WEBVTT - Bloomberg Markets Special Simulcast Day Three

0:00:01.800 --> 0:00:04.400
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week. I'm Carol Masser and I'm

0:00:04.440 --> 0:00:07.280
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stanebeck. We're here every day bringing

0:00:07.280 --> 0:00:09.799
<v Speaker 1>you the latest news from the world of business and finance,

0:00:09.840 --> 0:00:13.600
<v Speaker 1>plus technology, politics, economics, all furnessing the power of Business

0:00:13.640 --> 0:00:17.119
<v Speaker 1>Week reporters and editors, not to mention our journalists and

0:00:17.120 --> 0:00:19.600
<v Speaker 1>analyst in more than one and twenty countries. You can

0:00:19.640 --> 0:00:23.200
<v Speaker 1>download Bloomberg Business Week and iTunes, SoundCloud, or Bloomberg dot Com.

0:00:23.400 --> 0:00:25.120
<v Speaker 1>You can also listen to our radio show at two

0:00:25.160 --> 0:00:27.840
<v Speaker 1>pm Eastern Time on Bloomberg Radio or watch us on

0:00:27.880 --> 0:00:38.640
<v Speaker 1>YouTube search Bloomberg Global News. Just about two pm here

0:00:38.680 --> 0:00:41.640
<v Speaker 1>in New York. This is Bloomberg Market Special markets coverage

0:00:41.800 --> 0:00:45.200
<v Speaker 1>on this day and all week, as simulcast on Bloomberg Radio,

0:00:45.280 --> 0:00:48.239
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg TV, and on YouTube. We welcome all of our

0:00:48.240 --> 0:00:51.680
<v Speaker 1>audiences across all of our platforms. Here Romaine Bostick, alongside

0:00:51.800 --> 0:00:54.120
<v Speaker 1>Kritty Gupta and Tim Stanebek. We're gonna be walking you

0:00:54.160 --> 0:00:56.440
<v Speaker 1>through all the markets as we count you down to

0:00:56.480 --> 0:00:58.720
<v Speaker 1>the closing bell in just about two hours from now.

0:00:58.760 --> 0:01:01.639
<v Speaker 1>Looking at SMP five, find basically unchanged on the day.

0:01:01.680 --> 0:01:03.480
<v Speaker 1>It has been a good portion of the day, down

0:01:03.480 --> 0:01:05.800
<v Speaker 1>in the red, now starting to tick into the green

0:01:05.840 --> 0:01:08.280
<v Speaker 1>here forty seven ninety right now, up about a tenth

0:01:08.319 --> 0:01:10.600
<v Speaker 1>of a percent the Dow Jones industrial laverage. If you're

0:01:10.600 --> 0:01:12.640
<v Speaker 1>looking for a bright spot, that's where you're gonna find it.

0:01:12.680 --> 0:01:14.959
<v Speaker 1>Thirty six thousand and four ninety if you're counting, that

0:01:15.000 --> 0:01:16.720
<v Speaker 1>would be a record high. If it were to close

0:01:16.760 --> 0:01:18.840
<v Speaker 1>at that level, up about two tents of a percent.

0:01:19.000 --> 0:01:21.600
<v Speaker 1>You're to year yield drifting slightly lower here but still

0:01:21.640 --> 0:01:24.240
<v Speaker 1>camped out at around seventy five basis points. And as

0:01:24.240 --> 0:01:26.040
<v Speaker 1>far as some of the other risk assets out there,

0:01:26.240 --> 0:01:28.440
<v Speaker 1>including bitcoin, you can call it flat on the day

0:01:28.520 --> 0:01:31.640
<v Speaker 1>forty seven thousand, five forty six as measured by Bloomberg

0:01:31.680 --> 0:01:35.479
<v Speaker 1>pricing relatively unchanged here on the day Wednesday here, uh,

0:01:35.640 --> 0:01:38.680
<v Speaker 1>the third day of of the only three days left here,

0:01:38.680 --> 0:01:42.280
<v Speaker 1>I should say, in uh the year for trading. All right,

0:01:42.319 --> 0:01:44.520
<v Speaker 1>Let's go straight to our first guest, Timcreaty gonna be

0:01:44.560 --> 0:01:46.720
<v Speaker 1>joining us in just a second. Here. We want to

0:01:46.720 --> 0:01:48.640
<v Speaker 1>bring in our C Peck. He's joining us right now

0:01:49.000 --> 0:01:51.600
<v Speaker 1>from Fearless Wealth Core. P is the c I O

0:01:51.600 --> 0:01:54.520
<v Speaker 1>over there. R C. Great to have you here. Uh.

0:01:54.560 --> 0:01:57.640
<v Speaker 1>You know we've they've been saying all week long. I mean,

0:01:57.680 --> 0:01:59.560
<v Speaker 1>we of course look at the day to day moves,

0:01:59.600 --> 0:02:02.280
<v Speaker 1>but a week long, we've kind of looking back and

0:02:02.320 --> 0:02:05.240
<v Speaker 1>trying to extrapolate, you know, how investors should sort of

0:02:05.280 --> 0:02:10.040
<v Speaker 1>feel about coming off these just phenomenal gains, gains that

0:02:10.160 --> 0:02:12.720
<v Speaker 1>to some extent we're kind of unlikely. And I'm wondering

0:02:12.760 --> 0:02:17.320
<v Speaker 1>just how optimistic you are about the next year. I mean,

0:02:17.400 --> 0:02:20.400
<v Speaker 1>from a stock market point of view, I am very optimistic.

0:02:20.520 --> 0:02:23.520
<v Speaker 1>The market sees what the Fed is doing, It is

0:02:23.560 --> 0:02:27.440
<v Speaker 1>digesting it actually quite fast. Um. I love the Nasdaq

0:02:27.480 --> 0:02:30.239
<v Speaker 1>one hundred. It continues to do well. It's a little

0:02:30.320 --> 0:02:33.040
<v Speaker 1>under the SMP five hundred this year, but really I

0:02:33.040 --> 0:02:35.400
<v Speaker 1>think is gonna be a great year, and it's gonna

0:02:35.400 --> 0:02:37.400
<v Speaker 1>probably put off a lot of people because it will

0:02:37.440 --> 0:02:39.520
<v Speaker 1>be such a good year. So are so you think

0:02:39.520 --> 0:02:46.080
<v Speaker 1>the NASDAC outperform the SMP five hundred. I do absolutely

0:02:46.200 --> 0:02:49.079
<v Speaker 1>What what what will drive those gains? So one of

0:02:49.080 --> 0:02:51.280
<v Speaker 1>the things I looked at is what happens to the

0:02:51.440 --> 0:02:54.920
<v Speaker 1>SMP five and the NASTIC one hundred when the Fed

0:02:55.080 --> 0:02:59.480
<v Speaker 1>keeps their balance balance sheet flat or slightly down, and

0:02:59.560 --> 0:03:02.480
<v Speaker 1>the lear winner is actually the Nastic one D it

0:03:02.560 --> 0:03:05.880
<v Speaker 1>loves when the FED keeps its balance sheet flat. So

0:03:05.919 --> 0:03:07.760
<v Speaker 1>we can only go with what's happened. Of course I

0:03:07.760 --> 0:03:11.280
<v Speaker 1>could be wrong, UM, but I'm going with what what

0:03:11.400 --> 0:03:15.040
<v Speaker 1>index loves a flat balance sheet? R C. Let's talk

0:03:15.040 --> 0:03:16.920
<v Speaker 1>about what's in the index now, of course, is going

0:03:16.960 --> 0:03:18.720
<v Speaker 1>to be the majority of tech. I really want to

0:03:18.720 --> 0:03:21.359
<v Speaker 1>ask you, though, what kind of role is tech playing

0:03:21.360 --> 0:03:23.440
<v Speaker 1>in this? Is it a haven? Is it an inflation hedge?

0:03:23.560 --> 0:03:26.520
<v Speaker 1>Isn't your classic growth play or perhaps a value plays

0:03:26.560 --> 0:03:29.200
<v Speaker 1>kind of like keep peace of someone's portfolio. What role

0:03:29.240 --> 0:03:33.080
<v Speaker 1>does tech play? It's a fair question to ask because

0:03:33.880 --> 0:03:36.360
<v Speaker 1>of the Nasteck one hundred is quote unquote tech, right,

0:03:36.440 --> 0:03:39.720
<v Speaker 1>and the S and P is Tech. So tech is

0:03:39.760 --> 0:03:43.760
<v Speaker 1>eating the world right. The largest staples company is tech, Amazon,

0:03:43.800 --> 0:03:47.320
<v Speaker 1>the largest communication company is tech, and the second largest

0:03:47.320 --> 0:03:51.320
<v Speaker 1>communication company is tech, Google and Facebook. So I we

0:03:51.360 --> 0:03:54.680
<v Speaker 1>almost have to think of a new way or to

0:03:54.800 --> 0:03:57.480
<v Speaker 1>think about what tech is. It's it's eating the world

0:03:58.120 --> 0:03:59.880
<v Speaker 1>if you're in the United States. We're lucky in the

0:04:00.040 --> 0:04:03.480
<v Speaker 1>fact that most of these just major major companies are

0:04:03.560 --> 0:04:06.280
<v Speaker 1>in and based in the US. UM. And I think

0:04:06.280 --> 0:04:10.160
<v Speaker 1>it's going to continue happening because, especially with the pandemic.

0:04:10.200 --> 0:04:13.960
<v Speaker 1>It's accelerated the reach of technology companies. I can talk

0:04:14.000 --> 0:04:16.080
<v Speaker 1>a little bit here about I guess how you structure

0:04:16.200 --> 0:04:18.800
<v Speaker 1>or portfolio in this environment. We talk a lot, of

0:04:18.839 --> 0:04:20.320
<v Speaker 1>course about how I guess you could have just kind

0:04:20.320 --> 0:04:22.440
<v Speaker 1>of ridden the coattails of tech. But that's not gonna

0:04:22.480 --> 0:04:24.479
<v Speaker 1>work forever. In the old days, and some of us

0:04:24.520 --> 0:04:26.719
<v Speaker 1>are old enough to remember when you know you could actually,

0:04:26.720 --> 0:04:28.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, buy bonds and that would actually give you

0:04:28.960 --> 0:04:31.400
<v Speaker 1>some sort of return. That's not happening anymore, at least

0:04:31.480 --> 0:04:34.719
<v Speaker 1>not on a nominal basis, on a real basis. Excuse me,

0:04:34.839 --> 0:04:38.000
<v Speaker 1>I am curious as to whether, as folks sort of

0:04:38.040 --> 0:04:40.840
<v Speaker 1>look at their portfolio going forward, whether there's a strategy

0:04:40.880 --> 0:04:43.360
<v Speaker 1>they can take where they can sort of participate, I guess,

0:04:43.400 --> 0:04:45.400
<v Speaker 1>and whatever sort of run up we do get in

0:04:45.560 --> 0:04:48.200
<v Speaker 1>the riskier assets, but still find a way to sort

0:04:48.240 --> 0:04:53.599
<v Speaker 1>of protect themselves when that eventually falters. You know, there's

0:04:53.600 --> 0:04:56.080
<v Speaker 1>probably two ways you could go about that. Um One

0:04:56.120 --> 0:04:59.719
<v Speaker 1>would be there is one bond that's doing well in

0:04:59.720 --> 0:05:03.400
<v Speaker 1>place you protected treasuries, tips they're doing well. They're basically

0:05:03.480 --> 0:05:06.560
<v Speaker 1>the only type of bond that is doing well right now.

0:05:07.120 --> 0:05:11.160
<v Speaker 1>So if someone wanted a non equity, lower volatile asset.

0:05:12.000 --> 0:05:16.040
<v Speaker 1>Looking at the tips is a very fair simple investment

0:05:16.200 --> 0:05:20.200
<v Speaker 1>type of asset to add to the portfolio. The other is,

0:05:20.240 --> 0:05:22.520
<v Speaker 1>and I don't know how heretical this sounds to people,

0:05:23.040 --> 0:05:25.560
<v Speaker 1>but to own the index that is winning and has

0:05:25.560 --> 0:05:29.440
<v Speaker 1>been winning for one twenty years, which is the nasdeck

0:05:30.080 --> 0:05:35.160
<v Speaker 1>but or nastic one, but place some stop losses on it, right,

0:05:35.200 --> 0:05:37.240
<v Speaker 1>So maybe you cut out of a quarter of your

0:05:37.240 --> 0:05:41.960
<v Speaker 1>position if it closes down from peak high to low. Right,

0:05:41.960 --> 0:05:44.480
<v Speaker 1>So you could use it that way and you'd still

0:05:44.480 --> 0:05:46.599
<v Speaker 1>get the upside, but you could start to lower the

0:05:46.640 --> 0:05:49.320
<v Speaker 1>volatility and the downside by having some kind of circuit

0:05:49.360 --> 0:05:52.960
<v Speaker 1>breakers there. When it comes to equities, I know one

0:05:53.000 --> 0:05:56.280
<v Speaker 1>company that you're bullish on is PayPal, despite the fact

0:05:56.320 --> 0:06:00.240
<v Speaker 1>that it's down from its peak just a few months

0:06:00.240 --> 0:06:02.600
<v Speaker 1>ago over the summer. What makes you so bullish on

0:06:02.640 --> 0:06:06.680
<v Speaker 1>the company. I don't think it's going anywhere. It's you know,

0:06:06.720 --> 0:06:10.479
<v Speaker 1>over two billion um. Clearly it had had a double top.

0:06:10.480 --> 0:06:12.400
<v Speaker 1>If you look at a price chart it you know

0:06:12.480 --> 0:06:15.320
<v Speaker 1>it's it's in a correction phase, ites down intra a

0:06:15.440 --> 0:06:19.960
<v Speaker 1>day from the top to the bottom. It is adopting

0:06:20.000 --> 0:06:23.159
<v Speaker 1>crypto it is moving in that direction. It has Venmo,

0:06:23.200 --> 0:06:26.280
<v Speaker 1>which is moving faster in that direction. It is absolutely

0:06:26.320 --> 0:06:32.159
<v Speaker 1>taking a hit along with other growth slash crypto leaning equities.

0:06:32.839 --> 0:06:34.960
<v Speaker 1>And I don't think it's a close your eyes and buy,

0:06:35.160 --> 0:06:37.840
<v Speaker 1>but I think if it breaks and stays above two,

0:06:38.920 --> 0:06:42.080
<v Speaker 1>putting three of your money in it is a very

0:06:42.240 --> 0:06:47.520
<v Speaker 1>good upside, you know, managed downside individual stock our c

0:06:47.720 --> 0:06:49.880
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk a little bit about what's going on outside

0:06:49.880 --> 0:06:51.400
<v Speaker 1>of the stock market, and that of course brings me

0:06:51.440 --> 0:06:53.880
<v Speaker 1>to commodities. You mentioned cryptocurrencies for a second, but I

0:06:53.880 --> 0:06:55.839
<v Speaker 1>want to go to another currency we're looking at, which

0:06:55.839 --> 0:06:57.960
<v Speaker 1>is gold. I guess it's a commodity currency, whatever you

0:06:57.960 --> 0:07:01.279
<v Speaker 1>wanna call it. Gold really needs to kind of respond

0:07:01.360 --> 0:07:03.440
<v Speaker 1>to what's going on on the inflation front, on the

0:07:03.440 --> 0:07:07.120
<v Speaker 1>fed front. Why is it not doing anything? Yeah, I

0:07:07.120 --> 0:07:12.200
<v Speaker 1>completely agree. For sixteen months it's been trending down. Um,

0:07:12.240 --> 0:07:15.080
<v Speaker 1>there's a couple of reasons. One maybe if you're over sixty,

0:07:15.200 --> 0:07:19.080
<v Speaker 1>you still believe that gold is the hedge for inflation,

0:07:19.200 --> 0:07:22.720
<v Speaker 1>for money printing, for balance sheet changes. But if you're

0:07:22.880 --> 0:07:26.640
<v Speaker 1>under fifty, you're not looking at gold the same way anymore.

0:07:26.760 --> 0:07:29.800
<v Speaker 1>So I think gold has lost a lot of its buyers,

0:07:29.920 --> 0:07:32.760
<v Speaker 1>and has those buyers have moved to other assets. I

0:07:32.760 --> 0:07:34.480
<v Speaker 1>think that's one of the biggest things. Now, Look, if

0:07:34.480 --> 0:07:37.280
<v Speaker 1>it starts moving up, let's buy it. But if there

0:07:37.360 --> 0:07:40.400
<v Speaker 1>was ever an environment for gold to move higher, it

0:07:40.440 --> 0:07:43.360
<v Speaker 1>would have been the last sixteen months, and it hasn't. Yeah,

0:07:43.440 --> 0:07:46.680
<v Speaker 1>and now you're staring down a potentially uh some degree

0:07:46.680 --> 0:07:48.880
<v Speaker 1>of great normalization that could take some of the bloom

0:07:48.920 --> 0:07:50.880
<v Speaker 1>off of that rose further. Here, a lot of those

0:07:50.880 --> 0:07:53.200
<v Speaker 1>folks who would normally turn to gold in this environment

0:07:53.640 --> 0:07:56.000
<v Speaker 1>r C i'll have turned to cryptocurrencies here. What do

0:07:56.040 --> 0:07:57.560
<v Speaker 1>you say to folks who come to you and say

0:07:57.920 --> 0:08:01.880
<v Speaker 1>how much should I allocate? Well, I find just find

0:08:01.920 --> 0:08:04.480
<v Speaker 1>out volatility that can handle in a maybe a five

0:08:04.600 --> 0:08:07.360
<v Speaker 1>or ten percent of their portfolios. So let's just take

0:08:07.360 --> 0:08:09.880
<v Speaker 1>ten on the big end. Someone has a million dollars

0:08:09.920 --> 0:08:12.600
<v Speaker 1>and we put ten percent into crypto. First of all,

0:08:12.600 --> 0:08:14.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm probably gonna put in one of the big five cryptos,

0:08:15.000 --> 0:08:17.320
<v Speaker 1>and I'm going to say to them, expect this to

0:08:17.440 --> 0:08:19.680
<v Speaker 1>either be cut in half and then you have to,

0:08:19.960 --> 0:08:21.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, bring it back up to ten percent, or

0:08:22.000 --> 0:08:25.480
<v Speaker 1>don't be surprised if it doubles or triples and then

0:08:25.520 --> 0:08:28.200
<v Speaker 1>after a year we rebalance it back down. So to

0:08:28.200 --> 0:08:31.680
<v Speaker 1>answer your question, I think an annual rebouncing is going

0:08:31.720 --> 0:08:34.880
<v Speaker 1>to allow that you know, that bug called volatility to

0:08:34.920 --> 0:08:37.120
<v Speaker 1>be turned into a feature, and then I think it

0:08:37.160 --> 0:08:39.559
<v Speaker 1>can be something that's not only survivable, but can I

0:08:39.600 --> 0:08:42.880
<v Speaker 1>actually help your portfolio. R C. Peck, big thank you

0:08:42.920 --> 0:08:46.000
<v Speaker 1>to you for joining us, the CEO of Fearless Wealth,

0:08:46.200 --> 0:08:48.679
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much for taking the time. What is Tim

0:08:48.720 --> 0:08:52.199
<v Speaker 1>Stead of Creedy, Gupta and Romaine. You own gold, Tim

0:08:52.200 --> 0:09:03.120
<v Speaker 1>you're under This is Bloomberg Market's a special coverage edition

0:09:03.200 --> 0:09:05.839
<v Speaker 1>here all week long, of course, Uh, welcome in and

0:09:05.880 --> 0:09:08.520
<v Speaker 1>all of our audiences across all of our platforms Bloomberg TV,

0:09:08.679 --> 0:09:11.760
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio, YouTube, Romain Boston Creaty Group to Temps Stanegg.

0:09:11.840 --> 0:09:14.040
<v Speaker 1>Keep an eye right now on the commodities market settlement

0:09:14.080 --> 0:09:16.760
<v Speaker 1>of NIMEX screwed features coming in right now above seventy

0:09:16.840 --> 0:09:18.640
<v Speaker 1>six dollars a barrel. We should point out we did

0:09:18.679 --> 0:09:20.360
<v Speaker 1>get that e I A data a little bit earlier

0:09:20.360 --> 0:09:22.360
<v Speaker 1>today at three and a half million barrel drop in

0:09:22.360 --> 0:09:25.480
<v Speaker 1>the most recent week in US inventories. That's providing a

0:09:25.480 --> 0:09:27.600
<v Speaker 1>little bit of a boost here. Unfortunately, you're also seeing

0:09:27.600 --> 0:09:29.520
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of a boost and gasoline futures if

0:09:29.559 --> 0:09:31.720
<v Speaker 1>you're paying at the pump there. Keeping an eye here

0:09:32.040 --> 0:09:33.880
<v Speaker 1>on cotton as well, we're actually seeing a lot of

0:09:34.240 --> 0:09:36.440
<v Speaker 1>pressures not only on the supply side, but on the

0:09:36.440 --> 0:09:39.080
<v Speaker 1>demand side as well. That continues to underpin what's shaping

0:09:39.160 --> 0:09:42.120
<v Speaker 1>up to be on a phenomenal year for copper futures.

0:09:42.440 --> 0:09:44.480
<v Speaker 1>If you're an investor, if you're an a buyer, that's

0:09:44.480 --> 0:09:47.040
<v Speaker 1>not necessarily working out right now, And I want to

0:09:47.040 --> 0:09:49.400
<v Speaker 1>bring your attention for our viewers here to the third

0:09:49.400 --> 0:09:51.800
<v Speaker 1>line of your screen on coffee futures right now, US

0:09:51.880 --> 0:09:54.080
<v Speaker 1>camped out right around to twenty eight year, up about

0:09:54.200 --> 0:09:56.840
<v Speaker 1>one and a half percent here on the day. Based

0:09:56.880 --> 0:09:58.640
<v Speaker 1>on the games that we have today, we're now up

0:09:58.640 --> 0:10:02.800
<v Speaker 1>something like seventy percent, so that surpasses that seventy run

0:10:02.840 --> 0:10:04.640
<v Speaker 1>we had in two thousand and ten, and that's now

0:10:04.679 --> 0:10:07.240
<v Speaker 1>setting us up for what could be the biggest annual

0:10:07.280 --> 0:10:09.000
<v Speaker 1>game that we've seen on a rabbit of beans, at

0:10:09.040 --> 0:10:12.680
<v Speaker 1>least in the futures market. Going back to a new

0:10:12.760 --> 0:10:15.320
<v Speaker 1>data out new reporting out right now by e comp

0:10:15.360 --> 0:10:18.679
<v Speaker 1>Trading saying that world production may actually slide in two

0:10:18.720 --> 0:10:21.440
<v Speaker 1>which of course could underpin prices further. Guys, So basically

0:10:21.480 --> 0:10:24.240
<v Speaker 1>everything in the commodity space higher here. If you're buying oil,

0:10:24.280 --> 0:10:27.120
<v Speaker 1>you're buying gas, you're buying coffee, you're buying cotton. Eggs

0:10:27.160 --> 0:10:29.800
<v Speaker 1>even gone up, Tim, I'm told hopefully wine doesn't go

0:10:29.880 --> 0:10:31.440
<v Speaker 1>up as well. Yeah, that's the question. I mean, you're

0:10:31.440 --> 0:10:33.720
<v Speaker 1>talking about coffee, but I'm thinking about wine. Because joining

0:10:33.760 --> 0:10:36.920
<v Speaker 1>us right now is Alex Ryan Duckhorn Portfolio, President, CEO

0:10:37.040 --> 0:10:40.959
<v Speaker 1>and chairman. Duck Horn Portfolio produces luxury wine and spirits.

0:10:40.960 --> 0:10:45.960
<v Speaker 1>It includes Decoy, Postmark, Klera, Canvas Back and more wine brands. Alex,

0:10:45.960 --> 0:10:49.040
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much for joining us. You went public earlier

0:10:49.080 --> 0:10:52.200
<v Speaker 1>this year. Shares are up more than fift since going public,

0:10:52.200 --> 0:10:55.200
<v Speaker 1>though slightly off of a June peak. Give us an

0:10:55.240 --> 0:10:57.679
<v Speaker 1>update on on how holiday sales were. Were they strong?

0:10:58.400 --> 0:11:01.040
<v Speaker 1>All day sales are really strong. Thank you. UM. We've

0:11:01.040 --> 0:11:03.920
<v Speaker 1>been working to get the UH supply chain set up.

0:11:03.960 --> 0:11:06.640
<v Speaker 1>We were our partners were prepared for all of our

0:11:06.760 --> 0:11:08.880
<v Speaker 1>some new innovations and our in our in our standard

0:11:08.960 --> 0:11:12.959
<v Speaker 1>traditional mix and people love luxury wine UM for a

0:11:13.040 --> 0:11:15.440
<v Speaker 1>lot of reasons. It's very traditional. Pulling out of the

0:11:15.440 --> 0:11:20.679
<v Speaker 1>pandemic celebrating a challenging year. UH sales were excellent during

0:11:20.679 --> 0:11:22.920
<v Speaker 1>the holidays. We expect that to continue into the new year.

0:11:23.760 --> 0:11:26.160
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk about supply chain issues for a second one.

0:11:26.320 --> 0:11:28.720
<v Speaker 1>Have you had any into how might you be dealing

0:11:28.720 --> 0:11:32.320
<v Speaker 1>with them? We really haven't seen a significant impact. I

0:11:32.360 --> 0:11:34.240
<v Speaker 1>know it's a it's a it's a very hot topic

0:11:34.360 --> 0:11:37.760
<v Speaker 1>right now. On the incoming supply we're able to get wonderful,

0:11:37.800 --> 0:11:40.600
<v Speaker 1>wonderful grapes from throughout California and the state of Washington

0:11:40.640 --> 0:11:44.360
<v Speaker 1>where we're centered in those two wine growing regions, and

0:11:44.400 --> 0:11:46.000
<v Speaker 1>we've been able to get the grapes we need, so

0:11:46.080 --> 0:11:48.880
<v Speaker 1>kind of the incoming supply chain has has been managed

0:11:49.000 --> 0:11:50.480
<v Speaker 1>very very well, and I'm confident that we're going to

0:11:50.600 --> 0:11:53.760
<v Speaker 1>continue to have enough luxury wine to sell into the future.

0:11:54.200 --> 0:11:56.480
<v Speaker 1>On the on the distribution side, you know, with a

0:11:56.640 --> 0:12:01.200
<v Speaker 1>very diversified distribution platform with some really really good partners,

0:12:01.440 --> 0:12:03.960
<v Speaker 1>and that diversification has allowed us to make sure that

0:12:04.040 --> 0:12:06.800
<v Speaker 1>all the wines people want hit the market when they

0:12:06.840 --> 0:12:10.440
<v Speaker 1>want them, especially around this critical fault period. So very

0:12:10.520 --> 0:12:13.000
<v Speaker 1>few disruptions on our side, and it's really due to

0:12:13.040 --> 0:12:15.240
<v Speaker 1>the diligent work of a of a wonderful staff. I

0:12:15.280 --> 0:12:17.800
<v Speaker 1>have Alex talk a little bit about the quality of

0:12:17.840 --> 0:12:19.120
<v Speaker 1>some of the grapes that you're getting. There was a

0:12:19.160 --> 0:12:22.319
<v Speaker 1>lot of concern, particularly in nineteen last year and to

0:12:22.360 --> 0:12:25.160
<v Speaker 1>a certain extent this year about some of the wildfires

0:12:25.160 --> 0:12:27.079
<v Speaker 1>and some of the smoke and how that may or

0:12:27.120 --> 0:12:29.600
<v Speaker 1>may not have affected some of the crops at least

0:12:29.600 --> 0:12:32.360
<v Speaker 1>coming out of some of the Napa California regions. Here.

0:12:32.920 --> 0:12:35.600
<v Speaker 1>With the latest harvest that we've gotten, the latest vintages here,

0:12:35.920 --> 0:12:38.560
<v Speaker 1>how much assurance is do you have right now that

0:12:38.600 --> 0:12:40.520
<v Speaker 1>what you got? I guess, uh, for lack of a

0:12:40.520 --> 0:12:44.040
<v Speaker 1>better phrase, taste good. Because we're really good at what

0:12:44.080 --> 0:12:47.040
<v Speaker 1>we do. For forty years, we make luxury wine. And

0:12:47.320 --> 0:12:51.920
<v Speaker 1>the recent harvest, the harvest was not fire affected, uh,

0:12:51.920 --> 0:12:55.959
<v Speaker 1>and we had a really great growing season. Um uh.

0:12:56.040 --> 0:12:59.240
<v Speaker 1>So we're very fortunate that respect again the diversifications the

0:12:59.320 --> 0:13:02.520
<v Speaker 1>name of the store for what we do to preserve

0:13:02.720 --> 0:13:06.200
<v Speaker 1>the customer's best interest. So through that diversification, we're able

0:13:06.200 --> 0:13:08.480
<v Speaker 1>to get the great quality and the great styles that

0:13:08.520 --> 0:13:11.120
<v Speaker 1>we that we need to continue to make great wine.

0:13:11.200 --> 0:13:13.840
<v Speaker 1>And so I can assure you as you asked, that

0:13:13.920 --> 0:13:16.360
<v Speaker 1>they vantage is going to hit the mark and then

0:13:16.440 --> 0:13:19.240
<v Speaker 1>some for this year. Alex, I know that you said

0:13:19.280 --> 0:13:21.880
<v Speaker 1>that you've been able to navigate supply chain challenges pretty well.

0:13:21.920 --> 0:13:24.320
<v Speaker 1>But look, you're gonna have to pay more for shipping

0:13:24.360 --> 0:13:28.400
<v Speaker 1>if gasoline prices continue to go higher. Uh, wages, we

0:13:28.440 --> 0:13:31.560
<v Speaker 1>all know what's happening with it with wages. Price increases

0:13:31.600 --> 0:13:35.000
<v Speaker 1>for are you gonna have to make them? Uh? No,

0:13:35.080 --> 0:13:37.480
<v Speaker 1>We're not gonna force to make them. We're a luxury product,

0:13:37.520 --> 0:13:41.360
<v Speaker 1>as you know, a luxury premium price wine products, so

0:13:41.559 --> 0:13:46.439
<v Speaker 1>um um. Traditional and planned price increases are kind of

0:13:46.480 --> 0:13:49.360
<v Speaker 1>built into our long term plan and we're thinking the

0:13:49.400 --> 0:13:51.280
<v Speaker 1>long term. That's kind of what the wine business about.

0:13:51.640 --> 0:13:55.319
<v Speaker 1>So we will have and execute scheduled price increases accordingly.

0:13:55.559 --> 0:13:57.640
<v Speaker 1>But I don't think you're gonna find up being reactionary

0:13:57.679 --> 0:13:59.520
<v Speaker 1>to the market. That's just not fair to the consumer,

0:13:59.800 --> 0:14:02.000
<v Speaker 1>and so we'll be very measured to how we approach that.

0:14:02.280 --> 0:14:04.520
<v Speaker 1>But we do have pricing increases that you would expect

0:14:04.679 --> 0:14:07.080
<v Speaker 1>over the next several years built in the long term plan.

0:14:07.160 --> 0:14:09.360
<v Speaker 1>But again, we're not gonna We're not gonna do anything

0:14:09.640 --> 0:14:12.560
<v Speaker 1>rash or or or a reactionary Alex. At the end

0:14:12.559 --> 0:14:15.560
<v Speaker 1>of the day, wine is a luxury product has been

0:14:15.559 --> 0:14:19.120
<v Speaker 1>a fantastic year when it comes to just luxury sales broadly,

0:14:19.120 --> 0:14:22.240
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to wine or clothing or other luxury goods.

0:14:22.280 --> 0:14:24.120
<v Speaker 1>I wonder, though, how much of that is going to

0:14:24.160 --> 0:14:27.800
<v Speaker 1>continue into two. Do you see that's the momentum really

0:14:27.800 --> 0:14:32.080
<v Speaker 1>sustaining into the new year? I do. That's the best

0:14:32.160 --> 0:14:35.080
<v Speaker 1>question of the day. I do you know, Um, we've

0:14:35.080 --> 0:14:37.960
<v Speaker 1>been taking share now for the last several years and

0:14:38.080 --> 0:14:40.720
<v Speaker 1>starting to pay back wonderful dividends. People are getting exciting

0:14:40.760 --> 0:14:44.400
<v Speaker 1>about our brand or divertified brand and portfolio. I think

0:14:44.480 --> 0:14:48.880
<v Speaker 1>wine is a wine's a celebratory lifestyle, if you will,

0:14:48.920 --> 0:14:51.240
<v Speaker 1>and I think people not only want that, but need that,

0:14:51.320 --> 0:14:54.560
<v Speaker 1>and historically that's proven true. So I think that the

0:14:54.680 --> 0:14:58.760
<v Speaker 1>interest in wine, especially domestic California of West Coast United

0:14:58.760 --> 0:15:01.080
<v Speaker 1>States wine is going to continue. UM. I think the

0:15:01.120 --> 0:15:04.040
<v Speaker 1>shares we've taken uh in in in market games over

0:15:04.040 --> 0:15:06.400
<v Speaker 1>the last several years are starting to pay off. And

0:15:06.440 --> 0:15:09.360
<v Speaker 1>I think people want to celebrate with friends and family

0:15:09.680 --> 0:15:11.920
<v Speaker 1>and they want wine to be part of that process.

0:15:11.960 --> 0:15:14.640
<v Speaker 1>So we're encouraged and we think that that that trend

0:15:14.720 --> 0:15:16.760
<v Speaker 1>is going to continue into the new year and beyond.

0:15:17.760 --> 0:15:20.080
<v Speaker 1>All right, great stuff, Alex, I really appreciate and you

0:15:20.200 --> 0:15:22.240
<v Speaker 1>catch up with us. Alex Ryan there, of course, the

0:15:22.280 --> 0:15:31.320
<v Speaker 1>CEO and chairman of the dark Horn portfolio. This is

0:15:31.320 --> 0:15:34.840
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Market Special coverage all week long, a global simulcast

0:15:34.880 --> 0:15:37.880
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg TV, radio and YouTube. We welcome all of our

0:15:37.920 --> 0:15:41.240
<v Speaker 1>audiences across all of our platforms here, Romaine Bosti, Crety

0:15:41.240 --> 0:15:43.880
<v Speaker 1>Grouped Attempt Stentovic here, keep an eye on the markets.

0:15:43.960 --> 0:15:46.560
<v Speaker 1>Basically a sideways day here for the SMB five hundred,

0:15:46.720 --> 0:15:48.720
<v Speaker 1>the Dow actually trading at a record high. As far

0:15:48.720 --> 0:15:51.200
<v Speaker 1>as some of the individual movers. You're seeing Apple slightly

0:15:51.280 --> 0:15:53.480
<v Speaker 1>higher here on the day, but not really getting a

0:15:53.480 --> 0:15:56.080
<v Speaker 1>whole lot of juice here. Tesla shares also moving higher

0:15:56.160 --> 0:15:58.120
<v Speaker 1>by about four tenths of represent one of the big

0:15:58.160 --> 0:16:00.680
<v Speaker 1>decliners today is actually Too Simple. That's company of course

0:16:00.800 --> 0:16:04.520
<v Speaker 1>that makes these uh sort of technology for self driving trucks.

0:16:04.600 --> 0:16:06.440
<v Speaker 1>Here the shares have been higher on the day, but

0:16:06.440 --> 0:16:09.680
<v Speaker 1>they've actually flipped here in ABC slightly up marisource Burg

0:16:09.720 --> 0:16:11.880
<v Speaker 1>and I should point out slightly higher here up about

0:16:12.000 --> 0:16:14.400
<v Speaker 1>six tents of a percent and pretty You know, when

0:16:14.440 --> 0:16:16.040
<v Speaker 1>you look at this market and you talk about how

0:16:16.080 --> 0:16:18.600
<v Speaker 1>phenomenal of a trading year that we've had here, and

0:16:18.600 --> 0:16:20.640
<v Speaker 1>then you look at out of the tamp down in

0:16:20.640 --> 0:16:22.360
<v Speaker 1>this final week of the year. Is there anything that

0:16:22.400 --> 0:16:25.200
<v Speaker 1>we can read into that as we move into well,

0:16:25.200 --> 0:16:27.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's interesting that the investor base really kind

0:16:27.320 --> 0:16:29.600
<v Speaker 1>of took the Santa rally for granted that no worries

0:16:29.720 --> 0:16:31.960
<v Speaker 1>will just kind of be in cruise control for this

0:16:32.040 --> 0:16:34.040
<v Speaker 1>last week of the year, and yet you are seeing

0:16:34.120 --> 0:16:36.520
<v Speaker 1>hurdles that record high on Monday, but romains since then,

0:16:36.680 --> 0:16:39.600
<v Speaker 1>Marcuts have been under pressure. Yeah, they certainly have um,

0:16:39.640 --> 0:16:42.160
<v Speaker 1>but you know, under pressure and kind of relatively small moves,

0:16:42.240 --> 0:16:43.800
<v Speaker 1>especially compared to what we've seen for much of the

0:16:43.880 --> 0:16:46.640
<v Speaker 1>year and then what we've seen on Monday and last week.

0:16:46.640 --> 0:16:48.200
<v Speaker 1>But if you open up the hood of the SMP

0:16:48.320 --> 0:16:52.000
<v Speaker 1>five on either side, you do have some stocks making

0:16:52.040 --> 0:16:54.880
<v Speaker 1>big moves. I mean Home Depot, you have Procter and Gamble,

0:16:54.960 --> 0:16:57.760
<v Speaker 1>you have Micron all to the plus side, and then

0:16:58.080 --> 0:17:00.880
<v Speaker 1>laggards include Amazon and Video Facebook, so tech really weighing

0:17:00.920 --> 0:17:03.240
<v Speaker 1>down those gains that were pop Quiz him, what's the

0:17:03.240 --> 0:17:06.200
<v Speaker 1>best performing SNP stock this month. I'm gonna stay Home

0:17:06.200 --> 0:17:10.840
<v Speaker 1>Depot group just because of that, just because of the acquisition.

0:17:10.840 --> 0:17:12.600
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's see, I'm gonna give Abigail do a

0:17:12.560 --> 0:17:14.800
<v Speaker 1>little all right, she's standing by all right now with

0:17:14.880 --> 0:17:16.959
<v Speaker 1>the up broader. Look at what's going on in the market, Abigail,

0:17:17.000 --> 0:17:19.280
<v Speaker 1>what are you watching? Well, Roman, I'm watching that sideways

0:17:19.320 --> 0:17:22.200
<v Speaker 1>action that you were talking about. Investors basically treading water

0:17:22.280 --> 0:17:24.800
<v Speaker 1>in this final week of trading, and of course volume

0:17:24.880 --> 0:17:27.720
<v Speaker 1>super light fort below the twenty day moving average to

0:17:27.760 --> 0:17:29.840
<v Speaker 1>a lot of folks not at their desks, whether in

0:17:29.840 --> 0:17:32.680
<v Speaker 1>the office or at home, and the NAZAC over the

0:17:32.760 --> 0:17:35.000
<v Speaker 1>last two days is underperforming just a little bit. A

0:17:35.000 --> 0:17:36.439
<v Speaker 1>lot of those big names that you guys were just

0:17:36.480 --> 0:17:40.840
<v Speaker 1>talking about, Amazon, Google Meta are lower. However, the reason

0:17:40.920 --> 0:17:42.119
<v Speaker 1>that we seem to be having a little bit of

0:17:42.119 --> 0:17:45.240
<v Speaker 1>a pop here Biogen up about ten percent. Of course,

0:17:45.359 --> 0:17:49.359
<v Speaker 1>on that Korean report that UH Samsung could possibly be

0:17:49.400 --> 0:17:51.200
<v Speaker 1>doing a takeover. Sort of interesting because that would be

0:17:51.240 --> 0:17:54.160
<v Speaker 1>a completely new vertical but definitely giving life to the NAZAC,

0:17:54.280 --> 0:17:57.040
<v Speaker 1>which has been mainly lower all day and right now

0:17:57.119 --> 0:17:59.920
<v Speaker 1>flipping between small gains and losses, but at least there's

0:17:59.920 --> 0:18:02.720
<v Speaker 1>a gain there, and the SMP five hundred being helped

0:18:02.760 --> 0:18:06.560
<v Speaker 1>to a seventieth record close, potentially, Fabio, what is holding

0:18:06.640 --> 0:18:08.720
<v Speaker 1>the market back? We saw that record high on Monday.

0:18:08.720 --> 0:18:10.880
<v Speaker 1>Why are we not just hitting record highs every day

0:18:10.880 --> 0:18:13.439
<v Speaker 1>since then? You know? Creaty. I think that when you

0:18:13.480 --> 0:18:15.800
<v Speaker 1>have a year where the SMP five dred is up

0:18:15.800 --> 0:18:18.920
<v Speaker 1>almost twenty already year to date, up for a third

0:18:19.480 --> 0:18:22.240
<v Speaker 1>year in a row, the third the seventh double digit

0:18:22.359 --> 0:18:25.360
<v Speaker 1>year UH in the last ten years. The fact that

0:18:25.400 --> 0:18:28.320
<v Speaker 1>you have a small pullback from that record high and Monday,

0:18:28.359 --> 0:18:30.600
<v Speaker 1>it's not really too too big of a deal. Again,

0:18:30.680 --> 0:18:33.120
<v Speaker 1>not a lot of folks at their desks right now.

0:18:33.440 --> 0:18:35.919
<v Speaker 1>And Tech, even though it's a little bit weak today,

0:18:35.960 --> 0:18:39.480
<v Speaker 1>it's been a real UH standout up thirty on the year,

0:18:39.480 --> 0:18:42.520
<v Speaker 1>and one reason the earnings growth for this fourth quarter

0:18:42.600 --> 0:18:45.560
<v Speaker 1>expected to be very strong, around twenty seven percent. So

0:18:45.600 --> 0:18:48.040
<v Speaker 1>I think that there aren't any problems that investors are

0:18:48.040 --> 0:18:49.680
<v Speaker 1>looking at right now. It's just a lot of the

0:18:49.720 --> 0:18:51.960
<v Speaker 1>fact that a lot of people may not even actually

0:18:51.960 --> 0:18:54.640
<v Speaker 1>be in their seats. Oh don't say that, Abigail, Abigail,

0:18:54.720 --> 0:18:56.600
<v Speaker 1>do a little there before she's in her seats. Meet

0:18:56.600 --> 0:18:59.840
<v Speaker 1>Tim and Cretty. We're here. We're not going anywhere on

0:18:59.880 --> 0:19:02.720
<v Speaker 1>the SMP five hundred. Jo's industrial lavage at thirty six

0:19:02.960 --> 0:19:05.040
<v Speaker 1>five eleven. That is a record high if it holds

0:19:05.040 --> 0:19:07.560
<v Speaker 1>into the clothes joining us right now, Paul Christopher, head

0:19:07.560 --> 0:19:11.400
<v Speaker 1>of Global market Strategy for Wells Fargo Investment Institute. Paul,

0:19:11.680 --> 0:19:14.200
<v Speaker 1>let's look ahead to two. We've done all these surveys

0:19:14.200 --> 0:19:17.280
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg and other banks have done surveys basically saying

0:19:17.320 --> 0:19:21.520
<v Speaker 1>the biggest risk right now is a FED policy error

0:19:21.640 --> 0:19:25.160
<v Speaker 1>of some sort. Here. Does that worry you? It does

0:19:25.600 --> 0:19:28.520
<v Speaker 1>the market, and and the FED actually themselves in their

0:19:28.560 --> 0:19:31.960
<v Speaker 1>survey looking at three or four rate hikes, we think

0:19:32.000 --> 0:19:35.439
<v Speaker 1>that's unlikely. We're expecting one or two, as we do

0:19:35.600 --> 0:19:39.199
<v Speaker 1>think that inflation will moderate as the year progresses, and

0:19:39.240 --> 0:19:41.280
<v Speaker 1>that will let the FED off the hook for those

0:19:41.280 --> 0:19:44.439
<v Speaker 1>other one or two great hikes. But a policy mistake

0:19:44.520 --> 0:19:49.480
<v Speaker 1>can never be eliminated as a potential market mover, market disruptor.

0:19:49.480 --> 0:19:51.840
<v Speaker 1>And we're also worried about COVID and how that will

0:19:51.920 --> 0:19:55.080
<v Speaker 1>upset the change or the trend I should say in

0:19:55.080 --> 0:19:57.400
<v Speaker 1>in the economic growth and spending for the first half

0:19:57.400 --> 0:19:59.320
<v Speaker 1>of the year. Okay, well, let's start with inflation here.

0:19:59.359 --> 0:20:03.160
<v Speaker 1>And when you say in flation will moderate in give

0:20:03.240 --> 0:20:06.080
<v Speaker 1>us some numbers. What are you thinking, when will inflation

0:20:06.119 --> 0:20:07.960
<v Speaker 1>peak and how much will it moderate? Are you talking

0:20:08.000 --> 0:20:12.680
<v Speaker 1>sub two percent? Perhaps, Yeah, it's a good question. So

0:20:12.840 --> 0:20:16.919
<v Speaker 1>with with the omicron variant now starting to dominate and

0:20:17.040 --> 0:20:21.640
<v Speaker 1>China still locked into an approach to to to COVID

0:20:21.920 --> 0:20:25.080
<v Speaker 1>that says lock everything down, Our concern is that you'll

0:20:25.119 --> 0:20:28.960
<v Speaker 1>see more restraints on the supply side. That will mean

0:20:29.160 --> 0:20:32.840
<v Speaker 1>will have more an imbalance between supply and demand that

0:20:32.960 --> 0:20:36.600
<v Speaker 1>could fuel some further inflation pressures. We think you could

0:20:36.600 --> 0:20:39.520
<v Speaker 1>see a seven handle on CPI inflation in the next

0:20:39.560 --> 0:20:42.400
<v Speaker 1>couple of months. But after that, you know, there's already

0:20:42.440 --> 0:20:45.560
<v Speaker 1>evidence from the p m I s that you're starting

0:20:45.600 --> 0:20:49.040
<v Speaker 1>to see inventories build and order growth is starting to

0:20:49.080 --> 0:20:52.560
<v Speaker 1>slack off a little bit, maybe some companies stopping their

0:20:52.600 --> 0:20:57.560
<v Speaker 1>tendency to over order. And as those trends continue, you

0:20:57.600 --> 0:21:00.639
<v Speaker 1>will see inventories build, you will see supply catch up

0:21:00.640 --> 0:21:02.600
<v Speaker 1>with demand. You could even see a little bit of

0:21:02.600 --> 0:21:06.800
<v Speaker 1>excess inventory by year end that could be disinflationary. So

0:21:07.080 --> 0:21:10.040
<v Speaker 1>maybe something seven plus in the first quarter of the

0:21:10.119 --> 0:21:12.919
<v Speaker 1>year heading down to something in the mid fives, maybe

0:21:12.920 --> 0:21:15.680
<v Speaker 1>five three by the end of the year. And clearly

0:21:15.720 --> 0:21:19.240
<v Speaker 1>with a downtrend. We think inflation heads below five into

0:21:20.160 --> 0:21:23.560
<v Speaker 1>investors will take note of that, Paul. A classic post

0:21:23.560 --> 0:21:26.080
<v Speaker 1>recessionary play is going to be those that small cap trade.

0:21:26.119 --> 0:21:29.880
<v Speaker 1>Essentially this idea that the economy is recovering from a recession.

0:21:29.920 --> 0:21:32.639
<v Speaker 1>Therefore that's going to trickle into the smallest companies. But

0:21:32.720 --> 0:21:35.000
<v Speaker 1>that hasn't really been the outperformer this year. It's actually

0:21:35.040 --> 0:21:37.199
<v Speaker 1>been large caps. It's been mid caps. How much of

0:21:37.240 --> 0:21:41.520
<v Speaker 1>that trade continues into and we don't think that trade continues.

0:21:41.600 --> 0:21:43.960
<v Speaker 1>It was one we put on early this year. It

0:21:44.280 --> 0:21:45.840
<v Speaker 1>did well for a couple of months and we had

0:21:45.880 --> 0:21:48.600
<v Speaker 1>to close it out. Frankly speaking, it just it's just

0:21:48.720 --> 0:21:51.600
<v Speaker 1>not strong enough growth. What you're seeing, is it because

0:21:51.640 --> 0:21:54.080
<v Speaker 1>of the supply and demand and balances that I mentioned.

0:21:54.400 --> 0:21:58.560
<v Speaker 1>There's been an elongation. Uh, We're gonna have growth above

0:21:58.600 --> 0:22:01.919
<v Speaker 1>average for longer, but it's not gonna hit those high

0:22:02.040 --> 0:22:05.120
<v Speaker 1>levels of double digit economic growth that would really help

0:22:05.200 --> 0:22:07.359
<v Speaker 1>small caps. It's gonna be more in that four or

0:22:07.400 --> 0:22:10.920
<v Speaker 1>five six percent range. Uh that that really is still

0:22:11.000 --> 0:22:13.439
<v Speaker 1>pretty good for large caps, but doesn't do enough to

0:22:13.480 --> 0:22:16.080
<v Speaker 1>lift the boats uh in the small cap universe. So

0:22:16.119 --> 0:22:19.040
<v Speaker 1>we got out of that trade earlier this year. All Right,

0:22:19.080 --> 0:22:20.840
<v Speaker 1>we're talking a lot of stocks here, and I guess

0:22:21.080 --> 0:22:25.040
<v Speaker 1>any investor uh these days, Uh, it's certainly understandable why

0:22:25.040 --> 0:22:28.040
<v Speaker 1>you would be allocated pretty heavily, if not almost entirely

0:22:28.119 --> 0:22:30.360
<v Speaker 1>right now to the equity market here. But you're looking

0:22:30.400 --> 0:22:32.280
<v Speaker 1>at rates now starting to go back up. Do we

0:22:32.320 --> 0:22:35.600
<v Speaker 1>get to a stage soon where bonds actually start to

0:22:35.600 --> 0:22:41.280
<v Speaker 1>become attractive? Probably not. Uh, we'll see some upward movement

0:22:41.359 --> 0:22:43.879
<v Speaker 1>in rates. We're looking for a ten year at around

0:22:43.920 --> 0:22:46.600
<v Speaker 1>two and a quarter by the end of two If

0:22:46.600 --> 0:22:50.199
<v Speaker 1>we saw rates higher, let's say, around three percent or

0:22:50.240 --> 0:22:53.200
<v Speaker 1>just to blow three percent, that could be more interesting

0:22:53.240 --> 0:22:55.920
<v Speaker 1>and would be more risky for stocks. We just don't

0:22:55.920 --> 0:22:58.280
<v Speaker 1>think you're gonna get that kind of a move because

0:22:58.320 --> 0:23:01.080
<v Speaker 1>there's just still gonna be so much scarned about COVID

0:23:01.160 --> 0:23:03.520
<v Speaker 1>going into the year. There's going to be some concern

0:23:03.600 --> 0:23:06.439
<v Speaker 1>about inflation. As that comes down, we'll see that in

0:23:06.600 --> 0:23:10.280
<v Speaker 1>that concern roll off that will also help bonds. And frankly,

0:23:10.400 --> 0:23:12.600
<v Speaker 1>even if the Fed tapers is still gonna have a

0:23:12.720 --> 0:23:16.240
<v Speaker 1>nine trillion dollar balance sheet, that's gonna help bonds as well.

0:23:16.880 --> 0:23:20.520
<v Speaker 1>To to keep some some some bid under the price there,

0:23:20.880 --> 0:23:22.840
<v Speaker 1>and so it's a good it's a good sort of

0:23:22.960 --> 0:23:26.720
<v Speaker 1>environment for tech stocks. I think that continues into two.

0:23:26.960 --> 0:23:29.879
<v Speaker 1>Not so much for bonds. Paul Christopher, head of Global

0:23:29.880 --> 0:23:33.280
<v Speaker 1>market Strategy for Wells Fargo Investment Institute, thanks so much

0:23:33.320 --> 0:23:35.679
<v Speaker 1>for joining us something. Thank you. Happy yeah, Happy new

0:23:35.760 --> 0:23:37.600
<v Speaker 1>year to you as well. Crety, what do you make

0:23:37.600 --> 0:23:40.080
<v Speaker 1>of the call for inflation moderating and we're not talking

0:23:40.119 --> 0:23:42.040
<v Speaker 1>moderating stub three step two, we're talking by the end

0:23:42.040 --> 0:23:44.520
<v Speaker 1>of twenty two, he said, down to uh, you know

0:23:44.720 --> 0:23:47.480
<v Speaker 1>about five. Yeah, well, it's not that surprising, right, because

0:23:47.480 --> 0:23:51.439
<v Speaker 1>decelerating growth is already something that's kind of baked into markets,

0:23:51.440 --> 0:23:52.879
<v Speaker 1>the idea that you're just not going to get the

0:23:52.920 --> 0:23:56.480
<v Speaker 1>same kind of big post pandemic boom that you saw.

0:23:56.800 --> 0:23:58.880
<v Speaker 1>So this kind of makes sounse. The question is does

0:23:58.920 --> 0:24:01.720
<v Speaker 1>the FED kind of really fix or kind of tweak

0:24:01.960 --> 0:24:05.439
<v Speaker 1>their approach as you start to see inflation potentially peak. Yeah, well,

0:24:05.480 --> 0:24:07.520
<v Speaker 1>you're already seeing that sort of come down here at least.

0:24:07.560 --> 0:24:09.760
<v Speaker 1>You mean, even when you look at short term break evens,

0:24:09.760 --> 0:24:11.760
<v Speaker 1>like on a five year level, you're still something around

0:24:11.800 --> 0:24:13.880
<v Speaker 1>two point eight percent. So let's say we do get

0:24:13.920 --> 0:24:16.480
<v Speaker 1>say a seven percent print. What was it on January

0:24:16.520 --> 0:24:18.640
<v Speaker 1>twelve here? I think right now we're tracking it's something

0:24:18.680 --> 0:24:21.680
<v Speaker 1>like six point eight percent based on the economist surveys here.

0:24:21.840 --> 0:24:24.680
<v Speaker 1>The general expectation is that's going to snap back pretty

0:24:24.720 --> 0:24:27.560
<v Speaker 1>quickly here, maybe in two And it wasna, are you

0:24:27.560 --> 0:24:28.960
<v Speaker 1>not are you not sold on that town? I'm not

0:24:29.000 --> 0:24:31.280
<v Speaker 1>sold on it, just because of the virus and because

0:24:31.520 --> 0:24:34.080
<v Speaker 1>so much of the inflation is based on supply chain hiccups.

0:24:34.359 --> 0:24:37.960
<v Speaker 1>Look what we learned from Samsung overnight Samsung Electronics. Yeah,

0:24:38.280 --> 0:24:40.440
<v Speaker 1>and and if you know if they're closing chip factories

0:24:41.160 --> 0:24:43.480
<v Speaker 1>because of lockdowns in China, we know China has a

0:24:43.480 --> 0:24:45.400
<v Speaker 1>really aggressive stance when it comes to the virus. If

0:24:45.400 --> 0:24:52.280
<v Speaker 1>more things closed, more supply chain hiccups. This is Bloomberg

0:24:52.280 --> 0:24:56.080
<v Speaker 1>Market Special coverage this week, a global simulcast across our TV,

0:24:56.280 --> 0:24:59.320
<v Speaker 1>radio and YouTube platforms. We welcome all of our audiences here,

0:24:59.520 --> 0:25:02.720
<v Speaker 1>Romaine Stick alongside Tim Stenovic and Pretty Gupta, counting you

0:25:02.760 --> 0:25:04.720
<v Speaker 1>down to the closing bells in New York, which are

0:25:04.720 --> 0:25:08.040
<v Speaker 1>just a little more than eleven minutes away here. And

0:25:08.080 --> 0:25:10.159
<v Speaker 1>we started the day off and pretty much everything was

0:25:10.240 --> 0:25:12.160
<v Speaker 1>in the red on the day. But as we get

0:25:12.160 --> 0:25:14.280
<v Speaker 1>closer to the closing bills. Pretty much everything is now

0:25:14.280 --> 0:25:16.800
<v Speaker 1>flipped into the green. Here we should just point out

0:25:16.840 --> 0:25:18.359
<v Speaker 1>the DAW is at a record high, the sp as

0:25:18.359 --> 0:25:20.960
<v Speaker 1>a record I the NAZAC industries now in the green.

0:25:21.400 --> 0:25:23.359
<v Speaker 1>For our TV audience. Is what you're looking at on

0:25:23.400 --> 0:25:25.640
<v Speaker 1>the screen there. Those are some of the indexes right now.

0:25:25.640 --> 0:25:28.440
<v Speaker 1>The materials up about six tents of repercent, bank stocks

0:25:28.520 --> 0:25:30.840
<v Speaker 1>up about three tents of repercent as measured of course

0:25:30.880 --> 0:25:34.240
<v Speaker 1>by uh the KBW Bank Index, and pretty even homebuilders

0:25:34.280 --> 0:25:36.119
<v Speaker 1>getting a nice bit here, up about one percent. One

0:25:36.160 --> 0:25:38.560
<v Speaker 1>of the laggards. So today that's going to be energy, Yeah,

0:25:38.560 --> 0:25:40.680
<v Speaker 1>and what's interesting with energy, you're also seeing big tech

0:25:40.760 --> 0:25:43.440
<v Speaker 1>kind of fall in there on a sector basis. Communications

0:25:43.560 --> 0:25:46.240
<v Speaker 1>is going to be your key laggered on a sector basis,

0:25:46.240 --> 0:25:47.919
<v Speaker 1>Like I said, with energy, and when you tend to

0:25:47.960 --> 0:25:50.560
<v Speaker 1>see energy and tech at the bottom of the pack,

0:25:50.640 --> 0:25:53.200
<v Speaker 1>it tends to mean a pretty broad decline. But that's

0:25:53.240 --> 0:25:56.200
<v Speaker 1>not what you're seeing today, Tim and Romaine. You're actually

0:25:56.200 --> 0:25:58.440
<v Speaker 1>seeing a fairly broad rally with the exception of those

0:25:58.480 --> 0:26:00.240
<v Speaker 1>two sectors. Yeah, but I think it is particularly no doable.

0:26:00.280 --> 0:26:02.280
<v Speaker 1>Two is the smp F I've founded struggling for direction

0:26:02.359 --> 0:26:03.840
<v Speaker 1>for much of the day, seeing a little bit of

0:26:03.880 --> 0:26:06.479
<v Speaker 1>a leg higher towards the end of the trading session,

0:26:06.720 --> 0:26:08.760
<v Speaker 1>does this count, guys as a Santa Claus rally three

0:26:08.760 --> 0:26:10.439
<v Speaker 1>tenths of a percent higher from the smp F I've

0:26:10.440 --> 0:26:13.560
<v Speaker 1>founded on day three of a Santa Claus rally? Because altogether, Tim,

0:26:13.600 --> 0:26:17.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean that you don't believe in Santa Claus. I do,

0:26:17.440 --> 0:26:19.080
<v Speaker 1>of course I do. I can hear the bell from

0:26:19.080 --> 0:26:22.080
<v Speaker 1>the Polar Express. Okay, I mean I believe. I still

0:26:22.119 --> 0:26:24.439
<v Speaker 1>I want to believe. All right, let's see what if

0:26:24.440 --> 0:26:26.800
<v Speaker 1>our next guest believes. David Sowerby a great friend of

0:26:26.840 --> 0:26:29.560
<v Speaker 1>the show here. He's a managing director and portfolio manager

0:26:29.640 --> 0:26:33.920
<v Speaker 1>over at Ancre Advisors. Uh, David, let's start off. I

0:26:33.960 --> 0:26:35.679
<v Speaker 1>guess what the year that was? I mean, there are

0:26:35.720 --> 0:26:38.160
<v Speaker 1>a lot of gains baked into this market right now,

0:26:38.200 --> 0:26:40.360
<v Speaker 1>gains that I don't think a lot of people anticipated,

0:26:40.400 --> 0:26:42.439
<v Speaker 1>even some of the more bullish people here. And now

0:26:42.480 --> 0:26:44.280
<v Speaker 1>there's a big question as to how far that can

0:26:44.320 --> 0:26:49.480
<v Speaker 1>extend into the new year. Certainly a great two thousand

0:26:49.560 --> 0:26:53.040
<v Speaker 1>twenty one, because breath was I think better than it.

0:26:53.160 --> 0:26:56.639
<v Speaker 1>Certain than it wasn't two thousand twenty, you went the

0:26:56.840 --> 0:27:00.680
<v Speaker 1>entire year without that once a year ten percent correction.

0:27:01.600 --> 0:27:05.120
<v Speaker 1>Stocks well outperformed the bond market, which was flat to negative.

0:27:05.800 --> 0:27:08.280
<v Speaker 1>And one thing I know about a single calendar year,

0:27:08.400 --> 0:27:11.280
<v Speaker 1>Romaine is the rule of thumb for the last seventy

0:27:11.280 --> 0:27:13.960
<v Speaker 1>five years is either bet the over it's going to

0:27:15.000 --> 0:27:17.680
<v Speaker 1>or better, or bet the under it's gonna be five

0:27:17.720 --> 0:27:20.720
<v Speaker 1>percent or less. We've now had three straight years of

0:27:20.800 --> 0:27:24.240
<v Speaker 1>bet the over. Where since the last three years the

0:27:24.400 --> 0:27:29.400
<v Speaker 1>SMP five is returned better than at least the last

0:27:29.440 --> 0:27:31.800
<v Speaker 1>three calendar years. I have I have a question though, David,

0:27:31.840 --> 0:27:34.760
<v Speaker 1>why why don't you think that we've gotten that correction,

0:27:34.800 --> 0:27:37.520
<v Speaker 1>like a true correction, true pullback, and a reset in

0:27:37.560 --> 0:27:39.920
<v Speaker 1>this market. It seems like every time we go down

0:27:39.960 --> 0:27:43.720
<v Speaker 1>to three, that seems to trigger enough people to come

0:27:43.720 --> 0:27:45.680
<v Speaker 1>back in and buy that tip. And there are a

0:27:45.720 --> 0:27:48.119
<v Speaker 1>lot of people saying that maybe that's representative of some

0:27:48.200 --> 0:27:50.639
<v Speaker 1>dysfunction in the market, and other people say, well, the

0:27:50.680 --> 0:27:54.840
<v Speaker 1>market has just changed. I think fundamentally companies on a

0:27:54.920 --> 0:27:57.679
<v Speaker 1>micro basis, when I look at the individual companies and

0:27:57.680 --> 0:28:02.120
<v Speaker 1>how they're reporting quarterly earnings, their guidance, this has been

0:28:02.160 --> 0:28:06.440
<v Speaker 1>a very robust year where guidance has continuously been raised

0:28:06.800 --> 0:28:08.600
<v Speaker 1>throughout the year, and I think it's gonna get raised

0:28:08.640 --> 0:28:11.080
<v Speaker 1>a bit more in two thousand twenty two. Add in

0:28:11.720 --> 0:28:15.119
<v Speaker 1>that we've had this incredible monetary and fiscal stimulus for

0:28:15.160 --> 0:28:17.919
<v Speaker 1>the last eighteen months, and that's why I think you

0:28:17.920 --> 0:28:20.400
<v Speaker 1>haven't add a ten percent correction since March and two

0:28:20.400 --> 0:28:23.760
<v Speaker 1>thousand twenty. Yeah, David, let's talk about that trend essentially,

0:28:23.800 --> 0:28:26.879
<v Speaker 1>because not only have we not had this extremely long

0:28:27.000 --> 0:28:30.320
<v Speaker 1>stretch of no corrections, no technical corrections of ten percent

0:28:30.520 --> 0:28:33.520
<v Speaker 1>or more, but you've also had a pretty strong amount

0:28:33.520 --> 0:28:35.680
<v Speaker 1>of Recordize this is gonna be the seventieth record high

0:28:35.920 --> 0:28:38.600
<v Speaker 1>for today for the SMP five hundred. The last time

0:28:38.600 --> 0:28:40.800
<v Speaker 1>we saw both of those records met it was in

0:28:41.640 --> 0:28:44.120
<v Speaker 1>When you have this kind of global growth story, how

0:28:44.200 --> 0:28:46.960
<v Speaker 1>much of that becomes a story of two as well,

0:28:47.160 --> 0:28:50.240
<v Speaker 1>when you kind of have these diverging policy paths around

0:28:50.280 --> 0:28:52.600
<v Speaker 1>the world in the United States versus Europe, versus China.

0:28:52.800 --> 0:28:55.840
<v Speaker 1>What's your take on that? I think for two thousand

0:28:55.920 --> 0:28:58.479
<v Speaker 1>twenty two is what do you do for an encore?

0:28:58.600 --> 0:29:01.840
<v Speaker 1>Do you get the great Bruce Springsteen on Corn two?

0:29:03.120 --> 0:29:06.360
<v Speaker 1>Would we have four consecutive years of above average growth.

0:29:06.680 --> 0:29:09.680
<v Speaker 1>We haven't seen it since the late ninet nineties, even

0:29:09.720 --> 0:29:12.000
<v Speaker 1>back to the World War two years of the forties.

0:29:12.280 --> 0:29:15.520
<v Speaker 1>I think two thousand twenty two for that proverbial hard

0:29:15.520 --> 0:29:17.960
<v Speaker 1>to guest single calendar year, it's probably gonna be a

0:29:18.000 --> 0:29:20.880
<v Speaker 1>five to six percent return for the SMP five hund

0:29:21.200 --> 0:29:23.920
<v Speaker 1>But that doesn't mean that you can have very good

0:29:23.960 --> 0:29:27.680
<v Speaker 1>games among individual stocks, as you see a greater separation

0:29:27.760 --> 0:29:30.680
<v Speaker 1>of winners and losers next year. And I think you've

0:29:30.720 --> 0:29:33.320
<v Speaker 1>got a pretty good backdrop where the micro is still

0:29:33.360 --> 0:29:36.840
<v Speaker 1>telling me there are plenty good buying opportunities that I

0:29:36.840 --> 0:29:40.720
<v Speaker 1>can see individual names up better than ten percent next

0:29:40.800 --> 0:29:44.040
<v Speaker 1>year on average, when the SMP five hundred may return

0:29:44.120 --> 0:29:46.880
<v Speaker 1>five to six You know, David, that's so interesting that

0:29:46.920 --> 0:29:48.680
<v Speaker 1>you bring that up that on a micro level might

0:29:48.680 --> 0:29:50.840
<v Speaker 1>be sending you a different message than what the index

0:29:50.920 --> 0:29:52.880
<v Speaker 1>level is sending. And that's something that we've actually already

0:29:52.880 --> 0:29:56.000
<v Speaker 1>started seeing some big names like Facebook, Apple hitting those

0:29:56.000 --> 0:29:57.920
<v Speaker 1>corrections even though you didn't see it on the SMP

0:29:58.000 --> 0:29:59.960
<v Speaker 1>five hundred. Talked to us a little bit about where

0:30:00.000 --> 0:30:02.480
<v Speaker 1>you see some of those major moves that was ten

0:30:02.480 --> 0:30:05.520
<v Speaker 1>percent highers in that micro level. What areas are those

0:30:05.560 --> 0:30:08.520
<v Speaker 1>concentrated in well. We saw in the second half of

0:30:08.560 --> 0:30:12.640
<v Speaker 1>this year that small caps lagged, but now that we've

0:30:12.680 --> 0:30:17.280
<v Speaker 1>gotten the more debilitating talk of higher taxes at least

0:30:17.360 --> 0:30:21.040
<v Speaker 1>off the table for now. When when taxes go up,

0:30:21.160 --> 0:30:23.560
<v Speaker 1>the last four times they have gone up meaningfully, small

0:30:23.600 --> 0:30:26.600
<v Speaker 1>caps have lagged. Now that they're not likely to go higher,

0:30:26.640 --> 0:30:29.480
<v Speaker 1>I think that sets the table for small caps. In

0:30:29.520 --> 0:30:32.800
<v Speaker 1>an environment where GDP is going to grow better than

0:30:32.840 --> 0:30:36.120
<v Speaker 1>four percent, corporate profits will probably grow between ten and

0:30:36.120 --> 0:30:39.560
<v Speaker 1>twelve percent. Evaluations on small cap relative to their large

0:30:39.600 --> 0:30:43.320
<v Speaker 1>gap siblings are much more attractive, and I can build

0:30:43.400 --> 0:30:46.960
<v Speaker 1>individual stock portfolios where the free cash flow yield is

0:30:47.000 --> 0:30:50.040
<v Speaker 1>well better than five percent, and that compares well to

0:30:50.120 --> 0:30:52.280
<v Speaker 1>a ten year treasury at one and a half percent.

0:30:53.000 --> 0:30:54.960
<v Speaker 1>Uh Dare I say it's going to be a good

0:30:55.080 --> 0:30:57.680
<v Speaker 1>environment for the active stock manager, But I do think

0:30:57.680 --> 0:31:00.160
<v Speaker 1>that we're setting the table for the tail when used

0:31:00.160 --> 0:31:02.640
<v Speaker 1>to be better next year. We're in a a conversation with

0:31:02.720 --> 0:31:06.480
<v Speaker 1>David Swerby, Managing director and portfolio manager at Encore Advisors.

0:31:07.360 --> 0:31:10.240
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening to Bloomberg Business Week. Download the podcast

0:31:10.280 --> 0:31:13.239
<v Speaker 1>on iTunes, SoundCloud, or Bloomberg dot com, and you can

0:31:13.240 --> 0:31:15.400
<v Speaker 1>also Listen to our radio show at two pm Eastern

0:31:15.440 --> 0:31:18.120
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg Radio, or watch us on YouTube. Search to

0:31:18.120 --> 0:31:19.280
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Global News