WEBVTT - Tech Charges Higher and Adobe Misses the Mark

0:00:02.440 --> 0:00:06.760
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio News.

0:00:08.280 --> 0:00:09.640
<v Speaker 2>We're from Mahard.

0:00:09.280 --> 0:00:13.720
<v Speaker 1>Where innovation, money and power Collie in Silicon Valley NBN.

0:00:14.080 --> 0:00:18.360
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Technology with Caroline Hyde and Ed lud Love.

0:00:31.720 --> 0:00:32.560
<v Speaker 3>Live from New York.

0:00:32.840 --> 0:00:36.239
<v Speaker 4>This is Bloomberg Technology coming up. Tech charges higher as

0:00:36.240 --> 0:00:38.360
<v Speaker 4>the NASDAC is sept for its best week of the year.

0:00:38.840 --> 0:00:42.040
<v Speaker 4>We dig into the AI drivers as even as Adobe.

0:00:42.120 --> 0:00:45.320
<v Speaker 4>This is the mark a mutant forecast on AI growth,

0:00:45.360 --> 0:00:49.120
<v Speaker 4>overshadowing better than expected third quarter results. And Uber it

0:00:49.240 --> 0:00:52.680
<v Speaker 4>powers ahead as it expands its partnership with Weimo, bringing

0:00:52.680 --> 0:00:56.640
<v Speaker 4>autonomous right hailing to Austin and Atlanta. But let's look

0:00:56.680 --> 0:01:00.000
<v Speaker 4>into what's happening with Uber because we are driving higher

0:01:00.360 --> 0:01:03.000
<v Speaker 4>the putt four point nine percent. This is all surrounding,

0:01:03.040 --> 0:01:04.639
<v Speaker 4>of course, a deal that it's making with Waymo.

0:01:04.760 --> 0:01:07.080
<v Speaker 3>It really wants the owning autonomous driving.

0:01:07.160 --> 0:01:09.480
<v Speaker 4>Let's dig into that news that it will basically be

0:01:09.480 --> 0:01:12.760
<v Speaker 4>the only app offering driverless rides in waymow cars in

0:01:12.840 --> 0:01:14.160
<v Speaker 4>Austin and Atlanta.

0:01:14.440 --> 0:01:17.600
<v Speaker 3>So good news for this stock. Natalie Lung is with us.

0:01:17.520 --> 0:01:21.080
<v Speaker 4>To break it all down, and Natalie overall, I am

0:01:21.120 --> 0:01:25.080
<v Speaker 4>wandering more broadly about well what Uber.

0:01:24.800 --> 0:01:25.360
<v Speaker 3>Is seeing here.

0:01:25.480 --> 0:01:29.000
<v Speaker 4>Is it the challenge coming from robo taxes, challenge coming

0:01:29.240 --> 0:01:32.080
<v Speaker 4>from Tesla, or is it something else that drives us?

0:01:32.760 --> 0:01:35.039
<v Speaker 5>He couldn't be a combination of all these things. And

0:01:35.160 --> 0:01:39.360
<v Speaker 5>Uber wants to make early innings into being the platform

0:01:39.400 --> 0:01:42.200
<v Speaker 5>that people go to, that regular people go to to

0:01:42.240 --> 0:01:46.240
<v Speaker 5>get these consumer that get these driverless rides. So that's

0:01:46.280 --> 0:01:50.520
<v Speaker 5>why they're making partnerships with Weimo, as with Cruise as

0:01:50.560 --> 0:01:55.520
<v Speaker 5>well as byd for ride experiences outside the US. And

0:01:55.560 --> 0:01:59.040
<v Speaker 5>it wants to be that so called indispensable partner to

0:01:59.080 --> 0:02:02.640
<v Speaker 5>all these manufacturers who are looking to put their driverers

0:02:02.640 --> 0:02:03.360
<v Speaker 5>cars to use.

0:02:04.000 --> 0:02:06.800
<v Speaker 4>It's going to bring on board all electric Jaguar Ipace

0:02:06.920 --> 0:02:10.680
<v Speaker 4>vehicles the way mo offering how quickly am I going

0:02:10.720 --> 0:02:12.359
<v Speaker 4>to be able to get in one at the moment?

0:02:12.520 --> 0:02:15.200
<v Speaker 4>Where which cities? How fast will this expand?

0:02:16.080 --> 0:02:16.240
<v Speaker 6>Right?

0:02:16.320 --> 0:02:19.600
<v Speaker 5>So, Uber and Waimo currently has a collaboration in Phoenix,

0:02:19.840 --> 0:02:23.680
<v Speaker 5>so that's happening there now, but starting early next year,

0:02:24.240 --> 0:02:28.440
<v Speaker 5>Uber will be offering those way more rides exclusively in

0:02:28.560 --> 0:02:30.080
<v Speaker 5>Austin and Atlanta.

0:02:30.840 --> 0:02:32.520
<v Speaker 3>It really is a good day for the Uber stock.

0:02:32.520 --> 0:02:34.840
<v Speaker 4>We're popping first days since August the eighth, but up

0:02:34.840 --> 0:02:37.400
<v Speaker 4>almost five percent. Natalie Lung breaks down, we appreciate it

0:02:37.440 --> 0:02:40.680
<v Speaker 4>so much. Meanwhile, Adobe ches doing the opposite, whipsawing to

0:02:40.720 --> 0:02:43.440
<v Speaker 4>the lower side today after the company reported earnings yesterday,

0:02:43.480 --> 0:02:47.560
<v Speaker 4>after the bell outlook really failed to quell investor impatience

0:02:47.960 --> 0:02:51.560
<v Speaker 4>for new AI tools to start generating cash. Bradie Ford

0:02:51.600 --> 0:02:54.080
<v Speaker 4>pointed us toward it yesterday and is here with the

0:02:54.120 --> 0:02:57.559
<v Speaker 4>results today, and it does seem to be the digital media.

0:02:57.320 --> 0:02:58.720
<v Speaker 3>Side that is letting the side down.

0:03:00.120 --> 0:03:03.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Well, here's the big question for these software companies

0:03:03.160 --> 0:03:06.240
<v Speaker 2>that were the big winners over the last decade. Is

0:03:06.400 --> 0:03:10.119
<v Speaker 2>AI a meaningful new product that will unlock new revenue?

0:03:10.639 --> 0:03:12.600
<v Speaker 2>Are Is it just kind of like a cool feature

0:03:12.639 --> 0:03:14.880
<v Speaker 2>that you add in and it's a nice to have,

0:03:15.120 --> 0:03:18.160
<v Speaker 2>but it doesn't really move the needle. And that's the

0:03:18.240 --> 0:03:20.880
<v Speaker 2>question that investors been batting back and forth with Adobe.

0:03:20.960 --> 0:03:22.840
<v Speaker 2>And what we saw last night is just that that

0:03:23.639 --> 0:03:26.560
<v Speaker 2>incremental revenue they were hoping to see from new AI

0:03:26.680 --> 0:03:30.639
<v Speaker 2>products at least isn't materializing yet. We have executives talking

0:03:30.639 --> 0:03:35.160
<v Speaker 2>about we are optimizing for use and adoption rather than

0:03:35.280 --> 0:03:37.400
<v Speaker 2>really driving monetization on these products.

0:03:37.440 --> 0:03:37.720
<v Speaker 7>Yet.

0:03:38.280 --> 0:03:41.000
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, what did Chantanu have to say, to quell investors

0:03:41.080 --> 0:03:43.200
<v Speaker 4>nerves because this is a heavy sell off in the stock.

0:03:43.800 --> 0:03:44.680
<v Speaker 3>But they seem to be.

0:03:44.640 --> 0:03:48.920
<v Speaker 4>Trying to show that, yes, they're driving profitability, they're driving

0:03:49.000 --> 0:03:51.480
<v Speaker 4>forward in terms of their offerings, but not really speaking

0:03:51.520 --> 0:03:52.240
<v Speaker 4>to this weakness.

0:03:53.520 --> 0:03:53.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:03:53.880 --> 0:03:57.000
<v Speaker 2>Their defense, as I read it, and it was a

0:03:57.000 --> 0:04:00.400
<v Speaker 2>bit of a subtle one, is that AI is still

0:04:00.440 --> 0:04:03.680
<v Speaker 2>a value ad because it keeps folks from going to

0:04:03.720 --> 0:04:07.760
<v Speaker 2>our competitors and it allows us to increase prices. Right,

0:04:07.840 --> 0:04:10.360
<v Speaker 2>so it's not that I'm paying an additional ten dollars

0:04:10.360 --> 0:04:12.840
<v Speaker 2>for the new AI tools, but it's that, well, I'm

0:04:12.880 --> 0:04:15.760
<v Speaker 2>not going to go install Canva, and if you raise

0:04:15.800 --> 0:04:18.520
<v Speaker 2>my prices ten percent, I'm not going to cancel, and

0:04:18.560 --> 0:04:20.560
<v Speaker 2>I'm not going to fight you either. And so they

0:04:20.640 --> 0:04:24.000
<v Speaker 2>said that it's it's kind of an indirect monetization story

0:04:24.040 --> 0:04:26.720
<v Speaker 2>at this point, with more direct monetization to come in

0:04:26.760 --> 0:04:27.240
<v Speaker 2>the future.

0:04:27.680 --> 0:04:30.960
<v Speaker 4>What levers, therefore, can they pull to monetize in the future.

0:04:32.160 --> 0:04:34.400
<v Speaker 2>In the future, the idea would be that you know

0:04:34.760 --> 0:04:38.000
<v Speaker 2>generation saying photoshop, click here, make a picture of a

0:04:38.080 --> 0:04:41.440
<v Speaker 2>dog doing a backflip. Every time you do that, you

0:04:41.520 --> 0:04:44.719
<v Speaker 2>have let's say a thousand credit standard for generations you

0:04:44.760 --> 0:04:48.039
<v Speaker 2>go above that, you start getting charged. That's one method.

0:04:48.760 --> 0:04:52.200
<v Speaker 2>In more resource intensive models such as video, which they're

0:04:52.240 --> 0:04:54.599
<v Speaker 2>working on, they said that could be a whole different

0:04:54.640 --> 0:04:58.200
<v Speaker 2>monetization mechanism, in part because the compute would probably be

0:04:58.240 --> 0:05:02.560
<v Speaker 2>so much higher. So general credit packs, consumption and additional

0:05:02.640 --> 0:05:06.760
<v Speaker 2>productiers would be the general way folks would expect. And

0:05:06.800 --> 0:05:08.200
<v Speaker 2>they've spoken about.

0:05:09.520 --> 0:05:13.520
<v Speaker 4>One area of focus that we have for Adobe going

0:05:13.560 --> 0:05:15.840
<v Speaker 4>forward has been the investment that they're having to make

0:05:15.880 --> 0:05:18.200
<v Speaker 4>as well. The partnerships are striking where they're trying. You

0:05:18.240 --> 0:05:21.240
<v Speaker 4>were on yesterday just talking through how these businesses are

0:05:21.279 --> 0:05:24.919
<v Speaker 4>trying to delve into the three D modeling side of things.

0:05:25.000 --> 0:05:28.280
<v Speaker 4>How expensive is the artificial intelligence offering for them.

0:05:29.640 --> 0:05:32.880
<v Speaker 2>The beauty of being a giant company like Adobe. Some

0:05:32.920 --> 0:05:35.320
<v Speaker 2>folks have told me that Adobe Suite of Creative Tools

0:05:35.400 --> 0:05:38.719
<v Speaker 2>is one of the most profitable products ever and so

0:05:38.880 --> 0:05:40.640
<v Speaker 2>they have a bit of a mountain of cash and

0:05:40.680 --> 0:05:44.000
<v Speaker 2>so they're definitely able to train these things and throw

0:05:44.080 --> 0:05:46.960
<v Speaker 2>some money around without it being too diluted at this point.

0:05:47.040 --> 0:05:50.120
<v Speaker 2>So it's a big expense, especially for the startups. We

0:05:50.200 --> 0:05:52.080
<v Speaker 2>hear about it being a you know, it can be

0:05:52.080 --> 0:05:56.000
<v Speaker 2>even inhibiting factor. Adobe has really tried to message that, look,

0:05:56.080 --> 0:05:59.479
<v Speaker 2>we have a diversified business. We are willing to pull

0:05:59.560 --> 0:06:01.479
<v Speaker 2>some cash over here and put it over here to

0:06:01.520 --> 0:06:03.960
<v Speaker 2>make sure we're able to keep on doing this and

0:06:04.040 --> 0:06:07.680
<v Speaker 2>keep getting adoption. And they generally think that they're best

0:06:07.720 --> 0:06:12.720
<v Speaker 2>set by centralizing users on Adobe and keeping them there

0:06:12.760 --> 0:06:16.239
<v Speaker 2>by keeping AI accessible for a little longer before jacking

0:06:16.320 --> 0:06:17.000
<v Speaker 2>up the prices.

0:06:17.640 --> 0:06:29.400
<v Speaker 4>Ready, Ford, we thank you, thank you. Let's talk aviation

0:06:29.600 --> 0:06:32.880
<v Speaker 4>tech right now. Boeing factory workers walked off the job

0:06:32.960 --> 0:06:35.880
<v Speaker 4>for the first time in sixteen years today, halting manufacturing

0:06:35.880 --> 0:06:38.840
<v Speaker 4>across the plane maker's Seattle hub. This after members of

0:06:38.880 --> 0:06:42.280
<v Speaker 4>its largest union voted overwhelmingly to reject a contract offer

0:06:42.320 --> 0:06:45.240
<v Speaker 4>angle on strike. While both parties have expressed a desire

0:06:45.240 --> 0:06:48.040
<v Speaker 4>to get back to the bargaining table to move ads

0:06:48.080 --> 0:06:50.880
<v Speaker 4>to the strain on Boeing, let's just stick with the

0:06:50.880 --> 0:06:53.720
<v Speaker 4>airline industry now, because United Airlines has announced a deal

0:06:53.760 --> 0:06:57.039
<v Speaker 4>with Starlink. The airline is set to offer in flight

0:06:57.120 --> 0:07:01.320
<v Speaker 4>Wi Fi through SpaceX's Internet service for free. Winimberg's Nongrasch

0:07:01.400 --> 0:07:03.920
<v Speaker 4>joins us now, Wow, no more five dollars ninety nine

0:07:03.960 --> 0:07:06.479
<v Speaker 4>minimum spends when if you get on the plane. What

0:07:06.520 --> 0:07:09.760
<v Speaker 4>does it say about Starlink's reliability in the air right.

0:07:09.840 --> 0:07:12.520
<v Speaker 8>I think a lot of people were wondering when, you know,

0:07:12.600 --> 0:07:14.440
<v Speaker 8>they would strike a big deal with one of the

0:07:14.480 --> 0:07:17.440
<v Speaker 8>major airlines, and I think what it's showing is that

0:07:17.720 --> 0:07:20.200
<v Speaker 8>all right. You know, there were some questions about whether

0:07:20.280 --> 0:07:23.200
<v Speaker 8>or not it could handle the capacity earlier, but now

0:07:23.240 --> 0:07:25.800
<v Speaker 8>I think at least one of these airlines says all right,

0:07:26.080 --> 0:07:28.640
<v Speaker 8>I think they're ready to handle our fleet of vehicles.

0:07:28.960 --> 0:07:30.640
<v Speaker 4>When you say one of these airlines one of the

0:07:30.680 --> 0:07:32.800
<v Speaker 4>big carriers in the US, they've already got to deal

0:07:32.880 --> 0:07:34.760
<v Speaker 4>with Hawaiian airlines, right, They've.

0:07:34.560 --> 0:07:38.800
<v Speaker 8>Got JSX, which is a smaller airline you know, predominantly

0:07:38.800 --> 0:07:41.840
<v Speaker 8>based out of Texas. But yes, this is one of

0:07:41.840 --> 0:07:44.040
<v Speaker 8>the big four, if you will. And so now they

0:07:44.080 --> 0:07:46.600
<v Speaker 8>finally have I think the bragging rights that they need

0:07:46.640 --> 0:07:48.800
<v Speaker 8>to say, all right, we are here for the big time,

0:07:48.880 --> 0:07:49.680
<v Speaker 8>the big players.

0:07:50.160 --> 0:07:51.120
<v Speaker 3>Just look at this deal.

0:07:51.360 --> 0:07:53.400
<v Speaker 4>Scott Kirby really talking about how you're gonna be able

0:07:53.440 --> 0:07:55.720
<v Speaker 4>to just walk straight on the plane from the lounge.

0:07:56.080 --> 0:08:01.480
<v Speaker 4>Everything will be seamless. Ultimately you'll be connected devices. Also,

0:08:01.640 --> 0:08:03.960
<v Speaker 4>what you're going to be using on the aircraft itself.

0:08:04.680 --> 0:08:07.960
<v Speaker 4>What in terms of market shared. Do analysts think that

0:08:08.000 --> 0:08:10.240
<v Speaker 4>they're able to get his Scott Kirby the first guy

0:08:10.320 --> 0:08:11.640
<v Speaker 4>to go and everyone else follows.

0:08:11.920 --> 0:08:12.320
<v Speaker 3>I think so.

0:08:12.480 --> 0:08:14.520
<v Speaker 8>I think a lot of people think this might be like.

0:08:14.520 --> 0:08:16.480
<v Speaker 3>A watershed moment for them, you.

0:08:16.400 --> 0:08:20.120
<v Speaker 8>Know, because it's a big advertising get right. They can say,

0:08:20.160 --> 0:08:22.600
<v Speaker 8>all right, here we have one of the major players.

0:08:22.680 --> 0:08:24.600
<v Speaker 8>When are the other ones going to follow suit? And

0:08:24.680 --> 0:08:27.200
<v Speaker 8>so that's I think really the big get for them.

0:08:27.560 --> 0:08:30.320
<v Speaker 4>The technology is what we love to hear from you

0:08:30.480 --> 0:08:34.760
<v Speaker 4>and ultimately, how hard is this? We all understand how

0:08:34.800 --> 0:08:37.440
<v Speaker 4>glitchy the airline Wi Fi is at the moment, why

0:08:37.559 --> 0:08:37.800
<v Speaker 4>is that?

0:08:37.960 --> 0:08:38.960
<v Speaker 3>What does starting offer?

0:08:39.080 --> 0:08:41.320
<v Speaker 8>Well, one of the big advantages that starlink has over

0:08:41.400 --> 0:08:45.800
<v Speaker 8>its competitors for other Internet satellites is that they're closer. Right,

0:08:45.880 --> 0:08:49.199
<v Speaker 8>So the incumbents that a lot of the airlines use

0:08:49.360 --> 0:08:51.840
<v Speaker 8>use satellites that are in much higher orbits and so

0:08:52.240 --> 0:08:54.920
<v Speaker 8>there's a latency. There's that lag that I'm sure everybody

0:08:55.000 --> 0:08:58.000
<v Speaker 8>has been frustrated with on their planes from time to time.

0:08:58.280 --> 0:09:01.640
<v Speaker 8>But what starlink offers their satellites are much closer to

0:09:01.679 --> 0:09:04.680
<v Speaker 8>the Earth and so you can have that cut down

0:09:04.679 --> 0:09:08.040
<v Speaker 8>in latency. Of course, that comes with more satellites in orbit.

0:09:08.080 --> 0:09:09.800
<v Speaker 8>They need to launch more and more so that they

0:09:09.800 --> 0:09:12.440
<v Speaker 8>can have that global coverage because when you're closer to

0:09:12.440 --> 0:09:14.760
<v Speaker 8>the Earth, the satellites are moving a lot quicker, and

0:09:14.840 --> 0:09:17.280
<v Speaker 8>so in order to have a satellite overhead at any

0:09:17.280 --> 0:09:20.760
<v Speaker 8>given time, they just have to keep launching satellites. It's

0:09:20.800 --> 0:09:23.240
<v Speaker 8>basically a numbers game. But if they are able to

0:09:23.320 --> 0:09:25.800
<v Speaker 8>have enough satellites in orbit, then you cut down down

0:09:25.840 --> 0:09:28.040
<v Speaker 8>that latency and it's a more seamless experience.

0:09:28.360 --> 0:09:31.520
<v Speaker 4>Willumbre analyst Luis de Palmas, he's to be saying Stalin

0:09:31.559 --> 0:09:33.800
<v Speaker 4>is in no oppositioned to have the highest aviation mock

0:09:33.880 --> 0:09:36.280
<v Speaker 4>show in the next decade, but he's not saying in

0:09:36.320 --> 0:09:37.600
<v Speaker 4>the next two or three years.

0:09:37.640 --> 0:09:38.480
<v Speaker 3>This takes time run.

0:09:38.600 --> 0:09:41.320
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, it's definitely going to take time. And as we've seen,

0:09:41.720 --> 0:09:44.600
<v Speaker 8>you know, in terms of where Starlink has excelled, they've

0:09:44.640 --> 0:09:48.360
<v Speaker 8>really gone up in numbers. When it comes to individual subscribers,

0:09:48.960 --> 0:09:52.880
<v Speaker 8>maritime deals. They're definitely very popular over the ocean right

0:09:52.920 --> 0:09:56.720
<v Speaker 8>because there's less demand there, But when it comes to

0:09:57.240 --> 0:10:01.480
<v Speaker 8>the you know, over land and with bigger airlines, you

0:10:01.520 --> 0:10:02.760
<v Speaker 8>know that's going to take some time.

0:10:03.040 --> 0:10:03.959
<v Speaker 3>Also, you know, you have.

0:10:03.920 --> 0:10:06.600
<v Speaker 8>To get certain approvals, you have to re outfit the planes,

0:10:06.960 --> 0:10:08.480
<v Speaker 8>so it's going to be a slow process.

0:10:08.520 --> 0:10:09.680
<v Speaker 3>But this is just the first step.

0:10:09.720 --> 0:10:11.440
<v Speaker 8>And well it'll be interesting to see if any of

0:10:11.440 --> 0:10:12.480
<v Speaker 8>the other airlines follow.

0:10:13.280 --> 0:10:15.439
<v Speaker 4>I'm crush, what joy to have you in the studio

0:10:15.520 --> 0:10:17.760
<v Speaker 4>in New York. Watch this here traveling thank you so

0:10:17.880 --> 0:10:21.280
<v Speaker 4>much in a busy week in space elsewhere and transportation,

0:10:21.520 --> 0:10:24.760
<v Speaker 4>Amazon says it will invest more than two billion dollars

0:10:24.760 --> 0:10:28.040
<v Speaker 4>in its delivery service partner program, especially in an effort

0:10:28.120 --> 0:10:30.720
<v Speaker 4>to raise driver pay to a national average about twenty

0:10:30.760 --> 0:10:33.920
<v Speaker 4>two dollars an hour. Bloomberg's Matt Day reporting across this.

0:10:34.000 --> 0:10:36.280
<v Speaker 4>Why do it, Matt Well?

0:10:36.280 --> 0:10:36.480
<v Speaker 9>Why?

0:10:36.600 --> 0:10:39.360
<v Speaker 10>The first and kind of obvious context behind this is

0:10:39.400 --> 0:10:42.760
<v Speaker 10>a pressure from labor groups. You know, Amazon's contract delivery

0:10:42.800 --> 0:10:44.800
<v Speaker 10>drivers are a focused for the team Stais in particular,

0:10:44.840 --> 0:10:46.760
<v Speaker 10>they put a big target on Amazon's back, saying we're

0:10:46.760 --> 0:10:50.520
<v Speaker 10>going after them. Famously, these folks represent ups and have

0:10:50.640 --> 0:10:52.920
<v Speaker 10>said they think they can organize an Amazon worker. So

0:10:52.960 --> 0:10:54.640
<v Speaker 10>Amazon playing a little bit of defense here.

0:10:55.280 --> 0:10:59.240
<v Speaker 4>Defense Ultimately, why do they go for contractors? To begin with?

0:10:59.520 --> 0:11:01.400
<v Speaker 4>Why don't they hire their own drivers?

0:11:02.640 --> 0:11:04.280
<v Speaker 10>You know, the argument they make is that it's about

0:11:04.280 --> 0:11:07.480
<v Speaker 10>empowering small businesses. I think labor experts would maybe bat

0:11:07.480 --> 0:11:09.160
<v Speaker 10>an eye at that, but it is. It is a

0:11:09.200 --> 0:11:12.120
<v Speaker 10>relatively common model, right, FedEx uses you know, versions of this.

0:11:12.240 --> 0:11:14.760
<v Speaker 10>Uber you know, famously doesn't employ its own folks either.

0:11:15.400 --> 0:11:17.640
<v Speaker 10>So for Amazon, this gives them, you know, a bit

0:11:17.640 --> 0:11:18.720
<v Speaker 10>of a best of both worlds.

0:11:18.800 --> 0:11:18.920
<v Speaker 4>Right.

0:11:18.960 --> 0:11:20.800
<v Speaker 10>They don't have to provide you know, the perks of

0:11:20.840 --> 0:11:23.400
<v Speaker 10>employees to these folks directly. You know, at the same time,

0:11:23.440 --> 0:11:26.960
<v Speaker 10>they can exert a relatively high degree of control over independent,

0:11:27.040 --> 0:11:28.679
<v Speaker 10>often bespoke contract outfits.

0:11:29.120 --> 0:11:30.320
<v Speaker 3>How does it look abroad?

0:11:30.440 --> 0:11:32.839
<v Speaker 4>Is it this model in the US?

0:11:33.200 --> 0:11:34.400
<v Speaker 3>Same elsewhere? Different?

0:11:35.480 --> 0:11:37.120
<v Speaker 10>There are versions of it, and obviously, you know, in

0:11:37.160 --> 0:11:39.400
<v Speaker 10>countries with stricter labor laws, you know, they have to

0:11:39.400 --> 0:11:41.880
<v Speaker 10>comply with those. The US has fewer of those when

0:11:41.880 --> 0:11:44.439
<v Speaker 10>it comes to last mile drivers, but there are versions

0:11:44.440 --> 0:11:47.480
<v Speaker 10>of their Delivery Service Partner program abroad. They say there's

0:11:47.520 --> 0:11:50.720
<v Speaker 10>something like three hundred and ninety thousand drivers employed by

0:11:50.800 --> 0:11:53.199
<v Speaker 10>DSP's worldwide, So it's a it's a huge portion of

0:11:53.240 --> 0:11:55.200
<v Speaker 10>their you know, kind of workforce that does not accrue

0:11:55.240 --> 0:11:56.000
<v Speaker 10>to their books.

0:11:56.760 --> 0:11:59.800
<v Speaker 4>And let's talk about that books because I think Ultimately,

0:12:00.240 --> 0:12:03.080
<v Speaker 4>this is a business that has been cutting jobs, has

0:12:03.120 --> 0:12:06.040
<v Speaker 4>been getting leaner and meaner in areas it can, while

0:12:06.040 --> 0:12:09.760
<v Speaker 4>it's splurges an awful lot on artificial intelligence and compute.

0:12:10.400 --> 0:12:12.679
<v Speaker 4>What does this say a two billion dollar investment, what

0:12:12.720 --> 0:12:15.200
<v Speaker 4>does that in the context of Amazon's overall spending.

0:12:16.200 --> 0:12:18.400
<v Speaker 10>I think it's a reminder that, you know, as people

0:12:18.400 --> 0:12:20.319
<v Speaker 10>talk about them as a technology company, you know, their

0:12:20.320 --> 0:12:23.480
<v Speaker 10>core business of getting you things you know by by

0:12:23.520 --> 0:12:25.800
<v Speaker 10>delivery is still growing, even if it's slower than it

0:12:25.840 --> 0:12:27.839
<v Speaker 10>was during the boom years, and it still requires a

0:12:27.840 --> 0:12:29.199
<v Speaker 10>whole lot of bodies to make it work.

0:12:29.280 --> 0:12:29.400
<v Speaker 1>Right.

0:12:29.400 --> 0:12:31.600
<v Speaker 10>We're going to see surely from them announcements about their

0:12:31.600 --> 0:12:33.880
<v Speaker 10>seasonal hiring coming up for the fall, for the the

0:12:34.040 --> 0:12:36.440
<v Speaker 10>peak holiday season, something they do every year about this time.

0:12:37.120 --> 0:12:39.000
<v Speaker 10>So just a reminder I think that, you know, listen,

0:12:39.040 --> 0:12:41.520
<v Speaker 10>while they're they is getting all the headlines, they still

0:12:41.520 --> 0:12:43.439
<v Speaker 10>are moving a whole lot of stuff and require a

0:12:43.440 --> 0:12:45.840
<v Speaker 10>lot of partners to make that happen that day.

0:12:46.240 --> 0:12:49.439
<v Speaker 4>All things Amazon, we appreciate it, Thank you so much. Now,

0:12:49.480 --> 0:12:53.319
<v Speaker 4>coming up with the dirt bag of the Internet, who

0:12:53.360 --> 0:12:56.120
<v Speaker 4>happens to be behind the Crypto project promoted by Donald Trump?

0:12:56.840 --> 0:13:13.920
<v Speaker 3>That's next. This is Blouly Big Technology Revolute.

0:13:14.080 --> 0:13:17.240
<v Speaker 4>It's seeking licenses to start operating in the Middle East.

0:13:17.600 --> 0:13:21.160
<v Speaker 4>This is the London fintech giant hunts for growth beyond.

0:13:20.840 --> 0:13:21.760
<v Speaker 3>Its home market.

0:13:22.000 --> 0:13:24.760
<v Speaker 4>Now the firm has submitted applications to the Central Bank of.

0:13:24.760 --> 0:13:26.559
<v Speaker 3>The UAE reporting.

0:13:26.160 --> 0:13:30.000
<v Speaker 4>Shows to become an electronic money institution and offer remittiscences

0:13:30.559 --> 0:13:34.040
<v Speaker 4>in the country they of course. The sources currently speaking

0:13:34.040 --> 0:13:36.880
<v Speaker 4>to Bloomberg say that the goal is to eventually apply

0:13:37.000 --> 0:13:39.880
<v Speaker 4>for a full banking license similar to the one that

0:13:39.920 --> 0:13:42.959
<v Speaker 4>it recently received from regulators in the UK after years

0:13:43.480 --> 0:13:47.040
<v Speaker 4>of work. Now let's stick with the world of fintech,

0:13:47.080 --> 0:13:49.400
<v Speaker 4>but the crypto side of it. In the last year,

0:13:49.480 --> 0:13:52.880
<v Speaker 4>Donald Trump has fashioned himself into a friend to the

0:13:52.960 --> 0:13:56.720
<v Speaker 4>cryptocurrency crowd. He and his two older sons now have

0:13:56.800 --> 0:14:00.720
<v Speaker 4>been particularly good friends to World Liberty Finance, the crypto

0:14:00.760 --> 0:14:04.040
<v Speaker 4>project they've been promoting on social media. Here to tell

0:14:04.080 --> 0:14:07.440
<v Speaker 4>us more about well, the deal maker behind the project,

0:14:07.760 --> 0:14:12.120
<v Speaker 4>Sloomberg Investigative reporters Fox. You're also the author of book

0:14:12.320 --> 0:14:15.319
<v Speaker 4>Number Go Up Inside Crypto's Wild Rise and Staggering four,

0:14:15.360 --> 0:14:18.280
<v Speaker 4>which is up for a few awards. So congratulations on

0:14:18.320 --> 0:14:23.000
<v Speaker 4>that Zeke, you start your story focused on Chase Hero.

0:14:23.680 --> 0:14:24.960
<v Speaker 3>What can you tell about this guy?

0:14:26.320 --> 0:14:29.240
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, so Chase is an unknown in the crypto world,

0:14:29.480 --> 0:14:32.320
<v Speaker 9>but I dug it into his career and he's been

0:14:32.360 --> 0:14:35.560
<v Speaker 9>a marijuana dealer. He says he went to prison for that.

0:14:36.160 --> 0:14:40.280
<v Speaker 9>He sold weight loss calling cleanses online. He had one

0:14:40.360 --> 0:14:43.160
<v Speaker 9>hundred and forty nine dollars a month Get Rich Quick class.

0:14:43.440 --> 0:14:46.280
<v Speaker 9>And then now he appears to be the main deal

0:14:46.280 --> 0:14:50.400
<v Speaker 9>maker behind World Liberty Financial, which is this defive startup

0:14:50.760 --> 0:14:53.640
<v Speaker 9>the Trumps are promoting, and President Trump himself posted a

0:14:53.720 --> 0:14:56.040
<v Speaker 9>video saying, you know this is going to challenge the

0:14:56.040 --> 0:14:58.320
<v Speaker 9>big banks. So it's really bizarre to see that this

0:14:58.440 --> 0:14:59.840
<v Speaker 9>is the person they're partnering with.

0:15:00.960 --> 0:15:05.160
<v Speaker 4>I'm sorry, the guy behind this DeFi project isn't even

0:15:05.200 --> 0:15:06.200
<v Speaker 4>known in the crypto world.

0:15:07.400 --> 0:15:10.320
<v Speaker 9>No, and I mean he calls himself in videos. He

0:15:10.400 --> 0:15:12.560
<v Speaker 9>likes to call himself the dirt bag of the Internet.

0:15:13.080 --> 0:15:17.120
<v Speaker 9>I found in another video he said regulators should kick

0:15:17.160 --> 0:15:19.080
<v Speaker 9>people like him out of the industry, and not in

0:15:19.120 --> 0:15:23.240
<v Speaker 9>those words. He seems to have a very cynical, to

0:15:23.280 --> 0:15:28.440
<v Speaker 9>say the least, attitude towards crypto and this project World Liberty.

0:15:28.840 --> 0:15:30.600
<v Speaker 9>You know it might sound kind of impressive if you

0:15:30.640 --> 0:15:33.760
<v Speaker 9>didn't know about crypto, but it appears to be kind

0:15:33.760 --> 0:15:36.280
<v Speaker 9>of a copy of an existing project that didn't go

0:15:36.320 --> 0:15:38.320
<v Speaker 9>anywhere and then lost a lot of money in a hack.

0:15:38.960 --> 0:15:43.280
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, you're talking about the Dough project, right, Dough. That

0:15:43.400 --> 0:15:46.080
<v Speaker 4>seems to be what's got actually industry inside. Is the

0:15:46.080 --> 0:15:48.840
<v Speaker 4>crypto industry a little worried is ultimately that the people

0:15:48.880 --> 0:15:52.680
<v Speaker 4>behind Well Liberty Financial have come across from a much

0:15:52.720 --> 0:15:55.400
<v Speaker 4>smaller project that didn't manage to raise that many funds

0:15:55.760 --> 0:15:56.800
<v Speaker 4>and actually got hacked.

0:15:58.360 --> 0:16:01.400
<v Speaker 9>Yes, and I mean we don't know the details of

0:16:01.440 --> 0:16:05.360
<v Speaker 9>World Liberty. I obtained a white paper that lays out

0:16:05.400 --> 0:16:08.360
<v Speaker 9>some of them, but I'm sure it's all subject of change.

0:16:08.680 --> 0:16:11.680
<v Speaker 9>But this is supposed to be defile like decentralized finance.

0:16:11.880 --> 0:16:16.080
<v Speaker 9>The white paper says that seventy percent of the tokens

0:16:16.760 --> 0:16:20.720
<v Speaker 9>will be reserved for insiders. So talking to people in crypto,

0:16:21.080 --> 0:16:23.160
<v Speaker 9>they said, this looks like it could be more of

0:16:23.160 --> 0:16:25.560
<v Speaker 9>a cash grab than an innovative project.

0:16:26.640 --> 0:16:29.400
<v Speaker 4>Okay, And there in lies the issue that this could

0:16:29.440 --> 0:16:30.600
<v Speaker 4>be some sort of cash grab.

0:16:30.680 --> 0:16:31.080
<v Speaker 3>Some of the.

0:16:31.080 --> 0:16:33.800
<v Speaker 4>Details in your story and that might hint that there's

0:16:33.840 --> 0:16:37.280
<v Speaker 4>a slight difference in how this DeFi project is run

0:16:37.360 --> 0:16:41.520
<v Speaker 4>compared to others is that the people behind the cut

0:16:41.600 --> 0:16:45.400
<v Speaker 4>the overall project keep what of issue tokens.

0:16:45.400 --> 0:16:45.960
<v Speaker 3>That's a lot.

0:16:47.560 --> 0:16:51.160
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, And I mean like we're talking about this like

0:16:51.680 --> 0:16:53.280
<v Speaker 9>I think we're talking about this even a little bit

0:16:53.360 --> 0:16:56.240
<v Speaker 9>too seriously. Like you should go go read what this

0:16:56.320 --> 0:16:59.000
<v Speaker 9>guy says about crypto. I mean, I can't, I can't

0:16:59.040 --> 0:17:02.960
<v Speaker 9>repeat it. The language to this is a family TV channel,

0:17:03.160 --> 0:17:07.359
<v Speaker 9>I guess, but the way he talks about it doesn't

0:17:07.400 --> 0:17:10.520
<v Speaker 9>give you any confidence that this is a serious project

0:17:10.800 --> 0:17:13.879
<v Speaker 9>that's going to challenge big banks.

0:17:14.400 --> 0:17:19.600
<v Speaker 4>He says, basically, you can sell us a rubbish and

0:17:19.640 --> 0:17:22.360
<v Speaker 4>anyone will buy it in crypto. He happened to say

0:17:22.359 --> 0:17:24.520
<v Speaker 4>that in a twenty eighteen YouTube video recorded as he

0:17:24.600 --> 0:17:25.919
<v Speaker 4>drove his rolls Royce.

0:17:26.680 --> 0:17:29.399
<v Speaker 9>Yes, and I mean, I'm thinking deep to try and

0:17:29.400 --> 0:17:32.320
<v Speaker 9>find his crypto resume, and I found that he appeared

0:17:32.320 --> 0:17:36.439
<v Speaker 9>on influencer Logan Paul's podcast, and during the podcast, the

0:17:36.480 --> 0:17:40.480
<v Speaker 9>two of them promoted a token called Omi, which I

0:17:40.480 --> 0:17:43.359
<v Speaker 9>had also never heard of before since they promoted it

0:17:43.400 --> 0:17:46.199
<v Speaker 9>a couple of years ago. Is down ninety six percent

0:17:47.200 --> 0:17:51.200
<v Speaker 9>and another YouTuber, a scam busting YouTuber named coffee Zilla

0:17:51.480 --> 0:17:54.560
<v Speaker 9>posted this expose that appeared to show the two of

0:17:54.600 --> 0:17:58.520
<v Speaker 9>them coordinating ahead of the show their plan to talk

0:17:58.560 --> 0:17:59.160
<v Speaker 9>about OMI.

0:18:00.480 --> 0:18:03.840
<v Speaker 4>I mean, it seems that someone else listed in the

0:18:03.840 --> 0:18:07.520
<v Speaker 4>white paper who's responsible as operations lead used to run

0:18:07.560 --> 0:18:11.240
<v Speaker 4>a service called Date Hotter Girls, where he taught seminars

0:18:11.240 --> 0:18:13.760
<v Speaker 4>on how to pick up women. All of this just

0:18:13.760 --> 0:18:18.720
<v Speaker 4>feels like a real risk ultimately for the person who

0:18:18.760 --> 0:18:22.040
<v Speaker 4>is running to be president of the United States again

0:18:22.440 --> 0:18:24.960
<v Speaker 4>to be associating himself with Why do it?

0:18:26.680 --> 0:18:31.320
<v Speaker 9>I mean, it's pretty bizarre, and the crypto industry, to

0:18:31.760 --> 0:18:33.920
<v Speaker 9>the people I've spoke to from it, are not happy

0:18:33.960 --> 0:18:37.280
<v Speaker 9>about it. They like that Trump has flip flopped and

0:18:37.320 --> 0:18:40.240
<v Speaker 9>has endorsed crypto. He said that he's going to fire

0:18:40.280 --> 0:18:43.960
<v Speaker 9>the head of the SEC and provide looser regulations that

0:18:44.040 --> 0:18:46.720
<v Speaker 9>he says will make the US the crypto capital of

0:18:46.760 --> 0:18:49.440
<v Speaker 9>the world. They're like, that all sounds great, but then

0:18:49.480 --> 0:18:53.520
<v Speaker 9>why are you starting this pretty silly sounding new venture,

0:18:53.800 --> 0:18:57.560
<v Speaker 9>a for profit venture just before the election. It almost

0:18:57.840 --> 0:19:04.560
<v Speaker 9>discredits the I raises questions about his motivations for deregulating

0:19:05.040 --> 0:19:05.840
<v Speaker 9>the industry.

0:19:06.600 --> 0:19:14.000
<v Speaker 4>What has ultimately the world liberty financial spokespeople said to you,

0:19:14.080 --> 0:19:16.520
<v Speaker 4>have you tried to get in touch, What have they

0:19:16.840 --> 0:19:20.720
<v Speaker 4>said ultimately about the real underlying necessity of this project?

0:19:21.760 --> 0:19:24.560
<v Speaker 9>So I did contact them, and I received an email

0:19:24.640 --> 0:19:27.680
<v Speaker 9>back from a man who said he was not a spokesperson,

0:19:28.160 --> 0:19:31.360
<v Speaker 9>but then he spoke for World Liberty and said that

0:19:31.840 --> 0:19:34.080
<v Speaker 9>he could see where I was going with all these questions,

0:19:34.640 --> 0:19:38.320
<v Speaker 9>and it was painting an inaccurate portrait of this company,

0:19:38.760 --> 0:19:41.879
<v Speaker 9>and that time will tell that this is a serious

0:19:41.920 --> 0:19:44.840
<v Speaker 9>project that's doing cool stuff. And Donald Trump has said

0:19:45.080 --> 0:19:48.000
<v Speaker 9>he's going to unveil the details on Monday at eight

0:19:48.040 --> 0:19:51.560
<v Speaker 9>pm on a Twitter spaces So I guess we'll see

0:19:51.880 --> 0:19:54.000
<v Speaker 9>if what he says is consistent with the white paper.

0:19:54.119 --> 0:19:58.280
<v Speaker 9>If they've they've made some changes, I'll certainly be listening

0:19:59.520 --> 0:19:59.919
<v Speaker 9>whether or.

0:20:00.080 --> 0:20:03.119
<v Speaker 4>Not it will indeed move away from the old banks,

0:20:03.280 --> 0:20:07.439
<v Speaker 4>as former President Trump has discussed zep Fox. We might

0:20:07.480 --> 0:20:08.840
<v Speaker 4>need to come back to you on Monday. Thank you

0:20:08.920 --> 0:20:10.680
<v Speaker 4>so much, extraordinary peace.

0:20:10.920 --> 0:20:12.440
<v Speaker 3>Meanwhile, some news.

0:20:12.080 --> 0:20:14.280
<v Speaker 4>From a company that used to be associated with crypto

0:20:14.359 --> 0:20:16.240
<v Speaker 4>much more in the AI world now core Weave.

0:20:16.440 --> 0:20:18.280
<v Speaker 3>It's a cloud computing provider.

0:20:17.880 --> 0:20:21.560
<v Speaker 4>Now that's among the hottest startups in the artificial intelligence race,

0:20:21.880 --> 0:20:23.399
<v Speaker 4>and as in talks to a range of sale of

0:20:23.440 --> 0:20:26.720
<v Speaker 4>existing shares, valuing it to get this twenty three billion dollars,

0:20:26.760 --> 0:20:29.760
<v Speaker 4>according to sources. The sources say that the company is

0:20:29.800 --> 0:20:33.800
<v Speaker 4>discussing a transaction that would allow existing shareholders such as employees,

0:20:33.960 --> 0:20:36.440
<v Speaker 4>to tender between four hundred million and five hundred million

0:20:36.480 --> 0:20:47.600
<v Speaker 4>dollars worth of their holdings. Welcome back to Bloomberg Technology.

0:20:47.600 --> 0:20:49.440
<v Speaker 4>I'm Caroin Hide in New York. Let's get your check

0:20:49.560 --> 0:20:52.680
<v Speaker 4>on these markets, because they are higher, and in fact

0:20:53.040 --> 0:20:55.280
<v Speaker 4>they've been higher for five straight training days. And then

0:20:55.280 --> 0:20:56.879
<v Speaker 4>as that one hundred, if we've added more than a

0:20:56.880 --> 0:20:58.800
<v Speaker 4>trillion dollars in market cap, we're up and another four

0:20:58.840 --> 0:21:02.200
<v Speaker 4>tenths of percent. Maybe the panic of last week becomes

0:21:02.560 --> 0:21:05.000
<v Speaker 4>the past, and we start to once again factor in

0:21:05.000 --> 0:21:07.560
<v Speaker 4>maybe a forty percent chance at least that the Fed

0:21:07.600 --> 0:21:09.840
<v Speaker 4>could indeed cut rates to the tune of fifty basis

0:21:09.840 --> 0:21:12.320
<v Speaker 4>points as soon as September. That's what the market is

0:21:12.359 --> 0:21:14.800
<v Speaker 4>currently trying to digest. We see that reflected in the

0:21:14.800 --> 0:21:16.960
<v Speaker 4>bond market, the yields just falling on the two year yield.

0:21:17.200 --> 0:21:20.840
<v Speaker 4>I'm saying this because actually equities worldwide are seeing buoyancy

0:21:20.880 --> 0:21:23.880
<v Speaker 4>from their stock six hundred over in Europe. It finishes

0:21:23.960 --> 0:21:26.320
<v Speaker 4>the trading week also on the higher side, and it

0:21:26.359 --> 0:21:29.120
<v Speaker 4>adds some three quarters percent on the day. As we've

0:21:29.119 --> 0:21:31.040
<v Speaker 4>finished trade, let's move on to some of the individual

0:21:31.040 --> 0:21:33.680
<v Speaker 4>movers trading here in the United States. At least, look

0:21:34.080 --> 0:21:36.760
<v Speaker 4>chips have been on fire. We've made up so much

0:21:37.080 --> 0:21:39.679
<v Speaker 4>of last week's real panic selling that we saw. The

0:21:39.680 --> 0:21:41.680
<v Speaker 4>socks is currently up one point four percent. In fact,

0:21:41.720 --> 0:21:43.639
<v Speaker 4>every single name and been trading in the green on

0:21:43.680 --> 0:21:47.240
<v Speaker 4>the day, and largely we've got some meteoric moves over

0:21:47.280 --> 0:21:48.080
<v Speaker 4>the last five days.

0:21:48.200 --> 0:21:50.320
<v Speaker 3>Arm is up some twenty five percent.

0:21:50.720 --> 0:21:53.719
<v Speaker 4>This of course a chip design company that Raymond James

0:21:53.760 --> 0:21:54.880
<v Speaker 4>is saying.

0:21:54.680 --> 0:21:56.399
<v Speaker 3>They're now rating it and outperform.

0:21:56.480 --> 0:21:58.679
<v Speaker 4>They see it growth few particularly when it comes to

0:21:58.960 --> 0:22:01.160
<v Speaker 4>AI on the edge, and we're looking at Adobe though

0:22:01.160 --> 0:22:05.639
<v Speaker 4>despite managing two live up to expectations in its fiscal

0:22:05.680 --> 0:22:07.280
<v Speaker 4>third quarter, it's dragged lower.

0:22:07.320 --> 0:22:09.320
<v Speaker 3>It's forecasts not good enough. Where have we heard that

0:22:09.400 --> 0:22:12.280
<v Speaker 3>before in video broadcon.

0:22:12.080 --> 0:22:14.560
<v Speaker 4>And we've heard this a theme in the earning season,

0:22:14.560 --> 0:22:16.600
<v Speaker 4>and Adobe once again just not managing to show the

0:22:16.680 --> 0:22:20.240
<v Speaker 4>generation of revenue from AI, even though they do add

0:22:20.280 --> 0:22:21.280
<v Speaker 4>generative AI.

0:22:21.080 --> 0:22:21.760
<v Speaker 3>To their offering.

0:22:22.280 --> 0:22:25.360
<v Speaker 4>Let's just stick with AI now because AI pioneer faith

0:22:25.440 --> 0:22:27.800
<v Speaker 4>A Lee has raised two hundred and thirty million dollars

0:22:28.000 --> 0:22:30.520
<v Speaker 4>from a star studied list of investors for a new

0:22:30.560 --> 0:22:34.480
<v Speaker 4>AI startup called world Labs, which officially launches today. The

0:22:34.560 --> 0:22:37.159
<v Speaker 4>company aims to build software that can use images and

0:22:37.240 --> 0:22:37.960
<v Speaker 4>other data.

0:22:37.760 --> 0:22:39.159
<v Speaker 3>To make decisions about.

0:22:38.880 --> 0:22:43.200
<v Speaker 4>The three dimensional world, building what it calls large world models.

0:22:43.520 --> 0:22:46.439
<v Speaker 4>Here to talk about what exactly that means, and indeed

0:22:46.440 --> 0:22:49.680
<v Speaker 4>the fundraise doctor Fai Failee alongside Bloemug's Rachel Myths.

0:22:49.760 --> 0:22:52.240
<v Speaker 3>It is wonderful to have you both here and well,

0:22:52.560 --> 0:22:53.240
<v Speaker 3>doctor Lee.

0:22:53.680 --> 0:22:56.280
<v Speaker 4>I asked, first and foremost, what was it like raising

0:22:56.320 --> 0:22:59.280
<v Speaker 4>funds as an academic now entering this private world to

0:22:59.320 --> 0:22:59.960
<v Speaker 4>be raising money.

0:23:00.040 --> 0:23:02.639
<v Speaker 3>You've been in private well before, but to raise funds?

0:23:02.680 --> 0:23:04.840
<v Speaker 3>Was it easy? From the starstut a list.

0:23:06.240 --> 0:23:09.320
<v Speaker 1>Good morning, Carolyn, it's really good to be here. Well,

0:23:09.400 --> 0:23:12.560
<v Speaker 1>nothing is easy, but what's really really hard is make

0:23:12.680 --> 0:23:17.160
<v Speaker 1>spatial intelligence happen. I'm just so excited that we've brought

0:23:17.160 --> 0:23:23.080
<v Speaker 1>together a incredible group of pixel AI talents to work

0:23:23.119 --> 0:23:26.480
<v Speaker 1>on this really, really hard problem that we now call

0:23:26.840 --> 0:23:28.000
<v Speaker 1>spatial intelligence.

0:23:30.520 --> 0:23:34.320
<v Speaker 6>Explain to us what you mean when you say spatial intelligence,

0:23:34.359 --> 0:23:35.960
<v Speaker 6>And what is it that you're building exactly?

0:23:36.480 --> 0:23:40.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Rachel, Well, look, humans have spatial intelligence. It's actually

0:23:40.520 --> 0:23:44.000
<v Speaker 1>a very ancient ability. We have evolved over millions and

0:23:44.040 --> 0:23:49.120
<v Speaker 1>millions of years. It's the ability to understand, to reason,

0:23:49.720 --> 0:23:54.040
<v Speaker 1>to generate, and to even interact in a three D world,

0:23:54.640 --> 0:23:58.520
<v Speaker 1>whether you're looking at a beautiful flower or trying to

0:23:58.520 --> 0:24:03.639
<v Speaker 1>touch a butterfly or building a city. All this is

0:24:03.720 --> 0:24:06.080
<v Speaker 1>part of the capability of spatial intelligence.

0:24:07.680 --> 0:24:10.240
<v Speaker 6>We see that with humans, and we see that with animals.

0:24:10.400 --> 0:24:13.280
<v Speaker 6>How do you expect that we'll see that with computers.

0:24:14.200 --> 0:24:17.360
<v Speaker 1>Well, that's the problem we're working on. We're already starting

0:24:17.400 --> 0:24:21.960
<v Speaker 1>to make tremendous progress. The past decade of AI has

0:24:22.000 --> 0:24:26.720
<v Speaker 1>been pretty exhilarating, and people hear a lot about language recently,

0:24:26.800 --> 0:24:30.000
<v Speaker 1>but truly in the world of pixels and vision and

0:24:30.040 --> 0:24:34.920
<v Speaker 1>spatial intelligence, we've been making progress such as understanding what's

0:24:34.960 --> 0:24:37.720
<v Speaker 1>in the picture, to be able to tell a story

0:24:37.800 --> 0:24:41.560
<v Speaker 1>of what's in the picture, to even prompting a sentence

0:24:41.600 --> 0:24:45.080
<v Speaker 1>and get to the image out of it. But what's

0:24:45.240 --> 0:24:48.600
<v Speaker 1>really the next frontier, which is such a hard problem

0:24:48.640 --> 0:24:51.280
<v Speaker 1>to crack, is to bring all this into three D

0:24:51.520 --> 0:24:55.360
<v Speaker 1>because the real world is three D and humans. Spatial

0:24:55.359 --> 0:25:01.119
<v Speaker 1>intelligence is built upon this very native capability of understanding

0:25:01.560 --> 0:25:03.720
<v Speaker 1>and working with three D.

0:25:04.000 --> 0:25:08.480
<v Speaker 4>So let's put into real world contexts that working with

0:25:08.560 --> 0:25:12.760
<v Speaker 4>three D the applications. Is it robotics, is it manufacturing?

0:25:12.920 --> 0:25:15.640
<v Speaker 4>Is it just us interacting with the real world when

0:25:15.680 --> 0:25:17.919
<v Speaker 4>we put our AI function glasses on.

0:25:19.480 --> 0:25:23.480
<v Speaker 1>You're not wrong, Carolyn. This is such a foundational technology.

0:25:23.520 --> 0:25:30.600
<v Speaker 1>It's a foundational ability for computers that it has implications

0:25:30.840 --> 0:25:35.400
<v Speaker 1>in a wide range of use cases. To start with, right, creators.

0:25:35.680 --> 0:25:43.000
<v Speaker 1>Creators includes not only artists and VFX creators, but also designers,

0:25:43.040 --> 0:25:49.000
<v Speaker 1>in developers, builders, and this technology has a profound implication

0:25:49.119 --> 0:25:52.639
<v Speaker 1>for them. But in the long arc of this, of course,

0:25:53.880 --> 0:25:56.560
<v Speaker 1>robotics manufacturing.

0:25:55.960 --> 0:25:57.080
<v Speaker 3>A r v R.

0:25:57.600 --> 0:26:01.160
<v Speaker 1>This is you know, there's a reason that Apple calls

0:26:01.280 --> 0:26:05.400
<v Speaker 1>their vision pros spacial computing. Well, in my opinion, spacial

0:26:05.400 --> 0:26:09.600
<v Speaker 1>computing needs spacial intelligence, so does many other use cases.

0:26:09.920 --> 0:26:16.280
<v Speaker 4>Why does spatial computing need VC money, private sector action?

0:26:16.960 --> 0:26:20.400
<v Speaker 4>What couldn't you achieve in academia?

0:26:20.760 --> 0:26:23.840
<v Speaker 1>So this is a whole ecosystem.

0:26:23.880 --> 0:26:26.399
<v Speaker 3>We've been seeing this in AI.

0:26:26.480 --> 0:26:29.200
<v Speaker 1>We've been seeing this for years now, and this dates

0:26:29.240 --> 0:26:33.600
<v Speaker 1>back to any technology that our society our country is

0:26:33.640 --> 0:26:40.800
<v Speaker 1>building right. This ecosystem needs upstream fundamental curiosity driven research,

0:26:40.920 --> 0:26:45.280
<v Speaker 1>which I have spent many years of my life in,

0:26:45.640 --> 0:26:50.640
<v Speaker 1>but it also needs very focused drive industry. We've got

0:26:50.800 --> 0:26:55.040
<v Speaker 1>great big tech companies working on related problems, but we

0:26:55.200 --> 0:27:00.600
<v Speaker 1>also what's beautiful about our ecosystem, our startups that has

0:27:00.720 --> 0:27:05.080
<v Speaker 1>a toll dream has the ability to call on the

0:27:05.200 --> 0:27:09.719
<v Speaker 1>believers who believing cracking such a hard problem, and we

0:27:09.800 --> 0:27:14.520
<v Speaker 1>come together and focus all of our allergy in solving

0:27:14.600 --> 0:27:18.960
<v Speaker 1>this truly hard problem that needs to be scaled, needs

0:27:18.960 --> 0:27:22.359
<v Speaker 1>to be productionized, and needs to be delivered in the

0:27:22.440 --> 0:27:24.280
<v Speaker 1>hands of users and customers.

0:27:26.880 --> 0:27:28.960
<v Speaker 6>Doctor Lee, One of the things that you're most well

0:27:28.960 --> 0:27:33.280
<v Speaker 6>known for is image net, on big database of millions

0:27:33.280 --> 0:27:35.919
<v Speaker 6>of images that really help push forward the field of

0:27:36.080 --> 0:27:39.960
<v Speaker 6>object recognition and images. I'm curious how your work on

0:27:40.040 --> 0:27:42.960
<v Speaker 6>that played into your decision to start World Labs.

0:27:42.960 --> 0:27:44.880
<v Speaker 3>How do you see those two things as related?

0:27:45.240 --> 0:27:47.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, thanks for asking that question, Rachel. I think they're

0:27:47.800 --> 0:27:50.639
<v Speaker 1>related into two ways.

0:27:50.680 --> 0:27:51.200
<v Speaker 3>At least.

0:27:51.800 --> 0:27:55.640
<v Speaker 1>One is that image net is one of the earlier

0:27:55.680 --> 0:27:59.000
<v Speaker 1>work in the field of computer vision, which is in

0:27:59.040 --> 0:28:04.000
<v Speaker 1>the pixel space. Granted, in that time, you know more

0:28:04.040 --> 0:28:07.919
<v Speaker 1>than ten years ago what image net and the derivative

0:28:08.040 --> 0:28:10.640
<v Speaker 1>algorithms were able to do. Are still in a two

0:28:10.720 --> 0:28:16.760
<v Speaker 1>D space right, recognizing objects in photos and eventually telling

0:28:16.880 --> 0:28:21.800
<v Speaker 1>stories of pictures. But now this is an intellectual continuation

0:28:22.400 --> 0:28:27.240
<v Speaker 1>of the early working computer vision. Now we're into the

0:28:27.280 --> 0:28:31.600
<v Speaker 1>next really difficult chapter, which is spatial intelligence. So intellectually,

0:28:32.080 --> 0:28:36.840
<v Speaker 1>I feel it's my life's work in continuation and zooming

0:28:36.880 --> 0:28:41.600
<v Speaker 1>out one layer image that was my more than fifteen

0:28:41.680 --> 0:28:44.840
<v Speaker 1>years ago. It was my intellectual bet on a big

0:28:44.880 --> 0:28:47.520
<v Speaker 1>north star problem, a north star problem that can really

0:28:47.640 --> 0:28:51.800
<v Speaker 1>change the course of AI. I do believe spatial intelligence

0:28:51.960 --> 0:28:54.640
<v Speaker 1>is the next north star for me and for my team,

0:28:54.760 --> 0:28:57.000
<v Speaker 1>that it will change the course of AI.

0:28:57.960 --> 0:29:02.200
<v Speaker 6>One of the things I'm wondering about with the funding

0:29:02.240 --> 0:29:04.800
<v Speaker 6>for this company is there are a number of big

0:29:04.880 --> 0:29:08.120
<v Speaker 6>names in AI in particular that invested in this. We've

0:29:08.160 --> 0:29:12.000
<v Speaker 6>got Jeff Dean and Jeffrey Hinton and Dracopathy. Some of

0:29:12.040 --> 0:29:15.040
<v Speaker 6>them you've worked with previously. I know several you were

0:29:15.040 --> 0:29:17.560
<v Speaker 6>at Google at the same time. How did you pitch

0:29:17.600 --> 0:29:18.120
<v Speaker 6>them on it?

0:29:19.560 --> 0:29:22.520
<v Speaker 1>Well, that's the beauty of our field. The first of all,

0:29:22.600 --> 0:29:26.200
<v Speaker 1>these people have been friends and colleagues for years or

0:29:26.240 --> 0:29:31.040
<v Speaker 1>former students. I think they share my belief. I think

0:29:31.080 --> 0:29:35.720
<v Speaker 1>they see this as such a big problem and they

0:29:35.760 --> 0:29:39.040
<v Speaker 1>believe in my team that when they hear my co

0:29:39.120 --> 0:29:45.080
<v Speaker 1>founders been Mildenhall, Christophe Lassner, Justin Johnson, and really the

0:29:45.280 --> 0:29:50.120
<v Speaker 1>entire funding team, they recognize that while this is a

0:29:50.160 --> 0:29:53.920
<v Speaker 1>tough problem, it needs people who really can have the

0:29:53.960 --> 0:29:57.800
<v Speaker 1>ability and believe to crack this, and I think that's

0:29:57.800 --> 0:30:00.160
<v Speaker 1>why they support.

0:30:01.120 --> 0:30:05.960
<v Speaker 4>You've got money from big name vcs as well, Andrewson

0:30:06.040 --> 0:30:10.400
<v Speaker 4>and Horowitz, to name just one. I'm interested more broadly

0:30:10.440 --> 0:30:13.960
<v Speaker 4>about the rallying call you've had for money to go

0:30:14.040 --> 0:30:15.120
<v Speaker 4>towards academia.

0:30:15.160 --> 0:30:18.000
<v Speaker 3>You went to President Biden himself saying.

0:30:17.760 --> 0:30:19.960
<v Speaker 4>That there needs to be more funding in the public

0:30:20.000 --> 0:30:22.000
<v Speaker 4>sector as well as the private sector when it comes

0:30:22.000 --> 0:30:26.040
<v Speaker 4>to AI, R and D ultimately so universities can access

0:30:26.080 --> 0:30:30.200
<v Speaker 4>GPU and compute. Are you still feeling that necessity that

0:30:30.640 --> 0:30:32.480
<v Speaker 4>public sector needs money or have.

0:30:32.480 --> 0:30:34.320
<v Speaker 3>You just sort of given up and gone to the private.

0:30:34.040 --> 0:30:40.000
<v Speaker 1>Sector here, Carolyn, I actually believe even more so now

0:30:40.080 --> 0:30:43.920
<v Speaker 1>that I'm traversing both the private and the public sector

0:30:44.400 --> 0:30:48.800
<v Speaker 1>that's seeing the access to compute, access to support in

0:30:48.840 --> 0:30:52.440
<v Speaker 1>the private sector. I believe none of us will be

0:30:52.560 --> 0:30:55.840
<v Speaker 1>here in the private sector without the public sector, you know,

0:30:55.960 --> 0:31:02.400
<v Speaker 1>imaged net convolution on your network back probably gay transformer models.

0:31:02.880 --> 0:31:08.200
<v Speaker 1>Maining of these seminal work in AI came from public

0:31:08.240 --> 0:31:12.880
<v Speaker 1>sector first. So I think this ecosystem is so critical

0:31:13.000 --> 0:31:18.680
<v Speaker 1>and missing or the imbalance of any component is harmful

0:31:18.720 --> 0:31:21.960
<v Speaker 1>for the ecosystem. And now I have personal experience to

0:31:22.080 --> 0:31:25.640
<v Speaker 1>see the access we have to resources. It makes me

0:31:25.760 --> 0:31:29.160
<v Speaker 1>believe even more that our country needs to invest in

0:31:29.200 --> 0:31:33.440
<v Speaker 1>our public sector, in academia in this kind of moonshop

0:31:33.520 --> 0:31:40.320
<v Speaker 1>mentality to support students and faculty and researchers in basic science.

0:31:40.040 --> 0:31:43.960
<v Speaker 4>Research, academics backing you financially, as well as as I

0:31:44.000 --> 0:31:47.640
<v Speaker 4>say A sixteen z Nea Radical Ventures, as well as

0:31:47.640 --> 0:31:50.480
<v Speaker 4>many others and some celebrities in the mix as well.

0:31:50.640 --> 0:31:53.840
<v Speaker 4>We thank you so much. World Labs co founder Faith

0:31:53.840 --> 0:31:56.360
<v Speaker 4>Ailey and Brinibad's Rachel Metz appreciate it.

0:31:57.440 --> 0:31:59.080
<v Speaker 3>Now let's just talk about elsewhere.

0:31:58.800 --> 0:32:01.480
<v Speaker 4>And AI Open AI see Sam Altman and Video CEO

0:32:01.600 --> 0:32:05.040
<v Speaker 4>Jensen Wang and other industry leaders have actually just been

0:32:05.160 --> 0:32:08.360
<v Speaker 4>meeting with senior Biden administration officials at the White House

0:32:08.440 --> 0:32:12.360
<v Speaker 4>just yesterday, where they discussed steps to address massive infrastructure

0:32:12.400 --> 0:32:13.680
<v Speaker 4>means for AI projects.

0:32:13.960 --> 0:32:15.480
<v Speaker 3>Following the talks, the White House.

0:32:15.280 --> 0:32:19.600
<v Speaker 4>Announced an interagency they're calling it an Interagency Task Force

0:32:19.920 --> 0:32:22.719
<v Speaker 4>to help promote data center development in the US and

0:32:22.760 --> 0:32:27.880
<v Speaker 4>initiatives to support accelerator permitting for those facilities coming up.

0:32:27.960 --> 0:32:30.000
<v Speaker 3>I'm going to be joined by Dylan Cox, had.

0:32:29.840 --> 0:32:33.000
<v Speaker 4>A private market's research at Pitchbook for the firm's latest

0:32:33.000 --> 0:32:36.320
<v Speaker 4>report on private money going into startups like we've just

0:32:36.320 --> 0:32:39.800
<v Speaker 4>been talking about. And then we've got Rethink Impact founder

0:32:39.960 --> 0:32:42.640
<v Speaker 4>and managing partner Jenny Abranson on.

0:32:42.600 --> 0:32:44.840
<v Speaker 3>The firm's latest fundraise. It's a lot.

0:32:45.280 --> 0:33:03.880
<v Speaker 4>This is reallymog technology. This week, Pitchbook released it's quarterly

0:33:03.920 --> 0:33:07.280
<v Speaker 4>private market fundraising report. Not that pretty a reading. Funding

0:33:07.360 --> 0:33:09.800
<v Speaker 4>was down in the second quarter, with bench capitals seeing

0:33:09.840 --> 0:33:12.680
<v Speaker 4>a thirty three percent drop in fundraising year over year.

0:33:13.200 --> 0:33:15.520
<v Speaker 4>As discussed at All with Pitchbook head and private markets

0:33:15.520 --> 0:33:19.680
<v Speaker 4>research Dylan Cox, Dylan, we know that it's been hard

0:33:19.720 --> 0:33:22.400
<v Speaker 4>to raise funds for some who particularly is it.

0:33:22.360 --> 0:33:22.800
<v Speaker 3>Hard for.

0:33:24.480 --> 0:33:27.360
<v Speaker 11>Well, thanks for having me on over the last twelve months.

0:33:27.360 --> 0:33:31.280
<v Speaker 11>Our data shows it's been particularly hard for venture investors

0:33:31.400 --> 0:33:35.800
<v Speaker 11>as well as private real estate funds on the flip side.

0:33:35.840 --> 0:33:39.040
<v Speaker 11>Of things. We've seen some strategies have success, such as

0:33:39.080 --> 0:33:43.479
<v Speaker 11>private equity secondarias, which provides liquidity to private markets and

0:33:43.880 --> 0:33:47.040
<v Speaker 11>mitigates the jcre of impact for newer investors, as well

0:33:47.040 --> 0:33:50.240
<v Speaker 11>as private real assets which a lot of people don't expect.

0:33:50.480 --> 0:33:53.080
<v Speaker 11>There's a lot of money right now flowing into infrastructure,

0:33:53.440 --> 0:33:56.440
<v Speaker 11>kind of along the lines of decarbonization of the economy.

0:33:57.040 --> 0:34:01.640
<v Speaker 4>What about well, data center and digitalization, and we're seeing

0:34:01.680 --> 0:34:05.320
<v Speaker 4>that in terms of the real asset allocation we are.

0:34:05.400 --> 0:34:09.280
<v Speaker 11>That's another big piece of it. It's decarbonization, it's data centers.

0:34:09.280 --> 0:34:12.800
<v Speaker 11>But not to be forgotten are sort of traditional infrastructure

0:34:12.880 --> 0:34:16.520
<v Speaker 11>like roads, bridges, ports and airports. And then something that

0:34:16.760 --> 0:34:19.759
<v Speaker 11>also catches a lot of folks by surprise is the

0:34:20.560 --> 0:34:24.280
<v Speaker 11>sort of slow but study chugging along of more traditional

0:34:24.400 --> 0:34:27.240
<v Speaker 11>natural resources in that bucket, things like oil and gas

0:34:27.280 --> 0:34:30.319
<v Speaker 11>and timber. Funds I think have proved to be a

0:34:30.320 --> 0:34:33.000
<v Speaker 11>bit more resilient than a lot of investors would have expected,

0:34:33.080 --> 0:34:34.640
<v Speaker 11>maybe five or ten years ago.

0:34:35.280 --> 0:34:39.560
<v Speaker 4>Less on our tech theme of things, but important to acknowledge.

0:34:40.800 --> 0:34:42.799
<v Speaker 4>Talk to us a little bit about what's happening in BC.

0:34:43.480 --> 0:34:47.120
<v Speaker 4>What are the funds having to say to former LPs

0:34:47.200 --> 0:34:49.600
<v Speaker 4>to get them to commit to new funds. Where are

0:34:49.640 --> 0:34:54.320
<v Speaker 4>we seeing outlies raise big new funds to allocate.

0:34:55.440 --> 0:34:58.520
<v Speaker 11>Well, AI is certainly the name of the game, which

0:34:58.560 --> 0:35:01.920
<v Speaker 11>will of course surprise no. We're seeing much larger AI

0:35:02.000 --> 0:35:04.799
<v Speaker 11>focused funds as well as AI focused deals right now,

0:35:04.920 --> 0:35:07.600
<v Speaker 11>many of them you know, household names at this point.

0:35:08.120 --> 0:35:10.640
<v Speaker 11>But in terms of the asset class as a whole,

0:35:10.760 --> 0:35:14.560
<v Speaker 11>I think the single most important issue right now is liquidity.

0:35:14.920 --> 0:35:19.600
<v Speaker 11>That's distributions back to investors of venture capital funds viewed

0:35:19.640 --> 0:35:22.040
<v Speaker 11>as a proportion of the size of the fund or

0:35:22.040 --> 0:35:25.520
<v Speaker 11>of the assets and the fund. We're reaching decade lows

0:35:25.560 --> 0:35:28.680
<v Speaker 11>in terms of trailing twelve month distributions, which of course

0:35:28.760 --> 0:35:32.520
<v Speaker 11>means that investors in those venture funds have fewer dollars

0:35:32.520 --> 0:35:37.200
<v Speaker 11>on hand to recommit into the next vintage of venture vehicles.

0:35:38.280 --> 0:35:39.800
<v Speaker 4>Love that you talk us through the secondaries and the

0:35:39.880 --> 0:35:42.680
<v Speaker 4>liquidity side of things as well. Dylan Cox's pitchbook, head

0:35:42.680 --> 0:35:43.920
<v Speaker 4>of Private Markets Research.

0:35:44.120 --> 0:35:45.040
<v Speaker 3>Great to have your take.

0:35:45.440 --> 0:35:48.400
<v Speaker 4>We're actually going to now pinpoint a complete outlier to

0:35:48.440 --> 0:35:51.000
<v Speaker 4>the conversation that we've just been having because we think

0:35:51.120 --> 0:35:54.160
<v Speaker 4>Impact is now one of the largest VC firms dedicated

0:35:54.160 --> 0:35:56.920
<v Speaker 4>to funding female CEOs, and it's just announced the whopping

0:35:56.920 --> 0:35:58.440
<v Speaker 4>two hundred and fifty million dollar.

0:35:58.239 --> 0:36:01.440
<v Speaker 3>Fund, it's third and largest raised to date, any.

0:36:01.320 --> 0:36:03.680
<v Speaker 4>Doubling the firm's assets under management to more than half

0:36:03.680 --> 0:36:07.319
<v Speaker 4>a billion. Founder and managing partner Jenny Abramson joins us.

0:36:07.360 --> 0:36:08.360
<v Speaker 3>Now, So, Jenny, we're.

0:36:08.239 --> 0:36:11.799
<v Speaker 4>Just hearing that it's dire out there for venture but

0:36:11.880 --> 0:36:12.319
<v Speaker 4>not for you.

0:36:13.000 --> 0:36:15.120
<v Speaker 3>Who did you have to come on board? Which LPs

0:36:15.160 --> 0:36:15.800
<v Speaker 3>are interested?

0:36:17.360 --> 0:36:19.239
<v Speaker 7>Well, first of all, thank you for having me on

0:36:19.280 --> 0:36:22.319
<v Speaker 7>behalf of my partner Heidi Patel and the rest of

0:36:22.360 --> 0:36:25.360
<v Speaker 7>our everythinking back team. Yeah, we're very excited to have

0:36:25.440 --> 0:36:28.520
<v Speaker 7>announced more than two hundred and fifty million dollar raise,

0:36:28.920 --> 0:36:32.800
<v Speaker 7>the largest fund backing female CEOs. And we were fortunate,

0:36:33.120 --> 0:36:36.239
<v Speaker 7>despite the trends that Dylan shared, to be able to

0:36:36.280 --> 0:36:40.920
<v Speaker 7>do this in this market. And it was a large

0:36:40.960 --> 0:36:43.640
<v Speaker 7>part due to major institutions who came on board to

0:36:43.680 --> 0:36:44.480
<v Speaker 7>support the fund.

0:36:45.040 --> 0:36:49.839
<v Speaker 4>What sort of institutions are willing to almost take what

0:36:50.120 --> 0:36:53.160
<v Speaker 4>now feels that the pendulum has swung on a more

0:36:53.239 --> 0:36:54.680
<v Speaker 4>d I focused to investing.

0:36:56.280 --> 0:36:59.480
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, I think people major institutions. We had more than

0:36:59.600 --> 0:37:03.520
<v Speaker 7>ten university endowments, we had more than ten major foundations,

0:37:03.600 --> 0:37:07.200
<v Speaker 7>We had, for example, a hospital, and others that really

0:37:07.239 --> 0:37:10.360
<v Speaker 7>do care about returns, and I think have realized that

0:37:10.560 --> 0:37:14.319
<v Speaker 7>investing in women and gender lens investing is not just

0:37:14.680 --> 0:37:18.200
<v Speaker 7>something that feels good, but is actually good business. And

0:37:18.280 --> 0:37:21.680
<v Speaker 7>so they came on board along with many individuals self

0:37:21.680 --> 0:37:25.319
<v Speaker 7>made billionaires like Sarah Blakeley of Spanks and Sneaks, to

0:37:26.080 --> 0:37:30.120
<v Speaker 7>Melinda Frenchgates, the major philanthropists, and to many others. And

0:37:30.160 --> 0:37:34.080
<v Speaker 7>we think the combination of big institutions that I named

0:37:34.160 --> 0:37:38.840
<v Speaker 7>a global bank like UBS, Cambridge Associates and their LPs,

0:37:39.840 --> 0:37:42.800
<v Speaker 7>these kinds of institutions have realized that this is now

0:37:42.920 --> 0:37:44.319
<v Speaker 7>a mainstream opportunity.

0:37:44.520 --> 0:37:46.799
<v Speaker 4>We were just looking at some of your previous portfolio

0:37:46.800 --> 0:37:51.760
<v Speaker 4>from the first fund. The vintage is good, the billions.

0:37:51.400 --> 0:37:52.839
<v Speaker 3>That you've managed to raise it well.

0:37:53.040 --> 0:37:56.720
<v Speaker 4>These founders have now managed themselves valuable at Guild Education

0:37:56.880 --> 0:37:58.319
<v Speaker 4>for example, Spring.

0:37:58.080 --> 0:37:59.320
<v Speaker 3>Health, l Avest.

0:38:00.040 --> 0:38:02.879
<v Speaker 4>But these companies haven't yet exited per se some of them.

0:38:03.360 --> 0:38:05.040
<v Speaker 4>When do you think that that might occur in the

0:38:05.080 --> 0:38:07.200
<v Speaker 4>first fund? How is the IPO pipeline?

0:38:07.200 --> 0:38:07.359
<v Speaker 3>Look?

0:38:07.360 --> 0:38:09.799
<v Speaker 4>If you do these female founders want to go to

0:38:09.880 --> 0:38:11.919
<v Speaker 4>IPO or are they looking at M and A opportunities?

0:38:13.080 --> 0:38:14.759
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, it's a great question. I mean, I think the

0:38:14.920 --> 0:38:18.800
<v Speaker 7>data has shown that female entrepreneurs do deliver higher revenue,

0:38:18.920 --> 0:38:22.000
<v Speaker 7>more than twice as much per dollar invested, and tend

0:38:22.000 --> 0:38:25.520
<v Speaker 7>to exit on average a year faster than their male counterparts.

0:38:26.040 --> 0:38:28.759
<v Speaker 7>And these companies, you know, like all companies, there's been

0:38:28.800 --> 0:38:32.800
<v Speaker 7>a slower IPO market, but we invest sometimes as early

0:38:32.840 --> 0:38:35.480
<v Speaker 7>as a late seed, and so it can take companies

0:38:35.520 --> 0:38:39.120
<v Speaker 7>typically eight ten years as long as well as an

0:38:39.160 --> 0:38:42.600
<v Speaker 7>open IPO market. Of course, there's also M and A opportunities,

0:38:43.040 --> 0:38:46.000
<v Speaker 7>pe buys and others, and so depending on the company,

0:38:46.040 --> 0:38:48.000
<v Speaker 7>different different outcomes will occur.

0:38:48.600 --> 0:38:50.400
<v Speaker 4>We were just hearing from the people who've jumped on

0:38:50.440 --> 0:38:53.440
<v Speaker 4>board to commit capital in and what I kind of

0:38:53.520 --> 0:38:57.000
<v Speaker 4>already referenced of this moment where the pendulum has one,

0:38:57.520 --> 0:39:01.360
<v Speaker 4>we are hearing more pushback against that focus on women,

0:39:01.400 --> 0:39:05.040
<v Speaker 4>people of color, minority founders rather than wanting to embrace them.

0:39:05.400 --> 0:39:08.600
<v Speaker 4>We've seen the Fearless Fund, for example, actually have legal

0:39:08.640 --> 0:39:12.320
<v Speaker 4>issues being able to allocate its grants to women of color.

0:39:12.640 --> 0:39:14.640
<v Speaker 4>Was that anything that you heard of when you were

0:39:14.719 --> 0:39:17.759
<v Speaker 4>out this summer raising the money?

0:39:17.840 --> 0:39:22.440
<v Speaker 7>You know, we really mostly heard that people were excited

0:39:22.640 --> 0:39:26.760
<v Speaker 7>by the opportunity that investing in women is no longer

0:39:26.880 --> 0:39:29.120
<v Speaker 7>just a passing trend, and in the wake of the

0:39:29.160 --> 0:39:32.280
<v Speaker 7>me too movement, and I think this raise makes clear

0:39:32.600 --> 0:39:35.640
<v Speaker 7>that this is good business, good for the economy, and

0:39:35.680 --> 0:39:39.000
<v Speaker 7>certainly here to stay. So that's mostly what we heard.

0:39:39.080 --> 0:39:41.960
<v Speaker 7>Male founding companies continue to get ninety eight percent of

0:39:41.960 --> 0:39:45.439
<v Speaker 7>investment capital, and almost all of our companies have men

0:39:45.560 --> 0:39:48.440
<v Speaker 7>and women in the top team, and we think gender

0:39:48.480 --> 0:39:51.920
<v Speaker 7>diverse teams outperform. And our goal is to you know,

0:39:52.000 --> 0:39:54.200
<v Speaker 7>grow the pie here and grow the economy, which is

0:39:54.280 --> 0:39:57.320
<v Speaker 7>which is what we're doing by backing these great female leaders.

0:39:57.440 --> 0:40:00.520
<v Speaker 4>Oh boy, Jenny, but you say that stop two percent

0:40:00.600 --> 0:40:04.440
<v Speaker 4>basically a VC money going to female founded companies and

0:40:04.560 --> 0:40:08.239
<v Speaker 4>it isn't changing. And I'm interested as to why you

0:40:08.280 --> 0:40:10.440
<v Speaker 4>think that is occurring. If you give us all the

0:40:10.480 --> 0:40:15.160
<v Speaker 4>statistics that they're managing to exit quicker, they're building revenue faster,

0:40:15.280 --> 0:40:16.799
<v Speaker 4>we're seeing better outcomes.

0:40:18.360 --> 0:40:20.480
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, you know, I think this is the moment where

0:40:20.480 --> 0:40:23.200
<v Speaker 7>it's starting to turn to us. This raise from Rethink

0:40:23.239 --> 0:40:28.040
<v Speaker 7>Impact that we announced, it really shows that these mainstream investors,

0:40:28.040 --> 0:40:32.400
<v Speaker 7>these institutional investors, see the opportunity and that the opportunity

0:40:32.520 --> 0:40:35.640
<v Speaker 7>between the data and now examples of companies like many

0:40:35.680 --> 0:40:38.040
<v Speaker 7>that you held up. You know, a company like Spring

0:40:38.080 --> 0:40:41.080
<v Speaker 7>getting a three point three billion dollar valuation last month

0:40:41.320 --> 0:40:43.600
<v Speaker 7>and many others. We think that's going to be the

0:40:43.719 --> 0:40:48.360
<v Speaker 7>turn that leads to capital being more allocated in ways

0:40:48.400 --> 0:40:51.359
<v Speaker 7>that grow the pie. So we're excited. We think this

0:40:51.400 --> 0:40:53.680
<v Speaker 7>is that moment that things are going to finally unlock

0:40:54.000 --> 0:40:56.480
<v Speaker 7>and change that data point that's been stuck for a while.

0:40:57.200 --> 0:41:01.840
<v Speaker 4>Wow, Heidi, patl and yourself leading this and raising a

0:41:01.920 --> 0:41:05.560
<v Speaker 4>huge round, wreathing Impact founder and managing partner Jenny Abramson,

0:41:05.800 --> 0:41:08.600
<v Speaker 4>We thank you for your time. One other VC story

0:41:08.600 --> 0:41:11.600
<v Speaker 4>that we're watching, AI startup Paul Side is in talks

0:41:11.640 --> 0:41:14.000
<v Speaker 4>for a new round of funding, giving an evaluation.

0:41:13.560 --> 0:41:16.000
<v Speaker 3>Of three billion dollars or this before.

0:41:15.719 --> 0:41:18.840
<v Speaker 4>The company even released an initial product. According to sources,

0:41:18.840 --> 0:41:20.919
<v Speaker 4>the company is set to raise five hundred million dollars

0:41:20.960 --> 0:41:23.759
<v Speaker 4>in new financing with being Capital and talks to lead

0:41:23.880 --> 0:41:27.000
<v Speaker 4>the investment round. And that does it for this edition

0:41:27.000 --> 0:41:29.320
<v Speaker 4>of Blomberg Technology. You do not want to forget our podcast.

0:41:29.360 --> 0:41:31.000
<v Speaker 4>You can find it on the terminal as well as

0:41:31.000 --> 0:41:32.840
<v Speaker 4>online on Apple, Spotify, and iHeart.

0:41:33.160 --> 0:41:34.920
<v Speaker 3>And it'll be back with me next week.

0:41:35.360 --> 0:41:41.200
<v Speaker 4>Have a wonderful weekend. This is Bloomberg Technology