1 00:00:00,200 --> 00:00:03,600 Speaker 1: Hello, everybody, Welcome into the cycle. I have rian warmly 2 00:00:03,680 --> 00:00:06,720 Speaker 1: joined as always by Mike Mayer, and we are looking 3 00:00:06,760 --> 00:00:09,200 Speaker 1: back to the first half of the season. We're looking 4 00:00:09,240 --> 00:00:10,880 Speaker 1: ahead to the second half of the season. It is 5 00:00:10,880 --> 00:00:13,480 Speaker 1: the All Star break, so it wasn't really any actual 6 00:00:13,520 --> 00:00:15,800 Speaker 1: baseball being played this week. There was some last weekend, 7 00:00:15,880 --> 00:00:19,000 Speaker 1: but we decided, rather than doing our usual kind of 8 00:00:19,040 --> 00:00:21,560 Speaker 1: layout of the show, that we would react to the 9 00:00:21,600 --> 00:00:23,480 Speaker 1: Horme run derby in the All Star Game, and then 10 00:00:23,480 --> 00:00:27,600 Speaker 1: we'd offer some superlatives biggest first half surprise, biggest first 11 00:00:27,600 --> 00:00:31,800 Speaker 1: half disappointment, predictions, bold predictions for the second half of 12 00:00:31,800 --> 00:00:34,040 Speaker 1: the season, and then we will get back to our 13 00:00:34,080 --> 00:00:37,960 Speaker 1: two start pitcher competition at the end of the program. 14 00:00:38,240 --> 00:00:40,199 Speaker 1: Does that sound like a good plan for you? 15 00:00:40,320 --> 00:00:41,560 Speaker 2: Mayor yeah, that sounds good. 16 00:00:41,600 --> 00:00:44,280 Speaker 3: Without a ton of actual baseball to talk about, we 17 00:00:44,320 --> 00:00:48,319 Speaker 3: can go into the disappointment that was the Horme run 18 00:00:48,360 --> 00:00:52,599 Speaker 3: derby if you're watching from my perspective and you know, 19 00:00:52,880 --> 00:00:56,600 Speaker 3: the underwhelming All Star Game, and get into all the 20 00:00:56,640 --> 00:00:57,640 Speaker 3: other stuff you mentioned too. 21 00:00:58,040 --> 00:01:02,080 Speaker 1: We will dive into it all. Yeah, and this will 22 00:01:02,080 --> 00:01:04,720 Speaker 1: be a shorter episode I expect as well. Like I said, 23 00:01:04,800 --> 00:01:07,400 Speaker 1: kind of just something to uh to tide us over 24 00:01:07,560 --> 00:01:10,240 Speaker 1: during the break that we have here. Quick note for 25 00:01:10,280 --> 00:01:12,600 Speaker 1: everyone that if you like this content, the best free 26 00:01:12,600 --> 00:01:15,560 Speaker 1: way to show your support and encourage more content like 27 00:01:15,640 --> 00:01:18,960 Speaker 1: this is to leave a positive review at fantasypros dot 28 00:01:19,000 --> 00:01:23,040 Speaker 1: com slash MLB review. Let's dive right in, we are 29 00:01:23,080 --> 00:01:25,000 Speaker 1: going to react to. Let's let's talk about the Uh. 30 00:01:25,080 --> 00:01:26,840 Speaker 1: Let's talk about the All Star Game first, because I 31 00:01:26,840 --> 00:01:29,639 Speaker 1: think it's uh, there wasn't that much to talk about 32 00:01:29,920 --> 00:01:33,280 Speaker 1: American League one, as they do almost every year. Uh 33 00:01:33,319 --> 00:01:37,119 Speaker 1: shoho Tani did hit a bomb for the National League. 34 00:01:37,160 --> 00:01:39,440 Speaker 1: That was a very fun moment, and then pretty much 35 00:01:39,440 --> 00:01:42,400 Speaker 1: everything else that went right went right for the American League. 36 00:01:42,959 --> 00:01:45,440 Speaker 1: Anthony Santander got a base hit. That was the highlight 37 00:01:45,480 --> 00:01:48,280 Speaker 1: for me as an Orioles fan. Uh, because the rest, 38 00:01:48,320 --> 00:01:50,280 Speaker 1: I mean, corn Burn's starting was cool. It was a 39 00:01:50,560 --> 00:01:53,400 Speaker 1: you know, a fine inning. He gave up the walk 40 00:01:53,440 --> 00:01:56,160 Speaker 1: and the uh you know, the double, no runs, it 41 00:01:56,280 --> 00:01:59,520 Speaker 1: was whatever, and none of the hitters did anything of No. 42 00:01:59,600 --> 00:02:01,920 Speaker 1: Gotta have made a decent play, I guess, but yeah, 43 00:02:01,960 --> 00:02:03,680 Speaker 1: it was really kind of nondescript. What what did you 44 00:02:03,720 --> 00:02:04,800 Speaker 1: think watching the game. 45 00:02:04,800 --> 00:02:07,400 Speaker 3: Well, I didn't watch the game, so I didn't have 46 00:02:07,440 --> 00:02:09,440 Speaker 3: a whole ton of thoughts. I watched it back, so 47 00:02:09,560 --> 00:02:12,160 Speaker 3: I watched like highlights and I watched like parts of it, 48 00:02:12,240 --> 00:02:14,480 Speaker 3: but like you know, I just had other stuff going on. 49 00:02:14,600 --> 00:02:16,480 Speaker 3: Like I said last week, the All Star Game just 50 00:02:16,520 --> 00:02:18,160 Speaker 3: doesn't do it for me. I want I want the 51 00:02:18,200 --> 00:02:20,480 Speaker 3: All Star Game to matter. I wanted to count for 52 00:02:20,480 --> 00:02:23,400 Speaker 3: the World Series, and so I'm emotionally boycotting it until 53 00:02:23,400 --> 00:02:24,119 Speaker 3: they bring that back. 54 00:02:24,639 --> 00:02:26,680 Speaker 1: I was supposed to have a softball game last night, 55 00:02:26,720 --> 00:02:28,680 Speaker 1: so I was gonna not watch, and the only thing 56 00:02:28,720 --> 00:02:30,799 Speaker 1: I was going to go back it was to watch 57 00:02:30,880 --> 00:02:34,960 Speaker 1: just the Orioles moments if there were any. Then I 58 00:02:35,040 --> 00:02:36,680 Speaker 1: that you know, the game got rained out here in 59 00:02:36,720 --> 00:02:39,120 Speaker 1: Denver last night, so I was home, so I was like, 60 00:02:39,160 --> 00:02:40,600 Speaker 1: I guess I'll have it on while I'm like doing 61 00:02:40,680 --> 00:02:44,679 Speaker 1: other stuff. But yeah, it's it's always the least compelling 62 00:02:44,720 --> 00:02:47,160 Speaker 1: part of All Star break is the game itself. Even 63 00:02:47,160 --> 00:02:49,400 Speaker 1: though it is the best All Star game of the 64 00:02:49,440 --> 00:02:53,320 Speaker 1: major sports, it's still like I'm with you. In general, 65 00:02:54,400 --> 00:02:56,840 Speaker 1: I really only care to see my favorite players do 66 00:02:56,919 --> 00:02:59,640 Speaker 1: stuff I don't like, like, even as exciting as it 67 00:02:59,680 --> 00:03:01,720 Speaker 1: is to be like, oh, we get Paul Skans against 68 00:03:01,960 --> 00:03:05,920 Speaker 1: Gunner and Soto and Judge even that is like okay, 69 00:03:06,360 --> 00:03:09,560 Speaker 1: like I'm somewhat interested in that, but it's I wasn't 70 00:03:09,639 --> 00:03:12,360 Speaker 1: like this is going to bring in new fans. You know, 71 00:03:12,520 --> 00:03:14,359 Speaker 1: I'm gonna watch the game for the first seven years 72 00:03:14,360 --> 00:03:15,760 Speaker 1: because of this. It's it's it's fine. 73 00:03:16,880 --> 00:03:19,480 Speaker 3: And there people saying that, but like Skiens starting, They're like, 74 00:03:19,520 --> 00:03:20,639 Speaker 3: this is gonna be so big for the game. 75 00:03:20,680 --> 00:03:21,440 Speaker 2: I was like, no, it's not. 76 00:03:21,960 --> 00:03:24,679 Speaker 1: I saw I saw people that I follow who I 77 00:03:24,720 --> 00:03:27,480 Speaker 1: will not you know name publicly, but who said they 78 00:03:27,520 --> 00:03:30,079 Speaker 1: had not watched in like a decade and they were 79 00:03:30,080 --> 00:03:32,840 Speaker 1: gonna watch because we had Skiens starting. And I'm like, 80 00:03:33,280 --> 00:03:35,320 Speaker 1: these people are not actually baseball fans, and that's not 81 00:03:35,360 --> 00:03:38,000 Speaker 1: be like gatekeeping fandom. Like I'm like these they would 82 00:03:38,000 --> 00:03:40,120 Speaker 1: admit they are not baseball fans, like, well, now I'm 83 00:03:40,120 --> 00:03:42,520 Speaker 1: gonna watch because of Skiens. I just I don't think 84 00:03:42,560 --> 00:03:45,720 Speaker 1: that that head to head matchup is so cool that 85 00:03:45,760 --> 00:03:48,440 Speaker 1: it's going to bring in non baseball fans to a 86 00:03:48,480 --> 00:03:49,880 Speaker 1: game that ultimately doesn't matter. 87 00:03:50,920 --> 00:03:52,560 Speaker 3: The best I can describe it with like how I 88 00:03:52,560 --> 00:03:54,920 Speaker 3: feel about it now is that it's become like second 89 00:03:54,960 --> 00:03:57,080 Speaker 3: screen viewing. For me, like it's not going to be 90 00:03:57,080 --> 00:03:59,280 Speaker 3: my primary screen anymore, Like. 91 00:03:59,480 --> 00:04:03,000 Speaker 1: It was basic always that for me to be truthful. 92 00:04:03,080 --> 00:04:05,120 Speaker 1: Now the home Run Derby is different. I was also 93 00:04:05,120 --> 00:04:08,200 Speaker 1: so still have a softball game Monday night, and I 94 00:04:08,360 --> 00:04:11,240 Speaker 1: was I was recording the home run Derby with the 95 00:04:11,240 --> 00:04:14,280 Speaker 1: intention of not getting it spoiled and going home and 96 00:04:14,320 --> 00:04:16,520 Speaker 1: watching it all like that I do care about. And 97 00:04:16,600 --> 00:04:18,279 Speaker 1: that game also ended up getting rained out, so I 98 00:04:18,279 --> 00:04:20,720 Speaker 1: got to just watch it normally with everybody else. The 99 00:04:20,800 --> 00:04:22,400 Speaker 1: Homer Derby went quite well for me as a quick 100 00:04:22,400 --> 00:04:26,039 Speaker 1: recap for everyone. Of our teams that we drafted last week, 101 00:04:26,640 --> 00:04:30,880 Speaker 1: Mayor got Gunner Henderson, Marcelo Zuna, Adelis Garcia, and Alec 102 00:04:30,920 --> 00:04:34,159 Speaker 1: Bohm and Gunner was the first overall pick and he 103 00:04:34,240 --> 00:04:37,520 Speaker 1: had the fewest home runs in the opening round. My 104 00:04:37,640 --> 00:04:42,280 Speaker 1: team was Alonso, Bobby Wit, Junior, Jose Ramirez, and Taoscar Hernandez. 105 00:04:42,920 --> 00:04:46,760 Speaker 1: We messaged each other before the event kind of saying, well, 106 00:04:46,800 --> 00:04:48,440 Speaker 1: maybe we should just add up all the home runs 107 00:04:48,480 --> 00:04:51,039 Speaker 1: they hit and kind of have it team versus team 108 00:04:51,200 --> 00:04:55,000 Speaker 1: instead of strictly just you know, whoever drafted the winner, 109 00:04:55,040 --> 00:04:57,239 Speaker 1: like we talked about last week. It didn't matter because 110 00:04:57,320 --> 00:05:03,520 Speaker 1: I got both of those. I had both finalists, so 111 00:05:03,600 --> 00:05:05,320 Speaker 1: I was guaranteed to have the winner. By the time 112 00:05:05,320 --> 00:05:08,159 Speaker 1: we got to the championship round. The total home runs 113 00:05:08,160 --> 00:05:10,800 Speaker 1: that your team hit was eighty one. The total home 114 00:05:10,839 --> 00:05:14,440 Speaker 1: runs that my team hit was one hundred and forty four. 115 00:05:15,800 --> 00:05:18,880 Speaker 1: My faith in Bobby Wit Junior was proven to be 116 00:05:19,000 --> 00:05:21,200 Speaker 1: very correct, even though he didn't end up winning. He 117 00:05:21,400 --> 00:05:24,720 Speaker 1: obviously just barely missed tying by like two feet. It 118 00:05:24,720 --> 00:05:26,640 Speaker 1: was his very last swing, but he made it to 119 00:05:26,680 --> 00:05:28,640 Speaker 1: the finals. He hit the most home runs of the 120 00:05:28,760 --> 00:05:32,240 Speaker 1: entire night at fifty. Tay Oscar finished with forty nine, 121 00:05:32,320 --> 00:05:36,800 Speaker 1: even though he won the whole thing. So the guy 122 00:05:36,800 --> 00:05:38,960 Speaker 1: who was the last pick in our draft was the 123 00:05:38,960 --> 00:05:41,839 Speaker 1: one who ended up winning it, and the guy who 124 00:05:41,920 --> 00:05:43,920 Speaker 1: was like the fifth best odds or something. I think 125 00:05:43,960 --> 00:05:46,160 Speaker 1: you said in Wit, which I really disagreed with. I 126 00:05:46,200 --> 00:05:49,040 Speaker 1: told you along with Gunner and Alonso, which neither of 127 00:05:49,040 --> 00:05:52,000 Speaker 1: which worked out. Wit was like in my clear top three, 128 00:05:52,080 --> 00:05:54,960 Speaker 1: so that I felt very good about your pick of 129 00:05:55,040 --> 00:05:58,160 Speaker 1: Alc Bohm. Well technically wrong, because you could have had tay Oscar, 130 00:05:58,240 --> 00:06:01,039 Speaker 1: which would have you know, really matter for you obviously 131 00:06:01,080 --> 00:06:05,200 Speaker 1: since he won it. All the kind of philosophy behind 132 00:06:05,200 --> 00:06:07,240 Speaker 1: picking Bomb worked out quite well for you. 133 00:06:07,600 --> 00:06:08,040 Speaker 2: That's right. 134 00:06:08,120 --> 00:06:10,160 Speaker 3: Yeah, it turned out to be maybe my only good pick. 135 00:06:10,240 --> 00:06:12,760 Speaker 3: He uh not me showed out in the first round, 136 00:06:12,920 --> 00:06:16,960 Speaker 3: and maybe he showed on the first round and uh 137 00:06:17,040 --> 00:06:18,839 Speaker 3: you know got to a swing off with the eventual 138 00:06:18,920 --> 00:06:20,320 Speaker 3: champ almost made it to the final. 139 00:06:20,760 --> 00:06:21,920 Speaker 2: And I think you. 140 00:06:21,880 --> 00:06:24,760 Speaker 3: Know, he had that long layoff in between his rounds, 141 00:06:24,800 --> 00:06:26,479 Speaker 3: and you know he heated up at the end of 142 00:06:26,480 --> 00:06:28,120 Speaker 3: his second round. If he didn't have that long layoff, 143 00:06:28,120 --> 00:06:29,880 Speaker 3: we might be talking about alt bums the tramp here. 144 00:06:30,400 --> 00:06:33,000 Speaker 1: I think the long layoff for Gunner between all the 145 00:06:33,120 --> 00:06:35,120 Speaker 1: like intro and warm ups and then he had to 146 00:06:35,120 --> 00:06:38,640 Speaker 1: go last, I think that did affect him. But like 147 00:06:38,880 --> 00:06:41,240 Speaker 1: every single pick you made was the wrong one. You 148 00:06:41,279 --> 00:06:44,600 Speaker 1: picked Gunner over Alonso. Alonso had one more home run, 149 00:06:44,920 --> 00:06:46,120 Speaker 1: you then picked the first. 150 00:06:45,920 --> 00:06:48,440 Speaker 3: Of Gunner will always be the right pick because of 151 00:06:48,560 --> 00:06:49,440 Speaker 3: why I picked him. 152 00:06:49,640 --> 00:06:51,640 Speaker 2: So for me, it's still a win. 153 00:06:52,040 --> 00:06:54,000 Speaker 1: If you look at the derby in terms of like 154 00:06:54,360 --> 00:06:57,839 Speaker 1: every two picks was a round my guy, and every 155 00:06:57,839 --> 00:06:59,919 Speaker 1: two picks did better than you picked Gunner over Alonso, 156 00:07:00,080 --> 00:07:03,000 Speaker 1: which I know you had your reasons for. Alonzo did better. 157 00:07:03,040 --> 00:07:05,720 Speaker 1: You picked Ozuna over wit Wit did way better. You 158 00:07:05,760 --> 00:07:09,039 Speaker 1: picked at a Lease over Jose Ramirez. Ramirez did better. 159 00:07:09,120 --> 00:07:11,520 Speaker 1: He picked Bom over t Oskar. Toy Oscar won the 160 00:07:11,560 --> 00:07:14,920 Speaker 1: whole damn thing. So a very successful home run derby 161 00:07:14,960 --> 00:07:17,840 Speaker 1: for me. We did add that to our score. So 162 00:07:17,840 --> 00:07:19,760 Speaker 1: we're gonna do the two start picture competition at the 163 00:07:19,840 --> 00:07:22,520 Speaker 1: end of the show. But the current standings, including that 164 00:07:22,560 --> 00:07:27,320 Speaker 1: home run derby win, is myself nine and you six, 165 00:07:27,680 --> 00:07:31,040 Speaker 1: so I am up by three. As we stand here 166 00:07:31,080 --> 00:07:32,960 Speaker 1: at the All star break, would you take about the 167 00:07:33,040 --> 00:07:35,760 Speaker 1: new format? Did you have any takeaways from that? With 168 00:07:35,840 --> 00:07:39,320 Speaker 1: the kind of you know, combination of timed and then 169 00:07:39,480 --> 00:07:41,040 Speaker 1: the untimed at the end of each. 170 00:07:40,960 --> 00:07:44,520 Speaker 3: Round, it felt a little sleepy, Like it just felt 171 00:07:44,520 --> 00:07:46,640 Speaker 3: a little sleepy to me, like it dragged on. It 172 00:07:46,680 --> 00:07:49,880 Speaker 3: felt like, which I know, like technically isn't true because 173 00:07:49,880 --> 00:07:52,760 Speaker 3: it used to kind of be longer. But for some reason, 174 00:07:52,840 --> 00:07:55,160 Speaker 3: maybe it's just me like feeling nostalgic about the way 175 00:07:55,280 --> 00:07:57,360 Speaker 3: things used to be in like old man yell at Cloud, 176 00:07:57,440 --> 00:08:00,000 Speaker 3: but it just it feels like it used to be 177 00:08:00,200 --> 00:08:02,720 Speaker 3: more exciting, whereas like this one was kind of like, eh, 178 00:08:02,840 --> 00:08:04,920 Speaker 3: they felt kind of sleepy. I almost preferred the head 179 00:08:04,920 --> 00:08:07,000 Speaker 3: to head matchups to like make a little bit more exciting. 180 00:08:07,080 --> 00:08:09,640 Speaker 3: The first round was kind of like it was interesting 181 00:08:09,680 --> 00:08:11,600 Speaker 3: in that, like everyone's competing against each other to get 182 00:08:11,600 --> 00:08:13,800 Speaker 3: like the most summ runs. But like, I don't know, 183 00:08:13,880 --> 00:08:16,000 Speaker 3: I kind of almost preferred the head to head format. 184 00:08:16,400 --> 00:08:18,160 Speaker 1: So I disagree on the head to head I would 185 00:08:18,200 --> 00:08:20,960 Speaker 1: actually just like I came away thinking, what all I 186 00:08:21,000 --> 00:08:23,880 Speaker 1: really want is I want all eight guys or maybe 187 00:08:23,880 --> 00:08:25,360 Speaker 1: you only say six if you're going to do it 188 00:08:25,400 --> 00:08:27,960 Speaker 1: the way I'm describing, But whatever the number is, I 189 00:08:28,000 --> 00:08:29,560 Speaker 1: just want them each to get two rounds and then 190 00:08:29,560 --> 00:08:32,240 Speaker 1: whoever is the most wins. Like I don't feel the 191 00:08:32,320 --> 00:08:34,640 Speaker 1: need to do this bracket style and to have like 192 00:08:34,679 --> 00:08:38,240 Speaker 1: the ultimate change. You're just everybody gets two rounds, you 193 00:08:38,280 --> 00:08:40,360 Speaker 1: know that way you kind of get your warm up 194 00:08:40,440 --> 00:08:42,840 Speaker 1: round and whatever. You get two full rounds and then 195 00:08:42,880 --> 00:08:44,439 Speaker 1: whoever is the most at the end. That's like the 196 00:08:44,480 --> 00:08:46,560 Speaker 1: true essence of a home run derby, right, It's not 197 00:08:47,200 --> 00:08:49,240 Speaker 1: head to head. It's not endurance. She said, who could 198 00:08:49,240 --> 00:08:52,680 Speaker 1: go out here hit the coolest, biggest bombs, And that's 199 00:08:52,720 --> 00:08:57,680 Speaker 1: just really what I want to see. I I don't 200 00:08:58,080 --> 00:09:00,240 Speaker 1: I still don't quite get why they have both the 201 00:09:00,360 --> 00:09:05,079 Speaker 1: forty pitch limit and the three minute limit, because both 202 00:09:05,120 --> 00:09:08,440 Speaker 1: of those are inherently limiting of like, hey, let's not 203 00:09:08,520 --> 00:09:10,840 Speaker 1: let this drag on forever. We're gonna make sure that 204 00:09:10,920 --> 00:09:14,720 Speaker 1: this is done in roughly three minutes. But I don't 205 00:09:14,800 --> 00:09:17,960 Speaker 1: understand why you have both, Like why not just say 206 00:09:17,960 --> 00:09:20,600 Speaker 1: you get forty pitches. That's still limiting. It's not gonna 207 00:09:21,000 --> 00:09:23,199 Speaker 1: let it drag on because you only get forty pitches, 208 00:09:23,360 --> 00:09:25,400 Speaker 1: and that way everybody at least gets all forty pitches. 209 00:09:25,400 --> 00:09:27,560 Speaker 1: Because there was a couple guys who didn't be like 210 00:09:27,600 --> 00:09:29,360 Speaker 1: they went too slowly and so they didn't get like 211 00:09:29,360 --> 00:09:32,360 Speaker 1: two extra chances, And I was like, why what value 212 00:09:32,400 --> 00:09:35,000 Speaker 1: is that adding to have a clock when you're already 213 00:09:35,000 --> 00:09:37,240 Speaker 1: limiting the number of pitches, So that that seemed weird 214 00:09:37,280 --> 00:09:40,040 Speaker 1: to me. I didn't I didn't get it beforehand, I 215 00:09:40,040 --> 00:09:43,520 Speaker 1: didn't get it during the moment, and I didn't like it. 216 00:09:44,080 --> 00:09:48,920 Speaker 1: And also everybody talked about how like this changes so 217 00:09:48,960 --> 00:09:51,120 Speaker 1: we could kind of get back to actually enjoying the 218 00:09:51,160 --> 00:09:53,640 Speaker 1: home runs and taking it in, and that really wasn't 219 00:09:54,200 --> 00:09:56,040 Speaker 1: That didn't happen like I thought. The camera work was 220 00:09:56,040 --> 00:09:58,760 Speaker 1: actually really shoddy during this event. Like I don't know 221 00:09:58,760 --> 00:10:00,720 Speaker 1: how closely you were paying attention that, but I was 222 00:10:00,760 --> 00:10:05,720 Speaker 1: like really unimpressed with with ESPN and like they were missing. 223 00:10:05,920 --> 00:10:08,400 Speaker 1: There was like times where I forget who it was. 224 00:10:08,760 --> 00:10:12,320 Speaker 1: Somebody was on their like last swing and they would 225 00:10:12,400 --> 00:10:14,720 Speaker 1: just showed like Jose Ramirez his face in the dugout 226 00:10:14,760 --> 00:10:18,040 Speaker 1: watching the swing. I'm like, show me the blasts. This 227 00:10:18,120 --> 00:10:20,480 Speaker 1: is the whole point of the event is to see 228 00:10:20,800 --> 00:10:23,800 Speaker 1: baseball's best home run hitters hit the ball a million 229 00:10:23,840 --> 00:10:26,000 Speaker 1: miles and you're showing like there was one of them. 230 00:10:26,000 --> 00:10:30,160 Speaker 1: They showed like the picture his face on the swing, 231 00:10:30,280 --> 00:10:31,839 Speaker 1: like you didn't even see the like what are we 232 00:10:31,960 --> 00:10:34,520 Speaker 1: doing here? Like, and they had those really cool angles 233 00:10:34,520 --> 00:10:35,920 Speaker 1: where it was like kind of off to the side 234 00:10:35,960 --> 00:10:39,960 Speaker 1: and from the ground and so you could see the 235 00:10:40,000 --> 00:10:42,600 Speaker 1: actual trajectory of the but it was like the perfect shot, 236 00:10:42,640 --> 00:10:44,120 Speaker 1: and then they would go away from it, and I 237 00:10:44,160 --> 00:10:46,280 Speaker 1: was like, I thought it was bad. I thought it 238 00:10:46,360 --> 00:10:48,720 Speaker 1: you know, I wish Chris Berman was back with the back, back, 239 00:10:48,760 --> 00:10:51,600 Speaker 1: back back. I you know, I just I was. I 240 00:10:51,640 --> 00:10:53,400 Speaker 1: still like the event. It's my favorite part of All 241 00:10:53,440 --> 00:10:57,040 Speaker 1: Star Weekend, you know, the All Star break, But I 242 00:10:57,040 --> 00:10:58,920 Speaker 1: I was unimpressed with the rules changes. 243 00:11:00,080 --> 00:11:02,600 Speaker 3: Dare you suggest that baseball doesn't know how to market itself? 244 00:11:02,800 --> 00:11:05,240 Speaker 3: Clearly they've shown they know what they're doing it. 245 00:11:05,760 --> 00:11:08,280 Speaker 1: It was really bad and I'm not even going to 246 00:11:08,360 --> 00:11:13,600 Speaker 1: get into the national anthem, which obviously, whatever her name was, 247 00:11:13,880 --> 00:11:15,360 Speaker 1: I had not heard of the artist before, so sorry, 248 00:11:15,360 --> 00:11:17,240 Speaker 1: I don't remember her name, came out and said that 249 00:11:17,280 --> 00:11:19,520 Speaker 1: she was, you know, really inebriated during that and she's 250 00:11:19,559 --> 00:11:23,520 Speaker 1: checking herself in the rehab. There was some speculation online 251 00:11:23,559 --> 00:11:26,240 Speaker 1: that like that was all kind of a you know, 252 00:11:26,679 --> 00:11:29,440 Speaker 1: marketing ploy, So I'm not going to speculate on that. 253 00:11:29,520 --> 00:11:31,440 Speaker 1: I'll give her the benefit of the doubt and trust 254 00:11:31,440 --> 00:11:34,720 Speaker 1: that she's opening up and being vulnerable about an addiction 255 00:11:34,840 --> 00:11:36,040 Speaker 1: and is going to get help. So I wish her 256 00:11:36,040 --> 00:11:38,040 Speaker 1: the best if that's true. In the moment, it was 257 00:11:38,480 --> 00:11:42,079 Speaker 1: wild to experience that it was. I mean, it was 258 00:11:42,120 --> 00:11:45,640 Speaker 1: truly an all timer. So if you know, assuming again 259 00:11:45,640 --> 00:11:46,920 Speaker 1: giving her the benefit of doubt, I have no reason 260 00:11:46,960 --> 00:11:50,200 Speaker 1: to assume otherwise than you know. Obviously I hope for 261 00:11:50,200 --> 00:11:53,800 Speaker 1: the best for her and her recovery steps. But yeah, 262 00:11:53,880 --> 00:11:56,440 Speaker 1: that was quite a way to start things off. Sure 263 00:11:56,640 --> 00:11:59,840 Speaker 1: was all right, let's get into the biggest first half 264 00:12:00,240 --> 00:12:04,800 Speaker 1: prizes of the season, and you got to the sheet first, 265 00:12:05,320 --> 00:12:09,040 Speaker 1: and I wanted to pick somebody different from you as 266 00:12:09,120 --> 00:12:11,839 Speaker 1: much as I could, but I really couldn't feel like 267 00:12:11,840 --> 00:12:14,160 Speaker 1: I justified it, so I included some monerable mentions. But 268 00:12:14,240 --> 00:12:16,240 Speaker 1: your pick, which is the same one that I'm going 269 00:12:16,280 --> 00:12:18,440 Speaker 1: to agree with, is Renew Blanco. 270 00:12:18,720 --> 00:12:20,080 Speaker 2: Yeah, and it's the most obvious one. 271 00:12:20,080 --> 00:12:21,640 Speaker 3: And it's kind of funny that it turned out to 272 00:12:21,640 --> 00:12:23,240 Speaker 3: be the most obvious one because I was kind of 273 00:12:23,280 --> 00:12:25,040 Speaker 3: I went to our site and was looking at the 274 00:12:25,080 --> 00:12:26,960 Speaker 3: stats page and I was just I kind of left 275 00:12:27,000 --> 00:12:30,160 Speaker 3: it sorted by VBR so you can just see who 276 00:12:30,240 --> 00:12:32,720 Speaker 3: has been like the most viable hitters, the most viable pictures, 277 00:12:33,720 --> 00:12:36,079 Speaker 3: And I went to the hitters and I kind of 278 00:12:36,080 --> 00:12:38,520 Speaker 3: couldn't decide on anyone. And then I went to the 279 00:12:38,520 --> 00:12:41,320 Speaker 3: pictures and I'm literally like staring at the top of 280 00:12:41,320 --> 00:12:43,760 Speaker 3: the list and just like going back and forth, like 281 00:12:43,840 --> 00:12:45,360 Speaker 3: over his name, and I'm like, man, like, who am 282 00:12:45,400 --> 00:12:47,720 Speaker 3: I going to pick? And then like I just happened 283 00:12:47,760 --> 00:12:49,040 Speaker 3: to look at it, and I was like, why do 284 00:12:49,120 --> 00:12:52,560 Speaker 3: I keep skipping over Renew Blanco's name when he's by 285 00:12:52,679 --> 00:12:55,720 Speaker 3: far the biggest surprise, Like the guy through a no hitter. 286 00:12:56,000 --> 00:12:58,319 Speaker 3: We've been waiting for him for months to fall apart, 287 00:12:58,360 --> 00:13:02,800 Speaker 3: and he just hasn't. Like he's he's like clearly the 288 00:13:02,840 --> 00:13:05,439 Speaker 3: consensus biggest surprise of the first half in my opinion. 289 00:13:06,080 --> 00:13:08,840 Speaker 1: Yeah, it's very similar what you're describing to when I 290 00:13:08,880 --> 00:13:10,600 Speaker 1: was picking where to move when I first moved out 291 00:13:10,640 --> 00:13:12,839 Speaker 1: to Denver a couple of years ago, I realized at 292 00:13:12,840 --> 00:13:15,800 Speaker 1: some point that every city I was considering, I was 293 00:13:15,840 --> 00:13:17,880 Speaker 1: comparing in my head to, Okay, well is it better 294 00:13:17,880 --> 00:13:19,560 Speaker 1: than Denver or not? And so ultimately I was like, 295 00:13:19,760 --> 00:13:21,480 Speaker 1: why don't I just go to Denver because that's clearly 296 00:13:21,520 --> 00:13:24,040 Speaker 1: where I'm like planning to. It's where I'm comparing everything 297 00:13:24,040 --> 00:13:26,319 Speaker 1: else to. Anyway, same thing with what you just described 298 00:13:26,320 --> 00:13:28,280 Speaker 1: as Blanca, it's like he's just like the clear one 299 00:13:28,280 --> 00:13:32,560 Speaker 1: and there's no reason to overthink it to every point 300 00:13:32,640 --> 00:13:36,120 Speaker 1: you said, I mean like obviously like no expectations really whatsoever, 301 00:13:36,640 --> 00:13:39,120 Speaker 1: and then started off right away with a bang with 302 00:13:39,120 --> 00:13:41,640 Speaker 1: a no hitter, and like has really outside of that, 303 00:13:41,720 --> 00:13:43,800 Speaker 1: like suspension, and like he had a couple down starts 304 00:13:43,800 --> 00:13:45,959 Speaker 1: immediately following that. I actually did drop him in a 305 00:13:46,040 --> 00:13:50,560 Speaker 1: league that I'm regretting doing that. It's those smaller, you know, 306 00:13:50,720 --> 00:13:53,240 Speaker 1: bench sizes, and I really felt like I needed the spot, 307 00:13:53,280 --> 00:13:55,560 Speaker 1: and it was immediately after. He had a couple of 308 00:13:55,559 --> 00:13:58,480 Speaker 1: bad starts after the suspension, and I was like, well, 309 00:13:58,480 --> 00:14:00,760 Speaker 1: maybe like it was he was getting some you know, 310 00:14:00,840 --> 00:14:04,280 Speaker 1: kind of illegal benefit here. But I mean he's bounced 311 00:14:04,280 --> 00:14:07,240 Speaker 1: back nicely from that. He's very clearly the best surprise. 312 00:14:07,320 --> 00:14:10,000 Speaker 1: I did throw down a couple of honorable mentions. I 313 00:14:10,040 --> 00:14:12,480 Speaker 1: want to get your opinion on Chris Sale. I was 314 00:14:12,520 --> 00:14:15,000 Speaker 1: kind of leaving him for dead after you know, barely 315 00:14:15,000 --> 00:14:17,160 Speaker 1: pitching for a few years and then, you know, not 316 00:14:17,240 --> 00:14:21,400 Speaker 1: the best year last year. Seth Lugo has been really 317 00:14:21,440 --> 00:14:25,080 Speaker 1: consistent this year, really impressive in a way. I certainly 318 00:14:25,080 --> 00:14:28,000 Speaker 1: did not expect Stephen Kwan, like I was, you know, 319 00:14:28,040 --> 00:14:30,520 Speaker 1: a decent player, not somebody that came out of nowhere, 320 00:14:30,560 --> 00:14:33,640 Speaker 1: but has been so good, like very surprising power relative 321 00:14:33,640 --> 00:14:35,960 Speaker 1: to what he's done in his career. His batting average, 322 00:14:36,040 --> 00:14:38,120 Speaker 1: you know, is obviously you know, higher than it's been 323 00:14:38,120 --> 00:14:40,560 Speaker 1: for him before, because it's higher than just about everybody 324 00:14:40,560 --> 00:14:43,400 Speaker 1: this year. Louis Hill, who we've talked a lot about 325 00:14:43,800 --> 00:14:46,360 Speaker 1: with the innings limit, stuff coming up in the second half. 326 00:14:46,360 --> 00:14:49,240 Speaker 1: But I mean he kept the Yankees' rotation afloat for 327 00:14:49,480 --> 00:14:52,120 Speaker 1: two or three months there without Garrett Cole, Brent Rooker. 328 00:14:52,160 --> 00:14:53,600 Speaker 1: I wrote his name down like he was he had 329 00:14:53,600 --> 00:14:55,560 Speaker 1: thirty home runs last year, but like his batting average 330 00:14:55,560 --> 00:14:57,400 Speaker 1: is up fifty points this year. He's on pace for 331 00:14:57,800 --> 00:14:59,880 Speaker 1: you know, closer to forty home runs this year. He's 332 00:14:59,880 --> 00:15:02,680 Speaker 1: just and better than I expected than Ranger Suarez. Best 333 00:15:02,680 --> 00:15:04,960 Speaker 1: picture in baseball, as we've talked about a lot on 334 00:15:05,000 --> 00:15:05,760 Speaker 1: this show. 335 00:15:06,200 --> 00:15:07,200 Speaker 2: Like surprising at all. 336 00:15:08,400 --> 00:15:10,680 Speaker 1: I mean, I certainly didn't expect him to be at 337 00:15:10,720 --> 00:15:12,840 Speaker 1: the top of a lot of those you know MLB 338 00:15:12,960 --> 00:15:16,440 Speaker 1: social graphics of you know, picture power rankings. Ranger Suarez, 339 00:15:16,960 --> 00:15:18,560 Speaker 1: I didn't have that one on my bingo cards. So 340 00:15:18,600 --> 00:15:20,000 Speaker 1: any of those names stand out to you that you 341 00:15:20,040 --> 00:15:21,280 Speaker 1: agree with or disagree with. 342 00:15:22,080 --> 00:15:23,560 Speaker 3: A bunch of them are names I was kind of 343 00:15:23,600 --> 00:15:25,520 Speaker 3: skipping over, and like you said, I was comparing them 344 00:15:25,560 --> 00:15:29,840 Speaker 3: to Denver, I was comparing them to Rene Blanco. Seth 345 00:15:29,880 --> 00:15:32,320 Speaker 3: Lugo is a name that I think I almost picked 346 00:15:32,680 --> 00:15:35,120 Speaker 3: just because of how high he is on the Fantasy 347 00:15:35,120 --> 00:15:39,080 Speaker 3: Pros Baseball stats page on VBR. He's the fourth best 348 00:15:39,080 --> 00:15:42,760 Speaker 3: pitcher in fantasy right now Seth Lugo, which is which 349 00:15:42,800 --> 00:15:45,440 Speaker 3: is wild. We have seen him kind of flash in 350 00:15:45,440 --> 00:15:48,600 Speaker 3: the past. He's an older pitcher, he's thirty four, but 351 00:15:48,640 --> 00:15:51,360 Speaker 3: we've seen him previously in his career kind of do 352 00:15:51,640 --> 00:15:53,400 Speaker 3: things like this, but like more so out of the 353 00:15:53,440 --> 00:15:57,000 Speaker 3: bullpen as opposed to like now he's like finally getting 354 00:15:57,040 --> 00:15:58,440 Speaker 3: a chance to be a full time starter. He had 355 00:15:58,440 --> 00:16:02,360 Speaker 3: a solid year last year, not like otherworldly, but like 356 00:16:02,560 --> 00:16:06,280 Speaker 3: very good, very very above cromulent. He's more than cromulent. 357 00:16:07,160 --> 00:16:08,120 Speaker 2: And then this year he's. 358 00:16:08,040 --> 00:16:10,040 Speaker 3: Just fantastic and a lot of his expected number, like 359 00:16:10,040 --> 00:16:15,000 Speaker 3: he's he's been like the biggest like candidate for like 360 00:16:15,160 --> 00:16:17,880 Speaker 3: regression or like negative regression with this, which the stat 361 00:16:17,880 --> 00:16:21,800 Speaker 3: nerds hate that you say, but negative regression just because 362 00:16:21,840 --> 00:16:23,880 Speaker 3: like if you look at like statcast and Fangrafts and 363 00:16:23,920 --> 00:16:26,680 Speaker 3: all the other expecting like all his expected numbers, they're 364 00:16:26,680 --> 00:16:29,560 Speaker 3: all much worse and so like we're we're expecting regression. 365 00:16:30,400 --> 00:16:32,600 Speaker 3: But it's hard to deny the first half that he 366 00:16:32,720 --> 00:16:34,840 Speaker 3: just had and you know, he's continuing to pitch well, 367 00:16:34,880 --> 00:16:38,320 Speaker 3: and it's hard to argue with the fourth, you know, 368 00:16:38,400 --> 00:16:41,440 Speaker 3: most valuable pitcher in baseball that was probably free come 369 00:16:41,520 --> 00:16:43,239 Speaker 3: draft day, or if not free. 370 00:16:43,120 --> 00:16:43,600 Speaker 2: Very cheap. 371 00:16:43,840 --> 00:16:46,880 Speaker 1: Stat Nerds are correct. You can just say regression. You 372 00:16:46,880 --> 00:16:48,360 Speaker 1: don't need to say negative regression. 373 00:16:48,400 --> 00:16:50,040 Speaker 3: You want to drive it home though with like, look, 374 00:16:50,080 --> 00:16:53,080 Speaker 3: I mean negative regression. I want it to feel bad, 375 00:16:53,520 --> 00:16:54,360 Speaker 3: able to feel bad. 376 00:16:54,200 --> 00:16:57,960 Speaker 1: About this, really put emphasis on it. Okay, let's go 377 00:16:58,000 --> 00:17:01,480 Speaker 1: to our biggest first half disappointments. And you also picked 378 00:17:01,520 --> 00:17:05,280 Speaker 1: I think probably the most correct answer. We both have 379 00:17:05,560 --> 00:17:09,199 Speaker 1: first round outfielders though as our picks, so I'll go 380 00:17:09,240 --> 00:17:11,720 Speaker 1: first this time. I went with Julio Rodriguez, as you 381 00:17:11,760 --> 00:17:15,359 Speaker 1: already picked your guy. I think some of the underlying data, 382 00:17:15,640 --> 00:17:20,239 Speaker 1: like there's some optimism for the second half. He was 383 00:17:20,280 --> 00:17:25,560 Speaker 1: like abysmal abysmal early and like pseudo bounce back a bit, 384 00:17:25,680 --> 00:17:28,280 Speaker 1: but you know, he does still have ten home runs, 385 00:17:28,320 --> 00:17:31,560 Speaker 1: eighteen stolen bases, the ops is under seven hundred. It's 386 00:17:31,640 --> 00:17:35,040 Speaker 1: I mean, he was going like second overall in some drafts, 387 00:17:35,080 --> 00:17:37,720 Speaker 1: like I mean, there was outside of Acuna, like there 388 00:17:37,840 --> 00:17:40,720 Speaker 1: was about as much excitement for Julio's season as there 389 00:17:40,760 --> 00:17:43,600 Speaker 1: was for any player in baseball, and he just has 390 00:17:43,680 --> 00:17:45,199 Speaker 1: not lived up to that. He has not lived up 391 00:17:45,240 --> 00:17:47,080 Speaker 1: to the player that he was. You know, last year 392 00:17:47,080 --> 00:17:50,720 Speaker 1: he was thirty thirty. He's just has has been in 393 00:17:50,760 --> 00:17:53,639 Speaker 1: real step down, particularly in the power department. So that 394 00:17:53,680 --> 00:17:55,919 Speaker 1: OPS of six ninety is just a real eyesore for 395 00:17:55,960 --> 00:17:58,879 Speaker 1: a guy that in salary cap drafts you probably spent 396 00:17:59,040 --> 00:18:01,440 Speaker 1: as much as anybody was spent on again besides the 397 00:18:01,560 --> 00:18:02,240 Speaker 1: CUNA this year. 398 00:18:02,400 --> 00:18:04,040 Speaker 2: Yeah, for sure. And did you you're gonna mention your 399 00:18:04,080 --> 00:18:05,400 Speaker 2: honorable mentions there before I. 400 00:18:05,359 --> 00:18:09,040 Speaker 1: Go, Yeah, my honorable mentions Matt Olson and Austin Riley. 401 00:18:10,240 --> 00:18:12,199 Speaker 1: You know Olsen somebody we've talked about on the show 402 00:18:12,920 --> 00:18:15,760 Speaker 1: for a while in terms of so that we think 403 00:18:15,760 --> 00:18:19,960 Speaker 1: could positively regress. I'm saying with a smile because I 404 00:18:20,040 --> 00:18:23,640 Speaker 1: know you can just say regress and hasn't quite happened yet. 405 00:18:23,960 --> 00:18:25,879 Speaker 1: You know, just thirteen home runs this season, had fifty 406 00:18:25,880 --> 00:18:28,040 Speaker 1: four last year. He's only hitting two twenty nine hit 407 00:18:28,040 --> 00:18:31,720 Speaker 1: too eighty three last year. The OPS is seven fourteen 408 00:18:31,840 --> 00:18:33,639 Speaker 1: like last year was nearly a thousand. It's been a 409 00:18:33,680 --> 00:18:36,520 Speaker 1: real step down in a lot of ways, in every 410 00:18:36,520 --> 00:18:40,680 Speaker 1: way really, and and yeah, I mean I'm still somewhat 411 00:18:40,680 --> 00:18:42,400 Speaker 1: optimistic of what he can do in the second half. 412 00:18:42,400 --> 00:18:44,200 Speaker 1: But if we're just strictly looking at what has happened 413 00:18:44,440 --> 00:18:46,399 Speaker 1: in the first half, like hard to argue against him 414 00:18:46,440 --> 00:18:49,119 Speaker 1: as a major disappointment, and so more with Austin Riley. 415 00:18:49,160 --> 00:18:51,359 Speaker 1: I mean, he hit thirty plus homers each of the 416 00:18:51,400 --> 00:18:53,800 Speaker 1: last three years. He's only got twelve so far in 417 00:18:53,880 --> 00:18:56,720 Speaker 1: eighty two games this year. And this is somebody that 418 00:18:56,800 --> 00:19:00,000 Speaker 1: you were taking like mid second round, late second round. 419 00:19:00,160 --> 00:19:04,440 Speaker 1: Then you know, step down and batting average stepped down again, 420 00:19:04,480 --> 00:19:07,320 Speaker 1: really across the board. He's under forty RBI this season. 421 00:19:07,400 --> 00:19:09,960 Speaker 1: I meant, you know, here at the All Star break, 422 00:19:09,960 --> 00:19:11,880 Speaker 1: he's just been a bad year. So those were two 423 00:19:12,280 --> 00:19:15,800 Speaker 1: honorable mentions, but I think the correct answer is probably 424 00:19:15,880 --> 00:19:16,359 Speaker 1: your guy. 425 00:19:16,560 --> 00:19:18,439 Speaker 3: Yeah, it's a guy we've talked about a bunch, just 426 00:19:18,440 --> 00:19:25,159 Speaker 3: Corbyn Carroll, just an atrocious year after after what he 427 00:19:25,200 --> 00:19:27,520 Speaker 3: did last year and all the high expectations that we 428 00:19:27,600 --> 00:19:30,920 Speaker 3: had for him. I have a ton of exposure to 429 00:19:31,000 --> 00:19:34,480 Speaker 3: pretty much all four of these players, including we talked 430 00:19:34,520 --> 00:19:36,879 Speaker 3: about earlier in the year. I traded Corbyn Carroll for 431 00:19:36,960 --> 00:19:40,040 Speaker 3: Matt Elsons as a Bilo for BI low swap kind 432 00:19:40,040 --> 00:19:42,200 Speaker 3: of a thing, just like you know, I wanted out 433 00:19:42,200 --> 00:19:44,359 Speaker 3: of the Corbyn Carroll business. I was very concerned about 434 00:19:44,400 --> 00:19:47,720 Speaker 3: his shoulder, and I figured matt Elson would would bounce 435 00:19:47,720 --> 00:19:48,800 Speaker 3: back with a little bit more power. 436 00:19:48,840 --> 00:19:51,159 Speaker 2: He's somewhat bounced back a little bit. 437 00:19:51,160 --> 00:19:52,680 Speaker 3: But like as you were talking, you may have looked 438 00:19:52,680 --> 00:19:54,840 Speaker 3: in the sheet and seen me adding numbers next to 439 00:19:54,840 --> 00:19:59,479 Speaker 3: all these guys' names. And what I found was I 440 00:19:59,520 --> 00:20:02,080 Speaker 3: was just going going looking at the Fantasy Pros Baseball 441 00:20:02,119 --> 00:20:03,880 Speaker 3: s tat page and looking at their VBR, Like who's 442 00:20:03,880 --> 00:20:07,240 Speaker 3: been the most valuable of these guys. 443 00:20:06,880 --> 00:20:07,639 Speaker 2: In fantasy this year? 444 00:20:07,720 --> 00:20:12,760 Speaker 3: Julio Rodriguez surprisingly forty third, not great considering where you 445 00:20:12,800 --> 00:20:15,159 Speaker 3: probably drafted him. You know where you drafted him, so 446 00:20:15,200 --> 00:20:18,760 Speaker 3: that's not a great return on investment. But Corbick I 447 00:20:18,840 --> 00:20:20,840 Speaker 3: was surprised to see that Corban Carroll is ninety nine, 448 00:20:21,359 --> 00:20:23,760 Speaker 3: probably being propped up a lot by those stolen bases. 449 00:20:24,440 --> 00:20:26,760 Speaker 3: Maddilson is one thirty eight. He's the worst of the four, 450 00:20:26,880 --> 00:20:29,000 Speaker 3: which I was surprised that he was worse than Corbyn Carroll. 451 00:20:29,040 --> 00:20:30,680 Speaker 3: And then Austin Riley is of one oh five, right 452 00:20:30,720 --> 00:20:34,240 Speaker 3: near Corbyn Carroll. But so far, just grading the trade 453 00:20:34,280 --> 00:20:37,080 Speaker 3: of Mike Corbyn Carrell for Maddlson swap, I've technically gotten 454 00:20:37,080 --> 00:20:38,359 Speaker 3: the worst side of that. 455 00:20:38,560 --> 00:20:40,879 Speaker 1: Yeah, I mean, I mean Julio being that high. I 456 00:20:40,920 --> 00:20:42,760 Speaker 1: think that's just a lot of like he has double 457 00:20:42,800 --> 00:20:45,080 Speaker 1: digit to home runs and almost twenty steals at the 458 00:20:45,119 --> 00:20:47,200 Speaker 1: halfway or you know, a little beyond the halfway mark. 459 00:20:48,200 --> 00:20:51,440 Speaker 1: But with him, it's more of the downtimes have been 460 00:20:51,520 --> 00:20:54,639 Speaker 1: really down and the fact that you've had to spend 461 00:20:54,640 --> 00:20:59,080 Speaker 1: so much draft capital to get him. But that's interesting 462 00:20:59,080 --> 00:21:02,560 Speaker 1: to note. I knew who you know, I knew he 463 00:21:02,560 --> 00:21:05,320 Speaker 1: had been better than you know, Carol and Olson and Riley. 464 00:21:05,720 --> 00:21:08,080 Speaker 1: I didn't realize he had been considered a top fifty player, 465 00:21:08,119 --> 00:21:10,239 Speaker 1: though actually I don't. I don't actually roster a lot 466 00:21:10,240 --> 00:21:13,399 Speaker 1: of Julio, so I more follow him from just a 467 00:21:13,720 --> 00:21:16,879 Speaker 1: you know, professional standpoint, rather than like paying attention so 468 00:21:17,000 --> 00:21:20,119 Speaker 1: closely to like my teams and the rankings and stuff. 469 00:21:20,119 --> 00:21:23,880 Speaker 1: But so that is interesting. But yeah, like I said, 470 00:21:23,880 --> 00:21:26,760 Speaker 1: I think Carol's probably the correct pick. There so less consensus, 471 00:21:26,800 --> 00:21:28,960 Speaker 1: I think then on the surprise where we both just 472 00:21:29,040 --> 00:21:31,639 Speaker 1: very easily agree on Blanco. But I think Carol is 473 00:21:31,640 --> 00:21:34,240 Speaker 1: certainly a standout. Did you have any honorable mentions yourself 474 00:21:34,359 --> 00:21:36,399 Speaker 1: or I did not. 475 00:21:36,520 --> 00:21:37,959 Speaker 2: I didn't put any honorable mentions in there. 476 00:21:37,960 --> 00:21:39,240 Speaker 3: I was just looking at the list though, and I 477 00:21:39,240 --> 00:21:41,680 Speaker 3: thought it was funny that Julio Rodriguez is sandwiched by 478 00:21:41,720 --> 00:21:45,200 Speaker 3: two Orioles, Anthony Santander and then Jordan Westburg. 479 00:21:46,200 --> 00:21:48,720 Speaker 1: Interesting two guys who were not drafted in the first 480 00:21:48,760 --> 00:21:49,880 Speaker 1: round Fantasy. 481 00:21:50,560 --> 00:21:53,040 Speaker 2: Nor was Carlos Korea forty fifth overall? Yeah, which is 482 00:21:53,040 --> 00:21:55,440 Speaker 2: also surprising that he's forty fifth. Is he bad? Is 483 00:21:55,440 --> 00:21:57,280 Speaker 2: he really batting three to zero eight Carlos Coorea? 484 00:21:57,520 --> 00:22:01,680 Speaker 1: Yeah? I discovered that like a week or two ago, 485 00:22:01,920 --> 00:22:03,879 Speaker 1: and I was like, did a double take. I was like, 486 00:22:04,160 --> 00:22:07,720 Speaker 1: chare is having that good of a year, you know, 487 00:22:07,720 --> 00:22:09,399 Speaker 1: batting over three hundred. All right, let's go to our 488 00:22:09,640 --> 00:22:12,840 Speaker 1: bold predictions for the second half. We'll start at picture 489 00:22:13,600 --> 00:22:15,280 Speaker 1: and I will start with the guy that everybody just 490 00:22:15,320 --> 00:22:18,159 Speaker 1: watched in the All Star Game, Paul Skins, and I 491 00:22:18,200 --> 00:22:20,560 Speaker 1: actually wrote about this. We have an article on the 492 00:22:20,560 --> 00:22:23,879 Speaker 1: site with sixteen bold Fantasy Baseball predictions for the second half. 493 00:22:24,240 --> 00:22:27,560 Speaker 1: We got, you know, contributions there from myself, from you, 494 00:22:27,720 --> 00:22:30,280 Speaker 1: from Kelly, from Joey p from Welsh and from a 495 00:22:30,280 --> 00:22:33,720 Speaker 1: bunch of folks from outside, you know, the Fantasy Pros Company, 496 00:22:33,840 --> 00:22:38,800 Speaker 1: and my pitcher was Paul Skeens, and I said this 497 00:22:38,920 --> 00:22:42,119 Speaker 1: in the write up, where it's starting to feel less 498 00:22:42,119 --> 00:22:45,159 Speaker 1: bold by the week, every single start. This makes me 499 00:22:45,240 --> 00:22:47,880 Speaker 1: look like I'm going less out on a limb. And obviously, 500 00:22:47,880 --> 00:22:51,600 Speaker 1: the guy just started the All Star Game as a rookie. 501 00:22:51,680 --> 00:22:53,840 Speaker 1: I think he's going to finish the second half as 502 00:22:54,160 --> 00:22:58,200 Speaker 1: the consensus sp one in fantasy. That is not saying 503 00:22:58,240 --> 00:23:00,760 Speaker 1: he's going to be a top ten guy, not me saying, oh, 504 00:23:00,760 --> 00:23:02,879 Speaker 1: when we had that conversation two weeks ago, he should 505 00:23:02,880 --> 00:23:04,720 Speaker 1: have been in the elite Tier one guy. I mentioned 506 00:23:04,800 --> 00:23:07,440 Speaker 1: him as a possibility of maybe elevating that. I'm saying 507 00:23:07,440 --> 00:23:10,520 Speaker 1: he will be the inarguable best pitcher in fantasy baseball, 508 00:23:10,680 --> 00:23:13,240 Speaker 1: and yet he will be a top five pick in 509 00:23:13,320 --> 00:23:16,560 Speaker 1: twenty twenty five drafts. What do you think about that? 510 00:23:16,680 --> 00:23:18,400 Speaker 1: How's that for bold or is it not that bold 511 00:23:18,440 --> 00:23:19,479 Speaker 1: because Skeins is awesome. 512 00:23:20,920 --> 00:23:22,600 Speaker 2: I think it's like a it's a mix. 513 00:23:22,640 --> 00:23:25,119 Speaker 3: Like it's bold in that we're all looking at the 514 00:23:25,119 --> 00:23:28,240 Speaker 3: same thing right the innings. It's not bold in the 515 00:23:28,280 --> 00:23:30,040 Speaker 3: sense that, like a lot of people aren't going to 516 00:23:30,040 --> 00:23:32,280 Speaker 3: disagree that he looks like maybe he's the best. You know, 517 00:23:32,280 --> 00:23:34,040 Speaker 3: he just started the All Star Game. It wasn't by accident. 518 00:23:34,119 --> 00:23:37,720 Speaker 3: Everyone else thinks he's really good too. It's just so 519 00:23:37,760 --> 00:23:40,440 Speaker 3: that the Pirates aren't good and we're all worried about 520 00:23:40,440 --> 00:23:41,000 Speaker 3: those innings. 521 00:23:41,080 --> 00:23:43,719 Speaker 1: They're good also, so it's not like it's the White 522 00:23:43,720 --> 00:23:46,080 Speaker 1: Sox where it's like, oh, he will literally never get 523 00:23:46,119 --> 00:23:49,040 Speaker 1: any wins. Like the Pirates aren't good. It'd be nicer 524 00:23:49,080 --> 00:23:51,640 Speaker 1: if he was on like the Orioles or the Dodgers 525 00:23:51,720 --> 00:23:54,679 Speaker 1: or whoever. But like, I like, they're good enough that 526 00:23:54,800 --> 00:23:58,359 Speaker 1: if he is throwing seven no hit innings, he'll get 527 00:23:58,480 --> 00:24:00,439 Speaker 1: enough wins. I know. 528 00:24:00,480 --> 00:24:03,200 Speaker 3: It also just concerns me that he's just up there 529 00:24:03,200 --> 00:24:06,080 Speaker 3: throwing a hundred, which you know, we always see what 530 00:24:06,119 --> 00:24:08,200 Speaker 3: happens to those guys and want to say about that. 531 00:24:08,760 --> 00:24:13,040 Speaker 1: Any picture prediction is always going to have that caveat right, 532 00:24:13,080 --> 00:24:15,520 Speaker 1: there's no picture that you can really talk about that 533 00:24:15,560 --> 00:24:17,280 Speaker 1: there isn't the at least in the back of your 534 00:24:17,280 --> 00:24:18,919 Speaker 1: mind concerns. So you kind of have to make the 535 00:24:18,920 --> 00:24:22,760 Speaker 1: prediction assuming full health, and again assuming full like, I 536 00:24:22,840 --> 00:24:25,280 Speaker 1: just don't know what evidence there is from the last 537 00:24:25,280 --> 00:24:28,080 Speaker 1: two years of Paul Skeins' life and career that would 538 00:24:28,119 --> 00:24:31,000 Speaker 1: suggest he's anything other than the best picture on the planet. 539 00:24:31,800 --> 00:24:33,960 Speaker 3: Yeah, I won't disagree with you there. I got nothing 540 00:24:33,960 --> 00:24:34,800 Speaker 3: else to reply to that. 541 00:24:35,080 --> 00:24:35,840 Speaker 1: Well, who's your guy? 542 00:24:36,600 --> 00:24:37,240 Speaker 2: You didn't ask me. 543 00:24:37,280 --> 00:24:39,760 Speaker 1: You're the host, this is the team up, the team effort. 544 00:24:39,760 --> 00:24:41,919 Speaker 1: You're allowed to jump in if the you know, you 545 00:24:41,920 --> 00:24:45,080 Speaker 1: feel the conversation, the volition of the conversation is moving forward. 546 00:24:45,640 --> 00:24:48,040 Speaker 2: So maybe you had more there. All right, I'll go, well. 547 00:24:47,920 --> 00:24:49,320 Speaker 1: I know, I don't. I don't. I don't think there's 548 00:24:49,320 --> 00:24:51,320 Speaker 1: anything more to say, because to your point, it's really 549 00:24:51,359 --> 00:24:53,800 Speaker 1: just the innings and there's nothing else about it. And 550 00:24:53,840 --> 00:24:55,960 Speaker 1: I'm my bold predictions that the innings aren't going to matter. 551 00:24:56,040 --> 00:24:57,920 Speaker 1: And like I said, he's going to be I think 552 00:24:57,920 --> 00:24:59,480 Speaker 1: he's going to go. He's gonna be drafted in next 553 00:24:59,520 --> 00:25:02,600 Speaker 1: year's draft, ahead of everybody other than like, you know, 554 00:25:03,080 --> 00:25:06,439 Speaker 1: the if he's healthy, like Muki Akunya types, you know, 555 00:25:06,480 --> 00:25:09,359 Speaker 1: Bobby Witt like that, elite elite. Elite elite are the 556 00:25:09,359 --> 00:25:10,919 Speaker 1: only hitters that are going to go ahead of it, 557 00:25:10,960 --> 00:25:11,320 Speaker 1: might think. 558 00:25:12,560 --> 00:25:15,280 Speaker 3: Yeah, So for me, for both of my bold predictions, 559 00:25:15,320 --> 00:25:18,320 Speaker 3: I tried to kind of make multiple predictions for each 560 00:25:18,359 --> 00:25:20,400 Speaker 3: player just to make sure it was bold enough. Because 561 00:25:20,400 --> 00:25:22,440 Speaker 3: I wasn't sure if my take would be bold enough 562 00:25:23,119 --> 00:25:25,200 Speaker 3: on its own. And so this one, my picture one 563 00:25:25,240 --> 00:25:26,880 Speaker 3: is that Pablo Lopez is going to be an SP 564 00:25:26,960 --> 00:25:28,800 Speaker 3: one for Fantasy in the second half, and he's going 565 00:25:28,840 --> 00:25:31,160 Speaker 3: to finish in the top five in al SI young 566 00:25:31,240 --> 00:25:31,840 Speaker 3: Ward voting. 567 00:25:32,240 --> 00:25:34,560 Speaker 1: I think I think the cy Young inclusion is key. 568 00:25:34,600 --> 00:25:36,159 Speaker 1: I don't think it was bold enough without it. I 569 00:25:36,200 --> 00:25:37,080 Speaker 1: think it is with it. 570 00:25:37,359 --> 00:25:40,200 Speaker 3: Yeah, thank you for missing missing the right word here, 571 00:25:40,200 --> 00:25:43,719 Speaker 3: but thank you for agreeing with my process of of 572 00:25:43,760 --> 00:25:45,560 Speaker 3: why I would do that. And so there's gonna be 573 00:25:45,600 --> 00:25:48,040 Speaker 3: a lot of theme or a main theme, and pretty 574 00:25:48,119 --> 00:25:50,240 Speaker 3: much like every player I talk about in this episode, 575 00:25:50,280 --> 00:25:52,080 Speaker 3: and I'm going to keep coming back to VBR and 576 00:25:52,640 --> 00:25:54,560 Speaker 3: just because of this time of the year, we're at 577 00:25:54,560 --> 00:25:56,480 Speaker 3: the All Star break, it's a good time to like 578 00:25:56,560 --> 00:25:58,320 Speaker 3: kind of look at player value. And so I spent 579 00:25:58,400 --> 00:26:00,520 Speaker 3: a lot of time in my research for the episode 580 00:26:00,520 --> 00:26:02,880 Speaker 3: looking at VPR and looking at the value, and that's 581 00:26:02,960 --> 00:26:05,760 Speaker 3: kind of how I came about some of these bold predictions. 582 00:26:06,280 --> 00:26:08,959 Speaker 3: And so in terms of pictures right now, according to 583 00:26:09,040 --> 00:26:12,119 Speaker 3: pannies Ros of VPR, he's SP seventy four, so he's 584 00:26:12,160 --> 00:26:14,520 Speaker 3: not good at least overall, the. 585 00:26:14,560 --> 00:26:15,600 Speaker 2: Aire is north of five. 586 00:26:15,920 --> 00:26:18,879 Speaker 3: Now, he has been a popular by low candidate for 587 00:26:18,960 --> 00:26:22,040 Speaker 3: a lot of people, especially me. Throughout the first half, 588 00:26:22,040 --> 00:26:24,600 Speaker 3: we've seen the flashes of what he can be expect. 589 00:26:24,600 --> 00:26:28,040 Speaker 3: The numbers are all significantly better. And then I found 590 00:26:28,080 --> 00:26:30,120 Speaker 3: some interesting things as I was going through and looking 591 00:26:30,160 --> 00:26:32,960 Speaker 3: at his Cy Young odds because I went to the 592 00:26:33,000 --> 00:26:35,040 Speaker 3: betting pros consensus ods because that's where you can go 593 00:26:35,080 --> 00:26:36,600 Speaker 3: and see like the best odds, and you can see 594 00:26:36,600 --> 00:26:39,080 Speaker 3: which book has which odds, and I found some interesting 595 00:26:39,119 --> 00:26:42,119 Speaker 3: things because you can currently put in an al Cy 596 00:26:42,160 --> 00:26:45,200 Speaker 3: Young ticket for him at plus twenty thousand, which I thought, like, 597 00:26:45,240 --> 00:26:46,520 Speaker 3: I don't think he's going to win the SOI Young, 598 00:26:46,560 --> 00:26:48,920 Speaker 3: but plus twenty thousand, it's pretty absurd number for someone 599 00:26:48,960 --> 00:26:54,119 Speaker 3: like Papa Lopez who has that ceiling and on a 600 00:26:54,119 --> 00:26:56,359 Speaker 3: bunch of books. He's out of the top twenty five 601 00:26:56,600 --> 00:26:59,800 Speaker 3: in terms of like picture rankings for the odds. But 602 00:26:59,840 --> 00:27:01,520 Speaker 3: if you go to Caesars, they have him down to 603 00:27:01,520 --> 00:27:04,400 Speaker 3: plus fifty five hundred, so like nowhere close to plenty 604 00:27:04,960 --> 00:27:06,920 Speaker 3: to plus twenty thousand, and they have him as eleven. 605 00:27:07,320 --> 00:27:10,360 Speaker 3: So like in my in my you know, my theory 606 00:27:10,400 --> 00:27:12,440 Speaker 3: is that they're looking at the same things we're looking at, 607 00:27:12,680 --> 00:27:15,200 Speaker 3: Like all of his expected numbers are better, the strikeouts 608 00:27:15,200 --> 00:27:16,719 Speaker 3: are there, He's on a good team that can make 609 00:27:16,880 --> 00:27:18,600 Speaker 3: a really good push in the second half, and. 610 00:27:18,560 --> 00:27:20,600 Speaker 2: He can really climb those rankings. 611 00:27:20,840 --> 00:27:22,400 Speaker 3: You know, all he needs is like one good month 612 00:27:22,640 --> 00:27:25,160 Speaker 3: and he's top five, Like he's not that far off 613 00:27:25,440 --> 00:27:28,760 Speaker 3: because of all his other numbers, and so I just 614 00:27:28,800 --> 00:27:31,520 Speaker 3: think he has that in him. He's going to have 615 00:27:31,560 --> 00:27:33,080 Speaker 3: a strong second half. I think he's going to be 616 00:27:33,119 --> 00:27:36,520 Speaker 3: an SP one for people. You know, he's SP seventy 617 00:27:36,520 --> 00:27:38,159 Speaker 3: four right now, nowhere close to an SP one, but 618 00:27:38,200 --> 00:27:40,159 Speaker 3: I think it's gonna be a top twelve pitcher. And 619 00:27:40,240 --> 00:27:42,400 Speaker 3: I think, you know, he's going to make a push 620 00:27:42,440 --> 00:27:44,680 Speaker 3: and be you know, if he has like two good months, 621 00:27:44,960 --> 00:27:46,800 Speaker 3: he's right there in the cy Young you know, you know, 622 00:27:46,800 --> 00:27:48,159 Speaker 3: and you don't want to like root for injuries, but 623 00:27:48,200 --> 00:27:50,000 Speaker 3: like he's gonna one or two injuries away from like 624 00:27:50,800 --> 00:27:52,000 Speaker 3: being like maybe top three. 625 00:27:52,040 --> 00:27:52,920 Speaker 2: For that cy Young word. 626 00:27:53,160 --> 00:27:56,040 Speaker 1: Yeah, I think, like I said, adding that cy Young 627 00:27:56,600 --> 00:27:58,919 Speaker 1: element makes that a pretty good bold prediction. Let's go 628 00:27:58,920 --> 00:28:01,880 Speaker 1: to our bold hitter pretty for the second half. I'll 629 00:28:01,960 --> 00:28:03,240 Speaker 1: let you go first this time. 630 00:28:03,560 --> 00:28:04,080 Speaker 2: Let's see. 631 00:28:04,359 --> 00:28:07,639 Speaker 3: So my bold hitter prediction is someone that we just 632 00:28:07,800 --> 00:28:11,160 Speaker 3: saw win MVP for the All Star Game. It's Jaron 633 00:28:11,240 --> 00:28:14,760 Speaker 3: Duran and I made multiple predictions for him. And let 634 00:28:14,760 --> 00:28:17,480 Speaker 3: me scroll up to what I wrote. I wrote it 635 00:28:17,480 --> 00:28:18,919 Speaker 3: in the sheet too, but I went to the article 636 00:28:19,000 --> 00:28:21,080 Speaker 3: I didn't scroll far enough. We're gonna hear me scroll 637 00:28:21,080 --> 00:28:24,639 Speaker 3: in real time here. Okay, So my bold prediction is 638 00:28:24,640 --> 00:28:27,560 Speaker 3: that Daron Durant is a top five Fantasy player player 639 00:28:27,560 --> 00:28:30,600 Speaker 3: in Fantasy, becomes a consensus first round pick heading into 640 00:28:30,600 --> 00:28:34,359 Speaker 3: twenty twenty five, and really bold gets at least one 641 00:28:34,480 --> 00:28:37,640 Speaker 3: al MVP vote. So all I need is one red 642 00:28:37,680 --> 00:28:41,360 Speaker 3: sox Homer to vote for him for al MVP. Now 643 00:28:41,360 --> 00:28:43,120 Speaker 3: I think that again, you don't want to root for 644 00:28:43,120 --> 00:28:44,760 Speaker 3: any injuries, but I think he's going to need some 645 00:28:44,800 --> 00:28:48,640 Speaker 3: injuries in order to get that vote. But I was 646 00:28:49,200 --> 00:28:54,200 Speaker 3: interested again coming back to VBR, do you where would 647 00:28:54,200 --> 00:28:56,000 Speaker 3: you guess his value? If you haven't looked at the list, 648 00:28:56,040 --> 00:28:58,400 Speaker 3: where would guess Jaron Durant's value is right now in 649 00:28:58,520 --> 00:29:02,960 Speaker 3: VBR in terms of hitters, his overall value first half Fantasy. 650 00:29:03,720 --> 00:29:08,600 Speaker 1: That's a really good question, I think, like just as 651 00:29:08,680 --> 00:29:11,440 Speaker 1: a fan, like I would probably guess maybe in like 652 00:29:11,640 --> 00:29:16,840 Speaker 1: the twenties or thirties, I know he's been really really good, 653 00:29:16,880 --> 00:29:20,680 Speaker 1: but like I think he's been better. I think then 654 00:29:20,800 --> 00:29:21,760 Speaker 1: maybe the average fan. 655 00:29:21,680 --> 00:29:26,360 Speaker 3: Realizes twelve, he's the top twelve, so he's, you know, 656 00:29:27,360 --> 00:29:29,800 Speaker 3: technically a first round pick, you first round value as 657 00:29:29,800 --> 00:29:31,320 Speaker 3: somebod who's returned first round value. 658 00:29:31,680 --> 00:29:32,880 Speaker 2: And the other thing I found. 659 00:29:33,200 --> 00:29:34,960 Speaker 1: But by the way, just to be clear, I knew 660 00:29:34,960 --> 00:29:37,200 Speaker 1: he was in the top fifteen. I'm like trying to 661 00:29:37,200 --> 00:29:39,760 Speaker 1: put myself in the mindset of if I hadn't kind 662 00:29:39,760 --> 00:29:41,240 Speaker 1: of looked at everything already. 663 00:29:41,320 --> 00:29:44,560 Speaker 3: Yeah, Well, the other interesting thing that I noticed while 664 00:29:44,600 --> 00:29:48,320 Speaker 3: looking at it in terms of VBR and like how 665 00:29:48,320 --> 00:29:51,760 Speaker 3: it's calculated and how home runs can kind of impact 666 00:29:51,840 --> 00:29:54,240 Speaker 3: you know, your runs and your RBIs you know, pretty 667 00:29:54,280 --> 00:29:57,640 Speaker 3: much three of the five main categories. And there are 668 00:29:57,680 --> 00:30:02,080 Speaker 3: only two players in the top thirty five that have 669 00:30:02,440 --> 00:30:07,200 Speaker 3: eleven or fewer home runs or ten or fewer home runs. 670 00:30:07,360 --> 00:30:10,720 Speaker 3: So Jaron Duran has ten. Only one other player, Bryce Terrang, 671 00:30:11,240 --> 00:30:14,520 Speaker 3: who is twenty fourth overall, is he's the only other 672 00:30:14,520 --> 00:30:17,080 Speaker 3: player with fewer than ten home runs in the top 673 00:30:17,160 --> 00:30:19,840 Speaker 3: thirty five in terms of VBR and so that tells 674 00:30:19,880 --> 00:30:22,239 Speaker 3: me all he really needs is like a little bit 675 00:30:22,240 --> 00:30:24,840 Speaker 3: more power, which I've seen him have. I think playing 676 00:30:24,840 --> 00:30:26,640 Speaker 3: and I wrote this in the article too, I think 677 00:30:26,960 --> 00:30:29,040 Speaker 3: playing his home games at Fenway Park kind of zaps 678 00:30:29,040 --> 00:30:30,520 Speaker 3: some of his power because they have that deep right 679 00:30:30,560 --> 00:30:32,400 Speaker 3: field unless you pull it right down the line, Like 680 00:30:32,440 --> 00:30:34,240 Speaker 3: a lot of people don't realize straight away right field 681 00:30:34,240 --> 00:30:36,160 Speaker 3: and Fenway is three to eighty, like it's basically a 682 00:30:36,160 --> 00:30:38,680 Speaker 3: center field in some ballparks unless you pull it right 683 00:30:38,720 --> 00:30:42,200 Speaker 3: down the line. But I still think he can hit 684 00:30:42,240 --> 00:30:45,040 Speaker 3: another ten home runs. He already has what does he 685 00:30:45,120 --> 00:30:48,360 Speaker 3: have twenty two stolen bases, so he and he is 686 00:30:48,440 --> 00:30:50,480 Speaker 3: going to have a solid batting average. He's not far 687 00:30:50,520 --> 00:30:53,520 Speaker 3: away from like a twenty fifty season, batting two eighty, 688 00:30:53,600 --> 00:30:56,520 Speaker 3: scoring one hundred runs, driving in seventy five runs. That's 689 00:30:56,560 --> 00:30:59,320 Speaker 3: a really valuable season. And like the thing is, we've 690 00:30:59,360 --> 00:31:02,400 Speaker 3: seen him show this ceiling before. He either he's either 691 00:31:02,440 --> 00:31:05,000 Speaker 3: dealt with injuries or he's kind of been inconsistent. But 692 00:31:05,080 --> 00:31:06,880 Speaker 3: I think what we're seeing now is the breakout. And 693 00:31:06,920 --> 00:31:08,360 Speaker 3: you saw that in the All Star Game. You saw 694 00:31:08,360 --> 00:31:11,400 Speaker 3: the home running hit, and I just think we might 695 00:31:11,440 --> 00:31:13,480 Speaker 3: be looking at the first round talent going forward. 696 00:31:14,400 --> 00:31:17,320 Speaker 1: There's no way he gets in an al MVP vote 697 00:31:18,200 --> 00:31:22,479 Speaker 1: like a first place no chance, no chance, I mean 698 00:31:23,600 --> 00:31:28,640 Speaker 1: between Judge and Gunner and Sodo and Wit, like there's 699 00:31:28,680 --> 00:31:29,200 Speaker 1: no chance. 700 00:31:29,680 --> 00:31:31,760 Speaker 2: Well it doesn't say first place vote, just as. 701 00:31:31,720 --> 00:31:34,720 Speaker 1: Vote okay, okay, like a down ballot. 702 00:31:35,240 --> 00:31:37,320 Speaker 3: Yeah, when they vote like top three or something like that, 703 00:31:37,360 --> 00:31:38,600 Speaker 3: I think you can get a third place vote. 704 00:31:38,840 --> 00:31:40,800 Speaker 1: Guest five, I actually don't know off the top of 705 00:31:40,840 --> 00:31:44,760 Speaker 1: my head. So that's a good question. We should probably 706 00:31:44,760 --> 00:31:47,480 Speaker 1: know that. But if it's five, then I could see it. 707 00:31:47,560 --> 00:31:49,920 Speaker 1: Three I think is even still kind of a stretch honestly, 708 00:31:50,000 --> 00:31:53,760 Speaker 1: with like Judge and Gunner. Sure feels like one and 709 00:31:53,840 --> 00:31:56,120 Speaker 1: two and like Soto just with the Yankees factor two, 710 00:31:56,400 --> 00:32:00,400 Speaker 1: like unless Sodo and Judge somehow split votes from each other, 711 00:32:00,400 --> 00:32:03,520 Speaker 1: which I don't see happening. Like I think I think 712 00:32:03,560 --> 00:32:06,800 Speaker 1: those in WIT are your top four like on every ballot, 713 00:32:07,040 --> 00:32:07,920 Speaker 1: or at least they should be. 714 00:32:08,000 --> 00:32:10,720 Speaker 2: But yeah, I was saying just a vote, not a 715 00:32:10,720 --> 00:32:11,440 Speaker 2: first place votus. 716 00:32:11,480 --> 00:32:15,040 Speaker 1: Yes, that's fine. That's that's more, you know, understandable. My 717 00:32:15,560 --> 00:32:19,440 Speaker 1: bullet hitter prediction is for Jackson Churio. Uh. He did 718 00:32:19,480 --> 00:32:21,440 Speaker 1: take a step forward in June after like a really 719 00:32:21,520 --> 00:32:24,000 Speaker 1: terrible start to the season. He had a pretty bad 720 00:32:24,000 --> 00:32:25,760 Speaker 1: start to the year last year in the minors if 721 00:32:25,800 --> 00:32:28,880 Speaker 1: I remember correctly. So it's not like totally unheard of 722 00:32:28,920 --> 00:32:31,200 Speaker 1: for him to kind of start slow and then bounce 723 00:32:31,280 --> 00:32:35,000 Speaker 1: back into the summer. You know, his triple slash line 724 00:32:35,040 --> 00:32:37,440 Speaker 1: is two forty three to ninety four three eighty four. 725 00:32:37,440 --> 00:32:39,479 Speaker 1: He's at exactly three under plate appearances. He's got nine 726 00:32:39,520 --> 00:32:42,320 Speaker 1: home runs of ten stolen bases. Though. Uh. And really, 727 00:32:42,320 --> 00:32:44,040 Speaker 1: my point that I write here in the blurb and 728 00:32:44,320 --> 00:32:46,880 Speaker 1: that I you know, feel now, is just like, it's 729 00:32:47,000 --> 00:32:50,920 Speaker 1: less about, oh, this underlying data suggests he's due for breakout. 730 00:32:50,920 --> 00:32:53,120 Speaker 1: It's more just like I think the prospect pedigree is 731 00:32:53,160 --> 00:32:55,960 Speaker 1: just too darn good, the raw talent is too darn special. 732 00:32:56,200 --> 00:32:58,040 Speaker 1: I don't think he's gonna struggle very long. He's already, 733 00:32:58,040 --> 00:33:00,320 Speaker 1: like I said, starting to bounce back. I think that 734 00:33:00,480 --> 00:33:02,520 Speaker 1: we're in the middle of an adjustment already, and we're 735 00:33:02,520 --> 00:33:05,120 Speaker 1: going to see another leap into the second half. I 736 00:33:05,160 --> 00:33:08,880 Speaker 1: think he elevates into must start outfielder status in every 737 00:33:08,960 --> 00:33:12,120 Speaker 1: league format, even if it's only three outfielders whatever. I 738 00:33:12,120 --> 00:33:13,760 Speaker 1: think he's gonna be a must start outfielder, and I 739 00:33:13,800 --> 00:33:15,760 Speaker 1: think he's gonna finish close to He's not gonna get 740 00:33:15,800 --> 00:33:18,360 Speaker 1: but close to a twenty twenty a twenty five twenty 741 00:33:18,400 --> 00:33:21,440 Speaker 1: five season with an average north of two seventy five, 742 00:33:21,480 --> 00:33:22,960 Speaker 1: and where he is right now, that is not going 743 00:33:23,000 --> 00:33:24,400 Speaker 1: to be easy to get to. But I think he 744 00:33:24,520 --> 00:33:26,800 Speaker 1: is that strong of a second half to bounce back again. 745 00:33:26,800 --> 00:33:29,520 Speaker 1: That's more based on pedigree and the signs of life 746 00:33:29,520 --> 00:33:32,200 Speaker 1: we're starting to see and an attempt to be bold 747 00:33:32,280 --> 00:33:34,720 Speaker 1: than it is on oh well, the stat cast data 748 00:33:34,840 --> 00:33:36,920 Speaker 1: says x y or Z, it's not that. It's more 749 00:33:37,320 --> 00:33:39,880 Speaker 1: a belief in the player and the talent and kind 750 00:33:39,880 --> 00:33:41,120 Speaker 1: of the signs of life we're seeing. What do you 751 00:33:41,160 --> 00:33:41,840 Speaker 1: think about Cherio. 752 00:33:41,960 --> 00:33:43,600 Speaker 2: I've always liked Cheerio. I like to pick. 753 00:33:44,560 --> 00:33:46,080 Speaker 3: I think his second half is going to be really 754 00:33:46,160 --> 00:33:49,040 Speaker 3: interesting in the sense of how he's valued going into 755 00:33:49,080 --> 00:33:50,760 Speaker 3: next season, because I think if he has another like 756 00:33:50,840 --> 00:33:54,200 Speaker 3: somewhat mediocre half, he's going to be really a really 757 00:33:54,240 --> 00:33:56,920 Speaker 3: interesting evaluation heading in the next year, Like people are 758 00:33:56,920 --> 00:33:59,280 Speaker 3: going to try to, you know, see like is he 759 00:33:59,320 --> 00:34:01,480 Speaker 3: going to take another step forward next year? We didn't 760 00:34:01,480 --> 00:34:03,000 Speaker 3: see it all year, but now he has a year 761 00:34:03,080 --> 00:34:04,760 Speaker 3: under his belt. I think you're gonna see a lot 762 00:34:04,800 --> 00:34:07,520 Speaker 3: of different opinions heading in the next year. And if 763 00:34:07,520 --> 00:34:09,680 Speaker 3: he takes the next step forward, now he's gonna start 764 00:34:09,719 --> 00:34:11,839 Speaker 3: rising up draft boards because now people are going to say, like, oh, 765 00:34:11,880 --> 00:34:13,719 Speaker 3: like he turned things around the second half. 766 00:34:13,920 --> 00:34:15,320 Speaker 2: Now they're going to extrapolate the stats. 767 00:34:15,320 --> 00:34:17,080 Speaker 3: We're gonna get a full season of those stats, and 768 00:34:17,080 --> 00:34:18,640 Speaker 3: now he's going to start getting bumped up in the 769 00:34:18,640 --> 00:34:19,480 Speaker 3: earlier rounds. 770 00:34:20,040 --> 00:34:23,080 Speaker 1: I'm also like, so I have him in a keeper 771 00:34:23,200 --> 00:34:26,440 Speaker 1: league where you can only you keep minor leaguers too, 772 00:34:26,440 --> 00:34:30,120 Speaker 1: but you can only keep ten major league players, and 773 00:34:30,160 --> 00:34:32,040 Speaker 1: it's at costs, And so I have him for one 774 00:34:32,120 --> 00:34:34,000 Speaker 1: dollar because I got it in on him as a 775 00:34:34,040 --> 00:34:37,960 Speaker 1: prospect very early, and I have thought forever that this 776 00:34:38,040 --> 00:34:39,680 Speaker 1: is just gonna be. I also have Bobby Wit for 777 00:34:39,719 --> 00:34:41,799 Speaker 1: very cheap in that league. I'm like the like, he's 778 00:34:41,880 --> 00:34:43,600 Speaker 1: my next Bobby Wit. Like he's just gonna be this 779 00:34:43,600 --> 00:34:45,880 Speaker 1: elite prospect who's great for fantasy that I'm going to 780 00:34:45,960 --> 00:34:48,759 Speaker 1: have on my roster for his entire career. My team 781 00:34:48,840 --> 00:34:51,440 Speaker 1: is very, very good. I'm the best team in this league, 782 00:34:51,920 --> 00:34:54,719 Speaker 1: and well, I mean it's it's the only league I 783 00:34:54,760 --> 00:34:57,440 Speaker 1: can say that about, so I'm gonna say it about it. 784 00:34:57,640 --> 00:35:00,440 Speaker 1: My team is really loaded. And I'm like, if he 785 00:35:01,120 --> 00:35:04,399 Speaker 1: has the second half that resembles the April and May 786 00:35:04,480 --> 00:35:07,320 Speaker 1: of his first half, if this June, you know, stretch 787 00:35:07,400 --> 00:35:09,040 Speaker 1: looks like more of a mirage and it's not even 788 00:35:09,080 --> 00:35:10,680 Speaker 1: like he was lighting the world on fire. He was 789 00:35:10,719 --> 00:35:12,920 Speaker 1: just better than he have been. If that looks like 790 00:35:12,960 --> 00:35:14,719 Speaker 1: the outlier by the end of the season, I wonder 791 00:35:14,760 --> 00:35:16,719 Speaker 1: if maybe I do have to consider I just have 792 00:35:16,760 --> 00:35:18,400 Speaker 1: too many other good players. I think I think the 793 00:35:18,480 --> 00:35:21,120 Speaker 1: value is too strong and the pure upside is too strong, 794 00:35:21,239 --> 00:35:23,520 Speaker 1: and that's basically how I felt all year. But I 795 00:35:23,520 --> 00:35:26,080 Speaker 1: think I bring that up to say, I think you're right. 796 00:35:26,160 --> 00:35:28,880 Speaker 1: The second half will go a long way towards shaping 797 00:35:28,920 --> 00:35:31,200 Speaker 1: how people want to build a narrative around him for 798 00:35:31,239 --> 00:35:35,799 Speaker 1: next season. And I think, barring something like spectacular, like 799 00:35:35,840 --> 00:35:38,200 Speaker 1: he just becomes the next incarnation of Ronald Acuna and 800 00:35:38,200 --> 00:35:40,960 Speaker 1: everybody's in agreement and it's and it's obvious, barring something 801 00:35:41,000 --> 00:35:43,399 Speaker 1: like that, I think he'll be one of the more 802 00:35:43,520 --> 00:35:47,560 Speaker 1: fun players to debate next spring. And like when we 803 00:35:47,600 --> 00:35:49,920 Speaker 1: do our mock drafts, you know, when Joey p and 804 00:35:49,960 --> 00:35:52,319 Speaker 1: Welsh are doing their mock drafts. We'll be seeing like 805 00:35:52,320 --> 00:35:54,919 Speaker 1: whoever takes Cheerio, like, we'll get comments and it will 806 00:35:54,920 --> 00:35:58,879 Speaker 1: be a pick that is analyzed next year. So I'm 807 00:35:58,880 --> 00:36:00,520 Speaker 1: really curious to see what he does the rest of 808 00:36:00,560 --> 00:36:03,480 Speaker 1: the season. Love love, love the talent. Let's go to 809 00:36:03,480 --> 00:36:07,000 Speaker 1: our bold team prediction for the second half. Mine I 810 00:36:07,080 --> 00:36:08,919 Speaker 1: put that the Orioles will finish with the best record 811 00:36:09,000 --> 00:36:13,600 Speaker 1: in baseball. I don't think this is actually like like 812 00:36:13,640 --> 00:36:15,200 Speaker 1: I wrote, if it's not bold enough, I have a 813 00:36:15,239 --> 00:36:17,759 Speaker 1: backup option. I do think it's bolder than people might 814 00:36:17,760 --> 00:36:19,759 Speaker 1: give it credit for. Like I know, they just you know, 815 00:36:20,040 --> 00:36:21,879 Speaker 1: had the best record in the American League last year, 816 00:36:22,920 --> 00:36:25,440 Speaker 1: but they like have lost Kyle Bradish like which is 817 00:36:25,520 --> 00:36:28,680 Speaker 1: not nothing, and their starting pitchers beyond Corbyn Burds and 818 00:36:28,680 --> 00:36:32,319 Speaker 1: Grays Dendriguez have really like kind of taken a step back, 819 00:36:32,840 --> 00:36:36,320 Speaker 1: and the bullpen is in kind of the higher shape, 820 00:36:36,360 --> 00:36:38,960 Speaker 1: like outside of Kimberrell, who still is blowing one run 821 00:36:39,000 --> 00:36:43,720 Speaker 1: saves you know on occasion. The hitters were awful last week, 822 00:36:43,840 --> 00:36:46,279 Speaker 1: like they had one of their worst week in a 823 00:36:46,320 --> 00:36:49,080 Speaker 1: couple of years against the Cubs and the Yankees just 824 00:36:49,080 --> 00:36:50,839 Speaker 1: this past week going into the Alsto break. They really 825 00:36:50,920 --> 00:36:56,480 Speaker 1: needed the break. Things aren't as like peachy, all sunshine 826 00:36:56,480 --> 00:36:59,800 Speaker 1: and Roses in Baltimore as you might expect from the 827 00:36:59,840 --> 00:37:02,000 Speaker 1: way I like to talk about them, and just from 828 00:37:02,320 --> 00:37:05,120 Speaker 1: kind of the narrative around a fun young team rebuild, 829 00:37:05,200 --> 00:37:07,560 Speaker 1: come to fruition one of the best teams in baseball. Like, 830 00:37:08,120 --> 00:37:10,799 Speaker 1: there's maybe some cracks in the foundation. I do think 831 00:37:10,840 --> 00:37:13,160 Speaker 1: they addressed pitching at the trade deadline, which will go 832 00:37:13,160 --> 00:37:15,200 Speaker 1: a long way. I think they bounce back. I think 833 00:37:15,239 --> 00:37:18,319 Speaker 1: they hold off the Yankees, the Surgeon Red Sox. I 834 00:37:18,320 --> 00:37:21,120 Speaker 1: think they surpassed the Phillies, the Guardians. I think they 835 00:37:21,239 --> 00:37:23,759 Speaker 1: finished with the best record in baseball. And if you 836 00:37:23,760 --> 00:37:25,480 Speaker 1: think that's not bold enough or that it's too much 837 00:37:25,480 --> 00:37:28,399 Speaker 1: of a homer pick by backup is that. I think 838 00:37:28,400 --> 00:37:30,520 Speaker 1: I'm gonna say the Rangers make the playoffs. They're not 839 00:37:30,560 --> 00:37:33,240 Speaker 1: positioned to do so right now. Obviously under five hundred, 840 00:37:33,280 --> 00:37:34,960 Speaker 1: there's a lot of teams they have to jump to 841 00:37:35,000 --> 00:37:38,040 Speaker 1: get there. But this is still the defending World Series champs. 842 00:37:38,480 --> 00:37:41,319 Speaker 1: Great manager, a lot of talent on this team. You know, 843 00:37:41,520 --> 00:37:44,920 Speaker 1: guys getting better, like White, Langford, figuring it out. You know, 844 00:37:45,280 --> 00:37:47,560 Speaker 1: pitchers starting to come back healthy, stuff. 845 00:37:47,239 --> 00:37:50,480 Speaker 2: Like that, So to Grama is coming back. 846 00:37:50,760 --> 00:37:54,480 Speaker 1: Yeah, So I am again I'm trying to be bold here. 847 00:37:54,520 --> 00:37:56,080 Speaker 1: So I'm going to say that they pass all those 848 00:37:56,080 --> 00:37:57,680 Speaker 1: teams to make the playoffs. But my main one is 849 00:37:57,719 --> 00:38:00,279 Speaker 1: Orioles with the best record in baseball. Do you think 850 00:38:00,320 --> 00:38:03,200 Speaker 1: that's too it's not bold enough or too much of 851 00:38:03,200 --> 00:38:04,800 Speaker 1: a homer pick? Is that an acceptable one? 852 00:38:05,400 --> 00:38:07,920 Speaker 3: Well, it's definitely a homer pick. So I'm gonna always 853 00:38:07,960 --> 00:38:11,960 Speaker 3: call that out. I think it's it's not that bold, 854 00:38:12,000 --> 00:38:15,480 Speaker 3: but it's also like it's not you know, it's it's 855 00:38:15,480 --> 00:38:17,880 Speaker 3: significantly bold in the sense that like you're not like saying, like, oh, 856 00:38:17,920 --> 00:38:19,480 Speaker 3: I think the Oils are going to better than the Yankees. 857 00:38:19,520 --> 00:38:20,880 Speaker 2: Like it's the Oriols versus the field. 858 00:38:21,000 --> 00:38:23,239 Speaker 1: So yeah, I'm not saying they win the Al East. 859 00:38:23,280 --> 00:38:25,360 Speaker 1: I'm saying they have the best record of baseball. 860 00:38:25,360 --> 00:38:28,880 Speaker 3: That's not a gimme, and they're currently right around second. 861 00:38:28,920 --> 00:38:30,719 Speaker 3: The Phillies have the best record of baseball. Looks like 862 00:38:30,719 --> 00:38:31,799 Speaker 3: sixty two and thirty four. 863 00:38:31,960 --> 00:38:32,680 Speaker 1: Yeah. 864 00:38:32,719 --> 00:38:34,959 Speaker 3: The other thing about that is like the aliast is good, 865 00:38:35,440 --> 00:38:38,280 Speaker 3: Like the Blue Jays are going to sell they stink, 866 00:38:38,800 --> 00:38:41,479 Speaker 3: but everyone else is five hundred or better, and three 867 00:38:41,520 --> 00:38:44,839 Speaker 3: of those teams are significantly above five hundred. Now we'll 868 00:38:44,880 --> 00:38:47,719 Speaker 3: see if the Red Sox ownership decides to actually buy 869 00:38:47,760 --> 00:38:49,279 Speaker 3: at the deadline or if they just pull a high 870 00:38:49,280 --> 00:38:52,600 Speaker 3: and bloom and sell. Despite being ten games over five hundred, 871 00:38:53,040 --> 00:38:54,960 Speaker 3: but eleven games over five hundred. 872 00:38:55,280 --> 00:38:58,239 Speaker 1: Prior to this last weekend, the Orioles hadn't lost the 873 00:38:58,320 --> 00:39:00,520 Speaker 1: series to an Aliast team in a long time. That's 874 00:39:00,520 --> 00:39:03,920 Speaker 1: got a long way towards their success. You know, winning 875 00:39:03,920 --> 00:39:06,319 Speaker 1: the division last year is the fact that they've been 876 00:39:06,320 --> 00:39:08,839 Speaker 1: able to keep all the other teams the Al East 877 00:39:08,880 --> 00:39:11,680 Speaker 1: at bay. I hope that the snapping of that streak 878 00:39:11,719 --> 00:39:15,320 Speaker 1: doesn't kind of open those floodgates and they struggle against 879 00:39:15,320 --> 00:39:17,520 Speaker 1: their division opponents, and the second half we'll have to see. 880 00:39:17,719 --> 00:39:20,680 Speaker 1: Some would argue that your bold team prediction is also 881 00:39:20,880 --> 00:39:21,680 Speaker 1: a homer pick. 882 00:39:21,840 --> 00:39:25,400 Speaker 3: In a way, it is also it is also a 883 00:39:25,400 --> 00:39:29,880 Speaker 3: homer pick, but I also it was somewhat in reaction 884 00:39:30,040 --> 00:39:34,440 Speaker 3: to your pick because and it's somewhat I saw people 885 00:39:34,480 --> 00:39:37,840 Speaker 3: talking about this a couple of weeks ago whenever the 886 00:39:37,880 --> 00:39:40,400 Speaker 3: Red Sox played the Yankees, and it's why I made 887 00:39:40,400 --> 00:39:42,239 Speaker 3: a comment last week when you talked about, you know, 888 00:39:43,160 --> 00:39:45,880 Speaker 3: the best rosters in the Al East, and they were 889 00:39:45,960 --> 00:39:49,319 Speaker 3: kind of like tongue in cheek talking about like, do 890 00:39:49,360 --> 00:39:51,600 Speaker 3: the Yankees really have a better roster top to bottom 891 00:39:51,640 --> 00:39:54,400 Speaker 3: than the Red Sox, And they were like, probably, but 892 00:39:54,600 --> 00:39:57,080 Speaker 3: if you look at the Yankees roster, it's extremely top 893 00:39:57,120 --> 00:39:59,839 Speaker 3: heavy and it's not as deep as you think so 894 00:40:00,080 --> 00:40:02,640 Speaker 3: And again you don't want to like root for injuries 895 00:40:02,840 --> 00:40:05,439 Speaker 3: or really talk about injuries in that way, but they're 896 00:40:05,640 --> 00:40:08,920 Speaker 3: one significant injury away from not being a good team anymore. 897 00:40:09,280 --> 00:40:10,520 Speaker 2: Like even just. 898 00:40:10,480 --> 00:40:13,200 Speaker 3: Like looking at their I pulled up roster resource and 899 00:40:13,239 --> 00:40:15,080 Speaker 3: just looking at their lineup. They have Ben Rice, who's 900 00:40:15,080 --> 00:40:17,560 Speaker 3: like a great story starting at first base right now, 901 00:40:17,600 --> 00:40:19,759 Speaker 3: but who knows if that's If that sticks, then they 902 00:40:19,760 --> 00:40:23,239 Speaker 3: have Soto and Judge. Then it's Alex Perdugo, whatever is 903 00:40:23,320 --> 00:40:27,720 Speaker 3: left of Glabor Torres, Austin Wells, Anthony Volpi, overrated, Trent Grishram, 904 00:40:27,719 --> 00:40:28,600 Speaker 3: and DJ Lemayhew. 905 00:40:28,920 --> 00:40:30,640 Speaker 2: That's not a good lineup. 906 00:40:30,680 --> 00:40:34,640 Speaker 1: Dude, the good line The conversations that went on in 907 00:40:34,719 --> 00:40:38,440 Speaker 1: like May about like who would you rather have Gunner Henderson, 908 00:40:38,480 --> 00:40:42,000 Speaker 1: Bobby Wit Junior or Anthony Volpi I'm like, what that's 909 00:40:42,040 --> 00:40:44,960 Speaker 1: the meme of the two scary dragonheads and then the 910 00:40:45,000 --> 00:40:48,960 Speaker 1: one dufis looking one like Vulpi doesn't even belong in 911 00:40:49,000 --> 00:40:52,920 Speaker 1: the same stratosphere as the conversation between Gunner and Witt, 912 00:40:52,920 --> 00:40:55,480 Speaker 1: Like Gunner and Witt are like if you're building a 913 00:40:55,480 --> 00:40:59,759 Speaker 1: franchise tomorrow, like those are top five picks. Volpi is 914 00:40:59,800 --> 00:41:01,840 Speaker 1: not in the top twenty five. 915 00:41:02,400 --> 00:41:05,600 Speaker 3: No, And then and then they're pitching. They have, you know, 916 00:41:05,640 --> 00:41:07,279 Speaker 3: on the surface, they have good pitching staff. They have 917 00:41:07,320 --> 00:41:10,000 Speaker 3: Garrett Cole, but there's injury concerns there. And he also 918 00:41:10,040 --> 00:41:12,200 Speaker 3: hasn't looked exactly like Grek Cole since he came back. 919 00:41:12,400 --> 00:41:15,600 Speaker 3: We've seen what happened to Luise Heal, Carlos Rodan, you know, 920 00:41:15,800 --> 00:41:19,279 Speaker 3: up and down, he struggled Stroman, Nester Cortez, Like none 921 00:41:19,320 --> 00:41:21,279 Speaker 3: of them are sure things like it's a solid. 922 00:41:20,960 --> 00:41:23,160 Speaker 1: Staff, Like when s Jong Carlow coming back. 923 00:41:23,400 --> 00:41:25,160 Speaker 2: Doesn't matter, you know, it doesn't matter. 924 00:41:25,239 --> 00:41:27,920 Speaker 1: They add a little bit of help to I mean, 925 00:41:28,000 --> 00:41:30,279 Speaker 1: because you're right, Like, and I was paying a lot 926 00:41:30,280 --> 00:41:32,720 Speaker 1: of close attention to this during the Oils Yankee series 927 00:41:32,719 --> 00:41:36,399 Speaker 1: this weekend, Like it is Judge, it is Sodo and 928 00:41:36,440 --> 00:41:38,759 Speaker 1: then it's like really nothing else at least in terms 929 00:41:38,760 --> 00:41:39,600 Speaker 1: of the batting lineup. 930 00:41:40,360 --> 00:41:42,040 Speaker 2: Yeah, so I was looking at the rock. 931 00:41:42,200 --> 00:41:44,279 Speaker 3: That conversation led me to kind of look at the 932 00:41:44,360 --> 00:41:47,280 Speaker 3: roster and then just looking at the standings. Now, obviously 933 00:41:47,320 --> 00:41:50,040 Speaker 3: it's gonna be hard to miss the playoffs because of 934 00:41:50,080 --> 00:41:53,080 Speaker 3: the three wild card spots, but they're also they're three 935 00:41:53,160 --> 00:41:55,040 Speaker 3: and a half games up on a wild card spot. 936 00:41:55,280 --> 00:41:57,120 Speaker 3: The Twins are right behind them, the Red Sox right 937 00:41:57,120 --> 00:41:59,839 Speaker 3: behind them, the Royals are five games back, and then 938 00:41:59,880 --> 00:42:03,000 Speaker 3: you have the Astros, Rays, and the Rangers all sitting 939 00:42:03,080 --> 00:42:05,440 Speaker 3: right there. And like it's one bad week from the 940 00:42:05,520 --> 00:42:07,879 Speaker 3: from the Yankees and all of a sudden that race 941 00:42:08,000 --> 00:42:10,360 Speaker 3: is real tight. And that's assuming they don't overtake the 942 00:42:10,360 --> 00:42:13,279 Speaker 3: oils in the in the Al East. But like there's 943 00:42:13,320 --> 00:42:14,960 Speaker 3: a really I think they're going to make the playoffs 944 00:42:15,000 --> 00:42:17,759 Speaker 3: because there are three wild card spots, but there's a 945 00:42:17,800 --> 00:42:20,959 Speaker 3: realistic scenario where they're the second or third wildcard team 946 00:42:21,200 --> 00:42:24,120 Speaker 3: or doomsday scenario. They're on the outside looking to end it. 947 00:42:24,160 --> 00:42:26,320 Speaker 3: But I think they it would take probably an injury 948 00:42:26,320 --> 00:42:27,640 Speaker 3: to judge or soda for that to happen. 949 00:42:27,880 --> 00:42:30,520 Speaker 1: Let's go to our season long two Start Picture competition. 950 00:42:30,640 --> 00:42:33,320 Speaker 1: Like I mentioned earlier, the current record is Worm nine 951 00:42:33,480 --> 00:42:37,520 Speaker 1: and Mayor six. And because of the nature of this 952 00:42:37,600 --> 00:42:42,120 Speaker 1: week where it can be uncertain if guys are actually 953 00:42:42,120 --> 00:42:44,120 Speaker 1: lined up as two star pitchers or not as teams, 954 00:42:44,200 --> 00:42:46,680 Speaker 1: kind of reset the rotations plus all Star brek. We're 955 00:42:46,680 --> 00:42:50,120 Speaker 1: also taping this We should mention on Wednesday of this week. 956 00:42:50,239 --> 00:42:51,880 Speaker 1: Just it's how it worked out for scheduling, and we 957 00:42:51,880 --> 00:42:53,520 Speaker 1: figured it was fine to go early because there were 958 00:42:53,520 --> 00:42:55,840 Speaker 1: no games going on between now and when the school released. 959 00:42:56,000 --> 00:42:58,160 Speaker 1: But one of the effects of that is it's even 960 00:42:58,320 --> 00:43:00,680 Speaker 1: less clear kind of who for sure will be the 961 00:43:00,719 --> 00:43:02,680 Speaker 1: two star pictures. So we did our best. We checked 962 00:43:02,719 --> 00:43:05,239 Speaker 1: a couple websites and tried to project out as best 963 00:43:05,280 --> 00:43:08,359 Speaker 1: we could who it would be. But with that of mine, 964 00:43:08,440 --> 00:43:11,640 Speaker 1: we each provided backups for this week in case our 965 00:43:11,680 --> 00:43:16,160 Speaker 1: main person doesn't work out. So my main pick is 966 00:43:16,280 --> 00:43:18,600 Speaker 1: Zach Wheeler, and yes I did pick him in week 967 00:43:18,640 --> 00:43:21,640 Speaker 1: one and we said no repeats. But if you'll remember 968 00:43:22,560 --> 00:43:25,040 Speaker 1: Mayor when he was out of town, Bogman filled in 969 00:43:25,120 --> 00:43:27,880 Speaker 1: and Bogman made a pick for him. I thought Bogman 970 00:43:27,920 --> 00:43:30,560 Speaker 1: had access to the list of pictures that had already 971 00:43:30,560 --> 00:43:32,640 Speaker 1: been used. It turns out he didn't, so in the moment, 972 00:43:32,680 --> 00:43:35,920 Speaker 1: I made an executive decision that when he picked Aaron Nola, 973 00:43:36,000 --> 00:43:38,520 Speaker 1: who mayor had already used that okay, we would allow 974 00:43:39,080 --> 00:43:41,440 Speaker 1: one time for each of us, a one time repeat. 975 00:43:41,520 --> 00:43:43,120 Speaker 1: So I'm going to try and use that this week, 976 00:43:43,160 --> 00:43:45,919 Speaker 1: mostly because you picked my favorite option and I don't 977 00:43:45,960 --> 00:43:48,640 Speaker 1: really like anybody else that all that much. There's some 978 00:43:48,680 --> 00:43:50,799 Speaker 1: okay options, but I just you know, wasn't a big 979 00:43:50,800 --> 00:43:53,040 Speaker 1: fan of this week. So I'm going with Zach Wheeler 980 00:43:53,160 --> 00:43:57,279 Speaker 1: at Minnesota and home versus Cleveland my backup. And by 981 00:43:57,320 --> 00:43:59,400 Speaker 1: the way, with Wheeler's injury question marks like, I'm not 982 00:43:59,400 --> 00:44:01,080 Speaker 1: sure what the Philly as of right now are going 983 00:44:01,160 --> 00:44:03,240 Speaker 1: to do to line up the second half the rotation 984 00:44:03,400 --> 00:44:05,080 Speaker 1: or what they're going to do with him, so I 985 00:44:05,160 --> 00:44:07,160 Speaker 1: think there's a real chance that he doesn't make his two starts. 986 00:44:07,200 --> 00:44:10,000 Speaker 1: If he doesn't, my backup is Bryce Miller. He is 987 00:44:10,239 --> 00:44:13,319 Speaker 1: has really nice matchups home against the Angels and home 988 00:44:13,400 --> 00:44:17,000 Speaker 1: against the terrible White Sox. So my pick is Zach Wheeler. 989 00:44:17,440 --> 00:44:19,520 Speaker 1: Backup is Bryce Miller, who you got? 990 00:44:19,680 --> 00:44:21,560 Speaker 2: So I have Cole Reagan so I have not used 991 00:44:21,600 --> 00:44:23,200 Speaker 2: yet this year. He's at home. 992 00:44:23,280 --> 00:44:25,759 Speaker 3: He has two home starts, home against the Diamondbacks and 993 00:44:25,760 --> 00:44:28,400 Speaker 3: home versus the Cubs, and my backup is Garrett Crochet, 994 00:44:28,520 --> 00:44:30,239 Speaker 3: which I think we're talking about for the show. Neither 995 00:44:30,280 --> 00:44:32,279 Speaker 3: one of us has used yet this season. 996 00:44:32,080 --> 00:44:34,160 Speaker 1: Neither of us. Neither one of us has used Reagans either, 997 00:44:34,160 --> 00:44:36,279 Speaker 1: which I was really surprised by. I'm like, these are 998 00:44:36,320 --> 00:44:37,760 Speaker 1: two really good pictures. 999 00:44:38,239 --> 00:44:39,719 Speaker 3: Yeah, it must have just I know early in the 1000 00:44:39,719 --> 00:44:42,120 Speaker 3: season I was I was saving people for no reason, 1001 00:44:42,840 --> 00:44:43,400 Speaker 3: but I kind of. 1002 00:44:43,400 --> 00:44:46,040 Speaker 1: Hate used Crochet because I was like he might not 1003 00:44:46,080 --> 00:44:49,360 Speaker 1: be good in the second half because of the inning stuff, 1004 00:44:49,440 --> 00:44:51,040 Speaker 1: so like I should use him while I can, but 1005 00:44:51,120 --> 00:44:52,200 Speaker 1: I guess I guess I didn't. 1006 00:44:53,120 --> 00:44:54,960 Speaker 3: He also had a period there where he kind of 1007 00:44:55,040 --> 00:44:56,799 Speaker 3: wasn't pitching well, so he may have like come up 1008 00:44:56,840 --> 00:44:59,160 Speaker 3: on a two start week while he wasn't pitching well, 1009 00:44:59,200 --> 00:44:59,640 Speaker 3: so that could be. 1010 00:44:59,680 --> 00:45:00,160 Speaker 2: Part of it. 1011 00:45:00,200 --> 00:45:03,400 Speaker 3: And so his matchups are at the Texas Rangers and 1012 00:45:03,440 --> 00:45:06,800 Speaker 3: home against the Mariners. So my pick is Cole Reagan's 1013 00:45:07,000 --> 00:45:08,800 Speaker 3: and my backup is Garrett Crochet. 1014 00:45:09,040 --> 00:45:11,000 Speaker 1: Reagan's is the one. I think he's the best pick 1015 00:45:11,080 --> 00:45:12,840 Speaker 1: this week, So I'll. 1016 00:45:12,760 --> 00:45:15,120 Speaker 2: Know you jinxed it. So now I'm going to lose again. 1017 00:45:15,320 --> 00:45:16,960 Speaker 1: Well I hope not, because he's on that team. I 1018 00:45:16,960 --> 00:45:19,160 Speaker 1: said that was really good, so I hope he does. Well. Yeah, 1019 00:45:19,160 --> 00:45:22,399 Speaker 1: we're we're coming towards the end of evan of our 1020 00:45:22,440 --> 00:45:24,480 Speaker 1: time doing the show together. You know, as we kind 1021 00:45:24,480 --> 00:45:26,560 Speaker 1: of transition into football. The show will continue. It's not 1022 00:45:26,600 --> 00:45:30,080 Speaker 1: going anywhere, but us doing it together might not last 1023 00:45:30,080 --> 00:45:33,560 Speaker 1: too long. So I'm getting pretty darn close to maybe 1024 00:45:33,600 --> 00:45:36,920 Speaker 1: locking in a victory in this thing, unless we're going 1025 00:45:36,960 --> 00:45:38,840 Speaker 1: to continue it with somebody making the picks for me 1026 00:45:38,920 --> 00:45:39,800 Speaker 1: every single week. 1027 00:45:40,040 --> 00:45:42,000 Speaker 3: I was gonna say, if I stay on as host 1028 00:45:42,080 --> 00:45:44,120 Speaker 3: and someone else does it with me, I think maybe 1029 00:45:44,120 --> 00:45:47,200 Speaker 3: we just keep the competition going and. 1030 00:45:47,160 --> 00:45:49,320 Speaker 1: See if maybe I can like just submit my picks 1031 00:45:49,320 --> 00:45:51,640 Speaker 1: to you each week here or something like that, because 1032 00:45:51,680 --> 00:45:54,680 Speaker 1: that's that would be a lot of weeks of somebody 1033 00:45:54,680 --> 00:45:59,040 Speaker 1: else holding my feet in their hands. Yeah, all right, 1034 00:45:59,040 --> 00:46:01,400 Speaker 1: we'll get out of there on that. We ended up 1035 00:46:01,440 --> 00:46:03,960 Speaker 1: going close to an hour, So hopefully everybody got their 1036 00:46:04,280 --> 00:46:08,200 Speaker 1: their cycle Phil for this week. We'll be back next 1037 00:46:08,200 --> 00:46:11,440 Speaker 1: week as per usual, you know, towards the end of 1038 00:46:11,440 --> 00:46:13,520 Speaker 1: next week. But hope everybody enjoyed the All Star break 1039 00:46:13,560 --> 00:46:15,480 Speaker 1: and maybe had more fun with the All Star Game 1040 00:46:15,560 --> 00:46:17,879 Speaker 1: than we did, maybe had more fun with the Homer 1041 00:46:18,040 --> 00:46:20,759 Speaker 1: Derby than may Or did. I certainly enjoyed it well 1042 00:46:20,880 --> 00:46:25,359 Speaker 1: enough given our draft for Mayor, I'm Ryan warmly thanks 1043 00:46:25,360 --> 00:46:27,359 Speaker 1: everybody for tuning in and we'll see again next time. 1044 00:46:27,400 --> 00:46:30,560 Speaker 1: Thanks for listening to the Fantasy Pros Fantasy Baseball podcast, 1045 00:46:30,840 --> 00:46:34,400 Speaker 1: Follow us on x, Instagram, and TikTok at Fantasy Pros, 1046 00:46:34,520 --> 00:46:37,200 Speaker 1: and subscribe to our YouTube channel at YouTube dot com 1047 00:46:37,200 --> 00:46:38,880 Speaker 1: Slash Fantasy Pros MLB