WEBVTT - Live From Melbourne

0:00:13.960 --> 0:00:17.280
<v Speaker 1>Okay, Hi everybody, welcome to the Reneetlips Tennis Podcast. We

0:00:17.360 --> 0:00:21.120
<v Speaker 1>are bringing you live literally live and in person here

0:00:21.440 --> 0:00:23.279
<v Speaker 1>with my great friend Andrea Pekovic.

0:00:23.640 --> 0:00:26.800
<v Speaker 2>Hi, Hi, nice to see you. We are on floor

0:00:27.080 --> 0:00:30.320
<v Speaker 2>four of the players. It don't win for though, I

0:00:30.400 --> 0:00:33.720
<v Speaker 2>don't want to bother people who are trying to eat.

0:00:34.400 --> 0:00:37.440
<v Speaker 2>Actually I wanted to say the players restaurant, but it's

0:00:37.520 --> 0:00:41.320
<v Speaker 2>kind of players restaurants here at them.

0:00:41.520 --> 0:00:45.680
<v Speaker 1>If we're on the top floor, we are sitting rather

0:00:45.760 --> 0:00:49.720
<v Speaker 1>close to the Spanish contingent who are sitting over there.

0:00:49.720 --> 0:00:52.000
<v Speaker 1>So if you hear the names and the voices in

0:00:52.000 --> 0:00:55.440
<v Speaker 1>the background, that is who it is. But yeah, anyway,

0:00:55.480 --> 0:00:57.880
<v Speaker 1>let's get into it. So we started Sunday. I had

0:00:57.920 --> 0:01:00.280
<v Speaker 1>a lot of rain and so we a lot of

0:01:00.280 --> 0:01:03.240
<v Speaker 1>matches were canceled. But give me your first thoughts on

0:01:03.560 --> 0:01:05.880
<v Speaker 1>just overall the start of the tournament.

0:01:05.959 --> 0:01:08.200
<v Speaker 2>Okay, So let's start with the two matches I did,

0:01:08.240 --> 0:01:10.080
<v Speaker 2>and then maybe the ones you did. So I did

0:01:10.480 --> 0:01:14.840
<v Speaker 2>Ankatodoni the qualifier twenty years old against chin Wean Jang.

0:01:15.200 --> 0:01:18.679
<v Speaker 2>It was a fantastic first set. I mean considering in

0:01:18.720 --> 0:01:21.160
<v Speaker 2>the second week we will see better matches. But considering

0:01:21.200 --> 0:01:25.640
<v Speaker 2>it's the first round of a Grand Slam tournament. I

0:01:25.680 --> 0:01:28.160
<v Speaker 2>thought it was really good tennis. Unka to DONI is

0:01:28.720 --> 0:01:31.240
<v Speaker 2>playing well. I think she can do really well this year.

0:01:31.480 --> 0:01:34.959
<v Speaker 2>She had kind of a meteoric rise through the challenges

0:01:35.440 --> 0:01:39.480
<v Speaker 2>last year and qualified here, qualified in Brisbane, so she's

0:01:39.520 --> 0:01:41.840
<v Speaker 2>been doing really well. Has won six matches. She's already

0:01:41.959 --> 0:01:42.759
<v Speaker 2>twenty years old.

0:01:42.800 --> 0:01:45.120
<v Speaker 1>Okay, So you know, it's funny when you think, okay,

0:01:45.160 --> 0:01:48.440
<v Speaker 1>it's huge, huge, huge opportunity there right at twenty years

0:01:48.440 --> 0:01:50.560
<v Speaker 1>of age, and then you think Kaka gov twenty years

0:01:50.560 --> 0:01:50.880
<v Speaker 1>of ages.

0:01:50.960 --> 0:01:54.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's cricky. But she's like she can, yes, and

0:01:54.520 --> 0:01:57.640
<v Speaker 2>alien well, like from another world. I always say that

0:01:57.720 --> 0:02:00.640
<v Speaker 2>about player like immortals, you know, who do things that

0:02:00.680 --> 0:02:03.360
<v Speaker 2>normal people can. There from another world, sent to this

0:02:03.400 --> 0:02:06.760
<v Speaker 2>earth to pleasure us with that tennis.

0:02:06.880 --> 0:02:08.840
<v Speaker 1>Yes, indeed, and chin.

0:02:08.800 --> 0:02:11.480
<v Speaker 2>When I thought she looked actually she looked fully in control.

0:02:11.600 --> 0:02:13.919
<v Speaker 2>She was five three, five four, serving for the.

0:02:13.880 --> 0:02:16.160
<v Speaker 1>Member down forty love, but she was down three set

0:02:16.160 --> 0:02:17.560
<v Speaker 1>points in the first WLD, so that's the thing.

0:02:17.639 --> 0:02:20.239
<v Speaker 2>She was serving for the set five four forty love

0:02:20.360 --> 0:02:22.560
<v Speaker 2>and then got a little bit tight, just pulled back,

0:02:22.919 --> 0:02:25.040
<v Speaker 2>and I have to give credit to to Doni because

0:02:25.040 --> 0:02:27.280
<v Speaker 2>she could have just as easy gotten and unforced errors

0:02:27.280 --> 0:02:29.200
<v Speaker 2>and to Dony just didn't miss. She just went for

0:02:29.280 --> 0:02:33.200
<v Speaker 2>her shots. Chin went's speed of Groundstokes dropped a little,

0:02:33.360 --> 0:02:35.320
<v Speaker 2>didn't make it first serves, and all of a sudden

0:02:35.320 --> 0:02:37.880
<v Speaker 2>it was five six and the other girl had fifteen

0:02:37.919 --> 0:02:40.880
<v Speaker 2>forty two set points. And I will say, man, Chin

0:02:40.960 --> 0:02:43.560
<v Speaker 2>when is good under pressure? Yeah, she is good.

0:02:43.760 --> 0:02:45.959
<v Speaker 1>Do you think that she's getting better or do you

0:02:46.000 --> 0:02:46.720
<v Speaker 1>think she's always been?

0:02:46.840 --> 0:02:48.799
<v Speaker 2>Like, No, I think she's getting better. I think she's

0:02:48.840 --> 0:02:51.760
<v Speaker 2>always She was always good in sort of hiding her emotions.

0:02:51.840 --> 0:02:55.040
<v Speaker 2>I think a lot is going on underneath, but she's

0:02:55.040 --> 0:02:57.760
<v Speaker 2>good in hiding it. But I think the hiding of

0:02:57.840 --> 0:03:00.720
<v Speaker 2>it is transferring into what she's actually feeling. Because she

0:03:00.720 --> 0:03:03.120
<v Speaker 2>couldn't find the first surf for a couple of games.

0:03:03.400 --> 0:03:06.200
<v Speaker 2>Fifteen forty boom through first serfs. Yeah, and then in

0:03:06.280 --> 0:03:08.560
<v Speaker 2>the tiebreak the same made our first serfs. And then

0:03:08.560 --> 0:03:10.600
<v Speaker 2>it's so easy because her first surf is so good.

0:03:11.040 --> 0:03:13.040
<v Speaker 2>And then once she found her rhythm, and it has

0:03:13.080 --> 0:03:15.079
<v Speaker 2>to be said, this was her first match of the season.

0:03:15.120 --> 0:03:17.800
<v Speaker 2>She pulled out a United Cup did in play since

0:03:18.120 --> 0:03:21.920
<v Speaker 2>the WTA finals, so she's had quite a break compared

0:03:21.960 --> 0:03:24.080
<v Speaker 2>to other players, and I thought she did well in

0:03:24.160 --> 0:03:26.240
<v Speaker 2>the first set and then very well in the second set.

0:03:26.320 --> 0:03:28.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. So Sabalanca last night?

0:03:28.720 --> 0:03:30.120
<v Speaker 2>Oh yeah, yeah, perfect?

0:03:30.520 --> 0:03:33.919
<v Speaker 1>Was How would you describe that? Did you watch the match?

0:03:33.960 --> 0:03:35.640
<v Speaker 1>Because I thought it was a little patchy. I didn't

0:03:35.640 --> 0:03:37.920
<v Speaker 1>think it was. Like I said in the coverage with

0:03:37.960 --> 0:03:40.520
<v Speaker 1>Patrick McEnroe and Mary Joe Fernandez, I said, I don't

0:03:40.520 --> 0:03:43.320
<v Speaker 1>think she'll be ultra happy about this, the way she played,

0:03:43.560 --> 0:03:45.120
<v Speaker 1>and then Mary Joe said, no, I think she'll be

0:03:45.120 --> 0:03:47.560
<v Speaker 1>happy that she's gotten through. And you know, it wasn't

0:03:47.560 --> 0:03:51.000
<v Speaker 1>an easy, you know, name matchup. She's playing against Sloane Stevens,

0:03:51.040 --> 0:03:54.000
<v Speaker 1>and you know, it's tough to see Sloan not playing

0:03:54.040 --> 0:03:56.480
<v Speaker 1>well because you know, we know what she's capable of doing.

0:03:56.520 --> 0:03:59.000
<v Speaker 1>But you can see just the lack of confidence in her.

0:03:59.040 --> 0:04:00.880
<v Speaker 1>That's nine matches in a that she's lost in the

0:04:00.880 --> 0:04:03.000
<v Speaker 1>first round, and I don't know how many matches you've

0:04:03.040 --> 0:04:06.000
<v Speaker 1>lost in a row, but it starts to five for yeah, mentally,

0:04:06.040 --> 0:04:07.680
<v Speaker 1>it starts to really hurt you. And I think that

0:04:07.760 --> 0:04:09.200
<v Speaker 1>lost of the US Open when she was up a

0:04:09.200 --> 0:04:11.880
<v Speaker 1>set in three loves and then ended up losing that

0:04:11.920 --> 0:04:15.120
<v Speaker 1>first round because it devastated her. I can't even remember.

0:04:15.240 --> 0:04:19.160
<v Speaker 1>It was just so unbelievable that she ended up losing.

0:04:19.160 --> 0:04:22.600
<v Speaker 1>But to see Sloan, you know, pulling off a shots

0:04:22.720 --> 0:04:25.880
<v Speaker 1>not committing to them. Yeah, and it was just a

0:04:25.920 --> 0:04:27.760
<v Speaker 1>shit draw, let's face it. I mean, the one person

0:04:27.800 --> 0:04:29.320
<v Speaker 1>you really didn't want to play in the first round

0:04:29.360 --> 0:04:31.760
<v Speaker 1>was probably Sabalalnca, just because she comes in with so

0:04:31.880 --> 0:04:36.520
<v Speaker 1>much confidence after winning Queensland in Brisbane. So anyway, I

0:04:36.560 --> 0:04:39.680
<v Speaker 1>thought she she did. She played well enough, Saba Anca,

0:04:39.760 --> 0:04:41.719
<v Speaker 1>but I think that she'll be happy to get through

0:04:41.760 --> 0:04:43.400
<v Speaker 1>the first round, but I think she'll be looking to

0:04:43.520 --> 0:04:46.320
<v Speaker 1>improve on a few things like just very scratchy the

0:04:46.480 --> 0:04:49.159
<v Speaker 1>certain shots that she shouldn't be scratchy on. It'd be

0:04:49.160 --> 0:04:51.880
<v Speaker 1>one thing like if she was, you know, chen Wen

0:04:51.880 --> 0:04:54.040
<v Speaker 1>coming in not having a lot of matches at.

0:04:53.920 --> 0:04:54.599
<v Speaker 3>All this year.

0:04:54.720 --> 0:04:56.760
<v Speaker 1>She's had a lot of matches. So look, she got

0:04:56.800 --> 0:04:59.680
<v Speaker 1>through the match and I think, as we all know,

0:04:59.839 --> 0:05:02.000
<v Speaker 1>for around for a nightmare, they're very nerve wracking, and

0:05:02.040 --> 0:05:03.520
<v Speaker 1>so she got through them. Well.

0:05:03.680 --> 0:05:07.120
<v Speaker 2>Just to just to underline what you just said, I

0:05:07.120 --> 0:05:10.000
<v Speaker 2>think that really broke her because it was against Clara Burrell,

0:05:10.080 --> 0:05:12.159
<v Speaker 2>and she was not only upset and three oh, she

0:05:12.240 --> 0:05:14.440
<v Speaker 2>was up six oh three oh. So she was up

0:05:14.560 --> 0:05:17.400
<v Speaker 2>nine zero and then lost the match seven five and

0:05:17.480 --> 0:05:20.200
<v Speaker 2>the third. So that'll do it. Honestly, I just watched

0:05:20.200 --> 0:05:23.040
<v Speaker 2>the match until four zero in the first set, and

0:05:23.080 --> 0:05:24.520
<v Speaker 2>I thought Sabolenka looked like.

0:05:25.080 --> 0:05:26.680
<v Speaker 1>She had never I thought a three love it was

0:05:26.680 --> 0:05:28.640
<v Speaker 1>going to be love and loss. Yes, she was so

0:05:28.720 --> 0:05:30.359
<v Speaker 1>old and she went back to the point. That's what

0:05:30.400 --> 0:05:33.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm talking about the patch. She just went off like

0:05:33.839 --> 0:05:35.520
<v Speaker 1>all of a sudden, like two or three games. It

0:05:35.560 --> 0:05:38.280
<v Speaker 1>was just horrendous tns from her. So those are the

0:05:38.320 --> 0:05:40.920
<v Speaker 1>things that I feel like, if she's going to win

0:05:40.960 --> 0:05:43.400
<v Speaker 1>the tournament, which she's the favorite to do, she needs

0:05:43.400 --> 0:05:46.280
<v Speaker 1>to cut down on those errors when there was really

0:05:46.320 --> 0:05:48.120
<v Speaker 1>no pressure on her, you know what I mean.

0:05:48.160 --> 0:05:50.160
<v Speaker 2>When one question I wanted to ask you because I

0:05:50.200 --> 0:05:54.120
<v Speaker 2>did see that Sloan almost played only slices on the

0:05:54.120 --> 0:05:56.839
<v Speaker 2>backhead or a lot of slices, and she doesn't usually

0:05:56.880 --> 0:05:59.159
<v Speaker 2>do that. Now, granted I haven't seen her since the

0:05:59.240 --> 0:06:02.080
<v Speaker 2>US Open. Do you think there was a tactical choice

0:06:02.080 --> 0:06:04.000
<v Speaker 2>by them or do you think she's just trying to

0:06:04.200 --> 0:06:05.000
<v Speaker 2>hit more slices?

0:06:05.080 --> 0:06:07.000
<v Speaker 1>I think it was a combination. She was a little

0:06:07.000 --> 0:06:09.760
<v Speaker 1>bit you know, her foot what wasn't great to it,

0:06:09.800 --> 0:06:10.960
<v Speaker 1>and so she's kind of a little bit and I

0:06:11.000 --> 0:06:13.840
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't say lazy, she's a bit late to it. But

0:06:13.880 --> 0:06:17.680
<v Speaker 1>also it's a good tactic against Sabalanka. You don't really

0:06:17.720 --> 0:06:19.760
<v Speaker 1>want to give her pace. She's going to kill you.

0:06:19.880 --> 0:06:21.880
<v Speaker 1>So I think it was a choice of hers to

0:06:21.960 --> 0:06:24.120
<v Speaker 1>hit the slice and try and mix it up and

0:06:24.160 --> 0:06:26.159
<v Speaker 1>in the end it got elicited a lot of errors,

0:06:27.080 --> 0:06:30.760
<v Speaker 1>but look overall, sablank is still the player to be

0:06:31.000 --> 0:06:31.440
<v Speaker 1>for sure.

0:06:31.760 --> 0:06:32.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:06:32.160 --> 0:06:32.400
<v Speaker 1>Nice.

0:06:32.400 --> 0:06:35.719
<v Speaker 2>So what the match I did was the Paula Badosa

0:06:35.760 --> 0:06:38.039
<v Speaker 2>match against Oh yeah, Wang Ji knew there was a

0:06:38.040 --> 0:06:40.320
<v Speaker 2>fantastic I did that match as well. Yeah, that was

0:06:40.320 --> 0:06:42.760
<v Speaker 2>really you had to probably leave it way I was leaving.

0:06:43.080 --> 0:06:46.040
<v Speaker 1>I left after the first set in a bit okay,

0:06:46.400 --> 0:06:48.720
<v Speaker 1>and Wang was like very successful coming into the net.

0:06:48.760 --> 0:06:50.560
<v Speaker 2>Oh my god. And it was so funny because I

0:06:50.640 --> 0:06:53.919
<v Speaker 2>met god On he's her. She has a Serbian coach

0:06:53.960 --> 0:06:56.120
<v Speaker 2>who has moved to China five years ago and has

0:06:56.160 --> 0:06:59.360
<v Speaker 2>been working with her. And I've met him an hour

0:06:59.440 --> 0:07:01.080
<v Speaker 2>before the man and I asked him, what did you

0:07:01.080 --> 0:07:03.560
<v Speaker 2>guys work on and he said to me, well, she's

0:07:03.600 --> 0:07:06.159
<v Speaker 2>a really good doubles players because she won the French

0:07:06.200 --> 0:07:09.600
<v Speaker 2>Allengaros exactly in doubles, so we want her to come

0:07:09.640 --> 0:07:11.680
<v Speaker 2>to the net more often, and I mentioned it in

0:07:11.720 --> 0:07:14.200
<v Speaker 2>the broadcast. And then she came to the net seventeen

0:07:14.280 --> 0:07:16.000
<v Speaker 2>times and won sixteen points.

0:07:16.000 --> 0:07:18.360
<v Speaker 1>I guess what one she didn't win that point.

0:07:19.520 --> 0:07:22.400
<v Speaker 2>That was really sad. Yeah, she rushed that one a

0:07:22.400 --> 0:07:24.680
<v Speaker 2>little bit. But it was funny because I worked on

0:07:24.760 --> 0:07:27.360
<v Speaker 2>plenty of things and off seasons and they didn't work

0:07:27.400 --> 0:07:30.200
<v Speaker 2>so well right off the bed coming into the first

0:07:30.200 --> 0:07:32.200
<v Speaker 2>grandson after year, so that was really impressive. But I

0:07:32.240 --> 0:07:34.800
<v Speaker 2>thought she played man. She had stretches of play where

0:07:34.800 --> 0:07:36.720
<v Speaker 2>she looked like the best player in the world. It

0:07:36.760 --> 0:07:40.640
<v Speaker 2>was incredible and badosa. I felt she played a really

0:07:41.080 --> 0:07:43.760
<v Speaker 2>good conservative match. She didn't go for too much, she

0:07:43.840 --> 0:07:48.200
<v Speaker 2>had big targets, moved well, really extended the rallies long

0:07:48.360 --> 0:07:50.760
<v Speaker 2>and nicely when she needed to, and won all the

0:07:50.800 --> 0:07:53.960
<v Speaker 2>important points. So I think for her for her first round,

0:07:53.960 --> 0:07:57.120
<v Speaker 2>this was a very solid, good performance. I think she

0:07:57.160 --> 0:07:59.680
<v Speaker 2>can definitely play more aggressive in the future. But it

0:07:59.720 --> 0:08:02.640
<v Speaker 2>wasn't easy because, as we just mentioned, one came out

0:08:02.680 --> 0:08:04.840
<v Speaker 2>firing on our cylinder. So there was a tough first

0:08:04.920 --> 0:08:06.720
<v Speaker 2>round for part Life. Yeah, yeah, it was good. It

0:08:06.760 --> 0:08:08.480
<v Speaker 2>was good match for her because also one was one

0:08:08.520 --> 0:08:09.080
<v Speaker 2>of the.

0:08:08.880 --> 0:08:11.800
<v Speaker 1>Players just outside of being seated, So that was one

0:08:11.800 --> 0:08:14.080
<v Speaker 1>of the toughest first rounds. I want to get into.

0:08:14.240 --> 0:08:15.920
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk about a couple of matches from today and

0:08:16.000 --> 0:08:18.520
<v Speaker 1>then the looks look at the big picture of the tournament,

0:08:18.520 --> 0:08:20.920
<v Speaker 1>because we are going to you know, so you did Coco,

0:08:21.240 --> 0:08:23.960
<v Speaker 1>So I did Coco today? Did you happen to see

0:08:24.000 --> 0:08:24.640
<v Speaker 1>any of the match?

0:08:24.760 --> 0:08:26.600
<v Speaker 2>No, I was doing another match at the.

0:08:26.560 --> 0:08:28.960
<v Speaker 1>Same So I think it's a match that Coco.

0:08:29.040 --> 0:08:29.200
<v Speaker 4>Look.

0:08:29.280 --> 0:08:31.280
<v Speaker 1>You know she did admit after the match, because I

0:08:31.280 --> 0:08:33.800
<v Speaker 1>did interview her after the match for ESPN and she said, look,

0:08:33.840 --> 0:08:36.680
<v Speaker 1>I was very very nervous. It's a matchup that's not

0:08:36.720 --> 0:08:39.000
<v Speaker 1>been good for her. She's lost. Out of the three

0:08:39.000 --> 0:08:41.520
<v Speaker 1>times they've played, she's lost to Sophia Kennon.

0:08:41.360 --> 0:08:44.000
<v Speaker 2>Twice, and both of them on Grand Slam level, and both.

0:08:43.840 --> 0:08:46.359
<v Speaker 1>At Grand Slam level, and once here in the quarterfinals

0:08:46.400 --> 0:08:49.400
<v Speaker 1>when Sophia Kennon won the tournament. Clearly, Coco Cop is

0:08:49.559 --> 0:08:51.840
<v Speaker 1>much better player than she was back then, and yeah, older,

0:08:51.920 --> 0:08:54.760
<v Speaker 1>and she was stronger. I think she was sixteen, but

0:08:55.240 --> 0:08:57.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean that's pretty but you know, outrageously young, let's

0:08:57.880 --> 0:08:59.280
<v Speaker 1>put it that way. But you know you could tell

0:08:59.280 --> 0:09:02.440
<v Speaker 1>that she was a little nerve us. There's a bunch

0:09:02.440 --> 0:09:05.160
<v Speaker 1>of double faults today. I think seven or eight at least.

0:09:05.440 --> 0:09:06.800
<v Speaker 1>A lot of it had to do with the sun.

0:09:06.960 --> 0:09:07.719
<v Speaker 1>From that end of the.

0:09:07.640 --> 0:09:10.719
<v Speaker 2>Course, you made us such a great mind earlier when

0:09:10.760 --> 0:09:14.240
<v Speaker 2>we just talked briefly before we started recording. She has

0:09:14.280 --> 0:09:17.480
<v Speaker 2>only played indoors. Yeah, since she has that change, both

0:09:17.840 --> 0:09:20.680
<v Speaker 2>Wukhan and Beijing have they don't have the fork and

0:09:21.120 --> 0:09:25.600
<v Speaker 2>Perth yes, and Sydney complete they are completely covered even

0:09:25.640 --> 0:09:28.320
<v Speaker 2>but both Beijing and Juan have like this half kind

0:09:28.320 --> 0:09:31.080
<v Speaker 2>of thing where you feel protected from the wind. They

0:09:31.120 --> 0:09:33.679
<v Speaker 2>always played at night. They tend to play at night,

0:09:33.760 --> 0:09:36.160
<v Speaker 2>so you don't have the sun. And then of course

0:09:36.200 --> 0:09:39.720
<v Speaker 2>the WTA finals which he won was completely indoors, so

0:09:39.800 --> 0:09:41.840
<v Speaker 2>that was a really and you think that's the difference

0:09:41.840 --> 0:09:44.079
<v Speaker 2>the conditions and the weather coming into play.

0:09:44.160 --> 0:09:45.959
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Well, what I said at the start of the

0:09:46.000 --> 0:09:48.200
<v Speaker 1>match today was the one thing I'm interested in seeing

0:09:48.200 --> 0:09:51.000
<v Speaker 1>from Coco is how the serve is going to handle

0:09:51.080 --> 0:09:55.400
<v Speaker 1>the pressure outdoors. Because she hasn't played outdoors, she hasn't

0:09:55.440 --> 0:09:58.839
<v Speaker 1>had a lot of conditions to deal with sun and wind.

0:09:59.080 --> 0:10:01.120
<v Speaker 1>And we saw what happen today. There was a seven

0:10:01.200 --> 0:10:03.800
<v Speaker 1>or eight double faults. A lot of it came down

0:10:03.840 --> 0:10:05.280
<v Speaker 1>the end with the sun. I get it. But if

0:10:05.320 --> 0:10:08.839
<v Speaker 1>you have a if you have a mechanically sound serve,

0:10:09.000 --> 0:10:10.439
<v Speaker 1>you will find a way to throw the ball to

0:10:10.480 --> 0:10:12.160
<v Speaker 1>us up anyway to get it in the court. And

0:10:12.160 --> 0:10:14.160
<v Speaker 1>she had a struggle with that today. So that's a

0:10:14.200 --> 0:10:15.600
<v Speaker 1>little concerning. Will she play.

0:10:15.720 --> 0:10:18.320
<v Speaker 2>Sorry, I don't know the words mechanically sound served.

0:10:18.480 --> 0:10:22.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, can you explain a more in depth.

0:10:22.760 --> 0:10:24.640
<v Speaker 2>I don't know what these words mean next to each.

0:10:24.559 --> 0:10:58.439
<v Speaker 3>Will have very nice right, very nice right.

0:10:59.080 --> 0:11:02.640
<v Speaker 1>But you know, mechanical sounds serve meaning like my look,

0:11:02.760 --> 0:11:05.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm not comparing myself to Coco. She's a greater tennis

0:11:05.440 --> 0:11:07.320
<v Speaker 1>plan than I could ever be. But I had a

0:11:07.360 --> 0:11:10.120
<v Speaker 1>mechanically sound serve. So if the serve, if the sun

0:11:10.200 --> 0:11:12.000
<v Speaker 1>was in my eyes, I could throw the ball, toss

0:11:12.080 --> 0:11:13.560
<v Speaker 1>all the way to the right and still hit it

0:11:13.559 --> 0:11:15.880
<v Speaker 1>in because I could just hit a slider serve, you know,

0:11:16.440 --> 0:11:18.720
<v Speaker 1>And so you have to be able to you know.

0:11:18.920 --> 0:11:21.959
<v Speaker 1>Serena was famous of throwing that ball, toss like randomly

0:11:22.000 --> 0:11:24.040
<v Speaker 1>here at this train open, just getting in in the court.

0:11:24.080 --> 0:11:25.840
<v Speaker 2>Right, She did it to me that one time.

0:11:26.200 --> 0:11:26.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:11:26.640 --> 0:11:29.360
<v Speaker 2>Every time I thought she's serving a slice, she won tea.

0:11:29.440 --> 0:11:31.400
<v Speaker 2>When she threw it for a kick, she went slice.

0:11:31.440 --> 0:11:32.480
<v Speaker 2>That was so tough to read.

0:11:32.640 --> 0:11:35.559
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And I mean so mechanically sound is important when

0:11:35.600 --> 0:11:38.959
<v Speaker 1>you're nervous and when you're dealing with surroundings like sun

0:11:39.080 --> 0:11:40.679
<v Speaker 1>and wind and various things.

0:11:40.760 --> 0:11:44.560
<v Speaker 2>So she's just want to see David Ferrer, the Spanish

0:11:44.640 --> 0:11:48.360
<v Speaker 2>contagious that you mentioned. They're sitting here and drinking beer

0:11:48.400 --> 0:11:51.560
<v Speaker 2>and I appreciate that so much. It's five pm, well.

0:11:52.160 --> 0:11:55.880
<v Speaker 1>Somewhere, yeah, okay, and listen, five pm in Australia is

0:11:55.960 --> 0:11:58.920
<v Speaker 1>like it's like midnight. Okay, all right, So let's just

0:12:00.040 --> 0:12:03.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm happy for this this Spanish contingent. Clearly their players won,

0:12:04.120 --> 0:12:06.040
<v Speaker 1>I hope, and they're celebrated.

0:12:06.320 --> 0:12:07.600
<v Speaker 2>Are still is about to play?

0:12:07.720 --> 0:12:11.480
<v Speaker 1>That is true, that'll be drunk, yes, well, good for them.

0:12:11.880 --> 0:12:14.720
<v Speaker 1>So that's a little bit of a concern. The forehand

0:12:14.760 --> 0:12:17.160
<v Speaker 1>was okay, it wasn't great, but it was okay. I

0:12:17.160 --> 0:12:20.319
<v Speaker 1>thought Sophie can have played tactically, which is unusual for

0:12:20.360 --> 0:12:22.280
<v Speaker 1>her because she's pretty good tactically. I thought she played

0:12:22.280 --> 0:12:24.400
<v Speaker 1>a tactically poor match today. I thought she didn't go

0:12:24.440 --> 0:12:27.360
<v Speaker 1>after the forehand enough and she had a lot of opportunities.

0:12:28.000 --> 0:12:30.319
<v Speaker 1>But Coco got through it. Admitted that she was nervous

0:12:31.080 --> 0:12:34.880
<v Speaker 1>and this court is quick, so going further in the tournament.

0:12:34.880 --> 0:12:38.720
<v Speaker 1>But interestingly enough, Coco said that she gets less nervous

0:12:38.840 --> 0:12:39.959
<v Speaker 1>as the tournament goes on.

0:12:40.120 --> 0:12:42.240
<v Speaker 2>I had the same thing. I mean again, I think,

0:12:43.800 --> 0:12:46.080
<v Speaker 2>but I always tried to explain this to people when

0:12:46.360 --> 0:12:49.440
<v Speaker 2>journalists would ask you before a quarters, before a semis,

0:12:49.880 --> 0:12:52.960
<v Speaker 2>aren't you aren't you so nervous now that you're playing semis?

0:12:53.000 --> 0:12:54.959
<v Speaker 2>And I was like, I'm in the semis. I know

0:12:55.000 --> 0:12:57.600
<v Speaker 2>I'm playing well. You know I won like five matches. Yeah,

0:12:57.600 --> 0:12:59.640
<v Speaker 2>of course I'm playing well. It's much worse than the

0:12:59.640 --> 0:13:03.360
<v Speaker 2>first round. You haven't played in the conditions. Anything can

0:13:03.400 --> 0:13:07.320
<v Speaker 2>happen in the first round, especially on Sundays. Now that

0:13:07.360 --> 0:13:09.480
<v Speaker 2>they have the Sunday start. The worst thing that can

0:13:09.520 --> 0:13:12.080
<v Speaker 2>happen to you is lose at eleven am on a Sunday.

0:13:12.160 --> 0:13:14.760
<v Speaker 2>The tournament hasn't even started and you're already on the

0:13:14.760 --> 0:13:18.320
<v Speaker 2>plane back, especially from Europe because the planes leave at midnight,

0:13:18.400 --> 0:13:22.520
<v Speaker 2>so you're like already like waving from across the ocean

0:13:22.720 --> 0:13:27.160
<v Speaker 2>to the planes that haven't even seen. So that's a

0:13:27.320 --> 0:13:30.360
<v Speaker 2>terrible feeling to have. And I agree, But you could

0:13:30.440 --> 0:13:32.960
<v Speaker 2>also tell with her last year here she was scratchy

0:13:33.000 --> 0:13:35.080
<v Speaker 2>at times in the first week and then played a

0:13:35.120 --> 0:13:38.440
<v Speaker 2>really great match against Arena Sabalenka. Yeah, in the semi finals.

0:13:38.400 --> 0:13:40.520
<v Speaker 2>Since she's gone. And that's what the top players do, right,

0:13:40.520 --> 0:13:43.520
<v Speaker 2>they get better with the tournaments when it progressed. Yeah.

0:13:43.600 --> 0:13:45.640
<v Speaker 1>I think it's hard for people to understand that because

0:13:45.640 --> 0:13:47.400
<v Speaker 1>they think, well, the first round should be easier because

0:13:47.480 --> 0:13:49.720
<v Speaker 1>you're playing at like a lesser less yer. Yeah, but

0:13:49.760 --> 0:13:52.440
<v Speaker 1>it's not because you feel comfortable now you've prepared for

0:13:52.480 --> 0:13:55.320
<v Speaker 1>these big matches. I was the same way. First round,

0:13:55.360 --> 0:13:58.240
<v Speaker 1>you're shitting yourself, quarter final, semi final, you're like, let's go.

0:13:58.520 --> 0:13:58.840
<v Speaker 2>Yes.

0:13:59.160 --> 0:14:01.360
<v Speaker 1>So it was good hear that from her. So I

0:14:01.400 --> 0:14:02.959
<v Speaker 1>did say to her, and I find it. I go

0:14:03.080 --> 0:14:05.559
<v Speaker 1>to see what you thought about this, But I said,

0:14:05.880 --> 0:14:08.280
<v Speaker 1>leading into this match, for the last three or four days,

0:14:08.280 --> 0:14:10.240
<v Speaker 1>when you knew the schedule, you knew who you were

0:14:10.240 --> 0:14:13.000
<v Speaker 1>playing in the first round, did you focus on playing

0:14:13.040 --> 0:14:15.439
<v Speaker 1>against Kennon or did you focus on what you were

0:14:15.480 --> 0:14:18.720
<v Speaker 1>doing and for the tournament? And she said for the tournament.

0:14:19.080 --> 0:14:20.840
<v Speaker 1>In the last day, I focused on what I was

0:14:20.880 --> 0:14:22.720
<v Speaker 1>going to do in my match against Sophia I am

0:14:22.880 --> 0:14:25.040
<v Speaker 1>prior to that, I only thought about what I needed

0:14:25.080 --> 0:14:26.720
<v Speaker 1>to do to get through the tournament. So I thought

0:14:26.720 --> 0:14:30.760
<v Speaker 1>that was a really interesting way of thinking, and also

0:14:30.760 --> 0:14:32.600
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of a look into her mind that

0:14:32.680 --> 0:14:36.040
<v Speaker 1>she's that confident. So anyway, that was. That was I

0:14:36.040 --> 0:14:38.000
<v Speaker 1>thought a great good start. In the end, it could

0:14:38.000 --> 0:14:40.320
<v Speaker 1>have been better just the way she played, but having

0:14:40.360 --> 0:14:43.040
<v Speaker 1>lost to Cannon and the fact that Kenon what a

0:14:43.080 --> 0:14:44.240
<v Speaker 1>shitty draw for her, my.

0:14:44.240 --> 0:14:46.720
<v Speaker 2>God, And to be fair, the last time she lost

0:14:46.720 --> 0:14:49.440
<v Speaker 2>to Canon, she went on an absolute tear afterwards because

0:14:49.440 --> 0:14:52.040
<v Speaker 2>she lost them womens right and then one basically every

0:14:52.040 --> 0:14:53.520
<v Speaker 2>tournament that ever happened.

0:14:53.640 --> 0:14:55.200
<v Speaker 1>So maybe it's not a good thing. I'm just kidding.

0:14:56.360 --> 0:14:59.080
<v Speaker 2>Laura Robson said something funny, I say she said because

0:14:59.160 --> 0:15:03.040
<v Speaker 2>it was about that Catodoni and and Chinwuan Jang match.

0:15:03.320 --> 0:15:06.440
<v Speaker 2>She said, like, when you play this, when you're a qualifier,

0:15:06.560 --> 0:15:09.080
<v Speaker 2>you come as a lower ranked player into these tournaments

0:15:09.080 --> 0:15:10.880
<v Speaker 2>and you play a hide see, there will always be

0:15:10.960 --> 0:15:13.240
<v Speaker 2>somebody in the locker room telling you, well, it's good

0:15:13.240 --> 0:15:15.640
<v Speaker 2>that you get them now, better than to get them

0:15:15.680 --> 0:15:16.440
<v Speaker 2>in the fourth or.

0:15:17.000 --> 0:15:19.320
<v Speaker 1>Well, actually I have said that to somebody this week,

0:15:20.120 --> 0:15:22.240
<v Speaker 1>a young player from Australia who's playing one of the

0:15:22.240 --> 0:15:24.440
<v Speaker 1>best players in the world as well, give out it

0:15:24.440 --> 0:15:26.920
<v Speaker 1>to get them in their And it is true.

0:15:27.000 --> 0:15:29.120
<v Speaker 2>And there will always be somebody who will tell to you,

0:15:29.200 --> 0:15:30.600
<v Speaker 2>over qualifier, that's tough.

0:15:30.640 --> 0:15:34.680
<v Speaker 4>They have already won, play three matches, not just those

0:15:34.720 --> 0:15:38.320
<v Speaker 4>tennis stereotypes that every time you play somebody like this

0:15:38.440 --> 0:15:40.760
<v Speaker 4>you will hear in the locker room at least once.

0:15:40.880 --> 0:15:45.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, exactly. We just I just interviewed Francis Tiafo after

0:15:45.240 --> 0:15:48.880
<v Speaker 1>his battle. Five set match was incredible, My god, five sets,

0:15:49.160 --> 0:15:51.520
<v Speaker 1>puking on the court, hitting under armed serfs. I mean,

0:15:51.520 --> 0:15:55.240
<v Speaker 1>it was the most Francis Tiafo match I've seen in

0:15:55.240 --> 0:15:57.720
<v Speaker 1>a long time. But he got through it and he said,

0:15:57.720 --> 0:16:00.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, look, I know I'm getting to the second

0:16:00.160 --> 0:16:02.440
<v Speaker 1>part of my career. And so he said, if I'd

0:16:02.440 --> 0:16:05.120
<v Speaker 1>been in a reddit, I think he's I'm not sure,

0:16:05.880 --> 0:16:08.720
<v Speaker 1>I'll have you look it up, but he understands it. Look,

0:16:08.760 --> 0:16:12.800
<v Speaker 1>his end rate maybe is mid thirties, thirty six, and

0:16:12.840 --> 0:16:14.960
<v Speaker 1>so he is technically getting to the second part of

0:16:15.000 --> 0:16:17.240
<v Speaker 1>his career, right, he's probably like twenty six or twenty

0:16:17.280 --> 0:16:22.640
<v Speaker 1>seven six. So he said, I would have defaulted that

0:16:22.680 --> 0:16:25.160
<v Speaker 1>match today if it wasn't a Grand Slam. And so

0:16:25.240 --> 0:16:27.880
<v Speaker 1>that's how much he fought through. He was cramping, he

0:16:27.920 --> 0:16:31.640
<v Speaker 1>was having side cramps. He was like tanking return games

0:16:31.680 --> 0:16:34.760
<v Speaker 1>to conserve energy for his service games. And actually, in fact,

0:16:34.760 --> 0:16:37.920
<v Speaker 1>he tanked the last game and he was started diting

0:16:37.920 --> 0:16:39.640
<v Speaker 1>winners all over the place and ended up winning the game,

0:16:40.520 --> 0:16:42.800
<v Speaker 1>which was important because he would have had to serve

0:16:43.400 --> 0:16:45.760
<v Speaker 1>into the wind uphill, which he probably thinking, what do

0:16:45.760 --> 0:16:50.280
<v Speaker 1>you mean uphill? There's a slight little, a little tilt

0:16:50.320 --> 0:16:52.040
<v Speaker 1>on the courts here at this strain, open the tilt

0:16:52.080 --> 0:16:54.560
<v Speaker 1>down to the river. It's very minor, but when you're

0:16:54.600 --> 0:16:56.080
<v Speaker 1>out there, you feel it. And he would have been

0:16:56.120 --> 0:16:57.960
<v Speaker 1>serving uphill into the wind. And let me tell you

0:16:57.960 --> 0:16:59.360
<v Speaker 1>something that would have been hard for him.

0:17:00.120 --> 0:17:02.200
<v Speaker 2>And I don't know if you've ever cramped. I cramped.

0:17:02.680 --> 0:17:05.320
<v Speaker 1>I have cramped indoors and stood out playing doubles. How

0:17:05.320 --> 0:17:06.280
<v Speaker 1>embarrassing that is?

0:17:06.320 --> 0:17:08.600
<v Speaker 2>Weird? We will just glaze over it. As if it

0:17:08.720 --> 0:17:09.840
<v Speaker 2>never happened. I'm glad.

0:17:09.560 --> 0:17:11.119
<v Speaker 1>I know what it feels like.

0:17:11.520 --> 0:17:15.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, well, I will say I crammed once and then

0:17:15.080 --> 0:17:18.000
<v Speaker 2>I retired three months later because I was like, I'm

0:17:18.080 --> 0:17:21.119
<v Speaker 2>out of here. I'm not fit anymore. And it is

0:17:21.280 --> 0:17:25.200
<v Speaker 2>really hard on those quick explosive motions, which for Francis

0:17:25.280 --> 0:17:27.720
<v Speaker 2>is the serf, so there would have been hard to

0:17:27.760 --> 0:17:28.280
<v Speaker 2>serve out.

0:17:28.520 --> 0:17:30.480
<v Speaker 1>It was not easy. It was painful. He was and

0:17:30.520 --> 0:17:33.399
<v Speaker 1>he was puking, so he's clearly lost a condition. He's like,

0:17:34.040 --> 0:17:35.720
<v Speaker 1>you know that's going to make the cramp.

0:17:35.880 --> 0:17:36.760
<v Speaker 2>Jack Draper puke.

0:17:37.080 --> 0:17:39.800
<v Speaker 1>He Jack Draper puked all over he was Yeah, but

0:17:39.920 --> 0:17:43.040
<v Speaker 1>he did it strategically, really smart thing. He puked right

0:17:43.119 --> 0:17:45.600
<v Speaker 1>near the baseline, so they had to take forever to

0:17:45.640 --> 0:17:48.560
<v Speaker 1>clean it up. So I think the people that clean

0:17:48.640 --> 0:17:52.000
<v Speaker 1>that stuff up need to get a race. Just frankly,

0:17:52.040 --> 0:17:53.000
<v Speaker 1>and the dude that did.

0:17:52.840 --> 0:17:55.960
<v Speaker 2>It, even we ran into his girlfriend. Even his girlfriend

0:17:56.040 --> 0:17:56.920
<v Speaker 2>was like the poor girl.

0:17:57.840 --> 0:17:59.159
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, well there was a girl that cleaned up. There

0:17:59.200 --> 0:18:01.080
<v Speaker 1>was a guy there was like he was puking all

0:18:01.080 --> 0:18:03.879
<v Speaker 1>over the place. But anyway, it was a great effort

0:18:03.880 --> 0:18:05.720
<v Speaker 1>from him. And let's see how he handles that. Because

0:18:05.760 --> 0:18:08.080
<v Speaker 1>you've got a couple of days off now to recover,

0:18:08.119 --> 0:18:10.879
<v Speaker 1>which he needs, and we'll see how getting through a

0:18:10.880 --> 0:18:14.040
<v Speaker 1>match like that can help him go further. Another player

0:18:14.040 --> 0:18:16.960
<v Speaker 1>that we just saw win was Yannick Cinna. Certainly looks unbelievable.

0:18:17.000 --> 0:18:19.919
<v Speaker 1>That was an incredibly tough ra Jerry Jerry was one

0:18:19.920 --> 0:18:20.560
<v Speaker 1>of the next.

0:18:20.320 --> 0:18:22.679
<v Speaker 2>Thing we'll say one thing, tell me, I think the

0:18:22.840 --> 0:18:26.760
<v Speaker 2>top seats on the women's side have gotten incredibly tough

0:18:26.880 --> 0:18:31.400
<v Speaker 2>draws on paper. But then also in match Arena Sabalenka,

0:18:31.440 --> 0:18:35.879
<v Speaker 2>former US Open champion, Sloan Stevens, Coco Go, former Australian

0:18:35.920 --> 0:18:40.840
<v Speaker 2>Open champion, Sofia Cannon, and IgA Schriontek, got Katarina Senia Kova,

0:18:40.920 --> 0:18:44.040
<v Speaker 2>who is also a Grand Slam champion, maybe not singles,

0:18:44.080 --> 0:18:46.840
<v Speaker 2>but she's won nine Grand Slams. She's a gold medalist, yeah,

0:18:46.920 --> 0:18:49.359
<v Speaker 2>and she's got the Olympics, and she's a good singles player.

0:18:49.400 --> 0:18:50.840
<v Speaker 2>She's a farmer top thirty.

0:18:50.560 --> 0:18:52.640
<v Speaker 1>Now and they all got through them, they all.

0:18:52.520 --> 0:18:55.639
<v Speaker 2>Straight through them in straight sets. But and then Yanick

0:18:55.680 --> 0:18:59.159
<v Speaker 2>Sinner with Nicolas Sharry who is just outside of the

0:18:59.160 --> 0:19:03.560
<v Speaker 2>seating position, and so man today is.

0:19:03.520 --> 0:19:07.000
<v Speaker 1>Packed with the schedule that we've got going on Cosnovak

0:19:07.040 --> 0:19:11.040
<v Speaker 1>Djokovic is later on tonight seven PMC, ten times champion

0:19:11.080 --> 0:19:12.879
<v Speaker 1>coming out on the court. What do you think his

0:19:13.080 --> 0:19:16.080
<v Speaker 1>chances are to withdraw? Let's talk a little bit about

0:19:16.080 --> 0:19:19.200
<v Speaker 1>the overall now that you know the schedule, now the

0:19:19.280 --> 0:19:21.720
<v Speaker 1>end of the drawer and who's up the top, down

0:19:21.800 --> 0:19:25.359
<v Speaker 1>the bottom, all the things. Who what's your overall thought

0:19:25.359 --> 0:19:26.480
<v Speaker 1>process with the men and the women.

0:19:26.600 --> 0:19:30.200
<v Speaker 2>So my overall thought process is that in both parts,

0:19:30.280 --> 0:19:33.399
<v Speaker 2>the lower half is a lot weaker. But not in

0:19:33.520 --> 0:19:36.359
<v Speaker 2>terms of the seated players, because there is a Djokovic

0:19:36.359 --> 0:19:38.399
<v Speaker 2>and there is Alchoras, and there is a Zveref on

0:19:38.440 --> 0:19:40.480
<v Speaker 2>the men's side, and there is a Chiantek and a

0:19:40.520 --> 0:19:43.399
<v Speaker 2>Rebuccena on the women's side. But in terms of, you know,

0:19:43.520 --> 0:19:45.760
<v Speaker 2>the floaters that you don't want to have, they are

0:19:45.800 --> 0:19:48.080
<v Speaker 2>somehow all in the top half. Just as an example,

0:19:48.480 --> 0:19:51.160
<v Speaker 2>Nori and Bertini are playing each other in the first

0:19:51.240 --> 0:19:54.479
<v Speaker 2>round as unseated players. All these kinds of players are

0:19:54.560 --> 0:19:56.840
<v Speaker 2>kind of in the top half. Nikola Shari playing Yannick

0:19:56.840 --> 0:19:59.479
<v Speaker 2>Sinner in the first round. So I feel like in

0:19:59.520 --> 0:20:02.280
<v Speaker 2>that regard art, I think the people in the top

0:20:02.320 --> 0:20:04.439
<v Speaker 2>half will have a lot harder time to get to

0:20:04.520 --> 0:20:06.720
<v Speaker 2>the second week, you know, but then once you are

0:20:06.760 --> 0:20:09.760
<v Speaker 2>in the second week, it's a loaded It's a loaded

0:20:09.840 --> 0:20:12.360
<v Speaker 2>draw for Alexander z Vera. If you will just rejoice

0:20:12.359 --> 0:20:15.520
<v Speaker 2>that Taylor Fritz is away from him in the top half.

0:20:15.880 --> 0:20:18.600
<v Speaker 2>I think there was a prayer circle and multiple candles.

0:20:19.640 --> 0:20:23.320
<v Speaker 2>I don't want to see exactly. And then I mean,

0:20:23.359 --> 0:20:25.639
<v Speaker 2>this is this is tough. So quarter finals for Novak

0:20:25.680 --> 0:20:30.120
<v Speaker 2>would be Carlos al Charas and then is in.

0:20:30.040 --> 0:20:33.320
<v Speaker 1>The button quarters they're playing each other in the quarters.

0:20:33.040 --> 0:20:34.800
<v Speaker 2>They would play. Yeah, if they get through, they would

0:20:34.800 --> 0:20:35.320
<v Speaker 2>play each other.

0:20:35.359 --> 0:20:38.199
<v Speaker 1>That's a nightmare. I thought that I hadn't looked at

0:20:38.200 --> 0:20:40.199
<v Speaker 1>the draw. Again, I wasn't one hundred percent sure, but

0:20:40.240 --> 0:20:41.600
<v Speaker 1>that's a freaking nightmare.

0:20:41.680 --> 0:20:44.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean that's the third round mahaj, which is

0:20:44.800 --> 0:20:48.119
<v Speaker 2>not easy. Tell us night. He was playing incredible at

0:20:48.200 --> 0:20:50.639
<v Speaker 2>United Cup, but he had also an incredible maildown. If

0:20:50.640 --> 0:20:52.440
<v Speaker 2>you haven't seen them, please google it because it was

0:20:52.480 --> 0:20:53.840
<v Speaker 2>a good the.

0:20:53.840 --> 0:20:58.000
<v Speaker 1>Beautiful, it was all things happen. Yeah, speaking of Mahach

0:20:58.200 --> 0:21:00.760
<v Speaker 1>who now has to play Riley a Pelka. Actually, my god,

0:21:00.840 --> 0:21:02.560
<v Speaker 1>So what about Riley getting through last night?

0:21:02.960 --> 0:21:05.920
<v Speaker 2>Maybe maybe I'll take back the top half is more

0:21:05.960 --> 0:21:09.320
<v Speaker 2>loaded with these floaters because Mahatch and Opelka and Neo Novak.

0:21:09.400 --> 0:21:09.840
<v Speaker 2>That's tough.

0:21:09.960 --> 0:21:13.359
<v Speaker 1>That's that's rough. I did see Riley. He's you know,

0:21:13.359 --> 0:21:15.720
<v Speaker 1>he's still kind of having struggles with the back a

0:21:15.760 --> 0:21:17.800
<v Speaker 1>little bit. So we'll see how he recovers. Because he

0:21:17.840 --> 0:21:20.880
<v Speaker 1>finished very late last night, cool conditions. Did you see

0:21:20.920 --> 0:21:22.600
<v Speaker 1>him today? He was taking a day off. He was

0:21:22.680 --> 0:21:24.639
<v Speaker 1>going to do anything because I don't believe he has

0:21:24.680 --> 0:21:25.040
<v Speaker 1>to play.

0:21:25.440 --> 0:21:26.480
<v Speaker 2>I think he has two days.

0:21:26.560 --> 0:21:30.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, so look, you know that's he can beat

0:21:30.320 --> 0:21:31.760
<v Speaker 1>anyone as long as he's healthy.

0:21:32.240 --> 0:21:35.320
<v Speaker 2>So I'm supposed to get hot, so that would help him.

0:21:35.480 --> 0:21:37.840
<v Speaker 1>Super hot this week here in Melbourne. I mean it's hot, yeah,

0:21:38.119 --> 0:21:39.879
<v Speaker 1>I mean for people there in Europe right now in

0:21:39.920 --> 0:21:42.080
<v Speaker 1>New York, this is bloody hot. Yeah, but it's not

0:21:42.240 --> 0:21:44.480
<v Speaker 1>it's not what it could be. Yeah.

0:21:45.080 --> 0:21:47.760
<v Speaker 2>Maybe let's just talk quickly about Ego because I called

0:21:47.760 --> 0:21:50.360
<v Speaker 2>her match right now. I said she played Signa Kova

0:21:50.480 --> 0:21:53.120
<v Speaker 2>so tough first round, and Signacovi had stretches of play

0:21:53.119 --> 0:21:56.240
<v Speaker 2>where she hit as she can winners all over, played

0:21:56.280 --> 0:21:59.040
<v Speaker 2>so well. And what I really liked about Ego was

0:21:59.080 --> 0:22:01.399
<v Speaker 2>she kind of and that wym Fisette talked about this

0:22:01.560 --> 0:22:03.679
<v Speaker 2>during United Cup. We had the chance to chat to

0:22:03.760 --> 0:22:06.240
<v Speaker 2>him a few times, and he said he wants her

0:22:06.280 --> 0:22:09.239
<v Speaker 2>to panic less when these big hitters come around and

0:22:09.280 --> 0:22:11.240
<v Speaker 2>sort of just give a little shape on the ball,

0:22:11.359 --> 0:22:13.879
<v Speaker 2>stay in the rally and wait for these stretches of

0:22:13.960 --> 0:22:17.080
<v Speaker 2>play of the big hitters to subside. And she did

0:22:17.160 --> 0:22:21.160
<v Speaker 2>well today. There was one moment where Katerina had three

0:22:21.240 --> 0:22:26.680
<v Speaker 2>games where she hit seven winners, like incredible, where he

0:22:27.080 --> 0:22:29.760
<v Speaker 2>was on the verge of panicking, but she riled it

0:22:29.840 --> 0:22:32.199
<v Speaker 2>back in and she did so well, and that was

0:22:32.480 --> 0:22:35.520
<v Speaker 2>something that for me as an EGA fan, for all

0:22:35.560 --> 0:22:39.439
<v Speaker 2>EGA fans, was very encouraging. She reversed back to something

0:22:39.480 --> 0:22:41.560
<v Speaker 2>she did when she had her best season. She would

0:22:41.600 --> 0:22:44.320
<v Speaker 2>put a bit more shape on the forehand and trajectory

0:22:44.720 --> 0:22:48.280
<v Speaker 2>to give herself more time and whereas last year sometimes

0:22:48.320 --> 0:22:50.720
<v Speaker 2>she would get into this hitting fits with these big

0:22:50.800 --> 0:22:54.200
<v Speaker 2>hitters that she could not hit and she especially.

0:22:53.840 --> 0:22:55.359
<v Speaker 1>On a fast court. Now she can have hit of

0:22:55.440 --> 0:22:58.879
<v Speaker 1>player on a clay court. Changed direction.

0:22:59.080 --> 0:23:01.920
<v Speaker 2>Yes, yes, but that was so smart of her.

0:23:03.400 --> 0:23:06.399
<v Speaker 1>Who's going on the court. This is what you people

0:23:06.440 --> 0:23:07.120
<v Speaker 1>were going to hear.

0:23:07.840 --> 0:23:13.720
<v Speaker 2>In women's skirls. Petroma Christiana a nice manch Why don't

0:23:13.760 --> 0:23:14.399
<v Speaker 2>we go see it?

0:23:26.600 --> 0:23:36.639
<v Speaker 1>H M.

0:23:46.480 --> 0:23:49.920
<v Speaker 2>And so. So. I thought she did super well there.

0:23:50.080 --> 0:23:53.560
<v Speaker 2>And what was also another very encouraging sign she played

0:23:54.119 --> 0:23:56.919
<v Speaker 2>her best tennis in the most important moments. And we

0:23:57.000 --> 0:24:00.720
<v Speaker 2>had moments last year where it wasn't always the case

0:24:00.800 --> 0:24:02.520
<v Speaker 2>on the quick surface, and it's going to be fair

0:24:02.920 --> 0:24:05.680
<v Speaker 2>on the slow surfaces. She's the ego that we've always seen.

0:24:05.960 --> 0:24:10.160
<v Speaker 2>She has shortened the forehead swing. She's kind of if

0:24:10.200 --> 0:24:12.520
<v Speaker 2>you remember, she would go up with the racket face

0:24:12.560 --> 0:24:15.040
<v Speaker 2>and then drop it down before she hits it. Now

0:24:15.119 --> 0:24:18.159
<v Speaker 2>she's trying to do the quick rotation, so basically just

0:24:18.240 --> 0:24:23.840
<v Speaker 2>turning her shoulders sometimes it's still the most well. I

0:24:23.920 --> 0:24:27.320
<v Speaker 2>wish that was the only time anyone has ever compared

0:24:27.320 --> 0:24:29.080
<v Speaker 2>my forehand to ye're welcome.

0:24:29.080 --> 0:24:32.000
<v Speaker 1>Well, no one's going to be comparing my forehand to anyone,

0:24:32.359 --> 0:24:35.360
<v Speaker 1>particularly the world's one of the best places.

0:24:35.200 --> 0:24:37.840
<v Speaker 2>Over the world. Well, and they worked on the surf.

0:24:37.880 --> 0:24:40.439
<v Speaker 2>It's a bit more fluid, but Wims did say at

0:24:40.480 --> 0:24:44.159
<v Speaker 2>the United Cup that it's a stepping stone basically, that

0:24:44.240 --> 0:24:46.919
<v Speaker 2>this is a stepping stone to even more fluidity in

0:24:47.000 --> 0:24:51.119
<v Speaker 2>the future hopefully, And she's getting on average hundred seventy

0:24:51.240 --> 0:24:52.720
<v Speaker 2>nine hundred eighty cases, she's.

0:24:52.560 --> 0:24:54.760
<v Speaker 1>Probably the first serve. I'm not concerned about the first

0:24:54.800 --> 0:24:56.960
<v Speaker 1>surf of her. I'm concerned about the second serf. I'm

0:24:57.000 --> 0:24:59.480
<v Speaker 1>concerned about the fact that the second service isn't as

0:24:59.560 --> 0:25:01.680
<v Speaker 1>lethal it could be, and she doesn't get enough kick

0:25:01.680 --> 0:25:04.399
<v Speaker 1>on the bald toss, so well, I want I'm going

0:25:04.440 --> 0:25:06.080
<v Speaker 1>to keep my eye on that. It's sort of similar

0:25:06.080 --> 0:25:08.360
<v Speaker 1>to how I feel about Coco because you know, as

0:25:08.400 --> 0:25:10.040
<v Speaker 1>the old time has used to say, you're only as

0:25:10.080 --> 0:25:13.119
<v Speaker 1>good as your second serve, and nowadays, guess what that

0:25:13.280 --> 0:25:15.560
<v Speaker 1>is true, Because if you have a shit second serve

0:25:15.600 --> 0:25:17.760
<v Speaker 1>in men's and women's fantas, you are going to get crushed.

0:25:18.160 --> 0:25:20.680
<v Speaker 1>They are going to crush that second ball. And unless

0:25:20.720 --> 0:25:23.080
<v Speaker 1>you're an incredible mover, you can maybe get away with it.

0:25:23.119 --> 0:25:24.879
<v Speaker 1>But still, even if you're a cocoa go or an

0:25:24.880 --> 0:25:27.800
<v Speaker 1>eager shantech, if you don't hit your serve, well, these

0:25:27.800 --> 0:25:30.080
<v Speaker 1>girls are going to step up and crush the second serve.

0:25:30.160 --> 0:25:31.399
<v Speaker 1>So that is something that we're going to have to

0:25:31.480 --> 0:25:33.919
<v Speaker 1>keep an eye on because on this court it's fast,

0:25:33.960 --> 0:25:37.520
<v Speaker 1>Australia's fast, and it's hot, and the conditions play quick,

0:25:37.720 --> 0:25:40.440
<v Speaker 1>and that's why Sabalanca plays well here. It's why Rubarkina

0:25:40.520 --> 0:25:43.399
<v Speaker 1>has done well here and made the finals. So and

0:25:43.480 --> 0:25:46.840
<v Speaker 1>even Chinwen goes for the serf, you know, her second

0:25:46.880 --> 0:25:49.199
<v Speaker 1>serve has a bit more pop on it sometimes than

0:25:49.240 --> 0:25:53.240
<v Speaker 1>even eagers. They're pretty similar in a lot of ways.

0:25:53.280 --> 0:25:57.040
<v Speaker 2>But it's funny because the so I talked to a

0:25:57.040 --> 0:25:59.640
<v Speaker 2>few I did the week zero as we call it here.

0:25:59.680 --> 0:26:03.360
<v Speaker 2>I did few of the charity matches, just like interviewing

0:26:03.400 --> 0:26:06.520
<v Speaker 2>the players, and it's so funny. You interview five players

0:26:06.560 --> 0:26:09.640
<v Speaker 2>and they will tell you five different opinions on the

0:26:09.640 --> 0:26:12.960
<v Speaker 2>surfness of the court. And I the first person I

0:26:13.000 --> 0:26:14.920
<v Speaker 2>spoke to was Alex Deminor and he was like, this

0:26:14.960 --> 0:26:17.719
<v Speaker 2>is the slowest rod labor Arena has ever been. And

0:26:17.800 --> 0:26:20.560
<v Speaker 2>I'm like walking around telling everybody how slow it is.

0:26:20.600 --> 0:26:23.840
<v Speaker 2>And then I speak to Janick Sinner and Stefano Stizzipas

0:26:23.840 --> 0:26:25.960
<v Speaker 2>and both of them go, oh my god, it's so fast.

0:26:25.960 --> 0:26:28.320
<v Speaker 2>We didn't have a we didn't have a single rally.

0:26:28.320 --> 0:26:30.280
<v Speaker 2>We couldn't get over two shots per rally.

0:26:30.480 --> 0:26:31.080
<v Speaker 1>That's interesting.

0:26:31.160 --> 0:26:33.800
<v Speaker 2>So it's and then another person said, I can't remember, oh,

0:26:33.880 --> 0:26:37.680
<v Speaker 2>Carlito's he said that it's medium fast. It's like everything goes.

0:26:38.720 --> 0:26:41.120
<v Speaker 2>But you can basically ask four players and you will

0:26:41.160 --> 0:26:42.360
<v Speaker 2>get four different opinions.

0:26:42.920 --> 0:26:46.520
<v Speaker 1>I think the surface looks medium medium to fast. Yeah

0:26:46.560 --> 0:26:49.320
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't. It's not medium, it's not it's not definitely

0:26:49.320 --> 0:26:51.760
<v Speaker 1>not medium slow. So I guess we'll see who gets

0:26:51.800 --> 0:26:54.040
<v Speaker 1>through the second week. We'll have a pretty idea, pretty

0:26:54.040 --> 0:26:59.280
<v Speaker 1>good idea who's more comfortable on this court. But you know, overall,

0:26:59.359 --> 0:27:05.440
<v Speaker 1>I think sits a past losing that to Michelson. There's

0:27:05.480 --> 0:27:06.120
<v Speaker 1>something going on.

0:27:06.280 --> 0:27:07.240
<v Speaker 2>You have he has to.

0:27:07.400 --> 0:27:09.399
<v Speaker 1>I mean, how long before the dad's back in the picture.

0:27:09.480 --> 0:27:11.120
<v Speaker 2>I think I'm giving it one month.

0:27:11.520 --> 0:27:13.359
<v Speaker 1>Well one month, so you think Indian Wells he's going

0:27:13.440 --> 0:27:15.520
<v Speaker 1>to be back there. I think Indian Wells see Papa

0:27:15.600 --> 0:27:18.520
<v Speaker 1>Smurf back in the back in the players box. That'll

0:27:18.520 --> 0:27:22.560
<v Speaker 1>be interesting. But he is obviously struggling. But you know, look,

0:27:23.080 --> 0:27:25.040
<v Speaker 1>we are off to a great start here. It is.

0:27:25.840 --> 0:27:28.760
<v Speaker 1>The weather is beautiful today. It was crap yesterday. Petco

0:27:28.800 --> 0:27:30.920
<v Speaker 1>and I are working out arses off. We're going running

0:27:30.960 --> 0:27:33.080
<v Speaker 1>back and forth with everyone. What do you have for

0:27:33.119 --> 0:27:35.760
<v Speaker 1>a tremendous amount of Americans in the main draw here?

0:27:35.800 --> 0:27:39.160
<v Speaker 1>I think it was like thirty six or something thirty three. Yeah,

0:27:39.320 --> 0:27:41.760
<v Speaker 1>men and women, they have like thirty three players in

0:27:41.800 --> 0:27:43.720
<v Speaker 1>the main draw. That is a phenomenal effort.

0:27:43.760 --> 0:27:46.560
<v Speaker 2>We don't even have thirty three players and tennis.

0:27:47.320 --> 0:27:50.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean same with Australia. I mean that's impressive, very

0:27:50.600 --> 0:27:54.720
<v Speaker 1>impressive numbers. I have Daniel Collins and calling her later

0:27:54.760 --> 0:27:57.080
<v Speaker 1>on tonight. Yes, the dnimoll is back for another year,

0:27:57.160 --> 0:27:59.120
<v Speaker 1>so we'll see what happens. I don't know, haven't looked

0:27:59.119 --> 0:28:03.080
<v Speaker 1>at the schedule preparation again, Hey, listen, this is how

0:28:03.240 --> 0:28:07.239
<v Speaker 1>real she prey for matches. I don't well, we can

0:28:07.359 --> 0:28:10.359
<v Speaker 1>tell now, but who do you have to know?

0:28:10.640 --> 0:28:16.400
<v Speaker 2>I have Carlos interested to see how Carlus plays, so

0:28:16.640 --> 0:28:20.320
<v Speaker 2>I've done the charity matches with him and and it

0:28:20.400 --> 0:28:23.520
<v Speaker 2>was really interesting. I spoke to Juan Carlos Ferrero as

0:28:23.800 --> 0:28:28.000
<v Speaker 2>who I was really scared to talk to. He smells fantastic,

0:28:28.040 --> 0:28:30.400
<v Speaker 2>by the way. I nearly fainted when I I had

0:28:30.400 --> 0:28:35.480
<v Speaker 2>to like kind of awkwardly squat.

0:28:33.880 --> 0:28:35.119
<v Speaker 1>The best smelling team for me.

0:28:35.320 --> 0:28:39.480
<v Speaker 2>Okay, well try Carlos. And I was interviewing him and

0:28:39.520 --> 0:28:44.040
<v Speaker 2>I was just like awkwardly leaning into had a sniff

0:28:44.120 --> 0:28:46.720
<v Speaker 2>of his scent. He's just had surgery on his right

0:28:46.800 --> 0:28:50.360
<v Speaker 2>knee as his cottlage repair, and he told me it

0:28:50.440 --> 0:28:55.480
<v Speaker 2>was really interesting. They worked on Carlos's concentration and consistency

0:28:55.520 --> 0:28:58.280
<v Speaker 2>in the off season, and he said that he just

0:28:58.400 --> 0:29:01.240
<v Speaker 2>he's so young and his emotions young. He didn't say

0:29:01.240 --> 0:29:03.560
<v Speaker 2>it with these words, but he basically said he's such

0:29:03.600 --> 0:29:07.600
<v Speaker 2>a young person still that his thoughts just wander off,

0:29:07.680 --> 0:29:10.880
<v Speaker 2>and that's something they've worked on. And I wanted to ask,

0:29:11.360 --> 0:29:13.360
<v Speaker 2>how would you work on something like this, but I

0:29:13.400 --> 0:29:17.000
<v Speaker 2>only was allowed to questions, And Carlos has changed the serf,

0:29:17.040 --> 0:29:19.280
<v Speaker 2>so I wanted to ask about the serf as well.

0:29:19.320 --> 0:29:21.800
<v Speaker 2>So I had to pick and so I asked him

0:29:21.800 --> 0:29:24.440
<v Speaker 2>about the surf and he said, well, they also similar

0:29:24.480 --> 0:29:27.800
<v Speaker 2>as to EGA. He felt like Carlos's service motion was

0:29:27.840 --> 0:29:31.000
<v Speaker 2>a bit disjointed. So they also also worked on a fluidity.

0:29:31.040 --> 0:29:33.880
<v Speaker 2>You can see it right away. It looks very beautiful actually,

0:29:34.240 --> 0:29:37.080
<v Speaker 2>And he said that he felt that Carlos's speed on

0:29:37.280 --> 0:29:39.920
<v Speaker 2>serf is okay, it's enough because he has a lot

0:29:39.960 --> 0:29:44.880
<v Speaker 2>of different enough, but that the consistency is lacking, and

0:29:44.920 --> 0:29:47.080
<v Speaker 2>that's what they've been working on. So this is all.

0:29:47.160 --> 0:29:50.200
<v Speaker 2>This is not me this is one Carlos Ferrero's great

0:29:50.240 --> 0:29:55.800
<v Speaker 2>smelling guy knee operated words from me from my mouth

0:29:55.880 --> 0:29:56.520
<v Speaker 2>to your ear.

0:29:56.920 --> 0:29:58.880
<v Speaker 1>Well, I will say I think that the one thing

0:29:58.880 --> 0:30:00.640
<v Speaker 1>that hurts him, and I may have even discussed it

0:30:00.680 --> 0:30:02.440
<v Speaker 1>with you on the pod, is that he doesn't hit

0:30:02.480 --> 0:30:04.760
<v Speaker 1>his spots well enough on serve, and there were a

0:30:04.760 --> 0:30:07.120
<v Speaker 1>period of time the last few years where he did

0:30:07.240 --> 0:30:10.120
<v Speaker 1>hit it really well. I think that is one era

0:30:10.280 --> 0:30:12.040
<v Speaker 1>that he needs to improve on, which is why he

0:30:12.080 --> 0:30:14.240
<v Speaker 1>doesn't went on hard court like a Sinner does, because

0:30:14.280 --> 0:30:16.800
<v Speaker 1>Janni gets so many free points with his accuracy on

0:30:16.880 --> 0:30:19.840
<v Speaker 1>serve and his power on serve, whereas I think Carlos

0:30:19.880 --> 0:30:23.880
<v Speaker 1>doesn't have the power like Yannick. Clearly he's like five

0:30:23.920 --> 0:30:26.200
<v Speaker 1>inches shorter than him, so that makes a big difference.

0:30:26.200 --> 0:30:29.280
<v Speaker 1>And Sinner can get that snap and that accuracy getting

0:30:29.280 --> 0:30:31.240
<v Speaker 1>the corners. But I think that's an area that he

0:30:31.280 --> 0:30:33.080
<v Speaker 1>needs to work on, so if he can, so we'll

0:30:33.120 --> 0:30:36.000
<v Speaker 1>take a look at like as we call it Bolt six,

0:30:36.000 --> 0:30:39.080
<v Speaker 1>as it's new, it's taken over from Hawkeye. I'm gonna

0:30:39.120 --> 0:30:41.800
<v Speaker 1>be interested to see where Carlos is serving stats, look

0:30:41.840 --> 0:30:46.920
<v Speaker 1>as far as where he's actually pinpointing the serve. Last

0:30:46.960 --> 0:30:49.840
<v Speaker 1>year and this year, yeah, because if he's hitting his

0:30:49.920 --> 0:30:52.600
<v Speaker 1>spots better this year, he will have more success on

0:30:52.640 --> 0:30:55.240
<v Speaker 1>hard court. He can get away with it on clay

0:30:55.400 --> 0:30:59.200
<v Speaker 1>because the service is as important. And on grass. I

0:30:59.240 --> 0:31:01.840
<v Speaker 1>think he gets more confident on grass and he just

0:31:01.920 --> 0:31:07.920
<v Speaker 1>moves better and looks Kleine sept Quarter sept Quarter, who

0:31:08.000 --> 0:31:11.160
<v Speaker 1>had a great week last week in Adelaide, so and

0:31:11.480 --> 0:31:12.920
<v Speaker 1>so do Matti Keys. I just want to give a

0:31:12.960 --> 0:31:15.200
<v Speaker 1>shout out to those guys, Mattie Keys. I did speak

0:31:15.200 --> 0:31:17.560
<v Speaker 1>to Jessica Bagoula. I said, wow, man, Maddie played great,

0:31:17.600 --> 0:31:19.479
<v Speaker 1>and you know what she said, I've never seen her

0:31:19.720 --> 0:31:21.840
<v Speaker 1>play better tennis in my life. It was like I

0:31:21.920 --> 0:31:24.640
<v Speaker 1>could do nothing and shout out to jess who made

0:31:24.680 --> 0:31:25.960
<v Speaker 1>the final, but.

0:31:26.120 --> 0:31:27.280
<v Speaker 2>Mattie was getting married.

0:31:27.360 --> 0:31:30.680
<v Speaker 1>Will do to hey, listen, if she can find recommend

0:31:30.920 --> 0:31:33.680
<v Speaker 1>she can find mary assistency. And we all know that

0:31:33.760 --> 0:31:35.640
<v Speaker 1>no one hits the ball bigger than Maddie Keys, no

0:31:35.840 --> 0:31:39.120
<v Speaker 1>one she can hit it in good luck everybody.

0:31:39.200 --> 0:31:41.600
<v Speaker 2>I'm just always apprehensive about.

0:31:41.400 --> 0:31:44.960
<v Speaker 1>Well, yeah, because the big matches, she gets a little

0:31:45.000 --> 0:31:45.520
<v Speaker 1>anxious or.

0:31:45.520 --> 0:31:48.560
<v Speaker 2>Not about that. I'm always apprehensive when they win the

0:31:48.720 --> 0:31:52.760
<v Speaker 2>mat tournament before it feels like it happened only once

0:31:52.880 --> 0:31:55.080
<v Speaker 2>that the person who won the tournament before ended up

0:31:55.120 --> 0:31:58.680
<v Speaker 2>winning the Grand Slam after which was Barbora Krichikova who

0:31:58.720 --> 0:32:01.560
<v Speaker 2>won stass Book and then the French Open. I don't

0:32:01.600 --> 0:32:05.080
<v Speaker 2>think I can't remember anybody ever winning the tournament right before.

0:32:05.200 --> 0:32:07.440
<v Speaker 1>In Australia, we've had it happened in the past. It

0:32:07.560 --> 0:32:10.520
<v Speaker 1>used to be the tournament in Sydney. Like Alena kim Gleisters,

0:32:10.960 --> 0:32:13.240
<v Speaker 1>they would win Sydney and I don't know what she is, sure,

0:32:13.800 --> 0:32:15.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what she is. They won Sydney and

0:32:15.440 --> 0:32:16.440
<v Speaker 1>then they came down in one.

0:32:17.040 --> 0:32:18.040
<v Speaker 2>But I cannot remember.

0:32:18.040 --> 0:32:20.080
<v Speaker 1>Well look it up, but listen, our faithful listeners will

0:32:20.080 --> 0:32:20.760
<v Speaker 1>look that up on them.

0:32:20.840 --> 0:32:24.360
<v Speaker 2>Yes they were. Oh maybe another little inside because I

0:32:24.440 --> 0:32:26.400
<v Speaker 2>also got there was this charity week. Was great to

0:32:26.440 --> 0:32:28.880
<v Speaker 2>speak because they have this new coaches box on the court,

0:32:29.000 --> 0:32:31.720
<v Speaker 2>so the coaches said closer and so they had this

0:32:31.960 --> 0:32:36.200
<v Speaker 2>new initiative to bring them also closer into the media space.

0:32:36.280 --> 0:32:37.800
<v Speaker 2>So I had the chance to speak to them, and

0:32:37.880 --> 0:32:40.719
<v Speaker 2>I also spoke to Darren which was really interesting. Ok

0:32:40.920 --> 0:32:44.080
<v Speaker 2>Hill exactly Janick Sentner's coach, and it was really interesting

0:32:44.200 --> 0:32:47.320
<v Speaker 2>because I was I didn't know what to expect, whether

0:32:47.400 --> 0:32:50.320
<v Speaker 2>they will actually open up or try and keep some secrets.

0:32:50.680 --> 0:32:53.600
<v Speaker 2>And Darren was really open as well and said that

0:32:53.760 --> 0:32:59.640
<v Speaker 2>they basically worked on making Yanick more, make Yanick have

0:32:59.760 --> 0:33:03.360
<v Speaker 2>more variety. They continued on his net play for him

0:33:03.400 --> 0:33:06.120
<v Speaker 2>to finish points more often at the net, and they

0:33:06.200 --> 0:33:09.880
<v Speaker 2>also continued on his serf to have more accuracy and

0:33:10.000 --> 0:33:12.320
<v Speaker 2>more variety in a surf. They are very happy with

0:33:12.800 --> 0:33:16.240
<v Speaker 2>how the speed has progressed and now they want him

0:33:16.280 --> 0:33:19.720
<v Speaker 2>to be able to basically serve his spots and different

0:33:19.800 --> 0:33:20.960
<v Speaker 2>kind of slices.

0:33:20.560 --> 0:33:23.080
<v Speaker 1>And spaces and changed the pace on it a little bit. Yeah,

0:33:23.280 --> 0:33:25.920
<v Speaker 1>and listen, variety and overall as well, probably trying to

0:33:25.960 --> 0:33:28.200
<v Speaker 1>develop the fourhand drop shot a little bit more because

0:33:28.240 --> 0:33:29.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, when you hit the ball that big and hard,

0:33:29.880 --> 0:33:32.600
<v Speaker 1>everyone starts moving backwards. So like Carlos, if you can

0:33:32.680 --> 0:33:34.360
<v Speaker 1>hit that drop shot, it's certainly affected.

0:33:34.760 --> 0:33:38.640
<v Speaker 2>All right, guys, we're getting ready for full It's getting loud.

0:33:38.600 --> 0:33:41.520
<v Speaker 1>Getting louder, it's getting crazier. We love it here in Australia.

0:33:41.560 --> 0:33:45.680
<v Speaker 1>It's got great matches tonight. There's literally alcaraz Novak, Djokovic

0:33:45.880 --> 0:33:48.760
<v Speaker 1>and Nick Curious. We'll see what happens with Nick curios here?

0:33:48.920 --> 0:33:51.640
<v Speaker 1>What is your He's playing on the People's Court John

0:33:51.720 --> 0:33:52.280
<v Speaker 1>Caine Arena?

0:33:52.400 --> 0:33:56.400
<v Speaker 2>What is your guest? So I spoke to I spoke

0:33:56.480 --> 0:33:59.440
<v Speaker 2>to somebody who told me that Nick actually prefers the

0:33:59.560 --> 0:34:01.120
<v Speaker 2>tougher US in the first round.

0:34:01.240 --> 0:34:03.600
<v Speaker 1>Did you see us an excuse if he loses? Probably?

0:34:03.800 --> 0:34:04.360
<v Speaker 2>Oh you think so?

0:34:04.600 --> 0:34:05.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah? Probably?

0:34:05.360 --> 0:34:08.640
<v Speaker 2>Okay, Yeah, it was just surprised because I don't know

0:34:08.760 --> 0:34:10.759
<v Speaker 2>exactly who told me, but they were like, you know,

0:34:10.960 --> 0:34:13.520
<v Speaker 2>he's always waiting for the draw and hoping to get

0:34:13.560 --> 0:34:15.359
<v Speaker 2>one of the top seats in the first round.

0:34:15.600 --> 0:34:17.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, well, we'll see how he turns out tonight.

0:34:17.760 --> 0:34:20.400
<v Speaker 2>But we've got some that you believe that story or

0:34:20.440 --> 0:34:20.799
<v Speaker 2>you don't.

0:34:21.120 --> 0:34:25.440
<v Speaker 1>I believe it, but probably for different reasons of why. Okay,

0:34:25.880 --> 0:34:28.320
<v Speaker 1>but hey, listen, who knows. I don't know. I'm not

0:34:28.360 --> 0:34:31.400
<v Speaker 1>in Nick's head, and I'm grateful for that, that's for sure. Anyway.

0:34:31.520 --> 0:34:33.400
<v Speaker 1>All right, guys, well listen, it's a quick one and

0:34:33.640 --> 0:34:37.400
<v Speaker 1>we're happy to bring it to you. Live here, background,

0:34:37.480 --> 0:34:40.040
<v Speaker 1>noise from the strain and open, beautiful day. Thanks for

0:34:40.120 --> 0:34:42.480
<v Speaker 1>listening to us, and thanks for staying up late in

0:34:42.520 --> 0:34:45.439
<v Speaker 1>the US and watching us on ESPN. And throughout the world.

0:34:45.560 --> 0:34:49.040
<v Speaker 1>Listening to PETCO on the World Feed and we'll talk

0:34:49.120 --> 0:35:01.440
<v Speaker 1>to you soon. Why b B B