WEBVTT - Mini Crush #44

0:00:25.079 --> 0:00:28.800
<v Speaker 1>Hey, everybody, welcome to movie Crush, Mini Crush, Mini crush,

0:00:28.880 --> 0:00:34.000
<v Speaker 1>Movie Crush. You said that was a mouthful. I don't

0:00:34.000 --> 0:00:36.840
<v Speaker 1>even know where we are anymore. How are you doing?

0:00:37.040 --> 0:00:39.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm good man. I've got a little bit of a

0:00:39.560 --> 0:00:42.800
<v Speaker 1>of a of a snuffle off. I guess situation going on. Yeah, people,

0:00:42.800 --> 0:00:45.839
<v Speaker 1>we record these uh in batches sometimes a couple of

0:00:45.920 --> 0:00:48.480
<v Speaker 1>a time, so no one's not been sick for weeks

0:00:48.479 --> 0:00:50.760
<v Speaker 1>and weeks's true. Um, I got sick on my last

0:00:50.840 --> 0:00:53.400
<v Speaker 1>day of travel, uh in l a. I thought i'd,

0:00:53.400 --> 0:00:54.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, I get the funk something, you know, the

0:00:54.920 --> 0:00:58.240
<v Speaker 1>travel funk sometimes. But I thought I was in the clear,

0:00:58.400 --> 0:01:00.520
<v Speaker 1>and then the last day I got it, and I

0:01:00.640 --> 0:01:02.800
<v Speaker 1>got it. Chuck, You shouldn't have gone on that Tinder

0:01:02.880 --> 0:01:06.840
<v Speaker 1>date that where the young lady said I usually have colds.

0:01:06.640 --> 0:01:08.760
<v Speaker 1>That was her big selling point. That was her like

0:01:08.880 --> 0:01:12.160
<v Speaker 1>headline it did they have headlines? Which I think is hot?

0:01:12.360 --> 0:01:16.440
<v Speaker 1>By the way, colds Is there a headline? Get it?

0:01:16.520 --> 0:01:19.720
<v Speaker 1>Colds are hot? That's funny. It was an accent. Yeah, man,

0:01:19.760 --> 0:01:22.760
<v Speaker 1>it's like a profile you gotta have, like a you

0:01:22.800 --> 0:01:25.039
<v Speaker 1>have like a banner headline like of who you are?

0:01:25.959 --> 0:01:28.160
<v Speaker 1>That's not are you are you gonna show me your

0:01:28.200 --> 0:01:30.080
<v Speaker 1>tender profile. No, I just want to see what it says.

0:01:30.080 --> 0:01:33.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm interested. Yeah, so here's here's one. For example, it says,

0:01:33.080 --> 0:01:35.399
<v Speaker 1>if I could donate a million dollars, it would be

0:01:35.480 --> 0:01:38.880
<v Speaker 1>to save all pit bulls and orangutans. And that's just

0:01:38.959 --> 0:01:41.400
<v Speaker 1>sort of like, well, you gotta miss it. My here

0:01:41.720 --> 0:01:43.880
<v Speaker 1>if you want to know as much about me as

0:01:43.920 --> 0:01:45.920
<v Speaker 1>you can in one sentence, just as the sentence it

0:01:45.920 --> 0:01:49.200
<v Speaker 1>goes even further. My dream dinner guest is Elizabeth Warren. Wow,

0:01:49.200 --> 0:01:52.440
<v Speaker 1>this is a very progressive young lady. Most recent act

0:01:52.520 --> 0:01:56.560
<v Speaker 1>of kindness told somebody they dropped their phone. And is

0:01:56.600 --> 0:02:00.240
<v Speaker 1>this accompanied by a photo? It's a come, I need

0:02:00.240 --> 0:02:02.080
<v Speaker 1>buy a montage of photos. The first thing you see

0:02:02.080 --> 0:02:04.560
<v Speaker 1>as a picture with their name and then their age

0:02:04.800 --> 0:02:07.600
<v Speaker 1>and what they do if and this is on bumble,

0:02:07.720 --> 0:02:11.120
<v Speaker 1>which is this? This is like tender for young professionals.

0:02:12.200 --> 0:02:14.360
<v Speaker 1>Then you scroll through and it gives you some stats

0:02:14.400 --> 0:02:17.080
<v Speaker 1>about whether they like smoke, how tall they are, and

0:02:17.120 --> 0:02:19.560
<v Speaker 1>then you've got this little headline about saving pit bulls

0:02:19.560 --> 0:02:23.200
<v Speaker 1>and stuff. Man, just trying to bring you around to

0:02:23.240 --> 0:02:24.960
<v Speaker 1>the now, Chuck, this is how the kids do it

0:02:24.960 --> 0:02:27.359
<v Speaker 1>these days, I'm so out of it. Man, Do you

0:02:27.400 --> 0:02:29.800
<v Speaker 1>know what I did in my day? You went to

0:02:29.880 --> 0:02:32.400
<v Speaker 1>a place in humans. I would go to a bar

0:02:32.880 --> 0:02:35.560
<v Speaker 1>and hang out with my friends and never talk to

0:02:35.600 --> 0:02:38.320
<v Speaker 1>girls because I was just enjoying hanging out with my friends.

0:02:39.639 --> 0:02:42.000
<v Speaker 1>That's the thing that I keep saying. Never like the

0:02:42.040 --> 0:02:45.280
<v Speaker 1>guy who went and like, you know, Friday night, let

0:02:45.280 --> 0:02:47.760
<v Speaker 1>me go out and meet somebody. Anybody does that, dude?

0:02:47.760 --> 0:02:50.760
<v Speaker 1>Like that is just beyond my reblem of understanding. I

0:02:50.800 --> 0:02:53.760
<v Speaker 1>go to bars with my friends, and I keep saying,

0:02:53.800 --> 0:02:57.160
<v Speaker 1>maybe one day I'll just have a chance encounter, you

0:02:57.200 --> 0:02:59.600
<v Speaker 1>know that maybe that's what will happen. Well, that's the

0:02:59.639 --> 0:03:01.919
<v Speaker 1>only like as a result, I didn't date a lot.

0:03:02.000 --> 0:03:04.680
<v Speaker 1>I always had like how do you mean Emily, Well,

0:03:04.760 --> 0:03:08.720
<v Speaker 1>Emily and I were friends and people, that's the way,

0:03:08.840 --> 0:03:12.160
<v Speaker 1>Like anyone that was ever my girlfriend. I and I

0:03:12.160 --> 0:03:14.000
<v Speaker 1>didn't have a lot of them, but I had a few,

0:03:14.040 --> 0:03:16.280
<v Speaker 1>like long, steady girlfriends, and they were all people I

0:03:16.360 --> 0:03:19.520
<v Speaker 1>met through friends or through work or something. It was

0:03:19.600 --> 0:03:21.800
<v Speaker 1>never just like, Hey, I'm gonna go out and get

0:03:21.840 --> 0:03:24.680
<v Speaker 1>a phone number tonight. No, I you know, I don't know.

0:03:24.760 --> 0:03:26.960
<v Speaker 1>I didn't how to do that. I still don't That's

0:03:26.960 --> 0:03:29.480
<v Speaker 1>why the tender thing is is appealing to me because

0:03:29.840 --> 0:03:32.519
<v Speaker 1>it's a relatively say, you know, everyone's on there for

0:03:32.560 --> 0:03:35.480
<v Speaker 1>the same reason, and there's no worry of like walking

0:03:35.520 --> 0:03:37.040
<v Speaker 1>up to a girl in a bar and her like

0:03:37.200 --> 0:03:40.040
<v Speaker 1>looking at you, like, get away from me, creep. You know,

0:03:40.600 --> 0:03:42.880
<v Speaker 1>if I was young and single, I would totally probably

0:03:42.960 --> 0:03:46.560
<v Speaker 1>try that sort of dating just because it would make

0:03:46.640 --> 0:03:49.880
<v Speaker 1>me date, which I never did. And it's you know,

0:03:50.000 --> 0:03:53.120
<v Speaker 1>probably like you can just say like, hi, you seem

0:03:53.160 --> 0:03:54.960
<v Speaker 1>like a nice person and we have something in common.

0:03:55.000 --> 0:03:59.800
<v Speaker 1>But it has its own pitfalls though. There's all of issues.

0:04:00.160 --> 0:04:03.200
<v Speaker 1>It's like women get way more matches than men and

0:04:03.240 --> 0:04:06.800
<v Speaker 1>therefore are inundated by lots of creeps that are the

0:04:06.920 --> 0:04:09.880
<v Speaker 1>kind of wade through that if you're an actual decent

0:04:10.040 --> 0:04:14.240
<v Speaker 1>ish guy. Nightmare it can be for everybody kind of yeah,

0:04:14.280 --> 0:04:17.680
<v Speaker 1>all because it creeps exactly exactly. They're sucking it up

0:04:17.720 --> 0:04:20.239
<v Speaker 1>for everybody, really are man and then then they exist.

0:04:20.520 --> 0:04:24.279
<v Speaker 1>I r L and online yep. Um, all right, let's

0:04:24.320 --> 0:04:29.840
<v Speaker 1>start it off with some poles nol not but poles. Uh,

0:04:29.880 --> 0:04:31.640
<v Speaker 1>this one is pretty easy. I just went with Pole

0:04:31.680 --> 0:04:35.200
<v Speaker 1>truth Eminem's player Peanut, and I have to shout out

0:04:35.279 --> 0:04:38.880
<v Speaker 1>all the people that said trick question peanut butter. A

0:04:38.960 --> 0:04:41.440
<v Speaker 1>lot of people said that in the comments have you

0:04:41.440 --> 0:04:44.400
<v Speaker 1>ever had peanut butter? They're they're really good. I like

0:04:44.600 --> 0:04:47.440
<v Speaker 1>the crunch of the nut though, well I'm a peanut

0:04:47.520 --> 0:04:50.760
<v Speaker 1>guy for sure, but peanut butter is good. And someone

0:04:50.839 --> 0:04:53.840
<v Speaker 1>even mentioned the pretzel ones. Here's what I say. They

0:04:53.960 --> 0:04:56.360
<v Speaker 1>do not make the mistake of getting the caramel. Although

0:04:56.600 --> 0:04:59.920
<v Speaker 1>all apologies to Alicia Deats she said caramel, I don't.

0:05:00.000 --> 0:05:01.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't care for those. Let's just to get stuck

0:05:01.600 --> 0:05:05.640
<v Speaker 1>in your teeth. And it's a lot of It's a

0:05:05.640 --> 0:05:08.200
<v Speaker 1>lot of caramel to eat in one sitting, you know

0:05:08.200 --> 0:05:11.200
<v Speaker 1>what I mean? I want I want a single caramel bite.

0:05:11.240 --> 0:05:14.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't want an entire bag of caramel items. You know, sure?

0:05:14.360 --> 0:05:18.080
<v Speaker 1>I agree? Uh And also shout out to Trevor Dolinski

0:05:18.760 --> 0:05:23.040
<v Speaker 1>who says they're both gross skittles. Are you kidding me? So?

0:05:23.760 --> 0:05:28.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't awful, I'm skiing. Shout out to who was

0:05:28.560 --> 0:05:31.599
<v Speaker 1>it this sentence? That box of stuff? Then that's a Lopez.

0:05:31.640 --> 0:05:33.520
<v Speaker 1>Are we going to thank her on every show? Only

0:05:33.560 --> 0:05:36.520
<v Speaker 1>because she included two giant bags of peanut eminem So

0:05:36.560 --> 0:05:38.839
<v Speaker 1>clearly she has cast her a lot in the peanut

0:05:38.839 --> 0:05:41.760
<v Speaker 1>Eminem's camp, did she? I didn't see those. I gave

0:05:41.800 --> 0:05:44.680
<v Speaker 1>them away because I didn't want them, Now, that's right, Sorry, Chuck,

0:05:45.560 --> 0:05:46.839
<v Speaker 1>I know. And then I hold on a second, let

0:05:46.880 --> 0:05:49.560
<v Speaker 1>me say why I didn't want them Because they're delicious

0:05:49.560 --> 0:05:51.600
<v Speaker 1>and I would have eaten them all and I'm trying

0:05:51.640 --> 0:05:53.960
<v Speaker 1>not to be a fat boy, so that I gave

0:05:54.000 --> 0:05:57.240
<v Speaker 1>them away to. You know, the more bodily blessed folks

0:05:57.240 --> 0:06:00.080
<v Speaker 1>in our office. They just sit around and eat that

0:06:00.120 --> 0:06:01.880
<v Speaker 1>ship in one of our face and just keep getting

0:06:02.680 --> 0:06:08.279
<v Speaker 1>so funny. Okay, next poll, nol pull truth best Thanksgiving movie?

0:06:09.200 --> 0:06:13.000
<v Speaker 1>I can only pick two. Everyone. I apologize. You know what, dude,

0:06:13.680 --> 0:06:16.640
<v Speaker 1>I didn't even say who won the plan or peanut contest?

0:06:16.680 --> 0:06:19.440
<v Speaker 1>And I deleted it already. What well, you don't even know.

0:06:19.640 --> 0:06:21.919
<v Speaker 1>You don't remember now, I didn't even look because I

0:06:21.960 --> 0:06:24.640
<v Speaker 1>was looking at the comments, and then I just hid delete. Man,

0:06:24.800 --> 0:06:26.920
<v Speaker 1>we had that great conversation. I'm sorry, but now it's

0:06:26.960 --> 0:06:29.440
<v Speaker 1>my fault. I derail that with the whole Vanessa Lopez,

0:06:29.520 --> 0:06:33.040
<v Speaker 1>here's my prediction. I believe that peanut one that probably

0:06:33.040 --> 0:06:37.280
<v Speaker 1>one out. I don't think plane is the favored majority.

0:06:37.360 --> 0:06:40.359
<v Speaker 1>I would be interested to see sales figures for plane

0:06:40.480 --> 0:06:41.960
<v Speaker 1>versus you know that maybe we could figure it out

0:06:41.960 --> 0:06:46.159
<v Speaker 1>that do a quick sargenal. Sorry about that, everyone, What

0:06:46.240 --> 0:06:48.880
<v Speaker 1>a dumb dumb uh. This is a professional podcast, for

0:06:48.920 --> 0:06:52.640
<v Speaker 1>God's sakes, So pull truth. Best Thanksgiving movie and sort

0:06:52.640 --> 0:06:54.159
<v Speaker 1>of the biggest two that came to mind for me.

0:06:54.200 --> 0:06:58.360
<v Speaker 1>We're planes, trains and automobiles and Home for the Holidays.

0:06:59.360 --> 0:07:04.840
<v Speaker 1>Do you see Home of the Holidays, Holly Hunter? Oh? Yeah,

0:07:05.040 --> 0:07:06.680
<v Speaker 1>I saw that in the theater a long time ago.

0:07:06.880 --> 0:07:09.800
<v Speaker 1>That was a cool, intense little movie. It was good.

0:07:09.840 --> 0:07:13.320
<v Speaker 1>It was funny, but have some kind of intense stuff

0:07:13.320 --> 0:07:16.160
<v Speaker 1>in it, like because it God. Oh, I think so.

0:07:16.280 --> 0:07:17.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm trying to remember it is one of the like

0:07:18.120 --> 0:07:20.320
<v Speaker 1>a drug addict or something, or there was some family.

0:07:20.360 --> 0:07:22.720
<v Speaker 1>Foster directed this movie. Actually, I think you're right. I

0:07:22.720 --> 0:07:24.680
<v Speaker 1>remember really liking that and seeing in the theaters a

0:07:24.680 --> 0:07:26.520
<v Speaker 1>long time ago, but I don't remember much about it.

0:07:26.680 --> 0:07:30.960
<v Speaker 1>There may have been some sort of uh are you

0:07:30.960 --> 0:07:34.240
<v Speaker 1>thinking of the family stone that movie? Well, it would

0:07:34.240 --> 0:07:36.920
<v Speaker 1>spoil it. That had a family tragedy I think involved,

0:07:37.160 --> 0:07:39.040
<v Speaker 1>But I don't think Home for the Holidays did was

0:07:39.080 --> 0:07:42.880
<v Speaker 1>definitely directed by Jodie Foster. Very good movie. In one

0:07:42.920 --> 0:07:45.440
<v Speaker 1>line or the little log line, it's got Steve Guttenberg

0:07:45.520 --> 0:07:48.720
<v Speaker 1>in He's he's apparently a snob and uh. And Cynthia

0:07:48.760 --> 0:07:52.040
<v Speaker 1>Stevenson apparently is a long suffering sister. And then we

0:07:52.120 --> 0:07:54.520
<v Speaker 1>have In Bancroft and Charles Darning they were great, and

0:07:54.560 --> 0:07:58.320
<v Speaker 1>Geraldine Chaplin who was apparently a nutty aunt. But then

0:07:58.400 --> 0:08:01.880
<v Speaker 1>the evening gets interesting when sparks fly between Claudia and

0:08:01.920 --> 0:08:06.800
<v Speaker 1>her brother's handsome friend, Leo Fish played by Dylan McDermott.

0:08:06.960 --> 0:08:09.680
<v Speaker 1>He was funny in this. Actually, Leo Fish. That's a name.

0:08:09.920 --> 0:08:12.040
<v Speaker 1>That is a great name. That's a It's a name

0:08:12.080 --> 0:08:16.720
<v Speaker 1>only a screenwriter could come up with. Uh, this is overwhelming.

0:08:17.520 --> 0:08:20.240
<v Speaker 1>Five and seventy nine people said planes, trains, and automobiles

0:08:20.240 --> 0:08:24.480
<v Speaker 1>and only said Home for the Holidays. Uh, that that's

0:08:24.480 --> 0:08:27.320
<v Speaker 1>to be expected. I didn't think it would crush uh

0:08:27.480 --> 0:08:30.200
<v Speaker 1>that much. But Home for the Holidays is a really,

0:08:30.280 --> 0:08:33.640
<v Speaker 1>really good Thanksgiving movie. And like I said, planes, trains

0:08:33.640 --> 0:08:37.200
<v Speaker 1>and automobiles gives me serious anxiety. Yeah, I know, because

0:08:37.240 --> 0:08:39.320
<v Speaker 1>they're just late and they don't have their car and

0:08:39.520 --> 0:08:41.480
<v Speaker 1>they don't have their trains. They're having all these travel

0:08:41.559 --> 0:08:45.960
<v Speaker 1>logistic problems. You know, are you have travel stress? I

0:08:46.040 --> 0:08:48.400
<v Speaker 1>just want to I want everything to work out, you know.

0:08:48.720 --> 0:08:50.360
<v Speaker 1>I try to do everything in my power to be

0:08:50.400 --> 0:08:53.480
<v Speaker 1>prepared and to like, you know, get places on time. Right,

0:08:53.480 --> 0:08:55.800
<v Speaker 1>You're good, little boy scout trying to be uh. Mike

0:08:55.800 --> 0:08:59.480
<v Speaker 1>Shapiro in the comment says, Pieces of April. I gotta

0:08:59.480 --> 0:09:01.280
<v Speaker 1>shout that out because I love that movie too, Mike.

0:09:01.320 --> 0:09:03.760
<v Speaker 1>And that is a great Thanksgiving movie, but just a

0:09:03.760 --> 0:09:08.080
<v Speaker 1>little too obscure. Forty fift choice, he says, is Patricia

0:09:08.120 --> 0:09:11.240
<v Speaker 1>Clarkson's best role. I don't know about that, but boy,

0:09:11.320 --> 0:09:13.439
<v Speaker 1>she was great and that was just a really good movie.

0:09:13.880 --> 0:09:17.559
<v Speaker 1>So highly recommend everyonece he Pieces of April. Janet Cooke

0:09:17.640 --> 0:09:20.760
<v Speaker 1>Coon says, Chuck, this isn't a fair poll. Yeah, I

0:09:20.800 --> 0:09:27.480
<v Speaker 1>get it, I get it. Thank Facebook for that everyone. Um.

0:09:27.600 --> 0:09:32.240
<v Speaker 1>Sheila Hartwell says Son in Law wasn't an option. That's funny.

0:09:32.280 --> 0:09:34.240
<v Speaker 1>I didn't know that was a Thanksgiving movie. I don't

0:09:34.280 --> 0:09:36.560
<v Speaker 1>think I ever saw that. I never saw any poly

0:09:36.640 --> 0:09:41.440
<v Speaker 1>Shore movie all, not even a Nope Incino man, Nope,

0:09:41.880 --> 0:09:44.920
<v Speaker 1>you don't know about We's in the juice? You mean

0:09:45.000 --> 0:09:46.960
<v Speaker 1>Duke in the stats, We's in the juice. This is

0:09:46.960 --> 0:09:51.000
<v Speaker 1>when he goes in He's the weasel. He already had

0:09:51.000 --> 0:09:52.480
<v Speaker 1>that in his like stand up, right. That was just

0:09:52.520 --> 0:09:54.440
<v Speaker 1>funny because I liked him on MTV and I thought

0:09:54.440 --> 0:09:55.520
<v Speaker 1>he was kind of funny. I don't know why I

0:09:55.559 --> 0:09:57.560
<v Speaker 1>didn't see any of those dumb movies. Yeah, they're real dumb.

0:09:57.559 --> 0:09:59.880
<v Speaker 1>And in Sino Man, he goes into like a gas station,

0:10:00.040 --> 0:10:02.720
<v Speaker 1>a seven eleven, and he he like sticks his head under

0:10:02.760 --> 0:10:06.720
<v Speaker 1>the frosty machine and starts pouring it directly into his

0:10:06.800 --> 0:10:11.960
<v Speaker 1>mouth because he calls it. We's in the jit link

0:10:12.040 --> 0:10:14.120
<v Speaker 1>and I are cruising the mountain, bro, and we figured

0:10:14.280 --> 0:10:19.640
<v Speaker 1>we's a little jit. How do you not know this?

0:10:19.640 --> 0:10:23.480
<v Speaker 1>This is an important part of the cultural zeitgeist. That

0:10:23.520 --> 0:10:25.960
<v Speaker 1>was an MTV kid though of course I like the weasel.

0:10:26.040 --> 0:10:29.719
<v Speaker 1>That was funny, all right, Poul truth Dirty Dancings I

0:10:29.760 --> 0:10:31.520
<v Speaker 1>did a couple of days. Emily thought these were great.

0:10:31.640 --> 0:10:33.679
<v Speaker 1>She helped me come up with them too. Um, she

0:10:33.800 --> 0:10:38.040
<v Speaker 1>helped me write these Dirty dancings. Baby and Johnny, the

0:10:38.160 --> 0:10:44.559
<v Speaker 1>very famous couple from Dirty Dancing. Five years later, Splitsville

0:10:44.920 --> 0:10:49.120
<v Speaker 1>or still Dancing, I think that's an interesting question. Isn't

0:10:49.120 --> 0:10:52.000
<v Speaker 1>there a Dirty Dancing sequel Havanna Knights. Yeah, but I don't.

0:10:52.000 --> 0:10:53.959
<v Speaker 1>I don't think I had anything to do with them.

0:10:54.000 --> 0:10:55.760
<v Speaker 1>I might be wrong. I didn't see it, you know what.

0:10:55.800 --> 0:10:57.600
<v Speaker 1>I remember hearing a great story about like I think

0:10:57.640 --> 0:11:00.480
<v Speaker 1>Peter Segel, the guy that hosts Wait Wait, dar and

0:11:00.520 --> 0:11:03.240
<v Speaker 1>tell me. Yeah, he actually wrote the screenplay that got

0:11:03.240 --> 0:11:07.400
<v Speaker 1>turned into Dirty Dancing Havana Knights, But it wasn't ever

0:11:07.600 --> 0:11:10.080
<v Speaker 1>intended to be a dirty dancing movie. Was actually based

0:11:10.120 --> 0:11:12.920
<v Speaker 1>on some experience that he had had, like cool Cuban dancing. Yeah,

0:11:12.960 --> 0:11:15.600
<v Speaker 1>and then the studio like had the rights to make

0:11:15.640 --> 0:11:19.840
<v Speaker 1>another Dirty Dancing and slapped it right. I'm pretty sure

0:11:19.880 --> 0:11:21.120
<v Speaker 1>it was. It was it was either him or or

0:11:21.440 --> 0:11:22.640
<v Speaker 1>one of the other guys that do one of those

0:11:22.720 --> 0:11:25.360
<v Speaker 1>quiz type shows. But that's funny. I don't know, man,

0:11:25.360 --> 0:11:28.240
<v Speaker 1>I've never seen Dirty Dancing. Uh, that's a whole I

0:11:28.280 --> 0:11:30.840
<v Speaker 1>know that they have the time of their lives though. Yeah,

0:11:30.880 --> 0:11:32.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean I've seen it because and they owe it

0:11:32.679 --> 0:11:34.800
<v Speaker 1>to each other. Emily loves that movie. So I've seen

0:11:34.840 --> 0:11:38.080
<v Speaker 1>it a bunch at my house on TV, like when

0:11:38.120 --> 0:11:41.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm working and stuff in bed. But uh, I think

0:11:41.679 --> 0:11:43.360
<v Speaker 1>I might have even seen it when it came out,

0:11:43.480 --> 0:11:47.520
<v Speaker 1>like pre Emily, it's my dirty secret, so you're dirty

0:11:47.600 --> 0:11:52.520
<v Speaker 1>dancing secret. I think Emily agreed to four of you

0:11:52.520 --> 0:11:54.560
<v Speaker 1>said splits Field, there's no way that baby and Johnny

0:11:54.559 --> 0:11:57.079
<v Speaker 1>are still together, and only a hundred and seventy one

0:11:57.120 --> 0:12:00.439
<v Speaker 1>people are deerhearted enough to say they're still dancing, just

0:12:00.559 --> 0:12:03.400
<v Speaker 1>dancing away into the sunset, still dancing. They just have

0:12:03.480 --> 0:12:04.880
<v Speaker 1>to dance all the time. Is that part of the

0:12:04.920 --> 0:12:07.160
<v Speaker 1>rules of the movie, that is they're always dancing? Now,

0:12:07.400 --> 0:12:11.800
<v Speaker 1>it's like basketball, you can't stop dribbling. Uh, what about

0:12:11.840 --> 0:12:15.040
<v Speaker 1>Flash Dance? Is that the same No? Is it the

0:12:15.040 --> 0:12:17.800
<v Speaker 1>same movie? Good Lord and All? Is it the same

0:12:17.840 --> 0:12:20.920
<v Speaker 1>type of movie? No, not at all. If Dirty Dancing

0:12:21.000 --> 0:12:24.920
<v Speaker 1>is a very sort of Sacharin love story, it's a musical,

0:12:25.040 --> 0:12:29.760
<v Speaker 1>right about about this family in the fifties that goes

0:12:29.800 --> 0:12:32.480
<v Speaker 1>on vacation and like the I think it's like the

0:12:32.480 --> 0:12:35.640
<v Speaker 1>cat Skills or something for the summer, and they do

0:12:35.720 --> 0:12:38.839
<v Speaker 1>this every year. And there's a dancing instructor that's a

0:12:38.840 --> 0:12:43.240
<v Speaker 1>little older, paid by the sways and uh, he has

0:12:43.280 --> 0:12:47.319
<v Speaker 1>a little affair with a daughter of a guest. I

0:12:47.440 --> 0:12:49.360
<v Speaker 1>must be thinking of foot Loose. That is kind of

0:12:49.360 --> 0:12:52.360
<v Speaker 1>a musical, right, isn't that one? Like, No, there's a

0:12:52.400 --> 0:12:56.080
<v Speaker 1>lot of music, soundtrack heavy, but there's dancing. How do

0:12:56.160 --> 0:12:58.520
<v Speaker 1>they how do they justify these dance numbers just out

0:12:58.520 --> 0:13:00.760
<v Speaker 1>of out of the clear blue sky. Well, it's interesting.

0:13:00.840 --> 0:13:04.480
<v Speaker 1>There there was a certain genre of movie that you

0:13:04.520 --> 0:13:07.240
<v Speaker 1>can't call a musical because they're not singing, but their

0:13:07.320 --> 0:13:10.600
<v Speaker 1>dance movies to where people will break out and dance

0:13:10.720 --> 0:13:14.120
<v Speaker 1>to music that you're hearing in the theater as if

0:13:14.160 --> 0:13:17.920
<v Speaker 1>it is broadcast in the film somehow, although in the movies,

0:13:18.280 --> 0:13:20.080
<v Speaker 1>I think there usually is music playing, Like in the

0:13:20.160 --> 0:13:23.920
<v Speaker 1>very famous foot Loose, Dancing through the the fucking hay

0:13:23.960 --> 0:13:28.200
<v Speaker 1>Barn or whatever with Kevin Bacon. He pops in very clearly,

0:13:28.200 --> 0:13:30.320
<v Speaker 1>pops in a cassette tape and as v W bug

0:13:30.320 --> 0:13:33.000
<v Speaker 1>and opens the doors and cranks it up, and it's,

0:13:33.240 --> 0:13:36.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, like there's no one else around. It's just

0:13:36.320 --> 0:13:40.720
<v Speaker 1>Kevin Kevin Bacon working on his moves. Okay, Yeah, which

0:13:40.720 --> 0:13:45.800
<v Speaker 1>are both dance and gymnastic. I need to see foot Loose,

0:13:46.240 --> 0:13:47.920
<v Speaker 1>it's good. I should watch all of these. I should

0:13:47.920 --> 0:13:52.280
<v Speaker 1>do like a dance eighties dance trilogy. Yeah, because I'm

0:13:52.280 --> 0:13:54.320
<v Speaker 1>trying to think of other movies, I mean dirty dancing

0:13:54.360 --> 0:13:55.839
<v Speaker 1>that it was the music that was in the movie

0:13:55.880 --> 0:13:58.640
<v Speaker 1>because there were dance instructors, so the music was you know,

0:13:58.840 --> 0:14:01.480
<v Speaker 1>it made sense. Question why is it? Why is it

0:14:01.520 --> 0:14:07.079
<v Speaker 1>dirty dancing? And here's the deal is um during the daytime,

0:14:07.240 --> 0:14:10.320
<v Speaker 1>all these dancing structures teach like the tango and all

0:14:10.360 --> 0:14:13.280
<v Speaker 1>these very traditional things to like the senior citizens of

0:14:13.679 --> 0:14:16.920
<v Speaker 1>the camp or whatever. But at night and they get

0:14:16.960 --> 0:14:19.880
<v Speaker 1>together and they get in the back of halls with

0:14:19.920 --> 0:14:23.280
<v Speaker 1>the lights down and a little dirty dance which is

0:14:23.280 --> 0:14:26.800
<v Speaker 1>basically just grinding, like real sexy. I got it, Okay, Yeah,

0:14:27.080 --> 0:14:29.240
<v Speaker 1>So she goes to one of these parties after hours,

0:14:29.480 --> 0:14:32.720
<v Speaker 1>baby does She's like, who's that guy? And this Johnny?

0:14:32.760 --> 0:14:35.040
<v Speaker 1>So she had a bit of an awakening, you could say.

0:14:35.040 --> 0:14:38.520
<v Speaker 1>So it's actually not a bad movie. Well I'm not.

0:14:38.560 --> 0:14:40.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm not. I'm not trying to talk like it was

0:14:40.160 --> 0:14:42.320
<v Speaker 1>a huge movie for a reason, like it was still okay.

0:14:42.360 --> 0:14:44.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm just trying to wrap my head around the genre,

0:14:44.280 --> 0:14:46.040
<v Speaker 1>Like what the genre of these type of movies, because

0:14:46.040 --> 0:14:48.000
<v Speaker 1>they don't seem like musicals, and they don't seem like

0:14:48.040 --> 0:14:51.240
<v Speaker 1>the narrative. There's something yeah, the Flash Dance was the

0:14:51.280 --> 0:14:54.480
<v Speaker 1>same way it was, and like Saturday Night Fever. They

0:14:54.720 --> 0:14:56.800
<v Speaker 1>no one's singing in any of these movies, but there

0:14:56.800 --> 0:14:59.760
<v Speaker 1>are plenty of dancing. What about Breaking two Electric Boogaloo.

0:15:00.520 --> 0:15:02.840
<v Speaker 1>Flashdance is good though. You should see that. That's a

0:15:02.880 --> 0:15:07.960
<v Speaker 1>story of empowerment, female empowerment. Sort of for the time.

0:15:15.280 --> 0:15:17.440
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's do another pole. We're gonna finish these up.

0:15:19.120 --> 0:15:20.560
<v Speaker 1>A lot of commentary. No one's going to have you

0:15:20.600 --> 0:15:24.840
<v Speaker 1>back me and here commented saving it up, Chuck, you

0:15:24.840 --> 0:15:26.440
<v Speaker 1>didn't you took a vow. So I had no one

0:15:26.480 --> 0:15:28.800
<v Speaker 1>to talk to. I was by myself in l A. Yeah,

0:15:28.840 --> 0:15:30.360
<v Speaker 1>I was. I was traveling alone. Do you not have

0:15:30.400 --> 0:15:32.720
<v Speaker 1>any peeps there? Oh? I do? I okay, folks hung

0:15:32.760 --> 0:15:34.920
<v Speaker 1>out with some folks. But it was just like, yeah,

0:15:35.160 --> 0:15:37.520
<v Speaker 1>I was like I've got some Yeah, please lone me

0:15:37.560 --> 0:15:39.400
<v Speaker 1>some peeps. But l A is also like so spread out,

0:15:39.440 --> 0:15:41.640
<v Speaker 1>and everyone's like I was there during the weekends of pain,

0:15:41.680 --> 0:15:43.200
<v Speaker 1>and he asked for anyone to get anywhere. They're like,

0:15:43.200 --> 0:15:47.080
<v Speaker 1>where are you That's the first question to lask Like, hey, man,

0:15:47.120 --> 0:15:49.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm in town. Where are you staying? Because I'm not

0:15:49.720 --> 0:15:54.280
<v Speaker 1>coming to you alright, many crushed pole truth, full frontal

0:15:54.360 --> 0:15:58.840
<v Speaker 1>nudity and your choices. We're sure why not or no

0:15:58.960 --> 0:16:01.000
<v Speaker 1>private parts? Please? You mean do I want to see it?

0:16:01.080 --> 0:16:04.240
<v Speaker 1>Or will I do it? Will you do it? Depends

0:16:04.280 --> 0:16:07.560
<v Speaker 1>on how much you're talking? Uh? Do you want to

0:16:07.600 --> 0:16:10.640
<v Speaker 1>see it? Of course? Why do I care? Yeah? I

0:16:10.680 --> 0:16:12.200
<v Speaker 1>don't want to, like take I want to know in

0:16:12.280 --> 0:16:14.600
<v Speaker 1>advance if a movie I'm going to with, like my

0:16:14.680 --> 0:16:17.320
<v Speaker 1>mom or my ten year old has you know, hanging

0:16:17.360 --> 0:16:20.000
<v Speaker 1>dong or whatever, I definitely want to know any a chance.

0:16:20.200 --> 0:16:22.680
<v Speaker 1>Here's my deal. If it's like, if it serves a story,

0:16:22.760 --> 0:16:24.560
<v Speaker 1>then fine, I'm not I'm not going to be prudish

0:16:24.560 --> 0:16:28.680
<v Speaker 1>about it. Uh. For women, you know, they there's generally

0:16:28.760 --> 0:16:31.880
<v Speaker 1>some giant mrkin that's what they call it. You know

0:16:32.000 --> 0:16:35.480
<v Speaker 1>this this false pubic hairpiece, it's a pubic wig to

0:16:35.840 --> 0:16:38.800
<v Speaker 1>cover pubic wig, to you know, cover the parts that

0:16:39.280 --> 0:16:41.080
<v Speaker 1>like you don't really want to it's not a porn

0:16:42.160 --> 0:16:43.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, it doesn't happen, it doesn't have to be.

0:16:44.520 --> 0:16:49.520
<v Speaker 1>And then for dudes hanging their dong out, like again,

0:16:49.560 --> 0:16:51.640
<v Speaker 1>it's not porn. So I don't want to get too

0:16:51.640 --> 0:16:53.880
<v Speaker 1>crazy here, but it's not like it's never erect. You

0:16:53.920 --> 0:16:55.800
<v Speaker 1>know who loves doing it's just a dog shot is

0:16:56.000 --> 0:16:59.160
<v Speaker 1>Harvey Kitel. He loves he loves a good dog. Hang. Yeah,

0:16:59.240 --> 0:17:01.720
<v Speaker 1>have you seen Oddly Tenant? It's one of the one

0:17:01.720 --> 0:17:03.760
<v Speaker 1>of the last shots in the movie is him. Yeah,

0:17:04.040 --> 0:17:08.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, flaccid dong hang. And then he has shown

0:17:08.440 --> 0:17:10.680
<v Speaker 1>his dog. You got the piano, there's a there's a

0:17:10.760 --> 0:17:12.440
<v Speaker 1>hang in that one too. Yeah, he showed his dong

0:17:12.440 --> 0:17:14.359
<v Speaker 1>on that one. He was not shy. But that's the

0:17:14.359 --> 0:17:17.280
<v Speaker 1>thing that's interesting, is you Definitely I feel like women

0:17:17.280 --> 0:17:20.639
<v Speaker 1>are more pressured to do it than man obviously, but

0:17:20.680 --> 0:17:23.639
<v Speaker 1>it's also when it happens with a man in a movie,

0:17:23.800 --> 0:17:27.040
<v Speaker 1>it usually is a little bit more deliberate, like it's

0:17:27.040 --> 0:17:29.720
<v Speaker 1>like this is I don't know, not important, but like

0:17:30.200 --> 0:17:32.400
<v Speaker 1>they don't they certainly don't. A bigger deal was made

0:17:32.400 --> 0:17:36.160
<v Speaker 1>about it, I sure, like with Chasing not Chasing Amy,

0:17:36.240 --> 0:17:43.359
<v Speaker 1>Serving Silverman Forgetting Sarah Marshall. You're right, that's a different

0:17:43.359 --> 0:17:45.720
<v Speaker 1>movie entirely. But Jason Segel showed his dong and it

0:17:45.760 --> 0:17:49.080
<v Speaker 1>was like the subjective every single movie review and article

0:17:49.080 --> 0:17:51.719
<v Speaker 1>about it. But that was funny, the fact that that

0:17:51.800 --> 0:17:54.760
<v Speaker 1>full frontal nudity really played into the gag. Yeah, it

0:17:54.840 --> 0:17:57.480
<v Speaker 1>was shocking for sure, because all of a sudden happens

0:17:57.520 --> 0:18:00.399
<v Speaker 1>and you're like, whoa, you're also I didn't this was

0:18:00.440 --> 0:18:02.840
<v Speaker 1>this kind of movie, is kind of picture. Yeah, it

0:18:02.960 --> 0:18:05.320
<v Speaker 1>was a bold choice. Yeah, I agree, all right, so

0:18:05.400 --> 0:18:09.000
<v Speaker 1>that's what we feel. Um everyone, seven d and thirty

0:18:09.040 --> 0:18:11.159
<v Speaker 1>of you are not perdition. You just said sure, why not?

0:18:11.720 --> 0:18:13.560
<v Speaker 1>And a hundred and fifty eight of you though, said

0:18:13.640 --> 0:18:15.760
<v Speaker 1>no private parts please? No, they don't want to see

0:18:15.840 --> 0:18:21.360
<v Speaker 1>dong or uh? Is the plural Merkan Merkin or Merkins?

0:18:21.920 --> 0:18:23.639
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, but it's Mark. I think it's Merkins,

0:18:23.680 --> 0:18:25.240
<v Speaker 1>sort of like like a hundred wild Merkan in the

0:18:25.280 --> 0:18:27.840
<v Speaker 1>world wild Mark. Yeah. Do you remember the name of

0:18:27.880 --> 0:18:33.480
<v Speaker 1>the president in Doctor Strangelove? Oh? Man, I remember Dmitri

0:18:33.600 --> 0:18:37.240
<v Speaker 1>because he said it over and over. No, what was

0:18:37.240 --> 0:18:42.080
<v Speaker 1>it as President Merkin? Muffly God, I can't believe it.

0:18:42.200 --> 0:18:45.600
<v Speaker 1>Remember that. That's funny. It's a very kubrick In joke.

0:18:47.600 --> 0:18:50.920
<v Speaker 1>Um Art Riddle says it's actually more annoying when people

0:18:50.920 --> 0:18:55.640
<v Speaker 1>are conveniently wrapped in sheets to hide. It's a good point. Uh,

0:18:55.680 --> 0:19:00.240
<v Speaker 1>And Adrian Crane says, yes, I assume with a caveat

0:19:00.400 --> 0:19:03.359
<v Speaker 1>if the story calls for it. I'm over the gratuity

0:19:03.400 --> 0:19:08.800
<v Speaker 1>of it, especially female full frontal cough cough, hbo. Yeah,

0:19:08.840 --> 0:19:10.840
<v Speaker 1>she's probably talking about what's it called, Game of Thrones.

0:19:11.040 --> 0:19:14.639
<v Speaker 1>Game of Thrones. Yeah, I don't know, like um, and

0:19:14.680 --> 0:19:17.800
<v Speaker 1>I totally agree. That's like, that's just bullshit in this

0:19:17.880 --> 0:19:19.840
<v Speaker 1>day and age to be like, hey, throw some naked

0:19:19.880 --> 0:19:21.760
<v Speaker 1>lady out there. Well, but then, I mean, I would

0:19:21.800 --> 0:19:24.959
<v Speaker 1>say more so in West World because in Westworld, the

0:19:25.040 --> 0:19:29.560
<v Speaker 1>robot characters are always naked when they're like being serviced

0:19:29.640 --> 0:19:33.400
<v Speaker 1>or whatever, like yeah, but they're always naked. So that's

0:19:33.760 --> 0:19:36.080
<v Speaker 1>that You could you could argue that that does serve

0:19:36.119 --> 0:19:37.919
<v Speaker 1>the plot. You could also argue that it's like an

0:19:37.960 --> 0:19:41.160
<v Speaker 1>opportunity does have nudity comes right. Interesting. That is one

0:19:41.160 --> 0:19:43.679
<v Speaker 1>case where I could see just being like, well, now,

0:19:43.800 --> 0:19:46.000
<v Speaker 1>this is the story their robots, and like it would

0:19:46.040 --> 0:19:47.640
<v Speaker 1>be weird to have their clothes on while you're working

0:19:47.680 --> 0:19:50.359
<v Speaker 1>on them. But it's also a chance to show some

0:19:50.720 --> 0:19:53.639
<v Speaker 1>in a chance. That's true, but it's also very unsexy

0:19:53.760 --> 0:19:56.879
<v Speaker 1>because they're like always very like dead eyed looking and

0:19:57.440 --> 0:19:59.840
<v Speaker 1>kind of like pale, and like, you know, it's not

0:20:00.200 --> 0:20:03.720
<v Speaker 1>is that sexy to you that meant to titillate. There

0:20:03.720 --> 0:20:05.800
<v Speaker 1>are problems A Game of Thrones does thir things in

0:20:05.840 --> 0:20:09.440
<v Speaker 1>that are absolutely meant to right, that's sort of I

0:20:09.760 --> 0:20:12.440
<v Speaker 1>could see that that being the basis of that argument. Yeah,

0:20:12.680 --> 0:20:15.280
<v Speaker 1>quite a few people answer to that. When it's for

0:20:15.359 --> 0:20:19.080
<v Speaker 1>comedy too, it can be kind of funny. So, yeah,

0:20:19.280 --> 0:20:21.920
<v Speaker 1>interesting remember that scene? Did you? Did you see the

0:20:22.119 --> 0:20:27.440
<v Speaker 1>the Bruno movie? Oh? Yeah, I didn't that old character

0:20:27.560 --> 0:20:29.439
<v Speaker 1>like shows balls or something. It was just like a

0:20:29.480 --> 0:20:32.880
<v Speaker 1>part where there's a giant penis with a cartoon face

0:20:32.920 --> 0:20:35.800
<v Speaker 1>on it that's swinging around like a helicopter and it's

0:20:35.880 --> 0:20:38.840
<v Speaker 1>full screen, just out of nowhere. I remember thinking that

0:20:38.920 --> 0:20:42.879
<v Speaker 1>was pretty funny. Uh. So I did another pole truth

0:20:42.960 --> 0:20:45.479
<v Speaker 1>about a fictional movie couple and whether or not they

0:20:45.480 --> 0:20:48.359
<v Speaker 1>would still be together. I did Pretty Woman five years later?

0:20:49.240 --> 0:20:52.800
<v Speaker 1>Are they still together? And your choices were natch or

0:20:52.920 --> 0:20:57.600
<v Speaker 1>as if you like that? Was that Richard gear Is

0:20:57.640 --> 0:21:00.320
<v Speaker 1>that he was the guy? Yeah? And Julia Roberts. Wasn't

0:21:00.320 --> 0:21:02.959
<v Speaker 1>that meant to be sort of like almost um an

0:21:03.040 --> 0:21:05.680
<v Speaker 1>updated version of like My Fair Lady kind of where

0:21:05.680 --> 0:21:09.360
<v Speaker 1>he's he turns her into a Yeah sort of that said, right, Yeah,

0:21:09.400 --> 0:21:11.240
<v Speaker 1>I think I think people have said that, which is

0:21:11.280 --> 0:21:14.080
<v Speaker 1>inherently sexist and weird, right, like the whole idea of

0:21:14.119 --> 0:21:18.679
<v Speaker 1>like this gentleman is going to turn this sex worker

0:21:18.720 --> 0:21:21.960
<v Speaker 1>into a lady. You know, now, I've never seen Pretty Woman.

0:21:22.040 --> 0:21:25.520
<v Speaker 1>It's it's certainly dated. Is the movie itself dated? Do

0:21:25.560 --> 0:21:28.640
<v Speaker 1>you think? Because oh sure, yeah Pretty Woman? Yeah yeah,

0:21:28.720 --> 0:21:32.720
<v Speaker 1>yeah for real? And you know the message is like uh.

0:21:32.880 --> 0:21:36.640
<v Speaker 1>In fact, Bomb Water, the great band Bong Water Uh

0:21:36.680 --> 0:21:39.439
<v Speaker 1>and Magnusson had one of my favorite songs of all

0:21:39.480 --> 0:21:42.960
<v Speaker 1>time as Bongwater's folk song. And in folk song, she

0:21:43.000 --> 0:21:44.720
<v Speaker 1>goes on a diet tribe. It's like a ten minute

0:21:44.760 --> 0:21:49.000
<v Speaker 1>song about Pretty Woman. About the message of pretty Woman

0:21:49.240 --> 0:21:52.119
<v Speaker 1>is that's all a woman's made of sucking and shopping.

0:21:52.520 --> 0:21:55.560
<v Speaker 1>And then she starts this repetitious thing and the music

0:21:55.600 --> 0:21:59.160
<v Speaker 1>strive and she's going sucking and shopping and sucking and shopping,

0:21:59.520 --> 0:22:02.000
<v Speaker 1>and I wish a rich, handsome man would come along

0:22:02.080 --> 0:22:04.479
<v Speaker 1>and pluck me off the streets and take me shopping

0:22:04.520 --> 0:22:08.240
<v Speaker 1>on Hollywood Boulevard. And pretty Yeah, it's like a straight

0:22:08.320 --> 0:22:12.200
<v Speaker 1>up condemnation, but in only a very satirical, funny way.

0:22:12.359 --> 0:22:13.720
<v Speaker 1>I've got to watch the movie and then hear the

0:22:13.760 --> 0:22:18.440
<v Speaker 1>song man pong water is great. Alright, So two d

0:22:18.600 --> 0:22:22.040
<v Speaker 1>seventy seven of you say natch, and three fifty four

0:22:22.080 --> 0:22:27.080
<v Speaker 1>says if so, that's interesting, that's way closer. Two seventy

0:22:27.119 --> 0:22:30.840
<v Speaker 1>seven of you think that this rich businessman and sex

0:22:30.880 --> 0:22:36.600
<v Speaker 1>worker ended up together five years later. Very interesting romantics

0:22:36.600 --> 0:22:39.960
<v Speaker 1>at hard. I guess all right, I think there's one

0:22:39.960 --> 0:22:44.119
<v Speaker 1>more pole, nol um. Actually, that's it. That's all the polls.

0:22:44.160 --> 0:22:55.919
<v Speaker 1>Everybody exhausted the polls. We'll do uh, we'll do one

0:22:55.960 --> 0:22:59.160
<v Speaker 1>more segment and uh, I'm gonna skip and all those

0:22:59.200 --> 0:23:02.520
<v Speaker 1>holes for the weekend and give you a break. And

0:23:02.680 --> 0:23:05.040
<v Speaker 1>I am going to do this is actually, this is

0:23:05.080 --> 0:23:08.440
<v Speaker 1>kind of interesting. This is a little crowdsourcing of movie

0:23:08.480 --> 0:23:13.320
<v Speaker 1>Crush ideas on future segments from you all and let

0:23:13.320 --> 0:23:16.240
<v Speaker 1>you sort of really truly run the show here on

0:23:16.280 --> 0:23:18.840
<v Speaker 1>many crutch and I said, we'll read them on the

0:23:18.880 --> 0:23:21.199
<v Speaker 1>air and then you and I will pick pick some

0:23:21.240 --> 0:23:24.600
<v Speaker 1>of these for the future. So no, I need to

0:23:24.640 --> 0:23:26.520
<v Speaker 1>know from you, like, which one of these do you

0:23:26.560 --> 0:23:29.719
<v Speaker 1>think we should do in the future. Uh, And we'll

0:23:30.080 --> 0:23:35.080
<v Speaker 1>keep track of these and genuinely do these. So Jordan

0:23:35.119 --> 0:23:38.359
<v Speaker 1>Wheeler and also know if you submit for this, you

0:23:38.359 --> 0:23:44.080
<v Speaker 1>can also get chided and have us say your idea sticks. Okay, anyways,

0:23:44.080 --> 0:23:46.480
<v Speaker 1>implicit in the whole interaction, right, but it'll all be fun.

0:23:46.960 --> 0:23:49.280
<v Speaker 1>Jordan Wheeler says, how about a segment where you try

0:23:49.280 --> 0:23:52.679
<v Speaker 1>and badly explain the plot of a well known movie

0:23:52.960 --> 0:23:58.840
<v Speaker 1>happens on the rag like five times an episode. You're

0:23:58.880 --> 0:24:02.159
<v Speaker 1>totally right. Uh, it's yeah, we should call it mini

0:24:02.160 --> 0:24:06.199
<v Speaker 1>crush exactly, he says, e g. For Star Wars, you

0:24:06.200 --> 0:24:10.600
<v Speaker 1>could say one family's constant drama and incessant religious fervor,

0:24:11.040 --> 0:24:14.159
<v Speaker 1>along with a good dollop of casual incest, leads to

0:24:14.240 --> 0:24:18.520
<v Speaker 1>treason in the genocide of various native species. That's pretty awesome.

0:24:18.640 --> 0:24:21.160
<v Speaker 1>That's not how we do it, though, we would try

0:24:21.200 --> 0:24:25.640
<v Speaker 1>our best. That's good, Jordan. Just what you wrote about

0:24:25.720 --> 0:24:29.160
<v Speaker 1>Star Wars that is very creative. The dollop of incests,

0:24:29.200 --> 0:24:32.600
<v Speaker 1>good dollop of casual incest. That is good. Jordan. I

0:24:32.680 --> 0:24:34.960
<v Speaker 1>can give you props from there. Yeah, we might use that.

0:24:34.960 --> 0:24:37.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if I'm good enough to. That's my

0:24:37.880 --> 0:24:39.360
<v Speaker 1>point that we wouldn't do it like that. We would

0:24:39.400 --> 0:24:40.960
<v Speaker 1>do it how we do it. We would just kind

0:24:41.000 --> 0:24:43.679
<v Speaker 1>of be grasping at this plot. He just gave us

0:24:43.720 --> 0:24:45.679
<v Speaker 1>an example that it was a good example. Yeah, but

0:24:45.960 --> 0:24:47.159
<v Speaker 1>I think we know, I think we would know how

0:24:47.160 --> 0:24:49.119
<v Speaker 1>to go about this. I like that, everybody, all right.

0:24:49.160 --> 0:24:52.399
<v Speaker 1>Matthias Holtzman says this. I don't know if this is

0:24:52.520 --> 0:24:54.919
<v Speaker 1>could be a segment maybe, but I do like this.

0:24:55.000 --> 0:24:59.800
<v Speaker 1>He said, how many movies have their title within their dialogue?

0:25:01.080 --> 0:25:05.159
<v Speaker 1>Like The Godfather? Someone actually says the Godfather in that movie. Well,

0:25:05.200 --> 0:25:07.960
<v Speaker 1>there's actually no one ever, says Star Wars. So there's

0:25:07.960 --> 0:25:12.480
<v Speaker 1>this amazing YouTube collection UM with clips of movies where

0:25:12.520 --> 0:25:14.920
<v Speaker 1>they make the movie end as soon as someone in

0:25:14.960 --> 0:25:16.919
<v Speaker 1>the movie says the name of the movie. All right, kid,

0:25:16.920 --> 0:25:18.720
<v Speaker 1>do you have an example of that we end up play? Yeah,

0:25:18.720 --> 0:25:21.240
<v Speaker 1>well here's here. Here's here's two back to back. First

0:25:21.240 --> 0:25:23.919
<v Speaker 1>one is um Jurassic Park, and then the second one

0:25:24.000 --> 0:25:30.600
<v Speaker 1>is The Lord of the Rings t Rex. You said

0:25:30.600 --> 0:25:36.399
<v Speaker 1>you've got a t rex f so we have two rex.

0:25:37.720 --> 0:25:47.800
<v Speaker 1>Wow this movie, don't, my dear, I don't just sure.

0:25:48.800 --> 0:25:56.240
<v Speaker 1>It's just one of those things up everybody sucks. We'll

0:25:56.320 --> 0:26:07.080
<v Speaker 1>not moves you out, companion, So you should be the

0:26:07.119 --> 0:26:20.120
<v Speaker 1>fellowship that the real And it's always like some rock song. Yeah,

0:26:20.480 --> 0:26:22.280
<v Speaker 1>but they like they do the titles, like the titles

0:26:22.280 --> 0:26:23.800
<v Speaker 1>from the end of the movie and everything. But yeah,

0:26:23.840 --> 0:26:26.159
<v Speaker 1>that's it. There's a bunch, there's there's a lot of

0:26:26.160 --> 0:26:29.240
<v Speaker 1>movies where but it's sort of like a band who

0:26:29.280 --> 0:26:33.080
<v Speaker 1>has a you know, a song called their band title. Yeah. Well,

0:26:33.359 --> 0:26:35.000
<v Speaker 1>well I was thinking more along the lines of like

0:26:35.480 --> 0:26:38.240
<v Speaker 1>a song that has the lyric in it that is

0:26:38.280 --> 0:26:41.560
<v Speaker 1>the name of the album, but it isn't there. Yeah, yeah, yeah,

0:26:41.600 --> 0:26:45.080
<v Speaker 1>I like that. That's a go to Matthias. Thank you

0:26:45.119 --> 0:26:47.520
<v Speaker 1>for sending that in. Um. I don't know if we'll

0:26:47.520 --> 0:26:49.400
<v Speaker 1>do that segment, but we might touch on those every

0:26:49.480 --> 0:26:51.720
<v Speaker 1>now and then. I'm definitely gonna YouTube that ship for

0:26:51.720 --> 0:26:53.399
<v Speaker 1>the rest of the day. Yeah. It's got almost like

0:26:53.720 --> 0:26:55.840
<v Speaker 1>a billion views, you know it's it's got almost two

0:26:55.880 --> 0:26:59.560
<v Speaker 1>million views, a billion, a billion. I'm bad at reading numbers.

0:27:00.560 --> 0:27:05.720
<v Speaker 1>Oh that's funny, all right, Brian uh he says, says,

0:27:05.880 --> 0:27:09.239
<v Speaker 1>is it me or So? That's the title. Is it

0:27:09.320 --> 0:27:13.280
<v Speaker 1>me or Blank? Some movies that are universally loved, but

0:27:13.359 --> 0:27:16.760
<v Speaker 1>the Chuck Noler movie Crusher commenters never saw the appeal

0:27:16.840 --> 0:27:19.399
<v Speaker 1>of so. In other words, no, you would say is

0:27:19.440 --> 0:27:23.640
<v Speaker 1>it me or does Uh, what movie did you say

0:27:23.640 --> 0:27:28.800
<v Speaker 1>you didn't like? Splash or splash? No good? Yeah? Is it? Well?

0:27:28.880 --> 0:27:30.840
<v Speaker 1>What I don't understand is this like a meant to

0:27:30.840 --> 0:27:32.760
<v Speaker 1>be a bit of dialogue from like is this is

0:27:32.800 --> 0:27:35.040
<v Speaker 1>this a trope? Is it? Is it me? Or are

0:27:35.160 --> 0:27:36.679
<v Speaker 1>just more just like a thing that you don't like

0:27:36.760 --> 0:27:40.120
<v Speaker 1>that other people like? Yeah, like maybe something that's sort

0:27:40.160 --> 0:27:44.239
<v Speaker 1>of most people like that you don't like. Huh, all right,

0:27:44.440 --> 0:27:47.600
<v Speaker 1>what would yours be? No, geez, I get it? Is

0:27:47.600 --> 0:27:49.719
<v Speaker 1>it me? Or is the name of the segment? I

0:27:49.760 --> 0:27:52.680
<v Speaker 1>got it? We might we might workshop that a little bit.

0:27:53.119 --> 0:27:55.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm into this though, it could be like overrated, underrated

0:27:55.720 --> 0:27:57.760
<v Speaker 1>or something like that. Maybe we just pick an overrated

0:27:57.760 --> 0:27:59.520
<v Speaker 1>thing and then an underrated thing that might be fun

0:27:59.640 --> 0:28:02.879
<v Speaker 1>yeah not bad. Um So for me, an overrated movie

0:28:03.080 --> 0:28:08.680
<v Speaker 1>would be um, oh gosh, that's hard because I don't

0:28:09.520 --> 0:28:11.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't really think in those terms most of the time.

0:28:13.280 --> 0:28:14.879
<v Speaker 1>Like if if I'm not into it, I just kind

0:28:14.880 --> 0:28:16.080
<v Speaker 1>of like it flies r out of my mind. I

0:28:16.080 --> 0:28:18.959
<v Speaker 1>don't think about what other people maybe like, Oh, like

0:28:19.040 --> 0:28:21.040
<v Speaker 1>la la la land I thought was way over Oh.

0:28:21.080 --> 0:28:22.560
<v Speaker 1>I know, you always go on and on about that

0:28:22.560 --> 0:28:27.640
<v Speaker 1>fucking movie, that movie that was awesome that everyone loves.

0:28:27.760 --> 0:28:33.840
<v Speaker 1>Well that wait the segment al right, Ben McVitie says,

0:28:33.880 --> 0:28:36.840
<v Speaker 1>crush Call. And by the way, big ups to you

0:28:36.880 --> 0:28:40.040
<v Speaker 1>guys who who came up with cool clever titles, because

0:28:40.040 --> 0:28:42.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, we like to do that. Here, Ben mcvittie says,

0:28:42.440 --> 0:28:48.760
<v Speaker 1>crush call. Have listeners enter uh two and draw and

0:28:48.800 --> 0:28:51.640
<v Speaker 1>give a phone number. Okay, so one um, select one

0:28:51.640 --> 0:28:54.040
<v Speaker 1>listener and give them a call and spend five minutes

0:28:54.080 --> 0:28:58.800
<v Speaker 1>talking about their favorite movie. Crush call five minutes or so, hey,

0:28:58.840 --> 0:29:00.440
<v Speaker 1>that is not bad. Now that's good. We actually, you

0:29:00.440 --> 0:29:01.560
<v Speaker 1>know stuff they don't want you to know. We have

0:29:01.600 --> 0:29:04.800
<v Speaker 1>a call in number. We have it records them and

0:29:04.800 --> 0:29:06.440
<v Speaker 1>you can have you can access them and download them

0:29:06.440 --> 0:29:09.160
<v Speaker 1>and play him on the show. So that's some dark,

0:29:09.760 --> 0:29:12.680
<v Speaker 1>dark ops. Sometimes they are the ones that people, yeah,

0:29:12.760 --> 0:29:14.680
<v Speaker 1>we've only done one episode, but most of them were great.

0:29:14.680 --> 0:29:15.880
<v Speaker 1>And then a couple of them was like this dude,

0:29:15.880 --> 0:29:17.280
<v Speaker 1>Like one of them was this guy like breathing really

0:29:17.320 --> 0:29:20.080
<v Speaker 1>heavy and like saying really creepy stuff. But it was

0:29:20.160 --> 0:29:22.920
<v Speaker 1>kind of a joke. He oh, he was putting on.

0:29:22.960 --> 0:29:26.680
<v Speaker 1>He was putting on. Gotcha crush call man, that might

0:29:26.680 --> 0:29:28.480
<v Speaker 1>be a good way because I've been talking about having

0:29:29.360 --> 0:29:32.480
<v Speaker 1>listeners on as guests. So maybe a little five minute

0:29:32.800 --> 0:29:35.680
<v Speaker 1>chunks I can get more people in and then there's

0:29:35.720 --> 0:29:38.720
<v Speaker 1>not the pressure of someone who you know, may not

0:29:38.840 --> 0:29:41.960
<v Speaker 1>be uh, may not want to be on for forty

0:29:42.040 --> 0:29:46.120
<v Speaker 1>five minutes or whatever. Alright, I like that. Megan Carroll says,

0:29:46.160 --> 0:29:48.160
<v Speaker 1>gear up where you talk about a piece of equipment,

0:29:48.560 --> 0:29:50.280
<v Speaker 1>get really nerdy and get in some of the crazy

0:29:50.760 --> 0:29:53.400
<v Speaker 1>camera adaptations. Will that be fun to have our boy

0:29:53.440 --> 0:29:57.280
<v Speaker 1>Casey pegram and for a segment because he's or maybe

0:29:57.280 --> 0:29:59.880
<v Speaker 1>even just like talk about the history of a particular

0:30:00.040 --> 0:30:04.200
<v Speaker 1>type of you know, and the stead camera. I think

0:30:04.240 --> 0:30:06.440
<v Speaker 1>I might have done something on the steadicamp like that. Yeah,

0:30:06.600 --> 0:30:09.080
<v Speaker 1>or even just like the look of a certain era

0:30:09.120 --> 0:30:11.440
<v Speaker 1>of film. You can talk about technicolor like I don't know,

0:30:11.480 --> 0:30:14.280
<v Speaker 1>it's up. That's okay, that's good, you know what. A

0:30:14.280 --> 0:30:17.200
<v Speaker 1>lot of these are great everyone. So I think what

0:30:17.200 --> 0:30:20.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna do is go through this list transfer that.

0:30:21.000 --> 0:30:22.640
<v Speaker 1>Who am I kidding? I'm never going to do that.

0:30:22.800 --> 0:30:25.880
<v Speaker 1>I'll just leave it up and refer to it. I

0:30:25.920 --> 0:30:29.440
<v Speaker 1>think that does it for this week, Nol. I think

0:30:29.440 --> 0:30:32.320
<v Speaker 1>it does. Chuck. We're at thirty one minutes, so it's perfect.

0:30:32.360 --> 0:30:34.200
<v Speaker 1>Let's just that's the short and sweet. Let's just leave it,

0:30:34.280 --> 0:30:37.040
<v Speaker 1>leave it at that, all right, Thanks everybody, and thanks

0:30:37.040 --> 0:30:39.880
<v Speaker 1>for all these great ideas and funny comments on the

0:30:39.880 --> 0:30:43.840
<v Speaker 1>polls and for interacting with us. As always, these mini

0:30:43.840 --> 0:30:47.200
<v Speaker 1>crushes are are slowly becoming your voice, which I really like.

0:30:47.720 --> 0:30:49.920
<v Speaker 1>And as long as we have nol over there chuffing

0:30:50.000 --> 0:30:54.160
<v Speaker 1>up every now and then on that trick cue, Yeah,

0:30:54.480 --> 0:30:58.719
<v Speaker 1>well what do you mean, no chuff chuffing up? Thanks everybody,

0:30:58.720 --> 0:31:09.440
<v Speaker 1>We'll see you next week. I'm confus