Speaker 1: You are entering the freedom, huge smoking cond of evidence
Speaker 1: on the Biden crime family's corruption. Iran puts out fake
Speaker 1: news to hurt Trump and the media falls for it.
Speaker 1: Plus tonight pivotal presidential debate. Let's get to it. Buck
Speaker 1: sextonshing the news and disseminating information with actionable intelligence. Make
Speaker 1: no mistake Americans great, You're great American again. This is
Speaker 1: the Buck Sexton Show. Former CIA analysts can speak to
Speaker 1: three hours without a phone call. Try doing that sometimes, no,
Speaker 1: Welcome to the Buck Sexton Show. My friends, My, oh my,
Speaker 1: what a day this already is. And it's just going
Speaker 1: because we got that debate tonight and we have so
Speaker 1: much to talk about with regard to Hunter Biden, Joe Biden.
Speaker 1: Let's just let's just start with this. We've now gone
Speaker 1: from the Hunter Biden story about corruption, about selling influence
Speaker 1: to his access to his father. We've gone from this
Speaker 1: is blocked on social media ostensibly because it's a smear
Speaker 1: and it's not true, right too, well, actually it's Russian
Speaker 1: disinformation to Okay, it's all true, but our editorial judgment
Speaker 1: is it's not really a story. It's a little over
Speaker 1: a week they tried for maybe a day or two there. Oh,
Speaker 1: it's a non story because Joe Biden's not tied to it.
Speaker 1: And I said, look, if Joe Biden has no hand
Speaker 1: in any of this, Hunter being a screw up may
Speaker 1: not be enough. But this is quite a bit different.
Speaker 1: A lot of information, a lot of information coming out
Speaker 1: that is real based on this laptop, based on the communications.
Speaker 1: This is smoking gun level stuff in a normal criminal trial.
Speaker 1: Let's say, if you had the defendant's email saying that
Speaker 1: kind of stuff that Hunter Biden saying about a corrupt
Speaker 1: influence scheme, they'd be taking a plea deal. It'd be
Speaker 1: all over. But now we know the FBI had the
Speaker 1: laptop for a year, didn't do anything. It may have
Speaker 1: been subpoenaed though as part of a money laundering probe.
Speaker 1: Gee that information never got out. What a surprise that
Speaker 1: that wouldn't be leaked, something that would actually hurt a Democrat.
Speaker 1: And if you're wondering, hold on, are they really saying
Speaker 1: that this is all not a story that the emails
Speaker 1: coming out to suggest, not to suggest, to state that
Speaker 1: Joe Biden was getting a piece of this, that Hunter
Speaker 1: Biden was getting huge deals done with foreign adversary governments, okay,
Speaker 1: like China, that Hunter Biden was getting huge deals done,
Speaker 1: making a miss amount of money, giving kickbacks to his dad,
Speaker 1: and that everybody knew what was going on here. His
Speaker 1: business partner has come forward to confirm all this. The
Speaker 1: guy's a Navy vetter, and he's just like, look, I've
Speaker 1: got to tell the truth on this one. And he's
Speaker 1: got receipts, as they say, he's got the documents. We're
Speaker 1: beyond now rumor, innuendos, speculation. We're talking cold hard facts,
Speaker 1: my friends. That's where this Biden scandal currently is. And
Speaker 1: you have to laugh. NPR, their public editor, put this
Speaker 1: out earlier today. Why haven't you seen any stories from
Speaker 1: NPR about the New York Post Hunter Biden's story. The
Speaker 1: answer they give this is their managing editor for news quote,
Speaker 1: we don't want to waste our time on stories that
Speaker 1: are not really stories, and we don't want to waste
Speaker 1: the listeners and readers time on stories that are just
Speaker 1: pure distractions. That's right, friends, taxpayer funded in part, NPR
Speaker 1: is taking the position, now, oh sure you can prove
Speaker 1: everything that The New York Post has been saying from
Speaker 1: the beginning that Conservatives Republicans have been pointing out about
Speaker 1: the bidens going on two years now. You can prove this,
Speaker 1: but it's not really a story. How is this not
Speaker 1: a story? That's absurd? I mean, that's so stupid and
Speaker 1: so dishonest that it's hard to even debate it because
Speaker 1: it feels like we must be talking about somebody who's
Speaker 1: not smart enough to even understand the issues at hand.
Speaker 1: I mean, the NPR people, do they not know anything
Speaker 1: about politics? They're the political editors that are making this statement.
Speaker 1: But what you see, my friends, right now is the
Speaker 1: mainstream media engaging in an institutional mass self immolation to
Speaker 1: protect Biden. It's hard to fathom why they would ever
Speaker 1: do this till you recognize that they view a Trump
Speaker 1: victory as an existential threat to their professional and emotional
Speaker 1: well being. And so this is going to get much uglier,
Speaker 1: my friends, much uglier. Indeed, it's it's stunning. I mean,
Speaker 1: of the many accomplishments real Donald Trump, or Donald Trump
Speaker 1: rather can point to in his first four years, exposing
Speaker 1: the liberal mainstream media beyond any doubt as the unrepentant
Speaker 1: and reckless frauds they are, will go down in history
Speaker 1: as among the most important and useful shared that one
Speaker 1: on Twitter earlier today. I think folks see exactly what
Speaker 1: I mean. There's no going back for the media now,
Speaker 1: there's there's no They're never going to be able to
Speaker 1: make this argument. Oh, we're just journos. Oh we're just
Speaker 1: being honest. You know, we're just nonpartisan. Here. The China
Speaker 1: component of this is stunning. I mean, the Barisma and
Speaker 1: Ukraine stuff is bad enough, but now we find out
Speaker 1: that there's information about a Chinese government payoff to the
Speaker 1: Biden family. You mean, our primary, really our only geopolitical rival,
Speaker 1: knew that by funneling some cash nothing to them. I
Speaker 1: mean the Chinese Communist Party, it's got five ten million
Speaker 1: bucks in the couch cushions and then some and this
Speaker 1: is a joke to them, a pittance. They can help
Speaker 1: steer some aspect of US foreign policy just by paying
Speaker 1: off the then vice president's son, the things that they've
Speaker 1: accused Trump and his family of doing. When this is
Speaker 1: why the hypocrisy is so mind blowing. What the Democrats
Speaker 1: have been accusing Trump and his family of doing for
Speaker 1: years without evidence, unfairly maligning them, is what Joe Biden
Speaker 1: and his family not just Hunter, also his brother. That's
Speaker 1: what they've been doing. They are accusing the other side
Speaker 1: of what they themselves are guilty of doing. China's getting
Speaker 1: away scott free with stealing billions of dollars in intellectual
Speaker 1: property from US companies and billions more with their predatory
Speaker 1: trade practices until Donald Trump steps up. But before that
Speaker 1: they were getting away with it. And it makes so
Speaker 1: much more sense the moment you find out that the
Speaker 1: Bidens and others in our ruling class we're getting beach houses,
Speaker 1: benzes and BMW's out of the deal. Oh okay, why
Speaker 1: push back on China when business is so good? Side
Speaker 1: business that is, you know, that's really what this is
Speaker 1: turning into. You realize that US foreign policy was kind
Speaker 1: of a side hustle for the Bidens. The main event
Speaker 1: was getting cash, getting paid. It's amazing, friends, it's amazing.
Speaker 1: But this is what we're up against. This is what
Speaker 1: we were seeing. I mean, yesterday, the desperate media tried
Speaker 1: to suggest that a Rudy Giuliani hidden camera ambush for
Speaker 1: a Borat film was a big news story. But somehow Ulani,
Speaker 1: having ironclad proof that Hunter Biden was selling access to
Speaker 1: his vice president Dad is a non story or its
Speaker 1: Russian disinformation. This is all you have to know. The
Speaker 1: media can't go any lower. They have no integrity to
Speaker 1: protect it. It's all over for them now. In that regard,
Speaker 1: I mean, they can only fool those who wish to
Speaker 1: be fooled. It can only fool people who are either
Speaker 1: not honest enough or not smart enough for this to,
Speaker 1: you know, to see the truth of what's really going
Speaker 1: on here. So many people doing excellent work on this one.
Speaker 1: Sean Davis over at the Federalist has been diving into
Speaker 1: these emails. This is from his Twitter, he writes. Quote
Speaker 1: an emailed to Hunter Biden's partner from a top Chinese
Speaker 1: official on July twenty six, twenty seventeen, shows the Chinese
Speaker 1: energy company CEFC proposed a five million dollar interest free
Speaker 1: loan to the Biden family based on their trust on
Speaker 1: the Biden family. There's a quote that he polls should
Speaker 1: CEFC keep lending more to the family. Less than two
Speaker 1: weeks later, on August eighth, twenty seventeen, five million dollars
Speaker 1: was wired from a CEFC affiliated investment vehicle to a
Speaker 1: Delaware LC which spent the next year transferring nearly four
Speaker 1: point eight million dollars directly to Hunter Biden's firm, according
Speaker 1: to Senate investigators. Friends, this is exactly how you would
Speaker 1: engage in a access peddling, in a corrupt scheme where
Speaker 1: you're selling US foreign policy for personal gain. This is
Speaker 1: exactly how you would do it. You have the negotiations,
Speaker 1: You fly to China on Air fours two with Dad,
Speaker 1: You meet with a bunch of Chinese businessmen. Then you
Speaker 1: have them just give an interest free loan and they
Speaker 1: park it in a unnamed Delaware you know, an unknown
Speaker 1: Delaware LC and then that siphons off the money to
Speaker 1: your consulting fur, which you then get a piece of.
Speaker 1: I mean it looks like money laundering to me, friends,
Speaker 1: I mean, we're gonna have to look at what some
Speaker 1: of the legal experts find with these kinds of transactions.
Speaker 1: But it certainly stinks to high heaven. We know that much.
Speaker 1: These are not theories, my friends. This is all traceable,
Speaker 1: it is all provable, and it is all real. We
Speaker 1: have the evidence. And yet they're trying to pretend like
Speaker 1: this is somehow still nothing. Oh no, We're way way
Speaker 1: beyond that. But what I want you to be prepared
Speaker 1: for is that even though the media has been exposed
Speaker 1: as completely corrupt, frauds more so than anything else you
Speaker 1: can really think of, because this is all coming down
Speaker 1: at once, right before the election, and they're doing everything
Speaker 1: they can. There's a pathetic panic that has overtaken the
Speaker 1: mainstream media. They're doing whatever they can to try to
Speaker 1: avoid talking about any of this. They're downplaying it, they're
Speaker 1: lying about it. It's only going to get worse. They've
Speaker 1: already made their choice. Their choice is Joe Biden. Really,
Speaker 1: their choice is anybody but Trump, and they will do
Speaker 1: anything in their power to make sure that happens. There
Speaker 1: is nothing that is too debased, nothing that is too fraudulent,
Speaker 1: too pathetic for the biggest news organizations, the biggest names
Speaker 1: and mainstream news to carry the last buckets of water
Speaker 1: for Biden necessary in this election where we know it's
Speaker 1: going to be very very tight. We know it's going
Speaker 1: to be very close. So just be ready for this,
Speaker 1: be ready for exactly what's going to happen here, because yes,
Speaker 1: the Joe and Hunter Biden corruption apparatus is even worse
Speaker 1: than I initially thought, or at least there's much more
Speaker 1: proof of it, and the efforts to suppress it have
Speaker 1: proved that our media is depraved beyond salvation. But it's
Speaker 1: still going to be a very close election, and the
Speaker 1: Libs do not care about the truth, they do not
Speaker 1: care about the Biden corruption, and so Biden can still win.
Speaker 1: Keep the pressure on my friends and keep pushing. You're
Speaker 1: in the Freedom mund This is the Buck Sex and
Speaker 1: Show podcast now now would be a shadow doubt. The
Speaker 1: laptop is in fact Hunter Biden's. The emails are in
Speaker 1: fact accurate. The big guy reference in one of the
Speaker 1: emails is in fact Joe Biden. We know Hunter Biden
Speaker 1: had deals with communist Chiny Ukraine, deals with this company
Speaker 1: Barisma that Leaven the State Department said was a concern,
Speaker 1: and he was getting cast from the mayor of Moscow's wife,
Speaker 1: so all that, of course this should come up. Indeed,
Speaker 1: that's what we know, and there's still more that I
Speaker 1: think we're destined to find out in the days ahead,
Speaker 1: and all of this going into an election tonight where
Speaker 1: Biden shows up, it's not gonna be able to hide.
Speaker 1: Here's a prediction. There will be a critical moment of
Speaker 1: muting the debate moderator tonight in this debate will find
Speaker 1: a point at which Biden is on the ropes. You know,
Speaker 1: the Russian is cut and rocky circling, and he's about
Speaker 1: to about to finish him off, and they'll freeze it.
Speaker 1: They'll mute, they'll mute President Trump and then talk over
Speaker 1: him as well. Guaranteed to happen tonight at that moment
Speaker 1: where it's finally clear that Joe Biden can't evade anymore,
Speaker 1: but let's also talk about what he's trying to evade.
Speaker 1: A business associate of Hunter Biden's named Tony bob Lynsky
Speaker 1: has put out a statement. I want to read this
Speaker 1: statement to you so you understand the full scope of
Speaker 1: what we're talking about here. This is all information just
Speaker 1: the last twenty four hours coming out. Looks really bad
Speaker 1: for the Biden camp. Don't whatever the media says as
Speaker 1: a joke. This is all a nightmare for them. It
Speaker 1: really is. He writes, my name is Tomy Babolynski. The
Speaker 1: facts set forth below are true and accurate. They are
Speaker 1: not any form of domestic or foreign disinformation. Any suggestion
Speaker 1: to the contrary is false and offensive. I am the
Speaker 1: recipient of the email published seven days ago by the
Speaker 1: New York Post, which showed a copy to Hunter Biden
Speaker 1: Rob Walker. That email is genuine, so this is one
Speaker 1: of the guys involved in these communications. Here's what he writes.
Speaker 1: This afternoon, I received a request from the Senate Committee
Speaker 1: on Homeland Security and Government Affairs and the Senate Committee
Speaker 1: on Finance requesting all documents relating to my business affairs
Speaker 1: with the Biden family, as well as various foreign entities
Speaker 1: and individuals. I have extensive relevant record and communications, and
Speaker 1: I intend to produce those items to both committees in
Speaker 1: the immediate future. I am the grandson of a thirty
Speaker 1: seven year Army intelligence officer, the son of a twenty
Speaker 1: plus year career naval officer, and the brother of a
Speaker 1: twenty eight year career Naval flight officer. I myself served
Speaker 1: our country for four years and left the Navy as
Speaker 1: Lieutenant Bobolynski. I held a high level security clearance and
Speaker 1: was an instructor and then CTO for Naval Nuclear Power
Speaker 1: Training Command. I take great pride in the time my
Speaker 1: family and I serve this country. I am also not political,
Speaker 1: he goes on. The twenty seven email is in fact
Speaker 1: a reference to Joe Biden. The other jb reference in
Speaker 1: that email is Jim Biden, Joe's brother. Hunter Biden called
Speaker 1: his dad the big guy or my chairman, and frequently
Speaker 1: referenced asking him for his sign off or advice on
Speaker 1: various potential deals that we were discussing. I've seen Vice
Speaker 1: President Biden saying he never talked to Hunter about his business.
Speaker 1: I've seen firsthand that that's not true, because it wasn't
Speaker 1: just Hunter's business. They said they were putting the Biden
Speaker 1: family name and its legacy on the line. I realized
Speaker 1: that Chinese were not really focused on a healthy financial
Speaker 1: return on investment. They were looking at this as a
Speaker 1: political or influence investment. Once I realized that Hunter wanted
Speaker 1: to use the company as his personal piggy bank by
Speaker 1: just taking money out of it as soon as it
Speaker 1: came from the Chinese, I took steps to prevent that
Speaker 1: from happening. The Johnson report connected some dots in a
Speaker 1: way that shocked me. It made me realize the Bidens
Speaker 1: had gone behind my back and gotten paid millions of
Speaker 1: dollars by the Chinese, even though they told me they
Speaker 1: hadn't and wouldn't do that to their partners. I would
Speaker 1: ask the Biden family to address the American people and
Speaker 1: outline the facts so I can go back to being irrelevant,
Speaker 1: and so I am not in a position to have
Speaker 1: to answer those questions for them. I don't have a
Speaker 1: political acts to grind. I just saw behind the Biden curtain,
Speaker 1: and I grew concerned with what I saw. The Biden
Speaker 1: family aggressively leveraged the Biden family name to make millions
Speaker 1: of dollars from foreign entities, even though some were from
Speaker 1: communist controlled China. God bless America. One more thing that
Speaker 1: Lieutenant Babolinski writes here, The few campaign contributions I have
Speaker 1: made in my life were to Democrats. If the media
Speaker 1: and big tech companies had done their jobs of the
Speaker 1: past several weeks, I would be irrelevant in this story.
Speaker 1: Given my long standing service and devotion to this country,
Speaker 1: I could no longer allow my family name to be
Speaker 1: associated or tied to Russian disinformation or implied lies and
Speaker 1: false narratives dominating the media right now. After leaving the military,
Speaker 1: I became an institutional investor, investing extensively around the world.
Speaker 1: What I'm outlining to you is fact. I know it
Speaker 1: is fact because I lived it. I am the CEO
Speaker 1: of Cino Hawk Holdings, which was a partnership between the
Speaker 1: Chinese operating through CEFC and Chairman Yee and the Biden family.
Speaker 1: I was brought into the company to be the CEO
Speaker 1: by James Gillier and Hunter Biden. And the reference to
Speaker 1: the big guy and the much publicized May thirteenth email
Speaker 1: is in fact Joe Biden friends his partners are talking.
Speaker 1: We've got all the proof. It's all real. Biden family
Speaker 1: is a crime family and they think they're about to
Speaker 1: become the next first family of the United States. Thanks
Speaker 1: for listening to the Bus Show podcasts. Remember to subscribe
Speaker 1: on Apple podcasts, the iHeartRadio app, or wherever you get
Speaker 1: your podcasts. I mean, really, give this a little thought.
Speaker 1: What's the response to all of this? Now? They were
Speaker 1: telling this last week not true, not true? Then Russian disinformation,
Speaker 1: Russian disinformation, And now, well, what exactly is it? Oh,
Speaker 1: it's it's not important. If it's not important, why were
Speaker 1: we hearing so much about how it was Russian disinformation?
Speaker 1: Why even pay attention enough to it to make that claim?
Speaker 1: And of course it's important. They're they're insulting our intelligence,
Speaker 1: my friends, they are insulting your intelligence, mind, intelligence, every American.
Speaker 1: That's what the media is up to right now. They're
Speaker 1: putting Jill Biden out there saying that these are smears
Speaker 1: against my family. Nah no, I'm sorry, these are facts.
Speaker 1: The Democrats had a lot of different options in this campaign.
Speaker 1: They could have gone with a lot of people. I'll
Speaker 1: say this, say what you will about you know, Pete Buddha,
Speaker 1: Judge or Bernie Sanders. But they weren't taking payoffs from
Speaker 1: the Chinese. I've just you know, credit where it's due.
Speaker 1: Democrats had a lot of options, even Elizabeth Warren, I mean,
Speaker 1: for all of her flaws, not taking payoffs from foreign government,
Speaker 1: selling influence, doing other shady stuff. I'm sure. But Democrats
Speaker 1: brought this on themselves. They wanted to run a head fake,
Speaker 1: fraudulent candidate with big name recognition, tay Do Obama, that
Speaker 1: they could pretend was a moderate, and they thought they
Speaker 1: could just ram them, just like they were gonna ram
Speaker 1: Hillary Clinton down everybody's throats, and they wanted to ram
Speaker 1: John Carry down everybody's throats. They thought they were gonna
Speaker 1: pull it off. And look, they still might. Don't get
Speaker 1: me wrong, They've got so much of an institutional and
Speaker 1: platform advantage that even running a candidate as flawed as
Speaker 1: this guy, with all the lies that they're having to tell,
Speaker 1: maybe it still works. Doesn't mean that we can't talk
Speaker 1: about how insane this is, how crazy these circumstances are
Speaker 1: we find ourselves in. First of all, here's Joe Biden saying, Oh,
Speaker 1: it's all a smear. Sure, it is play eighteen. You know,
Speaker 1: as a mother, I mean it really. I don't like
Speaker 1: to see my son attacked, and certainly I don't like
Speaker 1: to see my husband attacked. But for me or to me,
Speaker 1: these are distractions. I mean, this election is not about
Speaker 1: Joe Biden or Jill Biden, or Kamala or Doug. It
Speaker 1: is about the American people. The American people don't want
Speaker 1: to hear these smears against my family. The American people
Speaker 1: are struggling right now. No, actually, I think they want
Speaker 1: to hear it. Sorry, Jill. I think I think they
Speaker 1: are curious now that it's fact, now that there's smoking
Speaker 1: gun evidence. I think that we've been told for four
Speaker 1: years that Donald Trump is a man of lacking, lacking
Speaker 1: in character, and his family has made all this money
Speaker 1: and shady ways, and you know, Trump Tower Moscow and
Speaker 1: some guy whose name I can't even pronounce from one
Speaker 1: of the stands, and the Miss Universe pageant and all
Speaker 1: the stuff we've heard about this now all of a sudden,
Speaker 1: none of that counts for Joe Biden. This guy's been
Speaker 1: in public life his whole life, and somehow he's very,
Speaker 1: very very rich. A lot of Democrats for whom that's
Speaker 1: the case, well, looks like they may have to pay
Speaker 1: the piper now, so to speak, at least the Biden's might.
Speaker 1: The only justice is going to come. Just so you
Speaker 1: understand this at the ballot box, I want everyone to
Speaker 1: be very clear, just as I said with Benghazi and
Speaker 1: Obama in the twenty twelve election, once Obama won that
Speaker 1: re election, forget about justice for Benghazi and what happened
Speaker 1: there wasn't wasn't going to occur because they controlled, They
Speaker 1: controlled the game, they control the refs, they control the players.
Speaker 1: Not gonna happen. Biden wins, all this goes away. In fact,
Speaker 1: they're gonna go after people that expose this. They're gonna
Speaker 1: go for payback. It's not going to be enough to
Speaker 1: merely push aside the obvious Biden family corruption. They're gonna
Speaker 1: want to make examples of people. How dare you expose
Speaker 1: the Democrat, the Democrat candidate for who he and his
Speaker 1: family members really are. Remember it's the brother, it's the son.
Speaker 1: I mean, getting in on this for sure from a
Speaker 1: lot of different angles. And then you have the responses
Speaker 1: to all this from the media, which are are honestly
Speaker 1: mind blowing. I mean, it's it's hard to think of
Speaker 1: how anybody could do this. Wake up, think their job
Speaker 1: is somehow guided by principles, facts, honesty, ethics, and then
Speaker 1: do what this media is doing. You know, the President
Speaker 1: I mentioned this yesterday and really get into the details.
Speaker 1: The President sat down with sixty minutes and Leslie Stall recently.
Speaker 1: You know, all these all these boomer media establishments, with
Speaker 1: these boomer correspondents who are just deeply unimpressive party hacks
Speaker 1: who have gotten you know, really fat and happy by
Speaker 1: being highly mediocre but playing the institutional political game well
Speaker 1: enough to rise up the ranks at these But there's
Speaker 1: been around a long time, you know, time to retire
Speaker 1: Leslie Stall. We've had enough. She's not the only one.
Speaker 1: There's a ton of them, whether you're talking about you know,
Speaker 1: Dan Rather or Larry King or these guys. They never
Speaker 1: want to give it up. It's never time to focus
Speaker 1: on something else in life. It's always me, me, me,
Speaker 1: more money, more attention, me me. That's who's at the
Speaker 1: top of the mainstream media apparatus. Not the smartest, not
Speaker 1: the best, not the most ethical. It's really the most
Speaker 1: narcissistic and the most selfish. That's unfortunately what these legacy outlets,
Speaker 1: what these legacy outlets prize. I mean, that's what does
Speaker 1: well for you. You're advantaged by taking that approach. Here's
Speaker 1: Leslie's Stall, for whatever reason, gets access to the President.
Speaker 1: She sits down in an interview with him, and I
Speaker 1: just want you to hear her completely laughable. Smack yourself
Speaker 1: in the face because you can't believe you're hearing something
Speaker 1: so stupid. Defense of why media outlets like hers have
Speaker 1: no interest in the Hunter Biden laptop. This is Remember
Speaker 1: this is the president. They taped the interview while it
Speaker 1: was being taped so that sixty minutes can't get away
Speaker 1: with their usual editing crap. So this is the White
Speaker 1: House releasing the rough of the rough cut of this
Speaker 1: play it. I think it's one of the biggest scandals
Speaker 1: I've ever seen. And you don't go thright because you
Speaker 1: want to talk about well, because it can't be verified
Speaker 1: talking about insignificant things. I'm telling you, of course verified.
Speaker 1: Excuse me, they found the laptop, Leslie? What can be verified?
Speaker 1: Why you said that even the family hasn't the family
Speaker 1: on the laptop. He's gone into hiding for five days.
Speaker 1: He's gone into hiding. He's preparing for your debate. It's
Speaker 1: taken in five days to prepare. I doubt it. Okay,
Speaker 1: so let's get back he's preparing for the debate. That's
Speaker 1: not even the funniest thing here. It can't be verified.
Speaker 1: Here is supposed to be a famous and dogged journalist,
Speaker 1: gets to the truth, gets the facts, gets the answers,
Speaker 1: and her response to why they won't even touch this
Speaker 1: enormously consequential story at the absolute peak of an election
Speaker 1: presidential election cycle is it can't be verified. Uh. This
Speaker 1: would be like if you sat down with the FBI
Speaker 1: and you had something for them, They're like, oh, this
Speaker 1: needs to be investigated exactly. Isn't that what you do here?
Speaker 1: Isn't this the Federal Bureau of Investigation? Otherwise what would
Speaker 1: you say you do here? Leslie? Stall journalist sixty minutes.
Speaker 1: CBS lots of money going into this. They can't find
Speaker 1: a way. First of all, it's already verified to anybody
Speaker 1: who's not an idiot. But if they want to play
Speaker 1: this verification game, the oh we kid, it would be
Speaker 1: like she said, whoaa, sorry, mister president. What you're asking
Speaker 1: for is journalism and that's not what we do here.
Speaker 1: It's pretty much what she's telling him can't be verified. No,
Speaker 1: it's first of all, it's verified. And second of all,
Speaker 1: if that was really a position they could take, then
Speaker 1: they should be the ones working to verify whether this
Speaker 1: is real or not. But remember, CBS is the same
Speaker 1: news outlet that at the absolute peak of a previous
Speaker 1: presidential cycle, put forward National Guard documents that use Microsoft
Speaker 1: word font that didn't exist from the year of the
Speaker 1: supposed National Guard document involving George W. Bush. So you know,
Speaker 1: they know their fake news, and then some they know
Speaker 1: how to play this game, they know what to do.
Speaker 1: It's just it's just incredible to watch this play out.
Speaker 1: They're so terrified, there's such fraudulent cowards the media and
Speaker 1: the Democrat Party. They're all, let's just talk about other
Speaker 1: let's talk more about healthcare. Let's talk about all these
Speaker 1: other No. I'm sorry. They put the President of the
Speaker 1: United States through a four year long but I'm sorry,
Speaker 1: three year long special counsel investigation and then impeachment based
Speaker 1: on nothing. They impeach Trump for bringing up answers about
Speaker 1: Hunter Biden corruption with the president of Ukraine. And it
Speaker 1: turns out that that's a completely legitimate inquiry because there
Speaker 1: is corruption involving Hunter Biden in Ukraine. So I'm sorry
Speaker 1: he is there some special I was saying this back
Speaker 1: when we were looking at this call, and whether it
Speaker 1: was legitimate or not. Is Joe Biden because he was
Speaker 1: formerly the vice president or his family members allowed to
Speaker 1: break the law? Is there some special get out of
Speaker 1: jail free car while we find out? Guess it's called
Speaker 1: being a democrat. It's called being a democrat. It's just
Speaker 1: amazing as we see how obvious all of this is.
Speaker 1: They're not even being clever with the fraud that they're
Speaker 1: perpetrating right now. They're not even they're not even impressive
Speaker 1: with the propaganda. I mean, what you're seeing here could
Speaker 1: be changing the course of history for this country. And
Speaker 1: the media pretends that the smoking gun emails of the
Speaker 1: Biden family and the Biden family's corruption, which now seems
Speaker 1: to go all the way up to Joe Biden himself,
Speaker 1: are no big deal. But these are the same journals
Speaker 1: who cheered an FBI investigation, including FISA warrants of the
Speaker 1: Trump campaign based solely on lies paid for by the DNC.
Speaker 1: Not only did the media run with the stories that
Speaker 1: were all lies, all just fabrications and nonsense about how
Speaker 1: Carter Page and George Papadopoulos were Russian agents part of
Speaker 1: a conspiracy to steal the election. Not only did the
Speaker 1: media run with that in its you know, as though
Speaker 1: it were gospel, the FBI, Obama's FBI, Obama's DOJ used
Speaker 1: that stuff as the basis for an actual criminal investigation,
Speaker 1: and used FISA warrants and use national security letters and
Speaker 1: used the most intrusive tools of the federal apparatus to
Speaker 1: spy on people. And now we're going to forget all
Speaker 1: of that. We're going to pretend that they're not playing
Speaker 1: the game as as dirty as they possibly can. I
Speaker 1: don't think so's it's amazing, friends. Oh now there, what's
Speaker 1: the latest? So, but Trump has a bank account in China,
Speaker 1: I'm hearing this one. This is this is what you're
Speaker 1: being told though. Oh my gosh, but there's a bank account.
Speaker 1: I mean, okay, what's in the bank account? How much money?
Speaker 1: They seem to think that that normal intelligent people can't
Speaker 1: figure out that. If you're worth a billion dollars and
Speaker 1: you know you've got a bank account somewhere with one
Speaker 1: hundred grand, nobody cares. Doesn't mean anything. It's like finding
Speaker 1: a twenty dollar bill in your back pocket of pants
Speaker 1: you haven't worn in a while. Oh, he's gonna foreign
Speaker 1: bank account. Well, how much is in this bank account?
Speaker 1: What were they doing with this bank act? But anything
Speaker 1: to get us talking about something else, something other than
Speaker 1: this issue. And it's just so fitting too, because you know,
Speaker 1: Trump is the one who's been willing to show that
Speaker 1: China is a problem for the United States, our elites,
Speaker 1: and it goes all the way across politics, really bipartisan senses,
Speaker 1: the think tanks in DC. They've done nothing but not
Speaker 1: just apologize. They've done apologias for China. They'll defend Chinese
Speaker 1: trade practices and policies because oh, they're just trying to
Speaker 1: catch up. The wealthier they get, the more liberal they'll
Speaker 1: get don't worry, and we realize, oh, are you getting
Speaker 1: wealthier too, Democrat and Republican lobbyists and think tankers and politicians,
Speaker 1: Are you getting wealthier while China gets wealthier? Turns out, yeah,
Speaker 1: it looks like that is the answer. But oh, don't worry.
Speaker 1: Obama showed up just in time to make jokes about
Speaker 1: how there's a there's a Trump Chinese bank account Play twenty.
Speaker 1: We know that he continues to do business with China
Speaker 1: because he's got a secret Chinese bank account. How is
Speaker 1: that possible? How is that possible? A secret Chinese bankccount?
Speaker 1: Cut Listen, Can you imagine if I that a secret
Speaker 1: Chinese bank account when I running from reelection? You think
Speaker 1: you think? You think Fox News might have been a
Speaker 1: little concerned about that. They would have called me Beijing Berry. Yes,
Speaker 1: this bank account is so secret that it paid one
Speaker 1: hundred and eighty eight thousand dollars in taxes in China
Speaker 1: from twenty thirteen to twenty fifteen. What do we what
Speaker 1: do we really think is in here citing an analysis
Speaker 1: of the president's tax records. So it's in his tax records.
Speaker 1: So in what way exactly is the bank account secret.
Speaker 1: I'm just wondering, right, this is a total smoke screen,
Speaker 1: smoke screen, desperate smokescreen from the libs. Trump's tax records
Speaker 1: showed investments of at least you ready for this, one
Speaker 1: hundred and ninety two thousand dollars in five companies that
Speaker 1: pursued interests business interests in China, according to the New
Speaker 1: York Times. Oh my gosh, one hundred and ninety thousand dollars?
Speaker 1: Did you? Does anyone think that Trump cares about one
Speaker 1: hundred and ninety thousand dollars in business deals? Really? That's
Speaker 1: a big that's a big deal. They guy's worth billions.
Speaker 1: You're in the freedom hunt. This is the Buck Sexton
Speaker 1: Show podcast. I want to share this one with you
Speaker 1: is a fun one. Yesterday the Washington Examiners Susan Farreccio.
Speaker 1: But as a bride spelt who's like running around trying
Speaker 1: to put out all the fires for the bid he's
Speaker 1: running around, is very very upset. How dare you say
Speaker 1: that we're not very hotest blay clip one? The bottom
Speaker 1: line is it deserves scrutiny by all media outlets. And
Speaker 1: if they pick and choose this and decide it's not
Speaker 1: worth their time. Um, I think that's showing real bias.
Speaker 1: I think everybody deserves to look at the Moller stuff,
Speaker 1: and everyone should look at this and give Buying the
Speaker 1: scrutiny that he You know, he's not running for president
Speaker 1: of the glee club. He's running for president of the
Speaker 1: United States. And this is serious. This is not last
Speaker 1: year's news. It's whether or not his son was coordinating
Speaker 1: to get him to talk to these Ukraine oligarchs and
Speaker 1: he was benefiting from it. I mean, it's it's it's
Speaker 1: really dirty. Look at give me Brunst. Then I want
Speaker 1: to move on to the Google which is a related story. Brian.
Speaker 1: You know I said it was last season. You're saying
Speaker 1: it's new. I think bottom line is we don't know
Speaker 1: what is real and what is fake in these emails,
Speaker 1: if there is anything real in them. Yeah, but that
Speaker 1: doesn't stop any from from from reporting the Muller and
Speaker 1: the dossier and all that stuff. I understand that you
Speaker 1: have a lot of about now now we have ethics. Okay,
Speaker 1: now we have it now. Don't you dare? Don't you
Speaker 1: dare act like newsrooms didn't have ethics in twenty seventeen
Speaker 1: and twenty eighteen. Well, I know they think, oh you can't,
Speaker 1: you can don't dare me all you want, Brian, I've
Speaker 1: been doing this for thirty years, so say whatever you want.
Speaker 1: It's my view and I've a right to say it.
Speaker 1: I was is that the newest media was unethical With Miller,
Speaker 1: you'll dare? Do you dare? She's like, actually, I having
Speaker 1: a dare, little man, go eat a donut. I've had
Speaker 1: enough for you. I love it. It was great. Susan
Speaker 1: Fareccio never seen her work before Big Fan, Now that
Speaker 1: was great. How dare you saying the video is not Autista?
Speaker 1: How dare don't know? Whatever Jeff Zucker's paging, it's not enough.
Speaker 1: I mean to debase yourself like this on TV or
Speaker 1: on radio or wherever this was. I think it was
Speaker 1: a TV show for the amusement of your ignorant and
Speaker 1: brainwash lib audience, so they don't have to be confronted
Speaker 1: with facts they don't like. It's a tough job, but
Speaker 1: Brad Stelter's there is ready to do it for everybody.
Speaker 1: Excuse made Zucker? Could I have a pat on the
Speaker 1: head please? I would like a pat on the head.
Speaker 1: Thanks for listening. To the bus seton show podcast. Remember
Speaker 1: to subscribe on Apple podcast, the iHeart Radio app, or
Speaker 1: wherever you get your podcasts. A second major news story
Speaker 1: that's really overshadowed by the Biden bombshells, But this one's
Speaker 1: big two because of the implications, but also what it
Speaker 1: shows us about what the media has been saying in
Speaker 1: the past and how serious they are willing to take
Speaker 1: their own words. You have heard no doubt for years
Speaker 1: about Russian interference in our election, and there's this constant specter,
Speaker 1: this constant fear of, oh my gosh, at howny moments,
Speaker 1: Russia might interfere. Russia's hiding under your bed and it's
Speaker 1: in the closet. Putin might steal everything from you. Oh no,
Speaker 1: what are we going to do? Right? They've they've made
Speaker 1: everyone think that Russia is a huge, huge problem for
Speaker 1: all of us, when the reality as we see it,
Speaker 1: is that Russia. Sure it is sometimes in opposition to
Speaker 1: US interests, but they did not steal the last election
Speaker 1: with one hundred thousand dollars of Facebook ads by some
Speaker 1: bot farm in a basement in Russia somewhere, right'. It's
Speaker 1: just insane. There's no way but they lost all sense
Speaker 1: or they abandoned all sense of context and all sense
Speaker 1: of you know, the way that anybody who's being honest
Speaker 1: would would weigh these issues. So we had this Russia
Speaker 1: collusion stealing the election thing, and you kept hearing about
Speaker 1: Russian interference at our election, and we're supposed to always
Speaker 1: be worried about this. Well, it turns out Iran has
Speaker 1: tried to interfere in our election and exposed a lot
Speaker 1: about certain groups, certain individuals in that process. Here is
Speaker 1: the DNI Ratcliffe making an announcement about this just last night.
Speaker 1: This was breaking news yesterday evening play fourteen. We would
Speaker 1: like to alert the public that we have identified that
Speaker 1: two foreign actors, Iran and Russia, have taken specific actions
Speaker 1: to influence public opinion relating to our elections. First, we
Speaker 1: have confirmed that some voter registration information has been obtained
Speaker 1: by Iran and separately by Russia. This data can be
Speaker 1: used by foreign actors to attempt to communicate false information
Speaker 1: to registered voters that they hope will cause confusion, so chaos,
Speaker 1: and undermine your confidence in American democracy. To that end,
Speaker 1: we have already seen Iran sending spoofed emails designed to
Speaker 1: intimidate voters in cite social unrest and damage President Trump.
Speaker 1: Iran is sending emails. What are those emails saying? What
Speaker 1: is the Iranian government doing here? That's what you have
Speaker 1: to look at first and to see see what's happening,
Speaker 1: so we can really understand all of this. But I
Speaker 1: will tell you this much, just based on the statement
Speaker 1: of the DNI. Here, what we know is that Iran
Speaker 1: is interfering in our election on behalf of Joe Biden,
Speaker 1: and by the rules established by our biased and moronic
Speaker 1: media in twenty sixteen. This now means that if Trump loses,
Speaker 1: we could spend four years whining about how Iran stole
Speaker 1: the election for Biden, and maybe we can even unleash
Speaker 1: a Special Council on him because of it. Now, let
Speaker 1: me say, because I'm not crazy, Iran is not stealing
Speaker 1: the election for Joe Biden. It's not going to happen.
Speaker 1: They don't have the influence operations capability. It's just that
Speaker 1: they can't. But what the Democrats did in twenty sixteen
Speaker 1: was essentially look at the circumstances that we're looking at
Speaker 1: now with Iran and say, oh, but Russia did something
Speaker 1: and because Russia did something and we're sad that the
Speaker 1: election was lost. Let's say that Russia's the reason the
Speaker 1: election was lost. Let's wildly exaggerate the ability of the
Speaker 1: Russian trolls the form to influence things in this election cycle,
Speaker 1: because that makes us feel better, and it also then
Speaker 1: becomes a weapon against the other side, even though there
Speaker 1: was no Russian collusion. To this day, it is a
Speaker 1: widespread belief among Democrats that the only reason they lost
Speaker 1: that twenty sixteen election is because of Russian intervention. That's
Speaker 1: what they tell themselves. That is the widespread belief among Democrats,
Speaker 1: and that also then justifies in their minds their complete
Speaker 1: lack of any respect for the office and any willingness
Speaker 1: to really concede that Trump is in fact the president.
Speaker 1: They will not concede that, they won't do it because
Speaker 1: they say, not my president, and illegitimate and hashtag resistance
Speaker 1: and all this stuff all because of Russia. So we're
Speaker 1: now in a place where we could say we very
Speaker 1: well could if we wanted to be a bunch of
Speaker 1: dishonest cry babies, like the Democrats by and large are,
Speaker 1: we could do the same thing. So thanks Iran, you've
Speaker 1: now given us a ready made excuse, just like the
Speaker 1: Democrats took in twenty sixteen. If our guy doesn't win,
Speaker 1: it's because of Iran, Iran, Iran, Iran. We'll just talk
Speaker 1: about it all the time. That would be stupid, it
Speaker 1: would be intellectually dishonest. But it's exactly what It's exactly
Speaker 1: what they did. That is how they played the game.
Speaker 1: But now, now, the funnier part for me is that
Speaker 1: when this initially happened, you know what the media reaction was. Well,
Speaker 1: it's not clear that the emails were it's not clear
Speaker 1: that the emails we're actually gonna gonna hurt Trump. You know,
Speaker 1: it's threatening Biden supporters. Okay, let's look at this. The
Speaker 1: Iranians created spoofed emails that were being sent around where
Speaker 1: it was supposedly proud boys. Remember all the focus on
Speaker 1: proud boys a few weeks ago and white supremacists. Who
Speaker 1: wants to who wants to guess if a moderator Trenet's
Speaker 1: gonna it's gonna ask President Trump? Excuse me, sir, but
Speaker 1: my journalistic integrity forces me to ask this question. I
Speaker 1: don't want to ask it, but I have to ask it.
Speaker 1: Do you to announce white supremacy, mister President, like for
Speaker 1: the fiftieth time, right. I know I'm gonna take a
Speaker 1: lot of heat for this, sir. I know I'm not
Speaker 1: gonna get invited to the fancy parties and people aren't
Speaker 1: going to high five me at the country club or
Speaker 1: maybe they'll do all of those things because I asked
Speaker 1: this question, but do you did announce white supremacy, sir? Yeah,
Speaker 1: they're gonna do that. I think it's a pretty good
Speaker 1: chance they'll be. Yeah. Look, Savanna Guthrie did it recently
Speaker 1: after it was already done by Chris Wallace. Yeah, I'll
Speaker 1: never nothing, Chris Wallace says, puts out. I have no
Speaker 1: interest in any of it. I mean I never did
Speaker 1: really before, to be honest, but definitely not not at
Speaker 1: this point. So now we get to the emails and
Speaker 1: what they were really meant to do. So they send
Speaker 1: out emails pretending to be proud boys, and the Iranian
Speaker 1: you know, the Iranian government and these Iranian false flag
Speaker 1: actor saw this as an opportunity to create greater division
Speaker 1: in the US. And let me also say that this
Speaker 1: is now something we should expect all the time because
Speaker 1: the Democrats, for partisan purposes wildly exaggerated the effect and
Speaker 1: the influence of even a very minor web based influence
Speaker 1: operation for our election. Now all countries that want to
Speaker 1: mess with us around the world can do this, doesn't
Speaker 1: matter how effective it is, doesn't matter if they get caught.
Speaker 1: At a minimum, the story breaks, and then one side
Speaker 1: in our country can blame the other and say, well,
Speaker 1: Russia or China or Iran or North Korea or wherever,
Speaker 1: depending on who actually does it helped you cheat, Therefore
Speaker 1: you didn't really win. You see how that pulls us apart.
Speaker 1: You see how that creates tremendous friction, and therefore it's
Speaker 1: a great victory. Doesn't have to be significant. You don't
Speaker 1: have if you're Iran, don't have to change the results
Speaker 1: of the election to poison American politics by doing just
Speaker 1: a little bit of interference in the election. You see,
Speaker 1: that's the standard that has now been set. Because the
Speaker 1: Democrats are crybabies, you can't accept that they lost. So
Speaker 1: this just encourages And this isn't a new theory. I've
Speaker 1: been telling you this for years. This just encourages other
Speaker 1: countries to get on this game. In fact, if you
Speaker 1: listen to old shows. I mean, I have to go
Speaker 1: back and find it. But I was saying, you're gonna
Speaker 1: have other countries to do this. I said it. I
Speaker 1: knew it. Other countries will get involved in this game
Speaker 1: because if nothing else, it's just a way of showing
Speaker 1: national spite for America from some other place that doesn't
Speaker 1: like us, that some regime that you know has. It
Speaker 1: shows disrespect. It doesn't have to be effective for it
Speaker 1: to be a very clear middle finger extended in Uncle
Speaker 1: Sam's direction. So then the media pretended, well, if it's
Speaker 1: from Proud Boys, which it wasn't, But if we're going
Speaker 1: to say it's from Proud Boys, and then if we're
Speaker 1: going to say that the Proud Boys are you know
Speaker 1: that the Proud Boys are trying to intimidate Democrats from
Speaker 1: going to vote. Why is this? This is feigned stupidity.
Speaker 1: I think, I don't know. A lot of journalists are
Speaker 1: really dumb. Unfortunately, your average journalist is like a B
Speaker 1: English literature student from a third tier liberal arts college
Speaker 1: or you know, a second or third rung state school somewhere.
Speaker 1: That's that's what you get for a lot of journals.
Speaker 1: It's not a particularly impressive bunch and the ones that
Speaker 1: went to fancy schools. Overwhelmingly they are either legacy admits
Speaker 1: or affirmative action admits or you know, trust me, not
Speaker 1: a lot of geniuses running around in the mainstream media.
Speaker 1: But you already knew that. So now we look at
Speaker 1: what really happens when these emails go around, right, the
Speaker 1: Proud Boys are allegedly it's not them, it's a spoof.
Speaker 1: We've already established that, but they're allegedly threatening Biden voters.
Speaker 1: The whole point is, then the Biden camp can turn
Speaker 1: around and see see look at these right wing extremists
Speaker 1: threatening people on behalf of Donald Trump. Donald Trump is
Speaker 1: a white supremacist Donald Trump. You know, it just plays
Speaker 1: in that narrative. That's how it harms Trump. Obviously, people
Speaker 1: aren't really gonna not show up at the polls because
Speaker 1: of this Iranian influence operation. This is not reality. What's
Speaker 1: much more likely is what's exactly happened here, which is
Speaker 1: that Trump gets blamed for something that not only Trump
Speaker 1: didn't do, but not even Trump supporters have done, or
Speaker 1: even Proud Boys or whatever, and it helps the Biden
Speaker 1: campaign as a result. It's also something that points to
Speaker 1: how if you're Iran, you really want Biden to win.
Speaker 1: Look at what Trump has done to the Iranians pulled
Speaker 1: out of the deal. Said sorry, you guys are jerks.
Speaker 1: Your country is not going to be allowed to play
Speaker 1: in the international community the way that it wants to.
Speaker 1: We're gonna keep sanctions in place, and if you mess
Speaker 1: with us, we're gonna come down on you like an anvil.
Speaker 1: And oh, by the way, Cosam Solomon, who was the
Speaker 1: architect of many murder missions against US soldiers, right, Iran
Speaker 1: was not at war with us. This was done and
Speaker 1: this was done as a total black ops you know,
Speaker 1: off the book, so to speak, situation on the part
Speaker 1: of the Iranians. They were killing our soldiers. The Iranian
Speaker 1: government was ordering our soldiers killed, and Kosam Solimani was
Speaker 1: at the heart of this. And then President Trump gave
Speaker 1: the order to turn Kossum into a pink mist and
Speaker 1: that is what happened. And we were told, oh my gosh,
Speaker 1: the Iranian response, the fury will shake us down to
Speaker 1: our foundation, and actually Trump made it very clear to them, Yeah,
Speaker 1: we took him out. That was the right move. He
Speaker 1: deserved it. You want to try something else, It's like
Speaker 1: I've said all along. Trump can be a little bit unpredictable,
Speaker 1: but kind of like having Doc Holiday on the street, Howitzer,
Speaker 1: you want the guy who's willing to pull the trigger
Speaker 1: and keep the enemy off balance to be part of
Speaker 1: your team. You want him on your side. And that
Speaker 1: certainly worked with the Iranians, which also reminds me of
Speaker 1: of Obama talking about foreign policy, and also just how
Speaker 1: how not normal everything is well here. Obama is supposed
Speaker 1: to be the secret weapon the Democrats have held in
Speaker 1: reserved at the last moment here play twenty one. We're
Speaker 1: not gonna have a president that goes out of his
Speaker 1: way to insult anybody who doesn't support him or threaten
Speaker 1: them with jail. That's not normal presidential behavior. We wasn't
Speaker 1: tolerated from a high school principle. We wren't tolerated from
Speaker 1: a coach. We w wasn't tolerated from a co worker.
Speaker 1: We wasn't tolerated in our own family, except for maybe
Speaker 1: crazy uncle somewhere. You know, Yeah, he's he's he's I
Speaker 1: mean we Why would we expect and accept this from
Speaker 1: the president of the United States? Why why Obama yelling
Speaker 1: the whole time He's talking. What is he keep his
Speaker 1: voice up here? Well, he's on a microphone. I'm just
Speaker 1: gonna because it. You know, I don't miss that guy
Speaker 1: at all. I tell you I don't miss him at all.
Speaker 1: But he was also saying on foreign policy that we need,
Speaker 1: I need to be respected again like we were under
Speaker 1: the Obama administration. Of course, that's the that's the takeaway,
Speaker 1: that's what it's supposed to be for that And I'm
Speaker 1: just gonna say I actually remember, and Obama apparently doesn't.
Speaker 1: The bloody catastrophes in Syria and Libya, the rise of
Speaker 1: isis major deterioration in our situation in Iraq and Afghanistan.
Speaker 1: Are troops deployed their Obama's embarrassing apology tour, bowing to
Speaker 1: foreign heads of state for no apparent reason, palettes of
Speaker 1: cash for Iran. These are all defining disasters of the
Speaker 1: Obama foreign policy era. What are the defining foreign policy
Speaker 1: design of the Trump administration? Peace deals in the Middle East,
Speaker 1: moving the embassy to Jerusalem, finally hitting back at the
Speaker 1: Iranians and not suffering any real consequences, pulling out of
Speaker 1: the disastrous Paris climate, a cord that no one's really
Speaker 1: going to enforce anyway, where's the big Oh he was
Speaker 1: too nice to Kim Jong un in negotiations. That's what
Speaker 1: we're supposed to all be losing sleep at night about. Sorry,
Speaker 1: not gonna happen. You're in the Freedom This is the
Speaker 1: Buck Sex and Show podcast. I'm keeping the terrorists, jihadist
Speaker 1: and violent extremists the hell out of our country. If
Speaker 1: that's okay, well, and I will never say it because
Speaker 1: it's not good to say it. And I'm not good
Speaker 1: on nice beautiful wood because I can tell it's ours
Speaker 1: because it's They spend a lot of money on building
Speaker 1: these things. But you haven't seen too much happening on
Speaker 1: that front, have you. Huh? You notice? Okay, Well, keep
Speaker 1: your eyes hey, keep your eyes out. Okay, keep your
Speaker 1: eyes open because they'd love to do something. Just keep
Speaker 1: your eyes open. But there's a reason for things not happening. Also,
Speaker 1: President has also managed to keep the terrorists, the jee hottests,
Speaker 1: the extremists at least all balance and much quieter they've
Speaker 1: been in years. President Trump's administration is the first one
Speaker 1: that I can remember as an adult where we didn't
Speaker 1: have the constant specter of another mass casualty. Gee, hottest
Speaker 1: attack hanging over our heads. He gets no credit for this,
Speaker 1: at least from the media and from the left. He
Speaker 1: hasn't started a new war. We're not embroiled in some
Speaker 1: new conflict. Gets no credit from the anti war demonstrators,
Speaker 1: and the so called peace movement in this country really
Speaker 1: just usually a trojan horse for a lot of socialists
Speaker 1: and radical Marxists. Oh, we just want world peace, except
Speaker 1: when the communist dictators are running wild all over the place.
Speaker 1: Then then all of a sudden, it's you know, glory
Speaker 1: revolution time. And you should also remember that Trump, on
Speaker 1: the one hand, says how great America is all the time.
Speaker 1: And this is Joe what Joe Biden says, because you know,
Speaker 1: I've often told you before there are people who take
Speaker 1: pride in being American in this country, and there are
Speaker 1: people who take pride in thinking they're better than America.
Speaker 1: The latter are known as Democrats. Here's Joe Biden basically
Speaker 1: saying that Play for America was an idea, an idea.
Speaker 1: We hold these truths to be self evident. We've never
Speaker 1: lived up to it, but we've never walked away from
Speaker 1: it before. And I just think we have to be
Speaker 1: more honest. Let our kids know as we raise them
Speaker 1: what actually did happen, Acknowledge our mistakes so we don't
Speaker 1: repeat them. We've never lived up to them. M I
Speaker 1: don't know. I think in World War Two we defeated
Speaker 1: the true global threat of fascism and and stop the
Speaker 1: external nation of millions and millions of people six million
Speaker 1: Jews eleven million people in total in the Nazi death camps.
Speaker 1: I think we lived up I think that the guy
Speaker 1: storming the beaches at Normandy, and I think those you know,
Speaker 1: fighting on the barren, rocky landscape of Iwajima, I think
Speaker 1: they lived up to it. I think we have many
Speaker 1: times lived up to it. But Joe Biden's a Democrat.
Speaker 1: A lot of people with sad, empty visions of themselves
Speaker 1: and the country that they live in, who are just
Speaker 1: desperate for approval and power and don't spend much time
Speaker 1: thinking about issues like humility and how lucky they are
Speaker 1: now that's for Republicans. Democrats would rather just trash the
Speaker 1: country that's given them so much, and Joe Biden's a great,
Speaker 1: a great champion of that trashing. Thanks for listening to
Speaker 1: the Bus and Show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on Apple podcasts,
Speaker 1: at the iHeartRadio app or wherever you get your podcast.
Speaker 1: Got a debate tonight in Nashville. Love Nashville place. I
Speaker 1: really would like to spend more time. Great town, great people, food, music,
Speaker 1: so much to recommend it, and I know it's becoming
Speaker 1: a bigger destination nationwide. People say I'm gonna move to Tennessee.
Speaker 1: I'm moving Nashville or Memphis. You know there's some great
Speaker 1: cities there, Chattanooga. I hear nice things about Chattanooga. But
Speaker 1: debate tonight in Memphis. I'm sorry, in Nashville, not Memphis.
Speaker 1: Debate tonight in Nashville, and the President's going to have
Speaker 1: some opportunities to push his opponent on things that we
Speaker 1: know the media won't don't expect. I mean, I don't
Speaker 1: think anybody believes that there will be a serious push
Speaker 1: from the moderators to get something out of Joe Biden
Speaker 1: that he doesn't want to share, because they're not there
Speaker 1: to get the truth. The reason for this debate, as
Speaker 1: far as the moderators are concerned, is that Joe Biden
Speaker 1: can check off the box. After basically hiding in the
Speaker 1: basement for most of the campaign, so he can pretend
Speaker 1: like he's running an actual campaign, and so that maybe
Speaker 1: they can trip Trump up a little bit and get
Speaker 1: some last minute undecided to sway over to Joe Biden.
Speaker 1: That's what the moderators are thinking. They don't care what
Speaker 1: Trump supporters think of their bias. They could care less.
Speaker 1: In fact, they will wear the scorn of Trump supporters
Speaker 1: as a badge of honor. Depending on how the debate
Speaker 1: goes tonight. They'll think it shows what serious and good
Speaker 1: journals they are. Well, there's one area where I think
Speaker 1: there will be a bit of a push, and that's
Speaker 1: on court packing, because you know, there's a new answer
Speaker 1: now from Joe Biden. For weeks he was saying, I
Speaker 1: can't I can't answer that because my answer will be
Speaker 1: a story as a presidential candidate that people talk about,
Speaker 1: to which everybody said, yeah, correct. But he got away
Speaker 1: with it for a while, and it's because he ultimately
Speaker 1: doesn't want to tell the left wing base of the
Speaker 1: Democrat Party. They're not willing to completely remake an essential
Speaker 1: American governmental institution that is necessary for the balance of powers,
Speaker 1: and it's necessary that not just become an obvious, blatant
Speaker 1: tool of politics, and it already has to some degree,
Speaker 1: but making it worse, it's not going to make it better.
Speaker 1: Biden was asked by sixty minutes about court packing, and
Speaker 1: this was fascinating because he's got this new answer. He
Speaker 1: just came up at play three. I've elected. What I
Speaker 1: will do is I'll put together a national commission of
Speaker 1: bipartisan commission of scholars, constitution scholars, Democrats, Republicans, liberal, conservative,
Speaker 1: and I will ask them do over a one hundred
Speaker 1: and eighty days come back to me with recommendations as
Speaker 1: to how to reform the court system because it's getting
Speaker 1: out of whack the way which is being handled. And
Speaker 1: it's not about court packing. There's a number of other
Speaker 1: things that are conscious scholars have debated, and I'd look
Speaker 1: to see what recommendations that commission might make. So you're
Speaker 1: telling us you're going to study this issue about whether
Speaker 1: to pack the court, no, whether there's a number of
Speaker 1: alternatives that are well beyond packing. This is a live ball. Oh,
Speaker 1: it is a live ball. No, it is a live ball.
Speaker 1: We're going to have to do that, and you're going
Speaker 1: to find there's a lot of conservative conscious scholars are
Speaker 1: saying it as well, the last thing we need to
Speaker 1: do is turn the Supreme Court and digest a political football.
Speaker 1: Whoever has the most votes gets whatever they want. Presidents
Speaker 1: come and go, Supreme Court justice to stay for generations.
Speaker 1: First of all, what was that? Yeah? Versions coming and going,
Speaker 1: you know, and yeah, a lot of scholar a conservative
Speaker 1: scholars or no, no, no. This is the kind of
Speaker 1: sound leadership, though you should expect from Joe Biden. On
Speaker 1: an issue like this of such great national importance. You're
Speaker 1: going to have a guy who's saying, well, I'm going
Speaker 1: to form a committee, and the committee's gonna tell me
Speaker 1: what I should do. We're all supposed to say, oh,
Speaker 1: that's great, Joe, Yeah, form that committee, man, awesome. There's
Speaker 1: only one of two outcomes that the committee will give him, right.
Speaker 1: I don't mean by their decision, I mean why he
Speaker 1: would do that. One is so that he can say
Speaker 1: I formed a committee and then just ignore it and
Speaker 1: do whatever he wants. Or two he wants to use
Speaker 1: the committee as an excuse for not doing anything. I
Speaker 1: think it's most likely the first one. I had the
Speaker 1: committee come together, But why would this? What do you
Speaker 1: need a committee for? This is a matter of what
Speaker 1: the Congress is going to do. The Congress is the committee,
Speaker 1: and so it's really just up to whether the President
Speaker 1: would support this or not. So what Joe Biden is
Speaker 1: telling you is that at this stage, after being in
Speaker 1: politics for over forty years, he in elected office for
Speaker 1: over forty years, he wants you to know that he's
Speaker 1: not really sure how he feels about court packing. He
Speaker 1: will he thinks it needs more study. M Yes, this
Speaker 1: is the leadership that you'll be able to expect from
Speaker 1: from Joe Biden. And this is the kind of really clear,
Speaker 1: you know, fearless, out in the front stuff that you'll
Speaker 1: expect from Joe Biden. Look, I think we all need
Speaker 1: to understand, first of all, the Democrats are caught here
Speaker 1: because they're the ones that created the arms race in
Speaker 1: the Supreme Court in the first place. You look back
Speaker 1: during the Clinton years Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Suitor, and
Speaker 1: you know these I know that wasn't he might he's
Speaker 1: not Clinton years, but whatever, you look back at left
Speaker 1: wing judges, Republicans have waved through left wing judges time
Speaker 1: and time again. Republicans have voted alongside with Democrats to
Speaker 1: put forward Ruth Bader Ginsberg and Atlanta Kagan and you know,
Speaker 1: even so to Mayor, which is she's an embarrassment to
Speaker 1: the Supreme Court, but you know she sits on it,
Speaker 1: and you know, suitor, and you know, go down the list.
Speaker 1: Republicans go along with that. It's Democrats who are like, no,
Speaker 1: we must have somebody that suits our ideological positions on
Speaker 1: the court, and we will stop anybody who does not
Speaker 1: fall into that category. Well, you've been able as a leftist.
Speaker 1: They've been able to get away with that for a
Speaker 1: long time. But eventually people tire of that. They see
Speaker 1: what's really happening. They understand that the Democrats are playing
Speaker 1: games here and that their interest is not in what's
Speaker 1: best for the rule of law and for the institution
Speaker 1: of the Supreme Court. Their interest is in getting their way,
Speaker 1: having the Supreme Court be a super legislature. It's exactly
Speaker 1: what they're trying to do here. So that's, you know,
Speaker 1: as we focus in on why they're so upset over
Speaker 1: the elevation of the completely qualified Amy Coney Barrett, their
Speaker 1: complaints are just because we're seeing who they really are.
Speaker 1: Senator Mike League gets at play eleven one party the
Speaker 1: Democrats has been the aggressor. In every single instance, at
Speaker 1: every step along the way, our side has used our
Speaker 1: constitutional authority and the other side has abused its authority.
Speaker 1: There is no tit for tat. There's just tat. Democrats
Speaker 1: killed Judge Bourke's nomination for partisan political reasons. They killed
Speaker 1: Miguel Astrada's nomination for partisan political reasons. They slandered Justice Thomas,
Speaker 1: Justice Alito, and Justice Kavanaugh for partisan political reasons. They
Speaker 1: knoked the filibuster again for partisan political reasons. And now
Speaker 1: they're trying to scuttle this meeting, this hearing, this vote
Speaker 1: for partisan political reasons. When it comes to the judiciary,
Speaker 1: abuse of power is their agenda? Correct. The whole point
Speaker 1: of the Supreme Court, as far as lives are concerned,
Speaker 1: is to get what they want. It's not to have
Speaker 1: an eminent body of scholars and you know, esteemed intellectuals
Speaker 1: in the matter and matters of legal jurisprudence who are
Speaker 1: going to come to constitutionally faithful decisions. That's not the
Speaker 1: purpose of the Supreme Court. As far as the Democrat Party,
Speaker 1: the American left is concerned, it's transactional. We have this thing,
Speaker 1: we want it to do the things we want it
Speaker 1: to do. Look, Republicans are the ones who always end
Speaker 1: up putting up these judges like Roberts, who just keep
Speaker 1: betraying what we thought was their judicial philosophy. In the
Speaker 1: case of Roberts, because you know, he likes being thought
Speaker 1: of as the guy who's protecting the institution of the court.
Speaker 1: He likes that he won't really get trashed in the
Speaker 1: editorial pages of the New York Times the way other judges,
Speaker 1: other judges like Alito and Thomas will, And do you know,
Speaker 1: so it's really about vanity. One man's vanity is changing
Speaker 1: federal law in a sense for all the rest of us.
Speaker 1: That's what we end up with the left. They never
Speaker 1: on the big issues, they never break ranks because they
Speaker 1: know why they're there. They understand that this is the expectation,
Speaker 1: that that's why they were put into this job in
Speaker 1: the first place. But nonetheless, the Democrats are whyming about
Speaker 1: this because we are days away from what should be
Speaker 1: the Amy Coney Barrett confirmation conclusion, I think on this Monday.
Speaker 1: So you know, Chuck Schumer is very upset about this.
Speaker 1: Here he is Play twenty three. I am here to
Speaker 1: stand with my colleagues on the Judiciary Committee, who are
Speaker 1: boycotting today's committee markup on the nomination of Judge Amy
Speaker 1: Coney Barrett to the Supreme Court. This is not a
Speaker 1: decision the members of the committee have taken lightly, but
Speaker 1: a Republican majority has left us no choice. We are
Speaker 1: boycotting this illegitimate hearing. The nomination of Amy Cony Barrett
Speaker 1: is the most illegitimate process I have ever witnessed in
Speaker 1: the Senate. Why is it illegitimate? This is the only
Speaker 1: thing you have to do. Ask that very basic, very
Speaker 1: straightforward question. What exactly about this is illegitimate? They don't, Oh,
Speaker 1: it's an election year. Where is that in the Constitution?
Speaker 1: Where is that in the rules of the Senate, in
Speaker 1: the law anywhere? So? How is it illegitimate? For the Democrats?
Speaker 1: Is a stand in word they're using here for I
Speaker 1: don't like, I don't like what's happening, So I'm just
Speaker 1: gonna call it illegitimate. They're they're bastardizing. They are changing
Speaker 1: in real time the definition of the word because it's
Speaker 1: useful for them. Corey Booker, who hopefully he's not going
Speaker 1: to cry as he says this, also is calling for
Speaker 1: the sen a GOP to stop the Barrett nomination because
Speaker 1: people have voted early. What play twelve. This is not right.
Speaker 1: It is wrong, and we should have a nation right now,
Speaker 1: in the midst of an election where people know that
Speaker 1: their healthcare is on the ballot, that equal justice is
Speaker 1: on the ballot, that access to securing your most fundamental
Speaker 1: rights and equalities on the ballot, that we should not
Speaker 1: wait for the American people to speak as they already
Speaker 1: are speaking, and wait to do this until after the
Speaker 1: next inauguration. To me, this is stunning. It is anti democratic,
Speaker 1: and it is an affront to what I believe or
Speaker 1: a lot of our shared most cherished values and ideas.
Speaker 1: In addition to that, it's contrary to the very words
Speaker 1: of so many of my colleagues. I mean, none of
Speaker 1: their arguments are even a little bit compelling. It's all
Speaker 1: just kind of an emotional appeal to their fellow Democrats.
Speaker 1: So bad what they're doing is like so upsetting, I'm
Speaker 1: so mad about it. Completely legitimate, it is the opposite
Speaker 1: of illegitimate. It is totally legitimate, and everyone can see that,
Speaker 1: or at least anybody who is being honest. Amy Coney
Speaker 1: Barrett will be a fine Supreme Court Justice. Donald Trump
Speaker 1: will have installed three Supreme Court picks in his first
Speaker 1: four years, which is also a reminder for a lot
Speaker 1: of people who felt like they were holding their nose
Speaker 1: in the last election voting for Trump because of judges
Speaker 1: and because of the need to have judges who will
Speaker 1: protect the Constitution and not be left wing activists. They
Speaker 1: played the right hand, They made the right move. They
Speaker 1: can't have any doubts or any regrets about that now
Speaker 1: seeing what's actually ended up happening. So that's I think
Speaker 1: that that should be very encouraging because I look, I'm
Speaker 1: seeing these polls. I see what's going on right now
Speaker 1: with this effort to make it seem like the Trump
Speaker 1: campaign can't win. It's already too late. You know, they're
Speaker 1: too far behind, not buying it, not buying it. I
Speaker 1: know that in some key states, Trump or rather Biden
Speaker 1: is underperforming where Hillary was, But who knows what the
Speaker 1: polls think about How dishonest the media is in this
Speaker 1: election cycle, more than I've ever seen before. I mean,
Speaker 1: they're more willing to be blatant in the dishonesty. They
Speaker 1: used to be a little bit more subtle. There was
Speaker 1: more more tactical caution in their bias than that. Right now,
Speaker 1: it's just anything for Biden. I mean, they're all just
Speaker 1: like little Biden bots running around doing everything can to
Speaker 1: help him. So I think there's also the very real
Speaker 1: chance that a lot of these polling agencies, they're not
Speaker 1: going to be wrong, untentially buy a lot, but they're
Speaker 1: always the tie is always going to go to the
Speaker 1: Biden if you know what I mean. They're always going
Speaker 1: to skew in that direction because that's what happened in
Speaker 1: twenty sixteen. I think that's what's happening once again because
Speaker 1: someone's gonna pay them and they want to be on
Speaker 1: the right side of the Democrat apparatus. You're in the
Speaker 1: Freedom Mind. This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast. Doctor
Speaker 1: Jill Biden is not really a doctor, but why let
Speaker 1: me take some medical advice from her on masking and
Speaker 1: rallies play nineteen. Well, I think this administration has made
Speaker 1: a political I mean, we need to listen to the
Speaker 1: to the doctors and the scientists. That's what we have
Speaker 1: to do. And I think it's totally irresponsible that people
Speaker 1: are going to these rallies and they're not wearing masks.
Speaker 1: They're not socially distancing. Um, it's irresponsible and people will
Speaker 1: die because of this. People will die because of Trump, right,
Speaker 1: that's what that's That's the would be first lady. There,
Speaker 1: she's already been the second Do we call her a
Speaker 1: second lady? I don't know if that's a thing, but
Speaker 1: there's the would be first lady telling us all this
Speaker 1: about masks. I gotta tell you my face. Favorite mask
Speaker 1: wearing story from this week is Chris Cuomo, who loves
Speaker 1: to go on TV be like hey, you know, really serious,
Speaker 1: look in his eyes, really a lot of gravitas he's
Speaker 1: pulling together. He's a wear a mask, you know, save lives.
Speaker 1: Wear a mask. Right. It turns out there's a letter
Speaker 1: which has I believe been verified at this point, and
Speaker 1: it was on Tucker's show last night from his building,
Speaker 1: his fancy building in New York City where he lives,
Speaker 1: where he is being scolded for putting other residents at
Speaker 1: risk for not wearing a mask in his own building.
Speaker 1: So when it comes to his own actions, and I
Speaker 1: think the surprise is absolutely nobody one of the biggest
Speaker 1: wear a mask or you're a bad person advocates does
Speaker 1: not himself around other people wear a mask when there's
Speaker 1: not a camera around. Does anyone get surprised at all
Speaker 1: by this kind of a fraud? Nah? Right, we actually
Speaker 1: expect it at this point. I think everyone just figures, oh, okay,
Speaker 1: so you know another another BS journalist here who's doing
Speaker 1: what we all know they do, which is say one
Speaker 1: thing for the cameras and try to get the clicks
Speaker 1: and the likes and the follows, and then when it
Speaker 1: comes to their own personal behavior they completely dispense with. Look,
Speaker 1: I didn't wear a mask all summer in my building,
Speaker 1: even though it was required because there was no COVID
Speaker 1: in New York. And it's absurd. And I also think
Speaker 1: that wearing a mask for the five seconds I walked
Speaker 1: through my lobby is idiocy. But I tell you that
Speaker 1: every day, like I tell you that all the time.
Speaker 1: I'm honest about it. And now, because my building is
Speaker 1: so paranoid, fine, I wear a mask when I walk
Speaker 1: in and out. I take it off the second I
Speaker 1: get into fresh air, but I carry one in my
Speaker 1: back pocket. He used the same mask all the time.
Speaker 1: It's disgusting. It's like putting a swamp on my mouth. Now.
Speaker 1: But anyway, but I'm consistent someone like Cuomo is a fraud,
Speaker 1: wants you to wear a mask, wants to be able
Speaker 1: to control you, and wants the virtue signaling points for
Speaker 1: demanding that control, but has no interest himself in living
Speaker 1: by the mandates that he forces upon you. You're a
Speaker 1: bad person if you don't do it. He's a good
Speaker 1: person for telling you to do it, but he's not
Speaker 1: going to do it. That really is the Democrat Party
Speaker 1: defined right now. It's true of the way they view
Speaker 1: the environment, taxes, social justice, everything just all a big
Speaker 1: bacchanal of hypocrisy. Thanks for listening to the Buses and
Speaker 1: Show podcast. Remember to subscribe on Apple podcasts, the iHeartRadio app,
Speaker 1: or wherever you get your podcasts. Harsani time, everybody. David Harsani,
Speaker 1: senior writer of National Review, Friend of the Show is
Speaker 1: with us now. He has a fair minded and honest
Speaker 1: eye looking at all the stuff going on right now
Speaker 1: with this Hunter Biden mess and the journalism or lack
Speaker 1: thereof around it. Great to have you back, David. What's up?
Speaker 1: Always a pleasure? Thank you? So right? Yeah, I mean
Speaker 1: a whole lot of sec we got we got emails
Speaker 1: now and people like Leslie Stall are telling the President
Speaker 1: United States to his face, well, we can't verify the laptop.
Speaker 1: I mean, you work for CBS sixty minutes. I thought
Speaker 1: the whole point was that they could verify things. The
Speaker 1: journalists really are just pretending to be inept morons, it
Speaker 1: seems at this point, because they can't come up with
Speaker 1: a better excuse. It's a completely new standard as well.
Speaker 1: I mean they just I was thinking before about the
Speaker 1: Atlantic story, where where you know, we've learned that supposedly
Speaker 1: or allegedly, Donald Trump had said all these horrible things
Speaker 1: about soldiers. There wasn't a single on the record source
Speaker 1: to corroborate that story. Nothing. Now we haven't on the
Speaker 1: record source. The guy's a Navy eve who was Hunter's partner,
Speaker 1: saying yes, these emails are real or this. I'm not
Speaker 1: sure if you said that about every email, but certain emails,
Speaker 1: and that yes, Joe Biden or at least Hunter told
Speaker 1: them that Joe Biden was a big part of what
Speaker 1: was going on. Now, whether that's true or not, in
Speaker 1: the end, and I think that there is plenty of
Speaker 1: evidence that he knew about it, Joe. It's certainly verified
Speaker 1: as within the normal journalistic ethics, right. I mean, you
Speaker 1: can talk about it now. It's in the public record.
Speaker 1: There are people who are on the record saying it's true.
Speaker 1: We know that the laptop is real. We have the
Speaker 1: signed paper from Hunter at the Delaware shop right near
Speaker 1: where the Bidens I think lived. So it's just insane.
Speaker 1: It's just insane that they won't cover it, and when
Speaker 1: they do, they're always just sort of trying to explain
Speaker 1: it away, or or it becomes like a pouncing story.
Speaker 1: The Repotans are ready to pounce on Hunter stuff. And
Speaker 1: it's not really even a bad Hunter. It's about Joe Biden.
Speaker 1: Well that's that's take a ten percent cut. That's what
Speaker 1: he was doing. That's the part of this. And I
Speaker 1: was saying, Hunter Biden being the world's biggest screw up
Speaker 1: in a million different ways and even perhaps trading off
Speaker 1: his dad's name on his own. You know, it's bad.
Speaker 1: But I don't think that you blame I don't think
Speaker 1: you blame a political candidate for the actions of their children,
Speaker 1: per se. I think that that is a line you
Speaker 1: can draw. But that's not what we're seeing here. We're
Speaker 1: seeing Hunter Biden in emails and communications talking about how
Speaker 1: Dad gets a cut. Dad knows about all this. The
Speaker 1: business partner Bablinsky, I think is his name, Lieutenant Bablinsky.
Speaker 1: He says that Joe Biden knew all about this and
Speaker 1: that it was all done. And it's just a reminder,
Speaker 1: you know, you would think they couldn't get away with
Speaker 1: something like this, David, so brazen and so unethical and
Speaker 1: very likely illegal by the way, you think, except if
Speaker 1: they won't, even if the journals won't even touch this
Speaker 1: story with all the information and corroboration it currently has.
Speaker 1: Do we really think that anybody was going to want
Speaker 1: of their own volition look into the Biden's finances years ago?
Speaker 1: Of course not No. And and now there's more. We
Speaker 1: have verified more information, and this story corroborated more of
Speaker 1: the things that the Post has reported and has had
Speaker 1: more on the real real sources on the record who
Speaker 1: were involved in the situation that we did for four
Speaker 1: years of Russia Gate story is that still haven't been corrected,
Speaker 1: that still haven't been corroborated. In fact, they've been mostly debunked.
Speaker 1: And yet now they're pretending that they have this high
Speaker 1: ethical standard. I mean, it's insane, And you're right, this
Speaker 1: is about listen. I think the Hunter's story would should
Speaker 1: be a story on its own if it's true, because
Speaker 1: it matters to you know, it's newsworthy. I no, no,
Speaker 1: if it's criminal, But the idea that the presidential candidate
Speaker 1: would allowed his son to leverage off the United States
Speaker 1: government and then take a ten percent cut, that's a
Speaker 1: pretty big story. I don't even know if it's illegal,
Speaker 1: but it sounds pretty corrupt. I'd like to know more
Speaker 1: about it. You know, it seems to me like that
Speaker 1: actually would be you know that that in a fair
Speaker 1: minded for a fair minded person, if Joe Biden was
Speaker 1: really getting a ten percent cut of his son doing
Speaker 1: deals based off of access to Joe Biden. First of all,
Speaker 1: I do believe that that is a criminal conspiracy. I
Speaker 1: think that that qualifies as quid pro quel corruption. Corruption
Speaker 1: cases are always a little tricky and there's a lot
Speaker 1: of stuff that goes into it, but I think that
Speaker 1: it probably would meet that threshold from what I know
Speaker 1: of the law. But beyond that, if I were a
Speaker 1: fair minded person, that would be disqualifying. I mean, that
Speaker 1: is straight up disgusting behavior for not just like a
Speaker 1: state senator or a city councilman the Vice president of
Speaker 1: the United States. How many stories have we read about
Speaker 1: how people come to this country from you know, diplomats
Speaker 1: and stay at a Trump property. Well, that's okay, that's newsworthy.
Speaker 1: Doesn't this seem at least as newsworthy as those stories.
Speaker 1: Is the front running presidential candidate we're talking about, and
Speaker 1: you know, we don't know. It would be crazy to
Speaker 1: think that all of this is just made up by Hunter,
Speaker 1: you know, in his emails. Even if that were true,
Speaker 1: they won't even ask him the question. And when they
Speaker 1: do ask one I saw one Wisconsin reporter asked, they
Speaker 1: do it in this really grading way where they're like,
Speaker 1: can you believe what these crazy Republicans are saying about you?
Speaker 1: You know, do you have a comment on this craziness
Speaker 1: and that? And then he gets to like tea off
Speaker 1: on them. But they never asked him a simple question,
Speaker 1: did you ever benefit financially from what Hunter was doing
Speaker 1: in Ukraine or in China? Did you know about it?
Speaker 1: Because he lied it, right, he lied in the past
Speaker 1: and said he knew nothing about what Hunter was doing.
Speaker 1: We know that that's probably not true now, right, I mean,
Speaker 1: that's the fact that there has not been a real
Speaker 1: ask of did you ever make any money off of
Speaker 1: anything Hunter did? And asking a straightforward way. I can
Speaker 1: guarantee that if someone asked that question, they would not
Speaker 1: get a clear denunciation from Joe Biden on There would
Speaker 1: be some massona you know, Trump's the real you know,
Speaker 1: they the usual Biden bluster. You would not get a
Speaker 1: real answer from him on it. Because I think they're
Speaker 1: going to be able to prove David in this last stretch.
Speaker 1: I mean, I know some of the people who have
Speaker 1: access to the emails that I think they're going to
Speaker 1: be able to prove this. Yeah, I mean he would
Speaker 1: just say, yeah, come on, you know, how dare are
Speaker 1: you and and try to distract and the media helped him.
Speaker 1: They bought a week with Russian disinformation, which was just
Speaker 1: a complete nonsensical lie, and then they bought they're trying
Speaker 1: to buy another week and then just trying to pull
Speaker 1: it out. Fine, I don't even know if this story
Speaker 1: would change anything that much. I don't know, but it
Speaker 1: is newsworthy, and journalists just actively not only actively not
Speaker 1: covering it, but trying to censor it. I don't mean
Speaker 1: government censorship, but what Twitter has done to the New
Speaker 1: York Post account. That is nuts, and I just I
Speaker 1: don't even know what would happen if they did that
Speaker 1: to the New York Times, which has run countless, you know,
Speaker 1: stories that they haven't verified. I mean, even the tax story.
Speaker 1: I don't even know if that's true. Did they speak
Speaker 1: to I don't know. We just have to trust them
Speaker 1: to some extent. The Post has been more transparent about
Speaker 1: the political and part is in nature of how that
Speaker 1: information was gathered, which I think is good to be
Speaker 1: transparent about. It doesn't mean that the information is untrue
Speaker 1: or that the laptop is certainly seems we're speaking to
Speaker 1: David Harsani, senior writer at National Review dot com. David,
Speaker 1: the Post got The New York Post got trashed by
Speaker 1: fellow journalists, which I just think is is inexcusable. It's
Speaker 1: so appalling on so levels. People were sneering at it.
Speaker 1: Oh it's a tabloid. Oh, Rupert Murdock owns it. Oh,
Speaker 1: as if it's like the newspaper that talks about you know,
Speaker 1: aliens landing in the desert and bringing back you know,
Speaker 1: a baby Jesus or something. You know what I mean,
Speaker 1: those things like they really were demeaning the newspaper last
Speaker 1: week for the most obvious political purposes. No one's now
Speaker 1: that it's clear the New York Post was one hundred
Speaker 1: percent corrected in the right. There's no apologies or even hey,
Speaker 1: maybe we'll be a little more fair minded to you
Speaker 1: guys next time. From the rest of the journalist Condre, Yeah, no,
Speaker 1: I mean they their their mission is to get Joe
Speaker 1: Biden elected. That's their mission. I mean, not all of them,
Speaker 1: but most of them. The political press, the Washington Posts, CNN, MSNBC,
Speaker 1: we all, you know, we know all the names. I mean,
Speaker 1: the Atlantic Rant ran with that story that that you
Speaker 1: know about about Trump saying all those terrible things about soldiers,
Speaker 1: I mean, and that that's a magazine filled but pseudo
Speaker 1: intellectuals and sort of nons just spewing out five thousand
Speaker 1: word nonsensical articles every single day. And yet we're supposed
Speaker 1: to take them seriously. But not reporters at the New
Speaker 1: York Post, which breaks stories all the time, biggest city
Speaker 1: in the world, large, one of the largest circulations in America.
Speaker 1: I mean, it's just nuts. And where are all these
Speaker 1: people like Brian stet All, both of those CNN media
Speaker 1: reporters and everyone else who who is constantly acting like
Speaker 1: being critical of journalism as an attack on the First Amendment.
Speaker 1: You know what I'm saying. They make no distinction between
Speaker 1: those except if it's about some reporter they don't like
Speaker 1: at the Daily Car or at you know, wherever, at
Speaker 1: the New York Post. I mean that, you know, I'm
Speaker 1: getting sick of like complaining about them in the sense
Speaker 1: that I think we just have to move on and
Speaker 1: we have to build our own media infrastructure and do
Speaker 1: what we have to do, because you can't fight this
Speaker 1: all the time because they don't care. There's no one above,
Speaker 1: there's no like editor in chief saying you have to
Speaker 1: act more professionally. There's no one stopping them anymore. I mean,
Speaker 1: you see them on Twitter. They just sort of sneer
Speaker 1: and laugh and retweet mediamas. You know what I mean.
Speaker 1: So yeah, I look, I think that journalists as a
Speaker 1: professional class are arguably the most dishonest and worst people
Speaker 1: engage in what is ostensibly a legal trade in the country.
Speaker 1: I mean, I really believe that, Like I would take
Speaker 1: any number of other how I would take you know,
Speaker 1: I don't know, you know, casino owners and strip club
Speaker 1: barons over journalists these days in terms of the ethics
Speaker 1: of their job, because at least those other folks are
Speaker 1: telling you what they're really doing. Journalists are engaged in
Speaker 1: a perpetual fraud. They're lying to the public about what
Speaker 1: their goals are and what they're doing. But I would
Speaker 1: have agreed with you even when I was working in
Speaker 1: a newspaper fifteen years ago on that. So I'm not
Speaker 1: going to argue, but I think you're right. And then
Speaker 1: they just want to quickly add because they drive me bananas.
Speaker 1: Then you have fact checkers, which with a conceit of
Speaker 1: which is that some person can decide an argument in
Speaker 1: a newspaper who's just a you know, a reporter. These
Speaker 1: are columnists, and yet now they're used by political campaigns
Speaker 1: by Democrats all the time to say this has been
Speaker 1: fact checked, where you know, it's an easy way to
Speaker 1: circumvent argument. But you know, I don't want to get
Speaker 1: too deeply into what the problems or journalism, but the
Speaker 1: thing is that I think that the pressure that many
Speaker 1: people have put on others to defend a post and
Speaker 1: to talk about Twitter has actually blown this story up,
Speaker 1: maybe even bigger than it would have been. Oh yeah,
Speaker 1: I think I think the effectively, the suppression, what I
Speaker 1: call the Great Suppression, magnified this story much more rapidly
Speaker 1: than if they had allowed it to pursue, you know,
Speaker 1: go through normal social media channels. But David, before we
Speaker 1: let you go, we've got a big debate tonight. People
Speaker 1: are going to be watching it soon after hearing us
Speaker 1: right here so or listening to it. So what are
Speaker 1: your expectations, what do you think, you know, what do
Speaker 1: you think is going to happen? And will it matter?
Speaker 1: I am I'm I'm skeptical that it will matter very much,
Speaker 1: though I think you see, you know, you see a
Speaker 1: national poll, some national posts getting wider, but put some
Speaker 1: of the state poles, you know, getting a little closer constricting.
Speaker 1: So I don't know how important it is. I don't
Speaker 1: think that Trump will do worse than he did last time.
Speaker 1: He was overly aggressive and he wouldn't let Biden speak.
Speaker 1: But I do think this is an opportunity for Trump
Speaker 1: to ask some questions that the media won't ask and
Speaker 1: bring it to the attention of people who haven't even
Speaker 1: even heard about it. That includes Hunter. Though I don't
Speaker 1: think he should obsess on that topic. I think he
Speaker 1: should just bring it up, but I don't know how
Speaker 1: much it will matter. Let's see David Arsali of National
Speaker 1: Review dot com. David, great to see him, my friend anytime.
Speaker 1: Thanks for having me. You're in the Freedom hunt. This
Speaker 1: is the Buck Sexton Show podcast. Biden is also pleasure
Speaker 1: mass amnesty and free federal healthcare for illegal aliens, and
Speaker 1: we all have a heart. It will obliterate Medicare and
Speaker 1: Social Security with it, but we all have a heart.
Speaker 1: The problem I want to take care of everybody. The
Speaker 1: problem is our country will be flooded with tens of
Speaker 1: millions of people, free healthcare, free education. I always say
Speaker 1: for them, it drives them crazy. Everybody gets a free
Speaker 1: Rolls Royce and then they say I am misrepresenting. They
Speaker 1: don't get a Rolls Royce. But no, but think of it.
Speaker 1: Free healthcare and I'll always protect. I will always protect
Speaker 1: your Medicare and your social security. President on immigration here,
Speaker 1: which because we're in this bizarre world of COVID, has
Speaker 1: become much less of an issue. But remember that was
Speaker 1: his signature issue in twenty sixteen. It is what separated
Speaker 1: him from the rest of the Republican field. It's what
Speaker 1: broke him out ahead of that Republican field, and it's
Speaker 1: an area where he has been proven to be very prescient.
Speaker 1: I think the President has been shown to be right
Speaker 1: on immigration. And when he says the Democrats, he's telling
Speaker 1: you what I've been telling you. They want amnesty, they
Speaker 1: get amnesty. They look they tried to get it through
Speaker 1: and make Republicans complicit in at the last time with
Speaker 1: the Gang of Eight Bill and Marco Rubio. Marco Rubio's
Speaker 1: career never really recovered from that, but they tried to
Speaker 1: make Republicans a part of it with this comment. You know,
Speaker 1: because the Republicans who want to be considered heroes and
Speaker 1: get a lot of nice media coverage, big donations, the
Speaker 1: Chamber of Commercial love, you the you know, the big
Speaker 1: moneyed interests for corporations that rely on cheap labor. You know,
Speaker 1: there's a lot of upside to being a Republican who
Speaker 1: supports amnesty. Paul Ryan was a Republican who really supported amnesty,
Speaker 1: for example. You know, you get to be an establishment
Speaker 1: guy who talks a lot about the Constitution and the debt,
Speaker 1: but doesn't really talk about what happens tomorrow. If we
Speaker 1: let the left get their way with policies like this.
Speaker 1: So Trump is right when he says that there's gonna
Speaker 1: be mass amnesty. And also with amnesty comes an enormous
Speaker 1: additional drain on the healthcare system, right, I mean, this
Speaker 1: is why. And they are all these like libertarian open
Speaker 1: borders groups that I come across the stuff will say, oh,
Speaker 1: but it will increase GDP. Yeah, but it'll increase the expenses.
Speaker 1: And these are individuals who are in an increasingly information
Speaker 1: based economy with already depressed wages and a lot of
Speaker 1: areas of the country again pre COVID, COVID has messed
Speaker 1: up the numbers, but for manual labor and for things
Speaker 1: where illegal immigrants are more able to compete for jobs.
Speaker 1: And that's real. And if you want to read on
Speaker 1: that or learn more about that, Professor Borjas at Harvard
Speaker 1: has done some of the most in depth research on it.
Speaker 1: I've read his work and he just shows, Yeah, when
Speaker 1: you flood an area with a lot of unskilled illegal
Speaker 1: immigrants for jobs like you know, carpentry and you know
Speaker 1: what you consider to be day laborer kind of work,
Speaker 1: it brings down a lot of other wages. And you know,
Speaker 1: carpenters who live in that area can make the same
Speaker 1: kind of money. And it's not nationwide all at once.
Speaker 1: It's it's really state by state, really county by county
Speaker 1: within this state. But think about what it will do
Speaker 1: to the healthcare system as well. You're going to bring
Speaker 1: people in who will overwhelmingly to be dependent upon the
Speaker 1: state via Medicaid or Medicare for All or whatever the
Speaker 1: Democrats are proposing. That's how it's going to work. So
Speaker 1: this is a this is a major concern. So you
Speaker 1: can look at this and the reality of the Democrats
Speaker 1: are going to try to do, or you can be
Speaker 1: a fake Republican who's just This is about character. This
Speaker 1: is about a good man versus a bad man. But guys,
Speaker 1: does Joe Scarborough think he's a good Man's that would
Speaker 1: be interesting. I'd like to hear that explanation. I'm not
Speaker 1: going to go too into the personal stuff that's public
Speaker 1: that we all know about with that guy. Not exactly
Speaker 1: a model for how to live your life, fair enough,
Speaker 1: but the big Trump supporter who now acts like he's
Speaker 1: the great hero of the resistance, but he's appealing to
Speaker 1: your your moral sensibility over at MSNBC. He works in
Speaker 1: a network that just spews lies and nonsense and divides
Speaker 1: people with the most aggressive and toxic identity politics narratives possible.
Speaker 1: You know. Se annd today ran a story about how
Speaker 1: the officer that had his knee on the neck of
Speaker 1: George Floyd third degree murder charge dropped. Oh yeah, they
Speaker 1: dropped that charge. They kept them more serious second degree
Speaker 1: murder charge. But CNN and the headline third degree murder
Speaker 1: charge dropped just to get everyone, Oh my gosh, here's
Speaker 1: Scarborough's pitch play eight. It's interesting. You can look at
Speaker 1: that video and I think most Americans would agree that
Speaker 1: this election is between a good man and a bad man. Yeah,
Speaker 1: and I feel comfortable saying that Donald Trump is a
Speaker 1: bad man. He's a bad man. He liked him a
Speaker 1: lot when he gave access to the president right or
Speaker 1: access to the Republican candidate Joe Biden was I'm sorry,
Speaker 1: Joe Scarborough rather was a big fan. But now now
Speaker 1: he's all about integrity and honesty and Trump's a bad guy, folks.
Speaker 1: Trump is imperfect. No one's ever said he was perfect.
Speaker 1: He's been a good president and he brings far more
Speaker 1: to the table and just there's so much more upside
Speaker 1: for all of us, for all Americans, including the psycho libs,
Speaker 1: who would scream if I said this to their faces,
Speaker 1: and I would love to, but they won't listen to me.
Speaker 1: It'll be better for all of us than a corrupt, phony,
Speaker 1: fraudulent Joe Biden. Oh, he's just a moderate presidency. Nobody
Speaker 1: really thinks that, but they're just trying to fool people.
Speaker 1: Thanks for listening to The bus Esson Show podcasts. Remember
Speaker 1: to subscribe on Apple podcast, the iHeartRadio app, or wherever
Speaker 1: you get your podcasts. Rock and roll, fellow patriots, we
Speaker 1: made ours go up to eleven. It's time for roll Call.
Speaker 1: Roll Call. Send us your thoughts, Facebook dot com, slash
Speaker 1: slash Buck Sexton if you want to send a message,
Speaker 1: that way, very easy way to do it. If you
Speaker 1: want to email us Team Buck at iHeartMedia dot com,
Speaker 1: or if you prefer, you can send a direct message
Speaker 1: on Instagram because I'm on the gram now. Buck Sexton
Speaker 1: is my name on the Instagram or tex sex sex
Speaker 1: dump whatever Keith Olverman calls me. But that's not actually
Speaker 1: my Instagram name. But I just think that's kind of funny,
Speaker 1: he said, it again yesterday on Twitter. What u maniac producer? Mark?
Speaker 1: Have you ever seen the old, the old Ben Affleck
Speaker 1: thing where he does an impersonation on SNL off Keith
Speaker 1: Overman and Miss Precious Perfect the cat. It may be
Speaker 1: the funniest thing Ben Affleck has ever done. I haven't.
Speaker 1: I'll have to go YouTube. Oh you should watch it.
Speaker 1: Miss Precious Perfect picked on by the condo board, unable
Speaker 1: to stay with me and my mum. It's amazing, It's amazing.
Speaker 1: You gotta watch it. It's like the bet. It's one
Speaker 1: of the funnier things I've remember seeing on SNL. Really
Speaker 1: for many years. This was back when SNL was a
Speaker 1: comedy show instead of a crappy pseudo political commentary show.
Speaker 1: I don't know if you know that. That used to
Speaker 1: be a thing. I miss old SL. I don't watch
Speaker 1: it anymore. Old SL was a bunch of people who
Speaker 1: are trying to actually do funny things on Saturday night
Speaker 1: for the entertainment of the American people. SNL for the
Speaker 1: last ten years or so has been like a wokeness parade. Yeah,
Speaker 1: we're so woke, man, it's gross. What do you got doing?
Speaker 1: What do you got going on? We got the debate
Speaker 1: coming up in just a little bit. What are you
Speaker 1: gonna be doing? I'll be watching the debate most likely.
Speaker 1: But do you do you do you game time eat
Speaker 1: or do you like to pre game eat? Oh? I
Speaker 1: pre game eat and then I'll have the football on
Speaker 1: the other TV that the it's the Giants are playing
Speaker 1: but they stink, so I don't really want to watch that,
Speaker 1: but I'll have it on. So will there be there
Speaker 1: will be Super Bowl this year? On time in January?
Speaker 1: Is that the plan as of right now? Yeah? I
Speaker 1: think it's still early February, but they have contingency plans
Speaker 1: that make it all go all the way to late
Speaker 1: March if they have to. How can how can the
Speaker 1: New market not have better sports teams? I know for
Speaker 1: the rest of the country, they're like, fuck, that's your problem,
Speaker 1: we don't care. But New York should have better teams.
Speaker 1: So the Jets are historically bad. Yeah, well that's not
Speaker 1: a surprise. Alrighty. Let's get to the roll call here, Dan,
Speaker 1: President Trump and the GOP is playing a dangerous game
Speaker 1: with the conservative bass. I am voting for Trump, but
Speaker 1: I have yet to see any accountability for actual criminal
Speaker 1: behavior from the left, Clinton emails, Obama Spygate, IRS scandal,
Speaker 1: Biden Shenanigans, and so on. No one is behind bars.
Speaker 1: We will not wait forever, and in fact we have
Speaker 1: waited long enough. It is time for accountability. If Trump
Speaker 1: blows it during the next term, the GOP will lose
Speaker 1: its base. I promise, uh Dan, what you're saying is true.
Speaker 1: I mean, there has been really no accountability for the
Speaker 1: Clinton emails, Spygate, IRS, and this Biden stuff. And I'm
Speaker 1: not going to tell you things I don't think are true.
Speaker 1: There's not gonna be accountability for any of that. Most likely,
Speaker 1: there's something about Republicans where, even though they know the
Speaker 1: other side we'll try to ruin us, imprison our children,
Speaker 1: take all of our money, and destroy our lives, and
Speaker 1: use the government and use federal agents and places like
Speaker 1: the FBI and prosecutors' offices as weapons to that effect,
Speaker 1: even though we're completely aware of that. Our team, our
Speaker 1: side is always wow. We don't want to be too rough.
Speaker 1: We don't want to you know, we don't want to
Speaker 1: make anybody feel too bad. So we're just gonna like,
Speaker 1: let bygones be bygones. And then they try to you know,
Speaker 1: run a special counsel, or they try to throw our
Speaker 1: kids in, you know, in prison again, or they do
Speaker 1: whatever it is that they do and we go back.
Speaker 1: It's just like a cycle. We just keep going through
Speaker 1: the same cycle over and over again. So, yeah, Dan,
Speaker 1: I hear what you're saying. Man. It's it's disappointing to
Speaker 1: be sure. I have no disagreement with you on that,
Speaker 1: and I think it is unfortunately unlikely to change. I
Speaker 1: do not see it changing anytime soon. Alex. Hey, I
Speaker 1: love the show. We love you, Alex. I imagine I'll
Speaker 1: be listening for a long time from the way I've
Speaker 1: been listening to y'all since the beginning of this pandemic.
Speaker 1: I just wanted to say, Duck duck go is a
Speaker 1: great search engine. I use it if I can't find
Speaker 1: what I'm looking for since Google tends to hide most
Speaker 1: conservative opinions and facts. Also, I can't wait to hear
Speaker 1: your Dracula podcast and the others you were talking about
Speaker 1: listening from Dallas. My mom told me about y'all when
Speaker 1: she tuned in the radio on her way to Florida. Well, Alex,
Speaker 1: that's great, man, Thank you so much. It's great to
Speaker 1: have a relatively new member of Team Buck who's really
Speaker 1: you know, into what we're doing here. Dracula podcast is
Speaker 1: in the works, and I've got a deadline here because
Speaker 1: it's only ten days, no less than that, nine days
Speaker 1: before Halloween, so I want to get it out before Halloween,
Speaker 1: so that'll be kind of cool. And as for Duck
Speaker 1: Duck Go, I've never even heard producer Mark you've even
Speaker 1: heard of it? I have. I know a lot of
Speaker 1: tech people like to talk about it because they don't
Speaker 1: like Google and all the tracking and whatnot. Oh interesting,
Speaker 1: Duck Duck Go. Okay, you ever playing Duck Duck Goose
Speaker 1: as a kid? Of course, what child didn't. Yeah, that
Speaker 1: was a fun one. Duck Duck Goose was good. I
Speaker 1: also I used to love Capture the Flag games when
Speaker 1: I was a kid. I thought that was a great one.
Speaker 1: Or man Hunt play those those were fun. Yeah, Capture
Speaker 1: the Flag was great. You know. Now it's like, oh
Speaker 1: my gosh, I'm supposed to run fast and people are
Speaker 1: gonna chase me. That sounds like sounds like I've done
Speaker 1: something illegal. I have no interest and had too much
Speaker 1: effort at this point. Yeah, it's gonna I'm gonna get
Speaker 1: winded by it, and that's no fun. We don't need that, Don.
Speaker 1: The lack of Civics being taught in schools has advantaged
Speaker 1: the left for years. The Biden campaign is now leveraging
Speaker 1: this ignorance, wrongly accused the administration of mismanaging of the pandemic. Ultimately,
Speaker 1: health is controlled by states and municipalities. How Governor Cromo
Speaker 1: mandated the admission of COVID nineteen positive patients to nursing
Speaker 1: homes is an example of this. The closing of business
Speaker 1: is also at the whim of states and municipalities. I
Speaker 1: hope the President uses the next debate to rectify this
Speaker 1: educational negligence to inform the citizenry of the role of
Speaker 1: the federal government in local issues like health. He needs
Speaker 1: to explain the role of federal government and how it
Speaker 1: is restricted from meddling in local governance. Yes, Don, I
Speaker 1: think it's true that people not understanding really both the
Speaker 1: foundation and origin of the government that we have and
Speaker 1: the reasons for the limitations. I mean, you know, limitations
Speaker 1: on government power has become almost a cultural thing. People
Speaker 1: hear them, they say, oh, here's some right wing tea
Speaker 1: party Bob, Well, no, of course you want a limited government.
Speaker 1: The alternative is a government that can take away any
Speaker 1: of your freedoms. So there's always the moral necessity for
Speaker 1: limitations on government authority and power, and that's also what
Speaker 1: laws serve to do. Or The biggest threat of tyranny
Speaker 1: that we face is not from some foreign government or
Speaker 1: foreign country, although China is getting pretty big and pretty scary.
Speaker 1: Who knows what twenty or thirty years from now is
Speaker 1: going to look like. The real threat of tyranny today
Speaker 1: is here at home, and we're seeing how quickly it
Speaker 1: can happen. We're seeing how the frog can boil slowly
Speaker 1: in the pot with the COVID restrictions that we're under
Speaker 1: that I'm amazed people are willing to still sit back
Speaker 1: and deal with this the way that they are. I mean,
Speaker 1: I would lead a civil disobedience movement in New York,
Speaker 1: except they be me and five other people and everybody
Speaker 1: else around us like Trump supporters get them. So what's
Speaker 1: the point? Doesn't do anything? Don't have a critical mass
Speaker 1: of people who think for themselves, an irrational in New
Speaker 1: York City that can push back on this. So, as
Speaker 1: I always telling you, you've got to have a plan.
Speaker 1: Don't just charge the machine gun nets. For me to
Speaker 1: be a a mask non com non compliance guy, I'd
Speaker 1: be one of very very few people in Manhattan that
Speaker 1: that would be taking that position. And it's not mask
Speaker 1: non compliants all the time. I mean, you know that's
Speaker 1: the thing. Look, if people want to wear it on subways,
Speaker 1: I get it. I mean there's some circumstances. I'm not
Speaker 1: crazy about it. But I also you know, they had
Speaker 1: this the Flaming Lips, which is apparently a band. They
Speaker 1: had a concert that a lot of people saw recently
Speaker 1: where everyone was in their own individual plastic bubble. All
Speaker 1: the all the audience in plastic bubbles. This is the
Speaker 1: future that we want. This is what we think people
Speaker 1: should be doing. This is lunacy, it's idiocy, it's it's
Speaker 1: embarrassing for the people involved. But now they even have
Speaker 1: it in New York Producer Mark, I have you see
Speaker 1: in this some restaurants they set up these plastic bubbles
Speaker 1: for people outside. Yeah, I will not be dining in
Speaker 1: one of those. Yeah. This is why I'm now just like, look,
Speaker 1: I want to eat takeout. I don't want to wear
Speaker 1: a mask and deal with all this crap. So I'll
Speaker 1: go to restaurant and pay them to make my food,
Speaker 1: then I just take it home. I can't. I can't
Speaker 1: sign on for this nonsense, this silliness, and it's really oppressive.
Speaker 1: I don't understand why people don't see it that way
Speaker 1: more they should see it that way anyway. Good A
Speaker 1: good note, Dohn. Thanks for writing in Adam Buck on
Speaker 1: t Swift. Isn't her whole career built on having bad
Speaker 1: taste in men? Why would Biden want her endorsement? Shields
Speaker 1: High Producer Mark, I defer to you. Is her? Is
Speaker 1: that what her career is based on? But yeah, that's up.
Speaker 1: Most of her songs involved heartbreak and breaking up with guys. Yeah.
Speaker 1: I think that's the joke he's making. No, he has not,
Speaker 1: she has not been. No, mhm. Interesting, she's like maybe
Speaker 1: almost thirty now somewhere around that I think is almost
Speaker 1: thirty something like that. Yeah, Producer Mark says it's true,
Speaker 1: So I believe it. So there you go. Yeah, Um,
Speaker 1: I like your joke, Adam, Thank you you're in. This
Speaker 1: is the Buck Sex and Show podcast. All right more
Speaker 1: roll call courtesy of Leslie. Hey there, Buck just wanted
Speaker 1: to say, I've been listening to you for a few
Speaker 1: months now, and I've passed the buck. With several of
Speaker 1: my conservative gal pals, we have what we lovingly refer
Speaker 1: to as buck Wild Girls Night now where we catch
Speaker 1: up on our weeks and talk about your podcast over wind.
Speaker 1: We absolutely adore you and very much appreciate your knowledge.
Speaker 1: It's really become a bonding experience for us being conservative ladies,
Speaker 1: because that's not an easy thing in today's world. So
Speaker 1: thank you for being the wise man in our lives.
Speaker 1: She'll tie well, thank you, Leslie. That's great, that's super
Speaker 1: That's buck Wild Girls' Night. Sounds like a lot of fun,
Speaker 1: gotta say, Producer Mark, do you have any comments that
Speaker 1: are safe for radio? I cannot make any comments out
Speaker 1: of fear of the FCC, fair enough, but no, that
Speaker 1: sounds lovely, Leslie. Thank you so much for writing in
Speaker 1: and telling us about this, and I hope you ladies
Speaker 1: enjoy some Pino noir. Listen to this pod cast and
Speaker 1: maybe cheese. I was gonna give cheese recon cheese is
Speaker 1: what I've already said this. French fries, chocolate, cheese. These
Speaker 1: are my food weaknesses. Without those I would be in
Speaker 1: much better shape. Calorically in my daily intake. But those
Speaker 1: are just three things that Now, as Mark Mark points out,
Speaker 1: you can put cheese on the fries to make them
Speaker 1: truly magnificent. But now let's turn this around for a second.
Speaker 1: Can you put chocolate on fries? Does anyone do this?
Speaker 1: Some people like to dip like a Wendy's frosty or
Speaker 1: a milkshake, a chocolate milkshake into their fries into that.
Speaker 1: I'm not a big fan of that, but I see
Speaker 1: the appeal. M Yes, milkshakes. I had those growing up.
Speaker 1: That's if you want to put on weight really quickly,
Speaker 1: I think an ice cream milkshake is one of the
Speaker 1: most effective ways you can possibly do it. So there's
Speaker 1: that because you're drinking it so you don't even think
Speaker 1: about it. Yeah, and it just goes right into your
Speaker 1: just the sugar rush goes right into your blood stream.
Speaker 1: It's already in liquid form, there's no fiber to slow
Speaker 1: it down. And a milkshake, I mean, you can do
Speaker 1: a milkshake that six seven, one hundred calories. Man, yeah,
Speaker 1: part of time. It's actually sounding delicious now that I'm
Speaker 1: talking about it out loud. Adam, Hey, Buck, what's the
Speaker 1: Shield's hie, what's the title of that book you wrote
Speaker 1: on socialism? Like to buy it? And what's the secret
Speaker 1: of getting a spot on Roll Call? Keep up the
Speaker 1: good work you gray Beard Millennial. Well, Adam, the book
Speaker 1: is the Socialism Survival Guide. I wrote it before the pandemic,
Speaker 1: so when I wrote it, we looked like maybe Bernie
Speaker 1: was going to be the nominee and we were going
Speaker 1: to be living in a very different world we're living
Speaker 1: in now. But the ideas all still very much apply
Speaker 1: when it comes to what the Democrats are trying to
Speaker 1: do going forward, and I make some predictions about what
Speaker 1: they what they will do, and my friends at Stansbury
Speaker 1: Research also adds some financial know how into all of it,
Speaker 1: so that there's a takeaway that you can take from
Speaker 1: it beyond just oh my gosh, bad things are happening
Speaker 1: because of you know, the socialism. So you can go
Speaker 1: to Buck Electionbook dot com if you want to get
Speaker 1: a totally free get a copy Buck Election book dot com.
Speaker 1: We're actually giving them away now at writing in advance
Speaker 1: at the election. As long as you know, give up,
Speaker 1: you give your email, sign up for your email and yeah,
Speaker 1: Buck electionbook dot Com. So check it out. And next
Speaker 1: up in low Roll Call we have Jeff, hey Buck
Speaker 1: and Mark Love the show. I'm passing the buck to
Speaker 1: get younger guys I work with more informed on politics anyway.
Speaker 1: I work in natural gas infrastructure construction and travel extensively
Speaker 1: through the West Virginia, Pennsylvania, and Ohio areas. As the
Speaker 1: polls are telling us, President Trump is losing in pan Ohio.
Speaker 1: From what I see on the road, a ratio of
Speaker 1: yard signs fifty to one in Trump's favor. Also, Trump
Speaker 1: supporters have flags, banners, homemade signs, and billboards on their property.
Speaker 1: I know this isn't science, but the truth about what's
Speaker 1: out there in fly over country is hard to ignore. Well, Jeff,
Speaker 1: I hope you're observations are in factor of a reflection,
Speaker 1: are in fact a you know a either they're correct, right,
Speaker 1: So there we go. I really hope you are. You're seeing.
Speaker 1: What you're seeing is what's going to be reflected in
Speaker 1: the election results. But as I've told you, and you know,
Speaker 1: I'm hitting this prediction hard. If it's close, they're not
Speaker 1: going to concede Pennsylvania. If that's the difference between winning
Speaker 1: and losing, which maybe it won't be. But they will
Speaker 1: not concede Pennsylvania and maybe a few other states on
Speaker 1: election night based upon mail in balloting. But Pennsylvania is
Speaker 1: really going to be the That's going to be a
Speaker 1: dog fight. I'm pretty confident about that. Tim writes in
Speaker 1: Hey Buck, I've been a listener from a Saturday Blaze
Speaker 1: days whoa original Saturday Squad O s S. I was
Speaker 1: a a Navy corpsman assigned to a Marine grunt battalion
Speaker 1: thirty seven years ago. On ten twenty three eighty three,
Speaker 1: I was in Bayirut, Lebanon for the US Marine Corps
Speaker 1: barracks bombing carnage. Our witness has still scared me to
Speaker 1: this day as a twenty two year old knucklehead, I
Speaker 1: never really understood but calls all the hostilities toward us.
Speaker 1: Almost every night we were in firefights or rocket attacks.
Speaker 1: The VA does not consider this a war, so many
Speaker 1: of us don't receive the care we need. Can you
Speaker 1: do a deep dive about the first major a true
Speaker 1: attack on America from Islamic terrorists? Thank you, simplify and
Speaker 1: shields high ps. Tell producer Mark there's room on the
Speaker 1: therapist couch for US mets and Giants fans to ask
Speaker 1: us why we hate ourselves? Well, first, Tim, I did
Speaker 1: do a deep dive on the Marine Barracks bombing some
Speaker 1: years ago. I forget, it might have been five or
Speaker 1: six years ago now. But on the you know, I
Speaker 1: know you're writing in and the anniversary of it will
Speaker 1: be tomorrow, so maybe I can bring back some of
Speaker 1: that and tell people about what happened that day. So
Speaker 1: that's a certainly we appreciate you writing in with that
Speaker 1: and thank you for your service. And as for producer Mark, Yeah, Mets,
Speaker 1: and well, who's worse right now? Mark? For their league?
Speaker 1: The Mets, the Giants. Giants by far, they're terrible. What's
Speaker 1: their record? They're one in five right now, that's rough.
Speaker 1: They have one more win than the Jets do. The
Speaker 1: Jets have not won a game yet, No, and they
Speaker 1: won't dull season. That's got a you know, when you're
Speaker 1: a professional and you're in a competitive lead like that,
Speaker 1: it's gotta be tough to never win a game. But
Speaker 1: we'll have to go and check check that out in time.
Speaker 1: See your producer Marks predictions correct. Everybody, please pass the buck,
Speaker 1: you know how to do it. Get somebody listened, to
Speaker 1: the podcast, new this week during this election season until
Speaker 1: next time, Shields High