WEBVTT - Bloomberg Surveillance TV: March 19, 2025

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:06.760
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio news.

0:00:11.600 --> 0:00:15.440
<v Speaker 2>This is the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Jonathan Ferrow, along

0:00:15.440 --> 0:00:18.680
<v Speaker 2>with Lisa Bromwitz and Amrie Hordern. Join us each day

0:00:18.720 --> 0:00:22.239
<v Speaker 2>for insight from the best in markets, economics, and geopolitics

0:00:22.400 --> 0:00:24.880
<v Speaker 2>from our global headquarters in New York City. We are

0:00:24.920 --> 0:00:27.680
<v Speaker 2>live on Bloomberg Television weekday mornings from six to nine

0:00:27.680 --> 0:00:31.280
<v Speaker 2>am Eastern. Subscribe to the podcast on Apple, Spotify or

0:00:31.280 --> 0:00:33.919
<v Speaker 2>anywhere else you listen, and as always on the Bloomberg

0:00:34.000 --> 0:00:37.040
<v Speaker 2>Terminal and the Bloomberg Business app. The President of the

0:00:37.159 --> 0:00:40.000
<v Speaker 2>United States, Donald Trump, on a phone call with the

0:00:40.080 --> 0:00:43.680
<v Speaker 2>Russian President Vladimir Putin, as the President makes the purse

0:00:43.720 --> 0:00:46.639
<v Speaker 2>for a thirty day ceasefire to build on the developments

0:00:46.640 --> 0:00:48.239
<v Speaker 2>of the last twenty four hours, and pleased to say,

0:00:48.280 --> 0:00:50.880
<v Speaker 2>we're joined now by Steve whitcaff the White House Special

0:00:50.960 --> 0:00:53.760
<v Speaker 2>Envoy to the Middle East. Steve, welcome to the program, Sir,

0:00:53.840 --> 0:00:56.440
<v Speaker 2>fantastic to get some time with you. I know how

0:00:56.520 --> 0:00:59.360
<v Speaker 2>much time you put in with the Russian President to

0:00:59.440 --> 0:01:02.240
<v Speaker 2>make this all happen. It's not the first time you've

0:01:02.240 --> 0:01:04.280
<v Speaker 2>spoken to him. It's not the first time the President

0:01:04.280 --> 0:01:06.960
<v Speaker 2>of the United States has spoken to the Russian leader either,

0:01:07.240 --> 0:01:09.600
<v Speaker 2>could you set the States for a cert How different

0:01:09.959 --> 0:01:10.480
<v Speaker 2>was this call?

0:01:12.200 --> 0:01:15.280
<v Speaker 3>I thought the call was epic, I thought, Jonathan, I

0:01:15.319 --> 0:01:20.880
<v Speaker 3>thought it was epic, transformational all you know, those are

0:01:20.920 --> 0:01:23.360
<v Speaker 3>the sorts of adjectives that I use about this call.

0:01:24.080 --> 0:01:24.959
<v Speaker 4>The president and.

0:01:26.800 --> 0:01:30.520
<v Speaker 3>President Trump and President Putin were in sync with one another.

0:01:31.319 --> 0:01:33.160
<v Speaker 3>The call was outcome oriented.

0:01:33.680 --> 0:01:34.800
<v Speaker 4>They were talking.

0:01:34.480 --> 0:01:38.960
<v Speaker 3>About how to save lives, how to stop the carnage.

0:01:39.480 --> 0:01:43.399
<v Speaker 3>And for me, I was proud to be an American

0:01:43.440 --> 0:01:44.640
<v Speaker 3>sitting there listening to it.

0:01:44.920 --> 0:01:47.760
<v Speaker 2>Steve, let's talk about some of the outcomes. We're hopeful

0:01:47.800 --> 0:01:50.240
<v Speaker 2>that ultimately we end up with a thirty day ceasefire.

0:01:50.240 --> 0:01:52.360
<v Speaker 2>Before we get there, we're working towards things like a

0:01:52.440 --> 0:01:55.480
<v Speaker 2>prisoner swap. We're working towards a maritime ceasefire in the

0:01:55.480 --> 0:01:58.520
<v Speaker 2>Black Sea. That's important too. There was also a conversation,

0:01:58.680 --> 0:02:01.000
<v Speaker 2>yes that about maybe in agreement to limit attacks on

0:02:01.120 --> 0:02:04.200
<v Speaker 2>energy infrastructure. And we'd love to build on that because

0:02:04.200 --> 0:02:06.559
<v Speaker 2>earlier on this morning we heard from the Ukrainian leader

0:02:06.800 --> 0:02:09.600
<v Speaker 2>who said the overnight Russia sent one hundred and fifty

0:02:09.680 --> 0:02:13.320
<v Speaker 2>drones and hit Ukrainian energy. I just wonder what was

0:02:13.400 --> 0:02:19.560
<v Speaker 2>actually agreed and whether rush across the line overnight, Well, what.

0:02:19.560 --> 0:02:23.480
<v Speaker 3>Was agreed between the two presidents was, and it was

0:02:23.800 --> 0:02:27.320
<v Speaker 3>at President Trump's suggestion, that there'd be a cessation of

0:02:27.360 --> 0:02:33.120
<v Speaker 3>attacks on energy infrastructure from both sides, and civilian infrastructure

0:02:33.120 --> 0:02:39.240
<v Speaker 3>for that matter, also working towards a black Sea moratorium

0:02:39.320 --> 0:02:44.120
<v Speaker 3>on hits on naval vessels and freighters carrying grain and

0:02:44.160 --> 0:02:48.480
<v Speaker 3>things of that sort, and ultimately that would evolve into

0:02:48.880 --> 0:02:52.200
<v Speaker 3>a full on ceasefire, which is a bit more complicated

0:02:52.240 --> 0:02:56.959
<v Speaker 3>because there's a two thousand kilometer border, there's Kursk, and

0:02:57.000 --> 0:03:00.320
<v Speaker 3>there's a lot of details that go in to that.

0:03:00.840 --> 0:03:05.440
<v Speaker 3>But with regard to your question on some of the

0:03:05.480 --> 0:03:10.680
<v Speaker 3>reporting with regard to the Russian drones last night, I

0:03:10.840 --> 0:03:14.520
<v Speaker 3>have it on good information from a telephone call I

0:03:14.520 --> 0:03:18.120
<v Speaker 3>had before I went on this show, that President Putin

0:03:18.200 --> 0:03:21.520
<v Speaker 3>issued an order within ten minutes of his call with

0:03:21.560 --> 0:03:27.240
<v Speaker 3>the President directing Russian forces not to be attacking any

0:03:27.360 --> 0:03:32.000
<v Speaker 3>Ukrainian energy infrastructure. And that was and any attacks that

0:03:32.080 --> 0:03:35.840
<v Speaker 3>happened last night would have happened before that order was given.

0:03:36.240 --> 0:03:39.720
<v Speaker 3>In fact, the Russians tell me this morning that seven

0:03:39.960 --> 0:03:43.600
<v Speaker 3>of their drones were on their way when President Putin

0:03:43.680 --> 0:03:46.760
<v Speaker 3>issued his order and they were shot down by Russian forces.

0:03:46.840 --> 0:03:51.480
<v Speaker 3>So I tend to believe that President Putin is operating

0:03:51.520 --> 0:03:53.840
<v Speaker 3>in good faith. He said that he was going to

0:03:53.880 --> 0:03:56.560
<v Speaker 3>be operating in good faith to the President yesterday, and

0:03:56.600 --> 0:03:57.800
<v Speaker 3>I take him at his word.

0:03:57.920 --> 0:04:02.080
<v Speaker 5>So, mister Rikkoff, is your understanding that of today, energy facilities,

0:04:02.680 --> 0:04:04.880
<v Speaker 5>energy infrastructure will be off limits.

0:04:06.400 --> 0:04:08.000
<v Speaker 4>That's my understanding, yes, ma'am.

0:04:08.080 --> 0:04:11.080
<v Speaker 5>Do you think the next stage, potentially, as we get

0:04:11.280 --> 0:04:16.599
<v Speaker 5>the roadmap towards thirty day full ceasefire, potentially geography should

0:04:16.600 --> 0:04:18.520
<v Speaker 5>be off limits, like drones hitting Kiev.

0:04:20.360 --> 0:04:23.960
<v Speaker 3>You know, I can't speak to that. I think the

0:04:24.000 --> 0:04:27.160
<v Speaker 3>idea behind the thirty day ceasefire. First of all, we

0:04:27.240 --> 0:04:31.200
<v Speaker 3>made more progress yesterday than has been made in the

0:04:31.240 --> 0:04:34.080
<v Speaker 3>last three and a half years. They actually, the tool

0:04:34.120 --> 0:04:39.400
<v Speaker 3>leaders actually talked and committed to cessation of attacks on

0:04:39.520 --> 0:04:44.440
<v Speaker 3>energy infrastructure and civilian infrastructure. They talked about reviving the

0:04:44.480 --> 0:04:49.200
<v Speaker 3>Black Sea maritime agreement that had been negotiated several years

0:04:49.240 --> 0:04:53.480
<v Speaker 3>ago and never really implemented. Those are monumental things and

0:04:53.560 --> 0:04:57.440
<v Speaker 3>they're trust building things as well. And I think beyond that,

0:04:57.640 --> 0:05:01.919
<v Speaker 3>they also went into how you would put the finishing

0:05:02.000 --> 0:05:06.080
<v Speaker 3>touches on a full on ceasefire. That full on ceasefire

0:05:06.400 --> 0:05:09.400
<v Speaker 3>has a lot to do with this two thousand kilometer

0:05:09.480 --> 0:05:13.600
<v Speaker 3>line that where the Ukrainians are lined up against the Russians.

0:05:13.600 --> 0:05:14.520
<v Speaker 4>It's complicated.

0:05:14.960 --> 0:05:18.719
<v Speaker 3>There are different battlefield conditions in various spots. That's for

0:05:18.800 --> 0:05:21.320
<v Speaker 3>the technical teams to figure it out. And they're going

0:05:21.400 --> 0:05:25.520
<v Speaker 3>to be meeting in Saudi Arabia, I believe, beginning Monday

0:05:25.560 --> 0:05:29.320
<v Speaker 3>and Tuesday. So lots of progress happened yesterday, and it

0:05:29.400 --> 0:05:31.760
<v Speaker 3>happened in large part because of President Trump.

0:05:32.160 --> 0:05:35.000
<v Speaker 2>Let's talk about that meeting in Saudi Arabia in the

0:05:35.040 --> 0:05:37.840
<v Speaker 2>next week or so. The team's going to be led by,

0:05:37.880 --> 0:05:40.520
<v Speaker 2>I believe Secretary Rubio. I think we all want to

0:05:40.520 --> 0:05:43.240
<v Speaker 2>know what needs to happen at that meeting before the

0:05:43.279 --> 0:05:45.560
<v Speaker 2>two leaders end up in the same room to get

0:05:45.560 --> 0:05:47.360
<v Speaker 2>to that end deal. That we all want to see

0:05:47.400 --> 0:05:48.799
<v Speaker 2>what needs to happen in the next week.

0:05:50.000 --> 0:05:52.599
<v Speaker 3>Well, I'm not sure that the Secretary of State has

0:05:52.640 --> 0:05:56.080
<v Speaker 3>done an amazing job, as has the National Security Advisor

0:05:56.160 --> 0:06:00.720
<v Speaker 3>Mike Waltz. They were both at the last meeting Jetta.

0:06:01.240 --> 0:06:04.160
<v Speaker 3>It went well, lots of trust building happened, and I

0:06:04.200 --> 0:06:07.200
<v Speaker 3>believe on Monday. We actually have the technical teams going

0:06:07.240 --> 0:06:10.520
<v Speaker 3>in why because that's what we're down to. We don't

0:06:10.560 --> 0:06:14.520
<v Speaker 3>need to have larging the larger overarching discussions that's been

0:06:14.600 --> 0:06:18.000
<v Speaker 3>had and it was completed yesterday between the two leaders.

0:06:18.320 --> 0:06:20.359
<v Speaker 4>They agreed on a pathway to.

0:06:22.400 --> 0:06:25.880
<v Speaker 3>Some cease fire conditions today and to a full on

0:06:26.080 --> 0:06:29.560
<v Speaker 3>cease fire that will be negotiated over the coming days.

0:06:29.839 --> 0:06:31.520
<v Speaker 3>I actually think in a couple of weeks we're going

0:06:31.560 --> 0:06:33.960
<v Speaker 3>to get to it. So lots of good things now

0:06:33.960 --> 0:06:36.479
<v Speaker 3>it's for the technical teams to dot the i's and

0:06:36.520 --> 0:06:39.640
<v Speaker 3>cross the t's, and everybody is committed to that process.

0:06:39.720 --> 0:06:40.800
<v Speaker 5>If you think we're going to get there in a

0:06:40.839 --> 0:06:43.240
<v Speaker 5>couple of weeks, could we then see a meeting in

0:06:43.320 --> 0:06:47.120
<v Speaker 5>person between President Trump and President Putin in the Kingdom?

0:06:47.800 --> 0:06:50.040
<v Speaker 3>You know, I can't speak for them, but my best

0:06:50.040 --> 0:06:54.159
<v Speaker 3>bet would be that it's likely to happen. They have

0:06:54.200 --> 0:06:56.359
<v Speaker 3>a great rapport together. They had a great rapport in

0:06:56.360 --> 0:07:01.040
<v Speaker 3>the first Trump administration. It was on display yesterday. This

0:07:01.320 --> 0:07:06.880
<v Speaker 3>was really a very positive, very proactive, outcome oriented call.

0:07:07.160 --> 0:07:11.080
<v Speaker 3>And that's who President Trump is. He's there to get

0:07:11.120 --> 0:07:14.200
<v Speaker 3>to the goal line, and we did. We went a

0:07:14.200 --> 0:07:15.800
<v Speaker 3>long way yesterday to doing that.

0:07:16.120 --> 0:07:18.920
<v Speaker 2>Even now, the president a long long time, going back decades.

0:07:18.960 --> 0:07:21.360
<v Speaker 2>In fact, there's very few people that know him better

0:07:21.400 --> 0:07:23.960
<v Speaker 2>than you do. There's a lot of people speculating about

0:07:23.960 --> 0:07:26.040
<v Speaker 2>what the motives are, what the end objectives are.

0:07:26.080 --> 0:07:27.640
<v Speaker 6>If we could just sit on that for a moment.

0:07:27.960 --> 0:07:31.280
<v Speaker 2>Does the push for peace in Ukraine run parallel with

0:07:31.440 --> 0:07:35.000
<v Speaker 2>the push to normalize US Rush relations or Steve?

0:07:35.120 --> 0:07:36.240
<v Speaker 6>Are they separate issues?

0:07:37.440 --> 0:07:39.880
<v Speaker 3>No, I don't think there's any doubt that the two

0:07:39.960 --> 0:07:45.240
<v Speaker 3>are important. For Russia is a critical relationship for US.

0:07:45.240 --> 0:07:50.560
<v Speaker 3>It's critical as it affects all other things out there, China, Iran.

0:07:50.600 --> 0:07:51.360
<v Speaker 4>The Middle East.

0:07:52.000 --> 0:07:56.720
<v Speaker 3>These two leaders coming together and I think having conversations

0:07:56.760 --> 0:08:00.960
<v Speaker 3>about nuclear proliferation, which they did yesterday and was anormously positive.

0:08:02.160 --> 0:08:05.760
<v Speaker 3>These are this is enormously beneficial.

0:08:05.160 --> 0:08:08.320
<v Speaker 4>For the world at large. And the President believes in this.

0:08:08.440 --> 0:08:11.760
<v Speaker 3>He believes in peace, he believes in engaging, He believes

0:08:11.800 --> 0:08:13.680
<v Speaker 3>in using peace through.

0:08:13.520 --> 0:08:14.160
<v Speaker 4>Strength to.

0:08:16.160 --> 0:08:19.400
<v Speaker 3>Create a better world for everybody. And with that could

0:08:19.480 --> 0:08:22.320
<v Speaker 3>come a drop in defense budgets. Take all that money

0:08:22.320 --> 0:08:25.320
<v Speaker 3>and spend it on things that matter more than waging

0:08:25.360 --> 0:08:28.080
<v Speaker 3>war all the time. This is his policy, and so

0:08:29.880 --> 0:08:34.559
<v Speaker 3>he's to be commended for that. Yesterday was literally transformational

0:08:34.600 --> 0:08:36.120
<v Speaker 3>as far as I as far as I am.

0:08:36.120 --> 0:08:38.720
<v Speaker 7>Concerned, mister Rikoff, So then is the idea of its

0:08:38.760 --> 0:08:44.280
<v Speaker 7>normalization to draw a wedge between Russia and China and

0:08:44.360 --> 0:08:48.280
<v Speaker 7>Russia in Iran as well to further isolate America's adversaries

0:08:48.320 --> 0:08:49.560
<v Speaker 7>like Tehran and Beijing.

0:08:51.760 --> 0:08:58.600
<v Speaker 3>The I think normalization is about having real conversation President Biden,

0:08:58.840 --> 0:09:02.400
<v Speaker 3>according to President Putin, did not speak to President Putin

0:09:02.440 --> 0:09:04.960
<v Speaker 3>for three and a half years. That's not a proper

0:09:05.000 --> 0:09:09.760
<v Speaker 3>way to run policy. President Trump, in a short eight

0:09:09.800 --> 0:09:14.920
<v Speaker 3>weeks has spoken to President Putin twice, very very positive

0:09:14.960 --> 0:09:19.520
<v Speaker 3>and constructive conversations. He's directed me on his behalf to

0:09:19.559 --> 0:09:22.280
<v Speaker 3>go to Moscow. I've had close to eight hours of

0:09:22.320 --> 0:09:25.680
<v Speaker 3>conversations with President Putin and met with other key people

0:09:26.000 --> 0:09:30.800
<v Speaker 3>on his team, and he's directed the National Security Advisor,

0:09:31.240 --> 0:09:35.760
<v Speaker 3>the Secretary of State, the CIA director Pete Hegseth, or

0:09:35.840 --> 0:09:39.800
<v Speaker 3>Secretary of Defense. Everybody is engaged in this process, and

0:09:40.679 --> 0:09:44.120
<v Speaker 3>it's really wonderful to see. I think people ought to

0:09:44.160 --> 0:09:45.960
<v Speaker 3>be uplifted, and I think you're going to see some

0:09:46.080 --> 0:09:47.520
<v Speaker 3>very very positive results in.

0:09:47.480 --> 0:09:48.040
<v Speaker 4>The new term.

0:09:48.200 --> 0:09:50.840
<v Speaker 2>In the lengthy conversations you have had with the Russian lead.

0:09:51.240 --> 0:09:53.840
<v Speaker 2>Did restrictions on Russian energy come up soil? Did they

0:09:53.840 --> 0:09:54.640
<v Speaker 2>come up yesterday?

0:09:56.320 --> 0:09:59.280
<v Speaker 3>When you say restrictions, Jonathan, on Russian energy, what do

0:09:59.360 --> 0:10:01.240
<v Speaker 3>you I'm not sure what you're asking.

0:10:01.520 --> 0:10:05.880
<v Speaker 2>Restrictions on financial services, engaging in deals that restrict the

0:10:05.880 --> 0:10:08.200
<v Speaker 2>flow of Russian energy, the price camp that the Bible

0:10:08.240 --> 0:10:11.520
<v Speaker 2>administration pushed over the last year or so, Sir, have

0:10:11.559 --> 0:10:14.480
<v Speaker 2>a variety of restrictions that make it difficult for Russian

0:10:14.559 --> 0:10:15.760
<v Speaker 2>energy to compete with energy.

0:10:16.040 --> 0:10:16.800
<v Speaker 6>I'll swear.

0:10:19.000 --> 0:10:21.560
<v Speaker 3>We did not discuss or the pardon me, the President

0:10:21.600 --> 0:10:24.240
<v Speaker 3>did not discuss specifically sanctions yesterday.

0:10:24.240 --> 0:10:25.600
<v Speaker 4>If that's what you're referring to.

0:10:26.040 --> 0:10:29.920
<v Speaker 3>I think obviously that's a conversation that the two leaders

0:10:29.920 --> 0:10:33.160
<v Speaker 3>are going to have and everybody is open to it.

0:10:33.200 --> 0:10:38.000
<v Speaker 3>But first and foremost, we want a solution to that

0:10:38.040 --> 0:10:40.199
<v Speaker 3>means an end to the fighting. We want to get

0:10:40.240 --> 0:10:43.200
<v Speaker 3>to the ceasefire. That's the President's policy, and we're going

0:10:43.240 --> 0:10:45.880
<v Speaker 3>to get to the ceasefire, and I think after that

0:10:46.840 --> 0:10:50.760
<v Speaker 3>everything else will be a detail sanction relief and all

0:10:50.800 --> 0:10:53.440
<v Speaker 3>the other things that go with a full on peace treaty.

0:10:53.480 --> 0:10:56.000
<v Speaker 5>Trump said last night to Fox News that Russia would

0:10:56.040 --> 0:10:59.120
<v Speaker 5>like to use some of the US economic power. This

0:10:59.160 --> 0:11:02.960
<v Speaker 5>is an individual who's been against the likes of Nordstream

0:11:03.000 --> 0:11:06.000
<v Speaker 5>Nordstream two for years. Mister Werkoff, you know that. But

0:11:06.080 --> 0:11:09.600
<v Speaker 5>can you see a world when Russian energy comes back

0:11:09.640 --> 0:11:12.880
<v Speaker 5>online via pipelines like Nordstream?

0:11:14.000 --> 0:11:15.360
<v Speaker 4>Well, I can certainly see that world.

0:11:15.400 --> 0:11:17.800
<v Speaker 3>But let me give you, let me give you an

0:11:17.920 --> 0:11:21.440
<v Speaker 3>example about the deleterious effects here and why we have

0:11:21.480 --> 0:11:24.480
<v Speaker 3>to get to a solution. Russian oil today is being

0:11:24.520 --> 0:11:26.920
<v Speaker 3>sold cheap to China. I'm not sure that's such a

0:11:26.920 --> 0:11:29.760
<v Speaker 3>wonderful benefit of that India.

0:11:31.000 --> 0:11:34.560
<v Speaker 4>OK So you're underscoring my point.

0:11:34.679 --> 0:11:37.960
<v Speaker 3>So there are all these deleterious things that could come

0:11:37.960 --> 0:11:41.120
<v Speaker 3>from this, and I think the beginning of it is

0:11:41.160 --> 0:11:44.120
<v Speaker 3>a conversation. I think it's sort of unacceptable for two

0:11:44.160 --> 0:11:48.480
<v Speaker 3>world leaders of the stature of a Russian president and

0:11:48.520 --> 0:11:51.120
<v Speaker 3>an American president who haven't talked to three and a

0:11:51.120 --> 0:11:55.040
<v Speaker 3>half years. That's an unacceptable policy program for the president.

0:11:55.760 --> 0:11:57.920
<v Speaker 3>He wants to get things done, and you get things

0:11:57.960 --> 0:12:01.480
<v Speaker 3>done by getting on a telephone or meeting personally and

0:12:01.520 --> 0:12:03.800
<v Speaker 3>instructing your staffs to do that, which is what he's

0:12:03.840 --> 0:12:04.240
<v Speaker 3>done here.

0:12:04.360 --> 0:12:05.080
<v Speaker 4>Mister Ricofer.

0:12:05.720 --> 0:12:06.520
<v Speaker 8>It's a conversation.

0:12:06.600 --> 0:12:08.439
<v Speaker 5>We've had a lot on this programmers. The fact that

0:12:08.600 --> 0:12:12.400
<v Speaker 5>sanctions when it comes to Russia didn't change Putin's motives

0:12:12.720 --> 0:12:15.720
<v Speaker 5>and they still were able to fund the war by selling.

0:12:15.400 --> 0:12:16.960
<v Speaker 7>A lot of these a lot of this energy.

0:12:17.160 --> 0:12:19.880
<v Speaker 5>It just created new markets for Russia to be willing

0:12:20.160 --> 0:12:23.200
<v Speaker 5>to trade. Scott Bessant, though, the Treasury Secretary said the

0:12:23.200 --> 0:12:25.920
<v Speaker 5>other day that we will go to attend and bring

0:12:26.000 --> 0:12:28.760
<v Speaker 5>sanctions if we have to on Russia to bring Putin

0:12:28.840 --> 0:12:31.280
<v Speaker 5>to the table. Do you see President Trump getting to

0:12:31.320 --> 0:12:35.280
<v Speaker 5>that point lifting sanctions to attend in order to cajole

0:12:35.360 --> 0:12:37.240
<v Speaker 5>Putin to the table for the ceasefire.

0:12:38.640 --> 0:12:41.600
<v Speaker 3>Look, Scott bessen does a great Treasury Secretary. I'm not

0:12:41.640 --> 0:12:45.240
<v Speaker 3>going to speak to what he had to say. I'm

0:12:45.280 --> 0:12:48.640
<v Speaker 3>going to say this. I've had two meetings at the

0:12:48.679 --> 0:12:52.760
<v Speaker 3>direction of President Trump with President Putin in the last

0:12:52.800 --> 0:12:56.160
<v Speaker 3>several weeks that have collectively aggregated to almost eight hours.

0:12:56.679 --> 0:12:59.840
<v Speaker 3>Many other people in the senior people in the administration

0:13:00.200 --> 0:13:03.679
<v Speaker 3>are having meetings with their colleagues and their counterparts there.

0:13:04.040 --> 0:13:07.359
<v Speaker 3>The President has directed all of this. There is amazing

0:13:07.480 --> 0:13:12.200
<v Speaker 3>progress being made. Yesterday, in one telephone call, we talked

0:13:12.240 --> 0:13:17.040
<v Speaker 3>about an immediate ceasefire on energy infrastructure. That's game changing,

0:13:17.360 --> 0:13:21.160
<v Speaker 3>and also the Black Sea moratorium game changing, and the

0:13:21.200 --> 0:13:24.120
<v Speaker 3>contours of how we get to a personal ceasefire, a

0:13:25.760 --> 0:13:30.400
<v Speaker 3>thirty day ceasefire, game changing. Enormous progress as compared to

0:13:30.440 --> 0:13:35.559
<v Speaker 3>where we were, because we're communicating, we're talking in a collegial,

0:13:35.840 --> 0:13:40.120
<v Speaker 3>constructive manner, and everybody is outcome oriented, the outcome being

0:13:40.440 --> 0:13:42.439
<v Speaker 3>the end of fighting there and the end of the

0:13:42.520 --> 0:13:43.120
<v Speaker 3>killing there.

0:13:43.480 --> 0:13:45.560
<v Speaker 2>We don't like to see that serve we could just finish.

0:13:45.600 --> 0:13:48.199
<v Speaker 2>On Europe, something we've not discussed in the last ten

0:13:48.240 --> 0:13:51.800
<v Speaker 2>minutes or so. The Europeans, Germany and the EU are

0:13:51.800 --> 0:13:55.120
<v Speaker 2>pushing to rearm. They're set to spend hundreds of billions

0:13:55.160 --> 0:13:57.960
<v Speaker 2>of euros on defense. That's something that President Trump has

0:13:57.960 --> 0:14:01.079
<v Speaker 2>been pushing for for quite a while. Does he welcome that,

0:14:01.320 --> 0:14:03.959
<v Speaker 2>does he complicate talks in any way? Does it antagonize

0:14:04.000 --> 0:14:06.200
<v Speaker 2>Russia and make this harder? How does he view that

0:14:06.200 --> 0:14:06.760
<v Speaker 2>at the moment?

0:14:08.000 --> 0:14:10.600
<v Speaker 3>Look, I think the President has a policy which is

0:14:10.679 --> 0:14:14.000
<v Speaker 3>that Europe should pay more for their own defense, and

0:14:14.200 --> 0:14:17.600
<v Speaker 3>so I think to the extent that that's what's happening.

0:14:17.640 --> 0:14:21.960
<v Speaker 3>I think that's a good thing, rearming and all the

0:14:22.000 --> 0:14:26.000
<v Speaker 3>other stuff that leads to more conflagration, that leads to

0:14:27.040 --> 0:14:29.600
<v Speaker 3>that undermines a peace process.

0:14:30.840 --> 0:14:33.200
<v Speaker 4>I would say that that's not such a good thing.

0:14:33.320 --> 0:14:37.280
<v Speaker 3>So look, we're here to get a deal in Russia

0:14:37.400 --> 0:14:40.600
<v Speaker 3>and Ukraine, and we're well on the way to getting

0:14:40.600 --> 0:14:42.560
<v Speaker 3>it done. And I think you're going to hear some

0:14:42.920 --> 0:14:47.560
<v Speaker 3>You're going to hear some really positive things happening as

0:14:47.600 --> 0:14:48.600
<v Speaker 3>these talks continue.

0:14:48.720 --> 0:14:52.000
<v Speaker 5>Mister Werkoff, you're a successful businessman that is now really

0:14:52.040 --> 0:14:56.440
<v Speaker 5>at the height of diplomacy around the world. European strong

0:14:56.520 --> 0:15:00.480
<v Speaker 5>economic ties with Russia did not prevent Putin for his

0:15:00.600 --> 0:15:04.720
<v Speaker 5>full scale invasion of Ukraine in twenty twenty one. Do

0:15:04.800 --> 0:15:08.120
<v Speaker 5>you think it could prevent hostilities in the future if

0:15:08.120 --> 0:15:11.440
<v Speaker 5>we were to see a ceasefire and businesses in trade

0:15:11.760 --> 0:15:13.320
<v Speaker 5>were back to come into.

0:15:13.160 --> 0:15:16.520
<v Speaker 3>The fore I don't think there's any doubt. I think

0:15:16.560 --> 0:15:20.040
<v Speaker 3>the point is to get everybody focused not on war,

0:15:20.560 --> 0:15:23.560
<v Speaker 3>but on making their countries better, on spending the money

0:15:23.600 --> 0:15:27.760
<v Speaker 3>on their people in Ukraine, on rebuilding, on doing on

0:15:27.880 --> 0:15:31.640
<v Speaker 3>doing good things for their people. That's how you get

0:15:31.640 --> 0:15:35.560
<v Speaker 3>to a better place. And that's President Trump's agenda throughout

0:15:35.600 --> 0:15:38.240
<v Speaker 3>the world and we see it being very very His

0:15:38.280 --> 0:15:39.560
<v Speaker 3>agenda is very effective.

0:15:39.600 --> 0:15:40.560
<v Speaker 4>People buy into it.

0:15:40.960 --> 0:15:43.160
<v Speaker 3>I was on the phone with President Macrone last night

0:15:43.480 --> 0:15:46.400
<v Speaker 3>giving him a download of what happened, and we had

0:15:46.440 --> 0:15:49.880
<v Speaker 3>a really positive conversation about the outcome. So I think

0:15:49.880 --> 0:15:53.080
<v Speaker 3>there's a lot of buy in to President Trump's leadership,

0:15:53.120 --> 0:15:55.680
<v Speaker 3>the way he's leading the world today, not just the

0:15:55.800 --> 0:15:59.240
<v Speaker 3>United States. It's just exceptional for me to watch.

0:15:59.280 --> 0:16:01.280
<v Speaker 2>We've a few seconds left with you, sir, but I

0:16:01.320 --> 0:16:04.400
<v Speaker 2>think that's an important comment to make relations with Europe.

0:16:04.440 --> 0:16:07.360
<v Speaker 2>They are endorsing, Are they this approach that the President

0:16:07.480 --> 0:16:09.800
<v Speaker 2>is taken, Because publicly they seem to be saying one thing.

0:16:10.120 --> 0:16:13.880
<v Speaker 2>Are they endorsing this approach? Privately, I'm hearing a lot

0:16:13.920 --> 0:16:17.880
<v Speaker 2>of endorsement, Jonathan. That's a very interesting development, sir. I

0:16:17.920 --> 0:16:20.280
<v Speaker 2>wanted to finish on you personally, just for a moment,

0:16:20.320 --> 0:16:23.360
<v Speaker 2>if we can, for the people internationally that aren't aware, Sir,

0:16:23.840 --> 0:16:27.200
<v Speaker 2>you were widely regarded as a talented negotiated making a

0:16:27.240 --> 0:16:30.600
<v Speaker 2>fortune in real estate before taking on these responsibilities, and

0:16:30.640 --> 0:16:32.680
<v Speaker 2>you seem to be having an instant impact in the role.

0:16:32.720 --> 0:16:35.400
<v Speaker 2>And it's started in January before Trump even got into

0:16:35.440 --> 0:16:38.520
<v Speaker 2>the White House, with the agreement, the ceasefire and hostage

0:16:38.600 --> 0:16:41.480
<v Speaker 2>change between Israel and Hamas in January. Can we just

0:16:41.520 --> 0:16:44.240
<v Speaker 2>finish on how transferable those skills actually are. How different

0:16:44.320 --> 0:16:46.720
<v Speaker 2>is this for you to go from that world of

0:16:46.760 --> 0:16:50.160
<v Speaker 2>real estate to this life and death in Ukraine.

0:16:51.720 --> 0:16:54.480
<v Speaker 3>Well, you know, I went into the real estate business.

0:16:54.520 --> 0:16:56.640
<v Speaker 3>I was a young lawyer and I went in because

0:16:56.680 --> 0:16:58.920
<v Speaker 3>I wanted to be Donald Trump to tell you the truth,

0:16:58.960 --> 0:17:00.960
<v Speaker 3>and that really is the truth. By the way I've

0:17:01.080 --> 0:17:04.359
<v Speaker 3>talked about this in the past, he was a great

0:17:04.359 --> 0:17:07.800
<v Speaker 3>real estate guy, and to a large extent, I follow

0:17:07.880 --> 0:17:12.280
<v Speaker 3>his example when it comes to negotiating. The President is

0:17:12.359 --> 0:17:17.960
<v Speaker 3>all about clearing up misconceptions, clearing up miscommunication, figuring out

0:17:18.280 --> 0:17:20.960
<v Speaker 3>how to get a good deal for all stakeholders, all

0:17:20.960 --> 0:17:24.040
<v Speaker 3>constituents as a part of the deal, and then deciding

0:17:24.080 --> 0:17:27.879
<v Speaker 3>beforehand what the outcome he wants is. That's how deals

0:17:27.920 --> 0:17:30.359
<v Speaker 3>get structured, and they're not all that dissimilar in the

0:17:30.400 --> 0:17:32.720
<v Speaker 3>political realm, and that's how we've done it in the

0:17:32.760 --> 0:17:36.080
<v Speaker 3>Middle East. We follow his direction in that way and

0:17:36.119 --> 0:17:37.240
<v Speaker 3>it's highly effective.

0:17:38.040 --> 0:17:40.200
<v Speaker 2>Steve, You've been generous with your time this morning, sir,

0:17:40.359 --> 0:17:42.560
<v Speaker 2>and we appreciate it. Hair Rum Blimbuck's vinements, We've going

0:17:42.600 --> 0:17:44.200
<v Speaker 2>to do this again. Thank you very much for being

0:17:44.200 --> 0:17:46.960
<v Speaker 2>with us. THEE House Special Envoy to Middle East, that

0:17:47.280 --> 0:18:01.520
<v Speaker 2>Steve Whitcuff. Bnandi Geldberg of TD writes market sentiment moved

0:18:01.520 --> 0:18:05.000
<v Speaker 2>from euphoria to dispasse so fast it's given investors whiplash.

0:18:05.200 --> 0:18:08.000
<v Speaker 2>While the data has become concerning, the economy is still

0:18:08.000 --> 0:18:10.240
<v Speaker 2>doing okay and show signs of moderating.

0:18:10.520 --> 0:18:11.800
<v Speaker 6>Kannadi joins us now for more.

0:18:11.800 --> 0:18:13.479
<v Speaker 2>It's good to see you, sir, Thanks for being If

0:18:13.480 --> 0:18:15.480
<v Speaker 2>he says exactly that today, is that holekish?

0:18:15.840 --> 0:18:16.240
<v Speaker 6>I think so.

0:18:16.600 --> 0:18:18.600
<v Speaker 9>I mean you were looking at that tenure rate right

0:18:18.640 --> 0:18:21.040
<v Speaker 9>around four thirty and saying, look how stuck it is.

0:18:21.440 --> 0:18:24.160
<v Speaker 9>I think if he sounds dubbish, he would get raped

0:18:24.160 --> 0:18:26.800
<v Speaker 9>to four percent. If he sounds hawkish, we can back

0:18:26.880 --> 0:18:29.400
<v Speaker 9>up pretty significantly. The market's been pricing in a lot

0:18:29.480 --> 0:18:32.280
<v Speaker 9>of you know, fed action, so to speak. If he

0:18:32.320 --> 0:18:35.240
<v Speaker 9>comes out and says nothing, I think we go back

0:18:35.280 --> 0:18:36.760
<v Speaker 9>up to four fifty four sixty.

0:18:36.480 --> 0:18:37.000
<v Speaker 4>In a hurry.

0:18:37.040 --> 0:18:38.879
<v Speaker 1>Hold on a second, on the short end, on of

0:18:38.880 --> 0:18:40.720
<v Speaker 1>the long end, on the long end, Okay, Isn't that

0:18:40.800 --> 0:18:44.080
<v Speaker 1>counterintuitive because some people are actually growing increasingly concerned about

0:18:44.119 --> 0:18:46.840
<v Speaker 1>longer term inflation with the expectation that you've got debt

0:18:46.880 --> 0:18:50.720
<v Speaker 1>issuance around the world, let alone deglobalization, et cetera. You're

0:18:50.760 --> 0:18:53.480
<v Speaker 1>saying that if they sound somewhat hawkish or at least

0:18:53.480 --> 0:18:56.359
<v Speaker 1>not ragingly dubvish, you could get a backup on the

0:18:56.400 --> 0:18:56.800
<v Speaker 1>long end.

0:18:56.800 --> 0:18:57.640
<v Speaker 8>How does that make sense?

0:18:58.000 --> 0:18:59.919
<v Speaker 9>I think, Look, I think the market is so much

0:19:00.160 --> 0:19:02.440
<v Speaker 9>worried about growth than inflation right now. I mean, we're

0:19:02.440 --> 0:19:05.520
<v Speaker 9>all talking kind of stackflationary impulses here. I do think

0:19:05.560 --> 0:19:09.400
<v Speaker 9>the Fed, if they face any sort of growth slowdown,

0:19:09.680 --> 0:19:11.639
<v Speaker 9>will be pretty quick to act. But I think at

0:19:11.640 --> 0:19:13.040
<v Speaker 9>this point they're going to pour a little bit of

0:19:13.040 --> 0:19:15.840
<v Speaker 9>cold water on the market's expectation that they're going to

0:19:15.880 --> 0:19:19.160
<v Speaker 9>come in effectively tomorrow and start cutting interest rates. They're

0:19:19.200 --> 0:19:21.200
<v Speaker 9>still in wait and see mode, and that could push

0:19:21.240 --> 0:19:22.639
<v Speaker 9>along end of the curve a little bit higher.

0:19:22.680 --> 0:19:24.719
<v Speaker 1>Watch what they do, not what they say. That's what

0:19:24.720 --> 0:19:27.080
<v Speaker 1>people are saying right now. When you have a drinking

0:19:27.119 --> 0:19:29.560
<v Speaker 1>game around uncertainty and data dependency, how.

0:19:29.440 --> 0:19:30.280
<v Speaker 6>Do you want to drink again?

0:19:30.880 --> 0:19:31.200
<v Speaker 8>Cheers?

0:19:31.280 --> 0:19:32.520
<v Speaker 6>There you go some hot water.

0:19:32.600 --> 0:19:34.679
<v Speaker 1>There is a question though, about how much they're going

0:19:34.720 --> 0:19:36.760
<v Speaker 1>to give a signaling with quantitative tightening. And I keep

0:19:36.800 --> 0:19:39.679
<v Speaker 1>going back to this because ultimately we've heard about that

0:19:39.680 --> 0:19:42.119
<v Speaker 1>from Scott Best at the Treasury Secretary. We've heard that

0:19:42.200 --> 0:19:45.600
<v Speaker 1>potentially they could start to pause the allowance of their

0:19:45.640 --> 0:19:48.800
<v Speaker 1>balance to roll off their lack of reinvestment as a

0:19:48.800 --> 0:19:51.439
<v Speaker 1>way to sort of ameliorate concertainty around the debt ceiling.

0:19:51.720 --> 0:19:53.600
<v Speaker 8>What do you take of that type of move If

0:19:53.640 --> 0:19:55.280
<v Speaker 8>that does come, I.

0:19:55.200 --> 0:19:57.879
<v Speaker 6>Think they'll try to sell it. As you know, this.

0:19:57.760 --> 0:20:00.520
<v Speaker 9>Is completely technical, don't read into this. I think part

0:20:00.520 --> 0:20:02.439
<v Speaker 9>of the issue is the markets are going to have

0:20:02.440 --> 0:20:05.440
<v Speaker 9>trouble divorcing that from you know, interest rate policy.

0:20:05.880 --> 0:20:07.840
<v Speaker 6>The Fed has always said there's two different programs.

0:20:08.000 --> 0:20:09.720
<v Speaker 9>Our view is they can still wait a little bit.

0:20:09.760 --> 0:20:12.360
<v Speaker 9>So our view is they don't have to actually cut

0:20:12.440 --> 0:20:15.439
<v Speaker 9>QT here. They can wait until the next meeting or

0:20:15.480 --> 0:20:17.639
<v Speaker 9>the meeting after. We actually think QT is going to

0:20:17.680 --> 0:20:20.240
<v Speaker 9>run all the way until September before they end, with

0:20:20.320 --> 0:20:22.440
<v Speaker 9>a little bit of a risk obviously to them ending earlier.

0:20:22.960 --> 0:20:24.960
<v Speaker 9>I think that discussion has already gotten in the market.

0:20:24.960 --> 0:20:27.280
<v Speaker 9>It's a little bit you know, optimistic. I would say,

0:20:27.400 --> 0:20:30.360
<v Speaker 9>Scott is some love to have QTM today because that's

0:20:30.400 --> 0:20:32.520
<v Speaker 9>three hundred billion less a year that the Treasury has

0:20:32.560 --> 0:20:35.760
<v Speaker 9>to fund. I would say it's more more likely than

0:20:35.800 --> 0:20:38.240
<v Speaker 9>not that it still stays in place for now. They've

0:20:38.280 --> 0:20:41.359
<v Speaker 9>got plenty of time until that August X date. I

0:20:41.400 --> 0:20:43.959
<v Speaker 9>don't think they need to rush. They can do it

0:20:43.960 --> 0:20:45.840
<v Speaker 9>in June, they can do it in July. Heck, they

0:20:45.840 --> 0:20:46.960
<v Speaker 9>can even do it in September.

0:20:47.160 --> 0:20:49.280
<v Speaker 2>They Treasury secondary sat and you'll see and set exactly

0:20:49.320 --> 0:20:51.600
<v Speaker 2>the same thing. By the way, so he essentially alluded

0:20:51.680 --> 0:20:53.760
<v Speaker 2>to that, let's get to the full cast median dup.

0:20:54.000 --> 0:20:56.679
<v Speaker 6>She has two cuts? Does it shives three? Two? I

0:20:56.720 --> 0:20:58.080
<v Speaker 6>think let's a shot at the end to today.

0:20:58.240 --> 0:21:00.520
<v Speaker 9>I think the risk is that it goes to three.

0:21:00.640 --> 0:21:03.199
<v Speaker 9>I mean, we've actually got it still showing two. I

0:21:03.240 --> 0:21:07.800
<v Speaker 9>think that conversation around inflation versus growth is really what

0:21:07.840 --> 0:21:11.439
<v Speaker 9>everyone's nervous about. And you know, I wouldn't be surprised

0:21:11.440 --> 0:21:13.919
<v Speaker 9>to see some of the dots actually move higher, not lower.

0:21:14.160 --> 0:21:17.119
<v Speaker 9>So I think the expectation is the dots all shift

0:21:17.200 --> 0:21:19.840
<v Speaker 9>universally lower because of the worry about growth. There's going

0:21:19.920 --> 0:21:22.120
<v Speaker 9>to be some Fed officials who are worried about inflation,

0:21:22.640 --> 0:21:25.600
<v Speaker 9>and there's a good chance the medium actually stays around two,

0:21:26.119 --> 0:21:28.560
<v Speaker 9>some shift lower, some shift higher, and we don't get

0:21:28.560 --> 0:21:29.280
<v Speaker 9>a lot of movement.

0:21:29.560 --> 0:21:31.359
<v Speaker 2>The biggest risk I think for Marcus today, and we're

0:21:31.400 --> 0:21:33.080
<v Speaker 2>all trying to gain this out. If you get a

0:21:33.080 --> 0:21:35.480
<v Speaker 2>snack flashing me outcome and the revisions to the forecast

0:21:35.560 --> 0:21:37.600
<v Speaker 2>and the Federal SEF that just looks tased and confused.

0:21:37.960 --> 0:21:38.840
<v Speaker 6>That helps nobody.

0:21:39.440 --> 0:21:41.960
<v Speaker 1>Well, it helps nobody who wants a FED put. But

0:21:42.000 --> 0:21:44.040
<v Speaker 1>anyone who's looking for a FED put, well, good luck.

0:21:44.320 --> 0:21:46.560
<v Speaker 1>I feel like the bond market maybe has moved away

0:21:46.600 --> 0:21:48.240
<v Speaker 1>from the idea of a FED put a little bit.

0:21:48.359 --> 0:21:50.639
<v Speaker 1>Stock markets still held out hope. It might be the

0:21:50.640 --> 0:21:52.600
<v Speaker 1>one most susceptible to disappointment today.

0:21:52.720 --> 0:21:54.600
<v Speaker 2>Do you think he's worried about what's developing in market

0:21:54.760 --> 0:21:56.320
<v Speaker 2>or it's just not big enough, not yet.

0:21:56.400 --> 0:21:59.040
<v Speaker 9>I think they're watching it closely. I think you know,

0:21:59.600 --> 0:22:03.160
<v Speaker 9>ski scope certainly matters. I think the timeline matters as well.

0:22:03.320 --> 0:22:05.040
<v Speaker 9>I mean, if you have a fifteen to twenty percent

0:22:05.040 --> 0:22:07.600
<v Speaker 9>fall in risky assets over the course of a couple

0:22:07.640 --> 0:22:10.040
<v Speaker 9>of weeks or a month, that's certainly concerning. If that

0:22:10.200 --> 0:22:13.200
<v Speaker 9>happens over the couple of months or a quarter, that's

0:22:13.200 --> 0:22:15.600
<v Speaker 9>something they keep an eye on. What we're really watching

0:22:15.840 --> 0:22:19.520
<v Speaker 9>is the impact of this fallen equities on hir income consumers.

0:22:19.560 --> 0:22:22.359
<v Speaker 9>There they have been the driving force of this economy

0:22:22.400 --> 0:22:24.879
<v Speaker 9>for the last couple of years. They're the reason the

0:22:24.920 --> 0:22:29.359
<v Speaker 9>economy has outperformed all expectations. If they snap their pocketbooks shut,

0:22:29.359 --> 0:22:31.040
<v Speaker 9>I think that's the fear. I think that's what markets

0:22:31.080 --> 0:22:33.879
<v Speaker 9>are trading right now. You know we've been taught before,

0:22:34.040 --> 0:22:35.920
<v Speaker 9>don't bet against the American consumer.

0:22:36.080 --> 0:22:36.600
<v Speaker 6>Not yet.

0:22:36.720 --> 0:22:38.879
<v Speaker 9>I think there's a lot of nervousness, but the data

0:22:38.960 --> 0:22:40.080
<v Speaker 9>is not there yet.

0:22:40.200 --> 0:22:41.520
<v Speaker 6>That would be a night to change.

0:22:41.560 --> 0:22:43.840
<v Speaker 2>Cannot appreciate your time as a ways, cannot go back

0:22:43.880 --> 0:22:56.240
<v Speaker 2>that of tday. We'll begin the saund with Stuck's steady

0:22:56.400 --> 0:22:59.280
<v Speaker 2>as Trina's White, the FMC rank decision, Kaki Chantry, if

0:22:59.280 --> 0:23:01.960
<v Speaker 2>black Croft wang in on the market volatility, writing this,

0:23:02.119 --> 0:23:04.800
<v Speaker 2>there is no single smoking gun, but rather we look

0:23:04.840 --> 0:23:07.399
<v Speaker 2>to a mosaic of data and sentiment indicators that have

0:23:07.440 --> 0:23:09.840
<v Speaker 2>all contributed to the pullback in risk.

0:23:09.880 --> 0:23:11.760
<v Speaker 6>Gnkie joins us now for more Gnkey and morning, it's

0:23:11.800 --> 0:23:12.280
<v Speaker 6>good to see you.

0:23:12.560 --> 0:23:12.840
<v Speaker 8>Morning.

0:23:12.840 --> 0:23:15.080
<v Speaker 2>Great Please You've said that because a lot of days

0:23:15.119 --> 0:23:16.919
<v Speaker 2>we get this down draft inequities and a lot of

0:23:16.920 --> 0:23:21.160
<v Speaker 2>people just say trade, trade, uncertainty, policy volatility, and then

0:23:21.160 --> 0:23:23.520
<v Speaker 2>we see names that aren't really associated for that story

0:23:23.600 --> 0:23:26.679
<v Speaker 2>down aggressively, maybe much more so than the gms of

0:23:26.720 --> 0:23:29.200
<v Speaker 2>this world, which you think explains the fuller picture.

0:23:29.440 --> 0:23:31.520
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, absolutely, so a couple of things. First of all,

0:23:31.560 --> 0:23:34.440
<v Speaker 10>thank you for having me. I would characterize it as

0:23:34.640 --> 0:23:37.360
<v Speaker 10>four different things that have been driving the markets over

0:23:37.359 --> 0:23:37.800
<v Speaker 10>the last.

0:23:37.680 --> 0:23:38.320
<v Speaker 8>Couple of weeks.

0:23:38.600 --> 0:23:41.200
<v Speaker 10>So the first is, as we were discussing earlier, there

0:23:41.280 --> 0:23:45.119
<v Speaker 10>has been a significant expectation of slowdown of growth for

0:23:45.240 --> 0:23:48.800
<v Speaker 10>Q one and the entirety of the year, and that's

0:23:48.880 --> 0:23:51.160
<v Speaker 10>coming from which brings me to the second point. That's

0:23:51.200 --> 0:23:55.719
<v Speaker 10>coming from consumption or expectations of consumers slowing down. For

0:23:55.760 --> 0:23:59.000
<v Speaker 10>the longest time, that has been the lynchpin of the economy.

0:23:59.359 --> 0:24:01.960
<v Speaker 10>If you're at going to see consumers slowing down, and

0:24:02.000 --> 0:24:05.119
<v Speaker 10>we've seen that in the soft data so far. We

0:24:05.359 --> 0:24:09.120
<v Speaker 10>haven't necessarily seen it in some of the harder data,

0:24:09.160 --> 0:24:11.040
<v Speaker 10>but if that comes about, I think that's going to

0:24:11.080 --> 0:24:13.720
<v Speaker 10>be a real concerns. We've heard that from corporate commentaries.

0:24:13.960 --> 0:24:17.000
<v Speaker 10>We're talking about Delta airlines. We've seen that from coals,

0:24:17.040 --> 0:24:18.960
<v Speaker 10>we saw it a couple of weeks ago from Walmart

0:24:19.000 --> 0:24:19.480
<v Speaker 10>and Target.

0:24:19.880 --> 0:24:20.720
<v Speaker 8>That's another thing.

0:24:21.119 --> 0:24:24.000
<v Speaker 10>I'll also say, of course this policy uncertainty that has

0:24:24.040 --> 0:24:28.080
<v Speaker 10>been there all along, but now alongside the policy uncertainty

0:24:28.119 --> 0:24:31.920
<v Speaker 10>and the questions about tariffs and immigration, there's now that

0:24:32.320 --> 0:24:36.200
<v Speaker 10>very real slowing down that you're seeing. Finally, I'll say

0:24:36.240 --> 0:24:38.200
<v Speaker 10>that we have to give a nod a little bit

0:24:38.359 --> 0:24:41.600
<v Speaker 10>to some of the valuations that we already had coming

0:24:41.640 --> 0:24:44.520
<v Speaker 10>into this year. We all admitted and we knew that

0:24:44.600 --> 0:24:48.199
<v Speaker 10>valuations in the US market were a little stretched. So

0:24:48.240 --> 0:24:50.959
<v Speaker 10>you're seeing that pullback happen. So it's a bunch of

0:24:51.000 --> 0:24:52.119
<v Speaker 10>things that are coming together.

0:24:52.440 --> 0:24:55.080
<v Speaker 1>We try to create a narrative for just momentum play.

0:24:55.160 --> 0:24:57.800
<v Speaker 1>And I keep saying this because the tech trade has

0:24:57.840 --> 0:25:00.119
<v Speaker 1>been the one that's got the most beaten up, and

0:25:00.160 --> 0:25:02.879
<v Speaker 1>it comes at a time where suddenly people are questioning

0:25:03.119 --> 0:25:05.320
<v Speaker 1>whether maybe their money will be better treated.

0:25:05.040 --> 0:25:05.800
<v Speaker 4>In other places.

0:25:05.880 --> 0:25:08.520
<v Speaker 1>You're seeing those flows rapidly shift. How much is that

0:25:08.640 --> 0:25:11.639
<v Speaker 1>ultimately with underpitting this and it's sort of exemplified by

0:25:11.640 --> 0:25:12.520
<v Speaker 1>the biggest losers.

0:25:12.760 --> 0:25:14.119
<v Speaker 8>I think that's a part of the story.

0:25:14.160 --> 0:25:17.240
<v Speaker 10>There's obviously, you know, two last week on Thursday, when

0:25:17.240 --> 0:25:20.160
<v Speaker 10>we had those big moves and we entered into correction territory.

0:25:20.400 --> 0:25:23.359
<v Speaker 10>A lot of finger pointing did happen towards what was

0:25:23.400 --> 0:25:27.280
<v Speaker 10>the positioning, what were some of the hedge fund most

0:25:27.280 --> 0:25:30.119
<v Speaker 10>shortened names, what were they doing all of that? And

0:25:30.440 --> 0:25:33.119
<v Speaker 10>surely that plays a role, yes, But if that was

0:25:33.200 --> 0:25:38.080
<v Speaker 10>happening in vacuum without the macro picture decelerating, if that

0:25:38.240 --> 0:25:40.639
<v Speaker 10>was happening in vacuum, it wouldn't have been ten percent,

0:25:40.920 --> 0:25:43.040
<v Speaker 10>it wouldn't have lasted, it wouldn't have been yesterday.

0:25:43.240 --> 0:25:44.639
<v Speaker 8>So I think it's a combination.

0:25:44.760 --> 0:25:48.800
<v Speaker 10>That was my point earlier that Jonathan, that you read out.

0:25:49.160 --> 0:25:51.919
<v Speaker 10>It's a lot of things coming together while at the

0:25:51.960 --> 0:25:55.520
<v Speaker 10>same time China and Europe are going the other way

0:25:55.560 --> 0:25:58.280
<v Speaker 10>in terms of fiscal expansion. I think this is a

0:25:58.320 --> 0:26:02.879
<v Speaker 10>great opportunity for investor to recognize, especially USM bust investors,

0:26:03.119 --> 0:26:06.040
<v Speaker 10>to recognize the need for adding hedges and the need

0:26:06.040 --> 0:26:10.080
<v Speaker 10>for diversification. To the extent you haven't had non US

0:26:10.080 --> 0:26:12.960
<v Speaker 10>in your portfolio, to the extent you haven't had inflation

0:26:13.040 --> 0:26:15.800
<v Speaker 10>link bombs in your portfolio, to the extent you haven't

0:26:15.800 --> 0:26:18.760
<v Speaker 10>had anything other than tech in your portfolio, we think

0:26:18.760 --> 0:26:20.960
<v Speaker 10>this is a good time to think about adding those hedges.

0:26:21.200 --> 0:26:23.600
<v Speaker 11>So let me ask you on the non US So.

0:26:23.680 --> 0:26:27.600
<v Speaker 11>Danny Berger earlier today shared a really interesting factoid that

0:26:27.680 --> 0:26:30.679
<v Speaker 11>since the start of last year twenty twenty four, do

0:26:30.760 --> 0:26:33.639
<v Speaker 11>we turn on the max seven is the same as

0:26:33.680 --> 0:26:37.240
<v Speaker 11>it return on the decks? Yeah, going forward, what do

0:26:37.280 --> 0:26:39.080
<v Speaker 11>you think that that relationship looks like?

0:26:39.720 --> 0:26:40.600
<v Speaker 8>I think a lot depends.

0:26:40.640 --> 0:26:43.520
<v Speaker 10>I mean, just yesterday, obviously we finally got the approval

0:26:43.640 --> 0:26:45.439
<v Speaker 10>of some of the fiscal policies that are going to

0:26:45.480 --> 0:26:47.720
<v Speaker 10>take place. I think a lot of that depends on

0:26:47.760 --> 0:26:50.000
<v Speaker 10>what ultimately happens and at what pace.

0:26:51.160 --> 0:26:53.240
<v Speaker 8>If I had to bet for the next.

0:26:53.040 --> 0:26:57.040
<v Speaker 10>Ten years, I would still put my money in American

0:26:57.080 --> 0:27:01.200
<v Speaker 10>Innovation and AI. Some of them is just large gap

0:27:01.359 --> 0:27:04.760
<v Speaker 10>quality US companies. Over the next few months or even

0:27:04.800 --> 0:27:07.040
<v Speaker 10>the next year. I think Germany, which is already, as

0:27:07.080 --> 0:27:09.359
<v Speaker 10>you pointed out, had an amazing run. I think there's

0:27:09.400 --> 0:27:11.640
<v Speaker 10>more to that story to go. But what is your

0:27:11.680 --> 0:27:15.400
<v Speaker 10>time frame? When I sit back and think about how

0:27:15.440 --> 0:27:19.000
<v Speaker 10>clients are positioned, especially in the US, and I think

0:27:19.040 --> 0:27:21.920
<v Speaker 10>a lot of people are recognizing the fact that they

0:27:22.040 --> 0:27:26.080
<v Speaker 10>haven't had the right diversification in their portfolio, that you've

0:27:26.119 --> 0:27:30.879
<v Speaker 10>had too much of large gap stocks only in the

0:27:31.040 --> 0:27:36.000
<v Speaker 10>US only. You haven't had Europe, you haven't had emerging markets.

0:27:36.320 --> 0:27:38.240
<v Speaker 10>And I think this is a time when investors, I

0:27:38.280 --> 0:27:41.240
<v Speaker 10>mean they should always be diversified, but certainly in the

0:27:41.280 --> 0:27:44.040
<v Speaker 10>near term if the growth is coming from elsewhere, you

0:27:44.119 --> 0:27:45.959
<v Speaker 10>want to be thinking about ways to add that.

0:27:46.240 --> 0:27:50.520
<v Speaker 11>So recent investor survey showed the biggest ever outflow from

0:27:50.600 --> 0:27:54.800
<v Speaker 11>US equities and showed the biggest ever outflow from the

0:27:54.920 --> 0:27:57.879
<v Speaker 11>US to the rest of the world. Yeah, some people

0:27:58.000 --> 0:28:01.240
<v Speaker 11>view this signaling the end of the really nasty technicals

0:28:01.920 --> 0:28:06.320
<v Speaker 11>and that now we can look to at least neutral technicals.

0:28:06.359 --> 0:28:06.919
<v Speaker 11>Do you buy that?

0:28:07.840 --> 0:28:10.560
<v Speaker 10>I mean, yes, I follow the survey. It's a good

0:28:10.600 --> 0:28:13.720
<v Speaker 10>one to follow if you're a market participant. I also

0:28:13.720 --> 0:28:15.760
<v Speaker 10>look at how many people fill out the survey. We

0:28:15.800 --> 0:28:18.160
<v Speaker 10>do our own and we just had a client call

0:28:18.240 --> 0:28:21.640
<v Speaker 10>with over two thousand people that answered similar pole questions,

0:28:21.920 --> 0:28:24.920
<v Speaker 10>and what they talked about was actually looking to buy,

0:28:25.000 --> 0:28:28.680
<v Speaker 10>looking for an opportunity to buy a pullback in US risks.

0:28:28.760 --> 0:28:31.800
<v Speaker 10>So I don't know if that survey by itself is

0:28:31.840 --> 0:28:34.080
<v Speaker 10>the end all and be all in terms of technicals.

0:28:34.320 --> 0:28:38.160
<v Speaker 10>I think this is an opportunity to educate. Honestly, this

0:28:38.320 --> 0:28:41.480
<v Speaker 10>is our opportunity to go out and tell investors that

0:28:41.600 --> 0:28:43.200
<v Speaker 10>there are other options.

0:28:43.240 --> 0:28:43.440
<v Speaker 6>There.

0:28:43.520 --> 0:28:45.880
<v Speaker 10>Used to be just one. There was no alternative. We

0:28:45.920 --> 0:28:48.960
<v Speaker 10>all know that acronym. Now there are other options. Those

0:28:49.040 --> 0:28:52.880
<v Speaker 10>options come in gold as diversifiers, in short data tips,

0:28:53.120 --> 0:28:55.840
<v Speaker 10>it comes in the minimum volatility parts of the US market,

0:28:55.920 --> 0:28:59.160
<v Speaker 10>and yes it comes in Europe and non US.

0:28:59.040 --> 0:29:01.480
<v Speaker 2>Prices during the edge right now, isn't it over the

0:29:01.600 --> 0:29:02.320
<v Speaker 2>last few months.

0:29:02.360 --> 0:29:04.440
<v Speaker 1>I love that idea that essentially, if you want to

0:29:04.440 --> 0:29:06.760
<v Speaker 1>talk about why Europe might make sense, now is your

0:29:06.800 --> 0:29:08.000
<v Speaker 1>moment to go talk to people.

0:29:08.080 --> 0:29:09.880
<v Speaker 2>It's easy to talk about now. We had people coming

0:29:09.880 --> 0:29:11.520
<v Speaker 2>on the program for so many years and the same

0:29:11.520 --> 0:29:13.040
<v Speaker 2>thing and nothing happened.

0:29:12.760 --> 0:29:14.600
<v Speaker 1>Exactly, so now they can come out and say, look,

0:29:14.680 --> 0:29:17.440
<v Speaker 1>there is hope there. I do wonder at what point

0:29:17.560 --> 0:29:20.320
<v Speaker 1>we get a structural shift and just Obahama's point earlier

0:29:20.320 --> 0:29:23.640
<v Speaker 1>about this idea, that are we looking at a long

0:29:23.760 --> 0:29:27.480
<v Speaker 1>term shift in flows and potential and how.

0:29:27.320 --> 0:29:28.040
<v Speaker 8>Do you price it in?

0:29:28.080 --> 0:29:31.520
<v Speaker 1>And it seems like investors are not really suggesting that

0:29:31.640 --> 0:29:31.920
<v Speaker 1>just yet.

0:29:32.000 --> 0:29:33.720
<v Speaker 2>Gucky, appreciate your time, so it's going to see you.

0:29:33.720 --> 0:29:47.000
<v Speaker 2>Thanks for dropping by Gaki chandrib of Black Crock still

0:29:47.000 --> 0:29:49.680
<v Speaker 2>a proper introduction. David Rumstein at the Carlile Group joined

0:29:49.720 --> 0:29:51.360
<v Speaker 2>us now for more. David, good morning, good to see.

0:29:51.160 --> 0:29:52.200
<v Speaker 4>You, My pleasure to be here.

0:29:52.240 --> 0:29:52.959
<v Speaker 12>Thank you for having me.

0:29:53.000 --> 0:29:55.120
<v Speaker 2>You've caught up with some fantastic individuals over the last

0:29:55.120 --> 0:29:57.840
<v Speaker 2>few weeks, including the former Treasury Secretary Steve Manuchin. But

0:29:57.840 --> 0:30:00.760
<v Speaker 2>I think we want your thoughts, your individual view on

0:30:00.840 --> 0:30:03.040
<v Speaker 2>where we are on this economy and where you think

0:30:03.280 --> 0:30:04.120
<v Speaker 2>things a headache.

0:30:04.800 --> 0:30:09.600
<v Speaker 12>Obviously, the economy depends on certainty, and there's some lack

0:30:09.640 --> 0:30:11.520
<v Speaker 12>of certainty right now. But what's going to happen on

0:30:11.600 --> 0:30:14.680
<v Speaker 12>taxes and tariffs? So when there's greater certainty, I think

0:30:14.680 --> 0:30:16.600
<v Speaker 12>we can better predict where the economy is going to go.

0:30:17.440 --> 0:30:20.640
<v Speaker 12>Muhammad knows that so well. So in my view, there's

0:30:20.680 --> 0:30:22.960
<v Speaker 12>some uncertainty right now. I had a chance recently at

0:30:23.080 --> 0:30:25.560
<v Speaker 12>an event over the weekend to interview the chairman of

0:30:25.600 --> 0:30:29.120
<v Speaker 12>the House Ways and Means Committee, and you know, he's

0:30:29.360 --> 0:30:31.960
<v Speaker 12>pretty bullish on his ability to get the tax cuts through.

0:30:31.960 --> 0:30:34.080
<v Speaker 12>The President wants, but the market wants to see if

0:30:34.080 --> 0:30:35.760
<v Speaker 12>it's actually going to happen, and then what's going to

0:30:35.760 --> 0:30:37.400
<v Speaker 12>happen in the Senate, And then we have to see

0:30:37.440 --> 0:30:39.000
<v Speaker 12>whether the tariffs are actually going to go through or

0:30:39.000 --> 0:30:41.760
<v Speaker 12>at what level. So there's some uncertainty, but right now

0:30:41.800 --> 0:30:45.800
<v Speaker 12>the market is not as disappointed and where things are

0:30:45.840 --> 0:30:48.920
<v Speaker 12>as I would have thought. The market's not collapsing as

0:30:48.920 --> 0:30:51.640
<v Speaker 12>some people thought it might. So you know, maybe some

0:30:51.680 --> 0:30:53.720
<v Speaker 12>of the things that President Trump is doing is or

0:30:53.760 --> 0:30:55.920
<v Speaker 12>having some impact on the market favorably.

0:30:56.160 --> 0:30:58.440
<v Speaker 1>How much is a FED part of this discussion with

0:30:58.520 --> 0:31:01.840
<v Speaker 1>people expecting them to step in and rescue the economy

0:31:01.880 --> 0:31:05.120
<v Speaker 1>should grow slow enough versus prioritize inflation.

0:31:06.280 --> 0:31:09.600
<v Speaker 12>Well when the FED, I think the Fed's view is

0:31:09.760 --> 0:31:12.840
<v Speaker 12>the FED doesn't surprise people. Under JPW, the FED pretty

0:31:12.920 --> 0:31:14.560
<v Speaker 12>much tells you what it's going to do and then

0:31:14.600 --> 0:31:17.840
<v Speaker 12>explains what it's done after he does it. And today

0:31:18.400 --> 0:31:20.080
<v Speaker 12>there's been no signals out of the FED that is

0:31:20.120 --> 0:31:21.840
<v Speaker 12>going to be a rate cut that I can see.

0:31:22.000 --> 0:31:23.640
<v Speaker 12>So I think it's unlikely you're going to get a

0:31:23.680 --> 0:31:26.080
<v Speaker 12>FED rate cut today, and therefore I think the market

0:31:26.120 --> 0:31:28.120
<v Speaker 12>would be shocked if it were. We'd be very happy

0:31:28.160 --> 0:31:30.560
<v Speaker 12>if it did, but I don't think it will happen today.

0:31:31.120 --> 0:31:34.280
<v Speaker 11>David Wall are we on two characterizations about private equity.

0:31:34.480 --> 0:31:37.360
<v Speaker 11>One is a ton of money on the sideline waiting

0:31:37.400 --> 0:31:41.920
<v Speaker 11>to come in and two distributions back. All feel very

0:31:42.000 --> 0:31:42.720
<v Speaker 11>very slow. Well.

0:31:42.760 --> 0:31:44.600
<v Speaker 12>For the last couple of years, there haven't been as

0:31:44.640 --> 0:31:47.520
<v Speaker 12>many exit opportunities as people wanted. As a result, a

0:31:47.560 --> 0:31:49.800
<v Speaker 12>lot of the private equity firms are ready to sell things.

0:31:50.280 --> 0:31:52.040
<v Speaker 12>They were hoping at the beginning of this year as

0:31:52.040 --> 0:31:56.360
<v Speaker 12>the new administration came in that there'll be looser regulatory controls,

0:31:56.520 --> 0:32:00.200
<v Speaker 12>IPOs better and so forth. That hasn't yet happened. It

0:32:00.240 --> 0:32:02.440
<v Speaker 12>may happen, hasn't yet happened. There is a lot of

0:32:02.480 --> 0:32:04.760
<v Speaker 12>money on the sidelines, for sure, and I do think

0:32:04.760 --> 0:32:06.280
<v Speaker 12>that some of the deals that have been talked about

0:32:06.320 --> 0:32:08.720
<v Speaker 12>probably will get done. But I think the market is

0:32:08.720 --> 0:32:10.400
<v Speaker 12>wait and see whether There are a lot of the

0:32:10.480 --> 0:32:12.640
<v Speaker 12>large deals are going to be approved by the FTC

0:32:12.880 --> 0:32:14.920
<v Speaker 12>or the Justice Department, and isn't clear that they will

0:32:14.920 --> 0:32:18.000
<v Speaker 12>get approved. For example, the Whiz deal that was I

0:32:18.000 --> 0:32:20.680
<v Speaker 12>guess announced or maybe going to be announced, it's not

0:32:20.720 --> 0:32:22.800
<v Speaker 12>clear that I'll get approved. It didn't get approved before

0:32:22.920 --> 0:32:26.000
<v Speaker 12>under Biden, or at least the temporary indications where it

0:32:26.000 --> 0:32:28.040
<v Speaker 12>wouldn't have been improved. Today, I don't know whether that

0:32:28.040 --> 0:32:30.160
<v Speaker 12>deal will be approved or not. That's a big deal

0:32:30.200 --> 0:32:33.240
<v Speaker 12>with the market. Market be very happy that deal will

0:32:33.240 --> 0:32:33.680
<v Speaker 12>get approved.

0:32:34.040 --> 0:32:36.360
<v Speaker 11>My guess would be So you mentioned the importance of

0:32:36.400 --> 0:32:40.040
<v Speaker 11>trying to resolve the uncertainty, and that's the upside. What's

0:32:40.040 --> 0:32:42.160
<v Speaker 11>the downside? What's the thing that keeps you up at night?

0:32:42.920 --> 0:32:46.360
<v Speaker 12>Well, clearly markets want to know what the rules of

0:32:46.360 --> 0:32:49.000
<v Speaker 12>the game are. Most business people can adapt. Just tell

0:32:49.080 --> 0:32:50.920
<v Speaker 12>us what the rules are, and we'll move one way

0:32:51.000 --> 0:32:53.440
<v Speaker 12>or the other. Right now, there's some uncertainty is whether

0:32:53.480 --> 0:32:55.720
<v Speaker 12>President Trump can get through the tax cuts he wants

0:32:55.720 --> 0:32:57.960
<v Speaker 12>at the level he wants. Can they get through the Senate?

0:32:58.280 --> 0:33:01.240
<v Speaker 12>Will those people get all the spending cuts they want?

0:33:01.360 --> 0:33:03.959
<v Speaker 12>Nobody really knows. Will the judges stop some of that?

0:33:04.160 --> 0:33:06.760
<v Speaker 12>There's some uncertainty Until there's more certainty. I don't think

0:33:06.760 --> 0:33:08.840
<v Speaker 12>anybody can know for certain whether we're really going to

0:33:08.920 --> 0:33:10.920
<v Speaker 12>have the economic boom that we would like to have.

0:33:11.040 --> 0:33:12.960
<v Speaker 5>David, you have a relationship with the president, You've spoken

0:33:13.000 --> 0:33:15.440
<v Speaker 5>to him. Do you believe there's something like the Trump

0:33:15.520 --> 0:33:17.680
<v Speaker 5>put still in play?

0:33:18.360 --> 0:33:18.479
<v Speaker 4>Well?

0:33:18.520 --> 0:33:22.760
<v Speaker 12>I think President Trump came into office with big expectations

0:33:22.760 --> 0:33:24.160
<v Speaker 12>from the market that he would do a lot of

0:33:24.160 --> 0:33:27.480
<v Speaker 12>things that President Biden didn't do. So far, President Trump

0:33:27.480 --> 0:33:29.360
<v Speaker 12>has tried to do a lot of these things. They

0:33:29.440 --> 0:33:32.200
<v Speaker 12>haven't yet come to reality, but they may. I just

0:33:32.200 --> 0:33:34.840
<v Speaker 12>don't know yet. I think he's fairly bullish about his

0:33:34.880 --> 0:33:37.000
<v Speaker 12>ability to get these things through Congress, but obviously he's

0:33:37.000 --> 0:33:39.480
<v Speaker 12>frustrated from time to time about what the judges are doing.

0:33:40.120 --> 0:33:43.120
<v Speaker 2>Last question comes from a blimpeg subscribe. But does mister

0:33:43.200 --> 0:33:45.800
<v Speaker 2>Rubinstein think the Orioles will win the American League East?

0:33:46.040 --> 0:33:47.720
<v Speaker 2>It seems to be the only thing people care about

0:33:47.800 --> 0:33:49.240
<v Speaker 2>right now. What's your wants to that?

0:33:49.280 --> 0:33:51.880
<v Speaker 12>We certainly deserve because we have a great owner and.

0:33:53.840 --> 0:33:54.840
<v Speaker 8>We agree with that high.

0:33:54.920 --> 0:33:57.360
<v Speaker 12>Yes, if the ownership is the most important criteria, we

0:33:57.400 --> 0:34:00.400
<v Speaker 12>should and we have a good team, and amazingly they

0:34:00.400 --> 0:34:02.560
<v Speaker 12>can project how many games we're gonna win in advance

0:34:02.560 --> 0:34:04.440
<v Speaker 12>of the season, and they're pretty accurate. But I won't

0:34:04.440 --> 0:34:05.520
<v Speaker 12>say how many they project.

0:34:05.600 --> 0:34:07.320
<v Speaker 2>I think Mike is part of the ownership group too,

0:34:07.360 --> 0:34:08.759
<v Speaker 2>so I've got to agree with that as well. So

0:34:08.840 --> 0:34:10.759
<v Speaker 2>it's always going to catch up with you. Appreciate your time.

0:34:10.840 --> 0:34:13.000
<v Speaker 2>Thank you, Thank you very much David Rubinstein there at

0:34:13.000 --> 0:34:16.000
<v Speaker 2>the Carlisle Group. Thank you, and do not miss David's

0:34:16.000 --> 0:34:19.560
<v Speaker 2>conversation with former Treasury Secretary Steve Manuchin tonight on peer

0:34:19.600 --> 0:34:23.520
<v Speaker 2>to peer Conversations Right here on Bloomberg. This is the

0:34:23.560 --> 0:34:27.799
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast, bringing you the best in markets, economics,

0:34:27.800 --> 0:34:30.760
<v Speaker 2>angio politics. You can watch the show live on Bloomberg

0:34:30.800 --> 0:34:33.960
<v Speaker 2>TV weekday mornings from six am to nine am Eastern.

0:34:34.280 --> 0:34:37.640
<v Speaker 2>Subscribe to the podcast on Apple, Spotify, or anywhere else

0:34:37.640 --> 0:34:40.040
<v Speaker 2>you listen, and as always, on the bloom Blog terminal

0:34:40.239 --> 0:34:41.560
<v Speaker 2>and the Bloomberg Business app