1 00:00:00,080 --> 00:00:02,800 Speaker 1: Let's get to our gas middle cotech ahead of emerging 2 00:00:02,840 --> 00:00:06,520 Speaker 1: market strategy at TV Securities Middle. I got to ask 3 00:00:06,559 --> 00:00:08,840 Speaker 1: you a question I asked a little bit earlier this morning. 4 00:00:08,960 --> 00:00:12,240 Speaker 1: It still kind of galls me. Um, the comments from 5 00:00:12,280 --> 00:00:16,680 Speaker 1: Bill Dudley. Now I understand, but he's basically saying that 6 00:00:16,720 --> 00:00:19,799 Speaker 1: if the stock market is optimistic, then the FED is 7 00:00:19,840 --> 00:00:25,400 Speaker 1: going to punish everybody with with even higher interest rates. Um. 8 00:00:25,480 --> 00:00:27,040 Speaker 1: And And I just want to ask you the basic 9 00:00:27,120 --> 00:00:31,040 Speaker 1: question and semi answer it myself. Does the stock market 10 00:00:31,160 --> 00:00:34,319 Speaker 1: cause inflation? And in my semi answer, and you tell 11 00:00:34,360 --> 00:00:36,960 Speaker 1: me if I'm wrong or right? When you when you 12 00:00:36,960 --> 00:00:39,920 Speaker 1: have an illness, you don't try to cure the symptoms. 13 00:00:40,080 --> 00:00:45,279 Speaker 1: You cure the disease. Markets and their optimism whatever, are 14 00:00:45,440 --> 00:00:49,000 Speaker 1: symptoms of the Fed's battle with inflation. How successful the 15 00:00:49,080 --> 00:00:52,720 Speaker 1: FED is or might be, it's inflation that's the disease, 16 00:00:53,159 --> 00:00:57,720 Speaker 1: not the markets. Does that make sense to you? It 17 00:00:57,760 --> 00:01:01,040 Speaker 1: does make sense, Um. But the same time, I think 18 00:01:01,080 --> 00:01:04,039 Speaker 1: the Fair is probably looking at the easing in financial 19 00:01:04,080 --> 00:01:07,720 Speaker 1: conditions that has been taking place via a weaker dollar 20 00:01:07,880 --> 00:01:11,080 Speaker 1: as well as stronger stock markets, and probably looking at 21 00:01:11,120 --> 00:01:14,800 Speaker 1: this is going against the impacts of their policy decisions. 22 00:01:14,800 --> 00:01:18,319 Speaker 1: It does effectively, whether it's direct or indirect, have some 23 00:01:18,360 --> 00:01:22,440 Speaker 1: impact on inflation, as it does boost balance sheets of companies, 24 00:01:22,480 --> 00:01:27,200 Speaker 1: consumers feel healthier, spending increases. Potentially it could feed into wages. 25 00:01:27,200 --> 00:01:29,160 Speaker 1: I mean, there's a number of angles here that the 26 00:01:29,160 --> 00:01:31,360 Speaker 1: FED is probably looking at. And the reality is that 27 00:01:31,440 --> 00:01:35,360 Speaker 1: we know that core services inflations in the US, tight 28 00:01:35,440 --> 00:01:38,600 Speaker 1: to the labor market is still very very high and elevated, 29 00:01:38,760 --> 00:01:41,160 Speaker 1: and the FED is concerned that they will need to 30 00:01:41,240 --> 00:01:44,160 Speaker 1: like rate much more significantly. So of course, if equities 31 00:01:44,160 --> 00:01:46,880 Speaker 1: are much stronger, it kind of plays into that some extent. 32 00:01:46,880 --> 00:01:48,640 Speaker 1: I do understand what you're saying that the partly it 33 00:01:48,720 --> 00:01:51,080 Speaker 1: is a symptom, and that's very true. But I do 34 00:01:51,200 --> 00:01:54,400 Speaker 1: think that the easy in financial conditions in general is 35 00:01:54,400 --> 00:01:56,280 Speaker 1: probably not something the FED wants to see at this 36 00:01:56,400 --> 00:02:00,639 Speaker 1: point in the cycle. However, I think that Brian stated 37 00:02:00,680 --> 00:02:03,240 Speaker 1: perfectly is it seems how investors look at this, the 38 00:02:03,680 --> 00:02:07,560 Speaker 1: FED is punishing us. The Fed is causing pain. If 39 00:02:07,600 --> 00:02:09,520 Speaker 1: you look at it from the Fed's point of view, 40 00:02:09,840 --> 00:02:15,040 Speaker 1: They're doing what's necessary unfortunately to bring down ultra high inflation. 41 00:02:15,360 --> 00:02:18,880 Speaker 1: And if they ease up because investors feel the feel 42 00:02:18,919 --> 00:02:21,040 Speaker 1: pain you know, it's actually the workers are going to 43 00:02:21,080 --> 00:02:23,600 Speaker 1: feel the pain, not the investors as much. Um, how 44 00:02:23,600 --> 00:02:26,560 Speaker 1: do you handle that as someone who's got to run money, 45 00:02:26,760 --> 00:02:29,880 Speaker 1: because now you have to gage two um elements, you've 46 00:02:29,880 --> 00:02:32,000 Speaker 1: got to gage the FED, and you've got to gage 47 00:02:32,040 --> 00:02:38,440 Speaker 1: the market's reaction. You know too that that's right. I mean, look, 48 00:02:38,480 --> 00:02:41,600 Speaker 1: I think pain is is the key word here, and 49 00:02:41,639 --> 00:02:45,560 Speaker 1: I think really where the pain is something that the 50 00:02:45,600 --> 00:02:47,440 Speaker 1: set is targeting is going to be in the labor market, 51 00:02:47,520 --> 00:02:50,000 Speaker 1: and as yet we're not seeing that. We've seen anecdotal 52 00:02:50,000 --> 00:02:53,200 Speaker 1: evidence that many companies are starting to look at shedding 53 00:02:53,280 --> 00:02:56,799 Speaker 1: labor and start layoffs the process of layoffs, but the 54 00:02:56,840 --> 00:02:59,079 Speaker 1: reality is, if you look at the job stata, it's 55 00:02:59,120 --> 00:03:02,360 Speaker 1: still pretty strong. Wage inflation is still very high. And 56 00:03:02,400 --> 00:03:06,000 Speaker 1: I think the said fees this is key um in 57 00:03:06,120 --> 00:03:08,760 Speaker 1: terms of only say inflicting pain, but it will be 58 00:03:09,040 --> 00:03:11,200 Speaker 1: jobs pain that's going to be the key hereof and 59 00:03:11,280 --> 00:03:14,640 Speaker 1: from the asset markets. And when they do finally start 60 00:03:14,680 --> 00:03:16,840 Speaker 1: to see that coming through, I think then we can 61 00:03:16,840 --> 00:03:19,720 Speaker 1: start talking about hitting the terminal rate and potentially even 62 00:03:19,840 --> 00:03:22,760 Speaker 1: cutting rates further out. But at this point we're just 63 00:03:22,800 --> 00:03:25,720 Speaker 1: not there. And I think, you know, that pain partly 64 00:03:26,120 --> 00:03:29,240 Speaker 1: and indirectly when when companies are struggling in a sense 65 00:03:29,280 --> 00:03:32,520 Speaker 1: of against higher interest rates and pressure on profits which 66 00:03:32,560 --> 00:03:36,200 Speaker 1: are likely to intensify, that will hurt equity markets, that 67 00:03:36,280 --> 00:03:40,640 Speaker 1: will potentially lead to more layoffs, and indirectly that could 68 00:03:40,640 --> 00:03:44,080 Speaker 1: put some lower pressure eating pressure on the wages. And 69 00:03:44,240 --> 00:03:45,920 Speaker 1: I think all of that is is directly going to 70 00:03:45,960 --> 00:03:49,520 Speaker 1: be linked with head policy. So clearly wages very big 71 00:03:49,560 --> 00:03:51,960 Speaker 1: part of this store, as you mentioned, and we had 72 00:03:51,960 --> 00:03:55,320 Speaker 1: a big balance over the past eighteen months. Coincides with 73 00:03:55,600 --> 00:03:58,720 Speaker 1: we did have a pandemic. So it's a big question. 74 00:03:59,120 --> 00:04:02,600 Speaker 1: Is it a one time or is there some structural 75 00:04:02,680 --> 00:04:05,560 Speaker 1: change in the economy now that could be permanent which 76 00:04:05,600 --> 00:04:08,800 Speaker 1: gives you this feedback loop in which prices and wages 77 00:04:09,000 --> 00:04:14,200 Speaker 1: drive each other up. Yeah. I think the risk is 78 00:04:14,240 --> 00:04:18,159 Speaker 1: that what we've seen via COVID and the the structural 79 00:04:18,200 --> 00:04:20,240 Speaker 1: shifts that we've seen in the labor market, you know, 80 00:04:20,480 --> 00:04:24,880 Speaker 1: the great resignation, the shift in the demographics, the whole 81 00:04:25,279 --> 00:04:28,480 Speaker 1: structure of the labor market shifting towards a significant work 82 00:04:28,480 --> 00:04:32,039 Speaker 1: from home tyme, bias, productivity changes all has an impact 83 00:04:32,040 --> 00:04:36,000 Speaker 1: that could be more prolonged going forward and could weigh 84 00:04:36,040 --> 00:04:38,839 Speaker 1: on the FED thinking. And I think the reality is 85 00:04:38,880 --> 00:04:40,840 Speaker 1: at the moment, you know, is we talk about what 86 00:04:41,040 --> 00:04:43,839 Speaker 1: keep talking about wages, but really wages are the key. 87 00:04:44,000 --> 00:04:47,880 Speaker 1: If we don't see any easing in pressure in wage 88 00:04:47,880 --> 00:04:52,080 Speaker 1: growth and earnings going forward, it does suggest effects policies 89 00:04:52,120 --> 00:04:54,720 Speaker 1: not taking effect, and I think that means again we 90 00:04:54,800 --> 00:04:57,160 Speaker 1: go back to an issue of pain. But all of 91 00:04:57,200 --> 00:04:59,240 Speaker 1: that means that we will probably need to suffer more 92 00:04:59,240 --> 00:05:04,040 Speaker 1: pain via even higher rates, a higher terminal rate going forward. 93 00:05:04,240 --> 00:05:05,960 Speaker 1: We think the terminal could get up to five and 94 00:05:05,960 --> 00:05:09,400 Speaker 1: a half per cent um into next year, but the 95 00:05:09,480 --> 00:05:11,880 Speaker 1: risks are still skewed towards even higher rates if we 96 00:05:11,920 --> 00:05:14,240 Speaker 1: don't see any easing in these pressures. So what does 97 00:05:14,279 --> 00:05:16,640 Speaker 1: this mean from emerging markets? Because coming into the end 98 00:05:16,680 --> 00:05:17,920 Speaker 1: of the year, a lot of people have said, that's 99 00:05:17,920 --> 00:05:20,080 Speaker 1: what we're going to see opportunities If for no other reason, 100 00:05:20,120 --> 00:05:23,360 Speaker 1: then the inflation problem isn't as bad. Uh. And yes, 101 00:05:23,440 --> 00:05:26,560 Speaker 1: the FED may put pressure on the dollar and downward 102 00:05:26,600 --> 00:05:29,320 Speaker 1: pressure on emerging market currencies, but they still see some 103 00:05:30,120 --> 00:05:32,080 Speaker 1: you know, areas where you can make some money. What 104 00:05:32,200 --> 00:05:36,920 Speaker 1: do you see? I think emerging markets have been backward 105 00:05:37,360 --> 00:05:40,000 Speaker 1: significantly in the last year or so, and obviously a 106 00:05:40,040 --> 00:05:42,960 Speaker 1: lot of that is through higher FED rates, it's through 107 00:05:43,960 --> 00:05:49,080 Speaker 1: general pressure on risk assets and worries that China's growth 108 00:05:49,160 --> 00:05:52,120 Speaker 1: is weakening and COVID concerns, etcetera, etcetera. And I think 109 00:05:52,240 --> 00:05:54,760 Speaker 1: you know, the one positive factor for EM into the 110 00:05:54,800 --> 00:05:57,240 Speaker 1: next year is positioning is very very light. We've seen 111 00:05:57,240 --> 00:05:59,719 Speaker 1: a huge outflow from e M as sets. I think 112 00:05:59,720 --> 00:06:02,400 Speaker 1: what benefit EM is if the FED, if the market 113 00:06:02,520 --> 00:06:06,800 Speaker 1: sees the FED peak UH and potentially starts pricing and easy, 114 00:06:07,279 --> 00:06:11,160 Speaker 1: that will start pushing flows back into emerging markets assets 115 00:06:11,160 --> 00:06:13,839 Speaker 1: that are in some ways pretty cheap and under invested. 116 00:06:13,880 --> 00:06:16,160 Speaker 1: So I'm a little bit more constructive on e M 117 00:06:16,279 --> 00:06:17,600 Speaker 1: next year. I know there's going to be a lot 118 00:06:17,600 --> 00:06:21,080 Speaker 1: of economic pain. I'm not particularly bullish on China next year, 119 00:06:21,279 --> 00:06:23,359 Speaker 1: but I do think we may see better prospects for 120 00:06:23,400 --> 00:06:26,760 Speaker 1: e M assets. We've just seen China leave the loan 121 00:06:26,839 --> 00:06:29,920 Speaker 1: prime rates unchanged, the one year at three sixty five 122 00:06:29,960 --> 00:06:33,159 Speaker 1: and the five year at four point three zero percent, 123 00:06:33,400 --> 00:06:37,880 Speaker 1: so no change there, no extra stimulus. Um your thoughts 124 00:06:37,880 --> 00:06:40,880 Speaker 1: on China here in the shorter term where they have 125 00:06:41,000 --> 00:06:45,919 Speaker 1: these issues tied to the reopening. I think China is 126 00:06:45,920 --> 00:06:47,680 Speaker 1: going to struggle in the near term. I think the 127 00:06:48,040 --> 00:06:53,719 Speaker 1: reopening process is still a little bit uncertain. It's still 128 00:06:54,080 --> 00:06:56,040 Speaker 1: got a lot of volatility in it. We can hear 129 00:06:56,040 --> 00:06:59,560 Speaker 1: anecdotal evidence of a ramp up in COVID cases even 130 00:06:59,600 --> 00:07:01,440 Speaker 1: if you've issue in numbers are not showing that to 131 00:07:01,520 --> 00:07:04,360 Speaker 1: some extent because they're not counting a symptomatic cases. The 132 00:07:04,720 --> 00:07:06,600 Speaker 1: data I think is going to be fairly weak in 133 00:07:06,640 --> 00:07:09,320 Speaker 1: the next one or two months. But medium term, I 134 00:07:09,360 --> 00:07:11,440 Speaker 1: think the opening up is a positive. I think as 135 00:07:11,480 --> 00:07:13,720 Speaker 1: we go into next year, it will help to push 136 00:07:13,720 --> 00:07:17,480 Speaker 1: them upside risk to Chinese activity, potentially getting us up 137 00:07:17,520 --> 00:07:20,320 Speaker 1: to sort of five percent or above growth. We're not 138 00:07:20,360 --> 00:07:22,680 Speaker 1: talking about seven eight percent we've seen in the past. 139 00:07:22,680 --> 00:07:24,680 Speaker 1: But I think you know, there is still a lot 140 00:07:24,720 --> 00:07:28,440 Speaker 1: of constraints on the economy. Trade is weakening, Exports aren't 141 00:07:28,440 --> 00:07:31,520 Speaker 1: going to pick up anytime soon. Uh, Consumers are still 142 00:07:31,600 --> 00:07:33,840 Speaker 1: very cautious of property sector still under a lot of 143 00:07:33,840 --> 00:07:36,240 Speaker 1: pressure despite recent measures. So it's going to be a 144 00:07:36,360 --> 00:07:39,280 Speaker 1: very slow grind to recovery for China's economy in the 145 00:07:39,360 --> 00:07:44,000 Speaker 1: next several months. Well. A lot of concerns possibly a 146 00:07:44,040 --> 00:07:48,240 Speaker 1: budding humanitarian disaster, and that the cases are starting to 147 00:07:48,320 --> 00:07:51,360 Speaker 1: run through a population that's not fully vaccinated. And then 148 00:07:51,360 --> 00:07:54,400 Speaker 1: also we had the US expressing concerns that we might 149 00:07:54,440 --> 00:07:59,040 Speaker 1: see some mutations that could extend the grip of this 150 00:07:59,200 --> 00:08:03,559 Speaker 1: virus on on human kind as it were. Anyway, Mittle, 151 00:08:03,560 --> 00:08:06,280 Speaker 1: thanks very much, Mittle, Katachia from Ted's Securities