this

0:09:44.000 --> 0:09:45.560
<v Speaker 3>giant distribution everywhere.

0:09:46.440 --> 0:09:50.520
<v Speaker 1>Well about the idea, I mean, I presume this study.

0:09:51.000 --> 0:09:54.440
<v Speaker 1>Is it driven, I mean it's knowledge driven. I guess

0:09:54.520 --> 0:09:58.360
<v Speaker 1>it's science. But is it a medical Is that what.

0:09:58.320 --> 0:09:58.880
<v Speaker 3>We're looking for?

0:09:59.360 --> 0:10:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Is it to try and solve problem? Like one of

0:10:04.040 --> 0:10:06.960
<v Speaker 1>this brings to mind is demanchia obviously in Alzheimer's, which

0:10:07.000 --> 0:10:11.080
<v Speaker 1>is a real kind of cognitive problem.

0:10:11.280 --> 0:10:15.520
<v Speaker 3>Yes, yeah, exactly right. So you know, the field of

0:10:15.520 --> 0:10:22.280
<v Speaker 3>neuroscience traditionally studies diseases and disorders and what happens with

0:10:22.320 --> 0:10:24.640
<v Speaker 3>the brain to make it change, for example, in cases

0:10:24.679 --> 0:10:27.680
<v Speaker 3>of dementia. I also study that. A lot of the

0:10:27.720 --> 0:10:30.920
<v Speaker 3>things I do have to do with those areas, but

0:10:31.280 --> 0:10:33.880
<v Speaker 3>just personally, I got very interested in the topic of

0:10:34.320 --> 0:10:38.719
<v Speaker 3>you know, how does the brain run in everyone under

0:10:38.800 --> 0:10:42.880
<v Speaker 3>normal circumstances, and again, what are the differences between people?

0:10:42.920 --> 0:10:45.240
<v Speaker 3>And by the way, how does it matter for society.

0:10:45.320 --> 0:10:47.000
<v Speaker 3>So one of the things I do I run this

0:10:47.880 --> 0:10:52.240
<v Speaker 3>Center for Neuroscience and Law, which is all the things

0:10:52.240 --> 0:10:54.839
<v Speaker 3>that we're learning in neuroscience. How does this affect the

0:10:55.280 --> 0:10:57.920
<v Speaker 3>legal system and how we think about things there.

0:10:58.400 --> 0:11:03.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, so if it there's a behavioral problem, for example,

0:11:03.520 --> 0:11:06.880
<v Speaker 1>excuse me, if you find out that someone reacts a

0:11:06.880 --> 0:11:10.400
<v Speaker 1>certain way being triggered by a certain stimulus. Like off

0:11:10.440 --> 0:11:11.679
<v Speaker 1>the top of my head, I'm not a doctor and

0:11:11.679 --> 0:11:13.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what I'm talking about, but say that

0:11:14.000 --> 0:11:16.560
<v Speaker 1>I have a brain that if you touch me, I

0:11:16.679 --> 0:11:20.480
<v Speaker 1>get very very upset. Is that something that you could

0:11:20.480 --> 0:11:23.200
<v Speaker 1>bring into the legal world where you say, well, this

0:11:23.679 --> 0:11:26.360
<v Speaker 1>person behaved very badly when they were being arrested, but

0:11:26.520 --> 0:11:28.200
<v Speaker 1>now we found out they've got the type of brain

0:11:28.320 --> 0:11:29.840
<v Speaker 1>if you touch them, they get very upset.

0:11:30.360 --> 0:11:35.200
<v Speaker 3>So here's the thing, great question. It turns out none

0:11:35.240 --> 0:11:38.160
<v Speaker 3>of this lets people off the hook. So if you

0:11:38.440 --> 0:11:40.760
<v Speaker 3>break the law, if you cross a sideal line, you

0:11:41.120 --> 0:11:43.680
<v Speaker 3>still have to confront the legal system for it. But

0:11:44.600 --> 0:11:46.400
<v Speaker 3>one of the things that tells us a lot about

0:11:47.160 --> 0:11:49.560
<v Speaker 3>is new methods for rehabilitation. So what we do right

0:11:49.600 --> 0:11:51.160
<v Speaker 3>now is a society and it is true around the

0:11:51.160 --> 0:11:54.480
<v Speaker 3>world we treat incarceration as a one size fits all solution,

0:11:55.400 --> 0:11:57.720
<v Speaker 3>but in fact, we know so much about the brain

0:11:57.760 --> 0:12:01.040
<v Speaker 3>now that if you come in with this particular disorder

0:12:01.080 --> 0:12:03.520
<v Speaker 3>where touching you on your shoulder, makes you react badly.

0:12:03.640 --> 0:12:05.400
<v Speaker 3>You know, maybe there's something we can do to help

0:12:05.480 --> 0:12:12.000
<v Speaker 3>you out, at least such that you know at least

0:12:13.400 --> 0:12:15.319
<v Speaker 3>exactly what we're not gonna do. And then it turns

0:12:15.320 --> 0:12:17.560
<v Speaker 3>out that you know, we might be able to help

0:12:17.600 --> 0:12:19.720
<v Speaker 3>you for the next time. Now, again, it doesn't let

0:12:19.720 --> 0:12:22.640
<v Speaker 3>people off the hook. It's not that you go without punishment,

0:12:22.679 --> 0:12:25.320
<v Speaker 3>but that's that's the idea, and there are lots of

0:12:25.360 --> 0:12:29.160
<v Speaker 3>ways we can do this. Just one example. I've been

0:12:29.400 --> 0:12:33.760
<v Speaker 3>a strong advocate for having specialized mental health courts. So

0:12:33.800 --> 0:12:35.160
<v Speaker 3>what we do right now as everyone goes to the

0:12:35.160 --> 0:12:37.680
<v Speaker 3>same court system, but if somebody has mental illness, which

0:12:37.720 --> 0:12:39.720
<v Speaker 3>is a you know, quite a high number of people

0:12:39.720 --> 0:12:42.160
<v Speaker 3>with mental illness end up on the wrong side of

0:12:42.240 --> 0:12:44.559
<v Speaker 3>legal system. You know, you have judges and juries that

0:12:44.600 --> 0:12:47.760
<v Speaker 3>maybe don't know anything about let's say schizophrenia or take

0:12:48.160 --> 0:12:52.240
<v Speaker 3>drug rehabilitation. Yeah, most judges and juries don't know a

0:12:52.280 --> 0:12:55.479
<v Speaker 3>great deal about what options are available. So having specialized

0:12:55.480 --> 0:12:57.800
<v Speaker 3>mental health courts, specialized drug courts, things like this are

0:12:57.800 --> 0:13:00.760
<v Speaker 3>really helpful where you have people that expertise, they know

0:13:01.000 --> 0:13:02.840
<v Speaker 3>the strategy is available.

0:13:03.360 --> 0:13:07.560
<v Speaker 1>It's an interesting thing that you mentioned excuse me schizophrenia

0:13:08.000 --> 0:13:12.480
<v Speaker 1>and drug rehabilitation, because schizophrenia. Remember I know nothing about this.

0:13:12.920 --> 0:13:16.160
<v Speaker 1>You know, you're the brain. I'm pinky, right, So that

0:13:17.280 --> 0:13:20.760
<v Speaker 1>my understanding of is or the tinium and I know

0:13:20.800 --> 0:13:23.800
<v Speaker 1>about it is that schizophrenia is a condition which you

0:13:24.120 --> 0:13:25.920
<v Speaker 1>I develop.

0:13:25.679 --> 0:13:29.240
<v Speaker 3>From a genetic position. Right. It's it's an illness that

0:13:29.280 --> 0:13:32.320
<v Speaker 3>is born within you. Right. It has a strong generic

0:13:32.400 --> 0:13:35.160
<v Speaker 3>component to it. It's not entirely can it be brought

0:13:35.240 --> 0:13:40.520
<v Speaker 3>on by by outside stimulus. It certainly can be exacerbated

0:13:40.520 --> 0:13:43.560
<v Speaker 3>and brought on early by things like drugs, for example.

0:13:43.760 --> 0:13:45.760
<v Speaker 3>So for sure, example, this is a real problem with

0:13:45.920 --> 0:13:49.520
<v Speaker 3>young people using marijuana, which has a much higher percentage

0:13:49.559 --> 0:13:53.040
<v Speaker 3>of THHC now than it used to in earlier strains.

0:13:53.600 --> 0:13:57.240
<v Speaker 3>A lot of young people are getting psychotic breaks as

0:13:57.280 --> 0:13:59.520
<v Speaker 3>a result of that much higher percentage than used to.

0:14:00.120 --> 0:14:02.240
<v Speaker 1>That happened to me when I took marijuana when I

0:14:02.320 --> 0:14:05.360
<v Speaker 1>was when I was young, I stopped take it.

0:14:05.400 --> 0:14:05.800
<v Speaker 3>I started.

0:14:05.800 --> 0:14:09.199
<v Speaker 1>I took marimana when it was about eighteen through until

0:14:09.200 --> 0:14:12.240
<v Speaker 1>I was about twenty, which is all terrible thing to do.

0:14:12.400 --> 0:14:15.199
<v Speaker 1>And I didn't do tons of it, but there was

0:14:15.240 --> 0:14:17.440
<v Speaker 1>at one point I took some and it it was

0:14:18.040 --> 0:14:22.359
<v Speaker 1>one of the most horrendous experiences of my life from marijuana,

0:14:22.400 --> 0:14:24.520
<v Speaker 1>and it's very hard to explain that to people who

0:14:25.240 --> 0:14:26.520
<v Speaker 1>don't get affected.

0:14:26.160 --> 0:14:29.520
<v Speaker 3>By it that way, right, right, exactly, And there's probably

0:14:29.520 --> 0:14:31.600
<v Speaker 3>a genetic component to that in terms of who gets

0:14:31.600 --> 0:14:34.560
<v Speaker 3>affected and who doesn't. But yeah, So back to your

0:14:34.600 --> 0:14:37.720
<v Speaker 3>question about schizophrenia though, right, So, what were you going

0:14:37.800 --> 0:14:40.600
<v Speaker 3>to So it's mostly genetic, but there are environmental things

0:14:40.600 --> 0:14:41.560
<v Speaker 3>that exacerbate it.

0:14:48.920 --> 0:14:51.280
<v Speaker 1>Well, I was going to ask you about drug addiction,

0:14:52.080 --> 0:14:55.560
<v Speaker 1>which I think I don't know. Is that the same

0:14:55.720 --> 0:15:00.360
<v Speaker 1>is it percent more percentage genetic for schizophrenia is for

0:15:00.440 --> 0:15:03.880
<v Speaker 1>drug addiction? Is it more environmental and land behavior for

0:15:04.000 --> 0:15:07.640
<v Speaker 1>drug and alcohol addiction? I can't imagine there is peer

0:15:07.680 --> 0:15:10.760
<v Speaker 1>pressure to become schizophrenic, you know. It seems like it's

0:15:10.800 --> 0:15:17.840
<v Speaker 1>almost accidental. Whereas I speak, is a sober alcoholic? I mean,

0:15:18.280 --> 0:15:21.560
<v Speaker 1>I didn't say out for that to happen, you know,

0:15:21.600 --> 0:15:23.760
<v Speaker 1>I say for the sober thing to happen, it basically,

0:15:23.760 --> 0:15:26.080
<v Speaker 1>but it kind of crept up on me. Is there

0:15:26.120 --> 0:15:29.000
<v Speaker 1>a genetic predisposition to both of these things? Is what

0:15:29.040 --> 0:15:29.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm saying.

0:15:29.760 --> 0:15:33.440
<v Speaker 3>There is, although completely separate genetics on the Sudie. But yes,

0:15:33.480 --> 0:15:36.680
<v Speaker 3>there is a genetic predisposition for addiction, for having an

0:15:36.720 --> 0:15:42.600
<v Speaker 3>addictive personality. That is clearly a thing. But there are

0:15:42.720 --> 0:15:45.600
<v Speaker 3>very few things really that can be separated cleanly into

0:15:45.760 --> 0:15:48.920
<v Speaker 3>nature versus nurture, because there are influences on both. I'll

0:15:48.960 --> 0:15:50.520
<v Speaker 3>just give you an example. It turns out that with

0:15:50.680 --> 0:15:55.600
<v Speaker 3>back to schizophrenia, one of the things that influences whether

0:15:55.680 --> 0:15:58.000
<v Speaker 3>someone has a psychotic break in part has to do

0:15:58.040 --> 0:16:00.640
<v Speaker 3>with whether they are living in a place where they

0:16:00.640 --> 0:16:03.120
<v Speaker 3>are in their culture, in their language, or whether they

0:16:03.160 --> 0:16:06.560
<v Speaker 3>have immigrated somewhere else. And when you're living somewhere else,

0:16:07.200 --> 0:16:10.920
<v Speaker 3>there are things like you know, you can't for example,

0:16:10.920 --> 0:16:14.160
<v Speaker 3>you can't make jokes in your new language as well,

0:16:14.280 --> 0:16:17.200
<v Speaker 3>or you can't fit in exactly as well. And it

0:16:17.240 --> 0:16:20.200
<v Speaker 3>turns out that more people have psychotic breaks. In my

0:16:20.200 --> 0:16:22.440
<v Speaker 3>book in Cognito, I talked about this as you know,

0:16:22.480 --> 0:16:25.560
<v Speaker 3>one of the risks of getting schatphrenia is the color

0:16:25.600 --> 0:16:30.120
<v Speaker 3>of your passport. So you know that's that's a surprising

0:16:30.320 --> 0:16:32.920
<v Speaker 3>social aspect of it that people have discovered.

0:16:33.240 --> 0:16:35.960
<v Speaker 1>Well, that's that's kind of fascinating to me. Then does

0:16:36.040 --> 0:16:40.920
<v Speaker 1>that does that lead you to study more men aloneness,

0:16:41.000 --> 0:16:44.200
<v Speaker 1>because clearly there are things like it's not a man

0:16:44.280 --> 0:16:47.640
<v Speaker 1>in aloneness, but clearly if someone is dyslexic, they're bre dyslexic. Right,

0:16:47.720 --> 0:16:50.160
<v Speaker 1>it's not something you learn as a little baby, that's right.

0:16:50.200 --> 0:16:53.760
<v Speaker 1>But if someone's left handed or right handed? I was,

0:16:53.760 --> 0:16:55.440
<v Speaker 1>was that do you learn?

0:16:55.520 --> 0:16:56.280
<v Speaker 3>That? Is it?

0:16:56.360 --> 0:16:58.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, how much information you get right in the beginning,

0:16:58.840 --> 0:16:59.840
<v Speaker 1>I think, is what I'm saying.

0:17:00.120 --> 0:17:02.320
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, yeah, these are great questions. The fact is, when

0:17:02.320 --> 0:17:05.080
<v Speaker 3>it comes to nature versus nurture, the answer is almost

0:17:05.119 --> 0:17:09.200
<v Speaker 3>always both. There are a very tiny number of things

0:17:09.720 --> 0:17:11.560
<v Speaker 3>that are one or the other. Four example, the first

0:17:11.600 --> 0:17:14.720
<v Speaker 3>gene that was pulled for a disease was Huntington's disease,

0:17:15.880 --> 0:17:19.600
<v Speaker 3>and everyone thought, great, if you have this gene, you're

0:17:19.640 --> 0:17:21.800
<v Speaker 3>gonna get Huntington's that's it. And never thought this is

0:17:21.840 --> 0:17:23.359
<v Speaker 3>going to be easy. But it turns out it's one

0:17:23.359 --> 0:17:27.040
<v Speaker 3>of the few monogenetic diseases that exist, meaning you know,

0:17:27.280 --> 0:17:29.200
<v Speaker 3>if you have this gene, blah blah, because everything turns

0:17:29.200 --> 0:17:33.439
<v Speaker 3>out to be more complicated. Other diseases involve genetics. They

0:17:33.480 --> 0:17:36.240
<v Speaker 3>have all lots of different genes, whole families of genes.

0:17:36.240 --> 0:17:37.800
<v Speaker 3>We're still trying to get to the bottom of them.

0:17:37.960 --> 0:17:42.679
<v Speaker 3>But also most of everything involves what's going on societally too.

0:17:42.840 --> 0:17:44.320
<v Speaker 3>Let me give you an example of this. This came

0:17:44.359 --> 0:17:48.520
<v Speaker 3>out some years ago. The question is are there genes

0:17:48.560 --> 0:17:51.680
<v Speaker 3>for depression? Well, it turns out if you're a carrier

0:17:51.720 --> 0:17:55.320
<v Speaker 3>of particular genes, the question is, okay, are you more

0:17:55.400 --> 0:17:57.560
<v Speaker 3>likely to get depression? And the answer is that totally

0:17:57.600 --> 0:18:01.160
<v Speaker 3>depends on the number of really traumatic life events you have.

0:18:01.320 --> 0:18:03.879
<v Speaker 3>So let's say, you know, a terrible car accident or

0:18:03.920 --> 0:18:05.960
<v Speaker 3>the death of a loved one, things like that. If

0:18:05.960 --> 0:18:09.879
<v Speaker 3>you've had a lot of traumatic life experiences and you

0:18:09.960 --> 0:18:12.960
<v Speaker 3>carry these genes, then your chance of getting depression is

0:18:13.040 --> 0:18:15.760
<v Speaker 3>much higher than someone who's had the same number of

0:18:15.760 --> 0:18:18.600
<v Speaker 3>traumatic life experiences but don't carry the genes. But if

0:18:18.640 --> 0:18:21.080
<v Speaker 3>you don't have let's say any or just a few

0:18:21.160 --> 0:18:24.680
<v Speaker 3>life experiences that are bad, your chances are no different

0:18:24.680 --> 0:18:28.280
<v Speaker 3>than anyone else. So this is now we refer to

0:18:28.320 --> 0:18:34.240
<v Speaker 3>this as gene times environment you know, gene x environment interactions.

0:18:34.640 --> 0:18:37.160
<v Speaker 3>So it depends on both things.

0:18:37.640 --> 0:18:41.040
<v Speaker 1>So it's kind of like a recipe then, right, yeah, yeah,

0:18:41.240 --> 0:18:44.439
<v Speaker 1>Like so I want to stay about like some some

0:18:44.600 --> 0:18:45.919
<v Speaker 1>bit of this and some bit of that.

0:18:46.040 --> 0:18:47.359
<v Speaker 3>You know, you get a little bit of sugar and

0:18:47.400 --> 0:18:48.800
<v Speaker 3>a little bit of salt and a little.

0:18:48.560 --> 0:18:51.560
<v Speaker 1>Bit of trauma, and you get you know, you get

0:18:51.560 --> 0:18:53.280
<v Speaker 1>a spatial thing, exactly.

0:18:53.280 --> 0:18:55.400
<v Speaker 3>And what this points to is the complexity of both

0:18:55.400 --> 0:18:59.560
<v Speaker 3>biology and life, right you know, yeah, born, Yeah, things

0:18:59.560 --> 0:19:01.639
<v Speaker 3>can happen to you that we're unexpected, and you can

0:19:01.720 --> 0:19:04.080
<v Speaker 3>have genes that interact in unexpected ways.

0:19:04.359 --> 0:19:08.080
<v Speaker 1>Yes, And that's so I imagine those probably an almost

0:19:08.200 --> 0:19:11.239
<v Speaker 1>infinite amount of variables and all these different things. So

0:19:11.520 --> 0:19:14.040
<v Speaker 1>to depend on how someone is ever going to be,

0:19:14.080 --> 0:19:16.680
<v Speaker 1>it just remains as elusive as ever then, right, that

0:19:17.280 --> 0:19:18.000
<v Speaker 1>is exactly right.

0:19:18.040 --> 0:19:21.560
<v Speaker 3>So you take a movie like Minority Report, where the

0:19:21.640 --> 0:19:23.640
<v Speaker 3>shtick was that you could predict who's going to commit

0:19:23.680 --> 0:19:26.920
<v Speaker 3>a crime in the future. It's total fantasy and it'll

0:19:26.960 --> 0:19:29.479
<v Speaker 3>never happen. In other words, people think, hey, as we

0:19:29.520 --> 0:19:32.159
<v Speaker 3>get better with brain imaging or with AI, won't we

0:19:32.200 --> 0:19:34.919
<v Speaker 3>get to that point someday? But the answer is never happened.

0:19:34.960 --> 0:19:40.240
<v Speaker 3>Why Because your brain is changing and rewiring every second

0:19:40.280 --> 0:19:43.920
<v Speaker 3>of your life depending on your interactions. So, for example,

0:19:44.520 --> 0:19:47.440
<v Speaker 3>your brain and my brain are different than they were

0:19:47.480 --> 0:19:51.080
<v Speaker 3>five minutes ago, just from conversing with each other. Right, So,

0:19:51.520 --> 0:19:54.320
<v Speaker 3>and this is the notion of brain plasticity, which is

0:19:54.359 --> 0:19:57.840
<v Speaker 3>that fundamentally, what mother nature has done is built a

0:19:57.960 --> 0:20:04.320
<v Speaker 3>system that absorbs the world and is constantly reconfiguring itself.

0:20:05.000 --> 0:20:07.840
<v Speaker 1>So I kind of you mentioned the AI there, so

0:20:07.960 --> 0:20:10.960
<v Speaker 1>I kind of find that fascinating because the idea I

0:20:11.040 --> 0:20:13.480
<v Speaker 1>suppose of AI. Again, I know not of AI either,

0:20:13.800 --> 0:20:17.359
<v Speaker 1>but the idea is that it mimics the landing pattern

0:20:17.480 --> 0:20:19.439
<v Speaker 1>of a human brain, right, because that's all it can do,

0:20:19.520 --> 0:20:21.440
<v Speaker 1>given the fact that's all we have to build it with.

0:20:22.080 --> 0:20:24.080
<v Speaker 3>Sort of, So this is the really interesting thing. So

0:20:24.720 --> 0:20:28.760
<v Speaker 3>AI launched many decades ago, and the idea was, okay, look,

0:20:28.800 --> 0:20:32.320
<v Speaker 3>the brain is super complicated, but fundamentally you've got these units,

0:20:32.320 --> 0:20:35.120
<v Speaker 3>and you've got these connections between the units in the brain.

0:20:35.200 --> 0:20:37.240
<v Speaker 3>These are neurons, and these are all the connections between

0:20:37.280 --> 0:20:40.000
<v Speaker 3>the urts. So people said, look, what if we just

0:20:40.040 --> 0:20:42.199
<v Speaker 3>make a cartoon version of this where you just have

0:20:42.400 --> 0:20:45.120
<v Speaker 3>these you know, little units that we've got these connections

0:20:45.119 --> 0:20:47.040
<v Speaker 3>that you are just changing the strength of those connections

0:20:47.040 --> 0:20:52.560
<v Speaker 3>across the big network. So that's where artificial neural networks

0:20:52.880 --> 0:20:55.280
<v Speaker 3>took off and went in that direction, and it turns

0:20:55.320 --> 0:21:00.000
<v Speaker 3>out that's become incredibly successful. We've got this great renaissance

0:21:00.160 --> 0:21:04.240
<v Speaker 3>going on of AI. But it's actually not that much

0:21:04.480 --> 0:21:07.959
<v Speaker 3>like the human brain. It's it's quite different. So there

0:21:07.960 --> 0:21:10.960
<v Speaker 3>are many many things that the human brain does that

0:21:11.000 --> 0:21:15.000
<v Speaker 3>AI simply can't, and at least in its current architecture,

0:21:16.119 --> 0:21:19.119
<v Speaker 3>you won't do anytime soon. I'll give you an example

0:21:19.119 --> 0:21:21.080
<v Speaker 3>of that. But I'll also say really quickly that it's

0:21:21.119 --> 0:21:24.600
<v Speaker 3>not to say that we can't build artificial neural networks

0:21:24.600 --> 0:21:27.120
<v Speaker 3>that are just like the brain and someday, maybe five

0:21:27.200 --> 0:21:29.440
<v Speaker 3>years now, maybe fifty years from now, do everything in

0:21:29.480 --> 0:21:33.360
<v Speaker 3>brain does. But our current stuff like chat GPT, for example,

0:21:33.400 --> 0:21:36.560
<v Speaker 3>does not have an internal model of the world. So

0:21:36.760 --> 0:21:40.520
<v Speaker 3>if I ask GPT, hey, when Craig Ferguson walks into

0:21:40.560 --> 0:21:44.080
<v Speaker 3>a room, does his nose come with him? It won't

0:21:44.160 --> 0:21:46.880
<v Speaker 3>know the answer to that because it has no model

0:21:47.000 --> 0:21:50.200
<v Speaker 3>of the world. You know, does does his spleen come

0:21:50.200 --> 0:21:50.520
<v Speaker 3>with him?

0:21:50.520 --> 0:21:50.680
<v Speaker 2>Well?

0:21:50.800 --> 0:21:53.240
<v Speaker 3>How does it know? It doesn't? It why? Because the

0:21:53.280 --> 0:21:56.199
<v Speaker 3>way chat GPT is trained, it's read everything in the

0:21:56.240 --> 0:22:00.520
<v Speaker 3>world and it's just doing statistical games on what word

0:22:00.600 --> 0:22:03.000
<v Speaker 3>is likely to come next. That's all GPT does. It's

0:22:03.040 --> 0:22:08.280
<v Speaker 3>an enormous, enormous network yeah, that's just why I did ask.

0:22:08.720 --> 0:22:11.919
<v Speaker 1>I asked chat GPT to write me a short Craig

0:22:11.960 --> 0:22:17.720
<v Speaker 1>ferguson stand up comedy routine. And you know, I feel

0:22:17.720 --> 0:22:21.720
<v Speaker 1>like either I'm a terrible writer but my delivery is great,

0:22:22.280 --> 0:22:26.240
<v Speaker 1>or just a a terrible comedian, or chat GPT has

0:22:26.280 --> 0:22:27.840
<v Speaker 1>got a way to go yet, and it should maybe,

0:22:27.880 --> 0:22:29.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, work on his material in some clubs.

0:22:30.440 --> 0:22:32.159
<v Speaker 3>So so, okay, this is a really good point. And

0:22:32.240 --> 0:22:36.480
<v Speaker 3>chat GPT is terrible at humor, at making up new jokes, Okay.

0:22:36.520 --> 0:22:40.520
<v Speaker 3>Why it's because it's just a statistical parent. And what

0:22:40.560 --> 0:22:44.280
<v Speaker 3>it realizes is that humor is all about the violation

0:22:44.359 --> 0:22:48.720
<v Speaker 3>of expectation, but it doesn't know how to violate it. Well,

0:22:48.920 --> 0:22:50.600
<v Speaker 3>so if you ask it, tell me a joke about

0:22:50.640 --> 0:22:52.440
<v Speaker 3>you know, three guys who walk into a bar and say,

0:22:52.440 --> 0:22:54.439
<v Speaker 3>you know, and do blah blah blah. It'll say the

0:22:54.440 --> 0:22:56.359
<v Speaker 3>first guy does this, the second guy does this, and

0:22:56.400 --> 0:22:58.800
<v Speaker 3>the third guy does this, and it'll say something that

0:22:58.840 --> 0:23:01.640
<v Speaker 3>doesn't make any sense because it knows the third thing

0:23:01.680 --> 0:23:03.840
<v Speaker 3>is supposed to break the pattern, but it doesn't know

0:23:03.880 --> 0:23:06.200
<v Speaker 3>how to do it in a funny way.

0:23:06.880 --> 0:23:11.360
<v Speaker 5>I feel in Spain, I I think there's an argument

0:23:11.440 --> 0:23:13.560
<v Speaker 5>to be made for having a comedy night in a

0:23:13.600 --> 0:23:16.920
<v Speaker 5>club where comedians have to tell jokes written by computers.

0:23:17.160 --> 0:23:20.399
<v Speaker 1>And in fact, I am going to put that together

0:23:20.440 --> 0:23:21.480
<v Speaker 1>as soon as possible.

0:23:24.600 --> 0:23:27.000
<v Speaker 3>So this is funny that you mentioned this because I'm

0:23:27.040 --> 0:23:31.360
<v Speaker 3>actually working on on on a television documentary now. I'm

0:23:31.400 --> 0:23:34.440
<v Speaker 3>writing this up with my colleagues. It's called Bits and Giggles,

0:23:34.800 --> 0:23:37.640
<v Speaker 3>and it's exactly about this. It's about a comedian who

0:23:37.680 --> 0:23:41.399
<v Speaker 3>goes on a road trip with no Yeah, We've actually

0:23:41.440 --> 0:23:45.560
<v Speaker 3>built a little bot that does you know speech to text?

0:23:45.560 --> 0:23:47.600
<v Speaker 3>It goes off to chat GPT and then does you

0:23:47.640 --> 0:23:50.600
<v Speaker 3>know text to speech? So you can have a dialogue

0:23:50.680 --> 0:23:53.359
<v Speaker 3>back and forth with this little bot. And the question

0:23:53.600 --> 0:23:56.159
<v Speaker 3>is what does AI mean for us? Will it be

0:23:56.280 --> 0:23:59.119
<v Speaker 3>funny it, can it take the place of community? Can

0:23:59.200 --> 0:24:02.960
<v Speaker 3>it perform on stage with a comedian? Yeah?

0:24:03.119 --> 0:24:06.320
<v Speaker 1>I think I think it's quite interesting because I because

0:24:06.359 --> 0:24:09.639
<v Speaker 1>of my own history with komedy, I love it and

0:24:09.720 --> 0:24:13.640
<v Speaker 1>I feel that it's a very human connectivity thing. It's

0:24:13.680 --> 0:24:16.320
<v Speaker 1>a very and it's odd way, it's very intimate thing,

0:24:17.160 --> 0:24:19.880
<v Speaker 1>even although you know it's one person then an audience

0:24:20.000 --> 0:24:22.040
<v Speaker 1>in the way that I do it anyway, and I

0:24:22.119 --> 0:24:27.240
<v Speaker 1>wonder if that happens, then do you have your robot lover,

0:24:27.440 --> 0:24:31.520
<v Speaker 1>do you have your robot husband, your robot wife, your

0:24:31.640 --> 0:24:34.520
<v Speaker 1>robot spouse, your robot children?

0:24:34.720 --> 0:24:38.760
<v Speaker 3>I mean, is it? Is it possible? Yeah? So okay,

0:24:38.840 --> 0:24:40.760
<v Speaker 3>so this is funny mite. So my wife has been

0:24:40.840 --> 0:24:42.760
<v Speaker 3>joking about this for a long time. She's been joking

0:24:42.760 --> 0:24:45.800
<v Speaker 3>about the five percent better David, by which she means,

0:24:46.400 --> 0:24:48.720
<v Speaker 3>what does she have AI David that had all my

0:24:48.760 --> 0:24:52.080
<v Speaker 3>good qualities but it never got distracted or angry or

0:24:52.119 --> 0:24:55.879
<v Speaker 3>you know, we looked in my phone beeps or whatever. So, uh,

0:24:56.400 --> 0:24:59.600
<v Speaker 3>we've talked about this a lot and what this means.

0:24:59.680 --> 0:25:02.359
<v Speaker 3>And you know, the issue now is that lots of

0:25:02.400 --> 0:25:04.879
<v Speaker 3>young people are getting AI girlfriends and to some lesser

0:25:04.920 --> 0:25:09.639
<v Speaker 3>extent AI boyfriends girls getting that. In Japan, apparently this

0:25:09.680 --> 0:25:13.840
<v Speaker 3>is becoming a bigger thing where people have these AI relationships.

0:25:14.640 --> 0:25:17.760
<v Speaker 3>We can imagine perhaps the downsides of this, but I

0:25:17.800 --> 0:25:20.520
<v Speaker 3>do want to note I think an upside for young

0:25:20.600 --> 0:25:24.159
<v Speaker 3>people is you might be able to learn how to

0:25:24.240 --> 0:25:27.520
<v Speaker 3>navigate relationships a little bit better, and you know, you

0:25:27.600 --> 0:25:31.359
<v Speaker 3>kind of get your sandbox, your practice relationship, and if

0:25:31.400 --> 0:25:34.480
<v Speaker 3>the AI it gives you good feedback, you might actually

0:25:34.560 --> 0:25:36.400
<v Speaker 3>be a better person in relationships.

0:25:36.840 --> 0:25:39.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, but then you don't get the requisite amount of

0:25:39.640 --> 0:25:42.520
<v Speaker 1>trauma to make you human. I mean, no one wants

0:25:42.560 --> 0:25:45.840
<v Speaker 1>to wish trauma and anyone but junior high school may

0:25:45.920 --> 0:25:49.520
<v Speaker 1>be an essential component of making you a better persons.

0:25:50.560 --> 0:25:54.200
<v Speaker 3>It's an interesting conundrum. So I agree with you, and

0:25:54.880 --> 0:25:56.680
<v Speaker 3>it turns out the way to do this, I think,

0:25:56.760 --> 0:26:00.320
<v Speaker 3>is to make the AI bought be traumatic in the

0:26:00.400 --> 0:26:03.080
<v Speaker 3>sense of, you know, if you say something wrong to it,

0:26:03.080 --> 0:26:05.320
<v Speaker 3>it's not kind or something. You know, it gets its

0:26:05.320 --> 0:26:09.359
<v Speaker 3>feelings hurt. Obviously it's just statistically impersonating this, but the

0:26:09.440 --> 0:26:12.480
<v Speaker 3>point is instead of having an AI that just says, oh,

0:26:12.520 --> 0:26:14.399
<v Speaker 3>that was so good, that was so funny and nice,

0:26:14.760 --> 0:26:17.000
<v Speaker 3>instead it gives you real feedback, tough love.

0:26:17.160 --> 0:26:20.520
<v Speaker 1>And that that might actually work better than the parenting

0:26:20.560 --> 0:26:24.359
<v Speaker 1>that my generation inflicted on the next generation, which I

0:26:24.359 --> 0:26:27.399
<v Speaker 1>think was a little too positive. I don't know, something

0:26:27.440 --> 0:26:30.119
<v Speaker 1>went wrong, So let me try it. Let me steer

0:26:30.160 --> 0:26:32.600
<v Speaker 1>you around back to the brain and perception a little bit,

0:26:32.640 --> 0:26:36.320
<v Speaker 1>because I'm fascinated by the idea in my own life,

0:26:36.320 --> 0:26:39.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm fascinated by the idea of I think most people

0:26:39.520 --> 0:26:42.200
<v Speaker 1>are What is all about was the meaning of life

0:26:42.520 --> 0:26:43.960
<v Speaker 1>was the is there a god?

0:26:44.480 --> 0:26:44.719
<v Speaker 3>You know?

0:26:45.200 --> 0:26:49.080
<v Speaker 1>And I wonder if in the study of the brain,

0:26:49.280 --> 0:26:53.159
<v Speaker 1>which is you know, it's information central, it's information and

0:26:53.200 --> 0:26:57.280
<v Speaker 1>control everything's passing through there, does it lead you in

0:26:57.400 --> 0:27:01.560
<v Speaker 1>any direction personally for yourself? Does it lead you in

0:27:01.600 --> 0:27:02.920
<v Speaker 1>an atheistic direction?

0:27:03.040 --> 0:27:06.639
<v Speaker 3>Does it lead you in a faith based direction? But

0:27:06.800 --> 0:27:09.600
<v Speaker 3>does it do anything to you personally? Sure? I mean,

0:27:09.640 --> 0:27:12.359
<v Speaker 3>I've spent my life in science, and I feel like

0:27:12.560 --> 0:27:17.359
<v Speaker 3>the main lesson that one can derive is to really

0:27:17.440 --> 0:27:22.879
<v Speaker 3>understand the vastness of our ignorance. And so the more

0:27:22.960 --> 0:27:26.800
<v Speaker 3>you reach down into science in the world and the cosmos,

0:27:26.920 --> 0:27:29.399
<v Speaker 3>you find that there's so much that we don't know,

0:27:29.520 --> 0:27:31.679
<v Speaker 3>we don't understand. So what does that meant for me?

0:27:32.119 --> 0:27:37.520
<v Speaker 3>I am neither an atheist nor religious, because atheism, at

0:27:37.600 --> 0:27:40.879
<v Speaker 3>least in its harshest form, in its strictest form, kind

0:27:40.880 --> 0:27:44.000
<v Speaker 3>of often pretends, Hey, we've got this all figured out,

0:27:44.000 --> 0:27:46.240
<v Speaker 3>we know what's going on here, but it's clear that

0:27:46.240 --> 0:27:49.119
<v Speaker 3>we don't know what's going on here. On the flip side,

0:27:49.880 --> 0:27:54.320
<v Speaker 3>all the traditional religions also pretend to have certainty about stuff,

0:27:54.359 --> 0:27:58.080
<v Speaker 3>and they're all making it up. And so that puts

0:27:58.119 --> 0:28:00.879
<v Speaker 3>me in the middle. I don't call my self agnostic,

0:28:00.960 --> 0:28:05.439
<v Speaker 3>because agnostic often means I don't know if there's a

0:28:05.480 --> 0:28:08.159
<v Speaker 3>guy with a beard on a cloud or not. But

0:28:08.480 --> 0:28:11.040
<v Speaker 3>I call myself something else. I call myself a possibilion.

0:28:11.359 --> 0:28:15.760
<v Speaker 3>And the idea with possibilianism is an active exploration of

0:28:15.800 --> 0:28:19.320
<v Speaker 3>the possibility space, trying to figure out what is going

0:28:19.359 --> 0:28:22.560
<v Speaker 3>on in this great, big cosmos that we're in. And

0:28:22.640 --> 0:28:27.080
<v Speaker 3>so the idea is, you know, to take a scientific

0:28:27.200 --> 0:28:30.719
<v Speaker 3>mindset to this question, which is to say, you know,

0:28:30.800 --> 0:28:34.200
<v Speaker 3>science always has a broad table and allows lots of

0:28:34.280 --> 0:28:37.920
<v Speaker 3>hypotheses on and says, okay, maybe this, maybe that cool.

0:28:37.920 --> 0:28:41.120
<v Speaker 3>I'll let anything on the table. But you know, we

0:28:41.280 --> 0:28:44.040
<v Speaker 3>use the tools of science to rule out parts of

0:28:44.040 --> 0:28:47.280
<v Speaker 3>the possibility space. So if you come and say, hey, look,

0:28:47.360 --> 0:28:49.000
<v Speaker 3>I think you know this thing is going on with

0:28:49.120 --> 0:28:51.959
<v Speaker 3>crystals or this or yesp or whatever, we can actually

0:28:52.000 --> 0:28:54.080
<v Speaker 3>test that and rule things out. And we and we

0:28:54.280 --> 0:28:55.880
<v Speaker 3>that's what we do all the time. There's lots of

0:28:55.920 --> 0:28:59.040
<v Speaker 3>stuff that's sort of off the table at this point.

0:28:59.600 --> 0:29:01.920
<v Speaker 3>For example, you know, if you were to say, like

0:29:02.040 --> 0:29:04.480
<v Speaker 3>you know, traditional religious books, hey the earth is six

0:29:04.520 --> 0:29:08.640
<v Speaker 3>thousand years old. You know that's a problem because you know,

0:29:09.040 --> 0:29:12.800
<v Speaker 3>the Japanese were, you know, making pottery six thousand years

0:29:12.840 --> 0:29:15.520
<v Speaker 3>before that, and so that can't be true. So we

0:29:16.040 --> 0:29:18.480
<v Speaker 3>can use the tools of science to open up new

0:29:18.520 --> 0:29:22.400
<v Speaker 3>folds in the possibility space and to rule things out.

0:29:22.720 --> 0:29:25.040
<v Speaker 3>But what it allows is a big space where we

0:29:25.080 --> 0:29:27.080
<v Speaker 3>can shine a flashlight around and say, all right, look,

0:29:27.160 --> 0:29:29.440
<v Speaker 3>we're not going to pretend that we know for sure

0:29:29.520 --> 0:29:33.560
<v Speaker 3>that nothing exists, or that this particular made up story exists. Instead,

0:29:33.600 --> 0:29:35.840
<v Speaker 3>we're going to explore. It's fascinating to me.

0:29:35.880 --> 0:29:37.920
<v Speaker 1>I imagine at some point in your life you run

0:29:37.960 --> 0:29:40.720
<v Speaker 1>across the varieties of religious experience.

0:29:41.080 --> 0:29:44.240
<v Speaker 3>The William James lechos, did you run under them? I

0:29:44.360 --> 0:29:45.880
<v Speaker 3>have not read that. I've heard of it.

0:29:46.520 --> 0:29:50.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, essentist because I'm kind of like claiming through it

0:29:50.320 --> 0:29:52.520
<v Speaker 1>right now for I don't know. I guess that's what

0:29:52.640 --> 0:29:56.160
<v Speaker 1>I do for entertainment. There was one of the lectures

0:29:56.160 --> 0:30:00.600
<v Speaker 1>he gave when he talks about that when people believe

0:30:00.640 --> 0:30:03.440
<v Speaker 1>something and it makes them feel good, then they are

0:30:03.520 --> 0:30:08.160
<v Speaker 1>convinced it's true. He's talking and I thought, that's fascinating

0:30:08.200 --> 0:30:09.800
<v Speaker 1>to me. I knew I was going to be talking

0:30:09.800 --> 0:30:12.120
<v Speaker 1>to you today as well, and I thought that that's

0:30:12.160 --> 0:30:16.920
<v Speaker 1>an interesting position to be in that the religious experience.

0:30:17.360 --> 0:30:23.000
<v Speaker 1>If something a ceremony, or a story, or a particular

0:30:23.200 --> 0:30:26.479
<v Speaker 1>piece of dogma gives you a sense of euphoria, is

0:30:26.520 --> 0:30:31.880
<v Speaker 1>euphoria something that breeds very similitude? Is it something that

0:30:31.920 --> 0:30:35.840
<v Speaker 1>you say, I feel good, therefore this must be true.

0:30:36.080 --> 0:30:38.680
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. I think there are lots of reasons why people

0:30:39.280 --> 0:30:43.800
<v Speaker 3>believe things about any religious story. One of them, of course,

0:30:43.920 --> 0:30:47.640
<v Speaker 3>is that often people don't apply real rigor in what

0:30:47.680 --> 0:30:50.120
<v Speaker 3>they call true or not true in the first place.

0:30:50.160 --> 0:30:52.760
<v Speaker 3>But secondly, there's a huge social component to this. If

0:30:52.760 --> 0:30:55.960
<v Speaker 3>your friends, your family, or loved ones go and they

0:30:56.000 --> 0:30:59.640
<v Speaker 3>pray to this deity at this situation, then people feel like, hey,

0:30:59.680 --> 0:31:03.800
<v Speaker 3>you know, that's something that is meaningful to me too.

0:31:04.360 --> 0:31:06.360
<v Speaker 3>So I think there are a lot of reasons why

0:31:06.400 --> 0:31:08.960
<v Speaker 3>people believe in things. One of them is that people,

0:31:09.240 --> 0:31:12.280
<v Speaker 3>you know, don't necessarily apply rigorous tools when they're deciding

0:31:12.280 --> 0:31:15.640
<v Speaker 3>what to believe or not. But more than that, there's

0:31:15.680 --> 0:31:19.680
<v Speaker 3>a huge social component to religion or faith of any sort,

0:31:19.680 --> 0:31:22.040
<v Speaker 3>which is to say, if your friends and loved ones

0:31:22.680 --> 0:31:25.200
<v Speaker 3>believe in a particular thing, we tend to be compelled

0:31:25.200 --> 0:31:27.440
<v Speaker 3>that way. And if you live in a place where

0:31:27.480 --> 0:31:31.520
<v Speaker 3>everyone around you believes whatever deity and whatever crazy thing.

0:31:31.840 --> 0:31:33.800
<v Speaker 3>Then you grow up that way and you think, of,

0:31:33.800 --> 0:31:35.480
<v Speaker 3>of course I must be true because these people that

0:31:35.520 --> 0:31:39.160
<v Speaker 3>I love and respect they believe that. So there are

0:31:39.200 --> 0:31:42.880
<v Speaker 3>many different things that compel people. And you know, maybe

0:31:42.920 --> 0:31:44.800
<v Speaker 3>someone says, Okay, I'm going to finally break from my

0:31:44.840 --> 0:31:48.720
<v Speaker 3>religion and they go to some other religion and whatever

0:31:48.760 --> 0:31:53.920
<v Speaker 3>they're you know, attractive people there, or a compelling narrator

0:31:53.920 --> 0:31:56.160
<v Speaker 3>who tells them something, and so they feel like, hey,

0:31:56.200 --> 0:31:58.440
<v Speaker 3>that fits with what I need in my life. That's

0:31:58.480 --> 0:32:01.600
<v Speaker 3>the message I need right now. But none of this, Yeah,

0:32:02.120 --> 0:32:05.320
<v Speaker 3>none of this qualifies as good reasons to believe. It's

0:32:05.360 --> 0:32:06.400
<v Speaker 3>just why people believe.

0:32:07.160 --> 0:32:10.480
<v Speaker 1>It's interesting though, because the only the ultimate measuring tool

0:32:10.520 --> 0:32:12.520
<v Speaker 1>that you have in front of you, or that you

0:32:12.600 --> 0:32:16.320
<v Speaker 1>have to use, is in fact your own perception and

0:32:16.360 --> 0:32:19.480
<v Speaker 1>the perception of your contemporaries. Right, So if you set

0:32:19.560 --> 0:32:23.760
<v Speaker 1>up even the most rigorous academic test, you're still looking

0:32:23.800 --> 0:32:26.040
<v Speaker 1>at it with your eyes and thinking about it with

0:32:26.200 --> 0:32:26.920
<v Speaker 1>your brain.

0:32:27.440 --> 0:32:29.280
<v Speaker 3>Don't I don't think so. I think that we can

0:32:29.320 --> 0:32:32.640
<v Speaker 3>actually use the tools of science really. So yeah, So,

0:32:33.680 --> 0:32:37.080
<v Speaker 3>for example, I mentioned the way that science opens up

0:32:37.120 --> 0:32:40.880
<v Speaker 3>new folds in the possibility space as we discover things,

0:32:41.240 --> 0:32:43.360
<v Speaker 3>for example, about the size of the I mean, look,

0:32:43.400 --> 0:32:46.280
<v Speaker 3>you know, poor you know, Galileo had to spend the

0:32:46.320 --> 0:32:49.800
<v Speaker 3>last part of his life imprisoned because he suggested that

0:32:49.880 --> 0:32:52.320
<v Speaker 3>maybe the Earth is going around the Sun and not

0:32:52.440 --> 0:32:54.920
<v Speaker 3>vice versa. But as we discover more and more about

0:32:54.920 --> 0:32:58.720
<v Speaker 3>the cosmos and understand the absolute enormity of it, and

0:32:59.160 --> 0:33:02.960
<v Speaker 3>that our galaxy has one hundred billion stars, any number

0:33:03.040 --> 0:33:05.320
<v Speaker 3>you know, any one of which has number of planets

0:33:05.360 --> 0:33:07.960
<v Speaker 3>rolling around it, and and our galaxy is one of

0:33:08.080 --> 0:33:11.840
<v Speaker 3>one hundred billion galaxies in the cosmos. And as we

0:33:11.960 --> 0:33:14.479
<v Speaker 3>as we understand these things, I think that opens us

0:33:14.560 --> 0:33:17.720
<v Speaker 3>up to a very different kind of faith, so that

0:33:17.720 --> 0:33:20.360
<v Speaker 3>we don't have to think about, Okay, my little local

0:33:20.400 --> 0:33:23.320
<v Speaker 3>deity can beat your local deity and so on. First

0:33:23.360 --> 0:33:25.560
<v Speaker 3>of all, science opens up these things. But then the

0:33:25.600 --> 0:33:28.240
<v Speaker 3>other thing I mention is that science rules things out,

0:33:29.760 --> 0:33:32.960
<v Speaker 3>you know, whether that's the age of the Earth or

0:33:33.000 --> 0:33:36.239
<v Speaker 3>the idea that you know, your deity, you know, did

0:33:36.680 --> 0:33:39.160
<v Speaker 3>some little things, some little magic trick, and you can

0:33:39.600 --> 0:33:43.280
<v Speaker 3>rule that stuff in or out. I think we probably

0:33:43.320 --> 0:33:46.600
<v Speaker 3>have a very different perspective on the world than we

0:33:46.680 --> 0:33:50.280
<v Speaker 3>did even three hundred years ago. When people consider it, Hey,

0:33:50.320 --> 0:33:53.880
<v Speaker 3>do I think this deity represents the truth? And and

0:33:53.880 --> 0:33:57.480
<v Speaker 3>and you know, for example, we're so global now that

0:33:57.560 --> 0:34:01.480
<v Speaker 3>we see there are two thousand religions on the planet,

0:34:01.920 --> 0:34:05.520
<v Speaker 3>and so it becomes harder to believe, Oh, the thing

0:34:05.520 --> 0:34:07.760
<v Speaker 3>that I grew up with has to be the right one,

0:34:07.760 --> 0:34:10.719
<v Speaker 3>because you now see that there are two thousand other

0:34:10.960 --> 0:34:14.320
<v Speaker 3>versions of this stuff. So anyway, all these things point

0:34:14.360 --> 0:34:17.560
<v Speaker 3>to as we become smarter as a society, I think

0:34:17.600 --> 0:34:22.480
<v Speaker 3>we can develop notions that maybe are more appropriate to

0:34:22.560 --> 0:34:31.879
<v Speaker 3>a deeper view along the lines of what you were saying.

0:34:31.920 --> 0:34:34.480
<v Speaker 1>I remember before my first kid was born, I said

0:34:35.000 --> 0:34:39.840
<v Speaker 1>to the obstetrician, how much do you actually know about

0:34:39.920 --> 0:34:43.760
<v Speaker 1>what pregnancy was going on in pregnancy? And she said,

0:34:44.160 --> 0:34:47.239
<v Speaker 1>if you'd ask me that question ten years ago, i'd

0:34:47.239 --> 0:34:51.880
<v Speaker 1>have said about fifty percent. But we've learned so much

0:34:52.480 --> 0:34:55.160
<v Speaker 1>that now I would say about twenty five percent.

0:34:55.920 --> 0:34:57.759
<v Speaker 3>Excellent, very good.

0:34:58.160 --> 0:35:01.720
<v Speaker 1>And I think that that that's a fascinating though, because

0:35:01.719 --> 0:35:07.040
<v Speaker 1>if you follow the logical, mathematical root of that, literally,

0:35:07.120 --> 0:35:08.960
<v Speaker 1>the more you know, the less you know.

0:35:09.560 --> 0:35:13.280
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that's exact. I mean, there used to be people

0:35:13.360 --> 0:35:17.560
<v Speaker 3>called pansophists, which meant, you know, someone who knows everything

0:35:17.640 --> 0:35:20.280
<v Speaker 3>to be known. And you know, back in ancient Greece

0:35:21.200 --> 0:35:23.680
<v Speaker 3>it was plausible to have somebody who was a Panzifist,

0:35:23.719 --> 0:35:27.239
<v Speaker 3>and now it's totally impossible. It has been for centuries.

0:35:29.200 --> 0:35:32.160
<v Speaker 3>So you know, that's lovely. And what I love, by

0:35:32.200 --> 0:35:34.040
<v Speaker 3>the way, about this moment in time right now, is

0:35:34.080 --> 0:35:39.640
<v Speaker 3>we've got AI that has consumed you know, every single

0:35:39.680 --> 0:35:43.600
<v Speaker 3>thing ever written by humans, and so that provides a

0:35:43.640 --> 0:35:47.400
<v Speaker 3>whole new way of interacting and learning human kind's knowledge,

0:35:47.400 --> 0:35:49.880
<v Speaker 3>which is a sphere that is now much too large

0:35:49.880 --> 0:35:52.440
<v Speaker 3>for any of us to ever hope to even get into.

0:35:52.840 --> 0:35:55.480
<v Speaker 3>But what we can do is find some doorway that

0:35:55.560 --> 0:35:58.239
<v Speaker 3>interests us and enter the sphere that way, and by

0:35:58.320 --> 0:36:02.440
<v Speaker 3>talking to the AI just you know, learn all about

0:36:02.480 --> 0:36:04.879
<v Speaker 3>the world by asking questions that are relevant to us.

0:36:04.880 --> 0:36:06.560
<v Speaker 3>And I think this is going to really change our

0:36:06.680 --> 0:36:11.359
<v Speaker 3>educational systems for schooling, because right now, you know, kids

0:36:11.480 --> 0:36:13.919
<v Speaker 3>in classrooms, it's too fast for half the kids, too

0:36:13.920 --> 0:36:18.400
<v Speaker 3>slow for half the kids. But we can finally achieve

0:36:18.520 --> 0:36:24.600
<v Speaker 3>this dream of real individualized education where everyone you know

0:36:24.680 --> 0:36:27.000
<v Speaker 3>has an AI tutor, which is, by the way, how

0:36:27.000 --> 0:36:28.920
<v Speaker 3>it used to go. You know, Alexander the Great was

0:36:28.960 --> 0:36:31.960
<v Speaker 3>tutored by Aristotle, and you know you'd sit there and

0:36:32.120 --> 0:36:35.520
<v Speaker 3>have conversations. And I think we'll return to that. But

0:36:35.560 --> 0:36:38.160
<v Speaker 3>what that's I mean, that's fantastic for learning.

0:36:38.200 --> 0:36:40.919
<v Speaker 1>But I mean what we what we were, you're talking

0:36:40.960 --> 0:36:43.560
<v Speaker 1>about as well, even we were talking about religion. Is

0:36:43.600 --> 0:36:49.080
<v Speaker 1>that your religion or your propensity to certain depressions or

0:36:49.320 --> 0:36:50.040
<v Speaker 1>or or.

0:36:51.880 --> 0:36:53.040
<v Speaker 3>Different traumas.

0:36:53.080 --> 0:36:58.239
<v Speaker 1>All of that's to do with socialization and to have

0:36:58.400 --> 0:37:02.960
<v Speaker 1>an AI a certain point, I have to ask myself.

0:37:02.960 --> 0:37:04.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I'm just speaking.

0:37:04.719 --> 0:37:07.240
<v Speaker 3>I love that. What's the point if it just mimics

0:37:07.280 --> 0:37:09.480
<v Speaker 3>everything that we've already go. We've ready to go all that,

0:37:10.560 --> 0:37:12.880
<v Speaker 3>So okay, great. Those are two types of questions. So

0:37:12.920 --> 0:37:15.680
<v Speaker 3>as far as socialization, I think that's what school will become.

0:37:15.719 --> 0:37:20.120
<v Speaker 3>I think you know, you're exactly right that that's such

0:37:20.160 --> 0:37:22.920
<v Speaker 3>an important part of growing up. And this was the

0:37:23.800 --> 0:37:26.960
<v Speaker 3>terrible thing for parents about COVID is seeing your young

0:37:27.080 --> 0:37:30.200
<v Speaker 3>children having to stay home and not wrestling and rolling

0:37:30.200 --> 0:37:33.239
<v Speaker 3>around and jumping on trampolines with other kids. So we'll

0:37:33.239 --> 0:37:35.480
<v Speaker 3>always have that, but school will become more about that

0:37:35.800 --> 0:37:38.480
<v Speaker 3>and instead of having the teacher drone on to the kids.

0:37:38.480 --> 0:37:41.319
<v Speaker 3>It'll be you know, the kids put on headphones. Do that,

0:37:43.440 --> 0:37:47.360
<v Speaker 3>at least as it stands. Now, what humans are really

0:37:47.400 --> 0:37:55.160
<v Speaker 3>great at doing is creativity and also understanding which creative

0:37:55.239 --> 0:37:59.640
<v Speaker 3>moves matter. So, for example, I can say to the AI,

0:37:59.719 --> 0:38:03.840
<v Speaker 3>hate generate one hundred pictures of you know, Craig sitting

0:38:03.840 --> 0:38:07.040
<v Speaker 3>in an avocado chair holding a poodle, and it'll do that.

0:38:07.440 --> 0:38:10.840
<v Speaker 3>But it doesn't know which of those pictures are better

0:38:11.360 --> 0:38:13.680
<v Speaker 3>than another. But a human looks at and says, oh, Craig,

0:38:13.680 --> 0:38:15.359
<v Speaker 3>that's a really good one, and that one over these

0:38:15.600 --> 0:38:20.840
<v Speaker 3>staying over here or whatever. And so humans are actually necessary,

0:38:20.840 --> 0:38:23.560
<v Speaker 3>at least at the moment for doing this next step

0:38:23.560 --> 0:38:26.800
<v Speaker 3>for figuring out Okay, I can ask, I can query

0:38:26.840 --> 0:38:28.799
<v Speaker 3>the AI, but what do I do with that? What's

0:38:28.840 --> 0:38:32.719
<v Speaker 3>the next step. I'll give you a specific example science.

0:38:33.080 --> 0:38:38.239
<v Speaker 3>So AI can tell me incredible things like, hey, I

0:38:38.280 --> 0:38:40.840
<v Speaker 3>need to understand you know, these facts that are scattered

0:38:40.840 --> 0:38:44.080
<v Speaker 3>around all these different journal papers across fifty years. Give

0:38:44.080 --> 0:38:46.719
<v Speaker 3>me a summary of this. It's trivial for it to

0:38:46.760 --> 0:38:48.960
<v Speaker 3>do that, and that's super useful. But what it can't

0:38:49.040 --> 0:38:54.120
<v Speaker 3>do is generate new sorts of science in the way that.

0:38:54.200 --> 0:38:57.479
<v Speaker 3>Let's say Albert Einstein says, Okay, what if I were

0:38:57.880 --> 0:39:00.600
<v Speaker 3>writing on a photon of lightweight? What would that be

0:39:00.719 --> 0:39:02.360
<v Speaker 3>like if we were moving into speed of light? And

0:39:02.520 --> 0:39:04.520
<v Speaker 3>he thinks through that, he says, oh, and he comes

0:39:04.600 --> 0:39:07.840
<v Speaker 3>up with the special theory of relativity. That's progress. He

0:39:07.880 --> 0:39:09.680
<v Speaker 3>wants to know about prize for this sort of stuff.

0:39:10.000 --> 0:39:12.400
<v Speaker 3>That's the kind of things that at least at the moment,

0:39:12.800 --> 0:39:16.880
<v Speaker 3>AI does not do. So in answer your question, the

0:39:18.040 --> 0:39:21.680
<v Speaker 3>ultimate perfect thing is if we have AI co pilots

0:39:21.719 --> 0:39:24.960
<v Speaker 3>with us who can tell us lots of information, and

0:39:25.000 --> 0:39:29.880
<v Speaker 3>then we use our creativity and our extrapolation and simulation

0:39:29.960 --> 0:39:34.520
<v Speaker 3>of possible futures to put that together to make to

0:39:34.560 --> 0:39:37.000
<v Speaker 3>make something that's the next step for our civilization.

0:39:37.360 --> 0:39:41.480
<v Speaker 1>All right, So if that can happen, and let's imagine

0:39:41.480 --> 0:39:46.680
<v Speaker 1>that it can, is there a possibility the certain point,

0:39:46.840 --> 0:39:52.440
<v Speaker 1>if we can find the genetic and chemical recipe for

0:39:52.560 --> 0:39:58.840
<v Speaker 1>any individual's personality, that that can be I'm asking the

0:39:58.880 --> 0:40:02.680
<v Speaker 1>singularity question. Can you put the mind and the soul

0:40:02.800 --> 0:40:10.240
<v Speaker 1>of a cognizant, coherent santient being inside something which is digital?

0:40:10.719 --> 0:40:13.520
<v Speaker 3>Okay, so that's the question of can you upload your brain?

0:40:13.680 --> 0:40:16.719
<v Speaker 3>So you don't have to die. Here's how it would work.

0:40:16.800 --> 0:40:20.760
<v Speaker 3>It would work by taking a scan of your brain

0:40:21.239 --> 0:40:23.640
<v Speaker 3>at the kind of resolution that we can't even dream

0:40:23.760 --> 0:40:27.160
<v Speaker 3>of now. Right now with our very fancy brain imaging

0:40:27.200 --> 0:40:31.640
<v Speaker 3>what we call fMRI functional magnetic residence imaging is very crude. Okay,

0:40:31.960 --> 0:40:36.120
<v Speaker 3>but cut to one hundred years from now, our great

0:40:36.160 --> 0:40:39.160
<v Speaker 3>grand children are sitting around having a podcast with each other,

0:40:39.440 --> 0:40:42.399
<v Speaker 3>and the question is, could you scan a brain at

0:40:42.400 --> 0:40:44.879
<v Speaker 3>the resolution where you know every single neuron and all

0:40:44.880 --> 0:40:47.720
<v Speaker 3>the connections and perhaps everything going on inside the neuron

0:40:48.000 --> 0:40:51.560
<v Speaker 3>and reproduce that algorithm on a computer? The answer is

0:40:51.640 --> 0:40:54.560
<v Speaker 3>probably probably you could do that, and therefore you could

0:40:54.600 --> 0:40:59.759
<v Speaker 3>download it and run Craig or Craig's great grandchild such

0:40:59.840 --> 0:41:02.839
<v Speaker 3>that you really couldn't tell a difference. So I say

0:41:02.960 --> 0:41:06.120
<v Speaker 3>to the computer, Hey, Craig's great grandchild, are you in there?

0:41:06.440 --> 0:41:09.000
<v Speaker 3>And she says, yeah, I'm here, what's up? And you know,

0:41:09.040 --> 0:41:12.640
<v Speaker 3>we have a conversation that's fascinating to me.

0:41:12.800 --> 0:41:16.359
<v Speaker 1>So the idea that is, I mean, I wouldn't hold

0:41:16.400 --> 0:41:20.920
<v Speaker 1>you to it, but sort of theoretically, sort of kind

0:41:20.960 --> 0:41:22.120
<v Speaker 1>of maybe.

0:41:22.719 --> 0:41:27.279
<v Speaker 3>Oh, theoretically yes. And it's because as best we can

0:41:27.320 --> 0:41:30.959
<v Speaker 3>tell this is just a machine in here. It's the

0:41:31.000 --> 0:41:34.440
<v Speaker 3>most complex sophisticated thing that we have ever come across

0:41:34.480 --> 0:41:38.160
<v Speaker 3>in our universe, the human brain. But it's just a machine.

0:41:38.200 --> 0:41:41.360
<v Speaker 3>It's just built out of eighty six billion neurons and

0:41:41.400 --> 0:41:44.080
<v Speaker 3>about the same number of glial cells, and it's you know,

0:41:44.239 --> 0:41:46.520
<v Speaker 3>every neuron in your head is popping off the little

0:41:46.600 --> 0:41:51.760
<v Speaker 3>signals tends to hundreds of times per second, So it's

0:41:52.280 --> 0:41:55.799
<v Speaker 3>unbelievably complex. You've got something like two hundred trillion connections

0:41:55.840 --> 0:41:58.440
<v Speaker 3>between these neurons, and as I said, it's it's like

0:41:58.480 --> 0:42:02.000
<v Speaker 3>a forest that's re configuring with every experience that you have.

0:42:02.040 --> 0:42:05.080
<v Speaker 3>So it's unbelievably complex. But it's a machine. And so

0:42:05.160 --> 0:42:07.160
<v Speaker 3>there's no reason that we should not be able to

0:42:07.280 --> 0:42:11.000
<v Speaker 3>reproduce that on silicon or whatever I mean. In theory,

0:42:11.080 --> 0:42:13.920
<v Speaker 3>I could reproduce your brain out of beer cans and

0:42:13.960 --> 0:42:14.680
<v Speaker 3>tennis balls.

0:42:14.960 --> 0:42:18.839
<v Speaker 1>And if it's definitely yeah, I don't think you need

0:42:18.880 --> 0:42:19.560
<v Speaker 1>the tennis ball.

0:42:21.560 --> 0:42:25.560
<v Speaker 3>And if it's doing the same algorithm, then then it's you.

0:42:25.600 --> 0:42:27.560
<v Speaker 3>And if I say, hey, Craig, how you doing, you say, ah,

0:42:27.600 --> 0:42:31.560
<v Speaker 3>I'm a little hungry, whatever, But it's it's you. Because

0:42:31.600 --> 0:42:33.759
<v Speaker 3>all we are is you know, these vast machines. And

0:42:33.840 --> 0:42:35.200
<v Speaker 3>by the way, the reason we know that, I'm not

0:42:35.239 --> 0:42:36.920
<v Speaker 3>just saying this as an assertion. The reason we know

0:42:37.040 --> 0:42:41.239
<v Speaker 3>that is because of centuries of studying brain damage. If

0:42:41.239 --> 0:42:43.560
<v Speaker 3>you study even a very tiny bit of your brain

0:42:44.800 --> 0:42:47.879
<v Speaker 3>that completely changes that can change your personality or decision making,

0:42:47.920 --> 0:42:52.560
<v Speaker 3>your ability to recognize animals, or see colors, or hear music,

0:42:52.840 --> 0:42:55.160
<v Speaker 3>or you know a thousand other things that we see

0:42:55.200 --> 0:42:57.360
<v Speaker 3>in the clinics every day. And that's how we know

0:42:58.120 --> 0:43:00.759
<v Speaker 3>that you are the operation of your brain and when

0:43:00.800 --> 0:43:03.080
<v Speaker 3>little things change, that changes you. And by the way,

0:43:03.160 --> 0:43:06.560
<v Speaker 3>drugs and alcohol are just invisibly small molecules that get

0:43:06.600 --> 0:43:08.560
<v Speaker 3>in your blood stream and change the functioning of your

0:43:08.600 --> 0:43:13.719
<v Speaker 3>brain changes you. You know, when you sleep each night,

0:43:13.719 --> 0:43:15.640
<v Speaker 3>you go into deep sleep and then you're not even

0:43:15.640 --> 0:43:17.880
<v Speaker 3>there anymore, and then you know, when you wake up,

0:43:17.920 --> 0:43:20.080
<v Speaker 3>it sort of reboots the whole system and so on.

0:43:20.320 --> 0:43:22.719
<v Speaker 3>But the point is it's all happening in these three

0:43:22.800 --> 0:43:25.680
<v Speaker 3>pounds here. That is you. That is fascinating.

0:43:25.920 --> 0:43:30.760
<v Speaker 1>So I have to ask you personally, what does anything

0:43:30.920 --> 0:43:32.120
<v Speaker 1>frighten you about this?

0:43:33.520 --> 0:43:37.840
<v Speaker 6>I don't think so, I mean, just because what you're saying,

0:43:37.840 --> 0:43:39.759
<v Speaker 6>would I think what you're saying would frighten a lot

0:43:39.800 --> 0:43:45.760
<v Speaker 6>of people who are committed to different theological or psychological

0:43:45.960 --> 0:43:50.760
<v Speaker 6>or philosophical ideas, and you're and you're saying some stuff

0:43:50.800 --> 0:43:51.839
<v Speaker 6>that would challenge that.

0:43:51.920 --> 0:43:55.560
<v Speaker 3>I think from a scientific point of view, Yeah, I mean,

0:43:55.640 --> 0:43:58.160
<v Speaker 3>I guess I can't say that people have all kinds

0:43:58.160 --> 0:44:00.520
<v Speaker 3>of you know, with eight point three billion people on

0:44:00.560 --> 0:44:02.960
<v Speaker 3>the earth, there are that many views on the world.

0:44:03.040 --> 0:44:09.799
<v Speaker 3>So but this view, I would assert, is the only

0:44:09.840 --> 0:44:13.280
<v Speaker 3>one that's defensible. I mean, you could have whatever faith

0:44:13.360 --> 0:44:15.439
<v Speaker 3>you have, whatever deity you have, But if you walk

0:44:15.480 --> 0:44:18.240
<v Speaker 3>into a neurology ward and you see patients with different

0:44:18.280 --> 0:44:20.640
<v Speaker 3>brain damage and they have different things going on, I

0:44:20.640 --> 0:44:25.319
<v Speaker 3>don't know how one would explain that otherwise except to say, yeah,

0:44:25.680 --> 0:44:29.520
<v Speaker 3>you are your brain. I guess the part that frightens me,

0:44:29.880 --> 0:44:33.560
<v Speaker 3>But it's sort of a calm, mellow fright is just

0:44:33.920 --> 0:44:37.920
<v Speaker 3>how fragile we are as creatures. But everybody knows that anyway.

0:44:37.960 --> 0:44:41.080
<v Speaker 3>All it takes is a stroke, you know, a little

0:44:41.320 --> 0:44:44.480
<v Speaker 3>clot that gets in there, or traumatic brain injury or

0:44:44.520 --> 0:44:47.000
<v Speaker 3>a brain tumor or whatever, and then you're not even

0:44:47.040 --> 0:44:50.239
<v Speaker 3>you anymore. So I guess that part is frightening, but

0:44:50.320 --> 0:44:54.520
<v Speaker 3>I'm so used to thinking about that. Yeah, it's a

0:44:54.680 --> 0:44:56.440
<v Speaker 3>fascinating endlessly.

0:44:56.719 --> 0:44:58.719
<v Speaker 1>I think that must be one of the attractions of it,

0:44:58.800 --> 0:45:02.840
<v Speaker 1>surely is the fact that it it's endless. It's endless,

0:45:02.880 --> 0:45:06.080
<v Speaker 1>there's no there's no endpoint where you go, well, that's

0:45:06.120 --> 0:45:08.480
<v Speaker 1>the brain done, let's move on to the kidneys. It's

0:45:08.640 --> 0:45:12.640
<v Speaker 1>there's just not it's a long way to go.

0:45:13.960 --> 0:45:18.520
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that's exactly right. And you know what's so cool

0:45:18.719 --> 0:45:21.600
<v Speaker 3>is so I've been in the field now, I wow,

0:45:21.920 --> 0:45:25.240
<v Speaker 3>well over a quarter century and the progress that I've seen.

0:45:25.600 --> 0:45:28.920
<v Speaker 3>But I would say exactly what the you know, what

0:45:28.960 --> 0:45:31.759
<v Speaker 3>the obstetricians said about pregnancy, I would say the same

0:45:31.800 --> 0:45:34.600
<v Speaker 3>thing about the brain, which is we we have so

0:45:34.760 --> 0:45:37.799
<v Speaker 3>much knowledge now we know less and less as a percentage.

0:45:38.719 --> 0:45:40.399
<v Speaker 3>You know, we have this book in the field called

0:45:40.440 --> 0:45:43.720
<v Speaker 3>Principles of Neuroscience, and it's enormous. It's about a thousand

0:45:43.800 --> 0:45:45.760
<v Speaker 3>pages long at this point, you know, it's the umpteenth

0:45:45.920 --> 0:45:48.760
<v Speaker 3>edition of this of this book. But what's very funny

0:45:48.760 --> 0:45:51.160
<v Speaker 3>about it is it keeps growing longer with each edition.

0:45:51.680 --> 0:45:54.520
<v Speaker 3>And it's not principles, because if it were principles, it

0:45:54.520 --> 0:45:58.160
<v Speaker 3>would be like a pamphlet, But instead, as we get

0:45:58.239 --> 0:46:00.919
<v Speaker 3>more and more data, we just keeping stuff in there.

0:46:01.000 --> 0:46:02.640
<v Speaker 3>We say, oh, well, but there's also this, and there's

0:46:02.680 --> 0:46:04.360
<v Speaker 3>that in these kind of cells and that kind of genes.

0:46:04.719 --> 0:46:07.400
<v Speaker 3>And what it demonstrates is we don't have the principles

0:46:07.480 --> 0:46:11.200
<v Speaker 3>yet that allow us to have some sort of compression

0:46:11.320 --> 0:46:11.680
<v Speaker 3>of this.

0:46:12.560 --> 0:46:14.640
<v Speaker 1>Does it have an effect on you and your personal level?

0:46:14.719 --> 0:46:18.120
<v Speaker 1>Do you drink alcohol? Do you? Do you take drugs?

0:46:18.160 --> 0:46:20.880
<v Speaker 3>Do you? I mean you don't have to in a

0:46:20.960 --> 0:46:23.520
<v Speaker 3>vague way? Do you know? No, I don't do any

0:46:23.560 --> 0:46:29.120
<v Speaker 3>of that. Actually. Is that because of brain damage? Yeah? Yeah, no,

0:46:29.200 --> 0:46:32.719
<v Speaker 3>I think right. I think it's because I'm sort of

0:46:32.719 --> 0:46:34.840
<v Speaker 3>a control freak about my brain. I just want to

0:46:34.920 --> 0:46:37.200
<v Speaker 3>keep this as healthy as I can. Yeah, so I

0:46:37.200 --> 0:46:39.400
<v Speaker 3>don't do any of that. I'm the last guy in

0:46:39.440 --> 0:46:42.680
<v Speaker 3>Silicon Valley that hasn't done psychedelics and had interesting trips

0:46:42.680 --> 0:46:45.480
<v Speaker 3>and souf and everyone asks me about that around here,

0:46:46.600 --> 0:46:48.960
<v Speaker 3>but I, yeah, I just I haven't taken it. It's

0:46:49.000 --> 0:46:51.600
<v Speaker 3>probably it's probably so low risk to do that, but

0:46:51.680 --> 0:46:58.239
<v Speaker 3>I just maybe that's a fear. Is the my consciousness

0:46:58.280 --> 0:47:00.640
<v Speaker 3>is a very particular thing, and I know that if

0:47:00.680 --> 0:47:04.440
<v Speaker 3>I stick in these invisibly small molecules. It'll change the

0:47:05.719 --> 0:47:08.840
<v Speaker 3>you know, the receptors or whatever. It'll change the activity

0:47:09.120 --> 0:47:12.480
<v Speaker 3>just a few percentage, and I'll be talking to silver leprechauns.

0:47:13.120 --> 0:47:15.200
<v Speaker 3>But I don't. I don't want to change that. I

0:47:15.200 --> 0:47:18.319
<v Speaker 3>don't want to mess up the system because this is

0:47:18.360 --> 0:47:22.279
<v Speaker 3>all I've got. And what about physical health do you?

0:47:22.520 --> 0:47:24.959
<v Speaker 1>I mean it kind of obviously your body feeds your brain,

0:47:25.080 --> 0:47:28.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean everything. So I mean do you find yourself

0:47:29.640 --> 0:47:34.720
<v Speaker 1>avoiding certain foods or or avoid in certain activities.

0:47:34.320 --> 0:47:37.799
<v Speaker 3>Or or yeah? We basically that I keep in really

0:47:37.800 --> 0:47:42.680
<v Speaker 3>good shape and I I eat healthfully. Yeah, I just

0:47:42.760 --> 0:47:45.400
<v Speaker 3>I try to make sure that I'm optimizing everything I

0:47:45.440 --> 0:47:46.360
<v Speaker 3>can on that front.

0:47:47.040 --> 0:47:48.759
<v Speaker 1>You are you hyper aware of it? Like if you

0:47:48.760 --> 0:47:51.680
<v Speaker 1>eat if you eat some sugar, do you do you

0:47:51.719 --> 0:47:52.080
<v Speaker 1>feel it?

0:47:52.120 --> 0:47:54.400
<v Speaker 3>Do you know what it's doing? Yeah? I know what

0:47:54.440 --> 0:47:58.359
<v Speaker 3>it's doing. I we let's see. I don't think I'm

0:47:58.400 --> 0:48:01.239
<v Speaker 3>hyper aware of it. But I I'm not even attracted

0:48:01.280 --> 0:48:04.840
<v Speaker 3>to sugary things. I don't even like that. But I

0:48:04.920 --> 0:48:07.160
<v Speaker 3>think I would say anymore. Obviously when I was a child,

0:48:07.200 --> 0:48:10.280
<v Speaker 3>I did. But the more the more I care about

0:48:10.280 --> 0:48:12.920
<v Speaker 3>optimizing the whole system, the less I'm even interested in

0:48:12.920 --> 0:48:14.600
<v Speaker 3>those sorts of things.

0:48:14.800 --> 0:48:18.400
<v Speaker 1>Let's very quickly, because I've been taken up an enormous

0:48:18.520 --> 0:48:19.000
<v Speaker 1>of your time.

0:48:19.040 --> 0:48:20.080
<v Speaker 3>But I'm fascinated by this.

0:48:20.480 --> 0:48:23.719
<v Speaker 1>What does because sugar is a thing for me, What

0:48:23.800 --> 0:48:26.360
<v Speaker 1>does sugar do in your brain?

0:48:27.440 --> 0:48:31.360
<v Speaker 3>Well, you know, so you increase blood sugar in your body,

0:48:31.400 --> 0:48:33.880
<v Speaker 3>and there are all kinds of bad effects that that

0:48:34.000 --> 0:48:38.239
<v Speaker 3>can have just physically in the brain. It's actually not

0:48:38.320 --> 0:48:40.920
<v Speaker 3>a bad thing because it's it's an energy source. It's

0:48:40.920 --> 0:48:43.279
<v Speaker 3>a quick energy source. So you know, if you're if

0:48:43.280 --> 0:48:45.239
<v Speaker 3>you're really tired and you need to do something, it's

0:48:45.239 --> 0:48:48.800
<v Speaker 3>probably it's probably not a bad idea. But the rest

0:48:48.840 --> 0:48:51.040
<v Speaker 3>of the body it reeks happy with time.

0:48:51.280 --> 0:48:55.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's well, it's a it's a fascinating thing, David.

0:48:55.360 --> 0:48:58.160
<v Speaker 1>And and thank you for being so patient with me,

0:48:58.160 --> 0:49:01.560
<v Speaker 1>because I really do know nothing about this, but I

0:49:01.560 --> 0:49:03.480
<v Speaker 1>feel like I know a little more another And now

0:49:03.520 --> 0:49:05.560
<v Speaker 1>that I know a little more, I really know how

0:49:05.640 --> 0:49:06.160
<v Speaker 1>little I.

0:49:06.160 --> 0:49:10.520
<v Speaker 3>Know about what I was talking about. But it's a

0:49:10.560 --> 0:49:11.360
<v Speaker 3>fascinating subject.

0:49:11.560 --> 0:49:13.000
<v Speaker 1>And I hope you'll come back and talk to us

0:49:13.040 --> 0:49:18.720
<v Speaker 1>again because it's it really is an endlessly interesting piece

0:49:18.760 --> 0:49:22.040
<v Speaker 1>of the world that you're involved in. Great, probably the

0:49:22.040 --> 0:49:25.839
<v Speaker 1>most important piece, I guess, I kind of think so.

0:49:25.920 --> 0:49:27.680
<v Speaker 3>I mean, it is the center of who we are.

0:49:27.760 --> 0:49:31.320
<v Speaker 3>There's really if you want to understand something about the self,

0:49:31.400 --> 0:49:34.080
<v Speaker 3>one can take you know, spiritual classes, psychology class and

0:49:34.080 --> 0:49:37.040
<v Speaker 3>stuff like that, and those are probably good inroads, but fundamentally,

0:49:37.560 --> 0:49:40.840
<v Speaker 3>this is the perceptual machinery by which you view the

0:49:40.880 --> 0:49:44.680
<v Speaker 3>whole world. So this is probably the best inroad there

0:49:44.719 --> 0:49:47.080
<v Speaker 3>is to understand what the what the heck we're doing here,

0:49:47.200 --> 0:49:49.319
<v Speaker 3>what your perception of the world is, and why you

0:49:49.360 --> 0:49:51.360
<v Speaker 3>react the way you do, why you have the feelings

0:49:51.440 --> 0:49:53.319
<v Speaker 3>and emotions you do, while you think the way you do,

0:49:53.440 --> 0:49:57.200
<v Speaker 3>and so on, and by the way, you know, you know,

0:49:57.280 --> 0:50:00.120
<v Speaker 3>I think. I've got this podcast called Inner Cosmos, and

0:50:00.200 --> 0:50:02.359
<v Speaker 3>what I do is every week I talk about this

0:50:02.440 --> 0:50:07.680
<v Speaker 3>intersection between the brain and daily life and why we

0:50:07.920 --> 0:50:09.319
<v Speaker 3>experience the world the way we do.

0:50:10.120 --> 0:50:13.439
<v Speaker 1>It is a fascinating idea, and I will watch your

0:50:13.480 --> 0:50:17.359
<v Speaker 1>Inner Cosmos and listen to your inner cosmos and investigate

0:50:17.400 --> 0:50:19.120
<v Speaker 1>your inner cosmos.

0:50:19.560 --> 0:50:21.239
<v Speaker 3>And see if it can help me. By I am

0:50:21.239 --> 0:50:23.279
<v Speaker 3>fascinated by it, and it really is great. David, Thank

0:50:23.280 --> 0:50:25.520
<v Speaker 3>you so much for being around great. Thanks Greig it's

0:50:25.520 --> 0:50:28.880
<v Speaker 3>such a pleasure to be here. Thanks buddy,